white
illinois
argued
november
decided
january
petitioner
white
trial
charges
related
sexual
assault
upon
girl
trial
ruled
testimony
recounting
statements
describing
crime
offered
babysitter
mother
investigating
officer
emergency
room
nurse
doctor
admissible
state
law
hearsay
exceptions
spontaneous
declarations
statements
made
course
securing
medical
treatment
trial
also
denied
white
motion
mistrial
based
presence
trial
failure
testify
white
found
guilty
jury
illinois
appellate
affirmed
conviction
rejecting
sixth
amendment
confrontation
clause
challenge
based
ohio
roberts
concluded
later
decision
state
inadi
foreclosed
rule
requiring
necessary
antecedent
introduction
hearsay
testimony
prosecution
must
either
produce
declarant
trial
show
declarant
unavailable
held
confrontation
clause
require
trial
admits
testimony
spontaneous
declaration
medical
examination
exceptions
hearsay
rule
either
prosecution
must
produce
declarant
trial
trial
must
find
declarant
unavailable
pp
rejects
argument
amicus
curiae
confrontation
clause
limited
purpose
prevent
abusive
practice
prosecuting
defendant
presentation
ex
parte
affidavits
without
affiants
ever
produced
trial
situation
clause
apply
introduction
statements
admitted
accepted
hearsay
exception
cases
statement
character
ex
parte
affidavit
witness
white
within
meaning
clause
statements
fit
description
narrow
reading
clause
virtually
eliminate
role
restricting
admission
hearsay
testimony
foreclosed
decisions
see
mattox
comes
late
day
warrant
reexamination
pp
although
roberts
contains
language
might
suggest
confrontation
clause
generally
requires
declarant
produced
trial
found
unavailable
statement
may
admitted
evidence
expansive
reading
negated
decision
inadi
supra
inadi
recognized
respect
coconspirator
statements
evidentiary
rationale
admitting
testimony
regarding
hearsay
spontaneous
declarations
statements
made
course
receiving
medical
care
declarations
made
contexts
provide
substantial
guarantees
trustworthiness
factors
contribute
statements
reliability
recaptured
later
testimony
statement
offered
moment
excitement
without
opportunity
reflect
consequences
one
exclamation
may
justifiably
carry
weight
trier
fact
similar
statement
offered
relative
calm
courtroom
similarly
statement
made
course
procuring
medical
services
declarant
knows
false
statement
may
cause
misdiagnosis
mistreatment
carries
special
guarantees
credibility
trier
fact
may
think
replicated
courtroom
testimony
proffered
hearsay
sufficient
guarantees
reliability
come
within
firmly
rooted
exception
hearsay
rule
confrontation
clause
satisfied
establishing
generally
applicable
unavailability
rule
practical
benefits
imposing
pointless
litigation
costs
pp
white
misplaces
reliance
coy
iowa
maryland
craig
draws
general
rule
hearsay
testimony
offered
child
permitted
upon
showing
necessity
cases
necessary
protect
child
physical
psychological
wellbeing
cases
involved
question
procedures
constitutionally
required
guarantee
defendant
confrontation
rights
child
witness
testifying
basis
importing
necessity
requirement
much
different
context
declarations
admitted
established
exceptions
hearsay
rule
pp
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
white
blackmun
stevens
kennedy
souter
joined
scalia
thomas
joined
except
discussion
rejecting
proposed
reading
witness
confrontation
clause
phrase
thomas
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
scalia
joined
gary
peterson
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
daniel
yuhas
arleen
anderson
argued
cause
respondent
brief
roland
burris
rosalyn
kaplan
terence
madsen
douglas
smith
stephen
nightingale
argued
cause
amicus
curiae
urging
affirmance
brief
solicitor
general
starr
assistant
attorney
general
mueller
deputy
solicitor
general
bryson
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
filed
state
california
et
al
daniel
lungren
attorney
general
