yeager
argued
march
decided
june
federal
indictment
charged
petitioner
yeager
securities
wire
fraud
allegedly
misleading
public
virtues
telecommunications
system
offered
employer
subsidiary
enron
insider
trading
selling
enron
stock
possession
material
nonpublic
information
new
system
performance
value
enron
indictment
also
charged
petitioner
money
laundering
conducting
various
transactions
proceeds
stock
sales
jury
acquitted
yeager
fraud
counts
failed
reach
verdict
counts
government
recharged
counts
yeager
moved
dismiss
charges
ground
jury
acquitting
fraud
counts
necessarily
decided
possess
material
nonpublic
information
project
performance
value
component
double
jeopardy
clause
therefore
barred
second
trial
insider
trading
money
laundering
district
denied
motion
fifth
circuit
affirmed
reasoning
fact
jury
hung
counts
opposed
acquitting
petitioner
cast
doubt
whether
necessarily
decided
petitioner
possess
material
nonpublic
information
inconsistency
acquittals
hung
counts
fifth
circuit
concluded
meant
government
prosecute
petitioner
anew
insider
trading
money
laundering
held
apparent
inconsistency
jury
verdict
acquittal
counts
failure
return
verdict
counts
affect
acquittals
preclusive
force
double
jeopardy
clause
pp
case
controlled
reasoning
ashe
swenson
squarely
held
double
jeopardy
clause
precludes
government
relitigating
issue
necessarily
decided
jury
acquittal
prior
trial
double
jeopardy
purposes
jury
inability
reach
verdict
yeager
counts
nonevent
given
weight
analysis
identify
jury
necessarily
determined
trial
courts
scrutinize
jury
decisions
failures
decide
jury
verdict
acquittal
represents
community
collective
judgment
regarding
evidence
arguments
presented
even
verdict
based
upon
egregiously
erroneous
foundation
fong
foo
finality
unassailable
see
arizona
washington
thus
possession
insider
information
critical
issue
ultimate
fact
charges
yeager
jury
verdict
necessarily
decided
issue
favor
protects
prosecution
charge
essential
element
pp
neither
richardson
powell
supports
government
argument
retry
yeager
insider
trading
money
laundering
richardson
conclusion
jury
failure
reach
verdict
event
terminates
jeopardy
open
door
using
hung
count
ignore
preclusive
effect
jury
acquittal
simply
rejection
argument
similar
government
today
mistrial
event
significance
also
rejected
contention
acquittal
never
preclude
retrial
hung
count
impute
irrationality
jury
violation
powell
rule
issue
preclusion
predicated
assumption
jury
acted
rationally
refusal
powell
dunn
impugn
legitimacy
jury
verdicts
face
logically
inconsistent
shows
fortiori
potentially
inconsistent
hung
count
command
different
result
pp
government
argued
even
hung
counts
enter
analysis
yeager
failed
show
jury
acquittals
necessarily
resolved
favor
issue
ultimate
fact
must
proved
convict
insider
trading
money
laundering
granted
certiorari
assumption
fifth
circuit
ruled
correctly
acquittals
meant
jury
found
yeager
insider
information
contradicted
presented
public
declines
engage
analysis
voluminous
record
unnecessary
resolve
narrow
legal
question
issue
appeals
chooses
may
revisit
factual
analysis
light
government
arguments
pp
reversed
remanded
stevens
delivered
opinion
roberts
souter
ginsburg
breyer
joined
kennedy
joined
parts
kennedy
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
scalia
filed
dissenting
opinion
thomas
alito
joined
alito
filed
dissenting
opinion
scalia
thomas
joined
scott
yeager
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
june
justice
stevens
delivered
opinion
dunn
speaking
justice
holmes
held
logical
inconsistency
guilty
verdict
verdict
acquittal
impugn
validity
either
verdict
question
presented
case
whether
apparent
inconsistency
jury
verdict
acquittal
counts
failure
return
verdict
counts
affects
preclusive
force
acquittals
double
jeopardy
clause
fifth
amendment
hold
enron
corporation
enron
acquired
telecommunications
business
expanded
ultimately
renamed
enron
broadband
services
ebs
petitioner
scott
yeager
served
senior
vice
president
strategic
development
ebs
october
employment
terminated
months
enron
filed
bankruptcy
december
tenure
petitioner
played
active
role
ebs
attempt
develop
nationwide
telecommunications
system
called
enron
intelligent
network
ein
summer
enron
announced
ebs
become
enron
business
major
part
overall
strategy
app
