dixon
argued
april
decided
june
petitioner
charged
receiving
firearm
indictment
violation
making
false
statements
connection
acquisition
firearm
violation
admitted
trial
knew
indictment
purchased
firearms
knew
crime
claimed
acting
duress
boyfriend
threatened
harm
daughters
buy
guns
bound
fifth
circuit
precedent
district
declined
request
jury
instruction
placing
upon
government
burden
disprove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
duress
defense
instead
jury
instructed
petitioner
burden
establish
defense
preponderance
evidence
convicted
fifth
circuit
affirmed
held
jury
instructions
run
afoul
due
process
clause
crimes
conviction
require
petitioner
acted
knowingly
merely
requires
proof
knowledge
facts
constitute
offense
bryan
willfully
requires
acting
knowledge
conduct
unlawful
ibid
thus
government
bore
burden
proving
beyond
reasonable
doubt
petitioner
knew
making
false
statements
knew
breaking
law
acquired
firearm
indictment
clearly
met
burden
petitioner
testified
effect
petitioner
contends
formed
necessary
mens
rea
freely
choose
commit
crimes
however
duress
defense
may
excuse
conduct
otherwise
punishable
see
bailey
existence
duress
normally
controvert
elements
offense
fact
petitioner
crimes
statutory
offenses
counterpart
common
law
supports
conclusion
jury
instructions
consistent
requirement
government
prove
mental
specified
run
afoul
due
process
placing
burden
petitioner
establish
duress
preponderance
evidence
pp
modern
common
law
require
government
bear
burden
disproving
petitioner
duress
defense
beyond
reasonable
doubt
rule
places
burden
proving
defense
defendant
upset
davis
interpreted
defendant
insanity
controvert
necessary
mens
rea
murder
committed
feloniously
wilfully
malice
aforethought
required
government
prove
defendant
sanity
beyond
reasonable
doubt
evidence
tending
prove
insanity
also
tended
disprove
essential
element
offense
duress
evidence
petitioner
adduced
trial
contradict
tend
disprove
element
statutory
offenses
also
helped
resulting
davis
rule
constitutionally
mandated
congress
overruled
statute
requiring
defendant
prove
insanity
clear
convincing
evidence
petitioner
reliance
davis
also
ignores
fact
federal
crimes
solely
creatures
statute
liparota
thus
must
effectuate
duress
defense
congress
may
contemplated
context
specific
offenses
oakland
cannabis
buyers
cooperative
assume
passing
relevant
act
congress
familiar
rule
rule
mckelvey
one
relying
affirmative
defense
must
set
establish
expected
federal
courts
apply
similar
approach
affirmative
defense
excuse
violating
new
law
accept
petitioner
contrary
hypothesis
davis
dramatically
upset
law
require
overwhelming
consensus
among
federal
courts
placing
burden
government
conflict
among
circuits
demonstrates
consensus
never
existed
similar
reason
weight
due
model
penal
code
evidence
congress
endorsed
code
views
incorporated
act
fact
congress
amended
act
add
mens
rea
requirement
punished
willful
violations
mental
state
embraced
code
effectuating
affirmative
defense
congress
may
contemplated
presumes
context
firearms
offenses
rule
congress
intended
petitioner
bear
burden
proving
duress
defense
preponderance
evidence
pp
affirmed
stevens
delivered
opinion
roberts
scalia
kennedy
thomas
ginsburg
alito
joined
kennedy
filed
concurring
opinion
alito
filed
concurring
opinion
scalia
joined
breyer
filed
dissenting
opinion
souter
joined
keshia
cherie
ashford
dixon
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
june
justice
stevens
delivered
opinion
january
petitioner
keshia
dixon
purchased
multiple
firearms
two
gun
shows
course
provided
incorrect
address
falsely
stated
indictment
felony
result
illegal
acts
petitioner
indicted
convicted
one
count
receiving
firearm
indictment
violation
eight
counts
making
false
statements
connection
acquisition
firearm
violation
trial
petitioner
admitted
knew
indictment
made
purchases
knew
crime
defense
acted
duress
boyfriend
threatened
kill
hurt
daughters
buy
guns
petitioner
contends
trial
judge
instructions
jury
erroneously
required
prove
duress
preponderance
evidence
instead
requiring
government
prove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
act
duress
appeals
rejected
petitioner
contention
given
contrary
treatment
issue
federal
granted
certiorari
trial
request
jury
instructions
defense
duress
petitioner
contended
burden
production
government
required
disprove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
duress
app
