mine
workers
bagwell
argued
november
decided
june
month
enjoining
petitioners
collectively
union
conducting
unlawful
activities
certain
mining
companies
virginia
trial
held
contempt
hearing
fined
union
disobedience
announced
union
fined
future
breach
injunction
subsequent
contempt
hearings
levied
union
termed
coercive
civil
fines
ordering
money
paid
commonwealth
counties
affected
unlawful
activities
strike
settled
refused
vacate
fines
owed
commonwealth
counties
concluding
payable
effect
public
ultimately
appointed
respondent
bagwell
act
special
commissioner
collect
unpaid
fines
virginia
appeals
reversed
ordered
fines
vacated
virginia
reversing
turn
rejected
petitioners
contention
fines
criminal
imposed
absent
criminal
trial
held
serious
contempt
fines
imposed
criminal
constitutionally
imposed
jury
trial
pp
criminal
contempt
fine
punitive
imposed
criminal
proceedings
including
right
jury
trial
contempt
fine
considered
civil
remedial
either
coerces
defendant
compliance
order
compensates
complainant
losses
sustained
mine
workers
america
fine
compensatory
civil
contemnor
opportunity
page
ii
purge
per
diem
fines
fixed
suspended
fines
pp
contempt
sanctions
share
punitive
coercive
characteristics
fundamental
question
underlying
distinction
civil
criminal
contempts
process
due
imposition
particular
contempt
sanction
direct
contempts
penalized
summarily
light
substantial
interest
maintaining
order
need
extensive
factfinding
likelihood
erroneous
deprivation
reduced
greater
procedural
protections
afforded
sanctions
indirect
contempts
certain
indirect
contempts
particularly
appropriate
imposition
civil
proceedings
including
contempts
impeding
ability
adjudicate
proceedings
contempts
involving
discrete
readily
ascertainable
acts
contempts
complex
injunctions
however
criminal
procedures
may
required
pp
mere
fact
contempt
fines
announced
advance
render
civil
criminal
laws
generally
provide
notice
sanction
imposed
union
ability
avoid
contempt
fines
indistinguishable
ability
citizen
avoid
criminal
sanction
considerations
confirm
fines
challenged
criminal
neither
parties
commonwealth
courts
suggested
fines
compensatory
union
sanctionable
conduct
occur
presence
otherwise
implicate
core
judicial
contempt
power
lesser
protections
may
appropriate
union
contumacy
involve
simple
affirmative
acts
sanctions
force
primarily
coercive
elaborate
factfinding
required
instead
levied
fines
widespread
ongoing
violations
complex
injunction
effectively
policing
union
compliance
entire
code
conduct
imposed
contumacy
lasted
many
months
spanned
several
counties
fines
assessed
serious
circumstances
disinterested
factfinding
evenhanded
adjudication
essential
union
entitled
criminal
jury
trial
pp
blackmun
delivered
opinion
unanimous
respect
parts
iii
opinion
respect
part
stevens
scalia
kennedy
souter
thomas
joined
scalia
filed
concurring
opinion
ginsburg
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
rehnquist
joined
mine
workers
bagwell
justice
blackmun
delivered
opinion
called
upon
consider
distinction
civil
criminal
contempt
specifically
address
whether
contempt
fines
levied
union
violations
labor
injunction
coercive
civil
fines
criminal
fines
constitutionally
imposed
jury
trial
conclude
fines
criminal
accordingly
reverse
judgment
virginia
petitioners
international
union
mine
workers
america
mine
workers
america
district
collectively
union
engaged
protracted
labor
dispute
clinchfield
coal
company
sea
mining
company
collectively
companies
alleged
unfair
labor
practices
april
companies
filed
suit
circuit
russell
county
virginia
enjoin
union
conducting
unlawful
activities
trial
entered
injunction
later
amended
prohibited
union
members
among
things
obstructing
ingress
egress
company
facilities
throwing
objects
physically
threatening
mine
workers
bagwell
company
employees
placing
jackrocks
roads
used
company
vehicles
picketing
specified
number
people
designated
sites
additionally
ordered
union
take
steps
necessary
ensure
compliance
injunction
place
supervisors
picket
sites
report
violations
app
pet
cert
may
trial
held
contempt
hearing
found
petitioners
committed
violations
injunction
fining
union
disobedience
announced
fine
union
future
violent
breach
injunction
future
nonviolent
infraction
exceeding
