lewis
jeffers
argued
february
decided
june
affirming
respondent
jeffers
murder
conviction
death
sentence
arizona
inter
alia
independently
reviewed
evidence
supporting
trial
finding
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
crime
committed
especially
heinous
cruel
depraved
manner
noted
recent
ruling
infliction
gratuitous
violence
victim
among
factors
considered
determining
whether
murder
especially
heinous
depraved
found
presence
factor
light
evidence
jeffers
climbed
top
dead
victim
hit
face
several
times
causing
additional
wounds
bleeding
noting
apparent
relish
defendant
commits
murder
another
relevant
factor
decisions
concluded
jeffers
relish
crime
evidenced
testimony
beating
dead
victim
called
bitch
dirty
snitch
stated
blow
landed
one
someone
felt
informed
federal
district
denied
jeffers
habeas
corpus
petition
appeals
agreed
district
especially
heinous
depraved
aggravating
circumstance
interpreted
narrowed
state
void
face
vacated
jeffers
death
sentence
ground
circumstance
unconstitutionally
vague
applied
held
appeals
erred
holding
arizona
construction
especially
heinous
depraved
aggravating
circumstance
case
contravened
godfrey
georgia
maynard
cartwright
dispute
arizona
applied
narrowing
construction
facts
jeffers
case
important
appeals
noted
circumstance
construed
state
courts
unconstitutionally
vague
face
even
held
jeffers
claim
arizona
construed
circumstance
constitutionally
narrow
manner
disposed
walton
arizona
ante
upheld
vagueness
challenge
precise
aggravating
circumstance
issue
moreover
claim
identical
jeffers
assertion
aggravating
circumstance
may
nevertheless
vague
applied
rejected
walton
ante
makes
clear
state
adopted
constitutionally
narrow
construction
facially
vague
aggravating
circumstance
applied
construction
facts
particular
case
fundamental
constitutional
requirement
channeling
limiting
capital
sentencer
discretion
satisfied
pp
appeals
erred
conducting
de
novo
comparison
facts
cases
facts
case
decide
jeffers
challenge
challenge
reduces
essence
claim
state
simply
misapplied
aggravating
circumstance
facts
jeffers
case
federal
habeas
corpus
relief
lie
errors
state
law
federal
habeas
review
state
application
constitutionally
narrowed
aggravating
circumstance
limited
determining
whether
state
finding
arbitrary
capricious
constitute
independent
due
process
eighth
amendment
violation
making
determination
appropriate
standard
review
rational
factfinder
standard
jackson
virginia
federal
must
view
evidence
light
favorable
prosecution
determine
whether
rational
trier
fact
found
elements
crime
beyond
reasonable
doubt
standard
rational
factfinder
found
jeffers
relished
crime
inflicted
gratuitous
violence
given
evidence
conduct
toward
victim
body
pp
reversed
remanded
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
white
scalia
kennedy
joined
brennan
filed
dissenting
opinion
marshall
joined
ante
blackmun
filed
dissenting
opinion
brennan
marshall
stevens
joined
post
gerald
grant
assistant
attorney
general
arizona
argued
cause
petitioners
briefs
robert
corbin
attorney
general
jessica
gifford
funkhouser
james
liebman
appointment
argued
cause
respondent
brief
donald
klein
frank
leto
kent
schneidegger
filed
brief
criminal
justice
legal
foundation
amicus
curiae
urging
reversal
justice
delivered
opinion
case
presents
issues
pertaining
federal
review
state
determination
offense
committed
especially
heinous
cruel
depraved
manner
relevant
facts
undisputed
evidence
trial
showed
may
police
arrested
respondent
jimmie
wayne
jeffers
girlfriend
penelope
cheney
charges
possession
narcotics
receipt
stolen
property
respondent
posted
bond
cheney
unable
post
bond
remained
custody
pima
county
jail
jail
respondent
received
reports
cheney
cooperating
police
providing
police
information
respondent
certain
heroin
transactions
respondent
wrote
note
another
jail
inmate
offering
money
kill
cheney
detention
officer
supposed
deliver
note
read
seized
october
respondent
released
jail
bond
pending
appeal
convictions
week
later
met
doris
van
der
veer
began
living
motel
tucson
respondent
subsequently
invited
cheney
motel
order
provide
heroin
day
murder
respondent
told
van
der
veer
cheney
coming
wished
alone
cheney
arrived
respondent
introduced
van
der
veer
excused
two
half
hours
van
der
veer
returned
motel
room
knocked
door
respondent
admitted
pointed
gun
ordered
sit
chair
quiet
upon
entering
motel
room
van
der
veer
saw
cheney
lying
unconscious
bed
cheney
appeared
cyanotic
respondent
injected
fluid
cheney
hand
told
van
der
veer
given
enough
shit
kill
horse
bitch
wo
die
van
der
veer
noticed
foam
coming
cheney
mouth
recognized
training
nurse
sign
heroin
overdose
van
der
veer
checked
cheney
condition
determined
still
alive
van
der
veer
asked
respondent
going
help
cheney
responded
going
kill
respondent
removed
belt
around
cheney
waist
began
choke
soon
discarded
belt
choked
bare
hands
van
der
veer
urged
stop
saying
cheney
probably
die
anyway
respondent
replied
seen
way
come
strangling
cheney
respondent
instructed
van
der
veer
check
cheney
pulse
van
der
veer
found
pulse
reported
cheney
dead
respondent
ordered
van
der
veer
inject
heroin
cheney
choke
took
pictures
van
der
veer
complied
respondent
told
van
der
veer
proof
accomplice
respondent
beat
cheney
hands
several
times
calling
bitch
dirty
snitch
stating
blow
landed
one
naming
several
names
respondent
dragged
body
bed
placed
shower
stall
three
days
body
began
smell
respondent
van
der
veer
wrapped
body
newspaper
plastic
garbage
bags
placed
sleeping
bag
transported
secluded
area
buried
shallow
grave
jury
convicted
respondent
murder
cheney
sentencing
hearing
trial
found
two
aggravating
circumstances
mitigating
factors
accordance
arizona
death
penalty
statute
supp
currently
stat
respondent
sentenced
death
app
direct
review
conviction
sentence
arizona
following
decision
lockett
ohio
vacated
respondent
death
sentence
remanded
resentencing
see
state
watson
requiring
trial
consider
nonstatutory
mitigating
factors
cert
denied
second
sentencing
hearing
trial
found
two
aggravating
circumstances
beyond
reasonable
doubt
respondent
created
grave
risk
death
