rosemond
argued
november
decided
march
petitioner
justus
rosemond
took
part
drug
deal
either
one
confederates
fired
gun
shooter
identity
disputed
government
charged
rosemond
violating
using
carrying
gun
connection
drug
trafficking
crime
alternative
aiding
abetting
offense
trial
judge
instructed
jury
rosemond
guilty
aiding
abetting
offense
knew
cohort
used
firearm
drug
trafficking
crime
knowingly
actively
participated
drug
trafficking
crime
deviated
rosemond
proposed
instruction
jury
must
find
acted
intentionally
facilitate
encourage
firearm
use
opposed
merely
predicate
drug
offense
rosemond
convicted
tenth
circuit
affirmed
rejecting
argument
district
aiding
abetting
instructions
erroneous
held
government
establishes
defendant
aided
abetted
violation
proving
defendant
actively
participated
underlying
drug
trafficking
violent
crime
advance
knowledge
confederate
use
carry
gun
crime
commission
pp
federal
aiding
abetting
statute
derives
standards
accomplice
liability
two
components
person
liable
takes
affirmative
act
furtherance
underlying
offense
intent
facilitate
offense
commission
pp
first
question
whether
rosemond
conduct
sufficient
satisfy
affirmative
act
requirement
aiding
abetting
section
two
elements
drug
deal
violent
crime
using
carrying
firearm
connection
crime
instructions
permitted
jury
convict
rosemond
aiding
abetting
even
facilitated
drug
element
gun
element
offense
instructions
correct
common
law
imposed
aiding
abetting
liability
person
facilitated
element
criminal
offense
even
facilitate
elements
principle
continues
govern
see
johnson
pp
addition
conduct
extending
part
crime
aiding
abetting
requires
intent
extending
whole
crime
defendant
must
associate
venture
also
participate
something
wishes
bring
seek
actions
make
succeed
nye
nissen
requirement
satisfied
person
actively
participates
criminal
venture
full
knowledge
circumstances
constituting
charged
offense
see
pereira
active
participant
drug
transaction
intent
needed
aid
abet
violation
knows
one
confederates
carry
gun
must
advance
knowledge
meaning
knowledge
time
accomplice
reasonable
opportunity
walk
away
pp
trial
jury
instructions
erroneous
failed
require
rosemond
knew
advance
one
cohorts
armed
telling
jury
consider
merely
whether
rosemond
knew
cohort
used
firearm
direct
jury
determine
rosemond
obtained
requisite
knowledge
decide
whether
rosemond
knew
gun
sufficient
time
withdraw
crime
case
remanded
permit
tenth
circuit
address
whether
objection
properly
preserved
whether
error
harmless
pp
vacated
remanded
kagan
delivered
opinion
roberts
kennedy
ginsburg
breyer
sotomayor
joined
scalia
joined
footnotes
alito
filed
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
thomas
joined
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
justus
rosemond
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
tenth
circuit
march
justice
kagan
delivered
opinion
federal
criminal
statute
title
prohibits
us
ing
carr
ying
firearm
relation
crime
violence
drug
trafficking
crime
case
consider
government
must
show
accuses
defendant
aiding
abetting
offense
hold
government
makes
case
proving
defendant
actively
participated
underlying
drug
trafficking
violent
crime
advance
knowledge
confederate
use
carry
gun
crime
commission
also
conclude
jury
instructions
given
erroneous
failed
require
defendant
knew
advance
one
cohorts
armed
case
arises
drug
deal
gone
bad
vashti
perez
arranged
sell
pound
marijuana
ricardo
gonzales
coby
painter
drove
local
park
make
exchange
accompanied
two
confederates
ronald
joseph
petitioner
justus
rosemond
one
men
apparently
took
front
passenger
seat
sat
back
witnesses
dispute
designated
meeting
place
gonzales
climbed
car
backseat
painter
waited
outside
backseat
passenger
allowed
gonzales
inspect
marijuana
rather
handing
money
gonzales
punched
man
face
fled
drugs
gonzales
painter
ran
away
one
male
passengers
one
contested
exited
car
fired
several
shots
semiautomatic
handgun
shooter
vehicle
three
wouldbe
drug
dealers
gave
chase
three
catch
quarry
police
officer
responding
dispatcher
alert
pulled
car
federal
prosecution
rosemond
government
charged
rosemond
inter
alia
violating
using
gun
connection
drug
trafficking
crime
aiding
abetting
offense
title
section
provides
person
relation
crime
violence
drug
trafficking
crime
uses
carries
firearm
shall
receive
sentence
minimums
applicable