picket
numbers
blocking
entrances
exits
early
stated
purpose
impos
prospective
civil
fines
payment
required
shown
defendants
disobeyed
orders
seven
subsequent
contempt
hearings
held
june
december
found
union
contempt
separate
violations
injunction
many
violent
based
stated
intention
fines
civil
coercive
contempt
hearing
conducted
civil
proceeding
trial
judge
parties
conducted
discovery
introduced
evidence
called
witnesses
trial
required
contumacious
acts
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
afford
union
right
jury
trial
mine
workers
bagwell
result
contempt
proceedings
levied
fines
union
approximately
ordered
payable
companies
union
objected
payment
fines
companies
light
law
enforcement
burdens
posed
strike
ordered
remaining
roughly
fines
paid
commonwealth
virginia
russell
dickenson
counties
two
counties
heavily
affected
unlawful
activity
appeals
contempt
orders
pending
union
companies
settled
underlying
labor
dispute
agreed
vacate
contempt
fines
jointly
moved
dismiss
case
special
mediator
representing
secretary
labor
app
governments
russell
dickenson
counties
supported
parties
motion
vacate
outstanding
fines
trial
granted
motion
dismiss
dissolved
injunction
vacated
fines
payable
companies
reiterating
belief
remaining
owed
counties
commonwealth
coercive
civil
fines
trial
refused
vacate
fines
concluding
payable
effect
public
app
pet
cert
companies
withdrew
parties
light
settlement
declined
seek
enforcement
outstanding
contempt
fines
commonwealth
attorneys
russell
dickenson
counties
also
asked
disqualified
case
appointed
respondent
john
bagwell
act
special
commissioner
collect
unpaid
contempt
fines
behalf
counties
commonwealth
appeals
virginia
reversed
ordered
contempt
fines
vacated
pursuant
settlement
agreement
assuming
purposes
mine
workers
bagwell
argument
fines
civil
concluded
civil
contempt
fines
imposed
part
civil
proceeding
private
parties
settled
underlying
litigation
settled
parties
without
discretion
refuse
vacate
fines
consolidated
appeals
virginia
reversed
held
whether
coercive
civil
contempt
sanctions
settled
private
parties
question
state
law
virginia
public
policy
disfavored
rule
dignity
law
public
respect
judiciary
maintained
also
rejected
petitioners
contention
outstanding
fines
criminal
imposed
absent
criminal
trial
trial
prospective
fine
schedule
intended
coerce
compliance
injunction
union
avoid
fines
obedience
reasoned
fines
civil
coercive
properly
imposed
civil
proceedings
orders
defendant
perform
affirmative
act
provides
defendant
shall
fined
fixed
amount
day
refuses
comply
defendant
control
destiny
true
respect
orders
present
case
prospective
fine
schedule
established
solely
purpose
coercing
union
refrain
engaging
certain
conduct
consequently
union
controlled
fate
mine
workers
bagwell
ii
criminal
contempt
crime
ordinary
sense
bloom
illinois
criminal
penalties
may
imposed
someone
afforded
protections
constitution
requires
criminal
proceedings
hicks
feiock
see
bradley
double
jeopardy
cooke
rights
notice
charges
assistance
counsel
summary
process
present
defense
gompers
bucks
stove
range
privilege
right
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
serious
criminal
contempts
involving
imprisonment
six
months
protections
include
right
jury
trial
bloom
see
also
taylor
hayes
contrast
civil
contempt
sanctions
penalties
designed
compel
future
compliance
order
considered
coercive
avoidable
obedience
thus
may
imposed
ordinary
civil
proceeding
upon
notice
opportunity
heard
neither
jury
trial
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
required
mine
workers
bagwell
gompers
recognized
however
stated
purposes
contempt
sanction
alone
determinative
hen
imposes
fines
punishments
contemnor
vindicating
legal
authority
enter
initial
order
also
seeking
give
effect
law
purpose
modifying
contemnor
behavior
conform
terms
required
order
hicks
contempt
sanctions
like
criminal
punishments
extent
punish
prior
offense
well
coerce
offender
future
obedience
hicks
accordingly
mine
workers
bagwell
held
conclusions
civil
criminal
nature
contempt
sanction
properly
drawn
subjective
intent
state
laws
courts
examination
character
relief
paradigmatic
coercive
civil
contempt
sanction
set
forth
gompers
involves
confining
contemnor
indefinitely
complies
