dillon
argued
march
decided
june
petitioner
dillon
convicted
inter
alia
crack
powder
cocaine
offenses
produced
base
offense
level
guidelines
range
months
imprisonment
sentenced
bottom
range
counts
sentencing
commission
amended
guidelines
reduce
base
offense
level
associated
quantity
crack
cocaine
ussg
supp
app
amdt
made
amendment
retroactive
ussg
supp
app
amdt
dillon
moved
sentence
reduction
provision
authorizes
district
reduce
otherwise
final
sentence
pursuant
guidelines
amendment
reduction
consistent
commission
policy
statements
relevant
policy
statement
ussg
precludes
reducing
sentence
term
less
minimum
amended
guidelines
range
except
limited
circumstances
addition
reduction
authorized
amendment
dillon
sought
variance
amended
guidelines
range
contending
booker
authorized
exercise
discretion
district
imposed
sentence
bottom
revised
range
declined
grant
reduction
finding
booker
inapplicable
proceedings
concluded
commission
directives
constrained
impose
sentence
within
amended
guidelines
range
third
circuit
affirmed
held
booker
holdings
apply
proceedings
therefore
require
treating
advisory
pp
statute
text
narrow
scope
belie
dillon
characterization
proceedings
resentencing
proceedings
governed
principles
sentencing
proceedings
instead
authorizes
limited
adjustment
otherwise
final
sentence
conclusion
supported
substantial
role
congress
gave
commission
respect
proceedings
charging
determining
whether
extent
guidelines
amendment
retroactive
authorizing
grant
reduction
consistent
applicable
policy
statements
issued
sentencing
commission
section
establishes
inquiry
must
determine
scope
reduction
authorized
consider
whether
authorized
reduction
warranted
according
applicable
factors
step
one
must
follow
commission
instructions
impose
term
imprisonment
within
amended
guidelines
range
unless
sentencing
originally
imposed
sentence
reference
appropriate
step
two
provision
transform
proceedings
plenary
resentencing
proceedings
pp
given
limited
scope
purpose
proceedings
section
implicate
booker
section
represents
congressional
act
lenity
intended
give
prisoners
benefit
later
enacted
adjustments
judgments
reflected
guidelines
taking
original
sentence
given
facts
found
judge
proceeding
serve
increase
prescribed
range
punishment
instead
affect
judge
exercise
discretion
within
range
exercise
contravene
sixth
amendment
even
informed
facts
apprendi
new
jersey
thus
dillon
sixth
amendment
rights
violated
district
adherence
instruction
consider
reduction
within
amended
guidelines
range
dillon
argument
booker
remedial
opinion
nonetheless
requires
guidelines
treated
advisory
proceedings
unpersuasive
given
proceedings
readily
distinguishable
sentencing
proceedings
pp
also
rejected
dillon
argument
district
corrected
mistakes
original
sentence
namely
booker
error
resulting
initial
sentencing
treatment
guidelines
mandatory
alleged
error
calculation
category
aspects
dillon
sentence
affected
guidelines
amendment
outside
scope
proceeding
district
properly
declined
address
pp
affirmed
sotomayor
delivered
opinion
roberts
scalia
kennedy
thomas
ginsburg
breyer
joined
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
alito
took
part
decision
case
percy
dillon
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
third
circuit
june
justice
sotomayor
delivered
opinion
federal
generally
may
modify
term
imprisonment
imposed
congress
provided
exception
rule
case
defendant
sentenced
term
imprisonment
based
sentencing
range
subsequently
lowered
sentencing
commission
circumstances
authorizes
reduce
term
imprisonment
reduction
consistent
applicable
commission
policy
statements
policy
statement
governing
proceedings
instructs
courts
reduce
term
imprisonment
minimum
amended
sentencing
range
except
extent
original
term
imprisonment
range
applicable
see
sentencing
commission
guidelines
manual
ussg
case
presents
question
whether
decision
booker
rendered
guidelines
advisory
remedy
sixth
amendment
problems
associated
mandatory
sentencing
regime
requires
treating
nonbinding
conclude
booker
demand
result
sentencing
reform
act
sra
act
stat
established
sentencing
commission
authorized
promulgate
sentencing
guidelines
issue
policy
statements
regarding
guidelines
application
see
act
also
charged
commission
periodically
reviewing
revising
guidelines
see
revision
reduces
guidelines
range
given
offense
commission
must
determine
circumstances
amount
sentences
prisoners
serving
terms
imprisonment
offense
may
reduced
enacted
sra
made
sentencing
guidelines
binding
see
booker
except
limited
circumstances
district
courts
lacked
discretion
depart
guidelines
range
see
burns
regime
facts
found
judge
preponderance
evidence
often
increased
mandatory
guidelines
range
permitted
judge
impose
sentence
greater
supported
facts
established
jury
verdict
guilty
plea
see
booker
held
booker
treating
guidelines
mandatory
circumstances
violated
sixth
amendment
right
criminal
defendants
tried
jury
every
element
offense
proved
government
beyond
reasonable
doubt
remedy
constitutional
problem
rendered
guidelines
advisory
invalidating
two
provisions
sra
supp
iv
generally
required
sentencing
impose
sentence
within
applicable
guidelines
range
ed
supp
iv
prescribed
standard
review
appeal
including
de
novo
review
guidelines
departures
two
sections
excised
statutory
two
sections
consequently
invalidated
held
remainder
act
satisfies
constitutional
requirements
ibid
booker
thus
left
intact
provisions
sra
including
giving
commission
authority
