concrete
pipe
prods
constr
laborers
trust
argued
december
decided
june
multiemployer
pension
plan
amendments
act
mppaa
amended
employee
retirement
income
security
act
erisa
provide
certain
circumstances
employer
withdrawing
multiemployer
plan
incurs
withdrawal
liability
share
plan
unfunded
vested
benefits
withdrawal
liability
assessed
means
notification
plan
sponsor
demand
payment
unresolved
dispute
referred
arbitration
sponsor
factual
determinations
presumed
correct
unless
contesting
party
shows
preponderance
evidence
determination
unreasonable
clearly
erroneous
sponsor
actuary
calculation
plan
unfunded
vested
benefits
presumed
correct
unless
contesting
party
shows
preponderance
evidence
inter
alia
actuarial
assumptions
methods
used
calculation
aggregate
unreasonable
petitioner
concrete
pipe
products
california
employer
charged
withdrawal
liability
trustees
respondent
multiemployer
pension
plan
plan
losing
arbitration
concrete
pipe
filed
action
set
aside
modify
arbitrator
decision
raised
constitutional
challenge
mppaa
district
granted
plan
motion
confirm
award
appeals
affirmed
held
mppaa
unconstitutionally
deny
concrete
pipe
impartial
adjudicator
placing
determination
withdrawal
liability
plan
sponsor
trustees
subject
presumptions
pp
even
assuming
possibility
trustee
bias
toward
imposing
greatest
possible
withdrawal
liability
suffice
bar
trustees
serving
adjudicators
concrete
pipe
withdrawal
liability
fiduciary
obligations
beneficiaries
plan
due
process
clause
violated
first
adjudication
case
arbitration
proceeding
trustees
initial
liability
determination
trustees
statutory
notification
demand
obligations
undertaken
enforcement
capacity
pp
arbitrator
adjudication
deny
concrete
pipe
right
procedural
due
process
presumption
shifts
burden
persuasion
employer
statute
incoherent
respect
degree
certainty
required
overturn
plan
sponsor
factual
determination
light
assumed
bias
deference
plan
sponsor
determination
raise
substantial
due
process
question
uncertainty
raised
incoherent
statute
resolved
applying
canon
requiring
ambiguous
statute
construed
avoid
serious
constitutional
problems
unless
construction
plainly
contrary
congress
intent
thus
presumption
construed
place
burden
employer
disprove
alleged
fact
preponderance
permitting
independent
review
arbitrator
trustees
factual
determinations
approach
taken
arbitrator
courts
case
inconsistent
interpretation
first
presumption
pp
presumption
also
raises
procedural
due
process
issue
assumptions
methods
used
calculating
withdrawal
liability
selected
first
instance
trustees
plan
actuary
trained
professional
subject
regulatory
standards
technical
nature
assumptions
methods
necessity
applying
ones
several
contexts
limit
actuary
opportunity
act
unfairly
toward
withdrawing
employer
moreover
since
speaks
reasonableness
trustees
conclusions
historical
fact
aggregate
reasonableness
actuary
assumptions
methods
calculating
dollar
liability
figure
employer
burden
overcome
presumption
simply
show
apparently
unbiased
professional
whose
obligations
tend
moderate
claimed
inclination
come
hard
withdrawing
employers
based
calculation
combination
methods
assumptions
falls
outside
range
reasonable
actuarial
practice
pp
mppaa
applied
deny
substantive
due
process
violation
fifth
amendment
imposition
withdrawal
liability
clearly
rational
concrete
pipe
liability
based
proportion
contributions
participation
plan
pp
mppaa
applied
take
concrete
pipe
property
without
compensation
application
regulatory
statute
otherwise
within
congress
powers
may
defeated
private
contractual
provisions
protecting
concrete
pipe
liability
beyond
specified
collective
bargaining
trust
agreements
see
connolly
pension
benefit
guaranty
corporation
examining
concrete
pipe
relationship
plan
light
three
factors
said
particular
significance
takings
claims
confirms
first
government
physically
invade
permanently
appropriate
concrete
pipe
assets
use
second
concrete
pipe
failed
show
pay
estimated
shareholder
equity
economic
impact
proportion
experience
plan
since
diminution
property
value
however
serious
insufficient
demonstrate
taking
see
village
euclid
ambler
realty
third
conditions
contractual
promises
give
concrete
pipe
reasonable
expectation
faced
liability
promised
benefits
time
began
making
payments
plan
pension
plans
long
subject
federal
regulation
indeed
withdrawing
employers
already
faced
contingent
liability
erisa
concrete
pipe
reliance
erisa
original
limitation
contingent
withdrawal
liability
net
worth
misplaced
reasonable
basis
expect
legislative
ceiling
never
lifted
see
usery
turner
elkhorn
mining
pp
souter
delivered
opinion
unanimous
except
insofar
join
statement
attached
scalia
join
part
thomas
join
part
filed
concurring
opinion
post
thomas
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
post
dennis
murphy
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
james
nelson
john
miller
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondent
carol
connor
flowe
argued
cause
pension
benefit
guaranty
corporation
amicus
curiae
urging
affirmance
brief
jeffrey
cohen
israel
goldowitz
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
filed
american
trucking
associations
daniel
barney
laurie
baulig
william
ewing
midwest
motor
express
et
al
alan
thiemann
charles
carroll
thomas
wilcox
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
filed
american
academy
actuaries
lauren
bloom
american
federation
labor
congress
industrial
organizations
robert
weinberg
laurence
gold
central
southeast
southwest
areas
pension
fund
thomas
nyhan
terence
craig
national
coordinating
committee
multiemployer
plans
gerald
feder
david
levin
teamsters
pension
trust
fund
philadelphia
vicinity
et
al
james
crawford
james
leyden
thomas
jennings
kent
cprek
justice
souter
delivered
opinion
respondent
construction
laborers
pension
trust
southern
california
plan
multiemployer
pension
trust
fund
established
trust
agreement
executed
petitioner
concrete
pipe
products
california
concrete
pipe
employer
former
contributor
plan
withdrew
assessed
withdrawal
liability
provisions
employee
retirement
income
security
act
erisa
ed
supp
iii
added
multiemployer
pension
plan
amendments
act
mppaa
stat
concrete
pipe
contends
mppaa
assessment
arbitration
provisions
worked
deny
procedural
due
process
although
upheld
mppaa
constitutional
challenge
substantive
component
due
process
clause
takings
clause
pension
benefit
guaranty
corporation
gray
connolly
pension
benefit
guaranty
corporation
concrete
pipe
contends
applied
mppaa
violates
provisions
well
see
merit
none
concrete
pipe
contentions
pension
plan
like
one
issue
one
employer
contributes
characteristically
maintained
fulfill
terms
collective
bargaining
agreements
contributions
made
employers
participating
multiemployer
plan
pooled
general
fund
available
pay
benefit
obligation
plan
receive
benefits
employee
participating
plan
need
work
one
employer
particular
continuous
period
service
credit
portable
employees
employer
participating
plan
may
receive
credit
work
done
participating
employer
employee
obtains
vested
right
secure
benefits
upon
retirement
accruing
certain
length
service
participating
employers
benefits
vest
plan
case
employee
accumulates
essentially
continuous
years
credit
see
brief
petitioner
multiemployer
plans
like
one
us
features
beneficial
industries
little
likelihood
individual
employers
establish
plans
employees
hundreds
perhaps
thousands
small
employers
countless
numbers
employers
going
business
year
nexus
employment
focused
relationship
workers
union
belong
industry
employed
rather
particular
employer
multiemployer
pension
plan
termination
insurance
program
hearings
subcommittee
oversight
house
committee
ways
means
statement
robert
georgine
chairman
national
coordinating
committee
multiemployer
plans
since
enactment
erisa
plan
subject
provisions
statute
defined
benefit
plan
plan
one
qualify
individual
account
plan
defined
contribution
plan
provide
among
things
individual
account
covered
employee
benefits
based
solely
upon
amount
contributed
covered
employee
account
see
concrete
pipe
challenged
determination
plan
falls
within
statutory
definition
defined
benefit
plan
issue
canvassed
history
erisa
mppaa
see
pension
benefit
guaranty
corporation
gray
supra
connolly
pension
benefit
guaranty
corporation
supra
erisa
designed
ensure
employees
beneficiaries
