henderson
argued
november
decided
february
federal
appeals
normally
correct
legal
error
made
criminal
trial
unless
defendant
first
brought
error
trial
attention
olano
federal
rule
criminal
procedure
provides
exception
permitting
plain
error
affects
substantial
rights
considered
even
though
brought
trial
attention
district
increased
length
petitioner
henderson
sentence
participate
prison
drug
rehabilitation
program
henderson
counsel
object
sentence
appeal
henderson
claimed
district
plainly
erred
increasing
sentence
solely
rehabilitative
purposes
appeal
pending
decided
tapia
error
impose
lengthen
prison
sentence
enable
offender
complete
treatment
program
otherwise
promote
rehabilitation
meant
district
sentence
erroneous
fifth
circuit
determined
rule
give
authority
correct
error
concluded
error
plain
rule
clear
current
law
time
trial
case
circuit
law
unsettled
tapia
decided
held
regardless
whether
legal
question
settled
unsettled
time
trial
error
plain
within
meaning
rule
long
error
plain
time
appellate
review
pp
question
whether
error
must
plain
time
committed
time
reviewed
reflects
two
competing
legal
principles
principle
right
may
forfeited
case
timely
asserted
tribunal
jurisdiction
determine
favors
limiting
assessment
plainness
time
error
commission
see
olano
supra
rule
appellate
must
apply
law
effect
time
renders
decision
favors
assessing
plainness
time
review
see
thorpe
housing
authority
durham
neither
principle
absolute
conflict
decided
looking
one
rather
text
rule
also
leaves
open
temporal
question
relevant
precedent
directly
answer
question
olano
said
rule
authorizes
appeals
correct
forfeited
error
error
plain
affect
substantial
rights
affect
fairness
integrity
public
reputation
judicial
proceedings
johnson
concluded
trial
decision
clearly
correct
circuit
law
made
becomes
clearly
contrary
law
time
appeal
enough
error
time
appellate
consideration
however
neither
case
addressed
rule
apply
law
unsettled
time
error
plain
time
review
pp
precedent
read
light
underlying
background
principles
leads
conclusion
rule
plain
error
phrase
applies
time
review
plain
error
covers
trial
decisions
plainly
correct
made
plainly
incorrect
made
cover
cases
middle
law
neither
clearly
correct
incorrect
unsettled
time
trial
decision
hold
contrary
lead
unjustifiably
different
treatment
similarly
situated
individuals
practical
reason
treat
defendant
harshly
simply
circuit
law
unclear
time
trial
even
time
error
rule
provide
added
incentive
counsel
call
trial
judge
attention
matter
judge
quickly
consider
remedial
action
incentive
little
practical
importance
since
counsel
normally
good
reasons
calling
trial
attention
potential
error
advantage
counsel
client
error
speedily
corrected
sum
contrast
time
error
rule
time
review
interpretation
furthers
basic
principle
appellate
must
apply
law
effect
time
renders
decision
thorpe
supra
works
little
practical
harm
upon
competing
administrative
principle
insists
counsel
call
potential
error
trial
attention
consistent
rule
basic
purpose
creating
exception
general
requirement
objection
made
trial
preserve
claim
error
pp
government
arguments
contrary
unpersuasive
claim
appellate
courts
consider
errors
counsel
called
trial
attention
errors
independently
recognized
overlooks
way
rule
restricts
appellate
authority
correct
error
errors
fact
seriously
affect
fairness
integrity
public
reputation
judicial
proceedings
government
also
fears
holding
lead
many
plain
error
claims
new
rule
law
set
appellate
automatically
lead
consider
contrary
determinations
trial
courts
plainly
erroneous
given
lower
decisions
questionable
plainly
wrong
fall
outside
rule
scope
given
error
must
affected
defendant
substantial
rights
affected
fairness
integrity
public
reputation
judicial
proceedings
finally
government
textual
argument
rule
written
mostly
past
tense
whatever
merits
foreclosed
johnson
pp
reversed
remanded
breyer
delivered
opinion
roberts
kennedy
ginsburg
sotomayor
kagan
joined
scalia
filed
dissenting
opinion
thomas
alito
joined
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
