dugger
adams
argued
november
decided
february
start
jury
selection
respondent
florida
trial
murder
trial
judge
instructed
prospective
jurors
responsibility
sentence
recommend
stating
jury
responsible
sentencing
jury
merely
advisory
role
defense
counsel
object
instructions
jury
found
respondent
guilty
recommended
death
sentence
trial
judge
imposed
florida
affirmed
conviction
sentence
direct
appeal
respondent
allege
error
either
state
federal
grounds
instructions
allege
subsequent
unsuccessful
motion
state
postconviction
relief
later
unsuccessful
federal
habeas
corpus
petition
thereafter
held
caldwell
mississippi
prosecutor
remarks
misinformed
jury
capital
case
role
appellate
review
violated
eighth
amendment
based
caldwell
respondent
filed
another
motion
state
postconviction
relief
challenging
first
time
instructions
question
arguing
violated
eighth
amendment
misinforming
jury
sentencing
role
florida
law
florida
another
case
held
trial
judge
override
jury
recommended
sentence
facts
clear
convincing
virtually
reasonable
person
differ
therefore
since
trial
judge
case
told
jurors
sentencing
responsibility
solely
failed
tell
override
verdict
limited
circumstances
judge
misled
jury
violation
caldwell
appeal
florida
refused
address
argument
respondent
failed
raise
direct
appeal
caldwell
claim
raised
respondent
second
federal
habeas
petition
district
held
claim
procedurally
barred
appeals
reversed
holding
claim
novel
time
respondent
trial
sentencing
appeal
legal
basis
reasonably
available
therefore
established
cause
procedural
default
proceeded
hold
instructions
question
violated
eighth
amendment
held
caldwell
provide
cause
respondent
procedural
default
despite
availability
claim
instructions
question
violated
state
law
respondent
object
trial
challenge
appeal
result
florida
law
barred
raising
issue
later
state
proceedings
respondent
offered
excuse
failure
challenge
instructions
grounds
none
amount
good
cause
federal
habeas
proceeding
determinative
case
ground
challenging
instructions
objectionable
state
law
necessary
element
subsequently
available
caldwell
claim
case
subsequently
available
federal
claim
excuse
procedural
default
reed
ross
distinguished
pp
reversed
white
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
scalia
kennedy
joined
blackmun
filed
dissenting
opinion
brennan
marshall
stevens
joined
post
margene
roper
assistant
attorney
general
florida
argued
cause
petitioners
brief
robert
butterworth
attorney
general
ronald
tabak
argued
cause
respondent
brief
larry
helm
spalding
mark
olive
kent
scheidegger
filed
brief
criminal
justice
legal
foundation
amicus
curiae
urging
reversal
michael
mello
susan
apel
filed
brief
national
legal
aid
defender
association
et
al
amici
curiae
justice
white
delivered
opinion
case
decide
whether
decision
caldwell
mississippi
provided
cause
respondent
failure
challenge
trial
instructions
accordance
state
procedures
respondent
aubrey
dennis
adams
charged
murder
trisa
gail
thornley
state
sought
impose
death
penalty
start
jury
selection
respondent
trial
trial
judge
undertook
instruct
prospective
jurors
advisory
role
florida
law
judge
informed
initial
panel
prospective
jurors
bound
recommendation
ultimate
responsibility
man
gets
shoulders
shoulders
merely
advisory
group
phase
two
come
back
say
judge
think
give
man
life
say
disregard
recommendation
jury
give
death
come
back
say
judge
think
put
death
say
disregard
recommendation
give
life
conscience
part
whether
going
put
man
death
decision
make
decision
make
conscience
app
october
jury
found
respondent
guilty
murder
separate
sentencing
hearing
jury
recommended
sentenced
death
trial
judge
imposed
death
sentence
florida
affirmed
respondent
conviction
sentence
direct
appeal
adams
state
denied
certiorari
respondent
allege
error
either
state
federal
grounds
trial
judge
instructions
jurors
responsibility
sentence
recommend
september
florida
affirmed
denial
respondent
first
motion
postconviction
relief
florida
rule
criminal
procedure
adams
state
respondent
challenge
trial
judge
statements
jurors
responsibility
death
sentence
respondent
next
filed
first
federal
habeas
petition
district
challenge
trial
judge
instructions
district
denied
habeas
petition
september
adams
wainwright
md
eleventh
circuit
affirmed
denied
certiorari
june
caldwell
mississippi
decided
held
remarks
prosecutor
capital
case
misinformed
