already
llc
dba
yums
nike
argued
november
decided
january
nike
filed
suit
alleging
two
already
athletic
shoes
violated
nike
air
force
trademark
already
denied
allegations
filed
counterclaim
challenging
validity
nike
air
force
trademark
suit
pending
nike
issued
covenant
sue
promising
raise
trademark
unfair
competition
claims
already
affiliated
entity
based
already
existing
footwear
designs
future
already
designs
constituted
colorable
imitation
already
current
products
nike
moved
dismiss
claims
prejudice
dismiss
already
counterclaim
without
prejudice
ground
covenant
extinguished
case
controversy
already
opposed
dismissal
counterclaim
contending
nike
established
covenant
mooted
case
support
already
presented
affidavit
president
stating
already
planned
introduce
new
versions
lines
market
affidavits
three
potential
investors
asserting
consider
investing
already
nike
trademark
invalidated
affidavit
already
executive
stating
nike
intimidated
retailers
refusing
carry
already
shoes
district
dismissed
already
counterclaim
concluding
longer
justiciable
controversy
second
circuit
affirmed
explained
covenant
broadly
drafted
conceive
shoe
infringe
nike
trademark
yet
fall
within
covenant
already
asserted
intent
market
shoe
held
case
moot
pp
case
becomes
moot
therefore
longer
case
controversy
article
iii
purposes
issues
presented
longer
parties
lack
legally
cognizable
interest
outcome
murphy
hunt
defendant
however
automatically
moot
case
simply
ending
unlawful
conduct
sued
city
mesquite
aladdin
castle
instead
defendant
claiming
voluntary
compliance
moots
case
bears
formidable
burden
showing
absolutely
clear
allegedly
wrongful
behavior
reasonably
expected
recur
friends
earth
laidlaw
environmental
services
toc
pp
nike
burden
show
reasonably
expected
resume
enforcement
efforts
already
voluntary
cessation
doctrine
disavowed
deakins
monaghan
employed
precisely
analysis
test
requires
finding
case
moot
challenged
action
pursuing
claim
resumed
subsequent
action
entirely
similar
claim
arise
future
pp
application
voluntary
cessation
doctrine
shows
case
moot
pp
breadth
covenant
suffices
meet
burden
imposed
doctrine
covenant
unconditional
irrevocable
prohibits
nike
filing
suit
making
claim
demand
protects
already
already
distributors
customers
covers
current
previous
designs
also
colorable
imitations
nike
demonstrated
covenant
encompasses
already
allegedly
unlawful
conduct
became
incumbent
already
indicate
engages
sufficiently
concrete
plans
engage
activities
arguably
infringe
nike
trademark
yet
covered
covenant
already
failed
courts
case
thus
moot
challenged
conduct
reasonably
expected
recur
cardinal
chemical
morton
altvater
freeman
distinguished
pp
already
alternative
theories
article
iii
injuries
save
case
mootness
none
injuries
suffices
support
article
iii
standing
first
place
already
argues
long
nike
free
assert
trademark
investors
hesitate
invest
already
absolutely
clear
challenged
conduct
reasonably
expected
recur
friends
earth
supra
fact
individuals
may
base
decisions
conjectural
hypothetical
speculation
give
rise
sort
concrete
actual
injury
necessary
establish
article
iii
standing
lujan
defenders
wildlife
already
worries
retailers
even
plaintiff
may
bring
invalidity
claim
based
reasonable
expectation
trademark
holder
take
action
plaintiff
retailers
covenant
extends
protection
already
distributors
customers
already
also
complains
nike
decision
sue
first
place
led
already
fear
another
suit
since
nike
met
burden
demonstrate
reasonable
risk
suit
concern
unfounded
already
falls
back
sweeping
argument
one
nike
competitors
inherently
standing
covenant
eradicate
effects
registered
invalid
trademark
logical
conclusion
theory
seems
market
participant
injured
article
iii
purposes
whenever
competitor
benefits
something
allegedly
unlawful
trademark
awarding
contract
never
accepted
boundless
theory
standing
already
policy
objection
dismissing
case
allows
