environmental
protection
agency
et
al
eme
homer
city
generation
et
argued
december
decided
april
congress
environmental
protection
agency
epa
agency
course
several
decades
made
many
efforts
deal
complex
challenge
curtailing
air
pollution
emitted
upwind
causing
harm
downwind
relevant
clean
air
act
caa
act
directs
epa
establish
national
ambient
air
quality
standards
naaqs
pollutants
levels
protect
public
health
epa
settles
naaqs
agency
must
designate
nonattainment
areas
locations
concentration
regulated
pollutant
exceeds
naaqs
state
must
submit
state
implementation
plan
sip
epa
within
three
years
new
revised
naaqs
date
epa
determines
state
sip
inadequate
agency
two
years
promulgate
federal
implementation
plan
fip
among
components
caa
mandates
sip
compliance
good
neighbor
provision
requires
sips
contain
adequate
provisions
prohibiting
source
type
emissions
activity
within
state
emitting
air
pollutant
amounts
contribute
significantly
nonattainment
interfere
maintenance
state
respect
naaqs
several
times
past
two
decades
epa
attempted
delineate
good
neighbor
provision
scope
identifying
upwind
contribute
significantly
nonattainment
downwind
circuit
found
fault
agency
attempt
clean
air
interstate
rule
cair
regulated
nitrogen
oxide
nox
sulfur
dioxide
emissions
gasses
issue
circuit
nevertheless
left
cair
temporarily
place
encouraging
epa
act
dispatch
dealing
problems
identified
epa
response
decision
air
pollution
rule
transport
rule
curbs
nox
emissions
upwind
achieve
downwind
attainment
three
naaqs
transport
rule
upwind
state
contribute
significantly
downwind
nonattainment
extent
exported
pollution
produced
one
percent
naaqs
least
one
downwind
state
eliminated
determined
epa
upwind
obliged
eliminate
emissions
meeting
criteria
complex
modeling
epa
created
annual
emissions
budget
regulated
state
upwind
representing
total
quantity
pollution
upwind
state
produce
given
year
transport
rule
earlier
determined
regulated
state
sip
inadequate
epa
contemporaneous
transport
rule
promulgated
fips
allocating
state
emissions
budgets
among
pollution
sources
group
state
local
governments
state
respondents
joined
industry
labor
groups
industry
respondents
petitioned
review
transport
rule
circuit
vacated
rule
entirety
holding
epa
actions
exceeded
agency
statutory
authority
two
respects
acknowledging
epa
fip
authority
generally
triggered
agency
disapproves
sip
nevertheless
concerned
incapable
fulfilling
good
neighbor
provision
without
prior
epa
guidance
thus
concluded
epa
must
give
reasonable
opportunity
allocate
emission
budgets
issuing
fips
also
found
agency
interpretation
good
neighbor
provision
unreasonable
concluding
epa
must
disregard
costs
consider
exclusively
upwind
state
physically
proportionate
responsibility
air
quality
problems
downwind
held
caa
command
given
second
opportunity
file
sip
epa
quantified
state
interstate
pollution
obligations
pp
state
respondents
challenge
epa
disapproval
particular
sip
instead
argue
notwithstanding
disapprovals
agency
still
obliged
grant
upwind
anadditional
opportunity
promulgate
adequate
sips
epa
set
state
emission
budget
claim
turn
validity
prior
sip
disapprovals
whether
caa
requires
epa
disapprove
sip
trigger
agency
authority
issue
fip
pp
caa
plain
text
supports
agency
disapproval
sip
without
triggers
epa
obligation
issue
fip
statute
sets
precise
deadlines
epa
epa
issues
new
revised
naaqs
state
shall
propose
sip
within
three
years
sip
shall
include
inter
alia
provisions
adequate
satisfy
good
neighbor
provision
epa
finds
sip
inadequate
agency
statutory
duty
issue
fip
time
within
two
years
however
sensible
circuit
exception
strict
time
prescription
may
reviewing
task
apply
text
statute
improve
upon
pavelic
leflore
marvel
entertainment
group
div
cadence
industries
nothing
act
differentiates
good
neighbor
provision
several
matters
state
must
address
sip
act
condition
duty
promulgate
fip
epa
first
quantified
upwind
state
good
neighbor
obligations
altering
congress
sip
fip
schedule
circuit
allowed
delay
congress
order
placed
information
submission
obligation
epa
congress
impose
pp
fact
epa
previously
accorded
upwind
chance
allocate
emission
budgets
among
sources
show
agency
acted
arbitrarily
refraining
epa
retained
discretion
alter
course
provided
gave
reasonable
explanation
motor
vehicle
mfrs
assn
state
farm
mut
automobile
ins
agency
admonished
circuit
act
dispatch
amending
replacing
cair
endeavoring
satisfy
directive
epa
acted
speedily
issuing
fips
transport
rule
contemporaneously
pp
epa
allocation
emission
reductions
among
upwind
permissible
workable
equitable
interpretation
good
neighbor
provision
pp
respondents
attack
epa
interpretation
good
neighbor
provision
foreclosed
provides
nly
objection
rule
raised
reasonable
specificity
period
public
comment
may
raised
judicial
review
even
assuming
respondents
failed
object
transport
rule
reasonable
specificity
lapse
jurisdictional
section
mandatory
jurisdictional
rule
see
arbaugh
speaks
party
procedural
obligations
authority
see
kontrick
ryan
epa
press
argument
unequivocally
circuit
pose
impassable
hindrance
review
pp
routinely
accords
dispositive
effect
agency
reasonable
interpretation
ambiguous
statutory
language
good
neighbor
provision
delegates
authority
epa
least
certainly
caa
provisions
involved
chevron
natural
resources
defense
council
epa
authority
reduce
upwind
pollution
extends
amounts
pollution
contribute
significantly
nonattainment
downwind
downwind
state
excess
pollution
often
caused
multiple
upwind
however
epa
must
address
allocate
responsibility
among
multiple
contributors
good
neighbor
provision
dictate
method
apportionment
nothing
provision
example
directs
proportional
allocation
method
advanced
circuit
method
works
neither
mathematically
practical
application
chevron
congress
silence
effectively
delegates
authority
epa
select
among
reasonable
options
see
mead
epa
chosen
allocation
method
permissible
construction
statute
chevron
agency
tasked
choosing
among
equal
amounts
eliminate
chosen
sensibly
reduce
amount
easier
less
costly
eradicate
industry
respondents
argue
final
calculation
rely
costs
nothing
good
neighbor
provision
text
precludes
choice
using
costs
transport
rule
calculus
efficient
equitable
solution
allocation
problem
good
neighbor
provision
compels
agency
address
efficient
epa
achieve
levels
attainment
emission
reductions
proportional
approach
aims
achieve
much
lower
overall
cost
equitable
imposing
uniform
cost
thresholds
regulated
epa
rule
subjects
stricter
regulation
done
less
past
control
pollution
pp
wholesale
invalidation
transport
rule
justified
either
circuit
remaining
objections
transport
rule
leaves
open
possibility
state
might
compelled
reduce
emissions
beyond
point
every
affected
downwind
state
attainment
epa
use
costs
foreclose
possibility
upwind
state
required
reduce
emissions
muchthat
state
placed
mark
epa
set
initial
threshold
significan
ce
first
instances
particular
downwind
locations
may
incidental
reductions
necessary
ensure
attainment
elsewhere
good
neighbor
provision
seeks
attainment
every
downwind
state
however
exceeding
attainment
one
state
rank
unless
unnecessary
achieving
attainment
downwind
state
second
epa
must
leeway
fulfilling
statutory
mandate
balance
possibilities
maximize
achievement
attainment
downwind
finally
voluminous
record
involving
thousands
linkages
respondents
point
instances
unnecessary
emission
reductions
even
contested
epa
pp
reversed
remanded
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
roberts
kennedy
breyer
sotomayor
kagan
joined
scalia
filed
dissenting
opinion
thomas
joined
alito
took
part
consideration
decision
cases
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
nos
et
al
et
al
et
et
al
writs
certiorari
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
april
justice
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
cases
concern
efforts
congress
environmental
protection
agency
epa
agency
cope
complex
problem
air
pollution
emitted
one
state
causing
harm
left
unregulated
emitting
upwind
state
reaps
benefits
economic
activity
causing
pollution
without
bearing
costs
see
revesz
federalism
interstate
environmental
externalities
rev
conversely
downwind
pollution
travels
unable
achieve
clean
air
influx
pollution
lack
authority
control
see
tackle
problem
congress
included
good
neighbor
provision
clean
air
act
act
caa
provision
current
phrasing
instructs
prohibit
sources
emitting
air
pollutant
amounts
contribute
significantly
downwind
nonattainment
interfere
maintenance
national
air
quality
standard
interpreting
good
neighbor
provision
epa
adopted
air
pollution
rule
commonly
hereinafter
called
transport
rule
rule
calls
consideration
costs
among
factors
determining
emission
reductions
upwind
state
must
make
improve
air
quality
polluted
downwind
areas
appeals
circuit
vacated
rule
entirety
held
good
neighbor
provision
requires
epa
consider
upwind
state
physically
proportionate
responsibility
downwind
state
air
quality
problem
reading
demanded
according
circuit
state
required
decrease
emissions
