wilkinson
director
ohio
department
rehabilitation
correction
et
al
dotson
et
argued
december
decided
march
respondents
dotson
johnson
ohio
state
prisoners
parole
officials
determined
dotson
eligible
parole
johnson
suitable
parole
brought
separate
actions
declaratory
injunctive
relief
claiming
ohio
parole
procedures
violate
federal
constitution
case
federal
district
concluded
action
lie
prisoner
seek
relief
habeas
corpus
suit
sixth
circuit
ultimately
consolidated
cases
reversed
finding
actions
proceed
held
state
prisoners
may
bring
action
declaratory
injunctive
relief
challenging
constitutionality
state
parole
procedures
need
seek
relief
exclusively
federal
habeas
corpus
statutes
pp
ohio
argues
unsuccessfully
respondents
claims
may
brought
federal
habeas
similar
state
proceedings
state
prisoner
use
action
challenge
fact
duration
confinement
preiser
rodriguez
respondents
lawsuits
effect
collaterally
attack
confinements
duration
argument
jumps
true
premise
likelihood
prisoners
hope
suits
help
bring
earlier
release
faulty
conclusion
habeas
sole
avenue
relief
case
law
makes
clear
connection
constitutionality
prisoners
parole
proceedings
release
confinement
tenuous
achieve
ohio
legal
objective
preiser
edwards
balisok
developed
exception
otherwise
broad
scope
actions
lie
within
core
habeas
corpus
preiser
supra
state
prisoner
requests
present
future
release
section
remains
available
procedural
challenges
success
necessarily
spell
immediate
speedier
release
prisoner
wolff
mcdonnell
prisoner
use
obtain
relief
success
necessarily
demonstrate
invalidity
confinement
duration
heck
humphrey
respondents
claims
cognizable
fall
within
implicit
habeas
exception
seek
relief
render
invalid
state
procedures
used
deny
parole
eligibility
dotson
parole
suitability
johnson
see
wolff
supra
neither
prisoner
seeks
injunction
ordering
immediate
speedier
release
community
see
preiser
supra
wolff
favorable
judgment
necessarily
imply
invalidity
conviction
sentence
heck
supra
success
dotson
mean
immediate
release
shorter
stay
prison
means
new
eligibility
review
may
speed
consideration
new
parole
application
success
johnson
means
new
parole
hearing
parole
authorities
may
discretion
decline
shorten
prison
term
neither
prisoner
claim
necessarily
spell
speedier
release
neither
lies
core
habeas
corpus
preiser
supra
finally
prisoners
claims
future
relief
successful
necessarily
imply
invalidity
confinement
shorten
duration
yet
distant
core
see
balisok
supra
pp
ohio
additional
arguments
respondents
actions
lie
favorable
judgment
necessarily
imply
invalidity
sentence
heck
supra
emphasis
added
sentences
include
particular
state
parole
procedures
decision
violate
principles
comity
opening
door
federal
without
prior
exhaustion
remedies
persuasive
pp
affirmed
remanded
breyer
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
stevens
scalia
souter
thomas
ginsburg
joined
scalia
filed
concurring
opinion
thomas
joined
kennedy
filed
dissenting
opinion
reginald
wilkinson
director
ohio
department
rehabilitation
correction
et
petitioners
william
dwight
dotson
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
sixth
circuit
march
justice
breyer
delivered
opinion
two
state
prisoners
brought
action
claiming
ohio
state
parole
procedures
violate
federal
constitution
prisoners
seek
declaratory
injunctive
relief
question
us
whether
may
bring
action
rev
stat
civil
rights
act
whether
must
instead
seek
relief
exclusively
federal
habeas
corpus
statutes
conclude
actions
may
brought
two
respondents
william
dotson
rogerico
johnson
currently
serving
lengthy
terms
ohio
prisons
dotson
began
serve
life
sentence
parole
board
rejected
first
parole
request
parole
officer
reviewing
dotson
records
year
determined
receive
consideration
parole
least
five
years
reaching
conclusion
dotson
parole
eligibility
officer
used
parole
guidelines
first
adopted
dotson
began
serve
term
dotson
claims
retroactive
application
new
harsher
guidelines
preguidelines
case
violates
constitution
ex
post
facto
due
process
clauses
seeks
declaration
effect
well
permanent
injunction
ordering
prison
