jennings
stephens
director
texas
department
criminal
justice
correctional
institutions
division
argued
october
decided
january
petitioner
jennings
sought
federal
habeas
relief
based
three
theories
ineffective
assistance
counsel
punishment
phase
state
capital
murder
trial
district
granted
relief
two
wiggins
theories
counsel
failed
present
evidence
deprived
background
failed
investigate
evidence
mental
impairment
see
wiggins
smith
spisak
theory
counsel
expressed
resignation
death
sentence
closing
argument
see
smith
spisak
ordered
texas
release
jennings
unless
within
days
state
granted
new
sentencing
hearing
commuted
death
sentence
state
attacked
wiggins
theories
appeal
jennings
defended
three
theories
fifth
circuit
reversed
grant
habeas
corpus
two
wiggins
theories
determined
lacked
jurisdiction
spisak
claim
implicitly
concluding
raising
argument
required
noted
jennings
neither
filed
timely
notice
appeal
see
fed
rule
app
proc
obtained
certificate
appealability
required
held
jennings
spisak
theory
defense
judgment
alternative
grounds
thus
required
take
obtain
certificate
appealability
argue
appeal
pp
jennings
appellee
may
urge
spisak
theory
unless
enlarge
rights
lessen
state
rights
district
judgment
american
railway
express
jennings
rights
judgment
release
retrial
commutation
within
fixed
time
state
option
spisak
claim
accepted
give
state
rights
judgment
retain
jennings
custody
pending
retrial
commute
sentence
spisak
claim
accepted
encumber
state
state
contends
district
opinion
entitled
jennings
retrial
resentencing
without
challenged
errors
additional
basis
asserted
jennings
sought
lessen
state
rights
retrial
thus
requires
view
contrary
ordinary
behavior
courts
reduce
opinions
verdicts
judgments
precisely
define
parties
rights
liabilities
prevailing
party
seeks
enforce
district
judgment
reasoning
rogers
hill
thus
potential
claim
entitled
jennings
new
sentencing
proceeding
advanced
consistent
american
railway
pp
helvering
pfeiffer
alexander
cosden
pipe
line
considerable
tension
american
railway
read
state
insists
requiring
jennings
raise
spisak
claim
even
rights
judgment
remain
undisturbed
pfeiffer
alexander
involved
disputes
multiple
discrete
federal
tax
liabilities
assertion
additional
tax
liabilities
defenses
necessarily
sought
enlarge
reduce
rights
internal
revenue
service
commissioner
contrast
jennings
whether
prevailing
single
theory
three
sought
indivisible
relief
new
sentencing
hearing
thus
pfeiffer
alexander
viewed
contradicting
inveterate
american
railway
rule
greenlaw
pp
question
whether
certificate
appealability
requirement
applies
need
addressed
clear
provision
embrace
defense
judgment
alternative
grounds
pp
fed
appx
reversed
remanded
scalia
delivered
opinion
roberts
ginsburg
breyer
sotomayor
kagan
joined
thomas
filed
dissenting
opinion
kennedy
alito
joined
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
robert
mitchell
jennings
petitioner
william
stephens
director
texas
partment
criminal
justice
rectional
institutions
division
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
january
justice
scalia
delivered
opinion
petitioner
robert
mitchell
jennings
sentenced
death
capital
murder
applied
federal
habeas
corpus
relief
three
theories
ineffective
assistance
counsel
prevailing
two
state
appealed
jennings
defended
writ
three
theories
consider
whether
jennings
permitted
pursue
theory
district
rejected
without
taking
obtaining
certificate
appealability
july
petitioner
robert
mitchell
jennings
entered
adult
bookstore
commit
robbery
officer
elston
howard
unhappy
coincidence
establishment
arrest
store
clerk
undeterred
jennings
shot
howard
four
times
robbed
store
escaped
howard
died
wounds
howard
merely
recent
victim
jennings
criminality
state
adjudicated
jennings
delinquent
convicted
aggravated
robbery
additional
aggravated
robberies
murdered
officer
howard
two
months
recent
release
prison
jennings
arrested
tried
convicted
capital
murder
state
sought
death
penalty
punishment
phase
state
introduced
evidence
jennings
lengthy
violent
