exxon
mobil
allapattah
services
et
argued
march
decided
june
exxon
dealers
filed
class
action
exxon
corporation
invoking
federal
district
diversity
jurisdiction
dealers
jury
verdict
certified
case
interlocutory
review
question
whether
properly
exercised
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
class
members
met
minimum
requirement
eleventh
circuit
upheld
extension
supplemental
jurisdiction
girl
family
sought
damages
foods
diversity
action
district
granted
summary
judgment
finding
none
plaintiffs
met
requirement
first
circuit
ruled
girl
family
alleged
requisite
amount
held
supplemental
jurisdiction
family
claims
improper
original
jurisdiction
lacking
diversity
case
one
plaintiff
fails
satisfy
requirement
held
elements
jurisdiction
present
least
one
named
plaintiff
action
satisfies
requirement
authorizes
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
plaintiffs
article
iii
case
controversy
even
claims
less
requisite
amount
pp
although
district
courts
may
exercise
jurisdiction
absent
statutory
basis
original
jurisdiction
claims
action
may
exercise
supplemental
jurisdiction
additional
claims
arising
case
controversy
see
mine
workers
gibbs
expansive
interpretation
apply
complete
diversity
requirement
incomplete
diversity
destroys
original
jurisdiction
respect
claims
leaving
nothing
supplemental
claims
adhere
statutory
prerequisites
including
requirements
analyzed
claim
claim
enacted
every
plaintiff
separately
satisfy
requirement
clark
paul
gray
zahn
international
paper
grant
original
jurisdiction
claims
involving
particular
parties
confer
supplemental
jurisdiction
additional
claims
involving
parties
finley
pp
parties
agree
overturned
finley
warrant
assuming
determine
scope
requires
examination
statute
text
light
context
structure
related
statutory
provisions
section
broad
grant
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
within
case
controversy
long
action
one
district
courts
original
jurisdiction
last
sentence
makes
clear
grant
extends
claims
involving
joinder
intervention
additional
parties
question
whether
diversity
case
claims
plaintiffs
satisfy
requirement
qualifies
civil
action
district
courts
original
jurisdiction
pp
answer
must
yes
complaint
least
one
claim
satisfying
requirement
relevant
jurisdictional
defects
district
beyond
question
original
jurisdiction
claim
original
jurisdiction
single
claim
complaint
original
jurisdiction
civil
action
even
action
comprises
fewer
claims
included
complaint
original
jurisdiction
action
decide
whether
constitutional
statutory
basis
exercising
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
action
section
contains
exceptions
broad
rule
withdraw
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
additional
parties
fact
exceptions
support
conclusion
pp
accept
alternative
view
supporting
theories
district
lacks
original
jurisdiction
civil
action
unless
original
jurisdiction
every
claim
complaint
indivisibility
theory
claims
must
stand
fall
single
indivisible
action
inconsistent
whole
notion
supplemental
jurisdiction
belied
practice
allowing
federal
courts
cure
jurisdictional
defects
dismissing
offending
parties
instead
entire
action
statute
broad
general
language
permit
theory
apply
diversity
cases
apply
cases
contamination
theory
inclusion
claim
party
falling
outside
district
original
jurisdiction
contaminates
every
claim
complaint
makes
sense
respect
complete
diversity
requirement
nondiverse
party
presence
eliminates
justification
federal
forum
makes
little
sense
regard
requirement
meant
ensure
dispute
sufficiently
important
warrant
attention
fallacious
suppose
simply
proposition
imposes
requirements
contamination
theory
germane
former
also
applies
latter
already
considered
rejected
virtually
identical
argument
closely
analogous
context
see
chicago
international
college
surgeons
pp
light
statute
text
structure
plausible
reading
original
jurisdiction
civil
action
comprising
claims
jurisdictional
defect
though
single
nondiverse
party
contaminate
every
claim
lawsuit
contamination
occur
respect
jurisdictional
defects
going
substantive
importance
individual
claims
thus
threshold
requirement
satisfied
cases
plaintiffs
diversity
action
allege
sufficient
amount
controversy
section
plain
text
overruled
clark
zahn
authorized
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
diverse
parties
arising
case
controversy
subject
enumerated
exceptions
applicable
ambiguous
need
examine
interpretative
tools
including
legislative
history
even
appropriate
give
legislative
history
significant
weight
pp
class
action
fairness
act
impact
analysis
cases
pp
affirmed
reversed
remanded
kennedy
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
scalia
souter
thomas
joined
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
breyer
joined
ginsburg
filed
dissenting
opinion
stevens
breyer
joined
exxon
mobil
corporation
petitioner
allapattah
services
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
eleventh
circuit
maria
del
rosario
ortega
et
petitioners
foods
writ
certiorari
appeals
first
circuit
june
justice
kennedy
delivered
opinion
consolidated
cases
present
question
whether
federal
diversity
action
may
exercise
supplemental
jurisdiction
additional
plaintiffs
whose
claims
satisfy
minimum
requirement
provided
claims
part
case
controversy
claims
plaintiffs
allege
sufficient
amount
controversy
decision
turns
correct
interpretation
question
divided
courts
appeals
granted
certiorari
resolve
conflict
hold
elements
jurisdiction
present
least
one
named
plaintiff
action
satisfies
requirement
authorize
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
plaintiffs
article
iii
case
controversy
even
claims
less
jurisdictional
amount
specified
statute
setting
forth
requirements
diversity
jurisdiction
affirm
judgment
appeals
eleventh
circuit
reverse
judgment
appeals
first
circuit
exxon
dealers
filed
suit
exxon
corporation
district
northern
district
florida
dealers
alleged
intentional
systematic
scheme
exxon
overcharged
fuel
purchased
exxon
plaintiffs
invoked
district
diversity
jurisdiction
unanimous
jury
verdict
favor
plaintiffs
district
certified
case
interlocutory
review
asking
whether
properly
exercised
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
class
members
meet
jurisdictional
minimum
amount
controversy
appeals
eleventh
circuit
upheld
district
extension
supplemental
jurisdiction
class
members
allapattah
services
exxon
find
held
clearly
unambiguously
provides
district
courts
authority
diversity
class
actions
exercise
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
class
members
meet
minimum
amount
controversy
long
district
original
jurisdiction
claims
least
one
class
representatives
decision
accords
views
courts
appeals
fourth
sixth
seventh
circuits
see
rosmer
pfizer
olden
lafarge
stromberg
metal
works
press
mechanical
brand
name
prescription
drugs
antitrust
litigation
courts
appeals
fifth
ninth
circuits
adopting
similar
analysis
statute
held
diversity
class
action
unnamed
class
members
need
meet
requirement
provided
named
class
members
decisions
however
unclear
whether
named
plaintiffs
must
satisfy
requirement
abbott
gibson
chrysler
case
us
appeals
first
circuit
took
different
position
meaning
case
girl
sued
diversity
action
district
district
puerto
rico
seeking
damages
unusually
severe
injuries
received
sliced
finger
tuna
family
joined
suit
seeking
damages
emotional
distress
certain
medical
expenses
district
granted
summary
judgment
finding
none
plaintiffs
met
minimum
requirement
appeals
first
circuit
however
ruled
injured
girl
family
members
made
allegations
damages
requisite
amount
appeals
addressed
whether
light
fact
one
plaintiff
met
requirements
original
jurisdiction
supplemental
jurisdiction
remaining
plaintiffs
claims
proper
held
authorizes
supplemental
jurisdiction
district
original
jurisdiction
action
diversity
case
original
jurisdiction
lacking
one
plaintiff
fails
satisfy
requirement
although
appeals
claimed
express
view
whether
result
class
action