another
person
van
der
veer
commission
murder
respondent
committed
murder
especially
heinous
cruel
depraved
manner
see
found
mitigating
factors
thereupon
resentenced
respondent
death
app
direct
appeal
arizona
affirmed
convictions
sentences
state
jeffers
cert
denied
regard
respondent
death
sentence
stated
arizona
law
independently
reviews
facts
trial
found
established
presence
absence
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
determine
latter
outweigh
former
find
present
citations
omitted
applying
standard
reversed
trial
finding
respondent
knowingly
created
grave
risk
death
another
person
addition
victim
offense
stat
ann
reviewed
trial
finding
respondent
committed
offense
especially
heinous
cruel
depraved
manner
noted
interpreted
applied
provision
light
dictionary
definitions
words
used
element
cruelty
involves
pain
mental
physical
distress
visited
upon
victims
heinous
depraved
involve
mental
state
attitude
perpetrator
reflected
words
actions
heinous
means
hatefully
shockingly
evil
grossly
bad
cruel
means
disposed
inflict
pain
esp
wanton
insensate
vindictive
manner
sadistic
depraved
means
marked
debasement
corruption
perversion
deterioration
citations
omitted
evidence
victim
suffered
pain
appears
record
injection
heroin
victim
lost
consciousness
never
regained
died
therefore
victim
experienced
pain
mental
suffering
murder
cruel
purposes
rejected
respondent
contention
especially
heinous
cruel
depraved
aggravating
circumstance
construed
applied
unconstitutionally
broad
relying
decision
state
gretzler
supra
held
ach
element
cruel
heinous
depraved
narrowly
defined
construed
meet
constitutional
standards
explained
insistent
murder
especially
cruel
especially
depraved
apply
clearly
defined
terms
delineated
factors
guide
us
determining
crime
indeed
committed
manner
case
law
reveals
applicable
murders
narrowly
limited
applicability
cases
stand
apart
norm
ibid
citations
omitted
respondent
petitioned
writ
habeas
corpus
district
district
arizona
alleging
among
claims
arizona
interpretation
especially
heinous
depraved
aggravating
circumstance
unconstitutionally
overbroad
vague
district
reiterated
arizona
law
murder
especially
heinous
depraved
includes
infliction
gratuitous
violence
upon
victim
indication
defendant
committed
crime
relish
jeffers
ricketts
citations
omitted
district
noted
evidence
case
indicates
victim
penny
either
taken
injected
jeffers
sufficiently
large
dose
heroin
lost
consciousness
even
lost
consciousness
jeffers
injected
heroin
kill
attempted
strangle
belt
finally
accomplished
intended
purpose
strangulation
hands
required
eyewitness
gunpoint
perform
acts
corpse
took
pictures
climbed
top
corpse
inflicted
blows
face
striking
corpse
stated
blow
one
persons
jeffers
believed
penny
responsible
arrest
due
narcotic
trafficking
activities
jeffers
pulled
corpse
across
floor
shower
remained
three
days
ibid
divided
panel
appeals
ninth
circuit
vacated
respondent
death
sentence
ground
especially
heinous
depraved
circumstance
unconstitutionally
vague
applied
jeffers
ricketts
initial
matter
appeals
agreed
district
subsection
aggravating
circumstance
unconstitutionally
vague
face
citing
chaney
lewis
cert
denied
appeals
held
however
hile
chaney
establishes
arizona
statute
void
face
capable
constitutional
application
naturally
answer
question
whether
arizona
statute
constitutionally
applied
jeffers
case
reviewing
number
arizona
cases
defining
applying
especially
heinous
depraved
circumstance
appeals
compared
facts
cases
facts
case
concluded
standard
heinousness
depravity
delineated
prior
arizona
cases
applied
principled
manner
jeffers
appeals
therefore
struck
respondent
death
sentence
arbitrary
apply
standard
especial
heinousness
depravity
jeffers
case
facts
permit
arbitrary
capricious
therefore
unconstitutional
application
standard
arizona
existing
standard
extended
jeffers
case
without
losing
ability
distinguish
principled
manner
condemns
death
citing
godfrey
georgia
dissenting
member
panel
maintained
majority
little
arizona
interpretation
facts
quite
reasonably
fit
within
statutory
definition
aggravating
circumstances
granted
certiorari
ricketts
jeffers
reverse
ii
petitioners
contend
case
presents
question
whether
federal
may
make
de
novo
review
evidence
supporting
state
finding
facially
constitutional
aggravating
circumstance
respondent
maintains
case
presents
question
whether
appeals
correctly
held
arizona
construction
subsection
aggravating
circumstance
case
contravened
decisions
godfrey
georgia
supra
maynard
cartwright
begin
analysis
respondent
contention
capital
punishment
doctrine
rooted
principle
eighth
fourteenth
amendments
tolerate
infliction
sentence
death
legal
systems
permit
unique
penalty
wantonly
freakishly
imposed
gregg
georgia
joint
opinion
quoting
furman
georgia
stewart
concurring
see
also
furman
supra
white
concurring
invalidating
capital
punishment
statute
meaningful
basis
distinguishing
cases
death
penalty
imposed
many
cases
accordingly
discretion
afforded
sentencing
body
matter
grave
determination
whether
human
life
taken
spared
discretion
must
suitably
directed
limited
minimize
risk
wholly
arbitrary
capricious
action
gregg
supra
principle
requires
state
channel
sentencer
discretion
clear
objective
standards
provide
specific
detailed
guidance
make
rationally
reviewable
process
imposing
sentence
death
godfrey
supra
footnotes
omitted
state
definitions
aggravating
circumstances
circumstances
make
criminal
defendant
eligible
death
penalty
therefore
play
significant
role
channeling
sentencer
discretion
gregg
example
held
georgia
outrageously
wantonly
vile
aggravating
circumstance
ann
supp
outrageously
wantonly
vile
horrible
inhuman
involved
torture
depravity
mind
aggravated
battery
victim
unconstitutionally
vague
georgia
courts
give
narrowing
construction
see
joint
opinion
although
arguabl
murder
involves
depravity
mind
aggravating
battery
reason
assume
georgia
adopt
construction
see
also
proffitt
florida
joint
opinion
upholding
florida
especially
heinous
atrocious
cruel
aggravating
circumstance
supp
ground
florida
restricted
circumstance
include
conscienceless
