hall
florida
argued
march
decided
may
held
eighth
fourteenth
amendments
forbid
execution
persons
intellectual
disability
see
atkins
virginia
hall
asked
florida
state
vacate
sentence
presenting
evidence
included
iq
test
score
denied
motion
determining
florida
statute
mandated
show
iq
score
permitted
present
additional
intellectual
disability
evidence
state
rejected
hall
appeal
finding
state
threshold
constitutional
held
state
threshold
requirement
interpreted
florida
unconstitutional
pp
eighth
amendment
reaffirms
duty
government
respect
dignity
persons
roper
simmons
prohibits
execution
persons
intellectual
disability
legitimate
penological
purpose
served
executing
intellectually
disabled
atkins
prohibiting
executions
also
protects
integrity
trial
process
individuals
face
special
risk
wrongful
execution
likely
give
false
confessions
often
poor
witnesses
less
able
give
meaningful
assistance
counsel
determining
whether
florida
intellectual
disability
definition
implements
principles
atkins
holding
proper
consider
psychiatric
professional
studies
elaborate
purpose
meaning
iq
scores
scores
relate
atkins
consider
several
implemented
atkins
pp
florida
rule
disregards
established
medical
practice
face
florida
statute
consistent
views
medical
community
discussed
atkins
conclusions
reached
defines
intellectual
disability
existence
concurrent
deficits
intellectual
adaptive
functioning
long
defining
characteristic
intellectual
disability
see
atkins
supra
nothing
statute
precludes
florida
considering
iq
test
standard
error
measurement
sem
statistical
fact
reflecting
test
inherent
imprecision
acknowledging
individual
score
best
understood
range
five
points
either
side
recorded
score
interpreted
florida
however
florida
rule
disregards
established
medical
practice
two
interrelated
ways
takes
iq
score
final
conclusive
evidence
defendant
intellectual
capacity
experts
consider
evidence
relies
purportedly
scientific
measurement
defendant
abilities
refusing
recognize
measurement
inherent
imprecision
professionals
long
agreed
iq
test
scores
read
range
florida
uses
test
score
fixed
number
thus
barring
consideration
relevant
evidence
deficits
adaptive
functioning
including
evidence
past
performance
environment
upbringing
pp
rejection
strict
cutoff
vast
majority
consistency
trend
roper
supra
toward
recognizing
sem
provide
strong
evidence
consensus
society
regard
strict
cutoff
proper
humane
nine
mandate
strict
iq
score
cutoff
thus
individual
hall
position
deemed
automatically
eligible
death
penalty
direction
change
consistent
since
atkins
many
passed
legislation
comply
constitutional
requirement
persons
intellectual
disability
executed
two
appear
set
strict
cutoff
least
others
either
abolished
death
penalty
passed
legislation
allowing
defendants
present
additional
intellectual
disability
evidence
iq
score
every
state
legislature
save
one
considered
issue
atkins
whose
law
interpreted
courts
taken
position
contrary
florida
pp
atkins
acknowledges
inherent
error
iq
testing
provides
substantial
guidance
definition
intellectual
disability
play
critical
role
advancing
protections
atkins
providing
understanding
intellectual
disability
measured
assessed
atkins
give
unfettered
discretion
define
full
scope
constitutional
protection
clinical
definitions
intellectual
disability
express
terms
rejected
strict
iq
test
score
cutoff
long
included
sem
fundamental
premise
atkins
see
nn
fleeting
mention
florida
citation
listing
outlawed
execution
intellectually
disabled
signal
atkins
approval
state
current
understanding
law
yet
interpreted
florida
require
strict
cutoff
pp
defendant
iq
test
score
falls
within
test
acknowledged
inherent
margin
error
defendant
must
able
present
additional
evidence
intellectual
disability
including
testimony
regarding
adaptive
deficits
legal
determination
intellectual
disability
distinct
medical
diagnosis
informed
medical
community
diagnostic
framework
particular
help
alternative
intellectual
disability
definition
presented
placed
substantial
reliance
medical
profession
expertise
pp
reversed
remanded
kennedy
delivered
opinion
ginsburg
breyer
sotomayor
kagan
joined
alito
filed
dissenting
opinion
roberts
scalia
thomas
joined
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
freddie
lee
hall
petitioner
florida
writ
certiorari
florida
may
justice
kennedy
delivered
opinion
held
eighth
fourteenth
amendments
constitution
forbid
execution
persons
intellectual
disability
atkins
virginia
florida
law
defines
intellectual
disability
require
iq
test
score
less
test
scores
prisoner
deemed
iq
exploration
intellectual
disability
foreclosed
rigid
rule
holds
creates
unacceptable
risk
persons
intellectual
disability
executed
thus
unconstitutional
february
freddie
lee
hall
petitioner
accomplice
mark
ruffin
kidnaped
beat
raped
murdered
karol
hurst
pregnant
newlywed
afterward
hall
ruffin
drove
convenience
store
planned
rob
parking
lot
store
killed
lonnie
coburn
sheriff
deputy
attempted
apprehend
hall
received
death
penalty
murders
although
sentence
coburn
murder
later
reduced
account
insufficient
evidence
premeditation
hall
florida
per
curiam
hall
argues
executed
intellectual
disability
previous
opinions
employed
term
mental
retardation
opinion
uses
term
intellectual
disability
describe
identical
phenomenon
see
rosa
law
stat
changing
entries
code
mental
retardation
intellectual
disability
schalock
et
al
renaming
mental
retardation
understanding
change
term
intellectual
disability
intellectual
developmental
disabilities
change
terminology
approved
used
latest
edition
diagnostic
statistical
manual
mental
disorders
one
basic
texts
used
psychiatrists
experts
manual
often
referred
initials
dsm
followed
edition
number
see
american
psychiatric
association
diagnostic
statistical
manual
mental
disorders
ed
hall
first
sentenced
yet
ruled
eighth
amendment
prohibits
imposing
death
penalty
persons
intellectual
disability
see
penry
lynaugh
time
florida
law
consider
intellectual
disability
statutory
mitigating
factor
held
capital
defendants
must
permitted
present
nonstatutory
mitigating
evidence
death
penalty
proceedings
hitchcock
dugger
hall
resentenced
hall
presented
substantial
unchallenged
evidence
intellectual
disability
school
records
indicated
teachers
identified
numerous
occasions
entally
retarded
app
hall
prosecuted
different
earlier
crime
lawyer
matter
later
testified
lawyer
ould
really
understand
anything
hall
said
respect
murder
trial
given
case
hall
counsel
recalled
hall
assist
defense
mental
level
much
lower
age
best
comparable
lawyer
daughter
brief
petitioner
number
medical
clinicians
testified
professional
opinion
hall
significantly
retarded
app
mentally
retarded
levels
understanding
typically
seen
toddlers
explained
detail
individual
ability
lack
ability
adapt
adjust
requirements
daily
life
success
lack
success
central
framework
followed
psychiatrists
professionals
diagnosing
intellectual
disability