thereafter
enron
issued
press
releases
touting
advanced
capabilities
ein
claiming
project
operational
january
company
annual
equity
analyst
conference
petitioner
others
allegedly
made
false
misleading
statements
value
performance
ein
project
january
price
enron
stock
rose
next
day
reached
point
petitioner
sold
shares
enron
stock
received
part
compensation
next
several
months
petitioner
sold
additional
shares
told
petitioner
stock
sales
generated
million
proceeds
million
personal
profit
ein
project
value
turned
illusory
intelligent
network
showcased
public
press
releases
analyst
conference
riddled
technological
problems
never
fully
developed
november
grand
jury
returned
fifth
superseding
indictment
charging
petitioner
counts
five
federal
offenses
conspiracy
commit
securities
wire
fraud
securities
fraud
wire
fraud
insider
trading
money
government
theory
prosecution
petitioner
acting
concert
enron
executives
purposefully
deceived
public
ein
project
order
inflate
value
enron
stock
ultimately
enrich
count
indictment
described
detail
alleged
conspiracy
commit
securities
fraud
wire
fraud
included
overt
acts
substantive
offenses
charged
counts
count
securities
fraud
count
alleged
petitioner
made
false
misleading
statements
january
analyst
conference
failed
state
facts
necessary
prevent
statements
made
others
misleading
counts
alleged
petitioner
others
committed
four
acts
wire
fraud
issued
four
press
releases
counts
insider
trading
counts
alleged
petitioner
made
separate
sales
enron
stock
possession
material
information
regarding
technological
capabilities
value
revenue
business
performance
ebs
counts
money
laundering
counts
described
financial
transactions
involving
petitioner
use
proceeds
sales
enron
stock
indictment
characterized
criminally
derived
property
simplify
discussion
shall
refer
counts
fraud
counts
remaining
counts
insider
trading
counts
trial
lasted
weeks
four
days
deliberations
jury
notified
reached
agreement
counts
deadlocked
others
judge
gave
jury
allen
charge
see
allen
urging
jurors
reexamine
grounds
opinions
continue
deliberations
end
day
achieve
final
verdict
counts
tr
july
jury
failed
break
deadlock
told
jurors
take
verdict
instead
prolonging
deliberations
jury
acquitted
petitioner
fraud
counts
failed
reach
verdict
insider
trading
counts
entered
judgment
acquittals
declared
mistrial
hung
counts
november
government
obtained
new
indictment
petitioner
eighth
superseding
indictment
recharged
petitioner
insider
trading
counts
jury
previously
hung
app
new
indictment
refined
government
case
whereas
earlier
indictment
named
multiple
defendants
new
indictment
dealt
exclusively
petitioner
instead
alleging
facts
implicating
broader
fraudulent
scheme
new
indictment
focused
petitioner
knowledge
ein
project
failure
disclose
information
public
selling
enron
stock
petitioner
moved
dismiss
counts
new
indictment
ground
acquittals
fraud
counts
precluded
government
retrying
insider
trading
argued
jury
acquittals
necessarily
decided
possess
material
nonpublic
information
performance
ein
project
value
enron
petitioner
view
reprosecution
insider
trading
require
government
prove
critical
fact
component
double
jeopardy
clause
barred
second
trial
issue
mandated
dismissal
insider
trading
counts
district
denied
motion
reviewing
trial
record
disagreed
petitioner
reading
jury
necessarily
decided
telling
jury
likely
concluded
petitioner
knowingly
willfully
participate
scheme
defraud
described
conspiracy
securities
fraud
wire
fraud
counts
supp
sd
tex
therefore
concluded
question
whether
petitioner
possessed
insider
information
necessarily
resolved
first
trial
litigated
anew
second
prosecution
appeals
disagreed
district
analysis
record
nevertheless
affirmed
reasoned
petitioner
dispute
government
theory
helped
shape
message
allegedly
fraudulent
presentations
made
analyst
conference
therefore
rejected
district
conclusion
jury
acquitted
petitioner
groun
participate
fraud
based
independent
review
record
appeals
instead
concluded
jury
must
found
acquitted
petitioner
insider
information
contradicted
presented
public
acknowledged
factual
determination
normally
preclude
government
retrying
petitioner
insider
trading
money
laundering
nevertheless
persuaded
truly
rational
jury
concluded
petitioner
insider
information
acquitted
insider
trading
counts