affirmative
command
order
pay
alimony
surrender
property
ordered
turned
receiver
make
conveyance
gompers
see
also
mccrone
failure
testify
imprisonment
fixed
term
similarly
coercive
contemnor
given
option
earlier
release
complies
shillitani
upholding
civil
determinate
sentence
includes
purge
clause
circumstances
contemnor
able
purge
contempt
obtain
release
committing
affirmative
act
thus
carries
keys
prison
pocket
gompers
quoting
nevitt
fed
contrast
fixed
sentence
imprisonment
punitive
criminal
imposed
retrospectively
completed
act
disobedience
gompers
contemnor
avoid
abbreviate
confinement
later
compliance
thus
gompers
concluded
sentence
imposed
samuel
gompers
violating
injunction
criminal
contempt
involves
prior
conduct
isolated
prohibited
act
resulting
sanction
coercive
effect
defendant
furnished
key
shorten
term
promising
repeat
offense
dichotomy
coercive
punitive
imprisonment
extended
fine
context
contempt
mine
workers
bagwell
fine
accordingly
considered
civil
remedial
either
coerce
defendant
compliance
order
compensate
complainant
losses
sustained
mine
workers
america
fine
compensatory
civil
contemnor
afforded
opportunity
purge
see
penfield
sec
thus
flat
unconditional
fine
totalling
even
little
announced
finding
contempt
criminal
contemnor
subsequent
opportunity
reduce
avoid
fine
compliance
close
analogy
coercive
imprisonment
per
diem
fine
imposed
day
contemnor
fails
comply
affirmative
order
like
civil
imprisonment
fines
exert
constant
coercive
pressure
jural
command
obeyed
future
indefinite
daily
fines
purged
less
comfortable
analogy
coercive
imprisonment
suspended
determinate
fines
sole
prior
decision
squarely
addressing
judicial
power
impose
coercive
civil
contempt
fines
mine
workers
supra
held
fixed
fines
also
may
considered
purgable
civil
imposed
suspended
pending
future
compliance
see
also
penfield
one
fined
unless
day
certain
complies
power
avoid
penalty
see
hicks
suspended
probationary
sentence
criminal
mine
workers
involved
fine
imposed
union
nationwide
war
ii
strike
activities
finding
determinate
fine
criminal
excessive
reduced
sanction
flat
criminal
fine
imposed
suspended
remaining
coercive
civil
fine
conditioned
union
ability
purge
fine
full
timely
mine
workers
bagwell
compliance
trial
order
concluded
light
purge
clause
civil
fine
operated
coercive
imposition
upon
defendant
union
compel
obedience
outstanding
order
revisited
issue
coercive
civil
contempt
fines
addressed
mine
workers
since
decision
erected
substantial
procedural
protections
areas
contempt
law
criminal
contempts
bloom
summary
contempts
taylor
hayes
codispoti
pennsylvania
johnson
mississippi
oliver
lower
federal
courts
state
courts
trial
nevertheless
relied
mine
workers
authorize
relatively
unlimited
judicial
power
impose
noncompensatory
civil
contempt
fines
underlying
somewhat
elusive
distinction
civil
criminal
contempt
fines
ultimate
question
posed
case
procedural
protections
due
particular
contempt
penalty
may
imposed
civil
contempt
sanctions
viewed
nonpunitive
avoidable
fewer
procedural
protections
sanctions
required
extent
contempts
take
mine
workers
bagwell
punitive
character
however
justified
considerations
central
contempt
power
criminal
procedural
protections
may
order
traditional
justification
relative
breadth
contempt
power
necessity
courts
independently
must
vested
power
impose
silence
respect
decorum
presence
submission
lawful
mandates
preserve
officers
approach
insults
pollution
anderson
dunn
wheat
courts
thus
embraced
inherent
contempt
authority
see
gompers
ex
parte
robinson
wall
power
necessary
exercise
others
hudson
cranch
contempt
power
also
uniquely
liable
abuse
bloom
quoting
ex
parte
terry
unlike
areas
law
legislature
defines
sanctionable
conduct
penalty
imposed
civil
contempt
proceedings
leave
offended
judge
solely
responsible
identifying
prosecuting
adjudicating
sanctioning
contumacious
conduct
contumacy
often
strikes
vulnerable
human
qualities
judge
temperament
bloom
supra
fusion
legislative
executive
judicial
powers
summons
forth
prospect
tyrannical
licentiousness
young
ex
rel
vuitton
scalia
concurring
judgment
quoting
anderson
accordingly
criminal
contempt
cases
even
compelling
argument
made
ordinary
criminal
cases
providing
right
jury
trial
protection
arbitrary
