deposit
guaranty
nat
bank
roper
argued
october
decided
march
respondents
holders
credit
cards
issued
petitioner
bank
sued
petitioner
damages
federal
district
seeking
represent
interests
class
similarly
situated
credit
card
customers
complaint
based
national
bank
act
alleged
usurious
finance
charges
made
accounts
respondents
putative
class
district
denied
respondents
motion
certify
class
ruling
circumstances
meet
requirements
federal
rule
civil
procedure
appeals
denied
respondents
motion
interlocutory
appeal
petitioner
tendered
respondent
maximum
amount
recovered
respondents
refused
accept
tender
district
respondents
objections
entered
judgment
favor
basis
tender
dismissed
action
amount
tender
deposited
petitioner
registry
respondents
thereafter
sought
review
class
certification
ruling
appeals
concluded
inter
alia
case
mooted
entry
judgment
respondents
favor
reversed
adverse
certification
ruling
held
neither
petitioner
tender
district
entry
judgment
favor
respondents
objections
mooted
private
case
controversy
individual
interest
litigation
distinguished
whatever
may
representative
responsibilities
putative
class
sufficient
permit
appeal
adverse
certification
ruling
pp
appropriate
case
appeal
may
permitted
adverse
ruling
collateral
judgment
merits
behest
party
prevailed
merits
long
party
retains
stake
appeal
satisfying
art
iii
requirements
neither
rejected
tender
dismissal
action
respondents
objections
mooted
claim
merits
long
retained
economic
interest
class
certification
pp
denial
class
certification
example
procedural
ruling
collateral
merits
litigation
appealable
entry
final
judgment
denial
certification
stands
adjudication
one
issues
litigated
respondents
asserted
throughout
appellate
litigation
continuing
individual
interest
resolution
class
certification
question
desire
shift
part
costs
litigation
share
benefits
class
certified
ultimately
prevails
thus
entitled
portion
district
judgment
reviewed
deny
right
appeal
simply
defendant
sought
buy
individual
claims
named
plaintiffs
contrary
sound
judicial
administration
pp
burger
delivered
opinion
brennan
white
marshall
rehnquist
stevens
joined
rehnquist
post
stevens
post
filed
concurring
opinions
blackmun
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
post
powell
filed
dissenting
opinion
stewart
joined
post
william
goodman
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
vardaman
dunn
champ
lyons
argued
cause
respondents
brief
frederick
helmsing
roberts
wilson
chief
justice
burger
delivered
opinion
granted
certiorari
decide
whether
tender
named
plaintiffs
class
action
amounts
claimed
individual
capacities
followed
entry
judgment
favor
basis
tender
objection
moots
case
terminates
right
appeal
denial
class
certification
respondents
holders
credit
cards
issued
bankamericard
plan
petitioner
deposit
guaranty
national
bank
sued
bank
district
southern
district
mississippi
seeking
represent
interests
class
similarly
aggrieved
customers
complaint
alleged
usurious
finance
charges
made
accounts
respondents
putative
class
mississippi
credit
card
holders
respondents
cause
action
based
provisions
national
bank
act
rev
stat
amended
section
permits
banks
within
coverage
act
charge
interest
rate
allowed
laws
state
territory
district
bank
located
case
higher
rate
interest
allowed
knowingly
charged
allows
person
paid
unlawful
interest
recover
twice
total
interest
paid
modern
phenomenon
credit
card
systems
largely
dependent
computers
perform
myriad
accounting
functions
required
charge
transaction
customer
account
case
bank
computer
programmed
billing
date
added
charges
subtracted
credits
added
finance
charges
due
bankamericard
plan
prepared
customers
statements
period
question
bank
made
monthly
service
charge
unpaid
balance
account
however
customers
allowed
days
within
pay
accounts
without
service
charge
payment
received
within
time
computer
added
customer
next
bill
unpaid
portion
prior
bill
shown
new
balance
actual
finance
charges
paid
customer
varied
depending
stream
transactions
repayment
plan
selected
addition
effective
annual
interest
rate
paid
customer
vary
service
charge
assessed
unpaid
balance
matter
charged
transactions
occurred
within
period
prior
billing
date
monthly
service
charge
asserted
usurious
certain
circumstances
resulting
effective
annual
interest
rate
allegedly
exceeded
maximum
interest
rate
permitted
mississippi
law
district
denied
respondents
motion
certify
class
ruling
circumstances
meet
requirements
federal
rule
civil
procedure
district
certified
order
denying
class
certification
discretionary
interlocutory
appeal
pursuant
proceedings
stayed
days
pending
possible
appellate
review
denial
class
certification
appeals
fifth
circuit
denied
respondents
motion
interlocutory
appeal
bank
tendered
named
plaintiff
form
offer
defendants
enter
judgment
consent
without
waiver
defenses
admission
liability
maximum
amount
recovered
amounts
tendered
respondents
roper
hudgins
respectively
including
legal
interest
costs
respondents
declined
accept
tender
made
counteroffer
judgment
attempted
reserve
right
appeal
adverse
class
certification
ruling
counteroffer
declined
bank
based
bank
offer
district
entered
judgment
respondents
favor
objection
dismissed
action
bank
deposited
amount
tendered
registry
remains
time
putative
class
member
sought
intervene
either
litigate
merits
appeal
certification
ruling
appears
time
district
entered
judgment
dismissed
case
statute
limitations
run
individual
claims
unnamed
class
members
respondents
sought
review
class
certification
ruling
appeals
bank
argued
case
mooted
entry
judgment
respondents
favor
rejecting
bank
contention
relied
part
airlines
mcdonald
held
member
putative
class
appeal
denial
class
certification
intervention
entry
judgment
favor
named
plaintiff
statutory
time
appeal
run
roper
consurve
two
members
panel
read