jury
failed
acquit
instead
hung
counts
pivotal
analysis
considering
hung
counts
along
acquittals
found
impossible
decide
certainty
jury
necessarily
determined
ibid
relying
circuit
precedent
larkin
concluded
conflict
acquittals
hung
counts
barred
application
issue
preclusion
case
several
courts
taken
contrary
view
held
jury
failure
reach
verdict
counts
play
role
determining
preclusive
effect
acquittal
see
ohayon
romeo
bailin
frazier
others
sided
appeals
see
howe
white
cadc
granted
certiorari
resolve
conflict
reverse
ii
double
jeopardy
clause
fifth
amendment
provides
shall
person
subject
offence
twice
put
jeopardy
life
limb
decided
exceptionally
large
number
cases
interpreting
provision
see
difrancesco
collecting
cases
decisions
found
guidance
ancestry
clause
brief
text
thus
example
risk
fined
imprisoned
implicates
neither
life
limb
early
cases
held
double
jeopardy
protection
extends
punishments
positively
covered
language
amendment
ex
parte
lange
wall
explained
clearly
spirit
instrument
prevent
second
punishment
judicial
proceedings
crime
far
common
law
gave
protection
ibid
cases
recognized
clause
embodies
two
vitally
important
interests
first
deeply
ingrained
principle
state
resources
power
allowed
make
repeated
attempts
convict
individual
alleged
offense
thereby
subjecting
embarrassment
expense
ordeal
compelling
live
continuing
state
anxiety
insecurity
well
enhancing
possibility
even
though
innocent
may
found
guilty
green
see
benton
maryland
difrancesco
second
interest
preservation
finality
judgments
crist
bretz
first
interest
implicated
whenever
state
seeks
second
trial
first
attempt
obtain
conviction
results
mistrial
jury
failed
reach
verdict
circumstances
however
defendant
interest
avoiding
multiple
trials
clause
prevent
government
seeking
reprosecute
despite
argument
textual
appeal
held
second
trial
place
defendant
jeopardy
twice
richardson
see
story
commentaries
constitution
pp
instead
jury
inability
reach
decision
kind
manifest
necessity
permits
declaration
mistrial
continuation
initial
jeopardy
commenced
jury
first
impaneled
see
arizona
washington
perez
wheat
interest
giving
prosecution
one
complete
opportunity
convict
violated
laws
justifies
treating
jury
inability
reach
verdict
nonevent
bar
retrial
washington
case
us
involves
mistrial
insider
trading
counts
question
presented
resolved
asking
whether
government
given
one
complete
opportunity
convict
petitioner
charges
rather
case
turns
second
interest
core
clause
must
determine
whether
interest
preserving
finality
jury
judgment
fraud
counts
including
jury
finding
petitioner
possess
insider
information
bars
retrial
insider
trading
counts
requires
us
look
beyond
clause
prohibition
put
jeopardy
twice
jury
acquittals
unquestionably
terminated
petitioner
jeopardy
respect
issues
finally
decided
counts
proper
question
clause
text
whether
appropriate
treat
insider
trading
charges
offence
fraud
charges
opinion
ashe
swenson
provides
basis
answer
ashe
squarely
held
double
jeopardy
clause
precludes
government
relitigating
issue
necessarily
decided
jury
acquittal
prior
trial
case
six
poker
players
robbed
group
masked
men
ashe
charged
acquitted
robbing
donald
knight
one
six
players
state
sought
retry
ashe
robbery
another
poker
player
weeks
first
jury
acquitted
second
prosecution
successful
facing
substantially
stronger
testimony
witnesses
part
ashe
convicted
sentenced
prison
term
concluded
subsequent
prosecution
constitutionally
prohibited
contested
issue
first
trial
whether
ashe
one
robbers
held
jury
verdict
acquittal
collaterally
estopped
state
trying
robbing
different
player
criminal
episode
explained
issue
ultimate
fact
determined
valid
final
judgment
acquittal
litigated
second
trial
separate
offense
decipher
jury
necessarily
decided
held
courts
examine
record
prior
proceeding
taking
account
pleadings
evidence
charge
relevant
matter
conclude
whether
rational
jury
grounded
verdict
upon
issue
defendant
seeks
foreclose
consideration
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
explained
inquiry
must
set
practical
frame
viewed
eye
circumstances
proceedings
ibid
quoting
sealfon
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
unlike
ashe
case
us
today
entails
trial
included
multiple
counts
rather
trial
single
offense
ashe
involved
acquittal
single
offense
case