analysis
inconsistent
appeals
eleventh
circuit
appeals
first
circuit
view
however
shared
courts
appeal
third
eighth
tenth
circuits
latter
two
courts
appeals
expressly
applied
rule
class
actions
see
meritcare
paul
mercury
ins
trimble
asarco
leonhardt
western
sugar
ii
district
courts
said
many
times
courts
limited
jurisdiction
possess
power
authorized
constitution
statute
kokkonen
guardian
life
ins
america
order
provide
federal
forum
plaintiffs
seek
vindicate
federal
rights
congress
conferred
district
courts
original
jurisdiction
cases
civil
actions
arise
constitution
laws
treaties
order
provide
neutral
forum
come
known
diversity
cases
congress
also
granted
district
courts
original
jurisdiction
civil
actions
citizens
different
citizens
foreign
citizens
foreign
citizens
ensure
diversity
jurisdiction
flood
federal
courts
minor
disputes
requires
matter
controversy
diversity
case
exceed
specified
amount
currently
although
district
courts
may
exercise
jurisdiction
absent
statutory
basis
well
established
certain
classes
cases
original
jurisdiction
claims
action
may
exercise
supplemental
jurisdiction
additional
claims
part
case
controversy
leading
modern
case
principle
mine
workers
gibbs
gibbs
plaintiff
alleged
defendant
conduct
violated
federal
state
law
district
gibbs
held
original
jurisdiction
action
based
federal
claims
gibbs
confirmed
district
additional
power
though
obligation
exercise
supplemental
jurisdiction
related
state
claims
arose
article
iii
case
controversy
federal
claim
must
substance
sufficient
confer
subject
matter
jurisdiction
ssuming
substantiality
federal
issues
power
federal
courts
hear
whole
later
noted
decision
allowing
jurisdiction
pendent
state
claims
gibbs
mention
let
alone
come
grips
text
jurisdictional
statutes
bedrock
principle
federal
courts
jurisdiction
without
statutory
authorization
finley
finley
nonetheless
reaffirmed
rationalized
gibbs
progeny
inferring
interpretive
principle
cases
involving
supplemental
jurisdiction
additional
claims
parties
properly
federal
jurisdictional
statutes
read
broadly
assumption
context
congress
intended
authorize
courts
exercise
full
article
iii
power
dispose
action
comprises
one
constitutional
case
quoting
gibbs
supra
however
applied
gibbs
expansive
interpretive
approach
aspects
jurisdictional
statutes
instance
consistently
interpreted
requiring
complete
diversity
case
multiple
plaintiffs
multiple
defendants
presence
action
single
plaintiff
state
single
defendant
deprives
district
original
diversity
jurisdiction
entire
action
strawbridge
curtiss
cranch
owen
equipment
erection
kroger
complete
diversity
requirement
mandated
constitution
state
farm
fire
casualty
tashire
plain
text
nonetheless
adhered
complete
diversity
rule
light
purpose
diversity
requirement
provide
federal
forum
important
disputes
state
courts
might
favor
perceived
favoring
litigants
presence
parties
state
sides
case
dispels
concern
eliminating
principal
reason
conferring
jurisdiction
claims
action
see
wisconsin
dept
corrections
schacht
specific
purpose
complete
diversity
rule
explains
adopted
gibbs
expansive
interpretive
approach
aspect
jurisdictional
statute
gibbs
undermine
complete
diversity
rule
order
federal
invoke
supplemental
jurisdiction
gibbs
must
first
original
jurisdiction
least
one
claim
action
incomplete
diversity
destroys
original
jurisdiction
respect
claims
nothing
supplemental
jurisdiction
adhere
contrast
diversity
requirement
statutory
prerequisites
federal
jurisdiction
including
requirements
analyzed
claim
claim
true
follow
necessity
district
authority
exercise
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
provided
original
jurisdiction
one
enactment
declined
contexts
instance
follow
gibbs
expansive
approach
interpretation
jurisdictional
statutes
took
restrictive
view
proper
interpretation
statutes
cases
involving
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
involving
additional
parties
plaintiffs
defendants
district
courts
lack
original
jurisdiction
claims
parties
standing
alone
thus
respect
jurisdictional
requirements
held
clark
paul
gray
every
plaintiff
must
separately
satisfy
requirement
though
clark
case
time
jurisdiction
requirement
analogous
requirement
diversity
cases
proper
practice
clark
held
requires
several
plaintiffs
bound
establish
jurisdictional
amount
respect
claim
suit
dismissed
fail
show
requisite
amount
involved
reaffirmed
rule
context
class
action
brought
invoking
diversity
jurisdiction
zahn
international
paper
follows
inescapably
clark
held
zahn
plaintiff
without
jurisdictional
amount
must
dismissed
case
even
though
others
allege
jurisdictionally
sufficient
claims
took
similar
approach
respect
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
additional
defendants
fall
outside
district
courts
original
jurisdiction
aldinger
howard
plaintiff
brought
action
county
officials
district
pursuant
statutory
grant
jurisdiction
plaintiff
alleged
supplemental
jurisdiction
related
claims
county
even
though
county
suable
subject
original
jurisdiction
held
supplemental
jurisdiction
exercised
congress
enacting
declined
albeit
implicitly
extend
federal
jurisdiction
party
sued
federal
civil
rights
statutes
concluded
supplemental
jurisdiction
additional
parties
exists
aldinger
held
federal
must
satisfy
art
icle
iii
permits
congress
statutes
conferring
jurisdiction
expressly
implication
negated
existence
finley
confronted
similar
issue
different
statutory
context
plaintiff
finley
brought
federal
tort
claims
act
negligence
suit
federal
aviation
administration
district
original
jurisdiction
plaintiff
tried
add
related
claims
defendants
invoking
district
supplemental
jurisdiction
pendent
parties
held
district
lacked
sufficient
statutory
basis
exercising
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
relying
primarily
zahn
aldinger
kroger
held
finley
grant
jurisdiction
claims
involving
particular
parties
confer
jurisdiction
additional
claims
different
parties
finley
limit
impair
gibbs
liberal
approach
interpreting
jurisdictional
statutes
context
supplemental
jurisdiction
additional
claims
involving
parties
finley
nevertheless
declined
extend
interpretive
assumption
claims
involving
additional
parties
finley
held
context
parties
contrast
claims
assume
full
constitutional
power
congressionally
authorized
read
jurisdictional
statutes
broadly
jurisdictional
statutes
existed
matters
stood
first
diversity
requirement
required
complete
diversity
absent
complete
diversity
district
lacked
original
jurisdiction
claims
action
strawbridge
cranch
kroger
second
district
original
jurisdiction
least
one
claim
jurisdictional
statutes
implicitly
authorized
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
parties
arising
article
iii
case
controversy
gibbs
third
even
district
original
jurisdiction
one
claims
particular
parties
jurisdictional
statutes
authorize
supplemental
jurisdiction
additional
claims
involving
parties
clark
supra
zahn
supra
finley
supra
finley
emphasized
hatever
say
regarding
scope
jurisdiction
conferred
particular
statute
course
changed
congress
congress
accepted
invitation
passed
judicial
improvements
act
stat
enacted
provision
controls
cases
section
provides
relevant
part
except
provided
subsections
expressly
provided
otherwise
federal
statute
civil
action
district
courts
original
jurisdiction
district
courts
shall
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
related
claims
action
within
original
jurisdiction
form
part
case
controversy
article
iii
constitution
supplemental
jurisdiction
shall
include
claims
involve
joinder
intervention
additional
parties
civil
action
district
courts
original
jurisdiction
founded
solely
section
title
district
courts
shall
supplemental
jurisdiction
subsection
claims
plaintiffs
persons
made
parties
rule
federal
rules
civil
procedure
claims
persons
proposed
joined
plaintiffs
rule
rules
seeking
intervene
plaintiffs
rule
rules
exercising
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
inconsistent
jurisdictional