rule
providing
obligation
named
plaintiffs
act
representative
capacity
behalf
putative
class
seeking
certification
outset
litigation
appealing
adverse
certification
ruling
view
district
also
responsibility
ensure
dismissal
suit
named
plaintiffs
prejudice
putative
class
members
one
member
panel
concurring
specially
limited
ruling
mootness
circumstances
case
filing
class
action
mere
tender
offer
settlement
named
plaintiffs
without
acceptance
moot
controversy
prevent
named
plaintiffs
appealing
adverse
certification
ruling
rejected
bank
mootness
argument
appeals
reviewed
district
ruling
class
certification
question
concluded
requisites
rule
satisfied
accordingly
reversed
adverse
certification
ruling
remanded
directions
certify
class
proceedings
certiorari
sought
review
holdings
appeals
mootness
class
certification
granted
writ
limited
question
mootness
resolve
conflicting
holdings
courts
appeals
ii
begin
identifying
interests
considered
questions
touching
justiciability
presented
context
first
interest
named
plaintiffs
personal
stake
substantive
controversy
related
right
litigants
federal
employ
appropriate
circumstances
procedural
device
rule
class
action
pursue
individual
claims
separate
consideration
distinct
private
interests
responsibility
named
plaintiffs
represent
collective
interests
putative
class
two
interests
implicated
rights
putative
class
members
potential
intervenors
responsibilities
district
protect
absent
class
integrity
judicial
process
monitoring
actions
parties
appeals
distinguish
among
distinct
interests
reviewed
possible
interests
view
bearing
whether
appeal
denial
certification
allowed
diverse
interests
interrelated
distinguish
among
purposes
analysis
conclude
resolution
narrow
question
presented
requires
consideration
private
interest
named
plaintiffs
critical
inquiry
turn
whether
respondents
individual
private
case
controversy
became
moot
reason
petitioner
tender
entry
judgment
respondents
favor
respondents
holders
credit
cards
issued
bank
claimed
damages
private
capacities
alleged
usurious
interest
charges
levied
violation
federal
law
complaint
asserted
suffered
actual
damage
result
illegal
acts
bank
complaint
satisfied
requirement
art
iii
constitution
parties
federal
civil
action
respondents
exercised
option
putative
members
similarly
situated
cardholder
class
assert
claims
rule
right
assert
claims
framework
class
action
clear
however
right
litigant
employ
rule
procedural
right
ancillary
litigation
substantive
claims
substantive
claims
become
moot
art
iii
sense
settlement
personal
claims
example
retains
jurisdiction
controversy
individual
plaintiffs
factual
context
question
arises
important
time
named
plaintiffs
accept
tender
settlement
case
instead
judgment
entered
favor
without
consent
case
dismissed
continued
objections
neither
rejected
tender
dismissal
action
plaintiffs
objections
mooted
plaintiffs
claim
merits
long
retained
economic
interest
class
certification
although
case
controversy
mooted
art
iii
sense
upon
payment
satisfaction
final
unappealable
judgment
decision
final
purposes
appeal
absolutely
resolve
case
controversy
time
appeal
run
confession
judgment
defendants
less
issues
moot
entire
case
issues
case
may
appealable
assume
district
final
judgment
fully
satisfying
named
plaintiffs
private
substantive
claims
preclude
appeal
aspect
final
judgment
however
follow
circumstance
terminate
named
plaintiffs
right
take
appeal
issue
class
certification
congress
vested
appellate
jurisdiction
courts
appeals
review
final
decisions
district
courts
ordinarily
party
aggrieved
judgment
order
district
may
exercise
statutory
right
appeal
therefrom
party
receives
sought
generally
aggrieved
judgment
affording
relief
appeal
public
service
brashear
freight
lines
new
york
telephone
maltbie
corning
troy
iron
nail
factory
moore
federal
practice
ed
rule
one
federal
appellate
practice
however
derived
statutes
granting
appellate
jurisdiction
historic
practices
appellate
courts
source
jurisdictional
limitations
art
iii
appropriate
case
appeal
may
permitted
adverse
ruling
collateral
judgment
merits
behest
party
prevailed
merits
long
party
retains
stake
appeal
satisfying
requirements
art
iii
illustration
principle
practice
electrical
fittings
thomas
betts
case
respondents
sued
petitioners
infringement
patent
suit
defense
may
prevail
either
successfully
attacking
validity
patent
successfully
defending
charge
infringement
electrical
fittings
decree
district
adjudged
patent
valid
dismissed
complaint
failure
prove
infringement
respondents
appeal
petitioners
sought
review
appeals
much
decree
adjudicated
patent
valid
respondents
filed
motion
dismiss
appeal
based
ground
appeal
raise
questions
already
moot
fact
petitioners
already
granted
dismissal
bill
relief
entitled
appeals
dismissed
appeal
ground
ruling
decree
district
subsequent
suits
matter
collateral
estoppel
otherwise
influence
litigation
issue
patent
validity
review
question
view
ruling
patent
validity
effect
subsequent
litigation
nevertheless
unanimous
allowed
appeal
reform
decree
party
may
appeal
judgment
decree
favor
purpose
obtaining
review
findings
deems
erroneous
necessary
support
decree
decree
purports
adjudge
validity
patent
though
adjudication
immaterial
disposition
cause
stands
adjudication
one
issues
litigated
think
petitioners
entitled
portion
decree
eliminated
circuit
appeals
jurisdiction
held
entertain
appeal
purpose
passing
merits
direct
reformation
decree
footnotes
omitted
view
denial
class
certification
example
procedural
ruling
collateral
merits
litigation
appealable
entry
final
judgment
denial
class
certification
stands
adjudication
one
issues
litigated
electrical
fittings
respondents
assert
continuing
stake
outcome
appeal
entitled
portion
district
judgment
reviewed
hold
appeals
jurisdiction
entertain
appeal
review
asserted
