hillman
maretta
argued
april
decided
june
federal
employees
group
life
insurance
act
feglia
establishes
insurance
program
federal
employees
feglia
permits
employee
name
beneficiary
life
insurance
proceeds
specifies
order
precedence
providing
employee
death
benefits
accrue
first
beneficiary
ahead
potential
recipients
virginia
statute
revokes
beneficiary
designation
contract
provides
death
benefit
former
spouse
change
decedent
marital
status
code
ann
section
event
provision
federal
law
separate
provision
virginia
law
section
provides
cause
action
rendering
former
spouse
liable
principal
amount
proceeds
party
received
section
warren
hillman
named
respondent
judy
maretta
beneficiary
federal
employees
group
life
insurance
fegli
policy
divorce
married
petitioner
jacqueline
hillman
never
changed
named
fegli
beneficiary
warren
death
maretta
still
named
beneficiary
filed
claim
fegli
proceeds
collected
hillman
sued
virginia
seeking
recovery
proceeds
section
maretta
argued
response
section
federal
law
parties
agreed
section
virginia
circuit
found
maretta
liable
hillman
section
fegli
policy
proceeds
state
reversed
concluding
section
feglia
conflicts
purposes
objectives
congress
held
section
virginia
statute
feglia
pp
state
law
extent
conflict
federal
statute
crosby
national
foreign
trade
council
case
raises
question
whether
virginia
law
stands
obstacle
accomplishment
execution
full
purposes
objectives
congress
hines
davidowitz
pp
determine
whether
state
law
conflicts
congress
purposes
objectives
nature
federal
interest
must
first
ascertained
crosby
two
previous
cases
govern
analysis
relationship
section
feglia
wissner
wissner
california
granted
decedent
widow
named
beneficiary
policy
federal
national
service
life
insurance
act
nslia
interest
insurance
proceeds
community
property
state
law
reversed
nslia
provided
insured
right
designate
beneficiary
change
designation
time
reasoned
congress
spoken
force
clarity
directing
proceeds
belong
named
beneficiary
addressed
similar
question
regarding
federal
servicemen
group
life
insurance
act
sglia
ridgway
ridgway
maine
imposed
constructive
trust
insurance
proceeds
paid
servicemember
widow
named
beneficiary
ordered
paid
decedent
first
wife
required
divorce
decree
holding
constructive
trust
ridgway
explained
wissner
controlled
sglia
made
clear
insured
service
member
possesses
right
freely
designate
beneficiary
alter
choice
time
communicating
decision
writing
proper
office
pp
reasoning
wissner
ridgway
applies
equal
force
nslia
sglia
strikingly
similar
feglia
creates
scheme
gives
highest
priority
insured
designated
beneficiary
underscores
employee
right
designation
waived
restricted
cfr
section
interferes
scheme
directs
proceeds
actually
belong
someone
named
beneficiary
creating
cause
action
recovery
third
party
feglia
establishes
clear
predictable
procedure
employee
indicate
intended
beneficiary
shall
evinces
congress
decision
accord
federal
employees
unfettered
freedom
choice
selecting
beneficiary
ensure
proceeds
actually
belong
beneficiary
conclusion
confirmed
another
provision
feglia
creates
limited
exception
order
precedence
allowing
proceeds
paid
someone
named
beneficiary
requisite
documentation
filed
government
employee
death
departure
beneficiary
designation
managed
within
outside
federal
system
make
alternative
distributions
outside
clear
procedure
congress
established
narrow
exception
transformed
general
license
state
law
override
feglia
pp
hillman
additional
arguments
support
different
result
unpersuasive
pp
affirmed
sotomayor
delivered
opinion
roberts
kennedy
ginsburg
breyer
kagan
joined
scalia
joined
thomas
alito
filed
opinions
concurring
judgment
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
jacqueline
hillman
petitioner
judy
maretta
writ
certiorari
virginia
june
justice
sotomayor
delivered
opinion
federal
employees
group
life
insurance
act
feglia
et
establishes
life
insurance
program
federal
employees
