paroline
et
argued
january
decided
april
respondent
victim
case
sexually
abused
young
girl
order
produce
child
pornography
learned
images
abuse
trafficked
internet
effect
repeating
original
wrongs
knew
humiliation
hurt
renewed
well
future
thousands
additional
wrongdoers
witnessed
crimes
petitioner
paroline
pleaded
guilty
federal
possessing
images
child
pornography
included
two
victim
violation
victim
sought
restitution
requesting
nearly
million
lost
income
future
treatment
counseling
costs
district
declined
award
restitution
concluding
government
met
burden
proving
losses
proximately
caused
paroline
offense
victim
sought
writ
mandamus
asking
fifth
circuit
direct
district
order
paroline
pay
restitution
granting
writ
rehearing
en
banc
fifth
circuit
held
inter
alia
limit
restitution
losses
proximately
caused
defendant
defendant
possessed
victim
images
made
liable
victim
entire
losses
trade
images
held
restitution
proper
extent
defendant
offense
proximately
caused
victim
losses
provision
broad
restitutionary
purpose
stating
district
shall
order
restitution
offense
chapter
title
paroline
possession
offense
requiring
district
courts
order
defendants
pay
victim
full
amount
victim
losses
determined
expressly
making
issuance
restitution
order
mandatory
government
burden
demonstrating
amount
victim
loss
say
one
event
proximately
caused
another
means
first
former
event
caused
latter
actual
cause
cause
fact
second
proximate
cause
sufficient
connection
result
concept
proximate
causation
applicable
criminal
tort
law
analysis
parallel
many
instances
section
defines
victim
individual
harmed
result
commission
crime
chapter
words
result
plainly
suggest
causation
referent
crime
offense
conviction
full
amount
victim
losses
includes
costs
incurred
victim
six
enumerated
categories
expense
reference
costs
incurred
victim
naturally
understood
costs
arising
result
offense
conviction
defendant
conduct
last
six
enumerated
categories
losses
suffered
proximate
result
offense
clearly
causal
requirement
one
proximate
cause
reading
supported
canon
construction
hen
several
words
followed
clause
applicable
much
first
words
last
natural
construction
language
demands
clause
read
applicable
porto
rico
railway
light
power
mor
reading
also
presents
commonsense
way
impose
sensible
limitations
claims
attenuated
costs
pp
applying
statute
causation
requirements
case
victims
compensated
defendants
held
account
impact
conduct
victims
defendants
made
liable
consequences
gravity
conduct
conduct
others
pp
somewhat
atypical
causal
process
underlies
losses
may
simple
prove
aggregate
losses
general
losses
stemming
ongoing
traffic
victim
images
question
purposes
much
general
losses
proximate
result
individual
defendant
offense
victim
costs
treatment
lost
income
resulting
trauma
knowing
images
abuse
viewed
direct
foreseeable
results
crimes
provided
prerequisite
factual
causation
satisfied
primary
problem
proper
standard
causation
fact
pp
showing
causation
proper
standard
possible
prove
victim
losses
less
one
possessor
individual
role
large
loosely
connected
network
images
circulate
victim
government
urge
read
require
less
restrictive
causation
standard
cases
like
endorse
theory
aggregate
causation
one
formulation
finds
factual
causation
satisfied
wrongdoer
conduct
though
alone
insufficient
cause
plaintiff
harm
combined
conduct
persons
sufficient
cause
harm
restatement
third
torts
liability
physical
emotional
harm
comment
tort
law
teaches
alternative
causal
tests
though
kind
legal
fiction
may
necessary
vindicate
law
purposes
anomalous
turn
away
person
harmed
combined
acts
many
wrongdoers
simply
none
wrongdoers
alone
caused
harm
nonsensical
adopt
rule
whereby
individuals
hurt
combined
wrongful
acts
many
redress
hurt
acts
one
person
alone
sound
principles
taken
far
however
alternative
causal
standards
treat
possessor
cause
fact
trauma
attendant
losses
incurred
result
ongoing
traffic
victim
images
aggregate
causation
logic
adopted
incautious
manner
context
criminal
restitution
differs
tort
law
numerous
respects
paroline
contribution
causal
process
underlying
victim
losses
minor
compared
combined
acts
relevant
offenders
compared
contributions
individual
offenders
particularly
distributors
initial
producer
child
pornography
congress
gave
indication
intended
statute
applied
expansive
manner
starkly
contrary
principle
restitution
reflect
consequences
defendant
conduct
victim
claims
holding
possessor
liable
entire
losses
fair
practical
part
offenders
seek
contribution
one
another
general
federal
right
contribution
specific
statutory
authorization
contribution
severe
approach
also
raise
questions
excessive
fines
clause
eighth
amendment
pp
victim
expansive
reading
must
rejected
mean
broader
principles
underlying
aggregate
causation
theories
irrelevant
determining
proper
outcome
cases
like
cause
victim
general
losses
trade
images
paroline
part
cause
undermines
purposes
tort
law
turn
away
plaintiffs
harmed
several
wrongdoers
undermine
purposes
turn
away
victims
cases
like
respect
statute
remedial
purpose
question
produce
anomalous
results
say
restitution
appropriate
circumstances
harms
kind
victim
endured
major
reason
child
pornography
outlawed
unlawful
conduct
everyone
reproduces
distributes
possesses
images
victim
abuse
including
paroline
plays
part
sustaining
aggravating
tragedy
doubt
congress
wanted
restitution
victims
denying
restitution
also
odds
penological
purposes
include
need
impress
upon
offenders
conduct
produces
concrete
devastating
harms
real
identifiable
victims
thus
shown
defendant
possessed
victim
images
victim
outstanding
losses
caused
continuing
traffic
images
impossible
trace
particular
amount
losses
individual
defendant
utilizing
traditional
causal
inquiry
order
restitution
amount
comports
defendant
relative
role
causal
process
underlying
victim
general
losses
district
courts
use
discretion
sound
judgment
determining
proper
amount
restitution
variety
factors
may
serve
guideposts
courts
might
start
determine
amount
victim
losses
caused
continuing
traffic
victim
images
base
award
factors
bearing
relative
causal
significance
defendant
conduct
producing
losses
victim
finds
approach
untenable
losses
indivisible
required
define
causal
standard
effects
statute
purposes
apply
concepts
mechanical
way
criminal
restitution
context
also
argues
consigned
piecemeal
restitution
may
never
lead
full
recovery
congress
promised
victims
full
swift
restitution
cost
holding
defendant
liable
amount
drastically
proportion
individual
causal
relation
losses
furthermore
approach
better
effects
need
impress
upon
defendants
acts
irrelevant
victimless
pp
though
approach
without
difficulties
courts
best
apply
statute
written
workable
manner
faithful
competing
principles
stake
victims
compensated
defendants
held
account
impact
conduct
conduct
others
district
courts
routinely
exercise
wide
discretion
sentencing
generally
fashioning
restitution
orders
able
apply
causal
standard
defined
without
detailed
guidance
vacated
remanded
kennedy
delivered
opinion
ginsburg
breyer
alito
kagan
joined
roberts
filed
dissenting
opinion
scalia
thomas
joined
sotomayor
filed
dissenting
opinion
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
doyle
randall
paroline
petitioner
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
april
justice
kennedy
delivered
opinion
case
presents
question
determine
amount
restitution
possessor
child
pornography
must
pay
victim
whose
childhood
abuse
appears
pornographic
materials
possessed
relevant
statutory
provisions
set
forth
enacted
component
violence
women
act
requires
district
courts
award
restitution
certain
federal
criminal
offenses
including
possession
petitioner
doyle
randall
paroline
pleaded
guilty
offense
admitted
possessing
images
child
pornography
included
two
depicted
sexual
exploitation
young
girl
young
woman
goes
pseudonym
amy
litigation
question
causal
relationship
must
established
defendant
conduct
victim
losses
purposes
determining
right
amount
restitution
three
decades
ago
observed
exploitive
use
children
production
pornography
become
serious
national
problem
new
york
ferber
demand
child
pornography
harms
children
part
drives
production
involves
child
abuse
harms
caused
child
pornography
however
still
extensive
child
pornography
permanent
record
depicted
child
abuse
harm
child
exacerbated
circulation
child
pornography
traded
ease
internet
number
still
images
videos
memorializing
sexual
assault
sexual
exploitation
children
many
young
age
grown
exponentially
sentencing
saris
et
federal
child
pornography
offenses
hereinafter
sentencing
report
one
person
whose
story
illustrates
devastating
harm
caused
child
pornography
respondent
victim
case
eight
nine
years
old
sexually
abused
uncle
order
produce
child
pornography
uncle
prosecuted
required
pay
restitution
sentenced
lengthy
prison
term
victim
underwent
initial
course