deprived
anticipated
retirement
benefits
termination
pension
plans
sufficient
funds
accumulated
congress
wanted
guarantee
worker
promised
defined
pension
benefit
upon
retirement
fulfilled
whatever
conditions
required
obtain
vested
benefit
actually
receive
citations
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
enacted
erisa
created
pension
benefit
guarantee
corporation
pbgc
administer
enforce
pension
plan
termination
insurance
program
contributors
multiemployer
plans
required
pay
insurance
premiums
ed
supp
iii
terms
statute
originally
enacted
guarantee
basic
benefits
multiemployer
plans
terminated
mandatory
terminations
prior
time
guarantee
benefits
upon
plan
termination
discretionary
pbgc
pbgc
choose
extend
guarantee
multiemployer
plan
terminated
insufficient
assets
pay
promised
benefits
employer
contributed
plan
five
preceding
years
liable
pbgc
shortfall
proportion
share
contributions
period
percent
employer
net
worth
words
employer
withdrawing
multiemployer
plan
subject
contingent
liability
dependent
upon
plan
termination
next
five
years
pbgc
decision
exercise
discretion
pay
guaranteed
benefits
gray
date
mandatory
coverage
multiemployer
plans
approached
congress
became
concerned
significant
number
plans
experiencing
extreme
financial
hardship
ibid
indeed
possibility
liability
upon
termination
plan
created
incentive
employers
withdraw
weak
multiemployer
plans
connolly
consequent
risk
insurance
system
unacceptable
congress
postponed
mandatory
guarantee
pending
preparation
pbgc
report
analyzing
problems
multiemployer
plans
recommending
possible
solutions
ibid
pbgc
issued
report
july
pension
benefit
guaranty
corporation
multiemployer
study
required
alleviate
problem
employer
withdrawals
pbgc
suggested
new
rules
withdrawing
employer
required
pay
whatever
share
plan
unfunded
liabilities
attributable
employer
participation
connolly
citation
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
mppaa
provides
procedure
calculating
assessing
withdrawal
liability
plan
actuary
subject
regulatory
professional
standards
must
determine
present
value
plan
liability
vested
benefits
absence
regulations
promulgated
pbgc
actuary
must
employ
actuarial
assumptions
methods
aggregate
reasonable
taking
account
experience
plan
reasonable
expectations
combination
offer
actuary
best
estimate
anticipated
experience
plan
assumptions
must
cover
matters
mortality
covered
employees
likelihood
benefits
vesting
importantly
future
interest
rates
settling
present
value
vested
benefits
actuary
calculates
unfunded
portion
deducting
value
plan
assets
order
determine
particular
employer
withdrawal
liability
unfunded
vested
liability
allocated
one
several
methods
provided
law
case
plan
used
presumptive
method
bases
withdrawal
liability
proportion
total
employer
contributions
plan
made
withdrawing
employer
certain
periods
see
ii
ii
essence
withdrawal
liability
imposes
withdrawing
employer
share
unfunded
vested
liability
proportional
employer
share
contributions
plan
years
participation
withdrawal
liability
assessed
notification
plan
sponsor
trustees
see
demand
payment
statute
requires
notification
demand
made
soon
practicable
employer
complete
partial
withdrawal
complete
withdrawal
occurs
employer
permanently
ceases
obligation
contribute
plan
permanently
ceases
covered
operations
plan
date
complete
withdrawal
date
cessation
obligation
contribute
cessation
covered
operations
presumed
correct
unless
party
contesting
determination
shows
preponderance
evidence
actuarial
assumptions
methods
used
determination
aggregate
unreasonable
taking
account
experience
plan
reasonable
expectations
ii
plan
actuary
made
significant
error
applying
actuarial
assumptions
methods
ii
parties
trust
agreement
creating
plan
southern
california
district
council
laborers
laborers
three
associations
contractors
building
industry
california
engineering
contractors
association
southern
california
contractors
association
app
stipulation
facts
filed
district
labor
management
relations
act
lmra
union
participates
management
plan
permitted
lmra
plan
must
administered
jointly
representatives
labor
management
accordingly
half
plan
trustees
selected
laborers
half
contractors
associations
concrete
pipe
never
member
contractors
associations
parties
trust
agreement
concrete
pipe
wholly
owned
subsidiary
concrete
pipe
products
purchased
certain
assets
another
company
including
concrete
pipe
manufacturing
plant
near
shafter
california
concrete
pipe
continued
operate
much
done
collective
bargaining
agreements
several
unions
including
laborers
concrete
pipe
abided
agreement
latter
contributing
plan
specified
rate
hour
worked
covered
employee
concrete
pipe
negotiated
new
contract
laborers
called
continuing
contributions
made
plan
based
hours
worked
covered
employees
collective
bargaining
unit
collective
bargaining
agreement
specified
remain
effect
june
thereafter
year
year
unless
either
concrete
pipe
laborers
gave
notice
desire
renegotiate
terminate
written
notice
given
least
sixty
days
prior
june
agreement
reached
june
employer
laborers
might
thereafter
give
written
notice
specified
date
least
fifteen
days
thereafter
agreement
considered
terminated
app
august
concrete
pipe
stopped
production
shafter
facility
although
details
matter
october
work
employees
covered
agreement
laborers
virtually
ceased
concrete
pipe
eventually
stopped
making
contributions
plan
spring
concrete
pipe
laborers
sent
timely
notice
desire
renegotiate
collective
bargaining
agreement
concrete
pipe
subsequently
bargained
impasse
november
sent
laborers
letter
withdrawing
recognition
union
employee
representative
giving
notice
intent
terminate
collective
bargaining
agreement
time
however
november
concrete
pipe
reopened
shafter
plant
produce
tons
concrete
pipe
needed
fill
two
orders
successfully
bid
hired
employees
classifications
covered
prior
agreement
laborers
contribute
plan
work
january
plan
notified
concrete
pipe
withdrawal
liability
claimed
amount
see
although
demand
letter
specify
date
plan
contended
complete
withdrawal
taken
place
referred
failure
concrete
pipe
make
contributions
plan
since
february
stated
advised
signed
renewal
collective
bargaining
agreement
obligating
continue
contributions
plan
behalf
construction
laborers
currently
employ
plan
filed
suit
seeking
assessed
withdrawal
liability
concrete
pipe
countersued
bar
collection
contending
complete
withdrawal
occurred
operations
shafter
plant
ceased
august
date
prior
effective
date
mppaa
challenging
mppaa
constitutional
grounds
cases
consolidated
district
central
district
california
sua
sponte
ordered
parties
arbitrate
issue
whether
withdrawal
occurred
prior
effective
date
mppaa
arbitration
took
place
two
phases
first
arbitrator
determined
concrete
pipe
withdrawn
plan
prior
effective
date
mppaa
app
second
phase
explicitly
applying
presumption
arbitrator
found
concrete
pipe
failed
meet
burden
showing
actuarial
assumptions
methods
unreasonable
aggregate
app
reasons
issue
arbitrator
rule
partially
concrete
pipe
favor
reduced
withdrawal
liability
concrete
pipe
filed
third
action
district
set
aside
modify
arbitrator
decision
raised
constitutional
challenge
district
treated
concrete
pipe
subsequent
motion
summary
judgment
petition
vacate
arbitrator
award
denied
granted
motion
plan
confirm
award
construction
laborers
pension
trust
southern
california
concrete
pipe
products
cd
july
app
concrete
pipe
appeal
judgment
district
affirmed
board
trustees
construction
laborers
pension
trust
southern
california
concrete
pipe
products
california
app
judgt
order
reported
granted
certiorari
limited
two
questions
presented
set
margin
iii
concrete
pipe
challenges
assessment
withdrawal
liability
several
grounds
first
placing
determination
withdrawal
liability
trustees
subject
presumptions
provided
mppaa
unconstitutional
denies
concrete
pipe
impartial
adjudicator
first
time
legal
question
see
pension
benefit
guaranty
corporation
yahn
mcdonnell
equally
divided
retail
wholesale
employees
teamsters
union
local
pension
plan
yahn
mcdonnell
concrete
pipe
amici
point
several
potential
sources
trustee
bias
toward
imposing
greatest
possible
withdrawal
liability
one
emphasize
strongly
roots
fact
trustees
including
selected
employers
fiduciaries
fund
thus
owe
exclusive
duty
fund
emphasis
omitted
said
another
case
discussing
employee
benefit
