douglas
california
argued
april
decided
march
california
state
petitioners
tried
jointly
convicted
felonies
sentenced
imprisonment
exercising
right
appeal
right
appealed
intermediate
appeals
indigent
applied
appointment
counsel
assist
appeal
accordance
state
rule
criminal
procedure
made
ex
parte
examination
record
determined
appointment
counsel
petitioners
advantage
defendant
helpful
appellate
denied
appointment
counsel
appeal
heard
without
assistance
counsel
convictions
affirmed
state
denied
discretionary
review
held
merits
one
appeal
indigent
right
decided
without
benefit
counsel
state
criminal
case
discrimination
rich
poor
violates
fourteenth
amendment
pp
cal
app
cal
rptr
judgment
vacated
cause
remanded
marvin
mitchelson
burton
marks
reargued
cause
petitioners
briefs
wirin
fred
okrand
nanette
dembitz
william
james
assistant
attorney
general
california
jack
goertzen
deputy
attorney
general
argued
cause
respondent
briefs
stanley
mosk
attorney
general
justice
douglas
delivered
opinion
petitioners
bennie
meyes
william
douglas
jointly
tried
convicted
california
information
charging
felonies
single
public
defender
appointed
represent
commencement
trial
defender
moved
continuance
stating
case
complicated
prepared
felt
handling
different
defense
every
day
conflict
interest
petitioners
requiring
appointment
separate
counsel
motion
denied
thereafter
petitioners
dismissed
defender
claiming
unprepared
renewed
motions
separate
counsel
continuance
motions
also
denied
petitioners
ultimately
convicted
jury
felonies
included
robbery
assault
deadly
weapon
assault
intent
commit
murder
given
prison
terms
appealed
right
california
district
appeal
affirmed
convictions
cal
app
cal
rptr
meyes
douglas
petitioned
discretionary
review
california
petitions
denied
without
hearing
cal
app
cal
granted
certiorari
although
several
questions
presented
petition
certiorari
address
one
record
shows
petitioners
requested
denied
assistance
counsel
appeal
even
though
plainly
appeared
indigents
denying
petitioners
requests
california
district
appeal
stated
gone
record
come
conclusion
good
whatever
served
appointment
counsel
cal
app
cal
rptr
district
appeal
acting
accordance
california
rule
criminal
procedure
provides
state
appellate
courts
upon
request
indigent
counsel
may
make
independent
investigation
record
determine
whether
advantage
defendant
helpful
appellate
counsel
appointed
investigation
appellate
courts
appoint
counsel
opinion
helpful
defendant
deny
appointment
counsel
judgment
appointment
value
either
defendant
people
hyde
cal
agree
however
justice
traynor
california
said
enial
counsel
appeal
indigent
seem
discrimination
least
invidious
condemned
griffin
illinois
people
brown
cal
concurring
opinion
griffin
illinois
held
state
may
grant
appellate
review
way
discriminate
convicted
defendants
account
poverty
draper
washington
post
right
free
transcript
appeal
issue
issue
whether
indigent
shall
denied
assistance
counsel
appeal
either
case
evil
discrimination
indigent
equal
justice
kind
appeal
man
enjoys
depends
amount
money
griffin
illinois
supra
spite
california
forward
treatment
indigents
present
practice
type
appeal
person
afforded
district
appeal
hinges
upon
whether
pay
assistance
counsel
appellate
passes
merits
case
full
benefit
written
briefs
oral
argument
counsel
appellate
forced
prejudge
merits
even
determine
whether
counsel
provided
stage
proceedings
barren
record
speaks
indigent
unless
printed
pages
show
injustice
committed
forced
go
without
champion
appeal
real
chance
may
showing
appeal
hidden
merit
deprived
decides
ex
parte
examination
record
assistance
counsel
required
concerned
problems
might
arise
denial
counsel
preparation
petition
discretionary
mandatory
review
beyond
stage
appellate
process
claims
presented
lawyer
passed
upon
appellate
dealing
first
appeal
granted
matter
right
rich
poor
alike
cal
penal
code
criminal
conviction
need
decide
whether
california
provide
counsel
indigent
seeking
discretionary
hearing
california
district
appeal
sustained
conviction
see
cal
art
vi
cal
rules
appeal
rules
whether
counsel
must
