gray
netherland
warden
argued
april
decided
june
start
petitioner
virginia
trial
capital
murder
richard
mcclelland
prosecution
acknowledged
trial
reach
penalty
phase
introduce
petitioner
admissions
inmates
previously
murdered
lisa
sorrell
daughter
day
petitioner
convicted
mcclelland
murder
prosecution
disclosed
introduce
additional
evidence
sentencing
linking
petitioner
sorrell
murders
including
crime
scene
photographs
testimony
sorrell
investigating
detective
medical
examiner
counsel
moved
exclude
evidence
pertaining
felony
petitioner
charged
although
counsel
also
complained
prepared
additional
evidence
defense
taken
surprise
request
continuance
denied
motions
exclude
hearing
petitioner
sentenced
death
exhausting
state
remedies
sought
federal
habeas
relief
claiming
relevant
inadequate
notice
prevented
defending
evidence
introduced
penalty
phase
commonwealth
failed
disclose
exculpatory
evidence
regarding
sorrell
murders
district
initially
denied
relief
finding
petitioner
constitutional
right
notice
individual
testimony
commonwealth
planned
introduce
sentencing
claim
made
brady
maryland
procedurally
barred
virginia
law
however
later
amended
judgment
concluding
petitioner
denied
due
process
commonwealth
failed
provide
fair
notice
sorrell
murder
evidence
introduced
reversing
fourth
circuit
found
granting
habeas
relief
give
petitioner
benefit
new
rule
federal
constitutional
law
violation
teague
lane
grant
certiorari
limited
petitioner
brady
claims
held
petitioner
brady
claim
procedurally
defaulted
never
raised
claim
state
knew
grounds
filed
first
state
petition
virginia
law
precludes
review
defaulted
claim
future
state
habeas
proceeding
provides
independent
adequate
ground
conviction
sentence
thus
prevents
federal
habeas
review
defaulted
claim
unless
petitioner
demonstrate
cause
prejudice
default
teague
lane
supra
made
demonstration
claim
cognizable
federal
suit
writ
pp
misrepresentation
claim
raised
petitioner
brief
remanded
appeals
determine
whether
fact
raised
issue
pp
brief
petitioner
relies
two
separate
due
process
challenges
manner
prosecution
introduced
evidence
sorrell
murders
claim
alleging
commonwealth
failed
give
adequate
notice
evidence
use
misrepresentation
claim
alleging
commonwealth
mislead
evidence
intended
present
purposes
exhausting
state
remedies
habeas
claim
must
include
reference
specific
federal
constitutional
guarantee
well
statement
facts
entitling
petitioner
relief
picard
connor
petitioner
satisfy
exhaustion
requirement
presenting
state
courts
facts
necessary
state
claim
relief
enough
make
general
appeal
constitutional
guarantee
broad
due
process
present
substance
claim
state
anderson
harless
gardner
florida
petitioner
relies
ruffalo
raley
ohio
mooney
holohan
relies
misrepresentation
widely
differing
contexts
two
claims
separate
pp
petitioner
never
raised
misrepresentation
issue
state
proceedings
federal
habeas
review
barred
unless
demonstrate
cause
prejudice
failure
raise
claim
state
proceedings
however
addressed
federal
proceedings
commonwealth
obligated
raise
procedural
default
defense
lose
right
assert
defense
thereafter
appeals
determines
issue
raised
consider
whether
commonwealth
preserved
defenses
proceed
consider
claim
preserved
defenses
appropriate
pp
petitioner
claim
require
adoption
new
constitutional
rule
pp
petitioner
contends
deprived
adequate
notice
received
one
day
notice
additional
evidence
rather
seeking
continuance
sought
evidence
excluded
prevail
must
establish
due
process
requires
receive
day
notice
commonwealth
evidence
must
also
show
due
process
required
continuance
whether
sought
one
chose
seek
continuance
exclusion
appropriate
remedy
adoption
new
constitutional
rule
establish
propositions
defendant
right
notice
charges
must
defend
ruffalo
supra
however
constitutional
right
notice
evidence
state
plans
use
prove
charges
brady
addressed
exculpatory
evidence
create
one
weatherford
bursey
gardner
florida
supra
distinguished
even
notice
required
exclusion
evidence
sole
remedy
violation
right
since
continuance
minimize
prejudice
taylor
illinois
petitioner
made
request
view
insistence
exclusion
trial
might
well
felt
interfering
counsel
tactical
decision
order
continuance
motion
pp
new
rule
petitioner
proposes
fall
within
teague
second
exception
watershed
rules
criminal
procedure
implicating
criminal
proceeding
fundamental
fairness
accuracy
whatever
one
may
think
importance
petitioner
proposed
rule
none
primacy
centrality
rule
adopted
gideon
wainwright
rules
may
thought
within
exception
saffle
parks
vacated
remanded
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
scalia
kennedy
thomas
joined
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
ginsburg
filed
dissenting
opinion
stevens
souter
breyer
joined