armarcion
henderson
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
february
justice
breyer
delivered
opinion
federal
appeals
normally
correct
legal
error
made
criminal
trial
proceedings
unless
defendant
first
brought
error
trial
attention
see
olano
federal
rule
criminal
procedure
creating
exception
normal
rule
says
plain
error
affects
substantial
rights
may
considered
even
though
brought
trial
attention
emphasis
added
rule
say
explicitly
however
time
error
must
plain
must
lower
ruling
plainly
erroneous
time
lower
made
error
error
still
count
plain
erroneous
nature
ruling
plain
time
appellate
review
case
us
concerns
district
decision
substantive
legal
question
unsettled
time
trial
acted
thus
foreclosing
possibility
error
plain
case
final
time
direct
appellate
review
however
question
become
settled
defendant
favor
making
trial
error
plain
later
time
view
long
error
plain
later
time
time
appellate
review
error
plain
within
meaning
rule
appeals
may
conside
error
even
though
brought
trial
attention
fed
rule
crim
proc
early
armarcion
henderson
petitioner
pleaded
guilty
federal
district
charge
felon
possession
firearm
district
judge
accepted
plea
june
sentenced
henderson
prison
term
months
ibid
judge
entered
longer
sentence
try
help
henderson
qualifying
drug
rehabilitation
program
program
provide
treatment
counse
ing
defendant
needs
right
app
pet
cert
henderson
counsel
object
indeed
judge
asked
counsel
reason
sentence
stated
imposed
counsel
replied
procedurally
ibid
subsequently
henderson
appealed
claiming
among
things
district
plain
ly
erred
sentencing
prison
term
solely
rehabilitative
purposes
henderson
sentenced
henderson
appeal
heard
decided
tapia
held
error
impose
lengthen
prison
sentence
enable
offender
complete
treatment
program
otherwise
promote
rehabilitation
slip
given
tapia
henderson
sentence
unlawful
district
decision
impose
sentence
erroneous
since
henderson
counsel
objected
trial
appeals
correct
error
unless
rule
applied
rule
however
applies
error
plain
error
plain
tapia
plain
tapia
thus
fifth
circuit
determine
temporal
scope
rule
words
plain
error
appeals
decided
rule
give
authority
correct
trial
error
appellate
panel
pointed
efore
tapia
circuit
split
whether
district
consider
defendant
rehabilitative
needs
lengthen
sentence
ibid
panel
added
fifth
circuit
pronounced
question
henderson
sentenced
ibid
thus
time
district
reached
decision
law
circuit
unsettled
appeals
concluded
henderson
show
error
case
plain
error
plain
clear
current
law
time
trial
ibid
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
fifth
circuit
denied
rehearing
en
banc
divided
vote
per
curiam
henderson
filed
petition
certiorari
granted
petition
resolve
differences
among
circuits
compare
cordery
time
review
mouling
cadc
time
error
ii
time
determining
plainness
time
error
committed
error
plain
plain
time
error
reviewed
question
reflects
conflict
two
important
competing
legal
principles
one
hand
procedural
principle
familiar
constitutional
right
right
sort
forfeited
criminal
well
civil
cases
failure
make
timely
assertion
right
tribunal
jurisdiction
determine
olano
quoting
yakus
principle
favors
assessing
plainness
limited
time
error
committed
hand
general
rule
appellate
must
apply
law
effect
time
renders
decision
thorpe
housing
authority
durham
see
ziffrin
indeed
chief
justice
marshall
wrote
long
ago
general
true
province
appellate
enquire
whether
judgment
rendered
erroneous
subsequent
judgment
decision
appellate
law
intervenes
positively
changes
rule
governs
law
must
obeyed
obligation
denied
case
must
decide
according
existing
laws
necessary
set
aside
judgment
rightful
rendered
affirmed
violation
law
judgment
must
set
aside
schooner
peggy
cranch
principle
favors
assessing
plainness
time
review
rule
makes
clear
first
principle
absolute
indeed
said
undeviating
judicially
declared
practice
courts
review
invariably
circumstances
decline
consider
questions
previously
specifically
urged
harmony
rules
fundamental
justice
olano
supra
quoting
hormel
helvering
ellipsis
original
neither
second
principle