jury
role
appellate
review
violated
eighth
amendment
plurality
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
based
caldwell
respondent
filed
second
motion
postconviction
relief
florida
rule
challenging
first
time
trial
judge
statements
jurors
responsible
sentence
recommended
arguing
judge
instructions
violated
eighth
amendment
misinforming
jury
role
florida
law
according
respondent
although
florida
death
penalty
statute
provided
jury
recommendation
advisory
florida
held
trial
judge
override
jury
verdict
facts
clear
convincing
virtually
reasonable
person
differ
tedder
state
per
curiam
since
trial
judge
case
told
jurors
sentencing
responsibility
solely
failed
tell
override
verdict
limited
circumstances
respondent
argued
judge
misled
jury
violation
caldwell
florida
refused
address
respondent
argument
merits
however
respondent
failed
raise
argument
direct
appeal
adams
state
cert
denied
caldwell
claim
raised
respondent
second
federal
habeas
petition
district
held
claim
procedurally
barred
alternatively
respondent
caldwell
claim
meritless
adams
wainwright
md
mar
app
pet
cert
eleventh
circuit
reversed
adams
wainwright
modified
denial
rehearing
appeals
held
respondent
caldwell
claim
novel
time
trial
october
sentencing
appeal
early
legal
basis
reasonably
available
time
therefore
established
cause
procedural
default
proceeded
address
merits
respondent
caldwell
claim
concluding
trial
judge
instructions
violated
eighth
amendment
granted
certiorari
review
eleventh
circuit
holding
caldwell
provides
cause
respondent
procedural
default
reverse
wainwright
sykes
required
habeas
petitioners
show
cause
prejudice
federal
courts
review
claims
state
courts
found
procedurally
defaulted
reaffirmed
requirement
several
occasions
see
murray
carrier
engle
isaac
however
left
open
resolution
future
decisions
precise
definition
cause
prejudice
amadeo
zant
quoting
sykes
supra
see
also
reed
ross
reed
ross
held
one
way
petitioner
establish
cause
showing
constitutional
claim
novel
legal
basis
reasonably
available
counsel
eleventh
circuit
relying
reed
held
case
eighth
amendment
jurisprudence
time
respondent
procedural
default
provide
reasonable
basis
raise
caldwell
claim
appeals
reviewed
prior
cases
concluded
none
indicated
statements
ones
made
trial
judge
implicated
eighth
amendment
prohibition
cruel
unusual
punishment
ibid
also
noted
find
decisions
courts
suggesting
type
eighth
amendment
claim
raised
time
ibid
believe
eleventh
circuit
failed
give
sufficient
weight
critical
fact
leads
us
conclude
without
passing
appeals
historical
analysis
caldwell
provide
cause
respondent
procedural
default
noted
decision
caldwell
relevant
certain
types
comment
mislead
jury
role
sentencing
process
way
allows
jury
feel
less
responsible
sentencing
decision
darden
wainwright
respondent
conceded
oral
argument
challenged
instructions
accurately
described
role
jury
state
law
basis
caldwell
claim
establish
caldwell
violation
defendant
necessarily
must
show
remarks
jury
improperly
described
role
assigned
jury
local
law
see
tr
oral
arg
respondent
therefore
must
asserting
case
trial
remarks
violated
state
law
finding
caldwell
violation
case
appeals
must
concluded
remarks
question
error
florida
law
respondent
appeals
correct
regard
respondent
plainly
basis
objection
argument
appeal
instructions
violated
state
law
see
pait
state
holding
misinforming
jury
role
constitutes
reversible
error
blackwell
state
yet
despite
availability
claim
state
law
respondent
object
remarks
trial
challenge
appeal
result
florida
law
bars
respondent
raising
issue
later
state
proceedings
see
adams
respondent
offers
excuse
failure
challenge
remarks
grounds
discern
none
amount
good
cause
federal
habeas
corpus
proceeding
respondent
objected
time
asserted
error
state
law
trial
appellate
sustained
objection
error
corrected
state
system
objection
overruled
ruling
sustained
appeal
likely
know
instruction
accurate
reflection
state
law
either
event
doubtful
later
decision
caldwell
provoked
filing
second
habeas
corpus
petition
circumstances
fact
turns
trial
remarks
objectionable
federal
well
state
grounds
good
cause
failure
follow
florida
procedural
rules
reed
ross
help
respondent
case
defendant
failed
challenge
appeal
instruction
plainly
valid
settled
law
state
six
years
later
held
mullaney
wilbur
instruction
violated
due
process
clause
federal
constitution
held