respectively
firearm
also
brandished
discharged
section
part
federal
aiding
abetting
statute
provides
hoever
commits
offense
aids
abets
counsels
commands
induces
procures
commission
punishable
principal
consistent
indictment
government
prosecuted
charge
two
alternative
theories
government
primary
contention
rosemond
used
firearm
aborted
drug
transaction
recognizing
identity
shooter
disputed
government
also
offered
argument
even
joseph
fired
gun
drug
deal
fell
apart
rosemond
aided
abetted
violation
district
judge
accordingly
instructed
jury
aiding
abetting
law
first
explained
way
challenged
neither
party
rudiments
statute
judge
stated
person
aids
abets
another
commit
offense
guilty
offense
committed
app
order
aid
abet
defendant
must
willfully
knowingly
associate
way
crime
seek
act
help
make
crime
succeed
judge
turned
applying
general
principles
deviated
instruction
rosemond
proposed
according
rosemond
defendant
found
guilty
aiding
abetting
violation
intentionally
took
action
facilitate
encourage
use
firearm
opposed
predicate
drug
offense
district
judge
disagreed
instead
telling
jury
convict
defendant
knew
cohort
used
firearm
drug
trafficking
crime
defendant
knowingly
actively
participated
drug
trafficking
crime
closing
argument
prosecutor
contended
rosemond
easily
satisfied
standard
even
fired
gun
still
guilty
crime
prosecutor
stated
rosemond
certainly
knew
actively
participated
drug
transaction
ibid
regards
element
prosecutor
urged
fact
person
present
active
drug
deal
shots
fired
know
cohort
using
gun
simply
ca
ibid
jury
convicted
rosemond
violating
well
offenses
charged
verdict
form
general
reveal
whether
jury
found
rosemond
used
gun
instead
aided
abetted
confederate
use
marijuana
deal
required
trial
imposed
sentence
months
imprisonment
statute
violation
tenth
circuit
affirmed
rejecting
rosemond
argument
district
aiding
abetting
instructions
appeals
acknowledged
circuits
agreed
rosemond
defendant
aids
abets
offense
intentionally
takes
action
facilitate
encourage
cohort
use
firearm
tenth
circuit
already
adopted
different
standard
thought
consonant
district
instructions
see
wiseman
requiring
defendant
actively
participated
underlying
crime
knew
confederate
carrying
firearm
appeals
held
rosemond
presented
sufficient
reason
departing
precedent
see
granted
certiorari
resolve
circuit
conflict
takes
aid
abet
offense
although
disagree
rosemond
principal
arguments
find
trial
erred
instructing
jury
therefore
vacate
judgment
ii
federal
aiding
abetting
statute
person
furthers
specifically
aids
abets
counsels
commands
induces
procures
commission
federal
offense
punishable
principal
provision
derives
though
simplifies
standards
accomplice
liability
see
standefer
peoni
hand
substance
formula
goes
back
long
way
reflects
view
culpability
person
may
responsible
crime
personally
carried
helps
another
complete
commission
see
hawley
mcgregor
criminal
law
previously
held
provide
knowing
aid
persons
committing
federal
crimes
intent
facilitate
crime
committing
crime
central
bank
denver
first
interstate
bank
denver
parties
embrace
formulation
agree
well
two
components
see
brief
petitioner
brief
common
law
person
liable
aiding
abetting
crime
takes
affirmative
act
furtherance
offense
intent
offense
commission
see
lafave
substantive
criminal
law
hereinafter
lafave
accomplice
liable
principal
gives
assistance
encouragement
intent
thereby
promote
facilitate
commission
crime
hicks
accomplice
liable
acts
assistance
done
intention
encouraging
abetting
crime
questions
parties
dispute
address
concern
two
requirements
affirmative
act
intent
apply
prosecution
aiding
abetting
offense
questions
arise
compound
nature
provision
recall
forbids
us
ing
carr
ying
firearm
engaged
crime
violence
drug
trafficking
crime
see
supra
prosecutor
must
show
use
carriage
gun
must
prove
commission
predicate
violent
drug
trafficking
offense
see
smith
purposes
ascertaining
aiding
abetting
liability
therefore
must
consider
person
act
crime
intend
facilitate
commission
address
issue
turn
consider
first
rosemond
account
conduct
divorced
issues
intent
rosemond
actively
drug
transaction
accompanying
two
others
site
money
exchanged
pound
marijuana
tells
took
action
respect
firearm
buy
borrow
gun
facilitate
narcotics
deal
carry
gun
scene
use
gun
subsequent
events
constituting
criminal
misadventure
acts
thus
advanced
one