california
george
williamson
chief
assistant
attorney
general
arnold
overoye
senior
assistant
attorney
general
karen
ziskind
janet
neeley
janet
bangle
deputy
attorneys
general
attorneys
general
respective
follows
jimmy
evans
alabama
charles
cole
alaska
gale
norton
colorado
richard
blumenthal
connecticut
robert
butterworth
florida
larry
echohawk
idaho
bonnie
campbell
iwoa
robert
stephan
kansas
fred
cowan
kentucky
michael
carpenter
maine
joseph
curran
maryland
scott
harshbarger
massachusetts
frank
kelley
michigan
hubert
humphrey
iii
minnesota
mike
moore
mississippi
marc
racicot
montana
frankie
sue
del
papa
new
jersey
lee
fisher
ohio
ernest
preate
pennsylvania
travis
medlock
south
carolina
paul
van
dam
utah
jeffrey
amestoy
vermont
mary
sue
terry
virginia
mario
palumbo
west
virginia
joseph
meyer
wyoming
city
new
york
victor
kovner
leonard
koerner
elizabeth
natrella
new
york
society
prevention
cruelty
children
john
hale
victim
assistance
centre
et
al
david
crump
natman
schaye
filed
brief
national
association
criminal
defense
lawyers
amicus
curiae
chief
justice
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
case
consider
whether
confrontation
clause
sixth
amendment
requires
trial
admits
testimony
spontaneous
declaration
medical
examination
exceptions
hearsay
rule
prosecution
must
either
produce
declarant
trial
trial
must
find
declarant
unavailable
illinois
appellate
concluded
procedures
constitutionally
required
agree
conclusion
petitioner
convicted
jury
aggravated
criminal
sexual
assault
residential
burglary
unlawful
restraint
ch
events
giving
rise
charges
related
sexual
assault
four
years
old
testimony
trial
established
early
morning
hours
april
babysitter
tony
devore
awakened
scream
devore
went
bedroom
witnessed
petitioner
leaving
room
petitioner
left
house
tr
devore
knew
petitioner
petitioner
friend
mother
tammy
grigsby
devore
asked
happened
according
devore
trial
testimony
stated
petitioner
put
hand
mouth
choked
threatened
whip
screamed
touch
ed
wrong
places
asked
devore
point
touched
identified
vaginal
area
tammy
grigsby
mother
returned
home
minutes
later
grigsby
testified
daughter
appeared
scared
little
hyper
grigsby
proceeded
question
daughter
happened
trial
grigsby
testified
repeated
claims
petitioner
choked
threatened
grigsby
also
testified
stated
petitioner
put
mouth
front
part
grigsby
also
noticed
bruises
red
marks
neck
previously
grigsby
called
police
officer
terry
lewis
arrived
minutes
later
roughly
minutes
scream
first
awakened
devore
lewis
questioned
alone
kitchen
trial
lewis
summary
statement
indicated
offered
essentially
story
first
reported
devore
grigsby
including
statement
petitioner
used
tongue
private
parts
lewis
concluded
investigation
approximately
four
hours
devore
first
heard
scream
taken
hospital
examined
first
cheryl
reents
emergency
room
nurse
michael
meinzen
testified
trial
testimony
indicated
response
questioning
provided
account
events
essentially
identical
one
given
devore
grigsby
lewis
never
testified
petitioner
trial
state
attempted
two
occasions
call
witness
apparently
experienced
emotional
difficulty
brought
courtroom
instance
left
without
testifying
app
defense
made
attempt
call
witness
trial
neither
made
asked
make
finding
unavailable
testify
tr
petitioner
objected
hearsay
grounds
devore
grigsby
lewis
reents
meinzen
permitted
testify
regarding
statements
describing
assault
trial
overruled
objection
respect
devore
grigsby
lewis
trial
concluded
testimony
permitted
pursuant
illinois
hearsay
exception
spontaneous
declarations
petitioner
objections
reents
meinzen
testimony
similarly
overruled
based
spontaneous
declaration
exception
exception
statements
made
course
securing
medical
treatment
trial
also
denied
petitioner
motion
mistrial
based
presence
failure
testify
app
petitioner
found
guilty
jury
illinois
appellate
affirmed
conviction
held
trial
operated
within
discretion