good
cause
procedural
default
challenge
instruction
novel
legal
basis
reasonably
available
counsel
hence
reason
suspecting
defense
counsel
flouting
state
procedures
tactical
reasons
respondent
claims
remarks
invalid
state
law
time
yet
remarks
objected
challenged
appeal
unlike
reed
legal
basis
challenge
plainly
available
safe
assume
failure
object
tactical
reasons
excuse
default
habeas
corpus
proceeding
indeed
time
respondent
trial
suggestion
comments
trial
judge
incline
jury
toward
leniency
rather
toward
recommending
death
sentence
see
dobbert
florida
furthermore
reed
legal
basis
claim
issue
lacking
said
adjudicating
claim
federal
infringe
interest
state
courts
enforcing
procedural
rules
said
state
every
interest
defendant
challenge
faulty
instruction
timely
manner
correct
misstatement
interest
disappear
later
held
instruction
violates
federal
constitution
erroneously
describes
role
jury
state
law
agree
respondent
appeals
availability
claim
state
law
establish
claim
available
constitution
see
clear
mere
errors
state
law
concern
unless
rise
reason
level
denial
rights
protected
constitution
barclay
florida
plurality
opinion
citation
omitted
issue
case
whether
respondent
obtained
federal
habeas
relief
time
trial
trial
judge
instructions
rather
issue
whether
exercise
equitable
power
overlook
respondent
state
procedural
default
reed
neither
hold
whenever
defendant
basis
challenging
particular
conduct
improper
failure
preserve
claim
state
procedural
law
bars
subsequently
available
claim
arising
conduct
indeed
respondent
challenged
improper
remarks
trial
judge
time
trial
violation
due
process
see
donnelly
dechristoforo
rather
determinative
case
ground
challenging
trial
judge
instructions
objectionable
state
law
necessary
element
subsequently
available
caldwell
claim
case
subsequently
available
federal
claim
excuse
procedural
default
judgment
appeals
therefore
reversed
ordered
footnotes
advisory
sentence
jury
hearing
evidence
jury
shall
deliberate
render
advisory
sentence
based
upon
following
matters
whether
sufficient
aggravating
circumstances
exist
enumerated
subsection
whether
sufficient
mitigating
circumstances
exist
outweigh
aggravating
circumstances
found
exist
based
considerations
whether
defendant
sentenced
life
imprisonment
death
findings
support
sentence
death
notwithstanding
recommendation
majority
jury
weighing
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
shall
enter
sentence
life
imprisonment
death
imposes
sentence
death
shall
set
forth
writing
findings
upon
sentence
death
based
facts
sufficient
aggravating
circumstances
exist
enumerated
subsection
insufficient
mitigating
circumstances
outweigh
aggravating
circumstances
aggravating
circumstances
trial
judge
found
murder
committed
respondent
engaged
attempting
kidnaping
rape
committed
avoid
arrest
especially
heinous
atrocious
cruel
mitigating
circumstances
trial
judge
found
respondent
significant
history
prior
criminal
activity
influence
extreme
emotional
mental
disturbance
time
murder
wife
getting
divorce
years
age
shortly
eleventh
circuit
decision
case
tenth
circuit
also
held
caldwell
sufficiently
novel
provide
cause
procedural
default
dutton
brown
en
banc
finding
cause
procedural
default
law
petitioner
relies
become
established
caldwell
decision
cert
denied
previously
however
fifth
circuit
held
moore
blackburn
alternative
holding
cert
denied
failure
raise
caldwell
claim
prior
habeas
petition
abuse
writ
see
rule
according
appeals
hat
competent
attorney
aware
claim
apparent
caldwell
opinion
although
petitioners
allege
brief
respondent
failure
raise
caldwell
claim
first
federal
habeas
petition
constitutes
abuse
writ
need
address
contention
given
resolution
case
procedural
bar
grounds
decide
whether
fact
jury
instructed
case
misinformed
role
florida
law
petition
certiorari
raise
issue
merit
respondent
caldwell
claim
irrelevant
disposition
case
cases
cited
caldwell
mississippi
support
decision
case
respondent
asserts
alternative
basis
upholding
judgment
appeals
procedural
bar
florida
relied
adequate
consistently
regularly
applied
johnson
mississippi
eleventh
circuit
stated
doubtful
adequate
independent
ground
present
case
went
find
respondent
established
cause
prejudice
default
first
respondent
argues
florida
law
claims
based
major
changes
constitutional
law
occur
defendant
direct
appeal
cognizable
rule
proceeding