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
end
syllabus
coleman
wayne
gray
petitioner
netherland
warden
petitioner
drove
car
back
murphy
mart
forced
mcclelland
gunpoint
reopen
store
filled
three
gym
bags
money
totaling
petitioner
drove
mcclelland
tucker
service
station
bought
gasoline
car
gas
car
trunk
proceeded
remote
side
road
took
mcclelland
feet
behind
car
ordered
lie
mcclelland
begged
petitioner
hurt
shoot
petitioner
assured
harmed
thus
assured
mcclelland
petitioner
fired
pistol
shots
back
head
rapid
succession
leaving
mcclelland
dead
body
side
road
petitioner
tucker
returned
intersection
seized
petitioner
telling
tucker
wanted
destroy
mcclelland
car
evidence
doused
interior
gasoline
lit
match
petitioner
tucker
later
arrested
indicted
circuit
city
suffolk
several
counts
including
capital
murder
evidence
petitioner
announced
killing
going
get
mcclelland
fired
wife
job
saleswoman
murphy
mart
petitioner
told
witnesses
killing
performed
prosecutor
entered
plea
bargain
tucker
return
tried
murder
instead
capital
murder
tucker
testify
petitioner
trial
events
leading
killing
identify
petitioner
actual
trigger
man
thursday
december
jury
convicted
petitioner
counts
evening
prosecution
informed
petitioner
counsel
commonwealth
introduce
evidence
beyond
petitioner
admissions
linking
petitioner
sorrell
murders
additional
evidence
included
photographs
crime
scene
testimony
police
detective
investigated
murders
state
medical
examiner
performed
autopsies
sorrells
bodies
testimony
meant
show
manner
lisa
shanta
sorrell
killed
resembled
manner
mcclelland
killed
next
morning
petitioner
counsel
made
two
motions
excluded
evidence
penalty
trial
evidence
pertaining
felony
defendant
yet
charged
counsel
argued
additional
evidence
exceeded
scope
evidence
admissible
sentencing
virginia
law
essence
prosecutor
trying
sorrell
case
minds
jurors
citing
watkins
commonwealth
cert
denied
although
counsel
also
complained
prepared
additional
evidence
petitioner
may
made
incriminating
statements
record
efense
taken
surprise
never
requested
continuance
trial
denied
motions
exclude
sentencing
phase
tucker
testified
shortly
mcclelland
murder
gray
pointed
picture
lisa
sorrell
newspaper
told
tucker
knocked
sorrell
petitioner
counsel
tucker
officer
michael
slezak
investigated
sorrell
murders
testified
found
lisa
body
front
seat
partially
burned
automobile
shanta
body
trunk
faruk
presswalla
medical
examiner
performed
autopsies
bodies
testified
lisa
killed
six
bullets
head
shot
gun
gray
supra
petitioner
counsel
presswalla
officer
slezak
suggest
mcclelland
murder
may
copycat
murder
committed
different
perpetrator
record
jury
fixed
petitioner
sentence
mcclelland
murder
death
trial
entered
judgment
verdicts
charges
petitioner
sentenced
death
virginia
affirmed
denied
certiorari
gray
virginia
suffolk
circuit
dismissed
petitioner
state
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
virginia
affirmed
dismissal
denied
certiorari
gray
thompson
commonwealth
moved
dismiss
petition
clarify
arguments
petitioner
sorrell
murder
claim
characterized
petitioner
allegations
seven
separate
subclaims
first
subclaim
asserted
petitioner
given
inadequate
notice
evidence
commonwealth
intended
introduce
permit
defend
third
relying
brady
maryland
asserted
commonwealth
failed
disclose
evidence
tending
prove
someone
else
committed
sorrell
murders
respondent
brief
support
motion
dismiss
ed
according
state
subclaim
meritless
basis
relief
federal
habeas
corpus
proceedings
sought
retroactive
application
new
rule
constitutional
law
commonwealth
alleged
brady
subclaim
presented
state
courts
direct
appeal
state
habeas
corpus
proceedings
thus
procedurally
barred
virginia
code
section
respondent
brief
support
motion
dismiss
supra
initially
district
dismissed
habeas
petition
adopted
commonwealth
characterization
petitioner
sorrell
claim
see
held
petitioner
entitled
relief
subclaim
constitutional
right
notice
individual
items
testimony
commonwealth
intends
introduce
penalty
phase
declined
review
brady
subclaim
procedurally
barred
later
petitioner
motion
district
amended
judgment
find
within
petitioner
sorrell
claim
specific
due
process
claim
admissibility
sorrell
murder
evidence
amending
judgment
announced
remained
unchanged
remaining
claims
dismissed
holding
evidentiary
hearing
sorrell
claim
district
ordered
petitioner
granted
writ
habeas
corpus
characterized
claim
allegation
petitioner
denied
due
process
law
fourteenth
amendment
constitution
commonwealth
failed
provide
fair
notice
evidence
concerning
sorrell
murders
introduced
penalty
phase
app
citing
gardner
florida
determined
constitutional
defect
petitioner
penalty
phase
hearing
petitioner
confronted
surprised
testimony
officer
slezak
dr
presswalla
app
defect
violated
petitioner
right
fair
notice
rendered
