barnhart
commissioner
social
security
peabody
coal
et
argued
october
decided
january
coal
industry
retiree
health
benefit
act
coal
act
act
commissioner
social
security
shall
october
assign
coal
industry
retiree
eligible
benefits
act
extant
operating
company
signatory
operator
related
entity
shall
responsible
funding
beneficiary
benefits
assignment
signatory
operator
binds
operator
pay
annual
premium
mine
workers
america
combined
benefit
fund
combined
fund
administers
benefits
premium
three
components
health
benefit
premium
death
benefit
premium
premium
retirees
assigned
particular
operator
whose
benefits
paid
combined
fund
assigned
important
object
coal
act
providing
stable
funding
health
benefits
orphan
retirees
although
signatory
operators
required
pay
unassigned
beneficiaries
premium
funding
mine
workers
america
pension
plan
umwa
pension
plan
abandoned
mine
land
reclamation
fund
aml
fund
runs
signatory
operator
unassigned
beneficiaries
premium
based
number
assigned
beneficiaries
signatory
assigned
retirees
required
cover
greatest
share
benefits
payable
unassigned
beneficiaries
two
separate
actions
different
district
courts
respondent
companies
challenged
initial
assignments
made
october
deadline
claiming
date
set
time
limit
commissioner
assignment
power
beneficiary
assigned
date
must
left
unassigned
life
challenged
assignments
void
corresponding
benefits
must
financed
transfers
umwa
pension
plan
aml
fund
necessary
unassigned
beneficiaries
premiums
paid
signatory
operators
timely
assignments
made
companies
obtained
summary
judgments
sixth
circuit
affirmed
held
initial
assignments
made
october
valid
despite
untimeliness
pp
companies
contention
commissioner
failure
jurisdictional
affected
beneficiaries
may
never
assigned
former
employers
may
go
scot
free
unsupportable
counterintuitive
pp
rejected
argument
comparable
companies
position
couching
duty
terms
mandatory
shall
together
specific
deadline
leaves
commissioner
authority
make
initial
assignment
october
brock
pierce
county
found
secretary
labor
deadline
issue
final
determination
complaint
federal
grant
fund
misuse
meant
spur
action
limit
scope
authority
untimely
action
valid
since
brock
ever
construed
provision
government
shall
act
within
specified
time
without
jurisdictional
limit
precluding
action
later
statute
specify
consequence
noncompliance
statutory
timing
provisions
federal
courts
ordinarily
impose
coercive
sanction
james
daniel
good
real
property
hence
oddity
claim
date
late
official
action
shift
financial
burdens
otherwise
responsible
private
purses
public
fisc
let
alone
siphon
money
funds
set
aside
different
public
purpose
like
aml
fund
land
reclamation
point
even
brock
case
subject
coal
act
passed
six
years
brock
congress
presumably
aware
readily
infer
congressional
intent
limit
agency
power
finish
mandatory
job
merely
specification
act
certain
time
nothing
limiting
shall
found
coal
act
express
language
supports
companies
structure
purpose
legislative
history
go
structural
clues
support
commissioner
act
instances
combining
shall
specific
date
possibly
read
prohibit
action
outside
statutory
period
see
instances
conclusion
based
plausibility
grounds
congress
meant
set
counterintuitive
limit
authority
act
said
surely
couched
intent
language
brock
already
held
lack
clear
jurisdictional
significance
pp
result
appealing
plausibility
affected
either
textual
features
companies
argue
indicate
inability
assign
beneficiaries
october
pp
provision
unassigned
beneficiary
status
characterized
specification
consequence
failure
assign
beneficiary
operator
related
person
speaks
terms
commissioner
failure
assign
beneficiaries
simply
beneficiaries
assigned
obvious
reason
unassigned
status
former
employer
disappearance
say
failure
timely
assignment
also
leave
beneficiary
unassigned
simply
means
unassigned
status
significance
peculiar
failure
timely
assignment
addition
extent
unassigned
status
consequence
mere
untimeliness
obvious
reason
specifying
consequence
supposed
desire
finality
default
rule
telling
social
security
administration
funding
source
use
absence
unrealistic
think
congress
understood
unassigned
status
enduring
consequence
uncompleted
work
nothing
indicates
foresaw
beneficiaries
matchable
operators
still
business
might
assigned
deadline
one
instance
congress
clearly
weighed
finality
october
accuracy
initial
assignments
accuracy
see
companies
attempts
limit
apparent
preference
accuracy
fail
pp
ii
provision
operator
contribution
benefit
unassigned
shall
calculated
based
assignments
october
mean
assigned
operator
percentage
potential
liability
benefit
unassigned
fixed
according
assignments
made
date
need
mean
companies
contend
assignments
actually
stand
date
mean
assignments
shall
date
assuming
commissioner
complies
congress
command
since
plain
reading
nothing
left
argument
except
stress
applicable
percentage
modified
accordance
exceptions
initial
error
assignee
operator
demise
enunciation
two
exceptions
imply
exclusion
third
reason
think
congress
considered
exclusion
good
reason
conclude
congress
foresee
failure
make
timely
assignments
pp
coal
act
designed
allocate
greatest
number
beneficiaries
prior
responsible
operator
way
reach
objective
read
statutory
date
spur
prompt
action
bar
tardy
completion
business
ensuring
benefits
funded
much
possible
principally
responsible
pp
fed
appx
first
judgment
second
judgment
reversed
souter
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
stevens
kennedy
ginsburg
breyer
joined
scalia
filed
dissenting
opinion
thomas
joined
thomas
filed
dissenting
opinion
jo
anne
barnhart
commissioner
social
security
petitioner
peabody
coal
company
et
al
jo
anne
barnhart
commissioner
social
security
petitioner
bellaire
corporation
et
al
michael
holland
et
petitioners
bellaire
corporation
et
al
writs
certiorari
appeals
sixth
circuit
january
justice
souter
delivered
opinion
coal
industry
retiree
health
benefit
act
coal
act
act
includes
present
providing
generally
commissioner
social
security
shall
october
assign
coal
industry
retiree
eligible
benefits
extant
operating
company
related
entity
shall
responsible
funding
assigned
beneficiary
benefits
question
whether
initial
assignment
made
date
valid
despite
untimeliness
hold
spoken
portions
coal
act
two
recent
cases
barnhart
sigmon
coal
eastern
enterprises
apfel
first
sketches
act
history
enough
recall
current
form
act
requires
commissioner
assign
possible
every
coal
industry
retiree
signatory
operator
defined
signatory
coal
