dolan
argued
april
decided
june
petitioner
dolan
pleaded
guilty
assault
resulting
serious
bodily
injury
entered
plea
agreement
stated
district
order
restitution
victim
dolan
presentence
report
also
noted
restitution
required
recommend
amount
lack
information
hospital
costs
lost
wages
mandatory
victims
restitution
act
provides
victim
losses
ascertainable
date
days
prior
sentencing
shall
set
date
final
determination
victim
losses
exceed
days
sentencing
july
district
held
sentencing
hearing
imposed
sentence
imprisonment
supervised
release
august
entered
judgment
stating
restitution
applicable
leaving
open
amount
restitution
given
information
yet
received
regarding
possible
restitution
payments
october
days
later
addendum
documenting
restitution
amount
added
presentence
report
set
hearing
february
three
months
deadline
expired
hearing
dolan
argued
deadline
passed
law
longer
authorized
restitution
disagreeing
ordered
restitution
tenth
circuit
affirmed
held
sentencing
misses
deadline
nonetheless
retains
power
order
restitution
least
made
clear
prior
deadline
expiration
order
restitution
leaving
open
days
amount
pp
determine
consequences
missed
deadline
statute
specify
looks
statutory
language
relevant
context
reveal
deadline
purposes
jurisdictional
deadline
expiration
prevents
permitting
taking
action
statute
attached
deadline
prohibition
absolute
waived
extended
equitable
reasons
see
john
sand
gravel
deadlines
rules
limit
jurisdiction
regulate
timing
motions
claims
brought
unless
party
points
another
litigant
missed
deadline
party
forfeits
deadline
protection
see
kontrick
ryan
instances
deadline
seeks
speed
creating
directive
legally
enforceable
deprive
judge
public
official
power
take
action
even
deadline
missed
see
light
language
context
purposes
statute
issue
sets
forth
third
kind
limitation
fact
sentencing
misses
deadline
even
government
fault
deprive
power
order
restitution
pp
several
considerations
lead
conclusion
first
statute
specify
consequence
noncompliance
timing
provisions
federal
courts
ordinarily
impose
coercive
sanction
james
daniel
good
real
property
statute
use
shall
alone
see
necessarily
bar
judges
taking
action
missed
deadline
refers
second
statute
places
primary
weight
emphasizes
importance
imposing
restitution
upon
convicted
certain
federal
crimes
see
third
statute
procedural
provisions
reinforce
substantive
purpose
reveal
statute
seeks
speed
primarily
help
crime
victims
secure
prompt
restitution
provide
defendants
certainty
amount
liability
fourth
read
statute
depriving
sentencing
power
order
restitution
harm
victims
likely
bear
responsibility
deadline
missed
statute
seeks
benefit
kind
harm
third
parties
provides
strong
indication
congress
intend
missed
deadline
work
forfeiture
see
brock
pierce
county
fifth
interpreted
similar
statutes
bail
reform
act
similarly
see
supra
sixth
defendant
normally
mitigate
potential
harm
telling
fears
deadline
missed
likely
set
timely
hearing
take
statutorily
required
action
pp
understated
potential
harm
defendant
missed
deadline
petitioner
claims
sentence
final
judgment
appeal
purposes
without
definitive
determination
restitution
amount
delay
determination
beyond
deadline
delay
ability
appeal
defendant
knows
restitution
ordered
aware
amount
usually
avoid
additional
delay
asking
timely
hearing
refuses
seek
mandamus
unlikely
instance
delay
causes
defendant
prejudice
remains
free
ask
appellate
take
fact
equitable
considerations
account
review
mean
accepts
petitioner
premise
sentencing
judgment
final
restitution
amount
determined
although
question
need
decided
strong
arguments
favor
appealability
initial
judgment
irrespective
delay
determining
restitution
amount
judgment
imposing
may
still
freighted
sufficiently
substantial
indicia
finality
support
appeal
corey
several
statutes
say
judgment
conviction
includes
imprisonment
final
judgment
moreover
provides
sentence
imposes
order
restitution