respondent
contends
words
eleventh
circuit
caldwell
claim
type
claim
florida
created
rule
procedure
ibid
given
conclusion
caldwell
excuse
respondent
procedural
default
hardly
fault
florida
reaching
similar
conclusion
procedural
rules
second
respondent
asserts
dissent
agrees
florida
failed
apply
procedural
rule
consistently
regularly
addressed
merits
several
cases
raising
caldwell
claims
postconviction
review
vast
majority
cases
however
florida
faithfully
applied
rule
claims
raised
direct
appeal
raised
postconviction
review
see
bertolotti
state
clark
state
jones
dugger
woods
state
cave
state
preston
state
doyle
state
ford
state
cert
pending
henderson
dugger
tafero
dugger
foster
state
cert
denied
phillips
dugger
copeland
wainwright
vacated
grounds
aldridge
state
state
sireci
adams
state
cert
denied
middleton
state
moreover
cases
respondent
dissent
cite
ignoring
procedural
defaults
convince
us
florida
fails
apply
procedural
rule
regularly
consistently
darden
state
alleged
default
discussed
involved
failure
raise
caldwell
claim
prior
rule
proceeding
mann
state
construed
mann
dugger
cert
pending
even
expressly
mention
defendant
caldwell
claim
combs
state
florida
noted
caldwell
unlike
instant
case
defendant
objected
mississippi
prosecutor
comment
daugherty
state
cert
denied
merely
relied
combs
finally
glock
dugger
merely
stated
trial
justified
summarily
denying
relief
petitioner
claims
clear
opinion
whether
trial
held
caldwell
claim
procedurally
barred
regardless
whether
cases
might
subject
federal
habeas
review
lack
plain
statement
decision
based
grounds
issue
considered
harris
reed
ante
believe
sufficient
undercut
adequacy
florida
procedural
rule
respondent
also
argues
overlook
procedural
default
failing
result
fundamental
miscarriage
justice
disagree
murray
carrier
stated
constitutional
violation
probably
resulted
conviction
one
actually
innocent
federal
habeas
may
grant
writ
even
absence
showing
cause
procedural
default
made
clear
however
case
extraordinary
one
since
recognized
difficulty
translating
concept
actual
innocence
guilt
phase
sentencing
phase
capital
trial
smith
murray
undertake
define
means
actually
innocent
death
sentence
clear
us
fact
trial
judge
case
found
equal
number
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
sufficient
show
alleged
error
instructing
jury
sentencing
resulted
fundamental
miscarriage
justice
dissent
assume
arguendo
fundamental
miscarriage
justice
results
whenever
substantial
claim
constitutional
violation
undermined
accuracy
sentencing
decision
post
according
dissent
since
essence
caldwell
claim
accuracy
sentencing
determination
unconstitutionally
undermined
post
standard
showing
fundamental
miscarriage
justice
necessarily
satisfied
reject
overbroad
view
demonstrating
error
nature
kind
error
might
affected
accuracy
death
sentence
far
demonstrating
individual
defendant
probably
actually
innocent
sentence
received
approach
taken
dissent
turn
case
error
results
fundamental
miscarriage
justice
extraordinary
case
carrier
supra
ordinary
one
justice
blackmun
justice
brennan
justice
marshall
justice
stevens
join
dissenting
although
repeatedly
ruled
eighth
amendment
prohibits
arbitrary
capricious
imposition
death
penalty
today
arbitrarily
imposes
procedural
obstacles
thwart
vindication
apparently
meritorious
eighth
amendment
claim
case
eleventh
circuit
determined
respondent
aubrey
dennis
adams
sentenced
death
violation
eighth
amendment
interpreted
caldwell
mississippi
reverses
determination
finds
death
sentence
valid
respondent
late
presenting
claim
florida
courts
words
sending
man
presumptively
unlawful
execution
lawyers
raise
objection
felt
appropriate
time
understand
accept
decision
federal
courts
lacked
authority
remedy
unconstitutional
death
sentence
manifestly
case
reversing
judgment
appeals
majority
relegates
discussion
established
doctrines
upon
full
consideration
might
entitle
respondent
affirmance
reversal
judgment
thus
majority
capriciously
casts
aside
precedent
reinstate
unconstitutionally
unreliable
death
sentence
purely
procedural
reasons
also
compounds
capriciousness
issuing
opinion
decisive
issues
receive
dismissive
consideration
given
treatment
case
worth
reflecting
moment
special
inappropriateness
cruelty
impending
execution
need
dwell
upon
history
decisions
whether
criminal
defendant
failure
comply
rule
state
procedure
