puckett
argued
january
decided
march
exchange
petitioner
puckett
guilty
plea
government
agreed
request
reduction
offense
level
federal
sentencing
guidelines
ground
accepted
responsibility
crimes
sentence
low
end
applicable
guidelines
range
district
accepted
plea
puckett
sentenced
assisted
another
crime
result
government
opposed
reduction
puckett
offense
level
district
denied
reduction
appeal
puckett
raised
first
time
argument
backing
away
reduction
request
government
broken
plea
agreement
fifth
circuit
found
puckett
forfeited
claim
failing
raise
applied
federal
rule
criminal
procedure
rule
standard
unpreserved
claims
error
held
although
error
occurred
obvious
puckett
satisfied
third
prong
analysis
failed
demonstrate
ultimate
sentence
affected
especially
since
district
judge
found
reductions
defendants
continued
engage
criminal
activity
rare
unknown
held
rule
test
applies
forfeited
claim
like
puckett
government
failed
meet
obligations
plea
agreement
applies
usual
fashion
pp
federal
criminal
cases
rule
instructs
parties
preserve
claims
error
informing
ruling
made
sought
action
party
wishes
take
party
objection
action
grounds
objection
party
failure
preserve
claim
ordinarily
prevents
raising
appeal
rule
recognizes
limited
exception
plain
errors
review
involves
four
prongs
must
error
defect
appellant
affirmatively
waived
olano
must
clear
obvious
see
must
affected
appellant
substantial
rights
affected
outcome
district
proceedings
ibid
three
prongs
satisfied
appeals
discretion
remedy
error
affect
fairness
integrity
public
reputation
judicial
proceedings
question
whether
review
applies
defendant
fails
preserve
claim
government
defaulted
obligations
conceivable
reason
exists
disregarding
evident
application
breach
undoubtedly
violates
defendant
rights
defendant
opportunity
seek
vindication
rights
district
fails
rule
clearly
sets
forth
consequences
forfeiture
others
pp
neither
puckett
doctrinal
arguments
practical
considerations
raises
counsel
applying
review
present
context
government
breach
plea
agreement
retroactively
cause
defendant
guilty
plea
unknowing
involuntary
decision
santobello
new
york
govern
since
question
whether
error
found
harmless
different
question
whether
subjected
review
puckett
wrong
contending
purpose
served
applying
review
much
gained
inducing
objection
made
trial
level
among
things
error
often
remedied
plea
breaches
satisfy
doctrine
four
prongs
pp
affirmed
scalia
delivered
opinion
roberts
kennedy
thomas
ginsburg
breyer
alito
joined
souter
filed
dissenting
opinion
stevens
joined
james
benjamin
puckett
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
march
justice
scalia
delivered
opinion
question
presented
case
whether
forfeited
claim
government
violated
terms
plea
agreement
subject
standard
review
set
forth
rule
federal
rules
criminal
procedure
july
james
puckett
indicted
grand
jury
northern
district
texas
one
count
armed
bank
robbery
one
count
using
firearm
relation
crime
violence
negotiated
plea
agreement
government
filed
district
september
part
deal
puckett
agreed
plead
guilty
counts
waive
trial
rights
cooperate
government
truthful
regarding
participation
criminal
activities
app
exchange
government
agreed
following
two
terms
government
agrees
puckett
demonstrated
acceptance
responsibility
thereby
qualifies
reduction
offense
level
government
also
agrees
request
puckett
sentence
placed
lowest
end
guideline
level
deemed
applicable
satisfy
first
obligations
government
filed
motion
district
pursuant
sentencing
commission
guidelines
manual
ussg
provision
directs
sentencing
courts
decrease
defendant
offense
level
guidelines
two
levels
clearly
demonstrates
acceptance
responsibility
offense
third
level
upon
motion
government
stating
defendant
assisted
authorities
investigation
prosecution
misconduct
timely
notifying
authorities
intention
enter
plea
guilty
two
weeks
later
district
held
plea
colloquy
see
fed
rule
crim
proc
accepted
puckett
plea
delays