involves
acquittal
counts
mistrial
declared
others
reasoning
ashe
nevertheless
controlling
double
jeopardy
purposes
jury
inability
reach
verdict
insider
trading
counts
nonevent
acquittals
fraud
counts
entitled
effect
ashe
acquittal
noted
see
supra
appeals
reasoned
hung
counts
must
considered
determine
issues
jury
decided
first
trial
viewed
isolation
explained
acquittals
fraud
charges
preclude
retrial
appeared
support
petitioner
argument
jury
decided
lacked
insider
information
viewed
alongside
hung
counts
however
acquittals
appeared
less
decisive
problem
saw
jury
found
petitioner
insider
information
jury
acting
rationally
also
acquitted
insider
trading
counts
ibid
fact
jury
hung
logical
wrinkle
made
impossible
decide
certainty
jury
necessarily
determined
ibid
petitioner
failed
show
jury
decided
refused
find
government
precluded
pursuing
hung
counts
new
prosecution
appeals
analysis
error
hung
count
relevant
part
record
prior
proceeding
see
ashe
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
jury
speaks
verdict
failure
reach
verdict
negative
implication
yield
piece
information
helps
put
together
trial
puzzle
mistried
count
therefore
nothing
like
forms
record
material
ashe
suggested
part
preclusion
inquiry
ibid
see
also
black
law
dictionary
ed
defining
record
official
report
proceedings
case
including
filed
papers
verbatim
transcript
trial
hearing
tangible
exhibits
unlike
pleadings
jury
charge
evidence
introduced
parties
way
decipher
hung
count
represents
even
usual
sense
relevance
hung
count
hardly
make
existence
fact
probable
less
probable
fed
rule
evid
host
reasons
sharp
disagreement
confusion
issues
exhaustion
long
trial
name
work
alone
tandem
cause
jury
ascribe
meaning
hung
count
presume
ability
identify
factor
play
jury
room
reasoned
analysis
conjecture
possible
reasons
jury
failure
reach
decision
play
part
assessing
legal
consequences
unanimous
verdict
jurors
return
contrary
conclusion
require
speculation
transpired
jury
room
courts
properly
avoid
explorations
jury
sovereign
space
see
powell
fed
rule
evid
good
reason
jury
deliberations
secret
subject
outside
examination
inquiry
jury
decided
evidence
confined
points
controversy
former
trial
testimony
given
parties
questions
submitted
jury
consideration
packet
sickles
wall
see
also
vaise
delaval
eng
lord
mansfield
refusing
rely
juror
affidavits
impeach
verdict
reached
coin
flip
wigmore
evidence
pp
mcnaughton
rev
ed
supp
accordingly
hold
consideration
hung
counts
place
analysis
indeed
relevant
fact
petitioner
already
survived
one
trial
factor
cutting
favor
rather
applying
double
jeopardy
bar
identify
jury
necessarily
determined
trial
courts
scrutinize
jury
decisions
failures
decide
jury
verdict
acquittal
represents
community
collective
judgment
regarding
evidence
arguments
presented
even
verdict
based
upon
egregiously
erroneous
foundation
fong
foo
per
curiam
finality
unassailable
see
washington
sanabria
thus
possession
insider
information
critical
issue
ultimate
fact
charges
petitioner
jury
verdict
necessarily
decided
issue
favor
protects
prosecution
charge
essential
element
iii
government
relies
heavily
two
cases
richardson
powell
argue
entitled
retry
petitioner
insider
trading
counts
neither
precedent
bear
weight
government
places
richardson
defendant
indicted
three
counts
narcotics
violations
jury
acquitted
one
count
hung
others
richardson
moved
bar
retrial
hung
counts
insisting
reprosecution
place
twice
jeopardy
offense
unlike
petitioner
case
richardson
argue
retrial
barred
jury
verdict
acquittal
meant
necessarily
decided
essential
fact
favor
simply
asserted
hung
counts
standing
alone
shielded
reprosecution
disagreed
held
protection
double
jeopardy
clause
terms
applies
event
acquittal
terminates
original
jeopardy
failure
jury
reach
verdict
explained
event
terminates
jeopardy
ibid
government
extrapolates
altogether
different
principle
retrial
always
permitted
whenever
jury
convicts
counts
hangs
others
brief
richardson
broad
rather
conclusion
rejection
argument
similar
one
government
urges
today
mistrial
event
significance
holding
open
door
using
mistried
count
ignore
preclusive
effect
jury
acquittal
government
next
contends
acquittal
never
preclude
retrial
mistried
count
impute
irrationality
jury
violation
rule
articulated
powell
powell
defendant
charged
various