therapy
beginning
continuing
end
period
therapist
notes
reported
involvement
dance
activities
support
family
justified
optimistic
assessment
app
functioning
appeared
decline
teenage
years
however
major
blow
recovery
came
age
learned
images
abuse
trafficked
internet
digital
images
available
nationwide
doubt
worldwide
though
exact
scale
trade
images
unknown
possessors
date
easily
number
thousands
knowledge
images
circulated
far
wide
renewed
victim
trauma
made
difficult
recover
abuse
explained
victim
impact
statement
submitted
district
case
every
day
life
live
constant
fear
someone
see
pictures
recognize
humiliated
hurts
know
someone
looking
little
girl
abused
camera
choose
forever
pictures
people
using
sick
things
want
erased
want
stopped
powerless
stop
like
powerless
stop
uncle
life
feelings
worse
crime
never
really
stopped
never
really
stop
like
abused
victim
says
statement
fear
trauma
make
difficult
trust
others
feel
control
happens
full
extent
victim
suffering
hard
grasp
abuser
took
away
childhood
innocence
freedom
kind
nightmares
memories
others
never
know
crimes
compounded
distribution
images
abuser
horrific
acts
meant
wrongs
inflicted
upon
effect
repeated
knew
humiliation
hurt
renewed
future
number
wrongdoers
witnessed
crimes
committed
petitioner
paroline
one
individuals
possessed
victim
images
pleaded
guilty
federal
one
count
possession
material
involving
sexual
exploitation
children
violation
supp
ed
tex
paroline
admitted
knowing
possession
images
child
pornography
two
depicted
respondent
victim
ibid
victim
sought
restitution
asking
close
million
consisting
nearly
million
lost
income
future
treatment
counseling
costs
app
also
sought
attorney
fees
costs
supp
parties
submitted
competing
expert
reports
stipulated
victim
know
paroline
none
claimed
losses
flowed
specific
knowledge
offense
conduct
app
briefing
hearings
district
declined
award
restitution
supp
district
observed
everyone
involved
child
pornography
abusers
producers
possessors
contribute
victim
ongoing
harm
concluded
government
burden
proving
amount
victim
losses
directly
produced
paroline
occurred
without
possession
images
district
found
standard
government
failed
meet
burden
proving
losses
proximately
caused
paroline
offense
thus
held
award
restitution
appropriate
case
victim
sought
writ
mandamus
asking
appeals
fifth
circuit
direct
district
order
paroline
pay
restitution
amount
requested
amy
appeals
denied
relief
victim
sought
rehearing
rehearing
request
granted
petition
writ
mandamus
amy
unknown
fifth
circuit
reheard
case
en
banc
along
another
case
defendant
michael
wright
raised
similar
issues
appealing
order
restitution
see
wright
per
curiam
relevant
appeals
set
determine
level
proof
required
award
restitution
victims
cases
like
held
limit
restitution
losses
proximately
caused
defendant
defendant
possessed
victim
images
made
liable
victim
entire
losses
trade
images
even
though
offenders
played
role
causing
losses
amy
unknown
en
banc
paroline
sought
review
certiorari
granted
resolve
conflict
courts
appeals
proper
causation
inquiry
purposes
determining
entitlement
amount
restitution
reasons
set
forth
decision
appeals
vacated
ii
title
provides
district
shall
order
restitution
offense
chapter
title
covers
number
offenses
involving
sexual
exploitation
children
child
pornography
particular
paroline
convicted
knowingly
possessing
child
pornography
chapter
offense
section
broad
restitutionary
purpose
requires
district
courts
order
defendants
pay
victim
full
amount
victim
losses
determined
expressly
issuance
restitution
order
section
mandatory
section
provides
order
restitution
section
shall
issued
enforced
accordance
section
turn
provides
relevant
part
burden
demonstrating
amount
loss
sustained
victim
result
offense
shall
attorney
government
threshold
question
faces
whether
limits
restitution
losses
proximately
caused
defendant
offense
conduct
fifth
circuit
held
contrary
holdings
courts
appeals
addressed
question
compare
general
requirement
applies
rogers
general
requirement
applies
benoit
fast
laraneta
burgess
evers
aumais
kennedy
monzel
cadc
mcdaniel
general
matter
say
one
event
proximately
caused
another
way
making
two
separate
related
assertions
first
means
former
event
caused
latter
known
actual
cause
cause
fact
concept
actual
cause
metaphysical
one
ordinary
inquiry
existence
causal
relation
laypeople
view
harper
james
gray
torts
ed
every
event
many
causes
however
see
proximate
law
uses
term
say
one
event
proximate
cause
another
means
cause
one
sufficient
connection
result
idea
proximate
cause
distinct
actual
cause
cause
fact
defies
easy
summary
flexible
concept
bridge
phoenix
bond
indemnity
generally
refers
basic
requirement
must
direct
relation
injury
asserted
injurious
conduct
alleged
csx
mcbride
roberts
dissenting
slip
quoting
holmes
securities
investor
protection
corporation
concept
proximate
causation
applicable
criminal
tort
law
analysis
parallel
many
instances
lafave
substantive
criminal
law
ed
hereinafter
lafave
proximate
cause
often
explicated
terms
foreseeability
scope
risk
created
predicate
conduct
see
ibid
restatement
third
torts
liability
physical
emotional
harm
hereinafter
restatement
requirement
proximate
cause
thus
serves
inter
alia
preclude
liability
situations
causal
link
conduct
result
attenuated
consequence
aptly
described
mere
fortuity
exxon
sofec
parties
agree
imposes
causation
requirement
statute
defines
victim
individual
harmed
result
commission
crime
chapter
words
result
plainly
suggest
causation
see
pacific
operators
offshore
llp
valladolid
slip
see
also
burrage
slip
straightforward
reading
indicates
term
crime
refers
offense
conviction
cf
hughey
defendant
offense
conduct
cause
harm
individual
individual
definition
victim
entitled
restitution
noted
requires
order
restitution
full
amount
victim
losses
statute
defines
include
costs
incurred
victim
six
enumerated
categories
expense
reference
costs
incurred
victim
naturally
understood
costs
stemming
source
qualifies
individual
victim
first
place
namely
ones
arising
result
offense
thus
typically
case
criminal
restitution
intended
compensate
victims
losses
caused
offense
conviction
see
important
point
means
central
concern
causal
inquiry
must
conduct
particular
defendant
restitution
sought
question
whether
restitution
limited
losses
proximately
caused
offense
noted
requirement
proximate
cause
restrictive
requirement
factual
cause
alone
even
made
express
reference
proximate
causation
might
well
hold
showing
proximate
cause
required
proximate
cause
standard
aspect
causation
criminal
law
law
torts
see
lafave
keeton
dobbs
keeton
owen
prosser
keeton
law
torts
ed
hereinafter
prosser
keeton
given
proximate
cause
traditional
role
causation
analysis
found
requirement
built
statute
expressly
impose
one
see
holmes
supra
associated
gen
contractors
carpenters
see
also
csx
supra
roberts
dissenting
slip
applied
standard
requirement
proximate
cause
actions
federal
statutes
text
expressly
provide
lexmark
static
control
components
ante
however
interpretive
task
easier
requirement
proximate
cause
statute
text
statute
enumerates
six
categories
covered
losses
include
certain
medical
services
physical
occupational
therapy
transportation
temporary
housing
child
care
lost
income
attorney
fees
costs
final
catchall
category
losses
suffered
victim
proximate
result
offense
victim
argues
proximate
result
language
appears
final
catchall
category
losses
set
forth
statute
requirement
losses
falling
within
prior
enumerated
categories
justifies
reading
part
grammatical
rule
last
antecedent
according
limiting
clause
phrase
ordinarily
read
modifying
noun
phrase
immediately
follows
barnhart
thomas
rule
absolute
assuredly
overcome
indicia
meaning
ibid
applied
mechanical
way
require
accepting
unlikely
premises
hayes
canons
statutory
construction
moreover
work
reading
victim
suggests
several
words
followed
clause
applicable
much
first
words
last
natural
construction
language
demands
clause
read
applicable
porto
rico
railway
light
power
mor
furthermore
familiar
canon
statutory
construction
catchall
clauses
read
bringing
within
statute
categories
similar
type
specifically
enumerated
federal
maritime
seatrain
lines
defines
broad
final
category
losses
suffered
proximate
result
offense
category
naturally
understood
summary
type
losses
covered
losses
suffered
proximate
result
offense
victim
says
congress
wanted
limit
losses
recoverable
proximately
caused
offense
written
statute
way
wrote
provides
restitution
victims
telemarketing
fraud
section
written
structured
much
like
simply
defines
term
full
amount
victim
losses
losses
suffered
victim
proximate
result
offense
essence
victim
argues
first
five
categories
losses
enumerated
superfluous
governed
requirement
however
unpersuasive
first
five
categories
provide
guidance
district
courts
specific
types
losses
congress
thought
often
proximate
result