revise
guidelines
ed
determine
extent
revision
retroactive
respect
offenses
sentencing
guidelines
establish
defendant
base
offense
level
according
type
weight
drug
see
ussg
commission
first
promulgated
guidelines
adopted
ratio
selected
congress
setting
mandatory
minimum
sentences
abuse
act
stat
framework
commission
treated
every
gram
crack
cocaine
equivalent
grams
powder
cocaine
kimbrough
commission
later
sought
alleviate
disparity
produced
ratio
several
failed
attempts
reform
see
commission
amended
guidelines
reduce
two
levels
base
offense
level
associated
quantity
crack
cocaine
see
ussg
supp
app
amdt
effective
commission
made
amendment
retroactive
see
amdt
effective
mar
commission
makes
guidelines
amendment
retroactive
authorizes
district
reduce
otherwise
final
sentence
based
amended
provision
reduction
must
consistent
applicable
policy
statements
issued
sentencing
commission
relevant
policy
statement
ussg
instructs
courts
proceeding
substitute
amended
guidelines
range
leav
ing
guideline
application
decisions
unaffected
may
grant
reduction
within
amended
guidelines
range
determines
one
warranted
considering
factors
set
forth
section
extent
applicable
except
limited
circumstances
however
forecloses
acting
reducing
sentence
term
less
minimum
amended
guideline
range
ii
jury
convicted
petitioner
percy
dillon
conspiracy
distribute
possess
intent
distribute
grams
powder
cocaine
grams
crack
cocaine
violation
possession
intent
distribute
grams
powder
cocaine
violation
use
firearm
relation
offense
violation
dillon
convictions
exposed
statutory
sentencing
range
years
life
conspiracy
years
cocaine
possession
mandatory
minimum
sentence
years
firearm
offense
served
consecutively
sentence
drug
offenses
sentencing
district
made
additional
findings
fact
concluded
dillon
responsible
kilograms
crack
kilograms
powder
cocaine
ussg
drug
quantities
produced
base
offense
level
offsetting
adjustments
acceptance
responsibility
reckless
endangerment
flight
dillon
total
offense
level
remained
coupled
category
offense
level
produced
guidelines
range
months
imprisonment
drug
counts
sentenced
dillon
bottom
guidelines
range
counts
followed
mandatory
sentence
firearm
count
total
sentence
months
imprisonment
dillon
sentencing
described
term
imprisonment
entirely
high
crime
dillon
committed
app
perceiving
basis
departing
sentencing
guidelines
district
felt
constrained
impose
sentence
within
prescribed
range
appeals
third
circuit
affirmed
dillon
convictions
sentence
appeal
see
sentencing
commission
made
amendment
guidelines
retroactive
dillon
filed
pro
se
motion
sentence
reduction
pursuant
motion
dillon
asked
grant
reduction
authorized
amendment
also
reduction
consistent
sentencing
factors
found
based
largely
postsentencing
conduct
including
determined
pursuit
educational
opportunities
dillon
contended
variance
amended
guidelines
range
warranted
case
urged
booker
authorized
grant
variance
amended
guidelines
range
advisory
notwithstanding
contrary
statement
district
reduced
dillon
sentence
months
term
bottom
revised
guidelines
declined
go
concluding
sentencing
proceedings
issue
booker
readily
distinguishable
found
booker
holdings
inapplicable
instant
proceeding
accordingly
held
lacked
authority
impose
sentence
inconsistent
third
circuit
affirmed
noted
codified
different
section
provisions
invalidated
booker
contains
provisions
finding
indication
booker
obviate
congressional
directive
sentence
reduction
pursuant
section
consistent
sentencing
commission
policy
statements
third
circuit
held
binding
therefore
agreed
district
lacked
authority
reduce
dillon
sentence
amended
guidelines
range
granted
certiorari
consider
booker
applicability
proceedings
iii
judgment
conviction
includes
sentence
imprisonment
constitutes
final
judgment
may
modified
district
except
limited
circumstances
section
establishes
exception
general
rule
finality
case
defendant
sentenced
term
imprisonment
based
sentencing
range
subsequently
lowered
sentencing
commission
pursuant
made
retroactive
pursuant
cases
congress
authorized
courts
reduce
term
imprisonment
considering
factors
set
forth
section
extent
applicable
reduction
consistent
applicable
policy
statements
issued
sentencing
commission
characterizing
proceedings
resentencing
proceedings
dillon
contends
practical
functional
difference
resentencing
pursuant
resentencing
brief
petitioner
accordingly
dillon
urges
principles
govern
sentencing
proceedings
likewise
govern
proceedings
courts
authority
vary
revised
guidelines
range
consistent
see
kimbrough
dillon
cites
support
view
instruction
consider
factors
determining
whether
sentence
reduction
warranted
dillon
approach
booker
preclude
commission
issuing
policy
statement
generally
forecloses
sentences
proceedings
ussg
purports
dillon
thus
asks
us
excise
mandatory
language
treat
provision
advisory
offending
statutory
provisions
booker
language
belies
dillon
characterization
proceedings
section
terms
authorize
sentencing
resentencing
proceeding
instead
provides
modif
ication
term
imprisonment
giving
courts
power
reduce
otherwise
final
sentence
circumstances
specified
commission
compare
referring
sentence
modification
provisio
authorizing
courts
appeals
remand
sentencing
upon
finding
error
establishing
terms
sentencing
upon
remand
describing
proceeding
resentenc
ing
capitalization
omitted
also
notable
provision
applies
limited
class
prisoners
namely
whose
sentence
based
sentencing
range
subsequently
lowered
commission