see
hall
siblings
testified
something
wrong
child
app
hall
slow
speech
slow
learn
walked
talked
long
brothers
sisters
great
difficulty
forming
words
hall
upbringing
appeared
make
deficits
adaptive
functioning
severe
hall
raised
words
sentencing
judge
horrible
family
circumstances
imaginable
eachers
siblings
alike
immediately
recognized
hall
significantly
mentally
retarded
retardation
garner
sympathy
mother
rather
caused
much
scorn
befall
hall
onstantly
beaten
made
simple
mistakes
ibid
mother
strap
hall
bed
night
rope
thrown
rafter
morning
awaken
hall
hoisting
whipping
belt
rope
cord
ibid
hall
beaten
ten
fifteen
times
week
sometimes
mother
tied
sack
swung
fire
beat
buried
sand
neck
legs
held
gun
hall
poked
sticks
hall
florida
barkett
dissenting
jury
notwithstanding
testimony
voted
sentence
hall
death
sentencing
adopted
jury
recommendation
found
substantial
evidence
record
support
finding
freddie
lee
hall
mentally
retarded
entire
life
app
yet
also
suspect
ed
defense
experts
guilty
professional
overkill
othing
experts
testified
explain
psychotic
person
formulate
plan
whereby
car
stolen
convenience
store
robbed
sentencing
went
state
even
assuming
expert
testimony
accurate
learning
disabilities
mental
retardation
mental
difficulties
used
justify
excuse
extenuate
moral
culpability
defendant
cause
hall
sentenced
death
florida
affirmed
concluding
hall
argument
mental
retardation
provided
pretense
moral
legal
justification
merit
hall
chief
justice
barkett
dissented
arguing
executing
person
intellectual
disability
violated
state
constitution
prohibition
cruel
unusual
punishment
ruled
eighth
amendment
prohibited
execution
persons
intellectual
disability
atkins
virginia
november
hall
filed
motion
claiming
intellectual
disability
executed
five
years
later
florida
held
hearing
consider
hall
motion
hall
presented
evidence
intellectual
disability
including
iq
test
score
hall
received
nine
iq
evaluations
years
scores
ranging
brief
respondent
sentencing
excluded
two
scores
evidentiary
reasons
leaving
scores
see
app
response
florida
argued
hall
found
intellectually
disabled
florida
law
requires
threshold
matter
hall
show
iq
test
score
presenting
additional
evidence
intellectual
disability
app
nder
law
person
mentally
retarded
florida
rejected
hall
appeal
held
florida
threshold
constitutional
granted
certiorari
ii
eighth
amendment
provides
xcessive
bail
shall
required
excessive
fines
imposed
cruel
unusual
punishments
inflicted
fourteenth
amendment
applies
restrictions
roper
simmons
furman
georgia
per
curiam
protecting
even
convicted
heinous
crimes
eighth
amendment
reaffirms
duty
government
respect
dignity
persons
roper
supra
see
also
trop
dulles
plurality
opinion
basic
concept
underlying
eighth
amendment
nothing
less
dignity
man
eighth
amendment
fastened
obsolete
may
acquire
meaning
public
opinion
becomes
enlightened
humane
justice
weems
enforce
constitution
protection
human
dignity
looks
evolving
standards
decency
mark
progress
maturing
society
trop
supra
eighth
amendment
protection
dignity
reflects
nation
nation
nation
aspire
affirm
nation
constant
unyielding
purpose
must
transmit
constitution
precepts
guarantees
retain
meaning
force
eighth
amendment
prohibits
certain
punishments
categorical
matter
citizen
may
denaturalized
ibid
person
may
sentenced
death
crime
committed
juvenile
roper
supra
relevant
case
persons
intellectual
disability
may
executed
atkins
legitimate
penological
purpose
served
executing
person
intellectual
disability
contravenes
eighth
amendment
impose
harshest
punishments
intellectually
disabled
person
violates
inherent
dignity
human
unishment
justified
one
three
principal
rationales
rehabilitation
deterrence
retribution
kennedy
louisiana
rehabilitation
evident
applicable
rationale
death
penalty
see
gregg
georgia
joint
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
deterrence
intellectual
disability
reason
condition
likely
unable
make
calculated
judgments
premise
deterrence
rationale
diminished
ability
process
information
learn
experience
engage
logical
reasoning
control
impulses
make
less
likely
process
information
possibility
execution
penalty
result
control
conduct
based
upon
information
atkins
retributive
values
also
executing
intellectual
disability
diminished
capacity
intellectually
disabled
lessens
moral
culpability
hence
retributive
value
punishment
see
culpability
average
murderer
insufficient
justify
extreme
sanction
available
state
lesser
culpability
mentally
retarded
offender
surely
merit
form
retribution
reason
imposing
death
penalty
person
intellectually
disabled
protect
integrity
trial
process
persons
face
special
risk
wrongful
execution
likely
give
false
confessions
often
poor
witnesses
less
able
give
meaningful
assistance
counsel
say
current
law
persons
intellectual
disability
meet
law
requirements
criminal
responsibility
may
tried
punished
may
however
receive
law
severe
sentence
question
case
presents
intellectual
disability
must
defined
order
implement
principles
holding
atkins
determine
florida
cutoff
rule
valid
proper
consider
psychiatric
professional
studies
elaborate
purpose
meaning
iq
scores
determine
scores
relate
holding
atkins
turn
leads
better
understanding
legislative
policies
various
holdings
state
courts
implement
atkins
rule
understanding
informs
determination
whether
consensus
instructs
decide
specific
issue
presented
conclusion
must
express
independent
determination
reached
light
instruction
found
sources
authorities
iii
state
courts
state
legislatures
consult
informed
work
medical
experts
determining
intellectual
disability
unsurprising
professionals
use
learning
skills
study
consider
consequences
classification
schemes
devise
diagnosis
persons
mental
psychiatric
disorders
disabilities
society
relies
upon
medical
professional
expertise
define
explain
diagnose
mental
condition
issue
definition
intellectual
disability
skilled
professionals
implications
far
beyond
confines
death
penalty
relevant
education
access
social
programs
medical
treatment
plans
determining
qualifies
intellectually
disabled
proper
consult
medical
community
opinions
noted
atkins
medical
community
defines
intellectual
disability
according
three
criteria
significantly
subaverage
intellectual
functioning
deficits
adaptive
functioning
inability
learn
basic
skills
adjust
behavior
changing
circumstances
onset
deficits
developmental
period
see
brief
american
psychological
association
et
al
amici
curiae
hereinafter
apa
brief
last
factor
referred
age
onset
issue
first
second
criteria
deficits
intellectual
functioning
deficits
adaptive
functioning
central
context
formal
assessment
existence
concurrent
deficits
intellectual
adaptive
functioning
long
defining
characteristic
intellectual
disability
face
florida
statute
consistent
views
medical
community
noted
discussed
atkins
florida
statute
defines
intellectual
disability
purposes
atkins
proceeding
significantly