precludes
review
conviction
sentence
subsequent
federal
habeas
corpus
proceeding
settled
adequate
independent
state
procedural
ground
precluded
direct
review
bars
habeas
review
unless
habeas
petitioner
demonstrate
cause
procedural
default
prejudice
resulting
alleged
constitutional
violation
wainwright
sykes
since
sykes
refined
cause
prejudice
standard
see
reed
ross
engle
isaac
also
held
habeas
review
defaulted
claim
available
even
absent
cause
default
failure
consider
claim
result
fundamental
miscarriage
justice
smith
murray
murray
carrier
smith
applied
fundamental
miscarriage
justice
principle
alleged
sentencing
error
capital
case
effort
equate
review
convictions
sentences
principle
apparently
settled
upon
following
standard
habeas
petitioner
must
make
substantial
showing
alleged
error
undermined
accuracy
guilt
sentencing
determination
even
narrow
standard
makes
clear
fundamental
miscarriage
justice
principle
applicable
allegations
capital
sentencing
errors
thus
precedents
appeals
correct
review
respondent
procedurally
defaulted
caldwell
claim
one
three
conditions
met
florida
finding
procedural
default
adequate
independent
ground
decision
respondent
show
cause
prejudice
default
failure
review
respondent
claim
result
fundamental
miscarriage
justice
yet
devotes
single
end
opinion
first
third
principles
ante
acknowledges
must
granted
certiorari
consider
whether
respondent
established
cause
procedural
default
ante
interest
cause
inquiry
permit
consign
status
rest
analysis
necessary
determining
whether
appeals
properly
considered
merits
respondent
caldwell
claim
indeed
two
principles
receive
attention
deserve
becomes
evident
provides
alternative
basis
affirming
appeals
judgment
ii
majority
recognizes
state
reliance
procedural
bar
rule
inadequate
rule
consistently
regularly
applied
ante
quoting
johnson
mississippi
majority
however
asserts
respondent
case
florida
reliance
procedural
bar
grounds
adequate
standard
must
disagree
respondent
raised
caldwell
claim
first
time
second
postconviction
motion
rule
florida
rules
criminal
procedure
florida
held
claim
among
others
procedurally
barred
respondent
raise
claim
direct
appeal
see
adams
state
cert
denied
found
presenting
caldwell
claim
successive
rule
proceeding
abuse
rule
decision
issued
march
prior
date
however
florida
two
rule
cases
foreclose
review
caldwell
claims
notwithstanding
existence
similar
procedural
defaults
first
darden
state
also
involved
second
rule
motion
florida
considered
merits
caldwell
claim
even
though
prisoner
like
respondent
failed
argue
either
direct
appeal
first
rule
motion
jury
misled
role
capital
sentencing
process
see
darden
state
direct
appeal
cert
dism
darden
state
first
rule
motion
indeed
choos
ing
address
merits
defaulted
caldwell
claim
darden
florida
explicitly
rebuffed
state
efforts
reject
claim
ground
presentation
constituted
abuse
rule
process
see
second
mann
state
florida
considered
merits
caldwell
claim
among
others
even
though
claim
raised
direct
appeal
eleventh
circuit
noted
florida
mann
simply
chose
enforce
procedural
default
rule
mann
dugger
en
banc
cert
pending
thus
time
decided
adams
florida
failed
apply
state
procedural
bar
rules
least
two
defaulted
caldwell
claims
furthermore
case
prior
adams
florida
plainly
hold
caldwell
claim
procedurally
barred
petitioners
cite
middleton
state
surely
questionable
whether
reference
procedural
default
case
satisfy
plain
statement
standard
harris
reed
ante
event
even
counting
middleton
case
florida
invoked
procedural
bar
rule
preclude
review
caldwell
claim
impossible
say
light
darden
mann
decision
adams
application
strictly
regularly
followed
state
procedural
requirements
barr
city
columbia
consequently
ground
adams
foreclosed
consideration
caldwell
claim
chosen
exercise
certiorari
jurisdiction
direct
review
fortiori
preclude
review
caldwell
claim
habeas
proceeding
see
wainwright
sykes
majority
reasons
discounting
darden
mann
persuasive
darden
majority
observes
florida
discuss
prisoner
failure
raise
caldwell
claim
direct
appeal
rather
mentioned
failure
raise
caldwell
claim
prior
rule
proceeding
observation
misses
point
fact
remains
darden
direct
appeal
raise
claim
jury
misled
role
sentencing
see
accordingly
darden
case
florida
bar
review
caldwell
claim
even
though
claim
raised
neither
direct
appeal
first
rule
proceeding
treatment
caldwell
claim
darden
thus
