exxon
mobil
et
al
saudi
basic
industries
argued
february
decided
march
doctrine
issue
case
applied
twice
rooker
fidelity
trust
district
columbia
appeals
feldman
rooker
plaintiffs
previously
defeated
state
filed
suit
federal
district
alleging
adverse
judgment
unconstitutional
asking
declared
null
void
noting
preliminarily
state
acted
within
jurisdiction
explained
decision
wrong
make
judgment
void
merely
left
open
reversal
modification
appropriate
timely
appellate
proceeding
federal
district
courts
rooker
recognized
empowered
exercise
original
appellate
jurisdictions
congress
empowered
alone
exercise
appellate
authority
reverse
modify
judgment
affirmed
decree
dismissing
federal
suit
lack
jurisdiction
feldman
two
plaintiffs
brought
actions
district
columbia
highest
denied
petitions
waive
rule
requiring
bar
applicants
graduated
accredited
law
school
recalling
rooker
observed
district
lacked
authority
review
final
judicial
determination
high
review
obtained
concluding
proceedings
applying
accreditation
rule
plaintiffs
judicial
nature
ruled
federal
district
lacked
jurisdiction
however
concluding
also
promulgating
bar
admission
rule
acted
legislatively
judicially
held
bar
district
addressing
validity
rule
long
plaintiffs
seek
review
rule
application
particular
case
since
feldman
never
applied
dismiss
action
want
jurisdiction
however
lower
federal
courts
variously
interpreted
doctrine
extend
far
beyond
contours
rooker
feldman
cases
overriding
congress
conferral
jurisdiction
concurrent
jurisdiction
exercised
state
courts
superseding
ordinary
application
preclusion
law
case
two
subsidiaries
petitioner
exxon
mobil
corporation
formed
joint
ventures
respondent
saudi
basic
industries
sabic
produce
polyethylene
saudi
arabia
dispute
arose
royalties
sabic
charged
joint
ventures
sabic
preemptively
sued
two
subsidiaries
delaware
state
seeking
declaratory
judgment
royalties
proper
exxonmobil
subsidiaries
countersued
federal
district
alleging
sabic
overcharged
trial
ultimately
yielded
jury
verdict
million
exxonmobil
subsidiaries
district
denied
sabic
motion
dismiss
federal
suit
interlocutory
appeal
eight
months
jury
verdict
third
circuit
motion
raised
question
whether
jurisdiction
federal
suit
failed
doctrine
exxonmobil
claims
already
litigated
state
question
district
jurisdiction
suit
outset
held
federal
jurisdiction
terminated
delaware
entered
judgment
jury
verdict
held
doctrine
confined
cases
kind
acquired
name
cases
brought
losers
complaining
injuries
caused
judgments
rendered
federal
district
proceedings
commenced
inviting
district
review
rejection
judgments
otherwise
override
supplant
preclusion
doctrine
augment
circumscribed
doctrines
allowing
federal
courts
stay
dismiss
proceedings
deference
actions
pp
rooker
feldman
exhibit
limited
circumstances
appellate
jurisdiction
judgments
precludes
federal
district
exercising
jurisdiction
action
otherwise
empowered
adjudicate
congressional
grant
authority
cases
plaintiffs
alleging
jurisdiction
called
upon
district
overturn
injurious
judgment
long
interpreted
vests
authority
review
judgment
solely
feldman
parallel
state
federal
litigation
triggered
simply
entry
judgment
state
see
mcclellan
carland
comity
abstention
doctrines
may
various
circumstances
permit
require
federal
stay
dismiss
federal
action
favor
litigation
see
colorado
river
water
conservation
dist
neither
rooker
feldman
supports
notion
properly
invoked
concurrent
jurisdiction
vanishes
state
reaches
judgment
related
question
case
remains
sub
judice
federal
disposition
federal
action
adjudication
complete
governed
preclusion
law
federal
courts
must
give
preclusive
effect
judgment
another
state
give
parsons
steel
first
alabama
bank
preclusion
jurisdictional
matter
see
fed
rule
