golden
state
transit
los
angeles
argued
october
decided
december
held
respondent
city
violated
federal
law
conditioning
renewal
petitioner
taxicab
franchise
settlement
pending
labor
dispute
petitioner
union
golden
state
transit
los
angeles
golden
state
district
enjoined
city
reinstate
franchise
however
concluded
authorize
compensatory
damages
award
since
supremacy
clause
create
individual
rights
may
vindicated
action
damages
since
even
though
city
conduct
national
labor
relations
act
nlra
golden
state
direct
violation
statute
act
comprehensive
enforcement
scheme
precluded
resort
appeals
affirmed
held
petitioner
entitled
maintain
action
compensatory
damages
pp
supremacy
clause
force
create
rights
enforceable
clause
source
federal
rights
rather
secure
federal
rights
according
priority
whenever
come
conflict
state
law
chapman
houston
welfare
rights
organization
pp
however
nlra
grants
petitioner
rights
enforceable
remedy
precluded
existence
comprehensive
enforcement
scheme
since
nlra
provides
mechanism
address
state
interference
federally
protected
labor
rights
moreover
city
argument
conduct
violate
rights
secured
nlra
rejected
since
petitioner
intended
beneficiary
statutory
scheme
gives
parties
agreement
right
make
use
economic
weapons
expressly
set
forth
nlra
free
federal
state
governmental
interference
machinists
wisconsin
employment
relations
violation
federal
right
implicit
statute
language
structure
much
direct
violation
right
violation
clearly
set
forth
text
statute
pp
stevens
delivered
opinion
brennan
white
marshall
blackmun
scalia
joined
kennedy
filed
dissenting
opinion
rehnquist
joined
post
zachary
fasman
argued
cause
filed
briefs
petitioner
john
haggerty
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondent
kenneth
geller
andrew
pincus
stuart
abrams
daniel
barney
robert
digges
laurie
baulig
william
busker
filed
brief
american
trucking
associations
amicus
curiae
urging
reversal
benna
ruth
solomon
charles
rothfeld
filed
brief
national
league
cities
et
al
amici
curiae
justice
stevens
delivered
opinion
golden
state
transit
los
angeles
golden
state
held
respondent
city
violated
federal
law
conditioning
renewal
petitioner
taxicab
franchise
settlement
pending
labor
dispute
petitioner
union
remand
district
enjoined
city
reinstate
franchise
concluded
ed
authorize
award
compensatory
damages
reasoned
supremacy
clause
create
individual
rights
may
vindicated
action
damages
section
supp
cd
cal
even
though
city
conduct
national
labor
relations
act
nlra
stat
amended
et
seq
ed
supp
cause
action
lie
direct
violation
statute
act
comprehensive
enforcement
scheme
precluded
resort
appeals
affirmed
granted
certiorari
limited
question
whether
nlra
granted
petitioner
rights
enforceable
section
provides
federal
remedy
deprivation
rights
privileges
immunities
secured
constitution
laws
language
statute
plainly
indicates
remedy
encompasses
violations
federal
statutory
well
constitutional
rights
repeatedly
held
coverage
statute
must
broadly
construed
see
felder
casey
maine
thiboutot
cf
price
provides
remedy
forms
official
violation
federally
protected
rights
monell
new
york
city
dept
social
services
determination
available
remedy
statutory
constitutional
violation
involves
inquiry
first
plaintiff
must
assert
violation
federal
right
see
middlesex
county
sewerage
authority
national
sea
clammers
section
speaks
terms
rights
privileges
immunities
violations
federal
law
deciding
whether
federal
right
violated
considered
whether
provision
question
creates
obligations
binding
governmental
unit
rather
express
congressional
preference
certain
kinds
treatment
pennhurst
state
school
hospital
halderman
interest
plaintiff
asserts
must
vague
amorphous
beyond
competence
judiciary
enforce
wright
roanoke
redevelopment
housing
authority
also
asked
whether
provision
question
intend
ed
benefit
putative
plaintiff
see
also
dissenting
citing
cort
ash
second
even
plaintiff
asserted
federal
right
defendant
may
show
congress
specifically
foreclosed
remedy
smith
robinson
providing
comprehensive
enforcement
mechanis
protection
federal
right
see
also
middlesex
county
sewerage
authority
national
sea
clammers
preiser
rodriguez
availability
administrative
mechanisms
protect
plaintiff
interests
necessarily
sufficient
demonstrate
congress
intended