criminal
history
jennings
attorney
called
prison
chaplain
testified
jennings
improvement
jennings
incorrigible
jennings
attorney
acknowledged
difficulty
sentencing
defense
closing
remarks
commenting
quarrel
death
sentence
nonetheless
pleading
mercy
client
jury
returned
special
verdict
consistent
texas
law
jennings
acted
deliberately
murder
present
continuing
threat
society
trial
sentenced
jennings
death
texas
courts
affirmed
jennings
conviction
sentence
denied
postconviction
relief
jennings
state
tex
crim
ex
parte
jennings
wl
tex
crim
jennings
applied
federal
habeas
corpus
relief
asserting
relevant
three
theories
ineffective
assistance
counsel
punishment
phase
trial
jennings
first
claimed
trial
counsel
ineffective
failing
present
evidence
disadvantaged
background
including
conception
product
mother
rape
mother
born
grew
poverty
jennings
offered
mother
sister
witnesses
jennings
next
argued
trial
counsel
ineffective
failure
investigate
present
evidence
jennings
low
intelligence
organic
brain
damage
trial
attorney
admitted
affidavit
failed
review
case
files
jennings
prior
convictions
contained
report
suggesting
jennings
suffered
mild
mental
retardation
mild
organic
brain
dysfunction
report
also
suggested
jennings
malingered
feigning
mental
illness
order
delay
proceedings
jennings
argued
trial
counsel
examined
jennings
prior
case
files
investigated
jennings
mental
health
problems
presented
evidence
mental
impairment
punishment
phase
finally
jennings
argued
counsel
constitutionally
ineffective
stating
quarrel
death
sentence
according
jennings
remark
expressed
resignation
even
propriety
death
sentence
jennings
cited
decision
wiggins
smith
establishing
constitutional
ineffectiveness
counsel
fails
investigate
introduce
substantial
mitigating
evidence
sentencing
proceeding
though
cite
decision
smith
spisak
also
argued
counsel
closing
remarks
amounted
constitutional
ineffectiveness
parties
referred
alleged
errors
wiggins
errors
spisak
error
use
terminology
federal
habeas
granted
jennings
relief
wiggins
theories
denied
relief
spisak
theory
jennings
thaler
wl
sd
apr
ordered
state
shall
release
jennings
custody
unless
within
days
state
texas
grants
jennings
new
sentencing
hearing
resentences
term
imprisonment
provided
texas
law
time
jennings
crime
state
appealed
attacking
wiggins
theories
trial
counsel
failure
present
evidence
deprived
background
failure
investigate
evidence
mental
impairment
jennings
argued
fifth
circuit
district
correctly
found
constitutional
ineffectiveness
wiggins
theories
argued
trial
counsel
performed
ineffectively
spisak
theory
fifth
circuit
reversed
grant
habeas
corpus
two
wiggins
theories
rendered
judgment
state
fed
appx
determined
lacked
jurisdiction
jennings
spisak
theory
implicitly
concluding
raising
argument
required
taking
panel
noted
jennings
failed
file
timely
notice
appeal
see
fed
rule
app
proc
failed
obtain
certificate
appealability
required
section
provides
relevant
nless
circuit
justice
judge
issues
certificate
appealability
appeal
may
taken
appeals
final
order
habeas
corpus
proceeding
granted
certiorari
decide
whether
jennings
required
file
notice
seek
certificate
appealability
pursue
spisak
theory
ii
rules
governing
argumentation
permissible
appellees
urging
affirmance
judgment
familiar
though
case
shows
familiarity
clarity
go
appellee
take
may
urge
support
decree
matter
appearing
record
although
argument
may
involve
attack
upon
reasoning
lower
american
railway
express
appellee
may
attack
decree
view
either
enlarging
rights
thereunder
lessening
rights
adversary
ibid
since
jennings
denial
spisak
theory
must
determine
whether
urging
theory
sought
enlarge
rights
lessen
state
district
judgment
granting
habeas
relief
district
opinion
section
labeled
order
commanded
state
release
jennings
custody
unless
within
days
state
texas
grants
jennings
new
sentencing
hearing
resentences
term
imprisonment
provided
texas
law
time
jennings
crime
wl
district
corresponding
entry
judgment
contained
similar
language
app
intuitive
answer