chapter
offense
general
matter
included
award
restitution
reading
statute
impose
general
limitation
accords
common
sense
noted
proximate
cause
forecloses
liability
situations
causal
link
conduct
result
attenuated
consequence
akin
mere
fortuity
example
suppose
traumatized
victim
chapter
offender
needed
therapy
car
accident
way
therapist
office
resulting
medical
costs
literal
sense
factual
result
offense
strange
indeed
make
defendant
pay
restitution
costs
victim
concedes
congress
intend
costs
like
recoverable
brief
respondent
amy
claims
unnecessary
read
limitation
order
exclude
costs
sort
ibid
says
statute
contextually
inferentially
require
nexus
losses
sustained
sufficient
connection
child
pornography
victim
may
right
concept
proximate
cause
necessary
impose
sensible
limitations
restitution
remote
consequences
one
effective
way
perhaps
obvious
way
excluding
costs
like
arising
hypothetical
car
accident
described
incorporate
limitation
statute
congress
reasons
given
requirement
applies
losses
described
restitution
therefore
proper
extent
defendant
offense
proximately
caused
victim
losses
iii
remains
difficult
question
apply
statute
causation
requirements
case
problem
stems
somewhat
atypical
causal
process
underlying
losses
victim
claims
perhaps
simple
enough
victim
prove
aggregate
losses
including
costs
psychiatric
treatment
lost
income
stem
ongoing
traffic
images
whole
complications
may
arise
disaggregating
losses
sustained
result
initial
physical
abuse
questions
may
set
aside
present
purposes
losses
may
called
convenience
sake
victim
general
losses
difficulty
determining
full
amount
general
losses
proximate
result
offense
conduct
particular
defendant
one
thousands
possessed
future
possess
victim
images
connection
victim
determining
amount
general
losses
defendant
must
pay
ultimate
question
much
losses
proximate
result
individual
offense
difficult
aspect
inquiry
concerns
threshold
requirement
causation
fact
sure
requirement
proximate
causation
distinct
mere
causation
fact
prevent
holding
possessor
liable
losses
caused
remote
sense
victim
costs
treatment
lost
income
resulting
trauma
knowing
images
abuse
viewed
direct
foreseeable
results
crimes
including
possession
assuming
prerequisite
factual
causation
satisfied
primary
problem
proper
standard
causation
fact
traditional
way
prove
one
event
cause
another
show
latter
occurred
former
approach
familiar
part
legal
tradition
see
lafave
prosser
keeton
party
disputes
showing
causation
satisfy
requirement
sometimes
showing
made
little
difficulty
example
causation
shown
ease
many
cases
involving
producers
child
pornography
see
parents
permit
children
used
production
see
individuals
sell
children
purposes
see
initial
distributor
pornographic
images
child
see
case
however
showing
causation
made
district
found
government
failed
prove
specific
losses
caused
paroline
sense
recognized
incredibly
difficult
case
like
supp
finding
solid
foundation
record
unchallenged
see
brief
respondent
amy
brief
see
supp
brief
victim
perspective
paroline
one
thousands
anonymous
possessors
sure
victim
precise
degree
trauma
likely
bears
relation
total
number
offenders
probably
less
rather
thousands
seen
images
possible
prove
losses
less
much
one
possessor
individual
role
large
loosely
connected
network
images
circulate
see
sentencing
report
ii
xx
even
without
paroline
offense
thousands
viewed
future
view
victim
images
shown
trauma
attendant
losses
different
paroline
offense
especially
given
parties
stipulation
victim
knowledge
paroline
see
supra
recognizing
losses
substantiated
approach
defendant
anonymous
possessor
images
wide
circulation
internet
victim
government
urge
read
require
less
restrictive
causation
standard
least
similar
cases
correct
note
courts
departed
standard
circumstances
warrant
especially
combined
conduct
multiple
wrongdoers
produces
bad
outcome
see
burrage
slip
acknowledging
undoubted
reality
courts
always
required
strict
causality
even
criminal
liability
issue
victim
government
look
literature
criminal
tort
law
alternatives
test
noted
common
exception
causation
requirement
applied
multiple
sufficient
causes
independently
produce
result
ibid
see
also
lafave
restatement
exception
ill
fit
parties
seem
recognize
paroline
possession
two
images
victim
surely
sufficient
cause
entire
losses
ongoing
trade
images
practical
way
isolate
subset
victim
general
losses
paroline
conduct
alone
sufficient
cause
see
brief
understandably
victim
government
thus
concentrate
handful
less
demanding
causation
tests
endorsed
authorities
tort
law
one
prominent
treatise
suggests
hen
conduct
two
actors
related
event
combined
conduct
viewed
whole
cause
event
application
rule
individually
absolve
conduct
cause
fact
event
prosser
keeton
restatement
adopts
similar
exception
ultiple
sufficient
causal
sets
restatement
comment
wrongdoer
conduct
though
alone
insufficient
cause
plaintiff
harm
combined
conduct
persons
sufficient
cause
harm
ibid
restatement
offers
example
case
three
people
independently
simultaneously
lean
car
creating
enough
combined
force
roll
cliff
ibid
even
exerted
little
force
move
car
force
exerted
two
sufficient
move
car
individual
factual
cause
car
destruction
ibid
government
argues
authorities
provide
ample
support
causation
theory
brief
theory
best
effectuate
congressional
intent
cases
like
victim
says
much
brief
respondent
amy
alternative
causal
tests
kind
legal
fiction
construct
conduct
wrongdoer
neither
necessary
sufficient
produce
outcome
conduct
strict
sense
said
caused
outcome
nonetheless
tort
law
teaches
alternative
less
demanding
causal
standards
necessary
certain
circumstances
vindicate
law
purposes
anomalous
turn
away
person
harmed
combined
acts
many
wrongdoers
simply
none
wrongdoers
alone
caused
harm
nonsensical
adopt
rule
whereby
individuals
hurt
combined
wrongful
acts
many
thus
many
instances
hurt
badly
otherwise
redress
whereas
individuals
hurt
acts
one
person
alone
remedy
underlie
various
aggregate
causation
tests
victim
government
cite
sound
principles
alternative
causal
standards
though
salutary
applied
judicious
manner
also
taken
far
illustrated
victim
suggested
approach
applying
cases
like
victim
says
strict
logic
alternative
causal
tests
possessor
images
part
causal
set
sufficient
produce
ongoing
trauma
possessor
treated
cause
fact
trauma
attendant
losses
incurred
result
entire
ongoing
traffic
images
argues
premise
accepted
requirement
proximate
causation
poses
barrier
seeks
restitution
losses
direct
foreseeable
result
offenses
statute
requires
restitution
full
amount
victim
losses
including
losses
suffered
victim
proximate
result
offense
argues
restitution
required
entire
aggregately
caused
amount
striking
outcome
reasoning
possessor
victim
images
bear
consequences
acts
many
thousands
possessed
images
illustrates
reluctant
adopt
aggregate
causation
logic
incautious
manner
especially
interpreting
criminal
statutes
language
expressly
suggesting
congress
intended
approach
see
burrage
slip
even
one
refer
law
torts
major
step
say
sufficient
causal
link
injury
wrong
victim
general
losses
suffered
proximate
result
paroline
offense
special
reason
context
criminal
restitution
aside
manifest
procedural
differences
criminal
sentencing
civil
tort
lawsuits
restitution
serves
purposes
differ
though
overlap
purposes
tort
law
see
kelly
robinson
noting
restitution
inter
alia
effective
rehabilitative
penalty
legal
fictions
developed
law
torts
imported
criminal
restitution
applied
utmost
limits
without
due
consideration
differences
contrary
victim
suggestion
akin
case
gang
ruffians
collectively
beats
person
woman
gang
raped
five
men
one
night
five
men
five
sequential
nights
brief
respondent
amy
first
case
involve
set
wrongdoers
acting
concert
see
prosser
keeton
discussing
full
liability
joint
enterprise
paroline
contact
overwhelming
majority
offenders
whose
actions
victim
hold
accountable
second
adopting
victim
approach
make
individual
possessor
liable
combined
consequences
acts
even
independently
acting
offenders
instead
number
may
reach
tens
thousands
see
brief
respondent
amy
unclear
whether
ever
sensible
embrace
fiction
victim
entire
losses
proximate
result
single
possessor
offense
paroline
contribution
causal
process
underlying
victim
losses
minor
compared
combined
acts
relevant
offenders
comparison
contributions
individual
offenders
particularly
distributors
may
caused
hundreds
thousands
viewings
initial
producer
child
pornography
see
restatement
comment
recognizing
rule
excluding
liability
individuals
whose
contribution
causal
set
factually
caused
outcome
pales
comparison
contributions
causal
set
see
reporters
note
comment
conclusion
none
two
dozen
small
contributions
sufficient
causal
set
cause
outcome
obviously
untenable
congress
gave
indication
intended
statute
applied
expansive
manner
victim
suggests
manner
contrary
bedrock
principle
restitution