pitiless
crime
unnecessarily
torturous
victim
godfrey
georgia
supra
however
plurality
held
although
georgia
adopted
narrowing
construction
georgia
subsection
aggravating
circumstance
death
sentence
issue
stand
evidence
existed
state
courts
applied
narrowing
construction
facts
case
circumstances
case
satisfy
criteria
laid
georgia
cases
adopting
narrowing
construction
georgia
courts
applied
narrowing
construction
plurality
considered
whether
georgia
affirming
death
sentence
nevertheless
applied
constitutional
construction
subsection
aggravating
circumstance
plurality
concluded
state
principled
way
distinguish
case
death
penalty
imposed
many
cases
reiterated
general
principle
aggravating
circumstances
must
construed
permit
sentencer
make
principled
distinction
deserve
death
penalty
see
spaziano
florida
state
determined
death
available
penalty
certain
crimes
must
administer
penalty
way
rationally
distinguish
individuals
death
appropriate
sanction
zant
stephens
aggravating
circumstance
must
genuinely
narrow
class
persons
eligible
death
penalty
must
reasonably
justify
imposition
severe
sentence
defendant
compared
others
found
guilty
murder
omitted
see
also
barclay
florida
stevens
concurring
judgment
constant
theme
cases
gregg
proffitt
godfrey
eddings
recently
zant
emphasis
procedural
protections
intended
ensure
death
penalty
imposed
consistent
rational
manner
lowenfield
phelps
indeed
maynard
cartwright
applied
teachings
godfrey
hold
oklahoma
courts
construed
oklahoma
especially
heinous
atrocious
cruel
aggravating
circumstance
manner
sufficient
cure
unfettered
discretion
jury
satisfy
commands
eighth
amendment
concluded
oklahoma
conclusion
th
facts
case
jury
verdict
murder
especially
heinous
atrocious
cruel
supportable
cure
constitutional
infirmity
aggravating
circumstance
ibid
respondent
reliance
godfrey
cartwright
however
yield
result
seeks
unlike
godfrey
dispute
case
arizona
applied
narrowing
construction
arizona
subsection
aggravating
circumstance
facts
respondent
case
see
state
jeffers
important
appeals
noted
subsection
aggravating
circumstance
interpreted
arizona
courts
unconstitutionally
vague
face
see
citing
chaney
lewis
arizona
appears
sufficiently
channeled
sentencing
discretion
prevent
arbitrary
capricious
capital
sentencing
decisions
defined
factors
set
forth
section
definitions
applied
consistently
chaney
supra
citations
quotations
omitted
even
appeals
held
resolved
doubt
matter
walton
arizona
ante
upheld
vagueness
challenge
precise
aggravating
circumstance
issue
case
see
ante
holding
walton
disposes
respondent
claim
arizona
construed
subsection
aggravating
circumstance
constitutionally
narrow
manner
bears
repeating
recognizing
proper
degree
definition
aggravating
factor
nature
susceptible
mathematical
precision
conclude
definition
given
especially
cruel
provision
arizona
constitutionally
sufficient
gives
meaningful
guidance
sentencer
fault
state
statement
crime
committed
especially
depraved
manner
perpetrator
relishes
murder
evidencing
debasement
perversion
shows
indifference
suffering
victim
evidences
sense
pleasure
killing
ante
citation
omitted
dissent
suggestion
reliance
walton
misplaced
without
merit
granted
certiorari
walton
decide
hether
arizona
especially
heinous
cruel
depraved
aggravating
circumstance
interpreted
arizona
courts
fails
channel
sentencer
discretion
required
eighth
amendment
brief
petitioner
walton
arizona
judgment
case
plainly
rested
negative
answer
question
see
ante
ante
scalia
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
see
also
ante
blackmun
dissenting
discussing
vagueness
state
courts
construction
especially
heinous
depraved
aggravating
circumstance
decline
dissent
apparent
invitation
reconsider
arguments
addressed
rejected
decision
announced
today
light
appeals
rejection
respondent
facial
challenge
respondent
defends
decision
ground
even
arizona
adopted
constitutionally
narrow
construction
subsection
aggravating
circumstance
even
arizona
applied
narrowing
construction
facts
case
aggravating
circumstance
may
nevertheless
vague
applied
rejected
identical
claim
walton
however
conclusion
reached
walton
applies
equal
force
case
walton
nevertheless
contends
heinous
cruel
depraved
factor
applied
arbitrary
manner
applied
distinguish
case
cases
death
sentence
imposed
effect
walton
challenges
proportionality
review
arizona
erroneous
asks
us
overturn
decline
concluded
challenged
factor
construed
arizona
courts
manner
furnishes
sufficient
guidance
sentencer
proportionality
review
constitutionally
required
lawfully
may
presume
walton
death
sentence
wantonly
freakishly
imposed
thus
sentence
disproportionate
within
recognized
meaning
eighth
amendment
kemp
pulley
harris
furthermore
arizona
plainly
undertook
proportionality
review
good
faith
found
walton
sentence
proportional
sentences
imposed
cases
similar
constitution
require
us
look
behind
conclusion
ante
light
rejection
respondent
constitutional
challenge
arizona
especially
heinous
depraved
aggravating
circumstance
see
walton
respondent
contention
arizona
application
narrowing
construction
facts
case
nevertheless
failed
distinguish
case
cases
find
aggravating
circumstance
reduces
essence
claim
state
simply
misapplied
aggravating
circumstance
facts
case
federal
habeas
corpus
relief
lie
errors
state
law
see
pulley
harris
rose
hodges
per
curiam
federal
habeas
review
state
application
constitutionally
narrowed
aggravating
circumstance
limited
determining
whether
state
finding
arbitrary
capricious
constitute
independent
due
process
eighth
amendment
violation
cf
donnelly
dechristoforo
absent
specific
constitutional
violation
federal
habeas
review
trial
error
limited
whether
error
infected
trial
unfairness
make
resulting
conviction
denial
due
process
making
determination
respect
state
findings
fact
application
law
counsels
sort
de
novo
review
undertaken
appeals
case
cf
illumined
case
examples
furnished
arizona
especially
heinous
depraved
standard
seems
call
conduct
attitudes
shocking
exhibited
jeffers
issue
solely
whether
state
properly
found
existence
constitutionally
narrowed
aggravating
circumstance
never