exercise
official
power
bloom
jurisprudence
contempt
area
attempted
balance
competing
concerns
necessity
mine
workers
bagwell
potential
arbitrariness
allowing
relatively
unencumbered
contempt
power
exercise
essential
requiring
progressively
greater
procedural
protections
considerations
come
play
necessity
justification
contempt
authority
pinnacle
course
contumacious
conduct
threatens
immediate
ability
conduct
proceedings
witness
refuses
testify
party
disrupts
see
young
scalia
concurring
judgment
judicial
contempt
power
power
limited
sanctioning
interfere
orderly
conduct
business
disobey
orders
necessary
conduct
business
thus
petty
direct
contempts
presence
traditionally
subject
summary
adjudication
maintain
order
courtroom
integrity
trial
process
face
actual
obstruction
justice
codispoti
pennsylvania
quoting
mcconnell
cf
wilson
harris
light
substantial
interest
rapidly
coercing
compliance
restoring
order
contempt
occurrence
reduces
need
extensive
factfinding
likelihood
erroneous
deprivation
summary
proceedings
tolerated
summary
adjudication
becomes
less
justifiable
leaves
realm
immediately
sanctioned
petty
direct
contempts
delays
punishing
direct
contempt
completion
trial
example
due
process
requires
contemnor
rights
notice
hearing
respected
taylor
hayes
much
difficult
argue
action
without
notice
hearing
kind
necessary
preserve
order
enable
mine
workers
bagwell
proceed
business
particularly
view
heightened
potential
abuse
posed
contempt
power
see
also
harris
direct
contempts
also
punished
serious
criminal
penalties
absent
full
protections
criminal
jury
trial
bloom
still
procedural
protections
afforded
contempts
occurring
considerations
justifying
expedited
procedures
pertain
summary
adjudication
indirect
contempts
prohibited
cooke
criminal
contempt
sanctions
entitled
full
criminal
process
hicks
certain
indirect
contempts
nevertheless
appropriate
imposition
civil
proceedings
contempts
failure
comply
document
discovery
example
occurring
outside
presence
impede
ability
adjudicate
proceedings
thus
touch
upon
core
justification
contempt
power
courts
traditionally
broad
authority
means
contempt
striking
pleadings
assessing
costs
excluding
evidence
entering
default
judgment
penalize
party
failure
comply
rules
conduct
governing
litigation
process
see
judicial
sanctions
never
considered
criminal
imposition
civil
coercive
fines
police
litigation
process
appears
consistent
authority
similarly
indirect
contempts
involving
discrete
readily
ascertainable
acts
turning
key
payment
judgment
properly
may
adjudicated
civil
proceedings
since
need
extensive
impartial
factfinding
less
pressing
discrete
category
indirect
contempts
however
civil
procedural
protections
may
insufficient
mine
workers
bagwell
contempts
involving
disobedience
complex
injunctions
often
require
elaborate
reliable
factfinding
cf
green
black
dissenting
citation
omitted
alleged
contempts
committed
beyond
presence
judge
personal
knowledge
material
facts
especially
suited
trial
jury
hearing
must
held
witnesses
must
called
evidence
taken
event
often
crucial
facts
close
dispute
contempts
obstruct
ability
adjudicate
proceedings
risk
erroneous
deprivation
lack
neutral
factfinder
may
substantial
circumstances
criminal
procedural
protections
rights
counsel
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
necessary
appropriate
protect
due
process
rights
parties
prevent
arbitrary
exercise
judicial
power
instant
case
neither
party
commonwealth
suggested
challenged
fines
compensatory
point
trial
attempt
calibrate
fines
damages
caused
union
contumacious
activities
indicate
fines
compensate
complainant
losses
sustained
mine
workers
nonparty
governments
turn
never
requested
compensation
presented
evidence
regarding
injuries
never
moved
intervene
suit
never
actively
defended
fines
imposed
issue
us
accordingly
limited
whether
fines
despite
noncompensatory
character
coercive
civil
criminal
sanctions
parties
propose
two
independent
tests
determining
whether
fines
civil
criminal
petitioners
argue
injunction
primarily
prohibited
mine
workers
bagwell
certain
conduct
rather
mandated
affirmative
acts
sanctions
criminal
respondent
turn
urges
trial
established
prospective
fine
schedule
union
avoid
compliance
fines
civil
character
