construction
national
labor
relations
board
et
argued
april
decided
june
petitioner
contract
modernize
steel
mill
mill
owner
filed
federal
lawsuit
respondent
unions
claiming
unions
engaged
lobbying
litigation
concerted
activities
order
delay
project
petitioner
nonunion
employees
ultimately
petitioner
lost
withdrew
claims
meantime
two
unions
lodged
complaints
petitioner
respondent
national
labor
relations
board
board
federal
proceedings
ended
board
general
counsel
issued
administrative
complaint
alleging
petitioner
filing
maintaining
lawsuit
violated
national
labor
relations
act
nlra
prohibits
employers
restraining
coercing
interfering
employees
exercise
rights
related
collective
bargaining
concerted
activities
board
ruled
general
counsel
favor
finding
lawsuit
unmeritorious
claims
dismissed
voluntarily
withdrawn
prejudice
filed
retaliate
unions
whose
conduct
protected
nlra
ordered
petitioner
cease
desist
prosecuting
suits
post
notice
employees
acknowledging
board
finding
promising
pursue
litigation
future
pay
unions
legal
fees
expenses
incurred
lawsuit
sixth
circuit
granted
board
enforcement
petition
relying
bill
johnson
restaurants
nlrb
held
judiciary
already
found
petitioner
claims
unions
unmeritorious
dismissed
evidence
simple
retaliatory
motive
sufficed
adjudge
petitioner
committing
unfair
labor
practice
also
rejected
petitioner
argument
professional
real
estate
investors
columbia
pictures
industries
baseless
sham
suits
restrict
otherwise
unfettered
right
seek
resolution
differences
finding
case
inapplicable
immunity
standard
established
antitrust
context
held
board
standard
imposing
liability
invalid
pp
right
petition
one
precious
liberties
safeguarded
bill
rights
considered
right
interpreting
federal
law
recognizing
antitrust
context
example
genuine
petitioning
immune
liability
sham
petitioning
definition
adopted
professional
real
estate
investors
requires
sham
antitrust
litigation
must
objectively
baseless
reasonable
litigant
realistically
expect
success
merits
litigant
subjective
motivation
must
conceal
attempt
interfere
directly
competitor
business
relationship
use
governmental
process
anticompetitive
weapon
suit
raises
underlying
issue
litigation
may
found
violate
federal
law
respect
nlra
recognizing
connection
previously
decided
board
enjoin
lawsuits
analogizing
antitrust
context
holding
board
enjoin
ongoing
baseless
suits
brought
retaliatory
motive
however
issue
standard
declaring
completed
suits
unlawful
bill
johnson
addressed
issue
dicta
noting
standard
allow
board
declare
lost
withdrawn
suit
violated
nlra
retaliatory
however
issue
bill
johnson
ongoing
suits
consider
precise
scope
term
retaliation
although
statements
regarding
completed
litigation
intended
guide
proceedings
expressly
order
board
adhere
prior
unlawfulness
finding
stated
standard
exercising
customary
refusal
bound
dicta
turns
question
presented
pp
objective
component
professional
real
estate
investors
sham
litigation
standard
protects
reasonably
based
petitioning
antitrust
liability
subjective
component
also
protects
petitioning
unmotivated
anticompetitive
intent
whether
reasonably
based
board
argues
broad
immunity
necessary
antitrust
context
treble
damages
remedy
privately
initiated
lawsuits
unnecessary
labor
law
context
adjudication
launched
solely
private
action
board
issue
punitive
remedies
arguments
show
nlra
poses
less
burden
petitioning
burdens
raise
first
amendment
concerns
board
may
declare
reasonably
based
unsuccessful
retaliatory
lawsuit
violates
nlra
resulting
illegality
finding
burden
finding
also
poses
threat
reputational
harm
different
additional
burden
imposed
penalties
identified
burden
must
examine
petitioning
activity
affects
bill
johnson
said
board
enjoin
baseless
retaliatory
suits
fell
outside
first
amendment
thus
analogous
false
statements
issue
however
class
reasonably
based
unsuccessful
lawsuits
whether
class
falls
outside
petition
clause
least
presents
difficult
constitutional
question
given
following
considerations
first
even
though
lawsuits
class
unsuccessful
class
includes
suits
involving
genuine
grievances
genuineness
turn
whether
grievance
succeeds
second
even
unsuccessful
reasonably
based
suits
advance
first
amendment
interests
finally
analogy
baseless
suits
false
statements
directly
extend
suits
unsuccessful
reasonably
based
board
confines
penalties
unsuccessful
suits
brought
retaliatory
motive
must
also
consider
significance
particular
limitation
fairly
included
within
question
presented
pp
board
definition
retaliatory
suit
one
brought
motive
interfere
exercise
protected
nlra
rights
covers
substantial
amount
genuine
petitioning
example
employer
suit
stop
employer
reasonably