later
restitution
order
final
judgment
even
assuming
rule
lenity
applied
statutory
time
provision
criminal
context
statutory
ambiguity
sufficiently
grievous
warrant
application
case
muscarello
pp
affirmed
breyer
delivered
opinion
thomas
ginsburg
alito
sotomayor
joined
roberts
filed
dissenting
opinion
stevens
scalia
kennedy
joined
brian
russell
dolan
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
tenth
circuit
june
justice
breyer
delivered
opinion
case
concerns
remedy
missing
statutory
deadline
statute
question
focuses
upon
mandatory
restitution
victims
crimes
provides
shall
set
date
final
determination
victim
losses
exceed
days
sentencing
hold
sentencing
misses
deadline
nonetheless
retains
power
order
restitution
least
sentencing
made
clear
prior
deadline
expiration
order
restitution
leaving
open
days
amount
february
petitioner
brian
dolan
pleaded
guilty
federal
charge
assault
resulting
serious
bodily
injury
app
entered
plea
agreement
stated
restitution
may
ordered
presentence
report
provided
end
may
noted
restitution
required
lacking
precise
information
hospital
costs
lost
wages
recommend
restitution
amount
july
district
held
dolan
sentencing
hearing
judge
sentenced
dolan
months
imprisonment
along
years
supervised
release
judge
aware
restitution
mandatory
said
insufficient
information
record
time
regarding
possible
restitution
payments
may
owed
leave
matter
open
pending
receipt
additional
information
dolan
anticipate
award
made
future
days
later
august
entered
judgment
among
things
stated
pursuant
mandatory
restitution
act
restitution
applicable
however
information
received
regarding
possible
restitution
payments
may
owed
therefore
order
restitution
time
boldface
deleted
probation
office
later
prepared
addendum
presentence
report
dated
october
reflected
views
parties
judge
later
indicated
received
addendum
documents
total
amount
restitution
due
case
date
october
days
dolan
july
sentencing
days
statute
days
sentencing
deadline
expire
sentencing
nonetheless
set
restitution
hearing
february
three
months
deadline
expired
far
record
shows
one
asked
earlier
hearing
hearing
dolan
pointed
deadline
passed
argued
law
longer
authorized
order
restitution
disagreed
ordered
restitution
see
memorandum
opinion
restitution
order
cr
nm
apr
app
pet
cert
appeals
affirmed
light
differences
among
courts
appeals
granted
dolan
petition
certiorari
question
compare
cheal
recognizing
authority
enter
restitution
order
past
days
balentine
maung
finding
authority
farr
ii
doubt
case
missed
statutory
deadline
final
determination
victim
losses
one
offered
excuse
party
seek
extension
tolling
days
equitable
reasons
information
needed
determine
requisite
restitution
amount
available
period
ended
thus
question
us
concerns
consequences
missed
deadline
statute
specify
answering
kind
question
looked
statutory
language
relevant
context
reveal
purposes
time
limit
designed
serve
answers
varied
depending
upon
particular
statute
time
limit
issue
sometimes
found
statute
question
imposes
jurisdictional
condition
upon
example
authority
hear
case
consider
pleadings
act
upon
motions
party
seeks
file
see
bowles
russell
cf
kontrick
ryan
finding
bankruptcy
rule
show
legislative
intent
delineat
classes
cases
persons
properly
within
adjudicatory
authority
see
also
reed
elsevier
muchnick
slip
discussing
use
term
jurisdictional
expiration
jurisdictional
deadline
prevents
permitting
taking
action
statute
attached
deadline
prohibition
absolute
parties
waive
extend
deadline
equitable
reasons
see
john
sand
gravel
instances
found
certain
deadlines
ordinary
rules
rules
limit
jurisdiction
rather
regulate
timing
motions
claims
brought
unless
party
points
another
litigant
missed
deadline
party
forfeits
deadline
protection
see
kontrick
ryan
supra
bankruptcy
rule
deadline
creditor
objection
debtor
discharge
eberhart
per
curiam
criminal
rule
deadline
filing
motion
new
trial
still
instances
found