required
federal
courts
peer
majestically
state
shoulder
might
interpretation
facts
quite
reasonably
perhaps
even
quite
plainly
fit
within
statutory
language
godfrey
white
dissenting
omitted
see
barclay
plurality
opinion
review
state
findings
aggravating
circumstances
limited
question
whether
unprincipled
arbitrary
somehow
violate
constitution
stevens
concurring
judgment
role
reexamine
trial
findings
fact
affirmed
florida
assuming
facts
true
federal
constitutional
infirmity
two
findings
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
rather
determining
whether
state
application
constitutionally
adequate
aggravating
circumstance
erroneous
raise
independent
due
process
eighth
amendment
violation
think
appropriate
standard
review
rational
factfinder
standard
established
jackson
virginia
held
jackson
federal
habeas
corpus
claimant
alleges
state
conviction
unsupported
evidence
federal
courts
must
determine
whether
conviction
obtained
violation
winship
asking
whether
viewing
evidence
light
favorable
prosecution
rational
trier
fact
found
essential
elements
crime
beyond
reasonable
doubt
citation
omitted
see
also
hold
challenge
state
criminal
conviction
brought
settled
procedural
prerequisites
claim
otherwise
satisfied
applicant
entitled
habeas
corpus
relief
found
upon
record
evidence
adduced
trial
rational
trier
fact
found
proof
guilt
beyond
reasonable
doubt
omitted
reasoned
familiar
standard
gives
full
play
responsibility
trier
fact
fairly
resolve
conflicts
testimony
weigh
evidence
draw
reasonable
inferences
basic
facts
ultimate
facts
defendant
found
guilty
crime
charged
factfinder
role
weigher
evidence
preserved
legal
conclusion
upon
judicial
review
evidence
considered
light
favorable
prosecution
omitted
moreover
federal
adhere
jackson
standard
even
reviewing
decision
state
appellate
independently
reviewed
evidence
underlying
question
remains
state
aggravating
circumstances
adequately
perform
constitutional
function
state
application
circumstances
raises
apart
due
process
eighth
amendment
concerns
question
proper
application
state
law
state
finding
aggravating
circumstance
particular
case
including
de
novo
finding
appellate
particular
offense
especially
heinous
depraved
arbitrary
capricious
reasonable
sentencer
concluded
indeed
respondent
agrees
state
especially
heinous
depraved
finding
insofar
matter
state
law
reviewable
federal
courts
rational
factfinder
rule
jackson
virginia
brief
respondent
emphasis
added
omitted
applying
jackson
standard
case
hold
rational
factfinder
found
respondent
relished
crime
inflicted
gratuitous
violence
victim
given
evidence
jeffers
beating
dead
victim
called
bitch
dirty
snitch
striking
blow
said
one
naming
several
names
state
jeffers
think
arizona
finding
respondent
relished
killing
one
rational
factfinder
made
moreover
arizona
finding
respondent
inflicted
gratuitous
violence
rationally
supported
evidence
respondent
climbed
top
dead
victim
hit
face
several
times
eventually
resulted
additional
wounds
bleeding
ibid
light
arizona
narrowing
construction
especially
heinous
depraved
aggravating
circumstance
see
state
gretzler
listing
factors
arizona
reasonably
concluded
respondent
committed
murder
especially
heinous
depraved
manner
foregoing
reasons
reverse
judgment
appeals
remand
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
aggravating
circumstances
considered
shall
following
defendant
convicted
another
offense
arizona
law
sentence
life
imprisonment
death
imposable
defendant
previously
convicted
felony
involving
use
threat
violence
another
person
commission
offense
defendant
knowingly
created
grave
risk
death
another
person
persons
addition
victim
offense
defendant
procured
commission
offense
payment
promise
payment
anything
pecuniary
value
defendant
committed
offense
consideration
receipt
expectation
receipt
anything
pecuniary
value
defendant
committed
offense
especially
heinous
cruel
depraved
manner
defendant
committed
offense
custody
state
department
corrections
law
enforcement
agency
county
city
jail
defendant
convicted
one
homicides
defined
committed
commission
offense
defendant
adult
time
offense
committed
tried
adult
victim
fifteen
years
age
murdered
individual
duty
peace
officer
killed
course
performing
official
duties
defendant
knew
known
victim
peace
officer
arizona
provides
determining
whether
impose
sentence
death
life
imprisonment
without
possibility
release
basis
shall
take
account
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
included
subsections
section
shall
impose
sentence
death
finds
one
aggravating
circumstances
enumerated
subsection
section
mitigating
circumstances
sufficiently
substantial
call
leniency
seeking
habeas
corpus
relief
appeals
ninth
circuit
respondent
jimmie
wayne
jeffers
raised
two
challenges
arizona
especially
heinous
depraved
aggravating
circumstance
circumstance
first
jeffers
contended
arizona
failed
articulate
constitutionally
sufficient
limiting
construction
circumstance
alternative
jeffers
argued
even
suitable
limiting
construction
developed
application
case
failed
satisfy
constitutional
requirements
appeals
deeming
bound
circuit
precedent
rejected
respondent
first
contention
jeffers
ricketts
citing
chaney
lewis
cert
denied
respect
second
contention
however
concluded
standard
enunciated
arizona
seems
call
conduct
attitudes
shocking
exhibited
jeffers
ecause
conclude
standard
heinousness
depravity
delineated
prior
arizona
cases
applied
principled
manner
jeffers
death
sentence
must
struck
arbitrary
state
filed
petition
rehearing
rehearing
en
banc
panel
indicated
ruling
rehearing
petition
deferred
pending
decision
sitting
en
banc
adamson
ricketts
order
march
quoted
brief
respondent
several
months
later
en
banc
issued
decision
adamson
ricketts
cert
pending
exhaustive
analysis
relevant
arizona
precedents
en
banc
concluded
circumstance
given
sufficiently
narrow
construction
arizona
application
kept
within
identifiable
boundaries
among
fifty
cases
finding
appealed
unable
distinguish
rationally
cases
arizona
upheld
finding
neither
legislative
standard
case
law
properly
channeled
decisionmaking
imposition
