verizon
maryland
public
service
commission
maryland
et
argued
december
decided
may
telecommunications
act
act
requires
incumbent
carriers
lecs
provide
interconnection
existing
networks
new
entrant
seeks
access
market
carriers
establish
reciprocal
compensation
arrangements
transporting
terminating
calls
others
customers
interconnection
agreements
submitted
state
utility
commission
approval
petitioner
verizon
maryland
incumbent
lec
maryland
negotiated
interconnection
agreement
competitor
later
acquired
respondent
mci
worldcom
maryland
public
service
commission
commission
approved
agreement
verizon
informed
worldcom
longer
pay
reciprocal
compensation
calls
made
verizon
customers
local
access
numbers
internet
service
providers
isps
isp
traffic
local
traffic
subject
reciprocal
compensation
agreement
worldcom
filed
complaint
commission
ordered
verizon
make
payments
past
future
calls
verizon
filed
action
federal
district
citing
basis
jurisdiction
naming
defendants
commission
individual
members
official
capacities
worldcom
competing
lecs
verizon
sought
declaratory
judgment
order
unlawful
injunction
prohibiting
enforcement
alleging
determination
verizon
must
pay
reciprocal
compensation
isp
traffic
violated
act
federal
communications
commission
ruling
district
dismissed
action
fourth
circuit
affirmed
holding
commission
waived
eleventh
amendment
immunity
suit
doctrine
ex
parte
young
permit
suit
individual
commissioners
official
capacities
neither
provides
basis
jurisdiction
verizon
claims
private
defendants
held
section
provides
basis
jurisdiction
verizon
claim
commission
order
requiring
reciprocal
compensation
calls
federal
law
federal
courts
jurisdiction
petitioner
right
recover
sustained
federal
law
given
one
construction
defeated
given
another
unless
claim
clearly
appears
immaterial
made
solely
obtain
jurisdiction
wholly
insubstantial
frivolous
steel
citizens
better
environment
resolution
verizon
claim
turns
whether
act
fcc
ruling
precludes
commission
ordering
payment
reciprocal
compensation
suggestion
claim
immaterial
insubstantial
frivolous
even
provides
party
aggrieved
state
commission
determination
section
may
bring
federal
action
determine
whether
interconnection
agreement
meets
requirements
confer
jurisdiction
divest
district
courts
authority
cf
abbott
laboratories
gardner
section
establish
distinctive
review
mechanism
commission
actions
covers
distinctively
limit
substantive
relief
available
finally
none
act
provisions
evince
intent
preclude
federal
review
commission
determination
pp
doctrine
ex
parte
young
permits
verizon
suit
go
forward
state
commissioners
official
capacities
thus
need
decide
whether
commission
waived
immunity
suit
voluntarily
participating
regulatory
regime
established
act
determining
whether
ex
parte
young
doctrine
avoids
eleventh
amendment
bar
suit
need
conduct
straightforward
inquiry
whether
complaint
alleges
ongoing
violation
federal
law
seeks
relief
properly
characterized
prospective
idaho
coeur
tribe
idaho
verizon
prayer
injunctive
relief
state
officials
restrained
enforcing
order
contravention
controlling
federal
law
clearly
satisfies
straightforward
inquiry
verizon
prayer
declaratory
relief
even
though
verizon
seeks
declaration
past
well
future
ineffectiveness
commission
action
private
parties
past
financial
liability
may
affected
past
liability
state
commissioners
issue
see
edelman
jordan
fourth
circuit
suggestion
doctrine
ex
parte
young
inapplicable
commission
order
probably
inconsistent
federal
law
unavailing
inquiry
whether
suit
lies
ex
parte
young
include
analysis
merits
claim
see
coeur
supra
merit
commission
argument
constitutes
detailed
exclusive
remedial
scheme
like
one
held
seminole
tribe
florida
implicitly
exclude
ex
parte
young
actions
pp
vacated
remanded
scalia
delivered
opinion
members
joined
except
took
part
consideration
decision
cases
kennedy
filed
concurring
opinion
souter
filed
concurring
opinion
ginsburg
breyer
joined
verizon
maryland
petitioner
public
service
commission
maryland
et
al
petitioner
public
service
commission
maryland
et
al
writs
certiorari
appeals
fourth
circuit
