davis
washington
argued
march
decided
june
operator
ascertained
michelle
mccottry
assaulted
former
boyfriend
petitioner
davis
fled
scene
mccottry
testify
davis
trial
felony
violation
domestic
order
admitted
recording
despite
davis
objection
based
sixth
amendment
confrontation
clause
convicted
washington
appeals
affirmed
state
concluded
inter
alia
portion
conversation
mccottry
identified
davis
assailant
testimonial
police
responded
reported
domestic
disturbance
home
amy
hershel
hammon
amy
told
nothing
wrong
gave
permission
enter
inside
one
officer
kept
petitioner
hershel
kitchen
interviewed
amy
elsewhere
complete
sign
battery
affidavit
amy
appear
hershel
bench
trial
inter
alia
domestic
battery
affidavit
testimony
officer
questioned
admitted
hershel
objection
opportunity
hershel
convicted
indiana
appeals
affirmed
relevant
part
state
also
affirmed
concluding
although
amy
affidavit
testimonial
wrongly
admitted
harmless
beyond
reasonable
doubt
held
confrontation
clause
bars
admission
testimonial
statements
witness
appear
trial
unless
unavailable
testify
defendant
prior
opportunity
crawford
washington
cases
require
determine
police
interrogations
produce
statements
fall
within
prohibition
without
attempting
produce
exhaustive
classification
conceivable
statements
either
testimonial
nontestimonial
suffices
decide
present
cases
hold
statements
nontestimonial
made
course
police
interrogation
circumstances
objectively
indicating
primary
purpose
interrogation
enable
police
assistance
meet
ongoing
emergency
testimonial
circumstances
objectively
indicate
ongoing
emergency
primary
purpose
interrogation
establish
prove
past
events
potentially
relevant
later
criminal
prosecution
pp
mccottry
statements
identifying
davis
assailant
testimonial
pp
case
requires
decide
whether
confrontation
clause
applies
testimonial
hearsay
whether
recording
qualifies
crawford
suggested
answer
first
question
noting
confrontation
clause
applies
accused
words
testimony
testimonial
statements
cause
declarant
witness
unaware
early
american
case
invoking
confrontation
clause
right
confrontation
involve
testimony
thus
defined
well
century
jurisprudence
carefully
applied
testimonial
context
later
cases
never
practice
dispensed
confrontation
clause
requirements
unavailability
prior
cases
involving
testimonial
hearsay
pp
question
davis
therefore
whether
objectively
considered
interrogation
call
produced
testimonial
statements
contrast
crawford
interrogation
took
place
police
station
directed
solely
establishing
past
crime
call
ordinarily
designed
primarily
describe
current
circumstances
requiring
police
assistance
difference
apparent
mccottry
speaking
events
actually
happening
crawford
interrogation
took
place
hours
events
occurred
moreover
mccottry
facing
ongoing
emergency
statements
elicited
necessary
enable
police
resolve
present
emergency
rather
simply
learn
happened
past
finally
difference
level
formality
striking
crawford
calmly
answered
questions
station
house
taping
taking
notes
mccottry
frantic
answers
provided
phone
environment
tranquil
even
safe
thus
circumstances
interrogation
objectively
indicate
primary
purpose
enable
police
assistance
meet
ongoing
emergency
acting
witness
testifying
pp
amy
hammon
statements
testimonial
much
different
crawford
clear
circumstances
amy
interrogation
part
investigation
possibly
criminal
past
conduct
emergency
progress
told
police
arrived
things
fine
officer
questioning
seeking
determine
happening
happened
objectively
viewed
primary
sole
purpose
investigation
investigate
possible
crime
formal
features
crawford
interrogation
strengthened
statements
testimonial
aspect
features
essential
point
cases
declarants
separated
defendants
statements
recounted
potentially
criminal
past
events
began
progressed
interrogation
took
place
time
events
reasons
comparison
crawford
compelling
comparison
davis
unpersuasive
statements
davis
taken
mccottry
alone
unprotected
police
apparently
immediate
danger
davis
seeking
aid
telling
story
past
pp
indiana
courts
may
determine
remand
whether
claim
forfeiture
wrongdoing
one
obtains
witness
absence
wrongdoing
forfeits
constitutional
right
confrontation
properly
raised
hammon
whether
meritorious
absent
finding
sixth
amendment
operates
exclude
amy
hammon
affidavit
pp
affirmed
reversed
remanded
scalia
delivered
opinion
roberts
stevens
kennedy
souter
ginsburg
breyer
alito
joined
thomas
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
adrian
martell
davis
petitioner
washington
writ
certiorari
washington
hershel
hammon
petitioner
indiana
writ
certiorari