civ
proc
parallel
litigation
federal
may
bound
recognize
effects
judgment
federal
jurisdiction
action
terminate
automatically
entry
judgment
state
stop
district
exercising
jurisdiction
simply
party
attempts
litigate
federal
matter
previously
litigated
state
federal
plaintiff
presents
independent
claim
even
one
denies
state
legal
conclusion
case
plaintiff
party
jurisdiction
state
law
determines
whether
defendant
prevails
preclusion
principles
pp
doctrine
preclude
federal
proceeding
case
exxonmobil
repaired
federal
undo
delaware
judgment
favor
appears
filed
suit
two
weeks
sabic
filed
delaware
well
judgment
state
protect
event
lost
state
grounds
state
statute
limitations
might
preclude
relief
federal
venue
prevent
district
exercising
jurisdiction
exxonmobil
filed
federal
action
emerge
vanquish
jurisdiction
exxonmobil
prevailed
delaware
courts
third
circuit
misperceived
narrow
ground
occupied
consequently
erred
ordering
federal
action
dismissed
pp
reversed
remanded
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
unanimous
exxon
mobil
corporation
exxon
chemical
arabia
mobil
yanbu
cal
company
petitioners
saudi
basic
industries
corporation
writ
certiorari
appeals
third
circuit
march
justice
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
case
concerns
come
known
doctrine
applied
twice
first
rooker
fidelity
trust
years
later
district
columbia
appeals
feldman
variously
interpreted
lower
courts
doctrine
sometimes
construed
extend
far
beyond
contours
rooker
feldman
cases
overriding
congress
conferral
jurisdiction
concurrent
jurisdiction
exercised
state
courts
superseding
ordinary
application
preclusion
law
pursuant
see
moccio
new
york
state
office
rooker
suit
commenced
federal
district
judgment
state
adverse
federal
plaintiffs
declared
null
void
feldman
parties
unsuccessful
district
columbia
appeals
district
highest
commenced
action
rejected
applications
holding
federal
suits
impermissible
emphasized
appellate
jurisdiction
reverse
modify
judgment
lodged
initially
judiciary
act
stat
exclusively
federal
district
courts
noted
empowered
exercise
original
appellate
jurisdiction
plaintiffs
rooker
feldman
litigated
lost
state
federal
complaints
observed
essentially
invited
federal
courts
first
instance
review
reverse
unfavorable
judgments
declared
suits
bounds
properly
dismissed
want
jurisdiction
doctrine
hold
today
confined
cases
kind
doctrine
acquired
name
cases
brought
losers
complaining
injuries
caused
judgments
rendered
district
proceedings
commenced
inviting
district
review
rejection
judgments
otherwise
override
supplant
preclusion
doctrine
augment
circumscribed
doctrines
allow
federal
courts
stay
dismiss
proceedings
deference
actions
case
us
appeals
third
circuit
misperceived
narrow
ground
occupied
consequently
erred
ordering
federal
action
dismissed
lack
jurisdiction
therefore
reverse
third
circuit
judgment
rooker
fidelity
trust
parties
defeated
state
turned
federal
district
relief
alleging
adverse
judgment
rendered
contravention
constitution
asked
federal
declare
null
void
noted
preliminarily
state
acted
within
jurisdiction
decision
wrong
explained
make
judgment
void
merely
left
open
reversal
modification
appropriate
timely
appellate
proceeding
ibid
federal
district
courts
rooker
recognized
lacked
requisite
appellate
authority
jurisdiction
strictly
original
among
federal
courts
rooker
clarified
congress
empowered
exercise
appellate
authority
reverse
modify
judgment
ibid
accordingly
affirmed
decree
dismissing
suit
lack
jurisdiction
sixty
years
later
decided
district
columbia
appeals
feldman
two
plaintiffs
case
hickey
feldman
neither
graduated
accredited
law
school
petitioned
district
columbia
appeals
waive
rule
required
bar
applicants
graduated
law
school
