austin
argued
april
decided
june
state
sentenced
petitioner
austin
guilty
plea
one
count
possessing
cocaine
intent
distribute
violation
south
dakota
law
filed
rem
action
federal
district
mobile
home
auto
body
shop
provide
forfeiture
respectively
vehicles
real
property
used
intended
used
facilitate
commission
certain
crimes
granting
government
summary
judgment
basis
officer
affidavit
austin
brought
two
grams
cocaine
mobile
home
body
shop
order
consummate
prearranged
sale
rejected
austin
argument
forfeiture
properties
violate
eighth
amendment
excessive
fines
clause
appeals
affirmed
agreeing
government
eighth
amendment
inapplicable
rem
civil
forfeitures
held
forfeiture
monetary
punishment
subject
limitations
excessive
fines
clause
pp
determinative
question
government
whether
forfeiture
civil
criminal
eighth
amendment
text
expressly
limited
criminal
cases
history
require
limitation
rather
crucial
question
whether
forfeiture
monetary
punishment
excessive
fines
clause
particularly
concerned
sanctions
frequently
serve
one
purpose
fact
forfeiture
serves
remedial
goals
exclude
clause
purview
long
explained
serving
part
punish
see
halper
thus
consideration
must
given
whether
time
eighth
amendment
ratified
forfeiture
understood
least
part
punishment
whether
forfeiture
understood
today
pp
review
english
american
law
time
following
ratification
eighth
amendment
demonstrates
forfeiture
generally
statutory
rem
forfeiture
particular
historically
understood
least
part
punishment
see
peisch
ware
cranch
understanding
runs
cases
rejecting
innocence
owner
common
law
defense
forfeiture
see
pearson
yacht
leasing
pp
forfeitures
properly
considered
punishment
today
since
nothing
provisions
contradicts
historical
understanding
since
sections
clearly
focus
owner
culpability
expressly
providing
innocent
owner
defenses
tying
forfeiture
directly
commission
drug
offenses
since
legislative
history
confirms
congress
understood
provisions
serving
deter
punish
thus
even
assuming
sections
serve
remedial
purpose
concluded
forfeiture
sections
serves
purpose
pp
declines
establish
test
determining
whether
forfeiture
constitutionally
excessive
since
prudence
dictates
lower
courts
allowed
consider
question
first
instance
blackmun
delivered
opinion
white
stevens
souter
joined
scalia
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
post
kennedy
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
rehnquist
thomas
joined
post
richard
johnson
argued
cause
fore
petitioner
briefs
scott
peters
miguel
estrada
argued
cause
brief
acting
solicitor
general
bryson
acting
assistant
attorney
general
keeney
thomas
booth
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
filed
american
civil
liberties
union
gerard
lynch
steven
shapiro
john
powell
national
association
criminal
defense
layers
david
smith
justin
miller
roger
conner
robert
teir
edward
dennis
peter
buscemi
filed
brief
american
alliance
rights
responsibilities
et
al
urging
affirmance
brief
amici
curiae
filed
state
arizona
et
al
grant
woods
attorney
general
arizona
cameron
holmes
sandra
janzen
assistant
attorneys
general
daniel
lungren
attorney
general
gary
schons
domenick
galluzzo
acting
chief
state
attorney
connectitcut
attorneys
general
respective
jurisdictions
follows
winston
bryant
arkansas
robert
butterworth
florida
michael
bowers
georgia
robert
marks
hawaii
larry
echohawk
idaho
robert
stephan
kansas
chris
gorman
kentucky
richard
ieyoub
louisiana
michael
carpenter
maine
joseph
curran
maryland
scott
harshbarger
massachusetts
frank
kelley
michigan
hubert
humphrey
iii
minnesota
michaelo
moore
mississippi
joseph
mazurek
montana
stenberg
nebraska
frankie
sue
del
papa
nevada
jeffrey
howard
new
carolina
susan
loving
oklahoma
ernest
preate
pennsylvania
jeffrey
pine
rhode
island
travis
medlock
sought
carolina
dan
morales
texas
jan
graham
utah
stephen
rosenthal
virginia
christine
gregoire
washington
joseph
meyer
wyoming
rosalie
simmonds
ballentine
virgin
islands
justice
blackmun
delivered
opinion
case
asked
decide
whether
excessive
fines
clause
eighth
amendment
applies
forfeitures
property
hold
therefore
remand
case
consideration
question
whether
forfeiture
issue
excessive
august
petitioner
richard
lyle
austin
indicted
four
counts
violating
south
dakota
drug