wage
agreement
specified
assignment
turn
retiree
employment
history
particular
operator
unless
appropriate
signatory
longer
business
case
proper
assignee
related
person
operator
defined
terms
corporate
associations
relationships
issue
act
recognizes
retirees
unassigned
assignment
signatory
operator
binds
operator
pay
annual
premium
mine
workers
america
combined
benefit
fund
established
act
administer
benefits
premium
three
components
starting
health
benefit
premium
computed
multiplying
number
assigned
retirees
year
per
beneficiary
premium
set
commissioner
based
combined
fund
health
benefit
expenses
prior
year
adjusted
changes
consumer
price
index
second
element
death
benefit
premium
projected
benefits
retirees
survivors
premium
operator
share
amount
actuarially
determined
combined
fund
required
pay
plan
year
death
benefits
coverage
possible
third
constituent
premium
retirees
assigned
particular
operator
whose
health
death
benefits
nonetheless
paid
combined
fund
assigned
beneficiaries
passage
coal
act
many
operators
withdrew
coal
wage
agreements
shifting
costs
paying
retirees
benefits
remaining
signatories
sigmon
coal
supra
important
object
coal
act
providing
stable
funding
health
benefits
orphan
retirees
house
committee
ways
means
development
implementation
coal
industry
retiree
health
benefit
act
comm
print
hereinafter
coal
act
implementation
see
energy
policy
act
pub
stat
intent
stabilize
plan
funding
provide
continuation
privately
financed
program
signatory
operators
may
compelled
contribute
benefit
unassigned
beneficiaries
however
funding
two
sources
must
run
mine
workers
america
pension
plan
umwa
pension
plan
required
make
three
substantial
payments
combined
fund
purpose
february
october
october
act
also
calls
yearly
payments
combined
fund
abandoned
mine
land
reclamation
fund
aml
fund
established
reclamation
restoration
land
water
resources
degraded
coal
mining
annual
transfers
aml
fund
limited
greater
million
annual
interest
earned
fund
subject
aggregate
limit
equal
amount
interest
earned
aml
fund
september
october
far
transfers
umwa
pension
plan
aml
fund
covered
benefits
unassigned
beneficiaries
fall
short
however
third
source
comes
play
third
element
operator
combined
fund
premium
becomes
actual
assignee
operators
operators
assigned
retirees
pay
unassigned
beneficiaries
premium
applicable
percentage
portion
amount
needed
pay
annual
benefits
unassigned
operator
applicable
percentage
defined
percentage
determined
dividing
number
eligible
beneficiaries
assigned
section
operator
total
number
eligible
beneficiaries
assigned
section
operators
determined
basis
assignments
october
signatory
assigned
retirees
thus
cover
greatest
share
benefits
payable
unassigned
well
spouses
certain
dependants
ii
although
provides
commissioner
shall
complete
assignments
october
commissioner
estimates
beneficiaries
first
assigned
signatory
operators
statutory
date
parties
disagree
reason
commissioner
failed
meet
deadline
dispute
need
resolved
october
commissioner
assigned
beneficiaries
respondents
peabody
coal
company
eastern
associated
coal
total
beneficiaries
respondents
bellaire
corporation
nacco
industries
north
american
coal
corporation
companies
challenged
assignments
two
separate
actions
different
district
courts
claiming
statutory
date
sets
time
limit
commissioner
power
assign
beneficiary
assigned
october
beneficiary
eligible
dependants
must
left
unassigned
life
respondent
companies
right
challenged
assignments
void
corresponding
benefits
must
financed
transfers
umwa
pension
plan
aml
fund
necessary
unassigned
beneficiary
premiums
paid
signatory
operators
timely
assignments
made
commissioner
denied
congress
intended
commissioner
tardiness
assignments
impose
permanent
charge
public
aml
fund
otherwise
earmarked
reclamation
raise
threat
permanently
heavier
financial
burdens
companies
happened
get
assignments
october
commissioner
argued
congress
primarily
intended
coal
operators
pay
retirees
trustees
combined
fund
intervened
one
cases
took
commissioner
view
initial
assignments
made
september
companies
obtained
summary
judgments
case
authority
dixie
fuel
commissioner
social
security
went
commissioner
issue
appeals
sixth
circuit
affirmed
two
opinions
likewise
following
dixie
fuel
peabody
coal
massanari
fed
appx
bellaire
massanari
fed
appx
conflicting
fourth
circuit
holding
holland
pardee
coal
granted
certiorari
resolve
reverse
iii
misses
point
simply
argue
october
date
mandatory
imperative
deadline
course
however
unrealistic
mandate
may
commissioner
discretion
choose
leave
assignments
prescribed
date
assignments
issue
represent
default
statutory
duty
though
may
well
wholly
blameless
one
failure
act
schedule
merely
raises
real
question
consequence
tardiness
respondent
companies
call
failure
jurisdictional
affected
beneficiaries
like
truly
orphan
beneficiaries
may
never
assigned
instead
must
permanent
wards
umwa
pension
plan
aml
fund
potentially
coal
operators
without
prior
relationship
beneficiaries
companies
words
say
tardily
assigned
beneficiaries
perhaps
formerly
employees
go
scot
free
think
claim
unsupportable
counterintuitive
first
companies
position
couching
duty
terms
mandatory
shall
together
specific
deadline
leaves
commissioner
authority
make
initial
assignment
october
rejected
comparable
argument
brock
pierce
county
dealing
power
secretary
labor
audit
grant
recipient
provision
shall
issue
final
determination
within
days
receiving
complaint
alleging
misuse
federal
grant
funds
like
appeals
ninth
circuit
brock
thought
mandate
deadline
together
implied
congress
intended
prevent
secretary
acting
statutory
period
contrary
expressed
reluctance
conclude
every
failure
agency
observe
procedural
requirement
voids
subsequent
agency
action
especially
important
public
rights
stake
reversed
litigation
secretary
responsibility
brock
substantial
ability
complete
within
days
subject
factors
beyond
secretary
control
secretary
delay
respondent
theory
prejudice
rights
taxpaying
public
accordingly
read
provision
meant
spur
secretary
action
limit
scope
authority
untimely
action
still
valid
since
brock
ever
construed
provision
government
shall
act
within
specified
time
without
jurisdictional
limit
precluding
action
later
thus
provision
detention
hearing
shall
held
immediately
upon
detainee
first
appearance
judicial
bar
detention
tardy
hearing
quoting
mandate
secretary
health
human
services
shall
within
certain
time
mean
official
lacked
power
act
beyond
regions
hospital
shalala
summed
way