question
whether
jennings
new
theory
expands
rights
straightforward
jennings
rights
judgment
judgment
provided
release
resentencing
commutation
within
fixed
time
state
option
spisak
theory
give
similarly
state
rights
judgment
retain
jennings
custody
pending
resentencing
commute
sentence
spisak
theory
allow
less
state
objects
straightforward
result
conditional
writ
habeas
corpus
argues
merely
entitle
successful
petitioner
retrial
resentencing
entitles
retrial
resentencing
without
challenged
errors
basis
habeas
relief
imposes
additional
implied
obligation
state
repeat
error
basis
asserted
successful
petitioner
seeks
lessen
state
rights
retrial
therefore
additional
basis
requires
unusual
position
one
contrary
manner
courts
ordinarily
behave
courts
reduce
opinions
verdicts
judgments
precisely
define
rights
liabilities
parties
parties
seeking
enforce
foreign
decree
attempt
domesticate
opinion
domesticate
judgment
restatement
third
foreign
relations
law
prevailing
party
seeks
enforce
district
reasoning
judgment
rogers
hill
like
federal
appellate
courts
review
lower
courts
opinions
judgments
chevron
natural
resources
defense
council
rule
contravenes
structure
makes
opinion
part
judgment
peculiar
especially
applied
impose
extrajudgment
obligations
sovereign
state
state
argument
might
force
case
district
explicitly
imposes
appellee
asks
appellate
explicitly
impose
condition
governing
details
retrial
case
us
implications
state
position
make
clear
orders
atypical
infer
conditions
silence
construing
every
federal
grant
habeas
corpus
carrying
attendant
list
unstated
acts
omissions
state
must
perform
perform
substantially
transform
conditional
habeas
corpus
relief
opportunity
replace
invalid
judgment
valid
one
wilkinson
dotson
scalia
concurring
general
grant
supervisory
authority
state
trial
courts
variation
theme
dissent
posits
apart
implied
terms
habeas
petitioner
successfully
defends
judgment
alternative
ground
expanded
rights
judgment
changed
judgment
effects
theory
confuses
party
rights
judgment
right
release
resentencing
commutation
state
option
preclusive
effects
judgment
might
future
proceedings
makes
nonsense
american
railway
whenever
appellee
successfully
defends
judgment
alternative
ground
changes
otherwise
judgment
effects
thereafter
issue
preclusion
longer
attaches
ground
trial
decided
case
instead
attaches
alternative
ground
appellate
affirmed
judgment
restatement
second
judgments
thus
making
alteration
effects
touchstone
necessity
require
every
defense
judgment
alternative
grounds
course
polar
opposite
rule
established
american
railway
habeas
judgment
jennings
entitled
state
option
either
release
resentencing
commutation
sentence
potential
claim
entitled
jennings
new
sentencing
proceeding
advanced
urge
support
judgment
within
meaning
american
railway
dissent
state
contend
applying
american
railway
fashion
lead
proliferation
frivolous
appellate
defenses
habeas
cases
problem
solved
congress
think
appropriate
adhere
usual
law
appeals
think
however
danger
exaggerated
begin
defenses
qualify
habeas
applicant
resentencing
required
take
order
raise
rejected
claim
result
new
trial
similarly
even
habeas
applicant
retrial
claim
conduct
constitutionally
beyond
power
state
punish
require
even
successful
applicant
defending
judgment
appeal
confined
alternative
grounds
present
record
may
simply
argue
alternative
basis
regardless
origin
ibid
moreover
successful
habeas
applicants
incentive
defend
habeas
grants
effectively
objective
furthered
diverting
appellate
attention
meritorious
defense
frivolous
one
dissent
gives
two
examples
habeas
petitioners
raised
numerous
ostensibly
frivolous
claims
post
prove
nothing
except
dissent
inability
substantiate
claim
holding
foster
presentation
frivolous
alternative
grounds
affirmance
examples
involved
habeas
petitioners
lost
magistrate
casting
basis
might
justify
writ
talking
habeas
petitioners
district
notion
often
expected
dilute
defense
basis
victory
dragging
frivolous
alternative
grounds
support
thoroughly
implausible