laws
austin
ultimately
pleaded
guilty
one
count
possessing
cocaine
intent
distribute
sentenced
state
seven
years
imprisonment
september
filed
rem
action
district
district
south
dakota
seeking
forfeiture
austin
mobile
home
auto
body
shop
austin
filed
claim
answer
complaint
february
made
motion
supported
affidavit
sioux
falls
police
officer
donald
satterlee
summary
judgment
according
satterlee
affidavit
austin
met
keith
engebretson
austin
body
shop
june
agreed
sell
cocaine
engebretson
austin
left
shop
went
mobile
home
returned
shop
two
grams
cocaine
sold
engebretson
state
authorities
executed
search
warrant
body
shop
mobile
home
following
day
discovered
small
amounts
marijuana
cocaine
caliber
revolver
drug
paraphernalia
approximately
cash
app
opposing
summary
judgment
austin
argued
forfeiture
properties
violate
eighth
amendment
district
rejected
argument
entered
summary
judgment
appeals
eighth
circuit
reluctantly
agree
government
affirmed
one
parcel
property
although
thought
principle
proportionality
applied
civil
actions
result
harsh
penalties
ibid
government
exacting
high
penalty
relation
offense
committed
felt
constrained
holding
forfeiture
unconstitutional
cited
decision
pearson
yacht
leasing
proposition
government
proceeding
property
rem
guilt
innocence
property
owner
constitutionally
irrelevant
reasoned
constrained
agree
ninth
circuit
constitution
allows
rem
forfeiture
visited
upon
innocent
owners
constitution
hardly
requires
proportionality
review
forfeitures
quoting
tax
lot
cert
denied
sub
nom
jaffee
granted
certiorari
resolve
apparent
conflict
appeals
second
circuit
applicability
eighth
amendment
rem
civil
forfeitures
see
certain
real
property
cert
denied
sub
nom
levin
ii
austin
contends
eighth
amendment
excessive
fines
clause
applies
rem
civil
forfeiture
proceedings
see
brief
petitioner
occasion
consider
clause
industries
kelco
disposal
held
excessive
fines
clause
limit
award
punitive
damages
private
party
civil
suit
government
neither
prosecuted
action
right
receive
share
damages
opinion
justice
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
reviewed
detail
history
excessive
fines
clause
see
concluded
eighth
amendment
english
bill
rights
derives
intended
prevent
government
abusing
power
punish
see
therefore
excessive
fines
clause
intended
limit
fines
directly
imposed
payable
government
found
unnecessary
decide
whether
excessive
fines
clause
applies
criminal
cases
argues
claim
government
conduct
civil
proceeding
limited
eighth
amendment
generally
excessive
fines
clause
particular
must
fail
unless
challenged
governmental
action
despite
label
recognized
criminal
punishment
time
eighth
amendment
adopted
brief
emphasis
added
provisions
bill
rights
expressly
limited
criminal
cases
fifth
amendment
clause
example
provides
person
shall
compelled
criminal
case
witness
protections
provided
sixth
amendment
explicitly
confined
criminal
prosecutions
see
generally
ward
text
eighth
amendment
includes
similar
limitation
see
supra
history
eighth
amendment
require
limitation
justice
noted
consideration
eighth
amendment
immediately
followed
consideration
fifth
amendment
deciding
confine
benefits
clause
fifth
amendment
criminal
proceedings
framers
turned
attention
eighth
amendment
proposals
limit
amendment
criminal
proceedings
section
english
bill
rights
expressly
limited
criminal
cases
either
original
draft
introduced
house
commons
contain
restriction
respect
bail
clause
requiring
excessive
bail
persons
committed
criminal
cases
imposing
excessive
fines
illegal
punishments
prevented
absence
similar
restriction
two
clauses
suggests
limited
criminal
cases
final
version
even
reference
criminal
cases
bail
clause
omitted
see
ch
stat
large
excessive
bail
required
excessive
fines
imposed
cruel
unusual
punishments
inflicted
see
also
schwoerer
declaration
rights
article
contains
reference
criminal
cases
thus
seem
apply
cases
purpose
eighth
amendment
putting
bail
clause
one
side
limit
government
power
punish
see
cruel
unusual
punishments
clause
concerned
punishment
excessive
fines
clause
limits
government
power
extract
payments
whether
cash
kind
punishment
offense
emphasis
added
notion
punishment
commonly
understand
cuts
across
division
civil
criminal
law
halper
commonly
understood