procedural
error
purpose
passing
merits
substantive
controversy
federal
appellate
jurisdiction
limited
appellant
personal
stake
appeal
respondents
maintained
throughout
appellate
litigation
retain
continuing
individual
interest
resolution
class
certification
question
desire
shift
part
costs
litigation
share
benefits
class
certified
ultimately
prevails
see
supra
individual
interest
may
satisfied
fully
effect
given
decision
appeals
setting
aside
held
erroneous
district
ruling
class
certification
electrical
fittings
petitioners
asserted
concern
success
unspecified
future
litigation
impaired
stare
decisis
application
district
ruling
patent
validity
concern
supplied
personal
stake
appeal
required
art
iii
satisfied
fully
petitioners
secured
appellate
decision
eliminating
erroneous
ruling
decree
decree
electrical
fittings
reformed
unreviewable
judgment
put
end
litigation
mooting
substantive
claims
proceedings
remand
may
follow
different
pattern
governed
principles
say
definitively
become
respondents
continuing
personal
interest
substantive
controversy
petitioner
case
returns
district
petitioner
denied
liability
respondents
tendered
appear
regard
nuisance
settlement
respondents
never
accepted
tender
judgment
satisfaction
substantive
claims
cf
cover
schwartz
judgment
district
accepting
petitioner
tender
set
aside
appeals
need
speculate
correctness
action
district
accepting
tender
first
instance
whether
petitioner
may
withdraw
tender
perhaps
question
thought
open
doubt
stated
past
without
extended
discussion
order
denying
class
certification
subject
effective
review
final
judgment
behest
named
plaintiff
coopers
lybrand
livesay
livesay
unanimously
rejected
argument
advanced
favor
affording
prejudgment
appeal
matter
right
adverse
class
certification
ruling
came
within
collateral
order
exception
rule
appealability
class
certification
question
final
judgment
merits
important
ingredient
ruling
livesay
proposition
cited
airlines
mcdonald
case
involved
judgment
entered
merits
favor
named
plaintiff
mcdonald
assumed
named
plaintiff
entitled
appeal
denial
class
certification
use
procedure
litigation
individual
claims
may
offer
substantial
advantages
named
plaintiffs
may
motivate
bring
cases
economic
reasons
might
brought
otherwise
plainly
growth
litigation
stimulated
agreements
enlargement
role
type
fee
arrangement
played
vindicating
rights
individuals
otherwise
might
consider
worth
candle
embark
litigation
optimum
result
might
consumed
cost
prospect
fee
arrangements
offers
advantages
litigation
named
plaintiffs
class
actions
well
attorneys
better
worse
financial
incentive
class
actions
offer
legal
profession
natural
outgrowth
increasing
reliance
private
attorney
general
vindication
legal
rights
obviously
development
facilitated
rule
aggregation
individual
claims
context
classwide
suit
evolutionary
response
existence
injuries
unremedied
regulatory
action
government
economically
feasible
obtain
relief
within
traditional
framework
multiplicity
small
individual
suits
damages
aggrieved
persons
may
without
effective
redress
unless
may
employ
device
potential
misuse
mechanism
obvious
benefits
class
members
often
nominal
symbolic
persons
class
members
becoming
chief
beneficiaries
remedy
abuses
lie
denying
relief
sought
rule
untoward
consequences
district
ruling
certification
issue
often
significant
decision
rendered
proceedings
deny
right
appeal
simply
defendant
sought
buy
individual
private
claims
named
plaintiffs
contrary
sound
judicial
administration
requiring
multiple
plaintiffs
bring
separate
actions
effectively
picked
defendant
tender
judgment
affirmative
ruling
class
certification
obtained
obviously
frustrate
objectives
class
actions
moreover
invite
waste
judicial
resources
stimulating
successive
suits
brought
others
claiming
aggrievement
interests
defendant
forestall
appeal
denial
class
certification
accomplished
tendering
individual
damages
claimed
named
plaintiffs
permitting
appeal
district
certification
ruling
either
interlocutory
appeal
entry
judgment
merits
also
minimizes
problems
raised
forum
shopping
putative
class
representatives
attempting
locate
judge
perceived
sympathetic
class
actions
small
individual
claims
otherwise
might
limited
local
state
courts
rather
federal
forum
justify
ignoring
overall
problem
wise
use
judicial
resources
policy
considerations
irrelevant
determination
whether
adverse
procedural
ruling
certification
subject
appeal
behest
named
plaintiffs
courts
certain
latitude
formulating
standards
govern
appealability
procedural
rulings
even
though
case
holding
may
determine
absolute
finality
judgment
thus
indirectly
determine
whether
controversy
become
moot
conclude
record
district
entry
judgment
favor
named
plaintiffs
objections
moot
private
case
controversy
respondents
individual
interest
litigation
distinguished
whatever
may
representative
responsibilities
putative
class
sufficient
permit
appeal
adverse
certification
ruling
affirmed
footnotes
district
found
requirements
rule
met
putative
class
representatives
failed
establish
predominance
questions
law
fact
common
class
members
class
action
shown
superior
method
adjudication
due
availability
traditional
procedures
prosecuting
individual
claims
mississippi
courts
horrendous
penalty
result
destruction
bank
claims
successfully
aggregated
substantive
law
mississippi
views
aggregation
usury
claims
undesirable
tremendous
burden
handling
claims
particularly
counterclaims
filed
reversal
district
denial
certification
appeals
may
relate
back
time
original
motion
certification
purposes
tolling
statute
limitations
claims
class
members
see
airlines
mcdonald
winokur
bell
federal
savings
loan
cert
denied
note
rule
prescribes
certain
responsibilities
district
case
brought
class
action
class
certified
class
action
may
dismissed
compromised
without
approval
notice