approved
american
bar
association
denied
waiver
requests
hickey
feldman
filed
suits
district
district
columbia
district
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
disagreed
question
whether
federal
suit
maintained
granted
certiorari
recalling
rooker
opinion
feldman
observed
first
district
lacked
authority
review
final
judicial
determination
high
review
determinations
feldman
opinion
reiterated
obtained
crucial
question
next
stated
whether
proceedings
judicial
nature
ibid
addressing
question
concluded
acted
judicially
legislatively
applying
accreditation
rule
hickey
feldman
waiver
petitions
determined
acted
judicially
adjudication
feldman
held
alone
among
federal
courts
review
authority
hence
extent
hickey
feldman
sought
review
district
district
columbia
appeals
denial
petitions
waiver
district
lacked
jurisdiction
complaints
determination
dispose
entire
case
promulgating
bar
admission
rule
said
acted
legislatively
judicially
challenges
constitutionality
state
bar
rules
elaborated
necessarily
require
district
review
final
judgment
judicial
proceeding
thus
reasoned
bar
district
proceedings
addressed
validity
accreditation
rule
feldman
rule
contested
federal
held
long
plaintiffs
seek
review
rule
application
particular
case
ibid
endeavored
separate
elements
hickey
feldman
complaints
failed
jurisdictional
threshold
survived
jurisdictional
inspection
plaintiffs
urged
district
columbia
appeals
acted
arbitrarily
denying
waiver
petitions
hickey
feldman
given
former
policy
granting
waivers
graduates
unaccredited
law
schools
ibid
charge
held
pursued
inextricably
intertwined
district
columbia
appeals
decisions
judicial
proceedings
deny
plaintiffs
petitions
hand
said
plaintiffs
maintain
claims
bar
admission
rule
unconstitutional
creates
irrebuttable
presumption
graduates
accredited
law
schools
fit
practice
law
discriminates
obtained
equivalent
legal
training
means
impermissibly
delegates
district
columbia
appeals
power
regulate
bar
american
bar
association
claims
require
review
judicial
decision
particular
case
left
open
question
whether
doctrine
res
judicata
foreclosed
litigation
elements
complaints
spared
dismissal
want
jurisdiction
since
feldman
never
applied
dismiss
action
want
jurisdiction
decisions
mentioned
rooker
feldman
done
passing
explain
cases
dictate
dismissal
see
verizon
md
public
serv
apply
suit
seeking
review
state
agency
action
johnson
de
grandy
bars
losing
party
state
seeking
substance
appellate
review
state
judgment
district
based
losing
party
claim
state
judgment
violates
loser
federal
rights
doctrine
application
federal
suit
brought
nonparty
state
suit
howlett
rose
citing
rooker
feldman
rule
federal
district
entertain
original
action
alleging
state
violated
constitution
giving
effect
unconstitutional
state
statute
asarco
kadish
instead
seeking
review
adverse
state
decision
petitioners
sued
federal
district
federal
action
attempt
obtain
direct
review
state
decision
represent
partial
inroad
construction
pennzoil
texaco
abstaining
younger
harris
rather
dismissing
suit
challenged
texas
procedures
enforcing
judgments
stevens
dissenting
anomalous
allow
courts
sit
review
judgments
entered
courts
equal
greater
authority
citing
rooker
feldman
ii
two
subsidiaries
petitioner
exxon
mobil
corporation
separate
companies
exxon
mobil
formed
joint
ventures
respondent
saudi
basic
industries
sabic
produce
polyethylene
saudi
arabia
supp
nj
two
decades
later
parties
began
dispute
royalties
sabic
charged
joint
ventures
sublicenses
polyethylene
manufacturing
method
sabic
preemptively
sued
two
exxonmobil
subsidiaries
delaware
superior
july
seeking
declaratory
judgment
royalty
charges
proper
joint
venture
agreements
supp
two
weeks
later
exxonmobil
subsidiaries
countersued