statute
specify
consequence
noncompliance
statutory
timing
provisions
federal
courts
ordinary
course
impose
coercive
sanction
james
daniel
good
real
property
hence
oddity
date
claim
late
official
action
shift
financial
burdens
otherwise
responsible
private
purses
public
fisc
let
alone
siphon
money
funds
set
aside
expressly
different
public
purpose
like
aml
fund
land
reclamation
point
however
even
brock
case
subject
coal
act
adopted
six
years
brock
came
congress
presumably
aware
readily
infer
congressional
intent
limit
agency
power
get
mandatory
job
done
merely
specification
act
certain
time
see
wells
brock
example
consequently
mean
statute
directing
official
action
needs
mandatory
shall
grant
power
sensibly
read
expire
job
supposed
done
nothing
limiting
however
found
coal
act
express
language
supports
companies
structure
purpose
legislative
history
go
structural
clues
support
commissioner
coal
act
instances
combining
word
shall
specific
date
possibly
read
prohibit
action
outside
statutory
period
congress
example
provided
umwa
pension
plan
shall
transfer
combined
fund
installments
million
february
october
october
failure
make
transfer
one
precise
dates
whatever
reason
left
umwa
pension
plan
authority
make
payment
october
even
business
day
consider
act
mandatory
provisions
trustees
combined
fund
shall
designated
later
days
enactment
date
designated
trustees
shall
later
days
enactment
date
give
commissioner
certain
information
benefits
one
seriously
argue
entire
scheme
nullified
appointments
left
day
trustees
whose
appointments
properly
left
day
powerless
divulge
information
ssa
period
instances
draw
conclusion
grounds
plausibility
congress
meant
set
counterintuitive
limit
authority
act
said
surely
couched
intent
language
brock
already
held
lack
clear
jurisdictional
significance
may
said
think
result
appealing
plausibility
affected
either
two
textual
features
companies
take
indicating
inability
assign
beneficiaries
statutory
date
provision
unassigned
beneficiary
status
provision
operator
contribution
benefit
unassigned
shall
calculated
basis
assignments
october
companies
characterize
provision
unassigned
beneficiaries
specification
consequence
failure
assign
beneficiary
operator
related
person
cf
brock
specifying
consequence
failure
say
shows
failure
must
governed
consequence
provided
corrected
tardy
assignment
corresponding
one
made
earlier
specified
consequence
words
reflects
legislative
preference
finality
accurate
initial
assignments
creates
right
part
companies
rely
permanently
state
affairs
october
think
line
reasoning
unsound
every
step
begin
whatever
might
inferable
fact
specific
provision
addressed
failure
make
timely
assignment
part
act
referring
unassigned
beneficiaries
provision
act
speaks
beneficiaries
terms
commissioner
failure
assign
time
simply
beneficiaries
assigned
obvious
reason
beneficiaries
unassigned
fact
disappearance
beneficiary
former
employer
leaving
signatory
operator
assignment
say
failure
timely
assignment
also
leave
beneficiary
unassigned
act
simply
means
unassigned
status
significance
peculiar
failure
timely
assignment
second
extent
unassigned
status
consequence
mere
untimeliness
far
obvious
reason
specifying
consequence
supposed
desire
face
provision
beneficiary
left
tardiness
functions
simply
default
rule
provide
coverage
new
regime
required
place
october
source
funding
every
beneficiary
provisions
unassigned
employees
tell
ssa
source
absence
read
provision
apparently
made
want
something
better
absolute
command
forgo
something
better
time
fact
unrealistic
think
congress
understood
unassigned
status
enduring
consequence
uncompleted
work
nothing
indicates
congress
even
foresaw
beneficiaries
matchable
operators
still
business
might
assigned
october
companies
point
commissioner
led
congress
believe
late
possible
assignments
made
time
see
supra
little
legislative
history
point
tends
show
congress
assumed
assignments
made
say
operator
still
business
made
time
october
heels
conference
committee
report
act
vote
senate
adopting
act
senator
wallop
gave
detailed
explanation
coal
act
provisions
unassigned
beneficiaries
assumed
unassigned
true
orphans
practical
matter
beneficiaries
assigned
specific
last
signatory
operator
related
person
assigned
operator
payment
purposes
instances
none
persons
remain
business
even
defined
include
related
businesses
thus
provisions
made
unassigned
beneficiary
premiums
cong
rec
senator
report
says
transfer
combined
fund
umwa
pension
plan
aml
fund
made
unassigned
beneficiaries
employed
assigned
operators
time
retirement
operator
remains
business
formulations
described
retiree
becomes
unassigned
beneficiary
coal
act
purpose
assure
beneficiary
assigned
remains
responsibility
particular
operator
number
unassigned
beneficiaries
kept
absolute
minimum
seems
crossed
congress
mind
category
unassigned
include
beneficiaries
let
alone
lot
beneficiaries
connected
operator
albeit
late
providing
consequence
default
apparently
congress
plainly
however
weigh
finality
october
accuracy
initial
assignments
one
circumstance
accuracy
section
speaks
beneficiaries
assigned
plan
year
suggesting
assignment
status
may
change
year
year
one
way
may
change
correcting
erroneous
assignment
act
operator
getting
notice
assignment
days
request
information
regarding
basis
assignment
days
receipt
information
ask
reconsideration
commissioner
finds
error
combined
fund
trustees
fix
reducing
premiums
refunding
overpayments
see
also
ii
nothing
said
finality
october
time
limit
whatever
imposed
commissioner
authority
reassign
companies
concede
must
statute
permits
reassignment
october
companies
however
try
limit
apparent
preference
accuracy
arguing
one
feature
provision
reconsideration
implicitly
supports
specific
isolated
exception
otherwise
unequivocal
bar
assignments
statutory
date
suggests
say
bar
otherwise
absolute
think
conclusion
follows
first
argument
circular
assumes
availability
reconsideration
process
time
limit
exception
bar
assignment
activity
imposed
october
time
limit
question
whether
october
mandate
fact
bar
section
say
nothing
provision
suggests
enacted
exception
october
date
language
operating
notwithstanding
date
specified
contrary
reassignment
made
subsection
ii
authority
reassign
contained
reasonably
read
lifting
jurisdictional
time
bar
simply
specifying
procedure
aggrieved
operator
follow
requesting
commissioner
exercise
assignment
power
contained
along
combined
operation
two
subsections
thus
implication
commissioner
powerless
