lynne
kalina
petitioner
rodney
fletcher
argued
october
decided
december
held
section
may
create
damages
remedy
prosecutor
making
false
statements
fact
affidavit
supporting
application
arrest
warrant
since
conduct
protected
doctrine
absolute
prosecutorial
immunity
pp
imbler
pachtman
subsequent
cases
recognize
criminal
prosecutor
fully
protected
absolute
immunity
performing
traditional
functions
advocate
see
buckley
fitzsimmons
protected
qualified
immunity
acting
advocate
functions
complaining
witness
presenting
judge
complaint
supporting
affidavit
establish
prob
able
cause
arrest
see
malley
briggs
cases
petitioner
activities
connection
preparation
filing
information
respondent
motion
arrest
warrant
clearly
protected
absolute
immunity
part
advocate
function
indeed
except
act
personally
attesting
truth
averments
certification
preparation
filing
third
document
protected
well
pp
however
petitioner
acting
complaining
witness
rather
lawyer
executed
certification
nder
penalty
perjury
insofar
may
provide
remedy
respondent
since
fourth
amendment
requirement
arrest
warrants
based
upon
probable
cause
supported
oath
affirmation
may
satisfied
mere
filing
unsworn
information
signed
prosecutor
see
gerstein
pugh
since
washington
prosecutions
commenced
information
state
law
requires
arrest
warrant
supported
either
affidavit
sworn
testimony
establishing
grounds
issuing
warrant
petitioner
certification
designed
satisfy
requirements
neither
federal
state
law
made
necessary
prosecutor
make
certification
petitioner
argument
execution
one
incident
presentation
viewed
whole
work
advocate
unavailing
although
exercise
advocate
professional
judgment
informed
petitioner
actions
judgment
affect
truth
falsity
factual
statements
contained
certification
testifying
facts
function
witness
lawyer
matter
brief
succinct
may
evidentiary
component
application
arrest
warrant
distinct
essential
predicate
finding
probable
cause
even
person
makes
constitutionally
required
oath
affirmation
lawyer
function
performs
witness
petitioner
final
argument
denying
absolute
immunity
chilling
effect
prosecutors
administration
justice
supported
evidence
unpersuasive
pp
affirmed
stevens
delivered
opinion
unanimous
scalia
filed
concurring
opinion
thomas
joined
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
lynne
kalina
petitioner
rodney
fletcher
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
december
justice
stevens
delivered
opinion
question
presented
whether
creates
damages
remedy
prosecutor
making
false
statements
fact
affidavit
supporting
application
arrest
warrant
whether
contends
conduct
protected
doctrine
absolute
prosecutorial
immunity
petitioner
deputy
prosecuting
attorney
king
county
washington
following
customary
practice
december
commenced
criminal
proceeding
respondent
filing
three
documents
king
county
superior
two
information
charging
respondent
burglary
motion
arrest
unsworn
pleadings
burglary
charge
based
alleged
theft
computer
equipment
school
washington
criminal
rules
require
arrest
warrant
supported
affidavit
sworn
testimony
establishing
grounds
issuing
warrant
satisfy
requirement
petitioner
supported
motion
third
certification
determination
probable
cause
summarized
evidence
supporting
charge
personally
vouched
truth
facts
set
forth
certification
penalty
perjury
based
petitioner
certification
trial
found
probable
cause
ordered
arrest
warrant
issued
petitioner
certification
contained
two
inaccurate
factual
statements
noting
respondent
fingerprints
found
glass
partition
school
petitioner
stated
respondent
never
associated
school
manner
permission
enter
school
take
property
fact
installed
partitions
premises
authorized
enter
school
also
stated
employee
electronics
store
identified
respondent
photo
montage
person
asked
appraisal
computer
stolen
school
fact
employee
identify
respondent
respondent
arrested
spent
day
jail
month
later
charges
dismissed
prosecutor
motion
ii
respondent
brought
action
rev
stat
amended
seeking
damages
petitioner
based
alleged
violation
constitutional
right
free
unreasonable
seizures
determining
immunity
accept
allegations
respondent
complaint
true
see
buckley
fitzsimmons
respondent
complaint
focuses
false
statements
made
petitioner
certification
petitioner
moved
summary
judgment
ground
three
documents
filed
commence
criminal
proceedings
procure
arrest
warrant
protected
doctrine
absolute
prosecutorial
