bakeret
al
general
motors
argued
october
decided
january
held
elwell
may
testify
missouri
action
without
offense
national
full
faith
credit
command
pp
animating
purpose
constitution
full
faith
credit
clause
alter
status
several
independent
foreign
sovereignties
free
ignore
obligations
created
laws
judicial
proceedings
others
make
integral
parts
single
nation
throughout
remedy
upon
obligation
might
demanded
right
irrespective
state
origin
milwaukee
county
white
judgments
full
faith
credit
obligation
exacting
final
judgment
one
state
rendered
adjudicatory
authority
subject
matter
persons
governed
judgment
qualifies
recognition
throughout
land
see
matsushita
elec
industrial
epstein
may
guided
forum
state
public
policy
determining
law
applicable
controversy
see
nevada
hall
decisions
support
roving
public
policy
exception
full
faith
credit
due
judgments
see
estin
estin
assuming
existence
ubiquitous
public
policy
exception
permitting
one
state
resist
recognition
another
judgment
district
bakers
action
misread
precedent
never
placed
equity
decrees
outside
full
faith
credit
domain
equity
decrees
payment
money
long
considered
equivalent
judgments
law
entitled
nationwide
recognition
see
barber
barber
reason
preclusive
effects
adjudication
parties
privity
claim
preclusion
issue
preclusion
differ
depending
solely
upon
type
relief
sought
civil
action
jackson
concurring
full
faith
credit
however
mean
enforcement
measures
must
travel
sister
state
judgment
preclusive
effects
measures
remain
subject
control
forum
law
see
mcelmoyle
ex
rel
bailey
cohen
pet
orders
commanding
action
inaction
denied
enforcement
sister
state
purported
accomplish
official
act
within
exclusive
province
state
interfered
litigation
ordering
state
authority
see
fall
eastin
pp
background
principles
view
turns
dimensions
order
gm
relies
upon
stop
elwell
testimony
asks
matters
michigan
injunction
legitimately
conclude
although
michigan
order
claim
preclusive
elwell
gm
michigan
judgment
reach
beyond
controversy
control
proceedings
gm
brought
parties
asserting
claims
merits
michigan
considered
michigan
power
parties
basis
commanding
become
intervenors
dispute
see
martin
wilks
essentially
although
michigan
decree
operate
elwell
preclude
volunteering
testimony
another
jurisdiction
michigan
entering
injunction
elwell
gm
stipulated
dictate
another
jurisdiction
evidence
relevant
bakers
controversy
michigan
inadmissible
conclusion
creates
general
exception
full
faith
credit
command
surely
permit
state
refuse
honor
sister
state
judgment
based
forum
choice
law
policy
preferences
simply
recognizes
however
mechanisms
enforcing
judgment
travel
judgment
purposes
full
faith
credit
one
state
judgment
automatically
transfer
title
land
another
state
similarly
michigan
decree
determine
evidentiary
issues
lawsuit
brought
parties
subject
jurisdiction
michigan
cf
nixon
language
consent
decree
excluding
scope
thenpending
georgia
action
informative
michigan
order
interfered
georgia
jurisdiction
michigan
ban
way
interfere
jurisdiction
courts
similar
cases
gm
recognized
interference
potential
consent
decree
agreeing
institute
contempt
proceedings
elwell
giving
subpoenaed
testimony
elsewhere
gm
ruled
resort
entered
injunction
telling
injunctions
ordinarily
enforced
enjoining
surrogate
tribunal
pp
reversed
remanded
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
stevens
souter
breyer
joined
scalia
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
kennedy
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
thomas
joined
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
kenneth
lee
baker
steven
robert
baker
next
friend
melissa
thomas
general
motorscorporation
writ
certiorari
appeals
eighth
circuit
january
justice
ginsburg
delivered
opinion
case
concerns
authority
one
state
order
witness
testimony
shall
heard
settlement
claims
counterclaims
precipitated
discharge
ronald
elwell
former
general
motors
corporation
gm
engineering
analyst
gm
paid
elwell
undisclosed
sum
money
parties
agreed
permanent
injunction
stipulated
gm
elwell
entered
michigan
county
injunction
prohibited
elwell
testifying
without
prior
written
consent
gm
witness
kind
litigation
already
filed
filed
future
involving
gm
owner
seller
manufacturer
designer
gm
separately
agreed
however
elwell
ordered
testify
tribunal
testimony
actionable
violation
michigan
injunction
agreement
entry
stipulated
injunction
michigan
elwell
subpoenaed
testify
product
liability
action
commenced
missouri
plaintiffs
involved
michigan
case
question
presented
whether
national
full
faith
credit
command
bars
elwell
testimony
missouri
case
hold
elwell
may
testify