believes
illegal
union
conduct
may
interfere
deter
employees
exercise
nlra
rights
employer
motive
still
reflects
subjectively
genuine
desire
test
conduct
legality
declaring
suit
illegal
affects
genuine
petitioning
board
also
claims
rely
evidence
antiunion
animus
infer
retaliatory
motive
yet
ill
uncommon
litigation
first
amendment
contexts
found
problematic
regulate
demonstrably
false
expression
based
presence
ill
thus
difficult
constitutional
question
made
significantly
easier
board
retaliatory
motive
limitation
final
question
whether
light
nlra
important
goals
board
may
nevertheless
burden
unsuccessful
reasonably
based
suit
brought
retaliatory
purpose
speech
burdens
different
antitrust
context
still
faced
difficult
constitutional
question
whether
class
petitioning
may
declared
unlawful
substantial
portion
subjectively
objectively
genuine
avoided
similarly
difficult
first
amendment
issue
edward
debartolo
florida
gulf
coast
building
constr
trades
council
adopting
limiting
construction
relevant
nlra
provision
section
prohibition
interfering
restraining
coercing
facially
broad
prohibition
debartolo
need
read
broadly
reach
entire
class
cases
board
deemed
retaliatory
nothing
text
indicates
must
read
reach
reasonably
based
unsuccessful
suits
filed
retaliatory
purpose
declines
board
standard
imposing
nlra
liability
allows
penalize
suits
standard
invalid
pp
reversed
remanded
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
scalia
kennedy
thomas
joined
scalia
filed
concurring
opinion
thomas
joined
breyer
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
stevens
souter
ginsburg
joined
construction
company
petitioner
national
labor
relations
board
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
sixth
circuit
june
justice
delivered
opinion
petitioner
sued
respondent
unions
claiming
lobbying
litigation
concerted
activities
violated
federal
labor
law
antitrust
law
petitioner
lost
withdrew
claims
national
labor
relations
board
decided
petitioner
violated
federal
labor
law
prosecuting
unsuccessful
suit
retaliatory
motive
appeals
affirmed
find
board
lacked
authority
assess
liability
using
standard
reverse
remand
petitioner
industrial
general
contractor
received
contract
modernize
california
steel
mill
near
beginning
according
petitioner
various
unions
attempted
delay
project
petitioner
employees
nonunion
ibid
september
petitioner
mill
operator
filed
suit
unions
district
northern
district
california
app
pet
cert
suit
based
following
basic
allegations
first
unions
lobbied
adoption
enforcement
emissions
standard
despite
real
concern
project
harm
environment
second
unions
handbilled
picketed
petitioner
site
also
encouraged
strikes
among
employees
petitioner
subcontractors
without
revealing
reasons
disagreement
ibid
third
delay
construction
project
raise
costs
unions
filed
action
state
alleging
violations
california
health
safety
code
finally
unions
launched
grievance
proceedings
petitioner
joint
venture
partner
based
inapplicable
collective
bargaining
agreements
initially
petitioner
mill
operator
sought
damages
relations
act
lmra
stat
amended
provides
cause
action
labor
organizations
injuries
caused
secondary
boycotts
prohibited
district
granted
unions
motion
summary
judgment
plaintiffs
claims
plaintiffs
amended
complaint
allege
unions
activities
violated
sherman
act
stat
amended
prohibit
certain
agreements
restraint
trade
monopolization
attempts
monopolize
district
dismissed
amended
complaint
however
realleged
claims
already
decided
district
also
dismissed
plaintiffs
claim
regarding
unions
state
lawsuit
since
plaintiffs
evidence
suit
reasonably
based
two
unions
plaintiffs
sued
never
parties
state
action
plaintiffs
filed
second
amended
complaint
included
remaining
claims
realleged
claims
already
decided
ibid
app
district
dismissed
decided
claims
imposed
sanctions
plaintiffs
federal
rule
civil
procedure
point
mill
operator
dismissed
remaining
claims
prejudice
ibid
district
granted
summary
judgment
unions
petitioner
antitrust
claim
petitioner
unable
show
unions
formed
combination
nonlabor
entities
illegitimate
purpose
ibid
petitioner
dismissed
remaining
claims
appealed
appeals
ninth
circuit
affirmed
dismissal
petitioner
antitrust
claim
held
district
erred
requiring
petitioner
prove
unions
combined
nonlabor
entities
illegitimate
purpose
found
error
harmless
since
unions
antitrust
immunity
lobbying
officials
petitioning
courts
agencies
unless
activity
sham
industries
contra
costa
county
bldg
const
trades
council
petitioner
argue
unions
litigation
activity
objectively
baseless
maintained
unions
engaged
pattern
automatic
petitioning
governmental
bodies
without
regard
merits
said
petitions
ibid