drug
offenses
jury
acquitted
powell
substantive
drug
charges
convicted
using
telephone
causing
offenses
powell
attacked
verdicts
appeal
irrationally
inconsistent
urged
reversal
convictions
insisted
collateral
estoppel
apply
verdicts
rendered
single
jury
preclude
acceptance
guilty
verdict
telephone
facilitation
count
jury
acquits
defendant
predicate
felony
rejected
argument
reasoning
issue
preclusion
predicated
assumption
jury
acted
rationally
arguing
jury
acquits
counts
inexplicably
hanging
others
rational
government
contends
issue
preclusion
inappropriate
case
powell
two
serious
flaws
line
reasoning
first
takes
powell
treatment
inconsistent
verdicts
imports
entirely
different
context
involving
verdicts
seemingly
inconsistent
hung
counts
situations
quite
dissimilar
powell
respect
jury
verdicts
counseled
giving
verdict
full
effect
however
inconsistent
explained
jury
verdict
brings
criminal
process
addition
collective
judgment
community
element
needed
finality
comparison
hung
counts
never
accorded
respect
matter
law
history
similar
jury
verdicts
relevant
sense
equating
government
argument
fails
second
government
reliance
powell
assumes
mistried
count
context
evidence
irrationality
explained
see
supra
fact
jury
hangs
evidence
nothing
course
failed
decide
anything
relying
hung
counts
question
basis
jury
verdicts
government
violates
assumption
rationality
invokes
support
bottom
government
misreads
cases
rejected
attempts
question
validity
jury
verdict
powell
dunn
faced
jury
verdicts
face
logically
inconsistent
yet
refused
impugn
legitimacy
either
verdict
case
merely
suggestion
jury
may
acted
irrationally
instead
resting
suggestion
verdict
government
relies
hung
count
thinnest
reed
powell
dunn
declined
use
clearly
inconsistent
verdict
soundness
another
verdict
fortiori
potentially
inconsistent
hung
count
command
different
result
iv
one
final
matter
requires
discussion
government
argues
even
conclude
acquittals
preclude
retrial
counts
jury
hangs
nevertheless
affirm
judgment
appeals
petitioner
failed
show
jury
necessarily
resolved
favor
issue
ultimate
fact
government
must
prove
order
convict
insider
trading
money
laundering
see
brief
given
length
complexity
proceedings
factual
dispute
understandable
district
appeals
read
record
differently
disagreeing
jury
necessarily
decided
acquittals
compare
supp
jury
necessarily
determined
defendant
yeager
knowingly
willfully
participate
agree
participate
scheme
defraud
connection
alleged
false
statements
material
omissions
made
analyst
conference
press
releases
jury
must
found
acquitted
yeager
yeager
insider
information
contradicted
presented
public
grant
certiorari
based
assumption
appeals
interpretation
record
correct
recognize
government
right
prevailing
party
appeals
defend
judgment
ground
properly
raised
whether
ground
relied
upon
rejected
even
considered
district
appeals
washington
confederated
bands
tribes
yakima
nation
decline
engage
analysis
voluminous
record
undertaking
unnecessary
resolution
narrow
legal
question
granted
certiorari
answer
chooses
appeals
may
revisit
factual
analysis
light
government
arguments
judgment
reversed
case
remanded
appeals
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
scott
yeager
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
june
justice
kennedy
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
join
parts
opinion
join
part
iv
view
concerns
expressed
justice
alito
well
justified
post
dissenting
opinion
insufficient
say
remand
appeals
may
chooses
revisit
factual
analysis
ante
correct
course
require
appeals
justice
alito
explains
judgments
acquittal
preclude
government
retrying
petitioner
issue
possession
insider
information
irrational
jury
acquit
without
finding
fact
post
see
ashe
swenson
retrial
precluded
rational
jury
grounded
verdict
upon
issue
defendant
seeks
foreclose
reasons
given
justice
alito
grounds
question
whether
petitioner
met
demanding
standard
post
district
familiar
record
found
petitioner
make
showing
rational
jury
acquitted
securities
fraud
different
basis
namely
petitioner
cause
misleading
statements
made
post
appeals
contrary
analysis
convincing
post
appeals
held
double
jeopardy
clause
permits
petitioner
retrial
view
acquitted
counts
inconsistent
jury
inability
reach
verdict
counts
today
corrects
misreading
double