civil
proceedings
may
advance
punitive
remedial
goals
conversely
punitive
well
remedial
goals
may
served
criminal
penalties
see
also
ex
rel
marcus
hess
frankfurter
concurring
thus
question
whether
forfeiture
civil
criminal
rather
whether
punishment
considering
question
mindful
fact
sanctions
frequently
serve
one
purpose
need
exclude
possibility
forfeiture
serves
remedial
purposes
conclude
subject
limitations
excessive
fines
clause
however
must
determine
explained
serving
part
punish
said
halper
civil
sanction
fairly
said
solely
serve
remedial
purpose
rather
explained
also
serving
either
retributive
deterrent
purposes
punishment
come
understand
term
turn
consider
whether
time
eighth
amendment
ratified
forfeiture
understood
least
part
punishment
whether
forfeiture
understood
today
iii
three
kinds
forfeiture
established
england
time
eighth
amendment
ratified
deodand
forfeiture
upon
conviction
felony
treason
statutory
forfeiture
see
understood
least
part
imposing
punishment
common
law
value
inanimate
object
directly
indirectly
causing
accidental
death
king
subject
forfeited
crown
deodand
origins
deodand
traceable
biblical
practices
reflected
view
instrument
death
accused
religious
expiation
required
see
holmes
common
law
value
instrument
forfeited
king
belief
king
provide
money
masses
said
good
dead
man
soul
insure
deodand
put
charitable
uses
blackstone
commentaries
application
deodand
religious
eleemosynary
purposes
ceased
deodand
became
source
crown
revenue
institution
justified
penalty
carelessness
footnotes
omitted
second
kind
common
law
forfeiture
fell
upon
convicted
felony
treason
convicted
felon
forfeited
chattels
crown
lands
escheated
lord
convicted
traitor
forfeited
property
real
personal
crown
forfeitures
known
forfeitures
estate
see
blackstone
forfeitures
obviously
served
punish
felons
traitors
see
palmyra
wheat
justified
ground
property
right
derived
society
one
lost
violating
society
laws
see
blackstone
third
english
law
provided
statutory
forfeitures
offending
objects
used
violation
customs
revenue
laws
notable
navigation
acts
required
shipping
commodities
english
vessels
violations
acts
resulted
forfeiture
illegally
carried
goods
well
ship
transported
see
generally
harper
english
navigation
laws
statute
construed
act
individual
seaman
undertaken
without
knowledge
master
owner
result
forfeiture
entire
ship
see
mitchell
torup
park
ex
yet
blackstone
considered
forfeiture
statutes
penal
blackstone
observed
statutory
forfeitures
likely
product
confluence
merger
deodand
tradition
belief
right
property
denied
wrongdoer
since
traditions
punitive
aspect
surprising
forfeiture
navigation
acts
justified
penalty
negligence
owners
ships
take
care
master
employ
master
mariners
negligence
plainly
imputable
master
report
cargo
ship
searched
examined
ship
proper
care
according
duty
found
tea
might
prevented
forfeiture
mitchell
england
three
kinds
forfeiture
third
took
hold
deodands
become
part
common
law
tradition
country
constitution
forbids
forfeiture
estate
punishment
treason
except
life
person
attainted
art
iii
cl
first
congress
also
abolished
forfeiture
estate
punishment
felons
act
apr
ch
stat
ong
adoption
constitution
common
law
courts
colonies
later
period
confederation
exercising
jurisdiction
rem
enforcement
english
local
forfeiture
statutes
quoting
hendry
moore
first
congress
passed
laws
subjecting
ships
cargos
involved
customs
offenses
forfeiture
follow
fact
however
first
congress
thought
forfeitures
beyond
purview
eighth
amendment
indeed
examination
laws
suggests
first
congress
viewed
forfeiture
punishment
example
act
july
ch
stat
congress
provided
goods
unloaded
except
day
permit
nd
master
commander
ship
vessel
shall
suffer
permit
master
commander
every
person
shall
aiding
assisting
landing
removing
housing
otherwise
securing
shall
forfeit
pay
sum
four
hundred
dollars
every
offence
shall
moreover
disabled
holding
office
trust
profit
term
exceeding
seven
years
shall
duty
collector
district
advertise
names
persons
public
gazette
state
resides
within
twenty
days
respective
conviction
goods
wares
merchandise
landed
discharged
shall
become
forfeited
may
seized
officer
customs
value
thereof
shall
amount
four
hundred
dollars
vessel
tackle
apparel
furniture
shall