especially
heinous
cruel
depraved
aggravating
circumstance
find
circumstance
arbitrarily
capriciously
applied
arizona
courts
respondent
jeffers
defends
judgment
appeals
grounds
satisfactory
limiting
construction
circumstance
derived
arizona
precedents
alternatively
construction
exist
improperly
applied
case
jeffers
first
claim
logically
antecedent
second
raises
issue
greater
general
importance
given
decision
en
banc
appeals
adamson
hardly
regarded
insubstantial
today
however
simply
refuses
discuss
merits
respondent
broad
challenge
circumstance
lieu
analysis
relies
single
sentence
dictum
opinion
another
case
issued
today
believe
arizona
application
factor
squared
governing
precedents
regard
majority
approach
parody
constitutional
adjudication
dissent
consistently
recognized
aggravating
circumstance
must
genuinely
narrow
class
persons
eligible
death
penalty
must
reasonably
justify
imposition
severe
sentence
defendant
compared
others
found
guilty
murder
zant
stephens
application
respondent
arizona
circumstance
sustained
aggravating
factor
provides
principled
way
distinguish
case
death
penalty
imposed
many
cases
godfrey
georgia
plurality
opinion
majority
contend
statutory
language
requires
murder
especially
heinous
depraved
sufficiently
precise
meet
constitutional
standards
rather
refers
repeatedly
narrowing
construction
circumstance
announced
arizona
see
ante
nowhere
precisely
narrowing
construction
examine
arizona
cases
see
whether
construction
consistently
applied
majority
suggests
however
narrowing
construction
announced
arizona
state
gretzler
cert
denied
see
ante
analysis
arizona
opinion
gretzler
relationship
prior
arizona
capital
cases
belies
characterization
prior
gretzler
arizona
application
circumstance
based
principally
decision
state
knapp
cert
denied
recited
dictionary
definitions
statutory
terms
heinous
defined
hatefully
shockingly
evil
grossly
bad
cruel
defined
disposed
inflict
pain
esp
wanton
insensate
vindictive
manner
sadistic
depraved
defined
marked
debasement
corruption
perversion
deterioration
concluded
hat
legislature
intended
include
aggravating
circumstance
killing
wherein
additional
circumstances
nature
enumerated
set
crime
apart
usual
norm
ibid
gretzler
suggest
knapp
definitions
insufficient
guide
sentencer
discretion
narrowing
required
contrary
quoted
definitions
approval
stated
believe
statutory
phrase
especially
heinous
cruel
depraved
construed
constitutionally
narrow
fashion
properly
applied
individual
cases
summary
law
developing
area
supports
conclusion
explaining
kinds
murders
properly
regarded
especially
heinous
depraved
stated
contrast
emphasis
upon
victim
suffering
feelings
case
cruelty
statutory
concepts
heinous
depraved
involve
killer
vile
state
mind
time
murder
evidenced
killer
actions
cases
suggested
specific
factors
lead
finding
heinousness
depravity
next
drawing
examples
prior
arizona
cases
identified
five
factors
presence
indicate
particular
killing
especially
heinous
depraved
factors
apparent
relishing
murder
killer
infliction
gratuitous
violence
victim
needless
mutilation
victim
senselessness
crime
helplessness
victim
finally
noted
circumstances
specific
factors
discussed
separate
crime
norm
first
degree
murders
reverse
finding
crime
committed
especially
heinous
cruel
depraved
manner
emphasis
added
arizona
opinion
gretzler
obviously
announce
narrowing
construction
circumstance
suggest
standards
previously
applied
inadequate
constraints
sentencer
discretion
essential
instead
arizona
cited
knapp
definitions
approval
gave
examples
application
matter
vaguely
defined
aggravating
circumstance
finite
number
cases
circumstance
applied
hardly
limits
application
aggravating
factor
list
prior
decisions
provide
illustrative
examples
among
see
arizona
description
manner
vague
aggravating
factor
applied
regarded
establishment
constitutionally
sufficient
narrowing
construction
gretzler
narrow
discretion
future
sentencers
simply
grouping
prior
decisions
categories
use
categories
serve
guide
sentencer
categories
narrow
enough
significant
number
homicides
fall
within
indicates
murder
covered
aggravating
circumstance
falls
within
one
enumerated
categories
arizona
decision
gretzler
satisfies
neither
criteria
first
degree
murders
fall
within
least
one
five
categories
listed
gretzler
hardly
surprising
result
since
gretzler
categories
simply
descriptive
prior
period
knapp
definitions
governed
application
aggravating
factor
since
gretzler
moreover
arizona
continued
identify
additional
circumstances
support
conclusion
particular
murder
especially
heinous
depraved
fact
also
unsurprising
gretzler
purport
lay
rules
future
simply
summarized
prior
case
law
indicated
finding
proper
circumstances
specific
factors
discussed
separate
crime
norm
first
degree
murders
emphasis
added
majority
contend
knapp
definitions
furnished
constitutionally
sufficient
guidance
capital
sentencers
arizona
prior
gretzler
reasonable
sentencer
might
conclude
every
first
degree
murder
especially
heinous
cruel
depraved
see
supra
reasonable
judge
surely
believe
killings
hatefully
shockingly
evil
marked
debasement
corruption
perversion
deterioration
yet
majority
apparently
concludes
arizona
cured
constitutional
infirmity
summarizing
prior
decisions
reiterating
approval
constitutionally
deficient
construction
relied
previously
pledging
follow
approach
future
majority
undertakes
close
examination
gretzler
arizona
cases
prior
subsequent
makes
attempt
explain
arizona
construction
terms
especially
heinous
depraved
said
satisfy
constitutional
requirements
announced
prior
decisions
indeed
majority
conclusion
arizona
satisfactorily
limited
reach
statutory
language
supported
analysis
instead
relies
assertion
resolved
doubt
matter
walton
arizona
ante
upheld
vagueness
challenge
precise
aggravating
circumstance
issue
case
ante
majority
claim
walton
involves
precise
aggravating
circumstance
issue
case
however
fundamentally
misrepresents
operation
arizona
statute
arizona
consistently
asserted
terms
heinous
cruel
depraved
considered
disjunctive
presence
one
three
factors
aggravating
circumstance
state
beaty