indiana
june
justice
scalia
delivered
opinion
cases
require
us
determine
statements
made
law
enforcement
personnel
call
crime
scene
testimonial
thus
subject
requirements
sixth
amendment
confrontation
clause
relevant
statements
davis
washington
made
emergency
operator
february
operator
answered
initial
call
connection
terminated
anyone
spoke
reversed
call
michelle
mccottry
answered
ensuing
conversation
operator
ascertained
mccottry
involved
domestic
disturbance
former
boyfriend
adrian
davis
petitioner
case
operator
hello
complainant
hello
operator
going
complainant
jumpin
operator
okay
listen
carefully
house
apartment
complainant
house
operator
weapons
complainant
usin
fists
operator
okay
drinking
complainant
operator
okay
sweetie
got
help
started
stay
line
okay
complainant
line
operator
listen
carefully
know
last
name
complainant
davis
operator
davis
okay
first
name
complainant
adran
operator
complainant
adrian
operator
adrian
complainant
yeah
operator
okay
middle
initial
complainant
martell
runnin
app
pp
conversation
continued
operator
learned
davis
un
door
hitting
mccottry
leaving
car
someone
else
mccottry
started
talking
operator
cut
saying
stop
talking
answer
questions
gathered
information
davis
including
birthday
learned
davis
told
mccottry
purpose
coming
house
get
stuff
since
mccottry
moving
mccottry
described
context
assault
operator
told
police
way
gon
na
check
area
first
operator
said
gon
na
come
talk
police
arrived
within
four
minutes
call
observed
mccottry
shaken
state
fresh
injuries
forearm
face
frantic
efforts
gather
belongings
children
leave
residence
en
banc
state
charged
davis
felony
violation
domestic
order
state
witnesses
two
police
officers
responded
call
officers
testified
mccottry
exhibited
injuries
appeared
recent
neither
officer
testify
cause
injuries
ibid
mccottry
presumably
testified
whether
davis
assailant
appear
davis
objection
based
confrontation
clause
sixth
amendment
trial
admitted
recording
exchange
operator
jury
convicted
washington
appeals
affirmed
app
washington
one
dissenting
justice
also
affirmed
concluding
portion
conversation
mccottry
identified
davis
testimonial
portions
conversation
testimonial
admitting
harmless
beyond
reasonable
doubt
granted
certiorari
hammon
indiana
police
responded
late
night
february
reported
domestic
disturbance
home
hershel
amy
hammon
ind
found
amy
alone
front
porch
appearing
frightened
told
matter
gave
permission
enter
house
officer
saw
gas
heating
unit
corner
living
room
flames
coming
partial
glass
front
pieces
glass
ground
front
flame
emitting
front
heating
unit
app
hershel
meanwhile
kitchen
told
police
wife
argument
fine
argument
became
physical
point
amy
come
back
inside
one
officers
remained
hershel
went
living
room
talk
amy
asked
occurred
ibid
app
hershel
made
several
attempts
participate
amy
conversation
police
see
rebuffed
officer
later
testified
hershel
became
angry
insisted
stay
separated
hammon
investigate
happened
hearing
amy
account
officer
fill
sign
battery
affidavit
amy
handwrote
following
broke
furnace
shoved
floor
broken
glass
hit
chest
threw
broke
lamps
phone
tore
van
leave
house
attacked
daughter
state
charged
hershel
domestic
battery
violating
probation
amy
subpoenaed
appear
subsequent
bench
trial
state
called
officer
questioned
amy
asked
recount
amy
told
authenticate
affidavit
hershel
counsel
repeatedly
objected
admission
evidence
see
one
point
hearing
prosecutor
defend
affidavit
made
oath
defense
counsel
said
give
us
opportunity
cross
examine
person
allegedly
drafted
makes
mad
nonetheless
trial
admitted
affidavit
present
sense
impression
amy
statements
excited
utterances
expressly
permitted
kinds
cases
even
declarant
available
testify
officer
thus
testified
amy
informed
hershel
argument
became
irrate
sic
fact
daughter
going
boyfriend
house
argument
became
physical
verbal
informed
hammon
verbal
part
argument
breaking
things
living
room
believe
stated
broke
phone
broke
lamp
broke
front
heater
became
physical
threw
glass
heater
informed
hammon
pushed
onto
ground
shoved
head
broken
glass
heater
punched
chest
twice
believe
trial
judge
found
hershel
guilty
charges
indiana
appeals
affirmed
relevant
part
indiana
also
affirmed
concluding
amy
statement
admissible
purposes
excited
utterance
statement
one
given
taken
significant
part
purposes
preserving
potential
future
use
legal
proceedings
motivations
questioner
declarant
central
concerns
amy
oral
statement
testimonial
standards
also
concluded
although
affidavit
testimonial
thus
wrongly
admitted
harmless
beyond
reasonable
doubt
largely
trial