nike
bully
small
innovators
support
adoption
broad
theory
granting
covenants
sue
may
risky
strategy
trademark
holder
accepting
already
theory
may
benefit
small
competitor
case
also
lowers
gates
larger
companies
resources
may
challenge
intellectual
property
portfolios
humble
rivals
simply
competitors
market
encourage
parties
employ
litigation
weapon
competitors
rather
last
resort
settling
disputes
pp
purpose
served
remanding
case
already
every
opportunity
incentive
submit
evidence
proceedings
refused
every
stage
proceedings
suggest
plans
design
shoe
violates
air
force
trademark
yet
falls
outside
covenant
courts
expressly
invoke
voluntary
cessation
standard
analysis
addressed
questions
addresses
standard
pp
affirmed
roberts
delivered
opinion
unanimous
kennedy
filed
concurring
opinion
thomas
alito
sotomayor
joined
opinion
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
already
llc
dba
yums
petitioner
nike
writ
certiorari
appeals
second
circuit
january
chief
justice
roberts
delivered
opinion
question
whether
covenant
enforce
trademark
competitor
existing
products
future
colorable
imitations
moots
competitor
action
trademark
declared
invalid
respondent
nike
designs
manufactures
sells
athletic
footwear
including
line
shoes
known
air
force
petitioner
already
also
designs
markets
athletic
footwear
including
shoe
lines
known
sugars
soulja
boys
nike
alleging
soulja
boys
infringed
diluted
air
force
trademark
demanded
already
cease
desist
sale
shoes
already
refused
nike
filed
suit
federal
alleging
soulja
boys
well
sugars
infringed
diluted
air
force
trademark
already
denied
allegations
filed
counterclaim
contending
air
force
trademark
invalid
march
eight
months
nike
filed
complaint
four
months
already
counterclaimed
nike
issued
covenant
sue
preamble
stated
already
actions
longer
infringe
dilute
nike
mark
level
sufficient
warrant
substantial
time
expense
continued
litigation
app
covenant
promised
nike
raise
already
affiliated
entity
trademark
unfair
competition
claim
based
already
existing
footwear
designs
future
already
designs
constituted
colorable
imitation
already
current
products
issuing
covenant
nike
moved
dismiss
claims
prejudice
dismiss
already
invalidity
counterclaim
without
prejudice
ground
covenant
extinguished
case
controversy
already
opposed
dismissal
counterclaim
arguing
nike
established
voluntary
cessation
mooted
case
support
already
presented
affidavit
president
stating
already
plans
introduce
new
versions
shoe
lines
market
affidavits
three
potential
investors
asserting
consider
investing
already
nike
trademark
invalidated
affidavit
one
already
executives
stating
nike
intimidated
retailers
refusing
carry
already
shoes
district
dismissed
already
counterclaim
stating
already
sought
invoke
declaratory
judgment
jurisdiction
bears
burden
demonstrating
subject
matter
jurisdiction
counterclaim
civ
sdny
app
pet
cert
read
covenant
broad
ly
concluding
already
future
products
arguably
infringed
nike
mark
imitations
already
current
footwear
therefore
protected
covenant
finding
evidence
already
sought
develop
shoes
covered
covenant
held
longer
substantial
controversy
sufficient
immediacy
reality
warrant
issuance
declaratory
judgment
quoting
medimmune
genentech
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
second
circuit
affirmed
held
determining
whether
covenant
sue
eliminates
justiciable
case
controversy
courts
look
totality
circumstances
including
language
covenant
whether
covenant
covers
future
well
past
activity
products
evidence
intention
part
party
asserting
jurisdiction
engage
conduct
covered
covenant
omitted
noting
covenant
covers
past
sales
future
sales
existing
products
colorable
imitations
second
circuit
found
hard
conceive
shoe
infringe
air
force
trademark
yet
fall
within
covenant
given
already
ha
asserted
intention
market
shoe
concluded
already
show
continuing
injury
therefore
justiciable
controversy
