us
airways
capacity
fiduciary
plan
administrator
us
airways
inc
employee
benefits
plan
mccutchen
et
argued
november
decided
april
health
benefits
plan
established
petitioner
us
airways
paid
medical
expenses
injuries
suffered
respondent
mccutchen
us
airways
employee
car
accident
caused
third
party
plan
entitled
us
airways
reimbursement
mccutchen
later
recovered
money
third
party
mccutchen
attorneys
secured
payments
mccutchen
received
deducting
lawyers
contingency
fee
us
airways
demanded
reimbursement
full
paid
mccutchen
comply
us
airways
filed
suit
employee
retirement
income
security
act
erisa
authorizes
administrators
bring
civil
action
obtain
appropriate
equitable
relief
enforce
terms
plan
mccutchen
raised
two
defenses
us
airways
request
equitable
lien
demanded
absent
part
us
airways
right
reimbursement
kick
us
airways
contribute
fair
share
costs
incurred
get
recovery
reimbursement
reduced
cover
contingency
fee
rejecting
arguments
district
granted
summary
judgment
us
airways
third
circuit
vacated
reasoning
traditional
equitable
doctrines
defenses
applied
suits
held
principle
unjust
enrichment
overrode
us
airways
reimbursement
clause
clause
leave
mccutchen
less
full
payment
medical
bills
give
us
airways
windfall
held
action
based
equitable
lien
agreement
like
one
erisa
plan
terms
govern
neither
general
unjust
enrichment
principles
specific
doctrines
reflecting
principles
rules
invoked
mccutchen
override
applicable
contract
pp
section
authorizes
kinds
relief
typically
available
equity
merger
law
equity
mertens
hewitt
associates
sereboff
mid
atlantic
medical
services
permitted
administrator
bring
suit
like
one
administrator
claim
enforce
reimbursement
clause
explained
equivalent
action
equity
enforce
lien
called
equitable
lien
agreement
accordingly
administrator
use
obtain
funds
beneficiaries
promised
turn
parties
agree
us
airways
pp
sereboff
logic
dooms
mccutchen
argument
two
equitable
doctrines
meant
prevent
unjust
enrichment
rule
doctrine
override
terms
erisa
plan
suit
sereboff
us
airways
seeking
enforce
equivalent
equitable
lien
agreement
lien
arises
serves
carry
contract
provisions
see
thus
enforcing
lien
means
holding
parties
mutual
promises
declining
apply
rules
even
equitable
absent
contract
odds
parties
expressed
commitments
found
nothing
contrary
historic
practice
equity
courts
mccutchen
identifies
slew
cases
courts
applied
equitable
doctrines
invoked
none
override
clear
contract
provided
otherwise
result
comports
erisa
focus
plan
provides
authorize
equitable
relief
large
mertens
countenances
relief
enforce
terms
plan
statute
pp
mccutchen
equitable
rules
trump
reimbursement
provision
may
aid
properly
construing
us
airways
plan
silent
allocation
attorney
fees
doctrine
provides
appropriate
default
rule
fill
gap
pp
ordinary
contract
interpretation
principles
support
conclusion
courts
construe
erisa
plans
contracts
looking
terms
plan
well
manifestations
parties
intent
firestone
tire
rubber
bruch
terms
plan
leave
gaps
courts
must
look
outside
plan
written
language
decide
agreement
meaning
cigna
amara
properly
take
account
doctrines
typically
traditionally
governed
given
situation
agreement
otherwise
pp
us
airways
reimbursement
provision
precludes
looking
rule
manner
provides
allocation
formula
expressly
contradicts
equitable
rule
contrast
plan
says
nothing
specific
pay
costs
recovery
given
contractual
gap
doctrine
provides
best
indication
parties
intent
cases
make
clear
doctrine
govern
absence
contrary
agreement
see
boeing
van
gemert
party
typically
expect
intend
plan
saying
nothing
attorney
fees
abrogate
strong
uniform
background
rule
loath
read
plan
way
rule
rationale
reinforces
conclusion
without
rule
insurer
free
ride
beneficiary
efforts
beneficiary
case
may
made
worse
pursued
third
party
contract
read
produce
strange
results
unless
specifically
provides
much
pp
vacated
remanded
kagan
delivered
opinion
kennedy
ginsburg
breyer
sotomayor
joined
scalia
filed
dissenting
opinion
roberts
thomas
alito
joined
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
us
airways
capacity
fiduciary
plan
administrator
us
airways
inc
employee
benefits
plan
petitioner
james
mccutchen
