scheuer
rhodes
argued
december
decided
april
together
krause
administrator
et
al
rhodes
governor
ohio
et
also
certiorari
petitioners
personal
representatives
estates
students
killed
campus
university
brought
damages
actions
governor
adjutant
general
ohio
national
guard
various
guard
officers
enlisted
members
university
president
charging
officials
acting
color
state
law
intentionally
recklessly
willfully
wantonly
caused
unnecessary
guard
deployment
campus
ordered
guard
members
perform
allegedly
illegal
acts
resulting
students
deaths
district
dismissed
complaints
lack
jurisdiction
without
filing
answer
without
evidence
governor
proclamations
brief
affidavits
adjutant
general
assistant
holding
respondents
sued
official
capacities
actions
therefore
effect
state
barred
eleventh
amendment
appeals
affirmed
ground
alternative
ground
doctrine
executive
immunity
absolute
barred
action
respondent
state
officials
held
eleventh
amendment
circumstances
bar
action
damages
state
official
charged
depriving
person
federal
right
color
state
law
district
acted
prematurely
hence
erroneously
dismissing
complaints
without
affording
petitioners
opportunity
subsequent
proof
establish
claims
pp
immunity
officers
executive
branch
state
government
acts
absolute
qualified
varying
degree
depending
upon
scope
discretion
responsibilities
particular
office
circumstances
existing
time
challenged
action
taken
pp
burger
delivered
opinion
members
joined
except
douglas
took
part
decision
cases
michael
geltner
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
leonard
schwartz
melvin
wulf
joel
gora
nelson
karl
niki
schwartz
walter
haffner
steven
sindell
argued
cause
petitioners
brief
joseph
sindell
joseph
kelner
charles
brown
argued
cause
respondents
brief
robert
howarth
delmar
christensen
lambros
brooke
alloway
argued
cause
respondents
brief
john
fn
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
cases
filed
mario
obledo
sanford
jay
rosen
mexican
american
legal
defense
educational
fund
david
engdahl
national
council
churches
christ
et
al
carl
character
filed
brief
national
bar
assn
amicus
curiae
urging
reversal
chief
justice
burger
delivered
opinion
granted
certiorari
cases
resolve
whether
district
correctly
dismissed
civil
damage
actions
brought
ground
actions
matter
law
state
ohio
hence
barred
eleventh
amendment
constitution
alternatively
actions
state
officials
immune
liability
acts
alleged
complaints
cases
arise
period
alleged
civil
disorder
campus
kent
state
university
ohio
may
us
another
context
gilligan
morgan
cases
personal
representatives
estates
three
students
died
episode
seek
damages
governor
adjutant
general
assistant
various
named
unnamed
officers
enlisted
members
ohio
national
guard
president
kent
state
university
complaints
cases
allege
cause
action
civil
rights
act
stat
petitioner
scheuer
also
alleges
cause
action
ohio
law
theory
pendent
jurisdiction
petitioners
krause
miller
make
similar
claim
asserting
jurisdiction
basis
diversity
citizenship
district
dismissed
complaints
lack
jurisdiction
subject
matter
theory
actions
although
form
named
individuals
substance
effect
state
ohio
thus
barred
eleventh
amendment
appeals
affirmed
action
district
agreeing
suit
legal
effect
one
state
ohio
alternatively
doctrine
executive
immunity
barred
action
state
officials
respondents
confronted
narrow
threshold
question
whether
district
properly
dismissed
complaints
hold
dismissal
inappropriate
stage
litigation
accordingly
reverse
judgments
remand
proceedings
intimate
view
merits
allegations
since
evidence
us
stage
complaints
cases
identical
thrust
essentially
essence
defendants
alleged
intentionally
recklessly
willfully
wantonly
caused
unnecessary
deployment
ohio
national
guard
kent
state
campus
manner
ordered
guard
members
perform
allegedly
illegal
actions
resulted
death
plaintiffs
decedents
complaints
allege
action
taken
color
state
law
deprived
decedents
lives
rights
without
due
process
law
fairly
read
complaints
allege
named
defendants
undertaking
actions
acted
either
outside
scope
respective
office
within
scope
acted
arbitrary
manner
grossly
abusing
lawful
powers
office
complaints
dismissed
district
lack
jurisdiction
without
filing
answer
complaints
pertinent
documentation
addition
complaints
two
proclamations
issued
respondent
governor
first
proclamation
ordered
guard
duty
protect
violence
arising
wildcat
strikes
trucking
industry
recited
account
conditions
prevailing
kent
state
university
time
dismissing
complaints
want
subject
matter
jurisdiction
early
stage
district
held
noted
earlier
defendants
sued
official
representative
capacities
actions
therefore
effect
state
ohio
primary
question
presented