bench
granted
certiorari
ii
confrontation
clause
sixth
amendment
provides
criminal
prosecutions
accused
shall
enjoy
right
confronted
witnesses
crawford
washington
held
provision
bars
admission
testimonial
statements
witness
appear
trial
unless
unavailable
testify
defendant
prior
opportunity
critical
portion
holding
portion
central
resolution
two
cases
us
phrase
testimonial
statements
statements
sort
cause
declarant
witness
within
meaning
confrontation
clause
see
testimonial
character
statement
separates
hearsay
subject
traditional
limitations
upon
hearsay
evidence
subject
confrontation
clause
opinion
crawford
set
forth
arious
formulations
core
class
statements
found
unnecessary
endorse
statements
qualify
definition
among
said
tatements
taken
police
officers
course
interrogations
ibid
see
also
questioning
generated
deponent
statement
crawford
made
recorded
police
custody
given
miranda
warnings
possible
suspect
qualifies
conceivable
definition
therefore
define
term
except
say
use
colloquial
rather
technical
legal
sense
one
imagine
various
definitions
need
select
among
case
ibid
character
statements
present
cases
clear
cases
require
us
determine
precisely
police
interrogations
produce
testimony
without
attempting
produce
exhaustive
classification
conceivable
statements
even
conceivable
statements
response
police
interrogation
either
testimonial
nontestimonial
suffices
decide
present
cases
hold
follows
statements
nontestimonial
made
course
police
interrogation
circumstances
objectively
indicating
primary
purpose
interrogation
enable
police
assistance
meet
ongoing
emergency
testimonial
circumstances
objectively
indicate
ongoing
emergency
primary
purpose
interrogation
establish
prove
past
events
potentially
relevant
later
criminal
iii
crawford
sufficed
resolution
case
us
determine
even
sixth
amendment
solely
concerned
testimonial
hearsay
primary
object
interrogations
law
enforcement
officers
fall
squarely
within
class
moreover
described
facts
case
spared
us
need
define
meant
interrogations
davis
case
today
permit
us
luxury
indecision
inquiries
police
operator
course
interrogation
one
sense
sense
qualifies
conceivable
definition
must
decide
therefore
whether
confrontation
clause
applies
testimonial
hearsay
whether
recording
call
qualifies
answer
first
question
suggested
crawford
even
explicitly
held
text
confrontation
clause
reflects
focus
testimonial
hearsay
applies
accused
words
testimony
webster
american
dictionary
english
language
turn
typically
solemn
declaration
affirmation
made
purpose
establishing
proving
fact
ibid
accuser
makes
formal
statement
government
officers
bears
testimony
sense
person
makes
casual
remark
acquaintance
limitation
clearly
reflected
text
constitutional
provision
must
fairly
said
mark
merely
core
perimeter
aware
early
american
case
invoking
confrontation
clause
right
confrontation
clearly
involve
testimony
thus
well
century
confrontation
clause
jurisprudence
carefully
applied
testimonial
context
see
reynolds
testimony
prior
trial
subject
confrontation
clause
petitioner
forfeited
right
procuring
witness
absence
mattox
prior
trial
testimony
deceased
witnesses
admitted
subject
kirby
guilty
pleas
jury
conviction
others
admitted
show
property
defendant
received
stolen
motes
written
deposition
subject
admissible
witness
available
dowdell
facts
regarding
conduct
prior
trial
certified
judge
clerk
official
reporter
relate
defendants
guilt
innocence
hence
statements
witnesses
confrontation
clause
even
later
cases
conforming
reasoning
ohio
roberts
never
practice
dispensed
confrontation
clause
requirements
unavailability
prior
cases
involved
testimonial
hearsay
see
crawford
cases
dispense
requirements
even
roberts
approach
statements
issue
clearly
nontestimonial
see
bourjaily
statements
made
unwittingly
government
informant
dutton
evans
plurality
opinion
statements
one
prisoner
another
american
cases
applying
confrontation
clause
state
constitutional
counterparts
involved
testimonial
statements
formal
sort
sworn
testimony
prior
judicial
proceedings
formal
depositions
oath
invites
argument
scope
clause
limited
formal
category
english
cases
progenitors
confrontation
clause
limit
exclusionary
rule
prior
testimony
formal
depositions
see
crawford
supra
event
think
conceivable
protections
confrontation
clause
readily
evaded
policeman
recite
unsworn
hearsay
testimony
declarant
instead
declarant
sign
deposition
indeed
one
point
case
english
early
american
state
federal
cited
question
us
davis
whether
objectively
considered
interrogation
took
place
course
call
produced