accorded
state
law
ruling
statements
offered
devore
grigsby
lewis
qualified
spontaneous
declaration
exception
ruling
statements
offered
reents
meinzen
qualified
medical
examination
exception
went
reject
petitioner
confrontation
clause
challenge
challenge
based
principally
language
contained
decision
ohio
roberts
concluded
later
decision
inadi
foreclosed
rule
requiring
necessary
antecedent
introduction
hearsay
testimony
prosecution
must
either
produce
declarant
trial
show
declarant
unavailable
illinois
denied
discretionary
review
granted
certiorari
limited
constitutional
question
whether
permitting
challenged
testimony
violated
petitioner
sixth
amendment
confrontation
clause
right
consider
preliminary
matter
argument
considered
urged
amicus
curiae
support
respondent
contends
petitioner
confrontation
clause
claim
rejected
confrontation
clause
limited
purpose
prevent
particular
abuse
common
century
england
prosecuting
defendant
presentation
ex
parte
affidavits
without
affiants
ever
produced
trial
statements
fit
description
suggests
witness
petitioner
within
meaning
clause
urges
position
apparently
order
might
conclude
confrontation
clause
generally
apply
introduction
statements
admitted
accepted
hearsay
exception
situation
confrontation
clause
apply
exception
argues
cases
statement
sought
admitted
character
ex
parte
affidavit
circumstances
surrounding
statement
utterance
suggest
statement
made
principal
purpose
accusing
incriminating
defendant
narrow
reading
confrontation
clause
virtually
eliminate
role
restricting
admission
hearsay
testimony
foreclosed
prior
cases
discussions
cases
going
back
least
far
mattox
included
historical
examination
origins
confrontation
clause
state
law
evidence
existing
time
sixth
amendment
adopted
later
careful
equate
confrontation
clause
prohibitions
general
rule
prohibiting
admission
hearsay
statements
idaho
wright
citations
omitted
nonetheless
consistently
sought
stee
middle
course
roberts
supra
recognizes
hearsay
rules
confrontation
clause
generally
designed
protect
similar
values
california
green
stem
roots
dutton
evans
mattox
upon
government
relies
allowed
recorded
testimony
witness
prior
trial
admitted
view
result
justified
hearsay
testimony
unlike
ex
parte
affidavit
came
within
established
exception
hearsay
rule
think
argument
presented
government
comes
late
day
warrant
reexamination
approach
therefore
turn
petitioner
principal
contention
prior
decision
roberts
requires
conviction
vacated
roberts
considered
confrontation
clause
challenge
introduction
trial
transcript
containing
testimony
probable
cause
hearing
transcript
included
testimony
witness
produced
trial
subject
examination
defendant
counsel
probable
cause
hearing
course
rejecting
confrontation
clause
claim
case
used
language
might
suggest
confrontation
clause
generally
requires
declarant
either
produced
trial
found
unavailable
statement
may
admitted
evidence
however
think
expansive
reading
clause
negated
subsequent
decision
inadi
supra
inadi
considered
admission
statements
made
coconspirator
course
conspiracy
initial
matter
rejected
proposition
roberts
established
rule
statement
admissible
without
showing
unavailability
contrary
rather
establishing
wholesale
revision
law
evidence
guise
confrontation
clause
ibid
concluded
roberts
must
read
consistently
question
answered
authority
cited
facts
understood
roberts
stands
proposition
unavailability
analysis
necessary
part
confrontation
clause
inquiry
challenged
statements
made
course
prior
judicial
proceeding
ibid
clarified
scope
roberts
inadi
went
reject
confrontation
clause
challenge
presented
particular
refused
extend
unavailability
requirement
established
roberts
statements
decision
rested
two
factors
first
unlike
former
testimony
coconspirator
statements
provide
evidence
conspiracy
context
replicated
even
declarant
testifies
matters
inadi
also
given
declarant