proposed
dismissal
compromise
shall
given
members
class
manner
directs
conceivably
also
may
circumstances
need
defined
district
responsibility
prior
approval
settlement
dismissal
class
action
provide
opportunity
intervention
member
putative
class
purpose
appealing
denial
class
certification
intervention
occurred
airlines
mcdonald
supra
dissent
construes
notice
appeal
complete
abandonment
respondents
art
iii
personal
stake
appeal
post
case
indeed
appeal
taken
named
plaintiffs
although
purpose
secure
class
certification
throughout
litigation
respondents
asserted
personal
stake
appeal
desire
shift
successful
class
litigants
portion
fees
expenses
incurred
litigation
assert
continuing
obligation
see
brief
opposition
motion
dismiss
appeal
reply
brief
pp
sense
petitioner
electrical
fittings
sought
review
district
procedural
error
district
correct
inquiring
fully
validity
patent
sinclair
carroll
interchemical
incorrect
adjudge
patent
valid
ruling
infringement
district
decided
hypothetical
controversy
altvater
freeman
yet
petitioners
take
appeal
correct
error
adverse
decision
litigated
issue
continued
assert
interest
outcome
issue
policy
reasons
considered
procedural
question
sufficient
importance
allow
appeal
coopers
lybrand
livesay
held
class
certification
ruling
fall
within
narrow
category
circumstances
appeal
allowed
prior
final
judgment
matter
right
however
ruling
livesay
intended
preclude
motions
seeking
discretionary
interlocutory
appeal
review
certification
ruling
see
cases
appeal
promise
substantial
savings
time
resources
reasons
viewed
hospitably
significant
benefit
claimants
choose
litigate
individual
claims
context
prospect
reducing
costs
litigation
particularly
attorney
fees
allocating
costs
among
members
class
benefit
recovery
typically
attorney
fees
named
plaintiff
proceeding
without
reliance
rule
exceed
value
individual
judgment
favor
one
plaintiff
damages
claimed
two
named
plaintiffs
totaled
plaintiffs
unlikely
obtain
legal
redress
acceptable
cost
unless
counsel
motivated
incentive
proceeded
basis
course
central
concept
rule
case
raise
question
propriety
agreements
see
miller
overview
federal
class
actions
past
present
future
federal
judicial
center
difficult
questions
arise
named
plaintiffs
responsibilities
putative
class
prior
certification
case
require
us
reach
questions
justice
rehnquist
concurring
write
briefly
state
seems
sufficient
differences
case
parole
geraghty
post
allow
appeal
denial
class
certification
case
dismiss
attempted
appeal
question
geraghty
moot
writing
clean
slate
might
well
resolve
cases
respondents
today
cleaned
slate
successful
formulating
sound
principles
replace
seem
muddled
inconsistent
ones
past
compare
sosna
iowa
franks
bowman
transportation
airlines
mcdonald
pasadena
city
bd
education
spangler
coopers
lybrand
livesay
indianapolis
school
jacobs
case
parole
geraghty
article
iii
precedents
jacobs
supra
spangler
supra
require
dismissal
action
geraghty
simply
individual
interest
remaining
certified
class
intervenors
supply
interest
action
within
narrow
class
cases
distinctly
capable
repetition
yet
evading
review
gerstein
pugh
facts
case
contrast
fit
within
framework
precedents
permitting
continuation
action
distinguishing
feature
defendant
made
unaccepted
offer
tender
settlement
individual
putative
representative
claim
action
moot
art
iii
sense
adopts
rule
individual
seeking
proceed
class
representative
required
accept
tender
individual
claims
long
require
acceptance
individual
required
prove
case
requisite
art
iii
adversity
continues
acceptance
need
mandated
precedents
since
defendant
offered
requested
complaint
relief
class
rule
give
defendant
practical
power
make
denial
class
certification
questions
unreviewable
since
adversity
fact
retained
set
facts
fits
within
narrow
class
cases
contrary
rule
lead
reality
otherwise
issue
evade
review
think
precedents
provide
maintenance
action
sosna
supra
gerstein
supra
accordingly
join
opinion
case
justice
powell
dissent
geraghty
justice
stevens
concurring
dissenting
opinion
justice
powell
district
erroneously
refused
certify
class
member
class
attempted
intervene
respondents
plaintiffs
arguably
present
post
position
apparently
based
notion
unless
class
members
present
purposes
thus
may
liable
costs
bound
judgment
etc
considered
present
purpose
respectfully
disagree
may
opinion
proper
complaint
filed
absent
members
class
considered
parties
case
controversy
least
limited
purpose
art
iii
jurisdiction
district
judge
fails
certify
class
believe
remain
parties
final
determination
made
action
may
maintained
class
action
thus
continued
viability
case
controversy
words
used
art
iii
depend
district
judge
initial
answer
certification
question
rather
depends
plaintiffs
right
class
certified
accordingly
even
named
plaintiff
personal
stake
lawsuit
effectively
eliminated
question
mootness
arises
simply
remaining
adversary
parties
unnamed
rather
issue
arises
whether
named
plaintiff
continues
proper
class
representative
purpose
appealing
adverse
class
determination
cf
east
texas
motor
freight
system
rodriguez
parole
geraghty
post
judgment
case
geraghty
named
plaintiffs
clearly
remained
appropriate
representatives
class
least
limited
purpose
therefore
join
opinion
justice
blackmun
concurring
judgment
concur
judgment
parole
geraghty
post
respondents
appeal
order
denying
class
certification
moot
agree
ruling
class
certification
motion
stands
litigated
issue
become
moot
named
plaintiff
suit
merits
mooted
limit
appealability
procedural
motion
however
situations
possibility
named
plaintiff
able
recover
attorney
fees
either
defendant
fund
awarded
class
general
agreement
class
properly
certified
case
become
moot
simply
class
representative
individual
interest
merits
litigation
expired
case
absent
class
members
continued
stake
controversy
sufficient
maintain