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
emphasis
added
ninth
circuit
allowed
petitioner
claim
proved
overcome
unions
antitrust
immunity
rejected
nonetheless
fifteen
actions
filed
unions
proven
successful
fact
half
actions
turn
merit
reconciled
charge
unions
filing
without
regard
success
omitted
ninth
circuit
reversed
district
award
rule
sanctions
however
petitioner
explained
realleged
decided
claims
based
circuit
precedent
suggesting
necessary
preserve
appeal
ibid
although
ninth
circuit
decided
rule
apply
amended
complaints
following
summary
judgment
held
petitioner
view
frivolous
counsel
blamed
err
ing
side
caution
meantime
two
unions
lodged
complaints
petitioner
national
labor
relations
board
board
federal
proceedings
ended
board
general
counsel
issued
administrative
complaint
petitioner
alleging
violated
national
labor
relations
act
nlra
stat
amended
filing
maintaining
federal
lawsuit
app
pet
cert
section
prohibits
employers
restraining
coercing
interfering
employees
exercise
rights
related
collective
bargaining
concerted
activities
panel
board
addressed
summary
judgment
ruled
favor
general
counsel
panel
determined
petitioner
federal
lawsuit
unmeritorious
petitioner
claims
dismissed
voluntarily
withdrawn
prejudice
app
pet
cert
panel
examined
whether
petitioner
suit
filed
retaliate
unions
engaging
activities
protected
nlra
panel
first
concluded
unions
conduct
protected
activity
decided
petitioner
lawsuit
unlawfully
motivated
directed
protected
conduct
necessarily
tended
discourage
similar
protected
activity
petitioner
admitted
filed
suit
stop
certain
nion
conduct
believed
unprotected
panel
found
additional
evidence
retaliatory
motive
petitioner
sued
unions
parties
state
lawsuit
panel
also
found
evidence
retaliatory
motive
petitioner
lmra
claims
utter
absence
merit
dismissed
summary
judgment
determining
petitioner
suit
violated
nlra
unsuccessful
retaliatory
panel
ordered
petitioner
cease
desist
prosecuting
suits
post
notice
employees
admitting
found
violated
nlra
promising
pursue
litigation
future
panel
also
ordered
petitioner
pay
unions
legal
fees
expenses
incurred
defense
federal
suit
petitioner
sought
review
board
decision
appeals
sixth
circuit
board
enforcement
order
sixth
circuit
granted
board
petition
relying
bill
johnson
restaurants
nlrb
sixth
circuit
held
judicial
branch
government
already
determined
petitioner
claims
unions
unmeritorious
dismissed
evidence
simple
retaliatory
motive
suffice
adjudge
petitioner
committing
unfair
labor
practice
rejected
petitioner
argument
professional
real
estate
investors
columbia
pictures
industries
baseless
sham
suits
serve
restrict
otherwise
unfettered
right
seek
resolution
differences
instead
decided
professional
real
estate
investors
inapplicable
immunity
standard
established
antitrust
context
without
reference
standard
determining
completed
litigation
violates
nlra
sixth
circuit
found
substantial
evidence
supported
board
inference
retaliatory
motive
petitioner
filed
unmeritorious
suit
realleged
previously
decided
claims
sought
treble
damages
antitrust
claim
sought
damages
unions
parties
state
suit
also
upheld
board
award
attorney
fees
petitioner
sought
review
sixth
circuit
judgment
petition
certiorari
raised
four
separate
questions
granted
certiorari
following
rephrased
question
appeals
err
holding
bill
johnson
restaurants
nlrb
nlrb
may
impose
liability
employer
filing
losing
retaliatory
lawsuit
even
employer
show
suit
objectively
baseless
professional
real
estate
investors
columbia
pictures
industries
reverse
judgment
sixth
circuit
remand
ii
first
amendment
provides
relevant
part
congress
shall
make
law
abridging
right
people
petition
government
redress
grievances
recognized
right
petition
one
precious
liberties
safeguarded
bill
rights
mine
workers
illinois
bar
explained
right
implied
idea
government
republican
form
cruikshank
also
considered
right
petition
interpreting
federal
law
antitrust
context
example
held
sherman
act
prohibit
persons
associating
attempt
persuade
legislature
executive
take
particular
action
respect
law
produce
restraint
monopoly
eastern
railroad
presidents
conference
noerr
motor
freight
based
interpretation
part
principle
lightly
impute
congress
intent
invade
freedoms
protected
bill
rights
right
petition
later
made
clear
antitrust
immunity
shields
sherman
act
concerted
effort
influence
public
officials
regardless
intent
purpose
mine
workers
pennington
antitrust
immunity
principles
extended
situations
groups
use
courts
advocate
causes
points
view
respecting
resolution
business
economic
interests
competitors
california
motor
transport
trucking
unlimited
emphasis
added
thus
made
explicit
right
petition
extends