whether
district
acted
prematurely
hence
erroneously
dismissing
complaints
stated
ground
thus
precluding
opportunity
plaintiffs
subsequent
proof
establish
claim
federal
reviews
sufficiency
complaint
reception
evidence
either
affidavit
admissions
task
necessarily
limited
one
issue
whether
plaintiff
ultimately
prevail
whether
claimant
entitled
offer
evidence
support
claims
indeed
may
appear
face
pleadings
recovery
remote
unlikely
test
moreover
well
established
passing
motion
dismiss
whether
ground
lack
jurisdiction
subject
matter
failure
state
cause
action
allegations
complaint
construed
favorably
pleader
appraising
sufficiency
complaint
follow
course
accepted
rule
complaint
dismissed
failure
state
claim
unless
appears
beyond
doubt
plaintiff
prove
set
facts
support
claim
entitle
relief
conley
gibson
omitted
ii
eleventh
amendment
constitution
provides
judicial
power
shall
construed
extend
suit
law
equity
commenced
prosecuted
one
citizens
another
state
well
established
amendment
bars
suits
state
named
party
also
party
fact
edelman
jordan
poindexter
greenhow
cunningham
macon
brunswick
applicability
determined
mere
names
titular
parties
essential
nature
effect
proceeding
appears
entire
record
ex
parte
new
york
however
since
ex
parte
young
settled
eleventh
amendment
provides
shield
state
official
confronted
claim
deprived
another
federal
right
color
state
law
ex
parte
young
teaches
state
officer
acts
state
law
manner
violative
federal
constitution
comes
conflict
superior
authority
constitution
case
stripped
official
representative
character
subjected
person
consequences
individual
conduct
state
power
impart
immunity
responsibility
authority
emphasis
supplied
analyzing
complaints
light
precedents
see
petitioners
allege
facts
demonstrate
seeking
impose
individual
personal
liability
named
defendants
claim
yet
established
proof
deprivation
federal
rights
defendants
color
state
law
whatever
plaintiffs
may
may
able
establish
merits
allegations
claims
stated
complaints
given
favorable
reading
required
federal
rules
civil
procedure
barred
eleventh
amendment
consequently
district
erred
dismissing
complaints
lack
jurisdiction
iii
appeals
relied
upon
existence
absolute
executive
immunity
alternative
ground
sustaining
dismissal
complaints
district
immunity
member
executive
branch
absolute
comprehensive
acts
allegedly
performed
within
scope
official
duty
appeals
correct
hand
immunity
absolute
rather
one
qualified
limited
executive
officer
may
may
subject
liability
depending
circumstances
may
revealed
evidence
concept
immunity
government
officers
personal
liability
springs
root
considerations
generated
doctrine
sovereign
immunity
latter
doctrine
king
wrong
protect
government
officers
personal
liability
common
law
soon
recognized
necessity
permitting
officials
perform
official
functions
free
threat
suits
personal
liability
official
immunity
apparently
rested
genesis
two
mutually
dependent
rationales
injustice
particularly
absence
bad
faith
subjecting
liability
officer
required
legal
obligations
position
exercise
discretion
danger
threat
liability
deter
willingness
execute
office
decisiveness
judgment
required
public
good
country
development
law
immunity
public
officials
product
constitutional
provision
well
legislative
judicial
processes
federal
constitution
grants
absolute
immunity
members
houses
congress
respect
speech
debate
vote
report
action
done
session
art
see
gravel
brewster
kilbourn
thompson
provision
intended
secure
legislative
branch
government
freedom
executive
judicial
encroachment
secured
england
bill
rights
carried
original
colonies
johnson
justice
harlan
noted
little
doubt
instigation
criminal
charges
critical
disfavored
legislators
executive
judicial
forum
chief
fear
prompting
long
struggle
parliamentary
privilege
england
context
american
system
separation
powers
predominate
thrust
speech
debate
clause
although
development
general
concept
immunity
mutations
underlying
rationale
undergone
application
various
positions
matters
immediate
concern
important
note
even
outset
one
policy
consideration
seems
pervade
analysis
public
interest
requires
decisions
action
enforce
laws
protection
public
justice
jackson
expressed
general
proposition
succinctly
stating
tort
government
govern
dalehite
dissenting
opinion
public
officials
whether
governors
mayors
police
legislators
judges
fail
make
decisions
needed
act
implement
decisions
made
fully
faithfully
perform
duties
offices
implicit
idea
officials
immunity
absolute
qualified
acts
recognition
may
err
concept
immunity
assumes
goes
assume
better
risk
error
possible
injury
error
decide
act
barr
matteo
observed
somewhat
parallel
context
privilege