pension
plans
permitted
lmra
principles
equity
trustee
bears
unwavering
duty
complete
loyalty
beneficiary
trust
exclusion
interests
parties
deter
trustee
temptation
prevent
possible
injury
beneficiary
rule
trustee
dividing
loyalties
must
enforced
uncompromising
rigidity
sum
duty
trustee
employee
benefit
fund
directly
antithetical
agent
appointing
party
erisa
essentially
codified
strict
fiduciary
standards
trustee
must
meet
title
requires
trustee
discharge
duties
solely
interest
participants
covered
employees
beneficiaries
nlrb
amax
coal
citations
omitted
omitted
trustees
act
biased
fashion
several
reasons
obvious
attempting
maximize
assets
available
beneficiaries
trust
making
findings
enhance
withdrawal
liability
next
selfless
existing
underfunding
consequence
prior
decisions
trustees
decisions
offset
leave
trustees
open
personal
liability
see
brief
american
trucking
associations
amicus
curiae
risk
bias
may
also
inhere
mere
fact
fiduciary
obligations
aside
trustees
appointed
unions
employers
union
trustees
may
thought
incentives
unrelated
question
withdrawal
impose
greater
rather
lesser
withdrawal
liability
employer
trustees
may
responsive
concerns
employers
continue
contribute
whose
future
burdens
may
reduced
high
withdrawal
liability
whose
competitive
position
may
enhanced
boot
see
brief
midwest
motor
express
et
al
amici
curiae
citing
note
trading
fairness
efficiency
constitutionality
dispute
resolution
procedures
multiemployer
pension
plan
amendments
act
supposed
threats
trustees
neutrality
due
process
requires
neutral
detached
judge
first
instance
ward
village
monroeville
command
different
legislature
delegates
adjudicative
functions
private
party
see
schweiker
mcclure
officers
acting
judicial
capacity
disqualified
interest
controversy
decided
course
general
rule
tumey
ohio
one
may
deprived
protected
interest
whether
criminal
civil
setting
see
marshall
jerrico
one
entitled
matter
due
process
law
adjudicator
situation
offer
possible
temptation
average
man
judge
might
lead
hold
balance
nice
clear
true
ward
supra
quoting
tumey
supra
even
appeal
trial
de
novo
cure
failure
provide
neutral
detached
adjudicator
ustice
indeed
must
satisfy
appearance
justice
stringent
rule
may
sometimes
bar
trial
even
judges
actual
bias
best
weigh
scales
justice
equally
contending
parties
marshall
jerrico
supra
citations
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
less
true
private
party
given
statutory
authority
adjudicate
dispute
assume
possibility
bias
stemming
trustees
statutory
role
fiduciary
obligation
suffice
bar
trustees
serving
adjudicators
concrete
pipe
withdrawal
liability
assumption
win
case
concrete
pipe
however
strand
governing
law
applied
determinations
affecting
liability
adjudicative
rigid
requirements
designed
officials
performing
judicial
functions
applicable
acting
prosecutorial
capacity
initial
determination
made
party
acting
enforcement
capacity
due
process
may
satisfied
providing
neutral
adjudicator
conduct
de
novo
review
factual
legal
issues
cf
see
also
cf
withrow
larkin
clearly
initial
view
facts
based
evidence
derived
nonadversarial
processes
practical
legal
matter
foreclosed
fair
effective
consideration
subsequent
adversary
hearing
leading
ultimate
decision
substantial
due
process
question
raised
distinction
adjudication
enforcement
disposes
claim
assumed
bias
appearance
bias
trustees
initial
determination
withdrawal
liability
alone
violates
due
process
clause
much
similar
claim
marshall
jerrico
although
faced
federal
agency
administrator
determined
violations
child
labor
law
assessed
penalties
statute
concluded
administrator
held
high
standards
required
whose
duty
make
final
decision
whose
impartiality
serves
ultimate
guarantee
fair
meaningful
proceeding
constitutional
regime
administrator
said
judge
performs
judicial
functions
hears
witnesses
rules
disputed
factual
legal
questions
function
assessing
violation
akin
prosecutor
civil
plaintiff
analysis
applies
equal
force
trustees
find
act
enforcement
capacity
statute
requires
plan
sponsor
trustees
notify
employer
amount
withdrawal
liability
demand
payment
actions
bear
hallmark
assessment
adjudication
trustees
required
hold
hearing
examine
witnesses
adjudicate
disputes
contending
parties
matters
fact
law
marshall
observed
employer
except
ing
penalty
entitled
de
novo
hearing
administrative
law
judge
concluded
latter
proceeding
initial
adjudication
likewise
conclude
first
adjudication
proceeding
occurs
arbitrator
trustees
initial
determination
liability
end
inquiry
however
concrete
pipe
goes
argue
statutory
presumptions
preserve
trustees
bias
limiting
arbitrator
autonomy
determine
withdrawal
liability
thereby
work
deny
employer
fair
adjudication
first
provision
issue
determination
made
plan
sponsor
presumed
correct
unless
party
contesting
determination
shows
preponderance
evidence
determination
unreasonable
clearly
erroneous
concrete
pipe
argues
presumption
denied
impartial
adjudicator
issue
withdrawal
date
thus
raising
constitutional
question
courts
appeals
divided
parties
apparently
agree
presumption
applies
factual
determinations
see
reply
brief
petitioner
brief
respondent
deferring
brief
pbgc
amicus
curiae
brief
pension
benefit
guaranty
corporation
amicus
curiae
position
consistent
pbgc
regulation
requiring
arbitrator
reaching
decision
follow
applicable
law
embodied
statutes
regulations
decisions
interpretations
agencies
charged
enforcement
act
pertinent
authorities
cfr
assume
purposes
case
regulation
reflects
sound
reading
statute
burden
showing
something
preponderance
evidence
common
standard
civil
law
simply
requires
trier
fact
believe
existence
fact
probable
nonexistence
may
find
favor
party
burden
persuade
judge
fact
existence
winship
harlan
concurring
brackets
original
citation
omitted
finding
clearly
erroneous
although
evidence
support
reviewing
body
entire
evidence
left
definite
firm
conviction
mistake
committed
gypsum
showing
unreasonableness
require
even
greater
certainty
error
part
reviewing
body
see
anderson
liberty
lobby
creating
presumption
issue
terms
combined
strange
way
descriptions
indicate
first
preponderance
customarily
used
prescribe
one
possible
burden
standard
proof
trier
fact
first
instance
proponent
proposition
loses
unless
proves
contested
proposition
preponderance
evidence
term
thus
belongs
category
clear
convincing
beyond
reasonable
doubt
also
used
prescribe
standards
proof
greater
degrees
certainty
thought
necessary
burden
satisfied
first
instance
factfinder
must
evaluate
raw
evidence
finding
sufficiently
reliable
sufficiently
probative
demonstrate
truth
asserted
proposition
requisite
degree
certainty
second
third
terms
differ
first
important
way
customarily
used
describe
degree
certainty
fact
proven
first
instance
degree
certainty
factfinder
first
instance
made
mistake
concluding
fact
proven
applicable
standard
proof
words
standards
review
normally
applied
reviewing
courts
determinations
fact
made
trial
courts
made
determinations
adjudicatory
capacity
unlike
trustees
see
terms
readily
indicate
reviewing
body
characteristically
examines
prior
findings
way
give
original
factfinder
conclusions
fact
degree
deference
makes
sense
many
circumstances
costs
providing
duplicative
proceedings
thought
outweigh
benefits
second
render
first
ultimately
useless
usual
case
factfinder
better
position
make
judgments
reliability
forms
evidence
reviewing
body
acting
solely
basis
written
record
evidence
evaluation
credibility
live
witness
obvious
example
thus
review
clearly
erroneous
standard
significantly
deferential
requiring
definite
firm
conviction
mistake
committed
application
reasonableness
standard
even
deferential
requiring
reviewer
sustain
finding
fact
unless
unlikely
reasonable
person
find
true
whatever
required
degree
proof
strangeness
statutory
language
creating
first
presumption
arises
combination
terms
first
category
burdens
proof
second
standards
review
true
course
apparent
confusion
categories
may
resulted
hybrid
nature
arbitrator
proceeding
supposed
applied
arbitrator
function
simply
reviewing
body
classic
sense
obliged
enquire
soundness
sponsor
determinations
challenged
may
receive
new
evidence
course
review
adopt
conclusions
fact
may
conduct
proceedings
manner
powers
arbitrator
may
title
state
code
see
authorized
example
hear
indeed
subpoena
witnesses
take
evidence
see
