expressions
hair
design
et
al
schneiderman
attorney
general
new
york
et
argued
january
decided
march
new
york
general
business
law
provides
seller
sales
transaction
may
impose
surcharge
holder
elects
use
credit
card
lieu
payment
cash
check
similar
means
petitioners
five
new
york
businesses
owners
wish
impose
surcharges
credit
card
use
filed
suit
state
officials
arguing
law
violates
first
amendment
regulating
communicate
prices
unconstitutionally
vague
district
ruled
favor
merchants
appeals
vacated
judgment
instructions
dismiss
appeals
concluded
context
pricing
merchants
post
one
price
like
charge
customers
pay
credit
card
law
required
sticker
price
price
charged
credit
card
users
context
law
regulated
relationship
two
prices
relying
precedent
holding
price
regulation
alone
regulates
conduct
speech
appeals
concluded
violate
first
amendment
appeals
abstained
reaching
merits
constitutional
challenge
pricing
practices
outside
context
held
review
limited
whether
unconstitutional
applied
particular
pricing
scheme
petitioners
argued
seek
employ
regime
merchants
post
cash
price
additional
credit
card
surcharge
pp
section
prohibits
pricing
regime
petitioners
wish
employ
section
define
surcharge
relying
term
ordinary
meaning
appeals
concluded
merchant
imposes
surcharge
posts
single
sticker
price
charges
credit
card
user
sticker
price
generally
accord
great
deference
interpretation
application
state
law
courts
appeals
pembaur
cincinnati
interpretation
appeals
clearly
wrong
brockett
spokane
arcades
follows
interpretation
pp
section
regulates
speech
appeals
concluded
posed
first
amendment
problem
price
controls
regulate
conduct
speech
section
however
like
typical
price
regulation
simply
regulates
amount
store
collect
law
tells
merchants
nothing
amount
allowed
collect
cash
credit
card
payer
instead
regulates
sellers
may
communicate
prices
regulating
communication
prices
rather
prices
regulates
speech
appeals
concluded
otherwise
determine
whether
survives
first
amendment
scrutiny
remand
appeals
analyze
speech
regulation
pp
section
vague
applied
petitioners
explained
bans
pricing
petitioners
argue
wish
employ
plaintiff
whose
speech
clearly
proscribed
raise
successful
vagueness
claim
holder
humanitarian
law
project
pp
vacated
remanded
roberts
delivered
opinion
kennedy
thomas
ginsburg
kagan
joined
breyer
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
sotomayor
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
alito
joined
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
expressions
hair
design
et
petitioners
eric
schneiderman
attorney
general
new
york
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
second
circuit
march
chief
justice
roberts
delivered
opinion
time
customer
pays
item
credit
card
merchant
selling
item
must
pay
transaction
fee
credit
card
issuer
merchants
balk
paying
fees
want
discourage
use
credit
cards
least
pass
fees
customers
use
one
method
achieving
ends
differential
pricing
charging
credit
card
users
customers
using
cash
merchants
wish
employ
differential
pricing
may
two
ways
relevant
impose
surcharge
use
credit
card
offer
discount
use
cash
gen
bus
law
new
york
banned
former
practice
question
presented
whether
regulates
merchants
speech
whether
statute
violates
first
amendment
conclude
regulate
speech
remand
appeals
determine
first
instance
whether
regulation
unconstitutional
credit
cards
first
introduced
contracts
card
issuers
merchants
barred
merchants
charging
credit
card
users
higher
prices
cash
customers
congress
put
partial
stop
practice
amendments
truth
lending
act
tila
amendments
prohibited
card
issuers
contractually
preventing
merchants
giving
discounts
customers
paid
cash
see
stat
law
however
said
nothing
surcharges
use
credit
two
years
later
congress
refined
dissimilar
treatment
discounts
surcharges
first
version
tila
barred
merchants
imposing
surcharges
customers
use
credit
cards
act
stat
second
congress
added
