nelson
colorado
argued
january
decided
april
petitioner
shannon
nelson
convicted
colorado
jury
two
felonies
three
misdemeanors
arising
alleged
sexual
physical
abuse
four
children
trial
imposed
prison
term
years
life
ordered
pay
costs
fees
restitution
appeal
nelson
conviction
reversed
trial
error
retrial
acquitted
charges
petitioner
louis
alonzo
madden
convicted
colorado
jury
attempting
patronize
prostituted
child
attempted
sexual
assault
trial
imposed
indeterminate
prison
sentence
ordered
pay
costs
fees
restitution
one
madden
convictions
reversed
direct
review
vacated
postconviction
review
state
elected
appeal
retry
case
colorado
department
corrections
withheld
nelson
inmate
account
conviction
acquittal
madden
paid
state
conviction
cases
funds
allocated
costs
fees
restitution
convictions
invalidated
petitioners
moved
return
funds
nelson
trial
denied
motion
outright
madden
postconviction
allowed
refund
costs
fees
restitution
colorado
appeals
concluded
petitioners
entitled
seek
refunds
paid
colorado
reversed
reasoned
colorado
compensation
certain
exonerated
persons
statute
exoneration
act
act
rev
stat
provided
exclusive
authority
refunds
neither
nelson
madden
filed
claim
act
courts
lacked
authority
order
refunds
colorado
also
held
due
process
problem
act
permits
colorado
retain
assessments
unless
prevailing
defendant
institutes
discrete
civil
proceeding
proves
innocence
clear
convincing
evidence
held
exoneration
act
scheme
comport
fourteenth
amendment
guarantee
due
process
pp
procedural
due
process
inspection
required
mathews
eldridge
governs
cases
medina
california
controls
state
procedural
rules
part
criminal
process
issue
cases
contrast
concern
continuing
deprivation
property
conviction
reversed
vacated
prospect
reprosecution
pp
three
considerations
balanced
mathews
private
interest
affected
risk
erroneous
deprivation
interest
procedures
used
governmental
interest
stake
weigh
decisively
colorado
scheme
pp
nelson
madden
obvious
interest
regaining
money
paid
colorado
state
may
retain
funds
simply
nelson
madden
convictions
place
funds
taken
convictions
erased
presumption
innocence
restored
see
johnson
mississippi
colorado
may
presume
person
adjudged
guilty
crime
nonetheless
guilty
enough
monetary
exactions
pp
colorado
scheme
creates
unacceptable
risk
erroneous
deprivation
defendants
property
exoneration
act
conditions
refund
defendants
proof
innocence
clear
convincing
evidence
defendants
petitioners
position
presumed
innocent
moreover
act
provides
remedy
assessments
tied
invalid
misdemeanor
convictions
recoupment
amount
sought
large
cost
mounting
claim
act
retaining
counsel
pursue
prohibitive
colorado
argues
act
provides
sufficient
process
compensate
defendant
loss
liberty
must
suffice
compensate
defendant
lesser
deprivation
money
nelson
madden
seek
return
property
compensation
temporary
deprivation
restoration
liberty
reversal
conviction
compensation
neither
return
money
taken
state
account
conviction
procedures
cited
colorado
need
probable
cause
support
criminal
charges
right
state
burden
prove
guilt
beyond
reasonable
doubt
address
risk
faced
defendant
whose
conviction
overturned
recover
funds
taken
based
solely
conviction
longer
valid
pp
colorado
interest
withholding
nelson
madden
money
state
currently
zero
claim
right
state
identified
equitable
considerations
favoring
position
indicated
way
exoneration
act
embodies
considerations
first
judgment
second
judgment
reversed
remanded
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
roberts
kennedy
breyer
sotomayor
kagan
joined
alito
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
thomas
filed
dissenting
opinion
gorsuch
took
part
consideration
decision
cases
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
shannon
nelson
petitioner
colorado
louis
madden
petitioner
colorado
writ
certiorari
colorado
april
justice
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
criminal
conviction
invalidated
reviewing
retrial
occur
state
obliged
refund
fees
costs
restitution
exacted
defendant
upon
consequence
conviction
answer
yes
absent
conviction
crime
one
presumed
innocent
colorado
law
us
cases
however
state
retains
assessments
unless
prevailing
defendant
institutes
discrete
civil
proceeding
proves
innocence
clear
convincing
evidence
scheme
hold
offends
fourteenth
amendment
guarantee
due
process
two
cases
us
review