making
specific
reference
subpoena
power
reviewing
body
clear
obligation
absent
contrary
showing
deem
certain
determinations
plan
sponsor
correct
reviewing
body
invested
powers
finder
fact
clear
power
take
evidence
course
review
presumption
correctness
district
bound
give
findings
fact
arbitrator
may
thus
provide
dual
sort
trial
review
ultimately
empowered
draw
conclusions
make
sense
describe
different
functions
respectively
language
trial
language
review
however
make
sense
use
language
trial
language
review
statute
statute
refer
different
arbitrator
functions
language
appropriate
refers
rather
one
single
conclusion
must
drawn
determination
previously
made
plan
sponsor
terms
statute
purports
provide
standard
reviewing
sponsor
findings
defines
nature
conclusion
arbitrator
must
draw
using
combination
terms
categorically
also
inconsistent
reading
used
distinct
usual
context
statutory
phrase
authorizing
arbitrator
reject
factual
conclusion
upon
proof
preponderance
implies
review
sponsor
determination
basis
record
supplemented
new
evidence
simple
error
statutory
phrase
given
effect
arbitrator
concluded
review
record
new
evidence
finding
fact
probably
wrong
rejected
different
finding
might
substituted
hand
requiring
showing
sponsor
determination
clearly
erroneous
unreasonable
grant
plan
sponsor
factual
findings
great
deal
deference
say
context
one
must
demonstrate
something
probably
clearly
erroneous
probably
unreasonable
meaningless
one
might
intelligibly
say
trial
criminal
prosecutor
bound
prove
element
probably
true
beyond
reasonable
doubt
statute
thus
incoherent
respect
degree
probability
error
required
employer
overcome
factual
conclusion
made
plan
sponsor
proper
response
incomprehensibility
obviously
important
deciding
case
permitted
employer
rebut
plan
sponsor
factual
conclusions
preponderance
merely
placing
burden
persuasion
employer
permitting
adjudication
facts
arbitrator
without
affording
deference
plan
sponsor
determinations
provision
constitutionally
unremarkable
although
observed
burden
proof
lies
given
issue
course
rarely
without
consequence
frequently
may
dispositive
outcome
litigation
application
utside
criminal
law
area
special
concerns
attend
locus
burden
persuasion
normally
issue
federal
constitutional
moment
lavine
milne
omitted
concrete
pipe
points
special
interest
distinguish
normal
case
indeed
entirely
sensible
burden
party
likely
information
relevant
facts
withdrawal
plan
obligation
demonstrate
facts
treated
plan
amounting
withdrawal
occur
alleged
rule
common
law
bailey
onus
probandi
citing
powell
evidence
every
case
onus
probandi
lies
party
wishes
support
case
particular
fact
lies
peculiarly
within
knowledge
supposed
cognizant
hand
employer
required
show
trustees
findings
either
unreasonable
clearly
erroneous
substantial
question
procedural
fairness
due
process
clause
essence
arbitrator
provided
statute
required
accept
plan
sponsor
findings
even
probably
incorrect
absent
showing
least
sufficient
instill
definite
firm
conviction
mistake
made
cf
withrow
larkin
light
assumption
possible
bias
employer
seem
deprived
thereby
impartial
adjudication
first
instance
entitled
due
process
clause
see
supra
hese
rules
necessary
order
ensure
enforceability
employer
liability
absence
presumptions
employers
effectively
nullify
obligation
refusing
pay
forcing
plan
sponsor
prove
every
element
involved
making
actuarial
determination
committee
believes
extremely
important
withdrawn
employer
begin
making
annual
payments
even
though
period
years
payments
must
continue
based
actual
liability
allocated
employer
pt
supra
legislative
history
thus
sheds
little
light
odd
language
chosen
describe
employer
burden
tells
us
provision
purpose
prevent
employer
forcing
plan
sponsor
prove
every
element
involved
making
actuarial
determination
since
purpose
served
simply
placing
burden
proof
historical
fact
employer
however
light
heavy
burden
may
legislative
history
nothing
make
sense
drafter
failure
choose
among
standards
included
text
although
faced
ambiguity
within
usual
degree
incoherence
common
obligation
situation
resolve
uncertainty
favor
definite
meaning
canon
resolving
ambiguity
applies
equal
force
terminology
renders
statute
incoherent
applying
canon
must
give
effect
one
conclusion
clearly
supported
statutory
language
congress
intended
shift
burden
persuasion
employer
dispute
sponsor
factual
determination
objective
realized
without
raising
serious
constitutional
concerns
simply
construing
presumption
place
burden
employer
disprove
challenged
factual
determination
preponderance
construing
statute
make
pretense
read
congressional
mind
perfection
indeed
even
problem
argument
obviously
made
congress
intended
greater
deference
preponderance
standard
extends
one
hardly
call
intent
clear
wondering
preponderance
standard
also
included
circumstances
enough
choice
attain
coherence
obviating
constitutional
problems
plainly
contrary
intent
congress
debartolo
supra
statute
construe
foreclose
factual
issue
independent
consideration
arbitrator
presumption
assumed
inapplicable
issues
law
constitutional
infirmity
reason
employer
may
avail
independent
review
concededly
neutral
arbitrator
find
derivative
constitutional
defect
infecting
presumption
district
must
afford
arbitrator
findings
fact
see
truly
factual
issues
arbitrator
decision
fails
reveal
force
factual
conclusions
trustees
presumed
correct
case
ordinarily
reverse
judgment
consideration
extent
arbitrator
application
presumption
contrary
construction
adopt
today
two
reasons
urged
upon
us
neither
party
persuade
us
take
course
plan
letter
concrete
pipe
contains
statement
facts
justifying
trustees
demand
parties
entered
factual
stipulation
district
prior
commencing
arbitration
two
circumstances
virtually
contested
factual
determinations
arbitrator
might
deferred
one
question
fact
may
disputed
arbitrator
found
apparently
first
instance
concrete
pipe
intent
closing
shafter
plant
cease
operations
permanently
app
express
opinion
whether
facts
case
constitute
complete
withdrawal
within
meaning
statute
question
us
today
approach
taken
arbitrator
courts
inconsistent
interpretation
first
presumption
determination
date
withdrawal
arbitrator
involve
misapplication
statutory
presumption
deprive
concrete
pipe
right
procedural
due
process
second
presumption
issue
attends
calculation
amount
withdrawal
liability
statute
provides
absence
particular
pbgc
regulations
plan
required
use
actuarial
assumptions
methods
aggregate
reasonable
taking
account
experience
plan
reasonable
expectations
combination
offer
actuary
best
estimate
anticipated
experience
plan
presumption
question
arises
provides
determination
plan
unfunded
vested
benefits
plan
year
presumed
correct
unless
party
contesting
determination
shows
preponderance
evidence
actuarial
assumptions
methods
used
determination
aggregate
unreasonable
taking
account
experience
plan
reasonable
expectations
ii
plan
actuary
made
significant
error
applying
actuarial
assumptions
methods
provision
like
counterpart
creating
presumption
factual
determinations
placing
burden
proof
employer
issues
implicated
applying
actuary
work
text
plainly
indicates
assumptions
methods
used
calculating
withdrawal
liability
selected
first
instance
trustees
plan
actuary
variety
reasons
actuary
like
trustees
vulnerable
suggestions
bias
appearance
although
plan
sponsors
employ
actuaries
trained
professionals
subject
regulatory
standards
see
technical
nature
actuary
assumptions
methods
necessity
applying
assumptions
methods
one
context
practical
matter
limit
opportunity
actuary
might
otherwise
act
unfairly
toward
withdrawing
employer
statutory
requirement
actuarial
assumptions
methods
aggregate
reasonable
unique
withdrawal
liability
context
statute
employs
identical
language
describe
actuarial
assumptions
methods
used
determining
whether
plan
satisfied
minimum
funding
requirements
contained
statute
use
language
describe
actuarial
assumptions
methods
used
different
contexts
tends
check
actuary
discretion
using
different
assumptions
different
purposes
well
attacked
presumptively
unreasonable
arbitration
judicial
review
view
trustees
required
act
reasonably
consistent
manner
greatly
limits
discretion
use
assumptions
overly
favorable
fund
one
context
tend
offsetting
unfavorable
consequences
contexts
example
use
assumptions
low
interest