subaverage
general
intellectual
functioning
existing
concurrently
deficits
adaptive
behavior
manifested
period
conception
age
stat
statute
defines
significantly
subaverage
general
intellectual
functioning
performance
two
standard
deviations
mean
score
standardized
intelligence
test
ibid
mean
iq
test
score
concept
standard
deviation
describes
scores
dispersed
population
standard
deviation
distinct
standard
error
measurement
concept
describes
reliability
test
discussed
standard
deviation
iq
test
approximately
points
two
standard
deviations
approximately
points
thus
test
taker
performs
two
standard
deviations
mean
score
approximately
points
mean
iq
test
score
approximately
points
face
statute
interpreted
consistently
atkins
conclusions
reaches
instant
case
nothing
statute
precludes
florida
taking
account
iq
test
standard
error
measurement
discussed
evidence
florida
legislature
intended
include
measurement
error
calculation
florida
interpreted
provisions
held
person
whose
test
score
including
score
within
margin
measurement
error
intellectual
disability
barred
presenting
evidence
show
faculties
limited
see
cherry
state
per
curiam
strict
iq
test
score
cutoff
issue
case
pursuant
mandatory
cutoff
sentencing
courts
consider
even
substantial
weighty
evidence
intellectual
disability
measured
made
manifest
defendant
failure
inability
adapt
social
cultural
environment
including
medical
histories
behavioral
records
school
tests
reports
testimony
regarding
past
behavior
family
circumstances
even
though
medical
community
accepts
evidence
probative
intellectual
disability
including
individuals
iq
test
score
see
apa
brief
relevant
clinical
authorities
agree
individual
iq
score
may
properly
diagnosed
intellectual
disability
significant
limitations
adaptive
functioning
also
exist
person
iq
score
may
severe
adaptive
behavior
problems
person
actual
functioning
comparable
individuals
lower
iq
score
florida
rule
disregards
established
medical
practice
two
interrelated
ways
takes
iq
score
final
conclusive
evidence
defendant
intellectual
capacity
experts
field
consider
evidence
also
relies
purportedly
scientific
measurement
defendant
abilities
iq
score
refusing
recognize
score
terms
imprecise
professionals
design
administer
interpret
iq
tests
agreed
years
iq
test
scores
read
single
fixed
number
range
see
wechsler
measurement
adult
intelligence
ed
reporting
range
error
early
iq
test
iq
test
standard
error
measurement
often
referred
abbreviation
sem
test
sem
statistical
fact
reflection
inherent
imprecision
test
see
furr
bacharach
psychometrics
ed
identifying
sem
one
important
concepts
measurement
theory
individual
iq
test
score
given
exam
may
fluctuate
variety
reasons
include
health
practice
earlier
tests
environment
location
test
examiner
demeanor
subjective
judgment
involved
scoring
certain
questions
exam
simple
lucky
guessing
see
american
association
intellectual
developmental
disabilities
schalock
et
user
guide
accompany
edition
intellectual
disability
definition
classification
systems
supports
hereinafter
aaidd
manual
kaufman
iq
testing
pp
sem
reflects
reality
individual
intellectual
functioning
reduced
single
numerical
score
purposes
iq
tests
sem
means
individual
score
best
understood
range
scores
either
side
recorded
score
sem
allows
clinicians
calculate
range
within
one
may
say
individual
true
iq
score
lies
see
apa
brief
sem
unit
measurement
sem
equates
confidence
measured
score
falls
within
given
score
range
sem
provides
confidence
level
measured
score
within
broader
range
score
instance
generally
considered
reflect
range
confidence
range
confidence
see
individuals
intellectual
disability
scores
approximately
two
standard
deviations
population
mean
including
margin
measurement
error
generally
points
involves
score
apa
brief
example
average
sem
iq
test
points
average
sem
iq
test
points
test
manuals
report
sems
different
age
groupings
scores
similar
identical
often
due
sampling
error
even
person
taken
multiple
tests
separate
score
must
assessed
using
sem
analysis
multiple
iq
scores
jointly
complicated
endeavor
see
schneider
principles
assessment
aptitude
achievement
oxford
handbook
child
psychological
assessment
saklofske
reynolds
schwean
eds
addition
test
may
flawed
administered
consistently
flawed
manner
multiple
examinations
may
result
repeated
similar
scores
even
consistent
score
conclusive
evidence
intellectual
functioning
despite
professional
explanations
florida
law
used
test
score
fixed
number
thus
barring
consideration
evidence
bearing
question
intellectual
disability
professionals
diagnose
law
determine
whether
intellectual
disability
exists
sem
applies
individual
iq
score
inquiry
consider
factors
indicating
whether
person
deficits
adaptive
functioning
include
evidence
past
performance
environment
upbringing
significant
majority
implement
protections
atkins
taking
sem
account
thus
acknowledging
error
inherent
using
test
score
without
necessary
adjustment
calculation
provides
objective
indicia
society
standards
context
eighth
amendment
roper
kentucky
virginia
legislatures
adopted
fixed
score
cutoff
identical
florida
rev
stat
ann
lexis
supp
bowling
commonwealth
code
ann
lexis
supp
johnson
commonwealth
vacated
remanded
grounds
alabama
also
may
use
strict
iq
score
cutoff
although
result
legislative
action
see
smith
state
crim
app
alabama
adopt
error
examining
defendant
iq
score
petitioner
question
rule
use
cutoff
greater
tr
oral
arg
included
alongside
florida
analysis
addition
arizona
delaware
kansas
north
carolina
washington
statutes
interpreted
provide
cutoff
leading
result
florida
mandates
cases
see
rev
stat
ann
west
del
code
ann
tit
supp
stat
ann
supp
stat
ann
lexis
rev
code
state
laws
might
interpreted
require
cutoff
mean
interpreted
however
see
state
vela
neb
although
nebraska
statute
specifies
intelligence
quotient
seventy
reliably
administered
intelligence
quotient
test
district
found
defendant
score
iq
test
considered
light
standard
error
measurement
considered
subaverage
general
intellectual
functioning
purposes
diagnosing
mental
retardation
arizona
statute
appears
set
broad
statutory
cutoff
rev
stat
ann
west
another
provision
instructs
courts
take
account
margin
error
test
administered
id
courts
meant
interpret
statute
situation
like
hall
altogether
clear
principal
arizona
case
matter
state
roque
ariz
statute
accounts
margin
error
requiring
multiple
tests
defendant
achieves
score
one
tests
proceeds
hearing
id
case
also
notes
defendant
iq
score
well
outside
margin
error
one
iq
test
id
kansas
execution
almost
five
decades
laws
jurisprudence
issue
unlikely
receive
attention
specific
question
see
atkins
ven
allow
execution
mentally
retarded
offenders
practice
uncommon
continue
authorize
executions
none
carried
decades
thus
little
need
pursue
legislation
barring
execution
mentally
retarded
delaware
executed
three
individuals
past
decade
washington
executed
one
person