hearing
clearly
unreliable
petitioner
attorneys
less
one
day
notice
additional
evidence
used
client
commonwealth
appealed
arguing
fourth
circuit
grant
petitioner
habeas
relief
give
benefit
new
rule
federal
constitutional
law
violation
teague
lane
fourth
circuit
reversed
judgment
granting
writ
rejected
petitioner
dismissal
several
claims
remanded
directions
habeas
corpus
petition
dismissed
gray
thompson
distinguished
gardner
district
relied
petitioner
unlike
gardner
sentenced
basis
secret
information
thus
concluded
petitioner
claim
compelled
existing
precedent
time
conviction
became
final
thus
considered
federal
habeas
proceedings
teague
commonwealth
scheduled
petitioner
execution
december
petitioner
applied
stay
execution
petitioned
writ
certiorari
granted
stay
application
december
january
granted
certiorari
limited
questions
whether
petitioner
claim
stated
new
rule
whether
commonwealth
violated
petitioner
due
process
rights
brady
withholding
evidence
exculpating
responsibility
sorrell
murders
see
pet
cert
ii
petitioner
failure
raise
brady
claim
state
implicates
requirements
habeas
exhaustion
procedural
default
section
bars
granting
habeas
corpus
relief
unless
appears
applicant
exhausted
remedies
available
courts
state
requirement
refers
remedies
still
available
time
federal
petition
engle
isaac
satisfied
clear
habeas
petitioner
claims
procedurally
barred
state
law
castille
peoples
however
procedural
bar
gives
rise
exhaustion
provides
independent
adequate
statelaw
ground
conviction
sentence
thus
prevents
federal
habeas
corpus
review
defaulted
claim
unless
petitioner
demonstrate
cause
prejudice
default
teague
lane
supra
isaac
supra
wainright
sykes
virginia
writ
habeas
corpus
ad
subjiciendum
shall
granted
basis
allegation
facts
petitioner
knowledge
time
filing
previous
petition
code
ann
section
petitioner
knew
grounds
brady
claim
filed
first
petition
section
precludes
review
petitioner
claim
future
state
habeas
proceeding
petitioner
makes
attempt
demonstrate
cause
prejudice
default
state
habeas
proceedings
claim
cognizable
federal
suit
writ
iii
picard
connor
held
purposes
exhausting
state
remedies
claim
relief
habeas
corpus
must
include
reference
specific
federal
constitutional
guarantee
well
statement
facts
entitle
petitioner
relief
considered
whether
habeas
petitioner
entitled
relief
basis
claim
raised
state
courts
federal
habeas
petition
indictment
procedure
brought
trial
violated
equal
protection
announcing
substance
federal
habeas
corpus
claim
must
first
presented
state
courts
rejected
contention
petitioner
satisfied
exhaustion
requirement
section
presenting
state
courts
facts
necessary
state
claim
relief
state
dealt
arguments
habeas
petitioner
offered
fault
failing
also
consider
sua
sponte
whether
indictment
procedure
denied
petitioner
equal
protection
laws
also
indicated
enough
make
general
appeal
constitutional
guarantee
broad
due
process
present
substance
claim
state
anderson
harless
habeas
petitioner
granted
relief
ground
violated
due
process
jury
instruction
obviate
requirement
prosecutor
prove
elements
crime
beyond
reasonable
doubt
citing
sandstrom
montana
manner
habeas
petitioner
cited
federal
authority
referring
decision
defendant
asserted
broad
federal
due
process
right
jury
instructions
properly
explain
state
law
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
review
record
satisfied
us
sandstrom
claim
never
presented
considered
state
courts
found
especially
significant
broad
federal
due
process
right
habeas
petition
might
read
incorporate
include
particular
analysis
developed
cases
sandstrom
ibid
due
process
challenge
petitioner
brief
relies
two
particular
analys
es
due
process
ibid
relying
cases
like
gardner
florida
skipper
south
carolina
petitioner
argues
given
notice
issues
involved
sentencing
hearing
reasonably
enable
prepare
case
brief
petitioner
quoting
schwartz
administrative
law
ed
denied
fair
opportunity
heard
determinative
sentencing
issues
brief
petitioner
right
stems
defendant
legitimate
interest
character
procedure
leads
imposition
sentence
death
gardner
supra
justifies
giving
opportunity
deny
potentially
determinative
sentencing
information
yet
another
way
state
may
unconstitutionally
deprive
defendant
meaningful
opportunity
address
issues
simply
misinforming
brief
petitioner
petitioner
cites
ruffalo
raley
ohio
mooney
holohan
proposition
ruffalo
disbarment
proceeding
held
disbarred
attorney
given
notice
charges
ohio
committee
administered
bar
discipline
raley
chairman
members
state
investigating
commission
assured
witnesses
privilege
available
witnesses
convicted
contempt
ohio
held
state
immunity
statute
rendered
fifth
amendment
privilege
unavailable
mooney
holohan
defendant
alleged
prosecution
knowingly
used
perjured
testimony
trial