foreclose
remedy
see
wright
cf
rosado
wyman
rather
statutory
framework
must
llowing
plaintiff
bring
action
inconsistent
congress
carefully
tailored
scheme
smith
burden
demonstrate
congress
expressly
withdrawn
remedy
defendant
see
wright
national
sea
clammers
lightly
conclude
congress
intended
preclude
reliance
remedy
deprivation
federally
secured
right
wright
quoting
smith
robinson
respondent
argues
supremacy
clause
force
create
rights
enforceable
agree
hat
clause
source
federal
rights
secure
federal
rights
according
priority
whenever
come
conflict
state
law
chapman
houston
welfare
rights
organization
see
also
swift
wickham
given
variety
situations
preemption
claims
may
asserted
state
federal
obviously
incorrect
assume
federal
right
action
pursuant
exists
every
time
federal
rule
law
state
regulatory
authority
conversely
fact
federal
statute
certain
state
action
preclude
possibility
federal
statute
may
create
federal
right
provides
remedy
cases
availability
remedy
turns
whether
statute
terms
interpreted
creates
obligations
sufficiently
specific
definite
within
competence
judiciary
enforce
wright
intended
benefit
putative
plaintiff
foreclosed
express
provision
specific
evidence
statute
ii
nub
controversy
parties
whether
nlra
creates
rights
labor
management
protected
governmental
interference
city
argue
action
precluded
existence
comprehensive
enforcement
scheme
although
national
labor
relations
board
nlrb
board
exclusive
jurisdiction
prevent
remedy
unfair
labor
practices
employers
unions
authority
address
conduct
protected
nlra
governmental
interference
thus
comprehensive
enforcement
scheme
preventing
state
interference
federally
protected
labor
rights
foreclose
remedy
substantial
question
holding
golden
state
city
conduct
within
competence
judiciary
enforce
rather
city
argues
held
liable
conduct
violate
rights
secured
nlra
basis
previous
cases
reject
argument
agree
petitioner
intended
beneficiary
statutory
scheme
prevents
governmental
interference
process
nlra
gives
rights
enforceable
governmental
interference
action
nlra
congress
occupied
field
legislation
passed
solely
interests
general
public
mind
circumstances
congressional
benefits
particular
parties
incident
federal
scheme
regulation
private
damages
remedy
may
available
nlra
however
creates
rights
labor
management
one
another
state
terms
act
confers
certain
rights
generally
employees
merely
employer
hill
florida
ex
rel
watson
stone
concurring
part
dissenting
part
see
also
motor
coach
employees
missouri
motor
coach
employees
wisconsin
employment
relations
automobile
workers
thus
stated
state
law
regulates
conduct
actually
protected
federal
law
follows
matter
substantive
right
brown
hotel
employees
rights
protected
state
interference
moreover
limited
explicitly
set
forth
protected
private
interference
nlra
long
understood
protect
range
conduct
state
private
interference
wisconsin
dept
industry
gould
see
also
new
york
telephone
new
york
dept
labor
powell
dissenting
congress
left
unregulated
important
regulations
imposed
sought
leave
labor
management
essentially
free
bargain
agreement
govern
relationship
contrary
city
contention
esort
economic
weapons
peaceful
measures
avail
right
employer
well
employee
machinists
wisconsin
employment
relations
quoting
american
ship
building
nlrb
golden
state
based
doctrine
identified
decision
machinists
wisconsin
employment
relations
supra
doctrine
fundamentally
different
rule
san
diego
building
trades
council
garmon
state
jurisdiction
conduct
arguably
protected
prohibited
nlra
interest
maintaining
uniformity
administration
federal
regulatory
jurisdiction
see
trainmen
jacksonville
terminal
machinists
reiterated
congress
intended
give
parties
agreement
right
make
use
economic
weapons
explicitly
set
forth
act
free
governmental
interference
congressional
intent
enacting
comprehensive
federal
law
labor
relations
required
certain
types
peaceful
conduct
must
free
regulation
machinists
rule
creates
free
zone
regulation
whether
federal
state
excluded
city
contrary
argument
nlra
secure
rights
state
duties
state
expressly
set
forth
text
statute
persuasive
held
based
language
structure
history
nlra
act
protects
certain
rights
labor
management
governmental
interference
true
rule
machinists
case
set
forth
specific
text