testimonial
statements
said
crawford
supra
interrogations
law
enforcement
officers
fall
squarely
within
class
testimonial
hearsay
immediately
mind
case
us
interrogations
solely
directed
establishing
facts
past
crime
order
identify
provide
evidence
convict
perpetrator
product
interrogation
whether
reduced
writing
signed
declarant
embedded
memory
perhaps
notes
interrogating
officer
testimonial
terms
american
dictionary
quoted
crawford
solemn
declaration
affirmation
made
purpose
establishing
proving
fact
solemnity
even
oral
declaration
relevant
past
fact
investigating
officer
well
enough
established
severe
consequences
attend
deliberate
falsehood
see
stewart
false
statements
made
federal
investigators
violate
state
reed
wi
state
criminal
offense
knowingly
giv
false
information
officer
intent
mislead
officer
performance
duty
call
hand
least
initial
interrogation
conducted
connection
call
ordinarily
designed
primarily
establis
prov
past
fact
describe
current
circumstances
requiring
police
assistance
difference
interrogation
davis
one
crawford
apparent
face
things
davis
mccottry
speaking
events
actually
happening
rather
describ
ing
past
events
lilly
virginia
plurality
opinion
sylvia
crawford
interrogation
hand
took
place
hours
events
described
occurred
moreover
reasonable
listener
recognize
mccottry
unlike
sylvia
crawford
facing
ongoing
emergency
although
one
might
call
provide
narrative
report
crime
absent
imminent
danger
mccottry
call
plainly
call
help
bona
fide
physical
threat
third
nature
asked
answered
davis
viewed
objectively
elicited
statements
necessary
able
resolve
present
emergency
rather
simply
learn
crawford
happened
past
true
even
operator
effort
establish
identity
assailant
dispatched
officers
might
know
whether
encountering
violent
felon
see
hiibel
sixth
judicial
dist
humboldt
finally
difference
level
formality
two
interviews
striking
crawford
responding
calmly
station
house
series
questions
taping
making
notes
answers
mccottry
frantic
answers
provided
phone
environment
tranquil
even
far
reasonable
operator
make
safe
conclude
circumstances
mccottry
interrogation
objectively
indicate
primary
purpose
enable
police
assistance
meet
ongoing
emergency
simply
acting
witness
testifying
said
weaker
substitute
live
testimony
trial
inadi
like
lord
cobham
statements
raleigh
case
tr
jane
dingler
ex
parte
statements
husband
king
dingler
leach
eng
sylvia
crawford
statement
crawford
cases
ex
parte
actors
evidentiary
products
ex
parte
communication
aligned
perfectly
courtroom
analogues
mccottry
emergency
statement
witness
goes
proclaim
emergency
seek
help
davis
seeks
cast
mccottry
unlikely
role
witness
pointing
english
cases
none
involves
statements
made
ongoing
emergency
king
brasier
leach
eng
example
young
rape
victim
immediately
coming
home
told
circumstances
injury
mother
eng
case
helpful
davis
relevant
statement
girl
screams
aid
chased
assailant
time
victim
got
home
story
account
past
events
say
conversation
begins
interrogation
determine
need
emergency
assistance
indiana
put
evolve
testimonial
statements
purpose
achieved
case
example
operator
gained
information
needed
address
exigency
moment
emergency
appears
ended
davis
drove
away
premises
operator
told
mccottry
quiet
proceeded
pose
battery
questions
readily
maintained
point
mccottry
statements
testimonial
unlike
structured
police
questioning
occurred
crawford
trial
courts
recognize
point
sixth
amendment
purposes
statements
response
interrogations
become
testimonial
limine
procedure
redact
exclude
portions
statement
become
testimonial
example
unduly
prejudicial
portions
otherwise
admissible
evidence
davis
jury
hear
complete
call
although
may
well
heard
testimonial
portions
asked
classify
mccottry
early
statements
identifying
davis
assailant
agree
washington
testimonial
also
concluded
even
later
parts
call
testimonial
admission
harmless
beyond
reasonable
doubt
davis
challenge
holding
therefore
assume
correct
determining
testimonial
nontestimonial
character
statements
product
interrogation
hammon
much
easier
task
since
much
different
statements
found
testimonial
crawford
entirely
clear
circumstances
interrogation
part
investigation
possibly
criminal
past
conduct
indeed
testifying
officer
expressly
acknowledged
app
emergency
progress
interrogating
officer
testified
heard
arguments
crashing
saw
one
throw
break
anything
officers
first
arrived
amy
told
things
fine
immediate
threat
person
officer
questioned
amy
second
time
elicited
challenged
statements
seeking
determine
davis
happening
rather
happened
objectively
viewed
primary
