daniels
argued
january
decided
april
petitioner
convicted
felon
possession
firearm
violation
sentence
enhanced
armed
career
criminal
act
acca
imposes
mandatory
minimum
sentence
anyone
violates
three
previous
convictions
inter
alia
violent
felony
petitioner
four
prior
state
convictions
unsuccessful
direct
appeal
petitioner
filed
motion
vacate
set
aside
correct
federal
sentence
pursuant
asserted
sentence
violated
constitution
based
part
two
prior
convictions
unconstitutional
prior
convictions
claimed
based
inadequate
guilty
pleas
one
product
ineffective
assistance
counsel
district
denied
motion
ninth
circuit
affirmed
held
judgment
affirmed
affirmed
justice
delivered
opinion
part
concluding
petitioner
failed
pursue
remedies
otherwise
available
challenge
prior
convictions
custody
convictions
may
use
motion
directed
federal
sentence
collaterally
attack
convictions
pp
custis
held
sole
exception
convictions
obtained
violation
right
counsel
defendant
right
acca
constitution
collaterally
attack
prior
convictions
federal
sentencing
proceeding
considerations
supporting
conclusion
ease
administration
interest
promoting
finality
judgments
also
present
context
district
evaluating
motion
unlikely
district
engaged
sentencing
documents
necessary
evaluate
claims
arising
proceedings
different
jurisdiction
moreover
retain
strong
interest
preserving
convictions
obtained
impose
wide
range
disabilities
convicted
even
release
pp
although
defendants
may
challenge
convictions
constitutional
infirmity
necessarily
follow
motion
appropriate
vehicle
determining
whether
conviction
later
used
enhance
federal
sentence
unconstitutionally
obtained
defendant
convicted
state
numerous
opportunities
challenge
constitutionality
conviction
vehicles
review
available
indefinitely
without
limitation
procedural
barriers
limit
access
review
merits
constitutional
claims
vindicating
presumption
regularity
attaches
final
judgments
even
question
waiver
constitutional
rights
parke
raley
thus
time
sentencing
acca
prior
conviction
set
aside
direct
collateral
review
presumptively
valid
may
used
enhance
federal
sentence
exception
convictions
obtained
violation
right
counsel
custis
supra
enhanced
federal
sentence
imposed
acca
person
sentenced
may
pursue
channels
direct
collateral
review
still
available
challenge
prior
conviction
however
prior
conviction
used
enhance
federal
sentence
longer
open
attack
right
defendant
failed
pursue
remedies
available
unsuccessfully
without
recourse
defendant
may
collaterally
attack
prior
conviction
motion
unless
claims
conviction
obtained
violation
right
counsel
raised
claim
federal
sentencing
proceeding
contrary
rule
effectively
permit
challenges
far
stale
brought
right
sanction
end
run
around
statutes
limitation
procedural
barriers
preclude
movant
attacking
prior
conviction
directly
nothing
constitution
precedent
requires
result
pp
delivered
opinion
part
rehnquist
kennedy
thomas
joined
scalia
joined
except
portion
opinion
recognizing
may
available
rare
circumstances
scalia
filed
opinion
concurring
part
souter
filed
dissenting
opinion
stevens
ginsburg
joined
breyer
filed
dissenting
opinion
earthy
daniels
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
april
justice
delivered
opinion
part
custis
addressed
whether
defendant
sentenced
armed
career
criminal
act
acca
collaterally
attack
validity
previous
state
convictions
used
enhance
federal
sentence
held
sole
exception
convictions
obtained
violation
right
counsel
defendant
right
bring
challenge
federal
sentencing
proceeding
consider
whether
sentencing
proceeding
concluded
individual
sentenced
may
challenge
federal
sentence
motion
supp
ground
prior
convictions
unconstitutionally
obtained
hold
general
rule
may
may
rare
circumstances
available
need
address
issue
petitioner
earthy
daniels
tried
convicted
felon
possession
firearm
violation
government
sought
enhance
sentence
acca
app
acca
imposes
mandatory
minimum
sentence
anyone
violates
three
previous
convictions
violent
felony
serious
drug
offense
petitioner
convicted
california
robbery
first
degree
burglary
district
found
petitioner
armed
career
criminal
within
meaning
acca