deadline
seeks
speed
creating
directive
legally
enforceable
deprive
judge
public
official
power
take
action
deadline
applies
deadline
missed
see
missed
deadline
holding
bail
detention
hearing
require
judge
release
defendant
brock
pierce
county
missed
deadline
making
final
determination
misuse
federal
grant
funds
prevent
later
recovery
funds
barnhart
peabody
coal
missed
deadline
assigning
industry
retiree
benefits
prevent
later
award
benefits
examining
language
context
purposes
statute
conclude
provision
us
sets
forth
third
kind
limitation
fact
sentencing
misses
statute
deadline
even
fault
government
deprive
power
order
restitution
several
considerations
lead
us
conclusion
first
statute
specify
consequence
noncompliance
timing
provisions
federal
courts
ordinary
course
impose
coercive
sanction
james
daniel
good
real
property
see
also
supra
speedy
trial
act
statute
specifying
missed
deadline
requires
dismissal
indictment
zedner
sanction
violation
act
dismissal
concede
statute
uses
word
shall
statute
use
word
alone
always
led
interpret
statutes
bar
judges
officials
taking
action
missed
statutory
deadline
refers
see
supra
use
word
shall
context
bail
hearing
makes
duty
mandatory
mean
sanction
breach
loss
later
powers
act
brock
supra
context
misuse
federal
funds
barnhart
supra
context
benefits
assignments
see
also
regions
hospital
shalala
respect
federal
official
reporting
date
second
statute
text
places
primary
weight
upon
emphasizes
importance
imposing
restitution
upon
convicted
certain
federal
crimes
amending
older
provision
left
restitution
sentencing
judge
discretion
statute
us
entitled
mandatory
victims
restitution
act
says
otwithstanding
provision
law
sentencing
defendant
convicted
specified
offense
shall
order
defendant
make
restitution
victim
offense
emphasis
added
cf
stating
may
order
restitution
sentencing
defendants
convicted
specified
crimes
act
goes
provide
restitution
shall
ordered
full
amount
victim
losses
without
consideration
economic
circumstances
defendant
third
act
procedural
provisions
reinforce
substantive
purpose
namely
statute
seeks
primarily
assure
victims
crime
receive
full
restitution
sure
speed
important
statute
requires
sentencing
judge
order
probation
office
prepare
report
providing
complete
accounting
losses
victim
restitution
owed
pursuant
plea
agreement
information
relating
economic
circumstances
defendant
prosecutor
consulting
identified
victims
must
promptly
provide
listing
amount
subject
restitution
later
days
prior
date
initially
set
sentencing
emphasis
added
provision
us
says
victim
losses
ascertainable
date
days
prior
sentencing
attorney
government
probation
officer
shall
inform
shall
set
date
final
determination
victim
losses
exceed
days
sentencing
statute
seeks
speed
primarily
help
victims
crime
secondarily
help
defendant
thus
sentence
following
language
quoted
statute
continues
victim
subsequently
discovers
losses
victim
shall
days
discovery
losses
petition
amended
restitution
order
ibid
sentence
imposes
time
limit
victim
subsequent
discovery
losses
consequently
might
award
restitution
losses
long
original
sentence
imposed
time
limit
expired
fact
along
act
main
substantive
objectives
say
act
efforts
secure
speedy
determination
restitution
primarily
designed
help
victims
crime
secure
prompt
restitution
rather
provide
defendants
certainty
amount
liability
cf
recognizing
need
finality
certainty
sentencing
process
also
stating
sole
due
process
interest
defendant
protected
right
sentenced
basis
invalid
premises
inaccurate
information
see
also
ibid
ustice
considered
served
full
restitution
made
fourth
read
statute
depriving
sentencing
power
order
restitution
harm
victims
crime
likely
bear
responsibility
deadline
missed
statute
also
seeks
benefit
cf
victim
shall
required
participate
phase
restitution
order
potential
harm
third
parties
normally
provides
strong
indication
congress
intend
missed
deadline