indeed
state
jennings
agree
rare
habeas
petitioner
successful
district
even
called
upon
defend
writ
appeal
finally
doubt
judicial
time
wasted
rejection
frivolous
claims
made
defense
judgment
appeal
already
taken
wasted
rejection
similar
claims
made
state
dissent
require
separate
proceeding
certificate
appealability
sure
dissent
points
post
certificate
ruling
made
one
judge
rather
three
judge
always
required
consider
rule
alternative
grounds
whereas
entertaining
government
habeas
appeal
reach
alternative
grounds
unless
rejects
ground
relied
lower
mention
fact
appeal
give
back
hand
frivolous
claims
en
passant
whereas
certificate
process
requires
opening
disposition
separate
proceeding
end
dissent
tries
evade
american
railway
asserting
habeas
corpus
unique
post
undoubtedly
differences
writs
habeas
corpus
judgments
notably
habeas
proceedings
traditionally
ignored
claimpreclusive
effect
earlier
adjudications
reality
things
habeas
different
mean
everything
habeas
different
dissent
must
justify
particular
distinction
urges
abandonment
usual
american
railway
rule
appropriate
one
state
also
advances
termed
corollary
american
railway
rule
citing
helvering
pfeiffer
alexander
cosden
pipe
line
state
insists
necessary
jennings
enlarge
rights
district
judgment
also
attack
district
ruling
rejecting
spisak
theory
even
jennings
rights
judgment
remain
undisturbed
view
pfeiffer
alexander
advanced
state
put
cases
considerable
tension
holding
american
railway
correct
view
pfeiffer
alexander
arose
disputes
commissioner
internal
revenue
service
taxpayers
regarding
multiple
discrete
federal
tax
liabilities
pfeiffer
supra
alexander
supra
pfeiffer
commissioner
prevailed
board
tax
appeals
contention
dividend
taxable
lost
similar
claim
cash
payment
taxpayer
sought
second
circuit
review
taxpayer
prevailed
dividend
liability
alexander
taxpayer
sought
refund
four
tax
liabilities
taxpayer
four
commissioner
appealed
tenth
circuit
affirmed
two
refunds
eliminated
third
reduced
fourth
pfeiffer
supra
alexander
supra
commissioner
sought
review
cases
refused
entertain
commissioner
arguments
regarding
cash
payment
pfeiffer
taxpayer
regarding
eliminated
reduced
claims
alexander
citing
american
railway
state
argues
holdings
expanded
need
beyond
merely
arguments
enlarge
rights
judgment
arguments
revisit
lower
disposition
issue
judgment
rests
state
argues
rejected
arguments
necessarily
expanded
commissioner
taxpayer
rights
points
respective
appellee
rejected
appeal
new
arguments
might
preserve
amount
assessed
view
pfeiffer
alexander
distorts
american
railway
american
railway
merely
require
party
fully
successful
new
arguments
certainly
obtain
greater
relief
provided
requires
party
arguments
presented
view
either
enlarging
rights
thereunder
lessening
rights
adversary
pfeiffer
alexander
assertion
additional
tax
liabilities
defenses
respectively
necessarily
sought
enlarge
reduce
commissioner
rights
even
combination
issues
affirmed
reversed
one
possibility
produced
tax
obligations
pronounced
judgment
rejected
state
dissent
theories
implied
terms
conditional
writs
jennings
spisak
theory
sought
relief
awarded
wiggins
theories
new
sentencing
hearing
whether
prevailing
single
theory
three
jennings
sought
indivisible
relief
occurred
neither
pfeiffer
alexander
decline
view
cases
contradicting
inveterate
rule
american
railway
greenlaw
finally
state
urges
even
jennings
required
take
american
railway
pfeiffer
alexander
required
obtain
certificate
appealability
disagree
section
title
provides
appeal
may
taken
appeals
without
certificate
appealability
requires
substantial
showing
denial
constitutional
right
unclear
whether
requirement
applies
habeas
petitioner
seeking
case
already
appeals
section
performs
important
function
state
properly
noticed
appeal
grant
habeas
relief
appeals
must
hear
case
remaining
gates
guarded
szabo
walls
easterbrook
need
decide
question
since
clear
applies
appeal
taken
appeals
whether
embraces
assuredly
embrace
defense
judgment
alternative
grounds
congress
enacted
entirely