granting
downward
departure
district
sentenced
petitioner
months
petitioner
adjudged
armed
career
criminal
received
sentence
direct
appeal
petitioner
argued
unsuccessfully
two
burglary
convictions
qualify
predicate
offenses
acca
see
table
petitioner
filed
motion
vacate
set
aside
correct
sentence
pursuant
district
central
district
california
section
postconviction
remedy
federal
prisoners
permits
prisoner
custody
sentence
federal
move
imposed
sentence
vacate
set
aside
correct
sentence
upon
ground
sentence
imposed
violation
constitution
laws
petitioner
asserted
current
federal
sentence
imposed
violation
constitution
based
part
robbery
convictions
prior
convictions
alleged
unconstitutional
based
guilty
pleas
knowing
voluntary
conviction
also
product
ineffective
assistance
counsel
app
contend
relief
appropriate
current
sentence
imposed
violation
acca
cf
brief
petitioner
district
denied
motion
app
panel
ninth
circuit
appeals
affirmed
held
decision
custis
bar
federal
habeas
review
validity
prior
conviction
used
federal
sentencing
enhancement
unless
petitioner
raises
claim
gideon
wainwright
internal
quotation
marks
citation
omitted
courts
appeals
divided
whether
custis
bars
relief
well
federal
sentencing
proceedings
granted
certiorari
ii
petitioner
custis
attempted
federal
sentencing
proceeding
attack
prior
state
convictions
used
enhance
sentence
acca
like
petitioner
custis
challenged
prior
convictions
product
allegedly
faulty
guilty
pleas
ineffective
assistance
counsel
challenges
type
custis
sought
bring
ris
level
jurisdictional
defect
ibid
two
considerations
supported
constitutional
conclusion
custis
ease
administration
interest
promoting
finality
judgments
respect
former
noted
resolving
constitutional
attacks
prior
convictions
require
sentencing
courts
rummage
frequently
nonexistent
difficult
obtain
transcripts
records
respect
latter
observed
allowing
collateral
attacks
inevitably
delay
impair
orderly
administration
justice
deprive
judgment
normal
force
effect
internal
quotation
marks
brackets
omitted
petitioner
contends
custis
rule
extend
proceedings
concerns
articulated
custis
present
context
brief
petitioner
disagree
first
district
evaluating
motion
unlikely
district
engaged
sentencing
documents
necessary
evaluate
claims
arising
proceedings
different
jurisdiction
petitioner
quite
right
federal
district
courts
capable
evaluating
constitutional
claims
raised
way
habeas
petition
institutional
competence
make
state
records
transcripts
easier
locate
facts
case
reinforce
concern
example
petitioner
contends
entered
guilty
pleas
without
full
understanding
essential
elements
crimes
charged
therefore
resulting
convictions
violated
due
process
app
claims
nature
require
close
scrutiny
record
yet
petitioner
placed
transcript
either
plea
colloquy
record
fact
admitted
transcript
missing
state
file
cf
circumstances
almost
futile
exercise
district
attempt
determine
accurately
communicated
petitioner
two
decades
ago
respect
concern
finality
petitioner
argues
served
complete
sentences
convictions
state
suffer
little
prejudice
convictions
invalidated
collateral
challenge
brief
petitioner
contrary
even
defendant
served
full
measure
sentence
state
retains
strong
interest
preserving
convictions
obtained
impose
wide
range
disabilities
convicted
crimes
even
release
example
california
petitioner
committed
crimes
persons
convicted
felony
may
disqualified
holding
public
office
subjected
restrictions
professional
licensing
barred
possessing
firearms
see
dept
justice
office
pardon
attorney
civil
disabilities
convicted
felons
survey
statute
authorizing
enhanced
sentences
recidivist
offenders
cal
penal
code
ann
west
see
also
parke
raley
oral
argument
petitioner
suggested
invalidating
prior
conviction
constitutional
grounds
purposes
use
acca
effect
beyond
federal
proceeding
tr
oral
arg
although
question
squarely
presented
state
conviction
determined
sufficiently
unreliable
used
enhance
federal
sentence
state
ability
use
judgment
subsequently
purposes
least
greatly
undermined
thus
state
real
continuing
interest
integrity
judgments
fundamental
level
petitioner
attempts
distinguish
custis