petitioner
admitted
request
contrary
fifth
circuit
precedent
trial
correctly
finding
bound
circuit
precedent
denied
petitioner
request
ibid
instead
judge
instructions
jury
defined
elements
duress
stated
petitioner
burden
proof
establish
defense
duress
preponderance
evidence
petitioner
argues
district
appeals
federal
law
requires
government
bear
burden
disproving
defense
beyond
reasonable
doubt
trial
erroneous
instruction
point
entitles
new
trial
two
aspects
petitioner
argument
support
proposed
instruction
merit
separate
discussion
first
petitioner
contends
defense
controverted
mens
rea
required
conviction
therefore
due
process
clause
requires
government
retain
burden
persuasion
element
brief
petitioner
second
petitioner
argues
fifth
circuit
rule
contrary
modern
common
law
ii
crimes
petitioner
convicted
require
acted
knowingly
willfully
explained
unless
text
statute
dictates
different
result
term
merely
requires
proof
knowledge
facts
constitute
offense
bryan
omitted
term
willfully
requires
defendant
acted
knowledge
conduct
unlawful
ibid
case
government
bore
burden
proving
beyond
reasonable
doubt
petitioner
knew
making
false
statements
connection
acquisition
firearms
knew
breaking
law
acquired
firearm
indictment
see
winship
although
government
may
proved
elements
ways
clearly
met
burden
petitioner
testified
knowingly
committed
certain
acts
put
false
address
forms
completed
purchase
firearms
falsely
claimed
actual
buyer
firearms
falsely
stated
indictment
time
purchase
testified
knew
breaking
law
individual
indictment
time
purchased
firearm
app
petitioner
contends
however
formed
necessary
mens
rea
crimes
freely
choose
commit
acts
question
even
assume
petitioner
overborne
threats
made
daughters
still
knew
making
false
statements
knew
breaking
law
buying
firearm
duress
defense
like
defense
necessity
considered
bailey
may
excuse
conduct
otherwise
punishable
existence
duress
normally
controvert
elements
offense
explained
bailey
riminal
liability
normally
based
upon
concurrence
two
factors
mind
hand
quoting
morissette
like
defense
necessity
defense
duress
negate
defendant
criminal
state
mind
applicable
offense
requires
defendant
acted
knowingly
willfully
instead
allows
defendant
avoid
liability
coercive
conditions
necessity
negates
conclusion
guilt
even
though
necessary
mens
rea
present
bailey
fact
petitioner
crimes
statutory
offenses
counterpart
common
law
also
supports
conclusion
duress
defense
way
disproves
element
crimes
observed
definition
elements
criminal
offense
entrusted
legislature
particularly
case
federal
crimes
solely
creatures
statute
liparota
consistent
movement
away
traditional
dichotomy
general
versus
specific
intent
toward
specifically
defined
hierarchy
culpable
mental
see
bailey
government
required
prove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
see
patterson
new
york
applicability
standard
however
always
dependent
state
defines
offense
charged
given
case
jury
instructions
case
consistent
requirement
run
afoul
due
process
clause
placed
burden
petitioner
establish
existence
duress
preponderance
evidence
iii
found
constitutional
basis
placing
upon
government
burden
disproving
petitioner
duress
defense
beyond
reasonable
doubt
next
address
petitioner
argument
modern
common
law
requires
government
bear
burden
making
argument
petitioner
recognizes
end
century
courts
generally
adhered
rule
proponent
issue
bears
burden
persuasion
factual
premises
applying
rule
fletcher
two
kinds
legal
rules
comparative
study
practices
criminal
cases
yale
petitioner
view
however
two
important
developments
established
contrary
rule
prevails
federal
courts
decision
davis
placed
burden
government
prove
defendant
sanity
publication
model
penal
code
although
undisputed
case
bears
repeating
common
law
burden
proving
affirmative
defenses
indeed
circumstances
justification
excuse
alleviation
rested
defendant
patterson
rule
accords
general
evidentiary
rule
burdens
producing
evidence
persuasion
regard
given
issue
generally
allocated
party
strong
mccormick
evidence
ed
context
defense
duress
accords
doctrine
facts
regard
issue
lie
peculiarly
knowledge
party
party
burden
proving
issue
although
claims
rule
placing
burden
defendant
prove
existence
duress
product
flawed
reasoning
petitioner
accepts
general
rule
least
decision
davis
brief
petitioner
according
petitioner
however
davis
initiated
revolution
overthrew
old
rule
established
proposed
rule
place