subject
like
forfeiture
seizure
cases
also
recognized
statutory
rem
forfeiture
imposes
punishment
peisch
ware
cranch
example
held
goods
removed
custody
revenue
officer
without
payment
duties
forfeitable
reason
unless
removed
consent
owner
agent
chief
justice
marshall
delivered
opinion
unanimous
also
opinion
removal
act
punishes
owner
forfeiture
goods
must
made
consent
connivance
person
employed
trusted
private
theft
open
robbery
without
fault
part
property
invaded
custody
officer
revenue
law
understood
punish
forfeiture
property
fiction
thing
primarily
considered
offender
venerable
history
case
law
see
palmyra
thing
primarily
considered
offender
rather
offence
attached
primarily
thing
harmony
vessel
commits
aggression
treated
offender
guilty
instrument
thing
forfeiture
attaches
without
reference
whatsoever
character
conduct
owner
dobbins
distillery
offence
attached
primarily
distillery
real
personal
property
used
connection
without
regard
whatsoever
personal
misconduct
responsibility
owner
yet
understood
fiction
rest
notion
owner
allows
property
become
involved
offense
negligent
thus
said
ascribing
property
certain
personality
power
complicity
guilt
wrong
analogy
law
deodand
quoted
blackstone
explanation
reason
deodand
misfortunes
part
owing
negligence
owner
therefore
properly
punished
forfeiture
quoting
blackstone
none
cases
apply
guilty
property
fiction
justify
forfeiture
owner
done
reasonably
expected
prevent
unlawful
use
property
palmyra
reject
argument
criminal
conviction
owner
prerequisite
forfeiture
property
see
personal
conviction
offender
necessary
enforce
forfeiture
rem
cases
nature
harmony
owners
claim
innocence
limited
fact
never
contemplated
authorized
acts
complained
dobbins
distillery
noted
responsibility
part
owner
arose
fact
leased
property
distiller
suffered
occupied
used
lessee
distillery
recent
cases
expressly
reserved
question
whether
fiction
employed
forfeit
property
truly
innocent
owner
see
noting
forfeiture
truly
innocent
owner
property
raise
serious
constitutional
questions
forfeiture
understood
punish
owner
reason
reserve
case
truly
innocent
owner
indeed
assumption
forfeiture
serves
part
punish
past
reservation
question
makes
sense
second
theory
justified
forfeiture
innocent
owner
property
owner
may
held
accountable
wrongs
others
entrusts
property
harmony
reasoned
acts
master
crew
cases
sort
bind
interest
owner
ship
whether
innocent
guilty
impliedly
submits
whatever
law
denounces
forfeiture
attached
ship
reason
unlawful
wanton
wrongs
repeated
reasoning
dobbins
distillery
unlawful
acts
distiller
bind
owner
property
respect
management
much
committed
owner
power
effect
law
vests
virtue
lease
abuses
trust
matter
settled
lessor
acts
violation
penal
consequences
property
considered
acts
owner
sum
even
though
rejected
innocence
owner
common
law
defense
forfeiture
consistently
recognized
forfeiture
serves
least
part
punish
owner
see
peisch
ware
cranch
act
punishes
owner
forfeiture
goods
dobbins
distillery
acts
violation
penal
consequences
property
considered
acts
owner
misfortunes
part
owing
negligence
owner
therefore
properly
punished
forfeiture
recently
noted
forfeiture
serves
punitive
deterrent
purposes
impos
es
economic
penalty
conclude
therefore
forfeiture
generally
statutory
rem
forfeiture
particular
historically
understood
least
part
punishment
iv
turn
next
consider
whether
forfeitures
properly
considered
punishment
today
find
nothing
provisions
legislative
history
contradict
historical
understanding
forfeiture
punishment
unlike
traditional
forfeiture
statutes
expressly
provide
innocent
owner
defense
see
conveyance
shall
forfeited
paragraph
extent
interest
owner
reason
act
omission
established
owner
committed
omitted
without
knowledge
consent
willful
blindness
owner
property
shall
forfeited
paragraph
extent
interest
owner
reason
act
omission
established
owner
committed
omitted
without
knowledge
consent
owner
see
also
parcel
rumson
land
plurality
opinion
noting
difference
traditional
forfeiture
statutes
exemptions
serve
focus
provisions
culpability
owner
way
makes
look
like
punishment
less
coin
currency
reasoned
provides
secretary
treasury
return
property
intend
violate
law
demonstrated
congress
intent
impose
penalty
upon
significantly
involved