ratable
share
pollution
chevron
natural
resources
defense
council
reversed
circuit
decision
failed
accord
deference
epa
reasonable
interpretation
ambiguous
clean
air
act
provision
satisfied
good
neighbor
provision
command
appeals
construction
epa
reasonably
interpreted
provision
reverse
circuit
judgment
air
pollution
transient
heedless
state
boundaries
pollutants
generated
upwind
sources
often
transported
air
currents
sometimes
hundreds
miles
downwind
pollution
travels
state
upwind
relieved
associated
costs
costs
borne
instead
downwind
whose
ability
achieve
maintain
satisfactory
air
quality
hampered
steady
stream
infiltrating
pollution
several
reasons
curtailing
interstate
air
pollution
poses
complex
challenge
environmental
regulators
first
identifying
upwind
origin
downwind
air
pollution
easy
endeavor
upwind
propel
pollutants
one
downwind
state
many
downwind
receive
pollution
multiple
upwind
qualify
upwind
downwind
see
brief
federal
petitioners
overlapping
interwoven
linkages
upwind
downwind
epa
contend
number
complicating
problem
pollutants
emerge
smokestacks
upwind
state
uniformly
migrate
downwind
pollutants
stay
within
upwind
borders
wind
carries
others
downwind
subset
group
drifts
without
air
quality
problems
wind
bloweth
listeth
thou
hearest
sound
thereof
canst
tell
whence
cometh
whither
goeth
holy
bible
john
king
james
version
crafting
solution
problem
interstate
air
pollution
regulators
must
account
vagaries
wind
finally
upwind
pollutants
find
way
downwind
left
unaltered
journey
rather
gases
emitted
upwind
polluters
carried
downwind
transformed
various
chemical
processes
altogether
different
pollutants
offending
gases
issue
cases
nitrogen
oxide
nox
sulfur
dioxide
often
develop
ozone
fine
particulate
matter
time
reach
atmospheres
downwind
see
fed
reg
see
also
fed
reg
describing
components
ozone
downwind
air
quality
must
therefore
measured
ozone
concentrations
epa
chore
quantify
amount
upwind
gases
nox
must
reduced
enable
downwind
keep
levels
ozone
check
past
years
congress
addressed
interstate
air
pollution
several
times
increasing
rigor
congress
directed
federal
authorities
encourage
cooperative
activities
local
governments
prevention
control
air
pollution
stat
congress
made
instruction
concrete
introducing
features
still
key
act
first
time
congress
directed
epa
establish
national
ambient
air
quality
standards
naaqs
pollutants
levels
protect
public
health
see
stat
amended
epa
settles
naaqs
act
requires
agency
designate
nonattainment
areas
locations
concentration
regulated
pollutant
exceeds
naaqs
act
shifts
burden
propose
plans
adequate
compliance
naaqs
state
must
submit
state
implementation
plan
sip
epa
within
three
years
new
revised
naaqs
epa
determines
state
failed
submit
adequate
sip
either
whole
part
act
requires
agency
promulgate
federal
implementation
plan
fip
within
two
years
epa
unless
state
corrects
deficiency
fip
issued
act
lists
matters
sip
must
cover
among
sip
components
version
act
required
sips
include
adequate
provisions
intergovernmental
cooperation
concerning
interstate
air
pollution
stat
statutory
requirement
text
altered
time
come
called
good
neighbor
provision
congress
amended
good
neighbor
provision
require
cooperation
directed
submit
sips
included
provisions
adequate
prohibi
stationary
source
within
state
emitting
air
pollutant
amounts
prevent
attainment
maintenance
air
quality
standards
state
stat
supp
ii
amended
provision
thus
explicitly
instructed
upwind
reduce
emissions
account
pollution
exported
beyond
borders
written
however
provision
regulated
individual
sources
considered
alone
emitted
enough
pollution
cause
nonattainment
downwind
state
often
impossible
say
single
source
group
sources
one
actually
prevents
attainment
downwind
version
good
neighbor
provision
proved
ineffective
see
ibid
noting
provision
inability
curb
collective
emissions
multiple
sources
congress
recently
amended
good
neighbor
provision
statute
current
form
requires
sips
contain
adequate
provisions
prohibiting
source
type
emissions
activity
within
state
emitting
air
pollutant
amounts
contribute
significantly
nonattainment
interfere
maintenance
state
respect
naaqs
controversy
us
centers
epa
recent
attempt
construe
provision
three
times
past
two
decades
epa
attempted
delineate
good
neighbor
provision
scope
identifying
upwind
contribute
significantly
nonattainment
downwind
epa
issued
rule
known
nox
sip
call
regulation
limited
nox
emissions
upwind
extent
emissions
contributed
nonattainment
ozone
standards
downwind
see
fed
reg
michigan
epa
circuit
upheld
nox
sip
call
specifically
affirming
epa
use
costs
determine
upwind
state
contribution
significan
within
meaning
statute
epa
issued
clean
air
interstate
rule
cair
fed
reg
cair
regulated
nox
emissions
insofar
emissions
contributed
downwind
nonattainment
two
naaqs
set
one
concerning
permissible
annual
measure
another
capping
average
ozone
level
gauged
period
see
circuit
initially
vacated
cair
arbitrary
capricious
see
north
carolina
epa
per
curiam
rehearing
decided
leave
rule
place
encouraging
epa
act
dispatch
dealing
problems
identified
see
north
carolina
epa
per
curiam
rule
challenged
transport
rule
epa
response
circuit
north
carolina
decision
finalized
august
transport
rule
curtails
nox
emissions
upwind
achieve
downwind
attainment
three
different
naaqs
two
naaqs
previously
addressed
cair
naaqs
levels
measured
daily
basis
see
fed
reg
transport
rule
epa
employed
approach
determine
upwind
contribute
significantly
nonattainment
therefore
amounts
eliminated
step
one
called
screening
analysis
agency
excluded
de
minimis
upwind
state
contributed
less
one
percent
three
downwind
state
receptor
location
epa
measures
air
quality
see
upwind
state
contributions
fell
threshold
state
considered
contribute
significantly
nonattainment
downwind
state
category
screened
exempted
regulation
rule
remaining
subjected
second
inquiry
epa
called
control
analysis
stage
agency
sought
generate
allocation
emission
reductions
among
upwind
screened
step
one
control
analysis
proceeded
way
epa
first
calculated
upwind
state
quantity
emissions
state
eliminate
several
cost
thresholds
see
cost
purposes
measured
cost
per
ton
emissions
prevented
instance
installing
scrubbers
powerplant
epa
estimated
example
amount
upwind
state
nox
emissions
fall
pollution
sources
within
state
employed
every
control
measure
available
cost
per
ton
less
see
agency
repeated
analysis
ascending
cost
thresholds
see
armed
information
epa
conducted
complex
modeling
establish
combined
effect
upwind
reductions
projected
cost
threshold
air
quality
downwind
see
agency
identified
significant
cost
threshold
points
model
noticeable
change
occurred
downwind
air
quality
large
upwind
emission
reductions
become
available
certain
type
emissions
control
strategy
becomes
ibid
example
reductions
nox
sufficient
resolve
significantly
curb
downwind
air
quality
problems
achieved
epa
determined
cost
threshold
per
ton
applied
uniformly
regulated
upwind
moving
beyond
cost
threshold
epa
concluded
result
minimal
additional
reductions
emissions
finally
epa
translated
cost
thresholds
amounts
emissions
upwind
required
eliminate
regulated
upwind
state
epa
created
annual
emissions
budget
budgets
represented
quantity
pollution
upwind
state
produce
given
year
sources
implemented
pollution
controls
available
chosen
cost
thresholds
see
epa
projected
improvements
downwind
air
quality
realized
upwind
state
emissions
exceed
level
budget
allocated
subject
certain
adjustments
relevant
taken
together
screening
control
inquiries
defined
epa
understanding
upwind
emissions
within
good
neighbor
provision
ambit
short
transport
rule
upwind
state
contribute
significantly
downwind
nonattainment
extent
exported
pollution
produced
one
percent
naaqs
least
one
downwind
state
step
one
eliminated
determined
epa
step
two
see
upwind
obliged
eliminate
emissions
meeting
state
regulated
transport
rule
epa
contemporaneously
promulgated
fip
allocating
state
emission
budget
among
sources
see
epa
determined
state
failed
submit
sip
adequate
compliance
good
neighbor
provision
determinations
regarding
sips
became
final
days
see
supp
many
went
epa
views
sip
determinations
triggered
statutory
obligation
promulgate
fip
within
two
years
see
view
contested
respondents
see
part
ii
infra
group
state
local
governments
state
respondents
joined
industry
labor
groups
industry
respondents
petitioned
review
transport
rule
appeals
circuit
dissent
judge
rogers
appeals
vacated
rule
entirety
see
epa
actions
appeals
held
exceeded
agency
statutory
authority
two
respects
promulgating
fips
giving
meaningful
opportunity
adopt
implementation
plans
epa
view
upset
caa
division
responsibility
federal
government
main
appeals
acknowledged
epa
fip
authority
triggered
moment
agency
disapproves
sip
see
thus
state
proposes
sip
inadequate
achieve
naaqs
epa
promulgate
fip
immediately
disapproving
sip
see
appeals
ruled
different
regime
applies
state
failure
meet
obligations
good
neighbor
provision
naaqs
clear
numerical
target
state
good
neighbor
obligation