davis
however
support
petitioner
position
case
reviewed
defendant
conviction
committed
murder
feloniously
wilfully
malice
aforethought
undisputed
prosecution
evidence
alone
considered
made
duty
jury
return
verdict
guilty
crime
charged
defendant
however
adduced
evidence
trial
tending
show
mental
capacity
form
requisite
intent
issue
correctness
trial
judge
instruction
jury
law
every
man
sane
burden
showing
true
upon
party
asserts
instruction
evidence
equilibrio
accused
sane
capable
comprehending
nature
effect
acts
treated
defence
insanity
entire
absence
proof
insane
reversing
defendant
conviction
found
unable
assent
doctrine
prosecution
murder
duty
jury
convict
evidence
equally
balanced
issue
sanity
accused
time
killing
emphasis
added
instead
concluded
defendant
entitled
acquittal
specific
crime
charged
upon
evidence
reasonable
doubt
whether
capable
law
committing
crime
ibid
emphasis
added
opinion
focused
definition
murder
explaining
essence
heinous
crime
committed
person
memory
discretion
aforethought
ibid
citations
omitted
reviewing
adjudged
cases
elementary
treatises
upon
criminal
law
found
admit
crime
murder
necessarily
involves
possession
accused
mental
capacity
render
criminally
responsible
acts
thus
ultimately
found
burden
proving
accused
sanity
rested
government
holding
rested
conclusion
davis
guilt
said
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
acts
held
joined
perpetrating
murder
charged
jury
upon
evidence
reasonable
doubt
whether
legally
capable
committing
crime
thing
whether
wilfully
deliberately
unlawfully
malice
aforethought
took
life
deceased
crime
murder
involves
sufficient
capacity
distinguish
right
wrong
legal
interpretation
every
verdict
guilty
charged
jury
believed
evidence
beyond
reasonable
doubt
accused
guilty
therefore
responsible
criminally
acts
upon
principle
consistently
humanity
verdict
guilty
properly
returned
jury
entertain
reasonable
doubt
existence
fact
essential
guilt
namely
capacity
law
accused
commit
crime
opinion
davis
interpreted
defendant
sanity
controvert
necessary
mens
rea
crime
murder
committed
feloniously
wilfully
malice
aforethought
ne
takes
human
life
said
actuated
malice
aforethought
deliberately
intended
take
life
wicked
depraved
malignant
heart
unless
time
sufficient
mind
comprehend
criminality
right
wrong
act
required
government
prove
defendant
sanity
beyond
reasonable
doubt
evidence
tended
prove
insanity
also
tended
disprove
essential
element
offense
charged
see
davis
fact
sanity
essential
fact
case
must
established
satisfaction
jury
beyond
reasonable
doubt
emphasis
added
whether
reasoning
correctly
treated
insanity
negating
mens
rea
murder
defined
statute
issue
supra
help
petitioner
evidence
duress
adduced
trial
contradict
tend
disprove
element
statutory
offenses
committed
proposition
davis
come
stand
help
petitioner
cause
although
written
narrowly
context
prosecution
crime
murder
davis
later
interpreted
establish
general
rule
federal
prosecutions
accused
acquittal
specific
crime
charged
upon
evidence
reasonable
doubt
whether
capable
law
committing
crime
leland
oregon
quoting
davis
explaining
davis
rule
applied
federal
courts
davis
federal
defendant
introduced
sufficient
evidence
raise
reasonable
doubt
sanity
sufficient
create
question
jury
government
bore
ultimate
burden
persuasion
beyond
reasonable
doubt
see
hall
holloway
cadc
post
apparent
recognition
fact
davis
relied
heightened
mens
rea
applicable
particular
statute
issue
held
leland
rule
constitutionally
mandated
congress
overruled
statute
requiring
defendant
prove
insanity
clear
convincing
evidence
stat
codified
moreover
congress
treated
defense
insanity
differently
duress
codifying
requiring
defendants
intend
rely
insanity
defense
provide
advance
notice
government
see
fed
rule
crim
proc
thus
even
rule
arising
davis
may
relevant
evaluation
affirmative
defenses
congress
differential
treatment
insanity
defense
rejection
davis
rule
inconsistent
petitioner
invitation
follow
davis
lead
case
indeed
petitioner
reliance
davis
ignores
fact
federal
crimes
solely
creatures
statute
liparota
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
also
stevens
concurring
judgment
explaining
addressing
whether
statute
issue
foreclosed
necessity
defense
specific
charges
brought
statute
bailey
need
speculate
however
precise
contours
whatever
defenses
duress
necessity
available
charges
brought
offenses
issue
case
created
statute
congress