requirements
section
parties
litigation
courts
consider
question
agree
overturned
result
finley
warrant
however
assuming
overrule
finley
otherwise
codify
existing
state
law
supplemental
jurisdiction
must
give
jurisdictional
statutes
expansive
interpretation
text
warrants
important
adopt
artificial
construction
narrower
text
provides
sound
canon
interpretation
requires
congress
speak
extraordinary
clarity
order
modify
rules
federal
jurisdiction
within
appropriate
constitutional
bounds
ordinary
principles
statutory
construction
apply
order
determine
scope
supplemental
jurisdiction
authorized
must
examine
statute
text
light
context
structure
related
statutory
provisions
section
broad
grant
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
within
case
controversy
long
action
one
district
courts
original
jurisdiction
last
sentence
makes
clear
grant
supplemental
jurisdiction
extends
claims
involving
joinder
intervention
additional
parties
single
question
us
therefore
whether
diversity
case
claims
plaintiffs
satisfy
requirement
claims
others
plaintiffs
presents
civil
action
district
courts
original
jurisdiction
answer
yes
confers
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
including
independently
satisfy
requirement
claims
part
article
iii
case
controversy
answer
inapplicable
light
holdings
clark
zahn
district
statutory
basis
exercising
supplemental
jurisdiction
additional
claims
conclude
answer
must
yes
complaint
contains
least
one
claim
satisfies
requirement
relevant
jurisdictional
defects
district
beyond
question
original
jurisdiction
claim
presence
claims
complaint
district
may
lack
original
jurisdiction
moment
original
jurisdiction
single
claim
complaint
original
jurisdiction
civil
action
within
meaning
even
civil
action
jurisdiction
comprises
fewer
claims
included
complaint
determines
original
jurisdiction
civil
action
turn
question
whether
constitutional
statutory
basis
exercising
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
action
section
commences
direction
relevant
statutes
may
provide
specific
exceptions
otherwise
broad
jurisdictional
grant
distinction
drawn
cases
fact
last
sentence
makes
clear
provision
grants
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
involving
joinder
intervention
additional
parties
terms
acknowledge
distinction
pendent
jurisdiction
doctrine
ancillary
jurisdiction
though
doctrines
pendent
ancillary
jurisdiction
developed
separately
historical
matter
recognized
doctrines
two
species
generic
problem
kroger
nothing
indicates
congressional
intent
recognize
preserve
create
meaningful
substantive
distinction
jurisdictional
categories
historically
labeled
pendent
ancillary
sum
total
relevant
statutory
language
holding
rest
language
alone
statute
course
instructs
us
examine
determine
exceptions
apply
proceed
section
qualifies
broad
rule
withdraw
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
additional
parties
issue
specific
exceptions
contained
moreover
provide
additional
support
conclusion
confers
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
section
applies
diversity
cases
withholds
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
plaintiffs
proposed
joined
indispensable
parties
federal
rule
civil
procedure
seek
intervene
pursuant
rule
nothing
text
however
withholds
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
plaintiffs
permissively
joined
rule
like
additional
plaintiffs
certified
members
pursuant
rule
like
additional
plaintiffs
natural
indeed
necessary
inference
confers
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
rule
rule
plaintiffs
inference
least
respect
rule
plaintiffs
strengthened
fact
explicitly
excludes
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
defendants
joined
rule
accept
view
urged
parties
commentators
courts
appeals
district
lacks
original
jurisdiction
civil
action
unless
original
jurisdiction
every
claim
complaint
understand
position
requires
assuming
either
claims
complaint
must
stand
fall
single
indivisible
civil
action
matter
definitional
necessity
refer
indivisibility
theory
else
inclusion
claim
party
falling
outside
district
original
jurisdiction
somehow
contaminates
every
claim
complaint
depriving
original
jurisdiction
claims
refer
contamination
theory
indivisibility
theory
easily
dismissed
inconsistent
whole
notion
supplemental
jurisdiction
district
must
original
jurisdiction
every
claim
complaint
order
original
jurisdiction
civil
action
gibbs
civil
action
district
assume
original
jurisdiction
basis
exercising
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
indivisibility
theory
belied
practice
diversity
cases
allowing
federal
courts
cure
jurisdictional
defects
dismissing
offending
parties
rather
dismissing
entire
action
clark
example
makes
clear
claims
jurisdictionally
defective
amount
controversy
destroy
original
jurisdiction
claims
dismissing
parties
failed
meet
requirement
retaining
jurisdiction
remaining
party
presence
jurisdictionally
problematic
claims
complaint
meant
district
without
original
jurisdiction
single
indivisible
civil
action
district
dismiss
whole
action
rather
particular
parties
also
find
unconvincing
say
definitional
indivisibility
theory
applies
context
diversity
cases
context
cases
broad
general
language
statute
permit
result
contention
premised
notion
phrase
original
jurisdiction
civil
actions
means
different
things
implausible
however
say
identical
phrase
means
one
thing
original
jurisdiction
actions
least
one
claim
complaint
meets
following
requirements
something
else
original
jurisdiction
actions
every
claim
complaint
meets
following
requirements
contamination
theory
noted
make
sense
special
context
complete
diversity
requirement
presence
nondiverse
parties
sides
lawsuit
eliminates
justification
providing
federal
forum
theory
however
makes
little
sense
respect
requirement
meant
ensure
dispute
sufficiently
important
warrant
attention
presence
single
nondiverse
party
may
eliminate
fear
bias
respect
claims
presence
claim
falls
short
minimum
amount
controversy
nothing
reduce
importance
claims
meet
requirement
fallacious
suppose
simply
proposition
imposes
diversity
requirement
requirement
contamination
theory
germane
former
also
relevant
latter
inherent
logical
connection
requirement
diversity
jurisdiction
jurisdiction
requirement
well
requirement
revived
clear
beyond
peradventure
provides
supplemental
jurisdiction
cases
claims
involve
sufficient
amount
controversy
words
unambiguously
overrules
holding
result
clark
however
quite
extraordinary
say
also
overrule
zahn
case
premised
substantial
part
holding
clark
addition
theoretical
difficulties
argument
district
original
jurisdiction
civil
action
original
jurisdiction
individual
claim
complaint
already
considered
rejected
virtually
identical
argument
closely
analogous
context
removal
jurisdiction
chicago
international
college
surgeons
plaintiff
brought
claims
state
defendant
removed
federal
plaintiff
objected
removal
citing
text
removal
statute
statutory
provision
bears
striking
similarity
relevant
portion
authorizes
removal
civil
action
district
courts
original
jurisdiction
college
surgeons
plaintiff
urged
claims
within
district
original
jurisdiction
authorize
removal
disagreed
federal
law
claims
held
suffice
make
actions
actions
within
jurisdiction
district
courts
nothing
jurisdictional
statutes
suggests
presence
related
state
law
claims
somehow
alters
fact
plaintiff
complaints
virtue
federal
claims
actions
within
federal
courts
jurisdiction
case
removed
district
original
jurisdiction
federal
law
claims
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
dissent
college
surgeons
argued
plaintiff
sought
review
local
administrative
agency
decision
review
sought
outside
scope
district
jurisdiction
opinion
ginsburg
rejected
suggestion
claims
involving
administrative
appeals
beyond
scope
supplemental
jurisdiction
opinion
claim
administrative
review
posture
case
deprived
district
original
jurisdiction
claims
case
importantly
present