indeed
sole
purpose
interrogation
investigate
possible
crime
course
precisely
officer
done
true
crawford
interrogation
formal
followed
miranda
warning
took
place
station
house
see
features
certainly
strengthened
statements
testimonial
aspect
made
objectively
apparent
purpose
exercise
nail
truth
past
criminal
events
none
essential
point
formal
enough
amy
interrogation
conducted
separate
room
away
husband
tried
intervene
officer
receiving
replies
use
investigat
ion
app
called
striking
resemblance
crawford
statement
ex
parte
examinations
shared
amy
statement
declarants
actively
separated
defendant
officers
forcibly
prevented
hershel
participating
interrogation
statements
deliberately
recounted
response
police
questioning
potentially
criminal
past
events
began
progressed
took
place
time
events
described
statements
official
interrogation
obvious
substitute
live
testimony
precisely
ness
direct
examination
inherently
indiana
amicus
curiae
argue
case
resolved
much
like
davis
reasons
find
comparison
crawford
compelling
find
comparison
davis
unpersuasive
statements
davis
taken
mccottry
alone
unprotected
police
amy
hammon
protected
apparently
immediate
danger
davis
seeking
aid
telling
story
past
mccottry
statements
showed
immediacy
amy
narrative
past
events
delivered
remove
time
danger
described
amy
answered
officer
questions
execute
affidavit
order
testified
establish
events
occurred
previously
app
although
necessarily
reject
indiana
implication
virtually
initial
inquiries
crime
scene
testimonial
see
hold
opposite
questions
scene
yield
nontestimonial
answers
already
observed
domestic
disputes
fficers
called
investigate
need
know
dealing
order
assess
situation
threat
safety
possible
danger
potential
victim
hiibel
exigencies
may
often
mean
initial
inquiries
produce
nontestimonial
statements
cases
like
one
amy
statements
neither
cry
help
provision
information
enabling
officers
immediately
end
threatening
situation
fact
given
alleged
crime
scene
initial
inquiries
immaterial
cf
crawford
supra
iv
respondents
cases
joined
number
amici
contend
nature
offenses
charged
two
cases
domestic
violence
requires
greater
flexibility
use
testimonial
evidence
particular
type
crime
notoriously
susceptible
intimidation
coercion
victim
ensure
testify
trial
occurs
confrontation
clause
gives
criminal
windfall
may
however
vitiate
constitutional
guarantees
effect
allowing
guilty
go
free
cf
kyllo
suppressing
evidence
illegal
search
defendants
seek
undermine
judicial
process
procuring
coercing
silence
witnesses
victims
sixth
amendment
require
courts
acquiesce
defendants
duty
assist
state
proving
guilt
duty
refrain
acting
ways
destroy
integrity
system
reiterate
said
crawford
rule
forfeiture
wrongdoing
extinguishes
confrontation
claims
essentially
equitable
grounds
citing
reynolds
one
obtains
absence
witness
wrongdoing
forfeits
constitutional
right
confrontation
take
position
standards
necessary
demonstrate
forfeiture
federal
courts
using
federal
rule
evidence
codifies
forfeiture
doctrine
generally
held
government
standard
see
scott
state
courts
tend
follow
practice
see
commonwealth
edwards
mass
moreover
hearing
forfeiture
required
edwards
instance
observed
hearsay
evidence
including
unavailable
witness
statements
may
considered
roberts
approach
confrontation
clause
undoubtedly
made
recourse
doctrine
less
necessary
prosecutors
show
reliability
ex
parte
statements
easily
show
defendant
procurement
witness
absence
crawford
overruling
roberts
destroy
ability
courts
protect
integrity
proceedings
determined
absent
finding
forfeiture
wrongdoing
sixth
amendment
operates
exclude
amy
hammon
affidavit
indiana
courts
may
asked
determine
remand
whether
claim
forfeiture
properly
raised
whether
meritorious
affirm
judgment
washington
reverse
judgment
indiana
remand
case
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
ordered
adrian
martell
davis
petitioner
washington
writ
certiorari
washington
hershel
hammon
petitioner
indiana
writ
certiorari
indiana
june
justice
thomas
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
crawford
washington
abandoned
general
reliability
inquiry
long
employed
judge
admissibility
hearsay
evidence
confrontation
clause
describing
inquiry
inherently
therefore
permanently
unpredictable
emphasis
original
today
mere
two
years
decided
crawford
adopts
equally
unpredictable
test
district
courts
charged
divining
primary
purpose
police
interrogations
ante
besides
difficult
courts
apply
test
characterizes
testimonial
therefore
inadmissible
evidence
bears
little
resemblance
recognized
evidence