enacted
omnibus
crime
control
safe
streets
act
hereinafter
safe
streets
act
act
see
stat
evidence
act
structure
history
congress
actually
considered
question
duress
defense
work
context
suggestion
offenses
issue
incompatible
defense
cf
oakland
cannabis
buyers
cooperative
assuming
defense
duress
available
statutory
crimes
must
determine
defense
look
like
congress
may
contemplated
discussed
common
law
long
required
defendant
bear
burden
proving
existence
duress
similarly
even
congress
enacted
affirmative
defense
proviso
statute
settled
rule
jurisdiction
indictment
pleading
need
negative
matter
exception
made
proviso
distinct
clause
incumbent
one
relies
exception
set
establish
mckelvey
see
also
dickson
pet
calling
general
rule
law
always
prevailed
become
consecrated
almost
maxim
interpretation
statutes
even
though
safe
streets
act
mention
defense
duress
safely
assume
congress
familiar
rule
applied
mckelvey
expected
federal
courts
apply
similar
approach
affirmative
defense
might
asserted
justification
excuse
violating
new
conclusion
surely
reasonable
petitioner
hypothesis
davis
dramatically
upset
rule
law
petitioner
cites
one
federal
case
decided
proposition
well
established
federal
law
government
bears
burden
disproving
duress
beyond
reasonable
doubt
case
involved
defendant
claim
lacked
specific
intent
defraud
required
statute
reason
committed
offense
duress
coercion
johnson
thus
appeals
explained
burden
upon
defendant
prove
defense
coercion
statement
best
understood
context
corollary
proposition
burden
proof
rests
upon
government
prove
defendant
guilt
beyond
reasonable
doubt
ibid
properly
understood
johnson
provides
petitioner
little
help
uphill
struggle
prove
dramatic
shift
federal
rule
occurred
davis
enactment
safe
streets
act
indeed
us
able
accept
petitioner
proposition
need
find
overwhelming
consensus
among
federal
courts
government
burden
disprove
existence
duress
beyond
reasonable
doubt
existence
today
disagreement
among
federal
courts
appeals
issue
however
disagreement
caused
us
grant
certiorari
case
see
supra
demonstrates
consensus
ever
existed
see
also
post
breyer
dissenting
discussing
differences
treatment
duress
defense
various
courts
appeals
also
undermining
petitioner
argument
fact
national
commission
reform
federal
criminal
laws
proposed
defendant
prove
existence
duress
preponderance
evidence
see
working
papers
moreover
seem
cases
placing
burden
defendant
prove
existence
even
discussing
issue
way
lack
evidence
help
petitioner
rule
burden
proving
duress
rests
defendant
petitioner
hypothesizes
davis
fomented
revolution
upsetting
rule
true
one
expect
find
cases
discussing
matter
cases
exist
similar
reason
give
weight
publication
model
penal
code
petitioner
notes
code
place
burden
government
disprove
existence
duress
beyond
reasonable
doubt
see
model
penal
code
hereinafter
model
penal
code
code
stating
element
offense
must
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
defining
element
anything
negatives
excuse
conduct
issue
establishing
affirmative
defense
duress
petitioner
argues
code
reflects
well
established
federal
law
existed
time
brief
petitioner
discussed
consensus
existed
congress
passed
safe
streets
act
even
assume
congress
familiarity
code
rule
establish
evidence
congress
endorsed
code
views
incorporated
safe
streets
act
fact
act
provides
evidence
contrary
despite
code
careful
delineation
mental
see
model
penal
code
safe
streets
act
attached
explicit
mens
rea
requirement
crime
receiving
firearm
indictment
stat
whoever
violates
provision
chapter
shall
fined
imprisoned
five
years
congress
amended
act
impose
mens
rea
requirement
punished
people
willfully
violate
statute
see
stat
mental
state
embraced
code
see
model
penal
code
defining
purposely
knowingly
recklessly
negligently
explanatory
note
though
term
used
definitions
crimes
contained
code
currency
existence
offenses
outside
criminal
code
suggest
desirability
clarification
congress
intended
adopt
code
structure
enacted
amended
safe
streets
act
one
expect
act
form
language
adhere
much
closely
used
code
reason
rely
model
penal
code
provide
evidence
congress
wanted
us
effectuate
duress
defense
context
iv
congress
chooses
enact
duress
defense
places
burden
government
disprove
duress
beyond
reasonable
doubt
light
congress
silence
issue
however
federal
courts
effectuate
affirmative
defense
duress
congress
may
contemplated
context
oakland
cannabis
buyers
cooperative