definitions
two
terms
discount
reduction
made
regular
price
surcharge
means
increasing
regular
price
cardholder
imposed
upon
customers
paying
cash
check
similar
means
ibid
congress
delineated
distinction
discounts
surcharges
defining
regular
price
merchant
tagged
posted
single
price
regular
price
single
price
cash
discount
act
stat
price
tagged
posted
merchant
employed
approach
posting
one
price
credit
another
cash
regular
price
whatever
charged
credit
card
users
ibid
surcharge
defined
increase
regular
price
credit
card
surcharge
regular
price
amount
charged
customers
using
credit
cards
effect
merchant
violate
surcharge
ban
posting
single
price
charging
credit
card
users
posted
price
federal
surcharge
ban
short
lived
congress
allowed
expire
renewed
ban
since
see
ibid
provision
preventing
credit
card
issuers
contractually
barring
discounts
cash
however
remained
place
lapse
federal
surcharge
ban
several
new
york
among
immediately
enacted
surcharge
bans
passed
gen
bus
law
adopted
operative
language
federal
ban
verbatim
providing
seller
sales
transaction
may
impose
surcharge
holder
elects
use
credit
card
lieu
payment
cash
check
similar
means
gen
bus
law
ann
west
see
also
unlike
federal
ban
new
york
legislation
included
definition
surcharge
addition
state
legislative
bans
credit
card
companies
though
barred
prohibiting
discounts
cash
included
provisions
contracts
prohibiting
merchants
imposing
surcharges
credit
card
use
history
new
york
law
essentially
coextensive
contractual
prohibitions
recent
years
however
merchants
brought
antitrust
challenges
contractual
provisions
suits
created
uncertainty
legal
validity
contractual
surcharge
bans
result
otherwise
redundant
legislative
surcharge
bans
like
increasingly
gained
importance
increasingly
come
scrutiny
petitioners
five
new
york
businesses
owners
wish
impose
surcharges
customers
use
credit
cards
time
one
customers
pays
credit
card
merchants
must
pay
transaction
fee
company
issued
credit
card
fee
generally
two
three
percent
purchase
price
fees
add
merchants
allege
pay
tens
thousands
dollars
every
year
credit
card
companies
rather
increase
prices
across
board
absorb
costs
merchants
want
pass
fees
along
customers
choose
use
credit
cards
also
want
make
clear
bad
guys
credit
card
companies
merchants
responsible
higher
prices
merchants
believe
surcharges
credit
effective
discounts
cash
accomplishing
goals
several
major
credit
card
issuers
agreed
drop
contractual
surcharge
prohibitions
merchants
filed
suit
new
york
attorney
general
three
new
york
district
attorneys
challenge
remaining
obstacle
charging
surcharges
credit
card
use
relevant
argued
law
violated
first
amendment
regulating
communicated
prices
unconstitutionally
vague
liability
law
turn
ed
blurry
difference
surcharges
discounts
app
complaint
district
ruled
favor
merchants
read
statute
draw
ing
line
prohibited
permissible
based
words
labels
rather
economic
realities
supp
sdny
concluded
law
therefore
regulated
speech
violated
first
amendment
commercial
speech
doctrine
addition
law
turned
virtually
incomprehensible
distinction
vendor
tell
customers
district
found
law
unconstitutionally
vague
appeals
second
circuit
vacated
judgment
district
instructions
dismiss
merchants
claims
began
considering
pricing
merchants
post
one
price
like
charge
customers
pay
credit
card
law
context
appeals
explained
regulate
relationship
two
prices
sticker
price
price
charged
credit
card
user
requiring
two
prices
equal
relying
precedent
holding
price
regulation
alone
regulates
conduct
speech
appeals
concluded
violate
first
amendment
also
considered
types
pricing
regimes
example
posting
separate
cash
credit
prices
appeals
thought
far
clear
prohibited
pricing
schemes
federal
surcharge
ban
modeled
apply
outside
context
merchants
clearly
shown
broader
reach
federal
law
ibid
deciding
petitioners
challenge
regard
turn
ed
unsettled
question
state
law
appeals
abstained
reaching