decision
appropriate
forum
defendant
may
challenge
prior
convictions
used
enhance
federal
sentence
issue
custis
according
petitioner
whether
defendant
attack
prior
conviction
constitutional
infirmity
brief
petitioner
quoting
nichols
ginsburg
dissenting
original
emphasis
deleted
appropriate
forum
challenge
petitioner
argues
least
forum
available
federal
proceeding
brief
petitioner
premise
underlying
petitioner
argument
defendants
may
challenge
convictions
constitutional
infirmity
quite
correct
beyond
dispute
convictions
must
obtained
manner
comports
federal
constitution
necessarily
follow
motion
appropriate
vehicle
determining
whether
conviction
later
used
enhance
federal
sentence
unconstitutionally
obtained
system
affords
defendant
convicted
state
numerous
opportunities
challenge
constitutionality
conviction
may
raise
constitutional
claims
direct
appeal
postconviction
proceedings
available
state
law
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
brought
pursuant
ed
supp
see
generally
liebman
hertz
federal
habeas
corpus
practice
procedure
ed
vehicles
review
however
available
indefinitely
without
limitation
procedural
barriers
statutes
limitations
rules
concerning
procedural
default
exhaustion
remedies
operate
limit
access
review
merits
constitutional
claim
see
olano
procedural
principle
familiar
constitutional
right
may
forfeited
criminal
well
civil
cases
failure
make
timely
assertion
right
tribunal
jurisdiction
determine
quoting
yakus
one
principles
vindicated
limitations
presumption
deeply
rooted
jurisprudence
presumption
regularity
attaches
final
judgments
even
question
waiver
constitutional
rights
parke
supra
thus
held
time
sentencing
acca
prior
conviction
set
aside
direct
collateral
review
conviction
presumptively
valid
may
used
enhance
federal
sentence
see
custis
rule
subject
one
exception
enhanced
federal
sentence
based
part
prior
conviction
obtained
violation
right
counsel
defendant
may
challenge
validity
prior
conviction
federal
sentencing
proceedings
constitutional
challenge
prior
conviction
may
raised
sentencing
forum
enhanced
federal
sentence
imposed
pursuant
acca
person
sentenced
may
pursue
channels
direct
collateral
review
still
available
challenge
prior
conviction
custis
noted
possibility
petitioner
still
custody
prior
convictions
attack
state
sentences
state
federal
habeas
review
ibid
challenge
underlying
conviction
successful
defendant
may
apply
reopening
federal
sentence
custis
express
opinion
appropriate
disposition
application
cf
ibid
however
prior
conviction
used
enhance
federal
sentence
longer
open
direct
collateral
attack
right
defendant
failed
pursue
remedies
available
defendant
unsuccessfully
defendant
without
recourse
presumption
validity
attached
prior
conviction
time
sentencing
conclusive
defendant
may
collaterally
attack
prior
conviction
motion
defendant
may
challenge
prior
conviction
product
gideon
violation
motion
generally
raised
claim
federal
sentencing
proceeding
see
frady
holding
procedural
default
rules
developed
habeas
corpus
context
apply
cases
see
also
reed
farley
justice
souter
says
holding
rul
es
application
choice
relief
relief
post
dissenting
opinion
characterization
problem
misses
point
said
defendant
generally
ample
opportunity
obtain
constitutional
review
state
conviction
supra
door
review
closed
post
defendant
either
failed
pursue
otherwise
available
remedies
failed
prove
constitutional
violation
conviction
becomes
final
defendant
entitled
another
bite
apple
simply
conviction
later
used
enhance
another
sentence
sure
text
broad
enough
cover
claim
enhanced
federal
sentence
violates
due
process
see
ibid
see
also
infra
due
process
claim
predicated
consideration
sentencing
fully
expired
prior
conviction
think
goals
easy
administration
finality
ample
horsepower
justify
foreclosing
relief
allow
defendants
sentenced
acca
collaterally
attack
prior
convictions
motion
effectively
permit
challenges
far
stale
brought
right
sanction
end
run
around
statutes
limitations
procedural
barriers
preclude
movant
attacking
prior
conviction
directly
nothing
constitution
precedent
requires
result
recognize
may
rare
cases
channel