remained
nebulous
unknown
observed
epa
calculated
state
emission
budget
ibid
without
budgets
appeals
said
upwind
compelled
take
stab
dark
calculating
significant
contribution
interstate
air
pollution
circuit
read
act
avoid
putting
position
epa
implicit
statutory
duty
held
give
upwind
reasonable
opportunity
allocate
emission
budgets
among
sources
agency
authority
issue
fips
triggered
circuit
also
held
agency
interpretation
good
neighbor
provision
ignored
three
red
lines
cabin
ing
epa
authority
first
circuit
interpreted
good
neighbor
provision
require
upwind
reduce
emissions
manner
proportional
contributio
pollution
downwind
transport
rule
however
treated
regulated
upwind
alike
regardless
relative
contribution
overall
problem
see
required
upwind
screened
step
one
reduce
emissions
accord
uniform
cost
thresholds
set
step
two
control
analysis
imposing
uniform
cost
thresholds
appeals
observed
force
upwind
reduce
emissions
fair
share
according
appeals
epa
also
failed
ensure
transport
rule
mandate
reduce
pollution
unnecessarily
good
neighbor
provision
circuit
noted
targets
emissions
upwind
significantly
naaqs
downwind
pollution
reduction
beyond
goal
unnecessary
outside
purview
agency
statutory
mandate
ibid
emission
budgets
calculated
reference
cost
alone
concluded
epa
done
nothing
guard
even
measure
potentially
imposed
transport
rule
see
ibid
finally
deciding
screening
analysis
upwind
contributions
threshold
insignificant
epa
established
floor
agency
authority
act
see
pointing
rule
reliance
costs
appeals
held
epa
failed
ensure
upwind
forced
reduce
emissions
threshold
see
ibid
dissent
judge
rogers
criticized
majority
deciding
two
questions
view
properly
see
first
addressed
majority
insistence
fips
abide
state
opportunity
allocate
emission
budget
among
sources
regarded
respondents
plea
effect
untimely
attack
epa
previous
sip
disapprovals
see
second
judge
rogers
assessment
respondents
failed
raise
substantive
objections
transport
rule
specificity
necessary
preserve
review
see
merits
judge
rogers
found
nothing
act
require
even
suggest
epa
must
quantify
state
good
neighbor
obligations
promulgated
fip
see
also
disagreed
conclusion
transport
rule
unreasonably
interpreted
act
see
granted
certiorari
decide
whether
circuit
accurately
construed
limits
caa
places
epa
authority
see
ii
epa
calculated
emission
budgets
circuit
held
agency
must
give
upwind
opportunity
propose
sips
allocating
budgets
among
sources
issuing
fip
state
respondents
put
fip
allocating
state
emission
budget
must
issue
epa
quantified
obligations
emission
budget
given
reasonable
opportunity
meet
obligations
sips
brief
state
respondents
reaching
merits
argument
first
reject
epa
threshold
objection
claim
untimely
according
agency
argument
circuit
opinion
accepting
rank
improper
collateral
attacks
epa
prior
sip
disapprovals
earlier
recounted
see
supra
epa
time
issued
transport
rule
determined
regulated
upwind
state
failed
submit
sip
adequate
satisfy
good
neighbor
provision
many
determinations
unchallenged
became
final
days
see
petitions
issue
filed
epa
argues
question
exercise
agency
fip
authority
without
subjecting
final
sip
disapprovals
untimely
review
disagree
gravamen
state
respondents
challenge
epa
disapproval
particular
sip
erroneous
rather
respondents
urge
notwithstanding
disapprovals
agency
obliged
grant
upwind
state
second
opportunity
adequate
sips
epa
set
state
emission
budget
claim
depend
validity
prior
sip
disapprovals
even
assuming
legitimacy
disapprovals
question
remains
whether
epa
required
disapprove
sip
state
respondents
urge
trigger
agency
statutory
authority
issue
turning
merits
hold
text
statute
supports
epa
position
earlier
noted
see
supra
caa
sets
series
precise
deadlines
epa
must
adhere
epa
issues
new
revised
naaqs
state
three
years
adopt
sip
adequate
compliance
act
requirements
see
among
requirements
act
mandate
sips
shall
include
provisions
sufficient
satisfy
good
neighbor
provision
epa
determines
sip
inadequate
agency
mandate
replace
fip
less
absolute
epa
shall
promulgate
fip
time
within
years
agency
finds
state
failed
make
required
submission
finds
plan
plan
revision
submitted
state
satisfy
minimum
relevant
criteria
disapproves
sip
whole
part
unless
state
corrects
deficiency
epa
approves
plan
plan
revision
agency
promulgates
fip
words
epa
found
sip
inadequate
agency
statutory
duty
issue
fip
time
within
two
years
unless
state
first
corrects
deficiency
one
contends
occurred
circuit
however
found
unwritten
exception
strict
time
prescription
sips
aimed
implementing
good
neighbor
provision
expecting
one
state
develop
comprehensive
solution
collective
problem
interstate
air
pollution
without
first
receiving
epa
guidance
appeals
assessment
set
ting
fail
circuit
therefore
required
epa
promulgating
state
emission
budget
give
state
reasonable
period
time
propose
sips
implementing
budget
see
however
sensible
appeals
reviewing
task
apply
text
statute
improve
upon
pavelic
leflore
marvel
entertainment
group
div
cadence
industries
nothing
act
good
neighbor
provision
several
matters
state
must
address
sip
rather
statute
speaks
without
reservation
naaqs
issued
state
shall
propose
sip
within
three
years
sip
shall
include
among
components
provisions
adequate
satisfy
good
neighbor
provision
act
condition
duty
promulgate
fip
epa
first
quantified
upwind
state
good
neighbor
obligations
judge
rogers
observed
dissent
circuit
decision
act
require
epa
furnish
upwind
information
kind
good
neighbor
obligations
fip
issues
see
instead
sip
failure
satisfy
good
neighbor
provision
without
triggers
epa
obligation
issue
federal
plan
within
two
years
epa
disapproved
sip
agency
wait
two
years
issue
fip
time
state
correc
deficiency
ibid
epa
obliged
wait
two
years
postpone
action
even
single
day
act
empowers
agency
promulgate
fip
time
within
limit
ibid
carving
exception
act
precise
deadlines
circuit
rewrites
statute
whose
plain
text
structure
establish
clear
chronology
federal
state
responsibilities
rogers
dissenting
practical
difficulties
cited
appeals
justify
departure
act
plain
text
see
barnhart
sigmon
coal
must
presume
legislature
says
statute
means
means
statute
says
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
congress
elected
make
epa
input
prerequisite
state
action
act
expressly
developing
vehicle
inspection
maintenance
programs
caa
example
must
await
epa
guidance
issuing
sips
state
obligation
adopt
sip
moreover
arises
epa
first
set
naaqs
state
must
meet
congress
intended
similarly
defer
discharge
obligations
good
neighbor
provision
congress
take
included
similar
direction
section
see
jama
immigration
customs
enforcement
lightly
assume
congress
omitted
adopted
text
requirements
nonetheless
intends
apply
reluctance
even
greater
congress
shown
elsewhere
statute
knows
make
requirement
short
nothing
statute
places
epa
obligation
provide
specific
metrics
undertake
fulfill
good
neighbor
obligations
altering
schedule
congress
provided
sips
fips
circuit
stretched
process
allowed
delay
congress
order
placed
information
submission
obligation
epa
congress
impose
circuit
hold
warrant
thus
revise
caa
prescriptions
oral
argument
state
respondents
emphasized
epa
previous
decisions
nox
sip
call
cair
quantify
emission
reductions
required
upwind
window
propose
sip
closed
see
tr
oral
arg
view
failing
accord
similar
grace
period
issuing
emission
budgets
epa
acted
arbitrarily
see
ibid
whatever
pattern
agency
followed
nox
sip
call
cair
proceedings
epa
retained
discretion
alter
course
provided
gave
reasonable
explanation
motor
vehicle
mfrs
assn
state
farm
mut
automobile
ins
agency
presented
explanation
transport
rule
noted
see
supra
circuit
north
carolina
decision
admonished
epa
act
dispatch
amending
replacing
cair
transport
rule
predecessor
see
warning
epa
stay
decision
vacate
cair
persist
indefinite
ly
given
north
carolina
stress
expeditious
action
cure
infirmities
identified
cair
epa
thought
appropriate
establish
lengthy
transition
period
entailed
allowing
time
propose
new
amended
sips
implementing
transport
rule
emission
budgets
see
fed
reg
citing
north
carolina
endeavoring
satisfy
circuit
directive
epa
acted
speedily
issuing
fips
contemporaneously
transport
rule
light
firm
deadlines
imposed
act
hold
circuit
lacked
authority
alter
condemn
epa
decision
arbitrary
iii
circuit
also
held
transport
rule
interpretation
good
neighbor
provision
conflicts
act
addressing
holding
take
jurisdictional
objection
raised
epa
caa
directs
nly
objection
rule
raised
reasonable
specificity
period
public
comment
may
raised
judicial
review
respondents
failed
state
objections
transport
rule
comment
period
specificity
required
preservation
epa
argues
see
brief
federal
petitioners
failure
administrative
level
epa
urges
forecloses
judicial
review
assuming
without
deciding
respondents
meet
act
reasonable
specificity
requirement
comment
period
regard
lapse
jurisdictional
cautioned
profligate
use
label
jurisdictional
sebelius
auburn
regional
medical
center
slip
rule
may
mandatory
yet
jurisdictional
explained
see
arbaugh
section
hold