petitioner
shannon
nelson
convicted
colorado
jury
five
counts
two
felonies
three
misdemeanors
arising
alleged
sexual
physical
abuse
four
children
app
trial
imposed
prison
sentence
years
life
ordered
nelson
pay
costs
fees
restitution
totaling
appeal
nelson
conviction
reversed
trial
error
ibid
retrial
new
jury
acquitted
nelson
charges
ibid
petitioner
louis
alonzo
madden
convicted
colorado
jury
attempting
patronize
prostituted
child
attempted
sexual
assault
force
see
trial
imposed
indeterminate
prison
sentence
ordered
madden
pay
costs
fees
restitution
totaling
ibid
colorado
reversed
one
madden
convictions
direct
review
postconviction
vacated
ibid
state
elected
appeal
retry
case
ibid
nelson
conviction
acquittal
colorado
department
corrections
withheld
inmate
account
went
costs
restitution
see
following
madden
conviction
madden
paid
colorado
went
costs
restitution
see
sole
legal
basis
assessments
fact
nelson
madden
absent
convictions
colorado
legal
right
exact
retain
petitioners
funds
convictions
invalidated
petitioners
moved
return
amounts
colorado
taken
nelson
case
trial
denied
motion
outright
madden
case
postconviction
allowed
refund
costs
fees
restitution
colorado
appeals
panel
heard
cases
concluded
nelson
madden
entitled
seek
refunds
paid
including
amounts
allocated
restitution
see
people
nelson
people
madden
wl
apr
costs
fees
restitution
held
must
tied
valid
conviction
absent
must
retur
defendant
status
quo
ante
wl
colorado
reversed
cases
must
statutory
authority
issue
refund
stated
colorado
compensation
certain
exonerated
persons
statute
exoneration
act
act
rev
stat
passed
provides
proper
procedure
seeking
refund
ruled
statute
addresses
refunds
concluded
exoneration
act
exclusive
process
exonerated
defendants
seeking
refund
costs
fees
restitution
neither
nelson
madden
filed
claim
act
determined
trial
courts
lacked
authority
order
refund
due
process
problem
continued
act
provides
sufficient
process
defendants
seek
refunds
costs
fees
restitution
paid
connection
conviction
justice
hood
dissented
cases
neither
petitioner
validly
convicted
explained
must
presumed
innocent
nelson
adopting
reasoning
nelson
madden
due
process
therefore
requires
mechanism
return
defendant
money
justice
hood
maintained
exoneration
act
required
petitioners
prove
innocence
act
concluded
supply
remedy
due
process
demands
granted
certiorari
exoneration
act
provides
civil
claim
relief
compensate
innocent
person
wrongly
convicted
recovery
act
available
defendant
served
part
term
incarceration
pursuant
felony
conviction
whose
conviction
overturned
reasons
insufficiency
evidence
legal
error
unrelated
actual
innocence
see
succeed
exoneration
act
claim
petitioner
must
show
clear
convincing
evidence
actual
innocence
offense
conviction
successful
petitioner
may
recoup
addition
compensation
time
fine
penalty
costs
restitution
paid
result
wrongful
conviction
quoting
colorado
legislation
recounted
defendant
must
prove
innocence
clear
convincing
evidence
obtain
refund
costs
fees
restitution
paid
pursuant
invalid
conviction
scheme
hold
comport
due
process
accordingly
reverse
judgment
colorado
ii
familiar
procedural
due
process
inspection
instructed
mathews
eldridge
governs
cases
colorado
argues
instead
apply
standard
medina
california
inquire
whether
nelson
madden
exposed
procedure
offensive
fundamental
principle
justice
medina
provide
appropriate
framework
assessing
validity
state
procedural
rules
part
criminal
process
rules
concern
example
allocation
burdens
proof
type
evidence
qualifying
cases
contrast
concern
continuing
deprivation
property
conviction
reversed
vacated
prospect
reprosecution
see
kaley
roberts
dissenting
slip
explaining
different
offices
mathews
medina
criminal
process
implicated
mathews
provides
relevant
inquiry
slip
iii
mathews
balancing
test
evaluates
private
interest
affected
risk
erroneous
deprivation
interest
procedures
used
governmental
interest
stake
three
considerations
weigh
decisively
colorado
scheme
nelson
madden
obvious
interest
regaining
money
paid
colorado
colorado
urges
however
funds
belong
state
nelson
madden
convictions
place
funds
taken
tr
oral
arg
convictions
erased
presumption
innocence
restored
see
johnson
mississippi
conviction
reversed
unless
defendant
retried
must
presumed
innocent
charge
xiomatic
elementary
presumption
innocence
lies
foundation
criminal
law
coffin