feglia
provides
employee
may
designate
beneficiary
receive
proceeds
life
insurance
time
death
separately
virginia
statute
addresses
situation
employee
marital
status
changed
update
beneficiary
designation
death
section
virginia
code
renders
former
spouse
liable
insurance
proceeds
whoever
received
applicable
law
usually
widow
widower
beneficiary
designation
code
ann
lexis
supp
case
presents
question
whether
remedy
created
feglia
implementing
regulations
hold
congress
enacted
feglia
provide
group
life
insurance
federal
employees
program
administered
federal
office
personnel
management
opm
pursuant
authority
granted
feglia
opm
entered
life
insurance
contract
metropolitan
life
insurance
company
see
cfr
individual
employees
enrolled
federal
employees
group
life
insurance
fegli
program
receive
coverage
contract
program
substantial
size
total
amount
fegli
insurance
coverage
force
billion
gao
federal
employees
group
life
insurance
retirement
benefit
retained
asset
account
disclosures
improved
feglia
provides
upon
employee
death
life
insurance
benefits
paid
accordance
specified
order
precedence
proceeds
accrue
irst
beneficiary
beneficiaries
employee
signed
witnessed
writing
received
death
ibid
designated
beneficiary
benefits
paid
widow
widower
employee
ibid
absent
widow
widower
benefits
accrue
child
children
employee
descendants
deceased
children
parents
employee
survivors
executor
administrator
estate
employee
last
next
kin
ibid
effective
beneficiary
designation
accompanying
revisions
must
writing
duly
filed
government
see
ibid
designation
change
cancellation
beneficiary
document
executed
filed
force
effect
opm
regulation
provides
employee
may
change
beneficiary
time
without
knowledge
consent
previous
beneficiary
makes
clear
right
waived
restricted
cfr
employees
informed
requirements
materials
opm
disseminates
connection
program
see
opm
fegli
booklet
rev
setting
forth
order
precedence
stating
opm
pay
benefits
irst
beneficiary
employee
designate
order
precedence
also
described
form
employees
use
designate
beneficiary
see
designation
beneficiary
fegli
program
sf
rev
mar
back
part
enrollment
form
advises
employees
update
designations
ntentions
hange
result
example
marriage
divorce
ibid
congress
amended
feglia
create
limited
exception
employee
right
designation
statute
provides
ny
amount
otherwise
paid
person
determined
order
precedence
shall
paid
whole
part
opm
another
person
extent
expressly
provided
terms
decree
divorce
annulment
legal
separation
related
settlement
event
decree
order
agreement
received
opm
employing
agency
employee
death
feglia
also
includes
express
provision
provision
relevant
part
provisions
contract
feglia
relate
nature
extent
coverage
benefits
including
payments
respect
benefits
shall
supersede
preempt
law
state
relates
group
life
insurance
extent
law
regulation
inconsistent
contractual
provisions
case
turns
interaction
provisions
feglia
virginia
statute
section
section
virginia
code
provides
divorce
annulment
revoke
beneficiary
designation
contained
existing
written
contract
owned
one
party
provides
payment
death
benefit
party
death
benefit
includes
payments
life
insurance
contract
event
section
federal
law
section
virginia
code
applies
section
provides
follows
code
ann
preempted
federal
law
respect
payment
death
benefit
former
spouse
value
receives
payment
death
benefit
former
spouse
entitled
personally
liable
amount
payment
person
entitled
preempted
words
section
section
creates
cause
action
rendering
former
spouse
liable
principal
amount
insurance
proceeds
person
received
section
continued
effect
warren
hillman
warren
respondent
judy
maretta
married
warren
named
maretta
beneficiary
fegli
policy
warren
maretta
divorced
four
years
later
married
petitioner
jacqueline
hillman
warren
died
unexpectedly
warren
never
changed
named
beneficiary
fegli
policy
continued
maretta
beneficiary
time
death
despite
divorce
subsequent
remarriage
hillman