remained
ibid
granted
certiorari
ii
article
iii
constitution
grants
judicial
branch
authority
adjudicate
cases
controversies
system
government
courts
business
deciding
legal
disputes
expounding
law
absence
case
controversy
daimlerchrysler
cuno
limitation
requires
invoke
power
federal
demonstrate
standing
personal
injury
fairly
traceable
defendant
allegedly
unlawful
conduct
likely
redressed
requested
relief
allen
wright
repeatedly
held
actual
controversy
must
exist
time
complaint
filed
stages
litigation
alvarez
smith
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
arizonans
official
english
arizona
qualify
case
fit
adjudication
actual
controversy
must
extant
stages
review
merely
time
complaint
quoting
preiser
newkirk
case
becomes
moot
therefore
longer
case
controversy
purposes
article
iii
issues
presented
longer
parties
lack
legally
cognizable
interest
outcome
murphy
hunt
per
curiam
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
matter
vehemently
parties
continue
dispute
lawfulness
conduct
precipitated
lawsuit
case
moot
dispute
longer
embedded
actual
controversy
plaintiffs
particular
legal
rights
alvarez
supra
recognized
however
defendant
automatically
moot
case
simply
ending
unlawful
conduct
sued
city
mesquite
aladdin
castle
otherwise
defendant
engage
unlawful
conduct
stop
sued
case
declared
moot
pick
left
repeating
cycle
achieves
unlawful
ends
given
concern
cases
explained
defendant
claiming
voluntary
compliance
moots
case
bears
formidable
burden
showing
absolutely
clear
allegedly
wrongful
behavior
reasonably
expected
recur
friends
earth
laidlaw
environmental
services
toc
iii
outset
litigation
parties
standing
pursue
competing
claims
nike
standing
sue
already
activity
allegedly
infringing
rights
trademark
law
already
standing
file
counterclaim
nike
allegedly
pressing
invalid
trademark
halt
already
legitimate
business
activity
see
medimmune
supra
genuine
threat
enforcement
intellectual
property
rights
inhibits
commercial
activity
may
support
standing
nike
dismissed
claims
prejudice
issued
covenant
calling
question
existence
continuing
case
controversy
precedents
nike
burden
show
reasonably
expected
resume
enforcement
efforts
already
friends
earth
supra
nike
makes
halfhearted
effort
avoid
test
relying
deakins
monaghan
argues
defendant
makes
judicially
enforceable
commitment
avoid
conduct
forms
basis
article
iii
controversy
reason
apply
special
rule
premised
defendant
unfettered
ability
old
ways
brief
respondent
nike
reliance
deakins
misplaced
deakins
disavow
voluntary
cessation
doctrine
employed
precisely
analysis
required
test
found
case
moot
challenged
action
pursuing
claim
resumed
subsequent
action
entirely
speculative
similar
claim
arise
future
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
distinguished
situation
one
defendant
free
return
old
ways
ibid
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
question
voluntary
cessation
doctrine
poses
allegedly
wrongful
behavior
reasonably
expected
recur
nike
avoid
formidable
burden
assuming
answer
question
friends
earth
supra
iv
determined
voluntary
cessation
doctrine
applies
begin
analysis
terms
covenant
nike
unconditionally
irrevocably
covenants
refrain
making
claim
demand
already
related
business
entities
including
distributors
employees
entities
customers
account
possible
cause
action
based
involving
trademark
infringement
unfair
competition
dilution
state
federal
law
relating
nike
mark
based
appearance
already
current
previous
footwear
product
designs
colorable
imitations
thereof
regardless
whether
footwear
produced
otherwise
used
commerce
effective
date
covenant
app
emphasis
added
breadth
covenant
suffices
meet
burden
imposed
voluntary
cessation
test
covenant
unconditional
irrevocable
beyond
simply
prohibiting
nike
filing
suit
prohibits
nike
making
claim
demand
reaches
beyond
already
protect
already
distributors
customers
covers
current
previous