neither
theory
satisfactorily
identifies
contempt
fines
criminal
thus
must
imposed
criminal
process
petitioners
correctly
note
gompers
suggests
possible
dichotomy
refusing
act
commanded
remedied
imprisonment
party
performs
required
act
act
forbidden
punished
imprisonment
definite
term
distinction
mandatory
prohibitory
orders
easily
applied
classic
contempt
scenario
contempt
sanctions
used
enforce
orders
compelling
forbidding
single
discrete
act
cases
orders
commanding
affirmative
act
simply
designate
actions
capable
coerced
distinction
coercion
affirmative
acts
punishment
prohibited
conduct
difficult
apply
conduct
recur
involved
injunction
contains
mandatory
prohibitory
provisions
moreover
borderline
cases
injunctive
provisions
containing
essentially
command
phrased
either
mandatory
prohibitory
terms
literal
application
petitioners
theory
injunction
ordering
union
strike
appear
prohibitory
criminal
injunction
ordering
union
continue
working
mandatory
civil
see
tr
oral
arg
dobbs
contempt
survey
cornell
enforcing
present
injunction
trial
imposed
fines
without
regard
mandatory
prohibitory
nature
clause
violated
accordingly
even
though
parsing
injunction
various
provisions
might
support
classification
contempts
mine
workers
bagwell
placing
jackrocks
roads
criminal
refusal
place
supervisors
picket
sites
civil
parties
asked
us
review
order
manner
case
like
involving
injunction
prescribes
detailed
code
conduct
appropriate
identify
character
entire
decree
cf
hicks
internal
quotations
omitted
civil
criminal
relief
imposed
criminal
feature
order
dominant
fixes
character
purposes
review
despite
respondent
urging
also
persuaded
dispositive
significance
accorded
fact
trial
prospectively
announced
sanctions
impose
trial
simply
levied
fines
finding
union
guilty
contempt
resulting
determinate
unconditional
fines
considered
solely
exclusively
punitive
hicks
see
also
penfield
supra
respondent
nevertheless
contends
trial
announcement
prospective
fine
schedule
allowed
union
avoid
paying
fine
simply
performing
act
required
order
hicks
thus
transformed
fines
coercive
civil
ones
respondent
maintains
virginia
held
trial
imposed
daily
civil
fine
coerce
union
compliance
prospective
fine
schedule
indistinguishable
sanction
respondent
argument
highlights
difficulties
encountered
parsing
coercive
civil
criminal
contempt
fines
fines
imposed
concededly
difficult
distinguish
either
determinate
punitive
fines
initially
suspended
civil
fines
ultimately
however
fact
trial
announced
fines
contumacy
rather
fact
justify
respondent
conclusion
mine
workers
bagwell
fines
civil
meaningfully
distinguish
penalties
ordinary
criminal
law
due
process
traditionally
requires
criminal
laws
provide
prior
notice
conduct
prohibited
sanction
imposed
trial
simply
announced
penalty
determinate
fines
per
violation
imposed
future
contempts
union
ability
avoid
contempt
fines
indistinguishable
ability
ordinary
citizen
avoid
criminal
sanction
conforming
behavior
law
fines
coercive
day
fines
even
suspended
fines
closely
analogous
fixed
determinate
retrospective
criminal
fines
petitioners
opportunity
purge
imposed
therefore
decline
conclude
mere
fact
sanctions
announced
advance
rendered
coercive
civil
matter
constitutional
law
considerations
convince
us
fines
challenged
criminal
union
sanctionable
conduct
occur
presence
otherwise
implicate
ability
maintain
order
adjudicate
proceedings
union
contumacy
involve
simple
affirmative
acts
paradigmatic
civil
contempts
examined
gompers
instead
virginia
trial
levied
contempt
fines
widespread
ongoing
violations
complex
injunction
effectively
policed
petitioners
compliance
entire
code
conduct
imposed
union
contumacy
lasted
many
months
spanned
substantial
portion
state
fines
assessed
serious
totalling
circumstances
mine
workers
bagwell
disinterested
factfinding
evenhanded
adjudication
essential
petitioners
entitled
criminal
jury
trial
reaching
conclusion
recognize
generally
deferred
legislature
determination
whether
sanction
civil
criminal
see
ward
helvering
mitchell
hen
state
proceedings
involved
state
law
provides
strong
guidance
whether
state
exercising
authority
nonpunitive
noncriminal
manner
hicks
quoting
allen
illinois
deviate
either
tradition
today
single
judge
rather
legislature
declares