work
forfeiture
depriving
power
award
restitution
victims
see
brock
parties
concede
assumes
official
proceed
deadline
inaction
hurt
third
party
see
also
singer
singer
sutherland
statutory
construction
pp
ed
hereinafter
singer
statutory
construction
missing
deadline
remove
power
exercise
duty
language
denying
performance
specified
time
especially
mandatory
construction
might
great
injury
persons
fault
case
slight
delay
part
public
officer
might
prejudice
private
rights
public
interest
omitted
fifth
previously
interpreted
similar
statutes
similarly
example
considered
bail
reform
act
judicial
officer
shall
hold
hearing
determine
whether
grant
bail
arrested
person
hearing
shall
held
immediately
upon
person
first
appearance
judicial
officer
continuance
five
days
may
also
granted
emphasis
added
judicial
officer
missed
deadline
held
judicial
officer
need
release
detained
person
rather
government
discovers
time
limits
expired
may
still
ask
prompt
detention
hearing
make
case
detain
based
upon
requirements
set
forth
statute
reasoned
failure
comply
hearing
deadline
subvert
procedural
scheme
invalidate
hearing
missing
deadline
diminish
strength
government
interest
preventing
release
avert
likely
commission
crimes
objective
act
mandatory
release
detained
person
proportion
ately
repair
inconvenience
uncertainty
timely
hearing
spared
neither
language
structure
statute
requires
denying
victim
restitution
order
remedy
missed
hearing
deadline
defeat
basic
purpose
mandatory
victims
restitution
act
remedy
proportion
ately
repair
harm
caused
defendant
delay
particularly
defendant
knew
restitution
including
likely
amount
well
expiration
time
limit
app
indeed
result
follows
fortiori
delay
worst
postpones
day
financial
reckoning
delay
postponed
constitutionally
guaranteed
bail
hearing
attached
risk
defendant
remain
improperly
confined
jail
see
stevens
dissenting
noting
seriousness
deprivation
liberty
physical
detention
imposes
stand
alone
found
support
similar
cases
involving
executive
officials
charged
carrying
mandatory
public
duties
timely
manner
see
citing
french
edwards
wall
brock
supra
cases
turn
consistent
numerous
similar
decisions
made
courts
throughout
nation
see
taylor
department
iowa
hutchinson
ryan
state
industrial
see
also
singer
statutory
construction
citing
cases
sixth
defendant
normally
mitigate
harm
missed
deadline
might
cause
least
obtains
relevant
information
regarding
restitution
amount
deadline
expires
defendant
fears
deadline
missed
simply
tell
likely
set
timely
hearing
take
statutorily
required
action
see
providing
may
require
additional
documentation
hear
testimony
though
deliberate
failure
sentencing
comply
statute
seems
improbable
occur
defendant
also
seek
mandamus
see
writs
act
la
buy
howes
leather
cf
brock
noting
availability
district
action
compel
agency
compliance
directive
petitioner
dolan
however
believes
understated
harm
defendant
missed
deadline
cause
show
makes
argument
defendant
appeal
sentence
unless
part
final
judgment
judgment
setting
forth
sentence
final
contains
definitive
determination
amount
restitution
delay
determination
amount
restitution
beyond
deadline
delay
defendant
ability
appeal
days
perhaps
point
due
process
rights
threatened
brief
petitioner
critical
problem
argument
lies
third
step
said
defendant
like
petitioner
knows
restitution
ordered
aware
restitution
amount
prior
expiration
deadline
usually
avoid
additional
delay
simply
pointing
statute
asking
grant
timely
hearing
happen
minimal
burden
defendant
small
cost
relative
prospect
depriving
innocent
crime
victims
due
restitution
still
refuse
defendant
seek
mandamus
believe
rarely
necessary
even
unlikely
instances
delay
cause
defendant
prejudice
perhaps
depriving
evidence
rebut
claimed
restitution
amount
defendant
remains
free
ask
take
fact
account
upon
review
inquiry
might
also
consider
reason
delay
party
responsible
cause
whether
government
victim
stevens