purposes
college
surgeons
stressed
district
original
jurisdiction
civil
action
purposes
long
original
jurisdiction
subset
claims
constituting
action
even
college
surgeons
dissent
took
issue
interpretation
appear
contest
view
although
college
surgeons
involved
additional
claims
parties
interpretation
applies
equally
cases
involving
additional
parties
whose
claims
fall
short
jurisdictional
amount
adopt
contrary
view
presence
additional
parties
means
civil
action
district
courts
original
jurisdiction
cases
simply
removable
knowledge
issued
reasoned
opinion
adopting
view
removal
statute
settled
course
absent
complete
diversity
case
removable
district
lack
original
jurisdiction
caterpillar
lewis
however
altogether
consistent
view
failure
complete
diversity
unlike
failure
claims
meet
requisite
amount
controversy
contaminates
every
claim
action
also
reject
argument
similar
attempted
distinction
college
surgeons
discussed
presence
additional
claims
district
lacks
jurisdiction
mean
civil
action
outside
purview
presence
additional
parties
basis
distinction
altogether
clear
considerable
tension
statutory
text
section
applies
terms
civil
action
district
courts
original
jurisdiction
last
sentence
expressly
contemplates
may
supplemental
jurisdiction
additional
parties
case
presence
parties
destroys
original
jurisdiction
within
meaning
civil
action
otherwise
properly
also
expressly
withholds
supplemental
jurisdiction
diversity
cases
claims
plaintiffs
joined
indispensable
parties
rule
joinder
parties
sufficient
deprive
district
original
jurisdiction
civil
action
within
meaning
specific
limitation
supplemental
jurisdiction
superfluous
argument
presence
additional
parties
removes
civil
action
scope
also
mean
left
finley
result
undisturbed
finley
involved
federal
tort
claims
act
suit
federal
defendant
claims
additional
defendants
otherwise
subject
federal
jurisdiction
yet
concede
one
purpose
change
result
reached
finley
finally
suggested
interpretation
creates
anomaly
regarding
exceptions
listed
immediately
obvious
congress
withhold
supplemental
jurisdiction
plaintiffs
joined
parties
needed
adjudication
rule
allow
supplemental
jurisdiction
plaintiffs
permissively
joined
rule
omission
rule
plaintiffs
list
exceptions
may
unintentional
drafting
gap
meritcare
case
congress
rather
courts
fix
omission
may
seem
odd
absurd
alternative
explanation
different
treatment
rule
rule
congress
concerned
extending
supplemental
jurisdiction
rule
plaintiffs
allow
circumvention
complete
diversity
rule
nondiverse
plaintiff
might
omitted
intentionally
original
action
joined
later
rule
necessary
party
see
stromberg
metal
works
contamination
theory
described
applicable
means
ruse
fail
congress
may
wanted
make
assurance
double
sure
generally
congress
may
concluded
federal
jurisdiction
appropriate
district
original
jurisdiction
claims
plaintiffs
essential
action
joined
rule
extent
omission
rule
plaintiffs
list
exceptions
anomalous
moreover
anomalous
inclusion
rule
plaintiffs
list
alternative
view
prevail
district
lacks
original
jurisdiction
civil
diversity
action
plaintiff
claims
fail
comply
requirements
need
special
exception
rule
plaintiffs
meet
requirements
though
omission
rule
plaintiffs
presents
something
puzzle
view
statute
inclusion
rule
plaintiffs
section
least
difficult
explain
alternative
view
circle
back
original
question
complaint
district
includes
multiple
claims
part
case
controversy
claims
within
original
jurisdiction
civil
action
district
courts
original
jurisdiction
original
jurisdiction
civil
action
comprising
claims
jurisdictional
defect
reading
plausible
light
text
structure
jurisdictional
statute
though
special
nature
purpose
diversity
requirement
mean
single
nondiverse
party
contaminate
every
claim
lawsuit
contamination
occur
respect
jurisdictional
defects
go
substantive
importance
individual
claims
follows
conclusion
threshold
requirement
satisfied
cases
like
us
plaintiffs
diversity
action
allege
sufficient
amount
controversy
hold
plain
text
overruled
clark
zahn
authorized
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
diverse
parties
arising
article
iii
case
controversy
subject
enumerated
exceptions
applicable
cases
us
proponents
alternative
view
insist
statute
least
ambiguous
look
interpretive
tools
including
legislative
history
supposedly
demonstrate
congress
intend
overrule
zahn
reject
argument
outset
simply
ambiguous
reasons
elaborated
interpreting
foreclose
supplemental
jurisdiction
plaintiffs
diversity
cases
meet
minimum
amount
controversy
inconsistent
text
read
light
statutory
provisions
established
jurisprudence
even
stipulate
however
reading
proponents
urge
upon
us
textually
plausible
legislative
history
cited
support
alter
view
best
interpretation
urge
legislative
history
refutes
interpretation
rely
primarily
house
judiciary
committee
report
judicial
improvements
act
house
report
report
report
explained
authorize
jurisdiction
case
like
finley
well
essentially
restore
understandings
authorization
limits
forms
supplemental
jurisdiction
house
report
report
stated
generally
authorizes
district
exercise
jurisdiction
supplemental
claim
whenever
forms
part
constitutional
case
controversy
claim
claims
provide
basis
district
original
jurisdiction
codifies
gibbs
fills
statutory
gap
recognized
finley
house
report
report
remarked
intended
affect
jurisdictional
requirements
class
actions
requirements
interpreted
prior
finley
citing
without
elaboration
zahn
tribe
cauble
house
report
report
noted
net
effect
implement
principal
rationale
kroger
house
report
effecting
one
small
change
practice
respect
diversity
actions
exclude
rule
extent
sought
joined
plaintiffs
rule
house
report
evident
report
meant
refer
rule
rule
repeatedly
held
authoritative
statement
statutory
text
legislative
history
extrinsic
material
extrinsic
materials
role
statutory
interpretation
extent
shed
reliable
light
enacting
legislature
understanding
otherwise
ambiguous
terms
extrinsic
materials
reliable
sources
insight
legislative
understandings
however
legislative
history
particular
vulnerable
two
serious
criticisms
first
legislative
history
often
murky
ambiguous
contradictory
judicial
investigation
legislative
history
tendency
become
borrow
judge
leventhal
memorable
phrase
exercise
crowd
picking
friends
see
wald
observations
use
legislative
history
term
iowa
rev
second
judicial
reliance
legislative
materials
like
committee
reports
subject
requirements
article
may
give
unrepresentative
committee
members
worse
yet
unelected
staffers
lobbyists
power
incentive
attempt
strategic
manipulations
legislative
history
secure
results
unable
achieve
statutory
text
need
comment
whether
problems
sufficiently
prevalent
render
legislative
history
inherently
unreliable
circumstances
point
members
disagreed
clear
however
instance
criticisms
right
mark
first
legislative
history
far
murkier
selective
quotation
house
report
suggest
text
based
substantially
draft
proposal
contained
federal
study
committee
working
paper
drafted
subcommittee
chaired
judge
posner
report
subcommittee
role
federal
courts
relationship
mar
reprinted
judicial
conference
federal
courts
study
committee
working
papers
subcommittee
reports
july
see
also
judicial
conference
report
federal
courts
study
committee
apr
study
committee
report
echoing
brief
summary
form
subcommittee
working
paper
proposal
noting
subcommittee
working
paper
contains
additional
material
subject
house
report
section
implements
recommendation
federal
courts
study
committee
found
pages
report
subcommittee
explained
language
echoed
house
report
proposal
basically
restores
law
existed
prior
finley
subcommittee
working
paper
observed
proposal
overrule
zahn
good
idea
subcommittee
working
paper
although
federal
courts
study
committee
expressly
adopt
subcommittee
specific
reference
zahn
neither
explicitly
disagreed
subcommittee
conclusion
best
reading
proposed
text
substantially
modified
proposal
avoid
result
study
committee
report
therefore
even
house
report
fairly