absolute
even
new
rule
law
issue
rule
give
appeals
authority
overlook
failure
object
unless
error
affect
substantial
rights
also
seriously
affect
fairness
integrity
public
reputation
judicial
proceedings
olano
supra
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
brackets
original
two
principles
point
different
directions
neither
absolute
decide
conflict
simply
looking
one
rather
text
rule
resolve
problem
say
appeals
may
consider
error
plain
language
look
past
rather
simply
says
appeals
may
consider
plain
error
language
leaves
temporal
question
open
see
infra
neither
precedent
answer
temporal
question
least
directly
olano
clearly
relevant
said
rule
authorizes
appeals
correct
forfeited
error
error
error
plain
error
affect
substantial
rights
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
pointing
rule
permissive
mandatory
added
standard
guide
exercise
remedial
discretion
rule
whether
error
affect
fairness
integrity
public
reputation
judicial
proceedings
quoting
atkinson
brackets
original
time
said
need
consider
special
case
error
unclear
time
trial
becomes
clear
appeal
applicable
law
clarified
case
us
johnson
also
relevant
considered
trial
decision
clearly
correct
circuit
law
made
time
review
become
plainly
erroneous
due
intervening
authoritative
legal
decision
concluded
law
time
trial
settled
clearly
contrary
law
time
appeal
enough
error
time
appellate
consideration
olano
however
declined
decide
whether
rule
apply
law
unsettled
time
error
plain
time
review
said
precisely
case
us
text
precedents
background
principles
directly
dictate
result
prior
precedent
helped
shape
current
law
precedent
read
light
underlying
principles
leads
us
interpret
rule
phrase
plain
error
applying
time
review
given
johnson
time
error
interpretation
prove
highly
unfairly
anomalous
consider
lay
legal
land
one
doubts
error
trial
judge
ordinarily
fall
within
rule
word
plain
long
trial
decision
plainly
incorrect
time
made
olano
supra
much
common
ground
johnson
adds
least
one
circumstance
error
trial
judge
also
fall
within
rule
word
plain
even
judge
plainly
incorrect
time
made
circumstance
error
plain
even
trial
judge
decision
plainly
correct
time
made
subsequently
becomes
incorrect
based
change
law
since
definition
trial
judge
commit
plain
error
time
ruling
johnson
explicitly
rejects
applying
words
plain
error
time
trial
judge
acted
instead
johnson
deems
enough
error
time
appellate
consideration
error
fall
within
rule
category
plain
error
ibid
rule
words
plain
error
cover
trial
decisions
plainly
correct
time
judge
made
decision
trial
decisions
plainly
incorrect
time
judge
made
decision
also
cover
cases
middle
law
time
trial
judge
decision
neither
clearly
correct
incorrect
unsettled
hold
contrary
bring
unjustifiably
different
treatment
similarly
situated
individuals
imagine
three
virtually
identical
defendants
different
circuit
sentenced
january
identical
long
prison
terms
given
long
sentences
reason
namely
obtain
rehabilitative
treatment
imagine
none
raises
objection
june
holds
form
sentencing
unlawful
december
three
different
circuits
considers
claim
trial
judge
prison
term
constituted
legal
error
imagine
first
circuit
law
january
made
trial
decision
clearly
lawful
time
judge
made
second
circuit
law
january
made
trial
decision
clearly
unlawful
time
judge
made
third
circuit
law
january
unsettled
apply
rule
words
plain
error
time
appellate
review
treat
three
defendants
alike
permit
three
go
argue
appellate
trial
error
affected
substantial
rights
seriously
affect
ed
fairness
integrity
public
reputation
judicial
proceedings
olano
supra
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
interpret
plain
error
differently
however
treat
three
virtually
identical
defendants
differently
allowing
first
two
defendants
third
defendant
potentially
qualify
rule
relief
three
defendants
suffered
legal
error
three
failed
object
three
benefit
new
legal
interpretation
reason
give
two
three
defendants
benefits
new
rule
law
third
cf
schooner
peggy
cranch
practical
ground
making
distinction
contrary
distinguish