departments
government
right
access
courts
one
aspect
right
petition
even
however
emphasized
immunity
extend
illegal
reprehensible
practice
may
corrupt
judicial
proces
hearkening
back
earlier
statement
antitrust
immunity
extend
lobbying
ostensibly
directed
toward
influencing
governmental
action
mere
sham
cover
actually
nothing
attempt
interfere
directly
business
relationships
competitor
noerr
supra
line
cases
thus
establishes
genuine
petitioning
immune
antitrust
liability
sham
petitioning
professional
real
estate
investors
adopted
definition
sham
antitrust
litigation
first
must
objectively
baseless
sense
reasonable
litigant
realistically
expect
success
merits
second
litigant
subjective
motivation
must
concea
attempt
interfere
directly
business
relationships
competitor
use
governmental
process
opposed
outcome
process
anticompetitive
weapon
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
emphasis
original
suit
violate
antitrust
laws
must
sham
objectively
subjectively
case
raises
underlying
issue
litigation
may
found
violate
federal
law
time
respect
nlra
rather
sherman
act
recognizing
underlying
connection
previously
decided
whether
board
enjoin
state
lawsuits
analogizing
antitrust
context
bill
johnson
restaurant
owner
filed
state
lawsuit
individuals
picketed
restaurant
waitress
fired
owner
alleged
picketing
harassing
dangerous
leaflet
distributed
picketers
libelous
waitress
filed
charge
board
claiming
suit
filed
retaliation
participation
protected
activities
administrative
law
judge
alj
decided
owner
suit
lacked
reasonable
basis
intended
penalize
protected
activity
based
assessment
evidence
credibility
board
upheld
determination
ordered
owner
withdraw
suit
pay
defendants
legal
expenses
appeals
enforced
order
ibid
vacated
judgment
however
holding
first
amendment
federalism
concerns
prevented
filing
prosecution
lawsuit
enjoined
unfair
labor
practice
even
commenced
plaintiff
desire
retaliate
defendant
exercising
rights
protected
nlra
also
held
board
may
decide
suit
baseless
making
credibility
determinations
alj
done
genuine
issues
material
fact
state
law
exist
recognition
sham
exception
antitrust
immunity
however
reasoned
follow
similar
course
nlra
held
board
enjoin
baseless
suits
brought
retaliatory
motive
citing
california
motor
transport
supra
remanded
proceedings
issue
today
standard
enjoining
ongoing
suits
standard
declaring
completed
suits
unlawful
bill
johnson
remarked
dicta
situation
judgment
goes
employer
state
suit
withdrawn
otherwise
shown
without
merit
employer
day
interest
state
providing
forum
citizens
vindicated
board
may
proceed
adjudicate
unfair
labor
practice
case
employer
suit
proved
unmeritorious
board
warranted
taking
fact
account
determining
whether
suit
filed
retaliation
exercise
employees
nlra
rights
violation
found
board
may
order
employer
reimburse
employees
wrongfully
sued
attorney
fees
expenses
may
also
order
proper
relief
effectuate
policies
nlra
standard
board
declare
lost
withdrawn
suit
violated
nlra
retaliatory
bill
johnson
however
issue
whether
board
enjoin
ongoing
state
lawsuit
without
finding
suit
lacked
reasonable
basis
law
fact
resolve
issue
actual
need
decide
whether
board
declare
unlawful
reasonably
based
suits
ultimately
unsuccessful
indeed
board
yet
declare
suit
unlawful
attempted
enjoin
uncompleted
suit
declared
baseless
occasion
consider
precise
scope
term
retaliation
see
infra
moreover
although
statements
regarding
completed
litigation
intended
guide
proceedings
expressly
order
board
adhere
prior
finding
unlawfulness
standard
stated
see
remand
board
may
reinstate
finding
petitioner
acted
unlawfully
board
adheres
previous
finding
suit
filed
retaliatory
purpose
emphasis
added
thus
exercising
customary
refusal
bound
dicta
bancorp
mortgage
bonner
mall
nership
turn
question
presented
iii
objective
component
sham
litigation
standard
professional
real
estate
investors
protects
reasonably
based
petitioning
antitrust
liability
subjective
component
also
protects
petitioning
unmotivated
anticompetitive
intent
whether
reasonably
based
board
admits
broad
immunity
justified
antitrust
context
properly
balances
risk
anticompetitive
lawsuits
chilling
effect
first
amendment
petitioning
might
caused
remedy
distinct
features
antitrust
litigation
fact
antitrust
claims
may
privately
initiated
may
impose
high
discovery
costs
brief
respondent
nlrb
according
board
however
broad
protection
unnecessary
labor
law
context
outside
lmra
enforcement
nlra
requires
board
general
counsel
first
authorize
issuance
administrative
complaint
thus
adjudication
launched
solely
private
action
see
nlrb
food
commercial
workers
board
issue
punitive
remedies
see
republic
steel
nlrb
instead