read
reflect
understanding
text
overrule
zahn
subcommittee
working
paper
based
reflected
opposite
understanding
house
report
authoritative
subcommittee
working
paper
utility
either
extend
light
sheds
enacting
legislature
understood
statutory
text
trying
figure
square
subcommittee
working
paper
understanding
house
report
understanding
reflective
understanding
enacting
legislators
hopeless
task
second
worst
fears
critics
argue
legislative
history
used
circumvent
article
process
realized
case
telltale
evidence
statement
three
law
professors
participated
drafting
see
house
report
face
permits
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
class
members
satisfy
section
jurisdictional
amount
requirement
overrule
zahn
disclaimer
intent
accomplish
result
legislative
history
better
statute
dealt
explicitly
problem
legislative
history
attempt
correct
oversight
rowe
burbank
mengler
compounding
creating
confusion
supplemental
jurisdiction
reply
professor
freer
emory
professors
frank
concede
one
refuses
consider
legislative
history
one
choice
conclude
section
wiped
zahn
books
ibid
exists
acknowledgment
parties
detailed
specific
knowledge
statute
drafting
process
plain
text
overruled
zahn
language
contrary
house
report
post
hoc
attempt
alter
result
one
need
subscribe
wholesale
condemnation
legislative
history
refuse
give
effect
deliberate
effort
amend
statute
committee
report
sum
even
believed
resort
legislative
history
appropriate
cases
point
concede
give
significant
weight
house
report
distinguished
jurists
drafted
subcommittee
working
paper
along
three
participants
drafting
agree
provision
face
overrules
zahn
accords
best
reading
statute
text
nothing
legislative
history
indicates
directly
explicitly
congress
understood
phrase
civil
action
district
courts
original
jurisdiction
exclude
cases
diversity
plaintiffs
meet
amount
controversy
requirement
credence
moreover
given
claim
congress
understood
overrule
zahn
proposal
controversial
little
sense
whether
member
congress
particularly
upset
result
case
one
plausibly
say
concerned
legislators
might
realized
possible
effect
text
adopting
certainly
competent
legislative
aide
studied
matter
flagged
issue
matter
importance
boss
especially
light
subcommittee
working
paper
number
reasons
legislators
spend
time
arguing
none
relevant
interpretation
words
statute
mean
finally
note
class
action
fairness
act
cafa
pub
stat
enacted
year
bearing
analysis
cases
subject
certain
limitations
cafa
confers
federal
diversity
jurisdiction
class
actions
aggregate
amount
controversy
exceeds
million
abrogates
rule
aggregating
claims
rule
recognized
reaffirmed
zahn
cafa
however
retroactive
views
congress
relevant
interpretation
text
enacted
congress
cafa
moreover
moot
significance
interpretation
many
proposed
exercises
supplemental
jurisdiction
even
context
might
fall
within
cafa
ambit
cafa
impact
one
way
interpretation
judgment
appeals
eleventh
circuit
affirmed
judgment
appeals
first
circuit
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
exxon
mobil
corporation
petitioner
allapattah
services
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
eleventh
circuit
maria
del
rosario
ortega
et
petitioners
foods
writ
certiorari
appeals
first
circuit
june
justice
stevens
justice
breyer
joins
dissenting
justice
ginsburg
carefully
reasoned
opinion
post
dissenting
opinion
demonstrates
error
rather
ambitious
reading
opaque
jurisdictional
statute
also
demonstrated
ambiguity
term
may
different
meanings
different
judges
made
remarkable
declaration
reading
statute
obviously
correct
justice
ginsburg
obviously
wrong
text
even
qualify
ambiguous
see
ante
ambiguity
apparently
eye
beholder
remain
convinced
unwise
treat
ambiguity
vel
non
statute
determinative
whether
legislative
history
consulted
indeed
believe
judges
rather
less
constrained
make
accountable
reliable
evidence
legislative
intent
see
koons
buick
pontiac
gmc
nigh
slip
stevens
concurring
legislative
history
provides
powerful
confirmation
justice
ginsburg
interpretation
statute
helpful
consider
full
relevant
portion
house
report
also
adopted
senate
section
authorize
jurisdiction
case
like
finley
well
essentially
restore
understandings
authorization
limits
forms
supplemental
jurisdiction
federal
question
cases
broadly
authorizes
district
courts
exercise
supplemental
jurisdiction
additional
claims
including
claims
involving
joinder
additional
parties
diversity
cases
district
courts
may
exercise
supplemental
jurisdiction
except
inconsistent
jurisdictional
requirements
diversity
statute
subsection
prohibits
district
case
jurisdiction
founded
solely
general
diversity
provision
exercising
supplemental
jurisdiction
specified
circumstances
net
effect
subsection
implement
principal
rationale
owen
equipment
erection
kroger
actions
district
courts
may
hear
plaintiffs
supplemental
claims
exercising
supplemental
jurisdiction
encourage
plaintiffs
evade
jurisdictional
requirement
simple
expedient
naming
initially
defendants
whose
joinder
satisfies
section
requirements
later
adding
claims
within
original
federal
jurisdiction
defendants
intervened
joined
supplemental
basis
accord
case
law
subsection
also
prohibits
joinder
intervention
persons
plaintiffs
adding
inconsistent
section
requirements
section
intended
affect
jurisdictional
requirements
class
actions
requirements
interpreted
prior
finley
tribe
cauble
zahn
international
paper
subsection
makes
one
small
change
practice
anomalously
current
practice
party
might
intervene
right
federal
rule
civil
procedure
take
advantage
supplemental
jurisdiction
come
within
supplemental
jurisdiction
parties
already
action
sought
effect
joinder
rule
subsection
eliminate
anomaly
excluding
rule
extent
sought
joined
plaintiffs
rule
pp
omitted
hereinafter
house
report
report
house
report
specifically
say
intended
upset
zahn
international
paper
entire
explanation
statute
demonstrates
congress
mind
specific
relatively
modest
task
undoing
decision
finley
addition
overturning
unfortunate
statute
according
report
codifies
preserves
understandings
authorization
limits
forms
supplemental
jurisdiction
house
report
exception
making
one
small
change
practice
relevant
sweeping
purpose
decision
imputes
congress
bears
resemblance
house
report
description
statute
seem
trouble
decision
today
treats
statutory
interpretation
pedantic
exercise
divorced
serious
attempt
ascertaining
congressional
intent
course
situations
honor
congress
apparent
intent
unless
intent
made
clear
text
statute
way
certain
congress
considered
issue
intended
disfavored
outcome
see
landgraf
usi
film
products
requiring
clear
statement
retroactive
civil
legislation
principle
provides
basis
discounting
house
report
given
cases
never
recognized
presumption
favor
expansive
diversity
jurisdiction
reasons
ignoring
virtual
billboard
congressional
intent
unpersuasive
subcommittee
federal
courts
study
committee
believed
earlier
substantially
similar
version
statute
overruled
zahn
see
ante
highlights
fact
statute
ambiguous
determinative
house
report
explicitly
rejected
broad
reading
statutory
text
report
special
significance
indicator
legislative
intent
congress
committee
reports
normally
considered
authoritative
explication
statute
text
purposes
busy
legislators
assistants
rely
explication
casting
votes
cf
garcia
surveying
legislative
history
repeatedly
stated
authoritative
source
finding
legislature
intent
lies
committee
reports
bill
considered
collective
understanding
congressmen
involved
drafting
studying
proposed
quoting
zuber
allen
brackets
original
second
reason
comment
three
law
professors
participated
drafting
see
ante
similarly
mark
law
review
article
refers
professors
merely
saying
text
statute
susceptible
overly
broad
simplistic
reading
clarification
house
report
therefore
appropriate
see
rowe
burbank
mengler
compounding
creating
confusion
supplemental
jurisdiction
reply
professor
freer
emory
significantly
reference
zahn
house
report
appear
place
indeed
wholly
consistent
report
broader