colorado
may
retain
funds
taken
nelson
madden
solely
convictions
see
supra
colorado
may
presume
person
adjudged
guilty
crime
nonetheless
guilty
enough
monetary
petitioners
prevailed
subsequent
review
rather
first
instance
moreover
inconsequential
suppose
trial
judge
grants
motion
set
aside
guilty
verdict
want
sufficient
evidence
event
defendant
pays
costs
fees
restitution
suppose
trial
enters
judgment
guilty
verdict
ordering
cost
fee
restitution
payments
reason
conviction
appeals
upsets
conviction
evidentiary
insufficiency
right
state
retain
amount
paid
defendant
make
difference
reviewing
rather
trial
determined
evidence
insufficient
burks
vulnerability
state
argument
keep
amounts
exacted
long
prevailed
first
instance
apparent
still
assume
case
sole
penalty
fine
colorado
reasoning
appeal
leave
defendant
emptyhanded
regardless
outcome
appeal
state
refund
obligation
see
tr
oral
arg
risk
erroneous
deprivation
defendants
interest
return
funds
colorado
urges
exoneration
act
exclusive
remedy
indeed
yes
act
conditions
refund
defendants
proof
innocence
clear
convincing
evidence
get
money
back
defendants
saddled
proof
burden
instead
explained
supra
entitled
presumed
innocent
furthermore
justice
hood
noted
dissent
act
provides
remedy
assessments
tied
invalid
misdemeanor
convictions
nelson
three
see
amounts
defendant
seeks
recoup
large
true
nelson
madden
cases
see
supra
cost
mounting
claim
exoneration
act
retaining
lawyer
pursue
colorado
argued
brief
exoneration
act
provides
sufficient
process
compensate
defendant
loss
liberty
act
also
suffice
defendant
seeks
compensation
less
significant
deprivation
monetary
assessments
paid
pursuant
conviction
later
overturned
brief
respondent
comparison
inapt
nelson
madden
seek
restoration
funds
paid
state
compensation
temporary
deprivation
funds
petitioners
seek
money
back
interest
funds
period
funds
state
custody
restoration
liberty
reversal
conviction
compensation
neither
return
money
taken
state
account
conviction
colorado
also
suggests
numerous
procedures
including
need
probable
cause
support
criminal
charges
right
state
burden
prove
guilt
beyond
reasonable
doubt
adequately
minimize
risk
erroneous
deprivation
property
see
colorado
misperceives
risk
issue
risk
involved
risk
wrongful
invalid
conviction
criminal
defendant
may
face
instead
risk
faced
defendant
whose
conviction
already
overturned
recover
funds
taken
solely
basis
conviction
longer
valid
none
procedures
addresses
risk
explained
exoneration
act
adequate
remedy
property
deprivation
nelson
madden
colorado
interest
withholding
nelson
madden
money
state
currently
zero
claim
right
equitable
onsiderations
colorado
suggests
may
bear
whether
state
may
withhold
funds
criminal
defendants
convictions
overturned
brief
respondent
colorado
however
identified
consideration
relevant
petitioners
cases
state
indicated
way
exoneration
act
embodies
equitable
considerations
iv
colorado
scheme
fails
due
process
measurement
defendants
interest
regaining
funds
high
risk
erroneous
deprivation
funds
exoneration
act
unacceptable
state
shown
countervailing
interests
retaining
amounts
question
comport
due
process
state
may
impose
anything
minimal
procedures
refund
exactions
dependent
upon
conviction
subsequently
invalidated
judgments
colorado
reversed
cases
remanded
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
ordered
justice
gorsuch
took
part
consideration
decision
cases
alito
concurring
judgment
shannon
nelson
petitioner
colorado
louis
madden
petitioner
colorado
writ
certiorari
colorado
april
justice
alito
concurring
judgment
agree
judgments
colorado
must
reversed
reach
conclusion
different
route
proper
framework
analyzing
cases
provided
medina
california
medina
applies
called
upon
asses
validity
state
procedural
rules
part
criminal
process
precisely
situation
cases
concern
colorado
rules
determining
whether
defendant
obtain
refund
money
required
pay
pursuant
judgment
conviction
later
reversed
holding
payments
must
refunded
relies
feature
criminal
law
presumption
innocence
since
demands
refunds
occur
either
automatically
least
without
imposing
anything
minimal
procedures
see
ante
appears
must
generally
occur
part
criminal
case
reasons
refund
obligation
surely
part
criminal
process
thus
falls
squarely
within
scope
medina
authority
cited
support
contrary
conclusion
dissent
see
ante
citing
kaley