due
health
problems
experienced
puckett
sentencing
take
place
almost
three
years
interim
puckett
assisted
another
man
scheme
defraud
postal
service
confessed
assistance
questioning
probation
officer
officer
prepared
addendum
puckett
presentence
report
recommending
receive
reduction
acceptance
responsibility
theory
true
acceptance
responsibility
requires
termination
criminal
conduct
see
ussg
sentencing
finally
take
place
may
puckett
counsel
objected
addendum
pointing
government
filed
motion
requesting
full
reduction
offense
level
granted
district
judge
turned
prosecutor
responded
motion
filed
long
time
ago
app
puckett
engaged
additional
criminal
behavior
made
clear
government
opposed
reduction
puckett
offense
level
acceptance
responsibility
probation
officer
added
view
guidelines
reduction
improper
hearing
submissions
district
judge
concluded
even
assuming
discretion
grant
reduction
rare
unknown
around
one
committed
crime
subsequent
crime
appear
even
get
three
points
agreed
however
follow
recommendation
government
made
pursuant
commitment
plea
agreement
puckett
sentenced
low
end
applicable
guidelines
range
turned
months
prison
armed
bank
robbery
mandatory
minimum
consecutive
term
months
firearm
crime
district
granted
reduction
acceptance
responsibility
bottom
guidelines
range
months
robbery
firearm
sentence
affected
importantly
time
exchange
puckett
counsel
object
government
violating
obligations
plea
agreement
backing
away
request
reduction
never
cited
relevant
provision
plea
agreement
move
withdraw
puckett
plea
grounds
government
broken
sentencing
promises
appeal
appeals
fifth
circuit
puckett
argue
inter
alia
government
violated
plea
agreement
sentencing
government
conceded
objecting
reduction
acceptance
responsibility
violated
obligation
set
forth
paragraph
agreement
maintained
puckett
forfeited
claim
failing
raise
district
appeals
agreed
applied
standard
rule
makes
applicable
unpreserved
claims
error
held
although
error
occurred
obvious
puckett
satisfied
third
prong
analysis
demonstrating
error
affected
substantial
rights
caused
prejudice
especially
light
district
judge
statement
granting
reduction
defendant
continued
engage
criminal
conduct
rare
unknown
puckett
show
government
breach
affected
ultimate
sentence
appeals
accordingly
affirmed
conviction
sentence
granted
certiorari
consider
question
divided
federal
courts
appeals
whether
rule
test
applies
forfeited
claim
like
puckett
government
failed
meet
obligations
plea
agreement
see
sealed
case
cadc
discussing
conflict
among
circuits
concluding
rule
apply
usual
fashion
affirm
ii
litigant
believes
error
occurred
detriment
federal
judicial
proceeding
must
object
order
preserve
issue
fails
timely
manner
claim
relief
error
forfeited
procedural
principle
familiar
right
may
forfeited
criminal
well
civil
cases
failure
make
timely
assertion
right
tribunal
jurisdiction
determine
yakus
error
properly
preserved
authority
remedy
error
reversing
judgment
example
ordering
new
trial
strictly
circumscribed
good
reason
anyone
familiar
work
courts
understands
errors
constant
trial
process
much
matter
reflexive
inclination
appellate
courts
reverse
unpreserved
error
fatal
padilla
en
banc
boudin
concurring
limitation
authority
serves
induce
timely
raising
claims
objections
gives
district
opportunity
consider
resolve
ordinarily
best
position
determine
relevant
facts
adjudicate
dispute
case
actual
invited
procedural
error
district
often
correct
avoid
mistake
possibly
affect
ultimate
outcome
course
rule
prevents
litigant
remaining
silent
objection
belatedly
raising
error
case
conclude
favor
cf
wainwright
sykes
see
also
vonn
federal
criminal
cases
rule
tells
parties
preserve
claims
error
informing
ruling
order
made
sought
action
party
wishes
take
party
objection
action
grounds
objection
failure
abide
rule
ordinarily
precludes
raising
appeal
unpreserved
claim
trial
error
see
young
rule
however
recognizes
limited
exception
preclusion