missouri
action
without
offense
full
faith
credit
requirement
two
lawsuits
initiated
different
parties
different
gave
rise
full
faith
credit
issue
us
one
suit
involved
severed
employment
relationship
complaint
describe
controversy
turn
centuryschoolbook
italic
suit
elwell
general
motors
ronald
elwell
gm
employee
fifteen
years
beginning
elwell
assigned
engineering
analysis
group
studied
performance
gm
vehicles
particularly
vehicles
involved
product
liability
litigation
elwell
studies
research
concentrated
vehicular
fires
assisted
improving
performance
gm
products
suggesting
changes
fuel
line
designs
course
employment
elwell
frequently
aided
gm
lawyers
engaged
defending
gm
product
liability
actions
beginning
employment
relationship
soured
gm
elwell
first
negotiated
agreement
elwell
retire
serving
gm
consultant
two
years
time
came
elwell
retire
however
disagreement
surfaced
continued
may
plaintiffs
product
liability
action
pending
georgia
deposed
elwell
georgia
case
involved
gm
pickup
truck
fuel
tank
burst
flames
collision
deposition
objection
counsel
gm
elwell
gave
testimony
differed
markedly
testimony
given
serving
expert
witness
gm
specifically
elwell
several
times
defended
safety
crashworthiness
pickup
fuel
system
deposition
georgia
action
however
elwell
testified
gm
pickup
truck
fuel
system
inferior
comparison
competing
products
month
later
elwell
sued
gm
michigan
county
alleging
wrongful
discharge
tort
contract
claims
gm
counterclaimed
contending
elwell
breached
fiduciary
duty
gm
disclosing
privileged
confidential
information
misappropriating
documents
response
gm
motion
preliminary
injunction
hearing
michigan
trial
november
enjoined
elwell
consulting
discussing
disclosing
person
general
motors
corporation
trade
secrets
confidential
information
matters
work
product
relating
manner
subject
matter
products
liability
litigation
whether
already
filed
filed
future
ronald
elwell
received
knowledge
entrusted
employments
general
motors
corporation
august
gm
elwell
entered
settlement
elwell
received
undisclosed
sum
money
parties
also
stipulated
entry
permanent
injunction
jointly
filed
michigan
stipulation
injunction
proposed
permanent
injunction
contained
two
proscriptions
first
substantially
repeated
terms
preliminary
injunction
second
comprehensively
enjoined
elwell
testifying
without
prior
written
consent
general
motors
corporation
either
upon
deposition
trial
expert
witness
witness
kind
consulting
attorneys
agents
litigation
already
filed
filed
future
involving
general
motors
corporation
owner
seller
manufacturer
designer
product
issue
encompassing
bar
consent
injunction
made
exception
provision
shall
operate
interfere
jurisdiction
georgia
litigation
involving
fuel
tank
still
pending
ibid
emphasis
added
noninterference
provision
appears
stipulated
decree
august
hearing
michigan
entered
injunction
precisely
tendered
parties
although
stipulated
injunction
contained
exception
georgia
action
pending
elwell
gm
included
separate
settlement
agreement
general
limitation
tribunal
ordered
elwell
testify
testimony
way
support
gm
action
violation
injunction
settlement
agreement
agreed
elwell
appearance
testimony
hearings
motions
quash
subpoena
deposition
trial
official
pro
ceeding
tribunal
orders
permanent
injunction
agreement
ment
agreement
quoted
six
years
since
settlement
elwell
testified
gm
georgia
pursuant
exception
contained
injunction
several
jurisdictions
elwell
subpoenaed
testify
centuryschoolbook
italic
suit
bakers
general
motors
described
employment
termination
litigation
next
summarize
complaint
underlying
case
decedent
beverly
garner
passenger
chevrolet
blazer
involved
february
missouri
highway
accident
blazer
engine
caught
fire
driver
passenger
died
september
garner
sons
kenneth
steven
baker
commenced
wrongful
death
product
liability
action
gm
missouri
state
bakers
alleged
faulty
fuel
pump
blazer
caused
engine
fire
killed
mother
gm
removed
case
federal
basis
parties
diverse
citizenship
merits
gm
asserted
fuel
pump
neither
faulty
cause
fire
collision
impact
injuries
alone
caused
garner
death
bakers
sought
depose
elwell
call
witness
trial
gm
objected
elwell
appearance
deponent
trial
witness
ground
michigan
injunction
barred
testimony
response
bakers
urged
michigan
injunction
override
missouri
subpoena
elwell
testimony
bakers
noted
settle
ment
agreement
elwell
testify
ordered
testimony
actionable
violation
michigan
injunction
camera
review
michigan
injunction
settlement
agreement
federal
district
missouri
allowed
bakers
depose
elwell
call
witness
trial
responding
gm
objection
district
stated
alternative
grounds
ruling
michigan
injunction