public
officers
defamation
actions
privilege
badge
emolument
exalted
office
expression
policy
designed
aid
effective
functioning
government
see
also
spalding
vilas
present
purposes
need
determine
whether
absolute
immunity
appeals
determined
governing
specific
allegations
complaint
chief
executive
officer
state
senior
subordinate
officers
enlisted
personnel
state
national
guard
president
university
immunity
qualified
absolute
scope
immunity
necessarily
related
facts
yet
established
either
affidavits
admissions
trial
record
final
resolution
question
must
take
account
functions
responsibilities
particular
defendants
capacities
officers
state
government
well
purposes
neither
inquiries
write
clean
slate
hardly
argued
late
date
circumstances
officers
state
government
subject
liability
statute
monroe
pape
supra
justice
douglas
writing
held
section
question
meant
give
remedy
parties
deprived
constitutional
rights
privileges
immunities
official
abuse
position
civil
rights
statutes
congress
intended
enforce
provisions
fourteenth
amendment
carry
badge
authority
state
represent
capacity
whether
act
accordance
authority
misuse
since
statute
relied
thus
included
within
scope
isuse
power
possessed
virtue
state
law
made
possible
wrongdoer
clothed
authority
state
law
quoting
classic
government
officials
class
totally
exempt
virtue
absolute
immunity
liability
terms
indeed
also
indicated
monroe
pape
supra
legislative
history
indicates
absolute
immunity
soon
monroe
pape
chief
justice
warren
noted
pierson
ray
legislative
record
gives
clear
indication
congress
meant
abolish
wholesale
immunities
previously
recognized
civil
rights
act
create
civil
liability
legislative
acts
legislators
field
legislators
traditionally
power
act
tenney
brandhove
noting
privilege
legislators
free
arrest
civil
process
say
legislative
proceedings
taproots
parliamentary
struggles
sixteenth
seventeenth
centuries
concluded
highly
improbable
congress
staunch
advocate
legislative
freedom
impinge
tradition
well
grounded
history
reason
covert
inclusion
general
language
statute
similar
fashion
pierson
ray
supra
examined
scope
judicial
immunity
statute
noting
record
contained
proof
specific
allegation
trial
judge
played
role
arrests
convictions
adjudge
petitioners
guilty
cases
came
concluded
congress
intended
abolish
immunity
judges
acts
within
judicial
role
done
specifically
errors
may
corrected
appeal
fear
unsatisfied
litigants
may
hound
litigation
charging
malice
corruption
imposing
burden
judges
contribute
principled
fearless
intimidation
ibid
defend
theory
believed
good
faith
constitutional
arrest
ministers
solely
using
white
waiting
room
rather
claimed
attempted
prove
arrested
solely
purpose
preventing
violence
testified
contradiction
ministers
crowd
gathered
imminent
violence
likely
jury
believed
testimony
officers
disbelieved
ministers
jury
found
officers
reasonably
believed
good
faith
arrest
constitutional
verdict
officers
follow
even
though
arrest
fact
without
probable
cause
unconstitutional
defense
good
faith
probable
cause
appeals
found
available
officers
action
false
arrest
imprisonment
also
available
action
sure
occasions
upon
acts
head
executive
department
protected
privilege
doubtless
far
broader
case
officer
less
sweeping
functions
higher
post
broader
range
responsibilities
duties
wider
scope
discretion
entails
title
office
duties
particular
officer
sought
made
respond
damages
entrusted
relation
act
complained
matters
committed
law
control
supervision
spalding
vilas
supra
must
provide
guide
delineating
scope
rule
clothes
official
acts
executive
officer
immunity
civil
defamation
suits
doubt
cases
expert
spot
may
called
upon
justify
conduct
later
notwithstanding
fact
sole
command
time
acted
best
knowledge
position
captain
ship
even
case
great
weight
given
determination
matter
judged
facts
appeared
merely
light
event
moyer
peabody
citations
omitted
extreme
position
deemed
well
taken
manifest
fiat
state
governor
constitution
law
land
restrictions
federal
constitution
upon
exercise
state
power
impotent
phrases
futility
state
may
time
disclose
simple
process
transferring
powers
legislation
governor
exercised
beyond
control
upon
assertion
necessity
system
government
conclusion
obviously
untenable
avenue
escape
paramount
authority
federal
constitution
substantial
showing
exertion
state
power
overridden
private
rights
secured
constitution
subject
necessarily
one
judicial
inquiry
appropriate
proceeding
directed
individuals
charged
transgression
iv
cases
present
posture
present
occasion
definitive
exploration
scope
immunity
available
state
executive
officials
absence
factual
record
permit
determination
applicability