opinion
roberts
slip
medina
state
rule
criminal
procedure
governed
specific
rule
set
bill
rights
violates
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
offends
fundamental
deeply
rooted
principle
justice
istorical
practice
probative
whether
procedural
rule
characterized
fundamental
indeed
petitioners
invite
us
measure
colorado
scheme
traditional
practice
reminding
us
due
process
recognized
practice
provides
touchstone
constitutional
analysis
brief
petitioners
quoting
honda
motor
oberg
petitioners
go
argue
length
traditional
rule
always
judgment
reversed
person
paid
money
pursuant
judgment
entitled
receive
money
back
brief
petitioners
see
see
also
brief
national
association
criminal
defense
lawyers
amicus
curiae
discussing
traditional
practice
contrast
turns
back
historical
practice
preferring
balance
competing
interests
according
lights
applies
balancing
test
set
mathews
eldridge
modern
invention
first
conceived
decide
procedures
government
must
observe
depriving
persons
novel
forms
property
welfare
social
security
disability
benefits
dusenbery
interests
previously
regarded
property
draw
historical
practice
guidance
mathews
subsequently
used
widely
civil
cases
pause
applying
balancing
test
matters
state
criminal
procedure
considerable
expertise
matters
criminal
procedure
criminal
process
grounded
centuries
tradition
medina
supra
applying
mathews
balancing
test
established
rules
criminal
practice
procedure
may
result
undue
interference
considered
legislative
judgments
careful
balance
constitution
strikes
liberty
order
medina
supra
long
practice
struck
particular
balance
competing
interests
state
charged
crimes
lightly
disturb
determination
reasons
medina
historical
inquiry
mathews
provides
proper
framework
use
ii
medina
colorado
scheme
issue
violates
due
process
american
law
long
recognized
individual
obligated
civil
judgment
pay
money
opposing
party
judgment
later
reversed
money
generally
repaid
see
northwestern
fuel
brock
right
restitution
one
lost
enforcement
judgment
subsequently
reversed
recognized
law
england
early
period
bank
bank
washington
pet
reversal
erroneous
judgment
law
raises
obligation
party
record
received
benefit
erroneous
judgment
make
restitution
party
lost
remedy
well
known
common
law
memorialized
part
judgment
reversal
directed
defendant
restored
things
lost
occasion
judgment
aforesaid
ruling
case
law
mckinney
rich
eds
duncan
kirkpatrick
serg
rawle
parties
acknowledge
practice
carried
criminal
cases
conviction
reversed
defendants
recover
fines
monetary
penalties
assessed
part
conviction
brief
respondent
reply
brief
see
right
recover
back
fine
penalty
paid
criminal
proceeding
judgment
imposing
fine
paid
vacated
reversed
appeal
may
order
restitution
amount
paid
mack
hale
kiser
eds
fine
illegally
imposed
paid
reversal
judgment
writ
restitution
may
issue
parties
received
fine
rule
regarding
recovery
however
even
though
general
application
without
exceptions
atlantic
coast
line
florida
cardozo
remedy
equitable
origin
function
return
money
mere
right
ed
exercise
sound
discretion
quoting
gould
mcfall
true
civil
criminal
cases
see
noting
restitution
fines
paid
conviction
later
reversed
necessarily
matter
right
restitution
fines
upon
reversal
conviction
matter
strict
legal
right
rather
one
exercise
discretion
central
question
courts
asked
whether
possessor
give
offense
equity
good
conscience
permitted
retain
successful
appellant
money
atlantic
coast
line
supra
history
supports
rejection
colorado
exoneration
act
procedures
act
places
heavy
burden
proof
defendants
provides
opportunity
refund
defendants
like
nelson
whose
misdemeanor
convictions
reversed
excludes
defendants
whose
convictions
reversed
reasons
unrelated
innocence
brief
respondent
stringent
requirements
guarantee
defendants
whose
convictions
reversed
realistic
opportunity
prove
deserving
refunds
colorado
abandoned
historical
procedures
generous
successful
appellants
incorporated
equitable
judgment
instead
colorado
adopted
system
harsh
inflexible
prevents
defendants
whose
convictions
reversed
demonstrating
entitlement
refund
indeed
colorado
general
assembly
made
financial
projections
based
assumption
one
person
every
five
years
qualify
financial
award
exoneration
act
colorado
legislative
council
staff
fiscal
note
state
local
revised
fiscal
impact
hb
apr
online
http
last
visited
apr