need
enforced
blocking
elwell
testimony
violate
missouri
public
policy
shielded
disclosure
privileged
otherwise
confidential
information
injunction
modified
michigan
elsewhere
modify
decree
trial
elwell
testified
support
bakers
claim
alleged
defect
fuel
pump
system
contributed
postcollision
fire
addition
identified
described
internal
gm
memorandum
bearing
risk
engine
fires
following
trial
jury
awarded
bakers
million
damages
district
entered
judgment
jury
verdict
appeals
eighth
circuit
reversed
district
judgment
ruling
inter
alia
elwell
testimony
admitted
assuming
arguendo
existence
public
policy
exception
full
faith
credit
command
appeals
concluded
district
erroneously
relied
missouri
policy
favoring
disclosure
relevant
nonprivileged
information
see
id
missouri
equally
strong
public
policy
favor
full
faith
credit
eighth
circuit
also
determined
evidence
insufficient
show
michigan
modify
injunction
barring
elwell
testimony
see
appeals
observed
michigan
asked
several
occasions
modify
injunction
yet
noted
michigan
intend
block
elwell
testimony
cases
like
bakers
injunction
unnecessary
id
granted
certiorari
decide
whether
full
faith
credit
requirement
stops
bakers
parties
michigan
proceeding
obtaining
elwell
testimony
missouri
wrongful
death
action
ii
constitution
full
faith
credit
clause
provides
full
faith
credit
shall
given
state
public
acts
records
judicial
proceedings
every
state
congress
may
general
laws
prescribe
manner
acts
records
proceedings
shall
proved
effect
thereof
acts
records
judicial
proceedings
copies
thereof
authenticated
shall
full
faith
credit
every
within
territories
possessions
law
usage
courts
state
ter
ritory
possession
taken
alter
status
several
independent
foreign
sovereignties
free
ignore
obligations
created
laws
judicial
proceedings
others
make
integral
parts
single
nation
throughout
remedy
upon
obligation
might
demanded
right
irrespective
state
origin
see
also
estin
estin
full
faith
credit
clause
substituted
command
earlier
principles
comity
thus
basically
altered
status
independent
sovereigns
precedent
differentiates
credit
owed
laws
legislative
measures
common
law
judgments
numerous
cases
held
credit
must
given
judgment
another
state
although
forum
required
entertain
suit
judgment
founded
milwaukee
county
full
faith
credit
clause
compel
state
substitute
statutes
statutes
dealing
subject
matter
concerning
competent
legislate
pacific
employers
ins
trial
accident
see
phillips
petroleum
shutts
regarding
judgments
however
full
faith
credit
obligation
exacting
final
judgment
one
state
rendered
adjudicatory
authority
subject
matter
persons
governed
judgment
qualifies
recognition
throughout
land
claim
issue
preclusion
res
judicata
purposes
words
judgment
rendering
state
gains
nationwide
force
see
matsushita
elec
industrial
epstein
kremer
chemical
constr
see
also
reese
johnson
scope
full
faith
credit
judgments
colum
rev
may
guided
forum
state
public
policy
determining
law
applicable
controversy
see
nevada
hall
decisions
support
roving
public
policy
exception
full
faith
credit
due
judgments
see
estin
full
faith
credit
clause
ordered
submission
even
hostile
policies
reflected
judgment
another
state
practical
operation
federal
system
constitution
designed
demanded
fauntleroy
lum
judgment
missouri
entitled
full
faith
credit
mississippi
even
missouri
judgment
rested
misapprehension
mississippi
law
assuming
existence
ubiquitous
public
policy
exception
permitting
one
state
resist
recognition
another
state
judgment
district
bakers
action
see
supra
misread
precedent
full
faith
credit
clause
one
provisions
incorporated
constitution
framers
purpose
transforming
aggregation
independent
sovereign
nation
sherrer
sherrer
aware
considerations
local
policy
law
rightly
deemed
impair
force
effect
full
faith
credit
clause
act
congress
require
given
money
judgment
outside
state
rendition
magnolia
petroleum
hunt
never
placed
equity
decrees
outside
full
faith
credit
domain
equity
decrees
payment
money
long
considered
equivalent
judgments
law
entitled
nationwide
recognition
see
barber
barber
unconditional
adjudication
petitioner
right
recover
sum
money
entitled
full
faith
credit
see
also
ehrenzweig
conflict
laws
rev
ed
describing
indefensible
old
doctrine
equity
decree
merge
claim
judgment
qualify
recognition
see
reason
preclusive
effects
adjudication
parties
privity
claim
preclusion
issue
preclusion
res
judicata
collateral
estoppel
differ
depending
solely
upon
type
relief
sought
civil
action
cf
barber
jackson
concurring
full
faith
credit
clause
implementing
statute
speak
judgments
proceedings
without
limitation
fed
rule
civ
proc
providing