section
text
together
narrow
scope
shows
congress
intended
authorize
limited
adjustment
otherwise
final
sentence
plenary
resentencing
proceeding
substantial
role
congress
gave
commission
respect
proceedings
supports
conclusion
sra
charges
commission
deciding
whether
amend
guidelines
determining
whether
extent
amendment
retroactive
power
thus
depends
first
instance
commission
decision
amend
guidelines
make
amendment
retroactive
also
constrained
commission
statements
dictating
amount
sentence
prisoner
serving
term
imprisonment
affected
amendment
may
reduced
see
also
braxton
noting
commission
implemented
power
read
context
reference
undermine
narrow
view
proceedings
former
provision
section
instructs
district
conside
factors
set
forth
section
extent
applicable
authorizes
reduction
basis
reduction
consistent
applicable
policy
statements
issued
sentencing
commission
namely
statute
thus
establishes
inquiry
must
first
determine
reduction
consistent
may
consider
whether
authorized
reduction
warranted
either
whole
part
according
factors
set
forth
following
approach
district
proceeding
impose
new
sentence
usual
sense
step
one
requires
follow
commission
instructions
determine
prisoner
eligibility
sentence
modification
extent
reduction
authorized
specifically
requires
begin
determin
ing
amended
guideline
range
applicable
defendant
relevant
amendment
effect
time
initial
sentencing
making
determination
shall
substitute
amendments
listed
subsection
corresponding
guideline
provisions
applied
defendant
sentenced
shall
leave
guideline
application
decisions
unaffected
ibid
consistent
limited
nature
proceedings
also
confines
extent
reduction
authorized
courts
generally
may
reduce
defendant
term
imprisonment
term
less
minimum
amended
guideline
range
produced
substitution
sentencing
originally
imposed
term
imprisonment
guidelines
range
authorize
proceeding
impose
term
comparably
amended
range
step
two
inquiry
instructs
consider
applicable
factors
determine
whether
discretion
reduction
authorized
reference
policies
relevant
step
one
warranted
whole
part
particular
circumstances
case
reference
appropriate
second
step
circumscribed
inquiry
serve
transform
proceedings
plenary
resentencing
proceedings
understanding
narrow
exception
rule
finality
finds
support
outside
statute
federal
rule
criminal
procedure
requires
defendant
present
sentencing
see
rule
excludes
requirement
proceedings
involv
correction
reduction
sentence
rule
rule
like
rule
delineates
limited
set
circumstances
sentence
may
corrected
reduced
specifically
authorizes
correct
sentence
resulted
arithmetical
technical
clear
error
within
days
sentencing
rule
authorizes
reduction
substantial
assistance
government
motion
rule
rule
therefore
sets
proceedings
authorized
rule
apart
sentencing
proceedings
given
limited
scope
purpose
conclude
proceedings
section
implicate
interests
identified
booker
notably
proceedings
authorized
constitutionally
compelled
aware
constitutional
requirement
retroactivity
entitles
defendants
sentenced
term
imprisonment
benefit
subsequent
guidelines
amendments
rather
represents
congressional
act
lenity
intended
give
prisoners
benefit
later
enacted
adjustments
judgments
reflected
guidelines
viewed
way
proceedings
implicate
sixth
amendment
right
essential
facts
found
jury
beyond
reasonable
doubt
taking
original
sentence
given
facts
found
judge
proceeding
serve
increase
prescribed
range
punishment
instead
affect
judge
exercise
discretion
within
range
udges
country
long
exercised
discretion
nature
imposing
sentence
within
established
limits
individual
case
exercise
discretion
contravene
sixth
amendment
even
informed
facts
apprendi
new
jersey
emphasis
original
proceedings
give
judges
circumscribed
discretion
encroachment
judge
upon
facts
historically
found
jury
threat
jury
domain
bulwark
trial
state
accused
oregon
ice
slip
accordingly
dillon
sixth
amendment
rights
violated
district
adherence
instruction
consider
reduction
within
amended
guidelines
range
dillon
contends
even
implicate
constitutional
rights
vindicated
booker
something
dissent
appears
concede
remedial
aspect
decision
applies
proceedings
section
requires
guidelines
treated
advisory
proceedings
sentencing
proceedings
support
position
dillon
invokes
ninth
circuit
reasoning
hicks
relying
rejection
booker
remedy
made
guidelines
advisory
certain
cases
namely
treating
binding
run
afoul
sixth
amendment
see
ninth
circuit
held
booker
precludes
treating
guidelines
mandatory
purposes
advisory
contexts
see
hicks
argument
unpersuasive
incomplete
remedy
rejected
booker
required
courts
treat
guidelines
differently
similar
proceedings
leading
potentially
unfair
results
considerable
administrative
challenges
see
already
explained
proceedings
authorized
readily
distinguishable
sentencing
proceedings
given
substantially
different
purpose
circumscribed
nature
proceedings
section
requiring
courts
honor
instruction
depart
amended
guidelines
range
proceedings
create
none
confusion
unfairness
led
us
booker
reject
government
argument
partial
fix
dissent
contrary
conclusion
rests
two
erroneous
premises
first
dissent
ignores
fundamental
differences
sentencing
proceedings
asserts
without
explanation
othing
turns
distinction
post
reasons
stated
statutory
differences
proceedings
highly
significant
second
dissent
gives
short
shrift
fact
booker
commission
retains
least
authority
bind
courts
congress
charged
commission
determining
circumstances
amount
sentences
prisoners