part
drug
part
incident
speak
bit
technically
one
element
drug
element
crime
enough
satisfy
conduct
requirement
aiding
abetting
charge
must
rosemond
claims
taken
act
assist
commission
firearm
component
common
law
imposed
aiding
abetting
liability
person
possessing
requisite
intent
part
even
though
every
part
criminal
venture
leading
treatise
published
around
time
enactment
put
point
accomplice
liability
attached
upon
proof
ny
participation
general
felonious
plan
carried
confederates
wharton
criminal
law
ed
hereinafter
wharton
emphasis
added
words
another
standard
reference
person
present
abetting
act
necessary
constitute
offense
performed
another
charged
principal
even
though
act
whole
thing
necessary
bishop
commentaries
criminal
law
ed
emphasis
added
several
acts
constitute
together
one
crime
separately
performed
different
individual
principals
whole
indeed
yet
third
treatise
underscored
person
involvement
crime
merely
partial
minimal
quantity
assistance
immaterial
long
accomplice
something
aid
crime
desty
compendium
american
criminal
law
emphasis
added
common
law
maintained
every
little
bit
helps
contribution
part
crime
aids
whole
principle
continues
govern
aiding
abetting
law
almost
every
appeals
held
defendant
convicted
aider
abettor
without
proof
participated
every
element
offense
sigalow
proscribing
aiding
abetting
congress
used
language
comprehends
assistance
rendered
words
acts
encouragement
support
presence
reves
ernst
young
even
aid
relates
one
crime
phases
elements
example
upholding
convictions
abetting
tax
evasion
scheme
found
irrelevant
defendants
filing
false
return
thought
amply
facilitated
illegal
scheme
helping
confederate
conceal
assets
johnson
shared
overall
crime
execution
explained
equal
responsibility
law
whatever
may
different
roles
similarly
approved
conviction
abetting
mail
fraud
even
though
defendant
played
part
mailing
fraudulent
documents
enough
law
conduct
requirement
ways
aided
deception
see
pereira
division
labor
two
confederates
thus
significance
strategy
take
element
take
one
free
neither
party
established
approach
rosemond
participation
drug
deal
satisfies
requirement
aiding
abetting
violation
previously
described
commission
drug
trafficking
violent
crime
less
use
firearm
essential
conduct
element
offense
see
supra
enacting
statute
congress
proscribed
use
firearm
commission
acts
constitute
drug
trafficking
crime
rosemond
therefore
assist
violation
facilitating
either
drug
transaction
firearm
use
course
helping
bring
one
part
offense
whether
trafficking
drugs
using
gun
necessarily
helped
complete
whole
ends
analysis
conduct
inconsequential
courts
applying
common
law
held
acts
advance
element
offense
matters
facilitated
one
component
rosemond
argues
contrary
requisite
act
must
directed
use
firearm
element
essential
feature
brief
petitioner
arguing
firearm
crime
really
charged
aiding
abetting
drug
trafficking
crime
rosemond
provide
demanding
affirmative
act
go
toward
element
considered
peculiarly
significant
rather
noted
courts
never
thought
relevant
importance
aid
rendered
see
supra
event
reject
rosemond
premise
somehow
using
guns
selling
narcotics
true
enough
rosemond
says
support
theory
establishes
separate
freestanding
offense
underlying
drug
trafficking
crime
brief
petitioner
quoting
simpson
true
establishes
freestanding
offense
distinct
might
apply
using
gun
say
discharging
firearm
public
park
coin
term
combination
crime
punishes
temporal
relational
conjunction
two
separate
acts
ground
together
pose
extreme
risk
harm
see
muscarello
noting
basic
purpose
combat
dangerous
combination
drugs
guns
act
relating
drugs
much
act
relating
guns
facilitates
violation
rosemond
related
argument
approach
conflate
two
distinct
offenses
allowing
conviction
abetting
violation
whenever
prosecution
shows
defendant
abetted
underlying
drug
trafficking
crime
fares
better
see
brief
petitioner
describe
aiding
abetting
conviction
requires
act
facilitating
one
another
element
also
state
mind
extending
entire
crime
see
infra
rule
defendant
may
convicted
abetting
violation
intent
reaches
beyond
simple
drug
sale
armed
one
aiding
abetting
law
intent
component
turn
thus
preserves
distinction
assisting
predicate
drug
trafficking
crime
assisting
broader
offense
begin
return
basics
aiding
abetting
law
intent
requirement
party
disputes
previously