one
form
action
known
action
lieu
discretely
labeled
actions
law
suits
equity
full
faith
credit
however
mean
must
adopt
practices
regarding
time
manner
mechanisms
enforcing
judgments
enforcement
measures
travel
sister
state
judgment
preclusive
effects
measures
remain
subject
control
forum
law
see
mcelmoyle
ex
rel
bailey
cohen
pet
judgment
may
enforced
laws
enforcing
forum
may
permit
see
also
restatement
second
conflict
laws
local
law
forum
determines
methods
judgment
another
state
orders
commanding
action
inaction
denied
enforcement
sister
state
purported
accomplish
official
act
within
exclusive
province
state
interfered
litigation
ordering
state
authority
thus
sister
state
decree
concerning
land
ownership
another
state
held
ineffective
transfer
title
see
fall
eastin
although
decree
may
indeed
preclusively
adjudicate
rights
obligations
running
parties
foreign
litigation
see
robertson
howard
may
doubted
equity
one
state
proper
case
compel
defendant
convey
property
situated
another
antisuit
injunctions
regarding
litigation
elsewhere
even
compatible
due
process
direction
constraining
parties
decree
see
cole
cunningham
fact
controlled
second
actions
regarding
litigation
see
james
grand
trunk
western
see
also
scoles
hay
conflict
laws
ed
observing
antisuit
injunction
address
thus
preclusive
effect
merits
litigation
second
forum
sanctions
tions
injunction
event
generally
administered
issued
injunction
see
stiller
hardman
nonrendition
forum
enforces
monetary
relief
portion
judgment
leaves
enforcement
injunctive
portion
rendition
forum
background
principles
view
turn
dimensions
order
gm
relies
upon
stop
elwell
testimony
specifically
take
question
matters
michigan
injunction
legitimately
conclude
earlier
recounted
see
supra
parties
michigan
county
elwell
gm
submitted
injunction
presiding
judge
signed
issue
joined
expressly
litigated
determined
michigan
proceeding
order
claim
preclusive
elwell
gm
elwell
claim
wrongful
discharge
related
contract
tort
claims
merged
judgment
sue
recover
see
parklane
hosiery
shore
doctrine
res
judicata
judgment
merits
prior
suit
bars
second
suit
involving
parties
privies
based
cause
action
see
also
restatement
second
judgments
similarly
gm
sue
elwell
elsewhere
counterclaim
gm
asserted
michigan
see
id
comment
defendant
interposes
counterclaim
substance
plaintiff
far
counterclaim
concerned
plaintiff
substance
michigan
judgment
however
reach
beyond
controversy
control
proceedings
gm
brought
parties
asserting
claims
merits
michigan
considered
michigan
power
parties
basis
commanding
become
intervenors
elwellgm
dispute
see
martin
wilks
essentially
michigan
lacks
authority
control
courts
elsewhere
precluding
actions
brought
strangers
michigan
litigation
determining
witnesses
competent
testify
evidence
relevant
admissible
search
truth
see
restatement
second
conflict
laws
rev
forum
law
governs
witness
competence
grounds
excluding
evidence
cf
soci
nationale
industrielle
dist
southern
dist
iowa
foreign
blocking
statute
barring
disclosure
certain
information
es
deprive
american
power
order
party
subject
jurisdiction
produce
information
first
city
bank
ca
new
york
bank
may
refuse
produce
records
german
branch
even
though
might
subject
bank
civil
liability
german
law
district
recognized
michigan
decree
operate
elwell
preclude
volunteering
testimony
see
app
pet
cert
michigan
entering
injunction
elwell
gm
stipulated
dictate
another
jurisdiction
evidence
relevant
bakers
controversy
michigan
inadmissible
conclusion
creates
general
exception
full
faith
credit
command
surely
permit
state
refuse
honor
sister
state
judgment
based
forum
choice
law
policy
preferences
rather
simply
recognize
mechanisms
enforcing
judgment
travel
judgment
purposes
full
faith
credit
see
mcelmoyle
ex
rel
bailey
cohen
pet
see
also
restatement
second
conflict
laws
one
state
judgment
automatically
transfer
title
land
another
state
see
fall
eastin
similarly
michigan
decree
determine
evidentiary
issues
lawsuit
brought
parties
subject
jurisdiction
michigan
cf
nixon
xceptions
demand
every
man
evidence
lightly
created
expansively
construed
derogation
search
language
consent
decree
informative
regard
excluding
georgia
action
ban
testimony
elwell
without
gm
permission
decree
provides
shall
operate
interfere
jurisdiction
georgia
elwell
general
motors
wayne
cty
order
dismissing
plaintiff
complaint
granting
permanent
injunction
app
emphasis
added
michigan
order
extended
georgia
case
interfer
ed
jurisdiction
georgia
michigan
ban
way
interfere
jurisdiction
courts
cases
similar
one
pending
georgia
line
recognition
interference
potential
consent
decree
gm
provided
settlement