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
third
circuit
april
justice
kagan
delivered
opinion
respondent
james
mccutchen
participated
health
benefits
plan
employer
petitioner
us
airways
established
employee
retirement
income
security
act
erisa
et
seq
plan
obliged
us
airways
pay
medical
expenses
mccutchen
incurred
result
third
party
actions
example
another
person
negligent
driving
plan
turn
entitled
us
airways
reimbursement
mccutchen
later
recovered
money
third
party
held
administrator
like
us
airways
may
enforce
reimbursement
provision
filing
suit
erisa
stat
see
sereboff
mid
atlantic
medical
services
section
authorizes
civil
action
obtain
appropriate
equitable
relief
enforce
terms
plan
consider
whether
kind
suit
plan
participant
like
mccutchen
may
raise
certain
equitable
defenses
deriving
principles
unjust
enrichment
particular
address
one
equitable
doctrine
limiting
reimbursement
amount
insured
double
recovery
another
requiring
party
seeking
reimbursement
pay
share
attorney
fees
incurred
securing
funds
third
party
hold
neither
equitable
rules
override
clear
terms
plan
explain
latter
usually
called
doctrine
plays
role
interpreting
us
airways
plan
plan
silent
allocating
costs
recovery
january
mccutchen
suffered
serious
injuries
another
driver
lost
control
car
collided
mccutchen
time
mccutchen
employee
us
airways
participant
health
plan
plan
paid
medical
expenses
arising
accident
mccutchen
behalf
mccutchen
retained
attorneys
exchange
contingency
fee
seek
recovery
damages
estimated
exceed
million
attorneys
sued
driver
responsible
crash
settled
limited
insurance
coverage
accident
killed
seriously
injured
three
people
counsel
also
secured
payment
mccutchen
automobile
insurer
maximum
amount
available
policy
mccutchen
thus
received
deducting
lawyer
fee
learning
mccutchen
recovery
us
airways
demanded
reimbursement
paid
medical
expenses
support
claim
us
airways
relied
following
statement
summary
plan
description
us
airways
pays
benefits
claim
incur
result
negligence
willful
misconduct
actions
third
party
ou
required
reimburse
us
airways
amounts
paid
claims
monies
recovered
third
party
including
limited
insurance
company
result
judgment
settlement
otherwise
app
mccutchen
denied
us
airways
entitled
reimbursement
attorneys
placed
escrow
account
pending
resolution
dispute
amount
represented
us
airways
full
claim
minus
proportionate
share
promised
attorney
fees
us
airways
filed
action
seeking
appropriate
equitable
relief
enforce
plan
reimbursement
provision
suit
requested
equitable
lien
escrow
account
mccutchen
possession
mccutchen
countered
raising
two
defenses
relevant
first
maintained
us
airways
receive
relief
sought
recovered
small
portion
total
damages
absent
part
us
airways
right
reimbursement
kick
second
contended
us
airways
least
contribute
fair
share
costs
incurred
get
recovery
reimbursement
therefore
marked
cover
promised
contingency
fee
district
rejected
arguments
granting
summary
judgment
us
airways
ground
plan
clear
ly
unambiguous
ly
provided
full
reimbursement
medical
expenses
paid
app
pet
cert
see
appeals
third
circuit
vacated
district
order
third
circuit
reasoned
suit
appropriate
equitable
relief
must
apply
equitable
doctrines
defenses
traditionally
limited
relief
requested
continued
principle
unjust
limit
plan
reimbursement
provision
see
quoting
palmer
law
restitution
full
reimbursement
third
circuit
thought
leav
mccutchen
less
full
payment
medical
bills
time
provide
windfall
us
airways
given
failure
contribute
cost
obtaining
recovery
third
circuit
instructed
district
determine
amount
shy
entire
qualify
appropriate
equitable
relief
ibid
granted
certiorari
resolve
circuit
split
whether
equitable
defenses
override
erisa
plan
reimbursement
vacate
third
circuit
decision
ii
administrator
like
us
airways
may
bring
suit
appropriate
equitable
relief
enforce
terms
plan
provision
held
authorizes
kinds
relief
typically
available
equity
days
divided
bench
law
equity
merged
mertens
hewitt
associates
emphasis
deleted
sereboff
mid
atlantic
medical
services
allowed
administrator
bring
suit
like
one
mid
atlantic
paid
medical
expenses
sereboffs
injured
car
crash
settled
tort
suit
driver
mid