character
speak
authority
party
procedural
obligations
see
kontrick
ryan
epa
pursued
reasonable
specificity
argument
vigorously
circuit
obligated
address
merits
argument
see
gonzalez
thaler
slip
epa
press
argument
unequivocally
circuit
indicated
reasonable
specificity
prescription
might
bar
judicial
review
brief
respondent
epa
et
al
cadc
see
also
therefore
count
prescription
impassable
hindrance
adjudication
respondents
attack
epa
interpretation
transport
rule
turn
attack
mindful
importance
issues
respondents
raise
ongoing
implementation
good
neighbor
provision
routinely
accord
dispositive
effect
agency
reasonable
interpretation
ambiguous
statutory
language
chevron
natural
resources
defense
council
pathmarking
decision
bears
notable
resemblance
cases
us
chevron
concerned
epa
definition
term
source
used
amendments
caa
amendments
placed
additional
restrictions
companies
liberty
add
new
pollution
sources
factories
see
although
source
might
interpreted
refer
individual
smokestack
epa
construed
term
refer
entire
plant
thereby
treat
ing
devices
within
plant
though
encased
within
single
ibid
agency
interpretation
new
device
subject
plant
additional
restrictions
alteration
increase
total
emissions
produced
plant
ibid
held
epa
interpretation
source
reasonable
construction
ambiguous
statutory
term
congress
directly
addressed
precise
interpretative
question
issue
cautioned
reviewing
simply
impose
construction
statute
rather
agency
charged
filling
gap
left
open
ambiguity
full
understanding
force
statutory
policy
depend
upon
ordinary
situation
administering
agency
construction
accorded
controlling
weight
unless
arbitrary
capricious
manifestly
contrary
statute
quoting
shimer
determining
none
terms
fit
epa
interpretation
source
deferred
agency
judgment
conclude
good
neighbor
provision
delegates
authority
epa
least
certainly
caa
provisions
involved
chevron
statute
requires
eliminate
amounts
pollution
contribute
significantly
nonattainment
downwind
emphasis
added
thus
epa
reduce
upwind
pollution
amounts
push
downwind
state
pollution
concentrations
relevant
naaqs
noted
earlier
however
nonattainment
downwind
results
collective
interwoven
contributions
multiple
upwind
see
supra
statute
therefore
calls
upon
agency
address
thorny
causation
problem
epa
allocate
among
multiple
contributing
upwind
responsibility
downwind
state
excess
pollution
simplified
example
illustrates
puzzle
epa
faced
suppose
agency
sets
naaqs
respect
particular
pollutant
parts
per
billion
ppb
level
pollutant
atmosphere
downwind
state
ppb
suppose
epa
determined
three
upwind
contributes
equivalent
ppb
relevant
pollutant
state
airspace
good
neighbor
provision
observed
prohibits
upwind
emissions
contribute
significantly
downwind
nonattainment
epa
authority
provision
therefore
limited
eliminating
total
overage
caused
collective
contribution
epa
divide
responsibility
among
three
agency
allocate
reductions
proportionally
ppb
per
capita
basis
basis
cost
abatement
metric
see
brief
federal
petitioners
noting
epa
consideration
different
approaches
good
neighbor
provision
answer
question
epa
cf
chevron
language
caa
simply
compel
given
interpretation
term
chevron
read
congress
silence
delegation
authority
epa
select
among
reasonable
options
see
mead
yet
appeals
believed
act
speaks
clearly
requiring
epa
allocate
responsibility
reducing
emissions
manner
proportional
state
contributio
problem
nothing
text
good
neighbor
provision
propels
epa
path
understandably
epa
notes
circuit
proportionality
approach
scarcely
satisfied
practice
see
app
etc
cadc
hile
possible
determine
emission
reduction
percentage
single
downwind
receptor
upwind
contribute
multiple
downwind
receptors
multiple
different
reduction
percentage
illustrate
consider
variation
example
set
imagine
contribute
air
pollution
state
ratio
one
five
state
contributes
five
times
amount
pollution
state
state
state
downwind
state
two
upwind
contributed
circuit
proportionality
requirement
easy
meet
epa
require
state
reduce
emissions
five
times
amount
demanded
state
realities
interstate
air
pollution
however
simple
upwind
contribute
pollution
multiple
downwind
varying
amounts
see
fed
reg
see
also
brief
respondent
calpine
et
al
support
petitioners
offering
examples
suppose
also
contribute
pollutants
second
downwind
state
state
time
ratio
seven
one
though
state
contributed
relatively
larger
share
pollution
state
respect
state
state
greater
offender
following
proportionality
approach
respect
state
demand
state
reduce
emissions
seven
times
much
state
recall
however
state
hypothesized
effect
five
times
large
reduction
respect
state
appeals
proportionality
edict
respect
state
state
appears
work
neither
mathematically
practical
application
proportionality
one
state
achieve
proportionality
others
quite
opposite
generally
true
upwind
contribute
pollution
two
downwind
receptors
proportionality
becomes
elusive
neither
circuit
respondents
face
problem
dissent
part
strains
give
meaning
circuit
proportionality
constraint
applied
world
multiple
upwind
contribute
emissions
multiple
downwind
locations
dissent
view
upwind
must
eliminate
emissions
whatever
minimum
amount
reduces
share
overage
every
one
downwind
linked
see
post
practical
terms
means
upwind
state
required
reduce
emissions
amount
necessary
eliminate
state
largest
downwind
contribution
dissent
formulation
however
account
combined
cumulative
effect
upwind
state
reductions
attainment
multiple
downwind
locations
see
ibid
approach
state
required
eliminate
emissions
pollutant
whatever
minimum
amount
reduces
state
level
unit
state
unit
emphasis
added
result
costly
overregulation
unnecessary
indeed
conflict
good
neighbor
provision
goal
response
dissent
asserts
epa
simply
required
make
allowance
overregulation
caused
approach
post
criterion
epa
employ
determine
make
allowance
much
dissent
admits
multiple
ways
epa
might
answer
questions
ibid
proportionality
one
ways
approach
led
overregulation
first
place
nonproportional
approach
play
role
setting
final
allocation
reduction
obligations
hardly
apparent
epa
free
depart
proportionality
back
end
outset
persuaded
good
neighbor
provision
dictate
particular
allocation
emissions
among
contributing
advanced
circuit
must
next
decide
whether
allocation
method
chosen
epa
permissible
construction
statute
chevron
epa
interprets
statute
upwind
emissions
rank
amounts
contribute
significantly
nonattainment
constitute
one
percent
relevant
naaqs
nonattaining
downwind
state
eliminated
cost
threshold
set
agency
see
fed
reg
words
identify
emissions
eliminated
epa
considered
magnitude
upwind
contributions
cost
associated
eliminating
industry
respondents
argue
however
epa
ultimately
divides
responsibility
among
upwind
final
calculation
rely
costs
good
neighbor
provision
respondents
dissent
emphasize
requires
state
prohibit
air
pollution
emitted
within
state
significantly
another
state
nonattaintment
brief
industry
respondents
emphasis
added
see
also
post
cost
preventing
emissions
urge
wholly
unrelated
actual
amoun
air
pollution
upwind
state
contributes
brief
industry
respondents
transport
rule
considers
costs
respondents
argue
contribute
identical
may
deemed
epa
made
substantially
different
contributions
explained
see
supra
agency
avoid
task
choosing
among
equal
amounts
eliminate
agency
chosen
sensibly
view
reduce
amount
easier
less
costly
eradicate
nothing
text
good
neighbor
provision
precludes
choice
using
costs
transport
rule
calculus
agree
epa
also
makes
good
sense
eliminating
amounts
reduced
efficient
equitable
solution
allocation
problem
good
neighbor
provision
requires
agency
address
efficient
epa
achieve
levels
attainment
emission
reductions
proportional
approach
aims
achieve
much
lower
overall
cost
imposing
uniform
cost
thresholds
regulated
epa
rule
subjects
stricter
regulation
done
relatively
less
past
control
pollution
upwind
yet
implemented
pollution
controls
stringency
neighbors
stopped
free
riding
neighbors
efforts
reduce
pollution
bring
emissions
installing
devices
kind
neighboring
already
invested
suppose
example
industries
upwind
state
expended
considerable
resources
installing
modern
devices
plants
factories
upwind
state
contrast
continue
run
old
dirty
plants
yet
perhaps
state
populous
therefore
generates
larger
sum
pollution
overall
two
emissions
equal
effects
downwind
attainment
state
state
required
eliminate
emissions
proportionally
equally
sources
state
compelled
spend
far
per
ton
reductions
already
utilized
lower
cost
pollution
controls
state
sources
also
achieve
greater
reductions
required
made
reductions
first
place
state
words
tolled
done
reduce
pollution
epa
allocation
avoids
anomalies
obligated
require
elimination
amounts
pollutants
contribute
nonattainment
naaqs
downwind
epa
must
decide
differentiate
among
otherwise
like
contributions
multiple
upwind
epa
found
decisive
difficulty
eliminating
amount
cost
incurred
lacking
dispositive
statutory
instruction
guide
epa
decision
conclude
reasonable
way
filling
gap
left
open
congress
chevron
circuit
stated
two
objections
epa