targeted
confrontation
clause
neither
cases
today
implicate
confrontation
clause
appropriately
targeted
standard
concur
judgment
davis
washington
dissent
resolution
hammon
indiana
confrontation
clause
provides
criminal
prosecutions
accused
shall
enjoy
right
confronted
witnesses
amdt
recognized
operative
phrase
clause
witnesses
interpreted
narrowly
reach
witnesses
actually
testify
trial
broadly
reach
many
whose
statements
offered
trial
crawford
supra
white
illinois
thomas
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
narrowest
interpretation
clause
conflict
history
giving
rise
adoption
clause
precedent
rejected
reading
see
crawford
supra
white
supra
opinion
thomas
rejection
narrowest
view
clause
however
require
broadest
application
clause
exclude
otherwise
admissible
hearsay
evidence
history
surrounding
right
confrontation
supports
conclusion
developed
target
particular
practices
occurred
english
bail
committal
statutes
passed
reign
queen
mary
namely
mode
criminal
procedure
particularly
use
ex
parte
examinations
evidence
accused
crawford
supra
white
supra
opinion
thomas
mattox
predominant
purpose
marian
committal
statute
institute
systematic
questioning
accused
witnesses
langbein
prosecuting
crime
renaissance
emphasis
added
statute
required
oral
examination
suspect
accusers
transcription
within
two
days
examinations
physical
transmission
judges
hearing
case
examinations
came
used
evidence
cases
lieu
personal
appearance
witness
crawford
supra
holdsworth
history
english
law
many
statements
inadmissible
matter
hearsay
law
bear
little
resemblance
evidentiary
practices
framers
proposed
confrontation
clause
prevent
see
crawford
supra
contrasting
overheard
remark
abuses
targeted
confrontation
clause
accordingly
unlikely
framers
intended
word
witness
read
broadly
include
statements
cf
dutton
evans
harlan
concurring
result
rejecting
assumption
core
purpose
confrontation
clause
sixth
amendment
prevent
overly
broad
exceptions
hearsay
rule
crawford
recognized
history
squared
language
clause
giving
rise
workable
accurate
interpretation
itnesses
said
testimony
quoting
webster
american
dictionary
english
language
solemn
declaration
affirmation
made
purpose
establishing
proving
fact
ibid
quoting
webster
supra
admittedly
set
forth
detailed
framework
addressing
whether
statement
testimonial
thus
subject
confrontation
clause
plain
terms
testimony
definition
endorsed
necessarily
require
degree
solemnity
statement
deemed
testimonial
requirement
solemnity
supports
view
statements
regulated
confrontation
clause
must
include
extrajudicial
statements
contained
formalized
testimonial
materials
affidavits
depositions
prior
testimony
confessions
white
supra
opinion
thomas
affidavits
depositions
prior
testimony
nature
taken
formalized
process
likewise
confessions
extracted
police
formal
manner
carry
sufficient
indicia
solemnity
constitute
formalized
statements
accordingly
bear
striking
resemblance
crawford
supra
examinations
accused
accusers
marian
see
generally
langbein
supra
although
concedes
early
american
cases
invoking
right
confrontation
confrontation
clause
clearly
involve
testimony
defined
crawford
ante
fails
acknowledge
cases
cites
fall
within
narrower
category
formalized
testimonial
materials
proposed
see
ante
interactions
police
accused
witnesses
resemble
marian
proceedings
early
cases
interactions
somehow
rendered
formal
crawford
example
interrogation
custodial
taken
warnings
given
pursuant
miranda
arizona
quoting
miranda
supra
imports
solemnity
process
present
mere
conversation
witness
suspect
police
concedes
case
cited
conclusion
confrontation
clause
also
applies
informal
police
questioning
certain
circumstances
ante
instead
sole
basis
conclusion
apprehension
confrontation
clause
readily
evaded
applicable
formalized
testimonial
materials
ante
proposed
solution
risk
evasion
needlessly
overinclusive
confrontation
clause
sought
regulate
prosecutorial
abuse
occurring
use
ex
parte
statements
evidence
accused
also
reaches
use
technically
informal
statements
used
evade
formalized
process
cf
ibid
even
interrogation
formal
production
evidence
prosecution
trial
resemble
abuses
targeted
confrontation
clause
prosecution
attempted
use
statements
means
circumventing
literal
right
confrontation
see
coy
iowa
case
confrontation
clause
fairly
applied
exclude
hearsay
statements
offered
prosecution
preventing
evasion
without
simultaneously
excluding
evidence
offered
prosecution
good
faith
standard
disconnected
history
unnecessary
prevent
abuse
also
yields
predictable
results
police
officers
prosecutors