review
actually
available
defendant
respect
prior
conviction
due
fault
circumstances
case
require
us
determine
whether
defendant
use
motion
challenge
federal
sentence
based
supp
allowing
second
successive
motion
newly
discovered
evidence
proven
viewed
light
evidence
whole
sufficient
establish
clear
convincing
evidence
reasonable
factfinder
found
movant
guilty
offense
ibid
tolling
limitation
period
movant
prevented
making
motion
impediment
created
governmental
action
violation
constitution
laws
iii
claim
made
sole
basis
petitioner
daniels
challenges
current
federal
sentence
two
prior
state
convictions
products
inadequate
guilty
pleas
ineffective
assistance
counsel
petitioner
pursued
claims
custody
convictions
counsel
conceded
oral
argument
indication
petitioner
prevented
external
force
tr
oral
arg
petitioner
federal
sentence
properly
enhanced
pursuant
acca
based
four
facially
valid
prior
state
convictions
petitioner
failed
pursue
remedies
otherwise
available
challenge
convictions
may
use
motion
collaterally
attack
convictions
judgment
appeals
ninth
circuit
therefore
affirmed
ordered
earthy
daniels
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
april
justice
scalia
concurring
part
agree
supp
gideon
exception
see
gideon
wainwright
permit
inquiry
whether
conviction
later
used
enhance
federal
sentence
unconstitutionally
obtained
agree
reasoning
far
goes
another
reason
reaching
result
however
one
prevents
joining
portion
opinion
speculates
may
rare
circumstances
available
channel
review
actually
available
defendant
respect
prior
conviction
due
fault
ante
simply
put
text
broad
enough
cover
claim
enhanced
federal
sentence
violates
due
process
enhancement
based
prior
convictions
addition
practical
reasons
justice
identifies
counseling
petitioner
interpretation
stands
text
provision
long
recognized
power
award
writ
habeas
corpus
courts
must
given
written
law
felker
turpin
quoting
ex
parte
bollman
cranch
section
authorizes
challenge
prisoner
custody
sentence
established
act
congress
claiming
right
released
upon
ground
sentence
imposed
violation
constitution
laws
emphases
added
already
determined
custis
sentencing
violate
due
process
clause
imposing
sentence
enhanced
prior
purportedly
tainted
convictions
unless
taint
result
gideon
violation
follows
ineluctably
establish
right
challenge
federal
sentences
based
enhancement
stale
convictions
conclusion
reinforced
reinforcement
possible
comparing
text
latter
governing
habeas
challenges
state
convictions
provides
ineffectiveness
incompetence
counsel
federal
state
collateral
proceedings
shall
ground
relief
proceeding
arising
supp
conceivable
reason
bar
placed
upon
challenges
state
convictions
upon
challenges
state
convictions
congress
expect
challenges
state
convictions
used
enhance
federal
convictions
brought
perhaps
precepts
fundamental
fairness
inherent
due
process
suggest
forum
litigate
challenges
like
petitioner
must
made
available
somewhere
odd
case
challenge
brought
earlier
follow
federal
sentencing
must
provide
remedy
much
less
federal
sentencing
need
provide
remedy
entirely
dependent
upon
impropriety
prior
federal
sentencing
must
fundamental
fairness
achieved
well
indeed
better
holding
rendering
jurisdiction
must
provide
means
challenge
enhancement
threatened
imposed
constitutional
rule
combined
rule
sentence
already
imposed
must
adjusted
accordingly
prevent
sentencing
hearings
routinely
complicated
inquiries
prior
convictions
locate
inquiries
best
conducted
rendering
jurisdiction
also
avoid
possible
gap
protection
result
using
cases
inappropriate
purpose
arising
fact
discussed
used
remedy
ineffective
assistance
postconviction
counsel
left
open
question
whether
ineffective
assistance
establish
constitutional
violation
see
coleman
thompson
possibly
means
relief
reasons
join
opinion
part
earthy
daniels
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
april
justice
souter
justice
stevens
justice
ginsburg
join
dissenting
custis
held
federal
defendant
facing
enhanced
sentence
basis
prior
state
convictions
armed
career
criminal
act
acca
one
exception
challenge
constitutionality
underlying
state
convictions