agreement
another
ordered
elwell
testify
testimony
way
render
vulnerable
suit
michigan
violation
injunction
agreement
see
eighth
circuit
regarded
settlement
agreement
provision
merely
concession
gm
courts
might
fail
extend
full
faith
credit
michigan
injunction
ibid
explained
however
michigan
power
reach
missouri
courtroom
displace
forum
determination
whether
admit
exclude
evidence
relevant
bakers
case
light
see
altruism
gm
agreement
institute
contempt
proceedings
elwell
michigan
giving
subpoenaed
testimony
elsewhere
rather
find
telling
gm
ruled
resort
entered
injunction
injunctions
ordinarily
enforced
enjoining
surrogate
tribunal
see
supra
sum
michigan
authority
shield
witness
another
jurisdiction
subpoena
power
case
involving
persons
causes
outside
michigan
governance
recognition
full
faith
credit
owed
dispositions
michigan
authority
order
michigan
decree
command
obedience
elsewhere
matter
michigan
lacks
authority
resolve
see
thomas
washington
gas
light
plurality
opinion
full
faith
credit
must
given
determination
state
tribunal
authority
make
parity
reasoning
full
faith
credit
need
given
determinations
power
reasons
stated
judgment
appeals
eighth
circuit
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
notes
judge
new
case
judge
conducted
hearing
preliminary
injunction
stage
presided
settlement
stage
entered
permanent
injunction
conflict
eighth
circuit
many
lower
courts
permitted
elwell
testify
nonprivileged
matters
see
addendum
brief
petitioners
citing
cases
predating
constitution
articles
confederation
contained
provision
order
full
faith
credit
shall
given
records
acts
judicial
proceedings
courts
magistrates
every
state
articles
confederation
art
iv
concise
history
full
faith
credit
see
jackson
full
faith
lawyer
clause
constitution
colum
rev
first
congress
enacted
original
full
faith
credit
statute
may
see
act
may
ch
stat
codified
amended
said
records
judicial
proceedings
authenticated
aforesaid
shall
faith
credit
given
every
within
law
usage
courts
state
whence
said
records
shall
although
text
statute
revised
since
command
full
faith
credit
judgments
remained
constant
res
judicata
term
traditionally
used
describe
two
discrete
effects
call
claim
preclusion
valid
final
adjudication
claim
precludes
second
action
claim
part
see
restatement
second
judgments
issue
preclusion
long
called
collateral
estoppel
issue
fact
law
actually
litigated
resolved
valid
final
judgment
binds
parties
subsequent
action
whether
different
claim
see
id
use
plain
english
terms
claim
issue
preclusion
lieu
res
judicata
collateral
estoppel
see
migra
warren
city
school
dist
bd
see
also
paulsen
sovern
public
policy
conflict
laws
colum
rev
noting
traditional
dubious
use
term
public
policy
obscure
assertion
forum
right
law
applied
controversy
forum
relationship
see
supra
wright
miller
cooper
federal
practice
procedure
although
second
state
need
directly
enforce
injunction
entered
another
state
may
often
required
honor
issue
preclusion
effects
first
congress
provided
interdistrict
registration
federal
judgments
recovery
money
property
upon
registration
judgment
shall
effect
judgment
district
district
registered
may
enforced
like
manner
similar
interstate
registration
procedure
effective
result
widespread
adoption
revised
uniform
enforcement
foreign
judgments
act
see
id
supp
table
listing
adoptions
district
columbia
held
impermissible
state
enjoin
party
proceeding
federal
see
donovan
dallas
yet
ruled
credit
due
state
injunction
barring
party
maintaining
litigation
another
state
see
ginsburg
judgments
search
full
faith
credit
rule
conflicting
judgments
harv
rev
see
also
reese
full
faith
credit
foreign
equity
decrees
iowa
rev
urging
although
yet
occasion
determine
issue
full
faith
credit
require
dismissal
action
whose
prosecution
enjoined
hold
otherwise
mean
effect
courts
one
state
control
goes
courts
another
state
courts
dealt
question
main
regarded
antisuit
injunctions
outside
full
faith
credit
ambit
see
id
see
also
id
current
state
law
permitting
antisuit
injunction
issue
compelling
deference
outside
rendering
state
may
reasonable
compromise
extreme
alternatives
general
rule
respect
antisuit
injunctions
running
state
courts
general
rule
denying
authority
issue
injunctions
directed
proceedings
gm
emphasizes
key
factor
warranting
injunction
elwell
inability
assure
testimony
might
give
steer
clear
knowledge
gained
protected
confidential
communications
see
brief
respondent
see
also
id
contending
elwell
testimony
pervasively
uncontrollably
leavened
general
motors
privileged
information
petitioners
assert
gm
dispute
however
point
elwell
testimony
bakers
action
gm