designs
colorable
imitations
addition
nike
originally
argued
sugars
soulja
boys
infringed
trademark
words
nike
believed
shoes
colorable
imitations
air
force
see
trademark
act
lanham
act
stat
amended
nike
covenant
allows
already
produce
existing
footwear
designs
including
sugar
soulja
boy
colorable
imitation
designs
agree
appeals
hard
imagine
scenario
potentially
infringe
nike
trademark
yet
fall
covenant
nike
taken
position
prospect
shoe
hard
pressed
assert
contrary
road
see
new
hampshire
maine
party
assumes
certain
position
legal
proceeding
succeeds
maintaining
position
may
thereafter
simply
interests
changed
assume
contrary
position
especially
prejudice
party
acquiesced
position
formerly
taken
quoting
davis
wakelee
shoe
exists
parties
pointed
evidence
already
dreamt
conceive
sits
far
tell
shelf
dorothy
ruby
slippers
perseus
winged
sandals
given
nike
demonstration
covenant
encompasses
allegedly
unlawful
conduct
incumbent
already
indicate
engages
sufficiently
concrete
plans
engage
activities
covered
covenant
information
already
business
activities
plans
uniquely
within
possession
case
moot
considering
covenant
language
plaintiff
anticipated
future
activities
satisfied
absolutely
clear
allegedly
unlawful
activity
reasonably
expected
recur
given
opportunity
district
already
assert
intent
design
market
shoe
expose
prospect
infringement
liability
see
app
pet
cert
finding
indication
intent
noting
absence
record
evidence
already
intends
make
arguably
infringing
shoe
unambiguously
covered
covenant
affidavit
submitted
district
question
president
saying
little
already
currently
plans
introduce
new
shoe
lines
make
modifications
existing
shoe
lines
never
stated
shoes
arguably
infringe
nike
trademark
yet
fall
outside
scope
covenant
appeal
second
circuit
failed
even
counsel
already
asked
oral
argument
whether
client
intention
design
market
shoe
even
arguably
fall
outside
covenant
tr
oral
arg
given
covenant
broad
language
given
already
asserted
concrete
plans
engage
conduct
covered
covenant
conclude
case
moot
challenged
conduct
reasonably
expected
recur
authorities
already
relies
point
cardinal
chemical
morton
affirmed
unremarkable
proposition
decision
rely
one
two
possible
alternative
grounds
noninfringement
rather
invalidity
strip
power
decide
second
question
particularly
decree
subject
review
essence
jurisdiction
review
case
decides
issue
two
independent
grounds
first
half
opinion
moot
second
half
vice
versa
issue
whether
district
jurisdiction
consider
claim
first
place
case
also
unlike
altvater
freeman
patent
holders
brought
suit
licensees
specific
performance
license
licensees
counterclaimed
seeking
declaratory
judgment
patents
invalid
appeals
finding
license
longer
force
devices
issue
infringe
dismissed
licensees
counterclaim
moot
reversed
finding
controversy
still
live
licensees
continued
manufactur
sell
additional
articles
claimed
fall
patents
patent
holders
continued
demand
royalties
products
course
whole
point
already
free
sell
shoes
without
fear
trademark
claim
already
argues
however
alternative
theories
article
iii
injuries
save
case
mootness
first
argues
long
nike
remains
free
assert
trademark
investors
apprehensive
investing
already
second
argues
given
nike
decision
sue
first
place
nike
trademarks
hang
already
operations
like
damoclean
sword
finally
relatedly
already
argues
one
nike
competitors
inherently
standing
challenge
nike
intellectual
property
problem
already
none
injuries
suffices
support
article
iii
standing
although
voluntary
cessation
standard
requires
defendant
show
challenged
behavior
reasonably
expected
recur
never
held
doctrine
imposing
burden
defendant
allows
plaintiff
rely
theories
article
iii
injury
fail
establish
standing
first
place
begin
already
argument
nike
trademark
registration
gives
false
color
state
federal
trademark
claims
expose
already
business
substantial
unpredictable
risks
deterring
investors