likely
change
status
time
trial
occurs
simply
calling
declarant
hope
repeat
prior
statements
poor
substitute
full
evidentiary
significance
flows
statements
made
conspiracy
operating
full
force
ibid
second
observed
little
benefit
accomplished
imposing
unavailability
rule
rule
work
bar
absolutely
introduction
statements
declarant
either
unavailable
available
produced
trial
statements
introduced
unavailability
rule
likely
produce
much
testimony
adds
meaningfully
trial
process
ibid
many
declarants
subpoenaed
prosecution
defense
regardless
confrontation
clause
requirement
compulsory
process
clause
evidentiary
rules
permitting
defendant
treat
witnesses
hostile
aid
defendants
obtaining
declarant
live
testimony
unavailability
rule
therefore
little
improve
accuracy
factfinding
likely
impose
substantial
additional
burdens
factfinding
process
prosecution
required
repeatedly
locate
keep
continuously
available
declarant
even
neither
prosecution
defense
interest
calling
witness
stand
additional
inquiry
injected
question
admissibility
evidence
litigated
trial
appeal
observations
although
expressed
context
evaluating
coconspirator
statements
apply
full
force
case
hand
note
first
evidentiary
rationale
permitting
hearsay
testimony
regarding
spontaneous
declarations
statements
made
course
receiving
medical
care
declarations
made
contexts
provide
substantial
guarantees
trustworthiness
factors
contribute
statements
reliability
recaptured
even
later
testimony
statement
offered
moment
excitement
without
opportunity
reflect
consequences
one
exclamation
may
justifiably
carry
weight
trier
fact
similar
statement
offered
relative
calm
courtroom
similarly
statement
made
course
procuring
medical
services
declarant
knows
false
statement
may
cause
misdiagnosis
mistreatment
carries
special
guarantees
credibility
trier
fact
may
think
replicated
courtroom
testimony
thus
materially
different
statements
issue
roberts
statements
sought
introduced
made
course
judicial
proceeding
consequently
threat
lost
evidentiary
value
statements
replaced
live
testimony
preference
live
testimony
case
statements
like
offered
roberts
importance
greatest
legal
engine
ever
invented
discovery
truth
green
thus
courts
adopted
general
rule
prohibiting
receipt
hearsay
evidence
proffered
hearsay
sufficient
guarantees
reliability
come
within
firmly
rooted
exception
hearsay
rule
confrontation
clause
satisfied
therefore
think
clear
statements
admitted
case
substantial
probative
value
value
duplicated
simply
declarant
later
testifying
exclude
probative
statements
strictures
confrontation
clause
height
given
confrontation
clause
basic
purpose
promotion
integrity
factfinding
process
coy
iowa
quoting
kentucky
stincer
also
noted
statement
qualifies
admission
firmly
rooted
hearsay
exception
trustworthy
adversarial
testing
expected
add
little
reliability
wright
given
evidentiary
value
statements
reliability
establishing
generally
applicable
unavailability
rule
practical
benefits
imposing
pointless
litigation
costs
see
reason
treat
statements
case
differently
found
admissible
inadi
contrary
rule
result
exactly
kind
wholesale
revision
laws
evidence
expressly
disavowed
inadi
therefore
see
basis
roberts
inadi
excluding
trial
aegis
confrontation
clause
evidence
embraced
within
exceptions
hearsay
rule
spontaneous
declarations
statements
made
medical
treatment
second
line
argument
petitioner
presses
upon
us
two
recent
decisions
involving
child
testimony
child
sexual
assault
cases
coy
iowa
supra
maryland
craig
coy
craig
required
us
consider
constitutionality
courtroom
procedures
designed
prevent
child
witness
face
across
open
courtroom
defendant
charged
sexually
assaulting
child
coy
vacated
conviction
resulted
trial
child
witness
testified
behind
screen
particularized
showing
procedure
necessary
avert
risk
harm
child
craig
upheld
conviction
resulted
trial
child
witness
testified
via
closed