ambiguity
whether
misrepresentation
claim
raised
addressed
district
appeals
one
hand
district
ordered
relief
primarily
basis
gardner
lack
notice
supra
hand
district
findings
advert
deliberate
decision
prosecutor
mislead
petitioner
counsel
tactical
advantage
see
app
ambiguity
federal
record
complicates
procedural
default
issue
procedural
default
affirmative
defense
commonwealth
misrepresentation
claim
addressed
stage
federal
proceedings
commonwealth
obligated
raise
procedural
default
defense
lose
right
assert
defense
thereafter
see
jenkins
anderson
see
also
schiro
farley
remand
appeals
determine
whether
petitioner
fact
raised
briefs
merits
asserts
fundamental
complaint
throughout
litigation
commonwealth
affirmative
misrepresentation
regarding
presentation
sorrell
murders
deprived
petitioner
fair
sentencing
proceeding
reply
brief
petitioner
misrepresentation
claim
raised
appeals
consider
whether
commonwealth
preserved
defenses
proceed
consider
claim
preserved
defenses
appropriate
latest
petitioner
knew
start
trial
prosecutor
intended
introduce
evidence
tending
show
committed
sorrell
murders
knew
commonwealth
call
tucker
stand
repeat
statement
petitioner
admitted
committing
murders
see
app
record
nonetheless
contends
deprived
adequate
notice
witnesses
police
officer
medical
examiner
investigated
sorrell
murders
advised
prosecutor
call
evening
sentencing
hearing
app
record
petitioner
attempt
cure
inadequacy
notice
requesting
time
respond
evidence
instead
moved
excluded
evidence
penalty
trial
evidence
pertaining
felony
defendant
yet
charged
facts
petitioner
prevail
claim
must
establish
due
process
requires
receive
day
notice
commonwealth
evidence
must
also
establish
due
process
required
continuance
whether
sought
one
chose
seek
continuance
exclusion
appropriate
remedy
inadequate
notice
conclude
adoption
new
constitutional
rule
establish
propositions
defendant
right
notice
charges
must
defend
well
established
ruffalo
cole
arkansas
defendant
claim
right
notice
evidence
state
plans
use
prove
charges
stands
quite
different
footing
said
due
process
clause
little
say
regarding
amount
discovery
parties
must
afforded
wardius
oregon
weatherford
bursey
considered
due
process
claim
defendant
convicted
aid
surprise
testimony
accomplice
undercover
agent
although
prosecutor
intended
introduce
agent
testimony
changed
mind
day
trial
keep
cover
agent
told
defendant
counsel
testify
defendant
rejected
defendant
claim
explaining
general
constitutional
right
discovery
criminal
case
brady
addressed
exculpatory
evidence
create
one
put
mildly
cases
compel
order
prosecutor
disclose
evidence
import
fact
strongly
validity
petitioner
claim
petitioner
relies
principally
gardner
florida
proposition
defendant
may
sentenced
death
basis
information
opportunity
deny
explain
opinion
stevens
gardner
trial
sentenced
defendant
death
relying
part
evidence
assembled
presentence
investigation
state
parole
commission
investigation
report
contained
confidential
portion
disclosed
defense
counsel
gardner
literally
opportunity
even
see
confidential
information
let
alone
contest
petitioner
present
case
hand
opportunity
hear
testimony
officer
slezak
presswalla
open
claim
notice
much
akin
one
rejected
weatherford
supra
one
upheld
gardner
even
cases
otherwise
notice
issue
acknowledged
exclusion
evidence
sole
remedy
violation
conceded
right
notice
alibi
witness
taylor
illinois
said
situation
less
drastic
sanction
always
available
prejudice
minimized
granting
continuance
counsel
request
continuance
argued
exclusion
counsel
argued
evidence
excluded
prepared
contest
evidence
also
exceeded
standard
virginia
watkins
commonwealth
relevance
evidence
sentencing
see
record
view
petitioner
insistence
exclusion
evidence
trial
might
well
felt
interfering
tactical
decision
counsel
order
continuance
motion
dissent
argues
petitioner
seeks
benefit
rule
capital
defendant
must
afforded
meaningful
opportunity
explain
deny
evidence
introduced
sentencing
post
disagree
dissent
assertion
petitioner
moved
continuance
disagree
characterization
constitutional
rule
underlying
claim
relief
compare
supra
post
dissent
glosses
similarities
case
weatherford
dictate
post
disposition
petitioner
clearly
precedent
cited
dissent
even
without
weatherford
petitioner
failure
move
continuance
still
think
doctrine
meaningless
applied
level
generality
sawyer
smith
therefore
hold
petitioner
claim
require
adoption
new
constitutional
rule
observed
saffle
parks
paradigmatic
example
watershed
rule
criminal
procedure
requirement
counsel
provided
criminal
trials
serious
offenses
citing
gideon
wainwright
whatever
one
may
think
importance
petitioner
proposed
rule
none
primacy
centrality
rule
adopted
gideon
rules
may
thought
within
exception
parks
supra
rule
teague
therefore
applies