brief
petitioner
demonstrate
already
presented
affidavits
potential
investors
stating
nike
lawsuit
dissuaded
investing
already
prompted
withdraw
prior
investments
consider
investing
already
nike
trademark
struck
app
pet
cert
already
argues
like
plaintiffs
village
euclid
ambler
realty
standing
challenge
ordinance
reduced
property
value
already
standing
challenge
trademark
mere
existence
hampers
ability
attract
capital
absolutely
clear
challenged
conduct
reasonably
expected
recur
friends
earth
fact
individuals
may
base
decisions
conjectural
hypothetical
speculation
give
rise
sort
concrete
actual
injury
necessary
establish
article
iii
standing
lujan
defenders
wildlife
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
euclid
reasoned
assuming
merits
plaintiff
claim
ordinance
effect
constitutes
present
invasion
plaintiff
property
rights
present
invasion
fact
covenant
promising
invasion
addition
unlike
plaintiffs
euclid
already
claim
nike
air
force
infringes
property
rights
already
also
pointed
affidavit
vice
president
stating
nike
suggested
already
retailers
refrain
carrying
already
shoes
lest
nike
cancel
account
take
actions
retailer
delay
shipment
retailer
nike
order
retailer
nike
order
app
even
plaintiff
may
bring
invalidity
claim
based
reasonable
expectation
trademark
holder
take
action
plaintiff
retailers
covenant
extends
protection
already
distributors
customers
even
nike
engaging
harassment
unfair
trade
practices
already
explained
invalidating
nike
trademark
anything
stop
already
also
complains
longer
blithely
go
shoe
business
risk
sued
reply
brief
counsel
told
us
oral
argument
bitten
twice
shy
tr
oral
arg
never
held
plaintiff
standing
pursue
declaratory
relief
merely
basis
bitten
quite
opposite
see
los
angeles
lyons
holding
justiciable
controversy
plaintiff
subjected
chokehold
given
conclusion
nike
met
burden
demonstrating
reasonable
risk
already
sued
reason
already
shy
one
nike
competitors
judicially
enforceable
covenant
protecting
litigation
relating
air
force
trademark
insofar
injury
threat
air
force
trademark
litigation
already
nike
least
injured
competitor
already
falls
back
sweeping
argument
context
registered
trademarks
covenant
matter
broad
eradicate
effects
registered
invalid
trademark
brief
petitioner
according
already
allowing
nike
unilaterally
moot
case
subverts
important
role
federal
courts
play
administration
federal
patent
trademark
law
allows
companies
like
nike
register
brandish
invalid
trademarks
intimidate
smaller
competitors
avoiding
judicial
review
issuing
covenants
rare
case
little
guy
fights
back
already
amici
thus
contend
already
company
engaged
business
designing
marketing
athletic
shoes
standing
challenge
nike
trademark
see
see
also
brief
intellectual
property
professors
amici
curiae
suggesting
standing
extends
participants
field
brief
public
patent
foundation
amici
curiae
public
standing
challenge
validity
issued
patent
registered
trademark
approach
nike
need
even
threatened
sue
first
already
even
plans
make
anything
resembling
air
force
sue
invalidate
trademark
simply
already
nike
compete
athletic
footwear
market
taken
logical
conclusion
theory
seems
market
participant
injured
article
iii
purposes
whenever
competitor
benefits
something
allegedly
unlawful
whether
trademark
awarding
contract
arrangement
never
accepted
boundless
theory
standing
cases
already
cites
remarkable
proposition
stand
thing
cases
standing
based
injury
particularized
concrete
mere
assertion
something
unlawful
benefited
plaintiff
competitor
northeastern
chapter
associated
gen
contractors
america
jacksonville
super
tire
engineering
mccorkle
already
arguments
boil
basic
policy
objection
dismissing
case
allows
nike
bully
small
innovators
lawfully
operating
public
domain
concern
compel
us
adopt
already
broad
theory
standing
first
granting
covenants
sue
may
risky
strategy
trademark
holder
see
mccarthy
trademarks
unfair