circuit
television
showing
necessity
petitioner
draws
two
cases
general
rule
hearsay
testimony
offered
child
permitted
upon
showing
necessity
cases
necessary
protect
child
physical
psychological
wellbeing
petitioner
reliance
misplaced
coy
craig
involved
question
procedures
constitutionally
required
guarantee
defendant
confrontation
right
witness
testifying
question
quite
separate
requirements
confrontation
clause
imposes
predicate
introduction
declarations
coy
craig
speak
latter
question
recognized
coy
admissibility
hearsay
statements
raises
concerns
lying
periphery
confrontation
clause
designed
address
thus
basis
importing
necessity
requirement
announced
cases
much
different
context
declarations
admitted
established
exceptions
hearsay
rule
foregoing
reasons
judgment
illinois
appellate
affirmed
footnotes
illinois
ch
provides
prosecution
violation
section
criminal
code
statements
made
victim
medical
personnel
purposes
medical
diagnosis
treatment
including
descriptions
cause
symptom
pain
sensations
inception
general
character
cause
external
source
thereof
insofar
reasonably
pertinent
diagnosis
treatment
shall
admitted
exception
hearsay
rule
criminal
prosecutions
accused
shall
enjoy
right
confronted
witnesses
amdt
take
given
therefore
testimony
properly
falls
within
relevant
hearsay
exceptions
note
also
position
advanced
previously
considered
gained
support
single
justice
see
dutton
evans
harlan
concurring
result
unavailability
rule
mean
rule
require
predicate
introducing
hearsay
testimony
either
showing
declarant
unavailability
production
trial
declarant
criminal
prosecutions
accused
shall
enjoy
right
compulsory
process
obtaining
witnesses
favor
amdt
indeed
factor
led
us
conclude
firmly
rooted
exceptions
carry
sufficient
indicia
reliability
satisfy
reliability
requirement
posed
confrontation
clause
see
idaho
wright
bourjaily
doubt
two
exceptions
consider
case
firmly
rooted
exception
spontaneous
declarations
least
two
centuries
old
see
wigmore
evidence
chadbourn
rev
may
date
late
century
see
thompson
trevanion
currently
recognized
federal
rules
evidence
rule
nearly
see
brief
amici
curiae
state
california
et
pp
collecting
state
statutes
cases
exception
statements
made
purposes
medical
diagnosis
treatment
similarly
recognized
federal
rules
evidence
rule
equally
widely
accepted
among
see
brief
amici
curiae
state
california
et
al
amici
curiae
justice
thomas
justice
scalia
joins
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
reaches
correct
result
precedents
write
separately
suggest
confrontation
clause
jurisprudence
evolved
manner
perhaps
inconsistent
text
history
clause
unnecessarily
rejects
dicta
suggestion
confrontation
clause
general
may
regulate
admission
hearsay
evidence
see
ante
truth
may
cases
unnecessarily
complicated
confused
relationship
constitutional
right
confrontation
hearsay
rules
evidence
confrontation
clause
provides
simply
criminal
prosecutions
accused
shall
enjoy
right
confronted
witnesses
amdt
plain
critical
phrase
within
clause
purposes
case
witnesses
attempt
unraveling
understanding
relationship
clause
hearsay
rules
must
begin
analysis
meaning
phrase
unfortunately
recent
cases
area
assumed
hearsay
declarants
witnesses
defendant
within
meaning
clause
see
ohio
roberts
lee
illinois
idaho
wright
assumption
neither
warranted
supported
history
text
confrontation
clause
virtually
evidence
drafters
confrontation
clause
intended
mean
see
california
green
harlan
concurring
dutton
evans
harlan
concurring
result
baker
right
confrontation
hearsay
rules
due
process
proposal
determining
hearsay
may
used
criminal
trials
rev
strictest
reading
construe
phrase
witnesses
confer
defendant
right
confront
witnesses
actually
appear
testify
trial
wigmore
view
net
result
constitutional
rule
far
testimony
required
hearsay
rule
taken
infrajudicially
shall
taken
certain
way
namely
subject
secretly
ex
parte
away