make
initial
assignment
operator
specified
date
suggestion
goes
way
second
reason
read
provision
correction
erroneous
assignments
implying
commissioner
employ
authority
make
tardy
initial
assignment
situation
like
read
enumeration
one
case
exclude
another
unless
fair
suppose
congress
considered
unnamed
possibility
meant
say
dominion
industries
held
repeatedly
canon
expressio
unius
est
exclusio
alterius
apply
every
statutory
listing
grouping
force
items
expressed
members
associated
group
series
justifying
inference
items
mentioned
excluded
deliberate
choice
inadvertence
vonn
explained
point
recently
last
term
unanimous
opinion
chevron
echazabal
statutory
language
suggesting
exclusiveness
missing
essential
extrastatutory
ingredient
demonstration
series
terms
omission
bespeaks
negative
implication
canon
depends
identifying
series
two
terms
things
understood
go
hand
hand
abridged
circumstances
supporting
sensible
inference
term
left
must
meant
excluded
crawford
construction
statutes
expressio
unius
properly
applies
natural
association
ideas
mind
reader
expressed
set
way
strong
contrast
omitted
contrast
enforces
affirmative
quoting
state
ex
rel
curtis
de
corps
ohio
vonn
supra
echazabal
respondents
fail
show
reason
congress
considered
reassignments
appeal
go
hand
hand
tardy
initial
assignments
since
congress
apparently
never
thought
initial
assignments
late
see
supra
better
inference
face
nothing
case
unprovided
remaining
textual
argument
companies
side
rests
definition
operator
applicable
percentage
overall
obligation
assignee
operators
related
persons
fund
benefits
unassigned
defined
percentage
operator
assigned
beneficiaries
among
assigned
beneficiaries
determined
basis
assignments
october
parenthesis
omitted
companies
argue
specification
october
means
assigned
operator
percentage
potential
liability
benefit
unassigned
fixed
according
assignments
made
date
subject
specific
exceptions
set
requiring
change
percentage
erroneously
assigned
retirees
reassigned
assignee
operators
go
business
companies
contend
position
rests
plain
meaning
date
means
assignments
actually
stand
date
yet
words
used
statute
read
another
way
since
congress
required
possible
assignments
complete
october
see
equally
fair
read
assignments
date
mean
assignments
shall
date
assuming
commissioner
complies
command
companies
reading
hospitable
early
finality
assignments
alternative
favors
completeness
accuracy
finality
prevails
seen
plain
reading
however
nothing
left
argument
except
stress
applicable
percentage
modified
accordance
two
exceptions
recognizing
changes
initial
error
demise
assignee
operator
answer
point
course
already
given
enunciation
two
exceptions
imply
exclusion
third
unless
reason
think
third
least
considered
whereas
good
reason
conclude
congress
adopted
language
question
foresee
failure
make
timely
assignments
see
supra
phrase
read
govern
situation
congress
clearly
require
absolute
finality
assignments
urged
companies
iv
much
certain
coal
act
rests
congress
stated
finding
necessary
identify
persons
responsible
plan
liabilities
express
desire
provide
continuation
privately
financed
program
delivery
health
care
benefits
energy
policy
act
pub
stat
words
senator
wallop
report
delivered
shortly
enactment
statute
designed
allocate
greatest
number
beneficiaries
plans
prior
responsible
operator
reason
definitions
intended
drafters
given
broad
interpretation
accomplish
goal
cong
rec
accept
companies
argument
specified
date
action
jurisdictional
read
act
allocate
greatest
least
number
beneficiaries
responsible
operator
way
reach
congressional
objective
however
read
statutory
date
spur
prompt
action
bar
tardy
completion
business
ensuring
benefits
funded
much
possible
identified
congress
principally
responsible
judgments
appeals
cases
accordingly
reversed
jo
anne
barnhart
commissioner
social
security
petitioner
peabody
coal
company
et
al
jo
anne
barnhart
commissioner
social
security
petitioner
bellaire
corporation
et
al
michael
holland
et
petitioners
bellaire
corporation
et
al
writs
certiorari
appeals
sixth
circuit
january
justice
scalia
justice
justice
thomas
join
dissenting
holding
today
confers
upon
commissioner
social
security
unexpiring
power
assign
retired
coal
miners
signatory
operators
view
disposition
irreconcilable
text
structure
coal
industry
retiree
health
benefit
act
coal
act
act
finds
support
precedents
respectfully
dissent
respondents
contend
commissioner
properly
assigned
responsibility
coal
miners
section
provides
pertinent
part
commissioner
social
security
shall
october
assign
coal
industry
retiree
eligible
beneficiary
signatory
operator
related
person
respect
remains
business
following
order
first
signatory
operator
signatory
coal
wage
agreement
subsequent
coal
wage
agreement
recent
signatory
operator
employ
coal
industry
retiree
coal
industry
least
years
second
retiree
assigned
paragraph
signatory
operator
signatory
coal
wage
agreement
subsequent
coal
wage
agreement
recent
signatory
operator
employ
coal
industry
retiree
coal
industry
third
retiree
assigned
paragraph
signatory
operator
employed
coal
industry
retiree
coal
industry
longer
period
time
signatory
operator
prior
effective
date
coal
wage
agreement
commissioner
failed
complete
task
assigning
eligible
beneficiary
signatory
operator
october
result
many
eligible
beneficiaries
unassigned
benefits
financed
time
mine
workers
america
pension
plan
umwa
pension
plan
abandoned
mine
land
reclamation
fund
see
commissioner
blames
failure
meet
statutory
deadline
magnitude
task
lack
appropriated
funds
brief
petitioners
trustees
umwa
combined
benefit
fund
thought
however
cases
letting
commissioner
complete
little
unfinished
business
barely
missed
deadline
concern
assignments
respondents
vast
majority
made
years
statutory
deadline
passed
app
respondents
contend
assignments
unlawful
unless
congress
conferred
upon
commissioner
power
claims
unexpiring
authority
assign
eligible
beneficiaries
signatory
operators
respondents
must
prevail
section
coal
act
provide
expansive
power
provisions
act
confirm
ii
well
established
agency
power
regulate
private
entities
must
grounded
statutory
grant
authority
congress
see
fda
brown
williamson
tobacco
bowen
georgetown
univ
hospital
louisiana
pub
serv
fcc
principle
special
importance
respect
extraordinary
power
commissioner
asserts
compel
coal
companies
pay
miners
families
health
benefits
never
contracted
pay
held
commissioner
use
power
even
exercised
october
violates
constitution
extent