treat
harshly
cases
circuit
law
unclear
simply
promote
arguments
whether
law
circuit
initially
unclear
rather
clearly
settled
one
way
arguments
likely
particularly
difficult
resolve
issue
matter
legal
degree
kind
extent
example
prosecutor
closing
argument
go
far
road
prejudice
time
error
interpretation
also
require
courts
appeals
play
kind
temporal
looking
law
decide
whether
error
exists
looking
law
decide
whether
error
plain
looking
circumstances
decide
whether
defendant
satisfied
olano
third
fourth
criteria
thus
time
error
interpretation
make
appellate
process
yet
complex
time
consuming
recognize
solicitor
general
points
time
error
rule
even
confined
instances
law
uncertain
cases
provide
added
incentive
counsel
call
lower
judge
attention
matter
time
judge
quickly
take
remedial
action
even
remedy
offered
lower
judge
analysis
may
help
appeals
decide
legal
question
see
brief
see
also
mouling
disagree
solicitor
general
however
also
believe
present
context
added
incentive
little
practical
importance
counsel
normally
good
reasons
calling
trial
attention
potential
error
example
normally
advantage
counsel
client
get
error
speedily
corrected
even
counsel
rely
upon
plain
error
rule
make
failure
object
trial
rule
help
law
changes
defendant
favor
change
comes
trial
appeal
decided
error
affected
defendant
substantial
rights
error
seriously
affect
ed
fairness
integrity
public
reputation
judicial
proceedings
olano
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
lawyer
deliberately
forgo
objection
perceives
slightly
expanded
chance
argue
plain
error
later
suspect
like
unicorn
finds
home
imagination
courtroom
upshot
time
review
interpretation
furthers
basic
schooner
peggy
principle
appellate
must
apply
law
effect
time
renders
decision
thorpe
works
little
practical
harm
upon
competing
administrative
principle
insists
counsel
call
potential
error
trial
attention
consistent
basic
purpose
rule
namely
creation
exception
general
requirement
objection
made
trial
see
supra
time
competing
time
error
rule
step
precedents
creates
unfair
anomalous
results
works
practical
administrative
harm
thus
direct
appeals
cases
yet
final
consider
time
review
interpretation
better
reading
rule
words
plain
error
iii
solicitor
general
makes
several
important
arguments
fail
lead
us
different
conclusion
first
government
argues
purpose
review
ensure
integrity
trial
proceedings
brief
turn
argument
goes
appellate
courts
consider
errors
counsel
called
attention
errors
trial
known
regardless
namely
plain
expanding
theme
one
appeals
described
plain
error
error
obvious
competent
district
judge
able
avoid
without
benefit
objection
state
law
unclear
trial
becomes
clear
result
later
authority
district
error
perforce
plain
expect
district
judges
knowledgeable
clairvoyant
turman
citation
omitted
approach
however
overlooks
way
rule
rule
restricts
appellate
authority
correct
error
errors
fact
seriously
affect
fairness
integrity
public
reputation
judicial
proceedings
cf
farrell
considering
issue
perspective
approach
runs
headlong
johnson
error
johnson
error
district
known
time
opposite
district
judge
known
ruling
time
made
error
perhaps
even
clairvoyance
led
hold
contrary
cf
khan
state
oil
registering
disagreement
precedent
following
nonetheless
state
oil
khan
approving
approach
rather
johnson
makes
clear
review
grading
system
trial
judges
broader
purposes
including
part
allowing
courts
appeals
better
identify
instances
application
new
rule
law
cases
appeal
meet
demands
fairness
judicial
integrity
see
johnson
olano
second
government
fears
holding
lead
many
claims
plain
error
brief
courts
appeals
clarify
law
opinions
appeals
defendants
including
many
never
objected
insist
appeals
judge
cases
according
new
rule
plain
error
cases
disappear
leaving
simple
error
stead
answer
claim
new
rule
law
set
forth
appellate
automatically
lead
consider
contrary
determinations
trial
courts
plainly
erroneous
many
new
rules
pointed
concern
matters
degree
kind
lower
ruling
matters
say
nature
closing
argument
even
wrong
light
new
appellate
holding
