nautilus
biosig
instruments
argued
april
decided
june
patent
act
requires
patent
specification
conclude
one
claims
particularly
pointing
distinctly
claiming
subject
matter
applicant
regards
invention
case
concerns
proper
reading
statute
clarity
precision
demand
assigned
respondent
biosig
instruments
patent
dispute
patent
involves
monitor
used
exercise
equipment
prior
monitors
patent
asserts
often
inaccurate
measuring
electrical
signals
accompanying
heartbeat
electrocardiograph
ecg
signals
presence
electrical
signals
electromyogram
emg
signals
generated
user
skeletal
muscles
impede
ecg
signal
detection
invention
claims
improve
prior
art
detecting
processing
ecg
signals
way
filters
emg
interference
claim
patent
contains
limitations
critical
dispute
refers
heart
rate
monitor
use
user
association
exercise
apparatus
exercise
procedures
claim
comprise
among
elements
cylindrical
bar
fitted
display
device
electronic
circuitry
including
difference
amplifier
half
cylindrical
bar
live
electrode
common
electrode
mounted
spaced
relationship
biosig
filed
patent
infringement
suit
alleging
nautilus
without
obtaining
license
sold
exercise
machines
containing
biosig
patented
technology
district
conducting
hearing
determine
proper
construction
patent
claims
granted
nautilus
motion
summary
judgment
ground
claim
term
spaced
relationship
failed
definiteness
requirement
federal
circuit
reversed
remanded
concluding
patent
claim
passes
threshold
long
claim
amenable
construction
claim
construed
insolubly
ambiguous
standard
determined
patent
survived
indefiniteness
review
held
patent
invalid
indefiniteness
claims
read
light
patent
specification
prosecution
history
fail
inform
reasonable
certainty
skilled
art
scope
invention
parties
agree
definiteness
evaluated
perspective
person
skilled
relevant
art
claims
read
light
patent
specification
prosecution
history
definiteness
measured
time
patent
application
parties
disagree
much
imprecision
tolerates
section
definiteness
requirement
must
take
account
inherent
limitations
language
see
festo
shoketsu
kinzoku
kogyo
kabushiki
one
hand
modicum
uncertainty
price
ensuring
appropriate
incentives
innovation
patents
addressed
lawyers
even
public
generally
skilled
relevant
art
carnegie
steel
cambria
iron
time
patent
must
precise
enough
afford
clear
notice
claimed
thereby
ing
public
still
open
markman
westview
instruments
manner
avoids
zone
uncertainty
enterprise
experimentation
may
enter
risk
infringement
claims
carbon
binney
smith
standard
adopted
mandates
clarity
recognizing
absolute
precision
unattainable
also
accords
opinions
stating
certainty
law
requires
patents
greater
reasonable
regard
minerals
separation
hyde
pp
federal
circuit
standard
tolerates
ambiguous
claims
others
satisfy
statute
definiteness
requirement
appeals
inquired
whether
patent
claims
amenable
construction
insolubly
ambiguous
formulations
lack
precision
demands
tolerate
imprecision
short
rendering
claim
insolubly
ambiguous
diminish
definiteness
requirement
function
foster
zone
uncertainty
carbon
warned
federal
circuit
fuller
explications
term
insolubly
ambiguous
may
come
closer
tracking
statutory
prescription
must
ensure
federal
circuit
test
least
probative
essential
inquiry
hilton
davis
chemical
expressions
insolubly
ambiguous
amenable
construction
permeate
federal
circuit
recent
decisions
concerning
fall
short
regard
leave
courts
patent
bar
sea
without
reliable
compass
pp
review
first
view
cutter
wilkinson
follows
ordinary
practice
remanding
federal
circuit
reconsider
proper
standard
whether
relevant
claims
patent
sufficiently
definite
see
johnson
california
pp
vacated
remanded
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
unanimous
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
nautilus
petitioner
biosig
instruments
writ
certiorari
appeals
federal
circuit
june
justice
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
patent
act
requires
patent
specification
conclude
one
claims
particularly
pointing
distinctly
claiming
subject
matter
applicant
regards
invention
ed
emphasis
added
case
involving
monitor
used
exercise
equipment
concerns
proper
reading
statute
clarity
precision
demand
according
federal
circuit
patent
claim
passes
threshold