recently
suspended
death
penalty
none
four
individuals
executed
recently
appears
brought
claim
similar
advanced
thus
nine
mandate
strict
iq
score
cutoff
four
delaware
kansas
north
carolina
washington
appear
considered
issue
courts
side
ledger
stand
abolished
death
penalty
either
full
new
offenses
oregon
suspended
death
penalty
executed
two
individuals
past
years
see
roper
considered
abandoned
death
penalty
altogether
part
consensus
juvenile
death
penalty
course
person
hall
position
executed
even
without
finding
intellectual
disability
thus
individual
hall
position
individual
iq
score
deemed
automatically
eligible
death
penalty
aggregate
numbers
considerations
bearing
determination
consensus
consistency
direction
change
also
relevant
see
quoting
atkins
supra
since
atkins
many
passed
legislation
comply
constitutional
requirement
persons
intellectual
disability
executed
two
virginia
delaware
appear
set
strict
cutoff
although
discussed
delaware
courts
yet
interpret
law
contrast
least
either
abolished
death
penalty
passed
legislation
allowing
defendants
present
additional
evidence
intellectual
disability
iq
test
score
since
atkins
five
abolished
death
penalty
legislation
see
pub
acts
comp
stat
ch
west
md
correc
servs
code
ann
et
seq
lexis
stat
ann
west
supp
laws
ch
addition
new
york
appeals
invalidated
new
york
death
penalty
state
constitution
see
people
levalle
legislation
passed
reinstate
impose
death
penalty
new
york
employ
iq
cutoff
determining
intellectual
disability
crim
proc
law
ann
west
addition
least
five
others
passed
legislation
allowing
defendant
present
additional
evidence
intellectual
disability
even
iq
test
score
see
cal
penal
code
ann
west
supp
iq
cutoff
idaho
code
lexis
supp
seventy
pizzutto
state
idaho
alleged
error
iq
testing
plus
minus
five
points
district
entitled
draw
reasonable
inferences
undisputed
facts
la
code
crim
proc
art
west
supp
iq
cutoff
rev
stat
iq
cutoff
utah
code
ann
lexis
iq
cutoff
code
likewise
set
strict
iq
cutoff
see
state
previously
allowed
defendants
iq
score
present
additional
evidence
intellectual
disability
modified
law
create
strict
cutoff
cf
roper
supra
since
stanford
kentucky
state
previously
prohibited
capital
punishment
juveniles
reinstated
summary
every
state
legislature
considered
issue
atkins
save
virginia
whose
law
interpreted
courts
taken
position
contrary
florida
indeed
florida
legislature
passed
relevant
legislation
prior
atkins
might
well
believed
law
create
fixed
cutoff
staff
analysis
accompanying
bill
contain
set
iq
level
two
standard
deviations
tests
iq
although
extended
senate
staff
analysis
economic
impact
statement
florida
interpreted
law
require
cutoff
see
cherry
bound
interpretation
rejection
strict
cutoff
vast
majority
consistency
trend
roper
supra
toward
recognizing
sem
provide
strong
evidence
consensus
society
regard
strict
cutoff
proper
humane
atkins
acknowledges
inherent
error
iq
testing
true
atkins
provide
definitive
procedural
substantive
guides
determining
person
claims
mental
retardation
falls
within
protection
eighth
amendment
bobby
bies
atkins
stated
people
claim
mentally
retarded
impaired
fall
within
range
mentally
retarded
offenders
national
consensus
approach
ford
wainwright
regard
insanity
leave
state
task
developing
appropriate
ways
enforce
constitutional
restriction
upon
execution
sentences
quoting
ford
wainwright
citation
omitted
discussed
play
critical
role
advancing
protections
providing
information
contributes
understanding
intellectual
disability
measured
assessed
atkins
give
unfettered
discretion
define
full
scope
constitutional
protection
atkins
twice
cited
definitions
intellectual
disability
express
terms
rejected
strict
iq
test
score
cutoff
atkins
first
cited
definition
provided
mental
retardation
typically
used
describe
people
iq
level
approximately
citing
diagnostic
statistical
manual
mental
disorders
ed
later
noted
iq
lower
typically
considered
cutoff
iq
score
intellectual
function
prong
mental
retardation
definition
furthermore
immediately
declared
left
task
developing
appropriate
ways
enforce
constitutional
restriction
stated
accompanying
state
statutory
definitions
mental
retardation
identical
generally
conform
clinical
definitions
ibid
thus
atkins
cited
clinical
definitions
intellectual
disability
also
noted
standards
based
conclusion
conformed
definitions
words
atkins
persons
meet
clinical
definitions
intellectual
disability
definition
diminished
capacities
understand
process
information
communicate
abstract
mistakes
learn
experience
engage
logical
reasoning
control
impulses
understand
reactions
others
thus
bear
diminish
ed
personal
culpability
ibid
clinical
definitions
intellectual
disability
take
account
iq
scores
represent
range
fixed
number
fundamental
premise
atkins
clinical
definitions
long
included
sem
see
diagnostic
statistical
manual
mental
disorders
rev
ed
since
measurement
fallible
iq
score
generally
thought
involve
error
measurement
approximately
five
points
hence
iq
considered
represent
band
zone
treating
iq
flexibility
permits
inclusion
mental
retardation
category
people
iqs
somewhat
higher
exhibit
significant
deficits
adaptive
behavior
respondent
argues
current
florida
law
favorably
cited
atkins
see
brief
respondent
evidence
national
consensus
specifically
cited
florida
statute
issue
substantively
changed
atkins
refer
florida
law
citation
listing
outlawed
execution
intellectually
disabled
fleeting
mention
signal
approval
florida
current
understanding
law
discussed
atkins
decided
florida
yet
interpreted
law
require
strict
iq
cutoff
new
interpretation
runs
counter
clinical
definition
cited
throughout
atkins
florida
legislative
report
indicating
kind
cutoff
need
used
respondent
argument
also
conflicts
logic
atkins
eighth
amendment
complete
autonomy
define
intellectual
disability
wished
decision
atkins
become
nullity
eighth
amendment
protection
human
dignity
become
reality
thus
reads
atkins
provide
substantial
guidance
definition
intellectual
disability
actions
precedents
give
us
essential
instruction
roper
inquiry
must
go
constitution
contemplates
end
judgment
brought
bear
question
acceptability
death
penalty
eighth
amendment
coker
georgia
plurality
opinion
exercise
independent
judgment
judicial
duty
see
roper
supra
extent
stanford
based
rejection
idea
required
bring
independent
judgment
bear
proportionality
death
penalty
particular
class
crimes
offenders
suffices
note
rejection
inconsistent
prior
eighth
amendment
decisions
citation
omitted
independent
judgment
florida
statute
interpreted
courts
unconstitutional
addition
views
precedent
determination
informed
views
medical
experts
views
dictate
decision
yet
disregard
informed
assessments
see
kansas
crane
science
psychiatry
informs
control
ultimate
legal
determinations
duty
interpret
constitution
need
isolation
legal
determination
intellectual
disability
distinct
medical
diagnosis
informed
medical
community