federal
sentencing
proceeding
custis
thus
precursor
case
us
custis
however
compelling
authority
today
disposition
although
opinion
custis
struck
portending
strictly
held
reading
case
free
portent
fact
understanding
one
member
custis
majority
custis
presented
forum
question
issue
whether
defendant
attack
prior
conviction
constitutional
infirmity
nichols
ginsburg
dissenting
emphasis
original
door
custis
remained
open
attack
prior
state
convictions
state
federal
habeas
challenge
underlying
convictions
see
custis
supra
custis
still
custody
purposes
state
convictions
time
federal
sentencing
thus
attack
state
sentences
maryland
federal
habeas
review
case
presents
distinct
question
happens
door
closed
reasons
reading
supp
restrictively
read
acca
sentencing
provisions
nothing
either
text
extension
rules
governing
habeas
review
state
convictions
ed
supp
language
providing
federal
prisoner
right
relief
sentence
imposed
violation
constitution
laws
obviously
broad
enough
include
claim
prior
conviction
used
anew
mandate
sentence
enhancement
acca
obtained
unconstitutionally
new
sentence
violates
terms
acca
rest
exclusion
claims
review
theory
petitioner
challenges
underlying
state
convictions
required
like
petitioner
exhaust
state
remedies
comply
state
procedural
rules
cf
ed
supp
rose
lundy
coleman
thompson
clear
requirements
premised
largely
comity
concerns
state
interest
finality
judgments
see
imported
context
federal
sentence
imposed
petitioner
completed
state
sentence
seeks
avoid
sentence
enhancement
federal
law
event
purport
apply
specific
requirements
setting
waived
state
see
supp
gray
netherland
subject
explicit
exceptions
instead
imposes
flat
ban
relief
subject
maybe
narrow
exceptions
textual
basis
related
precedent
habeas
law
rules
challenges
acca
sentencing
predicates
grounds
invoked
earlier
bar
challenges
sentencing
provisions
acca
acca
easy
administer
state
convictions
carry
finality
ante
whatever
force
reasons
might
alternative
avenues
challenge
open
even
come
close
horsepower
needed
rule
application
choice
relief
relief
easy
subject
person
higher
sentencing
range
commit
nearly
nine
extra
years
prisoner
colorable
claim
extended
commitment
rests
conviction
constitution
condemn
answer
value
finality
state
convictions
finality
valuable
state
law
demand
finality
street
prisoner
like
daniels
suddenly
barred
returning
challenge
validity
conviction
government
free
reach
back
impose
extended
imprisonment
sentence
enhancement
law
unheard
time
earlier
convictions
case
daniels
expected
anticipate
federal
enhancement
statute
enacted
even
blessed
statutory
clairvoyance
practice
told
challenge
convictions
government
sought
rely
future
enhancement
statute
acca
enacted
backdrop
pervasive
federal
practice
entertaining
constitutional
challenges
prior
convictions
used
anew
sentence
enhancement
practice
congress
threw
cold
water
enacted
acca
see
custis
see
ante
suppose
begrudge
concession
gideon
exception
first
announced
custis
inexplicable
one
might
argued
custis
gideon
violation
egregious
enough
excuse
defendant
failure
resort
forums
still
open
excuse
picking
choosing
among
constitutional
violations
forums
closed
need
address
gideon
reason
ignore
moore
dempsey
mooney
holohan
per
curiam
brown
mississippi
strickland
washington
miranda
arizona
brady
maryland
recognized
violations
constitution
none
say
wrong
recognize
collateral
review
old
state
convictions
cumbersome
see
ante
practical
consideration
real
world
confront
confront
defendant
acca
generally
paid
whatever
penalty
old
conviction
entailed
may
well
forgone
direct
challenge
penalty
practically
worth
challenging
may
well
passed
collateral
attack
counsel
speak
faced
acca
mandatory
minimum
old
conviction
suddenly
well
worth
challenging
counsel
may
available
denying
right
attack
convictions
later
attacks
worth
trouble
adopts
policy
promoting
challenges
earlier
may
justify
effort
perhaps
never
odd
incentive
create
eccentricity
hardly
softened
likelihood
defendants
notice
late
today
decision
devoid
support
either
tory
language
congressional
intention
respectfully
dissent
earthy
daniels
petitioner