petitioner
may
obtain
habeas
relief
claim
iv
ordered
justice
stevens
dissenting
justice
ginsburg
cogently
explained
law
requires
reversal
judgment
appeals
join
opinion
additional
observation
evidence
tending
support
proposition
petitioner
committed
sorrell
murders
even
sufficient
support
filing
charges
whatever
limits
due
process
places
upon
introduction
evidence
unadjudicated
conduct
capital
cases
surely
exceeded
given
vital
importance
decision
impose
death
sentence
appear
based
reason
rather
caprice
emotion
sentencing
proceeding
fundamentally
unfair
even
prosecutors
given
defense
counsel
fair
notice
intent
offer
evidence
see
gardner
florida
opinion
stevens
justice
ginsburg
justice
stevens
justice
souter
justice
breyer
join
dissenting
basic
due
process
criminal
proceedings
right
full
fair
potentially
effective
opportunity
defend
state
charges
petitioner
gray
accorded
fundamental
right
penalty
phase
trial
capital
murder
therefore
conclude
new
rule
implicated
petition
habeas
corpus
dissent
decision
denies
gray
resentencing
proceeding
seeks
conference
guilt
phase
began
gray
lawyers
requested
order
directing
prosecutor
disclose
evidence
introduce
penalty
phase
gray
convicted
defense
counsel
wanted
know
particular
whether
prosecutor
planned
introduce
evidence
relating
murders
lisa
sorrell
daughter
shanta
defense
counsel
informed
trial
basis
request
honor
concern
probably
best
stop
middle
day
late
afternoon
start
penalty
trial
next
day
good
reason
believe
prosecutor
going
call
people
introduce
statement
client
supposedly
made
another
inmate
murdered
sorrells
violent
crimes
throughout
entire
area
comes
going
want
know
advance
prepared
argument
absolute
dynamite
joint
appendix
pp
hereinafter
response
defense
counsel
disclosure
request
prosecutor
told
gray
lawyers
introduce
statements
gray
made
inmates
gray
allegedly
admitted
killing
sorrells
following
exchange
took
place
defense
counsel
moore
prosecutor
ferguson
moore
going
evidence
statement
ferguson
statements
client
made
moore
nothing
statements
ferguson
people
correct
statements
made
client
things
emphasis
added
evening
prosecutor
informed
defense
counsel
addition
gray
statements
planned
introduce
evidence
relating
sorrell
murders
evidence
included
testimony
detective
slezak
police
officer
investigated
sorrell
murders
regarding
observations
crime
scene
shortly
bodies
lisa
shanta
discovered
graphic
photographs
crime
scene
depicting
interior
partially
burned
car
lisa
body
front
seat
shanta
body
trunk
testimony
doctor
presswalla
state
medical
examiner
conducted
autopsies
victims
regarding
causes
deaths
graphic
photographs
victims
time
autopsies
including
photograph
depicting
back
lisa
head
shaved
reveal
six
gunshot
wounds
doctor
presswalla
autopsy
reports
see
app
additional
evidence
advanced
prosecutor
eve
penalty
phase
suggested
sorrell
murders
carried
manner
strikingly
similar
murder
mcclelland
gray
commonwealth
like
lisa
sorrell
mcclelland
shot
six
times
head
car
partially
burned
defense
counsel
later
explained
similarities
mcclelland
murder
sorrell
murder
obvious
anyone
sitting
jury
box
app
friday
morning
december
trial
proceedings
resumed
defense
counsel
informed
thursday
evening
developments
gray
lawyers
told
learned
first
time
previous
evening
prosecutor
planned
introduce
evidence
relating
sorrell
murders
gray
alleged
statements
counsel
stated
prepared
rebut
statements
prepared
rebut
additional
evidence
shortness
notice
prepared
try
sorrell
murder
today
counsel
told
given
sufficient
notice
ibid
gray
lawyers
argued
case
relied
prosecutor
watkins
commonwealth
distinguishable
counsel
explained
separate
murder
charges
outstanding
defendant
lawyers
representing
watkins
first
murder
trial
already
representing
respect
second
murders
aware
charges
aware
evidence
available
commonwealth
second
murder
charge
position
confront
evidence
come
penalty
trial
contrast
situation
watkins
counsel
pointed
prepared
gray
may
made
incriminating
statements
trial
nonetheless
ruled
sorrell
murders
evidence
admissible
stage
trial
penalty
phase
trial
commenced
prosecutor
keeping
representations
guilt
phase
began
called
melvin
tucker
stand
tucker
gray
accomplice
mcclelland
murder
along
gray
initially
charged
capital
murder
plea
negotiations
however
prosecutor
agreed
reduce
charge
tucker
murder
noncapital
offense
exchange
tucker
testimony
gray
app
tucker
testified
guilt
phase
gray
triggerman
mcclelland
murder
tucker
testified
penalty
phase
shortly
mcclelland
robbery
gray
searching
newspaper
information
crime
according
tucker
gray
stated
knocked
lisa
sorrell
pointed
picture
lisa
sorrell
newspaper
gray
lawyers
declined
tucker
penalty
phase
testimony
view
tucker
motive
lie
already
adequately
exposed
guilt
phase
see
testimony
defense
counsel
moore
melvin