enumerated
section
nlra
might
well
also
said
respect
number
rights
obligations
found
implicit
statute
language
rule
law
product
judicial
interpretation
vague
ambiguous
incomplete
statutory
provision
less
binding
rule
based
plain
meaning
statute
violation
federal
right
found
implicit
statute
language
structure
much
direct
violation
right
violation
right
clearly
set
forth
text
statute
machinists
rule
designed
garmon
rule
answer
question
whether
state
federal
regulations
apply
certain
conduct
rather
akin
rule
denies
either
sovereign
authority
abridge
personal
liberty
much
welfare
benefits
maine
thiboutot
right
prescribed
portion
rent
wright
roanoke
redevelopment
housing
authority
interest
free
governmental
regulation
peaceful
methods
putting
economic
pressure
upon
one
another
machinists
right
specifically
conferred
employers
employees
nlra
course
congress
authority
retract
statutorily
conferred
liberty
state
wright
thiboutot
relieve
federal
obligations
declining
federal
funds
cf
guardians
assn
civil
service
new
york
city
opinion
white
rosado
wyman
rule
remains
effect
guarantee
freedom
private
conduct
state
may
abridge
held
golden
state
respondent
refusal
renew
petitioner
franchise
violated
petitioner
right
use
permissible
economic
tactics
withstand
strike
case
come
within
recognized
exception
broad
remedial
scope
reverse
judgment
appeals
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
every
person
color
statute
ordinance
regulation
custom
usage
state
territory
district
columbia
subjects
causes
subjected
citizen
person
within
jurisdiction
thereof
deprivation
rights
privileges
immunities
secured
constitution
laws
shall
liable
party
injured
action
law
suit
equity
proper
proceeding
redress
city
correctly
notes
violate
nlra
section
specifically
since
party
collective
bargaining
agreement
golden
state
teamster
drivers
rather
merely
collateral
third
party
collective
bargaining
process
section
nlra
create
rights
obligations
respect
third
parties
parties
collective
bargaining
agreement
way
come
contact
collective
bargaining
process
rather
section
defines
concept
collective
bargaining
obligations
parties
engaged
collective
bargaining
language
issue
case
failure
make
concession
collective
bargaining
negotiations
unfair
labor
practice
thus
case
relied
section
holding
city
action
preempted
effect
forcing
bargaining
concession
golden
state
strain
language
purpose
nlra
misconstrue
import
opinion
find
city
directly
violated
section
solely
virtue
fact
took
action
preempted
section
article
vi
cl
constitution
provides
constitution
laws
shall
made
pursuance
thereof
treaties
made
shall
made
authority
shall
law
land
judges
every
state
shall
bound
thereby
thing
constitution
laws
state
contrary
notwithstanding
chapman
involved
predecessor
ed
jurisdictional
counterpart
provides
jurisdiction
civil
actions
redress
deprivation
color
state
law
statute
ordinance
regulation
custom
usage
right
privilege
immunity
secured
constitution
act
congress
providing
equal
rights
citizens
persons
within
jurisdiction
observed
first
prepositional
phrase
referring
constitutional
claims
included
rights
secured
solely
supremacy
clause
additional
language
providing
jurisdiction
claims
based
acts
congress
providing
equal
rights
citizens
superfluous
see
chapman
order
give
meaning
entire
statute
held
reference
constitutional
claims
therefore
include
rights
secured
solely
supremacy
clause
ibid
true
respect
supremacy
clause
understood
secure
constitutional
rights
reference
laws
wholly
unnecessary
follows
supremacy
clause
claim
based
statutory
violation
enforceable
statute
creates
rights
privileges
immunities
particular
plaintiff
appeals
thus
mistaken
ruling
nlrb
exclusive
jurisdiction
redress
violations
nlra
labor
management
federal
courts
jurisdiction
address
claims
governmental
interference
interests
protected
act
cases
repeatedly
stressed
distinctions
two
types
claims
see
brown
hotel
employees
machinists
wisconsin
employment
relations
trainmen
jacksonville
terminal
section
act
ed
pertinent
part
purpose
policy
chapter
prescribe
legitimate
rights
employees
employers
relations
affecting
commerce
garmon
divests
state
jurisdiction
actions
state
law
prohibits
conduct
arguably
prohibited
nlra
see
sears
roebuck
carpenters
belknap
hale
actions
involving
conduct