explained
person
aids
abets
crime
addition
taking
requisite
act
intends
facilitate
offense
commission
see
supra
intent
advance
different
lesser
offense
least
usually
sufficient
instead
intent
must
go
specific
entire
crime
charged
full
scope
predicate
crime
plus
gun
use
see
lafave
clark
marshall
law
crimes
pp
ed
ali
model
penal
code
comment
canonical
formulation
needed
state
mind
later
appropriated
parties
briefs
judge
learned
hand
aid
abet
crime
defendant
must
sort
associate
venture
also
participate
something
wishes
bring
seek
action
make
succeed
nye
nissen
quoting
peoni
see
brief
petitioner
brief
previously
found
intent
requirement
satisfied
person
actively
participates
criminal
venture
full
knowledge
circumstances
constituting
charged
offense
pereira
mail
fraud
case
discussed
found
requisite
intent
aiding
abetting
defendant
took
part
fraud
know
ing
confederate
take
care
mailing
see
supra
likewise
bozza
conviction
aiding
abetting
evasion
liquor
taxes
defendant
helped
operate
clandestine
distillery
know
ing
business
set
violate
government
revenue
laws
several
courts
appeals
similarly
held
addressing
fact
pattern
much
like
one
unarmed
driver
getaway
car
requisite
intent
aid
abet
armed
bank
robbery
knew
confederates
use
weapons
carrying
crime
see
akiti
easter
purposes
aiding
abetting
law
person
actively
participates
criminal
scheme
knowing
extent
character
intends
scheme
principle
holds
active
participant
drug
transaction
intent
needed
aid
abet
violation
knows
one
confederates
carry
gun
case
accomplice
decided
join
criminal
venture
share
benefits
full
awareness
scope
plan
calls
drug
sale
armed
one
chosen
like
abettors
pereira
bozza
driver
armed
robbery
align
illegal
scheme
entirety
including
use
firearm
determined
like
abettors
make
scheme
succeed
nye
nissen
thus
becomes
responsible
typical
way
aiders
abettors
conduct
others
may
brought
gun
drug
deal
took
part
deal
knowing
confederate
intended
commission
offense
armed
drug
sale
true
though
defendant
knowledge
firearm
must
advance
knowledge
otherwise
said
knowledge
enables
make
relevant
legal
indeed
moral
choice
accomplice
knows
beforehand
confederate
design
carry
gun
attempt
alter
plan
unsuccessful
withdraw
enterprise
deciding
instead
go
ahead
role
venture
shows
intent
aid
armed
offense
accomplice
knows
nothing
gun
appears
scene
may
already
completed
acts
assistance
even
may
late
point
realistic
opportunity
quit
crime
defendant
shown
requisite
intent
assist
crime
involving
gun
even
government
concedes
unarmed
accomplice
aid
abet
violation
unless
foreknowledge
confederate
commit
offense
firearm
brief
see
also
infra
reasons
given
think
means
knowledge
time
accomplice
something
notably
opt
walk
parties
find
something
dislike
view
issue
rosemond
argues
participant
drug
deal
intends
assist
violation
affirmatively
desires
one
confederates
use
gun
see
reply
brief
jury
rosemond
concedes
infer
state
mind
defendant
advance
knowledge
plan
included
firearm
see
tr
oral
arg
according
rosemond
instructions
must
also
permit
jury
draw
opposite
conclusion
although
defendant
participated
drug
deal
knowing
gun
involved
want
carriage
use
higher
standard
rosemond
claims
necessary
avoid
subjecting
persons
different
culpability
punishment
rosemond
offers
example
unarmed
driver
assisting
heist
store
person
spent
drive
trying
persuade
confederate
leave
gun
behind
convicted
abetting
shoplifting
armed
robbery
reply
brief
think
matters
purposes
gauging
intent
jury
instructions
convey
defendant
chosen
full
knowledge
participate
illegal
scheme
left
planned
identical
crime
consider
variant
rosemond
example
driver
getaway
car
wants
help
rob
convenience
store
argues
passionately
plan
eventually
accedes
confederates
decide
instead
hold
national
bank
whatever
original
misgivings
requisite
intent
aid
abet
bank
robbery
put
aside
doubts
knowingly
took
part
dangerous
crime
true
accomplice
knowingly
joins
armed
drug
transaction
regardless
whether
formerly
indifferent
even
resistant
using
firearms
law
care
whether
participates
happy
heart
sense
foreboding
either
way
culpability
either
way
knowingly
elected
aid
commission
peculiarly
risky
form
offense
final
metaphorical
way
making
point
virtue
using
firearm
drug
deal
ups
ante
accomplice
might
decide
play
perilous
stakes
might
grasp
better
course
fold
hand
expect
capacity
hedge
bets
joining
dangerous