tolling
deadline
defendant
delay
terlingo
adopting
dissent
approach
contrast
permit
defendant
delay
prevent
timely
order
restitution
potentially
allowing
defendant
manipulate
whether
restitution
awarded
since
presented
case
need
decide
whether
potential
harm
equitable
considerations
taken
consideration
focusing
upon
argument
third
step
mean
imply
accept
second
premise
sentencing
judgment
final
contains
definitive
determination
amount
restitution
contrary
strong
arguments
favor
appealability
initial
judgment
irrespective
delay
determining
restitution
amount
initial
judgment
imposed
sentence
imprisonment
supervised
release
stated
restitution
awarded
previously
said
judgment
imposes
discipline
may
still
freighted
sufficiently
substantial
indicia
finality
support
appeal
corey
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
solicitor
general
points
statutes
say
judgment
conviction
includes
sentence
imprisonment
final
judgment
judgment
imposes
supervised
release
imposed
conjunction
sentence
imprisonment
ibid
judgment
imposes
fine
see
tr
oral
arg
moreover
provides
sentence
imposes
order
restitution
later
restitution
order
final
judgment
thus
surprising
find
instances
defendant
appealed
entry
judgment
containing
initial
sentence
includes
term
imprisonment
defendant
subsequently
appealed
later
order
setting
forth
final
amount
restitution
appeals
consolidated
two
appeals
decided
together
see
stevens
supra
maung
cf
cheal
defendant
appeal
earlier
sentencing
judgment
makes
sense
otherwise
statutory
restitution
deadline
even
complied
delay
appeals
days
defendants
forced
wait
three
months
seeking
review
conviction
ordinarily
within
days
see
fed
rule
app
proc
nonetheless
light
fact
interaction
restitution
orders
appellate
time
limits
consequences
extending
well
beyond
cases
like
present
case
appeal
initial
conviction
sentence
simply
note
strength
arguments
militating
second
step
petitioner
argument
without
deciding
whether
party
must
appeal
leave
matters
another
day
dissent
however
creates
rule
adversely
affect
restitution
sentencing
practices
beyond
narrow
circumstances
presented
consider
example
judge
currently
lacking
sufficient
information
wishes
leave
open
say
amount
fine
special
condition
supervised
release
dissent
view
entry
judgment
immediately
deprive
judge
authority
later
fill
blank
absence
statute
specifically
providing
otherwise
see
post
opinion
roberts
thus
sentencing
judge
either
forgo
specific
dollar
amount
potential
condition
wait
enter
judgment
relevant
information
hand
former
alternative
sometimes
deprive
judges
power
enter
components
sentence
may
consider
essential
latter
alternative
require
defendant
wait
perhaps
months
taking
appeal
pointed
precedents
currently
place
sentencing
judge
dilemma
see
supra
need
depart
precedents
case
require
us
issue
adequately
briefed
lower
opportunity
consider
argument
petitioner
may
well
forfeited
rule
foreclose
current
practices
district
courts
unnecessarily
cabin
discretion
properly
exercise
scheduling
sentencing
matters
stevens
supra
cheal
supra
illustrating
district
practices
certainly
need
create
rule
context
restitution
provisions
dissent
refers
silent
whether
restitution
ordered
initial
sentencing
see
sanction
authorized
criminal
forfeiture
restitution
statutes
may
imposed
addition
rest
sentence
mandatory
orders
restitution
shall
apply
sentencing
proceedings
specified
offenses
even
dissent
theory
statute
elsewhere
provides
necessary
substantive
authorization
notwithstanding
provision
law
sentencing
defendant
convicted
specified
offense
shall
order
defendant
make
restitution
victim
offense
emphasis
added
dissent
explain
separate
statutory
provision
regarding
procedures
shall
set
date
final
determination
victim
losses
automatically
divests
distinct
substantive
authority
course
provision
plainly
confer
power
act
sentencing
post
emphasis
deleted
neither
plainly
remove
require
sentencing