object
question
answer
grounds
product
trade
secrets
privilege
see
brief
petitioners
event
observed
issue
preclusion
invoked
one
participate
prior
adjudication
see
laboratories
university
foundation
hansberry
lee
thus
justice
kennedy
emphasizes
obvious
noting
michigan
judgment
preclusive
effect
bakers
parties
michigan
litigation
see
post
observation
misses
thrust
gm
argument
gm
readily
acknowledges
commonplace
rule
person
may
bound
judgment
personam
case
made
party
brief
respondent
gm
adds
michigan
decree
bind
bakers
binds
elwell
forcibly
gm
insists
bakers
object
binding
effect
gm
seeks
michigan
judgment
bakers
constitutionally
protected
interest
obtaining
testimony
particular
witness
see
id
party
injunction
elwell
holding
legal
obligations
violate
anyone
due
process
given
argument
clear
issue
preclusion
principles
standing
alone
resolve
controversy
gm
presents
justice
kennedy
inexplicably
reads
decision
sweeping
exception
full
faith
credit
based
solely
integrity
missouri
judicial
processes
post
michigan
judgment
entitled
full
faith
credit
endeavored
make
plain
impermissibly
interferes
missouri
control
litigation
brought
parties
michigan
thus
justice
kennedy
hypothetical
see
ibid
misses
mark
bakers
parties
michigan
proceedings
actually
litigated
privileged
character
elwell
testimony
bakers
course
precluded
relitigating
issue
missouri
see
cromwell
county
sac
etermination
question
directly
involved
one
action
conclusive
question
second
suit
parties
see
also
supra
kenneth
lee
baker
steven
robert
baker
next
friend
melissa
thomas
general
motorscorporation
writ
certiorari
appeals
eighth
circuit
january
justice
scalia
concurring
judgment
agree
enforcement
measures
travel
judgments
preclusive
effects
ante
long
established
judgment
state
enforced
state
execution
issued
within
mcelmoyle
ex
rel
bailey
cohen
pet
recite
principle
decide
case
general
motors
asked
district
missouri
enforce
michigan
injunction
missouri
obliged
enforce
michigan
injunction
preventing
elwell
presenting
testimony
obliged
enforce
holding
elwell
contempt
full
faith
credit
clause
make
judgments
domestic
judgments
intents
purposes
gave
general
validity
faith
credit
evidence
execution
issue
upon
judgments
without
new
suit
tribunals
thompson
whitman
wall
emphasis
added
quoting
story
conflict
laws
judgment
decree
one
state
sure
may
grounds
action
defense
one
clause
implementing
statute
establish
rule
evidence
rather
jurisdiction
make
record
judgment
rendered
due
notice
one
state
conclusive
evidence
courts
another
state
matter
adjudged
affect
jurisdiction
either
judgment
rendered
offered
evidence
judgments
recovered
one
state
union
proved
courts
another
government
whether
state
national
within
differ
judgments
recovered
foreign
country
respect
reexaminable
merits
impeachable
fraud
obtaining
rendered
jurisdiction
cause
judgment
general
motors
obtained
michigan
carry
another
state
efficacy
judgment
upon
property
persons
enforced
execution
give
force
judgment
another
state
must
made
judgment
executed
latter
laws
may
permit
lynde
lynde
quoting
mcelmoyle
supra
see
watts
waddle
pet
case
involving
suit
obtain
equity
decree
ordering
conveyance
land
duplicating
decree
already
issued
another
state
neither
full
faith
credit
clause
implementing
statute
requires
missouri
execute
injunction
issued
courts
michigan
concur
judgment
kenneth
lee
baker
steven
robert
baker
next
friend
melissa
thomas
general
motorscorporation
writ
certiorari
appeals
eighth
circuit
january
justice
kennedy
justices
thomas
join
concurring
judgment
concur
judgment
view
case
controlled
full
faith
credit
principles
render
majority
extended
analysis
unnecessary
due
respect
problematic
degree
separate
opinion
explains
approach
majority
course
correct
hold
judgment
presented
courts
second
state
may
denied
enforcement
based
upon
disagreement
laws
state
rendition
full
faith
credit
forbids
second
state
questioning
judgment
grounds
little
doubt
proposition
often
recognized
second
state
obligation
give
effect
another
state
judgments
even
law
underlying
judgments
contravenes
public
policy
second
state
see
estin
estin
sherrer
sherrer
magnolia
petroleum
hunt
williams
north
carolina
fauntleroy
lum
concern
majority
stated
principle
proceeds
disregard
announcing
two
broad
exceptions
first
majority
allow
courts
outside
issuing
state
decline
enforce
judgments
purport
ing
accomplish
official
act
within
exclusive
province
sister
state
ante
second
basic
rule
full
faith
credit
said
cover
injunctions
interfer
ing
litigation
ordering
state
authority
ante
exceptions
majority
recognizes
neither
consistent
rejection
public
policy
exception
full