necessarily
plainly
wrong
rule
requirement
error
plain
means
lower
decisions
questionable
plainly
wrong
time
trial
time
appeal
fall
outside
rule
scope
reasons
concluding
holding
open
plain
error
floodgates
said
rule
contains
screening
criteria
error
must
affected
defendant
substantial
rights
must
seriously
affected
fairness
integrity
public
reputation
judicial
proceedings
olano
supra
courts
apply
latter
criteria
fact
defendant
object
despite
unsettled
law
may
well
count
grant
rule
relief
moreover
problem
arises
new
rule
law
law
previously
unsettled
district
reached
decision
contrary
subsequent
rule
limitations
may
well
explain
absence
account
us
plain
error
inundation
circuits
already
follow
interpretation
adopt
see
farrell
supra
cordery
garcia
ross
finally
government
points
rule
written
mostly
past
tense
says
plain
error
may
considered
even
though
brought
attention
emphasis
added
use
past
tense
government
argues
refers
plain
error
brought
attention
back
error
occurred
linguistic
fact
turn
means
error
must
plain
time
brief
whatever
merits
textual
argument
however
johnson
forecloses
error
issue
case
even
error
let
alone
plain
time
defendant
might
brought
attention
nonetheless
found
error
plain
error
square
government
textual
argument
holding
case
iv
reasons
conclude
whether
legal
question
settled
unsettled
time
trial
enough
error
time
appellate
consideration
second
part
olano
test
satisfied
johnson
supra
contrary
judgment
appeals
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
scalia
dissenting
armarcion
henderson
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
february
justice
scalia
justice
thomas
justice
alito
join
dissenting
law
unsettled
time
error
committed
error
plain
within
meaning
federal
rule
criminal
procedure
hold
otherwise
disregards
importance
claim
preservation
deprives
rule
plainness
limitation
conceivable
purpose
begins
analysis
misconceiving
task
thinks
order
resolve
supposed
conflict
two
competing
legal
principles
ante
principle
legal
right
may
forfeited
failure
assert
timely
fashion
principle
appellate
must
apply
law
effect
time
judgment
begin
conflict
forfeiture
rules
establish
exceptions
legal
rights
qualify
like
exceptions
conflict
modify
rather
mark
scope
second
task
case
exalted
philosophical
one
deciding
justice
lies
presumed
rightly
congress
taken
consideration
approving
rules
criminal
procedure
alas
mundane
lawyerly
task
deciding
whether
rules
criminal
procedure
make
failure
timely
objection
exception
rule
appellate
applies
law
effect
time
judgment
addressed
wrong
question
unsurprisingly
gives
wrong
answer
correct
answer
must
sought
text
federal
rules
criminal
procedure
beginning
rule
provides
party
may
preserve
claim
error
informing
ruling
order
made
sought
action
party
wishes
take
party
objection
action
grounds
objection
emphasis
added
surely
means
party
preserve
claim
error
assert
appeal
whatever
law
point
may
unless
informs
objects
action
ruling
order
made
sought
mean
means
nothing
move
rule
says
plain
error
affects
substantial
rights
may
considered
even
though
brought
trial
attention
meaning
difficult
grasp
exception
rule
rule
forfeiture
exception
applies
plain
error
question
us
whether
plainness
means
plainness
time
trial
ruling
order
made
sought
plainness
case
reaches
appeals
answer
question
seems
entirely
clear
rudimentary
principle
textual
interpretation
commonsensical
scarcely
needs
citation
one
interpretation
ambiguous
provision
causes
serve
purpose
consistent
entire
text
interpretation
renders
pointless
former
prevails
limiting
review
forfeited
errors
plain
objection
made
serves
purpose
consistent
rule
permits
reviewing
courts
correct
error
thwart
objective
causing
objections
made
good
objection
much
needed
error
plain
prosecution
fault
overlooking
error
solely
defendant
must
shared
equally
prosecutor
affirmed
principle
affirmed
proposition
plainness
determined
trial
stage
prior
opinions
terms
recourse
may
rule
appeal
trial
infected
error
trial
judge
prosecutor
derelict
countenancing
even
absent
defendant
timely
assistance