merits
constitutional
question
beyond
context
citing
railroad
tex
pullman
granted
certiorari
ii
preliminary
matter
note
petitioners
present
us
limited
challenge
observing
merchants
always
particularly
clear
scope
suit
appeals
deemed
bringing
facial
attack
well
challenge
application
statute
two
particular
pricing
regimes
pricing
pricing
us
however
merchants
disclaimed
facial
challenge
assuring
us
challenge
see
tr
oral
arg
remains
question
precise
application
law
seek
challenge
although
merchants
presented
wide
array
hypothetical
pricing
regimes
expressly
identified
one
pricing
scheme
seek
employ
posting
cash
price
additional
credit
card
surcharge
expressed
either
percentage
surcharge
additional
amount
see
app
tr
oral
arg
pricing
approach
petitioner
expressions
hair
design
might
example
post
sign
outside
salon
reading
haircuts
add
surcharge
pay
credit
card
petitioner
brooklyn
farmacy
soda
fountain
might
list
one
sundaes
menu
costing
surcharge
credit
card
users
take
petitioners
word
limit
review
question
whether
unconstitutional
applied
particular
pricing
iii
next
question
whether
prohibits
pricing
regime
petitioners
wish
employ
appeals
concluded
read
surcharge
mean
additional
amount
seller
regular
price
found
basically
applies
sellers
post
single
sticker
price
sticker
price
price
sellers
may
charge
customers
additional
amount
sticker
price
also
charged
cash
customers
interpretation
signs
kind
merchants
wish
post
surcharge
credit
card
users
violate
identify
one
sticker
price
indicate
credit
card
users
charged
amount
generally
accord
great
deference
interpretation
application
state
law
courts
appeals
pembaur
cincinnati
deference
warranted
render
unnecessary
review
decisions
respect
lower
federal
courts
better
schooled
able
interpret
laws
respective
brockett
spokane
arcades
quoting
cort
ash
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
surely
authority
differ
lower
federal
courts
meaning
state
statute
done
instances
lower
construction
clearly
wrong
plain
error
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
case
section
define
surcharge
appeals
looked
ordinary
meaning
term
charge
excess
usual
normal
amount
quoting
webster
third
new
international
dictionary
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
seller
posts
single
sticker
price
reasonable
treat
sticker
price
usual
normal
amount
conclude
merchant
imposes
surcharge
charges
credit
card
user
sticker
price
short
dismiss
appeals
interpretation
clearly
wrong
accordingly
consistent
customary
practice
follow
interpretation
iv
concluded
bars
pricing
regime
petitioners
wish
employ
turn
constitutional
arguments
law
unconstitutionally
regulates
speech
impermissibly
vague
appeals
concluded
posed
first
amendment
problem
law
regulated
conduct
reaching
conclusion
appeals
began
premise
price
controls
regulate
conduct
alone
see
liquormart
rhode
island
plurality
opinion
thomas
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
concurring
judgment
section
regulates
relationship
seller
sticker
price
price
seller
charges
credit
card
customers
requiring
two
amounts
equal
law
regulating
relationship
two
prices
regulates
speech
law
regulating
single
price
appeals
concluded
therefore
simply
conduct
regulation
like
typical
price
regulation
regulation
example
law
requiring
new
york
delis
charge
sandwiches
simply
regulate
amount
store
collect
words
regulate
sandwich
seller
conduct
sure
order
actually
collect
money
store
likely
put
menus
employees
tell
customers
price
written
oral
communications
speech
law
determining
amount
charged
indirectly
dictate
content
speech
law
effect
speech
incidental
primary
effect
conduct
never
deemed
abridgment
freedom
speech
press
make
course
conduct
illegal
merely
conduct
part
initiated
evidenced
carried
means
language
either
spoken
written
printed
rumsfeld
forum
demic
institutional
rights
quoting
giboney
empire
storage
ice
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