sharp
distinction
defending
judgment
appeal
taking
nothing
statute
justifies
ignoring
distinction
dissent
laments
result
frustrates
aedpa
purpose
preventing
frivolous
appeals
post
indulge
lament
insisting
defense
appealed
judgment
alternative
grounds
appeal
two
statutory
text
issue
addresses
tak
ing
appeal
making
arguments
defense
judgment
appeal
taken
extending
certificate
appealability
requirement
former
latter
beyond
power
courts
jennings
spisak
theory
neither
enlarged
rights
diminished
state
rights
district
judgment
required
neither
take
obtain
certificate
appealability
reverse
judgment
fifth
circuit
remand
case
consideration
jennings
spisak
claim
ordered
thomas
dissenting
robert
mitchell
jennings
petitioner
william
stephens
director
texas
department
criminal
justice
correctional
institutions
division
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
january
justice
thomas
justice
kennedy
justice
alito
join
dissenting
holds
today
prisoner
obtains
order
release
unless
state
grants
new
sentencing
proceeding
may
appellee
raise
alternative
argument
rejected
resulted
similar
order
majority
mistakenly
equates
judgment
granting
order
ordinary
civil
judgment
respectfully
dissent
title
amended
antiterrorism
effective
death
penalty
act
aedpa
provides
relevant
part
unless
circuit
justice
judge
issues
certificate
appealability
appeal
may
taken
appeals
final
order
habeas
corpus
proceeding
detention
complained
arises
process
issued
state
certificate
appealability
may
issue
applicant
made
substantial
showing
denial
constitutional
right
certificate
must
indicate
specific
issue
issues
satisfy
showing
jennings
obtain
certificate
appealability
coa
must
consider
whether
raising
took
appeal
within
meaning
aedpa
agree
majority
habeas
petitioner
takes
substance
form
appeals
must
obtain
coa
failure
obtain
coa
jurisdictional
bar
review
see
gonzalez
thaler
slip
critical
question
faces
whether
jennings
fact
ii
majority
correctly
identifies
rule
apply
determine
whether
party
taken
american
railway
express
fails
apply
accordance
history
writ
habeas
corpus
precedents
concerning
orders
traditional
principles
governing
equitable
relief
guides
supports
conclusion
prisoner
obtains
order
allowing
state
resentence
new
proceeding
entitled
state
elects
option
new
sentencing
proceeding
free
specific
constitutional
violation
identified
district
order
embodies
specific
right
appellee
attempt
add
additional
errors
attempt
modify
expand
rights
judgment
existence
writ
habeas
corpus
understood
far
narrowly
today
see
wright
west
opinion
thomas
originally
played
procedural
role
issued
right
prisoner
showed
probable
cause
believe
held
illegally
without
conviction
entered
competent
jurisdiction
prisoner
obligated
warden
file
return
identifying
grounds
imprisonment
church
treatise
writ
habeas
corpus
rev
ed
hereinafter
church
grant
writ
decided
nothing
except
case
calling
answer
gaoler
goddard
note
habeas
corpus
rev
ultimate
decision
matter
limited
confirming
legality
prisoner
confinement
ordering
immediate
discharge
see
church
writ
today
contrast
invoked
justify
broad
federal
review
state
criminal
proceedings
constitutional
violations
district
issues
writ
usually
enters
order
offering
state
choice
immediate
release
retrial
resentencing
within
defined
period
time
see
wilkinson
dotson
scalia
concurring
purpose
order
afford
state
opportunity
remedy
specific
constitutional
violation
identified
district
since
inception
century
ago
treated
order
entitling
habeas
petitioner
new
proceeding
new
proceeding
cures
specific
defect
identified
district
one
earliest
precedents
contemplating
order
bonner
case
involved
prisoner
lawfully
convicted
unlawfully
ordered
serve
federal
sentence
state
penitentiary
invoking
power
control
direct
form
judgment
entered
cases
brought
habeas
corpus
ordered
delay
discharge
allow
prisoner
taken
judgment
rendered
defects
want
jurisdiction
subject
complaint
judgment
may
corrected
emphasis
added
see
also
magwood
patterson
kennedy
joined
inter
alios
alito
dissenting