limited
restoring
previolation
status
quo
see
nlrb
mfg
board
also
allows
little
prehearing
discovery
nlrb
robbins
tire
rubber
however
arguments
demonstrate
threat
antitrust
suit
may
pose
greater
burden
petitioning
threat
nlra
adjudication
mean
burdens
posed
nlra
raise
first
amendment
concerns
determine
must
first
isolate
burdens
board
determination
petitioner
lawsuit
violated
nlra
resulted
order
requiring
petitioner
post
certain
notices
refrain
filing
similar
suits
pay
unions
attorney
fees
petitioner
challenge
board
authority
impose
notice
injunction
penalties
upon
finding
illegality
challenge
board
authority
award
attorney
fees
albeit
unsuccessfully
although
petitioner
sought
review
fee
issue
pet
cert
grant
certiorari
specific
question
instead
asking
parties
address
whether
board
may
impose
liability
retaliatory
lawsuit
unsuccessful
even
objectively
baseless
see
threshold
question
whether
board
may
declare
unsuccessful
retaliatory
lawsuit
violates
nlra
even
reasonably
based
may
resulting
finding
illegality
burden
addition
declaration
illegality
whatever
legal
consequences
flow
finding
also
poses
threat
reputational
harm
different
additional
burden
posed
penalties
fee
award
resolve
case
looking
finding
illegality
need
decide
whether
board
otherwise
authority
award
attorney
fees
suit
found
violate
nlra
identified
burden
must
examine
petitioning
activity
affects
bill
johnson
held
board
may
enjoin
reasonably
based
state
lawsuits
part
first
amendment
concerns
enjoining
lawsuit
characterized
prior
restraint
whereas
declaring
completed
lawsuit
unlawful
characterized
penalty
petitioning
analogy
suggests
injunctions
may
raise
greater
first
amendment
concerns
penalties
raise
concerns
likewise
fact
bill
johnson
allowed
certain
baseless
suits
enjoined
tells
little
propriety
imposing
penalties
various
classes
nonbaseless
suits
said
bill
johnson
board
enjoin
baseless
retaliatory
suits
fell
outside
first
amendment
thus
analogous
false
statements
emphasis
added
noting
need
protect
falsehoods
ensure
freedoms
speech
press
receive
breathing
space
essential
fruitful
exercise
quoting
naacp
button
example
breathing
space
protection
requirement
public
official
seeking
compensatory
damages
defamation
prove
clear
convincing
evidence
false
statements
made
knowledge
reckless
disregard
falsity
see
new
york
times
sullivan
least
consistent
breathing
space
principles
never
held
entire
class
objectively
baseless
litigation
may
enjoined
declared
unlawful
even
though
suits
may
advance
first
amendment
interests
instead
cases
like
bill
johnson
professional
real
estate
investors
holdings
limited
regulation
suits
objectively
baseless
subjectively
motivated
unlawful
purpose
need
resolve
whether
objectively
baseless
litigation
requires
breathing
room
protection
issue
suits
baseless
first
place
instead
initial
matter
dealing
class
reasonably
based
unsuccessful
lawsuits
whether
class
suits
falls
outside
scope
first
amendment
petition
clause
least
presents
difficult
constitutional
question
given
following
considerations
first
even
though
lawsuits
class
unsuccessful
class
nevertheless
includes
substantial
proportion
suits
involving
genuine
grievances
genuineness
grievance
turn
whether
succeeds
indeed
reflected
prior
cases
protected
petitioning
whenever
genuine
simply
triumphs
see
professional
real
estate
investors
protecting
suits
antitrust
liability
whenever
objectively
subjectively
genuine
pennington
shielding
antitrust
immunity
concerted
effort
influence
public
officials
text
first
amendment
speak
terms
successful
petitioning
speaks
simply
right
people
petition
government
redress
grievances
second
even
unsuccessful
reasonably
based
suits
advance
first
amendment
interests
like
successful
suits
unsuccessful
suits
allow
public
airing
disputed
facts
bill
johnson
supra
quoting
balmer
sham
litigation
antitrust
law
buffalo
rev
raise
matters
public
concern
also
promote
evolution
law
supporting
development
legal
theories
may
gain
acceptance
first
time
around
moreover
ability
lawfully
prosecute
even
unsuccessful
suits
adds
legitimacy
system
designated
alternative
force
see
andrews
right
access
petition
clause
first
amendment
defining
right
ohio
noting
potential
avoiding
violence
filing
unsuccessful
claims
finally
baseless
suits
seen
analogous
false
statements
analogy
directly
extend
suits
unsuccessful
reasonably
based
even
suit
seen
kind
provable
statement
fact
loses
mean
false
means
plaintiff
meet
burden
proving
truth
mean
defendant
proved
prove
contrary
board
confines
penalties
unsuccessful
suits
brought
retaliatory
motive
however
must
also
consider
significance
particular
limitation
fairly
included
within
question
presented
see