accordingly
exoneration
act
satisfy
due
process
requirements
see
cooper
oklahoma
state
rule
criminal
procedure
may
violate
due
process
rule
significantly
favorable
defendant
long
consistent
application
iii
although
practice
supports
judgment
rests
decision
different
grounds
mathews
analysis
reasons
reversal
petitioners
convictions
restored
presumption
innocence
colorado
may
presume
person
adjudged
guilty
crime
nonetheless
guilty
enough
monetary
exactions
ante
implication
brief
statement
mathews
reversal
restores
defendant
status
quo
ante
see
ante
confront
obvious
implications
reasoning
example
status
quo
ante
must
restored
defendant
compensated
adverse
economic
consequences
wrongful
conviction
cases
fines
payments
convicted
defendant
must
pay
minor
comparison
losses
result
conviction
imprisonment
attorney
fees
lost
income
damage
reputation
convincingly
explain
mathews
amorphous
balancing
test
stops
short
requiring
full
return
status
quo
ante
conviction
reversed
medina
american
legal
system
long
treated
compensation
economic
consequences
reversed
conviction
differently
refund
fines
payments
made
defendant
pursuant
criminal
judgment
statutes
providing
compensation
time
wrongfully
spent
prison
innovation
federal
government
four
passed
laws
king
compensation
persons
erroneously
confined
state
rev
keegan
supp
sdny
seems
legislation
government
subject
many
jurisdictions
done
since
laws
compensation
automatic
instead
defendant
bears
burden
proving
actual
innocence
sometimes
king
supra
burden
proving
innocence
compensation
proceeding
start
placed
upon
claimant
see
also
kahn
presumed
guilty
proven
innocent
burden
proof
wrongful
conviction
claims
state
compensation
statutes
reform
compensation
statutes
require
claimants
prove
innocence
either
preponderance
evidence
clear
convincing
evidence
omitted
construing
federal
statute
courts
held
compensation
proceeding
criminal
trial
burden
proof
placed
petitioner
brunner
noted
colorado
many
similar
statutes
designed
narrowly
compensate
persons
demonstrate
truly
innocent
apparently
acknowledges
statutes
pose
constitutional
difficulty
correct
conclusion
best
justified
reference
history
tradition
iv
disregard
historical
practice
particularly
damaging
comes
question
restitution
flatly
declares
state
obliged
refund
restitution
way
fees
costs
ante
conclusion
supported
historical
practice
overlooks
important
differences
restitution
paid
victims
offense
fines
payments
kept
state
although
restitution
may
included
criminal
judgment
many
attributes
civil
judgment
favor
victim
clear
colorado
law
although
obligation
pay
restitution
included
defendant
sentence
restitution
results
final
civil
judgment
defendant
favor
state
victim
rev
stat
entitlement
restitution
need
established
beyond
reasonable
doubt
accordance
standard
rules
evidence
criminal
procedure
people
pagan
app
rev
stat
judgment
may
enforced
either
state
victim
ignores
distinctive
attributes
restitution
merit
attention
restitution
order
much
like
civil
judgment
reversal
defendant
criminal
conviction
necessarily
undermine
basis
restitution
suppose
victim
successfully
sues
criminal
defendant
civilly
introduces
defendant
criminal
conviction
underlying
conduct
potentially
preclusive
evidence
establishing
essential
element
civil
claim
see
broun
mccormick
evidence
ed
discussing
admissibility
potential
preclusive
effect
criminal
conviction
subsequent
civil
litigation
suppose
defendant
criminal
conviction
later
reversed
trial
error
infect
later
civil
proceeding
example
admission
evidence
barred
exclusionary
rule
confrontation
clause
violation
unprecedented
suggest
due
process
requires
unwinding
civil
judgment
simply
rests
part
criminal
conviction
since
reversed
similar
scenario
unfold
respect
colorado
restitution
judgment
salient
difference
colorado
case
civil
judgment
obtained
part
criminal
proceeding
clear
certainly
explain
formal
distinction
make
substantive
especially
startling
insist
state
must
provide
refund
enforcing
restitution
judgment
victims
behalf
reliance
final
judgment
vacated
collateral
review
faced
fact
pattern
ninth
circuit
declined
require
reimbursement
reasoning
government
mere
escrow
agent
executing
final
judgment
favor
third
party
hayes
regrettably
mentions
none
treatment
restitution
grounded
historical
analysis
save
brief
ante
account
distinctive
civil
status
restitution
colorado