affected
guidelines
amendments
may
reduced
one
disputes
commission
retroactivity
determinations
made
pursuant
first
part
authorization
binding
see
post
aspect
commission
power
emphatically
undermines
dissent
insistence
guidelines
booker
completely
advisory
post
moreover
dissent
criticizes
approach
leaving
commission
tiniest
sliver
lawmaking
power
post
dissent
leave
commission
even
smaller
less
explicable
sliver
dissecting
authority
granted
reasons
conclude
neither
booker
constitutional
remedial
holding
requires
result
dillon
urges
iv
dillon
additionally
contends
district
erred
failing
correct
two
mistakes
original
sentence
view
district
required
recalculate
defendant
sentence
thus
mistakes
committed
initial
sentencing
imposed
anew
corrected
according
dillon
district
instant
proceeding
corrected
booker
error
resulted
initial
sentencing
treatment
guidelines
mandatory
adjusted
category
contends
erroneously
inflated
dillon
arguments
regard
premised
misunderstanding
scope
proceedings
dispelled
noted
authorize
resentencing
instead
permits
sentence
reduction
within
narrow
bounds
established
commission
relevant
policy
statement
instructs
proceeding
shall
substitute
amended
guidelines
range
initial
range
shall
leave
guideline
application
decisions
unaffected
aspects
sentence
dillon
seeks
correct
affected
commission
amendment
outside
scope
proceeding
authorized
district
properly
declined
address
foregoing
reasons
judgment
appeals
affirmed
justice
alito
took
part
decision
case
percy
dillon
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
third
circuit
june
justice
stevens
dissenting
sentencing
petitioner
percy
dillon
crack
offenses
district
stated
punishment
dillon
received
entirely
high
crime
committed
app
bound
sentencing
regime
mandatory
time
judge
choice
sentence
dillon
months
imprisonment
nearly
years
behind
bars
judge
later
explained
within
discretion
sentenced
dillon
years
imprisonment
dillon
sentenced
decision
booker
judge
discretion
instead
district
compelled
mete
punishment
believed
grossly
disproportionate
offense
therefore
greater
necessary
meet
goals
criminal
justice
system
punishment
dillon
received
high
part
time
conviction
drug
laws
punished
crack
cocaine
offenses
times
severely
powder
cocaine
offenses
explains
see
ante
sentencing
commission
commission
proposed
partial
fix
disparity
lowering
guidelines
ranges
crack
cocaine
offenses
ratio
see
sentencing
commission
guidelines
manual
supp
app
amdt
ussg
effective
pursuant
congressional
mandate
see
commission
made
change
retroactive
individuals
like
dillon
still
serving
sentences
crack
cocaine
offenses
see
ussg
supp
app
amdt
effective
mar
although
dillon
constitutional
right
obtain
benefit
commission
change
undisputed
statutory
right
federal
prisoner
sentenced
term
imprisonment
based
sentencing
range
subsequently
lowered
commission
may
seek
sentence
reduction
consider
factors
set
forth
section
reduction
consistent
applicable
policy
statements
issued
sentencing
commission
dillon
sought
relief
sentence
reduced
sentence
still
years
sentencing
judge
thought
necessary
initial
matter
proceeding
dillon
alleged
circumstances
warranted
additional
reduction
light
fact
sentence
greater
necessary
effectuate
goals
sentencing
system
also
emphasized
model
inmate
years
federal
prison
however
district
felt
hands
tied
time
ussg
purports
place
mandatory
limit
extent
sentence
reduction
may
order
pursuant
giving
commission
statement
effect
law
district
denied
dillon
relief
today
holds
one
limited
nook
sentencing
law
commission
retains
power
bind
judges
struck
booker
view
decision
treat
commission
policy
statement
mandatory
command
rather
advisory
recommendation
unfaithful
booker
also
dubious
constitutional
footing
permits
commission
exercise
barely
constrained
form
lawmaking
authority
manifestly
unjust
therefore
hold
context
sentence
modification
proceeding
district
may
consider
bound
applicable
policy
statements
promulgated
commission
words
apply
booker
remedial
holding
proceedings
although
join
justice
breyer
remedial
opinion
booker
nevertheless
clear
scope
applies
proceedings
initial
matter
moment
booker
excise
portion
crafting
remedy
time
nothing
separate
apart
guidelines
general
mandatory
nature
limited
district
discretion
proceeding
consequently
nothing
needed
excising
relief
available
consistent
commission
related
policy
statement
decided
booker
particular
policy
statement
issue
explicit
binding
prior
decision
booker
guidelines
mandatory
virtue
congressional
mandate
virtue
commission
decree
see
following
booker
commission
policy
statement
took
effect
march
statement
explain
fully
part
ii
infra
source
binding
authority
proceedings
purports
effect
reinstating
mandatory
guidelines
regime
within
context
sentence
modification
proceeding
commission
policy
statement
explicit
congressional
mandate
makes
guidelines
ranges
binding
matter
textual
analysis
divorced
judicial
precedent
certainly
reasonable
find
commission
set
mandatory
limits
sentence
reductions
mistake
view
take
narrow
approach
question
presented
case
turned
blind
eye
fundamental
decision
booker
useful
put
booker
context
deliberations
led
enactment
sentencing
reform
act
et
et
congress
considered
rejected
proposal
made
guidelines
advisory
see
mistretta
ultimately
decision
authorize
commission
issue
rules
force
effect
laws
generated
serious
debate
constitutionality
commission
see
scalia
dissenting
resolved
constitutional
debate
commission
favor
mistretta