accused
constitution
prescribe
kinds
testimonial
statements
dying
declarations
like
shall
given
infrajudicially
depends
law
evidence
time
mode
procedure
shall
followed
procedure
case
testimony
required
ordinary
law
evidence
given
infrajudicially
wigmore
evidence
chadbourn
rev
omitted
emphasis
modified
sixth
amendment
literally
contain
prohibition
upon
hearsay
evidence
since
guarantees
defendant
right
confront
witnesses
applied
sixth
amendment
context
prosecution
noun
witness
today
mean
either
one
knows
sees
thing
one
personally
present
one
gives
testimony
testifies
judicial
proceedings
one
make
solemn
declaration
oath
purpose
establishing
making
proof
fact
webster
american
dictionary
english
language
emphasis
added
see
also
buchanan
linguae
britannicae
vera
pronunciatio
former
meaning
one
knows
sees
cover
hearsay
evidence
excluded
sixth
amendment
words
following
noun
witnesses
phrase
obviously
refers
give
testimony
defendant
trial
maryland
craig
dissenting
opinion
relevant
historical
sources
earlier
decisions
nonetheless
suggest
narrower
reading
clause
one
given
since
may
well
correct
england
magistrates
interrogated
prisoner
accomplices
others
prior
trial
interrogations
intended
information
prisoner
right
probably
never
present
stephen
history
criminal
law
england
trial
proof
usually
given
reading
depositions
confessions
accomplices
letters
like
occasioned
frequent
demands
prisoner
accusers
witnesses
brought
face
face
see
also
wigmore
supra
appreciation
necessity
calling
person
stand
witness
rather
common
practice
obtain
information
consulting
informed
persons
called
holdsworth
history
english
law
ed
infamous
trial
sir
walter
raleigh
charges
treason
crown
primary
evidence
confession
alleged
coconspirator
confession
repudiated
trial
probably
obtained
torture
example
feature
english
criminal
procedure
see
pollitt
right
confrontation
history
modern
dress
stephen
supra
holdsworth
supra
apparently
response
abuses
common
law
right
confrontation
began
develop
england
late
early
centuries
wigmore
supra
pollitt
supra
justice
story
believed
sixth
amendment
codified
common
law
story
commentaries
constitution
previously
recognized
common
law
origins
right
see
salinger
right
confrontation
originate
provision
sixth
amendment
common
law
right
recognized
exceptions
consistently
indicated
primary
purpose
clause
prevent
abuses
occurred
england
see
mattox
primary
object
confrontation
clause
prevent
depositions
ex
parte
affidavits
sometimes
admitted
civil
cases
used
prisoner
lieu
personal
examination
witness
california
green
sufficient
note
particular
vice
gave
impetus
confrontation
claim
practice
trying
defendants
evidence
consisted
solely
ex
parte
affidavits
depositions
secured
examining
magistrates
thus
denying
defendant
opportunity
challenge
accuser
encounter
front
trier
fact
harlan
concurring
scant
information
available
may
tentatively
concluded
confrontation
clause
meant
constitutionalize
barrier
flagrant
abuses
trials
anonymous
accusers
absentee
witnesses
dutton
evans
harlan
concurring
result
paradigmatic
evil
confrontation
clause
aimed
trial
affidavit
appears
little
indication
historical
record
exceptions
hearsay
rule
understood
limited
simultaneously
evolving
common
law
right
confrontation
never
explored
historical
evidence
point
matter
plain
language
however
difficult
see
clause
apply
hearsay
evidence
general
proposition
justice
harlan
observed
one
translate
confrontation
clause
language
common
use
today
read
criminal
prosecutions
accused
shall
enjoy
right
present
witnesses
nothing
language
equivalent
connote
purpose
control
scope
rules
evidence
language
particularly
intended
prohibition
use
hearsay
opinion
concurring
result
amicus
curiae
suggested
confrontation
clause
apply
persons
provide
testimony
functional
equivalent
affidavits
depositions
confessions
made
contemplation
legal
proceedings
interpretation
ways