rates
tend
increase
fund
unfunded
vested
liability
withdrawal
liability
purposes
also
make
difficult
plan
meet
minimum
funding
requirements
retail
wholesale
employees
teamsters
union
local
pension
plan
yahn
mcdonnell
seitz
dissenting
part
second
major
difference
attending
two
presumptions
lies
sense
reasonableness
must
disproven
employer
attacking
actuary
methods
assumptions
reasonableness
trustees
determinations
historical
fact
following
usual
presumption
statutory
interpretation
term
carries
meaning
whenever
appears
act
see
atlantic
cleaners
dyers
might
expect
reasonable
function
denote
certain
range
probability
factual
determination
correct
several
reasons
however
think
clear
second
presumption
reasonableness
functions
quite
differently
first
course
statute
speak
terms
disproving
reasonableness
calculation
employer
share
unfunded
liability
finding
future
fact
obviously
analogous
findings
historical
fact
presumption
applies
section
speaks
instead
aggregate
reasonableness
assumptions
methods
employed
actuary
calculating
dollar
liability
figure
method
accurate
probably
true
within
range
reasonable
must
understood
refer
different
kind
judgment
one
make
sense
apply
review
methodology
well
assumptions
since
methodology
subject
technical
judgment
within
recognized
professional
discipline
make
sense
judge
reasonableness
method
reference
actuarial
profession
considers
within
scope
professional
acceptability
making
unfunded
liability
calculation
accordingly
employer
burden
overcome
presumption
question
proof
preponderance
actuarial
assumptions
methods
aggregate
unreasonable
simply
burden
show
combination
methods
assumptions
employed
calculation
acceptable
reasonable
actuary
practical
terms
burden
show
something
standard
actuarial
practice
accuracy
predictive
calculation
even
though
consonance
professional
standards
making
calculation
might
justify
confidence
results
sound
thus
understood
presumption
question
supports
due
process
objection
employer
merely
burden
show
apparently
unbiased
professional
whose
obligations
tend
moderate
claimed
inclination
come
hard
withdrawing
employers
based
calculation
combination
methods
assumptions
falls
outside
range
reasonable
actuarial
practice
sure
burden
may
mere
one
considers
actuarial
practice
described
nature
actuarial
art
science
keith
fulton
sons
new
england
teamsters
en
banc
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
employer
burden
covers
technical
actuarial
matters
respect
often
several
equally
correct
approaches
committee
print
since
imprecision
inheres
choice
actuarial
methods
assumptions
resulting
difficulty
simply
nature
beast
must
fall
whichever
party
bears
burden
persuasion
issue
least
interests
stake
substantial
concrete
pipe
allocation
one
party
another
raise
issue
due
process
see
supra
iv
concrete
pipe
argues
next
applied
mppaa
violates
substantive
due
process
takes
concrete
pipe
property
without
compensation
violation
fifth
amendment
issues
decisions
gray
connolly
provide
principal
guidance
gray
upheld
mppaa
substantive
due
process
challenge
unlike
employer
gray
concrete
pipe
complaint
mppaa
retroactively
applied
predicating
liability
withdrawal
decision
made
passage
statute
sure
since
withdrawal
liability
without
prewithdrawal
contributions
plan
made
statutory
enactment
conduct
upon
concrete
pipe
liability
rests
antedates
statute
fact
presents
far
weaker
premise
claiming
substantive
due
process
violation
even
gray
employer
raised
rejection
concrete
pipe
contention
compelled
decisions
gray
usery
turner
elkhorn
mining
upon
gray
relied
well
established
legislative
acts
adjusting
burdens
benefits
economic
life
come
presumption
constitutionality
burden
one
complaining
due
process
violation
establish
legislature
acted
arbitrary
irrational
way
see
ferguson
skrupa
williamson
lee
optical
may
liability
imposed
act
anticipated
time
actual
employment
cases
clear
legislation
readjusting
rights
burdens
unlawful
solely
upsets
otherwise
settled
expectations
see
fleming
rhodes
carpenter
wabash
norman
baltimore
ohio
home
bldg
loan
assn
blaisdell
louisville
nashville
mottley
true
even
though
effect
legislation
impose
new
duty
liability
based
past
acts
see
lichter
welch
henry
funkhouser
preston
gray
quoting
turner
elkhorn
supra
footnotes
omitted
argument
simply
ignores
nature
multiemployer
plans
said
operate
pooling
contributions
liabilities
employer
contributions
solely
benefit
employees
employees
worked
alone
thus
concrete
pipe
presupposition
none
employees
vested
benefits
time
withdrawal
may
wrong
employee
whose
benefits
vested
coming
work
concrete
pipe
may
earned
additional
vested
benefits
subsequent
covered
service
another
may
sufficient
prior
service
credit
obtain
vesting
benefits
employment
concrete
pipe
third
may
attained
vesting
working
employers
based
part
service
credits
earned
concrete
pipe
even
concrete
pipe
correct
none
employees
earned
enough
service
credits
entitlement
vested
benefits
time
concrete
pipe
withdrawal
concrete
pipe
employee
earned
service
credits
built
upon
future
employment
participating
employer
determining
whether
imposition
withdrawal
liability
rational
relevant
question
whether
withdrawing
employer
employees
vested
benefits
whether
employer
contributed
plan
probable
liability
providing
employees
service
credits
withdrawing
employer
liability
plan
based
proportion
plan
contributions
coincident
service
credits
provided
employer
employer
participation
plan
imposition
withdrawal
liability
clearly
rational
true
depending
future
employment
concrete
pipe
former
employees
withdrawal
liability
assessed
concrete
pipe
may
amount
less
share
plan
liability
strictly
attributable
employment
covered
workers
concrete
pipe
possibility
exactly
concrete
pipe
accepted
joined
plan
multiemployer
plan
features
insurance
scheme
employers
spread
risk
employees
meet
plan
vesting
requirements
obtain
entitlement
benefits
rational
employer
hopes
employees
vest
rate
average
employees
contributing
employers
way
pay
less
creating
plan
rational
employer
also
appreciates
foreseeable
risk
circumstances
may
produce
opposite
result
since
mppaa
spreads
unfunded
vested
liability
among
employers
approximately
manner
cost
spread
employers
participating
time
withdrawal
seen
venture
withdrawal
liability
consistent
risks
assumed
joining
plan
however
inconsistent
liability
may
employer
hopes
event
deferential
standard
review
applied
substantive
due
process
challenges
economic
legislation
need
mathematical
precision
fit
justification
means
see
turner
elkhorn
concrete
pipe
substantive
due
process
claim
enhanced
argument
mppaa
imposes
obligations
upon
contrary
limitations
liability
variously
contained
trust
agreement
collective
bargaining
agreement
laborens
multiemployer
associations
laborer
craft
master
labor
agreement
appendix
southern
california
master
labor
agreements
even
assuming
provisions
apply
concrete
pipe
argument
runs
holding
gray
federal
economic
legislation
subject
constraints
coextensive
imposed
upon
contract
clause
art
federal
constitution
gray
trust
new
jersey
subject
due
process
review
rationality
said
satisfied
application
mppaa
concrete
pipe
possibility
trustee
decisions
made
concrete
pipe
entered
plan
may
led
unfunded
liability
alter
constitutional
calculus
see
brief
petitioner
concrete
pipe
decision
enter
plan
decisions
made
voluntary
concrete
pipe
time
assessed
implications
plan
future
liability
similarly
concrete
pipe
rely
argument
based
fact
member
contractors
associations
represented
among
plan
trustees
control
decisions
trustees
entered
plan
may
increased
unfunded
liability
concrete
pipe
assessed
implications
future
liability
identity
trustees
plan
decided
enter
imposition
withdrawal
liability
rationally
related
terms
concrete
pipe
participation
plan
joined
suffices
substantive
due
process
scrutiny
economic
legislation
given
concrete
pipe
due
process
arguments
unavailing
surprising
indeed
discover
challenged
statute
nonetheless
violating
takings
clause
connolly
violation
following
analysis
connolly
begin
contractual
provisions
relied
upon
trust
agreement
collective
bargaining
agreements
find
helpful
concrete
pipe
adduced
facial
challenge
brought
connolly
described
opinion
express
terms
trust
agreement
plan
employer
sole
obligation
pension
trust
pay
contributions
required
collective
bargaining
agreement
trust
agreement