became
apparent
next
two
decades
mandatory
character
guidelines
coupled
practice
judicial
factfinding
produced
host
excessively
severe
sentences
also
created
unacceptable
risk
depriving
defendants
constitutional
protections
see
apprendi
new
jersey
holding
ther
fact
prior
conviction
fact
increases
penalty
crime
beyond
prescribed
statutory
maximum
must
submitted
jury
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
ring
arizona
holding
state
makes
increase
defendant
authorized
punishment
contingent
finding
fact
fact
matter
state
labels
must
found
jury
beyond
reasonable
doubt
blakely
washington
holding
hen
judge
inflicts
punishment
jury
verdict
alone
allow
jury
found
facts
law
makes
essential
punishment
judge
exceeds
proper
authority
citation
omitted
series
cases
arrived
present
understanding
determinate
sentencing
schemes
constitutionally
infirm
mandate
enhanced
punishments
based
facts
found
judge
preponderance
evidence
restoring
principles
outlined
landmark
cases
winship
apprendi
progeny
fundamentally
changed
landscape
modern
sentencing
paved
way
booker
booker
considered
whether
sentencing
reform
act
mandatory
determinate
sentencing
scheme
infringed
right
first
two
opinions
held
two
applications
guidelines
us
violated
sixth
amendment
sentencing
judge
case
imposed
severe
sentence
facts
found
jury
warranted
recognized
guidelines
read
merely
advisory
provisions
recommended
rather
required
selection
particular
sentences
response
differing
sets
facts
use
implicate
sixth
amendment
rejected
advisory
reading
guidelines
stood
satisfy
constitutional
guarantees
explained
fact
effect
increasing
mandatory
range
must
established
plea
guilty
must
admitted
defendant
proved
jury
beyond
reasonable
doubt
otherwise
sentence
violate
sixth
fifth
amendment
light
potential
mandatory
guidelines
sentences
violate
constitution
elect
among
possible
remedies
explained
dissent
second
booker
opinion
remedial
one
need
find
constitutional
infirmity
provision
sentencing
reform
act
provide
relief
defendants
booker
apply
guidelines
mandatory
fashion
future
cases
long
juries
allowed
decide
factual
issues
raised
requests
enhanced
sentences
see
stevens
dissenting
part
notwithstanding
fact
retained
guidelines
mandatory
prescriptive
effect
manner
consonant
right
nevertheless
adopted
broad
remedy
recast
guidelines
entirety
change
respond
determination
mandatory
guidelines
regime
violated
sixth
amendment
neither
opinion
respect
constitutional
holding
justice
breyer
remedial
opinion
contained
determination
instead
decision
make
guidelines
discretionary
rested
entirely
majority
judgment
congress
preferred
result
either
increase
jury
role
making
factual
findings
decision
invalidating
entire
regime
congress
wrestling
sentencing
reform
act
foresee
apprendi
ring
blakely
made
prediction
congress
foresight
elected
respect
mandatory
sentencing
regime
openly
acknowledged
methodology
essence
follows
explain
congress
likely
preferred
total
invalidation
act
act
sixth
amendment
requirement
engrafted
onto
congress
likely
preferred
excision
act
namely
act
mandatory
language
invalidation
entire
act
say
light
today
holding
compare
maintaining
act
written
jury
factfinding
added
dissenters
proposed
remedy
total
invalidation
statute
conclude
congress
preferred
latter
compare
remedy
total
invalidation
statute
conclude
congress
preferred
remedy
thus
rather
maintaining
act
written
jury
factfinding
added
opted
alter
commission
power
fundamental
way
away
fixed
determinate
sentencing
regime
based
mandatory
guidelines
henceforth
commission
guide
advise
federal
courts
exercise
sentencing
authority
commission
bind
held
follows
answer
question
remedy
finding
provision
federal
sentencing
statute
makes
guidelines
mandatory
supp
iv
incompatible
today
constitutional
holding
conclude
provision
must
severed
excised
must
one
statutory
section
ed
supp
iv
depends
upon
guidelines
mandatory
nature
modified
federal
sentencing
statute
see
sentencing
reform
act
sentencing
act
amended
et
et
makes
guidelines
effectively
advisory
requires
sentencing
consider
guidelines
ranges
see
supp
iv
permits
tailor
sentence
light
statutory
concerns
well
see
fair
way
read
booker
majority
remedy
eliminated
mandatory
features
guidelines
true
explicitly
severed
two
specific
statutory
sections
time
even
whisper
suggestion
mandatory
provision
existed
clear
foregoing
discussion
booker
decisions
repeatedly
emphasized
completely
advisory
nature
guidelines
see
cunningham
california
system
described
justice
breyer
opinion
booker
judges
longer
tied
sentencing
range
indicated
guidelines
obliged
account
range
along
sentencing
goals
congress
enumerated
sentencing
reform
act
rita
sentencing
enjoy
benefit
legal
presumption
guidelines
sentence
apply
gall
result
decision
booker
guidelines
advisory
appellate
review
sentencing
decisions
limited
determining
whether
kimbrough
sum
statute
still
requires
give
respectful
consideration
guidelines
booker
permits
tailor
sentence
light
statutory
concerns
well
internal
quotation
marks
citation
omitted
spears
per
curiam
slip
clarify
district
courts
entitled
reject
vary
categorically
guidelines
based
policy
disagreement
guidelines
case
law
quite
clear
guidelines
longer
mandatory
binding
effect
sentencing
may
presume
correct
reasonable
considers
individual
sentencing
decision
light
history
limited
nature
proceeding
beside
point
nothing
turns
whether
proceeding
best
understood
resentencing
sentence
modification
procedure
relevant
dillon