criminal
scheme
evading
penalties
leaving
use
gun
someone
else
aiding
abetting
law
prevents
outcome
long
player
knew
heightened
stakes
decided
stay
game
government
part
thinks
take
strict
view
defendant
charged
abetting
violation
must
acquire
knowledge
noted
government
recognizes
accused
accomplice
must
foreknowledge
gun
presence
brief
see
supra
government
views
standard
met
whenever
accomplice
learned
firearm
continues
act
assisting
drug
transaction
see
brief
according
government
jury
convict
defendant
even
became
aware
gun
realistically
opted
crime
approach
think
diminish
far
requirement
defendant
prosecution
must
intend
armed
drug
deal
assume
example
accomplice
agrees
participate
drug
sale
express
condition
one
brings
gun
place
exchange
parties
making
trade
accomplice
notices
one
confederates
poorly
concealed
firearm
jacket
government
convict
accomplice
aiding
abetting
offense
assists
completing
deal
without
incident
rather
running
away
otherwise
aborting
sale
see
tr
oral
arg
behaving
government
suggests
might
increase
risk
gun
violence
accomplice
participants
bystanders
conversely
finishing
sale
might
best
way
avoid
danger
circumstance
jury
entitled
find
defendant
intended
drug
sale
never
intended
facilitate
bear
responsibility
drug
deal
carried
gun
defendant
manifests
greater
intent
incurs
greater
liability
chooses
participate
drug
transaction
knowing
involve
firearm
makes
choice
knowledge
comes
late
reasonably
able
act
upon
iii
principles
district
erred
instructing
jury
explain
rosemond
needed
advance
knowledge
firearm
presence
recall
stated
rosemond
guilty
aiding
abetting
knew
cohort
used
firearm
drug
trafficking
crime
knowingly
actively
participated
drug
trafficking
crime
app
agree
instruction
second
half
explained
active
participation
drug
sale
sufficient
liability
even
conduct
extend
firearm
long
defendant
prior
knowledge
gun
involvement
see
supra
problem
instruction
came
description
knowledge
requirement
telling
jury
consider
merely
whether
rosemond
knew
cohort
used
firearm
direct
jury
determine
rosemond
obtained
requisite
knowledge
example
jury
convicted
even
rosemond
first
learned
gun
fired
took
action
advance
crime
reason
government
describes
instruction
first
half
potentially
misleading
candidly
explaining
clearer
say
rosemond
know
confederate
use
firearm
something
makes
absolutely
clear
need
foreknowledge
tr
oral
arg
agree
view
statement
failed
convey
rosemond
advance
knowledge
kind
described
confederate
armed
see
supra
government
contends
problematic
instruction
looks
accurate
viewed
context
particular
government
points
district
prefatory
umbrella
instruction
aid
abet
crime
defendant
must
willfully
knowingly
seek
act
help
make
crime
succeed
app
brief
statement
government
rightly
notes
mirrors
judge
hand
classic
formulation
tr
oral
arg
see
supra
statement
also
pitched
high
level
generality
immediately
afterward
district
provided
jury
test
noted
thus
indicating
broad
principle
apply
specific
charge
abetting
offense
therefore
see
umbrella
statement
cured
error
indeed
different
contextual
feature
case
amplified
mistake
earlier
described
prosecutor
asserted
closing
argument
test
easily
satisfied
person
present
active
drug
deal
shots
fired
know
cohort
using
gun
app
see
supra
prosecutor
thus
invited
jury
convict
rosemond
even
first
learned
gun
discharged
matter
afterward
message
jury
need
find
advance
knowledge
exactly
matter
government
said
required
send
case
back
tenth
circuit
consider
appropriate
consequence
district
error
government
makes
two
arguments
relevant
inquiry
first
contends
rosemond
failed
object
specifically
part
trial
instructions
found
wanting
thus
government
asserts
standard
apply
claim
see
fed
rule
crim
proc
johnson
second
government
argues
error
aiding
abetting
instruction
harmless
jury
must
found
based
another
part
verdict
discussed
rosemond
fired
gun
claims
raised
addressed
see
special
reason
decide
first
instance
see
travelers
casualty
surety
america
pacific
gas
elec
accordingly
vacate
judgment
remand
case
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
opinion
alito
justus
rosemond
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
tenth
circuit
march
justice
alito
justice
thomas
joins
concurring
part
dissenting
part
largely
agree
analysis
first
pages
opinion
strongly
disagree
discussion
comes
point
specifically