granting
certiorari
whether
board
may
impose
liability
employer
filing
losing
retaliatory
lawsuit
even
employer
show
suit
objectively
baseless
emphasis
added
iv
context
lawsuits
previously
indicated
retaliatory
suits
filed
retaliation
exercise
employees
nlra
rights
bill
johnson
supra
specifically
address
constitutes
retaliation
however
precise
scope
term
defined
board
view
retaliatory
suit
one
brought
motive
interfere
exercise
protected
nlra
rights
brief
respondent
nlrb
emphasis
added
read
however
board
definition
broadly
covers
substantial
amount
genuine
petitioning
example
employer
may
file
suit
stop
conduct
union
reasonably
believes
illegal
federal
law
even
though
conduct
otherwise
protected
nlra
practical
matter
filing
suit
may
interfere
deter
employees
exercise
nlra
rights
yet
employer
motive
may
still
reflect
subjectively
genuine
desire
test
legality
conduct
indeed
case
board
first
basis
finding
retaliatory
motive
fact
petitioner
suit
related
protected
conduct
petitioner
believed
unprotected
app
pet
cert
belief
subjectively
genuine
objectively
reasonable
declaring
resulting
suit
illegal
affects
genuine
petitioning
board
also
claims
rely
evidence
antiunion
animus
infer
retaliatory
motive
brief
respondent
nlrb
yet
ill
uncommon
litigation
cf
professional
real
estate
investors
stevens
concurring
judgment
may
presume
every
litigant
intends
harm
adversary
disputes
adverse
parties
may
generate
ill
recourse
courts
becomes
legal
practical
means
resolve
situation
mean
disputes
genuine
long
plaintiff
purpose
stop
conduct
reasonably
believes
illegal
petitioning
genuine
objectively
subjectively
see
even
first
amendment
contexts
found
problematic
regulate
demonstrably
false
expression
based
presence
ill
example
invalidated
criminal
statute
prohibiting
false
statements
public
officials
made
ill
see
garrison
louisiana
debate
public
issues
uninhibited
speaker
must
run
risk
proved
spoke
hatred
indeed
requirement
private
defamation
plaintiffs
prove
falsity
speech
matters
public
concern
may
indirectly
shield
much
speech
concealing
ill
motives
see
philadelphia
newspapers
hepps
see
also
hustler
magazine
falwell
prohibiting
use
ill
motive
create
liability
speech
realm
public
debate
public
figures
reasons
difficult
constitutional
question
noted
earlier
supra
made
significantly
easier
board
retaliatory
motive
limitation
since
limitation
fails
exclude
substantial
amount
petitioning
objectively
subjectively
genuine
final
question
whether
light
important
goals
nlra
board
may
nevertheless
burden
unsuccessful
reasonably
based
suit
concludes
suit
brought
retaliatory
purpose
explained
supra
answered
similar
question
negative
antitrust
context
burdens
speech
issue
case
different
issue
professional
real
estate
investors
still
faced
difficult
constitutional
question
namely
whether
class
petitioning
may
declared
unlawful
substantial
portion
subjectively
objectively
genuine
prior
labor
law
case
avoided
similarly
difficult
first
amendment
issue
adopting
limiting
construction
relevant
nlra
provision
see
edward
debartolo
florida
gulf
coast
building
constr
trades
council
issue
scope
nlra
limits
unions
threaten
ing
coerc
ing
restrain
ing
person
engaged
commerce
industry
affecting
commerce
respect
certain
prohibited
purposes
ii
board
read
provision
cover
handbilling
urged
customers
shop
mall
purpose
handbilling
convince
mall
proprietor
influence
tenant
quit
dealing
nonunion
contractor
likewise
debartolo
found
statutory
provisions
legislative
history
indicated
clear
intent
reach
handbilling
question
simply
read
statute
cover
thereby
avoiding
first
amendment
question
altogether
relevant
nlra
provision
prohibits
employers
interfer
ing
restrain
ing
coerc
ing
employees
exercise
rights
guaranteed
section
provides
relevant
part
employees
shall
right
form
join
assist
labor
organizations
bargain
collectively
representatives
choosing
engage
concerted
activities
purpose
collective
bargaining
mutual
aid
protection
section
prohibition
interfering
restraining
coercing
connection
rights
facially
broad
prohibition
issue
debartolo
might
read
reach
entire
class
suits
board
deemed
retaliatory
need
read
broadly
indeed
even
considered
context
suggestion
provisions
part
effort
cover
class
suits
see
generally
prohibiting
employers
interfering
formation
administration
union
discriminating
employment
practices
based
union
membership
discharging
employees
provide
testimony
file
charges
nlra
refusing
bargain
collectively
employee
representatives
nothing
statutory
text
indicating
must
read
reach
reasonably
based
unsuccessful
suits
filed
retaliatory
purpose
decline
board
standard
imposing
liability
nlra
allows
penalize
suits
standard
thus
invalid
decide
