dominguez
benitez
argued
april
decided
june
counsel
record
petitioner
theodore
olson
solicitor
general
washington
dc
respondent
benitez
myra
mossman
santa
barbara
ca
respondent
dominguez
benitez
hereinafter
dominguez
confessed
selling
drugs
informant
indicted
drug
possession
conspiracy
counts
conspiracy
count
faced
mandatory
minimum
sentence
plea
agreement
government
provided
dominguez
plead
guilty
conspiracy
government
dismiss
possession
charge
receive
reduction
two
levels
allow
authorize
sentence
otherwise
mandatory
minimum
agreement
bind
sentencing
withdraw
plea
rejected
government
stipulations
recommendations
pleaded
guilty
conspiracy
charge
plea
colloquy
failed
mention
though
written
plea
agreement
say
dominguez
withdraw
plea
accept
government
recommendations
see
fed
rule
crim
proc
probation
office
subsequently
found
dominguez
three
prior
convictions
making
ineligible
safety
valve
district
sentenced
mandatory
minimum
appeal
dominguez
argued
first
time
district
failure
warn
rule
instructs
withdraw
plea
accept
government
recommendations
required
reversal
ninth
circuit
agreed
citing
olano
applying
federal
rule
criminal
procedure
standard
held
obtain
relief
unpreserved
rule
failing
defendant
must
show
reasonable
probability
error
pleaded
guilty
pp
defendant
dilatory
raising
rule
error
reversal
unwarranted
unless
error
plain
vonn
except
certain
structural
errors
undermining
criminal
proceeding
fairness
whole
relief
error
tied
prejudicial
effect
standard
phrased
error
affects
substantial
rights
used
rule
means
error
prejudicial
effect
judicial
proceeding
outcome
see
kotteakos
kotteakos
held
affect
substantial
rights
error
must
substantial
injurious
effect
influence
determining
verdict
burden
demonstrating
prejudice
materiality
defendant
seeking
relief
invoked
similar
standard
requires
reasonable
probability
error
claimed
result
proceeding
different
required
bagley
opinion
blackmun
defendants
dominguez
burden
establishing
entitlement
relief
easy
first
standard
enforce
policies
underpinning
rule
generally
encourage
timely
objections
reduce
wasteful
reversals
demanding
strenuous
exertion
get
relief
unpreserved
error
see
vonn
supra
second
respect
particular
importance
finality
guilty
pleas
usually
rest
defendant
profession
guilt
open
indispensable
modern
criminal
justice
system
operation
see
timmreck
pp
ninth
circuit
test
case
fell
short
first
element
whether
error
minor
technical
requires
examination
omitted
warning
effect
defendant
decision
failing
repeated
significant
extent
test
second
element
whether
defendant
understood
rights
issue
pleaded
guilty
standard
allow
consideration
evidence
tending
show
misunderstanding
inconsequential
defendant
decision
evidence
indicating
relative
significance
facts
may
borne
choice
regardless
rule
error
consider
overall
strength
government
case
record
shows
controlled
drug
sale
informant
confession
one
fairly
ask
defendant
seeking
withdraw
plea
thought
gain
going
trial
point
defendant
actual
decision
enquire
whether
omitted
warning
made
difference
required
standard
reasonable
probability
hard
see
warning
affected
dominguez
assessment
strategic
position
also
plea
agreement
read
dominguez
native
spanish
specifically
warned
withdraw
plea
refused
accept
government
recommendations
fact
uncontested
dominguez
tends
show
rule
error
made
difference
outcome
pp
reversed
remanded
souter
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
stevens
kennedy
thomas
ginsburg
breyer
joined
scalia
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
petitioner
carlos
dominguez
benitez
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
june
justice
souter
delivered
opinion
respondent
claims
right
withdraw
plea
guilty
consequence
district
failure
give
one
warnings
required
federal
rule
criminal
procedure
claim
rule
error
preserved
timely
objection
standard
rule
applies
requirement
prove
effect
substantial
rights
question
showing
must
thus
made
obtain
relief
unpreserved
rule
failing
hold
defendant
obliged
show
reasonable
probability
error
entered
plea
early
may
confidential
informant
working
law
enforcement
arranged
respondent
carlos
dominguez
benitez
hereinafter
dominguez
buy
several
pounds
methamphetamine
first
informant
got
sample
dominguez
week
later
dominguez
went
restaurant
anaheim
california
consummate
sale
company
two
confederates
one
brought
shopping