may
justice
scalia
delivered
opinion
cases
present
question
whether
federal
district
courts
jurisdiction
telecommunication
carrier
claim
order
state
utility
commission
requiring
reciprocal
compensation
telephone
calls
internet
service
providers
violates
federal
law
telecommunications
act
act
act
pub
stat
created
new
telecommunications
regime
designed
foster
competition
local
telephone
markets
toward
end
act
imposed
various
obligations
incumbent
carriers
lecs
including
duty
share
networks
competitors
see
supp
new
entrant
seeks
access
market
incumbent
lec
must
provide
interconnection
incumbent
existing
network
carriers
must
establish
reciprocal
compensation
arrangements
transporting
terminating
calls
placed
others
customers
previously
described
see
iowa
utilities
incumbent
lec
may
negotiate
enter
binding
agreement
new
entrant
fulfill
duties
imposed
without
regard
standards
set
forth
provisions
agreement
must
submitted
state
commission
approval
may
reject
discriminates
carrier
party
consistent
public
interest
convenience
necessity
required
act
incumbent
lec
maryland
petitioner
verizon
maryland
formerly
known
bell
atlantic
maryland
negotiated
interconnection
agreement
competitors
including
mfs
intelenet
maryland
later
acquired
respondent
mci
worldcom
inc
maryland
public
service
commission
commission
approved
agreement
six
months
later
verizon
informed
worldcom
longer
pay
reciprocal
compensation
telephone
calls
made
verizon
customers
local
access
numbers
internet
service
providers
isps
claiming
isp
traffic
local
traffic
subject
reciprocal
compensation
agreement
isps
connect
customers
distant
web
sites
worldcom
disputed
verizon
claim
filed
complaint
commission
commission
found
favor
worldcom
ordering
verizon
timely
forward
future
interconnection
payments
owed
worldcom
telephone
calls
placed
isp
pay
worldcom
reciprocal
compensation
withheld
pending
resolution
dispute
verizon
appealed
maryland
state
affirmed
order
subsequently
federal
communications
commission
fcc
issued
ruling
later
vacated
appeals
circuit
see
bell
atlantic
tel
fcc
categorized
calls
nonlocal
purposes
reciprocal
compensation
concluded
absent
federal
compensation
mechanism
calls
state
commissions
construe
interconnection
agreements
requiring
reciprocal
compensation
verizon
filed
new
complaint
commission
arguing
fcc
ruling
established
verizon
longer
required
provide
reciprocal
compensation
isp
traffic
decision
commission
rejected
contention
concluding
matter
state
contract
law
worldcom
verizon
agreed
treat
calls
local
traffic
subject
reciprocal
compensation
verizon
filed
action
district
district
maryland
citing
basis
jurisdiction
naming
defendants
commission
individual
members
official
capacities
worldcom
competing
lecs
complaint
verizon
sought
declaratory
injunctive
relief
commission
order
alleging
determination
verizon
must
pay
reciprocal
compensation
worldcom
isp
traffic
violated
act
fcc
ruling
district
dismissed
action
divided
panel
appeals
fourth
circuit
affirmed
fourth
circuit
held
commission
waived
immunity
suit
voluntarily
participating
regulatory
scheme
set
act
doctrine
ex
parte
young
permit
suit
individual
commissioners
official
capacities
held
neither
provides
basis
jurisdiction
verizon
claims
private
defendants
verizon
intervenor
petitioned
review
four
questions
resolved
fourth
circuit
previously
granted
certiorari
mathias
worldcom
technologies
raised
question
whether
provides
basis
jurisdiction
granted
certiorari
question
set
case
oral
argument
tandem
mathias
oral
argument
reasons
explained
decision
mathias
released
today
post
granted
certiorari
remaining
three
questions
presented
cases
ii
worldcom
verizon
contend
independently
grant
federal
courts
jurisdiction
determine
whether
commission
order
requiring
verizon
pay
worldcom
reciprocal
compensation
calls
violates
act
section
sets
forth
procedures
relating
formation
commission
approval
interconnection
agreements
commission
approval
continuing
review
interconnection
terms
conditions
called
tatements
generally
available
terms
filed
lecs
section
provides
relevant
part
case
state
commission
makes