see
also
sorrell
ims
health
section
different
law
tells
merchants
nothing
amount
allowed
collect
cash
credit
card
payer
sellers
free
charge
cash
amount
credit
law
regulate
sellers
may
communicate
prices
merchant
wants
charge
cash
credit
may
convey
price
way
pleases
free
say
credit
card
surcharge
plus
credit
displays
identify
single
sticker
price
less
amount
credit
card
users
charged
instead
merchant
wishes
post
single
sticker
price
must
display
sticker
price
accordingly
agree
appeals
regulates
relationship
sticker
price
price
charged
credit
card
users
accept
conclusion
nothing
price
regulation
regulating
communication
prices
rather
prices
regulates
speech
concluded
otherwise
appeals
occasion
conduct
inquiry
whether
speech
regulation
survived
first
amendment
scrutiny
question
parties
dispute
whether
valid
commercial
speech
regulation
central
hudson
gas
elec
public
serv
whether
law
upheld
valid
disclosure
requirement
zauderer
office
disciplinary
counsel
ohio
review
first
view
nautilus
biosig
instruments
slip
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
accordingly
decline
consider
questions
first
instance
instead
remand
appeals
analyze
speech
given
way
merchants
presented
case
vagueness
challenge
gives
us
little
pause
pricing
practice
express
interest
employing
regime
listing
one
price
separate
surcharge
amount
explained
bars
plaintiff
whose
speech
clearly
proscribed
raise
successful
vagueness
claim
holder
humanitarian
law
project
although
merchants
argue
one
seem
put
finger
far
law
sweeps
brief
petitioners
least
clear
proscribes
intended
speech
accordingly
law
vague
applied
judgment
appeals
second
circuit
vacated
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
breyer
concurring
judgment
expressions
hair
design
et
petitioners
eric
schneiderman
attorney
general
new
york
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
second
circuit
march
justice
breyer
concurring
judgment
agree
new
york
statute
regulates
speech
virtually
government
regulation
affects
speech
human
relations
take
place
speech
human
relations
include
community
activities
kinds
commercial
otherwise
government
seeks
regulate
activities
often
wiser
try
distinguish
speech
conduct
see
post
democracy
expertise
academic
freedom
instead
normally
simply
ask
whether
challenged
statute
rule
regulation
affects
interest
first
amendment
protects
example
challenged
government
regulation
negatively
affects
processes
political
discourse
public
opinion
formed
expressed
interests
close
first
amendment
protective
core
courts
normally
scrutinize
regulation
great
care
see
boos
barry
challenged
regulation
restricts
informational
function
provided
truthful
commercial
speech
courts
apply
lesser
still
elevated
form
scrutiny
central
hudson
gas
elec
public
serv
however
challenged
regulation
simply
requires
commercial
speaker
disclose
purely
factual
uncontroversial
information
courts
apply
permissive
standard
review
zauderer
office
disciplinary
counsel
ohio
kind
regulation
normally
minimal
effect
first
amendment
interests
normally
need
reasonably
related
state
interest
preventing
deception
consumers
ibid
courts
apply
similarly
permissive
standard
review
regulatory
legislation
affecting
ordinary
commercial
transactions
carolene
products
since
legislation
normally
significantly
affect
interests
first
amendment
protects
normally
look
assurance
legislation
rests
upon
rational
basis
ibid
repeat
general
standards
judicial
approaches
believe
determining
proper
approach
typically
important
trying
distinguish
speech
conduct
see
sorrell
ims
health
breyer
dissenting
parties
differ
approach
applies
difference
reflects
fact
clear
new
york
law
face
law
seems
simply
tell
merchants
charge
higher
prices
users
ordinary
piece
commercial
legislation
subject
rational
basis
review
see
liquormart
rhode
island
opinion
stevens
may
however
make
sense
interpret
statute
working
like
expired
federal
law
replaced