method
defining
upwind
state
contribution
state
screened
step
one
epa
analysis
emission
budget
calculated
solely
reference
uniform
cost
thresholds
agency
selected
step
two
transport
rule
thus
left
open
possibility
state
might
compelled
reduce
emissions
beyond
point
every
affected
downwind
state
attainment
phenomenon
appeals
termed
see
supra
second
epa
focus
costs
foreclose
circuit
accurately
observed
possibility
upwind
state
required
reduce
emissions
much
state
longer
contributed
one
relevant
naaqs
downwind
state
place
state
mark
epa
set
screening
phase
initial
threshold
significan
ce
see
agree
appeals
extent
epa
require
state
reduce
output
pollution
necessary
achieve
attainment
every
downwind
state
odds
threshold
agency
set
epa
requires
upwind
state
reduce
emissions
amount
necessary
achieve
attainment
every
downwind
state
linked
agency
overstepped
authority
good
neighbor
provision
eliminate
amounts
contribute
nonattainment
epa
demand
reductions
drive
upwind
state
contribution
every
downwind
state
linked
one
percent
relevant
naaqs
counter
step
one
agency
interpretation
good
neighbor
provision
see
fed
reg
tates
whose
contributions
th
thresholds
significantly
contribute
nonattainment
relevant
neither
possibility
however
justifies
wholesale
invalidation
transport
rule
first
instances
particular
downwind
locations
circuit
acknowledged
see
may
incidental
reductions
necessary
ensure
attainment
elsewhere
individual
upwind
often
contribute
significantly
nonattainment
multiple
downwind
locations
emissions
reduction
required
bring
one
linked
downwind
state
attainment
may
well
large
enough
push
linked
downwind
attainment
good
neighbor
provision
seeks
attainment
every
downwind
state
however
exceeding
attainment
one
state
rank
unless
unnecessary
achieving
attainment
downwind
state
reductions
unnecessary
downwind
attainment
anywhere
fall
outside
agency
statutory
second
epa
statutory
duty
avoid
agency
also
statutory
obligation
avoid
maximize
achievement
attainment
downwind
reasons
earlier
explained
see
supra
degree
imprecision
inevitable
tackling
problem
interstate
air
pollution
slight
changes
wind
patterns
energy
consumption
example
may
vary
downwind
air
quality
ways
epa
might
anticipated
good
neighbor
provision
requires
epa
seek
downwind
attainment
naaqs
notwithstanding
uncertainties
hence
amount
emission
budgets
turn
demanding
necessary
surprising
required
balance
possibilities
epa
must
leeway
fulfilling
statutory
mandate
finally
voluminous
record
involving
thousands
linkages
respondents
point
instances
unnecessary
emission
reductions
even
contested
epa
compare
brief
industry
respondents
reply
brief
federal
petitioners
epa
part
offers
data
contested
respondents
purporting
show
upwind
required
limit
emissions
threshold
significance
compare
brief
federal
petitioners
brief
industry
respondents
upwind
state
concludes
forced
regulate
emissions
threshold
beyond
point
necessary
bring
downwind
attainment
state
may
bring
particularized
challenge
transport
rule
along
challenges
may
cf
babbitt
sweet
home
chapter
communities
great
approving
agency
reasonable
interpretation
statute
despite
possibility
improper
applications
american
hospital
assn
nlrb
rejecting
facial
challenge
national
labor
relations
board
rule
despite
possible
arbitrary
applications
satisfied
epa
methodology
face
arbitrary
capricious
manifestly
contrary
statute
chevron
uphold
transport
rule
possibility
rule
uncommon
particular
applications
might
exceed
epa
statutory
authority
warrant
judicial
condemnation
rule
entirety
sum
hold
caa
command
given
second
opportunity
file
sip
epa
quantified
state
interstate
pollution
obligations
conclude
good
neighbor
provision
require
epa
disregard
costs
consider
exclusively
upwind
state
physically
proportionate
responsibility
downwind
air
quality
problem
epa
allocation
emission
reductions
among
upwind
hold
permissible
workable
equitable
interpretation
good
neighbor
provision
reasons
stated
judgment
appeals
circuit
reversed
cases
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
justice
alito
took
part
consideration
decision
cases
scalia
dissenting
nos
et
al
et
al
et
et
al
writs
certiorari
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
april
justice
scalia
justice
thomas
joins
dissenting
many
important
decisions
federal
government
made
nowadays
unelected
agency
officials
exercising
broad
lawmaking
authority
rather
people
representatives
congress
statute
involved
present
cases
however
congress
right
specified
quite
precisely
responsibility
upwind
state
good
neighbor
provision
eliminate
amounts
pollutants
contributes
downwind
problem
areas
environmental
protection
agency
unsatisfied
system
agency
personnel
perhaps
correctly
thought
efficient
require
reductions
proportion
amounts
pollutants
upwind
state
responsible
basis
decrease
emissions
today
majority
approves
undemocratic
revision
clean
air
act
agency
came
forward
textual
justification
action
relying
farfetched
meaning
word
significantly
statutory
text
justification
feeble
today
majority
even
recite
much
less
defend
majority
reaches
result
look
hands
without
benefit
text
claiming
identified
remarkable
gap
statute
proceeds
fill
contrary
plain
logic
statute
analysis
pretended
textual
justification
simply
extends
analysis
beyond
scope
alleged
gap
additionally
majority
relieves
epa
obligation
announce
novel
interpretations
good
neighbor
provision
must
submit
plans
required
comply
interpretations
according
primacy
deciding
attain
governing
standards
clean
air
act
pregnant
obligation
agency
set
standards
expected
achieve
majority
nonetheless
approves
epa
promulgation
federal
plans
implementing
benchmarks
conceivably
met
benchmarks
affirm
judgment
circuit
epa
violated
law
crafting
transport
rule
implementing
transport
rule
axiomatic
administrative
agency
power
promulgate
legislative
regulations
limited
authority
delegated
congress
bowen
georgetown
univ
hospital
yet
today
majority
treats
text
clean
air
act
source
ceiling
epa
authority
regulate
interstate
air
pollution
rather
difficulty
overcome
pursuit
agency
responsibility
craf
solution
problem
interstate
air
pollution
ante
reality
congress
crafted
solution
good
neighbor
provision
requires
state
eliminate
whatever
amounts
air
pollutant
contribute
significantly
nonattainment
interfere
maintenance
national
ambient
standards
naaqs
statute
addresses
solely
environmental
consequences
emissions
facility
reducing
requires
shoulder
burdens
proportion
size
contributions
proportion
ease
bearing
epa
utterly
fanciful
according
ability
construction
sacrifices
democratically
adopted
text
bureaucratically
favored
policy
deserves
deference
chevron
natural
resources
defense
council
alleged
textual
support
significantly
government
argument
asserted
textual
support
approach
adopted
epa
transport
rule
ambiguity
word
significantly
statutory
requirement
state
eliminate
amounts
pollutants
contribute
significantly
nonattainment
downwind
emphasis
added
described
government
briefing
term
ambiguous
epa
may
permissibly
determine
amount
state
contribution
reference
amount
emissions
reductions
achievable
application
highly
controls
reply
brief
federal
petitioners
emphasis
added
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
government
stated
oral
argument
terms
language
significantly
epa
reasonably
construed
term
include
component
difficulty
achievement
cost
common
parlance
might
say
dunking
basketball
significant
achievement
somebody
feet
somebody
feet
tr
oral
arg
emphasis
added
course
statute
focus
whether
upwind
state
achieved
significantly
asks
whether
state
contributed
significantly
downwind
pollution
provision
addresses
physical
effects
physical
causes
magnitude
relationship
sufficient
trigger
regulation
admits
vagueness
stated
differently
statute
ambiguous
much
contribution
downwind
pollution
significant
ambiguous
whether
factors
unrelated
amounts
pollutants
make
contribution
affect
analysis
matter
whether
word
ambiguous
agency
interpreted
mean
home
concrete
supply
llc
scalia
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
slip
matter
whether
phrase
amounts
contribute
significantly
downwind
naaqs
nonattainment
ambiguous
epa
interpreted
mean
amounts
inexpensive
eliminate
extraordinary
congress
use
single
word
significantly
transmogrify
statute
assigns
responsibility
basis
amounts
pollutants
emitted
statute
authorizing
epa
reduce
interstate
pollution
manner
believes
efficient
repeatedly
said
congress
alter
fundamental
details
regulatory
scheme
vague
terms
ancillary
provisions
one
might
say
hide
elephants
mouseholes
whitman
american
trucking
citing
mci
telecommunications
american
telephone
telegraph
fda
brown
williamson
tobacco
statute
history
demonstrates
significantly
code
feel
free
consider
compliance
costs
previous
version
good
neighbor
provision
required
state
prohibit
emissions
prevent
attainment
maintenance
state
naaqs
stat
emphasis
added
evident
current
reformulation
targeting
air
pollutant
amounts
contribute
significantly
nonattainment
interfere
maintenance
state