determination
section
party
aggrieved
determination
may
bring
action
appropriate
federal
district
determine
whether
agreement
statement
meets
requirements
section
title
section
determination
issue
neither
approval
disapproval
negotiated
agreement
approval
disapproval
statement
generally
available
terms
worldcom
verizon
argue
however
state
commission
authority
implicitly
encompasses
authority
interpret
enforce
interconnection
agreement
commission
interpretation
enforcement
decision
therefore
determination
subject
federal
review
whether
text
construed
question
need
decide
agree
parties
alternative
contention
even
confer
jurisdiction
least
divest
district
courts
authority
review
commission
order
compliance
federal
law
verizon
alleged
complaint
commission
violated
act
fcc
ruling
ordered
payment
reciprocal
compensation
calls
verizon
sought
declaratory
judgment
commission
order
unlawful
injunction
prohibiting
enforcement
doubt
federal
courts
jurisdiction
entertain
suit
verizon
seeks
relief
commission
order
ground
regulation
federal
statute
virtue
supremacy
clause
constitution
must
prevail
claim
thus
presents
federal
question
federal
courts
jurisdiction
resolve
shaw
delta
air
lines
commission
contends
since
act
create
private
cause
action
challenge
commission
order
jurisdiction
entertain
suit
need
express
opinion
premise
argument
firmly
established
cases
absence
valid
opposed
arguable
cause
action
implicate
jurisdiction
statutory
constitutional
power
adjudicate
case
steel
citizens
better
environment
said
district
jurisdiction
right
petitioners
recover
complaint
sustained
constitution
laws
given
one
construction
defeated
given
another
unless
claim
clearly
appears
immaterial
made
solely
purpose
obtaining
jurisdiction
claim
wholly
insubstantial
frivolous
ibid
citation
omitted
resolution
verizon
claim
turns
whether
act
fcc
ruling
issued
thereunder
precludes
commission
ordering
payment
reciprocal
compensation
suggestion
verizon
claim
wholly
insubstantial
frivolous
ibid
verizon
claim
thus
falls
within
general
grant
jurisdiction
contrary
fourth
circuit
conclusion
nothing
purports
strip
jurisdiction
section
provides
federal
review
agreement
state
commission
makes
determination
include
worldcom
verizon
claim
interpretation
enforcement
interconnection
agreement
merely
makes
actions
state
commissions
reviewable
federal
enough
eliminate
jurisdiction
although
situation
precisely
parallel
elimination
federal
review
amount
elimination
review
think
said
abbott
laboratories
gardner
nonetheless
apt
mere
fact
acts
made
reviewable
suffice
support
implication
exclusion
others
internal
quotation
marks
citation
omitted
nothing
mere
fact
section
establish
distinctive
review
mechanism
commission
actions
covers
mechanism
review
distinctively
limit
substantive
relief
available
cf
fausto
indeed
even
mention
jurisdiction
reads
like
conferral
private
right
action
ny
party
aggrieved
determination
may
bring
action
appropriate
federal
district
cf
steel
supra
even
statutory
provision
uses
word
jurisdiction
may
relate
jurisdiction
see
also
davis
passman
finally
none
provisions
act
evince
intent
preclude
federal
review
commission
determination
anything
reinforce
conclusion
silence
subject
leaves
jurisdictional
grant
untouched
otherwise
applicable
jurisdiction
meant
excluded
excluded
expressly
section
provides
state
shall
jurisdiction
review
action
state
commission
approving
rejecting
agreement
section
sum
nothing
act
displays
intent
withdraw
federal
jurisdiction
presume
statute
means
neither
says
fairly
iii
commission
nonetheless
contends
eleventh
amendment
bars
verizon
claim
individual
commissioners
worldcom
verizon
counter
commission
subject
suit
voluntarily
participated
regulatory
regime
established
act
whether
commission
waived
immunity
another
question
need
decide
parties
also
argue
even
absent
waiver
verizon
may
proceed
individual
commissioners
official
capacities
pursuant
doctrine
ex
parte
young
determining
whether
doctrine
ex
parte
young
avoids
eleventh
amendment
bar
suit
need
conduct
straightforward
inquiry
whether
complaint
alleges
ongoing
violation
federal