criminal
enterprise
inclusion
defenses
reveals
similar
congressional
intent
punish
involved
drug
trafficking
furthermore
congress
chosen
tie
forfeiture
directly
commission
drug
offenses
thus
conveyance
forfeitable
used
intended
use
facilitate
transportation
controlled
substances
raw
materials
equipment
used
manufacture
distribute
real
property
forfeitable
used
intended
use
facilitate
commission
crime
punishable
one
year
imprisonment
see
supra
legislative
history
confirms
punitive
nature
provisions
added
subsection
congress
recognized
traditional
criminal
sanctions
fine
imprisonment
inadequate
deter
punish
enormously
profitable
trade
dangerous
drugs
characterized
forfeiture
real
property
powerful
deterrent
see
also
joint
explanation
senate
amendment
titles
ii
iii
psychotropic
substances
act
noting
penal
nature
forfeiture
statutes
government
argues
punitive
rather
considered
remedial
two
respects
first
remove
instruments
drug
trade
thereby
protecting
community
threat
continued
drug
dealing
brief
second
forfeited
assets
serve
compensate
government
expense
law
enforcement
activity
expenditure
societal
problems
urban
blight
drug
addiction
health
concerns
resulting
drug
trade
view
neither
argument
withstands
scrutiny
concededly
recognized
forfeiture
contraband
may
characterized
remedial
removes
dangerous
illegal
items
society
see
one
assortment
firearms
however
previously
rejected
government
attempt
extend
reasoning
conveyances
used
transport
illegal
liquor
see
one
plymouth
sedan
pennsylvania
case
noted
nothing
even
remotely
criminal
possessing
automobile
ibid
without
question
true
properties
involved
government
attempt
characterize
properties
instruments
drug
trade
must
meet
fate
pennsylvania
effort
characterize
plymouth
sedan
contraband
government
second
argument
remedial
nature
forfeiture
persuasive
previously
upheld
forfeiture
goods
involved
customs
violations
reasonable
form
liquidated
damages
one
lot
emerald
cut
stones
dramatic
variations
value
conveyances
real
property
forfeitable
undercut
similar
argument
respect
provisions
made
point
ward
forfeiture
property
penalty
ha
absolutely
correlation
damages
sustained
society
cost
enforcing
law
fundamentally
even
assuming
serve
remedial
purpose
government
argument
must
fail
civil
sanction
fairly
said
solely
serve
remedial
purpose
rather
explained
also
serving
either
retributive
deterrent
purposes
punishment
come
understand
term
halper
emphasis
added
light
historical
understanding
forfeiture
punishment
clear
focus
culpability
owner
evidence
congress
understood
provisions
serving
deter
punish
conclude
forfeiture
serves
solely
remedial
purpose
therefore
conclude
forfeiture
provisions
constitutes
payment
sovereign
punishment
offense
subject
limitations
eighth
amendment
excessive
fines
clause
austin
asks
establish
multifactor
test
determining
whether
forfeiture
constitutionally
excessive
see
brief
petitioner
decline
invitation
although
appeals
opined
government
exacting
high
penalty
relation
offense
committed
occasion
consider
factors
inform
decision
thought
foreclosed
engaging
inquiry
prudence
dictates
allow
lower
courts
consider
question
first
instance
see
yee
escondido
judgment
appeals
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
conveyances
including
aircraft
vehicles
vessels
used
intended
use
transport
manner
facilitate
transportation
sale
receipt
possession
concealment
controlled
substances
raw
materials
equipment
used
manufacture
distribution
real
property
including
right
title
interest
including
leasehold
interest
whole
lot
tract
land
appurtenances
improvements
used
intended
used
manner
part
commit
facilitate
commission
violation
subchapter
punishable
one
year
imprisonment
excessive
bail
shall
required
excessive
fines
imposed
cruel
unusual
punishments
inflicted
amdt
left
open
question
whether
excessive
fines
clause
applies
qui
tam
actions
private
party
brings
suit
name
shares
proceeds
see
instant
suit
prosecuted
austin
property
forfeited
occasion
address
question
general
matter
decisions
applying
constitutional
protections
civil
forfeiture
proceedings
adhered
distinction
provisions
limited
criminal
proceedings
provisions
thus
held
fourth
amendment
protection
unreasonable
searches
seizures
applies
forfeiture