atlantic
claimed
share
proceeds
invoking
plan
reimbursement
clause
held
mid
atlantic
action
sought
equitable
relief
requires
see
nature
recovery
requested
equitable
mid
atlantic
claimed
specifically
identifiable
funds
within
sereboffs
control
portion
settlement
gotten
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
basis
claim
equitable
mid
atlantic
relied
familiar
rul
equity
contract
convey
specific
yet
acquired
object
soon
contractor
gets
title
thing
quoting
barnes
alexander
mid
atlantic
claim
reimbursement
determined
equivalent
action
equity
enforce
lien
called
equitable
lien
agreement
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
accordingly
mid
atlantic
bring
action
seeking
funds
beneficiaries
promised
turn
parties
agree
us
airways
thing
question
case
concerns
role
equitable
defenses
alleging
unjust
enrichment
play
suit
earlier
noted
third
circuit
held
principle
unjust
enrichment
overrides
us
airways
reimbursement
clause
come
conflict
mccutchen
offers
refined
version
view
alleging
two
specific
equitable
doctrines
meant
prevent
unjust
enrichment
defeat
reimbursement
provision
brief
respondents
first
contends
equity
insurer
us
airways
position
recoup
insured
double
recovery
amount
insured
received
third
party
compensate
loss
insurance
covered
rule
limit
us
airways
reimbursement
share
mccutchen
settlements
paying
medical
expenses
mccutchen
keep
rest
damages
loss
future
earnings
pain
suffering
even
though
plan
gives
us
airways
first
claim
whole
recovery
second
mccutchen
claims
equity
doctrine
operated
reduce
award
us
airways
rule
litigant
lawyer
recovers
common
fund
benefit
persons
client
entitled
reasonable
attorney
fee
fund
whole
boeing
van
gemert
mccutchen
urges
doctrine
designed
prevent
freeloading
enables
pass
share
lawyer
fees
us
airways
matter
plan
rejected
similar
claim
sereboff
though
without
altogether
foreclosing
mccutchen
position
sereboffs
argued
among
things
lower
courts
erred
enforcing
mid
atlantic
reimbursement
clause
without
imposing
various
limitations
apply
truly
equitable
relief
grounded
principles
subrogation
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
particular
sereboffs
contended
variant
rule
called
doctrine
trumped
plan
terms
rebuffed
argument
explaining
sereboffs
improperly
mixing
matching
rules
different
equitable
boxes
sereboffs
asserted
parcel
equitable
defenses
available
insurer
brought
freestanding
action
equitable
subrogation
founded
contract
succeed
insured
judgment
third
party
ibid
mid
atlantic
reimbursement
claim
considered
equitable
replied
sought
enforce
lien
based
agreement
lien
imposed
independent
contract
virtue
equitable
ibid
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
light
fact
viewed
sereboffs
equitable
defenses
closely
resemble
mccutchen
beside
point
ibid
yet
left
narrow
opening
future
litigants
sereboffs
position
make
like
claim
observed
sereboffs
forfeited
distinct
assertion
relief
mid
atlantic
requested
although
equitable
appropriate
contravened
principles
like
doctrine
enter
mccutchen
make
basic
argument
end
however
sereboff
logic
dooms
mccutchen
effort
us
airways
like
mid
atlantic
seeking
enforce
equivalent
equitable
lien
agreement
kind
lien
name
announces
arises
serves
carry
contract
provisions
see
symons
pomeroy
equity
jurisprudence
ed
enforcing
lien
means
holding
parties
mutual
promises
see
barnes
walker
brown
conversely
means
declining
apply
rules
even
equitable
contract
absence
odds
parties
expressed
commitments
mccutchen
therefore
rely
theories
unjust
enrichment
defeat
us
airways
appeal
plan
clear
terms
principles
said
sereboff
beside
point
parties
demand
bargained
valid
agreement
see
restatement
third
restitution
unjust
enrichment
valid
contract
defines
obligations
parties
matters
within
scope
displacing
extent
inquiry
unjust
enrichment
circumstances
hewing
parties
exchange
yields
appropriate
well
equitable
relief
found
nothing
contrary
historic
practice
equity
courts
mccutchen
offers
us
slew
cases
courts
applied
rule
limit
insurers
efforts
recoup
funds
beneficiaries
tort
judgments
see
brief
respondents
citations
point
mccutchen
cases
courts
apparently
applied
equitable
doctrines
absence
relevant