clearly
employer
obligation
pension
benefits
employee
ended
employer
pays
appropriate
contribution
pension
trust
true
even
though
contributions
agreed
upon
insufficient
pay
benefits
plan
citations
footnotes
omitted
said
connolly
ppellants
claim
illegal
taking
gains
nothing
fact
employer
present
litigation
protected
terms
contract
liability
beyond
specified
contributions
agreed
contracts
however
express
fetter
constitutional
authority
congress
contracts
may
create
rights
property
contracts
deal
subject
matter
lies
within
control
congress
congenital
infirmity
parties
remove
transactions
reach
dominant
constitutional
power
making
contracts
regulatory
statute
otherwise
within
powers
congress
therefore
application
may
defeated
private
contractual
provisions
citations
omitted
following
connolly
next
step
analysis
subject
operative
facts
including
facts
contractual
relationship
standards
derived
prior
takings
clause
cases
see
identified
three
factors
particular
significance
assessing
results
required
ad
hoc
factual
inquir
circumstances
particular
case
connolly
first
nature
governmental
action
analysis
connolly
applies
equal
force
facts
us
today
government
physically
invade
permanently
appropriate
employer
assets
use
instead
act
safeguards
participants
multiemployer
pension
plans
requiring
withdrawing
employer
fund
share
plan
obligations
incurred
association
plan
interference
property
rights
employer
arises
public
program
adjusts
benefits
burdens
economic
life
promote
common
good
cases
constitute
taking
requiring
government
compensation
merit
concrete
pipe
contention
property
impermissibly
taken
sole
purpose
protecting
pbgc
government
body
forced
honor
pension
insurance
brief
petitioner
see
also
brief
midwest
motor
express
et
al
amici
curiae
solvency
pension
trust
fund
may
ultimately
redound
benefit
pbgc
set
part
guarantee
benefits
event
plan
failure
merely
incidental
primary
congressional
objective
protecting
covered
employees
beneficiaries
pension
trusts
like
plan
ere
taken
nothing
use
nullified
contractual
provision
limiting
liability
imposing
additional
obligation
otherwise
within
power
congress
impose
connolly
supra
concrete
pipe
argument
character
governmental
action
strengthened
fact
concrete
pipe
lacked
control
investment
benefit
decisions
may
increased
size
unfunded
vested
liability
response
argument
raised
substantive
due
process
clause
appropriate
although
concrete
pipe
member
management
associations
represented
among
trustees
fund
concrete
pipe
voluntarily
chose
participate
plan
notwithstanding
fact
see
supra
second
factor
bearing
taking
determination
severity
economic
impact
plan
concrete
pipe
shown
withdrawal
liability
proportion
experience
plan
notwithstanding
claim
required
pay
shareholder
equity
threshold
matter
plan
contests
figure
arguing
concrete
pipe
wholly
owned
subsidiary
concrete
pipe
products
simply
formed
facilitate
purchase
certain
assets
brief
respondent
relevant
issue
turns
diminution
net
worth
parent
company
concrete
pipe
see
tr
oral
arg
dispute
need
resolved
even
assuming
concrete
pipe
used
appropriate
measure
determining
portion
net
worth
required
paid
cases
long
established
mere
diminution
value
property
however
serious
insufficient
demonstrate
taking
see
village
euclid
ambler
realty
approximately
diminution
value
hadacheck
sebastian
diminution
final
factor
degree
interference
concrete
pipe
reasonable
expectations
connolly
controls
time
concrete
pipe
purchased
began
contributions
plan
pension
plans
long
subject
federal
regulation
hose
business
regulated
field
object
legislative
scheme
buttressed
subsequent
amendments
achieve
legislative
end
fha
darlington
see
also
usery
turner
elkhorn
mining
cases
cited
therein
indeed
time
plan
already
subject
erisa
withdrawing
employer
faced
contingent
liability
net
worth
see
ed
see
also
ed
connolly
supra
gray
thus
concrete
pipe
argues
requiring
pay
share
promised
benefits
ignores
express
conditions
contractual
promises
connolly
concurring
reasonable
expectation
faced
liability
promised
benefits
opinion
legislation
readjusting
rights
burdens
unlawful
solely
upsets
otherwise
settled
expectations
even
though
effect
legislation
impose
new
duty
liability
based
past
acts
turner
elkhorn
concrete
pipe
reliance
erisa
original
limitation
contingent
liability
net
worth
misplaced
reasonable
basis
expect
legislative
ceiling
never
lifted
employe
present
litigation
voluntarily
negotiated
maintained
pension
plan
determined
within
strictures
erisa
connolly
supra
light
relationship
concrete
pipe
plan
find
basis
conclude
concrete
pipe
forced
bear
burden
fairness
justice
borne
public
whole
armstrong
concluded
statutory
presumptions
work
deprivation
procedural
due
process
statute
applied
concrete
pipe
violates
substantive
constraint
fifth
amendment
affirm
judgment
appeals
ordered
footnotes
various
places
statute
uses
terms
participant
beneficiary
terms
defined
simplicity
use
term
covered
employee
refer
depending
context
earning
service
credits
entitled
benefits
even
employer
withdraws
erisa
requires
assessment
plan
liability
least
annually
see
supp
iii
pbgc
also
authorized
promulgate
regulations
governing
assumptions
done
see
brief
pension
benefit
guaranty
amicus
curiae
exception
definition
applies
building
construction
industry
see
neither
party
argues
pertains
case
average
rate
covered
employees
concrete
pipe
contributed
plan
per
hour
concrete
pipe
contributions
totaled
collective
bargaining
agreement
provided
contributions
laborer
rate
per
hour
concrete
pipe
total
contribution
plan
district
concluded
effective
date
withdrawal
liability
provisions
mppaa
september
reliance
ninth
circuit
decision
shelter
framing
pension
benefit
guaranty
corporation
held
retroactivity
provision
mppaa
unconstitutional
app
decision
shelter
framing
reversed
pension
benefit
guaranty
corporation
ra
gray
subsequent
decision
gray
congress
amended
effective
date
mpaa
withdrawal
liability
provisions
see
motion
confirm
award
plan
also
asked
modified
district
treated
motion
vacate
arbitration
award
denied
well
see
app
plan
appeal
grant
certiorari
limited
questions
presumptions
favoring
multiemployer
plans
like
construction
laborers
pension
trust
southern
california
violate
due
process
rights
concrete
pipe
products
denying
access
impartial
decisionmaker
provisions
pension
plan
amendments
act
violate
fifth
amendment
rights
concrete
pipe
products
applied
retroactively
imposing
withdrawal
liability
employer
never
employees
vested
pension
plan
whose
collective
bargaining
agreements
specifically
limited
liability
contributions
made
pet
cert
employer
may
ask
plan
sponsor
review
specific
matter
relating
determination
employer
liability
schedule
payments
plan
sponsor
must
respond
hardly
amounts
adjudication
statute
require
employer
exhaust
avenue
making
request
plan
sponsor
prior
initiating
arbitration
proceedings
see
need
say
precision
limits
may
financial
personal
interest
one
performs
prosecutorial
function
marshall
omitted
issue
within
scope
questions
granted
certiorari
case
courts
appeals
first
second
fourth
ninth
district
columbia
circuits
found
provision
issue
constitutional
appeals
third
circuit
struck
compare
keith
fulton
sons
new
england
teamsters
trucking
indus
pension
fund
en
banc
board
trustees
western
conference
teamsters
pension
trust
fund
thompson
bldg
materials
cert
denied
washington
star
international
typographical
union
negotiated
pension
plan
app
textile
workers
pension
fund
standard
dye
finishing
cert
denied
sub
nom
sibley
lindsay
curr
bakery
confectionery
tobacco
workers
republic
teamsters
joint
council
virginia
pension
fund
cert
denied
retail
wholesale
employees
teamsters
union
local
pension
plan
yahn
mcdonnell
aff
equally
divided
sub
nom
pension
benefit
guaranty
corporation
yahn
mcdonnell
utility
attempting
construe
finely
apply
unreasonable
standard
certain
determinations
possible
clearly
erroneous
formulation
others
distinctions
relevant
light
relationship
context
terms
statutory
phrase
requiring
showing
preponderance
explain
justice
thomas
reads
statute
standard
review
plan
sponsor
findings
fact
reading
clearly
erroneous
term
art
attempt
independent
literal
description
reading
arbitrator
concludes
factual
determination
plan
sponsor
probably
wrong
nonetheless
permitted
stand
unless
error
obvious
plain
gross
significant
manifest
see