tucker
extensively
guilt
phase
jurors
sitting
guilt
trial
penalty
phase
told
drawn
pretty
accurate
picture
melvin
tucker
strike
deal
tell
anybody
anything
wanted
hear
save
life
need
brought
prosecutor
called
detective
slezak
defense
counsel
renewed
objection
outside
presence
jury
admission
evidence
relating
sorrell
murders
gray
statements
counsel
reiterated
notice
taken
surprise
prosecutor
going
today
emphasized
said
going
beginning
trial
adhered
earlier
ruling
evidence
admissible
nothing
tucker
testimony
linking
gray
sorrell
murders
trial
allowed
prosecutor
introduce
testimony
detective
slezak
doctor
presswalla
well
crime
scene
autopsy
photographs
victims
autopsy
reports
see
supra
defense
case
gray
took
stand
admitted
complicity
mcclelland
murder
denied
triggerman
denied
involvement
sorrell
murders
app
closing
arguments
prosecutor
highlighted
similarities
sorrell
mcclelland
murders
urged
gray
commission
sorrell
murders
demonstrated
future
dangerous
ness
see
jury
fixed
gray
punishment
death
gray
unsuccessfully
argued
direct
appeal
virginia
state
habeas
proceedings
admission
additional
sorrell
murders
evidence
violated
right
fair
trial
fourteenth
amendment
gray
filed
federal
habeas
petition
district
eastern
district
virginia
gray
argued
among
things
admission
sorrell
murders
evidence
violated
fourteenth
amendment
rights
specifically
asserted
commonwealth
disclose
intentions
use
sorrell
murders
evidence
gray
late
date
impossible
gray
defense
counsel
reasonably
prepare
defend
evidence
trial
late
notice
gray
adequately
prepare
defend
innocence
regarding
sorrell
murders
conducting
evidentiary
hearing
district
granted
gray
writ
habeas
corpus
relying
primarily
gardner
florida
held
gray
due
process
rights
violated
commonwealth
failed
provide
fair
notice
evidence
concerning
sorrell
murders
introduced
penalty
phase
app
consequently
gray
became
vulnerable
death
sentence
basis
information
scant
opportunity
deny
explain
see
recalling
prosecutor
monday
morning
affirmations
introduce
gray
statements
district
noted
gray
lawyers
clearly
justifiably
shocked
prosecutor
reported
thursday
evening
intention
introduce
next
day
evidence
sorrell
murders
sorrell
murder
evidence
gray
lawyers
prepared
challenge
district
recounted
evidence
prosecutor
indicated
introduce
outset
trial
melvin
tucker
statement
gray
allegedly
confessed
murders
prosecutor
surprise
move
disarmed
gray
counsel
district
recognized
leaving
without
capacity
detective
slezak
doctor
presswalla
effectively
result
sorrell
murders
evidence
carrie
assurance
reliability
consequences
surprise
district
found
devastating
critically
prosecutor
statements
assurance
led
defense
counsel
forgo
investigation
details
sorrell
murders
including
review
evidence
collected
chesapeake
police
department
investigation
crimes
see
ibid
gray
lawyers
conducted
review
shown
none
forensic
evidence
collected
chesapeake
police
directly
linked
gray
sorrell
murders
moreover
evidence
chesapeake
police
obtain
strongly
suggested
timothy
sorrell
husband
shanta
actually
committed
notorious
murders
police
subsequently
learned
timothy
sorrell
apparent
motive
murders
two
weeks
lisa
shanta
killed
sorrells
obtained
life
insurance
policy
designated
timothy
shanta
beneficiaries
event
lisa
death
lisa
parents
later
filed
lawsuit
stop
sorrell
obtaining
proceeds
insurance
policy
alleging
responsible
lisa
death
ibid
addition
police
uncovered
evidence
suggesting
sorrell
involved
stolen
merchandise
ring
place
employment
naval
supply
center
lisa
angry
unhappy
husband
apparent
criminal
activities
based
information
detective
slezak
asked
local
commonwealth
attorney
determine
whether
appropriate
prosecute
timothy
sorrell
ibid
assessing
prejudicial
potency
sorrell
murders
evidence
admitted
penalty
phase
gray
trial
district
concluded
due
process
violation
harmless
district
therefore
vacated
gray
death
sentence
remanded
case
state
trial
resentencing
appeals
fourth
circuit
reversed
gray
thompson
held
federal
habeas
relief
barred
gray
due
process
claim
depended
new
rule
constitutional
law
teague
lane
applied
collateral
review
appeals
accordingly
remanded
case
directing
district
dismiss
gray
habeas
petition
ii
gray
claim
encompassing
fundamental
due
process
clause
contends
capital
defendant
must
afforded
meaningful
opportunity
explain
deny
evidence
introduced
sentencing
see
brief
petitioner
reply
brief
petitioner
district
concluded
gray
stripped
meaningful
opportunity
explain
deny
sorrell
murders
evidence
lawyers
unfairly
ambushed
surprised
devastatingly
disarmed
prosecutor
decision
announced
eve
penalty
trial
introduce
extensive
evidence
gray
statements
app
gray
counsel
reasonably
relied
prosecutor
unequivocal
statements
pledge
see
made
outset
trial
based
prosecutor
assurances
defense
counsel