contract
provision
see
washtenaw
mut
fire
ins
budd
fire
assn
philadelphia
wells
eq
others
courts
found
rules
comport
applicable
contract
term
example
svea
assurance
packham
md
case
mccutchen
calls
best
see
tr
oral
arg
viewed
rule
according
intention
contracting
parties
road
language
explained
agreement
construed
give
insurer
greater
recovery
see
also
knaffl
knoxville
banking
trust
camden
fire
ins
assn
prezioso
eq
ch
div
none
cases
find
equity
apply
rule
override
plain
contract
term
none
equity
mccutchen
asks
us
nevertheless
appearing
amicus
curiae
claims
rule
special
capacity
trump
conflicting
contract
government
begins
brief
foursquare
sereboff
analysis
suit
like
one
enforce
equitable
lien
agreement
agreement
general
restitutionary
principles
unjust
enrichment
provides
measure
relief
due
brief
government
naturally
enough
concludes
mccutchen
invoke
rule
defeat
plan
government
takes
unexpected
turn
comes
costs
incurred
beneficiary
obtain
money
third
party
terms
plan
control
equity
government
contends
inherent
authority
apportion
litigation
costs
accord
longstanding
equitable
doctrine
even
conflicts
parties
contract
agreement
governs
agreement
governs
reasons
given
government
mostly
accepts
looking
contract
terms
permit
exception
doubt
doctrine
deep
roots
equity
see
sprague
ticonic
nat
bank
tracing
equity
courts
authority
fees
first
judiciary
act
roots
however
set
soil
unjust
enrichment
allow
others
obtain
full
benefit
plaintiff
efforts
without
contributing
litigation
expenses
often
noted
enrich
others
unjustly
plaintiff
expense
mills
electric
see
boeing
trustees
greenough
supra
explained
principles
unjust
enrichment
give
way
enforces
equitable
lien
agreement
see
supra
agreement
becomes
measure
parties
equities
contract
abrogates
doctrine
insurer
unjustly
enriched
claiming
benefit
bargain
government
like
mccutchen
fails
produce
single
case
equity
applied
rule
rule
contract
provided
contrary
even
equity
party
sought
enforce
lien
agreement
provisions
agreement
controlled
suit
like
one
result
reach
based
historical
analysis
prior
cases
prescribe
fits
lock
key
erisa
focus
plan
provides
section
suit
brought
authorize
equitable
relief
large
mertens
quoting
rather
countenances
relief
enforce
terms
plan
statute
emphasis
added
limitation
reflects
erisa
principal
function
protect
contractually
defined
benefits
massachusetts
mut
life
ins
russell
statutory
scheme
often
noted
built
around
reliance
face
written
plan
documents
schoonejongen
every
employee
benefit
plan
shall
established
maintained
pursuant
written
instrument
administrator
must
act
accordance
documents
instruments
governing
plan
insofar
accord
statute
plan
short
center
erisa
precluding
mccutchen
equitable
defenses
overriding
plain
contract
terms
helps
remain
iii
yet
mccutchen
arguments
naught
equitable
rules
describes
trump
reimbursement
provision
still
might
aid
properly
construing
us
airways
plan
doctrine
though
rule
serves
function
plan
silent
allocation
attorney
fees
circumstances
doctrine
provides
appropriate
default
words
us
airways
wished
depart
rule
draft
contract
say
ordinary
principles
contract
interpretation
point
toward
conclusion
courts
construe
erisa
plans
contracts
looking
terms
plan
well
manifestations
parties
intent
firestone
tire
rubber
bruch
words
plan
may
speak
clearly
may
also
leave
gaps
must
often
look
outside
plan
written
language
decide
agreement
means
cigna
amara
slip
see
undertaking
task
properly
takes
account
background
legal
rules
doctrines
typically
traditionally
governed
given
situation
agreement
otherwise
see
stores
assoc
health
welfare
plan
wells
posner
ontracts
enacted
background
understandings
legal
principles
parties
may
bothered
incorporate
expressly
operate
default
rules
govern
absence
clear
expression
parties
contrary
intent
lord
williston
contracts
ed
restatement
second
contracts
indeed
ignoring
rules
likely
frustrate
parties
intent
produce
perverse
consequences
reimbursement
provision
issue
precludes
looking
rule
manner
contract
term
equitable
principle
address
problem
apportion
insurer
beneficiary
third
party
payment
recompense
injury
allocation
formulas
prescribe
differ
markedly
according
plan