post
citation
omitted
justice
thomas
adequately
explain
purpose
served
statute
let
erroneous
presumably
material
factual
determinations
stand
even
clearly
erroneous
legal
sense
unreasonable
merely
degree
happened
deviate
true
facts
even
latter
supported
overwhelming
evidence
refer
possible
congressional
desire
avoid
disputes
insignificant
errors
post
reading
factual
error
significant
sense
material
undeniably
incorrect
yet
still
stand
far
different
truth
justice
thomas
cites
presumption
innocence
proposition
presumption
issue
imply
standard
review
see
post
presumptions
imply
standards
review
mean
one
terms
statutory
presumption
says
factual
findings
plan
sponsor
stand
unless
showing
made
necessarily
implying
standard
review
findings
textual
incomprehensibility
concerns
narrow
matter
find
nothing
structure
statutory
scheme
provides
elucidation
presumption
issue
included
new
added
mppaa
erisa
text
version
bill
house
report
refers
presumption
contained
provision
began
purposes
part
determination
made
respect
plan
section
relating
employer
withdrawals
presumed
correct
unless
party
contesting
determination
shows
see
pt
enacted
text
replaced
purposes
proceeding
section
determination
made
plan
sponsor
sections
section
presumed
correct
unless
party
contesting
determination
shows
title
iv
added
title
stat
text
called
differs
somewhat
text
sections
enacted
bill
refers
codified
concern
legislative
history
goes
question
degree
certainty
error
congress
intended
require
situation
change
referent
took
place
might
implications
question
think
anything
relevant
legislative
history
turns
different
scope
earlier
version
bill
despite
favorable
finding
concrete
pipe
still
lost
course
arbitrator
treated
subjective
intent
irrelevant
see
app
district
appeals
relied
district
reasoning
go
far
see
factual
deference
decisions
arbitrator
finding
untainted
force
presumption
see
may
trustees
theory
replace
actuary
assumptions
involve
different
case
aware
least
one
case
plan
sponsor
exercised
decisive
influence
actuary
whose
initial
assumptions
disliked
see
huber
casablanca
industries
know
none
plan
sponsor
found
replaced
actuary
actuarial
methods
assumptions
different
ones
although
express
view
question
whether
plan
sponsor
must
adopt
assumptions
used
actuary
note
legislative
history
enacted
part
erisa
suggests
actuarial
assumptions
must
independently
determined
actuary
inappropriate
employer
substitute
judgment
qualified
actuary
respect
assumptions
see
also
indeed
view
problem
imprecision
reviewing
actuarial
methods
assumptions
seems
reason
including
presumption
statute
senate
committee
report
senate
committee
labor
human
resources
includes
presumption
reduce
likelihood
dispute
delay
technical
actuarial
matters
respect
often
several
equally
correct
approaches
without
presumption
plan
helpless
resist
dilatory
tactics
withdrawing
employer
tactics
intended
result
prohibitive
collection
costs
plan
committee
print
employer
calculation
whether
join
plan
include
factors
well
determination
benefits
hope
receive
participation
plan
see
supra
trust
agreement
section
neither
association
sic
officer
agent
employee
sic
committee
member
associations
shall
liable
make
contributions
fund
respect
pension
plan
except
extent
may
individual
employer
required
make
contributions
fund
respect
individual
joint
venture
operations
extent
may
incur
liability
trustee
hereinafter
provided
liability
individual
employer
fund
respect
pension
plan
shall
limited
payments
required
collective
bargaining
agreements
respect
individual
joint
venture
operations
event
shall
liable
responsible
portion
contributions
due
individual
employers
respect
operations
individual
employers
individual
employers
shall
required
make
payments
contributions
cost
operation
fund
pension
plan
except
may
hereafter
provided
collective
bargaining
agreements
section
neither
associations
individual
employer
union
local
union
employee
shall
liable
responsible
debts
liabilities
obligations
fund
trustees
app
article
laborers
craft
master
labor
agreement
provides
parties
recognize
agree
pension
trust
plan
created
negotiated
intended
continue
permitted
law
erisa
defined
contribution
plan
trust
individual
contractors
liability
regard
pension
remains
limited
exclusively
payment
contributions
specified
time
time
collective
bargaining
agreements
appendix
southern
california
master
labor
agreements
important
pension
benefits
never
guaranteed
payable
extent
fund
assets
pay
benefits
neither
employer
union
assumed
liability
directly
indirectly
provide
monthly
pension
benefits
employers
sole
obligation
make
contributions
called
collective
bargaining
agreement
pension
plan
also
considered
employers
union
trustees
defined
contribution
plan
plan
contends
record
reflect
appendix
mentioned
text
incorporated
reference
concrete
pipe
collective
bargaining
agreement
see
brief
respondent
even
concrete
pipe
represented
representative
like
trustees
bound
act
consistently
fiduciary
duty
owed
trustees
covered
employees
beneficiaries
plan
see
extent
concrete
pipe
argument
characterized
challenge
determination
notwithstanding
contractual
language
defined
benefits
plan
statute
question
concrete
pipe
seek
review
see
supra
see
brief
petitioner
erisa
contingent
liabilities
substantially
different
scope
liabilities
mppaa
concrete
pipe
reasonable
notice
net
worth
seized
justice
join
statement
attached
contractual
provisions
concrete
pipe
rely
provide
support
seeks
indeed
one
provision
article
laborers
craft
master
labor
agreement
provides
liability
limited
contributions
specific
collective
bargaining
agreements
permitted
law
erisa
app
justice
concurring
join
opinion
except
statement
petitioner
rel
erisa
original
limitation
contingent
liability
net
worth
ante
reasoning
generally
consistent
views
retroactive
withdrawal
liability
explained
connolly
pension
benefit
guaranty
corporation
concurring
opinion
need
restate
length
essence
position
imposition
type
retroactive
liability
employers
constitutional
must
rest
basis
employer
conduct
make
rational
treat
employees
expectations
benefits
plan
employer
responsibility
hold
otherwise
rather
reasons
although
withdrawal
liability
assessed
concrete
pipe
may
amount
share
plan
liability
strictly
attributable
employment
covered
workers
concrete
pipe
possibility
exactly
concrete
pipe
accepted
joined
plan
ante
agree
withdrawing
employer
held
responsible
statutory
share
unfunded
vested
benefits
employer
anticipated
prospect
withdrawal
liability
joined
plan
case
basis
employer
conduct
make
rational
treat
employees
expectations
benefits
plan
employer
responsibility
act
joining
plan
sure
petitioner
fact
accept
prospect
withdrawal
liability
joined
construction
laborers
pension
trust
plan
date
congress
yet
promulgated
multiemployer
pension
plan
amendments
act
mppaa
kind
withdrawal
liability
imposed
petitioner
yet
exist
although
employee
retirement
income
security
act
erisa
effect
create
contingent
liability
employer
withdrew
multiemployer
defined
benefit
plan
liability
limited
employer
net
worth
see
petitioner
withdrawal
liability
mppaa
amounts
net
worth
see
ante
addition
plan
apparently
hybrid
plan
provides
fixed
employee
benefits
fixed
employer
contributions
remains
open
question
whether
hybrid
plans
indeed
defined
benefit
rather
defined
contribution
plans
therefore
subject
withdrawal
liability
see
connolly
supra
concurring
decide
question
today
see
ante
petitioner
argued
withdrawal
liability
even
otherwise
permissible
exceed
cap
effect
petitioner
claimed
plan
defined
contribution
plan
short
petitioner
failed
adduce
two
features
case
might
demonstrated
accept
prospect
full
withdrawal
liability
joined
plan
therefore
agree
result
well
reasoning
however
agree
petitioner
precluded
rely
ing
erisa
original
limitation
contingent
liability
net
worth
ante
seizes
upon
passing
reference
petitioner
brief
see
ante
justify
issuing
unnecessary
statement
difficult
issue
parties
essentially
ignored
decide
without
adversary
briefing
argument
whether
erisa
cap
might
prevent
retroactive
withdrawal
liability
employer
net
worth
employer
joined
multiemployer
plan
passage
erisa
passage
mppaa
also
note
opinion
read
imply
employers
may
subjected
retroactive
withdrawal
liability
simply
pension
plans
long
subject
federal
regulation
ante
surely
employer
joined
multiemployer
plan
erisa
promulgated