spent
resources
tracking
information
police
records
sorrell
murders
prosecutor
switch
altogether
unanticipated
defense
counsel
left
chance
uncover
investigation
information
defused
prosecutor
case
short
without
time
prepare
effective
defense
fourth
circuit
recast
gray
claim
transforming
assertion
broad
constitutional
right
discovery
capital
cases
see
also
restates
reshapes
gray
claim
first
slices
gray
whole
claim
pieces
deals
discretely
segment
perceive
ante
misrepresentation
claim
ante
supposed
claim
ante
gray
however
never
claimed
constitutional
right
advance
discovery
commonwealth
evidence
brief
petitioner
accompanying
text
claim
basic
succumb
artificial
endeavors
divide
conquer
nothing
new
rule
capital
defendants
must
afforded
meaningful
opportunity
defend
state
penalty
phase
evidence
affirmed
century
ago
common
justice
requires
man
shall
condemned
person
property
without
opportunity
make
defence
baldwin
hale
wall
see
also
windsor
mcveigh
pro
forma
opportunity
due
process
demands
opportunity
heard
meaningful
time
meaningful
manner
armstrong
manzo
see
oliver
defendant
must
afforded
reasonable
opportunity
meet
charges
way
defense
explanation
morgan
right
hearing
embraces
right
present
evidence
also
reasonable
opportunity
know
claims
opposing
party
meet
absent
full
fair
potentially
effective
opportunity
defend
state
charges
right
hearing
barren
one
ibid
see
mullane
central
hanover
bank
trust
process
mere
gesture
due
process
gardner
florida
principal
decision
relied
district
confirmed
sentencing
phase
capital
trial
must
satisfy
requirements
due
process
clause
plurality
opinion
gardner
presented
question
whether
defendant
denied
due
process
trial
judge
sentenced
death
relying
part
presentence
report
including
confidential
portion
disclosed
defense
counsel
counsel
deprivation
opportunity
challenge
accuracy
materiality
undisclosed
information
gardner
plurality
reasoned
left
manifest
risk
information
accepted
confidence
may
erroneous
misinterpreted
basis
death
sentence
gardner
teaches
information
unexposed
adversary
testing
qualify
reliable
see
ibid
gardner
vacated
defendant
sentence
concluding
denied
due
process
law
death
penalty
imposed
least
part
basis
information
opportunity
deny
explain
urging
gardner
fails
dictate
decision
gray
commonwealth
relies
fourth
circuit
reasoning
effect
gardner
case
secrecy
gray
case
surprise
see
therefore
gray
seeks
extension
application
gardner
see
brief
respondent
teague
parlance
new
rule
brief
respondent
impermissible
leap
fourth
circuit
maintained
equate
failure
disclose
disclosure
fact
made
allegedly
late
unfair
teague
straightjacket
commonwealth
misunderstands
teague
requires
federal
courts
decide
habeas
petitioner
constitutional
claims
according
law
prevailing
time
conviction
became
final
teague
plurality
opinion
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
teague
bar
federal
habeas
courts
applying
myriad
factual
contexts
law
right
meaningful
chance
defend
explain
charges
pressed
state
see
wright
west
kennedy
concurring
judgment
beginning
point
rule
general
application
rule
designed
specific
purpose
evaluating
myriad
factual
contexts
infrequent
case
yields
result
novel
forges
new
rule
one
dictated
district
forg
new
rule
holding
facts
case
gray
denied
meaningful
opportunity
challenge
sorrell
murders
evidence
ordinarily
incumbent
upon
defense
counsel
receiving
adequate
notice
triable
issues
pursue
whatever
investigation
needed
rebut
relevant
evidence
state
may
introduce
however
keeping
practice
approved
virginia
highest
see
supra
prosecutor
expressly
delineated
scope
character
evidence
introduce
respect
sorrell
murders
nothing
statements
gray
allegedly
made
see
supra
gray
lawyers
reasonably
relied
prosecutor
statements
assurance
forgoing
inquiry
details
sorrell
crimes
investigation
responsibly
determined
unnecessary
cast
doubt
veracity
inmate
snitch
testimony
evidence
prosecutor
initially
said
offer
gray
lawyers
undeniably
caught
short
prosecutor
startling
announcement
night
penalty
phase
begin
effect
put
sorrell
murders
point
gray
lawyers
possibly
conduct
investigation
preparation
necessary
counter
prosecutor
newly
announced
evidence
thus
penalty
trial
defense
counsel
reduced
nearly
role
spectators
lacking
proof
later
uncovered
strongly
suggested
timothy
sorrell
gray
actual
killer
app
gray
lawyers
mount
feeble
detective
slezak
counsel
simply
inquired
detective
whether
crimes
prompt
copycat
crimes
see
gray
lawyers
questions
doctor
presswalla
medical
examiner
testified
sorrell
autopsies
sum
record
shows
beyond
genuine
debate
gray
afforded
meaningful
opportunity
defend
additional
sorrell
murders
evidence
fatal
infection
present
gardner
infects
case
well
defense
counsel
effectively
deprived
opportunity
challenge
accuracy
materiality