jeopardy
clause
question
remains
whether
clause
permits
petitioner
retrial
quite
distinct
reason
justice
alito
describes
remand
appeals
reexamine
question
scott
yeager
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
june
justice
scalia
justice
thomas
justice
alito
join
dissenting
double
jeopardy
clause
fifth
amendment
provides
person
shall
subject
offence
twice
put
jeopardy
life
limb
today
holds
proscription
interpreted
ashe
swenson
sometimes
bars
retrial
hung
counts
jury
acquits
factually
related
counts
result
neither
accords
original
meaning
double
jeopardy
clause
required
precedents
dissent
today
opinion
begins
proclamation
found
guidance
ancestry
double
jeopardy
clause
brief
text
ante
case
easy
indeed
cases
adhered
clause
original
meaning
english
pleas
auterfoits
acquit
auterfoits
convict
clause
based
barred
repeated
prosecution
identical
act
crime
blackstone
commentaries
laws
england
emphasis
added
see
also
grady
corbin
scalia
dissenting
described
sir
matthew
hale
man
acquitted
stealing
horse
later
arraigned
convict
ed
stealing
saddle
tho
done
time
pleas
crown
pleas
jury
acquittal
yeager
fraud
counts
posed
bar
prosecution
distinct
crimes
insider
trading
money
laundering
water
dam
ashe
departed
original
meaning
double
jeopardy
clause
holding
precludes
successive
prosecutions
distinct
crimes
facts
essential
conviction
second
crime
necessarily
resolved
defendant
favor
verdict
acquittal
first
crime
even
adhere
ashe
stare
decisis
grounds
cf
grady
supra
scalia
dissenting
today
holding
illogical
extension
case
ashe
held
clause
sometimes
bars
successive
prosecution
facts
found
prior
proceeding
today
bars
retrial
hung
counts
theory
continuing
jeopardy
justices
boston
municipal
lydon
prior
proceeding
simply
earlier
stage
proceeding
historical
matter
pleas
invoked
ha
conviction
acquittal
complete
trial
crist
bretz
extended
protections
double
jeopardy
clause
holding
jeopardy
attaches
earlier
time
jury
empanelled
sworn
although
one
might
think
early
attachment
mean
second
trial
new
jury
constitute
second
jeopardy
amended
innovation
holding
discharge
deadlocked
jury
terminat
original
jeopardy
richardson
principle
retrial
jury
failed
reach
verdict
new
trial
part
today
holding
inconsistent
principle
interprets
double
jeopardy
clause
first
time
effect
internally
within
single
prosecution
even
though
proceedings
accused
run
full
course
lydon
supra
quoting
price
georgia
conceptual
matter
makes
sense
say
events
occurring
within
single
prosecution
cause
accused
twice
put
jeopardy
amdt
cases
today
acknowledged
ever
since
dunn
refused
set
aside
convictions
inconsistent
acquittals
trial
made
clear
powell
ashe
mandate
different
result
reason
treat
perceived
inconsistencies
hung
counts
acquittals
differently
richardson
accentuates
point
cases
appellate
reverses
conviction
lack
constitutionally
sufficient
evidence
determination
constitutes
acquittal
double
jeopardy
clause
precludes
prosecution
burks
richardson
defendant
sought
prevent
retrial
jury
failed
reach
verdict
claiming
case
gone
jury
government
failed
present
sufficient
evidence
held
double
jeopardy
clause
inapplicable
event
acquittal
terminate
original
jeopardy
see
double
jeopardy
clause
effect
jury
acquittal
different
count
different
double
jeopardy
clause
effect
prosecution
failure
present
case
sufficient
go
jury
count
cases
predicate
necessary
double
jeopardy
clause
preclusion
new
prosecution
exists
former
factual
findings
implicit
jury
verdict
acquittal
latter
state
presentation
case
weak
demanded
jury
verdict
acquittal
cases
seems
double
jeopardy
clause
invoked
jeopardy
respect
retried
count
terminated
acquittals
majority
argues
unquestionably
terminat
yeager
jeopardy
respect
issues
finally
decided
counts
ante
emphasis
added
jeopardy
commenced
terminated
charge
charge
issue
issue
prosecution
failure
present
sufficient
evidence
first
trial
prevent
retrial
hung
count
retrial
considered
part
proceeding
basis
invoking
ashe
prevent
retrial
present
case
conviction
stand
contradictory
acquittal
pronounced
trial
reason
acquittal
prevent
state
pressing
contradictory
conviction
continuation
prosecution
hung
counts
ii
extension
ashe
circumstances
even
justified
based
rationales
underlying
holding
invoking
issue
preclusion
bar
seriatim
prosecutions
salutary
effect
preventing
government