us
airways
first
claim
entire
recovery
plan
description
monies
recovered
third
party
mccutchen
receives
whatever
left
anything
see
supra
contrast
rule
give
mccutchen
first
dibs
portion
recovery
compensating
losses
plan
cover
future
earnings
pain
suffering
us
airways
claim
attach
share
recovery
medical
expenses
see
supra
express
contract
term
short
contradicts
background
equitable
rule
reasons
given
agreement
must
govern
contrast
plan
provision
leaves
space
rule
operate
equitable
doctrine
earlier
noted
addresses
allocate
recovery
instead
pay
costs
obtaining
see
supra
contract
part
says
nothing
specific
issue
district
thus
erred
found
plan
clearly
repudiated
rule
see
supra
sure
plan
allocation
formula
first
claim
recovery
goes
us
airways
might
operate
every
dollar
received
third
party
even
covering
beneficiary
litigation
costs
alternatively
formula
apply
true
recovery
costs
obtaining
deducted
consider
comparative
purposes
income
tax
levied
net
gross
receipts
see
dawson
lawyers
involuntary
clients
attorney
fees
funds
harv
rev
claim
legal
services
first
charge
fund
must
satisfied
distribution
occurs
plan
terms
fail
select
two
alternatives
whether
recovery
us
airways
first
claim
every
cent
third
party
paid
instead
money
beneficiary
took
away
given
contractual
gap
doctrine
provides
best
indication
parties
intent
one
doubt
rule
govern
absence
contrary
agreement
recognized
consistently
someone
recovers
common
fund
benefit
persons
due
reasonable
attorney
fee
fund
whole
boeing
understood
rule
reflect
ing
traditional
practice
courts
equity
ibid
see
sprague
supra
applied
wide
range
circumstances
part
inherent
authority
see
boeing
hall
cole
mills
sprague
central
railroad
banking
pettus
greenough
state
courts
done
overwhelming
majority
routinely
use
rule
allocate
costs
recoveries
insurers
beneficiaries
appleman
see
supp
party
typically
expect
intend
plan
saying
nothing
attorney
fees
abrogate
strong
uniform
background
rule
means
loath
read
plan
rationale
rule
reinforces
conclusion
recoveries
often
come
free
get
one
insured
must
incur
lawyer
fees
expenses
without
cost
sharing
insurer
free
rides
beneficiary
efforts
taking
fruits
contributing
nothing
labor
odder
still
cases
indeed
case
beneficiary
made
worse
pursuing
third
party
recall
mccutchen
spent
representing
contingency
fee
get
leaving
real
recovery
us
airways
claimed
medical
expenses
put
mccutchen
hole
effect
pay
privilege
serving
us
airways
collection
agent
think
mccutchen
foreseen
result
signed
plan
doubt
even
us
airways
want
next
mccutchen
comes
along
likely
relieve
us
airways
costs
recovery
see
blackburn
sundstrand
easterbrook
injured
persons
charge
legal
costs
recoveries
people
like
mccutchen
future
every
reason
make
different
judgments
bringing
suit
throwing
plans
burden
expense
collection
prospect
generating
strange
results
militates
reading
general
reimbursement
provision
like
one
worth
us
airways
plan
expressly
addressed
costs
recovery
alter
doctrine
iv
holding
today
two
parts
one
favoring
us
airways
mccutchen
first
action
brought
based
equitable
lien
agreement
terms
erisa
plan
govern
neither
general
principles
unjust
enrichment
specific
doctrines
reflecting
principles
rules
override
applicable
contract
therefore
reject
third
circuit
decision
second
rule
informs
interpretation
us
airways
reimbursement
provision
term
advert
costs
recovery
properly
read
retain
doctrine
therefore
also
disagree
district
decision
light
rulings
vacate
judgment
remand
case
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
scalia
dissenting
us
airways
capacity
fiduciary
plan
administrator
us
airways
inc
employee
benefits
plan
petitioner
james
mccutchen
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
third
circuit
april
justice
scalia
chief
justice
thomas
justice
alito
join
dissenting
agree
parts
ii
opinion
conclude
equity
override
plain
terms
contract
goes
parts
iii
iv
however
hold
terms
plain
apply
doctrine
fill
contractual
gap
ante
problem
granted
certiorari
question
presumed
contract
terms
unambiguous
namely
plan
terms
give
absolute
right
full
reimbursement
pet
cert
interpreted
full
reimbursement
mean
plainly
says
reimbursement
funds
plan
expended