require
merchant
posts
prices
wants
charge
higher
price
simply
disclose
price
see
ed
see
also
post
sotomayor
concurring
judgment
case
though
affecting
merchant
speech
hinder
transmission
information
public
merchant
remain
free
say
whatever
wanted
long
also
revealed
price
customers
accordingly
law
still
receive
deferential
form
review
see
zauderer
supra
nonetheless
petitioners
suggest
statute
see
brief
petitioners
arguing
statute
forbids
raming
price
difference
credit
surcharge
statute
operation
unclear
interpretation
matter
state
law
agree
majority
remand
case
second
circuit
also
agree
justice
sotomayor
remand
may
well
helpful
second
circuit
ask
new
york
appeals
clarify
nature
obligations
statute
imposes
see
comp
code
rules
tit
rule
permitting
appeals
certify
dispositive
questions
new
york
law
new
york
appeals
sotomayor
concurring
judgment
expressions
hair
design
et
petitioners
eric
schneiderman
attorney
general
new
york
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
second
circuit
march
justice
sotomayor
justice
alito
joins
concurring
judgment
addresses
one
part
one
half
petitioners
first
amendment
challenge
new
york
statute
issue
outcome
worse
none
vacate
judgment
remand
directions
certify
case
new
york
appeals
definitive
interpretation
statute
permit
full
resolution
petitioners
claims
thus
concur
judgment
new
york
prohibits
merchants
impos
ing
surcharge
customer
elects
use
credit
card
lieu
payment
cash
check
similar
means
gen
bus
law
ann
west
merchant
violates
prohibition
commits
misdemeanor
risks
fine
exceed
five
hundred
dollars
term
imprisonment
one
year
ibid
section
interpreted
several
ways
first
read
prohibition
impos
ing
surcharge
credit
card
customers
appears
prohibit
charging
customers
pay
credit
card
pay
means
see
black
law
dictionary
ed
surcharge
means
additional
tax
charge
cost
may
require
merchant
charge
customers
price
matter
form
payment
earlier
federal
law
containing
almost
identical
prohibition
muddies
path
plain
text
reading
amendment
truth
lending
act
set
temporary
prohibition
barring
seller
sales
transaction
impos
ing
surcharge
cardholder
elects
use
credit
card
lieu
payment
cash
check
similar
means
stat
amendment
also
defined
surcharge
means
increasing
regular
price
cardholder
imposed
upon
customers
paying
cash
check
similar
means
ibid
egular
price
later
defined
mean
displayed
price
merchant
displayed
one
price
credit
card
price
merchant
either
display
prices
displayed
cash
credit
card
prices
stat
definition
merchant
violated
federal
prohibition
impos
ing
surcharge
displaying
form
one
price
cash
price
charging
credit
card
customers
higher
federal
law
lapsed
new
york
enacted
sets
ban
impos
ing
surcharge
new
york
borrowed
federal
prohibition
almost
verbatim
chose
without
explanation
borrow
federal
definitions
enact
clarifying
definitions
difference
laws
leaves
open
least
three
interpretations
read
line
plain
text
require
merchant
charge
price
customers
read
line
lapsed
federal
ban
permit
merchant
charge
different
prices
cash
credit
card
customers
prohibit
merchant
displaying
form
cash
price
charging
credit
card
customers
higher
price
reading
apply
merchant
displays
form
credit
card
price
charges
lower
price
cash
customers
merchant
displays
cash
credit
card
prices
form
read
broadly
based
omission
definitions
limited
federal
ban
scope
reading
might
prohibit
merchant
characterizing
difference
cash
credit
card
prices
surcharge
matter
displays
confirming
elusive
nature
new
york
pressed
almost
interpretations
litigation
district
viewed
mirroring
lapsed
federal
ban
see
supp
sdny
second
circuit
offered
lapsed
federal
ban
narrowing
interpretation
thus
suggesting
applies
broadly
provision
see
explained
prosecutorial
entities
new
york
bound
interpretation
interpretations
state
district
attorneys
parties
case
leaving
open
possibility
still
interpretations
see
tr
oral
arg
petitioners
five
new
york
merchants
customer
pays
credit
card