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
april
justice
breyer
dissenting
believe
congress
intended
courts
read
silences
federal
sentencing
statutes
permitting
defendants
challenge
validity
earlier
conviction
time
sentencing
see
paleo
implicitly
overruled
custis
practice
typically
followed
lower
courts
custis
see
souter
dissenting
courts
follow
comparable
practice
respect
factors
see
dunnigan
perjured
testimony
enhancement
given
appropriate
burden
proof
rules
see
gilbert
wicks
cert
denied
paleo
supra
citing
henry
cert
denied
gallman
cert
denied
taylor
cert
denied
practice
need
prove
unusually
burdensome
see
custis
supra
souter
dissenting
rejected
procedural
approach
custis
supra
must
face
alternative
later
challenge
earlier
convictions
collateral
proceeding
attacks
present
conviction
sentence
resolve
challenge
plurality
devised
broad
rule
immunizing
earlier
conviction
possible
exception
rare
circumstances
see
ante
rule
may
well
prove
unduly
restrictiv
ante
souter
dissenting
exceptions
may
well
bring
additional
delay
still
greater
litigation
complexity
insofar
plurality
ties
congress
hands
resting
exception
upon
constitutional
grounds
legal
inflexibility
given
restrictions
custis
placed
sentencing
courts
inclination
grant
supp
hearing
rare
circumstances
hypothesized
majority
subject
justice
scalia
criticism
may
inappropriate
forum
challenge
see
ante
opinion
concurring
part
legal
problem
lies
source
often
overturn
recently
decided
case
instance
earlier
decision
lead
complexity
blocks
simpler
procedural
approach
congress
intended
consequently
believe
one
rare
instances
reconsider
earlier
case
namely
custis
adopt
dissenters
views
reason
dissent
footnotes
justice
souter
concerned
defendant
may
forgo
direct
challenge
penalty
practically
worth
challenging
collateral
attack
counsel
speak
post
dissenting
opinion
whatever
incentives
may
exist
time
conviction
fact
remains
avenues
redress
generally
available
sought
timely
manner
person
chooses
pursue
remedies
knowledge
conviction
stay
record
knowledge
serve
incentive
commit
subsequent
crime
risk
sentence
crime
enhanced
recidivist
sentencing
statute
comparing
text
justice
scalia
concludes
congress
expect
challenges
state
convictions
used
enhance
federal
convictions
brought
post
opinion
concurring
part
course
true
also
beside
point
subject
motion
circumstance
enhanced
federal
sentence
prior
state
conviction
footnotes
justice
souter
asserts
custis
merely
held
exception
gideon
violations
neither
acca
constitution
provides
forum
sentencing
hearing
challenges
underlying
conviction
post
dissenting
opinion
constitution
provide
forum
sentencing
hearing
unconstitutional
sentence
basis
invalid
nonetheless
outstanding
prior
convictions
assuredly
constitution
permit
unconstitutional
acts
custis
necessarily
held
therefore
unconstitutional
gideon
exception
sentence
basis
invalid
nonetheless
outstanding
prior
convictions
justice
souter
apparently
understood
time
custis
decided
dissent
began
answers
difficult
constitutional
question
believe
underlying
statute
pose
question
turns
whether
constitution
permits
courts
enhance
defendant
sentence
basis
prior
conviction
defendant
show
obtained
violation
right
effective
assistance
counsel
footnotes
government
argues
citing
custis
supp
provide
remedy
constitution
violated
conviction
facially
valid
used
enhance
sentence
committing
another
crime
brief
misstates
holding
custis
merely
held
one
exception
discussed
neither
acca
constitution
provides
forum
sentencing
hearing
challenges
underlying
conviction
describing
types
fundamental
errors
cognizable
neither
custis
today
takes
position
acca
properly
applies
statutory
matter
underlying
sentences
fact
invalid
see
custis
supra
ante
language
invites
petitioner
establish
statutory
violation
continues
leave
door
open
promises
motion
revise
acca
sentence
defendant
first
obtained
order
vacating
predicate
conviction
state
collateral
proceeding
federal
habeas
review
state
judgment
ed
supp
see
ante
custis
supra
plurality
adds
possibility
exception
today
rule
petitioner
show
newly
discovered
evidence
legal
disability
period
state
custody
see
ante
exceptions
eclipse
rule