hillman
filed
claim
proceeds
warren
life
insurance
fegli
administrator
informed
proceeds
accrue
maretta
named
beneficiary
maretta
filed
claim
benefits
opm
collected
fegli
proceeds
amount
app
pet
cert
hillman
filed
lawsuit
virginia
circuit
arguing
maretta
liable
section
proceeds
deceased
husband
fegli
policy
parties
agreed
section
directly
reallocates
benefits
feglia
maretta
contended
section
also
federal
law
keep
insurance
proceeds
circuit
rejected
maretta
argument
granted
summary
judgment
hillman
finding
maretta
liable
hillman
section
proceeds
warren
policy
virginia
reversed
entered
judgment
maretta
found
feglia
clearly
instructed
insurance
proceeds
paid
named
beneficiary
reasoned
congress
intend
merely
named
beneficiary
fegli
policy
receive
proceeds
subject
recovery
third
party
state
law
therefore
concluded
section
feglia
stand
obstacle
accomplishment
execution
full
purposes
objectives
congress
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
granted
certiorari
resolve
conflict
among
state
federal
courts
whether
feglia
rule
state
law
automatically
assigns
interest
proceeds
fegli
policy
person
named
beneficiary
grants
person
right
recover
affirm
ii
supremacy
clause
congress
power
state
law
expressly
see
brown
hotel
employees
although
feglia
contains
express
provision
see
considered
whether
section
conflict
principles
limit
analysis
holding
state
law
extent
conflict
federal
statute
crosby
national
foreign
trade
council
citing
hines
davidowitz
conflict
occurs
compliance
federal
state
regulations
impossible
florida
lime
avocado
growers
paul
state
law
stands
obstacle
accomplishment
execution
full
purposes
objectives
congress
hines
case
raises
question
purposes
objectives
regulation
domestic
relations
traditionally
domain
state
law
see
burrus
therefore
presumption
state
laws
governing
domestic
relations
egelhoff
egelhoff
family
law
must
damage
substantial
federal
interests
supremacy
clause
demand
state
law
overridden
hisquierdo
hisquierdo
family
law
entirely
insulated
conflict
principles
recognized
state
laws
governing
economic
aspects
domestic
relations
must
give
way
clearly
conflicting
federal
enactments
ridgway
ridgway
determine
whether
state
law
conflicts
congress
purposes
objectives
must
first
ascertain
nature
federal
interest
crosby
hillman
contends
congress
purpose
enacting
feglia
advance
administrative
convenience
establishing
clear
rule
dictate
government
direct
insurance
proceeds
see
brief
petitioner
force
hillman
argument
significant
legislative
interest
large
federal
program
like
feglia
enable
efficient
administration
hillman
correct
administrative
convenience
congress
purpose
might
conflict
section
feglia
section
cause
action
takes
effect
benefits
paid
necessarily
impact
government
distribution
insurance
proceeds
cf
hardy
hardy
ind
part
maretta
insists
congress
substantial
purpose
enacting
feglia
ensure
duly
named
beneficiary
receive
insurance
proceeds
able
make
use
brief
respondent
maretta
correct
section
directly
conflict
objective
cause
action
take
insurance
proceeds
away
named
beneficiary
reallocate
someone
else
must
therefore
determine
understanding
feglia
purpose
correct
write
clean
slate
two
previous
cases
considered
federal
insurance
statutes
requiring
insurance
proceeds
paid
named
beneficiary
held
state
laws
mandated
different
distribution
benefits
statutes
addressed
cases
similar
feglia
impediments
federal
interests
prior
cases
analogous
one
created
section
virginia
statute
precedents
accordingly
govern
analysis
relationship
section
feglia
case
wissner
wissner
considered
whether
national
service
life
insurance
act
nslia
stat
rule
state
marital
property
law
congress
enacted
nslia
affor
uniform
comprehensive
system
life
insurance
members
veterans
armed
forces
wissner
california
granted
decedent
widow
named
beneficiary
interest
insurance
proceeds
community
property
state
law
reversed
holding
nslia
widow
action
recover
proceeds