particular
sanction
civil
criminal
deference
less
appropriate
cf
madsen
women
health
center
moreover
recognized
even
state
proceedings
label
affixed
contempt
ultimately
allowed
defeat
applicable
protections
federal
constitutional
law
hicks
feiock
conclude
serious
contempt
fines
imposed
criminal
mine
workers
bagwell
constitutionally
imposed
absent
jury
trial
iii
decision
concededly
imposes
procedural
burdens
courts
ability
sanction
widespread
indirect
contempts
complex
injunctions
noncompensatory
fines
holding
however
leaves
unaltered
longstanding
authority
judges
adjudicate
direct
contempts
summarily
enter
broad
compensatory
awards
contempts
civil
proceedings
see
sheet
metal
workers
equal
employment
opportunity
right
trial
jury
applies
serious
criminal
sanctions
courts
still
may
impose
noncompensatory
petty
fines
contempts
present
ones
without
conducting
jury
trial
also
disturb
ability
levy
albeit
criminal
contempt
process
serious
fines
like
case
ultimately
whatever
slight
burden
holding
may
impose
judicial
contempt
power
controlling
recognized
ago
say
need
respect
judges
courts
entitled
consideration
interest
individual
subjected
serious
criminal
punishment
without
benefit
procedural
protections
worked
carefully
years
deemed
fundamental
system
justice
genuine
respect
alone
lend
true
dignity
judicial
establishment
engendered
fear
unlimited
authority
firm
administration
law
institutionalized
procedures
worked
centuries
bloom
mine
workers
bagwell
judgment
virginia
reversed
ordered
footnotes
address
procedures
required
adjudication
indirect
contempts
occurring
direct
contempts
occur
presence
may
immediately
adjudged
sanctioned
summarily
see
ex
parte
terry
except
serious
criminal
contempts
jury
trial
required
bloom
illinois
traditional
distinction
civil
criminal
contempt
proceedings
pertain
cf
wilson
numerous
scholars
criticized
unworkable
traditional
distinction
civil
criminal
contempt
see
dudley
getting
beyond
distinction
new
approach
regulation
indirect
contempts
describing
distinction
civil
criminal
contempt
conceptually
unclear
exceedingly
difficult
apply
martineau
contempt
eliminating
confusion
civil
criminal
contempt
legal
concepts
bedeviled
courts
judges
lawyers
legal
commentators
contempt
moskovitz
contempt
injunctions
civil
criminal
goldfarb
contempt
power
describing
tangle
procedure
practice
resulting
unsatisfactory
fiction
although
size
fine
substantial
conduct
required
union
purge
suspended
fine
relatively
discrete
according
purgation
consisted
withdrawal
union
notice
terminating
labor
agreement
notifying
union
members
withdrawal
withdrawing
notifying
union
members
withdrawal
notice
questioning
ongoing
effectiveness
agreement
mine
workers
petty
contempt
like
petty
criminal
offenses
may
tried
without
jury
taylor
hayes
imposition
serious
criminal
contempt
fines
triggers
right
mine
workers
bagwell
jury
trial
bloom
date
specified
magnitude
contempt
fine
may
constitute
serious
criminal
sanction
although
held
fine
imposed
union
insufficient
trigger
sixth
amendment
right
jury
trial
see
muniz
hoffman
see
also
defining
petty
offenses
crimes
penalty
exceed
imprisonment
period
six
months
fine
individual
person
individual
need
answer
today
difficult
question
line
petty
serious
contempt
fines
drawn
since
fine
unquestionably
serious
contempt
sanction
mine
workers
bagwell
justice
scalia
concurring
join
opinion
classifying
contempt
fines
levied
petitioners
criminal
opinion
demonstrates
cases
employed
variety
easily
reconcilable
tests
differentiating
civil
criminal
contempts
since
tests
yield
result
need
decide
correct
one
case
extreme
facts
best
case
make
decision
wish
suggest
however
come
making
careful
examination
historical
practice
ultimately
yield
answer
one
person
able
make
rule
adjudicate
violation
assess
penalty
accord
usual
notions
fairness
separation
powers
see
ante
green
black
dissenting
cf
bloom
illinois
cooke
worse
still
person
conduct
adjudication
without
affording
protections
usually
given
criminal
trials
clearest
historical
practice
establish
mine
workers
bagwell
departure
procedures
constitution
normally
requires
denial
due
process
law
see
burnham
superior
county
marin
cf
honda
motor
oberg
ante
slip
common
law
contempts
divided
criminal
contempts
litigant