reject
conclusion
conviction
aiding
abetting
violation
demands
proof
alleged
aider
abettor
terms
realistic
opportunity
refrain
engaging
conduct
ante
rule
represents
important
far
aware
unprecedented
alteration
law
aiding
abetting
law
intentionality
generally
explain
disagreement
analysis
begin
case
law
mens
rea
required
establish
aiding
abetting
tension
cases
point
specifically
cases
suggest
aider
abettor
must
act
purposefully
intent
prominent
among
cases
nye
nissen
quotes
see
ante
case
quoting
judge
learned
hand
formulation
peoni
said
aider
abettor
must
crime
something
wishes
bring
seek
action
make
succeed
hand
cases
also
refers
ante
appear
hold
requisite
mens
rea
simply
knowledge
see
pereira
bozza
refers
interchangeably
tests
thus
leaves
case
law
somewhat
conflicted
state
previously
existed
difference
acting
purposefully
concept
properly
understood
acting
knowingly
slight
matter
great
concern
beginning
page
however
veers
new
mind
unfortunate
direction
imagines
following
situation
accomplice
agrees
participate
drug
sale
express
condition
one
brings
gun
place
exchange
parties
making
trade
accomplice
notices
one
confederates
poorly
concealed
firearm
jacket
ante
accomplice
despite
spotting
gun
continues
assist
completion
drug
sale
accomplice
aided
abetted
commission
violation
answer
depends
walking
away
observes
might
increase
risk
gun
violence
accomplice
participants
bystanders
conversely
finishing
sale
might
best
way
avoid
danger
ante
moreover
seriously
misguided
step
occurs
says
risk
walking
away
exceeds
unspecified
degree
risk
created
completing
sale
alleged
aider
abettor
chooses
continue
reason
alleged
aider
abettor
lacks
mens
rea
required
conviction
see
ante
done
convert
affirmative
defense
part
required
mens
rea
step
important
conceptual
practical
consequences
fundamentally
alters
prior
understanding
mental
form
foundation
substantive
criminal
law
places
strange
difficult
burden
prosecution
taken
radical
step
seen
comparing
holds
traditional
defense
necessity
defense
excuses
violation
law
harm
result
compliance
law
greater
result
violation
lafave
substantive
criminal
law
hereinafter
lafave
almost
exactly
calculus
adopted
traditional
approach
necessity
affirmative
defense
see
bailey
necessity
closely
related
defense
duress
affirmative
defenses
almost
invariably
negate
mens
rea
necessary
incur
criminal
liability
see
lafave
rationale
necessity
defense
person
faced
pressure
circumstances
nature
lacks
mental
element
crime
question
requires
duress
made
clear
except
narrow
circumstances
necessity
duress
negate
mens
rea
required
conviction
dixon
defendant
charged
knowingly
willfully
committing
certain
criminal
acts
claimed
committed
acts
boyfriend
threatened
kill
hurt
daughters
contended
formed
necessary
mens
rea
crimes
freely
choose
commit
acts
question
rejected
argument
explaining
duress
defense
like
defense
necessity
may
excuse
conduct
otherwise
punishable
existence
duress
normally
controvert
elements
offense
suggested
one
situation
prosecution
might
required
disprove
duress
namely
particular
crime
demands
proof
accused
acted
maliciously
say
without
justification
excuse
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
justifies
holding
ground
mens
rea
standard
articulated
nye
nissen
also
falls
within
exception
general
rule
proof
necessity
duress
negate
mens
rea
ante
refrained
pages
opinion
deciding
whether
aiding
abetting
requires
purposeful
opposed
knowing
conduct
quickly
without
explanation
jettisons
knowing
standard
concludes
purposeful
conduct
needed
critical
move
enough
alleged
aider
abettor
simply
know
confederate
carrying
gun
alleged
aider
abettor
hypothetical
case
spots
gun
confederate
person
unquestionably
mens
rea
needed
conviction
even
accepting
nye
nissen
standard
exclusive
means
proving
required
mens
rea
analysis
still
quite
wrong
nye
nissen
standard
government
must
simply
prove
defendant
conscious
object
hypothetical
drug
sale
defendant
knew
included
carrying
gun
one
participants
go
forward
completion
see
nye
nissen
intent
perfectly
consistent
facts
supporting
necessity
duress
defense
person
certainly
intend
success
criminal
enterprise
aids
belief
give
rise
lesser
evil
refusal
participate
bring
confuses
two
fundamentally
distinct
concepts
intent
motive
seems
assume
defendant
motive
aiding
criminal
venture
avoid
greater
evil
intent