right
present
proceeding
ante
sentence
reduction
proceeding
may
constitutionally
compelled
ante
general
reliance
booker
case
see
ante
odd
booker
explained
belief
congress
authorized
mandatory
system
cases
nonmandatory
system
others
yet
precisely
system
approves
today
approaching
case
booker
one
must
ask
whether
likely
fully
informed
congress
created
kind
commission
one
endowed
vast
responsibilities
drafting
advisory
guidelines
policy
statements
also
tiniest
sliver
lawmaking
power
tie
hands
district
exercise
grace
think
answer
obvious
ii
understanding
scope
booker
remedy
reinforced
additional
consideration
commission
policy
statement
today
allows
binding
effect
may
exceed
scope
commission
powers
one
disputes
congress
rejected
remedial
holding
booker
wished
instead
commission
rejected
booker
application
purporting
give
mandatory
force
policy
statement
action
presses
bounds
authority
congress
validly
gave
commission
clear
congress
authorized
commission
create
type
policy
statement
circumvent
decision
booker
accord
quite
permissive
congressional
delegations
jurisprudence
long
congress
lay
legislative
act
intelligible
principle
person
body
authorized
exercise
delegated
authority
directed
conform
legislative
action
forbidden
delegation
legislative
power
mistretta
quoting
hampton
legislative
actions
found
offend
principle
years
ago
upheld
constitutionality
commission
work
attack
mistretta
took
sanctuary
fact
enacting
sentencing
reform
act
creating
commission
congress
se
forth
merely
principle
minimal
standard
exercise
commission
discretion
ed
commission
se
specific
directives
govern
particular
situations
end
congress
gave
commission
clear
goals
specified
sentencing
ibid
prescribed
specific
tool
guidelines
system
commission
use
work
ibid
set
limits
appropriate
guidelines
ranges
commission
promulgate
set
forth
seven
factors
factors
respectively
assist
commission
formulation
offense
categories
establishment
categories
defendants
sentencing
purposes
explained
although
congress
granted
commission
substantial
discretion
formulating
guidelines
actuality
legislated
full
hierarchy
punishment
near
maximum
imprisonment
substantial
imprisonment
imprisonment
alternatives
stipulated
important
offense
offender
characteristics
place
defendants
within
categories
accordingly
concern
encroachment
aggrandizement
animated
jurisprudence
aroused
vigilance
pressure
inherent
within
separate
branches
exceed
outer
limits
power
quoting
ins
chadha
justice
scalia
disagreed
argued
forcefully
congress
creation
commission
pure
delegation
legislative
power
therefore
abuse
separation
powers
dissenting
opinion
congress
commitment
broad
policy
responsibility
institution
justice
scalia
view
violated
core
principle
governing
system
basic
policy
decisions
governing
society
made
legislature
although
acknowledged
mistretta
congress
permissibly
granted
substantial
powers
commission
set
law
policy
sentencing
generally
occasion
consider
whether
spoken
sufficient
clarity
respecting
commission
authority
prescribe
sentence
reductions
question
reared
head
view
raises
concerns
significantly
difficult
presented
mistretta
first
doubtful
congress
authorized
type
policy
statement
find
ussg
congress
instructed
commission
promulgate
general
policy
statements
regarding
application
guidelines
aspect
sentencing
sentence
implementation
view
commission
purposes
set
forth
section
title
including
appropriate
use
inter
alia
various
sentence
modification
provisions
envisioned
sentencing
reform
act
role
policy
statements
merely
inform
judge
exercise
discretion
within
otherwise
mandatory
guidelines
regime
see
explaining
sentencing
judge
required
take
policy
statements
account
deciding
sentence
impose
departure
policy
statement
grounds
appeal
see
also
identifying
potential
use
policy
statement
offe
recommendations
trea
future
existing
disparities
adequately
cured
guidelines
congress
reserved
binding
effect
commission
guidelines
commission
promulgate
pursuant
distinct
statutory
provision
sentencing
reform
act
thus
drew
basic
distinction
guidelines
bind
policy
statements
advise
given
distinction
significant
congress
elected
use
commission
power
set
limitations
sentencing
modification
procedures
rather
invoking
commission
guidelines
power
commission
trying
use
policy
statement
mandatory
effect
guideline
inverting
sentencing
reform
act
original
design
find
provision
within
authorize
commission
via
policy
statement
create
binding
guidelines
regime
respect
type
action
commission
taken
certainly
provision
even
approximates
detailed
prescriptions
commission
power
considered
mistretta
moreover
nothing
appear
authorize
type
policy
statement
also
nothing
appears
authorize
commission
fiat
limit
effect
decision
booker
respond
booker
whether
retain
mandatory
guidelines
decision
congress
congress
alone
booker
expressly
left
ball
congress
explaining
national
legislature
equipped
devise
install
long
term
sentencing
system
compatible
constitution
congress
judges
best
federal
system
justice
see
also
supra
congress
declined
disturb
booker
five
years
since
issuance
demonstrates
justice
breyer
clairvoyant
also
congress
acquiesced
discretionary
guidelines
regime
congress
silence
deprived
commission
intelligible
principle
hampton
steer
consideration
appropriate
response
booker
without
guidance
fear
promulgating
ussg
commission
may
made
type
basic
policy
decisio
justice
scalia
reminded
us
province
legislature
mistretta
dissenting
opinion
prior