circumventing
acquittals
forcing
defendants
gantlet
second
time
effectively
charges
cases
prosecution
merely
seeks
get
one
full
fair
opportunity
convict
charges
brought
initial
indictment
ohio
johnson
risk
gamesmanship
said
state
made
effort
prosecute
charges
seriatim
considerations
double
jeopardy
protection
implicit
application
collateral
estoppel
inapplicable
moreover
barring
retrial
jury
acquits
counts
hangs
others
bears
tenuous
relationship
preserving
finality
issue
ultimate
fact
actually
determined
valid
final
judgment
ashe
supra
clear
unanimous
jury
finding
unusual
situation
factual
finding
upon
acquittal
must
based
also
logically
require
acquittal
hung
count
said
certain
conflicting
dispositions
irrational
result
mistake
compromise
lenity
powell
least
likely
irrationality
consisted
failing
make
factual
finding
necessary
support
acquittal
irrationality
consisted
failing
adhere
factual
finding
respect
hung
count
agree
courts
avoid
speculation
jury
reached
particular
result
ante
opinion
steps
wrong
direction
pretending
acquittals
mean
something
probability
powell
supra
concluded
best
course
take
simply
insulate
jury
verdicts
review
grounds
inconsistency
view
conclusion
applies
claims
inconsistency
arise
proceeding
conviction
hung
counts
burdens
created
opinion
today
likely
substantial
ashe
inquiry
require
courts
examine
record
prior
proceeding
taking
account
pleadings
evidence
charge
relevant
matter
conclude
whether
rational
jury
grounded
verdict
upon
issue
defendant
seeks
foreclose
consideration
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
holding
abney
ensures
every
defendant
yeager
shoes
entitled
immediate
interlocutory
appeal
petition
certiorari
whenever
ashe
claim
rejected
trial
abney
supra
today
consistently
held
retrial
jury
unable
reach
verdict
part
original
prosecution
second
jeopardy
second
prosecution
believe
holding
line
extension
ashe
consistent
cases
original
meaning
double
jeopardy
clause
affirm
judgment
scott
yeager
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
june
justice
alito
justice
scalia
justice
thomas
join
dissenting
join
justice
scalia
dissenting
opinion
jury
acquits
counts
reach
agreement
others
think
double
jeopardy
clause
precludes
retrial
hung
counts
result
today
decision
however
law
contrary
write
separately
note
holding
makes
imperative
doctrine
issue
preclusion
applied
rigor
prescribed
ashe
swenson
loose
application
doctrine
lead
exceedingly
complicated
protracted
litigation
trial
appeal
may
produce
unjust
results
ashe
made
clear
acquittal
one
charge
precludes
subsequent
trial
different
charge
rational
jury
acquitted
first
charge
without
finding
defendant
favor
factual
issue
prosecution
prove
order
convict
later
trial
demanding
standard
second
trial
precluded
simply
unlikely
even
unlikely
original
jury
acquitted
without
finding
fact
question
irrational
jury
acquit
without
finding
fact
subsequent
trial
barred
defendant
burden
showing
issue
whose
relitigation
seeks
foreclose
actually
decided
first
proceeding
dowling
situation
presented
case
like
one
us
jury
acquits
counts
reach
verdict
others
calls
special
care
application
ashe
standard
situation
conclusion
verdicts
preclude
retrial
hung
counts
necessarily
means
jury
act
rationally
courts
begin
presumption
jury
actions
rationally
reconciled
analogous
situation
claimed
verdict
must
set
aside
ground
findings
set
jury
answers
special
interrogatories
inconsistent
duty
courts
attempt
harmonize
answers
possible
fair
reading
view
case
makes
jury
answers
special
interrogatories
consistent
must
resolved
way
gallick
baltimore
ohio
quoting
atlantic
gulf
stevedores
ellerman
lines
similar
approach
appropriate
present
case
reason
question
whether
ashe
standard
met
clear
fraud
counts
required
proof
element
necessary
conviction
insider
trading
charge
namely
petitioner
caused
material
misstatements
omissions
made
january
analyst
conference
press
releases
formed
basis
wire
fraud
counts
see
app
jury
instruction
count
two
securities
fraud
jury
instruction
counts
three
six
wire
fraud
far
apparent
jury
verdict
fraud
counts
rationally
based
determination
element
petitioner
caused
material
misstatements
omissions
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
district
judge
course
familiar
trial
evidence
analyzed
issue
follows
theory