explanation
congress
goal
overruling
finley
preserving
law
suggest
professors
participated
deliberate
effort
amend
statute
committee
report
ante
reveals
unrealistic
view
legislative
process
mention
disrespect
three
law
professors
acted
role
public
servants
sure
legislative
history
manipulated
situation
us
little
reason
fear
unholy
conspiracy
unrepresentative
committee
members
ante
law
professors
unelected
staffers
lobbyists
endeavored
torpedo
congress
attempt
overrule
without
discussion
two
longstanding
features
diversity
jurisprudence
nearly
pages
complicated
analysis
explores
subtle
doctrinal
nuances
coins
various
neologisms
announces
reasonably
read
another
way
see
ante
conclusion
difficult
accept
given
justice
ginsburg
persuasive
account
statutory
text
jurisprudential
backdrop
given
uncommonly
clear
legislative
history
confident
majority
interpretation
mistaken
respectfully
dissent
exxon
mobil
corporation
petitioner
allapattah
services
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
eleventh
circuit
maria
del
rosario
ortega
et
petitioners
foods
writ
certiorari
appeals
first
circuit
june
justice
ginsburg
justice
stevens
justice
justice
breyer
join
dissenting
cases
present
question
whether
congress
enacting
overruled
decisions
clark
paul
gray
reaffirming
holding
troy
bank
whitehead
zahn
international
paper
clark
held
jurisdiction
predicated
specified
amount
controversy
plaintiff
joined
litigation
must
independently
meet
jurisdictional
amount
requirement
zahn
confirmed
class
actions
governed
federal
rule
civil
procedure
ach
class
member
must
satisfy
jurisdictional
amount
class
member
must
dismissed
case
section
agree
designed
overturn
decision
finley
finley
concerned
jurisdiction
original
jurisdiction
cases
arising
federal
law
plaintiff
finley
sued
federal
tort
claims
act
ftca
recover
death
husband
children
airplane
crash
alleged
federal
aviation
administration
negligence
contributed
fatal
accident
later
amended
complaint
add
tort
claims
two
defendants
municipality
utility
company
independent
basis
federal
jurisdiction
existed
claims
plaintiff
brought
entire
action
state
federal
jurisdiction
ftca
actions
exclusive
hence
absent
federal
jurisdiction
embracing
claims
obliged
pursue
two
discrete
actions
one
federal
state
held
nevertheless
district
lacked
jurisdiction
claims
holding
stressed
congress
held
control
rein
congress
reverse
result
finley
permit
pendent
jurisdiction
claims
additional
defendants
chose
congress
wrought
issue
courts
appeals
sharply
divided
compare
stromberg
metal
works
press
mechanical
supersedes
clark
allows
jurisdiction
additional
parties
claims
worth
less
jurisdictional
minimum
abbott
nder
district
exercise
supplemental
jurisdiction
members
class
although
meet
requirement
class
representatives
meritcare
paul
mercury
ins
preserves
prohibition
aggregation
outlined
zahn
clark
leonhardt
western
sugar
alter
historical
rules
prohibiting
aggregation
claims
including
zahn
prohibition
aggregation
diversity
class
actions
today
holds
although
prompted
finley
case
original
access
federal
predicated
federal
question
notably
enlarges
federal
diversity
jurisdiction
reads
overrule
clark
zahn
thereby
allowing
access
federal
class
members
meet
excess
requirement
long
least
one
named
class
representative
jurisdictionally
sufficient
claim
ante
adopts
plausibly
broad
reading
measure
hardly
model
careful
drafter
art
another
plausible
reading
however
one
less
disruptive
jurisprudence
regarding
supplemental
jurisdiction
one
reads
instruct
statute
text
suggests
district
must
first
original
jurisdiction
civil
action
supplemental
jurisdiction
attach
clark
zahn
preserved
supplemental
jurisdiction
open
way
joinder
plaintiffs
inclusion
class
members
independently
meet
requirement
reasons
follow
conclude
narrower
construction
better
reading
section
captioned
supplemental
jurisdiction
codifies
doctrines
formerly
labeled
pendent
ancillary
jurisdiction
pendent
jurisdiction
involved
enlargement
litigation
include
related
claims
ancillary
jurisdiction
evolved
primarily
protect
defending
parties
others
whose
rights
might
adversely
affected
air
claims
ongoing
action
given
jurisdiction
principal
action
federal
courts
entertained
certain
matters
deemed
ancillary
regardless
citizenship
parties
amount
controversy
mine
workers
gibbs
leading
pendent
jurisdiction
case
involved
claim
union
wrongfully
inducing
plaintiff
discharge
plaintiff
stated
federal
claim
act
allied
claim
unlawful
conspiracy
interfere
employment
contract
upheld
joinder
federal
state
claims
power
federal
courts
hear
whole
said
state
federal
claims
derive
common
nucleus
operative
fact
linked
plaintiff
ordinarily
expected
try
one
judicial
proceeding
gibbs
involved
linkage
federal
state
claims
defendant
finley
contained
gibbs
without
congressional
authorization
admonished
pendent
jurisdiction
umbrella
stretched
cover
joinder
additional
parties
gibbs
departed
earlier
decisions
recognizing
jurisdiction
must
explicitly
conferred
said
observed
although
resting
much
narrower
basis
fallon
meltzer
shapiro
hart
wechsler
federal
courts
federal
system
ed
hereinafter
hart
wechsler
already
signaled
gibbs
approach
extended
field
finley
finley
limit
impair
gibbs
development
pendent
jurisdiction
made
plain
initiative
lie
congress
domain
ancillary
jurisdiction
evolved
sprawling
doctrine
pendent
jurisdiction
originally
rooted
notion
federal
jurisdiction
principal
suit
effectively
controls
property
fund
dispute
claimants
thereto
allowed
intervene
order
protect
interests
without
regard
jurisdiction
aldinger
addressed
permissible
scope
doctrine
relation
liberal
provisions
federal
rules
civil
procedure
joinder
parties
claims
kroger
commenced
suit
citizen
iowa
nebraska
corporation
nebraska
defendant
impleaded
iowa
corporation
defendant
rule
plaintiff
asserted
claims
impleaded
party
independent
basis
federal
jurisdiction
existed
newly
asserted
claims
plaintiff
impleaded
defendant
citizens
iowa
held
plaintiff
draw
defendant
manner
federal
courts
time
kroger
routinely
exercising
ancillary
jurisdiction
compulsory
counterclaims
impleader
claims
among
defendants
claims
parties
intervened
right
see
collecting
cases
kroger
however
nonfederal
claim
asserted
plaintiff
voluntarily
chose
bring
suit
upon
claim
federal
contrast
ancillary
jurisdiction
typically
involve
claims
defending
party
haled
another
person
whose
rights
might
irretrievably
lost
unless
assert
ongoing
action
federal
chosen
federal
rather
state
forum
said
plaintiff
accept
limitations
ibid
sum
cases
enactment
recognized
jurisdiction
gibbs
jurisdiction
finley
ancillary
jurisdiction
adhered
limitation
diversity
cases
throughout
litigation
plaintiffs
must
remain
diverse
defendants
see
kroger
although
pendent
jurisdiction
ancillary
jurisdiction
evolved
recognized
two
species
generic
problem
circumstances
may
federal
hear
decide
claim
arising
citizens
state
finley
regarded
question
one
properly
addressed
congress
see
wright
miller
ed
supp
hart
wechsler
shortly
decided
finley
congress
established
federal
courts
study
committee
take
issues
relating
federal
courts
congestion
delay
expense
expansion
judicial
conference
report
federal
courts
study
committee
apr
hereinafter
committee
report
committee
charge
conduct
study
addressing
crisis
federal
courts
caused
rapidly
growing
caseload
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
among
recommendations
committee
urged
congress
authorize
federal
courts
assert
pendent
jurisdiction
parties
without
independent
federal
jurisdictional
base
adopted
recommendation
overrule
finley
earlier
subcommittee
recommended
congress
overrule
finley
zahn
report
subcommittee
role
federal
courts
relationship
mar
reprinted
judicial
conference
federal
courts
study
committee
working
papers
subcommittee
reports
july
hereinafter
subcommittee
report
subcommittee
view
rom
policy
standpoint
zahn
de
little
sense
subcommittee
report
full
committee
however
urged
overruling
finley
adopt
recommendation
overrule
zahn
committee
report
separate