long
claim
amenable
construction
claim
construed
insolubly
ambiguous
conclude
federal
circuit
formulation
tolerates
ambiguous
claims
others
satisfy
statute
definiteness
requirement
place
insolubly
ambiguous
standard
hold
patent
invalid
indefiniteness
claims
read
light
specification
delineating
patent
prosecution
history
fail
inform
reasonable
certainty
skilled
art
scope
invention
expressing
opinion
validity
remand
instructing
federal
circuit
decide
case
employing
standard
prescribed
authorized
constitution
promote
progress
science
useful
arts
securing
limited
times
inventors
exclusive
right
discoveries
art
cl
congress
enacted
patent
laws
rewarding
inventors
limited
monopoly
th
monopoly
property
right
like
property
right
boundaries
clear
festo
shoketsu
kinzoku
kogyo
kabushiki
see
also
markman
westview
instruments
long
understood
patent
must
describe
exact
scope
invention
manufacture
thus
congress
enacted
first
patent
act
directed
patent
grantees
file
written
specification
containing
description
thing
things
invented
discovered
shall
particular
distinguish
invention
discovery
things
known
used
act
apr
stat
patent
laws
retained
requirement
definiteness
even
focus
patent
construction
shifted
early
patent
practice
recounted
written
specification
represented
key
patent
markman
eventually
however
patent
applicants
began
set
invention
scope
separate
section
known
claim
see
generally
moy
walker
patents
pp
ed
patent
act
expressly
conditioned
receipt
patent
inventor
inclusion
one
claims
described
particularity
distinctness
see
act
july
stat
obtain
patent
inventor
must
particularly
point
distinctly
claim
part
improvement
combination
inventor
claims
invention
discovery
act
definiteness
requirement
survives
today
largely
unaltered
section
patent
act
applicable
case
requires
patent
applicant
conclude
specification
one
claims
particularly
pointing
distinctly
claiming
subject
matter
applicant
regards
invention
lack
definiteness
renders
invalid
patent
claim
suit
ii
patent
dispute
patent
patent
issued
gregory
lekhtman
assigned
respondent
biosig
instruments
concerns
monitor
use
exercise
previous
monitors
patent
asserts
often
inaccurate
measuring
electrical
signals
accompanying
heartbeat
electrocardiograph
ecg
signals
inaccuracy
caused
electrical
signals
different
sort
known
electromyogram
emg
signals
generated
exerciser
skeletal
muscles
example
moves
arm
grips
exercise
monitor
hand
emg
signals
mask
ecg
signals
thereby
impede
detection
app
lekhtman
invention
claims
improve
prior
art
eliminating
impediment
invention
focuses
key
difference
emg
ecg
waveforms
ecg
signals
detected
user
left
hand
polarity
opposite
signals
detected
right
emg
signals
hand
polarity
patented
device
works
measuring
equalized
emg
signals
detected
hand
using
circuitry
subtract
identical
emg
signals
thus
filtering
emg
interference
relevant
patent
describes
monitor
contained
hollow
cylindrical
bar
user
grips
hands
hand
comes
contact
two
electrodes
one
live
one
common
device
illustrated
figure
patent
reproduced
appendix
opinion
claim
patent
contains
limitations
critical
dispute
refers
heart
rate
monitor
use
user
association
exercise
apparatus
exercise
procedures
claim
comprise
among
elements
elongate
member
cylindrical
bar
display
device
electronic
circuitry
including
difference
amplifier
half
cylindrical
bar
live
electrode
common
electrode
mounted
spaced
relationship
claim
sets
forth
additional
elements
including
cylindrical
bar
held
way
user
hands
contact
electrodes
side
bar
emg
signals
detected
two
electrode
pairs
equal
magnitude
phase
difference
amplifier
produce
substantially
zero
emg
signal
upon
subtracting
signals
one
another
ibid
dispute
parties
arose
biosig
allegedly
disclosed
patented
technology
stairmaster
sports
medical
products
inc
according
biosig
stairmaster
without
ever
obtaining
license
sold
exercise
machines
included
biosig
patented
technology
petitioner
nautilus
continued
acquiring
stairmaster
brand
based
allegations
biosig
brought
patent
infringement
suit
nautilus
district
southern
district
new
york
biosig
lawsuit
launched
nautilus
asked
patent
trademark
office
pto
reexamine
patent
reexamination
proceedings
centered
whether
patent
anticipated
rendered
obvious