viability
art
iii
case
certification
denied
district
however
appeals
determine
whether
members
class
continue
stake
outcome
determined
whether
action
properly
maintained
class
action
proper
class
action
entire
case
moot
hand
district
refusal
certify
class
erroneous
believe
remains
live
controversy
courts
jurisdiction
resolve
art
iii
recognize
tension
approach
suggested
sua
sponte
decision
indianapolis
school
jacobs
see
also
pasadena
city
bd
education
spangler
justice
blackmun
points
parole
geraghty
post
case
distinguishable
case
involved
attempt
litigate
merits
appeal
behalf
improperly
certified
class
agree
properly
consider
merits
threshold
question
whether
class
certified
resolved
however
disagree
conclusion
entire
action
dismissed
moot
view
absent
class
members
remained
sufficiently
present
remand
class
issue
appropriate
resolution
absent
class
members
whose
status
fully
adjudicated
present
purposes
litigating
merits
case
find
present
purposes
sharing
costs
suffering
adverse
judgment
class
ultimately
certified
class
members
course
retain
right
opt
agree
determination
case
geraghty
respective
named
plaintiffs
continue
sufficient
personal
stake
outcome
satisfy
art
iii
requirements
see
ante
geraghty
post
status
unnamed
members
uncertified
class
always
difficult
define
accurately
persons
described
parties
interest
see
smith
swormstedt
interested
parties
see
tribe
cauble
absent
parties
see
hansberry
lee
nothing
novel
suggestion
absent
parties
may
regarded
parties
limited
purpose
analyzing
status
case
controversy
certification
order
entered
indeed
since
concept
absent
parties
developed
long
anyone
conceived
certification
orders
find
difficult
understand
existence
case
controversy
constitutional
sense
depend
compliance
procedural
requirement
first
created
view
jurisdictional
issue
necessarily
enlarge
fiduciary
responsibilities
class
representative
justice
powell
suggests
see
post
event
share
concern
expressed
opinion
personal
liability
class
representative
costs
attorney
fees
case
ultimately
lost
anyone
voluntarily
engages
combat
whether
courtroom
elsewhere
must
recognize
blood
may
spilled
justice
powell
justice
stewart
joins
dissenting
respondents
two
credit
card
holders
claim
petitioner
charged
usurious
interest
violation
national
bank
act
mississippi
law
filed
action
late
recover
charges
plus
penalty
equal
amount
individual
totals
app
respondents
also
sought
relief
behalf
class
alleged
include
persons
claims
aggregating
million
four
years
litigation
district
denied
respondents
motion
class
certification
seven
months
later
petitioner
tendered
respondents
full
amount
individual
claims
plus
legal
interest
costs
respondents
objection
district
entered
final
judgment
favor
petitioner
deposited
full
amount
due
clerk
one
disputes
petitioner
tendered
everything
respondents
recovered
action
nevertheless
appeals
fifth
circuit
rejected
petitioner
suggestion
mootness
reversed
denial
class
certification
affirms
judgment
appeals
finding
respondents
retain
personal
stake
sharing
expense
litigation
members
putative
class
ante
speculative
interest
simply
sustain
jurisdiction
art
iii
established
controlling
precedents
accordingly
dissent
although
differences
case
similar
parole
geraghty
post
one
important
respect
require
us
decide
whether
putative
class
representatives
may
appeal
denial
class
certification
derive
benefit
whatever
relief
sought
action
geraghty
district
refused
certify
class
case
however
recognizes
established
art
iii
doctrine
right
employ
rule
procedural
right
ancillary
litigation
substantive
claims
ante
also
agrees
federal
retains
jurisdiction
controversy
parties
substantive
claims
become
moot
art
iii
sense
ibid
moreover
acknowledges
familiar
principle
party
personal
stake
outcome
action
presents
case
controversy
cognizable
federal
appeals
ante
indeed
dispositive
principles
disagreement
way
applies
case
view
principles
unambiguously
require
finding
mootness
since
class
certified
one
sought
intervene
respondents
plaintiffs
arguably
present
yet
respondents
continuing
interest
injuries
alleged
complaint
sought
damages
damages
tendered
full
respondents
make
claim
success
certification
motion
entitle
additional
relief
kind
petitioner
personal
claims
relief
abandoned
completely
appeal
taken
names
notice
appeal
filed
district
recites
respondents
appeal
behalf
others
similarly
situated
app
compelling
evidence
respondents
interest
individual
private
case
controversy
relied
today
ante
even
without
evidence
courts
routinely
held
tender
full
relief
remedies
plaintiff
injuries
eliminates
stake
outcome
california
san
pablo
tulare
drs
hill
thomas
per
curiam
lamb
commissioner
per
curiam
allen
revivals
campbell
per
curiam
tender
moots
case
whether
judgment
entered
ibid
thus
law
clear
federal
powerless
review
abstract
questions
remaining
case
plaintiff
refused
accept
proffered
settlement
fully
satisfies
claims
know
authority
remotely
suggesting
result
differ
district
entered
judgment
favor
respondents
instead
dismissing
lawsuit
moot
certainly
true
observes
entry
judgment
favor
party
moot
case
ante
never
doubt
party
may
appeal
aspects
generally
favorable
judgment
affect
adversely
see
wright
miller
cooper
federal
practice
procedure
moore
federal
practice
ed
requirement
adverse
effect
rule
federal
appellate
practice
ante
held
repeatedly
concedes
ante
art
iii
requires
live
controversy
personal
stake
issue
throughout
entirety
litigation
sosna
iowa
see
preiser
newkirk
constitutional
limitation
rule
practice
impelled
federal
courts
uniformly
require
showing
continuing
adverse
effect
order
confer
standing
appeal
barry
district
columbia
bd
elections
app
wright
miller
cooper
supra
see
altvater
freeman
electrical
fittings
thomas
betts
kapp
national
football
league
cover
schwartz
cert
denied
cases
show
requirements
art
iii
affected