cert
denied
therefore
accurate
characterize
circumstance
three
aggravating
factors
one
walton
arizona
determining
factor
established
relied
primarily
conclusion
murder
especially
cruel
although
also
indicated
murder
especially
depraved
stated
clearly
conclusion
necessary
finding
circumstance
see
state
walton
clear
evidence
cruelty
sufficient
sustain
trial
judge
finding
aggravating
factor
believe
evidence
also
supports
finding
depravity
affirming
jeffrey
walton
death
sentence
today
also
focuses
attention
constitutional
sufficiency
arizona
construction
cruelty
concludes
recognizing
proper
degree
definition
aggravating
factor
nature
susceptible
mathematical
precision
conclude
definition
given
especially
cruel
provision
arizona
constitutionally
sufficient
gives
meaningful
guidance
sentencer
fault
state
statement
crime
committed
especially
depraved
manner
perpetrator
relishes
murder
evidencing
debasement
perversion
shows
indifference
suffering
victim
evidences
sense
pleasure
killing
ante
emphasis
added
think
important
frank
happening
death
penalty
laws
many
establish
aggravating
circumstances
similar
one
issue
case
since
statutory
language
defining
factors
provide
constitutionally
adequate
guidance
constitutionality
aggravating
circumstances
necessarily
depends
construction
given
state
highest
expressed
apparent
approval
limiting
construction
requiring
torture
serious
physical
abuse
maynard
cartwright
held
permissible
construction
aggravating
circumstance
kind
prior
today
never
suggested
aggravating
factor
permissibly
construed
manner
make
reference
suffering
victim
decision
today
likely
result
execution
numerous
inmates
arizona
elsewhere
otherwise
put
death
yet
neither
case
walton
articulated
argument
support
decision
majority
undertaken
examination
way
aggravating
circumstance
applied
arizona
instead
relies
conspicuous
bootstrap
five
members
joined
majority
opinion
walton
single
sentence
asserts
without
explanation
majority
fault
arizona
construction
statutory
term
depraved
present
case
five
members
proclaim
bound
scrap
dictum
context
poor
excuse
constitutional
adjudication
capital
case
deeply
disturbing
degree
understandable
majority
chooses
rely
exclusively
brief
passing
dictum
walton
examined
range
homicides
arizona
held
especially
heinous
depraved
plausibly
argued
state
placed
meaningful
limits
application
aggravating
circumstance
dissent
walton
explains
detail
reasons
conclusion
aggravating
factor
defined
arizona
fails
satisfy
constitutional
requirements
appeals
ninth
circuit
sitting
en
banc
exhaustive
analysis
relevant
state
precedents
also
concluded
especially
heinous
depraved
circumstance
unconstitutionally
vague
see
adamson
ricketts
need
reiterate
arguments
sufficient
note
neither
arizona
attempted
refute
analysis
indeed
constitutional
defects
arizona
application
circumstance
illustrated
state
conclusion
respondent
relished
murder
factor
supports
finding
killing
especially
heinous
depraved
based
conclusion
testimony
indicating
respondent
struck
victim
several
times
appeared
dead
striking
called
bitch
dirty
snitch
striking
blow
said
one
naming
several
friends
victim
informed
police
arizona
explain
precisely
meant
saying
respondent
relished
crime
evidence
suggest
jeffers
killed
sake
killing
found
intrinsic
pleasure
act
murder
rather
evidence
indicates
respondent
killed
hatred
particular
individual
desire
revenge
difference
may
state
rationally
conclude
murder
committed
personal
hatred
reprehensible
killing
committed
reasons
state
arizona
said
arrived
conclusion
arizona
also
held
murder
especially
heinous
depraved
committed
eliminate
witness
see
state
correll
state
gillies
cert
denied
state
smith
senseless
see
gretzler
statute
provides
shall
aggravating
circumstance
murder
committed
pecuniary
gain
see
arizona
also
identified
blameworthy
motives
view
suggest
murder
especially
heinous
depraved
taken
together
decisions
arizona
hold
murder
deemed
especially
blameworthy
committed
virtually
reason
reason
arizona
decisions
dealing
especially
improper
motives
symptomatic
larger
pattern
construction
circumstance
least
since
gretzler
generally
avoided
error
simply
recounting
events
surrounding
particular
crime
announcing
conclusory
fashion
murder
especially
heinous
depraved
rather
typically
identifies
specific
factors
support
conclusion
aggravating
circumstance
established
one
decision
examined
isolation
may
appear
state
narrowly
construed
circumstance
manner
satisfies
constitutional
requirements
problem
arizona
identified
many
factors
shown
willing
add
new
factors
perceived
need
arises
body
precedents
places
meaningful
limitations
application
aggravating
circumstance
constitutional
infirmity
approach
recognized
examination
one
opinion
becomes
apparent
upon
examination
relevant
decisions
taken
whole
unfortunately
inquiry
required
informed
assessment
arizona
application
aggravating
factor
one
simply
refuses
undertake
ii
majority
devotes
energy
arguing
federal
habeas
concluded
state
adopted
constitutionally
sufficient
limiting
construction
aggravating
circumstance
largely
refrain
engaging
comparisons
homicide
review
prior
decisions
aggravating
factor
found
concludes
since
rational
factfinder
determined
respondent
relished
murder
engaged
gratuitous
violence
death
sentence
must
allowed
stand
concede
respondent
crime
plainly
distinguishable
murders
arizona
found
especially
heinous
depraved
indeed
conclusion
hardly
otherwise
argued
circumstance
construed
broadly
cover
virtually
every
first
degree
murder
scarcely
contend
finding
case
bizarre
aberrational
however
brief
observations
concerning
role
federal
habeas
courts
reviewing
state
findings
aggravating
circumstances
think
majority
wrong
arguing
state
application
valid
aggravating
circumstance
involves
question
state
law
see
ante
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
perform
state
law
function
determining
sentenced
death
aggravating
factors
also
perform
distinct
function
determining
murderers
eligible
death
penalty
matter
federal
law
see
zant
stephens
tatutory
aggravating
circumstances
play
constitutionally
necessary
function