competition
ed
ncontrolled
licensing
result
loss
significance
trademark
federal
registration
cancelled
sun
banks
sun
fed
sav
loan
finding
extensive
use
mark
impressive
evidence
likelihood
confusion
addition
lanham
act
provides
check
abusive
litigation
practices
providing
award
attorney
fees
exceptional
cases
gwaltney
smithfield
chesapeake
bay
foundation
explaining
award
litigation
costs
protect
suddenly
repentant
defendant
accepting
already
theory
may
benefit
small
competitor
case
lowering
gates
one
party
lowers
gates
result
larger
companies
resources
standing
challenge
intellectual
property
portfolios
humble
rivals
threatened
particular
patent
trademark
simply
competitors
market
encourage
parties
employ
litigation
weapon
competitors
rather
last
resort
settling
disputes
already
legally
cognizable
injury
fact
nike
took
steps
enforce
trademark
gone
given
breadth
covenant
reasonably
expected
recur
basis
find
live
controversy
case
clearly
moot
solicitor
general
asks
us
remand
case
proceedings
parties
develop
record
scope
covenant
petitioner
business
activities
courts
apply
proper
standard
record
brief
amicus
curiae
remand
serve
purpose
scope
covenant
clear
already
argument
covenant
drafted
broadly
instead
covenant
ever
see
tr
oral
arg
business
activities
plain
already
said
say
district
held
hearing
whether
case
mooted
covenant
every
stage
proceedings
thereafter
already
steadfastly
refused
suggest
plans
create
arguably
infringing
shoe
unambiguously
fall
within
scope
covenant
despite
every
incentive
opportunity
invitation
noted
district
expressly
found
indication
already
plans
app
pet
cert
already
never
challenged
finding
challenge
finding
appeal
second
circuit
even
though
significance
clear
appeals
expressly
found
already
asserted
intention
market
shoe
already
declined
challenge
conclusions
us
despite
questions
bench
addressing
particular
issue
tr
oral
arg
courts
expressly
invoke
voluntary
cessation
standard
articulated
cases
analysis
opinions
addressed
questions
addressed
today
standard
determining
case
moot
relied
breadth
covenant
absence
indication
already
produce
infringing
shoe
district
explained
hether
covenant
sue
divest
trial
jurisdiction
depends
covered
covenant
app
pet
cert
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
read
covenant
broadly
found
indication
already
forthcoming
models
extend
beyond
broad
language
even
concluded
already
perspective
little
difference
invalidating
trademark
scope
protection
already
afforded
covenant
likewise
appeals
asked
whether
covenant
covers
future
well
past
activity
products
inquired
evidence
intention
lack
intention
part
party
asserting
jurisdiction
engage
new
activity
develop
new
potentially
infringing
products
arguably
covered
covenant
concluded
breadth
covenant
renders
threat
litigation
remote
nonexistent
envision
shoe
within
nike
trademark
yet
protected
covenant
noting
already
asserted
intention
market
shoe
circumstances
remand
serve
purpose
appliances
seb
slip
announcing
new
standard
directly
applying
standard
affirm
jury
verdict
thornburg
gingles
announcing
applying
new
standard
uncontested
findings
made
district
confirmed
second
circuit
make
absolutely
clear
case
moot
judgment
appeals
affirmed
ordered
kennedy
concurring
already
llc
dba
yums
petitioner
nike
writ
certiorari
appeals
second
circuit
january
justice
kennedy
justice
thomas
justice
alito
justice
sotomayor
join
concurring
holds
precedents
instruct
respondent
nike
invoked
covenant
sue
show
case
moot
burden
establish
proposition
burden
already
show
justiciable
controversy
remains
voluntary
cessation
doctrine
nike
bears
formidable
burden
showing
absolutely
clear
allegedly
wrongful
behavior
reasonably
expected
recur
friends
earth
laidlaw
environmental
services
toc
circumstances
nike
must
demonstrate
covenant
sue
sufficient
breadth
force
already
reasonable
anticipation
future
trademark
infringement
claim
nike
district