petitioners
like
merchants
charged
processing
fee
card
issuer
petitioners
want
pass
fee
credit
card
paying
customers
cash
paying
customers
want
charge
cash
customers
one
price
credit
card
customers
higher
price
includes
processing
fee
one
petitioner
expressions
hair
design
currently
pass
costs
credit
card
processing
fees
credit
card
paying
customers
four
charge
one
price
customers
set
prices
account
processing
fees
predict
incur
five
prefer
use
different
pricing
system
display
ones
use
expressions
hair
design
five
points
academy
like
charge
cash
credit
card
customers
two
different
prices
display
cash
price
alongside
extra
charge
credit
card
customers
say
credit
card
charge
credit
card
charge
brooklyn
farmacy
soda
fountain
brite
buy
wines
spirits
want
charge
cash
credit
card
customers
two
different
prices
characterize
difference
prices
surcharge
display
convey
prices
customers
app
five
use
preferred
pricing
systems
displays
fear
violating
expressions
hair
design
five
points
academy
believe
prohibits
pricing
display
convey
credit
card
processing
costs
impermissibly
surcharge
rather
permissibly
discount
say
discount
cash
payment
discount
cash
payment
three
petitioners
believe
regulates
describe
difference
cash
credit
card
prices
view
clearly
state
regulates
descriptions
decided
uncertainty
counsels
change
petitioners
view
unconstitutional
restriction
ability
display
describe
prices
customers
sued
challenged
law
first
amendment
grounds
ii
resolving
petitioners
challenge
requires
accurate
picture
exactly
statute
works
understanding
needed
decide
whether
prohibits
petitioners
preferred
pricing
systems
displays
whether
prohibition
consistent
first
amendment
see
ante
second
circuit
decide
far
extends
instead
decided
applies
part
petitioners
challenge
pricing
display
expressions
hair
design
five
points
academy
wish
use
declined
decide
even
applies
rest
challenge
evades
easy
interpretation
partial
decision
neither
required
right
erred
asking
new
york
appeals
definitive
interpretation
errs
correcting
given
constitutional
challenge
turned
interpretation
ambiguous
state
statute
yet
definitively
interpreted
state
courts
second
circuit
faced
problem
interpretation
gave
authoritative
since
state
courts
federal
courts
final
word
interpretation
state
statutes
two
routes
abstention
certification
solution
allowed
secure
authoritative
interpretation
resolving
constitutional
challenge
context
abstention
certification
serve
goals
recognize
outcome
constitutional
challenge
turns
proper
interpretation
state
law
federal
resolution
constitutional
question
may
turn
unnecessary
state
courts
later
interpret
state
statute
differently
state
different
interpretation
might
result
statute
implicates
constitutional
question
renders
federal
constitutional
analysis
irrelevant
see
arizonans
official
english
arizona
brockett
spokane
arcades
concurring
abstention
certification
avoid
risk
deferring
federal
decision
constitutionality
state
statute
state
authoritatively
resolved
antecedent
question
abstention
blunt
instrument
railroad
tex
pullman
federal
decision
abstain
sends
plaintiff
state
plaintiff
obtains
state
courts
views
statute
may
return
federal
decision
hand
resolution
constitutional
question
pullman
abstention
thus
entail
full
round
litigation
state
system
resumption
proceedings
federal
arizonans
official
english
certification
offers
precise
tool
authorized
certification
federal
may
put
question
directly
state
highest
reducing
delay
cutting
cost
increasing
assurance
gaining
authoritative
response
ibid
rule
relevant
typical
certification
statutes
new
york
allows
federal
appeals
certify
determinative
questions
new
york
law
involved
case
pending
controlling
precedent
appeals
exists
new
york
appeals
comp
code
rules
tit
rule
decision
certify
rests
sound
discretion
federal
lehman
brothers
schein
repeatedly
emphasized
certification
offers
clear
advantages
abstention
ere
difficulty