matter
substantial
majority
committee
strongly
recommend
ed
elimination
diversity
jurisdiction
save
complex
litigation
interpleader
suits
involving
aliens
accord
subcommittee
report
step
committee
report
maintained
anywhere
nearly
much
reduce
federal
caseload
pressures
contain
growth
federal
judiciary
committee
report
congress
responded
adopting
part
judicial
improvements
act
stat
recommendations
federal
courts
study
committee
ranked
house
committee
judiciary
modest
noncontroversial
pp
hereinafter
see
also
cong
rec
congress
take
study
committee
immodest
proposal
curtail
diversity
jurisdiction
however
enact
supplemental
jurisdiction
statute
codified
ii
section
terms
operates
civil
actions
district
courts
original
jurisdiction
original
jurisdiction
relevant
jurisdiction
conferred
character
jurisdiction
essential
backdrop
comprehension
constitution
broadly
provides
jurisdiction
controversies
citizens
different
art
iii
cl
read
provision
demand
minimal
diversity
long
one
party
plaintiffs
side
one
party
defendants
side
diverse
citizenship
congress
may
authorize
federal
courts
exercise
diversity
jurisdiction
see
state
farm
fire
casualty
tashire
constitution
includes
limitation
exercise
federal
jurisdiction
start
congress
measures
construed
limited
federal
exercise
diversity
jurisdiction
two
principal
ways
first
unless
congress
specifies
otherwise
diversity
must
complete
parties
plaintiffs
side
must
diverse
parties
defendants
side
strawbridge
curtiss
cranch
see
wright
miller
ed
second
plaintiff
stake
must
independently
meet
specification
two
plaintiffs
separate
distinct
demands
unite
convenience
economy
single
suit
essential
demand
requisite
jurisdictional
amount
troy
bank
statute
today
governing
federal
exercise
diversity
jurisdiction
generality
cases
like
predecessors
incorporates
requirement
latter
statute
reads
district
courts
shall
original
jurisdiction
cases
matter
controversy
exceeds
sum
long
held
determining
whether
requirement
satisfied
single
plaintiff
may
aggregate
two
claims
single
defendant
even
claims
unrelated
see
edwards
bates
county
multiparty
cases
including
class
actions
unyieldingly
adhered
nonaggregation
rule
stated
troy
bank
see
clark
abandonment
nonaggregation
rule
class
actions
undercut
congressional
purpose
check
degree
rising
caseload
federal
courts
recently
addressed
meaning
controversy
language
zahn
zahn
like
snyder
decided
four
years
earlier
class
action
snyder
class
member
claim
large
enough
satisfy
jurisdictional
amount
zahn
named
plaintiffs
claims
nevertheless
declined
depart
longstanding
construction
controversy
requirement
zahn
stated
snyder
invoked
rule
several
plaintiffs
asserting
separate
distinct
claims
must
satisfy
requirement
claim
survive
motion
dismiss
rule
plainly
mandates
may
aggregation
entire
case
must
dismissed
none
plaintiffs
claims
meets
requirement
also
requires
plaintiff
without
jurisdictional
amount
must
dismissed
case
even
though
others
allege
jurisdictionally
sufficient
claims
rule
plaintiff
must
independently
satisfy
requirement
unless
congress
orders
otherwise
thus
solidly
established
reading
congress
enacted
judicial
improvements
act
added
title
cases
present
question
whether
congress
abrogated
nonaggregation
rule
long
tied
enacted
answering
question
context
provide
crucial
guide
rosario
ortega
foods
assume
ordinarily
congress
legislated
background
law
already
place
historical
development
law
see
national
archives
records
admin
favish
background
statutory
grant
diversity
jurisdiction
condition
congress
start
tied
grant
nonaggregation
rule
long
applied
determination
matter
controversy
section
provides
except
provided
subsections
expressly
provided
otherwise
federal
statute
civil
action
district
courts
original
jurisdiction
district
courts
shall
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
related
claims
action
within
original
jurisdiction
form
part
case
controversy
article
iii
constitution
supplemental
jurisdiction
shall
include
claims
involve
joinder
intervention
additional
parties
unanimous
reading
permit
jurisdiction
cases
thus
overrule
finley
basic
jurisdictional
grant
provides
district
courts
shall
original
jurisdiction
civil
actions
arising
constitution
laws
treaties
since
contained
requirement
see
stat
eliminating
requirement
civil
action
presenting
qualifying
claim
arising
federal
law
sole
requirement
met
district
courts
held
may
adjudicate
additionally
claims
deriv
ing
common
nucleus
operative
fact
gibbs
section
enlarges
category
include
claims
defendant
named
federal
claim
also
claims
involve
joinder
intervention
additional
parties
divides
however
impact
diversity
cases
controlled
majority
reading
permits
joinder
related
claims
cut
loose
nonaggregation
rule
long
attended
actions
claims
specified
excluded
expansion
grant
diversity
jurisdiction
contains
exception
joinder
plaintiffs
rule
class
actions
rule
concludes
clark
zahn
reading
surely
plausible
especially
one
detaches
context
attempts
reconciliation
prior
interpretations
requirement
text
first
circuit
held
read
another
way
one
involve
rejection
clark
zahn
explained
first
circuit
ortega
applied
class
actions
tenth
circuit
leonhardt
see
supra
addresses
civil
action
district
courts
original
jurisdiction
formulation
diversity
cases
sensibly
read
incorporate
rules
joinder
aggregation
tightly
tied
time
enactment
reading
complaint
must
first
meet
original
jurisdiction
measurement
supplemental
jurisdiction
authorized
authorizes
supplemental
jurisdiction
related
claims
words
preserve
undiminished
part
parcel
original
jurisdiction
determinations
complete
diversity
rule
decisions
restricting
aggregation
arrive
amount
section
office
prevent
erosion
complete
diversity
requirement
might
otherwise
result
expansive
application
termed
doctrine
ancillary
jurisdiction
see
pfander
supplemental
jurisdiction
section
case
sympathetic
textualism
rev
infra
contrast
construction
draws
sharp
line
diversity
components
see
ante
supra
interpretation
presented
sever
two
jurisdictional
requirements
restrained
reading
outlined
yield
affirmance
first
circuit
judgment
ortega
reversal
eleventh
circuit
judgment
exxon
discard
entirely
judicially
developed
doctrines
pendent
ancillary
jurisdiction
existed
finley
instead
recognize
essentially
codification
doctrines
placing
single
heading
largely
retaining
substance
overriding
finley
basic
change
supplemental
jurisdiction
district
original
jurisdiction
include
claims
involve
joinder
intervention
additional
parties
pendent
jurisdiction
earlier
explained
see
supra
applied
cases
allowed
plaintiffs
attach
nonfederal
claims
claims
ancillary
jurisdiction
applied
primarily
although
exclusively
diversity
cases
typically
involve
claims
defending
party
haled
kroger
emphasis
added
see
also
supra
first
circuit
observed
neither
doctrine
permitted
plaintiff
circumvent
dual
requirements
diversity
citizenship
amount
controversy
simply
joining
jurisdictionally
inadequate
claim
action
brought
jurisdictionally
competent
diversity
plaintiff
ortega
reading
find
persuasive
alig
statutory
supplemental
jurisdiction
judicially
developed
doctrines
pendent
ancillary
jurisdiction
also
synchronize
removal
statute
first
circuit
carefully
explained
section
like
applies
action
question
one
district
courts
original
jurisdiction
relying
language
interpreted
prohibit
removal
unless
entire
action
stands
time
removal
filed
federal
first
instance
see
syngenta
crop
protection
henson
tax
graham
per
curiam
section
thus
held
incorporate
complaint
rule
see
city
chicago
international
college
surgeons
complete
diversity
rule
see
caterpillar
lewis
rules
calculating
amount
controversy
see
paul
mercury
indem
red
cab
ortega
citations
omitted
added
less
disruptive
view
take
also
accounts
omission
rule
plaintiffs
rule
class
actions
text
one
reads
plenary
grant
supplemental
jurisdiction
federal
courts
sitting
diversity
one
indeed
look
exceptions
finding
none
permissive
joinder
parties
class
actions
one
conclude
congress
effectively
even
unintentionally