matters
concluded
one
point
time
dissent
assertion
see
post
uses
term
authority
jurisdictional
sense
rather
sense
lacks
authority
impose
sentence
maximum
introduces
tenuous
analogy
may
well
confuse
precedents
regarding
term
jurisdictional
see
supra
event
unless
one
reads
relevant
statute
deadline
ironclad
limit
upon
judge
authority
make
final
determination
victim
losses
statute
us
provides
adequate
authority
sentencing
judge
essentially
fill
blank
judgment
made
clear
restitution
applicable
app
boldface
deleted
since
sentencing
judge
later
order
correct
error
sentence
rule
apply
compare
fed
rule
crim
proc
post
hence
dissent
claim
statute
creates
authority
even
assume
else
favor
merely
restate
question
posed
case
answer
moreover
dissent
reading
creates
serious
statutory
anomaly
reads
statute
permitting
sentencing
judge
order
restitution
victim
subsequently
discovers
losses
month
year
years
entry
original
judgment
time
depriving
judge
power
award
restitution
victim
whose
losses
ascertainable
within
days
compare
first
sentence
second
sentence
sensible
reading
statute
makes
restitution
mandatory
victims
finally
petitioner
asks
us
apply
rule
lenity
favor
reading
statute
dolan
provided
us
example
instance
rule
lenity
applied
statutory
time
provision
criminal
context
see
wiltberger
wheat
applying
rule
interpreting
substantive
criminal
statute
bifulco
applying
rule
interpreting
penalties
assuming
argument
sake
rule
might
applied
considering
statute
text
structure
purpose
nonetheless
find
statutory
ambiguity
sufficiently
grievous
warrant
application
case
muscarello
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
caron
rejecting
application
rule
ambiguous
reading
implausible
reading
congressional
purpose
reasons
judgment
appeals
tenth
circuit
affirmed
brian
russell
dolan
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
tenth
circuit
june
chief
justice
roberts
justice
stevens
justice
scalia
justice
kennedy
join
dissenting
statute
issue
case
provides
victim
losses
ascertainable
least
days
prior
sentencing
shall
set
date
final
determination
victim
losses
exceed
days
sentencing
view
failing
meet
deadline
consequence
whatever
reads
statute
said
shall
set
date
final
determination
victim
losses
time
sentencing
respectfully
dissent
absence
order
restitution
must
imposed
sentencing
imposed
restitution
may
imposed
addition
sentence
probation
fine
imprisonment
authorized
see
section
turn
authorizes
courts
order
restitution
imposing
sentence
defendant
emphasis
added
pursuant
yet
provisions
requiring
orders
made
sentencing
defendant
emphasis
added
mandatory
restitution
provisions
apply
sentencing
proceedings
convictions
certain
crimes
emphasis
added
time
sentencing
must
state
open
reasons
imposition
particular
sentence
including
reasons
order
ing
restitution
fails
provisions
authorize
restitution
orders
sentencing
confer
authority
order
restitution
sentencing
concluded
congress
permits
courts
impose
criminal
penalties
time
sentencing
explicitly
see
provisional
sentence
study
period
authorizing
certain
penalties
imposing
sentence
time
thereafter
permitting
extension
supervised
release
provisional
sentencing
mentally
ill
see
also
fed
rules
crim
proc
presentencing
forfeiture
orders
cf
corey
appeals
provisional
final
sentences
authorized
law
sentence
imposed
moreover
final
trial
judge
authority
modify
narrowly
circumscribed
stated
trial
courts
authority
prior
adoption
rule
addonizio
congress
since
revoked
broad
authority
correct
illegal
sentences
originally
set
forth
rule
see
sentencing
reform
act
pub
stat
see
also
historical
notes
amendments
rule
today
error
may
corrected
trial
clear
within
days
sentence
announced
rules
rule
criminal
procedure
allowing
extensions
time
expressly
provides
may
extend
time
take
action
rule
except
stated
rule
rule
reiterated
time
limits
made
binding
rule
may
extended
addonizio
supra
rule
creates
inflexible
rules
eberhart
per