ascertaining
local
law
excuse
abstaining
remitting
parties
state
tribunal
start
another
lawsuit
keeping
case
waiting
answer
certified
question
fully
resolving
issues
long
run
save
time
energy
resources
helps
build
cooperative
judicial
federalism
result
availability
certification
greatly
simplifies
analysis
whether
abstain
bellotti
baird
see
also
arizonans
official
english
certification
today
covers
territory
dominated
deferral
device
called
pullman
abstention
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
described
abstention
particularly
problematic
challenge
state
statute
rests
first
amendment
cf
virginia
american
booksellers
certification
contrast
cumbersome
context
problematic
abstention
doctrine
method
may
expeditiously
obtain
construction
houston
hill
chose
convoluted
course
rejected
certification
abstained
part
decided
question
part
dividing
petitioners
challenge
two
parts
first
part
held
prohibit
pricing
display
expressions
hair
design
five
points
academy
prefer
displaying
cash
price
alongside
credit
card
found
application
consistent
first
amendment
see
second
part
declined
address
whether
speaks
unconstitutionally
restricts
petitioners
wish
display
cash
credit
card
prices
form
describe
difference
prices
see
doubted
whether
reach
broadly
assumed
even
new
york
state
courts
construe
statute
narrowly
line
lapsed
federal
provision
declined
certify
question
chose
instead
abstain
deciding
part
petitioners
challenge
see
even
though
new
york
responsible
enforcing
never
quite
abandon
ed
position
might
reach
broadly
lapsed
federal
provision
second
circuit
exercised
discretion
certify
antecedent
question
pricing
schemes
pricing
displays
prohibit
certification
might
avoided
need
constitutional
ruling
altogether
state
reads
price
regulation
constitutional
concerns
implicated
compare
liquormart
rhode
island
plurality
opinion
direct
regulation
prices
involve
restriction
speech
virginia
bd
pharmacy
virginia
citizens
consumer
council
price
advertisements
contain
protected
speech
convey
merchant
sell
prescription
drug
certification
might
limited
scope
constitutional
challenge
case
state
reads
mirror
lapsed
federal
ban
eliminate
need
constitutional
ruling
second
part
petitioners
challenge
premised
reading
prohibits
lapsed
federal
ban
least
certification
allowed
resolve
petitioners
entire
challenge
one
go
second
circuit
declined
exercise
discretion
certify
viewed
state
record
underdeveloped
thought
new
york
appeals
interpret
resolve
challenge
based
record
issues
pure
questions
law
whether
prohibits
petitioners
preferred
pricing
displays
statutory
interpretation
question
new
york
appeals
whether
survives
petitioners
first
amendment
challenge
constitutional
question
second
circuit
issues
turn
limited
set
facts
pricing
systems
displays
petitioners
wish
use
discussed
record
contains
facts
state
record
thus
counsel
certification
given
significant
benefits
certification
offered
given
absence
persuasive
downsides
identified
second
circuit
decision
certify
abuse
discretion
consequences
decision
certify
reverberate
throughout
opinion
today
lack
definitive
interpretation
chooses
address
first
part
petitioners
challenge
defer
second
circuit
partial
interpretation
ante
holds
restrict
constitutionally
protected
speech
ante
decide
whether
restriction
constitutionally
permissible
require
answer
question
case
whether
statute
permits
pricing
schemes
like
one
expressions
currently
uses
ante
sends
case
back
second
circuit
proceedings
ante
iii
complexity
case
might
avoided
arizonans
official
english
second
circuit
certified
question
meaning
case
first
opinion
foreclose
second
circuit
choosing
route
remand
rather
contributing
piecemeal
resolution
case
vacate
judgment
remand
instructions
certify
case
new
york
appeals
allow
definitively
interpret
thus
concur
judgment
footnotes
petitioner
expressions
hair
design
currently
posts
separate
prices
cash
credit
posts
something