context
firearms
offenses
issue
usually
case
given
rule
presume
congress
intended
petitioner
bear
burden
proving
defense
duress
preponderance
evidence
accordingly
judgment
appeals
affirmed
ordered
keshia
cherie
ashford
dixon
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
june
justice
kennedy
concurring
one
disputes
subject
constitutional
constraints
congress
authority
determine
content
duress
defense
respect
federal
crimes
direct
whether
burden
proof
rests
defense
prosecution
question
proceed
congress
enacted
criminal
statute
omnibus
crime
control
safe
streets
act
stat
et
seq
hereinafter
safe
streets
act
without
explicit
instructions
regarding
duress
defense
burden
proof
see
ante
issues
congressional
intent
respect
nature
extent
definition
federal
crimes
arise
assume
congress
acted
certain
background
understandings
set
forth
judicial
decisions
legal
tradition
see
bailey
decisions
turn
consult
sources
legal
treatises
american
legal
institute
model
penal
code
see
jimenez
recio
salinas
sources
rely
upon
insight
gained
time
legal
process
continues
absent
contrary
indication
statute
assume
congress
want
foreclose
courts
consulting
newer
sources
considering
innovative
arguments
resolving
issues
confronted
statute
within
likely
purview
congress
enacted
criminal
prohibition
applicable
particular
case
looks
state
law
time
statute
enacted
see
ante
better
reading
opinion
isolated
authorities
writings
control
unless
indicative
guiding
principles
upon
congress
likely
relied
otherwise
seems
altogether
fiction
attribute
congress
intent
one
way
assigning
burden
proof
seems
unlikely
moreover
congress
wanted
burden
proof
duress
vary
statute
statute
depending
upon
date
enactment
consistent
propositions
looks
precedents
traditions
also
treatment
insanity
defense
statute
proposal
national
commission
reform
federal
criminal
laws
even
though
postdated
passage
safe
streets
act
see
ante
reason
suppose
congress
wanted
depart
traditional
principles
allocating
burden
proof
proper
approach
simply
apply
principles
context
duress
see
schaffer
weast
slip
plain
text
statute
silent
allocation
burden
persuasion
proceed
consider
ordinary
default
rule
exceptions
facts
needed
prove
disprove
defense
lie
peculiarly
knowledge
defendant
broun
mccormick
evidence
ed
see
ante
claim
duress
instances
depends
upon
conduct
takes
place
criminal
act
person
allegedly
coerced
defendant
often
unwilling
come
forward
testify
prosecution
may
without
practical
means
disproving
defendant
allegations
good
reason
maintain
usual
rule
placing
burden
production
persuasion
together
party
raising
issue
see
broun
supra
ante
analysis
may
come
different
result
course
defenses
observations
join
opinion
keshia
cherie
ashford
dixon
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
june
justice
alito
justice
scalia
joins
concurring
join
opinion
understanding
hold
allocation
burden
persuasion
defense
duress
may
vary
one
federal
criminal
statute
another
duress
established
defense
common
law
see
blackstone
commentaries
laws
england
congress
began
enact
federal
criminal
statutes
presumptively
intended
offenses
subject
defense
moreover
congress
presumptively
intended
burdens
production
persuasion
placed
common
law
defendant
although
congress
certainly
free
alter
pattern
place
one
burdens
prosecution
either
selected
federal
crimes
congress
done
instead
continued
revise
federal
criminal
laws
create
new
federal
crimes
without
addressing
issue
duress
circumstances
believe
burdens
remain
congress
began
enacting
federal
criminal
statutes
assume
congress
makes
new
implicit
judgment
allocation
burdens
whenever
creates
new
federal
crime
matter
whenever
substantially
revises
existing
criminal
statute
unrealistic
assume
every
occasion
congress
surveys
allocation
burdens
proof
duress
existing
federal
case
law
law
tacitly
adopts
whatever
predominant
position
happens
time
methodology
create
serious
problems
district
courts
courts
appeals
required
decide
burden
persuasion
allocated
federal
crimes
enacted
different
dates
allocation
differed
different
offenses
might
federal
criminal
cases
trial
judge
forced
instruct
jury
defendant
bears
burden
persuasion
defense
offenses
charged
indictment
prosecution
bears
burden
others
also
assume
justice
breyer
see
post
congress
implicitly
delegated
federal
courts
task
deciding
manner
burden
persuasion
allocated
allocation
burden
debatable
policy
question
important
empirical
component