law
seeks
relief
properly
characterized
prospective
idaho
coeur
tribe
idaho
joined
scalia
thomas
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
see
also
souter
dissenting
joined
stevens
ginsburg
breyer
verizon
sought
injunctive
declaratory
relief
alleging
commission
order
requiring
payment
reciprocal
compensation
act
fcc
ruling
prayer
injunctive
relief
state
officials
restrained
enforcing
order
contravention
controlling
federal
law
clearly
satisfies
straightforward
inquiry
approved
injunction
suits
state
regulatory
commissioners
like
contexts
see
prentis
atlantic
coast
line
hen
rate
fixed
bill
commission
restrain
members
enforcing
bad
suit
state
proper
form
remedy
alabama
pub
serv
southern
mcneill
southern
smyth
ames
reagan
farmers
loan
trust
indeed
ex
parte
young
suit
state
officials
including
state
utility
commissioners
though
state
attorney
general
appealed
enjoin
enforcement
railroad
commission
order
requiring
reduction
rates
insofar
exposure
state
concerned
prayer
declaratory
relief
adds
nothing
prayer
injunction
fourth
circuit
suggested
verizon
claim
brought
ex
parte
young
commission
order
probably
inconsistent
federal
law
noted
fcc
ruling
relied
upon
verizon
seem
require
compensation
isp
traffic
appeals
circuit
vacated
ruling
commission
interpreted
interconnection
agreement
state
principles
may
may
true
fcc
ruling
support
verizon
claim
may
may
also
true
state
contract
law
federal
law
verizon
contends
applies
disputes
regarding
interpretation
verizon
agreement
inquiry
whether
suit
lies
ex
parte
young
include
analysis
merits
claim
see
coeur
supra
allegation
ongoing
violation
federal
law
ordinarily
sufficient
emphasis
added
act
display
intent
foreclose
jurisdiction
ex
parte
young
concluded
indian
gaming
regulatory
act
seminole
tribe
florida
indian
tribe
sued
state
florida
violating
duty
negotiate
imposed
act
congress
specified
means
enforce
duty
provision
intended
define
also
limit
significantly
duty
imposed
intricate
procedures
set
forth
provision
prescribed
issue
order
directing
state
negotiate
require
state
submit
mediation
order
secretary
interior
notified
concluded
quite
modest
set
sanctions
displayed
intent
provide
complete
immediate
relief
otherwise
available
ex
parte
young
permitting
suit
ex
parte
young
thus
inconsistent
detailed
remedial
scheme
limited
one
congress
prescribed
enforce
state
statutory
duty
negotiate
commission
argument
constitutes
detailed
exclusive
remedial
scheme
like
one
seminole
tribe
implicitly
excluding
ex
parte
young
actions
without
merit
section
provides
state
commissions
make
certain
determinations
aggrieved
party
may
bring
suit
federal
establish
compliance
requirements
even
regard
determinations
covers
places
restriction
relief
award
even
say
suit
brought
state
commission
individual
commissioners
carriers
benefiting
state
commission
order
mere
fact
congress
authorized
federal
courts
review
whether
commission
action
complies
without
impose
upon
state
liability
significantly
limited
liability
imposed
upon
state
officer
ex
parte
young
seminole
tribe
supra
conclude
provides
basis
jurisdiction
verizon
claim
commission
order
requiring
reciprocal
compensation
calls
federal
law
also
conclude
doctrine
ex
parte
young
permits
verizon
suit
go
forward
state
commissioners
official
capacities
vacate
judgment
appeals
remand
cases
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
justice
took
part
consideration
decision
cases
verizon
maryland
petitioner
public
service
commission
maryland
et
al
petitioner
public
service
commission
maryland
et
al
writs
certiorari
appeals
fourth
circuit
may
justice
kennedy
concurring
reasons
well
stated
agree
verizon
maryland
may
proceed
state
commissioners
official
capacity
doctrine
ex
parte
young
plaintiff
seeks
enjoin
state
utility
commissioner
enforcing
order
alleged
violate
federal
law
eleventh
amendment
poses
bar
see
idaho
coeur
tribe
idaho
principal
opinion
kennedy
joined
rehnquist
unlike
case
idaho
coeur
tribe
idaho
supra
plaintiffs
tried
use
ex
parte
young
divest
state
sovereignty
territory
within
boundaries
case
straightforward
inquiry
endorses