appeals
issued
rulings
erroneous
premise
already
make
relevant
showing
imposed
burden
establish
certain
proposition
wrong
party
remand
reviewing
often
appropriate
determine
whether
outcome
different
proper
rule
applied
however
concludes
case
must
deemed
moot
events
based
terms
scope
covenant
already
seeming
insistence
matter
might
worded
covenant
drawn
trademark
holder
moot
case
brief
petitioner
tr
oral
arg
reasons
goes
far
already
appears
also
need
determine
whether
real
produce
new
product
first
colorable
imitation
existing
product
line
might
thought
infringe
nike
trademark
brief
separate
concurrence
written
underscore
covenants
like
one
nike
filed
taken
automatic
means
party
first
charged
competitor
trademark
infringement
suddenly
abandon
suit
without
incurring
risk
ensuing
adverse
adjudication
courts
well
aware
charges
trademark
infringement
disruptive
good
business
relations
manufacturer
alleged
infringer
retailers
investors
mere
pendency
litigation
mean
actors
marketplace
may
reluctant
future
dealings
alleged
infringer
nike
appears
well
aware
dynamic
case
referring
already
stated
one
point
ver
past
eight
months
nike
cleared
worst
offending
infringers
already
remains
one
last
companies
identified
top
ten
list
infringers
app
demonstrated
reluctance
investors
distributors
retailers
maintain
good
relations
alleged
infringer
might
appropriate
case
indication
market
anticipates
new
line
products
outside
covenant
sue
yet
still
within
zone
alleged
infringement
noted
outset
trademark
holder
burden
show
case
burden
alleged
infringer
prove
covenant
sue
inadequate
protect
current
future
products
trademark
enforcement
action
later
cases
careful
consideration
must
given
consequences
using
covenant
sue
basis
motion
dismiss
moot
holder
alleged
trademark
commence
suit
competitor
midcourse
file
covenant
sue
require
competitor
business
network
engage
costly
satellite
proceedings
demonstrate
future
production
sales
might
still
compromised
seem
trademark
holder
burden
show
case
moot
may
fall
well
short
formidable
suit
trademark
holder
initiated
later
seeks
moot
may
still
cause
disruption
costs
competition
formidable
burden
show
case
moot
require
trademark
holder
outset
make
substantial
showing
business
competitor
supply
network
disrupted
weakened
satellite
litigation
mootness
threat
latent
terms
covenant
unfair
allow
party
commences
suit
use
delivery
covenant
sue
force
competitor
expose
future
business
plans
otherwise
disadvantage
competitor
business
network
aid
deeming
moot
suit
trademark
holder
chose
initiate
relatively
cases
discussed
meaning
effect
covenants
sue
context
ongoing
litigation
see
revolution
eyewear
aspex
eyewear
ca
fed
pharmaceutical
forest
ca
fed
courts
proceed
caution
ruling
used
terminate
litigation
insistence
proper
allocation
formidable
burden
party
asserting
mootness
one
way
ensure
covenants
automatic
mechanisms
trademark
holders
use
courts
intimidate
competitors
without
time
assuming
risk
trademark
found
invalid
unenforceable
still
may
doubts
nike
showing
suffice
circumstances
already
litigation
stance
seem
made
proceedings
mootness
issue
unnecessary
addition
notes
future
trademark
proceeding
nike
bound
lower
courts
broad
reading
particular
covenant
thus
barring
suit
already
shoe
exact
copy
counterfeit
version
air
force
shoe
see
ante
citing
new
hampshire
maine
observations
join
opinion
judgment
footnotes
nike
acknowledged
already
manufacture
exact
copy
air
force
shoe
nike
claim
covenant
permits
infringement
suit
ground
counterfeit
differs
colorable
imitation
lanham
act
already
however
never
asserted
intent
make
counterfeit
air
force
ibid
moreover
counterfeit
presumably
include
nike
swoosh
independently
registered
trademark
issue
invalidating
air
force
trademark
may
sufficient
allow
already
proceed
make
counterfeits
see
defining
counterfeit
spurious
mark
identical
substantially
indistinguishable
registered
mark