diagnostic
framework
atkins
points
diagnostic
criteria
employed
psychiatric
professionals
professional
community
teachings
particular
help
case
alternative
definition
intellectual
disability
presented
placed
substantial
reliance
expertise
medical
profession
failing
take
account
sem
setting
strict
cutoff
florida
goes
unanimous
professional
consensus
apa
brief
neither
florida
amici
point
single
medical
professional
supports
cutoff
repudiates
iq
test
scores
approximations
conceptual
functioning
may
insufficient
assess
reasoning
situations
mastery
practical
tasks
statement
well
captures
independent
assessment
individual
iq
test
score
lower
atkins
supra
may
show
intellectual
disability
presenting
additional
evidence
regarding
difficulties
adaptive
functioning
flaws
florida
law
result
inherent
error
iq
tests
iq
score
approximation
final
infallible
assessment
intellectual
functioning
see
apa
brief
standard
pyschometric
practice
report
relevant
reliabilities
standard
errors
measurement
reporting
test
score
ibid
margin
error
inherent
accuracy
iq
scores
furr
psychometrics
standard
error
measurement
important
psychometric
value
implications
applied
measurement
sem
concept
peculiar
psychiatric
profession
iq
tests
measure
recognized
relied
upon
create
devise
tests
sorts
identifying
sem
one
important
concepts
measurement
theory
awareness
iq
test
limits
particular
importance
conducting
conjunctive
assessment
necessary
assess
individual
intellectual
ability
see
american
association
intellectual
developmental
disabilities
intellectual
disability
definition
classification
systems
supports
ed
must
stressed
diagnosis
intellectual
disability
intended
reflect
clinical
judgment
rather
actuarial
determination
intellectual
disability
condition
number
see
courts
must
recognize
medical
community
iq
test
imprecise
say
iq
test
score
unhelpful
considerable
significance
medical
community
recognizes
using
scores
assess
defendant
eligibility
death
penalty
state
must
afford
test
scores
studied
skepticism
design
use
tests
understand
iq
test
score
represents
range
rather
fixed
number
state
ignores
inherent
imprecision
tests
risks
executing
person
suffers
intellectual
disability
see
apa
brief
universally
accepted
clinical
standards
diagnosing
intellectual
disability
determination
hall
intellectually
disabled
considered
valid
agrees
medical
experts
defendant
iq
test
score
falls
within
test
acknowledged
inherent
margin
error
defendant
must
able
present
additional
evidence
intellectual
disability
including
testimony
regarding
adaptive
deficits
sound
view
single
factor
dispositive
conjunctive
interrelated
assessment
see
person
iq
score
may
severe
adaptive
behavior
problems
person
actual
functioning
comparable
individuals
lower
iq
score
florida
statute
interpreted
courts
misuses
iq
score
terms
turn
bars
consideration
evidence
must
considered
determining
whether
defendant
capital
case
intellectual
disability
florida
rule
invalid
constitution
cruel
unusual
punishments
clause
florida
seeks
execute
man
scored
instead
iq
test
florida
one
rigid
rule
florida
rule
misconstrues
statements
atkins
intellectually
characterized
iq
approximately
florida
rule
direct
opposition
views
design
administer
interpret
iq
test
failing
take
account
standard
error
measurement
florida
law
contradicts
test
design
also
bars
essential
part
sentencing
inquiry
adaptive
functioning
freddie
lee
hall
may
may
intellectually
law
requires
opportunity
present
evidence
intellectual
disability
including
deficits
adaptive
functioning
lifetime
death
penalty
gravest
sentence
society
may
impose
persons
facing
severe
sanction
must
fair
opportunity
show
constitution
prohibits
execution
florida
law
contravenes
nation
commitment
dignity
duty
teach
human
decency
mark
civilized
world
laboratories
experimentation
experiments
may
deny
basic
dignity
constitution
protects
judgment
florida
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
ordered
alito
dissenting
freddie
lee
hall
petitioner
florida
writ
certiorari
florida
may
justice
alito
chief
justice
justice
scalia
justice
thomas
join
dissenting
atkins
virginia
held
eighth
amendment
prohibits
death
sentence
defendants
intellectually
disabled
mandate
use
single
method
identifying
defendants
today
overrules
latter
holding
based
largely
positions
adopted
private
professional
associations
taking
step
sharply
departs
framework
prescribed
prior
eighth
amendment
cases
adopts
uniform
national
rule
conceptually
unsound
likely
result
confusion
therefore
respectfully
dissent
approach
case
marks
new
unwise
turn
eighth
amendment
case
law
atkins
cases
held
prohibition
cruel
unusual
punishment
embodies
evolving
standards
decency
mark
progress
maturing
society
explained
evolving
standards
informed
objective
factors
maximum
possible
extent
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
addition
pinpointed
clearest
reliable
objective
evidence
contemporary
values
legislation
enacted
country
legislatures
ibid
prior
cases
referred
evolving
standards
maturing
society
meant
standards
american
society
whole
however
strikes
state
law
based
evolving
standards
professional
societies
notably
american
psychiatric
association
apa
begins
analysis
views
associations
see
ante
briefly
discussing
enactments
state
legislatures
see
ante
returns
associations
views
interpreting
atkins
exercising
independent
judgment
constitutionality
florida
law
see
ante
approach
reconciled
framework
prescribed
eighth
amendment
cases
modern
eighth
amendment
precedents
whether
punishment
cruel
unusual
depends
currently
prevailing
societal
norms
long
held
laws
enacted
state
legislatures
provide
clearest
reliable
objective
evidence
contemporary
values
penry
lynaugh
democratic
society
legislatures
courts
constituted
respond
consequently
moral
values
people
gregg
georgia
joint
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
jj
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
approach
originally
conceived
first
asked
whether
challenged
practice
contravened
clear
national
consensus
evidenced
state
legislation
consensus
found
go
ask
whether
reason
disagree
judgment
atkins
invoking
procedure
atkins
held
eighth
amendment
forbids
execution
defendants
intellectually
disabled
see
critical
analysis
conclusion
today
society
views
mentally
retarded
offenders
categorically
less
culpable
average
criminal
consensus
continued
unquestionably
reflects
widespread
judgment
relationship
mental
retardation
penological
purposes
served
death
penalty
atkins
identified
consensus
execution
intellectually
disabled
observed
serious
disagreement
among
respect
best
method
determining
offenders
fact
retarded
ibid
therefore
le
ft
task
developing
appropriate
ways
identify
defendants
ibid
internal
quotation
marks
alteration
omitted
noted
five
years
ago
atkins
provide
definitive
procedural
substantive
guides
determining
person
intellectually
disabled
bobby
bies
consistent
role