stage
legislative
definition
circumscribe
class
persons
eligible
death
penalty
lowenfield
phelps
point
particularly
clear
cases
like
present
one
circumstance
aggravating
factor
arizona
found
exist
state
erred
determination
aggravating
circumstance
proved
error
federal
constitutional
significance
defendant
claims
aggravating
factor
established
contending
eighth
amendment
simply
state
law
prohibits
execution
majority
points
federal
courts
habeas
corpus
proceedings
must
generally
accord
presumption
correctness
state
factual
findings
ante
emphasis
added
presumption
correctness
apply
however
habeas
petitioner
demonstrates
factfinding
procedure
employed
state
adequate
afford
full
fair
hearing
present
case
sentencing
procedure
conducted
clearly
unconstitutional
scheme
see
supra
relevant
factfinder
therefore
arizona
majority
appears
acknowledge
see
ante
arguing
federal
adhere
jackson
standard
even
reviewing
decision
state
appellate
independently
reviewed
evidence
held
general
presumption
correctness
mandated
applicable
factual
findings
state
appellate
courts
sumner
mata
also
recognized
however
might
instances
presumption
apply
appellate
factfinding
appellate
factfinding
procedures
adequate
see
example
question
might
given
case
turn
credibility
determinations
accurately
made
appellate
basis
paper
record
cabana
bullock
indeed
present
case
inadequacy
arizona
procedure
goes
beyond
fact
see
witnesses
forced
rely
upon
paper
record
times
respondent
trial
sentencing
hearing
even
appellate
briefs
submitted
oral
argument
conducted
respondent
reason
believe
sentencer
attach
particular
importance
conclusion
defendant
relished
killing
inflicted
gratuitous
violence
victim
death
arizona
opinion
gretzler
issued
days
prior
decision
jeffers
case
far
late
jeffers
submit
evidence
argument
regarding
presence
gretzler
factors
present
case
appears
dispute
regarding
primary
facts
underlying
arizona
finding
circumstance
respondent
apparently
deny
struck
victim
dead
cursed
conflict
testimony
regarding
point
regard
arizona
factfinding
procedures
adequate
resolve
conflict
determining
jeffers
relished
crime
inflicted
gratuitous
violence
victim
arizona
simply
apply
determinate
standards
new
set
facts
rather
assertion
respondent
relished
killing
penelope
cheney
said
much
understanding
word
relish
jeffers
state
mind
time
murder
thus
despite
prior
ninth
circuit
decision
holding
circumstance
adequately
narrowed
federal
properly
limit
question
whether
rational
factfinder
might
conclude
jeffers
relished
killing
employed
gratuitous
violence
rather
habeas
right
duty
ask
whether
arizona
construction
circumstance
remained
adequate
satisfy
constitution
light
application
case
hand
thus
habeas
review
cases
kind
necessarily
involves
comparison
case
review
prior
decisions
applying
aggravating
factor
means
determining
whether
state
incorrectly
applied
construction
statutory
terms
means
determining
whether
state
application
construction
instant
case
expands
scope
aggravating
factor
way
make
previously
valid
limiting
construction
unconstitutionally
broad
indeed
think
comparative
approach
necessary
matter
standard
review
habeas
employs
even
state
finding
reviewed
rational
factfinder
standard
majority
wrong
say
appeals
erred
comparing
jeffers
crime
cases
factor
established
words
like
relish
may
somewhat
precise
heinous
depraved
still
less
crystalline
clarity
attempting
apply
jackson
standard
must
ask
whether
rational
factfinder
believe
jeffers
relished
crime
term
construed
arizona
arizona
used
word
relish
mean
one
thing
decisions
something
different
jeffers
case
application
jeffers
arbitrary
even
meanings
found
given
dictionary
appeals
departed
rational
factfinder
standard
requiring
close
correlation
case
others
simply
employing
comparative
approach
suppose
example
arizona
consistently
construed
circumstance
requiring
physical
abuse
found
standard
satisfied
cases
killer
subjected
victim
prolonged
severe
physical
suffering
presumably
construction
valid
see
maynard
cartwright
suppose
subsequent
case
found
factor
proved
defendant
slapped
victim
shot
dead
defendant
federal
habeas
raise
two
related
distinct
challenges
first
defendant
might
argue
reasonable
factfinder
conclude
single
slap
constituted
physical
abuse
term
previously
construed
arizona
amount
contention
state
misapplied
rule
alternatively
defendant
might
argue
physical
abuse
longer
deemed
adequate
limiting
construction
phrase
construed
including
single
slap
however
challenge
framed
though
habeas
limit
question
whether
rational
factfinder
conclude
slap
fell
within
plausible
definition
physical
abuse
iii
majority
discussion
way
federal
habeas
review
application
valid
aggravating
circumstance
facts
particular
case
seems
flawed
significant
respects
principal
disagreement
however
insistence
addressing
issue
majority
makes
effort
justify
holding
arizona
placed
constitutionally
sufficient
limitations
especially
heinous
depraved
aggravating
circumstance
instead
relies
entirely
sentence
dictum
today
opinion
walton
opinion
offers
rationale
support
conclusion
dissenting
opinion
walton
notes
increasing
tendency
review
constitutional
claims
capital
defendants
perfunctory
manner
action
case
goes
far
beyond
anything
observed
dissent
circumstance
applies
sentencer
finds
defendant
committed
offense
especially
heinous
cruel
depraved
manner
present
case
arizona
found
cruelty
proved
evidence
victim
suffered
pain
state
jeffers
find
murder
heinous
depraved
adequacy
finding
issue
case
arizona
disagreed
trial
determination
jeffers
knowingly
created
grave
risk
death
another
person
persons
addition
victim
offense
see
consequently
jeffers
sentence
death
rests
entirely
factor
eleven
judges
sat
en
banc
panel
adamson
seven
judges
concluded
none
three
terms
heinous
cruel
depraved
circumstance
construed
arizona
manner
satisfied
constitutional
requirements
four
judges
argued
state
announced
satisfactory
construction
word
cruel
four
declined
express
view
adequacy
arizona
application
terms
heinous
depraved
opinion
concurring
dissenting
petitioner
contends
jeffers
entitled
argue
arizona
failed
articulate
constitutionally