reflect
consequences
defendant
conduct
see
hughey
conduct
thousands
geographically
temporally
distant
offenders
acting
independently
defendant
contact
victim
argues
holding
possessor
liable
entire
losses
fair
practical
part
offenders
may
seek
contribution
one
another
brief
respondent
amy
might
mitigate
degree
concerns
approach
presents
scant
authority
contention
offenders
convicted
different
proceedings
different
jurisdictions
ordered
pay
restitution
victim
may
seek
contribution
one
another
general
federal
right
contribution
northwest
airlines
transport
workers
victim
point
clear
statutory
basis
right
contribution
circumstances
thus
suggests
imply
cause
action
brief
respondent
amy
rare
step
circumstance
see
stoneridge
investment
partners
llc
musick
peeler
garrett
employers
ins
wausau
noting
precedents
teach
creation
new
rights
left
legislatures
courts
little
address
practical
problems
offenders
face
seeking
contribution
event
see
brief
problems
victim
fails
grapple
reality
victim
suggested
approach
amount
holding
possessor
images
liable
conduct
thousands
independently
acting
possessors
distributors
legal
practical
avenue
seeking
contribution
approach
severe
might
raise
questions
excessive
fines
clause
eighth
amendment
sure
said
excessive
fines
clause
intended
limit
fines
directly
imposed
payable
government
industries
kelco
disposal
restitution
paid
victim
imposed
government
culmination
criminal
proceeding
requires
conviction
underlying
crime
bajakajian
thus
despite
differences
restitution
traditional
fine
restitution
still
implicates
prosecutorial
powers
government
supra
primary
goal
restitution
remedial
compensatory
cf
bajakajian
supra
also
serves
punitive
purposes
see
pasquantino
purpose
awarding
restitution
mete
appropriate
criminal
punishment
kelly
may
sufficient
bring
within
purview
excessive
fines
clause
bajakajian
supra
real
question
whether
holding
single
possessor
liable
millions
dollars
losses
collectively
caused
thousands
independent
actors
might
excessive
disproportionate
circumstances
concerns
offer
reason
interpret
statute
way
victim
suggests
contention
victim
entire
losses
ongoing
trade
images
suffered
proximate
result
paroline
offense
purposes
must
rejected
mean
broader
principles
underlying
aggregate
causation
theories
government
victim
cite
irrelevant
determining
proper
outcome
cases
like
cause
victim
general
losses
trade
images
paroline
part
cause
one
viewed
images
possible
identify
discrete
readily
definable
incremental
loss
caused
indisputable
part
overall
phenomenon
caused
general
losses
undermines
purposes
tort
law
turn
away
plaintiffs
harmed
several
wrongdoers
undermine
remedial
penological
purposes
turn
away
victims
cases
like
respect
statute
remedial
purpose
question
produce
anomalous
results
say
restitution
appropriate
circumstances
common
ground
victim
suffers
continuing
grievous
harm
result
knowledge
large
indeterminate
number
individuals
viewed
future
view
images
sexual
abuse
endured
brief
petitioner
brief
respondent
wright
brief
brief
respondent
amy
harms
sort
major
reason
child
pornography
outlawed
see
ferber
unlawful
conduct
everyone
reproduces
distributes
possesses
images
victim
abuse
including
paroline
plays
part
sustaining
aggravating
tragedy
doubt
congress
wanted
victims
receive
restitution
harms
like
law
makes
restitution
mandatory
offenses
chapter
language
indicates
congress
clear
intent
victims
child
pornography
compensated
perpetrators
contributed
anguish
undermine
intent
apply
statute
way
render
dead
letter
prosecutions
type
denying
restitution
cases
like
also
odds
penological
purposes
mandatory
restitution
scheme
sense
every
viewing
child
pornography
repetition
victim
abuse
one
reason
make
restitution
mandatory
crimes
like
impress
upon
offenders
conduct
produces
concrete
devastating
harms
real
identifiable
victims
see
kelly
supra
restitution
effective
rehabilitative
penalty
forces
defendant
confront
concrete
terms
harm
actions
caused
inconsistent
purpose
apply
statute
way
leaves
offenders
mistaken
impression
possession
least
images
wide
circulation
victimless
crime
statute
terms
required
showing
strict
causation
purposes
beside
point
text
statute
limited
although
congress
limited
restitution
losses
proximate
result
defendant
offense
unelaborated
causal
language
means
requires
causation
terms
see
burrage
slip
courts
need
read
phrases
like
results
require
causality
textual
contextual
reason
conclude
otherwise
authorities
government
victim
cite
show
availability
alternative
causal
standards
circumstances
warrant
less
test
default
part
background
legal
tradition
congress
legislated
cf
slip
unacceptable
adopt
causal
standard
strict
undermine
congressional
intent
neither
plain
text
statute
legal
tradition
demands
approach
special
context
shown
defendant
possessed
victim
images
victim
outstanding
losses
caused
continuing
traffic
images
impossible
trace
particular
amount
losses
individual
defendant
recourse
traditional
causal
inquiry
applying
order
restitution
amount
comports
defendant
relative
role
causal
process
underlies
victim
general
losses
amount
severe
case
like
given
nature
causal
connection
conduct
possessor
like
paroline
entirety
victim
general
losses
trade
images
product
acts
thousands
offenders
however
token
nominal
amount
required
restitution
reasonable
circumscribed
award
imposed
recognition
indisputable
role
offender
causal
process
underlying
victim
losses
suited
relative
size
causal
role
serve
twin
goals
helping
victim
achieve
eventual
restitution
losses
impressing
upon
offenders
fact
crimes
even
simple
possession
affect
real
victims
remains
question
district
courts
go
determining
proper
amount
restitution
general
level
abstraction
must
assess
best
available
evidence
significance
individual
defendant
conduct
light
broader
causal
process
produced
victim
losses
precise
mathematical
inquiry
involves
use
discretion
sound
judgment
neither
unusual
novel
either
wider
context
criminal
sentencing
specific
domain
restitution
well
recognized
district
courts
necessity
exercise
discretion
fashioning
restitution
order
indeed
district
expressly
authorized
conduct
similar
inquiry
multiple
defendants
contributed
loss
victim
appear
case
may
apportion
liability
among
defendants
reflect
level
contribution
victim
loss
defendant
ibid
assessing
individual
defendant
role
causal
process
behind
victim
losses
involve
substantially
different
greater
exercise
discretion
variety
factors
district
courts
might
consider
determining
proper
amount
restitution
neither
necessary
appropriate
prescribe
precise
algorithm
determining
proper
restitution
amount
point
law
development
unduly
constrain
decisionmakers
closest
facts
given
case
district
courts
might
starting
point
determine
amount
victim
losses
caused
continuing
traffic
victim
images
excluding
course
remote
losses
like
hypothetical
car
accident
described
see
supra
set
award
restitution
consideration
factors
bear
relative
causal
significance
defendant
conduct
producing
losses
include
number
past
criminal
defendants
found
contributed
victim
general
losses
reasonable
predictions
number
future
offenders
likely
caught
convicted
crimes
contributing
victim
general
losses
available
reasonably
reliable
estimate
broader
number
offenders
involved
course
never
caught
convicted
whether
defendant
reproduced
distributed
images
victim
whether
defendant
connection
initial
production
images
many
images
victim
defendant
possessed
facts
relevant
defendant
relative
causal
role
see
brief
factors
need
converted
rigid
formula
especially
result
trivial
restitution
orders
rather
serve
rough
guideposts
determining
amount
fits
offense
resulting
amount
fixed
deemed
amount
victim
general
losses
proximate
result
offense
purposes
thus
full
amount
losses
awarded
set
appropriate
payment
schedule
consideration
defendant
financial
means
see
victim
says
approach
untenable
losses
indivisible
sense
term
used
tort
law
reasonable
basis
factfinder
determine
amount
damages
separately
caused
one
offender
conduct
restatement
third
torts
apportionment
liability
premise
argument
sense
fiction
say
paroline
caused
losses
losses
lesser
amount
necessary
embrace
much
greater
fiction
paroline
caused
victim
losses
ongoing
trade
images
non
sequitur
required
define
causal
standard
effects
statute
purposes
apply
concepts
mechanical
way
criminal
restitution
context
even
victim
losses
fully
indivisible
sense
debatable
treating
paroline
proximate
cause
victim
losses
especially
absence
workable
system
contribution
stretches
fiction
aggregate
causation
breaking
point
treating
cause
smaller
amount
victim
general
losses
taking
account
role
overall
causal
process
behind
losses
effects
statute
purposes
avoids
nonsensical
result
turning
away
victims
emptyhanded
without
sacrificing
need
sentencing
victim
also
argues
approach
consign
piecemeal
restitution
leave
face
decades