imposes
severe
retroactive
liability
certain
coal
companies
see
eastern
enterprises
apfel
agency
exercises
power
tests
constitutional
limits
obligation
assure
rooted
text
statute
holds
commissioner
retains
power
act
october
congress
specify
consequence
statutory
deadline
ante
makes
sense
power
conferred
limited
time
automatic
consequence
expiration
time
expiration
power
landowner
authorizes
someone
cut
christmas
trees
december
doubt
happens
december
passes
authority
cut
terminates
situation
changed
authorization
combined
mandate
landowner
enters
contract
says
party
shall
cut
christmas
trees
property
december
even
time
essence
contract
essence
reasons
shall
discuss
part
iii
infra
one
think
contractor
continuing
authority
days
weeks
perpetually
harvest
points
ante
three
provisions
coal
act
combine
word
shall
statutory
deadline
view
extendible
section
umwa
pension
plan
shall
transfer
combined
fund
february
says
trustees
combined
fund
shall
later
days
enactment
date
furnish
certain
information
regarding
benefits
commissioner
provides
certain
individuals
described
shall
designate
trustees
combined
fund
later
days
enactment
date
agree
actions
mandated
first
two
deadlines
taken
deadlines
expired
though
perhaps
forever
claims
deadline
reason
however
apply
provisions
power
mandated
stem
mere
implication
mandate
private
entities
involved
power
prescribed
quite
apart
statutory
command
certain
date
umwa
pension
plan
power
transfer
trustees
combined
fund
power
provide
specified
information
whether
statute
commands
question
whether
late
exercise
unquestionably
authorized
act
produce
consequences
statute
says
follow
timely
exercise
act
though
pursue
analogy
contract
provided
landowner
harvest
deliver
trees
december
even
december
passes
surely
harvest
deliver
trees
issue
whether
december
date
central
contract
late
delivery
contractual
consequence
requiring
side
counterperformance
commissioner
social
security
contrast
private
entity
creature
congress
authority
assign
beneficiaries
operators
except
insofar
authority
implicit
mandate
mandate
hence
implicit
authority
expired
october
last
three
provisions
confer
power
otherwise
available
private
entities
involved
power
appoint
initial
trustees
board
combined
fund
however
think
clear
indeed
think
quite
debatable
whether
power
survives
deadline
thought
utterly
essential
trustees
place
seems
reasonable
interpret
provision
appointment
successor
trustees
include
power
fill
vacancies
arising
initial
failure
appoint
interpret
initial
appointment
power
extend
beyond
specified
termination
date
provision
surely
establish
proposition
mandates
include
continuing
authority
iii
none
cases
relies
even
remotely
point
brock
pierce
county
agency
action
question
authorized
explicit
statutory
grant
authority
separate
apart
provision
contained
mandate
title
supp
repealed
gave
secretary
labor
authority
order
sanctions
corrective
actions
appropriate
another
provision
statute
former
required
secretary
investigating
complaint
recipient
misusing
funds
make
final
determination
regarding
truth
allegation
later
days
receiving
complaint
held
secretary
failure
meet
deadline
prevent
ordering
repayment
misspent
funds
respondent
said
shown
anything
caused
secretary
lose
power
act
emphasis
added
contrast
commissioner
never
power
act
apart
mandate
expired
october
james
daniel
good
real
property
federal
statutes
authorized
government
bring
forfeiture
action
within
limitation
period
held
power
revoked
government
failure
comply
separate
internal
timing
requirements
set
forth
provisions
failed
specify
consequence
noncompliance
refused
impose
coercive
sanction
terminating
government
authority
bring
forfeiture
action
james
daniel
good
supra
authorization
separate
defaulted
obligation
affected
authorization
separate
defaulted
obligation
statute
issue
gave
courts
power
order
pretrial
detention
hearing
pursuant
provisions
subsection
section
one
provisions
hearing
shall
held
immediately
upon
person
first
appearance
judicial
officer
failed
hold
hearing
immediately
upon
respondent
first
appearance
yet
held
authority
order
pretrial
detention
unaffected
explained
conceivable
combination
procedural
irregularities
render
detention
hearing
flawed
constitute
hearing
pursuant
provisions
subsection
purposes
emphasis
added
mere
failure
comply
requirement
alone
effect
case
holds
authorization
separate
defaulted
obligation
affected
authorization
separate
defaulted
obligation
contrast
cases
present
ones
demonstrates
extended
discussion
whether
congress
specified
consequences
commissioner
failure
comply
october
deadline
ante
quite
beside
point
specification
termination
authority
may
needed
separate
authorization
canceled
utterly
superfluous
authorization
contained
mandate
expired
iv
commissioner
lacks
authority
assign
eligible
beneficiaries
statutory
deadline
confirmed
provisions
coal
act
otherwise
rendered
incoherent
calculation
death
benefit
premiums
unassigned
beneficiaries
premiums
owed
coal
operators
based
assigned
operator
applicable
percentage
defined
percentage
determined
dividing
number
eligible
beneficiaries
assigned
section
operator
total
number
eligible
beneficiaries
assigned
section
operators
determined
basis
assignments
october
emphasis
added
statute
specifies
two
circumstances
adjustments
may
made
assigned
operator
applicable
percentage
changes
assignments
october
result
appeals
process
set
see
assigned
operator
goes
business
see
provision
allows
adjustments
account
initial
assignments
perfectly
consistent
view
power
assign
extend
beyond
october
incompatible
holding
contrary
response
structural
dilemma
nothing
short
astonishing
concludes
applicable
percentage
based
assignments
october
may
adjusted
account
subsequent
initial
assignments
notwithstanding
statutory
command
applicable
percentage
determined
basis
assignments
october
notwithstanding
statute
provision
two
two
exceptions
command
include
initial
assignments
enunciation
two
exceptions
says
imply
exclusion
third
unless
reason
think
third
least
considered
ante
ince
congress
apparently
never
thought
initial
assignments
late
better
inference
face
nothing
case
unprovided
referred
limitation
upon
accepted
principle
construction
inclusio
unius
exclusio
alterius
see
myers
fdic
leatherman
tarrant
county
narcotics
intelligence
coordination
unit
also
absurd
limitation
since
means
unimaginable
unlisted
item
likely
excluded
new
maxim
mean
example
exceptions
hearsay
rule
beyond
set
forth
federal
rules
evidence
must
recognized