officials
grant
immediate
parole
hearing
accordance
statutory
laws
administrative
rules
place
committed
crimes
app
dotson
complaint
prospective
declaratory
injunctive
relief
johnson
began
serve
prison
term
parole
board
considered
rejected
first
parole
request
finding
unsuitable
release
making
determination
board
applied
new
guidelines
johnson
claims
application
new
harsher
guidelines
preguidelines
case
violated
constitution
ex
post
facto
clause
also
alleges
parole
board
proceedings
members
present
denying
adequate
opportunity
speak
violated
constitution
due
process
clause
johnson
complaint
seeks
new
parole
hearing
conducted
constitutionally
proper
procedures
injunction
ordering
state
comply
constitutional
due
process
ex
post
facto
requirements
future
prisoners
brought
actions
federal
case
federal
district
concluded
action
lie
prisoner
seek
relief
habeas
corpus
suit
dotson
wilkinson
cv
nd
ohio
johnson
ghee
cv
nd
ohio
july
prisoner
appealed
appeals
sixth
circuit
ultimately
consolidated
two
appeals
heard
cases
en
banc
found
actions
proceed
reversed
lower
courts
ohio
parole
officials
petitioned
certiorari
granted
review
ii
held
prisoner
state
custody
use
action
challenge
fact
duration
confinement
preiser
rodriguez
see
also
wolff
mcdonnell
heck
humphrey
edwards
balisok
must
seek
federal
habeas
corpus
relief
appropriate
state
relief
instead
ohio
points
inmates
cases
attack
proceedings
dotson
proceedings
johnson
believe
victory
claims
lead
speedier
release
prison
consequently
ohio
argues
prisoners
lawsuits
effect
collaterally
attack
duration
confinement
hence
claim
may
brought
habeas
corpus
action
problem
ohio
argument
lies
jump
true
premise
likelihood
prisoners
hope
actions
help
bring
earlier
release
faulty
conclusion
habeas
sole
avenue
relief
consideration
case
law
makes
clear
connection
constitutionality
prisoners
parole
proceedings
release
confinement
tenuous
achieve
ohio
legal
objective
initially
addressed
relationship
federal
habeas
statutes
preiser
rodriguez
supra
case
state
prisoners
brought
civil
rights
actions
attacking
constitutionality
prison
disciplinary
proceedings
led
deprivation
credits
conceded
language
literally
covers
claims
see
authorizing
claims
alleging
deprivation
constitutional
rights
every
person
acting
color
state
law
noted
language
federal
habeas
statutes
applies
well
see
permitting
claims
person
held
custody
violation
constitution
moreover
observed
language
habeas
statute
specific
writ
history
makes
clear
traditionally
accepted
specific
instrument
obtain
release
unlawful
confinement
preiser
considerations
linguistic
specificity
history
comity
led
find
implicit
exception
otherwise
broad
scope
actions
lie
within
core
habeas
corpus
preiser
defining
scope
exception
concluded
action
lie
state
prisoner
challenges
fact
duration
confinement
seeks
either
immediate
release
prison
shortening
term
confinement
action
restoration
credits
effect
demands
immediate
release
shorter
period
detention
attacks
duration
physical
confinement
thus
lies
core
habeas
corpus
therefore
held
preiser
prisoners
pursue
claims
wolff
mcdonnell
supra
elaborated
contours
habeas
corpus
core
preiser
state
prisoners
brought
action
challenging
prison
officials
revocation
credits
means
constitutionally
deficient
disciplinary
proceedings
held
prisoners
use
obtain
restoration
credits
preiser
held
injunction
restoring
good
time
improperly
taken
foreclosed
inmates
use
obtain
declaration
predicate
requested
damages
award
disciplinary
procedures
invalid
ibid
also
seek
way
ancillary
relief
otherwise
proper
injunction
enjoining
prospective
enforcement
invalid
prison
regulations
ibid
emphasis
added
neither
case
victory
prisoners
necessarily
meant
immediate
release
shorter
period
incarceration
prisoners
attacked
wrong
procedures
wrong
result
denial
credits
heck
supra
discussing
wolff
heck
considered
different
related
circumstance
state
prisoner
brought
action
damages
challenging
conduct
state
officials
prisoner
claimed
unconstitutionally
caused
conviction
improperly
investigating
crime
destroying
evidence
pointed
hoary
principle
civil
tort