detecting
frady
error
trial
plain
rationale
penalizing
forfeiture
weakest
injustice
defendant
correspondingly
strong
hand
unable
provide
purpose
served
plainness
requirement
applied
case
reaches
appeals
consider
two
defendants
circuit
fail
object
identical
error
committed
trial
unsettled
law
happenstance
defendant
appeal
considered
first
appeals
recognizes
error
denies
relief
law
unclear
time
appeals
opinion
defendant
appeal
heard
later
reaps
benefit
opinion
defendant
case
settling
law
favor
possible
purpose
served
distinguishing
two
appellants
negligence
raising
error
equivalent
regardless
happens
time
appeal
en
banc
smith
dissenting
since
doctrine
sort
possibly
induce
counsel
make
contemporaneous
objection
seemingly
purpose
whatever
except
create
described
anomaly
quite
true
serve
purpose
enabling
today
opinion
say
rule
preserved
entirely
converted
rule
course
rule
mistakes
affecting
substantial
rights
corrected
appeal
better
serve
mistaken
understanding
purpose
rule
fairness
ante
combined
erroneous
perception
defendants
fail
make
timely
objection
misapplication
law
stand
boat
see
ante
rule
contrary
clear
text
rule
tempers
rule
fairness
error
plain
must
find
application
plainness
requirement
even
one
utterly
pointless
done
ii
contends
evaluating
plainness
level
runs
headlong
johnson
ante
error
points
error
district
known
time
ibid
johnson
decided
way
whatever
stage
plainness
requirement
evaluated
since
found
error
meet
final
requirement
olano
forfeited
error
affect
fairness
integrity
public
reputation
judicial
proceedings
accept
however
said
johnson
presumably
hold
future
cases
situation
presented
case
plainness
time
appeal
suffice
situation
law
settled
defendant
trial
became
plain
favor
time
appeal
narrow
class
cases
rule
promotes
fairness
efficiency
concerns
rule
law
settled
defendant
trial
remiss
failing
bring
claim
error
attention
futile
objection
therefore
disserve
efficiency
rule
result
counsel
inevitably
making
long
virtually
useless
laundry
list
objections
rulings
plainly
supported
existing
precedent
unique
context
approach
actually
furthers
substantial
interest
orderly
administration
justice
underlies
contemporaneous
objection
rule
david
wrote
johnson
circumspect
opinion
took
pains
exclude
method
articulated
case
us
agreeing
petitioner
situation
rule
impede
rather
assist
fairness
efficiency
opinion
said
case
law
time
trial
settled
clearly
contrary
law
time
appeal
enough
error
time
appellate
consideration
limitation
opinion
clear
concerns
justified
evaluating
plainness
time
appeal
johnson
cut
rule
law
clear
uncertain
time
trial
difficult
often
hectic
process
conducting
trial
judge
depends
parties
officers
flag
issues
might
otherwise
escape
notice
prompt
claim
error
circumstances
futile
eminently
useful
hypothesizes
three
defendants
failing
object
trial
ruling
later
case
reaches
appeals
shown
opinion
error
one
tried
circuit
whose
law
time
clearly
accorded
holding
one
tried
circuit
whose
law
clearly
contradicted
holding
one
tried
circuit
whose
law
point
uncertain
ante
defendants
asserts
similarly
situated
rule
appropriately
treats
alike
similarly
situated
insofar
purposes
rules
concerned
treating
alike
frustrates
purposes
circuit
law
clearly
accorded
later
opinion
trial
known
law
hence
raising
point
counsel
needed
classic
case
reversal
appeal
circuit
law
clearly
contradicted
later
opinion
trial
known
law
counsel
raising
point
futile
wasteful
rather
sparing
judicial
resources
classic
case
johnson
reversal
appeal
circuit
law
unsettled
trial
need
counsel
assistance
failure
provide
excuse
classic
case
normal
application
requirement
rule
sure
litigants
alike
three
suffered
legal
error
ante
sole
unqualified
objective
appellate
review
correct
error
suffice
entitle
equal
treatment
today
however
objective
correcting
error
qualified
objective
inducing
counsel
bring
forward
claims
error
remedied
without
overturning
verdict
setting
convicted
criminal
defendant
free
overlook
counsel
failure
object
spend
judicial
resources
conduct
review
set
aside
criminal
conviction
retrial
may