unlikely
congress
perhaps
rules
committee
considered
unnamed
exceptions
cases
support
proposition
see
williamson
salerno
reason
make
case
unprovided
exception
clear
import
exclusive
listing
make
exception
clear
textual
disposition
way
therefore
treatment
issue
ample
precedent
many
wrongly
decided
cases
replace
legislature
said
courts
thinks
legislature
said
judges
estimation
said
considered
unanticipated
consequences
say
courts
disapprove
event
relevant
question
whether
excludes
grounds
adjustments
applicable
percentage
rather
whether
anything
statute
affirmatively
authorizes
answer
question
answer
surprise
given
acknowledgment
congress
foresee
failure
make
timely
assignments
ante
initial
assignments
also
reconciled
coal
act
provisions
regarding
appointments
board
trustees
section
establishes
combined
fund
board
seven
members
one
designated
three
employers
assigned
greatest
number
eligible
beneficiaries
section
act
provides
initial
trustee
fill
position
pending
completion
assignment
process
permits
initial
trustee
serve
november
evident
therefore
three
employers
assigned
greatest
number
eligible
beneficiaries
section
must
known
november
simply
inconceivable
three
appointing
employers
unknown
post
left
unfilled
commissioner
completes
assignment
process
whenever
might
designated
trustee
constantly
change
identity
three
employers
assigned
greatest
number
eligible
beneficiaries
section
constantly
changes
bottom
reading
coal
act
confident
filling
provisions
cover
cases
provided
rests
upon
perception
statute
overriding
goal
accuracy
assignments
foundation
sand
coal
act
demonstrably
scheme
requires
even
attempts
require
perfect
match
beneficiary
coal
operator
responsible
beneficiary
health
care
provides
best
rough
justice
seemingly
unfair
inequitable
provisions
abound
example
operator
goes
business
provides
beneficiaries
previously
assigned
operator
must
go
unassigned
pool
purposes
calculating
applicable
percentage
makes
provision
reassigned
another
operator
even
another
operator
might
qualify
hardly
compatible
scheme
keen
accuracy
assignments
envisions
perpetual
assignment
authority
commissioner
account
existence
retreats
nuanced
position
coal
act
prefers
accuracy
finality
first
assignment
ante
strange
preference
perfection
virgin
assignments
mystery
one
might
understand
insisting
upon
perfect
possible
october
prohibiting
future
changes
way
initial
assignment
otherwise
assure
initial
system
near
perfect
possible
abstain
future
adjustments
upset
expectations
render
sales
companies
difficult
conceivable
reason
insistence
upon
perfection
initial
assignments
whether
made
deadline
afterward
however
act
insist
upon
accuracy
initial
assignments
even
made
deadline
assigned
beneficiary
one
signatory
operator
held
responsible
health
benefits
even
miner
worked
signatory
operators
perfect
fairness
share
responsibility
reality
coal
act
reflects
compromise
goals
perfection
assignments
finality
provides
accuracy
initial
assignments
along
repose
signatory
operators
given
full
notice
obligations
october
plan
business
accordingly
without
surprise
new
retroactive
liabilities
imposed
commissioner
naive
rely
guesses
congress
wanted
legislation
complicated
culmination
long
legislative
battle
put
barnhart
sigmon
coal
highly
interested
parties
attempt
ed
pull
provisions
different
directions
best
way
faithful
resulting
compromise
follow
statute
text
done
impute
congress
one
statutory
objective
favored
majority
expense
equally
plausible
statutory
objectives
think
clear
text
provisions
coal
act
commissioner
lacks
authority
assign
eligible
beneficiaries
signatory
operators
october
respectfully
dissent
judgment
contrary
jo
anne
barnhart
commissioner
social
security
petitioner
peabody
coal
company
et
al
jo
anne
barnhart
commissioner
social
security
petitioner
bellaire
corporation
et
al
michael
holland
et
petitioners
bellaire
corporation
et
al
writs
certiorari
appeals
sixth
circuit
january
justice
thomas
dissenting
fully
agree
justice
scalia
analysis
cases
accordingly
join
opinion
write
separately
however
reiterate
seemingly
obvious
rule
unless
congress
explicitly
otherwise
construe
statutory
term
accordance
ordinary
natural
meaning
fdic
meyer
thus
absent
congressional
directive
contrary
shall
must
construed
mandatory
command
see
american
heritage
dictionary
ed
defining
shall
something
take
place
exist
future
something
order
promise
requirement
obligation
shall
leave
shall
answer
misdeeds
penalty
shall
exceed
two
years
prison
congress
desires
give
shall
nonmandatory
meaning
must
say
explicitly
specifying
consequences
noncompliance
explicitly
defining
term
shall
mean
something
mandatory
directive
indeed
congress
perfectly
free
signify
hortatory
nature
wishes
choosing
among
wide
array
words
fact
carry
meaning
preferably
possible
readily
come
mind
given
foregoing
disagree
brock
pierce
county
progeny
extent
taken
perhaps
erroneously
see
ante
scalia
dissenting
suggest
shall
mandatory
failure
specify
consequence
noncompliance
preserves
power
act
face
noncompliance
even
grant
authority
act
coterminous
mandatory
command
fail
see
reason
eviscerating
clear
meaning
shall
impermissible
goal
saving
congress
choices
name
achieving
better
policy
article
iii
vest
judges
authority
rectify
congressional
decisions
view
imprudent
also
note
current
interpretive
approach
penalty
failing
comply
duty
congress
specify
consequences
noncompliance
result
irrational
congress
indicates
lesser
penalty
noncompliance
less
loss
power
act
administer
lesser
penalty
shall
stands
let
government
officials
shirk
duty
impunity
rather
depriving
term
shall
ordinary
meaning
apply
term
mandatory
directive
secretary
conclusion
obvious
secretary
power
make
initial
assignments
october
footnotes
together
barnhart
commissioner
social
security
bellaire
et
al
see
rule
holland
et
al
bellaire
et
also
certiorari
footnotes
coal
act
definition
related
persons
subject
opinion
last
term
barnhart
sigmon
coal
simplicity
refer
related
persons
separately
balance
opinion
according
congressional
report
total
premium
single
beneficiary
fiscal
year
figure
includes
health
death
benefit
premiums
since
unassigned
beneficiaries
premium
yet
charged
coal
act
implementation
premium
approximately
general
accounting
office
report
retired
coal
miners
health
benefit
funds
financial
challenges
continue
apr
commissioner
proffered
reason
delay
social
security
administration
ssa
permitted
expend
appropriated
funds
commence
work
assignments
july
congress
enacted
supplemental