prior
art
principally
patent
issued
inventor
named
fujisaki
similarly
disclosed
monitor
using
two
pairs
electrodes
difference
amplifier
endeavoring
distinguish
patent
prior
art
biosig
submitted
declaration
lekhtman
declaration
attested
among
things
patent
sufficiently
informed
person
skilled
art
configure
detecting
electrodes
produce
equal
emg
signals
left
right
hands
although
electrodes
design
variables
including
spacing
shape
size
material
standardized
across
exercise
machines
lekhtman
explained
skilled
artisan
undertake
trial
error
process
equalization
entail
experimentation
different
electrode
configurations
order
optimize
emg
signal
cancellation
pto
issued
determination
confirming
patentability
patent
claims
biosig
thereafter
reinstituted
infringement
suit
parties
voluntarily
dismissed
without
prejudice
pto
reexamination
underway
district
conducted
hearing
determine
proper
construction
patent
claims
see
markman
westview
instruments
claim
construction
matter
law
reserved
decision
including
claim
term
spaced
relationship
according
biosig
spaced
relationship
referred
distance
live
electrode
common
electrode
electrode
pair
nautilus
seizing
biosig
submissions
pto
reexamination
maintained
spaced
relationship
must
distance
greater
width
electrode
app
district
ultimately
construed
term
mean
defined
relationship
live
electrode
common
electrode
one
side
cylindrical
bar
different
defined
relationship
live
electrode
common
electrode
side
cylindrical
bar
without
reference
electrodes
width
app
pet
cert
nautilus
moved
summary
judgment
arguing
term
spaced
relationship
construed
indefinite
district
granted
motion
words
district
concluded
tell
anyone
precisely
space
even
supply
parameters
determining
appropriate
spacing
federal
circuit
reversed
remanded
claim
indefinite
majority
opinion
stated
amenable
construction
ambiguous
quoting
datamize
llc
plumtree
software
ca
fed
standard
majority
determined
patent
survived
indefiniteness
review
considering
first
intrinsic
evidence
claim
language
specification
prosecution
history
majority
discerned
certain
inherent
parameters
claimed
apparatus
skilled
artisan
may
sufficient
understand
metes
bounds
relationship
sources
meaning
majority
explained
make
plain
distance
separating
live
common
electrodes
half
bar
greater
width
user
hands
claim
requires
live
common
electrodes
independently
detect
electrical
signals
two
distinct
points
hand
ibid
furthermore
majority
noted
intrinsic
evidence
teaches
distance
infinitesimally
small
effectively
merging
live
common
electrodes
single
electrode
one
detection
point
ibid
claim
functional
provisions
majority
went
observe
shed
additional
light
meaning
spaced
relationship
surveying
record
pto
reexamination
majority
concluded
skilled
artisan
know
attain
indicated
functions
equalizing
removing
emg
signals
adjusting
design
variables
including
spacing
concurring
opinion
judge
schall
reached
majority
result
employing
limited
analysis
judge
schall
accepted
majority
recitation
definiteness
standard
claims
amenable
construction
nonetheless
indefinite
construction
remains
insolubly
ambiguous
ibid
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
district
construction
spaced
relationship
judge
schall
maintained
sufficiently
clear
term
means
fixed
spatial
relationship
live
electrode
common
electrode
side
cylindrical
bar
ibid
judge
schall
agreed
majority
intrinsic
evidence
discloses
inherent
limits
spacing
unlike
majority
judge
schall
presum
functional
linkage
relationship
limitation
removal
emg
signals
limitations
claim
view
relationship
limitation
included
functional
requirement
remove
emg
signals
ibid
granted
certiorari
vacate
remand
iii
although
parties
disagree
dispositive
question
patent
withstand
definiteness
scrutiny
accord
several
aspects
inquiry
first
definiteness
evaluated
perspective
someone
skilled
relevant
art
see
general
elec
wabash
appliance
see
also
patent
specification
shall
contain
written
description
invention
manner
process
making
using
full
clear
concise
exact
terms
enable
person
skilled
art
pertains
nearly
connected
make
use
emphasis
added
second
assessing
definiteness
claims
read
light
patent
specification
prosecution
history
see
adams
specification
festo
shoketsu