conditional
grant
relief
allows
state
correct
error
occurred
original
sentencing
understanding
habeas
judgments
prevailed
unbroken
line
precedent
see
richmond
lewis
hilton
braunskill
dowd
ex
rel
cook
mahler
eby
cf
dotson
supra
scalia
concurring
conditional
writ
serves
release
order
provide
state
opportunity
correct
constitutional
quoting
braunskill
supra
state
fails
cure
specific
constitutional
violation
identified
district
habeas
petitioner
entitled
release
prevailing
habeas
petitioner
shown
conviction
sentencing
proceeding
unconstitutional
therefore
actually
entitled
release
dotson
scalia
concurring
conditional
writs
enable
habeas
courts
give
time
replace
invalid
judgment
valid
one
consequence
fail
always
release
entitlement
release
tied
constitutional
violation
identified
state
committing
new
constitutional
violation
new
sentencing
proceeding
required
release
habeas
petitioner
old
order
cf
magwood
supra
explaining
habeas
petitioner
obtains
new
sentencing
proceeding
basis
one
error
may
subsequently
raise
first
habeas
application
errors
repeated
proceeding
habeas
petitioner
rights
order
thus
defined
violation
justified
entry
wording
order
pitchess
davis
per
curiam
makes
clear
davis
involved
prisoner
obtained
habeas
relief
prosecutor
failed
disclose
material
exculpatory
laboratory
report
violation
brady
maryland
state
moved
retry
prisoner
discovered
state
destroyed
physical
evidence
used
initial
trial
district
granted
prisoner
motion
convert
initial
order
unconditional
order
appeals
affirmed
decision
granted
certiorari
reversed
although
order
provided
prisoner
released
unless
state
moved
retry
within
days
davis
pitchess
supp
cd
cal
read
order
require
state
provid
respondent
laboratory
report
addition
moving
retry
within
days
davis
emphasis
added
order
address
separate
issue
physical
evidence
refused
allow
district
use
destruction
basis
converting
order
unconditional
order
decision
makes
sense
considered
light
traditional
principles
equitable
relief
frequently
rested
habeas
decisions
equitable
principles
withrow
williams
scalia
concurring
part
dissenting
part
principles
remain
relevant
aedpa
enactment
consistent
statutory
scheme
congress
adopted
see
mcquiggin
perkins
scalia
dissenting
slip
frequently
recognized
equitable
remedy
must
limited
inadequacy
produced
asserted
injury
lewis
casey
thus
order
permit
federal
habeas
maintain
continuing
supervision
retrial
conducted
pursuant
conditional
writ
granted
habeas
davis
neither
order
permit
state
hold
prisoner
new
judgment
infected
constitutional
violation
justified
order
entry
first
place
see
dotson
supra
scalia
concurring
harvest
castro
phifer
warden
interpretation
judgments
render
writ
hollow
history
writ
habeas
corpus
treatment
orders
traditional
principles
equitable
relief
resolve
dispute
issue
habeas
petitioner
awarded
order
based
error
sentencing
proceeding
entitled
order
new
proceeding
without
specific
constitutional
violation
identified
district
raising
constitutional
violation
appeal
attempt
modify
prisoner
rights
flowing
order
given
principles
judgment
appeals
affirmed
jennings
prevailed
district
two
theories
ineffective
assistance
counsel
lost
another
district
entered
order
instructing
state
release
jennings
unless
granted
jennings
new
sentencing
hearing
within
days
commuted
sentence
ante
precedents
general
order
embodies
specific
instruction
state
respect
new
sentencing
proceeding
resentence
jennings
without
two
identified
wiggins
errors
see
ante
citing
wiggins
smith
state
failure
comply
order
justify
jennings
release
jennings
attempted
expand
rights
judgment
attempted
alter
instruction
state
adding
additional
instruction
spisak
error
accordingly
grounds
upon
obtain
immediate
release
see
ante
citing
smith
spisak
jennings
substance
needed
obtain
coa
iii
majority
makes
attempt
reconcile
decision
history
orders
precedents
traditional
limitations
equitable
relief
instead
divines
intuitive
answer
question
presented
ante
law
judgments
incorrect
source
law
position
fundamentally
odds
law