proceedings
see
one
plymouth
sedan
pennsylvania
boyd
sixth
amendment
confrontation
clause
see
zucker
also
held
due
process
requirement
guilt
criminal
proceeding
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
see
winship
apply
civil
forfeiture
proceedings
see
lilienthal
tobacco
double
jeopardy
clause
held
apply
civil
forfeiture
proceedings
cases
forfeiture
properly
characterized
remedial
see
one
assortment
firearms
one
lot
emerald
cut
stones
see
generally
halper
double
jeopardy
clause
prohibits
second
sanction
may
fairly
characterized
remedial
conversely
fifth
amendment
clause
textually
limited
criminal
case
applied
civil
forfeiture
proceedings
forfeiture
statute
made
culpability
owner
relevant
see
coin
currency
owner
faced
possibility
subsequent
criminal
proceedings
see
boyd
see
also
ward
discussing
boyd
course
even
protections
associated
criminal
cases
may
apply
civil
forfeiture
proceeding
punitive
proceeding
must
reasonably
considered
criminal
see
kennedy
ward
supra
ingraham
wright
concluded
omission
reference
criminal
cases
without
substantive
significance
light
preservation
similar
reference
criminal
cases
preamble
english
bill
rights
reference
preamble
however
related
excessive
bail
see
ch
stat
large
moreover
preamble
appears
designed
catalog
misdeeds
james
ii
see
ibid
rather
define
scope
substantive
rights
set
subsequent
sections
reason
reliance
kennedy
ward
misplaced
question
cases
whether
nominally
civil
penalty
reclassified
criminal
safeguards
attend
criminal
prosecution
required
see
ward
addressing
separate
question
whether
punishment
imposed
employed
tests
articulated
ward
see
halper
since
case
deal
question
whether
eighth
amendment
excessive
fines
clause
applies
need
address
application
tests
dictionaries
time
confirm
fine
understood
include
forfeiture
vice
versa
see
sheridan
general
dictionary
english
language
unpaginated
defining
fine
mulct
pecuniary
punishment
penalty
forfeit
money
paid
exemption
liberty
walker
critical
pronouncing
dictionary
unpaginated
sheridan
supra
defining
forfeiture
act
forfeiting
thing
forfeited
mulct
fine
walker
supra
kersey
new
english
dictionary
unpaginated
defining
forfeit
default
fine
penalty
peisch
removal
goods
custody
revenue
officer
occurred
theft
robbery
pursuant
writ
replevin
issued
state
see
cranch
thus
peisch
stands
general
principle
law
understood
forfeit
property
owners
consignees
account
misconduct
mere
strangers
owners
consignees
control
government
relies
heavily
fiction
see
brief
understand
government
rely
separately
technical
distinction
proceedings
rem
proceedings
personam
note
reliance
misplaced
fictions
rem
forfeiture
developed
primarily
expand
reach
courts
republic
nat
bank
miami
particularly
admiralty
proceedings
might
lacked
personam
jurisdiction
owner
property
see
also
harmony
adhel
discussed
text
forfeiture
proceedings
historically
understood
imposing
punishment
despite
rem
nature
forfeiture
provisions
issue
exempt
innocent
owners
occasion
decide
case
whether
comport
due
process
forfeit
property
truly
innocent
owner
criminal
context
permitted
punishment
absence
conscious
wrongdoing
long
defendant
powerless
prevent
correct
violation
park
corporate
officer
strictly
liable
food
drug
cosmetic
act
nothing
inconsistent
therefore
viewing
forfeiture
punishment
even
though
forfeiture
occasioned
acts
person
owner
doubts
justice
scalia
see
post
justice
kennedy
see
post
express
regard
historical
understanding
forfeiture
punishment
appear
stem
misunderstanding
relevant
question
halper
question
whether
forfeiture
serves
part
punish
one
need
exclude
possibility
forfeiture
serves
purposes
reach
conclusion
although
omits
reference
legislative
history
brief
present
case
quoted
passage
approval
brief
parcel
rumson
land
rumson
see
brief
pp
halper
focused
whether
sanction
applied
individual
case
serves
goals
punishment
case
however
makes
sense
focus
whole
halper
involved
small
provision
ordinary
case
said
make
government
whole
value
conveyances
real
property
forfeitable
hand
vary
dramatically
relationship
government
actual
costs
amount
sanction
merely
coincidental
see
ward
furthermore
seen
forfeiture
statutes
historically
understood
serving
simply
remedial
goals
also
punishment
deterrence
finally
appears
make