rule
provides
full
plain
error
affects
substantial
rights
may
considered
even
though
brought
attention
explained
olano
rule
review
review
involves
four
steps
prongs
first
must
error
defect
sort
eviation
legal
rule
intentionally
relinquished
abandoned
affirmatively
waived
appellant
second
legal
error
must
clear
obvious
rather
subject
reasonable
dispute
see
third
error
must
affected
appellant
substantial
rights
ordinary
case
means
must
demonstrate
affected
outcome
district
proceedings
ibid
fourth
finally
three
prongs
satisfied
appeals
discretion
remedy
error
discretion
exercised
error
affect
fairness
integrity
public
reputation
judicial
proceedings
quoting
atkinson
meeting
four
prongs
difficult
dominguez
benitez
repeatedly
cautioned
ny
unwarranted
extension
authority
granted
rule
disturb
careful
balance
strikes
judicial
efficiency
redress
injustice
see
young
supra
creation
unjustified
exception
rule
ven
less
appropriate
johnson
real
question
case
whether
review
applies
defendant
fails
preserve
claim
government
defaulted
obligations
rather
conceivable
reason
exists
disregarding
evident
application
breach
undoubtedly
violation
defendant
rights
see
santobello
new
york
defendant
opportunity
seek
vindication
rights
district
fails
rule
clearly
sets
forth
consequences
forfeiture
others
iii
puckett
puts
forward
several
possible
reasons
review
apply
present
context
understand
making
effectively
four
distinct
arguments
two
doctrinal
two
practical
consider
set
turn
puckett
primary
argument
proceeds
follows
government
breaks
promise
made
defendant
course
securing
guilty
plea
knowing
voluntary
character
plea
retroactively
vanishes
turns
defendant
aware
true
consequences
since
guilty
pleas
must
knowing
voluntary
valid
mccarthy
guilty
plea
thus
void
along
defendant
corresponding
waiver
right
trial
precedents
waiver
right
trial
must
made
defendant
personally
see
taylor
illinois
action
counsel
alone
resurrect
voided
waiver
therefore
puckett
concludes
counsel
failure
timely
object
government
breach
effect
analysis
appeals
must
always
correct
error
elaborate
analysis
suffers
least
two
defects
first
nothing
support
proposition
government
breach
plea
agreement
retroactively
causes
defendant
agreement
unknowing
involuntary
anything
support
proposition
mere
breach
contract
retroactively
causes
party
promise
coerced
induced
fraud
although
analogy
may
hold
respects
plea
bargains
essentially
contracts
see
mabry
johnson
consideration
contract
fails
one
exchanged
promises
kept
say
voluntary
bilateral
consent
contract
never
existed
automatically
utterly
void
say
contract
broken
see
lord
williston
contracts
ed
hereinafter
williston
party
injured
breach
generally
entitled
remedy
might
include
right
rescind
contract
entirely
see
ed
thing
saying
contract
never
validly
concluded
defendant
agrees
plea
bargain
government
takes
certain
obligations
obligations
met
defendant
entitled
seek
remedy
might
cases
rescission
agreement
allowing
take
back
consideration
furnished
withdraw
plea
rescission
possible
remedy
santobello
allowed
resentencing
government
fully
comply
agreement
effect
specific
performance
contract
case
entirely
clear
breach
cause
guilty
plea
entered
unknowing
involuntary
precisely
plea
knowing
voluntary
hence
valid
government
obligated
uphold
side
moreover
perhaps
fundamentally
puckett
argument
confuses
concepts
waiver
forfeiture
nobody
contends
puckett
counsel
waived
intentionally
relinquished
abandoned
olano
puckett
right
seek
relief
government
breach
error
analysis
add
nothing
objection
rather
puckett
forfeited
claim
error
counsel
failure
raise
argument
district
precedents
requiring
certain
waivers
personal
knowing
voluntary
thus
simply
irrelevant
holdings
determine
whether
error
occurred
say
nothing
proper
standard
review
claim
error
preserved
question
presented
case
assumes
error
standard
review
dispute
puckett
second
doctrinal
attack
rests
decision
santobello
case
state
promised
plea