actions
appropriate
vehicles
challenging
validity
outstanding
criminal
judgments
held
establishing
basis
damages
claim
necessarily
demonstrates
invalidity
conviction
action
lie
unless
conviction
sentence
already
invalidated
added
action
even
successful
demonstrate
invalidity
outstanding
criminal
judgment
action
allowed
proceed
ibid
finally
edwards
balisok
supra
returned
prison
disciplinary
procedure
context
kind
addressed
previously
preiser
wolff
balisok
sought
declaration
procedures
employed
state
officials
deprive
credits
violated
due
process
damages
use
unconstitutional
procedures
injunction
prevent
future
violations
applying
heck
found
habeas
sole
vehicle
inmate
constitutional
challenge
insofar
prisoner
sought
declaratory
relief
money
damages
principal
procedural
defect
complained
namely
deceit
bias
part
decisionmaker
established
necessarily
imply
invalidity
deprivation
balisok
credits
hence
success
prisoner
claim
money
damages
accompanying
claim
declaratory
relief
necessarily
imply
invalidity
punishment
imposed
nonetheless
prisoner
claim
injunction
barring
future
unconstitutional
procedures
fall
within
habeas
exclusive
domain
rdinarily
prayer
prospective
relief
imply
invalidity
previous
loss
credits
ibid
throughout
legal
journey
preiser
balisok
focused
need
ensure
state
prisoners
use
habeas
corpus
similar
state
remedies
seek
invalidate
duration
confinement
either
directly
injunction
compelling
speedier
release
indirectly
judicial
determination
necessarily
implies
unlawfulness
state
custody
thus
preiser
found
implied
exception
coverage
claim
seeks
simply
relates
core
habeas
corpus
relief
state
prisoner
requests
present
future
release
cf
post
kennedy
dissenting
arguing
preiser
covers
challenges
relate
duration
confinement
wolff
makes
clear
remains
available
procedural
challenges
success
action
necessarily
spell
immediate
speedier
release
prisoner
heck
specifies
prisoner
use
obtain
damages
success
necessarily
imply
unlawfulness
previously
invalidated
conviction
sentence
balisok
like
wolff
demonstrates
habeas
remedies
displace
actions
success
civil
rights
suit
necessarily
vitiate
legality
previously
invalidated
state
confinement
cases
taken
together
indicate
state
prisoner
action
barred
absent
prior
invalidation
matter
relief
sought
damages
equitable
relief
matter
target
prisoner
suit
state
conduct
leading
conviction
internal
prison
proceedings
success
action
necessarily
demonstrate
invalidity
confinement
duration
applying
principles
present
case
conclude
respondents
claims
cognizable
fall
within
implicit
habeas
exception
dotson
johnson
seek
relief
render
invalid
state
procedures
used
deny
parole
eligibility
dotson
parole
suitability
johnson
see
wolff
supra
neither
respondent
seeks
injunction
ordering
immediate
speedier
release
community
see
preiser
wolff
supra
wolff
favorable
judgment
necessarily
imply
invalidity
conviction
sentence
heck
supra
success
dotson
mean
immediate
release
confinement
shorter
stay
prison
means
new
eligibility
review
speed
consideration
new
parole
application
success
johnson
means
new
parole
hearing
ohio
parole
authorities
may
discretion
decline
shorten
prison
term
see
ohio
rev
code
ann
lexis
describing
parole
authority
broad
discretionary
powers
inmates
orient
correctional
inst
ohio
state
adult
parole
auth
see
also
tr
oral
arg
petitioners
counsel
conceding
success
respondents
claims
inevitably
lead
release
neither
prisoner
claim
necessarily
spell
speedier
release
neither
lies
core
habeas
corpus
preiser
finally
prisoners
claims
future
relief
successful
necessarily
imply
invalidity
confinement
shorten
duration
yet
distant
core
see
balisok
supra
dissent
disagrees
legal
analysis
advocates
use
different
legal
standard
critical
part
view
habeas
challenge
sentence
core
challenge
necessarily
produce
prisoner
release
standard
must
wrong
see
post
heck
standard
irrelevant
heck
concerned
damages
see
post
first
believe
case
challenging
sentence
seeks
prisoner
release
pertinent
sense
seeks
invalidation
whole
part
judgment
authorizing
prisoner
confinement
fact
state
may
seek
new
judgment