difficult
impossible
exactly
disavowed
young
quoting
henderson
kibbe
turn
quoting
namet
iii
sees
harm
evisceration
rule
disbelieving
lawyer
deliberately
forgo
objection
perceives
slightly
expanded
chance
argue
error
later
ante
hard
say
whether
conclusion
springs
touching
faith
good
sportsmanship
criminal
defense
counsel
unkind
disparagement
intelligence
criminal
case
always
trial
shown
sure
loser
jury
makes
entire
sense
stand
silent
makes
mistake
may
basis
undoing
conviction
thought
counsel
deliberately
forgo
objection
delusion
hitherto
indulged
worrying
opinion
joined
author
today
opinion
counsel
remaining
silent
objection
belatedly
raising
error
case
conclude
favor
puckett
event
sandbagging
evil
feared
feared
even
lessening
counsel
diligent
efforts
identify
uncertain
points
law
bring
rather
defendant
version
attention
error
never
occur
remarkably
naïve
disbelieve
proposition
lessening
costs
noncompliance
rule
diminishes
incentives
diligent
objecting
see
meltzer
state
forfeitures
federal
rights
harv
rev
meant
apply
exceptional
circumstances
atkinson
rule
today
transformed
around
consequences
claim
forfeiture
final
argument
rule
wor
practical
administrative
harm
ante
even
peculiar
rest
opinion
whatever
administrative
ease
may
flow
rule
moment
outweighed
lower
ing
bar
review
undoubtedly
result
remands
new
trials
smith
dissenting
pollyannaish
rejoinder
reversals
occur
anyway
defendant
must
still
show
error
affected
substantial
rights
olano
prong
seriously
affected
fairness
judicial
proceedings
olano
prong
ante
doubt
many
hitherto
forfeited
claims
may
incorrectly
found
meet
vague
requirements
claims
whether
found
meet
evaluated
vague
standards
requiring
intensive
consideration
producing
judgment
whose
correctness
often
difficult
assess
belief
difficult
assess
whether
error
plain
time
trial
really
hard
appellate
courts
regularly
conduct
type
inquiry
areas
law
example
context
federal
habeas
corpus
review
relief
may
granted
state
prisoner
based
legal
error
unless
error
contrary
unreasonable
application
clearly
established
federal
law
time
state
render
ed
decision
cullen
pinholster
slip
similarly
determine
whether
public
officials
immunity
based
law
clearly
established
time
acts
see
harlow
fitzgerald
offers
us
reason
believe
inquiry
difficult
context
event
rule
assessing
plainness
eliminate
need
assess
plainness
contrary
belief
need
arise
new
rule
law
law
previously
unsettled
district
reached
decision
contrary
subsequent
rule
ante
emphasis
added
easy
situation
exists
present
case
may
well
exception
rather
rule
claims
failure
object
plain
error
excused
error
plain
becomes
retrospect
law
subsequently
clarified
also
disregards
statutory
provision
rule
perry
cadc
recognized
much
olano
government
essentially
concede
accepted
district
interpretation
federal
rule
criminal
procedure
plainly
erroneous
even
though
appellate
yet
say
text
rule
clear
reasons
question
whether
law
unsettled
often
admit
easy
answer
courts
appeals
resolve
lots
claims
practical
difficulties
professes
avoid
avoided
today
opinion
converts
plain
error
limitation
rule
limitation
designed
induce
trial
objections
assist
limitation
designed
serve
conceivable
purpose
fair
trial
suffer
ensuing
disregard
unenforceable
rule
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
reality
course
object
rule
fairness
extent
compatible
preservation
principal
objective
requirement
rule
suppresses
limitation
paying
lip
service
olano
rule
analysis
reducing
requirement
part
analysis
nullity
asserts
rule
rule
restricts
appellate
authority
correct
error
errors
fact
seriously
affect
fairness
integrity
public
reputation
judicial
proceedings
ante
description
prong
olano
analysis
see
olano
even
pertain
words
plain
error
rule
rather
word
may
exercise
discretion
consider
plain
error
nothing
whatever
plainness
rule
clearly
restricts
review
errors
plain
offers
explanation
none
purpose
restriction
possibly
serve
plainness
determined
appellate
stage
able
join
judgment
johnson
even
though
join
portion
opinion
addressing
stage
plainness
evaluated
see