starkly
inconsistent
treatment
caldwell
claim
adams
despite
identical
procedural
posture
two
cases
reason
alone
darden
demonstrates
inadequacy
procedural
bar
ruling
adams
mann
majority
notes
specifically
mention
prisoner
caldwell
claim
majority
misses
point
respondent
case
florida
expressly
mention
caldwell
claim
see
issue
however
whether
florida
case
identified
claim
name
whether
held
claim
procedurally
barred
mann
adams
thus
inconsistent
treatment
caldwell
claims
mann
adams
supports
finding
inadequacy
view
majority
attempts
distinguish
darden
mann
clearly
unavailing
two
cases
suffice
show
respondent
procedural
default
constitute
adequate
state
ground
barring
review
caldwell
claim
moreover
decisions
florida
handed
adams
reinforce
conclusion
inconsistent
applying
procedural
bar
rules
caldwell
claims
combs
state
invoke
procedural
default
basis
decision
notwithstanding
prisoner
failure
present
caldwell
claim
direct
appeal
see
combs
state
cert
denied
rather
affirmatively
chose
address
merits
caldwell
claim
largely
wanted
announce
view
caldwell
inapplicable
florida
capital
cases
florida
also
rely
procedural
bar
grounds
daugherty
state
cert
denied
even
though
case
involved
second
rule
motion
convict
like
respondent
raise
caldwell
claim
either
direct
review
first
rule
motion
see
daugherty
state
direct
appeal
cert
denied
daugherty
state
first
rule
motion
cert
denied
rather
daugherty
rested
rejection
caldwell
claim
solely
ground
combs
determined
caldwell
inapplicable
florida
recently
glock
dugger
florida
hold
caldwell
claim
procedurally
barred
even
though
claim
raised
direct
appeal
puiatti
state
sum
combs
daugherty
glock
convincingly
demonstrate
florida
still
strictly
apply
procedural
bar
rules
caldwell
claims
contrasting
five
cases
darden
mann
combs
daugherty
glock
adams
one
seriously
contend
florida
applied
procedural
bar
rules
evenhandedly
similar
claims
hathorn
lovorn
thus
adequacy
issue
fully
considered
escaping
conclusion
florida
rejection
respondent
caldwell
claim
rest
adequate
state
ground
yet
unseemly
haste
reverse
appeals
issue
cause
majority
treats
adequacy
issue
afterthought
although
analytically
antecedent
issue
iii
even
somehow
convinced
florida
reliance
respondent
procedural
default
adequate
within
meaning
precedents
still
conclude
appeals
properly
reached
merits
respondent
caldwell
claim
quarrel
majority
determination
respondent
show
cause
procedural
default
determination
however
end
inquiry
smith
murray
rather
majority
apparently
recognizes
must
consider
whether
failure
examine
merits
caldwell
claim
habeas
action
result
fundamental
miscarriage
justice
majority
believes
injustice
occur
disagree
respondent
caldwell
claim
see
generally
brief
respondent
rests
following
premises
florida
law
judge
trial
permitted
overturn
jury
judgment
whether
receive
life
death
sentence
upon
clear
convincing
showing
jury
choice
erroneous
notwithstanding
rule
florida
law
trial
judge
repeatedly
insistently
told
jurors
sentencing
vote
strictly
recommendation
nothing
bound
follow
recommendation
sole
determiner
whether
respondent
receives
life
put
electric
chair
app
furthermore
judge
drummed
misinformation
jurors
heads
repeatedly
telling
important
thing
remember
nonbinding
nature
recommendation
capital
sentencing
decision
conscience
appeals
held
must
assume
repeated
insistent
comments
mischaracterized
jury
role
state
law
sentencing
process
respondent
case
distorted
render
sentence
inherently
suspect
alleged
error
case
severe
incorrect
instructions
may
well
caused
jury
vote
death
sentence
returned
accurately
instructed
see
caldwell
mississippi
jurors
erroneously
believe
responsibility
defendant
death
lies
someone
else
conscience
may
willing
vote
death
send
message
extreme
disapproval
defendant
acts
thus
plain
respondent
presented
substantial
claim
alleged
error
undermined
accuracy
sentencing
determination
trial
smith
murray
indeed
essence
caldwell
claim
accuracy
sentencing
determination
unconstitutionally
undermined
respect
alleged
sentencing
error
entirely
unlike
one
issue
smith
admission
particular
testimony
allegedly
violated
fifth
eighth
amendments
question
whether
admission
pervert
ed
jury
deliberations
issues
relevant
capital
sentencing
determination
case
contrast
concern
inclusion
exclusion
particular
evidence
concern
detailed
repeated
explanation
jury
responsibility
lack
sentencing
process