factual
context
suggestion
mootness
arises
see
ante
whatever
context
art
iii
asks
single
question
continuing
controversy
adverse
parties
retain
requisite
stake
outcome
action
electrical
fittings
thomas
betts
supra
case
primarily
relied
upon
provides
little
support
today
ruling
electrical
fittings
limited
appeal
allowed
petitioner
prejudiced
inclusion
unnecessary
adverse
finding
generally
favorable
decree
see
ante
existence
district
order
denying
certification
effect
whatever
respondents
thus
personal
stake
justified
electrical
fittings
appeal
present
case
absent
stake
simply
irrelevant
policy
considerations
sometimes
may
favor
appeal
procedural
ruling
collateral
merits
litigation
significant
ruling
stands
adjudication
one
issues
litigated
ante
collateral
rulings
like
rulings
may
appealed
requirements
art
iii
satisfied
recognizing
right
appeal
subject
jurisdictional
limitations
art
iii
agrees
party
retains
stake
appeal
satisfy
requirements
art
iii
ante
see
ante
also
agrees
respondents
remaining
stake
merits
substantive
controversy
ibid
nevertheless
holds
respondents
retain
personal
stake
appeal
desire
shift
successful
class
litigants
portion
fees
expenses
incurred
litigation
assert
continuing
obligation
ante
see
ante
conclusion
neither
legally
sound
supported
record
fails
identify
single
item
expense
chargeable
petitioner
incurred
respondents
petitioner
tender
similarly
respondents
conspicuously
vague
identifying
fees
expenses
relied
upon
supplying
adverse
interest
essential
live
controversy
expense
mentioned
respondents
apart
costs
included
petitioner
tender
present
obligation
offer
provide
security
costs
event
class
ultimately
certified
brief
respondents
app
attorney
fee
arrangement
case
create
obligation
present
future
affected
certification
class
respondents
complaint
identifies
fee
paid
subject
approval
per
cent
amount
final
judgment
arrangement
customary
type
contingent
fee
identified
record
briefs
yet
one
explained
respondents
obligation
pay
recovery
counsel
reduced
class
certified
members
become
similarly
obligated
pay
recovery
thus
asserted
interest
spreading
attorney
fees
expenses
relates
present
obligation
expectation
respondents
particularly
counsel
certain
fees
expenses
may
become
payable
event
class
certified
expectation
wholly
irrelevant
existence
present
controversy
petitioner
respondents
reliance
unidentified
fees
expenses
reconciled
repeated
admonition
unadorned
speculation
suffice
invoke
federal
judicial
power
simon
eastern
ky
welfare
rights
speculation
particularly
inappropriate
case
since
neither
respondents
suggested
petitioner
ever
liable
fees
expenses
relied
upon
indeed
american
rule
bar
award
attorney
fees
petitioner
thus
respondents
injury
exists
one
fairly
traced
petitioner
see
gladstone
realtors
village
bellwood
whatever
may
basis
respondents
asserted
desire
share
fees
expenses
unnamed
members
class
petitioner
merely
bystander
ederal
courts
without
power
decide
questions
affect
rights
litigants
case
north
carolina
rice
elementary
principle
dispose
case
since
respondents
continuing
personal
stake
outcome
action
art
iii
precedents
require
case
dismissed
moot
ashcroft
mattis
per
curiam
weinstein
bradford
per
curiam
preiser
newkirk
indianapolis
school
jacobs
defunis
odegaard
per
curiam
north
carolina
rice
supra
sec
medical
committee
human
rights
respondents
suggest
claims
capable
repetition
yet
evading
review
cf
gerstein
pugh
single
one
alleged
class
members
sought
intervene
nine
years
since
action
filed
cf
airlines
mcdonald
anyone
challenged
allegedly
usurious
charges
informal
complaint
protest
tr
oral
arg
even
certification
denied
action
lay
dormant
seven
months
respondents
sought
take
interlocutory
appeal
without
provoking
response
anyone
previously
may
thought
class
action
protect
rights
apart
persistence
lawyers
noncase
since
petitioner
tendered
full
satisfaction
respondents
individual
claims
sure
respondents
counsel
may
interest
enlarged
recovery
inherent
contingent
fee
arrangement
know
decision
holds
lawyer
interest
larger
fee
paid
third
persons
present
creates
personal
stake
outcome
required
art
iii
ii
despite
absence
art
iii
controversy
directs
remand
federal
action
litigated
lawyers
whose
clients
unidentified
class
members
shown
desire
represented
anyone
appears
endorse
form
litigation
reasons
policy
practice
said
effective
response
existence
injuries
unremedied
regulatory
action
government
ante
aware
consideration
ever
influenced
determining
whether
constitution
confers
jurisdiction
federal
courts
event
consequences
finding
mootness
likely
restrictive
seems
fear
fails
recognize
allowing
action
proceed
without
interested
plaintiff
generate
practical
difficulties
magnitude
finding
mootness
repercussions
primarily
two
situations
first
involves
named
plaintiff
fails
obtain
class
certification
pursues
case
successful
litigated
judgment
believe
subsequent
attempt
plaintiff
appeal
denial
certification
generally
barred
art
iii
consequences
applying
settled
rules
mootness
situation
unjust
injunctive
declaratory
relief
granted
absent
members
putative
class
obtained
force
stare
decisis
decree
benefits
actual
class
membership
hand
damages
awarded
appeal
permitted
reversal
certification
ruling
enable
putative
class
members
take
advantage
favorable
judgment
issue
liability
without
assuming
risk
bound
unfavorable
judgment
thus
decision
allow
appeals
situation
reinstate
intervention
amendments
rule
intended
eliminate
perhaps
commonly
mootness
question
arise
defendant
attempts
force
settlement
judgment
petitioner
case
defendant
certainly
substantial
incentive
use
tactic
cases
argues
result
deny
compensation
putative
class
members
jeopardize
enforcement
certain
legal
rights
private
attorney
general
ante
practical
argument
without
force
predicating
judgment
concerns
amounts
judicial