curiam
thus
trial
fails
impose
mandatory
term
imprisonment
see
mandatory
fine
see
mandatory
order
restitution
see
government
simply
ask
impose
correct
sentence
later
error
clear
raised
within
days
might
corrected
rule
otherwise
government
must
appeal
seek
resentencing
remand
section
limited
exception
bedrock
rules
permits
trial
go
forward
sentencing
delaying
restitution
order
days
provision
meaningful
precisely
restitution
must
otherwise
ordered
sentencing
sentences
otherwise
final
unless
properly
corrected
trial
courts
power
amend
sentences
time
unnecessary
however
district
failed
make
use
limited
authority
dolan
sentenced
july
declined
order
restitution
time
set
date
future
restitution
order
app
see
also
period
elapsed
october
time
government
seek
timely
relief
whether
rule
appeal
cf
corey
supra
berman
assert
claim
deadline
lawfully
extended
equitably
tolled
issue
agree
us
see
ante
april
days
sentencing
dolan
already
released
prison
district
nonetheless
ordered
restitution
app
pet
cert
see
obtained
authority
add
additional
terms
dolan
sentence
step
misses
searches
remedy
violation
ante
rule
trial
alter
sentence
time
sentencing
section
limited
exception
rule
limits
exceeded
exception
apply
general
rule
takes
sentence
changed
add
restitution
provision
section
grants
authority
subject
deadline
deadline
met
authority
longer
available
appears
reason
confers
authority
add
restitution
provision
least
days
camel
nose
permitted
delay
sneaks
tent
delay
permissible
ante
says
provides
days
final
determination
victims
losses
free
pass
impose
restitution
whenever
trial
gets
around
power
order
restitution
days
sentencing
order
additional
term
imprisonment
send
dolan
back
prison
ii
avoid
conclusion
runs
series
irrelevancies
trump
clear
statutory
text
notes
example
provides
otwithstanding
provision
law
sentencing
defendant
convicted
specified
offense
shall
order
defendant
make
restitution
victim
offense
ante
quoting
emphasis
opinion
issue
us
restitution
ordered
language
underscore
sentencing
provision
plainly
confers
power
act
sentencing
power
attaches
virtue
incorporates
procedures
including
limited
exception
see
also
procedures
section
shall
apply
orders
restitution
section
puts
greater
emphasis
reading
statute
purpose
namely
provide
restitution
victims
crime
certainly
purpose
congress
sought
promote
legislation
pursues
purposes
costs
frustrates
rather
effectuates
legislative
intent
simplistically
assume
whatever
furthers
statute
primary
objective
must
law
rodriguez
per
curiam
congress
balance
interest
restitution
contrary
interest
promptly
determining
defendant
sentence
balance
struck
clearly
set
forth
statute
determine
victim
losses
date
exceed
days
sentencing
whether
limit
primarily
designed
help
victims
crime
ante
cease
law
invoked
defendants
find
support
second
sentence
see
ante
provision
addresses
distinct
issue
newly
discovered
losses
sets
higher
good
cause
standard
fact
congress
struck
balance
restitution
finality
differently
context
justify
overriding
balance
struck
also
analogizes
limit
provisions
discussed
precedents
nothing
rights
criminal
defendants
procedural
protections
heightened
importance
let
alone
finality
criminal
sentencing
cited
cases
said
establish
official
failure
meet
deadline
always
deprive
official
power
act
beyond
regions
hospital
shalala
failure
comply
deprive
anyone
anything
trial
never
general
authority
alter
sentences
imposed
way
administrative
agencies
cited
cases
said
general
regulatory
authority
trial
authority
add
restitution
provision
otherwise
final
sentence
conferred
provision
limited
authority
section
take
away
anything
might
persist
absence
even
perplexing
suggestion
references
authority
trial
courts
necessarily
implicate
questions
jurisdiction
ante
say
lacks
authority
order
belated
restitution
use
authority
jurisdictional
sense
see
arbaugh
sense
lacks
authority
impose
sentence
statutory
maximum
action
error