little
practical
difference
whether
excessive
fines
clause
applies
forfeitures
characterized
purely
remedial
clause
prohibits
imposition
excessive
fines
fine
serves
purely
remedial
purposes
considered
excessive
event
justice
scalia
suggests
sole
measure
rem
forfeiture
excessiveness
relationship
forfeited
property
offense
see
post
rule
possibility
connection
property
offense
may
relevant
decision
today
way
limits
appeals
considering
factors
determining
whether
forfeiture
austin
property
excessive
justice
scalia
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
recently
stated
time
eighth
amendment
drafted
term
fine
understood
mean
payment
sovereign
punishment
offense
industries
kelco
disposal
seems
opinion
obscures
clear
statement
needlessly
attempts
derive
sparse
case
law
subject
rem
forfeiture
questionable
proposition
owner
property
taken
pursuant
forfeiture
always
blameworthy
write
separately
explain
consider
forfeiture
fine
point
excessiveness
inquiry
statutory
rem
forfeitures
different
usual
excessiveness
inquiry
whether
sort
forfeiture
property
may
covered
eighth
amendment
difficult
question
forfeiture
fine
appeared
one
many
definitions
various
dictionaries
see
ante
payment
word
used
synonym
fine
certainly
includes
assessments
webster
new
international
dictionary
ed
defining
payment
hat
paid
thing
given
discharge
debt
obligation
moreover
eighth
amendment
limit
cash
fines
permitting
limitless
assessments
make
little
sense
altering
form
star
chamber
abuses
led
provision
english
bill
rights
excessive
fines
clause
directly
derives
see
supra
cf
harmelin
michigan
opinion
scalia
alexander
ante
today
held
personam
criminal
forfeiture
eighth
amendment
fine
order
constitute
fine
eighth
amendment
however
forfeiture
must
constitute
punishment
much
closer
question
whether
statutory
rem
forfeitures
opposed
personam
forfeitures
meet
requirement
latter
assessments
whether
monetary
kind
punish
property
owner
criminal
conduct
former
confiscations
property
rights
based
improper
use
property
regardless
whether
owner
violated
law
statutory
rem
forfeitures
long
history
see
generally
pearson
yacht
leasing
property
apply
contraband
see
forfeiture
act
passed
first
congress
ante
necessarily
property
used
illegal
purposes
theory
rem
forfeiture
said
lawful
property
committed
offense
see
palmyra
wheat
forfeiture
vessel
piracy
harmony
forfeiture
vessel
cargo
piracy
dobbins
distillery
forfeiture
distillery
real
property
evasion
revenue
laws
goldsmith
forfeiture
goods
concealed
avoid
taxes
however
theory
may
expressed
seems
taking
lawful
property
must
considered
whole
part
see
halper
punitive
purpose
compensatory
make
someone
whole
injury
caused
unlawful
use
property
see
ibid
punishment
imposed
whether
one
quaintly
considers
object
property
realistically
regards
object
property
owner
conclusion
supported
blackstone
observation
even
confiscation
deodand
whose
religious
origin
supposedly
reflect
punitive
motive
expiation
see
law
deodands
law
mag
came
explained
part
reference
owner
well
offending
property
blackstone
commentaries
accord
law
deodands
supra
cases
described
statutory
rem
forfeiture
likely
product
confluence
merger
deodand
tradition
belief
right
property
denied
wrongdoer
supra
apparently
believes
however
actual
culpability
affected
property
owner
establish
forfeiture
provision
punitive
sets
establish
part
iii
culpability
exists
case
rem
forfeitures
view
however
case
law
far
ambiguous
acknowledges
never
held
constitution
requires
negligence
degree
culpability
support
forfeitures
see
ante
supra
reserving
question
supra
prominent
treatise
explains
statutory
rem
forfeitures
solely
reference
fiction
property
guilty
strictly
separating
forfeitures
require
personal
offense
owner
see
bishop
commentaries
criminal
law
ed
correct
culpability
owner
essential
difference
except
perhaps
burden
proof
traditional
rem
forfeiture
traditional
personam
forfeiture
common
law
distinctions
swept
away
reliance
bits
dicta
moreover
degree
personal
culpability
part
property
owner
always
exists
rem
forfeitures
see
ante
hard
understand
kept
reserving
therefore
academic
question
whether
personal
culpability
constitutionally
required
see
ante
today
see
ante
reserved
question
without
engaging
misleading
discussion