litigation
might
never
lead
full
recovery
brief
respondent
amy
convert
congress
promise
child
pornography
victims
empty
gesture
congress
promised
victims
full
swift
restitution
costs
sure
statute
strong
restitutionary
purpose
purpose
twisted
license
hold
defendant
liable
amount
drastically
proportion
individual
causal
relation
victim
losses
furthermore
approach
sort
better
effects
need
impress
upon
defendants
acts
irrelevant
victimless
government
observes
reply
brief
undermine
important
purpose
criminal
restitution
victim
simply
collected
full
losses
handful
wealthy
possessors
left
remainder
pay
nothing
already
fully
collected
course
victim
someday
collect
restitution
losses
makes
sense
spread
payment
among
larger
number
offenders
amounts
closely
proportion
respective
causal
roles
circumstances
made
aware
concrete
mechanism
restitution
impact
possession
victims
approach
without
difficulties
restitution
orders
represent
application
law
decisionmaker
caprice
philip
morris
usa
williams
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
approach
articulated
involves
discretion
estimation
courts
best
apply
statute
written
workable
manner
faithful
competing
principles
stake
victims
compensated
defendants
held
account
impact
conduct
victims
also
defendants
made
liable
consequences
gravity
conduct
conduct
others
district
courts
routinely
exercise
wide
discretion
sentencing
general
matter
specifically
fashioning
restitution
orders
reason
believe
apply
causal
standard
defined
reasonable
manner
without
detailed
guidance
stage
law
elaboration
based
experience
prior
cases
kind
government
noted
see
supra
bears
burden
proving
amount
victim
losses
also
inform
district
courts
restitution
sought
ordered
cases
fifth
circuit
interpretation
requirements
incorrect
district
likewise
erred
requiring
strict
showing
causation
judgment
appeals
vacated
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
roberts
dissenting
doyle
randall
paroline
petitioner
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
april
chief
justice
roberts
justice
scalia
justice
thomas
join
dissenting
certainly
agree
amy
deserves
restitution
congress
making
restitution
mandatory
victims
child
pornography
meant
unfortunately
restitution
statute
congress
wrote
child
pornography
offenses
makes
impossible
award
relief
amy
case
instead
tailoring
statute
unique
harms
caused
child
pornography
congress
borrowed
generic
restitution
standard
makes
restitution
contingent
government
ability
prove
preponderance
evidence
amount
loss
sustained
victim
result
defendant
crime
comes
paroline
crime
possession
two
amy
images
possible
anything
pick
arbitrary
number
amount
arbitrary
good
enough
criminal
law
attempts
design
coherent
restitution
system
focusing
defendant
relative
role
causal
process
underlies
victim
general
losses
ante
inquiry
sensible
may
one
congress
adopted
undertaking
inquiry
congress
require
district
case
concluded
government
meet
statutory
burden
proof
government
concedes
point
see
brief
practically
impossible
know
whether
amy
losses
slightly
lower
one
subtract
one
defendant
ten
fifty
must
regretfully
dissent
section
title
directs
district
shall
order
restitution
offense
chapter
includes
paroline
offense
knowingly
possessing
child
pornography
violation
section
case
congress
purpose
clear
use
shall
section
emphasizes
issuance
restitution
order
section
mandatory
section
spells
may
receive
restitution
provides
order
restitution
section
shall
direct
defendant
pay
victim
appropriate
mechanism
full
amount
victim
losses
determined
pursuant
section
term
defined
individual
harmed
result
commission
crime
chapter
term
amount
victim
losses
includes
costs
incurred
victim
medical
services
relating
physical
psychiatric
psychological
care
lost
income
losses
suffered
victim
proximate
result
offense
section
describes
district
must
calculate
restitution
provides
order
restitution
section
shall
issued
enforced
accordance
section
manner
order
section
unlike
section
sections
designed
specifically
child
pornography
offenses
part
mandatory
victims
restitution
act
supply
general
guidelines
many
federal
offenses
relevant
section
provides
ny
dispute
proper
amount
type
restitution
shall
resolved
preponderance
evidence
burden
demonstrating
amount
loss
sustained
victim
result
offense
shall
attorney
government
explains
statute
allows
restitution
losses
proximate
result
paroline
offense
see
ante
citing
contrary
paroline
argument
proximate
cause
requirement
easily
satisfied
case
readily
foreseeable
paroline
crime
cause
amy
suffer
precisely
types
losses
claims
future
lost
wages
costs
treatment
counseling
attorney
fees
costs
eligible
losses
enumerated
section
direct
relation
types
injuries
paroline
injurious
conduct
holmes
securities
investor
protection
corporation
therefore
agree
paroline
actually
caused
losses
also
proximately
caused
see
ante
pressing
problem
statutory
requirement
actual
causation
see
burrage
slip
ordinary
meaning
term
results
requires
proof
defendant
conduct
actual
cause
injury
correctly
holds
statute
precludes
restitution
award
sought
amy
preferred
justice
sotomayor
dissent
hold
paroline
responsible
amy
entire
loss
see
ante
contra
post
congress
authorized
restitution
amount
loss
sustained
victim
result
offense
interpreted
virtually
identical
language
predecessor
statute
section
require
restitution
tied
loss
caused
offense
conviction
hughey
citing
ed
emphasis
added
restitution
may
imposed
losses
caused
crime
justice
sotomayor
dissent
dismisses
section
congress
direct
answer
question
presented
case
namely
resolve
dispute
proper
amount
restitution
justice
sotomayor
thinks
answer
question
begins
ends
statement
section
defendant
must
pay
full
amount
victim
losses
see
post
losses
answer
found
rest
sentence
full
amount
victim
losses
determined
pursuant
paragraph
emphasis
added
aragraph
course
instructs
order
restitution
section
shall
issued
enforced
accordance
section
manner
order
section
section
provides
statute
burden
proof
specifies
defendant
pay
losses
sustained
result
offense
offense
offense
conviction
paroline
possession
two
amy
images
one
suggests
paroline
crime
actually
caused
amy
suffer
millions
dollars
losses
statute
allow
award
millions
dollars
restitution
determining
amount
statute
allow
amount
amy
losses
paroline
offense
caused
real
difficulty
case
see
ante
regrettably
congress
provided
mechanism
answering
question
actual
causation
determined
using
traditional
standard
acknowledges
showing
causation
made
case
ante
amy
incurred
lost
wages
counseling
costs
even
paroline
viewed
images
government
amy
respond
offering
aggregate
causation
theory
borrowed
tort
law
even
apply
legal
fiction
ante
assume
purposes
argument
paroline
crime
contributed
something
amy
total
losses
suffices
establish
causation
fact
sufficient
award
restitution
statute
requires
determination
amount
paroline
must
pay
must
pay
full
amount
victim
losses
yes
determined
section
full
amount
losses
caused
government
burden
establish
amount
one
suggested
plausible
means
government
carry
problem
stems
nature
amy
injury
explained
section
general
statute
designed
provide
restitution
common
crimes
fraud
assault
section
standard
work
fine
crime
victims
usually
difficult
identify
harm
caused
defendant
offense
dispute
usually
amount
victim
loss
example
value
lost
assets
cost
night
hospital
amy
qualitatively
different
injury
loss
undoubtedly
genuine
result
collective
actions
huge
number
people
beginning
uncle
abused
put
images
internet
distributors
make
images
widely
available
possessors
paroline
view
images
harm
amy
produced
time
gradually
tens
thousands
persons
acting
independently
one
suffers
particular
knowledge
images
viewed
online
unknown
number
people
fear
person
meets
might
recognize
witnessed
abuse
app
amy
know
paroline
nothing
record
comes
close
establishing
amy
suffered
less
paroline
possessed
images
let
alone
much
less
see
brief
amy
injury
indivisible
means
paroline
particular
share
losses
unknowable
yet
proof
paroline
particular
share
statute
requires
simply
importing
generic
restitution
statute
without
accounting
diffuse
harm
suffered
victims
child
pornography
congress
set
restitution
system
sure
fail
cases
like
one
perhaps
case
different
facts
say
single
distributor
handful
possessors
susceptible
proof
statute
requires
tens
thousands
copies
amy
images
changed
hands
across
world
decade
demand
government
prove
amount
loss
sustained
victim
result
offense
offense
particular
case
demand
impossible
emphasis
added
congress
conditioned
restitution
government
meeting
burden
proof
effectively
precluded
restitution
cases
involving
possession
distribution
child
pornography
ii
district
paroline
case
found
government
meet
statutory
burden
proof
government
really
contest
holding
instead
asks
held
less
demanding
standard
litigated
issue
years
virtually
every
circuit
best
government
come
tell