arguably
protected
nlra
provided
injured
party
means
bringing
dispute
board
see
longshoremen
davis
rule
avoids
potential
jurisdictional
conflict
state
courts
agencies
nlrb
ensuring
primary
responsibility
interpreting
applying
body
labor
law
remains
nlrb
brown
hotel
employees
apart
notions
primary
jurisdiction
objection
state
courts
nlrb
exercising
concurrent
jurisdiction
conduct
prohibited
federal
act
sears
roebuck
omitted
referring
substantive
aspects
process
wrote
decisions
hold
congress
meant
activities
whether
employer
employees
regulable
nlrb
neither
board
afforded
flexibility
picking
choosing
economic
devices
labor
management
shall
branded
unlawful
nlrb
insurance
agents
rather
without
authority
attempt
introduce
standard
properly
balanced
bargaining
power
omitted
define
economic
sanctions
might
permitted
negotiating
parties
ideal
balanced
state
collective
bargaining
machinists
cf
bomar
keyes
hand
statutory
privilege
sit
federal
jury
protected
interference
state
cert
denied
justice
kennedy
chief
justice
justice
join
dissenting
majority
concludes
ed
requires
city
los
angeles
pay
compensatory
damages
golden
state
transit
violating
company
right
national
labor
relations
act
nlra
et
seq
ed
supp
employ
economic
weapons
collective
bargaining
without
state
interference
respect
dissent
although
agree
much
majority
discussion
nlra
consider
statutes
provide
golden
state
remedy
decision
golden
state
transit
los
angeles
golden
state
held
city
power
condition
renewal
golden
state
operating
franchise
upon
settlement
company
labor
dispute
imposing
condition
interfere
nlra
although
city
lack
power
sense
immunized
golden
state
interference
city
view
nlra
secure
immunity
within
meaning
district
however
jurisdiction
enjoin
city
action
federal
statutes
earliest
cases
interpreting
constitutional
law
recent
ones
acknowledged
private
party
assert
immunity
state
local
regulation
ground
constitution
federal
statute
allocate
power
enact
regulation
national
government
exclusion
litigant
standing
contend
proper
allocation
power
requires
particular
outcome
dispute
whether
dispute
individual
parties
see
gibbons
ogden
wheat
willson
black
bird
creek
marsh
pet
hauenstein
lynham
dispute
involves
state
subdivisions
see
cooley
board
wardens
port
philadelphia
city
burbank
lockheed
air
terminal
ray
atlantic
richfield
injured
party
need
vest
right
assert
attempted
exercise
jurisdiction
control
violates
proper
distribution
powers
within
federal
system
submit
interpret
give
cause
action
damages
wrong
committed
state
local
entities
misapprehending
precise
location
boundaries
state
federal
power
dispute
taxicab
franchise
involves
greater
transgression
nlra
preemption
create
legal
interest
golden
state
interest
city
infringed
follow
golden
state
may
obtain
relief
ii
nlra
creates
two
relations
encompass
different
legal
interests
statute
creates
first
relation
golden
state
striking
union
statute
establishes
duties
golden
state
union
correlatives
duties
rights
nlra
example
duty
bargain
good
faith
correlatives
duties
right
bargain
good
faith
see
appeals
correct
determine
allegations
injury
case
implicate
rights
duties
flow
first
legal
relation
see
nlra
also
creates
jural
relation
city
golden
state
although
nlra
provide
detailed
way
city
act
renewing
operating
franchise
statute
effect
supremacy
clause
analyzed
machinists
wisconsin
employment
relations
ruled
although
nlrb
affords
power
regulate
activities
within
peripheral
concern
power
authority
influence
substantive
terms
agreements
applying
machinists
golden
state
held
city
power
interfere
nlra
conditioning
golden
state
franchise
renewal
upon
settlement
labor
dispute
see
city
lack
power
gives
rise
correlative
legal
interest
golden
state
discuss
golden
state
majority
chosen
call
interest
right
see
ante
prefer
follow
familiar
hohfeldian
terminology
say
golden
state
immunity
city
interference
nlra
see
hohfeld
fundamental
legal
conceptions
applied
judicial
reasoning
yale
defining
correlative
power
immunity
terminology
best
reflects
congress
intent
create
free
zone
bargaining
described
machinists
see
iii
section
provides
federal
remedy
deprivation
rights
privileges
immunities
secured
constitution
laws
case
us
today
asks
applies
claims
answered
question
decisions
ruled
allegation
incompatibility