bag
kilogram
drugs
meeting
ended
informant
gave
signal
officers
arrested
dealers
dominguez
confessed
selling
methamphetamine
gave
information
supplier
confederates
federal
grand
jury
indicted
dominguez
two
counts
conspiracy
possess
grams
methamphetamine
possession
grams
methamphetamine
mixture
intent
distribute
conspiracy
count
dominguez
faced
statutory
mandatory
minimum
sentence
years
maximum
life
stat
district
appointed
counsel
began
talking
government
plea
agreement
september
district
received
first
several
letters
asked
new
lawyer
expressed
discomfort
plea
agreement
counsel
encouraging
sign
counsel
motion
held
status
conference
dominguez
spoke
judge
said
dissatisfied
representation
wanted
better
deal
asked
whether
talking
disposition
trial
dominguez
answered
time
decided
go
trial
app
counsel
spoke
effect
later
proceeding
said
told
prosecutor
along
wo
trial
date
set
based
client
representations
want
trial
explained
dominguez
help
plea
negotiations
found
reason
change
counsel
shortly
parties
agreed
dominguez
plead
guilty
conspiracy
government
dismiss
possession
charge
government
stipulated
dominguez
receive
known
reduction
two
levels
see
sentencing
commission
guidelines
manual
hereinafter
ussg
safety
valve
important
allow
invoke
authorizing
sentence
otherwise
mandatory
minimum
certain
cases
diminished
culpability
chance
dominguez
sentence
years
chance
turned
satisfying
five
conditions
one
going
dominguez
criminal
history
agreement
address
agreement
however
warn
dominguez
bind
sentencing
dominguez
withdraw
plea
accept
government
stipulations
recommendations
hearing
next
day
dominguez
changed
plea
guilty
plea
colloquy
gave
almost
required
rule
warnings
including
warning
plea
agreement
bind
judge
failed
mention
dominguez
withdraw
plea
accept
government
recommendations
see
fed
rule
crim
proc
probation
office
subsequently
issued
report
found
dominguez
three
prior
convictions
two
names
neither
defense
counsel
prosecutor
known
time
plea
negotiations
upshot
dominguez
ineligible
safety
valve
chance
escape
sentence
years
receiving
two
letters
dominguez
complaining
quality
counsel
representation
district
sentenced
dominguez
mandatory
minimum
sentencing
hearing
counsel
told
thought
dominguez
might
least
eligible
mitigation
agreed
three
convictions
dominguez
told
never
knowledge
points
responsibility
safety
valve
anything
like
app
replied
light
lengthy
change
plea
proceedings
difficult
accept
dominguez
said
appeal
dominguez
argued
district
failure
warn
rule
instructs
withdraw
guilty
plea
accept
government
recommendations
required
reversal
waiting
vonn
divided
panel
appeals
ninth
circuit
agreed
cited
olano
applying
standard
held
district
indeed
erred
error
plain
affected
dominguez
substantial
rights
required
correction
interests
justice
show
substantial
rights
affected
appeals
required
dominguez
prove
error
minor
technical
understand
rights
issue
entered
guilty
plea
rejected
government
arguments
written
plea
agreement
district
statements
plea
colloquy
sufficiently
advised
dominguez
rights
given
dominguez
inability
speak
english
assurances
counsel
likely
qualify
provision
judge
tallman
dissented
warning
majority
analysis
followed
neither
vonn
circuit
precedent
granted
certiorari
question
hether
order
show
violation
federal
rule
criminal
procedure
constitutes
reversible
plain
error
defendant
must
demonstrate
pleaded
guilty
violation
occurred
pet
cert
reverse
ii
government
agreed
make
nonbinding
sentencing
recommendation
rule
required
advise
defendant
defendant
right
withdraw
plea
follow
recommendation
request
rule
however
instructs
every
violation
terms
calls
reversal
conviction
entitling
defendant
withdraw
guilty
plea
variance
requirements
rule
harmless
error
affect
substantial
rights
fed
rule
crim
proc
vonn
considered
standard
applies
defendant
dilatory
raising
rule
error
held
reversal
order
unless
error
plain
see
olano
supra
although
explained
assessing
effect
rule
error
reviewing
must
look
entire
record
plea
proceedings
alone
vonn
supra
formulate
standard
determining
whether
defendant
shown
standard
requires
olano
supra
effect
substantial
rights
certain
structural
errors
undermining
fairness
criminal
proceeding
whole
even
preserved
error
requires
reversal
without
regard
mistake
effect
proceeding
see
arizona
fulminante
giving
examples
dominguez
argue
either
rule
error
generally
rule