sabic
district
district
new
jersey
alleging
sabic
overcharged
joint
ventures
sublicenses
app
exxonmobil
invoked
jurisdiction
new
jersey
action
authorizes
district
courts
adjudicate
actions
foreign
supp
january
exxonmobil
subsidiaries
answered
sabic
complaint
asserting
counterclaims
claims
exxonmobil
made
federal
suit
new
jersey
state
suit
went
trial
march
jury
returned
verdict
million
favor
exxonmobil
subsidiaries
ibid
saudi
basic
industries
mobil
yanbu
petrochemical
del
sabic
appealed
judgment
entered
verdict
delaware
trial
sabic
moved
dismiss
federal
suit
alleging
inter
alia
immunity
foreign
sovereign
immunities
act
et
seq
ed
supp
ii
federal
district
denied
sabic
motion
dismiss
supp
sabic
took
interlocutory
appeal
appeals
heard
argument
december
eight
months
jury
verdict
appeals
motion
raised
question
whether
subject
matter
jurisdiction
case
fails
doctrine
exxonmobil
claims
already
litigated
state
question
district
possession
jurisdiction
outset
suit
held
federal
jurisdiction
terminated
delaware
superior
entered
judgment
jury
verdict
rejected
exxonmobil
argument
apply
exxonmobil
filed
federal
complaint
well
judgment
relevant
consideration
stated
whether
state
judgment
precedes
federal
judgment
claims
apply
federal
actions
filed
prior
judgment
appeals
worried
encouraging
parties
maintain
federal
actions
policies
state
claims
pending
exxonmobil
claims
litigated
judgment
state
appeals
held
preclude
federal
district
proceeding
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
exxonmobil
point
prevailing
delaware
seeking
overturn
judgment
nevertheless
appeals
hypothesized
sabic
appeal
delaware
exxonmobil
endeavoring
federal
action
invalidate
judgment
situation
concluded
contemplated
intertwined
bar
granted
certiorari
resolve
conflict
among
courts
appeals
scope
doctrine
reverse
judgment
appeals
third
iii
rooker
feldman
exhibit
limited
circumstances
appellate
jurisdiction
judgments
precludes
district
exercising
jurisdiction
action
otherwise
empowered
adjudicate
congressional
grant
authority
suits
foreign
federal
question
diversity
cases
losing
party
state
filed
suit
federal
state
proceedings
ended
complaining
injury
caused
judgment
seeking
review
rejection
judgment
plaintiffs
cases
alleging
jurisdiction
called
upon
district
overturn
injurious
judgment
long
interpreted
vests
authority
review
state
judgment
solely
feldman
rooker
district
courts
rooker
feldman
lacked
jurisdiction
see
verizon
md
doctrine
merely
recognizes
grant
original
jurisdiction
authorize
district
courts
exercise
appellate
jurisdiction
judgments
congress
reserved
see
parallel
state
federal
litigation
triggered
simply
entry
judgment
state
repeatedly
held
pendency
action
state
bar
proceedings
concerning
matter
federal
jurisdiction
mcclellan
carland
accord
doran
salem
inn
atlantic
coast
line
younger
harris
burford
sun
oil
railroad
tex
pullman
neither
rooker
feldman
supports
notion
properly
invoked
concurrent
jurisdiction
vanishes
state
reaches
judgment
related
question
case
remains
sub
judice
federal
disposition
federal
action
adjudication
complete
governed
preclusion
law
full
faith
credit
act
originally
enacted
ch
stat
requires
federal
give
preclusive
effect
judgment
another
state
give
parsons
steel
first
alabama
bank
accord
matsushita
elec
industrial
epstein
marrese
american
academy
orthopaedic
surgeons
preclusion
course
jurisdictional
matter
see
fed
rule
civ
proc
listing
res
judicata
affirmative
defense
parallel
litigation
federal
may
bound
recognize
effects
judgment
federal
jurisdiction
action
terminate
automatically
entry
judgment
state
stop
district
exercising
jurisdiction
simply
party
attempts
litigate
federal
matter
previously
litigated
state
federal
plaintiff
present
independent
claim