immunity
district
denied
motion
holding
entitled
absolute
immunity
whether
qualified
immunity
apply
question
fact
appeals
ninth
circuit
affirmed
ninth
circuit
first
noted
decision
malley
briggs
police
officer
secures
arrest
warrant
without
probable
cause
assert
absolute
immunity
defense
observed
petitioner
actions
writing
signing
filing
declaration
arrest
warrant
virtually
identical
police
officer
actions
malley
relying
functional
approach
endorsed
buckley
fitzsimmons
appeals
concluded
expose
police
potential
liability
protecting
prosecutors
act
appeals
acknowledged
sixth
circuit
reached
different
result
joseph
patterson
cert
denied
case
predated
decision
buckley
never
squarely
addressed
question
whether
prosecutor
may
held
liable
conduct
obtaining
arrest
warrant
granted
certiorari
resolve
conflict
affirm
iii
section
codification
civil
rights
act
text
statute
purports
create
damages
remedy
every
state
official
violation
person
federal
constitutional
statutory
rights
coverage
statute
thus
broader
common
law
torts
nevertheless
recognized
congress
intended
statute
construed
light
principles
well
settled
time
enactment
see
tenney
brandhove
briscoe
lahue
thus
examined
commonlaw
doctrine
identifying
elements
cause
action
defenses
available
state
actors
imbler
pachtman
held
former
prisoner
whose
conviction
set
aside
collateral
proceedings
maintain
action
prosecutor
litigated
charges
relying
part
precedent
perhaps
even
importantly
policy
considerations
underlying
precedent
concluded
state
prosecuting
attorney
acted
within
scope
duties
initiating
pursuing
criminal
tion
amenable
suit
liberally
construed
imbler
complaint
included
charge
prosecution
wrongfully
commenced
also
charge
false
testimony
offered
well
charge
exculpatory
evidence
suppressed
constitutional
claims
thus
broader
specific
antecedent
nevertheless
relying
decisions
providing
prosecutors
absolute
immunity
tort
actions
based
claims
decision
prosecute
malicious
unsupported
probable
cause
well
actions
defamation
based
statements
made
trial
concluded
statute
construed
provide
analogous
defense
claims
asserted
imbler
policy
considerations
justified
decisions
affording
absolute
immunity
prosecutors
performing
traditional
functions
applied
equally
statutory
claims
based
conduct
functions
considerations
included
interest
protecting
prosecutor
harassing
litigation
divert
time
attention
official
duties
interest
enabling
exercise
independent
judgment
deciding
suits
bring
conducting
former
interest
lend
support
immunity
litigation
occupant
office
whereas
latter
applicable
official
performing
functions
require
exercise
prosecutorial
discretion
later
cases
made
clear
interest
protecting
proper
functioning
office
rather
interest
protecting
occupant
primary
importance
imbler
attempt
define
outer
limits
prosecutor
absolute
immunity
recognize
rationale
encompass
official
activities
thus
concluded
pachtman
activities
intimately
associated
judicial
phase
criminal
process
thus
functions
reasons
absolute
immunity
apply
full
force
put
one
side
aspects
prosecutor
responsibility
cast
role
administrator
investigative
officer
rather
advocate
subsequent
cases
confirmed
importance
judicial
process
protecting
prosecutor
serving
advocate
judicial
proceedings
thus
burns
reed
noting
consensus
among
courts
appeals
concerning
prosecutorial
conduct
grand
juries
held
prosecutor
appearance
support
application
search
warrant
presentation
evidence
hearing
protected
absolute
immunity
buckley
categorically
stated
acts
undertaken
prosecutor
preparing
initiation
judicial
proceedings
trial
occur
course
role
advocate
state
entitled
protections
absolute
immunity
cases
however
found
defense
unavailable
prosecutor
performing
different
function
burns
provision
legal
advice
police
pretrial
investigation
facts
protected
qualified
rather
absolute
immunity
similarly
buckley
prosecutor
acting
advocate
either
held
press
conference
allegedly
fabricated
evidence
concerning
unsolved
crime
reference
latter
holding
explained
difference
advocate
role
evaluating
evidence
interviewing
witnesses
prepares
trial
one
hand
detective
role
searching
clues
corroboration
might
give
probable
cause
recommend
suspect
arrested
hand
prosecutor
performs
investigative
functions
normally
performed
detective
police
officer
appropriate
justifiable
act
immunity
protect
one
hampton
chicago
internal
quotation
marks
omitted
cert
denied