pertinent
part
nslia
provided
insured
right
designate
beneficiary
beneficiaries
insurance
within
designated
class
shall
times
right
change
beneficiary
beneficiaries
ibid
quoting
reasoned
congress
spoken
force
clarity
directing
proceeds
belong
named
beneficiary
california
decision
stand
found
substitute
widow
mother
beneficiary
congress
directed
shall
receive
insurance
money
ridgway
considered
similar
question
regarding
federal
servicemen
group
life
insurance
act
sglia
pub
stat
another
insurance
scheme
members
armed
services
maine
imposed
constructive
trust
insurance
proceeds
paid
servicemember
widow
named
beneficiary
ordered
paid
decedent
first
wife
required
terms
divorce
decree
holding
constructive
trust
explained
issue
controlled
wissner
wissner
applicable
provisions
sglia
made
clear
insured
service
member
possesses
right
freely
designate
beneficiary
alter
choice
time
communicating
decision
writing
proper
office
citing
wissner
also
noted
sglia
established
precedence
provided
benefits
first
paid
member
may
designated
appropriately
filed
writing
received
prior
death
quoting
notwithstanding
small
differences
sglia
nslia
concluded
sglia
unqualified
pay
proceeds
properly
designated
clearly
suggest
ed
different
result
intended
congress
reasoning
wissner
ridgway
applies
equal
force
statutes
considered
earlier
cases
strikingly
similar
feglia
like
nslia
sglia
feglia
creates
scheme
gives
highest
priority
insured
designated
beneficiary
indeed
feglia
includes
order
precedence
nearly
identical
one
sglia
require
insurance
proceeds
paid
first
named
beneficiary
ahead
potential
recipient
compare
ibid
ed
feglia
implementing
regulations
underscore
employee
right
designation
waived
restricted
cfr
feglia
statutes
congress
force
clarity
directing
proceeds
belong
named
beneficiary
ridgway
quoting
wissner
emphasis
added
section
interferes
congress
scheme
directs
proceeds
actually
belong
someone
named
beneficiary
creating
cause
action
recovery
third
party
ridgway
see
code
ann
makes
difference
whether
state
law
requires
transfer
proceeds
section
creates
cause
action
like
section
enables
another
person
receive
proceeds
upon
filing
action
state
either
case
state
law
displaces
beneficiary
selected
insured
accordance
feglia
places
someone
else
stead
wissner
applicable
state
law
substitutes
widow
beneficiary
congress
directed
shall
receive
insurance
money
thereby
frustrates
deliberate
purpose
congress
ensure
federal
employee
named
beneficiary
receives
proceeds
ibid
one
imagine
plausible
reasons
favor
different
policy
many
employees
perhaps
neglect
update
beneficiary
designations
change
marital
status
result
legislature
thought
default
rule
providing
insurance
proceeds
accrue
widow
widower
named
beneficiary
likely
align
people
intentions
similarly
legislature
might
reasonably
believed
employee
reliable
evidence
intent
beneficiary
designation
form
executed
years
earlier
judgment
congress
rather
draw
inference
employee
probable
intent
range
sources
congress
established
clear
predictable
procedure
employee
indicate
intended
beneficiary
life
insurance
shall
like
statutes
issue
ridgway
wissner
feglia
evinces
congress
decision
accord
federal
employees
unfettered
freedom
choice
selecting
beneficiary
insurance
proceeds
ensure
proceeds
actually
belong
beneficiary
ridgway
employee
ability
name
beneficiary
acts
guarantee
complete
full
performance
contract
exclusion
conflicting
claims
wissner
promise
comes
expectation
insurance
proceeds
paid
named
beneficiary
beneficiary
use
confirmation
congress
intended
insurance
proceeds
paid
accordance
feglia
procedures
section
feglia
provides
ny
amount
otherwise
paid
order
precedence
shall
paid
another
person
extent
expressly
provided
terms
decree
divorce
annulment
legal
separation
exception
however
applies
decree
order
agreement
received
date
covered
employee
death
employing
agency
provision
allows
proceeds
paid
someone
named
beneficiary
requisite