congress
made
employers
liable
unfunded
benefits
might
strong
constitutional
challenge
retroactive
withdrawal
liability
issue
presented
petitioner
joined
plan
passage
erisa
address
remains
resolved
future
case
justice
thomas
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
join
opinion
except
part
portion
opinion
grapples
trustee
presumption
finds
presumption
incoherent
respect
degree
probability
error
required
employer
overcome
factual
conclusion
made
plan
sponsor
ante
view
substantial
question
procedural
fairness
due
process
clause
employers
show
sponsors
findings
unreasonable
clearly
erroneous
ante
proceeds
interpret
statute
required
unconstrained
evidentiary
hearing
factual
issue
concerning
employer
withdrawal
liability
ante
today
provided
purposes
arbitration
proceeding
section
determination
made
plan
sponsor
sections
title
section
title
presumed
correct
unless
party
contesting
determination
shows
preponderance
evidence
determination
unreasonable
clearly
erroneous
emphasis
added
see
three
missteps
analysis
first
believes
statutory
text
incomprehensib
le
ante
refers
three
different
mutually
inconsistent
degree
certainty
ante
probability
ante
incorrect
large
part
overlooks
grammatical
structure
statute
section
sets
parallelism
phrase
preponderance
evidence
establishes
standard
proof
arbitration
proceeding
critical
terms
unreasonable
clearly
erroneous
preponderance
evidence
adverbial
phrase
modifies
show
ing
required
employer
unreasonable
clearly
erroneous
hand
predicate
adjectives
used
describe
employer
must
show
incoherence
identified
follows
assumption
congress
confus
ed
burdens
proof
standards
review
ante
believes
terms
clearly
erroneous
unreasonable
must
signify
standards
review
ante
standards
proof
standards
review
entirely
unrelated
concepts
intimates
see
ante
reading
leads
conclusion
meaningless
ante
statute
interpreted
defines
nature
conclusion
arbitrator
must
draw
using
combination
terms
categorically
ante
preoccupation
standards
review
understandable
least
respect
clearly
erroneous
term
established
legal
usage
see
anderson
bessemer
city
civ
proc
reading
compelled
used
statutory
provision
unreasonable
clearly
erroneous
signify
standards
applicable
review
prior
findings
since
arbitrator
undeniably
factfinder
appellate
tribunal
see
establishing
presumption
correctness
findings
fact
made
arbitrator
arbitrator
undertake
examination
preponderance
evidence
explicitly
establishes
role
factfinder
appellate
review
occur
taking
evidence
sees
arbitrator
hybrid
acts
trier
fact
reviewer
facts
found
ante
presumption
correctness
applies
plan
sponsor
determinations
make
arbitrator
reviewing
body
ante
presumption
innocence
criminal
trial
renders
jury
reviewer
rather
trier
fact
way
conundrum
apparent
terms
unreasonable
clearly
erroneous
must
refer
effect
elements
employer
claim
arbitration
proceeding
prevail
action
arbitrator
words
employer
must
show
preponderance
evidence
first
plan
sponsor
made
determination
one
relevant
provisions
second
determination
either
unreasonable
clearly
erroneous
construction
requires
us
put
aside
technical
definition
clearly
erroneous
focus
literal
meaning
phrase
clear
error
simply
mean
obvious
plain
gross
significant
manifest
error
miscalculation
see
black
law
dictionary
ed
may
natural
reading
legal
term
art
drop
assumption
clearly
erroneous
must
reference
bessemer
city
standard
review
avoid
incoherence
trapped
majority
term
unreasonable
course
even
readily
construed
refer
something
standard
review
since
hardly
thought
sharply
defined
meaning
limited
context
appellate
review
example
nothing
unusual
requiring
party
show
element
substantive
claim
something
interstate
carrier
filed
rate
example
see
reiter
cooper
unreasonable
section
thus
susceptible
reading
gives
coherent
meaning
interpretation
also
conforms
neatly
similar
language
structure
actuarial
presumption
today
finds
unproblematic
see
ante
presumption
provides
actuary
determination
unfunded
vested
benefits
presumed
correct
unless
employer
shows
preponderance
evidence
actuarial
assumptions
methods
unreasonable
actuary
made
significant
error
offers
persuasive
explanation
presumption
suffer
incoherence
addition
reading
term
clearly
erroneous
renders
virtually
indistinguishable
term
significant
error
second
false
step
analysis
use
rule
construction
applied
edward
debartolo
florida
gulf
coast
building
constr
trades
council
ante
rule
requires
adopt
reasonable
alternative
interpretation
statute
necessary
avoid
serious
constitutional
problems
provide
authority
construe
statute
way
plainly
contrary
intent
congress
debartolo
supra
rule
stretched
beyond
point
alternative
construction
remains
fairly
possible
public
citizen
department
justice
kennedy
concurring
judgment
emphasis
original
quoting
crowell
benson
given
broad
scope
lest
whole
new
range
government
action
proscribed
interpretive
shadows
cast
constitutional
provisions
might
might
invalidate
public
citizen
supra
plain
view
congress
intended
shield
plan
sponsor
factual
determinations
behind
presumption
correctness
intended
withdrawing
employers
show
something
simple
error
construction
plainly
contrary
intent
fairly
possible
terms
statute
rather
reasonable
alternative
reading
therefore
interpretation
adopted
today
effectively
declaration
statute
written
unconstitutional
leads
final
perhaps
fundamental
disagreement
appropriately
invoke
rule
construction
must
significantly
higher
degree
confidence
statutory
provision
unconstitutional
problematic
interpretation
adopted
potential
due
process
problem
troubling
supposed
lack
neutral
impartial
arbitration
hearing
ante
potential
based
assumption
risk
possibility
trustee
bias
ante
bias
existed
might
preserve
arbitration
proceeding
presumption
correctness
ante
petitioner
established
trustees
biased
fact
whatever
structural
bias
may
flow
trustees
fiduciary
obligations
fact
trustees
appointed
interested
parties
see
ante
likely
nullified
elaborately
detailed
criteria
channel
cabin
exercise
discretion
see
ed
supp
iii
bias
may
checked
particular
requirement
consistency
governs
trustees
choice
method
calculating
liability
see
keith
fulton
sons
new
england
teamsters
trucking
industry
pension
fund
en
banc
fiduciary
duty
trustees
owe
fund
simultaneously
prevent
imposing
excessive
withdrawal
liability
discourage
employers
joining
fund
future
consider
countervailing
forces
even
real
risk
structural
bias
may
distort
trustees
factual
determinations
inclined
believe
arbitration
proceeding
presumption
provides
adequate
process
employer
cf
mathews
eldridge
adequacy
specific
procedures
involves
consideration
private
public
interests
risk
erroneous
deprivation
conclusion
rests
principally
nature
particular
statutory
determinations
presumption
applies
described
many
determinations
mathematical
computations
trustees
must
perform
involve
little
discretion
result
employer
correspondingly
little
difficulty
proving
existence
significant
error
made
trustees
either
inadvertently
bias
said
withdrawal
date
determinations
especially
information
relevant
determination
better
known
employer
trustees
public
interest
plain
face
statute
congress
want
withdrawing
employers
avoid
obligations
engaging
lengthy
arbitration
relatively
insignificant
errors
time
employer
interest
correcting
miscalculations
significant
adequately
protected
opportunity
arbitration
afforded
reasons
concur
judgment
application
deprive
concrete
pipe
right
procedural
due
process
ante
regrettably
compounds
muddles
textual
difficulty
suggesting
sense
preponderance
evidence
unreasonable
clearly
erroneous
comparable
refer
relative
degree
certainty
ante
fact
basis
comparing
particular
standard
proof
particular
standard
review
appellate
tribunal
required
determine
whether
clearly
erroneous
find
disputed
fact
preponderance
evidence
ask
whether
reasonable
factfinder
found
probable
cause
believe
clear
convincing
evidence
supporting
fact
question
see
anderson
liberty
lobby
defendant
civil
case
moves
summary
judgment
directed
verdict
inquiry
whether
reasonable
jurors
find
preponderance
evidence
plaintiff
entitled
verdict
emphasis
added
jackson
virginia
critical
inquiry
review
sufficiency
evidence
support
criminal
conviction
whether
rational
trier
fact
found
essential
elements
crime
beyond
reasonable
doubt
emphasis
added
combination
evidentiary
review
standards
possible