information
relied
imposing
death
sentence
gardner
unexposed
adversary
testing
sorrell
murders
evidence
carrie
assurance
reliability
app
debate
adversaries
valued
system
justice
contribution
function
trials
gardner
precluded
prosecutor
shift
trial
tolerance
hold
otherwise
simply
ignore
actualities
powell
alabama
reasons
stated
conclude
district
decision
vacating
gray
death
sentence
rest
new
rule
constitutional
law
therefore
reverse
judgment
appeals
respectfully
dissent
decision
footnotes
prosecutor
introduced
testimony
evidence
petitioner
future
dangerousness
prosecutor
also
introduced
evidence
petitioner
criminal
record
included
felony
convictions
least
crimes
violence
including
armed
robbery
malicious
wounding
petitioner
record
revealed
locked
restaurant
employees
food
freezer
robbing
restaurant
threatened
lives
two
persons
mcclelland
gray
commonwealth
cert
denied
five
subclaims
relevant
review
petitioner
object
later
start
penalty
phase
admission
sorrell
murder
evidence
counsel
conceded
prepared
refute
evidence
consisted
testimony
tucker
petitioner
fellow
inmates
petitioner
admitted
killing
sorrells
see
record
district
described
petitioners
counsel
made
plea
additional
time
prepare
app
appeals
found
plea
insufficient
legal
effect
defense
felt
unprepared
undertake
effective
one
think
formal
motion
continuance
forthcoming
none
ever
made
counsel
moved
evidence
excluded
gray
thompson
agree
appeals
request
made
pursuant
peterson
commonwealth
instructed
virginia
law
preferred
practice
capital
trials
make
known
defendant
trial
evidence
adduced
penalty
stage
found
guilty
gray
convicted
killing
sorrells
virginia
law
bar
admission
evidence
relating
crimes
penalty
phase
trial
one
virginia
two
aggravating
circumstances
requires
jury
determine
whether
probability
defendant
commit
criminal
acts
violence
constitute
continuing
serious
threat
society
code
ann
section
virginia
held
evidence
prior
unadjudicated
criminal
conduct
may
used
penalty
phase
prove
defendant
propensity
commit
criminal
acts
violence
future
watkins
commonwealth
district
suggested
one
respect
version
events
implausible
mcclelland
murder
occurred
may
six
months
sorrells
killed
newspaper
may
containing
photograph
lisa
sorrell
ever
introduced
evidence
see
app
district
noted
regard
investigator
engaged
gray
federal
habeas
counsel
run
driving
test
indicating
coleman
gray
performed
sorrell
murders
wife
dinner
hour
prosecutor
speculated
police
designated
sorrell
sole
suspect
evidence
sent
crime
labs
analysis
asked
describe
sorrell
demeanor
made
suspicious
slezak
testified
know
describe
say
expect
find
situation
like
seemed
defensive
contrast
police
never
established
gray
supposed
motive
killing
sorrells
lisa
found
jewelry
necklace
gold
earrings
undisturbed
well
cash
postal
money
order
suggesting
robbery
perpetrator
motive
despite
defense
counsel
pretrial
request
exculpatory
evidence
pursuant
brady
maryland
prosecutor
never
disclosed
evidence
incriminating
timothy
sorrell
gray
presented
brady
claim
federal
habeas
petition
district
noted
claim
raised
state
therefore
held
procedurally
barred
gray
trial
local
prosecutor
reportedly
stated
affidavit
sorrell
longer
suspect
see
news
report
cf
gault
notice
parents
night
juvenile
delinquency
hearing
constitutionally
inadequate
due
process
requires
notice
given
sufficiently
advance
scheduled
proceedings
reasonable
opportunity
prepare
afforded
powell
alabama
defense
counsel
appointed
morning
trial
satisfy
constitutional
requirement
counsel
lacked
opportunity
investigate
case
observed
decide
otherwise
simply
ignore
actualities
attaches
weight
failure
gray
lawyers
ask
explicitly
deferral
penalty
phase
see
ante
uncontested
defense
counsel
made
formal
motion
continuance
district
described
episode
counsel
plea
ded
additional
time
prepare
app
earlier
noted
see
supra
counsel
explicit
dilemma
confronting
defense
prepared
try
sorrell
murder
today
suggestion
plea
insufficient
legal
effect
ante
puzzling
neither
fourth
circuit
commonwealth
cited
virginia
authority
proposition
cf
smith
estelle
state
points
us
rule
texas
law
saying
moving
continuance
way
object
surprise
aff
grounds
given
potency
evidence
question
difficult
comprehend
speculation
defense
counsel
tactical
reasons
may
wanted
exclusion
time
compare
ante
tr
oral
arg
counsel
petitioner
urged
trial
judge
asked
please
stop
happening
violates
client
right
fair
trial
existence
right
turn
whether
counsel
next
says
please
exclude
evidence
opposed
please
give
time
weatherford
bursey
featured
see
ante
hardly
controls
case
state
witness
prosecutor
misled
defense
counsel
furthermore
weatherford
involve
penalty
phase
capital
trial
stage
reliability
concerns
vital
finally
defendant
weatherford
object
trial
surprise
witness
later
show
prejudiced
surprise