documentation
filed
government
departure
beneficiary
designation
managed
within
outside
federal
explained
congress
explicitly
enumerates
certain
exceptions
general
prohibition
additional
exceptions
implied
absence
evidence
contrary
legislative
intent
andrus
glover
constr
section
creates
limited
exception
order
precedence
make
alternative
distributions
outside
clear
procedure
congress
established
transform
narrow
exception
general
license
state
law
override
feglia
see
trw
andrews
short
beneficiary
duly
named
insurance
proceeds
owed
feglia
allocated
another
person
operation
state
law
section
exactly
therefore
agree
virginia
iii
persuaded
hillman
additional
arguments
support
different
result
hillman
contends
ridgway
wissner
distinguished
unlike
statutes
considered
cases
feglia
include
provision
brief
petitioner
provisions
nslia
sglia
identical
broadly
prohibited
attachment
levy
seizure
insurance
proceeds
legal
process
ed
incorporated
reference
wissner
ridgway
found
relevant
state
laws
violated
provisions
conflict
supported
conclusion
state
laws
discussions
provisions
however
alternative
grounds
support
judgment
case
necessary
components
holdings
see
ridgway
describing
separately
provision
noting
state
law
also
conflicted
noting
wissner
found
provision
independent
ground
result
reached
case
emphasis
added
see
also
rose
rose
describing
wissner
treatment
provision
clearly
alternative
holding
absence
provision
feglia
render
ridgway
wissner
primary
holdings
less
applicable
next
hillman
suggests
wissner
ridgway
set
aside
feglia
contains
express
provision
conflict
principles
ordinarily
apply
brief
petitioner
noted
pass
parties
express
arguments
thus
address
conflict
see
supra
need
consider
whether
section
expressly
hillman
incorrect
suggest
feglia
express
provision
renders
conflict
inapplicable
rather
made
clear
existence
separate
provision
bar
ordinary
working
conflict
principles
sprietsma
mercury
marine
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
arizona
slip
hillman
argues
ridgway
controlling
provision
feglia
specifically
authorizes
employee
assign
fegli
policy
whereas
sglia
implementing
regulations
prohibit
assignment
see
supp
cfr
premise
hillman
argument
feglia
assignment
provision
suggests
employee
less
substantial
interest
ultimately
receives
proceeds
employee
ability
assign
fegli
policy
fact
highlights
congress
intent
allow
employee
wide
latitude
determine
proceeds
paid
whether
named
beneficiary
selects
indirectly
assignment
policy
someone
else
finally
hillman
attempts
distinguish
ridgway
wissner
congress
enacted
statutes
issue
cases
goal
improving
military
morale
brief
petitioner
congress
aim
increasing
morale
armed
services
however
basis
analysis
either
case
see
wissner
ridgway
section
direct
conflict
feglia
interferes
congress
objective
insurance
proceeds
belong
named
beneficiary
accordingly
hold
section
federal
law
judgment
virginia
affirmed
ordered
thomas
concurring
judgment
jacqueline
hillman
petitioner
judy
maretta
writ
certiorari
virginia
june
justice
thomas
concurring
judgment
correctly
concludes
virginia
code
section
federal
employees
group
life
insurance
act
feglia
et
seq
join
purposes
objectives
framework
majority
uses
reach
conclusion
ante
framework
illegitimate
basis
finding
state
law
see
wyeth
levine
thomas
concurring
judgment
entirely
unnecessary
result
case
ordinary
meanings
feglia
section
directly
conflict
accordingly
concur
judgment
supremacy
clause
establishes
federal
law
shall
law
land
thing
constitution
laws
state
contrary
nothwithstanding
art
vi
cl
state
law
conflict
state
law
must
give
way
pliva
mensing
slip
quoting
wyeth
noted
courts
assessing
whether
state
federal
law
conflict
engage
freewheeling
inquiry
whether
state
law
undermines
supposed
federal
purposes
approach
looks
beyond
text
enacted
federal
law
thereby
permits
federal
government
displace
state
law
without
satisfying
essential
precondition
namely
presentment