alleged
error
thus
global
scope
necessarily
pervades
entire
sentencing
process
indeed
alleged
error
case
true
help
pervert
sentencing
decision
consequently
respondent
caldwell
claim
must
fall
within
scope
fundamental
miscarriage
justice
exception
sykes
cause
prejudice
test
unless
today
means
repudiate
sub
silentio
opinion
smith
words
respondent
caldwell
claim
precisely
kind
claim
remains
reviewable
federal
habeas
action
even
though
respondent
establish
cause
procedural
default
see
smith
holding
otherwise
sends
respondent
execution
presumptively
unlawful
presumptively
inaccurate
well
see
caldwell
nothing
habeas
corpus
precedents
calls
consummately
capricious
result
iv
contrary
result
reached
majority
today
precedents
amply
support
appeals
decision
consider
whether
respondent
death
sentence
unconstitutionally
unreliable
despite
respondent
failure
raise
constitutional
issue
accordance
state
procedures
surprising
suppose
misses
force
precedents
since
confines
relevant
inquiry
single
end
opinion
reach
question
cause
certiorari
granted
making
mockery
requirement
state
procedural
bar
rules
appl
ied
evenhandedly
similar
claims
hathorn
lovorn
dismiss
writ
certiorari
improvidently
granted
similarly
wish
undertake
task
applying
fundamental
miscarriage
justice
inquiry
remand
case
appeals
purpose
inasmuch
chosen
decide
issues
conclusory
treatment
receive
suffice
discharge
responsibilities
respondent
issues
matter
life
death
indeed
expected
reinstates
death
sentence
vacated
judgment
purely
procedural
reasons
particularly
careful
consider
fully
issues
necessary
disposition
case
judge
opinion
expectation
naive
dissent
johnson
mississippi
maynard
cartwright
booth
maryland
california
ramos
zant
stephens
caldwell
ruled
constitutionally
impermissible
rest
death
sentence
determination
made
sentencer
led
believe
responsibility
determining
appropriateness
defendant
death
rests
elsewhere
see
adams
wainwright
case
eleventh
circuit
subsequent
case
heard
en
banc
occasion
express
unanimous
approval
panel
decision
respondent
caldwell
claim
meritorious
even
en
banc
eleventh
circuit
divided
sharply
validity
caldwell
claims
brought
prisoners
weaker
factual
records
see
harich
dugger
cert
pending
moreover
instant
case
petitioners
even
seek
review
appeals
determination
caldwell
respondent
death
sentence
violated
eighth
amendment
see
ante
one
may
well
uncertain
meaning
smith
gave
term
fundamental
miscarriage
justice
opinion
cites
murray
carrier
constitutional
violation
probably
resulted
conviction
one
actually
innocent
federal
habeas
may
grant
writ
even
absence
showing
cause
procedural
default
smith
majority
acknowledged
however
concept
actual
innocence
translate
easily
context
alleged
error
sentencing
phase
trial
capital
offense
nonetheless
said
text
smith
appears
rendered
translation
refusal
review
constitutionality
death
sentence
result
fundamental
miscarriage
justice
unless
substantial
claim
constitutional
violation
undermined
accuracy
sentencing
decision
event
evaluating
whether
respondent
procedural
default
precluded
appeals
consideration
caldwell
claim
assume
arguendo
governing
standard
smith
appeals
found
respondent
argues
florida
hold
caldwell
claim
abuse
rule
procedure
reading
florida
opinion
however
appears
contrary
plain
language
carefully
reviewed
respondent
remaining
claims
find
one
either
raised
direct
appeal
therefore
find
review
sought
respondent
barred
rule
abuse
procedure
governed
rules
caselaw
firmly
established
necessity
raising
available
issues
upon
direct
appeal
emphasis
added
direct
appeal
darden
challenged
certain
statements
prosecutor
unconstitutionally
prejudicial
statements
however
concern
jury
role
sentencing
process
darden
suggest
jury
misled
role
see
second
rule
proceeding
contrast
also
attempt
ed
show
caldwell
jury
misled
role
sentencing
process
majority
attempts
dismiss
combs
saying
noted
defendant
failure
raise
caldwell
claim
trial
clear
combs
decision
rely
procedural
default
basis
rejecting
caldwell
claim
case
rather
combs
opinion
emphatic
expressing
desire
address
caldwell
claim
merits
see
consequently
combs
proof
inconsistent
treatment
caldwell
claims
florida
postconviction
proceedings
majority
efforts
discount
daugherty
glock
reveal
fundamental
misunderstanding
consistency
inquiry
johnson
mississippi
inquiry
requires
considering
whether
prisoner
asserted
caldwell
claim