thus
prosecutor
plans
executes
raid
suspected
weapons
cache
greater
claim
complete
immunity
activities
police
officers
allegedly
acting
direction
cases
make
clear
absolute
immunity
protects
prosecutor
role
advocate
grounded
special
esteem
perform
functions
certainly
desire
shield
abuses
office
lesser
degree
immunity
impair
judicial
process
malley
thus
determining
immunity
examine
nature
function
performed
identity
actor
performed
forrester
white
point
perhaps
best
illustrated
determination
senior
law
enforcement
official
attorney
general
protected
qualified
rather
absolute
immunity
engaged
performance
national
defense
functions
rather
prosecutorial
functions
mitchell
forsyth
malley
considered
rejected
two
theories
immunity
might
accorded
police
officer
caused
unconstitutional
arrest
presenting
judge
complaint
supporting
affidavit
failed
establish
probable
cause
first
argument
function
comparable
complaining
witness
actually
militated
claim
witnesses
subject
suit
common
law
second
argument
rested
similarity
conduct
functions
often
performed
prosecutors
explained
alternative
ground
claiming
absolute
immunity
petitioner
draws
analogy
officer
requesting
warrant
prosecutor
asks
grand
jury
indict
suspect
like
prosecutor
petitioner
argues
officer
must
exercise
discretionary
judgment
based
evidence
like
prosecutor
officer
may
exercise
best
judgment
threat
retaliatory
lawsuits
hangs
thus
petitioner
urges
us
read
giving
officer
absolute
immunity
enjoyed
prosecutor
cf
imbler
pachtman
intend
disrespect
officer
applying
warrant
observing
action
vital
part
administration
criminal
justice
removed
judicial
phase
criminal
proceedings
act
prosecutor
seeking
indictment
furthermore
petitioner
analogy
force
take
account
fact
prosecutor
act
seeking
indictment
first
step
process
seeking
conviction
exposing
prosecutor
liability
initial
phase
prosecutorial
work
interfere
exercise
independent
judgment
every
phase
work
since
prosecutor
might
come
see
later
decisions
terms
effect
potential
liability
thus
shield
prosecutor
ing
indictment
lesser
immunity
cial
process
cases
make
quite
clear
petitioner
activities
connection
preparation
filing
two
three
charging
information
motion
arrest
protected
absolute
immunity
indeed
except
act
personally
attesting
truth
averments
certification
seems
equally
clear
preparation
filing
third
document
package
part
advocate
function
well
critical
question
however
whether
acting
complaining
witness
rather
lawyer
executed
certification
nder
penalty
perjury
turn
question
iv
fourth
amendment
requires
arrest
warrants
based
upon
probable
cause
supported
oath
affirmation
requirement
may
satisfied
indictment
returned
grand
jury
mere
filing
criminal
charges
unsworn
information
signed
prosecutor
gerstein
pugh
see
also
coolidge
new
hampshire
accordingly
since
prosecutions
washington
commenced
information
washington
law
requires
compliance
constitutional
command
arrest
warrant
supported
either
affidavit
sworn
testimony
establishing
grounds
issuing
warrant
certification
determination
probable
cause
executed
petitioner
designed
satisfy
requirements
although
law
required
document
sworn
certified
penalty
perjury
neither
federal
state
law
made
necessary
prosecutor
make
certification
petitioner
performed
act
competent
witness
might
performed
even
may
following
practice
routinely
employed
colleagues
predecessors
king
county
washington
practice
surely
prevalent
parts
country
even
mandated
law
king
county
neither
petitioner
amici
argue
prosecutors
routinely
follow
king
county
practice
indeed
tradition
well
ethics
profession
generally
instruct
counsel
avoid
risks
associated
participating
advocate
witness
proceeding
nevertheless
petitioner
argues
execution
certificate
one
incident
presentation
viewed
whole
work
advocate
integral
initiation
prosecution
characterization
appropriate
drafting
certification
determination
evidence
sufficiently
strong
justify
finding
decision
file
charges
presentation
information
motion
matters
involved
exercise
professional
judgment
indeed
even
selection
particular
facts
include
certification
provide
evidentiary
support
finding
probable
cause
required
exercise
judgment
advocate
judgment
affect
truth
falsity
factual
statements
testifying
facts
function
witness
lawyer
matter
brief
succinct
may
evidentiary
component
application
arrest
warrant
distinct
essential
predicate
finding
probable
cause
even