new
trial
new
sentencing
proceeding
beside
point
second
balisok
applied
heck
standard
addressed
claim
seeking
damages
also
separate
declaration
state
procedures
unlawful
see
iii
ohio
makes
two
additional
arguments
first
ohio
points
language
heck
indicating
prisoner
damages
action
lie
favorable
judgment
necessarily
imply
invalidity
conviction
sentence
emphasis
added
ohio
argues
parole
proceedings
part
prisoners
sentence
indeed
aspect
sentence
claims
successful
invalidate
find
argument
persuasive
context
heck
uses
word
sentence
refer
prison
procedures
substantive
determinations
length
confinement
see
muhammad
close
per
curiam
incarceration
matters
heck
incarceration
ordered
original
judgment
conviction
heck
uses
word
sentence
interchangeably
terms
continuing
confinement
imprisonment
per
curiam
wilwording
swenson
per
curiam
interpretation
heck
consistent
balisok
held
prisoner
suit
sought
nullification
disciplinary
procedures
rather
nullification
disciplinary
procedures
lead
necessarily
restoration
credits
hence
shortening
prisoner
sentence
second
ohio
says
decision
favor
respondents
break
faith
principles
comity
opening
door
federal
without
prior
exhaustion
remedies
earlier
cases
however
already
placed
important
comity
considerations
balance
weighed
competing
need
vindicate
federal
rights
without
exhaustion
concluded
prisoners
may
bring
claims
without
fully
exhausting
remedies
long
suits
established
necessarily
invalidate
confinement
see
part
ii
supra
thus
see
reason
moving
line
cases
draw
particularly
since
congress
already
strengthened
requirement
prisoners
exhaust
state
administrative
remedies
precondition
action
see
porter
nussle
reasons
sixth
circuit
judgment
affirmed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
reginald
wilkinson
director
ohio
department
rehabilitation
correction
et
petitioners
william
dwight
dotson
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
sixth
circuit
march
justice
scalia
justice
thomas
joins
concurring
join
opinion
view
reads
heck
humphrey
edwards
balisok
correctly
full
agreement
holding
ecause
neither
prisoner
claim
necessarily
spell
speedier
release
neither
lies
core
habeas
may
brought
rev
stat
ante
write
separately
note
contrary
holding
require
us
broaden
scope
habeas
relief
beyond
recognition
preiser
rodriguez
cases
follow
hold
congress
enacting
preserved
habeas
corpus
statute
sole
authorization
challenges
allegedly
unlawful
confinement
time
adoption
federal
habeas
statute
mirrored
writ
habeas
corpus
authorized
single
form
relief
prisoner
immediate
release
custody
see
act
stat
congress
shortly
thereafter
amended
statute
authorizing
federal
habeas
courts
dispose
party
law
justice
require
rev
stat
statute
reads
virtually
today
dispose
matter
law
justice
require
interpreted
broader
remedial
language
permit
relief
short
release
example
habeas
petitioner
challenges
one
several
consecutive
sentences
may
invalidate
challenged
sentence
even
though
prisoner
remains
custody
serve
others
see
peyton
rowe
walker
wainwright
per
curiam
thus
preiser
held
prisoners
action
barred
relief
sought
restoration
credits
shorten
prisoners
incarceration
hasten
date
transferred
supervised
release
available
habeas
see
one
thing
say
permissible
habeas
relief
cases
interpret
statute
includes
ordering
quantum
change
level
custody
graham
broglin
posner
release
incarceration
parole
quite
another
say
habeas
statute
authorizes
federal
courts
order
relief
neither
terminates
custody
accelerates
future
date
release
custody
reduces
level
custody
sought
mandating
new
parole
hearing
may
may
result
release
prescription
composition
hearing
panel
specification
procedures
followed
holding
sort
judicial
immersion
administration
discretionary
parole
lies
core
habeas
utterly
sever
writ
roots
cf
bell
wolfish
treating
open
question
whether
claims
cognizable
habeas
dissent
suggests
habeas
may
issue
conditional
writ
ordering
prisoner
released
unless
state
conducts
new
sentencing
proceeding
may
also
issue
conditional
writ
ordering
release
absent
new
parole
proceeding
see
post
opinion
kennedy
prisoner
shows