sufficient
limiting
construction
circumstance
petitioner
argues
point
waived
since
ninth
circuit
panel
ruled
respondent
claim
jeffers
seek
rehearing
certiorari
reply
brief
petitioner
majority
correctly
though
silently
rejects
proposition
basis
suggestion
respondent
sought
rehearing
appeals
filed
prevailed
well
established
respondent
may
defend
judgment
appeals
ground
supported
record
see
smith
phillips
contention
plausible
godfrey
plurality
considering
georgia
outrageously
wantonly
vile
horrible
inhuman
aggravating
circumstance
concluded
nothing
words
standing
alone
implies
inherent
restraint
arbitrary
capricious
infliction
death
sentence
person
ordinary
sensibility
fairly
characterize
almost
every
murder
outrageously
wantonly
vile
horrible
inhuman
maynard
cartwright
considered
oklahoma
especially
heinous
atrocious
cruel
aggravating
factor
unanimously
concluded
language
oklahoma
aggravating
circumstance
issue
gave
guidance
outrageously
wantonly
vile
horrible
inhuman
language
jury
returned
verdict
godfrey
statutory
language
precise
respondent
sentenced
lo
death
trial
judge
arizona
provided
guidance
application
circumstance
beyond
definitions
quoted
state
knapp
respondent
sentencing
procedure
therefore
conducted
invalid
scheme
affirm
judgment
ground
even
believed
arizona
subsequently
announced
valid
limiting
construction
aggravating
factor
see
clemons
mississippi
dissenting
opinion
describing
kinds
murders
qualify
especially
heinous
depraved
arizona
continued
employ
formulations
relied
upon
knapp
see
state
fulminante
quoting
knapp
definitions
cert
granted
state
beaty
cert
denied
state
poland
state
johnson
finding
appropriate
cases
killer
acted
fashion
acts
set
apart
norm
first
degree
murderers
majority
also
places
peculiar
emphasis
appeals
conclusion
aggravating
factor
construed
arizona
unconstitutionally
vague
see
ante
unusual
show
deference
legal
conclusion
appeals
particularly
conclusion
made
decision
review
simply
perverse
rely
upon
appeals
decision
proposition
longer
good
law
within
circuit
majority
inexplicably
neglects
mention
panel
conclusion
point
superseded
decision
en
banc
adamson
ricketts
seven
judges
expressed
view
question
concluded
arizona
failed
articulate
constitutionally
sufficient
narrowing
construction
terms
heinous
depraved
might
even
accurate
say
aggravating
circumstance
includes
two
distinct
concepts
cruelty
arizona
made
superficial
effort
explain
difference
murder
heinous
murder
depraved
see
adamson
ricketts
one
commentator
stated
permit
imposition
death
penalty
based
finding
murder
way
worse
murders
use
variety
terms
denote
aggravating
circumstance
statutes
containing
either
alone
combination
terms
especially
heinous
atrocious
cruel
depravity
mind
outrageously
vile
wanton
inhuman
aggravating
circumstances
generated
controversy
aggravating
circumstance
commentators
universally
criticized
vague
overbroad
meaningless
rosen
especially
heinous
aggravating
circumstance
capital
cases
standardless
standard
footnotes
omitted
addition
present
case
least
occasions
arizona
found
particular
murder
especially
heinous
depraved
especially
cruel
see
state
ceja
state
clark
cert
denied
state
bishop
state
tison
cert
denied
state
ortiz
cert
denied
state
woratzeck
state
zaragoza
cert
denied
state
harding
cert
denied
state
fisher
cert
denied
state
villafuerte
cert
denied
state
cert
denied
state
wallace
cert
denied
four
cases
besides
present
one
aggravating
circumstance
see
state
ceja
supra
state
bishop
supra
state
villafuerte
supra
state
wallace
supra
identification
particularly
blameworthy
motives
murder
seem
however
appropriately
task
legislature
state
judiciary
see
rosen
codification
aggravating
factor
vaguely
defined
circumstance
essence
act
legislative
abdication
since
requires
state
courts
make
fundamental
policy
choices
guise
interpreting
statute
arizona
construed
aggravating
factor
applying
whenever
expectation
financial
gain
cause
murders
state
clark
clark
rejected
specially
concurring
justice
position
aggravating
circumstance
applied
murders
committed
hired
killers
see
state
murder
demonstrate
manliness
reflects
manifest
disregard
fundamental
principles
upon
society
based
state
mccall
finding
supported
part
fact
mutilation
victims
bodies
designed
message
warn
people
cert
denied
state
might
reasonably
conclude
murder
especially
reprehensible
victim
years
old
child
physically
vulnerable
life
ahead
years
old
respect
traditionally
accorded
elderly
years
old
person
age
likely
others
dependent
upon
support
cogent
argument
also
made
killing
victim
especially
blameworthy
none
choices
unreasonable
state
statute
kind
must
choose
state
invoked
first
one
argument
ultimately
found
virtually
every
case
age
victim
made
murder
especially
heinous
depraved
aggravating
circumstance
broad
approach
developed
majority
walton
however
arizona
impunity
apply
aggravating
circumstance
fashion
state
held
youth
victim
made
particular
murder
especially
heinous
depraved
presumably
assert
construction
narrowed
application
aggravating
factor
manner
satisfied
constitutional
standards
defendant
cited
decisions
state
held
murders
especially
heinous
depraved
victim
years
old
apparently
refuse
read
cases
ground
defendant
entitled
challeng
proportionality
review
arizona
see
ante
quoting
walton
ante
similarly
eighth
amendment
prohibits
imposition
capital
sentence
unless
defendant
found
killed
attempted
kill
intended
killing
take
place
enmund
florida
may
laws
many
require
similar
finding
adequacy
procedure
finding
made
question
federal
well
state
law
presumption
correctness
also
inapplicable
material
facts
adequately
developed
state
hearing
applicant
receive
full
fair
adequate
hearing
state
proceeding
arizona
gretzler
summarized
prior
arizona
decisions
support
conclusion
circumstance
established
murderer
relished
killing
employed
gratuitous
violence
prior
decisions
use
terms
relish
gratuitous
violence
part
simply
recounted
facts
case
concluded
murder
especially
cruel
depraved
prior
decision
gretzler
jeffers
notice
gretzler
factors
accorded
particular
significance
determining
whether
factor
established