deal
make
sentencing
recommendation
prosecutor
apparently
unaware
commitment
asked
state
trial
impose
maximum
penalty
one
year
defense
counsel
immediately
objected
trial
judge
proceeded
anyway
impose
sentence
reassuring
santobello
prosecutor
recommendation
affect
decision
vacated
conviction
remanded
case
interests
justice
thus
best
served
puckett
maintains
interests
justice
required
remand
santobello
even
though
breach
likely
harmless
interests
call
remand
whenever
government
reneges
plea
bargain
forfeiture
agree
whether
error
found
harmless
simply
different
question
whether
subjected
review
santobello
given
error
case
preserved
necessarily
addressed
former
doctrine
precedent
aside
puckett
argues
practical
considerations
counsel
subjecting
claims
rule
review
specifically
contends
purpose
served
applying
rule
plea
breaches
always
satisfy
four
prongs
making
application
superfluous
accepting
arguendo
dubitante
policy
concerns
ever
authorize
departure
federal
rules
arguments
wrong
puckett
suggests
prosecution
broken
agreement
requesting
higher
sentence
agreed
upon
late
unring
bell
even
objection
made
district
judge
already
heard
request
santobello
matter
influenced
demand
futile
objection
one
thing
requiring
objection
means
defendant
game
system
wait
ing
see
sentence
later
str
ikes
satisfactory
vonn
seeking
second
bite
apple
raising
claim
another
breach
always
case
district
apprised
claim
position
adjudicate
matter
first
instance
creating
factual
record
facilitating
appellate
review
thirdly
breaches
may
curable
upon
timely
objection
example
prosecution
simply
forgot
commitment
willing
adhere
agreement
finally
breach
established
cured
district
grant
immediate
remedy
withdrawal
plea
resentencing
different
judge
thus
avoid
delay
expense
full
appeal
puckett
also
contends
review
substantive
work
context
government
breach
plea
agreement
brief
petitioner
claims
third
prong
prejudice
prong
application
since
claims
fall
within
special
category
forfeited
errors
corrected
regardless
effect
outcome
olano
supra
several
times
declined
resolve
whether
structural
errors
affect
framework
within
trial
proceeds
arizona
fulminante
automatically
satisfy
third
prong
test
olano
supra
johnson
cotton
need
answer
question
breach
plea
deal
structural
error
used
term
never
described
see
johnson
supra
shares
common
features
errors
held
structural
plea
breach
necessarily
render
criminal
trial
fundamentally
unfair
unreliable
vehicle
determining
guilt
innocence
neder
emphasis
deleted
defy
analysis
standards
affecting
entire
adjudicatory
framework
fulminante
supra
difficulty
assessing
effect
error
greater
respect
plea
breaches
sentencing
respect
procedural
errors
sentencing
routinely
subject
harmlessness
review
see
teague
santobello
hold
automatic
reversal
warranted
objection
government
breach
plea
agreement
holding
rested
upon
premise
errors
like
structural
errors
somehow
susceptible
amenable
review
harmlessness
rather
upon
policy
interest
establishing
trust
defendants
prosecutors
necessary
sustain
plea
bargaining
essential
highly
desirable
part
criminal
process
rule
contemporaneous
objection
equally
essential
desirable
two
collide
see
need
relieve
defendant
usual
burden
showing
prejudice
see
olano
defendant
whose
plea
agreement
broken
government
always
able
show
prejudice
either
obtained
benefits
contemplated
deal
anyway
sentence
prosecutor
promised
request
likely
obtained
benefits
event
seemingly
case
dissent
view
defendant
puckett
position
always
suffered
impairment
substantial
rights
olano
third
prong
convicted
absence
trial
compliance
terms
plea
agreement
dispensing
government
obligation
prove
case
post
opinion
souter
simply
ipse
dixit
recasting
conceded
error
breach
plea
agreement
effect
substantial
rights
trial
error
said
impair
substantial
rights
harm
defined
convicted
trial
tainted
error
fact
protected
liberty
interest
stake
render
case
different
see
post
interest
always
stake
criminal