law
laws
many
affected
jurisdictions
provide
remedy
crime
victims
consider
restitution
unique
characteristics
might
affect
balance
strikes
mathews
ante
summarily
rejects
proposition
might
militate
blanket
rule
requiring
refund
money
paid
restitution
see
evidence
amply
establishes
defendant
injured
victims
restitution
paid
defendant
conviction
reversed
ground
inapplicable
civil
suit
situation
true
proclaims
state
interest
withholding
refund
reach
conclusion
state
law
mandated
refund
recipients
restitution
federal
government
always
required
foot
bill
risk
discourage
seeking
restitution
least
providing
funds
victims
conclusion
appellate
review
unnecessary
issue
sweeping
pronouncement
restitution
address
subject
dispose
cases
acknowledged
least
circumstances
refunds
restitution
payments
made
later
reversed
judgments
constitutionally
required
reasons
concur
judgment
thomas
dissenting
shannon
nelson
petitioner
colorado
louis
madden
petitioner
colorado
writ
certiorari
colorado
april
justice
thomas
dissenting
majority
concurring
opinions
debate
whether
procedural
due
process
framework
mathews
eldridge
medina
california
governs
question
us
opinions
bypass
important
question
cases
whether
petitioners
show
substantive
entitlement
return
money
paid
pursuant
criminal
convictions
later
reversed
vacated
assumes
without
reference
either
state
federal
law
defendants
whose
convictions
reversed
substantive
right
money
exacted
basis
convictions
assumes
away
real
issue
cases
parties
agreed
existence
colorado
obligation
provide
particular
procedures
depends
whether
petitioners
substantive
entitlement
money
colorado
concedes
petitioners
present
entitlement
money
due
process
requires
state
accord
procedure
get
back
tr
oral
arg
colorado
acknowledges
procedural
hurdles
impose
returning
money
fairly
minimal
petitioners
need
prove
convictions
reversed
paid
certain
sum
money
see
ibid
similarly
petitioners
concede
defendants
position
substantive
right
recover
money
money
belongs
state
colorado
need
provide
procedure
give
back
defendants
position
entitlement
money
paid
pursuant
reversed
convictions
nothing
adjudicate
light
concessions
see
justification
decision
address
procedures
adjudicating
substantive
entitlement
failing
determine
whether
substantive
entitlement
exists
first
place
view
petitioners
demonstrated
defendants
whose
convictions
reversed
possess
substantive
entitlement
either
state
law
constitution
recover
money
paid
state
pursuant
convictions
accordingly
agree
decision
reverse
judgments
colorado
fourteenth
amendment
provides
state
shall
deprive
person
life
liberty
property
without
due
process
law
amdt
emphasis
added
show
colorado
violated
constitution
procedural
guarantees
relevant
petitioners
must
first
establish
deprived
protected
property
interest
see
castle
rock
gonzales
procedural
component
due
process
clause
protect
everything
might
described
benefit
property
interest
benefit
person
clearly
must
legitimate
claim
entitlement
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
constitution
protects
rather
creates
property
interests
existence
property
interest
determined
reference
rules
understandings
stem
independent
source
state
law
phillips
washington
legal
foundation
quoting
board
regents
state
colleges
roth
petitioners
undoubtedly
interest
regaining
money
paid
colorado
ante
succeed
procedural
due
process
claim
petitioners
must
first
point
recognized
property
interest
money
state
federal
law
within
meaning
fourteenth
amendment
parties
dispute
whether
colorado
law
petitioners
state
property
interest
money
paid
petitioners
pursuant
convictions
petitioners
contend
money
remains
property
state
law
reply
brief
see
also
tr
oral
arg
colorado
counters
petitioners
paid
money
pursuant
convictions
costs
fees
became
property
state
restitution
became
property
victims
see
brief
respondent
key
premise
colorado
holdings
cases
moneys
lawfully
exacted
pursuant
valid
conviction
become
public
funds
victims
money
colorado
law
colorado
explained
petitioner
shannon
nelson
case
trial
properly
ordered
pay
costs
fees
restitution
pursuant
valid
statutes
correctly
distributed
th
ose
funds
victims
public
funds
ordered
statutes
emphasis
added
accord
applying
analysis
petitioner
louis
madden
case
colorado
noted
nce
state
disburses
restitution
victims
state
longer
controls
money
colorado
explained