whether
board
may
declare
unlawful
unsuccessful
reasonably
based
suits
filed
motive
impose
costs
litigation
process
regardless
outcome
retaliation
nlra
protected
activity
since
board
standard
confine
suits
likewise
need
decide
dicta
bill
johnson
may
meant
retaliation
see
supra
finally
nothing
holding
today
read
question
validity
common
litigation
sanctions
imposed
courts
authorized
rule
federal
rules
civil
procedure
validity
statutory
provisions
merely
authorize
imposition
attorney
fees
losing
plaintiff
judgment
appeals
sixth
circuit
therefore
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
construction
company
petitioner
national
labor
relations
board
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
sixth
circuit
june
justice
scalia
justice
thomas
joins
concurring
although
scrupulously
avoids
deciding
question
presented
case
agree
justice
breyer
implication
decision
today
future
appropriate
case
construe
national
labor
relations
act
nlra
way
already
construed
sherman
act
prohibit
lawsuits
objectively
baseless
subjectively
intended
abuse
process
see
professional
real
estate
investors
columbia
pictures
industries
choosing
make
explicit
implied
disagreeing
result
justice
breyer
describes
number
differences
nlra
sherman
act
suggest
complainant
enjoys
greater
first
amendment
rights
file
lawsuit
face
latter
former
post
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
missing
list
however
important
difference
suggests
indeed
demands
precisely
opposite
conclusion
sherman
act
entity
making
factual
determination
whether
objectively
reasonable
suit
brought
unlawful
motive
article
iii
even
protection
thought
right
access
article
iii
courts
much
imperiled
nlra
however
entity
making
factual
finding
determines
whether
litigant
punished
filing
objectively
reasonable
lawsuit
executive
agency
national
labor
relations
board
difference
undermines
justice
breyer
analysis
doubt
least
poses
difficult
question
first
amendment
whether
executive
agency
given
power
punish
reasonably
based
suit
filed
article
iii
whenever
concludes
insulated
de
novo
judicial
review
standard
complainant
one
motive
rather
another
makes
resort
courts
risky
venture
dependent
upon
findings
body
independence
prescribed
article
iii
courts
extraordinary
interpret
statute
silent
subject
intrude
upon
courts
ability
decide
postulants
assistance
punished
reason
able
unlike
justice
breyer
join
opinion
full
including
carefully
circumscribed
statement
nothing
holding
today
read
question
validity
common
litigation
sanctions
imposed
courts
ante
emphasis
added
construction
company
petitioner
national
labor
relations
board
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
sixth
circuit
june
justice
breyer
justice
stevens
justice
souter
justice
ginsburg
join
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
understand
opinion
focuses
employer
lawsuits
reasonably
based
unsuccessful
filed
retaliatory
motive
motive
interfere
protected
union
conduct
see
ante
holds
national
labor
relations
national
labor
relations
act
nlra
act
permit
national
labor
relations
board
declare
unlawful
act
employer
filing
suit
circumstances
present
say
kind
case
board
rests
finding
retaliatory
motive
almost
exclusively
upon
simple
fact
employer
filed
reasonably
based
unsuccessful
lawsuit
employer
like
union
ante
expressly
leaves
open
circumstances
evidence
retaliation
antiunion
motive
might
stronger
different
showing
example
employer
indifferent
outcome
intends
reasonably
based
unsuccessful
lawsuit
simply
impose
litigation
costs
union
ante
see
also
professional
real
estate
investors
columbia
pictures
industries
stevens
joined
concurring
judgment
discussing
colorable
suits
filed
illegal
purpose
address
lawsuits
employer
brings
part
broader
course
conduct
aimed
harming
unions
interfering
employees
exercise
rights
nlra
concur
opinion
insofar
holds
set
forth
recognize
broad
leeway
act
gives
board
make
findings
determine
appropriate
relief
see
nlrb
gissel
packing
shepard
nlrb
concur
descriptions
given
board
appeals
board
reasons
finding
unlawful
employer
activity
insofar
probative
seem
rest
little
fact
employer
filed
reasonably
based
ultimately
unsuccessful
lawsuit
see
app
pet
cert
finding
retaliatory
motive
suit
directed
protected
conduct
necessarily
tended
discourage
similar
protected
activity
admittedly
brought
stop
conduct
construction
company
thought
unprotected
involved
unions
parties
certain
suits
company
unmeritorious
bill
johnson
restaurants
nlrb
suggested
board
warranted
taking
account
unfair
labor
practice
purposes
fact
employer
lost
suit
suggest
seems
board
thought
losing
lawsuit
union
virtually
alone
shows
retaliation
see
suggesting
retaliatory