faith
credit
accord
established
rules
implementing
full
faith
credit
clause
employed
resolve
case
furthermore
exceptions
full
faith
credit
potential
disrupting
judgments
give
us
considerable
pause
decisions
careful
foreclose
effect
types
injunctions
majority
place
outside
ambit
full
faith
credit
authorities
seem
disregarded
today
holding
example
majority
chooses
discuss
extent
courts
may
compel
conveyance
property
jurisdictions
subject
proven
quite
difficult
cases
uphold
actions
state
courts
affecting
land
outside
territorial
reach
robertson
howard
may
doubted
equity
one
state
proper
case
compel
defendant
convey
property
situated
another
state
see
also
carpenter
strange
muller
dows
massie
watts
cranch
see
generally
wright
miller
kane
federal
practice
procedure
pp
ed
restatement
second
conflict
laws
comment
reese
full
faith
credit
foreign
equity
decrees
iowa
rev
undertaken
today
announce
exception
denies
full
faith
credit
based
principle
prior
judgment
interferes
litigation
pending
another
jurisdiction
see
cole
cunningham
simon
southern
cf
baltimore
ohio
kepner
donovan
dallas
harlan
dissenting
see
generally
reese
supra
yet
occasion
determine
whether
practice
ignoring
antisuit
injunctions
consistent
full
faith
credit
general
matter
disagreement
among
state
courts
duty
recognize
decrees
enjoining
proceedings
courts
see
schopler
extraterritorial
recognition
propriety
counterinjunction
injunction
actions
courts
supp
subjects
fundamental
delicate
addressed
case
necessarily
requiring
discussion
even
caution
lest
announce
rules
sound
later
application
see
restatement
supra
comment
occasion
determine
whether
full
faith
credit
requires
state
enforce
valid
judgment
sister
state
orders
act
payment
money
enjoins
act
scoles
hay
conflict
laws
ed
noting
interstate
recognition
equity
decrees
divorce
decrees
decrees
ordering
payment
money
matter
uncertainty
might
required
hold
future
case
raises
issue
otherwise
valid
judgment
intrude
upon
essential
processes
courts
outside
issuing
state
certain
narrow
circumstances
need
announce
define
principle
even
qualification
full
faith
credit
required
judicial
processes
second
state
sought
controlled
procedural
institutional
aspects
discussion
provide
sufficient
guidance
exception
construed
light
precedents
majority
broad
review
matters
articulate
rationale
underlying
conclusions
absence
elaboration
unclear
particular
injunction
renders
undeserving
full
faith
credit
reliance
upon
unidentified
principles
justify
omitting
certain
types
injunctions
doctrine
application
leaves
decision
uneasy
tension
rejection
broad
public
policy
exception
full
faith
credit
following
example
illustrates
uncertainty
surrounding
majority
approach
suppose
bakers
anticipated
need
elwell
testimony
missouri
appeared
michigan
litigate
privileged
character
testimony
sought
elicit
assume
law
privilege
jurisdictions
elwell
gm
bakers
michigan
michigan
law
gave
injunction
preclusive
effect
bakers
relitigate
point
general
principles
issue
preclusion
control
perhaps
argument
made
majority
appears
say
integrity
missouri
judicial
processes
demands
rule
allowing
relitigation
issue
reasons
given
need
confront
interesting
question
event
rule
exception
full
faith
credit
requires
courts
provide
direct
enforcement
judgments
issued
also
requires
federal
courts
give
preclusive
effect
state
judgments
judg
ments
given
courts
state
judgments
emerged
kremer
chemical
constr
accord
parsons
steel
first
alabama
bank
marrese
american
academy
orthopaedic
surgeons
migra
warren
city
school
dist
bd
haring
prosise
allen
mccurry
full
faith
credit
local
doctrines
res
judicata
speaking
generally
become
part
national
jurisprudence
riley
new
york
trust
whether
injunction
enforceable
another
state
terms
courts
second
state
required
honor
issue
preclusive
effects
see
parsons
steel
supra
wright
miller
cooper
federal
practice
procedure
ii
case
us
course
bakers
neither
parties
earlier
litigation
subject
jurisdiction
michigan
courts
majority
pays
scant
attention
circumstance
becomes
critical
beginning
point
full
faith
credit
analysis
requires
determination
effect
judgment
courts
issuing
state
recent
full
faith
credit
cases
said
determining
force
effect
judgment
first
step
analysis
matsushita
elec
industrial
epstein
marrese
supra
haring
supra
see
also
kremer
supra
state
courts
give
preclusive
effect
prior
judgment
courts
accord
greater
efficacy
haring
supra
quoting
union
planters
bank
memphis
accord
marrese
con
clusion
issuing
state
give
prior
judgment
preclusive
effect
ends
inquiry
making
unnecessary
determine
existence
exceptions
full
faith
credit
decline
inquire
questions
inquiry