rule
motion
caldwell
claim
raised
direct
appeal
prior
rule
motion
florida
hold
caldwell
claim
procedurally
barred
daugherty
glock
satisfy
criteria
thus
cases
florida
failed
apply
procedural
bar
rules
caldwell
claims
thereby
undercutting
consistency
application
rules
similarly
situated
claims
daugherty
relied
combs
negate
fact
contrary
daugherty
exclusive
reliance
combs
basis
deciding
caldwell
issue
proves
conclusively
daugherty
application
procedural
bar
rule
similarly
regarding
glock
irrelevant
whether
trial
held
caldwell
claim
procedurally
barred
ante
either
way
remains
true
florida
hold
caldwell
claim
procedurally
barred
relevant
point
consistency
issue
sure
florida
time
held
caldwell
claims
procedurally
barred
fact
undermine
conclusion
least
florida
decided
adams
consistently
regularly
apply
procedural
bar
rule
caldwell
claim
johnson
mississippi
negate
fact
persists
failing
treat
caldwell
claims
evenhanded
manner
addition
historically
expressed
particular
reluctance
give
force
state
discretionary
refusal
consider
capital
defendant
meritorious
federal
constitutional
claim
reasons
procedural
default
see
williams
georgia
patterson
alabama
holding
state
procedural
bar
adequate
majority
ignores
longstanding
precedents
nonetheless
digress
note
one
disturbing
aspect
majority
analysis
cause
issue
majority
broadly
asserts
establish
caldwell
violation
defendant
necessarily
must
show
remarks
jury
improperly
described
role
assigned
jury
local
law
ante
pointedly
majority
continues
respondent
therefore
must
asserting
case
trial
remarks
violated
state
law
ante
contrary
majority
description
caldwell
holding
may
possible
establish
caldwell
violation
showing
jury
instructions
although
accurate
state
law
nonetheless
minimize
jury
sense
responsibility
sentencing
process
see
steffen
ohio
brennan
dissenting
denial
certiorari
need
address
issue
however
respondent
asserting
majority
contends
must
asserting
particular
caldwell
claim
rests
premise
jury
given
inaccurate
information
role
state
law
brief
respondent
thus
suffice
say
respondent
lacks
cause
procedural
default
theory
caldwell
claim
objectionable
instructions
erroneous
state
law
see
harich
dugger
see
also
mann
dugger
en
banc
cert
pending
testimony
issue
smith
defendant
psychiatrist
psychiatric
evaluation
defendant
discussed
prior
incident
deviant
sexual
conduct
part
sentencing
phase
trial
prosecution
called
psychiatrist
stand
elicited
description
defendant
said
even
majority
appears
recognize
ante
trial
judge
finding
equal
number
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
lends
support
respondent
contention
review
caldwell
claim
necessary
avoid
fundamental
miscarriage
justice
equal
number
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
suggests
sentencing
decision
close
call
fact
two
justices
florida
dissented
respondent
direct
appeal
see
adams
state
circumstances
likely
egregiously
misinforming
jury
role
process
affected
result
majority
es
undertake
define
means
actually
innocent
death
sentence
ante
yet
apparently
concludes
respondent
show
probably
actually
innocent
sentence
received
ibid
incoherence
decisionmaking
disturbing
case
especially
shocking
capital
case
moreover
majority
recognize
difficulty
applying
concept
actual
innocence
sentencing
determinations
yet
persists
using
problematic
term
without
clarification
meaning
sentencing
context
ibid
worse
smith
murray
articulate
standard
yet
today
ignores
majority
smith
attempted
faithfully
apply
standard
articulated
smith
majority
best
discern
whether
prisoner
demonstrated
substantial
claim
alleged
error
undermined
accuracy
guilt
sentencing
determination
see
also
harris
reed
ante
concurring
quoting
relevant
language
smith
majority
today
refuses
apply
standard
evident
respondent
must
prevail
alleged
error
telling
jurors
death
sentence
consciences
florida
law
sentencing
determination
binding
unless
clearly
erroneous
respondent
undoubtedly
presented
substantial
claim
error
undermined
accuracy
sentence
especially
given
equal
number
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
case
see
supra
refusing
apply
standard
today
effectively
discards
opinion
smith
yet
also
refusing
define
actual
innocence
sentencing
context
offers
nothing
place
way
leaves
law
shambles
reinstates
respondent
death
sentence
without
ever
bothering
determine
legal
principle
actually
governs
case