punished
affront
fixed
fine
period
incarceration
civil
contempts
uncooperative
litigant
incarcerated
later
cases
fined
complied
specific
order
see
gompers
bucks
stove
range
incarceration
compliance
distinctive
sanction
sheds
light
upon
nature
decrees
enforced
civil
contempt
sanction
makes
sense
order
requires
performance
identifiable
act
perhaps
cessation
continuing
performance
identifiable
act
general
prohibition
future
lend
enforcement
conditional
incarceration
since
single
act
cessation
single
act
demonstrate
compliance
justify
release
one
expressed
difference
criminal
civil
contempts
follows
punishment
criminal
contempt
undo
remedy
thing
done
civil
contempt
punishment
remedies
disobedience
fox
one
expect
orders
underlay
civil
contempt
fines
incarceration
usually
mandatory
rather
prohibitory
see
gompers
supra
directing
litigants
perform
acts
mine
workers
bagwell
litigation
example
turning
document
give
effect
judgment
example
executing
deed
conveyance
latter
category
order
particularly
common
since
jurisdiction
equity
courts
generally
personam
rather
rem
relief
decreed
almost
always
directive
individual
perform
act
regard
property
issue
see
pomeroy
equity
jurisprudence
pp
ed
mandatory
injunctions
issued
upon
termination
litigation
usually
required
single
simple
act
mcclintock
principles
equity
pp
ed
indeed
historical
prejudice
chancery
rendering
decrees
called
single
affirmative
act
specific
performance
contracts
sought
categorical
rule
decree
issue
required
ongoing
supervision
see
marble
ripley
wall
see
also
mcclintock
supra
pp
story
commentaries
equity
jurisprudence
redfield
ed
ed
compliance
single
act
mandates
addition
simple
quick
achieved
contemnor
relationship
came
end
least
insofar
subject
order
concerned
document
turned
land
conveyed
litigant
obligation
coercive
power
litigant
ceased
see
mine
workers
black
concurring
part
dissenting
part
engage
ongoing
supervision
litigant
conduct
order
continue
regulate
behavior
even
equitable
decrees
prohibitory
rather
mandatory
earlier
times
much
less
sweeping
modern
counterparts
prior
mine
workers
bagwell
labor
injunctions
late
injunctions
issued
primarily
relatively
narrow
disputes
property
see
kerr
treatise
law
practice
injunctions
see
also
frankfurter
greene
labor
injunction
contemporary
courts
abandoned
earlier
limitations
upon
scope
mandatory
injunctive
decrees
see
mcdowell
equity
constitution
routinely
issue
complex
decrees
involve
extended
disputes
place
continuing
supervisory
roles
parties
institutions
see
missouri
jenkins
swann
bd
professor
chayes
described
extent
transformation
modern
decree
differs
almost
every
relevant
characteristic
relief
traditional
model
adjudication
least
centerpiece
provides
complex
ongoing
regime
performance
rather
simple
transfer
finally
prolongs
deepens
rather
terminates
involvement
dispute
chayes
role
judge
public
law
litigation
mine
workers
bagwell
order
issue
provides
relatively
tame
example
modern
complex
decree
amended
injunction
prohibited
inter
alia
puncturing
tires
threatening
following
interfering
respondents
employees
placing
pickets
specified
locations
roving
picketing
required
inter
alia
petitioners
provide
list
names
designated
supervisors
app
pet
cert
although
seem
quite
accord
historical
practice
enforce
conditional
incarceration
per
diem
fines
compliance
last
provision
discrete
command
observance
readily
ascertained
using
means
enforce
remainder
order
novelty
per
diem
fines
came
used
coerce
compliance
decrees
relevant
respects
like
conditional
prison
terms
incarceration
penalty
continued
contemnor
complied
compliance
stopped
punishment
course
eliminate
restore
punishment
already
endured
mine
workers
bagwell
justice
ginsburg
chief
justice
joins
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
issue
case
whether
contempt
proceedings
brought
petitioner
unions
classified
civil
criminal
explains
proceedings
criminal
unions
entitled
precedents
jury
trial
disputed
fines
imposed
bench
proceedings
stand
see
ante
gompers
bucks
stove
range
notes
see
ante
case
area
civil
contempt
sanction
gompers
instructs
designed
coerce
defendant
thing
required
order
benefit
complainant
rather
vindicate
authority
law
sanction
operates
coercively
applies
continuously
defendant
performs