defense
evident
closing
argument
direct
testimony
defendant
yeager
argued
defendant
yeager
participate
crafting
statements
press
releases
participate
creation
slides
statements
presented
analysts
conference
reach
agreement
person
make
false
misleading
deceptive
statements
material
omissions
fact
app
pet
cert
record
provides
support
district
analysis
summation
petitioner
attorney
argued
scott
yeager
nothing
counts
securities
wire
fraud
counts
tr
respect
january
conference
provided
basis
securities
fraud
count
petitioner
attorney
emphasized
client
say
anything
counsel
reiterated
petitioner
make
presentation
make
statement
ibid
counsel
summation
point
summarized
portions
petitioner
trial
testimony
minimized
involvement
matters
relating
conference
see
respect
press
releases
wire
fraud
counts
based
petitioner
attorney
argued
scott
yeager
nothing
press
releases
make
press
releases
show
evidence
show
scott
participated
press
release
counsel
comments
summation
tracked
petitioner
testimony
denying
participation
press
releases
see
portions
record
suggest
rational
jury
might
found
petitioner
cause
misstatements
omissions
conference
press
releases
light
length
complexity
trial
record
position
say
certainty
ashe
standard
met
case
brief
discussion
question
opinion
appeals
satisfactorily
show
district
analysis
incorrect
concluding
verdict
securities
fraud
count
based
finding
respondent
cause
misstatements
omissions
conference
appeals
stated
petitioner
dispute
helped
shape
message
conference
presentations
app
pet
cert
surely
tension
statement
previously
mentioned
portions
petitioner
trial
testimony
defense
summation
appeals
held
ashe
apply
jury
acquits
counts
hangs
others
analysis
possible
grounds
jury
securities
fraud
verdict
necessary
support
decision
held
ashe
govern
context
reexamination
possible
grounds
fraud
count
acquittals
warranted
footnotes
see
conspiracy
commit
fraud
ed
ed
cfr
securities
fraud
ed
wire
fraud
ed
ed
cfr
insider
trading
money
laundering
petitioner
charged
counts
indictment
included
counts
covering
conduct
executives
purportedly
involved
alleged
fraud
petitioner
also
moved
dismiss
relevant
counts
earlier
indictment
response
government
assertion
reprosecute
petitioner
previously
hung
counts
indictment
well
see
although
doctrine
collateral
estoppel
developed
civil
litigation
already
extended
criminal
proceedings
ashe
decided
justification
application
first
offered
justice
holmes
observed
safeguards
person
often
rightly
mentioned
solemn
reverence
less
protect
liability
debt
oppenheimer
currently
descriptive
term
issue
preclusion
often
used
lieu
collateral
estoppel
see
restatement
second
judgments
indeed
many
indications
jury
case
exhausted
trial
see
reply
brief
petitioner
cataloging
numerous
statements
record
reveal
real
possibility
jurors
cut
deliberations
short
exhaustion
also
require
much
defendant
preclude
retrial
must
show
jury
necessarily
decided
issue
favor
yet
borrow
appeals
ecause
impossible
determine
jury
hung
defendant
rebut
inferences
may
motivated
jury
hang
without
ability
seek
conclusive
proof
see
fed
rule
evid
reason
impose
burden
defendant
footnotes
case
arises
federal
federal
doctrine
issue
preclusion
might
prevented
government
retrying
yeager
even
without
ashe
innovation
see
oppenheimer
district
held
jury
case
necessarily
decided
yeager
lacked
inside
information
fact
yeager
claims
government
barred
relitigating
supp
sd
tex
jurisdiction
interlocutory
appeal
holding
comes
way
collateral
order
doctrine
encompasses
claims
former
jeopardy
abney
accorded
privilege
litigants
asserting
issue
preclusion
government
issued
new
indictment
mistrial
case
alter
fact
double
jeopardy
purposes
retrial
part
initial
proceeding
matter
practice
seems
prosecutors
courts
treat
retrials
mistrials
part
proceeding
filing
superseding
indictments
original
docket
number
see
superseding
information
pena
case
md
implies
new
indictment
case
materially
refined
charges
ante
relevant
changes
dropping
defendants
elimination
counts
related
factual
allegations
compare
app
app
claims
jury
failure
reach
verdict
relevant
evidence
ante
justifications
statement
utterly
unpersuasive
obvious
failure
reach
verdict
one
count
make
existence
factual
finding
necessary
predicate
counts
substantially
less
probable
fed
rule
evid
believe
otherwise
beyond