courts
awarding
restitution
look
courts
done
workable
guide
least
courts
taken
vastly
different
approaches
materially
indistinguishable
cases
according
government
lodging
case
district
courts
awarding
less
amy
full
losses
imposed
restitution
orders
varying
restitution
awards
amy
december
lodging
supposed
use
figures
sort
guidance
pick
median
figure
mean
something
else
point
government
submission
lacks
basis
law
first
district
courts
confronted
amy
case
awarded
articulable
reason
legal
basis
awarding
one
figures
paroline
case
statute
requires
proof
defendant
harm
done
going
rate
course
government
acknowledges
approach
work
well
first
case
brought
particular
victim
tr
oral
arg
majority
proposal
district
assess
best
available
evidence
significance
individual
defendant
conduct
light
broader
causal
process
produced
victim
losses
ante
even
plausible
way
design
restitution
system
amy
complex
injury
way
around
fact
system
congress
created
statute
requires
restitution
based
exclusively
losses
resulted
defendant
crime
defendant
relative
culpability
majority
plan
situate
paroline
along
spectrum
offenders
contributed
amy
harm
assist
district
calculating
amount
amy
losses
amount
lost
wages
counseling
costs
caused
paroline
crime
defendant
correct
course
awarding
amy
restitution
contrary
congress
remedial
penological
purposes
see
ante
previously
refused
allow
policy
considerations
including
expansive
declaration
purpose
need
compensate
victims
full
losses
suffered
deter
us
reading
virtually
identical
statutory
language
require
proof
harm
caused
solely
defendant
particular
offense
hughey
moreover
even
relative
role
causal
process
approach
statute
ante
unlikely
make
amy
whole
extent
district
courts
form
sort
consensus
much
award
experience
shows
amount
particular
case
quite
small
significant
majority
defendants
ordered
pay
amy
less
lodging
means
amy
stuck
litigating
years
come
acknowledges
amy
may
end
piecemeal
restitution
yet
responds
simply
congress
promised
victims
full
swift
restitution
costs
ante
amy
fare
better
district
courts
consider
factors
suggested
majority
including
number
defendants
convicted
possessing
amy
images
rough
estimate
likely
convicted
future
even
rougher
estimate
total
number
persons
involved
harm
ante
first
place
last
figure
relevant
paroline
relative
significance
logically
measured
light
everyone
contributed
amy
injury
caught
convicted
even
worse
extent
possible
project
total
number
persons
viewed
amy
images
number
tragically
large
means
restitution
awards
tied
lead
pitiful
recovery
every
case
see
brief
respondent
amy
estimating
paroline
amy
harm
majority
says
courts
impose
trivial
restitution
orders
ante
hard
see
fairly
assessing
defendant
relative
contribution
anything
else
confidence
judicial
discretion
save
statute
arbitrary
application
see
ante
true
district
courts
exercise
substantial
discretion
awarding
restitution
imposing
sentences
general
mere
instinct
courts
instead
guided
statutory
standards
restitution
context
fair
determination
losses
caused
individual
defendant
section
sentencing
generally
detailed
factors
section
contrary
approach
one
asks
district
judges
impose
restitution
criminal
punishment
guided
solely
intuitions
regarding
comparative
fault
undermine
requirement
every
criminal
defendant
receive
due
process
law
decision
today
means
amy
go
home
nothing
mistake
salutary
outcome
lead
readers
conclude
amy
prevailed
congress
done
justice
victims
child
pornography
statute
written
allows
recovery
say
give
congress
chance
fix
respectfully
dissent
sotomayor
dissenting
doyle
randall
paroline
petitioner
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
april
justice
sotomayor
dissenting
long
recognized
grave
physiological
emotional
mental
injuries
suffered
victims
child
pornography
new
york
ferber
traffic
images
depicting
child
sexual
abuse
observed
even
greater
threat
child
victim
sexual
abuse
victim
must
life
knowing
recording
circulating
within
mass
distribution
system
child
pornography
emphasized
later
case
images
cause
continuing
harm
haunting
chil
years
come
osborne
ohio
congress
enacted
backdrop
statute
imposes
mandatory
duty
courts
order
restitution
victims
federal
offenses
involving
sexual
abuse
children
including
possession
child
pornography
commands
offense
shall
direct
defendant
pay
victim
full
amount
victim
losses
interprets
statute
require
restitution
circumscribed
amount
less
entirety
victim
losses
total
instructs
courts
estimate
based
defendant
relative
role
victim
harm
ante
amount
holds
neither
nominal
severe
ibid
appreciate
effort
achieve
perceives
result
declines
require
restitution
victim
full
losses
result
might
seem
incongruent
individual
possessor
partial
role
harm
countless
others
participated
rejects
position
advanced
paroline
dissenting
opinion
chief
justice
result
restitution
cases
like
perverse
reason
child
victimized
many
approach
however
reconciled
law
congress
enacted
congress
mandated
restitution
full
amount
victim
losses
within
framework
settled
tort
law
principles
treat
defendants
like
paroline
jointly
severally
liable
indivisible
consequences
intentional
concerted
conduct
extent
award
full
amount
victim
losses
may
lead
fears
unfair
treatment
particular
defendants
congress
provided
mechanism
accommodate
concerns
courts
order
partial
payments
periodic
schedule
defendant
financial
circumstances
interest
justice
require
accordingly
affirm
fifth
circuit
holding
district
must
enter
restitution
order
reflecting
amount
amy
losses
amy
unknown
instruct
consider
periodic
payment
schedule
remand
two
distinct
related
questions
case
first
whether
paroline
conduct
bears
sufficient
causal
nexus
amy
harm
second
nexus
exists
much
restitution
paroline
required
pay
beginning
causation
agree
majority
proximate
causation
beyond
dispute
medical
economic
losses
suffered
amy
direct
foreseeable
results
crimes
ante
accord
ante
roberts
dissenting
real
issue
proper
standard
causation
fact
ante
majority
opinion
majority
share
common
ground
much
issue
agree
ordinary
way
prove
show
result
occurred
defendant
conduct
burrage
slip
also
agree
always
required
alternative
standards
factual
causation
appropriate
contextual
reason
conclude
much
ante
quoting
burrage
slip
importantly
agree
ample
reasons
reject
strict
causality
requirement
see
ante
starting
text
declares
shall
order
restitution
offense
chapter
possession
child
pornography
offense
relevant
chapter
term
shall
creates
obligation
impervious
judicial
discretion
lexecon
milberg
weiss
bershad
hynes
lerach
text
clearer
must
order
restitution
person
convicted
possessing
child
pornography
section
underscores
directive
declaring
issuance
restitution
order
section
mandatory
statute
title
mandatory
restitution
reinforces
still
interpreting
require
causality
flout
simple
textual
commands
showing
causation
made
case
many
like
ante
even
without
paroline
offense
regrettable
fact
thousands
viewed
future
view
amy
images
shown
trauma
attendant
losses
different
parolin
requirement
thus
make
restitution
opposite
mandatory
preclude
restitution
victim
typical
child
pornography
offense
nonsensical
reason
child
victimized
many
approach
transform
something
unrecognizable
congress
wrote
congress
passed
common
knowledge
child
pornography
victims
suffer
harm
hands
numerous
offenders
possess
images
common
whether
print
film
electronic
form
see
shouvlin
preventing
sexual
exploitation
children
model
act
wake
forest
rev
describing
enormous
number
magazines
hundreds
films
produced
year
depicting
sexual
abuse
children
circulated
untold
numbers
offenders
distribution
system
ensures
even
small
towns
access
material
doyle
fbi
probing
child
porn
computers
san
francisco
chronicle
describing
complaint
child
pornographic
photographs
circulating
via
america
computer
service
congress
also
acutely
aware
severe
injuries
victims
child
pornography
suffer
hands
criminals
possess
view
recorded
images
sexual
abuse
congress
found
example
continued
existence
circulation
child
pornography
images
causes
child
victims
sexual
abuse
continuing
harm
haunting
children
future
years
child
pornography
prevention
act
stat
congressional
findings
notes
following
hereinafter
findings
inconceivable
congress
imposed
mandatory
restitution
obligation
possessors
contribute
continuing
harm
direct
courts
apply
cause
requirement
prevent
victims
actually
obtaining
recovery
course
alternative
standard
determining
consistent
text
context
enacted
aggregate
causation
majority
points
aggregate
causation
less
test
part
background
legal
tradition
congress
legislated
ante
standard
hen
conduct
two
actors
related
event
combined
conduct
viewed
whole
cause
event
application
rule
individually
absolve
conduct
cause
fact
event
ante
quoting
keeton
dobbs
keeton
owen
prosser
keeton
law
torts
ed
hereinafter
prosser
keeton
paroline
fellow
offenders
plainly
qualify
factual
causes
approach
amy