clause
analysis
therefore
instead
hew
closely
text
structure
provisions
issue
find
duly
enacted
federal
law
effectively
repeal
contrary
state
law
pliva
supra
slip
applying
principles
clear
ordinary
meaning
feglia
directly
conflicts
section
feglia
provides
life
insurance
benefits
paid
according
particular
order
precedence
see
also
cfr
benefits
distributed
first
beneficiary
beneficiaries
designated
employee
signed
witnessed
writing
received
death
insured
fails
designate
beneficiary
feglia
provides
specific
order
benefits
must
distributed
next
widow
widower
employee
absent
widow
widower
child
children
employee
descendants
deceased
children
ibid
ante
insured
right
change
beneficiary
designation
time
without
knowledge
consent
previous
beneficiary
right
waived
restricted
cfr
section
directly
conflicts
statutory
scheme
nullifies
insured
statutory
right
designate
beneficiary
right
designate
beneficiary
encompasses
corresponding
right
named
beneficiary
receive
proceeds
also
retain
indeed
right
designate
beneficiary
well
term
beneficiary
meaningless
effect
designation
saddle
nominal
beneficiary
liability
state
law
full
value
proceeds
section
accomplishes
exactly
transforms
designated
beneficiary
defendant
state
defendant
liable
individual
state
designated
true
beneficiary
hillman
insist
mailed
check
opposed
maretta
designated
beneficiary
section
requires
effect
result
see
ante
section
displaces
beneficiary
selected
insured
accordance
feglia
places
someone
else
stead
right
designate
beneficiary
means
anything
must
conclude
section
directly
conflicts
feglia
order
precedence
direct
conflict
section
feglia
also
evident
fact
section
function
accomplish
section
achieved
section
section
provides
upon
entry
decree
annulment
divorce
bond
matrimony
revocable
beneficiary
designation
contained
existing
written
contract
owned
one
party
provides
payment
death
benefit
party
revoked
death
benefit
prevented
passing
former
spouse
section
shall
paid
former
spouse
predeceased
decedent
code
ann
lexis
cum
supp
parties
agree
feglia
provision
brief
petitioner
brief
respondent
see
also
good
reason
insured
designated
former
spouse
beneficiary
life
insurance
policy
section
purports
revok
designation
event
divorce
annulment
purporting
alter
feglia
statutory
order
precedence
section
clearly
federal
law
tellingly
precisely
context
context
section
operates
see
course
section
preclude
direct
payment
benefits
designated
beneficiary
however
accomplishes
prohibited
result
transforming
designated
party
little
passthrough
true
beneficiary
squared
feglia
consequently
section
must
yield
reasons
agree
conclusion
section
therefore
concur
judgment
alito
concurring
judgment
jacqueline
hillman
petitioner
judy
maretta
writ
certiorari
virginia
june
justice
alito
concurring
judgment
concur
judgment
one
purposes
federal
employees
group
life
insurance
act
feglia
implement
expressed
wishes
insured
hold
state
law
effectively
overrides
insured
actual
articulated
choice
beneficiary
challenged
provision
virginia
law
effect
way
background
code
ann
lexis
supp
provides
entry
divorce
automatically
revokes
insured
prior
designation
former
spouse
beneficiary
policy
case
insured
remarries
divorce
dies
making
new
feglia
designation
proceeds
automatically
paid
insured
former
spouse
provision
virginia
law
issue
surviving
spouse
entitled
recover
proceeds
former
spouse
see
code
ann
section
apparently
requires
result
even
manifests
clear
contrary
intent
providing
specifically
recent
proceeds
go
another
party
example
insured
children
former
marriage
overrides
insured
express
intent
whether
intent
expressed
via
beneficiary
designation
reliable
means
agree
feglia
interpreted
light
prior
decisions
wissner
wissner
ridgway
ridgway
feglia
seems
two
primary
purposes
objectives
first
administrative
convenience
easier
insurance
administrator
pay
insurance
proceeds
person
insured
designated
specified
form
without
consider
claims
made