attempting
comply
law
cf
crawford
supra
criticizing
unpredictability
test
white
undoubtedly
police
officers
deciding
whether
give
miranda
warnings
possible
emergency
situation
act
host
different
instinctive
largely
unverifiable
motives
safety
safety
others
perhaps
well
desire
obtain
incriminating
evidence
suspect
assigning
one
two
largely
unverifiable
motives
primacy
requires
constructing
hierarchy
purpose
rarely
present
reliably
discernible
inevitably
quite
simply
exercise
fiction
repeated
invocation
word
objectiv
describe
test
see
ante
however
suggests
may
mean
reference
purpose
instead
inquire
function
served
interrogation
certainly
test
avoid
pitfalls
led
us
repeatedly
reject
tests
dependent
subjective
intentions
police
however
cost
even
disconnected
prosecutorial
abuses
targeted
confrontation
clause
additionally
shift
ability
control
whether
violation
occurred
police
prosecutor
judge
whose
determination
primary
purpose
particular
interrogation
unpredictable
necessarily
tethered
actual
purpose
police
performed
interrogation
neither
call
issue
davis
police
questioning
issue
hammon
testimonial
appropriate
framework
neither
call
questioning
formalized
circumstances
surrounding
taking
statements
render
statements
sufficiently
formal
resemble
marian
examinations
statements
neither
mirandized
custodial
accompanied
similar
indicia
formality
finally
suggestion
prosecution
attempted
offer
women
hearsay
evidence
trial
order
evade
confrontation
see
ind
prosecution
subpoenaed
amy
hammon
testify
present
en
banc
state
unable
locate
michelle
mccottry
time
trial
accordingly
statements
issue
cases
nontestimonial
admissible
confrontation
clause
determination
evidence
hammon
must
excluded
extends
confrontation
clause
far
beyond
abuses
intended
prevent
combined
holding
evidence
davis
perfectly
admissible
however
hammon
holding
also
reveals
difficulty
applying
requirement
courts
investigate
primary
purpose
investigation
draws
line
two
cases
based
explanation
hammon
involves
emergency
progress
instead
mere
questioning
part
investigation
possibly
criminal
past
conduct
ante
explanation
davis
involves
questioning
primary
purpose
enabl
ing
police
assistance
meet
ongoing
emergency
ante
fact
officer
hammon
investigating
hammon
past
conduct
foreclose
possibility
primary
purpose
inquiry
assess
whether
hammon
constituted
continuing
danger
wife
requiring
police
presence
action
hardly
remarkable
hammon
act
abusively
towards
wife
presence
officers
ante
good
judgment
refrain
criminal
behavior
presence
police
sheds
little
light
whether
violence
resumed
police
left
without
questioning
transforming
dismisses
past
conduct
back
ongoing
emergency
ante
mere
fact
mccottry
needed
emergency
aid
shed
light
whether
primary
purpose
gathering
example
name
assailant
protect
police
protect
victim
gather
information
prosecution
cases
like
many
similar
cases
pronouncement
primary
motive
behind
interrogation
calls
nothing
guess
courts
ii
standard
adopted
today
neither
workable
targeted
attempt
reach
abuses
forbidden
clause
concur
judgment
davis
washington
respectfully
dissent
resolution
hammon
indiana
footnotes
together
hammon
indiana
certiorari
indiana
footnotes
holding
refers
interrogations
explained
statements
cases
presently
us
products
interrogations
circumstances
tend
generate
testimonial
responses
imply
however
statements
made
absence
interrogation
necessarily
nontestimonial
framers
willing
exempt
volunteered
testimony
answers
questions
exempt
answers
detailed
interrogation
part
evidence
sir
walter
raleigh
letter
lord
cobham
plainly
result
sustained
questioning
raleigh
case
tr
course
even
interrogation
exists
final
analysis
declarant
statements
interrogator
questions
confrontation
clause
requires
us
evaluate
operators
law
enforcement
officers
may
least
agents
law
enforcement
conduct
interrogations
callers
purposes
opinion
without
deciding
point
consider
acts
acts
police
crawford
washington
therefore
ing
today
makes
unnecessary
consider
whether
statements
made
someone
law
enforcement
personnel
testimonial
see
state
webb
super
eq
per
curiam
excluding
deposition
taken
absence
accused
state
atkins
super
eq
per
curiam
excluding
prior
testimony
deceased
witness
johnston
state
err
app
admitting
written
deposition
deceased
deponent
defendant
opportunity
finn
commonwealth
excluding
prior
testimony
witness
still
alive
though
outside
jurisdiction
state
hill
app
excluding
deposition
deceased
victim
taken
absence
accused
commonwealth
richards
mass
excluding
preliminary
examination
testimony
deceased
witness
witness
precise