losses
occurred
combined
conduct
applying
rule
excuse
every
reason
think
congress
intended
incorporate
aggregate
causation
whereas
requirement
set
mandatory
restitution
command
collision
course
aggregate
causation
standard
follows
directly
statute
section
unequivocal
offers
exception
defendants
possess
images
child
abuse
common
offenders
aggregate
causation
standard
exists
avoid
exactly
kind
exception
see
prosser
keeton
aggregate
causation
applies
multiple
defendants
bea
like
relationship
victim
injury
ach
seeks
escape
liability
reason
recognized
likewise
protect
defendant
group
thus
leaving
victim
without
remedy
face
fact
none
acted
improperly
victim
suffered
harm
restatement
third
torts
liability
physical
emotional
harm
comment
similar
bottom
congress
intend
create
safe
harbor
inflict
upon
victims
proverbial
death
thousand
cuts
given
nature
child
pornography
market
large
class
offenders
contribute
jointly
victims
harm
trading
images
causation
requirement
swallow
mandatory
restitution
command
leaving
victims
little
hope
recovery
textual
contextual
reason
necessary
conclude
congress
incorporated
aggregate
causation
burrage
slip
dissent
chief
justice
suggests
contrary
conclusion
compelled
decision
hughey
hughey
involved
defendant
convicted
single
count
unauthorized
credit
card
use
resulted
losses
government
nonetheless
requested
restitution
additional
losses
based
different
counts
indictment
government
agreed
dismiss
declined
government
request
reasoning
restitution
tied
offense
conviction
commonsense
holding
course
casts
doubt
ordinary
practice
requiring
restitution
losses
caused
offense
defendant
convicted
loss
product
combined
conduct
multiple
offenders
troubles
colleagues
case
concept
restitution
cases
involving
losses
caused
one
offender
objection
instead
restitution
cases
victim
losses
caused
many
offenders
chief
justice
puts
congress
wrote
law
enable
amy
recover
images
circulated
single
distributor
handful
possessors
ante
victimized
numerous
distributors
thousands
possessors
gets
nothing
goes
without
saying
congress
intend
result
colleagues
dissent
next
assert
restitution
may
awarded
describes
government
burden
showing
loss
sustained
victim
result
offense
provision
nothing
close
direct
answer
case
ante
simply
restates
question
losses
sustained
victim
result
defendant
offense
result
produced
combination
offenses
others
one
answer
defendant
offense
losses
cause
second
offense
losses
part
aggregate
cause
former
preclude
restitution
cases
like
latter
allow
given
congress
mandatory
command
courts
shall
order
restitution
offense
beyond
clear
answer
congress
chief
justice
dissent
also
fails
contend
ramifications
suggestion
forecloses
entry
restitution
cases
victim
suffers
indivisible
losses
result
aggregate
conduct
numerous
offenders
claims
reading
work
fine
common
crimes
assault
ante
victim
vicious
gang
assault
single
offender
conduct
labeled
cause
discrete
injury
offenses
unfortunately
common
see
wheelock
wl
ed
may
defendant
convicted
participation
gang
rape
victim
several
individuals
provided
alcohol
girl
became
intoxicated
unconscious
sexually
assaulted
homer
wl
june
similar
thought
beyond
refute
victim
tragic
offense
entitled
restitution
even
though
none
losses
may
attributed
solely
individual
defendant
opinion
chief
justice
agreement
explain
result
different
victims
like
amy
suffered
heart
wrenching
losses
hands
thousands
offenders
rather
ii
majority
accepts
aggregate
causation
least
extent
ruling
requires
possessors
pay
amount
restitution
even
though
impossible
say
caused
particular
amount
victim
losses
recourse
traditional
causal
inquiry
ante
majority
resists
strict
logic
aggregate
causation
fear
produce
striking
outcome
award
individual
possessor
entire
aggregately
caused
amount
ante
majority
accordingly
holds
applying
order
restitution
amount
comports
defendant
relative
contribution
victim
general
losses
ante
majority
apportionment
approach
appears
sensible
one
instance
goal
proportionality
sentencing
avoid
turning
away
victims
emptyhanded
spread
payment
among
offenders
ante
suffers
far
fundamental
problem
contravenes
language
congress
actually
used
section
directs
courts
enter
restitution
proportional
relative
amount
full
amount
victim
losses
command
unequivocal
buttressed
tort
law
tradition
joint
several
liability
within
congress
legislated
defendant
found
bear
sufficient
causal
nexus
victim
harm
provides
straightforward
instruction
much
restitution
order
order
restitution
section
shall
direct
defendant
pay
victim
full
amount
victim
losses
word
shall
imposes
discretionless
obligatio
lopez
davis
considering
restitution
request
license
deviate
statute
command
must
enter
order
full
amount
victim
losses
regardless
whether
defendants
may
contributed
victim
harm
doubt
matter
congress
eliminated
ii
bars
declin
ing
issue
restitution
order
section
ground
victim
entitled
receive
compensation
injuries
proceeds
insurance
source
one
source
victim
entitled
receive
compensation
course
offenders
possess
images
sexual
abuse
unthinkable
congress
expressly
forbidden
courts
award
victims
restitution
harms
aggregately
caused
many
offenders
permit
restitution
orders
single
penny
reason
majority
recognizes
congress
draft
vacuum
context
settled
tort
law
traditions
see
ante
see
also
meyer
holley
congress
legislates
legal
background
ordinary
principles
section
functions
tort
statute
one
designed
ensure
victims
recover
compensatory
damages
efficient
manner
concurrent
criminal
proceedings
see
restatement
torts
purposes
tort
law
include
give
compensation
indemnity
restitution
harms
punish
wrongdoers
dolan
substantive
purpose
related
mandatory
victims
restitution
act
ensure
victims
crime
receive
full
restitution
nature
child
pornography
industry
indivisible
quality
injuries
suffered
victims
make
paradigmatic
situation
traditional
tort
law
principles
require
joint
several
liability
requiring
restitution
full
amount
victim
losses
congress
depart
principles
embraced
first
injuries
caused
child
pornography
possessors
impossible
apportion
practical
sense
said
example
paroline
offense
alone
required
amy
attend
five
additional
minutes
therapy
caused
discrete
portion
lost
income
majority
overlooks
fact
ordering
courts
surmise
circumscribed
amount
loss
based
list
factors
ante
see
also
ante
roberts
dissenting
section
full
restitution
requirement
dispenses
guesswork
however
harmonizes
settled
tort
law
tradition
concerning
indivisible
injuries
explained
rule
edmonds
compagnie
generale
transatlantique
unless
plaintiff
injury
divisible
causation
part
separately
assigned
tortfeasor
rule
tortfeasor
relieved
liability
entire
harm
caused
another
negligence
also
factor
effecting
injury
see
also
prosser
keeton
joint
several
liability
applies
injuries
obviously
incapable
reasonable
practical
division
feneff
boston
maine
mass
similar
second
congress
adopted
backdrop
rule
governing
concerted
action
joint
tortfeasors
specifies
two
tortfeasors
act
concert
well
settled
liable
entire
result
prosser
keeton
degree
concerted
action
required
rule
inordinate
one
person
acts
produce
injury
full
knowledge
others
acting
similar
manner
conduct
contribute
produce
single
harm
joint
tort
consummated
even
prearranged
plan
harper
james
gray
law
torts
ed
hereinafter
harper
james
see
also
troop
dew
ark
defendants
jointly
liable
uncoordinated
acts
working
common
purpose
child
pornography
possessors
jointly
liable
standard
act
concert
part
global
network
possessors
distributors
producers
pursue
common
purpose
trafficking
images
child
sexual
abuse
congress
recognized
possessors
material
integral
part
market
sexual
exploitative
use
children
finding
moreover
although
possessors
like
paroline
may
familiar
every
last
participant
market
child
sexual
abuse
images
little
doubt
act
knowledge
inevitable
harms
caused
combined
conduct
paroline
admitted
possessing
images
minors
engaged
sexually
explicit
conduct
downloaded
offenders
internet
see
supp
app
communally
browsing
downloading
internet
child
pornography
offenders
like
paroline
fuel
process
allows
industry
flourish
paedophiles
networking
internet
child
abuse
internet
ending
silence
arnaldo
ed
indeed
one
expert
describes
internet
child
pornography
networks
example
complex
criminal
conspiracy
quintessential
concerted
action
joint
several
liability
attaches
lastly
full
restitution
requirement
conforms
congress
understood
uniform
rule
governing
joint
several
liability
intentional
torts
rule
ach
person
commits
tort
requires
intent
jointly
severally
liable
indivisible
injury
legally
caused
tortious
conduct
restatement
third
torts
apportionment
liability
little
doubt
possession
images
child
sexually
abused
amount
intentional
invasion
privacy
tort
extreme
one
see
restatement
second
torts
one
intentionally
intrudes
physically
otherwise
upon
another
private
affairs
concerns
subject
liability
intrusion
highly