appointed
indigent
seeking
review
appellate
affirmance
conviction
appeal
right
petition
writ
certiorari
lies
within
discretion
appropriate
observe
state
consistently
fourteenth
amendment
provide
differences
long
result
amount
denial
due
process
invidious
discrimination
williamson
lee
optical
griffin
illinois
supra
absolute
equality
required
lines
drawn
often
sustain
see
tigner
texas
goesaert
cleary
merits
one
appeal
indigent
right
decided
without
benefit
counsel
think
unconstitutional
line
drawn
rich
poor
indigent
forced
run
gantlet
preliminary
showing
merit
right
appeal
comport
fair
procedure
federal
courts
hand
indigent
must
afforded
counsel
appeal
whenever
challenges
certification
appeal
taken
good
faith
johnson
federal
courts
must
honor
request
counsel
regardless
think
merits
case
may
representation
role
advocate
required
ellis
california
however
gone
record
denied
counsel
indigent
recourse
prosecute
appeal
best
matter
meritorious
case
may
turn
present
case
counsel
denied
petitioners
appeal
shows
discrimination
possibly
good
obviously
bad
cases
cases
rich
man
require
listen
argument
counsel
deciding
merits
poor
man
lacking
equality
demanded
fourteenth
amendment
rich
man
appeals
right
enjoys
benefit
counsel
examination
record
research
law
marshalling
arguments
behalf
indigent
already
burdened
preliminary
determination
case
without
merit
forced
shift
indigent
record
unclear
errors
hidden
right
meaningless
ritual
rich
man
meaningful
appeal
vacate
judgment
district
appeal
remand
case
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
society
acts
deprive
one
members
life
liberty
property
takes
awesome
steps
general
respect
adherence
law
whole
well
expected
without
judicial
recognition
paramount
need
prompt
eminently
fair
sober
criminal
law
procedures
methods
employ
enforcement
criminal
law
aptly
called
measures
quality
civilization
may
judged
coppedge
justice
clark
dissenting
adhere
vote
griffin
illinois
always
understood
case
control
state
obligation
furnish
record
indigent
appeal
took
pains
point
state
free
find
means
affording
adequate
effective
appellate
review
indigent
defendants
california
done
procedure
furnishing
attorneys
indigents
appeal
know
overwhelming
percentage
forma
pauperis
appeals
frivolous
statistics
show
petitions
filed
variety
california
light
like
experience
provided
upon
filing
application
appointment
counsel
district
appeal
shall
make
independent
investigation
record
determine
whether
advantage
defendant
helpful
appellate
counsel
appointed
people
hyde
cal
california
courts
examining
record
certified
appointment
neither
advantageous
petitioners
helpful
therefore
refused
go
useless
gesture
appointing
attorney
view
neither
equal
protection
clause
due
process
clause
requires
understand
says
procedure
afforded
petitioners
meaningless
ritual
appoint
attorney
utter
extravagance
waste
state
funds
surely
meaningless
petitioners
new
fetish
indigency
piles
intolerable
burden
state
judicial
machinery
indeed
correct
may
first
clean
house
afforded
indigent
litigants
much
less
protection
california
last
term
received
forma
pauperis
applications
none
appointed
attorneys
required
record
appeals
right
still
denied
petitions
dismissed
appeals
moving
papers
alone
time
hundreds
paid
cases
permitted
petitions
appeals
filed
records
briefs
counsel
disposed
due
course
hand
california
furnishes
indigent
complete
record
counsel
requested
requires
appellate
courts
either
appoint
counsel
make
independent
investigation
record
determine
whether
advantage
defendant
helpful
counsel
appointed
unlike
lane
brown
decided
today
post
decision
matters
placed
unreviewable
discretion
public
defender
appointed
counsel
made
appellate
california
concern
rights
indigents
clearly
revealed
people
hyde
supra
although
public
defender
undertaken
prosecution
appeal
district
appeal
nevertheless
referred
application
counsel
record
los
angeles
bar
association
one
members
reviewed
papers
certified
meritorious
ground
appeal
disclosed
despite
california
district
appeal
made
independent
examination
record
old
adage
good
mother
used
quote
people