person
makes
constitutionally
required
oath
affirmation
lawyer
function
performs
giving
sworn
testimony
witness
finally
petitioner
argues
denying
absolute
immunity
chilling
effect
prosecutors
administration
justice
persuaded
may
well
true
prosecutors
king
county
may
abandon
practice
routinely
attesting
facts
recited
certification
determination
probable
cause
pattern
procedures
employed
parts
nation
petitioner
presents
evidence
administration
justice
harmed
king
county
practice
followed
respects
however
argument
addresses
concerns
affected
decision
merely
hold
may
provide
remedy
respondent
insofar
petitioner
performed
function
complaining
witness
depart
prior
cases
recognized
prosecutor
fully
protected
absolute
immunity
performing
traditional
functions
advocate
see
imbler
buckley
accordingly
judgment
appeals
ninth
circuit
affirmed
notes
washington
criminal
rule
see
rev
code
providing
inter
alia
certification
made
penalty
perjury
equivalent
affidavit
accord
king
county
local
criminal
rule
app
id
see
briscoe
lahue
title
provides
every
person
color
statute
ordinance
regulation
custom
usage
state
territory
district
columbia
subjects
causes
subjected
citizen
person
within
jurisdiction
thereof
deprivation
rights
privileges
immunities
secured
constitution
laws
shall
liable
party
injured
action
law
suit
equity
proper
proceeding
redress
see
cases
cited
decided
granted
broader
immunity
public
prosecutors
available
malicious
prosecution
actions
private
persons
brought
prosecutions
early
common
law
see
savile
roberts
ld
raym
eng
hill
miles
bigelow
leading
cases
law
torts
however
early
cases
decided
office
public
prosecutor
modern
form
common
see
langbein
origins
public
prosecution
common
law
legal
hist
kress
progress
prosecution
annals
acad
pol
soc
sci
white
frank
noting
availability
malicious
prosecution
action
curtailed
growth
office
public
prosecutor
thus
imbler
drew
guidance
first
american
cases
addressing
availability
malicious
prosecution
actions
public
prosecutors
perhaps
importantly
policy
considerations
underlying
firmly
established
rules
providing
absolute
immunity
judges
jurors
see
imbler
pachtman
discussing
similarity
functions
performed
judges
jurors
prosecutors
bradley
fisher
wall
yates
lansing
johns
kent
note
civil
liability
district
attorney
acts
rev
see
white
concurring
judgment
examining
nature
function
performed
recent
innovation
ex
parte
virginia
stated
hether
act
done
judge
judicial
determined
character
character
agent
see
also
bradley
fisher
examining
character
act
performed
judge
noted
omplaining
witnesses
absolutely
immune
common
law
generally
accepted
rule
one
procured
issuance
arrest
warrant
submitting
complaint
held
liable
complaint
made
maliciously
without
probable
cause
given
malice
lack
probable
cause
complainant
enjoyed
immunity
common
law
thus
affords
support
petitioner
malley
briggs
omitted
washington
criminal
rule
provides
warrant
arrest
must
supported
affidavit
sworn
testimony
establishing
grounds
issuing
warrant
must
determine
probable
cause
issuing
amicus
curiae
points
federal
prosecutors
typically
personally
attest
facts
affidavit
filed
support
application
arrest
warrant
nstead
law
enforcement
agent
ordinarily
attests
facts
brief
amici
curiae
counties
state
washington
state
local
rules
two
counties
washington
require
prosecutor
file
additional
document
beyond
information
brief
counties
state
washington
amici
curiae
see
washington
rule
professional
conduct
lawyer
shall
act
advocate
trial
lawyer
likely
necessary
witness
unless
four
narrow
exceptions
apply
aba
model
rules
professional
conduct
brief
petitioner
lynne
kalina
petitioner
rodney
fletcher
writ
certiorari
appeals
ninth
circuit
december
justice
scalia
justice
thomas
joins
concurring
agree
kalina
performed
essentially
function
criminal
process
police
officers
malley
briggs
join
opinion
write
separately
shame
opinions
reflect
awareness
functional
approach
immunity
questions
produced
curious
inversions
common
law
existed
enacted
conscientious
prosecutor
reading
cases
conclude
absolute
immunity
decision
seek
arrest
warrant
filing
information
qualified
immunity
testimony
witness
support
warrant
rule
sense
exactly
opposite
course
thing
absolute
prosecutorial
immunity
enacted
indeed
points
ante
generally
thing
modern
public
prosecutor
common
law
recognized
judicial
immunity
protected
judges
jurors
grand
jurors
members
courts