appropriations
act
pub
stat
commissioner
also
task
researching
employment
records
approximately
coal
industry
workers
order
determine
appropriate
signatory
operators
monumental
completed
october
without
additional
resources
respondent
companies
counter
acting
commissioner
assured
congress
less
month
statutory
date
ssa
meet
statutory
responsibility
complete
assignments
time
hearing
provisions
relating
health
benefits
retired
coal
miners
house
ways
means
committee
hereinafter
coal
act
hearing
ser
comm
print
statement
acting
commissioner
thompson
representative
informed
congress
ssa
completed
process
making
initial
assignment
decisions
october
required
law
hearing
coal
industry
retiree
health
benefit
act
subcommittee
oversight
house
committee
ways
means
ser
statement
principal
deputy
commissioner
thompson
general
accounting
office
estimated
invalidation
assignments
made
september
require
combined
fund
refund
million
premium
payments
letter
gloria
jarmon
hon
william
roth
senate
committee
finance
http
visited
available
clerk
case
file
grant
certiorari
appeals
third
circuit
came
side
fourth
circuit
see
shenango
apfel
one
disagree
justice
scalia
hen
power
conferred
limited
time
automatic
consequence
expiration
time
expiration
power
post
dissenting
opinion
assumption
commissioner
power
assign
retirees
conferred
limited
time
assumes
away
question
decided
justice
scalia
dissent
elaboration
circularity
forever
returning
must
postulate
constitutes
mandate
expired
statutory
date
post
justice
scalia
closest
approach
nonconclusory
justification
position
assertion
entirely
formal
interpretive
rule
date
figuring
statutory
subsection
creation
mandatory
obligation
ipso
facto
negates
power
tardy
performance
post
justice
scalia
cites
authority
formalism
contradicted
single
statutory
subsection
provided
judicial
officer
shall
hold
hearing
hearing
shall
held
immediately
upon
person
first
appearance
judicial
officer
quoting
conversely
brock
pierce
county
james
daniel
good
real
property
regions
hospital
shalala
ascribed
significance
formal
placement
time
limitation
one
ask
statute
providing
obligor
shall
perform
duty
october
thought
differ
fundamentally
one
providing
obligor
shall
perform
duty
ii
obligor
duty
shall
performed
october
accepted
fact
time
limits
jurisdictional
even
though
expressed
separate
statutory
section
jurisdictional
grants
see
providing
courts
appeals
shall
jurisdiction
appeals
final
decisions
district
courts
providing
notice
appeal
civil
cases
must
filed
within
thirty
days
entry
judgment
browder
director
dept
corrections
stating
limitation
mandatory
citation
omitted
others
even
incorporated
jurisdictional
provision
see
supra
formalistic
rules
account
difference
explained
contextual
historical
indications
congress
meant
accomplish
intent
revealed
several
obvious
ways
rules
define
operator
liability
terms
employment
history
see
appellate
rights
test
appropriateness
initial
assignment
see
infra
expressed
understanding
companies
got
benefit
worker
labor
pay
worker
benefits
see
infra
else
anyone
naturally
expect
opposed
sensible
indications
initial
assignment
deadline
meant
jurisdictional
justice
scalia
new
formal
rule
thwart
statute
object
relieve
respondent
companies
responsibility
less
lucky
operators
might
required
shoulder
undoubtedly
much
political
compromise
development
coal
act
politics
justify
turning
process
initial
assignment
game
chance
respondent
companies
attempt
distinguish
brock
noted
case
aggrieved
party
sue
administrative
procedure
act
compel
agency
action
unlawfully
withheld
unreasonably
delayed
quoting
companies
assert
remedy
applied
commissioner
duty
whether
case
companies
argue
aggrieved
failure
assign
retirees
statutory
date
contrary
temporarily
avoided
payment
premium
amounts
indisputably
liable
assignments
timely
made
therefore
appear
need
provide
operators
remedy
much
less
drastic
remedy
respondent
see
case
commissioner
failure
meet
october
deadline
justice
scalia
concedes
theory
extend
far
limit
umwa
pension
plan
duty
transfer
funds
combined
fund
particular
dates
justice
scalia
attempts
avoid
outcome
assuming
without
basis
umwa
pension
plan
power
transfer
funds
combined
fund
absence
authorization
post
dissenting
opinion
justice
scalia
confidence
misplaced
prior
coal
act
enactment
vice
chairman
secretary
labor
coal
commission
testified
congress
legislative
authorization
needed
transfer
occur
one
things
concerned
commission
first
understanding
present
state
law
employee
retirement
income
security
act
act
within
power
participants
signatories
transfer
pension
surplus
benefit
fund
one
reasons
recommendation
transfer
authorized
hearing
subcommittee
medicare
care
senate
committee
finance
statement
coal
commission
vice
chairman
perritt
appears
provides
umwa
pension
plan
power
act
time
limit
according
justice
scalia
render
action
date
ultra
vires
result
even
dissent
embrace
justice
scalia
thinks
debatable
power
appoint
initial
trustees
survives
deadline
post
order
avoid
embarrassment
concluding
tardiness
remove
authority
appoint
initial
trustees
render
act
dead
letter
suggests
initial
trustee
appointed
even
though
provision
applies
appointment
successor
trustee
made
manner
trustee
succeeded
whereas
initial
trustee
succeed
anyone
extreme
implausibility
justice
scalia
suggested
reading
points
unreasonableness
placing
jurisdictional
gloss
time
limitation
impossible
believe
congress
meant
herculean
effort
resolve
coal
industry
benefit
crisis
come
absolutely
nothing
trustees
designated
late
basic
lesson
learned
justice
scalia
contortions
avoid
untoward
results
flowing
formalistic
theory
time
limits
mandatory
official
action
always
jurisdictional
occur
authorizing
provision
lesson
something
wrong
theory
many
consequences
course
intended
induce
obligated
person
take
untimely
action
rather
bar
action
altogether
section
example
denies
certain
tax
deductions
operators
fail
make
contributions
specified
periods
provides
penalty
operators
fail
pay
premiums
time
first
consequence
eliminated
operator
takes
action
necessarily
untimely
second
penalty
ceases
run
premiums
paid
albeit
time
postenactment
statements
though
entitled
less
weight
effect
hearing
house
committee
ways
means
september
one
member
asked
whether
ssa
established
procedures
assure
beneficiaries
improperly
designated
unassigned
acting
commissioner
social
security
responded
employee
training
emphasized
intent
coal
act
assign
miners
mine
operators
possible
coal
act
hearing
statements
johnson