venture
succeed
intent
undertake
act
course
perfectly
consistent
motive
avoiding
adverse
consequences
otherwise
occur
testify
daily
experience
people
wake
go
work
balance
checkbooks
shop
groceries
yes
commit
crimes
believe
something
bad
happen
things
deepest
desire
heart
person
may
go
work
morning
keep
family
destitution
mean
intend
put
full
day
work
way
fact
defendant
carries
crime
feels
must
pain
terrible
consequences
mean
intend
carry
crime
jean
valjean
stole
loaf
bread
feed
starving
family
certainly
intended
commit
theft
fact
living
america
today
may
pleaded
necessity
defense
change
fact
see
hugo
les
misérables
fall
river
press
ed
commentators
recognized
elementary
distinction
intent
motive
sir
james
fitzjames
stephen
explains
puts
loaded
pistol
temple
shoots
head
deliberately
obvious
every
case
intention
must
kill
history
criminal
law
england
fact
throws
light
whatever
motives
killing
may
infinitely
various
motive
may
desire
revenge
desire
plunder
wish
part
defend
attack
put
man
already
mortally
wounded
agony
cases
intention
motives
different
intention
may
remain
unchanged
first
last
whilst
motives
may
vary
moment
moment
ibid
unsurprisingly
cases
recognized
lawful
motive
necessity
duress
consistent
mens
rea
necessary
satisfy
requirement
intent
martin
ohio
considered
whether
due
process
permitted
state
ohio
place
burden
proving
defendant
charged
aggravated
murder
ohio
statute
aggravated
murder
consisted
purposely
prior
calculation
design
caus
ing
death
another
alteration
original
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
martin
pleaded
required
prove
fault
creating
situation
giving
rise
argument
victim
honest
belief
imminent
danger
death
great
bodily
harm
means
escape
danger
use
force
violate
duty
retreat
avoid
danger
ibid
martin
argued
due
process
permit
state
impose
burden
proving
proving
necessarily
negate
elements
aggravated
murder
state
required
prove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
disagreed
explaining
elements
state
required
prove
convict
martin
elements
martin
required
prove
prevail
theory
holding
recognized
defendant
purpose
kill
another
incompatible
defendant
honest
belief
imminent
danger
death
great
bodily
harm
use
force
necessary
preserve
life
words
fact
defendant
intends
kill
another
avert
mortal
peril
mean
defendant
intend
kill
principle
plays
wide
variety
cases
provides
good
example
ninth
circuit
decide
whether
defendant
constitutionally
required
bear
burden
proving
duress
defense
conviction
attempted
illegal
reentry
pleaded
duress
testifying
entered
escape
deadly
threat
posed
abusive
mexican
police
officers
chasing
ninth
circuit
earlier
held
mens
rea
required
conviction
attempted
illegal
reentry
purpose
conscious
desire
reenter
appeals
nevertheless
found
constitution
permitted
imposition
burden
proving
duress
proving
duress
require
prove
purposely
entered
ninth
circuit
explained
duress
mens
rea
requirement
intent
overlap
desire
enter
country
even
act
crossing
border
done
escape
harm
thus
seems
inarguable
existence
purpose
intent
carry
crime
perfectly
compatible
facts
giving
rise
necessity
duress
defense
proposition
established
error
readily
apparent
requires
government
prove
defendant
rosemond
situation
walked
away
without
risking
harm
greater
cause
continuing
crime
circumstances
traditionally
support
necessity
duress
defense
imposes
requirement
government
despite
fact
dangerous
circumstances
simply
bear
whether
defendant
intends
offense
succeed
reading
required
aiding
abetting
liability
usual
rule
defendant
bears
burden
proving
affirmative
defenses
justified
compelling
commonsense
intuition
facts
regard
issue
lie
peculiarly
knowledge
party
party
best
situated
bear
burden
proof
smith
slip
quoting
dixon
alteration
original
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
abandoning
rule
cases
involving
aiding
abetting
offenses
creates
perverse
arrangement
whereby
prosecution
must
prove
something
peculiarly
within
knowledge
defendant
imagine
aids
committing
offense
claims
learned
gun
crime
begun
burden
proof
might
testify
hothead
previously
shot
others
crossed
rule
prosecution
order
show
intent
needed
convict
aider
abettor
presumably
burden
proving
person
believe
prosecution
offering
testimony
friends
associates
regarding
peaceful
easygoing
nature
introducing
entries
diary
reflects
sense
safety