suits
might
commenced
plaintiff
desire
retaliate
defendant
exercising
rights
protected
act
insofar
language
opinion
might
suggest
rule
see
ante
agree
one
thing
believe
bill
johnson
decided
many
questions
declares
unanswered
see
ante
held
board
may
halt
prosecution
lawsuit
unless
suit
lacks
objectively
reasonable
basis
nonetheless
may
proceed
adjudicate
unfair
labor
practice
case
employer
brings
merely
unmeritorious
retaliatory
suit
loses
diamond
walnut
growers
nlrb
nlrb
international
union
operating
engineers
local
braun
elec
summitville
tiles
machinists
lodge
technologies
enf
find
good
reason
characterize
statements
bill
johnson
dicta
though
recognize
language
characterizing
bill
johnson
dicta
another
thing
believe
antitrust
precedent
determines
outcome
see
professional
real
estate
supra
eastern
railroad
presidents
conference
noerr
motor
freight
precedent
finds
sham
lawsuits
exempt
reach
antitrust
laws
professional
real
estate
supra
noerr
supra
hold
employers
enjoy
similar
exemption
reach
labor
laws
antitrust
law
labor
law
differ
significantly
respect
consequences
administration
scope
history
purposes
certain
differences
minor
worth
noting
given
concern
avoid
discouraging
legitimate
lawsuits
apply
antitrust
law
defendant
reasonably
based
unsuccessful
anticompetitive
lawsuit
ample
threatens
defendant
treble
damages
considerable
deterrent
see
ante
apply
labor
law
employer
reasonably
based
unsuccessful
retaliatory
lawsuit
threatens
employer
shift
liability
attorney
fees
see
ante
similarly
apply
antitrust
law
defendant
reasonably
based
unsuccessful
anticompetitive
lawsuit
threatens
defendant
high
costs
initiate
suit
apply
labor
law
employer
reasonably
based
unsuccessful
retaliatory
lawsuit
threatens
employer
typically
far
lower
costs
defending
charge
congressionally
authorized
politically
accountable
administrative
agency
acts
screen
meritless
complaints
see
ibid
see
also
nlrb
ann
showing
unfair
labor
practice
cases
closed
resolved
order
board
contested
case
differences
related
scope
purpose
history
major
determinative
antitrust
law
focuses
generally
upon
anticompetitive
conduct
arise
myriad
circumstances
anticompetitively
motivated
lawsuits
occupy
one
tiny
corner
universe
circumscribe
boundaries
corner
significantly
limit
scope
antitrust
law
undermine
basic
related
purpose
way
contrast
nlra
finds
need
regulate
employer
antiunion
lawsuits
much
historical
reason
throughout
century
courts
upheld
prosecutions
unions
criminal
conspiracies
tomlins
state
unions
struck
protective
labor
legislation
say
shorter
working
hours
better
working
conditions
forbath
law
shaping
american
labor
movement
courts
struck
roughly
labor
laws
roughly
granted
injunctions
employees
labor
unions
weakened
unions
ability
organize
conservatively
estimating
least
injunctions
issued
labor
conflicts
process
reinterpreted
federal
statutes
congress
intended
use
organizing
activities
labor
unions
see
debs
applying
interstate
commerce
act
union
activities
loewe
lawlor
applying
sherman
act
see
generally
frankfurter
greene
labor
injunction
congress
initially
passed
clayton
act
prevent
employers
using
law
particularly
antitrust
law
way
congress
hoped
substitut
opinion
congress
propriety
purpose
union
activities
differing
judges
prejudicial
position
equality
workingman
employer
duplex
printing
press
deering
brandeis
joined
holmes
clarke
dissenting
clayton
act
proved
insufficient
congress
passed
act
made
labor
injunction
unlawful
see
hutcheson
underlying
aim
act
restore
broad
purpose
congress
thought
formulated
clayton
act
frustrated
congress
believed
unduly
restrictive
judicial
construction
see
also
marine
cooks
panama
enactment
prompted
desire
withdraw
federal
courts
type
controversy
many
believed
similar
objectives
informed
congress
later
enactment
nlra
took
courts
much
power
regulate
relations
employers
labor
workingmen
granting
authority
administrative
agency
duplex
printing
supra
brandeis
dissenting
see
mine
workers
pennington
goldberg
dissenting
describing
justice
brandeis
dissent
duplex
printing
carried
day
courts
history
congress
passed
nlra
upshot
employer
antiunion
lawsuit
occupies
position
far
closer
heart
labor
law
defendant
anticompetitive
lawsuit
respect
antitrust
law
fact
makes
difference
indeed
given
differences
history
purpose
see
treat
labor
law
sought
give
board
power
regulate
employer
antiunion
conduct
including
retaliatory
lawsuits
antitrust
law
comparable
purpose
evident
perhaps
previously
made
clear
two
areas
law
significantly
differ
compare
professional
real
estate
bill
johnson
know
reopens
matters
opinion
today
see
ante
note
done
leave
open
end
decide
understanding
extent
describe
outset
see
supra
join
opinion