acting
commissioner
thompson
record
hearing
also
contains
statement
committee
chairman
act
required
operators
pay
retirees
assume
proportionate
share
liability
true
orphans
retirees
whose
companies
longer
existence
pay
benefits
point
witness
suggest
unassigned
beneficiary
system
intended
miners
assigned
assigned
october
miners
remain
unassigned
perpetuity
order
protect
status
quo
date
respondent
companies
cite
postenactment
statement
representative
johnson
congress
obligation
make
sure
companies
time
figure
liability
prepare
deal
representative
comment
purport
interpret
coal
act
adopted
however
made
discussing
whether
resolution
passed
give
coal
operators
time
prepare
coal
act
obligations
ibid
one
statement
senator
wallop
preenactment
report
companies
cite
indicates
understanding
assignments
fixed
october
see
cong
rec
percentage
unassigned
beneficiary
premiums
allocable
assigned
operator
october
remain
fixed
future
years
discussed
however
indication
congress
foresaw
commissioner
unable
complete
assignments
statutory
date
general
statement
made
assumption
assignments
ever
made
made
october
show
legislative
preference
finality
accuracy
assumption
proven
incorrect
course
case
unprovided
exception
expressio
unius
canon
post
scalia
dissenting
merely
canon
tell
us
case
provided
negative
implication
unless
item
unmentioned
normally
associated
items
listed
companies
emphasize
requires
beneficiaries
whose
operator
goes
business
must
treated
unassigned
reassigned
even
assuming
provision
goes
definition
applicable
percentage
directly
implicate
assignments
effect
companies
suggest
said
congress
wished
identify
first
responsible
operator
given
retiree
follow
second
assignment
less
responsible
operator
initial
assigned
operator
left
business
interest
indicate
object
finality
accuracy
first
assignment
contrary
opts
finality
accurate
initial
assignment
made
absence
exact
explanation
arrangement
suppose
explanation
good
political
horse
trading
provisions
terms
govern
initial
assignment
made
tell
us
nothing
period
initial
assignment
may
made
fact
permissibility
postappeal
reassignment
october
makes
plain
congress
insisting
upon
perfect
possible
october
prohibiting
future
changes
way
initial
assignment
otherwise
post
scalia
dissenting
justice
scalia
agrees
contrary
reassignment
provision
indicates
system
accuracy
initial
assignments
whether
made
deadline
afterward
precisely
act
envisions
ibid
throughout
opinion
accuracy
refers
elusive
system
perfect
fairness
assignments
commissioner
following
scheme
set
may
said
provision
initial
trustee
serve
november
contrary
justice
scalia
view
post
dissenting
opinion
respondent
companies
view
transfers
aml
fund
prove
insufficient
cover
benefits
unassigned
beneficiaries
operator
received
assignments
prior
october
contribute
penny
unassigned
beneficiary
pool
solely
due
commissioner
fortuitous
failure
make
assignments
statutory
deadline
time
operators
received
full
assignments
prior
october
forced
cover
fair
share
unassigned
beneficiaries
premiums
although
justice
scalia
sees
act
rife
seemingly
unfair
inequitable
provisions
post
dissenting
opinion
even
view
reason
assume
congress
meant
contested
provisions
construed
unfair
inequitable
manner
possible
event
justice
scalia
citation
help
position
provides
clear
statutory
solution
problem
congress
anticipated
end
assigned
operator
business
congress
propounded
response
issue
us
clear
doubtless
split
courts
appeals
cases
us
review
given
absence
express
provision
statute
goals
best
served
treating
operators
way
congress
intended
treated
allowing
commissioner
identify
operators
responsible
congressional
research
service
report
dated
shortly
enactment
likewise
act
envisioned
herever
possible
responsibility
individual
beneficiaries
assigned
previous
employer
still
business
coal
industry
use
abandoned
mine
reclamation
fund
monies
umwa
orphan
retiree
health
benefits
reprinted
cong
footnotes
interpretation
assum
away
question
decided
accuses
ante
assumption
rather
consequence
proposition
scope
agency
power
determined
text
statutory
grant
authority
power
assign
eligible
beneficiar
ies
prefaced
phrase
october
statutory
date
intertwined
grant
authority
part
definition
commissioner
power
statute
provided
commissioner
shall
october
assign
eligible
beneficiary
signatory
operator
surely
beyond
dispute
assignments
ineffective
different
conclusion
obtain
temporal
scope
commissioner
authority
likewise
defined
according
clear
unambiguous
date
charges
formalism
ante
language
matter
form
form
congress
chose
presumptively
represents
political
compromise
congress
arrived
private
entities
unlike
administrative
agencies
need
authorization
congress
order
act
power
take
action
within
scope
charter
unless
law
forbids
suggests
employee
retirement
income
security
act
erisa
may
actually
forbid
umwa
pension
plan
transferring
pension
surplus
benefit
fund
ante
true
convert
statutory
provision
mold
instead
means
umwa
pension
plan
subject
contradictory
statutory
mandates
relevant
question
becomes
whether
extent
implicitly
repealed
provisions
erisa
applied
umwa
pension
plan
resolving
question
small
task
given
disinclination
find
implied
repeals
see
morton
mancari
speculate
instead
content
go
along
assumption
nothing
rest
coal
act
prevents
umwa
pension
plan
transferring
money
combined
fund
statutory
deadline
emphasize
nothing
concession
lends
support
interpretation
enduring
consequence
today
opinion
may
well
gutting
ancient
canon
construction
speaks
volumes
dearth
precedent
position
principal
case
relies
upon
ante
chevron
echazabal
express
language
statute
interpreted
case
demonstrated
single
enumerated
example
qualification
standard
illustrative
rather
exhaustive
term
qualification
standards
may
include
requirement
individual
shall
pose
direct
threat
health
safety
individuals
workplace
emphasis
added
little
wonder
find
text
omission
bespeaks
negative
implication
course
opinion
said
nothing
requirement
central
analysis
today
fair
suppose
congress
considered
unnamed
possibility
ante
points
review
process
support
view
coal
act
envisions
accuracy
inital
assignments
whether
made
deadline
afterward
ante
emphasis
deleted
fact
shows
opposite
reflecting
statute
competing
objectives
accuracy
assignments
finality
sections
provide
time
limits
coal
operators
request
reconsideration
commissioner
errors
discovered
time
limits
passed
forever
closed
correction
unless
course
chooses
interest
accuracy
assignments
ignore
time
limits
ignored
time
limit