ante
proves
complex
coeur
seven
members
described
ex
parte
young
requiring
nothing
allegation
ongoing
violation
federal
law
request
prospective
relief
divided
four
three
however
whether
deceptively
simple
test
met
view
ex
parte
young
jurisprudence
requires
careful
consideration
sovereign
interests
state
well
obligations
state
officials
respect
supremacy
federal
law
see
coeur
supra
principal
opinion
kennedy
joined
rehnquist
believe
approach
whether
stated
express
terms
path
followed
coeur
well
many
cases
preceding
also
believe
necessary
otherwise
eleventh
amendment
ex
parte
young
become
legal
fiction
complaint
case
however
parallels
suit
permitted
ex
parte
young
brief
explanation
join
opinion
verizon
maryland
petitioner
public
service
commission
maryland
et
al
petitioner
public
service
commission
maryland
et
al
writs
certiorari
appeals
fourth
circuit
may
justice
souter
justice
ginsburg
justice
breyer
join
concurring
join
opinion
part
iii
rests
ground
us
agree
assumption
eleventh
bar
relief
available
doctrine
ex
parte
young
although
assumption
apparently
made
start
litigation
think
open
doubt
write
separately
question
whether
cases
even
implicate
eleventh
amendment
state
maryland
named
defendant
nominal
one
verizon
maryland
private
party
suing
seek
money
damages
sort
declaratory
injunctive
relief
private
verizon
seek
order
enjoining
state
enforcing
purely
rate
orders
dubious
constitutionality
relief
requested
ex
parte
young
instead
verizon
claims
maryland
public
service
commission
wrongly
decided
question
federal
decisional
power
conferred
telecommunications
act
act
power
person
may
wield
verizon
accordingly
seeks
simple
order
relief
running
state
commission
different
adjudication
federal
question
means
appellate
review
federal
district
whose
jurisdiction
entertain
claim
error
today
affirmed
district
see
things
verizon
way
reverse
state
commission
qua
federal
regulator
dishonor
done
dignity
state
accepted
congressionally
conferred
power
decide
matters
federal
law
first
instance
one
answer
might
even
naming
state
commission
defendant
suit
declaratory
injunctive
relief
federal
unconstitutional
indignity
see
right
least
suit
seek
bar
state
authority
applying
enforcing
state
law
request
declaratory
injunctive
relief
simply
formality
obtaining
process
review
cf
davis
administrative
law
treatise
ed
suit
injunction
declaratory
judgment
district
always
available
reach
reviewable
federal
administrative
action
absence
specific
statute
making
remedy
exclusive
nominal
position
state
defendant
must
regarded
settled
doctrine
question
whether
suit
within
prohibition
amendment
always
determined
reference
nominal
parties
record
ayers
alteration
original
quoting
poindexter
greenhow
applicability
eleventh
amendment
pivots
formalism
state
found
wrong
side
case
name
regulatory
appeal
constitutional
immunity
becomes
nothing
accident
captioning
practice
utility
cases
reviewed
courts
matter
formal
nominal
position
governmental
body
circumstances
even
universal
practice
regulatory
commission
generally
nominal
defendant
party
appeals
federal
uniform
practice
among
several
caption
utility
cases
judicial
review
terms
appealing
credible
response
maryland
credit
advances
state
strong
interest
case
adjudication
federal
question
see
supplemental
brief
respondents
adverse
ruling
one
appeal
doubt
affect
state
commission
ruling
future
cases
true
time
state
decides
federal
question
successful
appeal
made
one
thinks
eleventh
amendment
applies
instance
see
cohens
virginia
wheat
writ
error
decision
suit
eleventh
amendment
mckesson
division
alcoholic
beverages
tobacco
dept
business
regulation
eleventh
amendment
constrain
appellate
jurisdiction
cases
arising
state
courts
unanimous
cf
art
vi
constitution
laws
shall
law
land
whether
issue
comes
decision
federal
reviewing
state
determination
question
federal
law
neither
prudent
natural
see
review
impugning
dignity
state
implicating
sovereign
immunity
federal
system
footnotes
together
public
service
commission
maryland
et
also
certiorari
footnotes
section
interconnection
agreement
provides
reciprocal
compensation