policymaking
respect
adequacy
compensation
enforcement
available
particular
substantive
claims
judgment
ordinarily
best
left
congress
least
result
consistent
substantive
law
giving
rise
claim
today
however
never
pauses
consider
law
usury
since
mississippi
law
condemns
aggregation
usury
claims
concern
compensation
putative
class
members
case
best
misplaced
worst
inconsistent
command
rules
enabling
act
concern
putative
class
members
telling
appropriate
case
pattern
forced
settlement
indeed
waste
judicial
resources
litigation
successive
suits
members
putative
class
doubt
consequent
problems
judicial
administration
real
problems
addressed
measures
short
undercutting
law
mootness
seems
done
today
first
step
authorization
interlocutory
appeals
denial
class
certification
appropriate
circumstances
district
courts
already
empowered
certify
appeals
involve
certain
controlling
questions
law
many
cases
defendant
undoubtedly
forgo
opportunity
settle
individual
plaintiff
order
obtain
immediate
final
determination
class
certification
question
appeal
defendant
attempt
moot
class
action
forced
settlement
district
powerless
least
circumstances
may
require
putative
class
members
receive
sort
notice
opportunity
intervene
within
appeal
period
rule
availability
measures
significant
deterrent
deliberate
mooting
class
actions
indeed
district
management
problem
measures
tailored
case
hand
may
well
preferable
approval
appeals
circumstances
extent
interlocutory
appeals
unavailable
managerial
powers
lacking
congress
correct
deficiency
since
limited
decision
case
judicially
fashioned
solutions
legislative
problems
often
attended
unfortunate
practical
consequences
today
holding
exception
remand
respondents
serve
representatives
solely
purpose
obtaining
class
certification
since
gain
nothing
action
participation
intended
benefit
counsel
members
putative
class
indicated
interest
claims
asserted
case
respondents
serve
motion
indeed
serve
since
certified
class
considered
determination
respondents
fairly
adequately
represent
members
nothing
rule
authorizes
novel
procedure
requirements
rule
easily
adapted
respondents
members
class
seek
represent
see
east
texas
motor
freight
rodriguez
currently
nonexistent
claims
typical
claims
class
within
meaning
rule
holding
well
may
prevent
future
forced
settlements
litigation
thus
difficulties
faced
district
remand
case
may
arise
precisely
analogous
circumstances
today
result
also
authorizes
appeals
putative
class
representatives
litigated
prevailed
merits
individual
claims
order
denying
class
certification
reversed
situation
named
plaintiffs
remand
continuing
relationship
putative
class
respondents
remand
certification
also
lead
intervention
direct
violation
rule
see
supra
tensions
arising
express
terms
rule
undermine
conclusion
policies
underlying
rule
dictate
result
reached
today
iii
sum
attempted
solution
problem
forced
settlements
consumer
class
actions
departs
settled
principles
art
iii
jurisprudence
unnecessarily
creates
significant
problems
administration
rule
may
work
serious
injustice
case
vacate
judgment
appeals
remand
instructions
dismiss
appeal
moot
jurisdiction
premised
national
bank
act
adopts
interest
limits
set
state
law
although
respondents
also
asked
attorney
fees
complaint
shows
fees
granted
damages
ultimately
awarded
class
app
possibility
prospective
relief
mississippi
usury
statute
amended
authorize
inter
alia
charges
issue
case
miss
laws
ch
see
miss
code
ann
supp
neither
respondents
asserted
petitioner
tender
fails
include
costs
fees
held
liable
see
part
infra
statutory
right
appeal
ante
supply
personal
stake
outcome
congress
abrogate
art
iii
limitations
jurisdiction
federal
courts
gladstone
realtors
village
bellwood
airlines
mcdonald
coopers
lybrand
livesay
contrary
incidental
dictum
cases
stated
denial
class
certification
subject
appellate
review
final
judgment
behest
named
plaintiffs
neither
case
discussed
mootness
neither
analyzed
proposition
way
indeed
authority
cited
coopers
lybrand
airlines
see
authority
cited
airlines
concession
made
defendant
list
cases
courts
appeals
one
dealt
suggestion
mootness
analogous
situation
see
statements
casually
enunciated
without
word
explanation
opinions
dealing
unrelated
legal
questions
controlling
even
persuasive
shown
reflection
inconsistent
settled
law
agrees
today
neither
case
creates
exception
fundamental
rule
ederal
appellate
jurisdiction
limited
appellant
personal
stake
appeal
ante
also
mentions
use
procedure
litigation
individual
claims
may
offer
substantial
advantages
named
plaintiffs
ante
advantages
accrue
respondents
litigating
claims
remand
indeed
refers
respondents
context
point
total
damages
small
unlikely
obtain
legal
redress
acceptable
cost
means
class
action
ante
may
assume
respondents
interest
procedure
means
interesting
lawyers
case
obtaining
satisfactory
settlement
may
interest
properly
furthered
rule
respondents
obtained
access
full
individual
relief
interest
disappeared
perhaps
strongest
respondents
statements
course
interest
respondents
assertion
right
proceed
behalf
class
includes
matters
prospect
spreading
attorney
fees
expenses
among
claimants
thus
reducing
percentage
otherwise
payable
brief
opposition
motion
dismiss
appeal
reply
brief
filed
roper
consurve
respondents
demand
judgment
asks
award
ost
action
well
attorney
fees
amount
hereinabove
alleged
amount
may
deemed
fit
proper
app
request
fees
clarified
paragraph
vi
amended
complaint
reads
follows
plaintiff
alleges
clerk
designated
custodian
funds
judgment
paid
plaintiff
persons
similarly
situated
defendants
clerk
deposit
said
funds
suitable
depository
upon
proper
order
disburse
said
funds
deduction
necessary
expenses
attorney
fees
plaintiff
attorneys
herein
per
cent
amount
paid
reasonable
standards
including
alleged
utilized
defendants
suing
certain
members
sic