kinzoku
kogyo
kabushiki
prosecution
history
third
efiniteness
measured
viewpoint
person
skilled
art
time
patent
filed
brief
respondent
emphasis
added
see
generally
manzo
patent
claim
construction
federal
circuit
patent
claims
construed
objective
perspective
skilled
artisan
based
applicant
actually
claimed
disclosed
stated
application
parties
differ
however
articulations
much
imprecision
tolerates
nautilus
view
patent
invalid
claim
ambiguous
readers
reasonably
interpret
claim
scope
differently
brief
petitioner
biosig
solicitor
general
require
patent
provide
reasonable
notice
scope
claimed
invention
see
brief
respondent
brief
amicus
curiae
section
said
entails
delicate
balance
festo
one
hand
definiteness
requirement
must
take
account
inherent
limitations
language
see
ibid
modicum
uncertainty
recognized
price
ensuring
appropriate
incentives
innovation
one
must
bear
mind
moreover
patents
addressed
lawyers
even
public
generally
rather
skilled
relevant
art
carnegie
steel
cambria
iron
also
stating
description
sufficient
apprise
steel
manufacturers
language
art
definite
feature
invention
serve
warning
others
patent
claims
monopoly
sufficiently
definite
sustain
patent
time
patent
must
precise
enough
afford
clear
notice
claimed
thereby
ing
public
still
open
markman
quoting
mcclain
ortmayer
otherwise
zone
uncertainty
enterprise
experimentation
may
enter
risk
infringement
claims
carbon
binney
smith
absent
meaningful
definiteness
check
told
patent
applicants
face
powerful
incentives
inject
ambiguity
claims
see
brief
petitioner
citing
patent
treatises
drafting
guides
see
also
federal
trade
commission
evolving
ip
marketplace
aligning
patent
notice
remedies
competition
quoting
testimony
patent
system
fosters
incentive
vague
ambiguous
claims
defer
clarity
costs
eliminating
temptation
order
patent
drafter
best
position
resolve
ambiguity
patent
claims
halliburton
energy
llc
ca
fed
see
also
hormone
research
foundation
genentech
ca
fed
axiom
patent
law
patentee
free
lexicographer
determine
proper
office
definiteness
command
therefore
must
reconcile
concerns
tug
opposite
directions
cognizant
competing
concerns
read
require
patent
claims
viewed
light
specification
prosecution
history
inform
skilled
art
scope
invention
reasonable
certainty
definiteness
requirement
understood
mandates
clarity
recognizing
absolute
precision
unattainable
standard
adopt
accords
opinions
stating
certainty
law
requires
patents
greater
reasonable
regard
minerals
separation
hyde
see
also
carbon
claims
must
reasonably
markman
claim
construction
calls
necessarily
sophisticated
analysis
whole
document
may
turn
evaluations
expert
testimony
resolving
nautilus
definiteness
challenge
federal
circuit
asked
whether
patent
claims
amenable
construction
insolubly
ambiguous
formulations
breed
lower
lack
precision
demands
sufficient
ascribe
meaning
patent
claims
definiteness
inquiry
trains
understanding
skilled
artisan
time
patent
application
viewing
matters
post
hoc
tolerate
imprecision
short
rendering
claim
insolubly
ambiguous
diminish
definiteness
requirement
function
foster
zone
uncertainty
carbon
warned
appreciating
terms
like
ambiguous
may
felicitous
brief
respondent
biosig
argues
phrase
shorthand
label
probing
inquiry
federal
circuit
applies
practice
federal
circuit
fuller
explications
term
insolubly
ambiguous
recognize
may
come
closer
tracking
statutory
prescription
see
case
reasonable
efforts
claim
construction
result
definition
provide
sufficient
particularity
clarity
inform
skilled
artisans
bounds
claim
claim
insolubly
ambiguous
invalid
indefiniteness
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
although
micromanag
federal
circuit
particular
word
choice
applying
doctrines
must
ensure
federal
circuit
test
least
probative
essential
inquiry
hilton
davis
chemical
falling
short
regard
expressions
insolubly
ambiguous
amenable
construction
permeate
federal
circuit
recent
decisions
concerning
agree
nautilus
amici
terminology
leave
courts
patent
bar
sea
without
reliable
iv
courts
parties
advanced
conflicting
arguments
definiteness
claims
patent
nautilus
maintains
claim
term
spaced
relationship
open
multiple
interpretations
reflecting
markedly
different
understandings
patent
scope