feels
carrying
criminal
enterprises
company
furthermore
even
hothead
knew
presumably
entitled
escape
liability
continued
offense
fear
reaction
walked
away
rule
government
prove
continued
participation
account
fear
introducing
footage
convenient
security
camera
demonstrating
eyes
wide
fear
breathing
rapid
rule
breaks
tradition
case
law
also
makes
sense
respectfully
dissent
portion
opinion
places
government
burden
proving
alleged
aider
abettor
offense
terms
realistic
opportunity
refrain
engaging
conduct
issue
footnotes
justice
scalia
joins
footnotes
opinion
government
agreed
bring
charges
four
participants
narcotics
deal
exchange
giving
truthful
testimony
rosemond
see
record
appeals
stated
address
argument
even
jury
found
rosemond
fired
gun
conviction
based
general
verdict
subject
challenge
jury
instructed
alternative
theories
guilt
may
relied
invalid
one
quoting
hedgpeth
pulido
per
curiam
see
bancalari
wharton
treatise
gave
following
example
multiple
confederates
perform
different
roles
carrying
crime
assume
wharton
hypothesized
several
persons
act
concert
steal
man
goods
wharton
victim
induced
fraud
trust
one
presence
others
goods
possession
ibid
afterward
another
party
entice
owner
away
goods
may
carry
wharton
concludes
guilty
principals
see
also
ali
cadc
roving
defendant
guilty
aiding
abetting
ordinarily
require
government
establish
participation
element
underlying
offense
government
required
prove
defendant
participated
element
substantive
offense
order
hold
liable
aider
abettor
woods
government
need
prove
assistance
related
every
element
underlying
offense
forth
consider
hypothetical
similar
johnson
pereira
modern
variant
wharton
treatise
see
supra
suppose
part
kidnapping
scheme
one
accomplice
lures
victim
car
false
pretenses
another
drives
vehicle
third
allows
use
house
hold
victim
captive
still
fourth
keeps
watch
outside
divert
potential
witnesses
none
personally
completed
even
assisted
elements
offense
see
listing
elements
requisite
intent
liable
authorities
suggest
exception
general
rule
another
crime
natural
probable
consequence
crime
defendant
intended
abet
see
lafave
citing
cases
see
better
view
one
accomplice
crime
merely
crime
natural
probable
consequence
another
offense
accomplice
question
implicated
one
contends
violation
natural
probable
consequence
simple
drug
trafficking
therefore
express
view
issue
deal
cases
defendants
incidentally
facilitate
criminal
venture
rather
actively
participate
hypothetical
case
owner
gun
store
sells
firearm
criminal
knowing
caring
gun
used
express
view
sort
facts
suffice
show
third
party
intent
necessary
convicted
aiding
abetting
course
defendant
continues
participate
crime
gun
displayed
used
confederate
jury
permissibly
infer
failure
object
withdraw
knowledge
criminal
case
factfinder
draw
inferences
defendant
intent
based
facts
circumstances
crime
commission
contrary
dissent
view
see
post
nothing
holding
changes
way
defenses
duress
necessity
operate
neither
decision
remotely
deny
intent
undertake
act
perfectly
consistent
motive
avoiding
adverse
consequences
otherwise
occur
post
holding
grounded
distinctive
intent
standard
aiding
abetting
someone
else
act
words
judge
hand
defendant
must
sort
associate
venture
seems
good
enough
dissent
also
participate
something
wishes
bring
seek
action
make
succeed
nye
nissen
quoting
peoni
reasons
given
see
supra
think
intent
standard
satisfied
defendant
charged
aiding
abetting
offense
learns
gun
realistically
walk
away
opportunity
decide
whether
wishes
bring
make
succeed
armed
drug
transaction
rather
simple
drug
crime
defendant
prior
knowledge
part
intent
required
aid
abet
offense
burden
prove
resides
government
footnotes
also
concerned
use
without
clarification
phrase
advance
knowledge
lead
readers
astray
ante
viewed
phrase
naturally
means
knowledge
acquired
advance
commission
drug
trafficking
offense
means
rather
advance
knowledge
used
may
include
knowledge
acquired
drug
trafficking
offense
progress
specifically
defendant
knowledge
says
first
learns
gun
drug
offense
progress
time
realistically
opted
crime
ante
traditionally
defense
necessity
employed
natural
forces
created
situation
justifying
situation
product
human
action
duress
appropriate
defense
lafave
odern
cases
tended
blur
distinction
two
defenses
bailey
doubtless
possible
treat
duress
branch
law
necessity
lafave