commission
overhaul
policy
statement
even
applicable
policy
statement
effect
decided
booker
nothing
guidelines
see
supra
understood
light
booker
precluded
dillon
obtaining
type
discretionary
sentence
reduction
seeks
assuming
eligible
standing
dillon
way
presently
two
provisions
revised
contemporaneously
commission
decision
make
amendments
crack
cocaine
offense
guidelines
retroactive
question
purpose
commission
amendments
policy
statement
circumvent
booker
remedy
see
brief
federal
public
community
defenders
et
al
amici
curiae
describing
history
promulgation
current
version
end
commission
disclaimed
proceedings
constitute
full
resentencing
defendant
ussg
advised
shall
reduce
defendant
term
imprisonment
policy
statement
term
less
minimum
amended
guideline
range
determined
new
range
words
commission
told
federal
courts
guidelines
least
proceedings
remain
mandatory
binding
commission
taken
upon
issuance
general
policy
statement
make
guidelines
mandatory
subject
jury
findings
cases
either
strike
act
grounds
apply
remedy
booker
render
statement
advisory
makes
little
difference
view
commission
rejected
booker
remedy
single
procedure
encroachment
subtle
legislative
response
booker
decision
congress
make
commission
iii
separate
arguments
noted
decision
today
may
reflect
concern
contrary
holding
discourage
commission
issuing
retroactive
amendments
guidelines
owing
fear
burdening
district
courts
might
described
subtle
threat
commission
highlighted
point
amicus
brief
supporting
government
brief
explains
holding
dillon
introduce
uncertainty
commission
assessments
effects
retroactivity
decisions
making
decisions
difficult
weigh
ing
making
guideline
amendments
retroactive
future
brief
sentencing
commission
amicus
curiae
even
explanation
accurate
influence
assessment
legal
question
us
commission
statutory
obligation
review
amend
guidelines
ranges
congress
commanded
commission
shall
specify
circumstances
amendment
retroactive
indicating
substantial
amendments
receive
type
retroactive
effect
see
also
noted
committee
expect
commission
recommend
adjusting
existing
sentences
guidelines
simply
refined
way
might
cause
isolated
instances
existing
sentences
falling
old
guidelines
minor
downward
adjustment
guidelines
words
congress
left
retroactivity
decision
commission
discretion
done
presumption
form
retroactive
relief
appropriate
guidelines
amendment
accept
commission
ignore
obligations
withhold
retroactive
application
guidelines
reduction
simply
judge
discretion
enter
sentence
proceeding
undoubtedly
discretionary
application
guidelines
proceedings
impose
greater
burden
district
courts
process
require
evaluations
rather
rote
reductions
commission
envisioned
made
amendment
retroactive
important
remember
already
requires
district
consider
factors
determines
whether
grant
reduction
well
extent
reduction
additional
consideration
evidence
proffered
justify
downward
departure
need
create
great
deal
work
indeed
need
create
particular
adversarial
process
commission
simply
advise
district
courts
review
paper
submissions
including
original
presentence
report
objections
well
new
submissions
courts
intimately
familiar
sentencing
regime
discretionary
application
factors
facts
dillon
case
show
additional
burden
courts
caused
applying
booker
remedial
holding
likely
pales
comparison
benefit
achieving
tailored
proportionate
sentences
individuals
currently
serving
terms
imprisonment
exceed
necessary
meet
goals
sentencing
system
dillon
years
old
sentenced
nearly
years
imprisonment
drug
crimes
attorney
urged
district
enter
sentence
inter
alia
gross
disparity
sentences
crack
powder
cocaine
offenses
app
take
another
years
agree
finally
kimbrough
sentencing
courts
consider
unjust
disparity
district
constrained
guidelines
increased
dillon
sentence
based
facts
years
sentence
authorized
jury
verdict
see
brief
petitioner
lament
personally
believe
serving
months
feel
bound
guidelines
feel
grounds
depart
ing
guidelines
app
acknowledged
say
penalties
fair
think
fair
also
implored
dillon
make
something
hand
dealt
hope
prison
take
time
consider
direction
life
take
return
society
people
like
spread
word
young
men
age
hesitate
get
involved
dealing
drugs
ibid
dillon
done
participated
outreach
efforts
communities
imprisoned
extensive
work
adolescents
steer
away
life
drugs
crime
brief
petitioner
working
two
universities
facilitated
initiation
studies
program
hunters
point
family
bay
area
organization
devoted
assisting
youth
also
played
large
role
initiating
similar
program
prison
facility
berkeley
prison
outreach
coordinator
stated
district
without
dillon
insight
advice
project
succeeded
grown
way
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
dillon
also
prepared
successful
life
returns
society
obtained
general
equivalency
diploma
ged
taken
vocational
classes
property
management
job
prospects
awaiting
upon
release
government
concedes
dillon
undertaken
significant
institutional
rehabilitation
education
brief
appeals
acknowledged
booker
apply
proceedings
pursuant
dillon
likely
ideal
candidate
sentence
yet
government
continue
spend
year
keep
dillon
behind
bars
release
given
circumstances
case
scarcely
think
greater
waste
nation
precious
resources
cf
barber
thomas
ante
slip
kennedy
dissenting
way
call
attention
human
implications
case
speak
terms
economics
noted
interpretation
comes
cost
taxpayers
untold
millions
dollars
dillon
continued
imprisonment
truly
sad
example
come
view
exceptionally
often
mindlessly