brief
opposition
petition
conceded
contract
beneficiary
required
reimburse
plan
amounts
paid
monies
beneficiary
recovers
without
contribution
attorney
fees
expenses
brief
opposition
emphasis
added
parties
well
solicitor
general
treated
concession
valid
see
brief
petitioner
brief
respondents
brief
amicus
curiae
thus
business
deploying
petitioner
argument
neither
preserved
see
baldwin
reese
fairly
included
within
question
presented
see
yee
escondido
reverse
judgment
third
circuit
footnotes
made
clear
statements
summary
plan
description
communicat
beneficiaries
plan
constitute
terms
plan
cigna
amara
slip
nonetheless
parties
litigated
case
lower
courts
decided
based
solely
language
quoted
see
app
pet
cert
response
request
solicitor
general
plan
come
light
see
letter
matthew
wessler
william
suter
clerk
available
clerk
case
file
late
affect
happens
everyone
case
treated
language
summary
description
though
came
plan
well
compare
case
holding
equitable
doctrines
trump
plan
terms
cgi
technologies
solutions
rose
zurich
ins
holding
administrative
comm
stores
shank
moore
capitalcare
cadc
bombadier
aerospace
employee
welfare
benefits
plan
ferror
poirot
wansbrough
administrative
comm
stores
varco
sans
ellipses
provides
plan
administrator
may
bring
civil
action
enjoin
act
practice
violates
provision
subchapter
terms
plan
obtain
appropriate
equitable
relief
redress
violations
ii
enforce
provisions
subchapter
terms
plan
prior
cases
secondary
sources
confirm
mccutchen
characterization
rules
deriving
primarily
principles
unjust
enrichment
see
boeing
doctrine
rests
perception
persons
obtain
benefit
lawsuit
without
contributing
cost
unjustly
enriched
mills
electric
similar
dobbs
law
remedies
ed
hereinafter
dobbs
similar
palmer
law
restitution
injured
person
unjustly
enriched
received
excess
full
compensation
two
sources
loss
couch
cyclopedia
insurance
law
ed
similar
appleman
appleman
insurance
law
practice
cum
supp
hereinafter
appleman
similar
subrogation
simply
means
substitution
one
person
another
one
person
allowed
stand
shoes
another
assert
person
rights
third
party
dobbs
see
appleman
involves
substitution
insurer
rights
insured
sereboff
analysis
concerned
subrogation
actions
based
equitable
principles
independent
agreement
subrogation
action
may
also
founded
contract
incorporating
principles
see
dobbs
us
airways
suggested
oral
argument
mccutchen
case
ge
lot
stronger
plan
spoke
subrogation
without
separately
granting
right
reimbursement
tr
oral
arg
need
consider
question
us
airways
seeks
enforce
reimbursement
provision
kind
considered
sereboff
dissent
faults
us
addressing
issue
think
adequately
preserved
presented
language
dissent
highlights
mccutchen
brief
opposition
indicating
plan
clearly
abrogates
doctrine
comes
description
us
airways
claim
district
see
post
opinion
scalia
brief
opposition
mccutchen
argument
urged
position
adopt
doctrine
applies
plan
silent
see
app
pet
cert
defendants
memorandum
opposition
plaintiff
motion
summary
judgment
wd
doc
pp
us
airways
wanted
exclude
deduction
attorney
fees
easily
expressed
sure
mccutchen
shifted
ground
appeal
district
ruled
third
circuit
precedent
foreclosed
argument
see
app
pet
cert
appeals
decision
put
alternative
contention
rule
trumps
contract
claims
basis
nature
function
doctrine
parties
disputed
throughout
litigation
similarly
question
decide
included
question
presented
principal
clause
question
asks
whether
may
use
equitable
principles
rewrite
contractual
language
pet
cert
answer
rewrite
inform
reply
well
within
question
scope
reason
almost
every
state
confronted
issue
done
apply
doctrine
face
contract
giving
insurer
general
right
recoup
funds
insured
recovery
without
specifically
addressing
attorney
fees
see
ex
parte
state
farm
mut
auto
ins
york
ins
group
van
hall
barreca
cobb
pp
la
federal
kemper
ins
arnold
state
farm
mut
auto
ins
clinton
northern
buckeye
educ
council
group
health
benefits
plan
lawson
ohio
app
lancer
murillo
tex
app
breslin
liberty
mut
ins
super
app
div
hospital
service
pennsylvania
ins
national
union
fire
ins
grimes
foremost
life
ins
waters
app
citing
foremost
life
ins
waters
app
lee
state
farm
mut
auto
ins
cal
app
cal
rptr