martial
private
arbitrators
various
assessors
commissioners
immunity
absolute
extended
individuals
charged
resolving
disputes
parties
authoritatively
adjudicat
ing
private
rights
public
officials
made
discretionary
policy
decisions
involve
actual
adjudication
protected
immunity
defeated
showing
malice
hence
akin
call
qualified
rather
absolute
immunity
continue
believe
prosecutorial
functions
existed
modern
form
considered
burns
reed
scalia
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
conclusion
accords
common
law
treatment
private
prosecutors
commonly
performed
function
delegated
public
officials
like
petitioner
private
citizen
initiated
procured
criminal
prosecution
still
sued
tort
malicious
acted
maliciously
without
probable
cause
prosecution
ultimately
terminated
defendant
favor
thus
although
private
prosecutors
sometimes
called
complaining
witnesses
since
public
servants
entitled
immunity
kind
qualified
immunity
built
elements
tort
common
law
also
recognized
absolute
immunity
statements
made
course
judicial
proceeding
relevant
matter
tried
immunity
protected
witnesses
attorneys
defeated
even
allegation
statement
maliciously
false
see
hilliard
law
torts
however
immunity
slander
libel
actions
common
law
therefore
kalina
protected
something
resembling
qualified
immunity
sued
malicious
prosecution
tortious
act
case
decision
bring
criminal
charges
fletcher
liability
attach
fletcher
prove
prosecution
malicious
without
probable
cause
ultimately
unsuccessful
kalina
false
statements
witness
support
warrant
application
independent
actionable
tort
although
might
evidence
malice
initiation
malicious
prosecution
suit
absolute
privilege
protecting
testimony
suits
defamation
long
road
superficially
least
opposite
result
today
opinion
began
imbler
pachtman
granted
prosecutors
absolute
immunity
function
initiating
criminal
prosecution
briscoe
lahue
extended
similar
absolute
immunity
function
serving
witness
malley
briggs
supra
recognized
additional
functional
category
complaining
witness
since
category
entitled
qualified
immunity
overturned
directed
verdict
favor
police
officer
caused
plaintiff
arrested
presenting
judge
complaint
affidavit
supporting
probable
cause
said
omplaining
witnesses
absolutely
immune
common
law
generally
accepted
rule
one
procured
issuance
arrest
warrant
submitting
complaint
held
liable
complaint
made
maliciously
without
probable
cause
given
malice
lack
probable
cause
complainant
enjoyed
immunity
statement
correct
implies
distinction
witnesses
absolutely
immune
complaining
witnesses
best
qualifiedly
immune
little
foundation
common
law
law
recognize
two
kinds
witness
recognized
two
different
torts
sense
malley
discussion
complaining
witnesses
feint
awaking
different
type
witness
much
recognizing
different
cause
action
malicious
prosecution
comment
police
witness
immunity
chi
rev
time
malley
decided
however
methodology
forced
express
conclusion
terms
whether
particular
function
issue
entitled
immunity
common
law
see
briscoe
supra
cases
clearly
indicate
immunity
analysis
rests
functional
categories
inventing
new
functional
category
complaining
witness
history
liable
common
law
liable
comment
supra
malley
moved
immunity
jurisprudence
much
closer
results
common
law
achieved
analytical
approach
based
upon
functional
analysis
faithfully
replicate
common
law
demonstrated
opinion
today
describing
subset
actors
criminal
process
subject
suit
complaining
witnesses
implies
testifying
critical
event
complaining
witness
sued
malicious
prosecution
whether
ever
provided
factual
testimony
long
role
initiating
procuring
prosecution
sense
witness
complaining
witness
misleading
applied
police
officers
malley
confusion
less
harmless
however
imbler
malley
collide
produce
rule
stands
common
law
head
kalina
absolutely
immune
suit
challenging
decision
prosecute
seek
arrest
warrant
sued
changes
functional
categories
providing
personal
testimony
imbler
principle
absolute
prosecutorial
immunity
functional
categories
approach
immunity
questions
imposed
cases
like
briscoe
make
faithful
adherence
common
law
embodied
difficult
imbler
functional
approach
deeply
embedded
jurisprudence
reasons
stare
decisis
abandon
given
concessions
malley
distortion
term
complaining
witness
may
take
us
close
right
answer
likely
get
kalina
conduct
clearly
places
functional
category
agree
entitled
absolute
immunity
precedents
footnotes