atkins
left
florida
follows
procedure
issue
explained
atkins
order
defendant
qualify
intellectually
disabled
three
separate
requirements
must
met
must
shown
defendant
significantly
subaverage
intellectual
functioning
deficits
adaptive
behavior
onset
factors
occurred
age
see
ante
implementing
framework
determined
first
requirement
satisfied
defendant
scores
higher
iq
tests
method
measuring
intellectual
today
holds
scheme
offends
eighth
amendment
objects
florida
approach
treats
iq
test
scores
conclusive
ignores
fact
iq
score
might
reflect
true
iq
errors
measurement
concludes
state
must
view
defendant
iq
range
potential
scores
calculated
using
statistical
concept
known
standard
error
measurement
sem
see
part
infra
holds
range
includes
iq
accepted
level
intellectual
disability
defendant
must
permitted
produce
evidence
intellectual
disability
addition
iq
scores
see
support
holding
traditional
approach
identifying
society
evolving
standards
decency
fair
analysis
current
state
laws
absence
consensus
found
atkins
persists
today
telling
hall
rely
consensus
among
candidly
argues
instead
precise
number
share
florida
approach
immaterial
reply
brief
analysis
aggressive
according
significant
majority
reject
florida
strict
cutoff
instead
take
sem
account
deciding
whether
defendant
meets
first
requirement
test
ante
count
nine
mandate
strict
iq
score
cutoff
allow
defendants
present
additional
evidence
individual
test
score
ante
abolished
death
penalty
long
suspended
operation
ante
numbers
concludes
defendant
iq
score
deemed
automatically
eligible
death
penalty
analysis
deeply
flawed
begin
addition
recognizes
rules
similar
florida
idaho
appear
require
courts
take
sem
account
rejecting
claim
intellectual
remaining
death
penalty
either
said
nothing
sem
clarified
whether
require
accordingly
including
florida
require
sem
taken
account
consider
sem
taken
definitive
position
question
statistics
regarded
establishing
national
consensus
florida
approach
attempting
circumvent
statistics
includes
count
never
impose
death
penalty
maneuver
justified
true
counted
prior
eighth
amendment
cases
cases
concerned
substantive
question
whether
class
individuals
categorically
ineligible
death
penalty
roper
simmons
example
counted
part
consensus
imposition
capital
sentence
crime
committed
minor
reasoned
state
decision
abolish
death
penalty
necessarily
demonstrates
judgment
death
penalty
inappropriate
offenders
including
juveniles
ibid
similar
reasoning
possible
fact
state
abolished
death
penalty
says
nothing
state
resolve
evidentiary
problem
identifying
defendants
intellectually
disabled
explain
state
may
reasonably
conclude
florida
approach
fairer
accurate
approach
requires
therefore
inferred
state
forced
choose
two
approaches
necessarily
select
reasons
quite
wrong
proclaim
vast
majority
rejected
florida
approach
ante
divided
question
whether
sem
play
role
determining
whether
capital
defendant
intellectually
disabled
require
consideration
sem
agree
role
sem
play
differ
example
sort
evidence
introduced
iq
testing
reveals
iq
require
evidence
intellectual
deficits
others
permit
defendant
move
second
prong
test
submit
evidence
deficits
adaptive
fairest
assessment
current
situation
adopted
multitude
approaches
difficult
question
light
resolution
case
straightforward
methodological
consensus
among
time
atkins
consensus
today
absence
consensus
basis
holding
florida
method
contravenes
society
standards
decency
perhaps
recognizes
weakness
arguments
true
national
consensus
places
heavy
reliance
views
recently
announced
professional
organizations
attempts
downplay
degree
decision
dependent
upon
views
private
groups
game
attempt
shoehorn
views
associations
calculus
reasons
follows
views
associations
help
determining
iq
scores
relate
holding
atkins
turn
leads
better
understanding
legislative
policies
various
holdings
state
courts
implement
atkins
rule
hat
understanding
informs
determination
whether
consensus
instructs
decide
specific
issue
presented
ante
follow
logic
modern
eighth
amendment
cases
counts
society
standards
say
standards
american
people
standards
professional
associations
best
represent
views
small
professional
elite
also
mistakenly
suggests
dictated
atkins
see
ante
contrary
atkins
expressly
left
task
defining
intellectual
disability
although
atkins
perceived
professional
consensus
best
procedure
used
identifying
intellectually
atkins
declined
import
view
law
instead
made
clear
professional
consensus
means
dispositive
see
reliance
views
professional
associations
also
lead
serious
practical
problems
briefly
note
first
views
professional
associations
often
tying
eighth
amendment
law
views
lead
instability
continue
fuel
litigation
danger
dramatically
illustrated
recent
publication
apa
relies
publication
fundamentally
alters
first
prong
longstanding
definition
intellectual
disability
embraced
atkins
adopted
new
publication
apa
discards
significantly
subaverage
intellectual
functioning
element
elevating
apa
current
views
constitutional
significance
therefore
throws
question
basic
approach
atkins
approved
followed
also
noteworthy
changes
adopted
professional
associations
sometimes
rescinded
example
aaidd
extended
baseline
intellectual
functioning
cutoff
iq
score
approximately
aaidd
ed
table
boldface
deleted
see
kaplan
sadock
comprehensive
textbook
psychiatry
sadock
sadock
ruiz
ed
hereinafter
kaplan
sadock
change
generated
much
controversy
used
aaidd
definition
continuing
use
definition
ibid
aaidd
baseline
iq
changed
back
approximately
less
ibid
second
approach
implicitly
calls
upon
judiciary
either
follow
every
new
change
thinking
professional
organizations
judge
validity
new
change
example
tacitly
makes
judgment
diagnostic
criteria
intellectual
disability
prevailed
time
atkins
decided
longer
legitimate
publications
atkins
cited
differ
markedly
recent
editions
endorsed
see
third
approach
requires
judiciary
determine
professional
organizations
entitled
special
deference
professional
organizations
disagree
provides
guidance
deciding
organizations
views
govern
fourth
binds
eighth
amendment
law
definitions
intellectual
disability
promulgated
use
making
variety
decisions
quite
different
decision
whether
imposition
death
sentence
particular
case
serve
valid
penological
end
case
intellectual
functioning
important
correlation
ability
understand
gravity
crime
purpose
penalty
well
ability
resist
momentary
impulse
influence
others
see
contrast
determining
eligibility
social
services
adaptive
functioning
may
much
important
cf
xxxvii
clinical
considerations
may
relevant
legal
judgments
turn
individual
responsibility
similar
practical
problems
like
call
legislative
judgments
judicial
resolution
ii
find
consensus
among
independently
assess
method
florida
adopted
determining
intellectual
disability
even
appropriate
us
look
beyond
evidence
societal
standards
conclude
florida
method
unconstitutional
faults
florida
tak
ing
iq