federal
state
statutes
regulations
give
rise
claim
secured
constitution
within
meaning
majority
agrees
within
meaning
chapman
houston
welfare
rights
organization
discussing
ed
jurisdictional
counterpart
federal
statute
instead
must
secure
right
privilege
immunity
order
provide
remedy
preceding
analysis
shows
golden
state
immunity
arose
relation
created
nlra
unlike
majority
however
think
nlra
secures
immunity
contemplated
chapman
section
uses
word
secure
mean
protect
make
certain
hague
committee
industrial
organization
opinion
stone
sense
securing
person
individual
rights
carter
greenhow
section
thus
distinguishes
secured
rights
privileges
immunities
interests
merely
resulting
allocation
power
state
federal
governments
representative
shellabarger
sponsored
bill
became
see
cong
globe
recognized
explained
distinction
follows
provisions
constitution
restrain
directly
relate
tenth
section
first
article
state
shall
make
treaty
grant
letters
marque
coin
money
emit
bills
credit
relate
divisions
political
powers
general
governments
relate
directly
rights
persons
within
persons
therein
prohibitions
upon
political
powers
nature
even
occasion
arose
enforced
courts
declaring
void
state
acts
encroachment
federal
powers
thus
thus
sufficiently
enforced
provisions
constitution
class
secures
rights
liabilities
persons
within
persons
app
concerns
federal
structure
nation
rather
securing
rights
privileges
immunities
individuals
although
majority
finds
machinists
doctrine
akin
rule
denies
either
sovereign
authority
abridge
personal
liberty
ante
describes
interest
free
governmental
regulation
right
specifically
conferred
nlra
employers
employees
agree
federal
law
secures
legal
interest
within
meaning
golden
state
contend
federal
statute
protects
city
primary
conduct
apart
governmental
character
machinists
noted
rests
upon
allocation
power
rather
upon
individual
rights
privileges
immunities
see
machinists
dispute
golden
state
city
exists
federal
government
exercised
power
commerce
clause
regulate
golden
state
labor
relations
nlra
thus
deprived
city
power
effect
regulations
relations
although
recent
decisions
wright
thiboutot
suggest
congress
secure
individual
interests
golden
state
statute
congress
secure
nlra
golden
state
immunity
defined
machinists
nothing
substance
requirement
imposed
collective
bargaining
immunity
instance
prevent
exercising
power
commerce
clause
authorize
actions
taken
city
immunity
rather
permits
company
object
wrong
sovereign
attempted
regulate
labor
relations
golden
state
immunity
benefit
company
individual
instead
results
supremacy
clause
separate
protection
federal
structure
division
power
constitutional
system
federal
law
secure
immunity
golden
state
within
meaning
case
us
differs
one
governmental
character
action
constitutes
element
primary
wrong
injured
party
seeks
vindicate
constitution
see
monroe
pape
case
unlike
statutory
cases
maine
thiboutot
plaintiffs
thiboutot
sued
state
officials
withholding
welfare
benefits
violation
social
security
act
particular
claimed
many
words
social
security
act
imposed
upon
defendants
duty
plaintiffs
pay
benefits
correlative
duty
gave
plaintiffs
right
defendants
benefits
paid
expansive
interpretation
allowed
plaintiffs
recover
damages
deprivation
statutory
right
thiboutot
case
however
provides
help
golden
state
nlra
affords
golden
state
counterpart
plaintiffs
individual
interests
social
security
benefits
iv
concluding
golden
state
may
obtain
relief
leave
company
without
remedy
despite
one
might
think
increase
litigation
statute
recent
years
provide
exclusive
relief
federal
courts
offer
held
golden
state
company
survive
summary
judgment
machinists
doctrine
claim
purport
make
ruling
respect
even
cite
provision
omission
discussion
perhaps
stemmed
recognition
plaintiffs
may
vindicate
machinists
claims
seeking
declaratory
equitable
relief
federal
district
courts
powers
federal
jurisdictional
statutes
see
ed
ed
new
york
telephone
new
york
dept
labor
plaintiff
sought
declaratory
injunctive
relief
machinists
claim
statutes
limit
jurisdiction
show
deprivation
right
privilege
immunity
secured
federal
law
within
meaning
golden
state
asked
relief
complaint
see
app
district
jurisdiction
enter
injunction
behalf
company
reasons
stated
view
golden
state
claim
dissent