culpability
even
punishment
personal
culpability
necessary
forfeiture
fine
even
rem
forfeitures
general
punish
personal
culpability
rem
forfeiture
case
fine
discusses
part
iv
statute
contrast
traditional
rem
forfeiture
requires
owner
innocent
degree
culpability
guilty
property
see
also
parcel
rumson
land
plurality
opinion
contrasting
drug
forfeiture
statute
traditional
statutory
rem
forfeitures
property
must
offend
owner
must
completely
without
fault
consideration
compensating
loss
since
value
property
irrelevant
whether
forfeited
enough
satisfy
standard
make
entire
discussion
part
iii
dictum
statutory
forfeitures
certainly
payment
kind
sovereign
punishment
offense
ii
forfeiture
works
fine
raises
excessiveness
issue
remands
agree
remand
order
think
worth
pointing
remand
excessiveness
analysis
must
different
applicable
monetary
fines
perhaps
personam
forfeitures
case
monetary
fine
eighth
amendment
origins
english
bill
rights
intended
limit
abusive
penalties
assessed
king
opponents
see
demonstrate
touchstone
value
fine
relation
offense
alexander
indicated
true
personam
forfeiture
ante
however
offense
petitioner
convicted
relevant
forfeiture
section
requires
government
show
probable
cause
subject
property
used
prohibited
purpose
burden
shifts
property
owner
show
preponderance
evidence
use
made
without
knowledge
consent
willful
blindness
see
also
property
used
see
incorporating
unlike
monetary
fines
statutory
rem
forfeitures
traditionally
fixed
determining
appropriate
value
penalty
relation
committed
offense
determining
property
tainted
unlawful
use
issue
value
property
irrelevant
scales
used
measure
unlawful
drug
sales
example
confiscable
whether
made
purest
gold
basest
metal
rem
forfeiture
goes
beyond
traditional
limits
eighth
amendment
permits
applies
property
properly
regarded
instrumentality
offense
building
example
isolated
drug
sale
happens
occur
confiscation
excessive
fine
question
much
confiscated
property
worth
whether
confiscated
property
close
enough
relationship
offense
inquiry
statutory
forfeitures
common
law
parallels
even
case
deodands
juries
careful
confiscate
instrument
death
thus
man
killed
moving
cart
cart
horses
deodands
man
died
fell
wheel
immobile
cart
wheel
treated
deodand
since
wheel
regarded
cause
death
hale
pleas
crown
blackstone
commentaries
law
deodands
law
cases
suggest
similar
instrumentality
inquiry
considering
permissible
scope
statutory
forfeiture
cf
harmony
ship
used
piracy
forfeited
cargo
relevant
inquiry
excessive
forfeiture
relationship
property
offense
close
enough
render
property
traditional
standards
guilty
hence
forfeitable
join
opinion
part
concur
judgment
thus
contrary
contention
ante
agree
point
agree
however
culpability
property
owner
necessary
establish
punitiveness
punitiveness
part
established
showing
least
cases
affected
property
owners
culpable
say
statutory
forfeiture
must
always
least
partly
punitive
else
fine
see
ante
justice
kennedy
chief
justice
justice
thomas
join
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
substantial
agreement
part
justice
scalia
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
share
justice
scalia
belief
part
iii
opinion
quite
unnecessary
decision
case
fails
support
argument
seems
rather
doubtful
well
recounting
law
history
risk
anachronism
attribute
earlier
time
intent
employ
legal
concepts
yet
evolved
see
something
opinion
eagerness
discover
unified
theory
forfeitures
recites
consistent
rationale
personal
punishment
neither
cases
narratives
common
law
suggest
many
reasons
explained
justice
scalia
convinced
rem
forfeitures
account
owner
blameworthy
conduct
impositions
rem
forfeiture
may
designed
either
remove
property
causing
injury
see
harmony
give
jurisdiction
asset
control
order
make
injured
parties
whole
see
republic
nat
bank
miami
point
may
confront
constitutional
question
whether
forfeiture
permitted
owner
committed
wrong
sort
intentional
negligent
raise
serious
question
though
history
forfeiture
laws
might
determinative
issue
important
bearing
outcome
reserve
necessary
occasion
inquiry
undertakes
unlike
justice
scalia
see
ante
also
reserve
question
whether
rem
forfeitures
always
amount
intended
punishment
owner
forfeited
property
observations
concur
part
concur
judgment