judgments
purports
rely
majority
agrees
understand
rule
applies
given
case
one
must
understand
rights
parties
obtained
judgment
issue
majority
refuses
look
past
language
order
course
true
parties
domesticate
judgments
opinions
ante
similarly
true
prevailing
parties
enforce
judgments
reasoning
ante
truisms
however
answer
question
rights
flow
judgments
answering
question
majority
simply
announces
rights
flow
habeas
petitioner
judgment
rights
flow
civil
judgment
assertion
ignores
unique
context
habeas
traditional
principles
law
judgments
never
applied
explained
writ
habeas
corpus
historically
purely
procedural
mechanism
obtain
determination
legality
prisoner
confinement
church
determination
never
treated
ordinary
civil
judgment
entitled
res
judicata
effect
see
also
mccleskey
zant
even
majority
correct
law
judgments
simply
imported
habeas
context
misapplies
law
long
recognized
principles
including
doctrine
preclusion
parties
greater
rights
civil
judgments
merely
particular
relief
afforded
prevailing
plaintiff
claims
wholly
merged
judgment
preventing
defendant
future
action
judgment
availing
defenses
raised
first
adjudication
claims
restatement
second
judgments
defendant
whether
victorious
rely
upon
judgment
final
adjudication
particular
claim
preventing
plaintiff
pursuing
another
action
future
claim
principles
give
rights
parties
beyond
remedy
ordered
narrowly
artificially
defining
rights
flowing
civil
judgment
solely
rights
identified
written
order
majority
disregards
basic
principles
majority
purports
apply
general
law
judgments
decision
damage
well
beyond
habeas
context
case
arises
habeas
context
specifically
majority
opinion
invites
frivolous
appeals
congress
passed
aedpa
prevent
although
courts
long
relied
certificate
probable
cause
mechanism
prevent
frivolous
appeals
habeas
cases
aedpa
narrowed
access
appeals
creation
coa
requirement
cockrell
thomas
dissenting
habeas
petitioner
obtain
coa
absent
substantial
showing
denial
constitutional
merely
federal
right
see
slack
mcdaniel
requirement
serves
important
gatekeeping
function
majority
decision
seriously
undermine
courts
ability
perform
function
allowing
prisoners
pursue
alternative
allegation
matter
frivolous
justified
new
proceeding
awarded
order
danger
means
exaggerated
ante
majority
suggests
habeas
petitioners
frequently
pursue
arguments
collateral
review
even
though
effectively
concentrate
handful
arguments
see
calvert
henderson
wl
ed
mar
raising
allegations
ineffective
assistance
counsel
battle
roper
wl
ed
mar
raising
double
jeopardy
issue
allegations
ineffective
assistance
counsel
see
little
reason
suspect
prisoners
file
scattershot
applications
suddenly
alter
strategy
appeal
indeed
experience
courts
appeals
suggests
otherwise
see
jones
keane
noting
refusing
consider
absent
coa
prevailing
petitioner
alternative
grounds
affirmance
allegations
insufficiency
evidence
ineffective
assistance
trial
appellate
counsel
experience
courts
appeals
conduct
likely
grow
majority
approved
appeals
seventh
circuit
permitted
prevailing
habeas
petitioners
raise
rejected
claims
alternative
grounds
affirmance
courts
appeals
subject
rule
majority
also
overlooks
significant
procedural
distinction
application
coa
merits
appeal
majority
expresses
doubt
judicial
time
wasted
rejection
frivolous
claims
made
defense
judgment
appeal
already
taken
wasted
rejection
similar
claims
made
separate
proceeding
certificate
appealability
ante
coa
decided
single
appeals
judge
merits
appeal
must
heard
panel
mandating
involvement
two
additional
judges
adjudication
claims
today
ruling
triples
burden
courts
appeals
repeatedly
recognized
aedpa
purpose
reduc
delays
execution
state
federal
criminal
sentences
ryan
valencia
gonzales
slip
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
one
key
ways
aedpa
encourages
finality
narrow
scope
appellate
review
requiring
habeas
petitioners
obtain
coas
majority
decision
undermines
legislative
choice
transforms
understanding
orders
prevailed
since
first
announced
creation
respectfully
dissent