live
glass
houses
best
throw
stones
dissent
statistics
office
clerk
reveal
term
forma
pauperis
petitions
certiorari
granted
forma
pauperis
appeals
one
summarily
dismissed
crucial
question
course
effectiveness
appellate
review
unquestionably
provided
lane
brown
post
unreviewable
decision
public
defender
precluded
appellate
review
indiana
law
fairness
effectiveness
appellate
review
compared
griffin
illinois
state
conceded
necessity
transcript
adequate
review
alleged
trial
errors
case
compare
statement
district
appeal
affirming
briefs
filed
meyes
douglas
adopted
conform
rules
respects
well
written
present
possible
points
clearly
ably
abundant
citation
pertinent
authorities
doubt
prepared
one
well
versed
criminal
law
procedure
brief
writing
prejudicial
error
appointing
counsel
defendants
appeal
cal
app
cal
rptr
justice
harlan
justice
stewart
joins
dissenting
holding
indigent
absolute
right
appointed
counsel
appeal
state
criminal
conviction
appears
rely
equal
protection
clause
guarantees
fair
procedure
inherent
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
obvious
emphasis
equal
protection
view
equal
protection
clause
apposite
application
cases
like
present
one
lead
mischievous
results
case
judged
solely
due
process
clause
believe
california
procedure
violates
provision
equal
protection
course
prohibited
equal
protection
clause
discriminating
rich
poor
formulation
application
laws
far
different
thing
suggest
provision
prevents
state
adopting
law
general
applicability
may
affect
poor
harshly
rich
hand
making
effort
redress
economic
imbalances
eliminating
entirely
every
financial
exaction
state
imposes
uniform
basis
easily
satisfied
indigent
yet
take
one
dispute
constitutional
power
state
levy
uniform
sales
tax
charge
tuition
state
university
fix
rates
purchase
water
municipal
corporation
impose
standard
fine
criminal
violations
establish
minimum
bail
various
categories
offenses
contended
state
may
classify
crimes
acts
poor
likely
commit
rich
surely
basis
attacking
state
law
provided
benefits
needy
simply
benefits
fell
short
goods
services
others
purchase
laws
deny
equal
protection
less
fortunate
one
essential
reason
equal
protection
clause
impose
affirmative
duty
lift
handicaps
flowing
differences
economic
circumstances
construe
read
constitution
philosophy
leveling
foreign
many
basic
concepts
proper
relations
government
society
state
may
moral
obligation
eliminate
evils
poverty
required
equal
protection
clause
give
whatever
others
afford
thus
apparent
present
case
draper
washington
post
lane
brown
post
decided
today
one
properly
regarded
arising
clause
california
discriminate
rich
poor
uniform
policy
permitting
everyone
appeal
retain
counsel
separate
rule
dealing
standards
appointment
counsel
unable
retain
attorneys
sole
classification
established
rule
cases
believed
merit
regarded
frivolous
course
matter
far
state
rule
might
go
providing
counsel
indigents
never
expected
satisfy
affirmative
duty
one
existed
place
poor
level
afford
best
legal
talent
available
parenthetically
noted
present
problem
may
viewed
one
equal
protection
may
question
right
appointed
counsel
trial
analysis
right
gideon
wainwright
ante
decided
today
wholly
unnecessary
short
way
dispose
gideon
wainwright
words
simply
say
state
deprives
indigent
equal
protection
whenever
fails
furnish
legal
services
perhaps
services
well
equivalent
affluent
defendant
obtain
real
question
case
submit
one
permits
satisfactory
analysis
whether
state
rule
applied
case
consistent
requirements
fair
procedure
guaranteed
due
process
clause
course
considering
question
must
lost
sight
state
responsibility
due
process
clause
provide
justice
refusal
furnish
criminal
indigents
things
others
afford
may
fall
short
constitutional
standards
fairness
problem
us
whether
case
due
process
precisely
towards
providing
adequate
appellate
review
part
concedes
california
forward
treatment
indigents
state
formulated
system
today
strikes
system
requires
state
appellate
courts
appoint
counsel
appeal
indigent
defendant
except
judgment
appointment
value
either
defendant
people
hyde