score
final
conclusive
evidence
defendant
intellectual
capacity
failing
recognize
iq
score
may
imprecise
ante
view
however
florida
adopted
sensible
standard
comports
longstanding
belief
iq
tests
best
measure
intellectual
functioning
although
entirely
ignores
part
florida
scheme
state
takes
account
inevitable
risk
testing
error
permitting
defendants
introduce
multiple
scores
contrast
establishes
standard
conflates
long
understood
two
independent
requirements
proving
intellectual
disability
significantly
subaverage
intellectual
functioning
deficits
adaptive
behavior
also
mandates
use
alternative
method
dealing
risk
testing
error
without
hint
accurate
florida
approach
first
supposed
error
identifies
florida
takes
iq
score
conclusive
evidence
intellectual
functioning
ante
initial
matter
one
get
impression
reading
opinion
hall
introduced
one
test
score
see
ante
truth
florida
courts
considered
multiple
scores
particular
iq
test
hall
dubbed
gold
standard
see
brief
petitioner
app
florida
statute
imposes
limit
number
iq
scores
defendant
may
introduce
simply
wrong
analyze
florida
system
one
views
single
iq
score
final
conclusive
evidence
defendant
suffer
subaverage
intellectual
functioning
see
brief
respondent
florida
rule
allows
multiple
evaluations
hall
believed
statistical
error
rate
prevented
tests
reflecting
true
score
sought
still
testing
proper
question
ask
therefore
whether
actual
approach
falls
outside
range
discretion
allowed
atkins
offers
persuasive
reason
concluding
indeed
opinion
never
identifies
evidence
intellectual
functioning
require
florida
admit
recognized
atkins
longstanding
practices
least
previous
views
professional
organizations
seem
reflect
understanding
iq
scores
best
way
measure
intellectual
functioning
see
recent
publication
apa
example
ranked
severity
intellectual
disability
exclusively
iq
scores
necessarily
pinpointing
onset
disability
according
iq
see
presented
solid
evidence
longstanding
reliance
multiple
iq
test
scores
measure
intellectual
functioning
unreasonable
outside
ordinary
unconstitutional
certainly
supplied
information
merely
held
florida
must
permit
defendants
introduce
additional
evidence
whatever
might
significantly
subaverage
intellectual
functioning
decision
limited
scope
understand
opinion
also
holds
iq
tests
reveal
iq
defendants
must
allowed
present
evidence
deficits
adaptive
behavior
second
prong
test
see
ante
remarkable
change
took
universal
understanding
intellectual
disability
years
ago
atkins
instructed
clinical
definitions
mental
retardation
require
subaverage
intellectual
functioning
also
significant
limitations
adaptive
skills
emphasis
alterations
added
approach
taken
vast
majority
correctly
recognizes
require
concurrent
deficits
intellectual
functioning
adaptive
behavior
requiring
defendants
prove
ante
emphasis
added
yet
holds
defendant
iq
score
high
must
consider
factors
indicating
whether
person
deficits
adaptive
functioning
ante
see
ante
words
even
defendant
failed
show
meets
first
prong
standard
intellectual
disability
significantly
subaverage
functioning
evidence
second
prong
deficits
adaptive
behavior
establish
intellectual
disability
offers
little
explanation
sea
change
asserts
vaguely
sound
view
single
factor
dispositive
conjunctive
interrelated
assessment
ante
ignores
fact
deficits
adaptive
behavior
used
establish
deficits
mental
functioning
two
prongs
meant
show
distinct
components
intellectual
disability
ntellectual
functions
include
reasoning
problem
solving
planning
abstract
thinking
judgment
academic
learning
learning
experience
adaptive
functioning
refers
ability
meet
developmental
sociocultural
standards
personal
independence
social
responsibility
strong
evidence
deficit
adaptive
behavior
necessarily
demonstrate
deficit
intellectual
functioning
without
latter
person
simply
classified
intellectually
disabled
particularly
troubling
relax
proof
requirements
prong
prong
directly
relates
concerns
led
primary
holding
atkins
explained
diminished
ability
understand
process
information
learn
experience
engage
logical
reasoning
control
impulses
diminished
intellectual
functioning
make
less
likely
defendant
process
information
possibility
execution
penalty
therefore
deterred
committing
murders
see
also
hey
often
act
impulse
rather
pursuant
premeditated
plan
see
also
ante
defendant
display
significantly
subaverage
intellectual
functioning
therefore
among
class
defendants
identified
atkins
finally
relying
primarily
proof
adaptive
deficits
produce
inequities
administration
capital
punishment
far
tell
adaptive
behavior
malleable
factor
without
firm
theoretical
empirical
roots
see
kaplan
sadock
consensus
exists
among
medical
practitioners
facts
critical
analyzing
factor
measurement
relies
largely
subjective
judgments
florida
approach
avoids
disparities
reliance
factor
tends
produce
thus
promotes
consistency
application
death
penalty
confidence
administered
haphazardly
second
interrelated
objection
florida
rule
fails
account
risk
error
inherent
iq
testing
order
diminish
risk
establishes
rule
iq
testing
reveals
iq
claim
intellectual
disability
rejected
basis
test
scores
alone
ante
misunderstands
sem
works
fails
explain
florida
method
accounting
risk
error
allowing
defendant
take
rely
multiple
tests
effective
approach
compels
begins
simple
uncontroversial
proposition
every
testing
situation
susceptible
error
thus
may
result
imperfect
measurement
true
iq
wades
technical
matters
must
understood
order
see
goes
wrong
various
ways
account
error
iq
testing
one
way
florida
approach
evaluate
multiple
test
results
another
use
mathematical
measurement
called
standard
error
measurement
sem
see
aamr
ed
app
critical
importance
single
uniform
sem
across
iq
tests
even
across
rather
sem
varies
test
subgroup
age
group
user
guide
accompany
aaidd
ed
definition
classification
systems
supports
know
sem
particular
test
particular
adding
one
sem
subtracting
one
sem
obtained
score
establishes
interval
scores
known
confidence
interval
see
aamr
ed
interval
represents
range
scores
within
sure
true
iq
falls
see
oxford
handbook
child
psychological
assessment
saklofske
reynolds
schwean
eds
interval
centered
obtained
score
includes
scores
score
amount
sem
since
chance
true
iq
falls
within
range
chance
true
iq
falls
outside
interval
approximately
equal
odds
falls
interval
interval
example
scores
iq
test
sem
confidence
interval
range
situation
approximately
chance
true
iq
roughly
chance
roughly
chance
thus
chance
score
similarly
using
two
sems
build
confidence
interval
process
except
add
two
sems
subtract
two
sems
obtained
score
illustrate
use
two
sems
let
us
hypothesize
case
defendant
obtained
score
sem
prior
example
chance
true
score
roughly
chance
score
chance
score
probability
true
score
roughly
two
examples
show
greater
degree
confidence
demanded
greater
range
scores
fall
within
confidence
interval
therefore
away
obtained
score
yet
still
fall
within