offensive
reasonable
person
section
imposition
joint
several
liability
makes
particular
sense
viewed
light
intentional
tort
rule
end
day
question
allocate
losses
among
defendants
really
choice
placing
risk
loss
defendants
since
one
caught
first
may
required
pay
fair
share
victim
since
apportionment
regime
risk
preventing
obtaining
full
recovery
whatever
merits
placing
risk
loss
victim
context
offense
congress
evidently
struck
balance
quite
differently
context
placing
risk
morally
culpable
possessors
child
pornography
innocent
child
victims
notwithstanding
text
longstanding
tort
law
traditions
support
majority
adopts
apportionment
approach
based
concern
joint
several
liability
might
lead
unfairness
applied
individual
defendants
see
ante
majority
finds
approach
necessary
provide
individual
defendants
ability
seek
contribution
offenders
ante
agree
statute
create
cause
action
contribution
unlike
majority
think
absence
contribution
suggests
congress
intended
phrase
full
amount
victim
losses
mean
something
less
instead
expending
judicial
resources
disputes
intentional
tortfeasors
congress
crafted
different
mechanism
preventing
inequitable
treatment
individual
defendants
use
periodic
payment
schedules
section
directs
order
restitution
section
shall
issued
enforced
accordance
section
section
turn
reiterates
command
courts
shall
order
restitution
victim
full
amount
victim
losses
goes
distinguish
amount
restitution
ordered
schedule
payments
made
thus
shall
specify
restitution
order
schedule
according
whic
restitution
paid
provides
restitution
order
may
direct
defendant
make
single
lump
sum
payment
partial
payments
specified
intervals
critically
choosing
partial
payments
courts
shall
consider
financial
resources
assets
defendant
along
financial
obligations
defendant
including
obligations
dependents
applying
factors
set
appropriate
payment
schedule
light
individual
child
pornography
possessor
financial
circumstances
difficult
indeed
already
robust
body
case
law
clarifying
payment
schedules
set
example
courts
appeals
uniformly
found
abuse
discretion
require
defendants
make
immediate
payments
full
amount
restitution
award
ability
cases
congress
instead
required
courts
impose
periodic
payment
schedules
see
mcglothlin
reversing
payment
order
defendant
ability
pay
restitution
immediately
requiring
district
set
periodic
payment
schedule
myers
existing
body
law
also
provides
guidance
proper
payment
schedules
compare
calbat
annual
payment
abuse
discretion
defendant
net
worth
yearly
income
harris
supp
sdny
setting
payment
schedule
greater
per
month
defendant
gross
income
section
provision
partial
periodic
payments
thus
alleviates
concerns
unfairness
vast
number
child
pornography
defendants
modest
financial
resources
difficult
challenge
presented
however
case
wealthy
defendant
able
satisfy
large
restitution
judgment
immediate
payment
statute
fully
capable
ensuring
results
defendants
addition
offender
financial
circumstances
permits
courts
consider
factors
interest
justice
deciding
whether
impose
payment
schedule
see
district
shall
specify
payment
schedule
pursuant
section
restitution
order
shall
payable
periodic
installments
interest
justice
accordingly
context
restitution
order
wealthy
child
pornography
possessor
likely
interest
justice
district
set
payment
schedule
requiring
defendant
pay
restitution
amounts
equal
periodic
losses
district
finds
actually
incurred
victim
given
timeframe
case
example
amy
expert
estimates
suffer
approximately
million
losses
medical
costs
lost
income
next
years
life
approximately
per
year
estimate
deemed
accurate
enter
restitution
order
wealthy
defendant
full
million
amount
amy
losses
make
payable
annual
schedule
per
year
serve
interest
justice
periodic
payment
schedule
allow
individual
wealthy
defendant
ultimate
burden
substantially
offset
payments
made
entry
full
restitution
award
provide
certainty
amy
made
whole
losses
although
ultimately
reach
different
conclusion
proper
interpretation
statutory
scheme
appreciate
caution
announced
approach
example
expressly
rejects
possibility
district
courts
entering
restitution
orders
token
nominal
amount
ante
point
important
taken
context
aspects
opinion
might
construed
otherwise
instance
estimating
restitution
amount
district
may
consider
broader
number
offenders
involved
course
never
caught
convicted
ante
factor
given
much
weight
lead
exactly
type
trivial
restitution
awards
disclaims
amy
counsel
noted
instance
light
large
number
persons
possess
images
truly
proportional
approach
restitution
lead
award
individual
defendant
brief
respondent
amy
congress
obviously
intend
outcome
wisely
refuses
permit
end
course
congress
final
say
congress
wishes
recodify
full
restitution
command
language
perhaps
even
clear
mandatory
directive
order
restitution
full
amount
victim
losses
congress
might
amend
statute
example
include
term
aggregate
causation
alternatively
avoid
uncertainty
apportionment
approach
congress
might
wish
enact
fixed
minimum
restitution
amounts
see
statutorily
imposed
minimum
civil
remedy
meanwhile
hope
approach
unduly
undermine
ability
victims
like
amy
recover
unfathomable
harms
sustained
footnotes
case
loss
product
combined
conduct
multiple
offenders
post
sotomayor
dissenting
section
provides
may
make
defendant
liable
payment
full
amount
restitution
may
apportion
liability
among
defendants
reflect
level
contribution
victim
loss
economic
circumstances
defendant
notes
however
provision
applies
multiple
defendants
sentenced
proceeding
charged
indictment
ante
see
also
brief
correct
amount
one
favored
justice
sotomayor
dissent
hold
paroline
liable
losses
certainly
cause
without
right
seek
contribution
others
harmed
amy
gang
assaults
discussed
justice
sotomayor
post
fair
analogy
gang
members
cases
acted
together
common
plan
one
aiding
abetting
others
inflicting
harm
paroline
never
met
interacted
virtually
persons
contributed
amy
injury
possession
offense
aid
abet
anyone
amy
uncle
initial
source
injuries
ordered
pay
restitution
underscores
arbitrary
statute
applied
child
pornography
offenses
footnotes
fifth
circuit
recognized
standard
years
ago
observed
ccording
great
weight
authority
concurrent
successive
acts
omissions
two
persons
although
acting
independently
combination
direct
proximate
cause
single
injury
may
held
liable
though
act
alone
might
caused
entire
injury
damage
might
resulted
act
phillips
petroleum
hardee
quoting
jur
negligence
chief
justice
dissent
elides
distinction
aggregate
causation
despite
assum
ing
purposes
argument
incorporates
aggregate
causation
dissent
nevertheless
applies
causation
determine
full
amount
losses
paroline
must
pay
see
ante
arguing
paroline
asked
pay
full
amount
losses
caused
losses
others
combined
cause
dissenting
colleagues
ways
either
incorporates
aggregate
causation
case
full
amount
amy
losses
losses
aggregately
caused
paroline
like
offenders
requires
causation
case
amy
gets
nothing
chief
justice
objects
gang
assaults
fair
analogy
involve
group
individuals
acting
together
common
plan
ante
individuals
need
act
together
trigger
joint
several
liability
liability
applies
equally
multiple
actors
independently
commit
intentional
torts
combine
produce
indivisible
injury
infra
event
offenders
issue
case
act
together
common
end
trafficking
market
images
child
sexual
abuse
see
infra
offenders
may
physically
room
commit
crimes
reason
read
mandatory
restitution
command
statute
child
abusers
hide
behind
anonymity
computer
screen
possession
child
pornography
constitutes
intentional
tort
notwithstanding
offense
requires
mens
rea
knowledge
see
punishing
one
knowingly
sells
possesses
child
pornography
one
said
act
knowingly
aware
result
practically
certain
follow
conduct
bailey
definition
anything
exacting
kind
intent
required
intentional
tort
restatement
defines
intent
include
situations
actor
believes
consequences
substantially
certain
result
act
restatement
second
torts
facts
case
show
offset
significant
june
december
amy
obtained
restitution
awards
persons
ordered
pay
amount
see
restitution
awards
amy
december
lodging
offenders
new
offenders
caught
month
instead
ordered
pay
full
amount
restitution
periodic
amounts
according
financial
means
wealthy
defendant
annual
obligation
terminate
long
required
pay
anything
close
full
million
victim
receives
full
amount
restitution
outstanding
obligations
expire
displace
settled
joint
several
liability
rule
forbidding
double
recovery
see
restatement
second
torts
see
also
nucci
mentions
amy
received
roughly
uncle
person
responsible
abusing
child
ante
care
must
taken
considering
amount
award
amy
uncle
however
ante
amy
expert
explained
amy
back
normal
end
treatment
initial
offense
app
chiefly
discovering
eight
years
later
images
sexual
abuse
spread
internet
amy
suffered
additional
losses
due
realization
possessors
like
paroline
viewing
sexual
abuse
never
really
ended