absence
specific
direction
congress
cf
fed
rule
evid
assume
congress
conferred
authority
judiciary
keshia
cherie
ashford
dixon
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
june
justice
breyer
justice
souter
joins
dissenting
courts
long
recognized
duress
constitutes
defense
criminal
charge
historically
defense
excuse
criminal
conduct
threat
imminent
death
serious
bodily
injury
led
defendant
commit
crime
defendant
reasonable
legal
alternative
breaking
law
defendant
responsible
creating
threat
bailey
see
also
lafave
substantive
criminal
law
pp
hereinafter
lafave
ante
opinion
decides
today
respect
federal
crimes
defense
must
bear
burden
producing
evidence
duress
persuading
jury
agree
majority
burden
production
lies
defendant
burden
persuasion
issue
constitutional
congress
may
allocate
burden
sees
fit
also
believe
absence
indication
different
congressional
intent
burden
persuading
jury
beyond
reasonable
doubt
lie
burdens
normally
lie
criminal
cases
upon
prosecution
disagreement
majority
part
reflects
different
view
determine
relevant
congressional
intent
congress
speaks
burdens
proof
must
course
follow
says
suppose
normally
case
relevant
federal
statute
silent
majority
proceeds
assumption
congress
wished
courts
fill
gap
examining
judicial
practice
time
congress
enacted
particular
criminal
statute
question
ante
opinion
follow
approach
believe
congress
intended
placement
burdens
vary
statute
statute
time
time
unrealistic
risks
unnecessary
complexity
jury
confusion
unfairness
unrealistic
silence
well
mean
congress
specifically
consider
burden
persuasion
respect
duress
defense
simply
think
secondary
matter
done
congress
wanted
courts
freeze
current
practice
wanted
impose
different
requirements
claims
duress
identical
statutes
similar
relevant
difference
time
enactment
indeed
individual
instances
criminal
conduct
often
violate
several
statutes
trial
violations
judge
instruct
jury
apply
different
standards
proof
duress
defense
depending
upon
congress
enacted
particular
statute
question
case
defendant
boyfriend
given
drug
money
insisted
threat
death
use
money
buy
gun
launder
rest
see
ed
supp
ii
see
infra
assume
instead
congress
silence
typically
means
congress
expected
courts
develop
burden
rules
governing
affirmative
defenses
done
past
beginning
common
law
taking
full
account
subsequent
need
law
evolve
judicial
practice
informed
reason
experience
see
davis
mcnabb
ante
opinion
proposed
general
revision
federal
criminal
code
instructed
courts
determine
contours
affirmative
defenses
principles
common
law
may
interpreted
light
reason
wigmore
evidence
chadbourn
rev
ed
allocation
burdens
proof
present
courts
questions
policy
fairness
based
experience
different
situations
approach
produce
uniform
federal
practice
across
different
affirmative
defenses
well
across
statutes
passed
different
points
time
ii
approach
leads
conclude
federal
criminal
cases
prosecution
bear
duress
defense
burden
persuasion
issue
close
one
blackstone
time
accused
bore
burden
proof
affirmative
defenses
see
blackstone
commentaries
patterson
new
york
experts
taken
different
positions
matter
model
penal
code
example
recommends
placing
burden
persuasion
prosecution
ali
model
penal
code
pp
brown
commission
recommends
placing
upon
defendant
national
commission
reform
federal
criminal
laws
working
papers
proposed
revision
federal
criminal
code
agnostically
turned
matter
courts
decision
moreover
practical
argument
favors
government
position
namely
defendants
bear
burden
persuasion
defendants
often
superior
access
relevant
proof
nonetheless
several
factors
favor
placing
burden
prosecution
one
thing
certain
respects
question
duress
resembles
mens
rea
issue
always
prosecution
prove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
see
winship
martin
ohio
questions
defendant
criminal
activity
voluntary
external
principle
wind
propelled
acted
nicomachean
ethics
aristotle
browne
transl
moreover
actions
intentional
whether
wanted
buy
guns
whether
wanted
lie
decided
things
knew
indeed
action
willful
sense
knew
break
law
ante
opinion
see
also
ratzlaf
nonetheless
defendant
acts
duress
lacks
semblance
meaningful
choice
sense
choice
free
blackstone
wrote
criminal
law
punishes
abuse
th
free
hence
highly
equitable
man
excused
acts
done
unavoidable
force
compulsion
commentaries
force
compulsion
acting
upon
resemblance
lack
mens
rea
lies
cf
austin
ifs
cans
proceedings
british
academy
noting