class
state
courts
unpaid
accounts
see
supra
consequences
flow
rule
fees
recoverable
putative
class
members
may
traced
class
defendant
purposes
requirement
least
rule
support
claim
person
accepted
full
settlement
individual
claim
entitled
file
suit
behalf
unrecompensed
class
apparently
putative
plaintiff
need
asser
ante
fees
incurred
anticipation
litigation
ultimately
might
shared
prevailing
class
cases
discussed
fully
parole
geraghty
post
powell
dissenting
defendant
shown
embarked
course
conduct
designed
insulate
class
certification
issue
appellate
review
order
avoid
classwide
liability
proper
circumstances
might
find
gerstein
test
satisfied
case
moot
see
susman
lincoln
american
wright
miller
cooper
federal
practice
procedure
cum
supp
comment
continuation
representation
class
actions
following
dismissal
class
representative
duke
suggest
counsel
acted
improperly
pursuing
case
since
prevailed
appeals
responsibility
allowing
clientless
litigation
falls
federal
courts
see
comment
immediate
appealability
orders
denying
class
certification
ohio
actions
brought
rule
class
member
must
decide
time
certification
whether
opt
action
rule
provision
designed
bring
end
spurious
class
action
class
members
permitted
intervene
decision
merits
order
secure
benefits
decision
notes
advisory
committee
amendments
rule
liddell
litton
systems
rejecting
borrower
class
action
fry
layton
miss
petitioner
national
bank
alleged
failure
comply
mississippi
interest
limits
violate
national
bank
act
understand
national
bank
act
displaces
state
policy
disfavoring
aggregation
usury
claims
primary
purpose
act
protect
national
banks
discriminatory
treatment
undue
penalties
may
imposed
state
law
see
act
provides
rules
procedure
promulgated
shall
enlarge
modify
substantive
right
see
american
pipe
construction
utah
developments
law
class
actions
harv
rev
see
generally
landers
legalized
blackmail
legalized
theft
consumer
class
actions
dilemma
cal
rev
coopers
lybrand
livesay
held
denial
class
certification
final
decision
appealable
right
relied
case
dangers
indiscriminate
interlocutory
review
although
coopers
lybrand
prevents
review
cases
desirable
congress
may
remedy
problem
appropriate
legislation
congress
currently
bill
attempts
remedy
difficulties
infecting
troubled
area
sess
bill
supported
department
justice
proposes
bypass
rules
enabling
act
problem
see
supra
eliminate
problems
claims
small
justify
individual
lawsuits
creating
new
federal
right
action
damages
bill
provides
enforcement
right
instances
actions
brought
name
bill
also
authorizes
interlocutory
appeals
grant
denial
ruling
replace
class
certification
proposed
procedures
noted
supra
respondents
took
appeal
names
one
think
candid
disclaimer
personal
interest
destroy
foundation
upon
predicates
art
iii
jurisdiction
ante
see
supra
district
properly
may
conclude
remand
respondents
reasons
adequately
represent
class
justice
stevens
concurring
opinion
persons
alleged
members
putative
class
considered
parties
case
controversy
least
limited
purpose
art
iii
remain
parties
final
determination
made
action
may
maintained
class
action
ante
novel
view
apparently
derives
early
cases
referred
class
members
bound
judgment
absent
parties
hansberry
lee
parties
interest
smith
swormstedt
ante
cases
decided
certification
established
method
class
achieves
judicial
recognition
rule
members
putative
class
bound
judgment
unless
proper
certification
order
entered
may
interested
parties
time
make
parties
litigation
sense
recognized
indianapolis
school
jacobs
held
oral
certification
order
insufficient
identify
interests
absent
class
members
art
iii
purposes
result
hardly
different
class
identified
see
also
memphis
light
gas
water
div
craft
baxter
palmigiano
weinstein
bradford
pasadena
city
bd
education
spangler
justice
stevens
indicates
unnamed
members
uncertified
class
may
present
parties
purposes
others
authority
cited
selective
presence
action
explanation
offered
determine
unidentified
parties
present
presence
limited
satisfaction
art
iii
requirement
rule
party
status
content
apart
art
iii
described
legal
fiction
hand
proposed
rule
apply
outside
art
iii
context
may
troublesome
implications
prejudice
bringing
class
actions
presumably
purpose
rule
party
status
assure
satisfaction
claims
named
parties
terminate
litigation
rights
unnamed
parties
extinguished
failure
named
parties
appeal
thus
rule
proposed
justice
stevens
accomplish
purpose
suppose
fiduciary
duty
must
imposed
upon
named
parties
continue
litigation
unnamed
parties
remain
unidentified
fail
intervene
fiduciaries
named
parties
required
continue
litigate
also
assume
personal
responsibility
costs
attorney
fees
case
ultimately
lost
responsible
litigants
willing
file
class
actions
thereby
assumed
fiduciary
obligations
like
questions
substantial
resolved
rule
believe
merit
careful
study
congress
perhaps
unwittingly
creates
major
category
clientless
litigation
unique
system
resurrection
dead
controversy
may
result
irreparable
injury
innocent
parties
well
petitioner
bank
district
denied
certification
september
assigned
one
reasons
possible
destruction
petitioner
bank
damages
alleged
total
million
potentially
augmented
accrual
interest
app
see
ante
possible
destruction
bank
irrelevant
jurisdictional
issue
serious
indeed
depositors
stockholders
community
served
said
necessary
redress
injuries
possibly
suffered
members
putative
class
yet
person
come
forward
nearly
nine
years
passed
since
action
filed
indeed
challenged
conduct
authorized
statute
almost
six
years
ago
district
may
called
upon
determine
whether
equitable
doctrine
relation
back
permits
toll
statute
limitations
remand
ante
hardly
inappropriate
consider
equities
sides
circumstances
presented
district
may
well
see
reason
exercise
equitable
discretion
favor
putative
class
members
slept
rights
many
years