harsh
federal
punishment
scheme
iv
neither
interests
justice
common
sense
lends
support
decision
preserve
single
sliver
commission
lawmaking
power
resurrects
today
thought
booker
dismantled
mandatory
guidelines
regime
finish
job
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
sentencing
commission
substantially
revised
march
see
ussg
supp
app
amdt
effective
mar
roughly
three
months
district
decision
case
current
version
relevant
guidelines
provisions
meaningfully
different
version
effect
time
district
decision
references
opinion
current
edition
guidelines
section
provides
shall
impose
sentence
sufficient
greater
necessary
comply
purposes
set
forth
paragraph
subsection
enumerates
several
factors
shall
consider
determining
appropriate
sentence
including
nature
circumstances
offense
history
characteristics
defendant
probation
office
based
dillon
assessment
two
prior
misdemeanor
convictions
one
possession
marijuana
one
resisting
arrest
dillon
object
calculation
score
revised
sentence
reflects
term
imprisonment
narcotics
offenses
mandatory
consecutive
term
firearm
offense
respond
dissent
discussion
see
post
opinion
stevens
issue
fairly
encompassed
within
questions
presented
briefed
parties
ninth
circuit
subsequently
agreed
consider
en
banc
booker
applicability
proceedings
see
fox
matter
stayed
pending
decision
case
footnotes
guidelines
manual
contains
two
types
provisions
guidelines
see
policy
statements
see
use
guidelines
opinion
refer
guidelines
described
well
generally
provisions
guidelines
manual
section
numbers
types
provisions
enumerated
identically
within
commission
guidelines
manual
effects
discussed
detail
herein
different
policy
statement
also
contained
described
fairly
limitation
amount
available
sentence
reduction
see
ussg
reduction
defendant
term
imprisonment
may
event
exceed
number
months
maximum
guideline
range
applicable
defendant
lowered
part
amendment
guidelines
manual
commission
deleted
provision
explaining
rather
complex
subsection
unnecessary
restriction
consideration
revised
sentence
ussg
app
amdt
effective
later
application
note
commission
indicated
amended
guideline
range
limit
extent
eligible
defendant
sentence
may
reduced
amdt
effective
bottom
line
guidelines
mandatory
nature
effect
policy
statement
made
guidelines
ranges
binding
proceeding
see
stevens
concurring
slip
discussing
significant
sentencing
policy
trend
involving
shift
mandatory
determinate
sentencing
schemes
based
judicial
factfinding
preponderance
standard
see
also
booker
opinion
breyer
approach
adopt
severance
excision
two
provisions
make
guidelines
system
advisory
maintaining
strong
connection
sentence
imposed
offender
real
conduct
connection
important
increased
uniformity
sentencing
congress
intended
guidelines
system
achieve
emphasis
added
congress
preferred
mandatory
system
system
dissenters
envisage
finally
act
without
provision
related
language
remains
consistent
congress
initial
basic
sentencing
intent
system
remaining
excision
lacking
mandatory
features
congress
enacted
retains
features
help
objectives
emphasis
added
ibid
district
courts
bound
apply
guidelines
must
consult
guidelines
take
account
sentencing
emphasis
added
seems
however
least
one
additional
provision
sentencing
reform
act
excised
order
accomplish
remedy
section
prescribes
guidelines
binding
effect
upon
remand
new
sentence
direct
appeal
shall
impose
sentence
outside
applicable
guidelines
range
see
also
spears
slip
istrict
courts
entitled
vary
guidelines
case
circumstances
otherwise
justify
variance
guidelines
sentencing
range
kimbrough
government
acknowledges
guidelines
advisory
general
matter
may
vary
guidelines
ranges
based
solely
policy
considerations
including
disagreements
scalia
concurring
district
free
make
reasonable
application
factors
reject
due
consideration
advice
guidelines
thumb
scales
guidelines
must
followed
even
district
application
factors
entirely
reasonable
guidelines
large
expanse
application
entitle
defendant
lesser
sentence
presence
certain
additional
facts
found
judge
rather
jury
said
booker
violate
sixth
amendment
gall
sentencing
may
presume
guidelines
range
reasonable
government
argument
along
lines
less
subtle
forbid
sentencing
commission
limiting
scope
section
sentence
reduction
proceedings
scope
amendments
inevitably
discourage
sentencing
commission
ever
authorizing
sentence
reductions
brief
notes
agree
authorizes
commission
determine
retroactive
effect
sentence
reductions
ante
understand
directing
commission
prescribe
retroactive
effect
guidelines
amendments
power
make
retroactivity
determinations
meaningfully
different
however
power
claims
commission
granting
former
power
congress
instructed
commission
perform
gate
keeping
function
determining
individuals
eligible
relief
pursuant
contrast
power
claims
commission
today
type
mandatory
sentencing
authority
issue
booker
contrary
conclusion
commission
booker
power
bind
district
setting
particular
sentence
also
accept
broad
understanding
power
commission
derives
see
ante
suffers
delegation
concerns
discussed
see
supra
think
commission
authority
encompasses
ability
promulgate
binding
guidelines
via
policy
statements
matter
separate
power
promulgate
guidelines
power
unaffected
decision
booker
see
hanlon
hecker
gopstein
expanding
zones
modest
proposal
increase
use
alternatives
incarceration
federal
sentencing
aba
criminal
justice
pp
winter
fiscal
year
cost
incarcerate
offender
federal
bureau
prisons
facility
months