cal
judgment
reached
independent
investigation
trial
record
reviewing
even
counsel
denied
full
appeal
merits
accorded
indigent
appellant
together
statement
reasons
counsel
assigned
nothing
present
case
case
cited
us
indicate
system
resulted
injustice
quite
contrary
every
reason
believe
california
appellate
courts
made
painstaking
effort
apply
rule
fairly
live
state
mandate
see
discussion
people
vigil
cal
app
cal
rptr
today
held
case
one
us
absolute
right
services
counsel
trial
gideon
wainwright
ante
appellate
procedures
involved
stand
entirely
different
constitutional
footing
first
appellate
review
required
fourteenth
amendment
mckane
durston
see
griffin
illinois
supra
thus
question
presented
narrow
one
whether
state
rules
respect
appointment
counsel
arbitrary
unreasonable
context
particular
appellate
procedure
established
require
invalidation
second
kinds
questions
may
arise
appeal
circumscribed
record
proceedings
led
conviction
encompass
large
variety
tactical
strategic
problems
must
resolved
trial
third
california
applies
rule
indigent
appellant
receives
benefit
expert
conscientious
legal
appraisal
merits
case
basis
trial
record
whether
assigned
counsel
guaranteed
full
consideration
appeal
painting
broad
brush
conclude
circumstances
appeal
like
trial
finds
constitutionally
offensive
california
procedure
bears
striking
resemblance
rules
many
state
courts
last
resort
petitions
certiorari
leave
appeal
filed
indigent
defendants
pro
se
practice
appears
petition
certiorari
case
merits
review
leave
proceed
forma
pauperis
granted
case
transferred
appellate
docket
counsel
appointed
since
review
generally
discretionary
since
often
even
given
benefit
record
proceedings
disadvantages
indigent
petitioner
might
regarded
substantial
california
conscientiously
committed
great
principle
equal
justice
law
never
deemed
constitutionally
required
appoint
counsel
assist
preparation
pro
se
petitions
certiorari
currently
filed
term
know
experience
appellate
courts
generally
go
way
give
fair
consideration
unrepresented
distinguishes
review
present
case
grounds
california
rule
relates
first
appeal
granted
matter
right
ante
fail
see
significance
difference
surely
contended
requirements
fair
procedure
exhausted
indigent
given
one
appellate
review
cf
lane
brown
post
well
suggested
appointed
counsel
necessary
fair
administration
justice
initial
appeal
taken
matter
right
reviewing
full
record
already
determined
frivolous
petition
asking
higher
appellate
exercise
discretion
consider
may
substantial
constitutional
claim
indication
record
state
cases
cited
us
california
procedure
differs
material
respect
screening
appeals
federal
criminal
cases
prescribed
recently
last
term
coppedge
occasion
pass
upon
application
statute
although
decision
established
stringent
restrictions
power
federal
courts
reject
application
leave
appeal
forma
pauperis
nonetheless
recognized
federal
courts
prevent
needless
expenditure
public
funds
summarily
disposing
frivolous
appeals
indeed
respects
california
outdone
federal
system
since
provides
transcript
appeal
merits
cases
matter
frivolous
agree
constitution
prohibits
state
seeking
redress
economic
imbalances
bar
justice
provide
indigents
full
review
taking
reasonable
steps
guard
needless
expense
california
done
accordingly
affirm
state
judgment
majority
griffin
appeared
rely
blend
equal
protection
due
process
clauses
arriving
result
far
result
case
rested
due
process
grounds
fully
accept
authority
griffin
griffin
illinois
supra
dissenting
opinion
writer
california
law
provides
counsel
appointed
appeal
shall
fix
reasonable
fee
paid
state
california
penal
code
course
clear
may
require
state
compel
attorneys
donate
services
petitioners
also
contend
denied
effective
assistance
counsel
trial
claim
view
without
merit
reading
record
leaves
little
doubt
petitioners
dismissal
appointed
counsel
efforts
obtain
continuance
designed
delay
proceedings
likelihood
manufacture
appealable
issue
moreover
trial
acted
well
within
constitutional
bounds
denying
claim
conflict
interest
douglas
meyes
required
separate
appointed
attorney