confidence
interval
misunderstands
principles
makes
factual
mistakes
surely
confuse
attempting
comply
opinion
first
unjustifiably
assumes
blanket
common
error
measurement
see
ante
assumption
gives
rise
holding
defendant
must
permitted
introduce
additional
evidence
iq
tests
reveal
iq
high
see
ibid
sems
however
vary
iq
test
reason
assume
sem
points
indeed
appears
sem
generally
estimated
three
five
points
iq
tests
aamr
ed
know
sem
hall
recent
iq
test
less
half
estimate
brief
petitioner
relatedly
misreads
authorities
relies
establish
cutoff
iq
score
true
certain
professional
organizations
advocated
cutoff
atkins
cited
organizations
cutoff
see
ante
overlooks
critical
fact
organizations
endorsed
iq
cutoff
based
express
understanding
one
standard
error
measurement
sem
three
five
points
iq
tests
aamr
mental
retardation
ed
hereinafter
aamr
ed
atkins
citing
aamr
ed
kaplan
sadock
sadock
sadock
ed
see
also
aamr
ed
aaidd
ed
words
number
relevant
extent
single
sem
estimated
high
points
aamr
ed
contrast
know
sem
hall
latest
iq
test
less
half
estimate
relevance
number
case
blindly
import
margin
error
know
matter
fact
relevant
sem
amounts
requiring
consideration
two
sems
approach
finds
support
atkins
anywhere
else
factual
errors
ambiguities
unclear
whether
concludes
defendant
constitutionally
entitled
introduce
evidence
intellectual
disability
whenever
score
lower
mistaken
understanding
sem
tests
confidence
interval
using
one
sem
includes
score
confidence
interval
using
two
sems
includes
score
view
none
approaches
defensible
approach
tied
fixed
score
dismissed
hand
discussed
every
test
different
sem
two
approaches
require
defendant
permitted
submit
additional
evidence
iq
long
confidence
interval
using
one
sem
two
sems
respectively
includes
score
foundation
eighth
amendment
case
law
hall
concedes
eighth
amendment
permits
assign
defendant
burden
establishing
intellectual
disability
least
preponderance
evidence
see
tr
oral
arg
words
defendant
required
prove
probability
iq
greater
approach
contrast
defendant
prove
significantly
subaverage
intellectual
functioning
showing
simply
probability
true
iq
little
rule
rule
totally
transforms
allocation
nature
burden
proof
referred
confidence
intervals
result
straightforward
application
sem
context
one
sem
establishes
confidence
interval
two
sems
establish
confidence
interval
see
aaidd
ed
simple
enough
devise
confidence
interval
confidence
interval
matter
therefore
excuse
mechanically
imposing
standards
unhinged
legal
logic
override
valid
state
laws
establishing
burdens
proof
appropriate
confidence
level
ultimately
judgment
best
left
legislatures
judgment
defendant
must
establish
likely
intellectually
disabled
defer
determination
also
fails
grasp
florida
system
already
accounts
risk
testing
error
allowing
introduction
multiple
test
scores
never
explains
criticisms
uncertainty
resulting
use
single
iq
score
apply
defendant
consistently
scores
multiple
tests
contrary
evident
assumption
view
multiple
consistent
scores
establish
much
higher
degree
attempt
address
say
analysis
multiple
iq
scores
jointly
complicated
endeavor
ante
evaluation
intellectual
disability
whether
based
objective
tests
subjective
observations
complicated
conducting
proper
analysis
multiple
scores
produces
iq
reliable
approach
mandated
basis
rejecting
florida
reasons
affirm
judgment
florida
footnotes
see
american
association
intellectual
developmental
disabilities
aaidd
intellectual
disability
ed
hereinafter
aaidd
ed
cataloguing
history
iq
cutoff
criteria
since
earlier
publications
aaidd
published
former
name
american
association
mental
retardation
hereinafter
aamr
assume
additional
evidence
means
evidence
iq
testing
florida
rule
already
allows
multiple
evaluations
petitioner
sought
still
testing
brief
respondent
see
also
brief
petitioner
app
discuss
florida
base
decision
finding
hall
iq
florida
courts
considered
several
iq
scores
see
app
brief
petitioner
see
idaho
code
lexis
cum
supp
pizzuto
state
idaho
stating
legislature
require
iq
score
within
five
points
giving
district
discretion
interpret
defendant
iq
montana
new
hampshire
wyoming
ruled
subject
two
defined
significantly
subaverage
intellectual
functioning
see
rev
stat
ann
code
ann
cum
supp
franklin
maynard
per
curiam
two
statutes
impose
rebuttable
presumptions
intellectual
disability
defendant
iq
said
whether
defendant
allowed
provide
evidence
iq
see
ark
code
ann
neb
rev
stat
one
state
mentioned
measurement
errors
explain
defendant
must
prove
deficits
adaptive
behavior
despite
iq
see
stripling
state
another
state
mentioned
sem
responding
argument
defendant
suggest
sem
legally
relevant
see
goodwin
state
mo
compare
ybarra
state
state
dunn
pp
la
see
forensic
psychology
neuropsychology
criminal
civil
cases
hall
ed
hereinafter
forensic
psychology
compare
apa
diagnostic
statistical
manual
mental
disorders
rev
ed
hereinafter
apa
diagnostic
statistical
manual
mental
disorders
ed
hereinafter
see
brief
petitioner
listing
valid
iq
scores
hall
alleges
also
scored
wechsler
test
score
admitted
evidence
doubts
validity
app
hall
allege
potential
practice
effect
skewed
scores
see
aaidd
ed
cataloguing
history
iq
cutoff
criteria
since
mental
retardation
characterized
significantly
subaverage
intellectual
functioning
iq
approximately
boldface
deleted
general
intellectual
functioning
defined
intelligence
quotient
italics
deleted
aamr
mental
retardation
ed
hereinafter
aamr
ed
ntellectual
functioning
still
best
represented
iq
scores
see
del
code
tit
idaho
code
rev
stat
code
ann
lexis
cum
supp
longstanding
views
professional
organizations
also
intellectual
functioning
adaptive
behavior
independent
factors
see
organizations
might
recommend
examining
evidence
adaptive
behavior
even
iq
sheds
light
legal
rule
given
appear
require
defendants
prove
prong
separately
preponderance
evidence
see
oxford
handbook
child
psychological
assessment
saklofske
reynolds
schwean
eds
multiple
scores
provide
greater
precision
frances
essentials
psychiatric
diagnosis
responding
challenge
rev
ed
pattern
test
scores
important
score
given
test
multiple
scores
moreover
good
reason
treat
low
scores
differently
high
scores
although
one
better
iq
test
one
capable
one
certainly
worse
forensic
psychology
sharp
unexplained
drop
iq
scores
following
incarceration
strong
evidence
malingering
frances
supra
igher
scores
likely
indicative
since
many
reasons
given
score
might
underestimate
person
intelligence
reason
scores
overestimate
also
iq
testing
may
flawed
multiple
examinations
may
result
repeated
similar
scores
conclusive
evidence
intellectual
functioning
ante
argument
proves
much
potential
flaws
administering
multiple
tests
sufficient
render
inaccurate
conclude
even
scores
sufficient
appropriate
remedy
incorrectly
administered
tests
disregard
tests
ignore
fact
multiple
properly
administered
tests
yielding
scores
give
high
degree
confidence
individual
intellectually
disabled