discrete
affirmative
act
required
order
example
production
document
presentation
testimony
ibid
civil
contemnor
thus
carries
keys
prison
mine
workers
bagwell
pocket
moment
end
sentence
discharge
previously
refused
quoting
nevitt
criminal
contempt
sanction
contrast
punitive
imposed
vindicate
authority
gompers
supra
unlike
civil
contemnor
refused
perform
discrete
affirmative
act
commanded
gompers
explains
criminal
contemnor
ne
commanded
criminal
contemnor
disobedience
past
completed
act
deed
sanction
undo
see
accordingly
criminal
contempt
sanction
operates
coerce
future
act
defendant
benefit
complainant
uphold
dignity
law
punishing
contemnor
disobedience
criminal
contempt
sanction
determinate
unconditional
said
gompers
defendant
furnished
key
shorten
term
promising
repeat
offense
even
outlined
civil
criminal
contempt
prototypes
however
gompers
acknowledged
categories
filled
actual
cases
altogether
neat
tidy
civil
contempt
proceedings
although
primarily
remedial
also
vindicat
authority
criminal
contempt
proceedings
although
designed
vindicate
authority
law
may
bestow
incidental
benefit
upon
complainant
punishment
tends
prevent
repetition
disobedience
ii
classifications
described
gompers
come
strong
criticism
particularly
scholars
many
observed
gompers
mine
workers
bagwell
categories
civil
criminal
contempt
unstable
theory
problematic
practice
see
ante
citing
scholarly
criticism
see
also
dudley
getting
beyond
distinction
new
approach
regulation
indirect
contempts
citing
additional
scholarly
criticism
cases
however
consistently
resorted
distinction
criminal
civil
contempt
determine
whether
certain
constitutional
protections
required
criminal
prosecutions
apply
contempt
proceedings
see
dixon
slip
held
certain
constitutional
protections
criminal
defendants
apply
nonsummary
criminal
contempt
prosecutions
criminal
prosecutions
citing
cases
repeatedly
relied
upon
gompers
delineation
distinction
criminal
civil
contempt
see
hicks
feiock
parties
accordingly
presented
arguments
within
gompers
framework
two
considerations
persuade
contempt
proceedings
case
classified
criminal
rather
civil
first
accept
logic
bagwell
argument
fines
civil
conditional
coercive
fine
elude
categorization
fines
case
conditional
bagwell
says
imposed
unions
complied
injunction
fines
conditional
sense
however
even
supplemented
injunction
fines
schedule
indeed
fine
conditional
upon
compliance
noncompliance
imposition
cf
ante
unions
ability
avoid
imposition
fines
indistinguishable
ability
ordinary
citizen
mine
workers
bagwell
avoid
criminal
sanction
conforming
behavior
law
furthermore
fines
coercive
sense
one
purposes
encourage
union
compliance
injunction
criminal
contempt
sanctions
may
also
coerce
sense
ten
prevent
repetition
disobedience
gompers
bagwell
thesis
fines
civil
conditional
coercive
broaden
compass
terms
function
lost
second
virginia
courts
refusal
vacate
fines
despite
parties
settlement
joint
motion
see
ante
characteristic
criminal
civil
proceedings
explaining
fines
outlived
underlying
civil
dispute
virginia
stated
courts
commonwealth
must
authority
enforce
orders
employing
coercive
civil
sanctions
dignity
law
public
respect
judiciary
maintained
virginia
references
upholding
public
authority
maintaining
dignity
law
reflect
purposes
gompers
ranked
criminal
contempt
side
see
supra
moreover
private
complainant
gone
scene
official
appointed
commonwealth
collect
fines
commonwealth
mine
workers
bagwell
coffers
implausible
invoke
justification
benefiting
civil
complainant
commonwealth
pursues
fines
account
agent
private
party
without
tying
exactions
exclusively
claim
compensation
cf
hicks
fine
punitive
paid
remedial
civil
defendant
avoid
paying
fine
simply
performing
affirmative
act
required
trial
declared
proceedings
indeed
civil
outset
granted
parties
motions
vacate
fines
bagwell
likens
prospective
fines
schedule
civil
contempt
fine
imposed
mine
workers
case
however
contemnor
union
given
opportunity
fine
imposed
avoid
fine
effect
ing
full
compliance
injunction
explains
see
ante
purposes
allowing
union
avoid
fine
full
compliance
broad
injunction
see
reduced
performance
three
affirmative
acts
opportunity
purge
consistent
civil
contempt
scenario
described
gompers
see
supra
unavailable
unions
case
page