respect
naaqs
meant
simply
eliminate
implication
polluting
state
rather
merely
contributing
cause
downwind
nonattainment
maintenance
problem
allow
cost
concerns
creep
back
door
another
respect
also
epa
reliance
upon
word
significantly
plainly
mistaken
good
neighbor
provision
targets
elimination
emissions
contribute
significantly
nonattainment
naaqs
state
also
interfere
maintenance
naaqs
state
significantly
absent
latter
phrase
epa
provide
textual
justification
conclusion
amounts
pollutant
travel
downwind
single
area
state
emissions
said
interfere
maintenance
naaqs
cheaper
eliminate
yet
epa
proposes
use
according
ability
approach
nonattainment
areas
maintenance
areas
credit
majority
allude
much
less
try
defend
government
significantly
argument
serious
downside
significantly
called
service
counter
criterion
responsibility
plainly
provided
statute
text
amounts
pollutants
contributed
downwind
problem
areas
see
brief
federal
petitioners
forsworn
reliance
significantly
convert
responsibility
amounts
pollutants
responsibility
easy
reduction
pollutants
majority
impaled
upon
statutory
text
alleged
gap
fill
void
created
abandonment
epa
significantly
argument
majority
identifies
gap
text
epa
must
fill
text
says
upwind
state
must
responsible
contribution
downwind
pollution
say
responsibility
divided
among
multiple
total
combined
contribution
downwind
pollution
particular
area
exceeds
reduction
relevant
naaqs
requires
example
given
majority
ante
three
upwind
contributes
units
pollutant
downwind
state
reduction
required
state
comply
naaqs
units
responsibility
units
apportioned
wow
hard
one
almost
equivalent
asking
buried
grant
tomb
criterion
responsibility
amounts
pollutants
surely
shared
responsibility
must
based
upon
relative
amounts
pollutants
majority
example
units
state
statute
makes
sense
otherwise
good
neighbor
provision
contains
gap
blind
obvious
order
pursue
preferred
policy
majority
bring
analysis
fill
gap
really
exist
filled
gap
extends
principle
situations
beyond
imaginary
gap
situations
apportionment
required
even
upwind
state
contributes
pollutants
single
downwind
state
annual
emissions
budget
based
upon
amounts
pollutants
contributes
upon
pollution
controls
available
chosen
cost
thresholds
ante
epa
justification
implausible
notion
significantly
imports
cost
concerns
provision
majority
abandoned
absurdity
left
deal
situation
defense
even
imaginary
gap
statutory
text
majority
criticisms
proportional
reduction
impossibility
majority
contends
approach
scarcely
satisfied
practice
appears
work
neither
mathematically
practical
application
ante
essence
approach
impossible
application
true
know
legal
authority
democratic
principle
derive
consequence
epa
rewrite
statute
rather
consequence
statute
inoperative
sometimes
statutes
rule
canon
interpretation
make
effective
applicable
situations
fact
purport
govern
cases
statute
must
simply
fail
pound
jurisprudence
omitted
words
impossibility
argument
independent
force
relevant
majority
textual
interpretation
permissible
event
argument
wrong
impossibility
theorem
rests
upon
following
scenario
imagine
contribute
air
pollution
state
ratio
one
five
ante
suppose
also
contribute
pollutants
second
downwind
state
state
time
ratio
seven
one
ibid
majority
concludes
appeals
proportionality
edict
respect
state
state
appears
work
neither
mathematically
practical
application
ibid
majority
model
relies
two
faulty
premises
one
oversimplification
misapprehension
first
majority
formulation
suggests
epa
measures
comparative
downwind
drift
pollutants
proportions
reality
however
epa
assesses
quantities
physical
units
proportions
majority
illustration
ratio
describing
relative
contributions
state
pollution
might
mean
example
responsible
unit
pollutant
naaqs
responsible
unit
second
example
assuming
ratio
underlying
state
contributions
state
pollution
might
mean
state
supplies
unit
pollutant
naaqs
state
unit
approach
state
required
eliminate
emissions
pollutant
whatever
minimum
amount
reduces
state
level
unit
state
unit
state
turn
required
curtail
emissions
whatever
minimum
amount
decreases
state
measure
unit
state
unit
majority
objects
reductions
state
must
make
help
bring
state
compliance
may
necessary
help
bring
state
compliance
resulting
respect
see
ante
objection
discloses
second
flaw
impossibility
theorem
echoing
epa
see
brief
federal
petitioners
majority
believes
circuit
interpretation
good
neighbor
provision
forbids
respect
even
single
downwind
receptor
way
approach
deemed
work
neither
mathematically
practical
application
face
ante
premise
incorrect
although
circuit
simplified
examples
might
support
conclusion
opinion
explicitly
acknowledged
complexity
conditions
demands
contrary
sure
may
truly
unavoidable
downwind
occurs
byproduct
necessity
reducing
upwind
emissions
enough
meet
naaqs
downwind
moreover
majority
recognizes
good
neighbor
provision
categorically
prohibit
good
neighbor
provision
seeks
attainment
every
downwind
state
exceeding
attainment
one
state
rank
unless
unnecessary
achieving
attainment
downwind
state
ante
majority
apparently
fails
appreciate
cleared
potential
point
confusion
nothing
stands
way
approach
majority
relies
epa
document
preceding
transport
rule
establish
agency
supposed
belief
approach
scarcely
satisfied
practice
ante
document
says
thing
rather
shows
agency
rejected
air
methodology
impossible
application
failed
account
costs
see
app
etc
cadc
pp
document
labels
technical
difficulty
impossibility
fact
upwind
contribute
multiple
downwind
receptors
multiple
different
reduction
percentage
one
clean
air
act
full
technical
difficulties
one
overcome
requiring
state
make
greatest
reduction
necessary
respect
downwind
area
apparently
conceding
approach
may
impossible
application
majority
alternatively
asserts
cause
costly
overregulation
unnecessary
indeed
conflict
good
neighbor
provision
goal
attainment
ante
assertion
massive
overregulation
assumes
vast
number
downwind
accidental
beneficiaries
collateral
pollution
reductions
nontargeted
reductions
occur
consequence
required
reductions
targeted
neighboring
downwind
collateral
pollution
reduction
opposite
collateral
damage
speak
majority
contends
collateral
pollution
reductions
enjoyed
downwind
state
cause
required
upwind
reductions
actually
targeting
state
exceed
level
necessary
assure
attainment
maintenance
thus
producing
unnecessary
reason
believe
problem
extensive
thus
costly
majority
alleges
majority
provides
none
never
mind
suffices
say
likely
occur
required
reductions
apportioned
among
upwind
basis
amounts
pollutants
contributed
apportioned
basis
cost
conceivable
reason
bear
brunt
majority
epa
approach
less
likely
bear
brunt
statute
approach
indeed
epa
never
attempted
establish
transport
rule
produce
gross
see
causes
problem
manner
apportioning
required
reductions
composite
volume
required
reductions
downwind
state
majority
approach
reduces
admittedly
entirely
eliminate
epa
applies
principle
determining
proportions
required
reductions
upwind
state
must
bear
determining
volume
required
reductions
see
supra
case
solution
system
difficult
discern
calculating
responsibilities
epa
simply
required
make
allowance
called
collateral
pollution
reductions
agency
set
upwind
obligations
levels
taking
account
reductions
suffice
produce
attainment
downwind
doubtless
multiple
ways
agency
accomplish
task
accordance
statute
proportional
majority
invokes
unexplained
device
prevent
uncommon
particular
applications
scheme
ante
whatever
device
serve
well
prevent
approach
outlined
fully
acknowledge
approach
demand
complicated
computations
one
upwind
state
linked
multiple
downwind
vice
versa
confident
however
epa
skilled
adhere
statute
quantitative
rather
efficiency
mandate
crafting
quantitative
solutions
indeed
calculations
performed
desk
whereas
according
ability
approach
requires
unwieldy
field
examination
many
sources
many
sorts
equipment
plus
ça
change
epa
continuing
quest
authority
majority
agrees
epa
assessment
sing
costs
transport
rule
calculus
makes
good
sense
ante
opinion
declares
liminating
amounts
reduced
efficient
equitable
solution
allocation
problem
good
neighbor
provision
requires
agency
address
ibid
efficient
probably
equitable
perhaps
perhaps
see
brief
industry
respondents
point
whether
efficiency
dominant
subordinate
role
epa
determine
first
time
epa
sought
convert
clean
air
act
mandate
regulation
whitman
american
trucking
confronted
epa
contention
consider
costs
setting
naaqs
provision
issue
like
one
expressly
bar
decisionmaking
unlike
one
even
contained
words
arguably
ambiguous
relevant
respect
specifically
instructed
epa
set
primary
naaqs
attainment
maintenance
requisite
protect
public
health
adequate
margin
safety
one
hardly
overstate
capaciousness
word
adequate
phrase
public
health
least
equally
susceptible
indeed
much
susceptible
permitting
analysis
word
significantly
respondents
american
trucking
argued
setting
naaqs
without
considering
costs
may
bring
failing
industries
fewer
jobs
turn
may
produce
poorer
less
healthy
citizens
see
concluded
context