consistent
text
history
clause
current
jurisprudence
largely
consistent
cases
carefully
formulated
however
approach
might
difficult
apply
might
develop
manner
entirely
consistent
crucial
witnesses
phrase
case
example
victim
statements
investigating
police
officer
might
considered
functional
equivalent
testimony
statements
arguably
made
contemplation
legal
proceedings
attempts
draw
line
statements
made
contemplation
legal
proceedings
made
entangle
courts
multitude
difficulties
types
statements
categorically
characterized
within
without
reach
defendant
confrontation
rights
even
statements
made
police
government
officials
deemed
automatically
subject
right
confrontation
imagine
victim
blurts
accusation
passing
police
officer
unsuspecting
social
services
worker
told
possible
child
abuse
also
clear
approach
whether
declarant
listener
must
contemplating
legal
proceedings
devotes
little
attention
application
proposed
standard
case
thus
faced
situation
text
sixth
amendment
supports
view
history
earlier
cases
point
away
strictest
reading
text
despite
tension
believe
possible
interpret
confrontation
clause
along
lines
suggested
manner
faithful
provision
text
history
one
possible
formulation
follows
federal
constitutional
right
confrontation
extends
witness
actually
testifies
trial
confrontation
clause
implicated
extrajudicial
statements
insofar
contained
formalized
testimonial
materials
affidavits
depositions
prior
testimony
confessions
discrete
category
testimonial
materials
historically
abused
prosecutors
means
depriving
criminal
defendants
benefit
adversary
process
see
mattox
approach
confrontation
clause
construed
extend
beyond
historical
evil
directed
approach
consistent
vast
majority
cases
since
virtually
decided
ohio
roberts
involved
prior
testimony
confessions
exactly
type
formalized
testimonial
evidence
lies
core
confrontation
clause
concern
narrower
reading
confrontation
clause
greatly
simplify
inquiry
hearsay
context
furthermore
interpretation
avoid
problem
posed
current
focus
hearsay
exceptions
firmly
rooted
common
law
see
ante
never
explained
confrontation
clause
implications
state
decision
adopt
exception
recognized
common
law
one
recognized
majority
current
jurisprudence
suggests
order
satisfy
sixth
amendment
state
establish
individual
case
hearsay
admitted
pursuant
newly
created
exception
bears
particularized
guarantees
trustworthiness
continue
exception
became
firmly
rooted
common
law
even
possible
standard
result
difficult
square
clause
neither
language
clause
historical
evidence
appears
support
notion
confrontation
clause
intended
constitutionalize
hearsay
rule
exceptions
although
repeatedly
disavowed
intent
cause
result
see
ante
idaho
wright
inadi
dutton
evans
california
green
fear
decisions
edged
ever
direction
foregoing
reasons
respectfully
suggest
appropriate
case
reconsider
phrase
witness
confrontation
clause
pertains
admission
hearsay
join
opinion
except
discussion
narrow
reading
phrase
proposed
recent
decision
address
question
explicitly
ohio
roberts
simply
stated
historical
evidence
leaves
little
doubt
however
clause
intended
exclude
hearsay
citing
california
green
cited
passage
green
simply
reiterates
previously
noted
point
right
confrontation
evolved
response
problem
trial
affidavit
thus
statement
roberts
clause
intended
exclude
hearsay
correct
far
goes
affidavits
depositions
hearsay
opinion
read
established
drafters
intended
clause
encompass
hearsay
even
hearsay
general
see
reynolds
testimony
prior
trial
mattox
motes
testimony
preliminary
trial
pointer
texas
preliminary
hearing
testimony
douglas
alabama
codefendant
confession
brookhart
janis
barber
page
preliminary
hearing
testimony
bruton
codefendant
confession
roberts
russell
per
curiam
berger
california
per
curiam
preliminary
hearing
testimony
california
green
preliminary
hearing
testimony
statement
police
mancusi
stubbs
prior
testimony