sentencing
unconstitutional
actually
entitled
release
judgment
pursuant
confined
invalidated
conditional
writ
serves
delay
release
order
provide
state
opportunity
correct
constitutional
violation
hilton
braunskill
see
bonner
conditional
writ
proper
resentencing
contrast
validly
sentenced
prisoner
shows
state
made
procedural
error
denying
discretionary
parole
established
right
release
obtain
habeas
relief
conditional
otherwise
conditional
writs
enable
habeas
courts
give
time
replace
invalid
judgment
valid
one
consequence
fail
always
release
conditional
writs
weapon
federal
habeas
courts
extort
respondent
custodian
forms
relief
short
release
whether
new
parole
hearing
new
mattress
applicant
cell
petitioners
counter
need
concerned
expansion
habeas
relief
prisoners
naturally
prefer
habeas
corpus
light
burdensome
prerequisites
attached
habeas
relief
prerequisites
exhaustion
state
remedies
reliance
clearly
established
federal
law
deference
previous
findings
fact
apply
person
custody
pursuant
judgment
state
contrast
delineation
scope
permissible
relief
applies
federal
habeas
proceedings
whether
petitioner
federal
state
custody
see
thus
may
shield
petitioners
fellow
state
wardens
impact
broadened
writ
urge
us
create
every
warden
responding
habeas
petition
claim
protection
federal
prisoners
whose
custodians
acting
color
state
law
hence
sued
greater
incentives
shoehorn
claims
habeas
finally
note
opinion
focuses
correctly
whether
claims
respondents
pleaded
claims
may
pursued
habeas
whether
respondents
successful
obtaining
habeas
relief
claims
see
ante
thus
example
prisoner
wishes
challenge
length
confinement
obtain
federal
habeas
relief
statute
limitations
restrictions
successive
petitions
use
unavailability
federal
habeas
relief
individual
case
grounds
proceeding
cf
preiser
supra
wholly
frustrate
explicit
congressional
intent
hold
state
prisoners
evade
exhaustion
requirement
simple
expedient
putting
different
label
pleadings
observations
join
opinion
reginald
wilkinson
director
ohio
department
rehabilitation
correction
et
petitioners
william
dwight
dotson
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
sixth
circuit
march
justice
kennedy
dissenting
case
insists
attack
parole
proceedings
brought
rev
stat
may
dismissed
grounds
habeas
corpus
exclusive
remedy
claims
primary
reason
offered
holding
order
entitling
prisoner
new
parole
proceeding
might
result
early
release
reason
however
applies
equal
logic
force
sentencing
proceeding
since
elementary
habeas
appropriate
remedy
challenging
sentence
something
must
quite
wrong
first
premise
everyone
knows
prisoner
succeeds
habeas
action
obtains
new
sentencing
hearing
sentence
may
may
reduced
sentence
end
perhaps
longer
prisoner
early
release
means
assured
simply
first
sentence
found
unlawful
yet
one
say
attack
judicial
sentencing
proceedings
following
conviction
may
raised
action
inconsistency
treatment
sentencing
proceedings
parole
proceedings
thus
difficult
justify
furthermore
tension
precedents
reasons
write
respectful
dissent
challenges
parole
proceedings
cognizable
habeas
respondents
challenge
parole
determinations
deny
release
eligibility
consideration
release
also
guarantee
continued
confinement
next
scheduled
parole
proceeding
see
ante
majority
opinion
parole
determination
made
proceeding
flawed
errors
constitutional
dimensions
respondents
allege
continued
confinement
may
well
result
constitutional
violation
respondents
thus
raise
cognizable
habeas
claim
custody
violation
constitution
see
also
hertz
liebman
federal
habeas
corpus
practice
procedure
pp
ed
noting
range
claims
cognizable
federal
habeas
corpus
includes
challenges
duration
sentence
including
basis
parole
good
time
administratively
opposed
rules
citing
numerous
cases
effect
recognition
elementary
principle
courts
appeals
adjudicated
merits
many
parole
challenges
federal
habeas
corpus
proceedings
see
california
dept
corrections
morales
vaughn
nulph
faatz
per
curiam
fender
thompson
concerns
holding
increased
diminished
fact
seem
deny
respondents
claims
indeed
cognizable
habeas
corpus
proceedings
justice