entire
provision
interpretation
de
sense
ibid
quoted
earlier
said
congress
alter
fundamental
details
regulatory
scheme
vague
terms
ancillary
provisions
hide
elephants
mouseholes
american
trucking
refused
find
implicit
ambiguous
sections
clear
air
act
authorization
consider
costs
elsewhere
often
expressly
granted
citing
tradition
dating
back
union
elec
epa
indeed
numerous
clean
air
act
provisions
explicitly
permitting
costs
taken
account
see
american
trucking
thus
demanded
textual
commitment
authority
epa
consider
costs
hurdle
good
neighbor
provision
comes
nowhere
close
clearing
today
opinion
turns
back
upon
case
incompatible
ii
imposition
federal
implementation
plans
circuit
vacated
transport
rule
additional
reason
epa
took
reins
allocating
emissions
budgets
among
sources
federal
implementation
plans
fips
without
first
providing
meaningful
opportunity
perform
task
state
implementation
plans
sips
majority
rejects
ruling
ground
act
require
epa
furnish
upwind
information
kind
good
neighbor
obligations
fip
issues
ante
othing
statute
majority
says
places
epa
obligation
provide
specific
metrics
undertake
fulfill
good
neighbor
obligations
ante
remarkably
expansive
reasoning
makes
hash
clean
air
act
transforming
program
based
cooperative
federalism
one
centralized
federal
control
nothing
good
neighbor
provision
suggests
stark
departure
act
fundamental
structure
implications
state
regulatory
primacy
core
clean
air
act
sets
forth
regulatory
strategy
act
begins
declaring
air
pollution
prevention
reduction
elimination
measures
amount
pollutants
produced
created
source
air
pollution
control
source
primary
responsibility
local
governments
emphasis
added
state
primacy
permeates
title
addresses
promulgation
implementation
naaqs
particular
epa
must
promulgate
naaqs
pollutant
criteria
issued
pursuant
section
turn
requires
state
usually
within
three
years
new
revised
naaqs
submit
sip
providing
implementation
maintenance
enforcement
epa
may
step
take
responsibility
state
discharges
inadequately
specifically
agency
finds
state
failed
make
required
complete
submission
disapproves
sip
shall
promulgate
fip
time
within
years
unless
state
corrects
deficiency
epa
approves
sip
sip
revision
describe
effect
statutory
scheme
simple
terms
epa
sets
numerical
benchmarks
congress
plainly
left
power
determine
sources
burdened
regulation
extent
union
elec
present
chosen
means
achieving
epa
benchmarks
sips
sip
fails
meet
goals
may
agency
commandeer
state
authority
promulgating
fip
long
ultimate
effect
state
choice
emission
limitations
compliance
naaqs
state
liberty
adopt
whatever
mix
emission
limitations
deems
best
suited
particular
situation
train
natural
resources
defense
council
epa
emphasized
relegated
act
secondary
role
process
determining
enforcing
specific
emission
limitations
necessary
naaqs
met
ibid
good
neighbor
provision
one
requirements
sips
must
comply
statutory
structure
described
plainly
demands
epa
afford
meaningful
opportunity
allocate
reduction
responsibilities
among
sources
within
borders
majority
holds
epa
may
effect
force
guess
responsibilities
might
requiring
submit
sips
learning
agency
regards
significan
contribution
consequence
losing
regulatory
primacy
guess
wrong
epa
asserts
circuit
wrong
factual
matter
reasoning
feasibly
implement
good
neighbor
provision
without
knowing
agency
considers
obligations
brief
federal
petitioners
literally
unbelievable
support
epa
muster
assertions
routinely
undertake
technically
complex
air
quality
determinations
emissions
information
publicly
available
ibid
respondents
rightly
state
scientific
knowledge
world
useless
left
guess
way
epa
might
ultimately
quantify
ce
brief
state
respondents
call
punish
ing
failing
meet
standard
epa
yet
announced
yet
know
asking
hit
target
epa
defines
requiring
take
stab
dark
set
ting
fail
call
hid
ing
ball
brief
state
respondents
shell
game
call
pin
tail
donkey
tr
oral
arg
recently
explained
one
thing
expect
regulated
parties
conform
conduct
agency
interpretations
agency
announces
quite
another
require
regulated
parties
divine
agency
interpretations
advance
else
held
liable
agency
announces
interpretations
first
time
demands
deference
christopher
smithkline
beecham
slip
principle
applies
fortiori
regulatory
regime
rests
principles
cooperative
federalism
past
epa
practice
epa
long
acknowledged
proposition
nonsensical
expect
comply
good
neighbor
provision
absent
direction
constitutes
significan
contribution
interstate
pollution
agency
consistently
adopted
position
prior
transport
rule
issued
nox
sip
call
epa
acknowledged
ithout
determining
acceptable
level
nox
reductions
upwind
state
guidance
acceptable
submission
fed
reg
epa
deemed
efficient
indeed
necessary
federal
government
establish
overall
emissions
levels
various
ibid
accordingly
agency
quantified
responsibilities
allowed
year
submit
sips
implement
similarly
epa
issued
clean
air
interstate
rule
cair
explicitly
recognize
face
great
difficulties
developing
transport
sips
meet
requirements
today
action
without
th
data
policies
provided
rule
including
judgments
epa
concerning
appropriate
criteria
determining
whether
upwind
sources
contribute
significantly
downwind
nonattainment
agency
thus
gave
months
submit
sips
implementing
new
responsibilities
see
although
epa
published
fips
window
closed
specified
meant
serve
federal
backstop
become
effective
unless
necessary
year
cair
sip
submission
deadline
even
since
promulgating
transport
rule
epa
repeatedly
reaffirmed
expected
read
agency
mind
proceedings
epa
time
stated
although
ome
elements
process
relatively
straightforward
others
clearly
require
interpretation
epa
rulemaking
recommendations
guidance
order
give
specific
meaning
particular
naaqs
example
latter
agency
remarked
good
neighbor
provision
contains
numerous
terms
require
substantial
rulemaking
epa
order
determine
basic
points
constitutes
significant
contribution
citing
cair
fact
epa
repeated
precise
statements
twice
times
following
promulgation
transport
notwithstanding
parties
may
argued
litigation
many
years
ago
beyond
responsible
debate
possibly
design
sips
without
knowing
targets
must
aim
epa
insists
enjoys
significant
discretion
indeed
consider
essentially
whatever
factors
wishes
determine
constitutes
significan
contribution
interstate
pollution
simultaneously
asserts
know
quantities
choose
agency
majority
ways
abuse
discretion
majority
attempts
place
blame
hollowing
core
clean
air
act
act
plain
text
ante
first
textual
element
refers
requirement
epa
disapproved
sip
shall
promulgate
fip
time
within
years
say
agency
discretion
whether
act
defer
action
later
point
period
also
discretion
work
within
prescribed
timetable
respect
rightful
role
statutory
scheme
delaying
issuance
enforcement
fips
pending
resubmission
approval
sips
epa
conduct
surrounding
cair
clearly
demonstrates
assumes
agency
insists
disapproving
sips
promulgating
applicable
standards
though
fact
epa
discretion
publicize
metrics
window
submit
sips
closes
first
place
majority
agency
retained
discretion
alter
course
one
pursued
nox
sip
call
cair
ante
misses
point
point
epa
discretion
arrange
things
preserve
clean
air
act
core
principle
state
primacy
abuse
discretion
refuse
see
see
also
identical
text
administrative
procedure
act
indeed
proviso
agency
authority
promulgate
fip
within
period
terminates
state
corrects
deficiency
epa
approves
sip
sip
revision
explicitly
contemplates
majority
conception
administrative
discretion
sprawling
allow
epa
subvert
state
primacy
respect
concerns
good
neighbor
provision
respect
much
broader
concerns
naaqs
program
generally
must
submit
sips
within
years
new
revised
naaqs
shorter
period
epa
may
prescribe
emphasis
added
principled
reason
read
scheduling
provision
less
malleable
manner
one
issue
majority
view
epa
demand
submit
sips
within
matter
days
even
hours
naaqs
publication
else
face
immediate
imposition
fips
second
element
plain
text
majority
relies
small
beer
indeed
good
neighbor
provision
expressly
state
epa
must
publish
target
quantities
required
submit
sips
even
though
clean
air
act
naaqs
generally
vehicle
inspection
maintenance
programs
see
premise
majority
reasons
ad
congress
intended
similarly
defer
discharge
obligations
good
neighbor
provision
congress
included
similar
direction
section
ante
perhaps
epa
read
statute
differently
declared
nox
sip
call
etermining
overall
level
air
pollutants
allowed
emitted
state
comparable
determining
naaqs
courts
recognized
epa
responsibility
distinguishable
determining
particular
mix
controls
among
individual
sources
attain
standards
caselaw
identifies
state
responsibility
fed
reg
emphasis
added
negative
implication
suggested
statute
failure
use
consistent
terminology
helpful
guide
determining
meaning
especially
provisions
question
enacted
time
case
interpretive
canon
like
others
one
clue
aid
construction
overcome
powerful
indications
meaning
elsewhere
statute
said
rule
thumb
tip
scales
statute
read
multiple
ways
sebelius
auburn
regional
medical
center
slip
internal
quotation
marks
brackets