colorado
constitution
protects
colorado
legislature
control
public
money
thus
may
authorize
refunds
public
funds
pursuant
statutory
authority
exoneration
act
colorado
held
provides
statutory
authority
refunding
costs
fees
restitution
defendant
conviction
overturned
petitioners
sought
refund
exoneration
act
trial
lacked
authority
order
refund
nelson
costs
fees
restitution
point
litigation
petitioners
attempted
demonstrate
satisfy
requirements
exoneration
act
act
colorado
recognizes
substantive
entitlement
kind
property
issue
cases
among
things
defendant
prove
actually
innocent
rev
stat
exoneration
act
alone
defines
scope
substantive
entitlement
interpreted
due
process
clause
require
provide
certain
procedures
notice
hearing
individual
prove
substantive
entitlement
defend
deprivation
property
clause
properly
understood
nothing
say
existence
scope
substantive
entitlement
see
part
infra
petitioners
want
rewrite
contours
substantive
entitlement
contained
exoneration
act
err
invoking
procedural
due
process
see
reply
brief
argument
sounds
procedural
due
process
majority
responds
asserting
without
citing
state
law
colorado
legal
right
retain
petitioners
money
convictions
invalidated
ante
true
matter
state
law
certain
provisions
exoneration
act
require
state
return
costs
fees
restitution
limited
circumstances
following
conviction
reversal
superfluous
thus
extent
majority
implicitly
suggests
petitioners
right
automatic
refund
point
majority
entirely
unclear
plainly
incorrect
defendants
petitioners
position
substantive
right
recover
money
paid
colorado
state
law
petitioners
asserted
right
automatic
refund
must
arise
due
process
clause
due
process
clause
confers
substantive
rights
mcdonald
chicago
thomas
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
notion
constitutional
provision
guarantees
person
deprived
life
liberty
property
define
substance
rights
strains
credulity
even
casual
user
words
event
petitioners
appear
disavow
substantive
due
process
right
return
funds
paid
see
reply
brief
tr
oral
arg
absence
property
right
state
law
apart
right
provided
exoneration
act
petitioners
decline
invoke
colorado
refusal
return
money
depriv
ation
property
within
meaning
fourteenth
amendment
colorado
therefore
required
provide
process
return
money
ii
one
disputes
petitioners
never
convicted
colorado
required
pay
money
issue
one
disputes
colorado
require
petitioners
pay
additional
costs
fees
restitution
convictions
invalidated
follow
however
petitioners
property
right
money
paid
pursuant
convictions
belongs
state
victims
colorado
law
today
announces
petitioners
right
automatic
refund
state
legal
right
money
ante
intuitive
rhetorical
appeal
aside
seriously
attempt
ground
conclusion
state
federal
law
petitioners
supposed
right
automatic
refund
arises
colorado
law
colorado
remains
free
remand
clarify
whether
right
fact
exists
arises
substantive
due
process
procedural
due
process
analysis
misses
point
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
together
madden
colorado
also
certiorari
see
rule
footnotes
costs
fees
went
victim
compensation
fund
victims
witnesses
assistance
law
enforcement
fund
vast
fund
see
costs
fees
went
victim
compensation
fund
vast
fund
special
advocate
surcharge
see
app
see
rev
stat
levying
fees
criminal
action
resulting
conviction
deferred
judgment
sentence
vast
fund
fees
ii
special
advocate
surcharge
one
exception
order
conviction
shall
include
consideration
restitution
see
also
state
pays
cost
criminal
cases
defendant
acquitted
citing
rev
stat
colorado
law
restitution
order
tied
criminal
conviction
rendered
separate
civil
judgment
see
conviction
reversed
restitution
order
dependent
conviction
simultaneously
vacated
see
people
scearce
app
cases
pending
colorado
passed
new
legislation
provide
eimbursement
amounts
paid
following
vacated
conviction
see
house
bill
quoting
language
rev
stat
new
provision
legislation
takes
effect
september
effect
cases
us
prior
exoneration
act
colorado
recognized
competence
courts
upon
reversal
conviction
order
refund
monetary
exactions
imposed
defendant
solely
reason
conviction
toland
strohl
compensation
exoneration
act
includes
per
year
incarceration
wrongful
conviction
additional
sums
per
year
served
defendant
sentence
death
placed
parole
probation
sex
offender
registry
compensation
child
support
payments
due
incarceration