obviate
new
extensions
exceptions
full
faith
credit
see
haring
supra
honor
undoubted
principle
courts
need
give
prior
judgment
force
effect
issuing
state
gives
case
us
resolved
appeals
parties
arguments
seemed
embrace
assumption
michigan
apply
full
force
judgment
bakers
michigan
law
appear
support
assumption
simple
fact
bakers
parties
michigan
proceedings
nothing
indicates
michigan
make
novel
assertion
earlier
injunction
binds
bakers
party
subject
jurisdiction
collateral
estoppel
apply
michigan
law
parties
must
full
opportunity
litigate
issue
must
mutuality
estoppel
nummer
treasury
quoting
storey
meijer
cert
denied
although
trend
modern
law
abolish
requirement
mutuality
reaffirmed
commitment
doctrine
howell
vito
trucking
excavating
mutuality
estoppel
remains
law
jurisdiction
lichon
american
universal
ins
omitted
since
bakers
parties
michigan
proceedings
opportunity
litigate
issues
presented
appears
michigan
law
treat
bound
judgment
majority
cites
authority
contrary
makes
difference
judgment
question
injunction
michigan
twice
rejected
arguments
injunctions
preclusive
effect
later
litigation
relying
small
part
fact
persons
preclusion
asserted
parties
earlier
litigation
bacon
walden
defendant
party
prior
injunctive
suit
matter
law
affected
bound
decree
rendered
detroit
detroit
fact
defendant
way
party
record
sufficient
answer
contention
holding
circuit
judge
prior
injunctive
case
controlling
determination
present
opinion
appeals
suggests
michigan
issued
injunction
intended
bind
third
parties
litigation
question
however
trial
intended
particular
case
preclusive
effect
judgment
controlling
legal
principles
state
full
faith
credit
measures
effect
judgment
laws
rendering
state
including
authoritative
rulings
state
highest
questions
issue
preclusion
jurisdiction
third
parties
see
kremer
supra
matsushita
supra
fact
michigan
trial
courts
refused
reconsider
injunction
instead
required
litigants
return
trial
issued
first
place
sheds
little
light
substance
issue
preclusion
law
michigan
construing
state
law
must
determine
highest
state
decide
issue
see
king
order
commercial
travelers
amer
ica
commissioner
estate
bosch
case
moreover
michigan
trial
courts
declined
modify
injunction
appear
base
rulings
preclusion
law
relied
instead
michigan
rule
directs
parties
wishing
modify
injunction
present
arguments
entered
see
brief
respondent
rule
procedural
rule
based
comity
concerns
preclusion
rule
reflects
michigan
determination
within
state
michigan
respect
issuing
judicial
resources
best
preserved
allowing
issuing
determine
whether
injunction
apply
proceedings
procedural
rule
binding
courts
another
state
virtue
full
faith
credit
see
sun
oil
wortman
state
may
apply
procedural
rules
actions
litigated
courts
bakers
never
appeared
michigan
full
faith
credit
used
force
subject
michigan
jurisdiction
see
baker
baker
eccles
assume
party
resident
beyond
confines
state
required
come
within
borders
submit
personal
controversy
tribunals
upon
receiving
notice
suit
place
residence
futile
attempt
extend
authority
control
state
beyond
territory
michigan
law
burden
persuasion
rests
party
raising
preclusion
defense
see
detroit
qualls
finance
simms
light
doctrines
absence
contrary
authority
one
conclude
gm
carried
burden
showing
michigan
courts
bind
bakers
terms
earlier
injunction
prohibiting
elwell
testifying
result
come
surprise
unlikely
michigan
give
judgment
preclusive
effect
person
party
proceeding
entered
otherwise
subject
jurisdiction
issuing
see
kremer
previously
recognized
judicially
created
doctrine
collateral
estoppel
apply
party
earlier
decision
asserted
fair
opportunity
litigate
claim
issue
although
inconsistent
point
gm
disavows
desire
issue
preclude
bakers
claiming
party
injunction
elwell
see
brief
respondent
difficult
accept
assessing
preclusive
reach
judgment
look
practical
effect
martin
wilks
donovan
dallas
matter
prohibition
addressed
parties
rather
federal
oklahoma
packing
oklahoma
gas
elec
injunction
restraint
parties
formally
directed
state
immaterial
despite
disclaimer
gm
seeks
alter
course
suit
bakers
preventing
bakers
litigating
admissibility
elwell
testimony
furthermore
even
accept
gm
argument
bakers
essentially
irrelevant
dispute
gm
argument
flawed
terms
elwell
present
litigation
seek
relitigate
anything
witness
party
events
determining
threshold
matter
extent
michigan
law
gives
preclusive
effect
injunction
eliminates
need
decide
whether
full
faith
credit
applies
equitable
decrees
general
matter
extent
general
rules
full
faith
credit
subject
exceptions
michigan
law
seek
bind
bakers
injunction
suffices
resolve
case
reasons
concur
judgment
footnotes