cases
eliminating
third
prong
semantics
makes
nullity
olano
instruction
defendant
normally
must
make
specific
showing
prejudice
order
obtain
relief
puckett
contends
fourth
prong
review
likewise
application
every
breach
plea
agreement
constitute
miscarriage
justice
fourth
prong
meant
applied
basis
emphasized
per
se
approach
review
flawed
young
true
enough
government
reneges
plea
deal
integrity
system
may
called
question
may
well
countervailing
factors
particular
cases
puckett
good
example
given
obviously
cease
life
crime
receipt
sentencing
reduction
acceptance
responsibility
ludicrous
compromise
public
reputation
judicial
proceedings
course
second
prong
review
also
often
bite
cases
breaches
clear
obvious
plea
agreements
always
models
draftsmanship
scope
government
commitments
occasion
open
doubt
moreover
government
often
colorable
albeit
ultimately
inadequate
excuse
nonperformance
see
supra
application
review
present
context
consistent
cases
serves
worthy
purposes
meaningful
effects
event
compelled
federal
rules
recognize
government
breach
plea
agreement
serious
matter
seriousness
error
claimed
remove
consideration
ambit
federal
rules
criminal
procedure
johnson
judgment
appeals
affirmed
james
benjamin
puckett
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
march
justice
souter
justice
stevens
joins
dissenting
petitioner
situation
excite
sympathy
holding
stand
rule
circumstances
less
peculiar
disagree
colleagues
respect
interest
stake
criminal
defendant
case
like
respectfully
dissent
case
turns
whether
review
applies
unpreserved
claim
government
breached
plea
agreement
identifying
relevant
effect
substantial
rights
implicated
third
prong
olano
agree
majority
plain
error
proper
test
depart
holding
effect
question
length
incarceration
offense
charged
error
probably
made
ultimate
difference
hold
relevant
effect
conviction
absence
trial
compliance
terms
plea
agreement
dispensing
government
obligation
prove
case
first
two
conditions
recognizing
plain
error
error
clear
see
without
doubt
satisfied
sentencing
colloquy
accordance
federal
rule
criminal
procedure
laid
ground
satisfying
requirement
error
obvious
making
public
record
terms
plea
agreement
puckett
government
written
agreement
government
representation
district
included
government
statement
puckett
qualified
reduction
offense
level
sentencing
guidelines
acceptance
responsibility
offense
see
app
government
agrees
puckett
demonstrated
acceptance
responsibility
thereby
qualifies
reduction
offense
level
government
agrees
puckett
demonstrated
acceptance
responsibility
thereby
qualify
three
level
reduction
offense
level
puckett
indeed
appear
satisfied
conditions
government
commitment
premised
accepted
responsibility
committing
offense
assisted
authorities
investigation
prosecution
misconduct
timely
notifying
authorities
intention
enter
plea
guilty
sentencing
commission
guidelines
manual
subsequent
criminality
unusual
break
guilty
plea
sentencing
failure
part
accept
responsibility
prior
crimes
benefit
government
already
received
time
puckett
pleaded
guilty
case
government
insisted
provision
plea
agreement
allowing
back
commitment
puckett
engaged
additional
criminal
conduct
prior
sentencing
therefore
bound
terms
agreement
made
whether
puckett
fact
entitled
reduction
administering
criminal
law
less
civil
parties
routinely
bound
agreements
wish
made
government
choice
admit
breached
plea
agreement
sentencing
objected
reduction
despite
contention
doctrine
save
puckett
failure
object
sentencing
hearing
government
deny
deal
deal
deny
broke
word
doctrine
however
avail
puckett
anything
unless
remaining
conditions
set
olano
satisfied
third
requiring
showing
sentencing
puckett
plea
given
return
unfulfilled
promise
government
violated
substantial
rights
see
majority
understands
effect
question
length
incarceration
see
ante
rights
acquired
defendant
relate
sentencing
must
show
affected
sentence
since
puckett
hardly
show
apprised