scalia
concurring
opinion
suggests
otherwise
respondents
seek
form
relief
new
parole
hearings
unavailable
habeas
ante
common
practice
granting
conditional
writ
ordering
state
release
prisoner
else
correct
constitutional
error
new
hearing
already
allows
habeas
compel
type
relief
justice
scalia
supposes
unavailable
see
hilton
braunskill
federal
habeas
corpus
practice
reflected
decisions
indicates
broad
discretion
conditioning
judgment
granting
habeas
relief
habeas
available
parole
challenges
like
respondents
preiser
rodriguez
thus
requires
holding
also
provides
exclusive
vehicle
preiser
held
challenges
fact
duration
prisoner
confinement
opposed
conditions
prison
life
must
brought
habeas
language
sure
capacious
enough
include
challenge
fact
duration
confinement
preiser
nonetheless
established
habeas
specific
applicable
remedy
exclusive
means
raising
challenge
respondents
challenges
adverse
parole
system
determinations
relate
conditions
confinement
rather
fact
duration
confinement
see
butterfield
bail
challenge
procedures
used
denial
parole
necessarily
implicates
validity
denial
parole
therefore
prisoner
continuing
confinement
straightforward
application
preiser
cases
yield
conclusion
claims
must
brought
habeas
majority
contrary
holding
permitting
parole
determination
challenges
go
forward
based
argument
claims
characterized
challenges
conditions
confinement
rather
fact
duration
argument
unavailable
majority
must
say
instead
respondents
claims
fall
habeas
ante
gives
two
reasons
first
success
claims
necessarily
entitle
respondents
immediate
release
ante
noted
outset
proves
far
much
line
reasoning
sound
remove
core
habeas
challenge
unconstitutional
sentencing
procedure
second
reason
success
claims
necessarily
imply
invalidity
respondents
convictions
sentences
ante
misplaced
irrelevant
misplaced
takes
context
test
employed
heck
humphrey
edwards
balisok
cases
temptation
seek
relief
unavailable
habeas
damages
declaratory
relief
serving
predicate
damages
thus
end
run
around
preiser
heck
supra
balisok
supra
see
also
muhammad
close
per
curiam
recognizing
damages
unavailable
habeas
today
case
present
problem
fact
respondents
claims
impugn
validity
convictions
sentences
also
irrelevant
true
respondents
contentions
nothing
original
convictions
sentencing
determinations
stating
fact
however
gets
closer
resolving
whether
parole
determinations
subject
direct
challenge
habeas
held
administrative
decisions
denying
credits
subject
attack
habeas
preiser
supra
balisok
supra
makes
point
cite
sentence
fragment
close
observing
incarceration
matters
heck
incarceration
ordered
original
judgment
conviction
ante
quoting
statement
however
inapplicable
even
terms
addresses
heck
problem
one
furthermore
even
apart
heck
inapplicability
case
full
sentence
majority
takes
quotation
makes
clear
close
contrasting
confinement
per
se
special
disciplinary
confinement
infraction
prison
rules
simply
issue
sum
neither
majority
stated
principles
justify
deviation
holding
preiser
demands
today
ruling
blurs
preiser
formulation
apparent
respondents
challenges
relate
conditions
confinement
solely
duration
notwithstanding
preiser
direction
challenges
fact
duration
confinement
restricted
habeas
decision
allow
numerous
challenges
state
parole
system
determinations
relate
solely
duration
prisoners
confinement
unsurprising
filed
amicus
brief
joining
ohio
urging
opposite
result
see
brief
alabama
et
al
amici
curiae
today
decision
allows
state
prisoners
raising
parole
challenges
circumvent
state
courts
compare
providing
person
custody
pursuant
judgment
must
general
exhaust
remedies
available
courts
state
seeking
federal
habeas
relief
requiring
prisoner
exhaust
administrative
remedies
bringing
action
challenge
prison
conditions
parole
systems
doubt
variations
state
state
within
special
province
expertise
state
courts
address
challenges
state
parole
determinations
first
instance
particularly
many
challenges
raise
state
procedural
questions
today
objection
many
deprives
federal
courts
invaluable
assistance
frontline
expertise
found
state
courts
reasons
given
reverse