albeit
one
denies
legal
conclusion
state
reached
case
party
jurisdiction
state
law
determines
whether
defendant
prevails
principles
preclusion
gash
assocs
village
rosemont
accord
noel
hall
case
surely
paradigm
situation
precludes
federal
district
proceeding
quoting
verniero
exxonmobil
plainly
repaired
federal
undo
delaware
judgment
favor
rather
appears
exxonmobil
filed
suit
federal
district
two
weeks
sabic
filed
delaware
well
judgment
state
protect
event
lost
state
grounds
state
statute
limitations
might
preclude
relief
federal
venue
tr
oral
arg
app
prevent
district
exercising
jurisdiction
exxonmobil
filed
federal
action
emerge
vanquish
jurisdiction
exxonmobil
prevailed
delaware
courts
reasons
stated
judgment
appeals
third
circuit
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
earlier
opinion
used
expression
explained
district
entertain
constitutional
claims
attacking
judgment
even
state
passed
directly
claims
constitutional
attack
inextricably
intertwined
state
judgment
district
columbia
appeals
feldman
respondent
saudi
basic
industries
urges
asarco
kadish
expanded
jurisdictional
bar
include
federal
actions
simply
raise
claims
previously
litigated
state
brief
respondent
asarco
petitioners
defendants
action
sought
review
arizona
invalidation
state
statute
governing
mineral
leases
state
lands
dismissed
suggestion
petitioners
pursued
claim
new
action
federal
district
action
said
essence
attempt
obtain
direct
review
arizona
decision
lower
federal
courts
contravention
injury
petitioners
losing
parties
state
complained
hypothetical
federal
suit
caused
state
invalidation
mineral
leases
relief
sought
undo
state
invalidation
statute
hypothetical
suit
asarco
therefore
shares
characteristics
suits
rooker
feldman
loser
state
invites
federal
district
overturn
judgment
decided
rooker
decided
feldman
cited
rooker
one
opinion
fishgold
sullivan
drydock
repair
reference
finality
prior
judgments
see
rooker
fidelity
trust
unless
reversed
modified
judgment
effective
conclusive
rooker
appearance
reports
occurs
justice
white
dissent
denial
certiorari
florida
state
bd
dentistry
mack
sabic
saudi
arabian
corporation
owned
saudi
government
owned
private
investors
supp
exxonmobil
request
appeals
initially
stayed
consideration
appeal
await
resolution
proceedings
delaware
app
november
shortly
sabic
filed
appeal
delaware
appeals
sabic
motion
lifted
stay
set
appeal
argument
one
day
argument
appeals
directed
parties
prepared
address
whether
doctrine
deprived
district
jurisdiction
case
app
sabic
contends
case
moot
delaware
affirmed
judgment
favor
exxonmobil
saudi
basic
industries
mobil
yanbu
petrochemical
denied
reargument
en
banc
saudi
basic
industries
mobil
yanbu
petrochemical
brief
respondent
sabic
continues
oppose
delaware
judgment
however
represented
petition
writ
certiorari
tr
oral
arg
controversy
therefore
remains
live
congress
minded
may
explicitly
empower
district
courts
oversee
certain
judgments
done
notably
authorizing
federal
habeas
review
state
prisoners
petitions
appeals
criticized
exxonmobil
pursuing
federal
suit
insurance
policy
adverse
result
state
nothing
necessarily
inappropriate
however
filing
protective
action
see
rhines
weber
ante
permitting
federal
district
stay
federal
habeas
action
hold
petition
abeyance
petitioner
exhausts
claims
state
union
pacific
dept
revenue
noting
railroad
company
filed
protective
actions
state
prevent
expiration
state
statute
limitations
government
virgin
islands
neadle
supp
md
staying
action
brought
plaintiffs
protect
event
personal
jurisdiction
defendants
failed
district
virgin
islands
see
also
england
louisiana
bd
medical
examiners
permitting
party
reserve
litigation
federal
constitutional
claims
federal
state
resolves
questions
state
law