described
act
refers
payment
arrangements
recover
costs
incurred
transport
termination
local
traffic
originating
one
party
network
terminating
party
network
turn
defines
local
traffic
originated
customer
one
party
party
network
terminates
customer
party
party
network
within
given
local
calling
area
expanded
area
service
eas
area
defined
bell
atlantic
effective
customer
tariffs
local
traffic
include
traffic
originated
terminated
commercial
mobile
radio
service
carrier
fourth
circuit
suggested
maryland
law
federal
communications
act
grant
commission
authority
interpret
enforce
interconnection
agreements
approves
citing
md
pub
util
code
ann
parties
dispute
whether
fact
federal
state
law
confers
authority
party
contends
commission
lacked
jurisdiction
interpret
enforce
agreement
commission
also
suggests
doctrine
precludes
federal
district
exercising
jurisdiction
verizon
claim
see
district
columbia
appeals
feldman
rooker
fidelity
trust
doctrine
merely
recognizes
grant
original
jurisdiction
authorize
district
courts
exercise
appellate
jurisdiction
judgments
congress
reserved
see
doctrine
application
judicial
review
executive
action
including
determinations
made
state
administrative
agency
footnotes
set
aside
moment
continuing
conviction
interpretation
eleventh
amendment
majority
embraced
fundamentally
mistaken
see
alden
maine
dissenting
opinion
seminole
tribe
florida
dissenting
opinion
judicial
power
shall
construed
extend
suit
law
equity
commenced
prosecuted
one
citizens
another
state
citizens
subjects
foreign
state
amdt
compare
board
trustees
univ
garrett
money
damages
state
employer
title
americans
disabilities
act
kimel
florida
bd
regents
money
damages
state
employer
age
discrimination
employment
act
alden
maine
supra
money
damages
state
employer
fair
labor
standards
act
state
florida
prepaid
postsecondary
ed
expense
bd
college
savings
bank
money
damages
injunctive
declaratory
relief
state
patent
infringement
college
savings
bank
florida
prepaid
postsecondary
ed
expense
trademark
violations
seminole
tribe
supra
suit
compel
state
negotiate
good
faith
hans
louisiana
money
damages
failure
honor
state
securities
seminole
tribe
majority
observed
relief
sought
plaintiff
suing
state
irrelevant
question
whether
suit
barred
eleventh
amendment
said
context
suit
injunctive
relief
enforce
duty
negotiate
opposed
money
damages
point
conventional
relief
sorts
declaratory
relief
different
kind
judicial
review
agency
action
sought
cases
whether
interpretation
provision
privately
negotiated
interconnection
agreement
presents
federal
issue
different
question
neither
address
present
judicial
review
fcc
determinations
act
committed
directly
courts
appeal
see
fed
rule
app
proc
see
hawaiian
electric
haw
petition
interstate
power
app
appeal
campaign
ratepayers
rights
petition
declaratory
ruling
northwestern
public
service
citizens
utilities
fourth
circuit
obliquely
questioned
strength
state
interest
noting
maryland
law
necessary
state
commission
much
less
individual
commissioners
party
appeal
review
determinations
bell
atlantic
mci
worldcom
maryland
statute
fourth
circuit
cited
md
pub
util
code
ann
provide
commission
may
must
party
appeal
maryland
courts
specified
public
service
commission
one
certain
agencies
functions
identified
execution
definite
public
policy
representative
state
participation
litigation
affecting
decisions
regarded
legislature
essential
adequate
protection
state
interests
calvert
county
planning
howlin
realty
management
md
app
quoting
zoning
appeals
board
mckinney
md
app
possible
ground
distinction
reviews
decisions
federal
district
initially
reviews
decisions
act
argument
constitution
requires
controversy
state
dignitary
interests
implicated
decided
federal
sign
respect
state
sovereignty
see
farquhar
georgia
iredell
reprinted
documentary
history
pp
marcus
ed
may
also
fairly
presumed
several
thought
important
stipulate
awful
important
trial
state
party
cognizable
position
long
rejected
inconsistent
doctrine
congressional
abrogation
presumes
may
sued
federal
district
first
instance
congress
properly
provides
see
seminole
tribe