law
reversible
appeal
jurisdictional
student
aid
funds
espinosa
slip
compliance
limitation
jurisdiction
statutory
precondition
obtaining
particular
order
condition
satisfied
end
appear
need
instead
suggests
abandon
bedrock
rules
sentences
imposed
final
exceptions
ones
congress
chooses
allow
congress
allowed
various
ones
instead
proposes
judicial
power
alter
sentences
apparently
time
trial
leave
open
say
amount
fine
ante
say
number
years
thus
defendant
like
dolan
served
entire
sentence
knows
long
might
still
order
additional
imprisonment
additional
restitution
additional
fine
additional
condition
supervised
release
see
ante
cites
authority
support
fill
th
blank
sentencing
two
cases
implicated
circuit
split
ante
prior
enactment
however
widely
recognized
requirement
impose
restitution
sentencing
meant
estitution
must
determined
time
sentencing
left
open
sentencing
concluded
federal
judicial
center
wood
guideline
sentencing
outline
appellate
case
law
selected
issues
emphasis
added
citing
porter
ramilo
prendergast
sasnett
finds
rule
inapplicable
district
ing
clear
error
sentence
ante
true
enough
government
lose
limitation
rule
clear
errors
corrected
within
days
sentencing
leave
trial
courts
free
make
changes
sentences
whenever
choose
rule
makes
sense
background
rule
trial
courts
change
sentences
true
empowers
wish
delay
sentencing
desires
information
otherwise
available
impose
provisional
sentence
study
period
statute
largely
unnecessary
trial
order
addonizio
thought
noncontroversial
sentence
imposed
final
subject
exceptions
congress
allowed
contrary
suggestion
ante
dolan
invoked
principle
see
brief
petitioner
reply
brief
petitioner
appellant
opening
brief
pp
citing
blackwell
proposition
district
inherent
authority
modify
sentence
finds
necessary
question
principle
indeed
accuse
dissent
creat
ing
th
rule
ante
highlights
misguided
decision
counter
effects
opinion
restore
semblance
finality
sentencing
advises
defendants
seek
mandamus
remedy
described
drastic
extraordinary
reserved
really
extraordinary
causes
one
potent
weapons
judicial
arsenal
cheney
dist
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
odd
procedure
contemplates
defendant
received
harsher
sentence
invoke
drastic
extraordinary
remedy
mandamus
make
sure
gets
sentencing
errors
corrected
trial
fails
order
appropriate
sentence
government
must
appeal
correct
ends
case
greenlaw
slip
moreover
mandamus
remedy
helps
defendants
know
danger
increased
sentence
imposes
another
rule
namely
trial
must
explicitly
leave
open
precise
sentence
time
sentencing
ante
must
make
clear
prior
deadline
expiration
order
restitution
indeterminate
time
ante
emphasis
added
make
crucial
announcement
sentencing
prior
deadline
expiration
judicially
created
deadlines
taken
seriously
imposed
congress
back
beginning
asking
remedy
failing
meet
relevant
deadline
suggestion
require
notice
intent
augment
sentence
future
date
may
good
idea
even
better
one
might
set
particular
date
say
days
sentencing
parties
base
expectations
congress
choice
good
enough
us
district
case
failed
order
mandatory
restitution
sentencing
dolan
wrong
two
wrongs
make
right
mistake
gave
authority
amend
dolan
sentence
later
beyond
days
allowed
add
sentencing
term
requiring
restitution
mindful
fact
trial
blunders
victims
may
suffer
consequences
like
unavoidable
result
system
rules
one
appeals
mistaken
ruling
amount
restitution
whether
restitution
applies
finality
necessarily
obstruct
victims
full
recovery
congress
balance
competing
interests
recovery
finality
done
clearly
judicial
inquiry
complete
barnhart
sigmon
coal
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
footnotes
whether
date
must
set
sentencing
us
order
setting
date
plainly
entered
days
sentencing
happened
see
app
equally
inapposite
statute
case
rested
lower
authority
whether
bail
hearing
held
whereas
statutory
condition
whether
losses
determined
within
days
sentencing