overruled
clark
zahn
one
recognizes
nonaggregation
rule
delineated
clark
zahn
forms
part
determination
whether
original
jurisdiction
exists
diversity
case
see
supra
plaintiffs
meet
requirement
fail
threshold
congress
reason
resort
exception
turn
plaintiffs
away
federal
given
claims
start
fall
outside
jurisdiction
see
pfander
moderate
reading
assign
different
meanings
original
jurisdiction
diversity
cases
see
ante
first
circuit
stated
riginal
jurisdiction
meaning
every
case
underlying
statutory
grant
original
jurisdiction
must
satisfied
differs
federal
question
diversity
cases
meaning
jurisdiction
rather
discrete
requirements
sections
sole
issue
whether
federal
question
appears
face
plaintiff
complaint
citizenship
parties
amounts
stand
recover
bear
determination
section
contrast
predicates
original
jurisdiction
identity
parties
complete
diversity
satisfaction
specification
short
jurisdiction
language
operates
differently
diversity
cases
meaning
term
varies
statutes
different
ortega
utility
reading
section
allows
parties
plaintiff
assert
reactive
claims
entertained
heading
ancillary
jurisdiction
see
supra
listing
claims
including
compulsory
counterclaims
impleader
claims
federal
courts
routinely
exercised
ancillary
jurisdiction
earlier
observed
see
supra
stops
plaintiffs
circumventing
jurisdictional
requirements
using
another
claim
hook
add
claim
plaintiff
brought
first
instance
kroger
paradigm
case
see
supra
held
ancillary
jurisdiction
extend
plaintiff
claim
nondiverse
party
impleaded
defendant
rule
section
corroborative
coverage
claims
formerly
called
ancillary
provides
exceptions
assure
added
claims
fundamentally
alter
jurisdictional
requirements
section
see
pfander
supra
enigmatic
defies
flawless
interpretation
see
supra
reading
persuaded
better
accords
historical
legal
context
congress
enactment
supplemental
jurisdiction
statute
see
supra
established
limits
pendent
ancillary
jurisdiction
see
supra
attribute
congress
jurisdictional
enlargement
broader
one
legislators
adverted
cf
finley
follows
sound
counsel
close
questions
statutory
construction
resolved
favor
continuity
change
shapiro
continuity
change
statutory
interpretation
rev
reasons
stated
hold
overrule
clark
zahn
therefore
affirm
judgment
appeals
first
circuit
reverse
judgment
appeals
eleventh
circuit
footnotes
together
del
rosario
ortega
et
al
foods
certiorari
appeals
first
circuit
footnotes
last
quoted
paragraph
intended
refer
rule
rule
see
ante
pointed
dissent
finley
majority
decision
faithful
precedents
casually
dismissed
accumulated
wisdom
judges
henry
friendly
special
learning
expertise
matters
federal
jurisdiction
professors
account
challenges
faced
drafting
gives
sense
think
statute
proved
difficult
interpret
broadly
codifying
complex
area
like
supplemental
jurisdiction
professor
freer
discussion
illustrates
complex
business
danger
result
effort
deal
foreseeables
statute
prolix
baroque
everyday
use
application
practitioners
judges
section
reflects
effort
provide
sufficient
detail
without
overdoing
statute
concededly
perfect
accomplishes
however
change
direction
taken
finley
provide
basic
guidance
particular
legislative
history
general
approval
case
law
treated
specific
issues
professor
freer
raises
trust
federal
courts
changed
direction
interpret
statute
sensibly
emory
footnotes
oth
finley
result
implications
sparked
considerable
criticism
hart
wechsler
see
also
wright
miller
cooper
freer
federal
practice
procedure
ed
supp
hereinafter
wright
miller
characterizing
finley
decision
surprising
see
generally
wright
miller
ed
discussing
pendent
jurisdiction
discussing
ancillary
jurisdiction
hart
wechsler
discussing
pendent
jurisdiction
discussing
ancillary
jurisdiction
anomalously
holding
class
member
must
satisfy
jurisdictional
amount
zahn
international
paper
zahn
refer
tribe
cauble
established
class
action
citizenship
named
plaintiff
controlling
see
zahn
brennan
dissenting
urging
zahn
inconsistency
omnibus
act
encompassed
civil
justice
reform
act
title
creation
new
judgeships
title
ii
federal
courts
study
committee
implementation
act
title
iii
establishment
national
commission
judicial
discipline
removal
title
iv
endeavoring
preserve
complete
diversity
rule
first
stated
strawbridge
curtiss
cranch
opinion
drives
wedge
two
components
treating
requirement
essential
requirement
readily
disposable
see
ante
section
however
rank
order
two
requirements
rdinary
principl
statutory
construction
sound
canon
interpretation
ante
allows
slice
way
partial
explanation
asserts
amount
controversy
analyzed
diversity
requirement
see
ante
altogether
clear
cure
improper
joinder
nondiverse
party
cure
improper
joinder
plaintiff
satisfy
jurisdictional
amount
cases
original
jurisdiction
preserved
dismissing
nonqualifying
party
see
caterpillar
lewis
diversity
zahn
noted
zahn
exercise
jurisdiction
diversity
jurisdiction
conditioned
limitation
nonaggregation
rule
applied
heads
federal
jurisdiction
cf
ante
added
however
congress
ha
exempted
major
areas
jurisdiction
requirements
thus
diminishing
impact
matter
controversy
specification
cases
arising
federal
law
zahn
title
provides
civil
action
district
courts
original
jurisdiction
founded
solely
section
title
district
courts
shall
supplemental
jurisdiction
subsection
claims
plaintiffs
persons
made
parties
rule
federal
rules
civil
procedure
claims
persons
proposed
joined
plaintiffs
rule
rules
seeking
intervene
plaintiffs
rule
rules
exercising
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
inconsistent
jurisdictional
requirements
section
construction
see
ante
beatriz
ortega
family
members
remain
action
joinder
merely
permissive
see
fed
rule
civ
proc
however
presence
needed
adjudication
rule
dismissal
required
inclusion
may
join
exclusion
must
join
defies
rational
explanation
cf
ante
others
adopting
interpretation
embraces
acknowledged
see
stromberg
metal
works
press
mechanical
recognizing
anomaly
inquiring
sense
make
cf
wright
miller
ed
distinction
rule
rule
seems
incongruous
serves
apparent
public
policy
purpose
reading
immaterial
withdraw
supplemental
jurisdiction
claims
additional
parties
issue
ante
claims
come
within
first
place
congress
reason
list
see
infra
opinion
blends
two
doctrines
according
significance
discrete
development
see
ante
point
extended
discussion
chicago
international
college
surgeons
instant
cases
see
ante
slips
grasp
disagreement
case
none
properly
read
authorize
exercise
supplemental
jurisdiction
removed
cases
international
college
surgeons
unusual
federal
asked
review
decision
local
administrative
agency
review
unsuccessfully
argued
appellate
character
therefore
outside
ken
empowered
exercise
original
jurisdiction
compare
ginsburg
dissenting
notes
passage
year
class
action
fairness
act
cafa
pub
stat
ante
dismiss
legislation
irrelevant
subject
several
exceptions
qualifications
cafa
provides
adjudication
class
actions
diversity
minimal
one
plaintiff
diversity
one
defendant
suffices
matter
controversy
aggregate
amount
excess
significant
cafa
enlargement
diversity
jurisdiction
accomplished
clearly
conspicuously
amending
cf
rosario
ortega
renders
unnecessary
listing
rule
plaintiffs
rule
class
actions
see
supra
similarly
unnecessary
refer
persons
proposed
joined
plaintiffs
rule
one
account
congress
bracketed
persons
persons
seeking
intervene
plaintiffs
rule
modify
practice
enactment
courts
entertained
heading
ancillary
jurisdiction
claims
rule
intervenors
right
see
owen
equipment
erection
kroger
denied
ancillary
jurisdiction
claims
necessary
rule
plaintiffs
see
wright
miller
ed
supp
congress
may
sought
simply
underscore
seeking
join
plaintiffs
whether
rule
rule
treated
alike
denied
joinder
inconsistent
jurisdictional
requirements
section
see
ortega
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
subsection
makes
one
small
change
practice
eliminates
rule
interpretation
described
opinion
rely
measure
legislative
history
history
justice
stevens
shown
see
ante
dissenting
opinion
corroborative
statutory
reading
set