error
structural
otherwise
relief
error
tied
way
prejudicial
effect
standard
phrased
error
affects
substantial
rights
used
rule
previously
taken
mean
error
prejudicial
effect
outcome
judicial
proceeding
see
kotteakos
affect
substantial
rights
see
error
must
substantial
injurious
effect
influence
determining
verdict
kotteakos
supra
cases
burden
demonstrating
prejudice
materiality
defendant
seeking
relief
invoked
standard
similarities
kotteakos
formulation
requiring
showing
reasonable
probability
error
claimed
result
proceeding
different
bagley
opinion
blackmun
adopting
prejudice
standard
strickland
washington
claims
brady
maryland
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
white
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
reason
appeared
treating
phrase
affecting
substantial
rights
untethered
prejudice
requirement
applying
olano
nonstructural
error
doubting
bagley
sensible
model
follow
vonn
makes
clear
burden
establishing
entitlement
relief
plain
error
defendant
claiming
several
reasons
think
burden
easy
defendants
dominguez
position
first
standard
enforce
policies
underpin
rule
generally
encourage
timely
objections
reduce
wasteful
reversals
demanding
strenuous
exertion
get
relief
unpreserved
error
see
vonn
case
reasons
complemented
fact
worth
repeating
violation
claimed
rule
due
process
hold
therefore
defendant
seeks
reversal
conviction
guilty
plea
ground
district
committed
plain
error
rule
must
show
reasonable
probability
error
entered
plea
defendant
must
thus
satisfy
judgment
reviewing
informed
entire
record
probability
different
result
undermine
confidence
proceeding
strickland
supra
bagley
supra
opinion
blackmun
already
said
points
test
applied
appeals
case
fell
short
first
element
whether
error
minor
technical
phrase
took
graibe
turn
found
commentary
accompanied
amendment
rule
element
requires
examination
effect
omitted
warning
defendant
decision
failing
repeated
significant
extent
second
element
ninth
circuit
test
taken
minore
asks
whether
defendant
understood
rights
issue
entered
guilty
plea
true
enquiry
gets
closer
first
consideration
likely
effect
rule
error
defendant
decision
plead
assessing
claim
error
affected
defendant
decision
plead
guilty
must
take
account
indication
omission
rule
warning
misled
standard
appeals
allow
consideration
record
evidence
tending
show
misunderstanding
inconsequential
defendant
decision
evidence
indicating
relative
significance
facts
may
borne
choice
regardless
rule
relevant
evidence
appeals
thus
passed
case
included
dominguez
statement
district
intend
go
trial
counsel
confirmation
representation
made
hearing
neglected
relevant
considerations
also
included
implications
raised
dominguez
protests
sentencing
hearing
claimed
pleaded
guilty
never
knowledge
points
responsibility
safety
valve
anything
like
app
statements
credited
show
dominguez
confused
law
applied
sentence
clearly
informed
suggest
causal
link
confusion
particular
rule
violation
seeks
relief
matters
may
relevant
escape
notice
ninth
circuit
test
overall
strength
government
case
possible
defenses
appear
record
subjects
courts
accustomed
considering
strickland
brady
analysis
record
made
guilty
plea
sentencing
reveals
evidence
one
showing
controlled
sale
drugs
informant
confession
one
fairly
ask
defendant
seeking
withdraw
plea
might
ever
thought
gain
going
trial
point
question
defendant
actual
decision
reasonably
probable
gone
trial
absent
error
matter
choice
may
foolish
point
rather
enquire
whether
omitted
warning
made
difference
required
standard
reasonable
probability
hard
see
warning
effect
dominguez
assessment
strategic
position
even
reason
think
warning
bench
mattered
plea
agreement
read
dominguez
native
spanish
specifically
warned
withdraw
plea
refused
accept
government
recommendations
fact
uncontested
dominguez
tends
show
rule
error
made
difference
outcome
reverse
judgment
appeals
remand
case
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
petitioner
carlos
dominguez
benitez
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
june
justice
scalia
concurring
judgment
agree
much
opinion
concur
disposition
case
however
agree
holding
respondent
need
show
prejudice
preponderance
evidence
ante
count
adopted
fewer
four
assertedly
different
standards
probability
relating
assessment
whether
outcome
trial
different
error
occurred
omitted
evidence