like
cash
credit
displays
prices
way
however
considers
compelled
challenged
law
wants
charge
different
prices
prior
becoming
aware
law
expressions
posted
single
prices
along
notice
informing
customers
three
percent
surcharge
added
bill
paid
credit
card
expressions
indicated
prefer
return
prior
practice
see
app
complaint
given
petitioners
representations
narrow
scope
challenge
limit
consideration
pricing
regime
present
purposes
petitioners
affidavits
briefing
reference
potential
pricing
schemes
may
considered
appeals
extent
deems
appropriate
see
brief
petitioners
relying
fully
claim
regulated
speech
petitioners
advance
argument
appeals
constitutionally
problematic
even
deemed
regulation
conduct
see
noting
petitioners
challenged
assess
statute
constitutionality
appeals
may
need
consider
question
need
answer
whether
statute
permits
pricing
schemes
like
one
petitioner
expressions
currently
uses
see
supra
respondents
argument
constitutionally
valid
disclosure
requirement
rests
interpretation
statute
allows
schemes
similar
reasons
petitioners
related
argument
regarding
abstention
longer
issue
appeals
abstained
deciding
whether
constitutional
outside
context
merchants
disavowed
intent
challenge
law
outside
context
footnotes
interpretation
lapsed
federal
ban
offered
accepted
majority
purposes
opinion
assume
interpretation
correct
section
sparse
enforcement
history
clear
ambiguity
new
york
pursued
one
prosecution
resulted
conviction
later
set
aside
appeal
decision
supports
require
giving
broader
reading
lapsed
federal
ban
see
people
fulvio
misc
stating
permits
conviction
careless
enough
describe
higher
price
terms
amount
price
derived
adding
charge
lower
price
emphasis
deleted
recent
enforcement
spree
opaque
group
merchants
state
customer
called
asking
prices
quote
cash
price
tell
customers
charged
example
surcharge
payment
credit
card
see
app
state
new
york
attorney
general
office
told
violated
directed
stop
explained
comply
quoting
credit
card
price
offering
discoun
payment
cash
ibid
merchants
acts
violated
lapsed
federal
ban
stating
single
cash
price
charging
higher
price
credit
card
customers
recent
enforcement
actions
demonstrate
prohibits
acts
stretches
new
york
attorney
general
lacks
adopt
interpretation
binds
prosecutorial
entities
state
enforcement
actions
speak
attorney
general
may
interpret
see
tr
oral
arg
multiple
available
interpretations
render
vague
violate
due
process
clause
render
ambiguous
enough
warrant
asking
new
york
appeals
resolve
statute
meaning
new
york
appeals
regularly
accepts
answers
certified
questions
see
flo
eddie
sirius
xm
radio
certified
apr
pasternack
laboratory
holdings
june
certified
matter
viking
pump
may
certified
june
beck
chevrolet
general
motors
llc
may
certified
may
ministers
missionaries
benefit
bd
snow
certified
mar
second
circuit
actively
vigorously
employed
certification
kaye
tribute
judge
guido
calabresi
annual
survey
noting
based
service
chief
judge
new
york
appeals
certification
second
circuit
done
enormous
amount
bridge
gap
state
federal
systems
truly
engage
plain
text
reading
merchant
may
charge
different
prices
cash
credit
card
customers
see
free
consider
reading
remand
light
constitutional
holding
invoking
interpretive
rule
deference
lower
federal
construction
law
state
within
jurisdiction
line
general
principle
resolve
issues
state
law
read
deference
second
circuit
holding
defer
lower
federal
interpretation
state
law
even
cast
serious
constitutional
doubt
invalidate
state
law
rule
incorrect
see
frisby
schultz
describing
lower
courts
interpretation
plain
error
extent
endorsed
broad
reading
law
issue
lower
courts
ran
afoul
principle
statutes
interpreted
avoid
constitutional
difficulties
silence
relevance
avoidance
canon
second
circuit
interpretation
consistent
unexpressed
conclusion
disagree
narrowing
construction
available
avoid
constitutional
concerns
broader
constriction
raises
constitutional
concerns