exemplified
disagreement
among
members
federal
circuit
biosig
responds
spaced
relationship
read
light
specification
illustrated
accompanying
drawings
delineates
permissible
spacing
sufficient
precision
indful
review
first
view
cutter
wilkinson
decline
apply
standard
announced
controversy
nautilus
biosig
explained
federal
circuit
invoked
standard
amorphous
statutory
definiteness
requirement
allows
therefore
follow
ordinary
practice
remanding
appeals
reconsider
proper
standard
whether
relevant
claims
patent
sufficiently
definite
see
johnson
california
gasperini
center
humanities
reasons
stated
vacate
judgment
appeals
federal
circuit
remand
case
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
appendix
patent
figure
footnotes
america
invents
act
pub
stat
enacted
congress
amended
several
parts
patent
act
amendments
modified
minor
respects
pertinent
event
amended
versions
provisions
inapplicable
patent
applications
filed
september
proceedings
commenced
september
see
stat
notes
following
application
filed
relevant
proceedings
initiated
accordingly
opinion
citations
patent
act
refer
edition
code
difference
polarity
occurs
heart
aligned
vertically
relation
center
body
organ
tilts
leftward
apex
bottom
app
depicted
figure
patent
reproduced
appendix
opinion
live
electrodes
identified
numbers
common
electrodes
lekhtman
declaration
also
referred
expert
report
prepared
henrietta
galiana
chair
department
biomedical
engineering
mcgill
university
use
infringement
litigation
report
described
galiana
laboratory
technician
equipped
wooden
dowel
wire
metal
foil
glue
electrical
tape
drawings
patent
able
two
hours
build
monitor
worked
described
patent
see
also
eibel
process
minnesota
ontario
paper
upholding
definite
patent
improvement
machine
provided
wire
placed
high
substantial
elevation
readers
skilled
art
paper
making
versed
use
machine
difficulty
determining
substantial
elevation
needed
machine
operate
specified
see
also
carbon
binney
smith
statutory
requirement
particularity
distinctness
claims
met
clearly
distinguish
claimed
went
art
clearly
circumscribe
foreclosed
future
enterprise
general
elec
wabash
appliance
limits
patent
must
known
protection
patentee
encouragement
inventive
genius
others
assurance
subject
patent
dedicated
ultimately
online
http
www
sites
default
files
documents
reports
evolving
ip
marketplace
aligning
patent
notice
remedies
competition
report
federal
trade
visited
may
available
clerk
case
file
see
every
penny
counts
wells
fargo
bank
supp
wl
md
mar
finding
account
used
claim
lacks
definiteness
might
mean
several
different
things
informed
confident
choice
available
among
contending
definitions
extent
indefiniteness
falls
far
short
ambiguity
required
invalidate
claim
hearing
components
shure
ca
fed
definiteness
claim
terms
depends
whether
terms
given
reasonable
meaning
datamize
llc
plumtree
software
ca
fed
claims
amenable
construction
ambiguous
indefinite
exxon
research
engineering
ca
fed
claim
insolubly
ambiguous
narrowing
construction
properly
adopted
held
claim
see
also
dept
commerce
manual
patent
examining
procedure
ed
pto
manual
describing
federal
circuit
test
upholding
claim
validity
meaning
gleaned
language
federal
circuit
suggests
permissive
definiteness
standard
respect
statutory
presumption
patent
validity
quoting
exxon
research
see
also
patent
shall
presumed
valid
burden
establishing
invalidity
patent
claim
thereof
shall
rest
party
asserting
invalidity
microsoft
partnership
slip
invalidity
defenses
must
proved
clear
convincing
evidence
parties
appear
agree
however
presumption
validity
alter
degree
clarity
demands
patent
applicants
contrary
incorporates
definiteness
requirement
reference
see
defenses
infringement
actions
include
nvalidity
patent
claim
suit
failure
comply
requirement
parties
nonetheless
dispute
whether
factual
findings
subsidiary
ultimate
issue
definiteness
trigger
standard
relatedly
whether
deference
due
pto
resolution
disputed
issues
fact
leave
questions
another
day
treated
definiteness
legal
issue
reviews
without
deference
biosig
called
attention
contested
factual
matter
pto
determination
thereof
pertinent
infringement
claims
notably
however
three
panel
members
found
nautilus
arguments
unavailing