others
based
ground
affect
initial
payment
proceeds
operates
funds
received
designated
beneficiary
thus
causes
inconvenience
administer
payment
feglia
proceeds
second
purpose
objective
effectuation
insured
expressed
intent
considerations
basis
decisions
wissner
ridgway
understand
cases
conflict
person
insured
beneficiary
another
person
whose
claim
proceeds
based
insured
expressed
intent
cases
held
favor
designated
beneficiary
present
case
bears
similarity
wissner
ridgway
petitioner
claim
depends
upon
state
automatically
alters
ultimate
recipient
divorced
employee
insurance
proceeds
sure
virginia
provision
may
well
reflect
unexpressed
preferences
majority
insureds
whose
situations
similar
insured
case
individuals
divorce
remarriage
fail
change
prior
designation
former
spouse
beneficiary
policy
feglia
prioritizes
insured
expressed
intent
telling
petitioner
theory
still
entitled
insurance
proceeds
even
example
insured
died
shortly
executing
new
leaving
proceeds
someone
else
shows
claim
based
something
manifestation
insured
intent
operates
blunt
tool
override
insured
express
declaration
intent
conflicts
feglia
purpose
prioritizing
insured
articulated
wishes
considerations
affirming
decision
goes
well
beyond
necessary
opines
party
designated
beneficiary
feglia
policy
must
allowed
keep
insurance
proceeds
even
contrary
expressed
intent
indisputable
example
insured
writes
postdivorce
specifically
leaving
proceeds
someone
else
see
ante
explanation
follows
congress
sought
ensure
employee
intent
given
effect
designation
beneficiary
narrow
exceptions
specifically
provided
statute
words
congress
wanted
designated
beneficiary
rather
person
named
later
keep
proceeds
congress
wanted
named
beneficiary
keep
proceeds
needless
say
circular
reasoning
explain
congress
might
wanted
designated
beneficiary
keep
proceeds
even
indisputably
contrary
insured
expressed
wishes
time
death
doubtful
purpose
objective
feglia
honored
holding
necessary
resolve
question
case
reasons
concur
judgment
footnotes
justice
scalia
joins
opinion
compare
metropolitan
life
ins
zaldivar
feglia
rule
metropolitan
life
ins
sullivan
per
curiam
metropolitan
life
ins
mcmorris
gonzalez
hardy
hardy
ind
mccord
spradling
miss
kidd
pritzel
mo
app
hillman
points
textual
differences
among
nslia
sglia
feglia
suggests
example
provision
nslia
enabling
appointment
beneficiary
use
precisely
feglia
order
precedence
reply
brief
even
small
differences
statutory
language
however
diminish
critical
similarity
shared
three
statutes
reflects
congress
unqualified
directive
proceeds
accrue
named
beneficiary
ridgway
concurrence
justice
alito
argues
one
feglia
purposes
effectuat
insured
expressed
intent
evidence
beyond
employee
named
beneficiary
therefore
relevant
circumstances
determining
intent
post
opinion
concurring
judgment
emphasis
original
reasons
explained
however
statement
congress
purpose
incomplete
see
supra
congress
sought
ensure
employee
intent
given
effect
designation
beneficiary
narrow
exceptions
specifically
provided
statute
see
infra
congress
enacted
following
decisions
found
feglia
constructive
trust
actions
predicated
upon
divorce
decrees
see
gonzalez
reflecting
backdrop
house
report
noted
current
law
divorce
decrees
affect
payment
life
insurance
proceeds
instead
policyholder
dies
proceeds
paid
beneficiary
designated
policyholder
individuals
specified
statute
address
issue
raised
lower
cases
congress
amended
feglia
allow
state
law
take
precedence
named
beneficiary
conflict
divorce
decree
annulment
congress
instead
described
precise
conditions
divorce
decree
displace
employee
named
beneficiary
hillman
contends
feglia
indicates
congress
contemplated
proceeds
paid
someone
named
beneficiary
section
consistent
broad
principle
brief
petitioner
noted
however
opposite
implication
framed
specific
exception
rule
proceeds
accrue
cases
named
beneficiary
hillman
suggests
general
rule
authorizing
state
law
supersede
feglia