difference
choosing
something
one
opportunity
ability
otherwise
choosing
something
one
lacks
opportunity
ability
davis
supra
allocated
federal
insanity
defense
burden
government
partly
reasons
case
read
light
leland
oregon
suggests
even
insanity
always
show
absence
mens
rea
show
absence
davis
supra
citing
blackstone
emphasis
added
another
thing
federal
courts
matter
statutory
construction
supervisory
power
imposed
burden
persuasion
upon
prosecution
respect
insanity
entrapment
resemble
duress
defense
certain
relevant
ways
respect
duress
example
defendant
illegal
act
voluntary
indeed
intentional
circumstances
deprive
defendant
meaningful
ability
opportunity
act
otherwise
depriving
defendant
choice
free
insanity
said
may
involve
circumstances
resemble
identical
lack
mens
rea
entrapment
requires
prosecution
prove
defendant
predisposed
commit
crime
matter
sometimes
best
known
defendant
see
first
circuit
pattern
criminal
jury
instructions
thomas
government
virgin
islands
smith
harris
nos
app
lexis
branch
sixth
circuit
pattern
criminal
jury
instructions
jackson
pierre
corrigan
alvarez
bynum
cadc
see
also
mullaney
wilbur
noting
insanity
see
davis
reversing
judgment
affirming
conviction
prosecution
failed
matter
law
adduce
evidence
support
jury
verdict
petitioner
predisposed
independent
government
acts
beyond
reasonable
doubt
commit
crime
see
also
patterson
noting
davis
wide
impact
practice
federal
courts
respect
burden
proving
various
affirmative
defenses
patterson
supra
powell
dissenting
ince
decision
davis
federal
prosecutors
borne
burden
persuasion
respect
factors
like
insanity
malice
provocation
defendant
carried
burden
production
federal
courts
respect
federal
crimes
imposed
burden
persuasion
respect
duress
defense
upon
government
following
johnson
authorities
devitt
blackmar
federal
jury
practice
instructions
ed
federal
judicial
center
pattern
criminal
jury
instructions
seven
circuits
squarely
placed
burden
persuasion
upon
prosecution
one
circuit
fifth
placed
burden
defendant
four
third
fourth
eleventh
district
columbia
far
tell
definitive
practice
compare
arthurs
mitchell
campbell
talbott
per
curiam
campbell
hearst
falcon
willis
putting
burden
defendant
preponderance
compare
also
first
circuit
pattern
criminal
jury
instructions
sixth
circuit
pattern
criminal
jury
instructions
seventh
circuit
pattern
criminal
jury
instructions
eighth
circuit
pattern
criminal
jury
instructions
fifth
circuit
pattern
criminal
jury
instructions
petitioner
adds
without
contradiction
allocate
burden
similarly
ratio
brief
petitioner
brief
beginning
matter
became
complicated
ninth
circuit
began
require
defendant
bear
burden
proving
duress
certain
circumstances
per
curiam
years
later
third
sixth
eleventh
circuits
followed
suit
cases
concerning
closely
related
justification
defense
see
dodd
brown
deleveaux
eleventh
circuit
pattern
criminal
jury
instructions
see
sixth
circuit
pattern
criminal
jury
instructions
stating
burden
proof
issue
duress
undecided
circuit
latter
cases
however
put
burden
defendant
criminal
statute
narrows
mens
rea
requirement
burden
defendant
statute
requires
defendant
act
knowledge
suggest
courts
statute
requires
defendant
act
willfully
intentionally
voluntarily
see
supra
ninth
circuit
pattern
criminal
jury
instructions
see
fei
lin
see
also
eleventh
circuit
pattern
criminal
jury
instructions
diaz
indicating
bifurcated
rule
might
appropriate
noting
circuit
precedent
contrary
similarly
tenth
circuit
placed
burden
proving
duress
upon
defendant
strict
liability
cases
mens
rea
element
crime
unser
apparent
upshot
four
circuits
place
burden
persuasion
prosecution
across
board
one
places
burden
prosecution
statute
requires
mens
rea
otherwise
four
held
suggested
burden
prosecution
statute
requires
intentional
willful
state
mind
statute
requires
knowledge
circuits
divided
apparently
one
fifth
agrees
position
taken
today
concede
logic
government
practical
argument
defendants
superior
access
evidence
remain
uncertain
argument
strength
every
criminal
case
defendant
least
equal
familiarity
facts
greater
familiarity
prosecution
tot
strict
contours
duress
defense
well
defendant
burden
production
already
substantially
narrow
circumstances
defense
may
used
defendant
may
find
difficult
example
show
duress
relevant
conduct
took
place
long
criminal
act
cf
ante
opinion
kennedy
defendant
must
show
alternative
breaking
law
supra
difficult
show
remote
threat
see
also