tuition
waivers
state
institutions
higher
education
exonerated
person
children
conceived
legally
adopted
incarceration
reasonable
attorney
fees
bringing
exoneration
act
claim
see
cooper
oklahoma
standard
proof
establish
incompetence
stand
trial
dowling
admissibility
testimony
prior
crime
defendant
acquitted
patterson
new
york
burden
proving
affirmative
defense
medina
california
burden
proving
incompetence
stand
trial
citing
bell
wolfish
colorado
asserts
presumption
innocence
applies
criminal
trials
thus
application
brief
respondent
colorado
misapprehends
wolfish
opinion
case
recognized
due
process
clause
detainee
adjudged
guilty
crime
may
punished
see
wolfish
held
presumption
prevent
government
detain
ing
defendant
ensure
presence
trial
long
conditions
restrictions
detention
amount
punishment
otherwise
violate
constitution
medina
applicable
colorado
exoneration
act
scheme
similarly
fail
due
process
measurement
medina
criminal
procedure
violates
due
process
offends
principle
justice
rooted
traditions
conscience
people
ranked
fundamental
quoting
patterson
presumption
innocence
unquestionably
fits
bill
colorado
invites
distinction
convictions
merely
voidable
rather
void
urges
invalidated
convictions
fall
voidable
category
see
brief
respondent
justice
hood
noted
dissent
however
reversal
reversal
regardless
reason
nd
invalid
conviction
conviction
dissent
echoes
colorado
argument
nelson
madden
prevailed
trial
dissent
agrees
costs
fees
restitution
exacted
see
post
prevailed
appellate
inspection
state
gets
keep
money
see
ibid
colorado
law
dissent
reads
colorado
opinion
moneys
lawfully
exacted
pursuant
valid
conviction
become
public
funds
case
restitution
victims
money
post
shut
dissent
sights
however
convictions
pursuant
state
took
petitioners
money
invalid
hence
state
legal
right
retain
money
given
invalidity
convictions
exoneration
act
afford
sufficient
process
enable
state
retain
money
surely
successful
petitioner
exoneration
act
recover
reasonable
attorney
fees
iv
neither
defendant
counsel
likely
assume
risk
loss
amounts
gained
worth
candle
colorado
additionally
argues
defendants
request
stay
sentence
pending
appeal
thereby
reducing
risk
erroneous
deprivation
see
brief
respondent
state
acknowledged
oral
argument
defendants
meet
requirements
stay
pending
appeal
entails
tr
oral
arg
even
stay
available
trial
may
require
defendant
deposit
whole
part
costs
app
rule
footnotes
briefly
opines
medina
analysis
come
cases
discussion
issue
dictum
substantially
incomplete
suggests
medina
support
judgment
presumption
innocence
deeply
rooted
fundamental
ante
true
course
presumption
restored
conviction
reversed
says
little
question
hand
namely
must
happen
presumption
restored
notably
cites
single
case
applying
presumption
innocence
refund
context
time
ignores
cases
bear
directly
question
cases
thus
must
part
proper
medina
inquiry
see
infra
page
position
also
odds
principles
procedural
due
process
jurisprudence
well
settled
example
plaintiff
deprived
property
inadequate
process
entitled
compensated
defendant
prove
deprivation
occurred
even
plaintiff
given
due
process
thompson
district
columbia
cadc
see
carey
piphus
principle
obvious
tension
holding
cites
one
intermediate
appellate
case
proposition
conviction
reversed
restitution
order
dependent
conviction
simultaneously
vacated
ante
citing
people
scearce
app
scearce
discuss
whether
payments
made
victims
whether
recoverable
state
important
scearce
hardly
last
word
question
whether
due
process
invariably
requires
refund
restitution
footnotes
previously
observed
due
process
clause
may
originally
understood
require
government
proceed
according
land
according
written
constitutional
statutory
provisions
depriving
someone
life
liberty
property
johnson
thomas
concurring
judgment
slip
quoting
hamdi
rumsfeld
thomas
dissenting
colorado
advance
argument
unnecessary
resolve
issue
cases
assume
due
process
clause
requires
baseline
procedures
regardless
provisions
colorado
law
specifically
exoneration
act
entitles
exonerated
defendant
compensation
convicted
felony
incarcerated
among
requirements
prove
clear
convincing
evidence
actually
innocent
meaning
conviction
result
miscarriage
justice
factually
innocent
rev
stat
see
nelson
insufficiency
evidence
legal
error
unrelated
person
actual
innocence
support
either
exoneration
subsequent
compensation
act
ibid