included
see
chapman
california
adopting
harmless
beyond
reasonable
doubt
standard
preserving
direct
review
conviction
obtained
trial
constitutional
error
occurred
brecht
abrahamson
rejecting
chapman
favor
less
injurious
effect
standard
kotteakos
overturning
conviction
collateral
review
agurs
rejecting
kotteakos
overturning
conviction
basis
brady
violations
favor
even
less
standard
later
described
strickland
washington
reasonable
probability
distinguishing
reasonable
probability
standard
still
yet
less
likely
standard
applicable
claims
newly
discovered
evidence
see
generally
kyles
whitley
ineffable
gradations
probability
seem
quite
beyond
ability
judicial
mind
mind
grasp
thus
harmful
rather
helpful
consistency
rationality
judicial
decisionmaking
especially
applied
hypothesizing
events
never
fact
occurred
enterprise
factfinding
closer
divination
purposes
estimating
happened
seems
serviceable
standards
traditional
beyond
reasonable
doubt
likely
pretend
higher
degree
precision
therefore
extend
reasonable
probability
standard
context
hold
defendant
failed
object
trial
thus
burden
proving
mistake
failed
prevent
effect
substantial
rights
must
show
effect
probable
likely
footnotes
dominguez
speaks
writes
spanish
english
certified
translator
present
hearings
describe
plea
agreement
letters
english
record
show
translated
assisted
dominguez
writing
agreement
also
contemplated
dominguez
total
offense
level
guidelines
considering
safety
valve
downward
adjustment
acceptance
responsibility
assuming
assuming
minimal
criminal
history
sentence
low
months
see
ussg
ch
pt
sentencing
table
time
plea
hearing
requirement
appeared
federal
rule
criminal
procedure
changed
substance
refer
current
rule
text
opinion
likewise
rules
also
received
stylistic
amendment
courts
appeals
employed
different
tests
see
infra
congress
gave
courts
instruction
partial
response
decision
mccarthy
felt
caused
many
reversals
reasons
insubstantial
see
vonn
discussing
history
rule
argument
made
prevail
omission
single
rule
warning
without
colorably
structural
cf
timmreck
holding
rule
error
without
cognizable
collateral
review
government
burden
addressing
prejudice
excusing
preserved
error
harmless
direct
review
criminal
conviction
enough
negate
effect
outcome
case
see
chapman
california
must
able
declare
belief
constitutional
error
harmless
beyond
reasonable
doubt
government
burden
showing
constitutional
trial
error
harmless
comes
collateral
review
heightened
interest
finality
generally
calls
government
meet
lenient
kotteakos
standard
brecht
abrahamson
burden
defendant
show
prejudice
first
instance
course
easier
show
reasonable
doubt
constitutional
error
affected
trial
show
likely
effect
outcome
verdict
standard
similar
one
already
applied
courts
appeals
though
courts
drawn
direct
connection
strickland
bagley
cases
understood
reviewing
harmless
rather
plain
error
see
martinez
review
asking
whether
rule
violations
likely
affected
defendant
willingness
plead
guilty
see
also
johnson
en
banc
review
asking
whether
defendant
knowledge
comprehension
full
correct
information
likely
affect
willingness
plead
guilty
cf
olano
main
difference
substantial
rights
analyses
burden
persuasion
shifts
government
defendant
one
significant
difference
however
rule
claims
claims
strickland
brady
maryland
latter
may
raised
postconviction
proceedings
petition
habeas
corpus
motion
vacate
sentence
proceedings
permit
greater
development
record
see
massaro
strickland
claims
procedurally
defaulted
brought
first
time
advantages
form
proceeding
hearing
cases
rule
claims
contrast
way
open
egregious
cases
timmreck
supra
see
also
vonn
noting
rule
meant
disturb
timmreck
defendant
rarely
ever
able
obtain
relief
rule
violations
relief
direct
appeal
given
standard
apply
many
cases
difficult
get
cf
raineri
boudin
ust
many
fair
trials
perfect
ones
flaws
also
expected
rule
proceedings
rule
however
foreclose
relief
altogether
standard
confused
requirement
defendant
prove
preponderance
evidence
error
things
different
see
kyles
whitley
another
point
contrast
constitutional
question
whether
defendant
guilty
plea
knowing
voluntary
held
example
record
criminal
conviction
obtained
guilty
plea
contains
evidence
defendant
knew
rights
putatively
waiving
conviction
must
reversed
boykin
alabama
suggest
conviction
saved
even
overwhelming
evidence
defendant
pleaded
guilty
regardless