lafave
duress
generally
requires
immediate
imminent
threat
defendant
take
advantage
reasonable
opportunity
escape
defendant
terminate
conduct
soon
claimed
duress
lost
coercive
force
important
need
prove
mens
rea
easily
present
precisely
practical
difficulties
proof
prosecutor
suppose
example
defendant
claims
old
lady
told
white
powder
transported
across
border
medicine
dying
son
cf
mares
see
also
mullaney
wilbur
requiring
government
prove
absence
passion
murder
conviction
imposes
unique
hardship
prosecution
particularly
difficult
see
practical
distinction
affirmative
defense
say
government
says
prosecution
may
unable
call
witness
likely
information
bearing
point
namely
defendant
brief
difference
respect
defendant
says
boyfriend
threatened
kill
battered
woman
says
killed
husband
husband
evidence
certainly
unavailable
see
also
jacobson
entrapment
need
prove
propensity
regardless
unless
defendant
testifies
prove
difficult
satisfy
defendant
burden
production
course
defendant
testifies
possible
word
evaluate
claim
practicality
without
somewhat
systematic
evidence
existence
problem
say
circuits
many
years
imposed
burden
prosecutor
course
wrong
government
practical
need
views
prevail
government
remain
free
ask
congress
reallocate
burden
finally
virtue
uniformity
treating
federal
statutory
burden
persuasion
similarly
respect
actus
reus
mens
rea
mistake
entrapment
duress
second
circuit
imposing
burden
persuasion
duress
prosecution
wrote
differences
respect
create
grave
possibility
juror
confusion
mitchell
newman
joined
feinberg
friendly
risk
unfairness
well
reasons
believe
absence
indication
congressional
intent
contrary
federal
criminal
law
place
burden
persuasion
respect
duress
defense
upon
prosecution
common
respect
many
affirmative
defenses
must
prove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
respect
dissent
footnotes
talbott
per
curiam
riffe
simpson
federal
statute
defining
elements
duress
defense
specified
elements
defense
see
bailey
need
today
instead
presume
accuracy
district
description
elements
defendant
unlawful
imminent
threat
nature
induce
apprehension
death
serious
bodily
injury
defendant
recklessly
negligently
placed
situation
probable
forced
perform
criminal
conduct
defendant
reasonable
legal
alternative
violating
law
chance
refuse
perform
criminal
act
also
avoid
threatened
harm
direct
causal
relationship
may
reasonably
anticipated
criminal
act
avoidance
threatened
harm
see
app
see
generally
harper
although
contain
mens
rea
requirement
relevant
sentencing
provision
requires
violation
committed
willfully
government
recognized
oral
argument
may
crimes
nature
mens
rea
require
government
disprove
existence
duress
beyond
reasonable
doubt
see
tr
oral
arg
see
also
lafave
substantive
criminal
law
ed
hereinafter
lafave
explaining
crimes
require
crime
done
black
law
dictionary
ed
defining
malice
intent
without
justification
excuse
commit
wrongful
act
professor
lafave
explained
duress
defense
follows
rationale
defense
defendant
faced
unnerving
threat
harm
unless
act
violates
literal
language
criminal
law
somehow
loses
mental
capacity
commit
crime
question
defendant
engaged
voluntary
act
rather
even
though
done
act
crime
requires
mental
state
crime
requires
conduct
violates
literal
language
criminal
law
excused
lafave
omitted
congress
findings
support
safe
streets
act
show
congress
concerned
ease
person
acquire
firearms
significant
factor
prevalence
lawlessness
violent
crime
stat
unrealistic
read
concern
proliferation
violent
crime
implicitly
away
defense
strongly
rooted
history
duress
defense
see
blackstone
commentaries
laws
england
previously
made
assumption
addressing
affirmative
defenses
see
oakland
cannabis
buyers
cooperative
bailey
parties
give
us
reason
question
indeed
congressional
committee
consider
codifying
duress
defense
courts
determine
defense
according
principles
common
law
may
interpreted
light
reason
experience
duress
like
defense
issue
mckelvey
excuse
allows
exception
liability
see
lafave
rationale
defense
duress
defendant
excused
victim
threat
person
reasonable
moral
strength
fairly
expected
trial
instructed
jury
warranted
acquitting
defendant
basis
acted
duress
believe
evidence
defendant
committed
acts
government
alleges
well
grounded
apprehension
immediate
death
serious
bodily
injury
instruction
require
government
disprove
duress
beyond
reasonable
doubt
seemingly
placed
burden
defendant
prove
existence
duress