words
available
bostick
state
admitting
deposition
deceased
defendant
declined
opportunity
people
newman
hill
sup
per
curiam
excluding
prior
trial
testimony
witness
still
alive
state
campbell
app
excluding
deposition
taken
absence
accused
state
valentine
per
curiam
admitting
preliminary
examination
testimony
decedent
defendant
opportunity
kendrick
state
admitting
testimony
deceased
witness
defendant
prior
trial
state
houser
mo
excluding
deposition
deponent
still
alive
roberts
condition
ed
admissibility
hearsay
evidence
whether
falls
rooted
hearsay
exception
bears
guarantees
trustworthiness
crawford
quoting
roberts
overruled
roberts
crawford
restoring
unavailability
requirements
dissent
criticizes
test
neither
workable
targeted
attempt
reach
abuses
forbidden
confrontation
clause
post
opinion
thomas
former
acknowledged
holding
exhaustive
classification
conceivable
statements
even
conceivable
statements
response
police
interrogation
supra
rather
resolution
cases
us
like
cases
test
objective
quite
workable
dissent
attempting
formulate
exhaustive
classification
provided
anything
deserves
description
workable
unless
one
thinks
distinction
formal
informal
statements
see
post
qualifies
dissent
even
qualifies
vague
distinction
acknowledging
confrontation
clause
also
reaches
use
technically
informal
statements
used
evade
formalized
process
post
cautioning
clause
stop
state
us
ing
statements
means
circumventing
literal
right
confrontation
post
hard
see
much
predictable
rule
adopt
narrow
situations
address
indeed
dissent
approach
eminently
arguable
dissent
agree
rather
disagree
disposition
hammon
indiana
charge
holding
targeted
attempt
reach
abuses
forbidden
confrontation
clause
dissent
describes
depositions
taken
marian
magistrates
characterized
high
degree
formality
see
post
dispute
formality
indeed
essential
testimonial
utterance
longer
examining
marian
magistrates
forebears
examining
police
officers
see
friedman
crime
punishment
american
history
perform
investigative
testimonial
functions
performed
examining
marian
magistrates
see
langbein
origins
adversary
criminal
trial
imports
sufficient
formality
view
lies
officers
criminal
offenses
restricting
confrontation
clause
precise
forms
originally
directed
recipe
extinction
cf
kyllo
police
investigations
course
way
impugned
characterization
fruits
testimonial
investigations
past
crimes
prevent
future
harms
lead
necessary
arrests
prosecutors
may
hope
inculpatory
nontestimonial
evidence
gathered
essentially
beyond
police
control
saying
emergency
exists
make
confrontation
clause
way
governs
police
conduct
trial
use
investigatory
collection
ex
parte
testimonial
statements
offends
provision
neither
police
conduct
govern
confrontation
clause
testimonial
statements
footnotes
like
presume
acts
operator
acts
police
ante
accordingly
refer
operator
davis
officer
hammon
counterparts
similar
cases
collectively
police
recent
cases
nearly
hold
excludable
confrontation
clause
materials
plainly
highly
formal
see
white
illinois
thomas
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
exceptions
involve
confessions
codefendants
police
confessions
appear
either
formal
due
occurrence
custody
formalized
signed
documents
see
douglas
alabama
signed
confession
brookhart
janis
signed
confession
taken
accomplice
arrest
see
brief
petitioner
brookhart
janis
pp
bruton
custodial
interrogation
roberts
russell
per
curiam
custodial
interrogation
following
warning
statement
used
trial
see
brief
opposition
pp
possibility
oral
declaration
past
fact
police
officer
false
result
legal
consequences
speaker
see
ante
may
render
honesty
casual
conversations
police
officers
important
however
render
conversations
solemn
formal
ordinary
meanings
terms
see
new
york
quarles
subjective
motivation
officer
relevant
considering
whether
public
safety
exception
miranda
arizona
applicable
rhode
island
innis
subjective
intent
police
officer
obtain
incriminatory
statement
relevant
whether
interrogation
occurred
whren
refusing
evaluate
fourth
amendment
reasonableness
light
officers
actual
motivations
although
police
questioning
hammon
ultimately
reduced
affidavit
agree
affidavit
inadmissible
per
se
definition
term
testimonial
brief
respondent
brief
amicus
curiae
factors
relies
determine
police
questioning
hammon
testimonial
apply
equally
davis
example
hammon
actively
separated
victim
thereby
prevented
participating
interrogation
davis
apart
mccottry
questioned
operator
thus
unable
participate
questioning
ante
similarly
events
described
mccottry
time
recounted
operator
ibid
see
en
banc