omitted
clean
air
act
simply
read
make
epa
primary
regulator
context
canon
easily
overcome
statute
structure
mention
sheer
impossibility
submitting
sensible
sip
without
epa
guidance
negative
implication
tiniest
mousehole
majority
discovers
elephant
federal
control
addressing
problem
interstate
pollution
manner
congress
prescribed
manner
matter
complex
difficult
enterprise
egardless
serious
problem
administrative
agency
seeks
address
may
exercise
authority
manner
inconsistent
administrative
structure
congress
enacted
law
brown
williamson
quoting
etsi
pipeline
project
missouri
majority
approval
epa
approach
clean
air
act
violates
foundational
principle
popular
government
dissent
footnotes
together
american
lung
association
et
al
eme
homer
city
generation
et
also
certiorari
footnotes
rule
challenged
epa
evaluated
separate
linkages
downwind
upwind
brief
federal
petitioners
fips
sips
introduced
version
act
particular
deadlines
discussed
added
see
stat
respect
naaqs
addressed
rule
threshold
corresponded
levels
micrograms
per
cubic
meter
annual
daily
parts
per
billion
ppb
ozone
see
fed
reg
example
naaqs
ozone
ppb
contribution
less
ppb
downwind
location
fall
outside
epa
criteria
significance
illustrate
technology
priced
capable
eliminating
two
tons
pollution
stated
cost
per
ton
epa
modeled
reductions
achieved
cost
levels
per
ton
eliminated
see
epa
determined
one
group
upwind
downwind
air
quality
problems
resolved
per
ton
threshold
see
another
group
however
level
controls
suffice
epa
found
pollution
controls
costing
per
ton
necessary
see
example
pollution
sources
within
texas
permitted
emit
tons
subject
variations
specified
epa
see
table
similarly
upwind
epa
independently
determined
interfer
ing
maintenance
naaqs
downwind
required
eliminate
pollution
extent
emissions
satisfied
criteria
see
fips
specified
maximum
amount
pollution
pollution
source
emit
sources
ceiling
sell
unused
allocations
sources
reduce
emissions
necessary
level
cheaply
see
type
system
cuts
costs
still
reducing
pollution
target
levels
three
challenge
epa
determinations
see
petition
review
ohio
epa
petition
review
kansas
epa
cadc
notice
georgia
epa
cadc
challenges
consolidated
proceeding
remain
pending
held
abeyance
cases
sixth
circuits
see
twelfth
joint
status
report
ohio
epa
order
kansas
epa
cadc
may
order
georgia
epa
cadc
may
state
respondents
make
second
argument
reach
urge
epa
impose
fips
several
upwind
whose
sips
previously
approved
agency
cair
epa
changed
approvals
disapprovals
issued
transport
rule
see
fed
reg
assert
process
epa
improper
argument
passed
circuit
see
leave
appeals
consider
first
instance
remand
point
dissent
argues
beyond
responsible
debate
possibly
design
sips
without
knowing
targets
must
aim
post
many
state
respondents
thought
otherwise
however
litigating
matter
michigan
epa
cadc
see
final
brief
petitioning
cadc
epa
responsibility
establish
naaqs
without
intervention
epa
duty
right
develop
sips
meet
see
also
epa
role
determine
whether
sip
submitted
dictate
contents
submittal
first
instance
ach
state
right
obligation
write
sip
complies
including
neighbor
light
caa
core
principle
cooperative
federalism
dissent
believes
epa
abused
discretion
failing
give
additional
opportunity
submit
sips
satisfaction
good
neighbor
provision
post
nothing
statute
restricts
epa
contrary
earlier
observed
see
supra
plain
text
caa
grants
epa
plenary
authority
issue
fip
time
within
period
begins
moment
epa
determines
sip
inadequate
emphasis
added
though
speak
epa
task
good
neighbor
provision
initially
directed
upwind
earlier
explained
see
part
supra
state
failed
propose
sip
adequate
compliance
provision
epa
called
upon
act
uncertainties
inherent
measuring
interstate
air
pollution
see
supra
reductions
exactly
ppb
likely
unattainable
see
infra
simplicity
sake
hypothetical
assumes
epa
required
emission
reductions
downwind
state
statutory
gap
identified
also
exists
good
neighbor
provision
second
instruction
instruction
requires
epa
eliminate
amounts
upwind
pollution
interfere
maintenance
naaqs
downwind
state
mandate
contains
qualifier
analogous
significantly
yet
entails
delegation
administrative
authority
character
one
discussed
epa
constrained
first
part
good
neighbor
provision
eliminate
amounts
contribute
nonattainment
epa
limited
second
part
provision
reduce
amounts
interfere
maintenance
enough
permit
state
maintain
satisfactory
air
quality
emphasis
added
multiple
upwind
contributing
maintenance
problem
however
epa
confronts
challenge
contribute
significantly
mandate
creates
epa
allocate
reductions
among
multiple
upwind
many
contribute
amounts
sufficient
impede
downwind
maintenance
nothing
either
clause
good
neighbor
provision
provides
criteria
epa
meant
apportion
responsibility
see
one
need
slightly
complicate
world
envisioned
dissent
assume
world
made
four
two
upwind
two
downwind
suppose
also
dissent
allows
see
post
reductions
state
must
make
eliminate
share
amount
state
nonattainment
necessary
state
eliminate
share
state
nonattainment
later
explained
see
infra
kind
agree
dissent
acceptable
statute
suppose
however
state
also
contributes
pollution
state
state
reductions
must
make
eliminate
proportion
state
overage
exceed
reductions
must
make
bring
state
attainment
case
dissent
state
reduce
enough
eliminate
share
state
nonattainment
enough
eliminate
share
state
overage
converse
true
state
dissent
approach
state
reduce
minimum
necessary
eliminate
proportional
share
state
nonattainment
enough
eliminate
proportion
state
overage
result
total
amount
required
reduce
exceed
necessary
attainment
downwind
involved
state
state
thus
unnecessary
achieving
attainment
involved
impermissible
good
neighbor
provision
see
infra
problem
worsen
hypothetical
altered
include
two
downwind
two
upwind
real
circumstances
epa
must
address
dissent
approach
similarly
infirm
toll
upwind
already
invested
heavily
means
reduce
pollution
industries
cause
lightening
burden
done
relatively
less
control
pollution
emanating
local
enterprises
dissent
see
post
relies
heavily
decision
whitman
american
trucking
whitman
held
relevant
text
caa
unambiguously
bars
epa
considering
costs
determining
naaqs
section
commands
epa
set
naaqs
levels
requisite
protect
public
health
adequate
margin
safety
mandate
observed
whitman
absolute
precluded
consideration
cost
naaqs
calculation
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
good
neighbor
provision
grants
epa
discretion
eliminate
amounts
pollution
contribute
significantly
nonattainment
downwind
particular
amounts
qualify
elimination
statute
silent
unlike
provision
issue
whitman
provides
express
criteria
epa
set
naaqs
good
neighbor
provision
earlier
explained
fails
provide
metric
epa
differentiate
among
contributions
multiple
upwind
see
supra
following
example
based
record
offered
brief
respondent
calpine
et
al
support
petitioners
ohio
west
virginia
pennsylvania
indiana
contribute
varying
amounts
five
different
nonattainment
areas
three
downwind
implementation
transport
rule
epa
modeling
demonstrates
bring
three
five
areas
attainment
comfortable
margin
fourth
barely
see
fig
fifth
downwind
receptor
however
still
fall
short
attainment
despite
reductions
rule
requires
see
ibid
epa
lower
emission
reductions
required
upwind
reduce
first
three
areas
area
barely
achieving
attainment
longer
area
still
nonattainment
fall
even
behind
thus
first
three
downwind
receptors
essential
attainment
achieved
fourth
fifth
progress
toward
goal
dissent
suggests
qualification
term
tantamount
admission
nothing
stands
way
approach
post
permitting
one
state
purpose
achieving
attainment
another
furthers
stated
goal
good
neighbor
provision
attainment
naaqs
contrast
scheme
neither
necessary
achieve
downwind
attainment
mandated
terms
statute
earlier
discussed
see
supra
permitting
purpose
achieving
proportionality
thus
contravene
clear
limits
statute
places
epa
good
neighbor
authority
eliminate
amounts
upwind
pollutants
essential
achieving
attainment
downwind
footnotes
agree
majority
analysis
turning
aside
epa
threshold
objections
judicial
review
see
ante
majority
insists
proportionality
one
ways
ante
easy
imagine
precluding
unnecessary
reducing
manner
burdens
upwind
state
linked
given
downwind
area
retain
proportionality
produced
approach
majority
shrugs
american
trucking
reasoning
characterized
provision
question
absolute
nothing
say
good
neighbor
provision
absolute
see
ante
textbook
example
begging
question
since
good
neighbor
provision
absolute
point
issue
american
trucking
dealt
provision
absolute
irrelevant
contrary
american
trucking
right
point
described
text
provision
issue
even
categorical
absolute
provision
issue
american
trucking
addition
citations
text
see
fed
reg
unimpressed
way
explanation
majority
accepts
epa
circuit
admonished
act
dispatch
amending
replacing
cair
ante
citing
north
carolina
epa
per
curiam
courts
appeals
raised
eyebrows
wagging
fingers
law
least
urge
agency
take
ultra
vires
action
encouragement
act
illegally
qualify
good
reaso
agency
alteration
course
fcc
fox
television
stations