foregoing
principles
respondents
district
acted
answers
filed
without
evidence
copies
proclamations
issued
respondent
rhodes
brief
affidavits
adjutant
general
assistant
dismissing
complaints
district
appeals
erroneously
accepted
fact
good
faith
governor
took
judicial
notice
mob
rule
existed
kent
state
university
opportunity
afforded
petitioners
contest
facts
assumed
conclusion
evidence
courts
finding
good
faith
properly
made
circumstances
cases
dispositive
conclusion
judicially
noticed
readily
grant
declaration
emergency
chief
executive
state
entitled
great
weight
conclusive
sterling
constantin
supra
documents
properly
district
early
pleading
stage
specifically
placed
issue
whether
governor
subordinate
officers
acting
within
scope
duties
constitution
laws
ohio
whether
acted
within
range
discretion
permitted
holders
office
ohio
law
whether
acted
good
faith
proclaiming
emergency
actions
taken
cope
emergency
declared
similarly
complaints
place
directly
issue
whether
lesser
officers
enlisted
personnel
guard
acted
obedience
orders
superiors
proceedings
either
way
summary
judgment
trial
merits
required
complaining
parties
entitled
heard
fully
possible
motion
dismiss
complaint
intimate
evaluation
whatever
merits
petitioners
claims
whether
possible
support
proof
hold
allegations
respective
complaints
entitled
judicially
resolved
judgments
appeals
reversed
cases
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
krause
complaint
plaintiff
citizen
pennsylvania
expressly
invokes
federal
diversity
jurisdiction
miller
complaint
plaintiff
citizen
new
york
complaint
specifically
refer
jurisdiction
alleges
facts
clearly
support
diversity
jurisdiction
app
see
fed
rule
civ
proc
krause
case
adjutant
general
assistant
also
filed
brief
affidavits
seem
basically
directed
motion
change
venue
event
make
substantial
contribution
jurisdictional
immunity
questions
england
legislative
immunity
secured
long
struggle
bill
rights
freedom
speech
debates
proceedings
parliament
impeached
questioned
place
parliament
sess
see
stockdale
hansard
ad
eng
english
experience
course
guided
drafters
speech
debate
clause
see
tenney
brandhove
johnson
brewster
regard
judicial
immunity
holdsworth
notes
case
courts
record
held
certainly
early
edward
iii
reign
litigant
go
behind
record
order
make
judge
civilly
criminally
liable
abuse
jurisdiction
holdsworth
history
english
law
modern
concept
owes
much
elaboration
restatement
coke
judges
sixteenth
early
seventeenth
centuries
et
seq
see
floyd
barker
eng
immunity
crown
traditionally
limited
nature
officers
crown
first
insulated
responsibility
since
king
claim
act
absolute
insulation
gradually
eroded
statute
westminster
edw
repealed
statute
westminster
ii
edw
repealed
development
liability
especially
times
tudors
stuarts
slow
see
public
officers
protection
act
jac
repealed
accession
william
mary
liability
officers
saw
jaffe
termed
remarkable
significant
extension
ashby
white
bro
eng
reversing
mod
eng
jaffe
suits
governments
officers
sovereign
immunity
harv
rev
dicey
law
constitution
ed
footnotes
omitted
see
generally
barr
matteo
performance
discretionary
duty
remained
seems
defense
see
jaffe
suits
governments
officers
damage
actions
harv
rev
see
also
spalding
vilas
et
seq
jaffe
suits
governments
officers
damage
actions
harv
justice
frankfurter
noted
tenney
brandhove
provision
constitution
reflection
political
principles
already
firmly
established
three
state
constitutions
adopted
federal
constitution
specifically
protected
privilege
see
coffin
coffin
mass
see
also
kilbourn
thompson
example
floyd
barker
supra
coke
emphasized
judges
make
account
god
king
since
contrary
rule
tend
scandal
subversion
justice
sincere
free
continual
calumniations
eng
see
also
yaselli
goff
aff
per
curiam
spalding
vilas
noted
exercising
functions
office
head
executive
department
keeping
within
limits
authority
apprehension
motives
control
official
conduct
may
time
become
subject
inquiry
civil
suit
damages
seriously
cripple
proper
effective
administration
public
affairs
entrusted
executive
branch
government
subjected
restraint
spalding
vilas
discussing
early
principles
judicial
immunity
country
cf
randall
brigham
wall
bradley
fisher
wall
yates
lansing
johns
noted
similarity
controlling
policy
considerations
case
executive
officers
judges
opinion
general
considerations
public
policy
convenience
demand
judges
courts
superior
jurisdiction
immunity
civil
suits
damages
arising
acts
done
course
performance
judicial
functions
apply
large
extent
official
communications
made
heads
executive
departments
engaged
discharge
duties
imposed
upon
law
interests
people
require
due
protection
accorded
respect
official
acts