subsequent
criminality
given
reduction
even
absence
government
breach
majority
view
satisfy
substantial
rights
criterion
fails
qualify
correction
admitted
clear
error
contrary
identify
effect
substantial
rights
criminal
conviction
regardless
length
incarceration
reason
simply
constitution
protected
liberty
interest
freedom
criminal
taint
subject
fifth
amendment
due
process
guarantee
fundamental
fairness
properly
understood
require
trial
plea
agreement
honored
government
stigma
conviction
imposed
protection
vanish
convicted
defendant
turns
get
light
sentence
trial
leading
possible
conviction
sentencing
hearing
alone
focus
guarantee
possibility
criminal
conviction
without
calls
due
process
protection
legal
system
constituted
way
hard
imagine
anything
less
fair
branding
someone
criminal
tried
convicted
entered
plea
guilty
induced
agreement
government
refuses
honor
agreements
must
therefore
kept
government
well
individual
doctrine
ever
rescue
defendant
consequence
forfeiting
rights
inattention
used
government
induced
admission
criminality
making
agreement
deliberately
breaks
defendant
satisfied
end
bargain
redressing
fundamentally
unfair
behavior
government
whether
vacating
plea
enforcing
plea
agreement
see
santobello
new
york
worth
undoubted
risk
allowing
defendant
game
system
additional
administrative
burdens
see
ante
judiciary
worried
gamesmanship
extra
proceedings
needs
minimize
likelihood
making
plain
require
government
keep
word
seek
rescission
plea
agreement
cause
thus
find
defendant
substantial
rights
violated
whenever
government
breaches
plea
agreement
unless
defendant
got
bargained
anyway
sentencing
said
third
olano
criterion
determines
treatment
fourth
addressing
whether
leaving
error
uncorrected
may
said
affect
fairness
integrity
public
reputation
judicial
proceedings
olano
supra
quoting
atkinson
right
case
protected
interest
guarantee
one
liable
spend
day
behind
bars
convict
without
trial
agreement
fairness
integrity
judicial
branch
suffer
imprisons
defendant
pleaded
guilty
reliance
plea
agreement
government
repudiate
obligation
agreed
upon
precisely
happened
yet
judiciary
denies
relief
appellate
procedure
correcting
patent
error
judicial
repute
escape
without
damage
eyes
anyone
sees
beyond
oddity
case
puckett
entitled
relief
every
defendant
may
make
agreement
government
entitled
take
government
word
puckett
insists
government
keep
word
going
doctrine
judiciary
excuse
closing
generally
available
avenue
redress
puckett
criminal
defendant
standing
shoes
footnotes
puckett
points
brady
quoted
approvingly
fifth
circuit
statement
guilty
pleas
must
stand
unless
induced
misrepresentation
including
unfulfilled
unfulfillable
promises
quoting
shelton
en
banc
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
hornbook
law
misrepresentation
requires
intent
time
contracting
perform
williston
difficult
explain
precedent
relied
upon
puckett
suggestion
mabry
johnson
prosecution
breaches
promise
respect
executed
plea
agreement
defendant
pleads
guilty
false
premise
hence
conviction
stand
statement
like
one
brady
dictum
conclusion
conviction
stand
sometimes
true
remedy
prescribes
breach
even
conviction
overturned
reason
guilty
plea
unknowing
involuntary
disavow
aspect
mabry
dictum
contradicts
holding
today
indeed
case
government
might
well
argued
excused
obligation
assert
demonstrated
acceptance
responsibility
puckett
ongoing
criminal
conduct
hindered
performance
see
williston
ed
argument
might
convinced
us
pressed
government
conceded
breach
analyze
case
comes
us
need
confront
today
question
whether
santobello
rule
survived
recent
elaboration
principles
cases
fulminante
neder
explained
breach
consists
wrongful
denial
rights
obtained
defendant
plea
agreement
automatically
invalidate
plea
agree
government
question
regard
prejudice
whether
puckett
entered
plea
known
future
violation
cf
dominguez
benitez
rights
acquired
defendant
relate
sentencing
must
show
affected
sentence