alvarez
cook
county
state
attorney
smith
et
argued
october
decided
december
illinois
law
provides
forfeiture
movable
personal
property
used
facilitate
drug
crime
permits
police
seize
property
without
warrant
allows
state
keep
property
nearly
five
months
beginning
judicial
forfeiture
proceedings
respondents
six
individuals
cars
cash
seized
law
brought
federal
civil
rights
action
claiming
failure
state
provide
speedy
postseizure
hearing
violated
federal
due
process
clause
district
dismissed
case
based
circuit
precedent
appeal
seventh
circuit
departed
precedent
ruled
respondents
granted
certiorari
review
seventh
circuit
due
process
determination
oral
argument
learned
actual
property
disputes
parties
resolved
held
case
moot
constitution
permits
decide
legal
questions
context
actual
cases
controversies
art
iii
actual
controversy
must
exist
stages
review
complaint
filed
preiser
newkirk
longer
actual
controversy
regarding
ownership
possession
underlying
property
claim
damages
properly
certified
class
dispute
class
certification
case
fit
within
category
cases
capable
repetition
evading
review
abstract
dispute
law
remains
pp
judgment
vacated
moot
cases
normally
vacates
lower
judgment
clears
path
relitigation
issues
preserves
rights
parties
prejudicing
none
preliminary
decision
munsingwear
mootness
result
settlement
rather
happenstance
however
losing
party
forfeits
equitable
remedy
vacatur
bancorp
mortgage
bonner
mall
partnership
case
closely
resembles
mootness
happenstance
settlement
bancorp
party
seeking
review
caused
mootness
voluntarily
settling
issue
contested
throughout
litigation
believes
presence
federal
case
played
significant
role
termination
plaintiffs
forfeiture
proceedings
plaintiffs
forfeiture
cases
took
place
procedural
link
case
apparently
terminated
substantive
grounds
ordinary
course
knowledge
one
raised
procedural
question
issue
cases
therefore
concludes
follow
ordinary
practice
order
vacatur
pp
vacated
remanded
breyer
delivered
opinion
roberts
scalia
kennedy
thomas
ginsburg
alito
sotomayor
joined
stevens
joined
parts
ii
stevens
filed
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
anita
alvarez
cook
county
state
attorney
petitioner
chermane
smith
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
seventh
circuit
december
justice
breyer
delivered
opinion
granted
certiorari
case
determine
whether
illinois
law
provides
sufficiently
speedy
opportunity
individual
whose
car
cash
police
seized
without
warrant
contest
lawfulness
seizure
see
amdt
von
neumann
time
oral
argument
however
learned
underlying
property
disputes
ended
state
returned
cars
seized
individual
property
owners
either
forfeited
relevant
cash
accepted
final
state
return
consequently
find
case
moot
therefore
vacate
judgment
appeals
remand
case
instructions
dismiss
munsingwear
see
also
gressman
geller
shapiro
bishop
hartnett
practice
ed
illinois
law
provides
forfeiture
movable
personal
property
including
cars
cash
used
facilitate
drug
crime
comp
ch
west
permits
police
officer
seize
property
without
warrant
officer
probable
cause
believe
property
used
warrantless
seizure
reasonable
circumstances
officer
seized
property
without
warrant
relevant
law
enforcement
agency
must
notify
state
attorney
within
days
seizure
state
attorney
must
notify
property
owner
impending
forfeiture
within
days
owner
wishes
contest
forfeiture
state
attorney
must
begin
judicial
forfeiture
proceedings
within
yet
days
see
ch
thus
statute
gives
state
days
nearly
five
months
begin
judicial
forfeiture
proceedings
time
statute
permits
state
keep
car
cash
within
possession
november
six
individuals
respondents
plaintiffs
brought
federal
civil
rights
action
defendants
city
chicago
superintendent
chicago
police
department
cook
county
state
attorney
petitioner
shall
call
state
attorney
see
rev
stat
three
individuals
chermane
smith
edmanuel
perez
tyhesha
brunston
said
earlier
police
upon
arrests
seized
cars
without
warrant
see
complaint
app
smith
seizure
perez
seizure
mar
brunston
seizure
apr
plaintiffs
motion
class
certification
three
plaintiffs
michelle
waldo
kirk
yunker
tony
williams
said
earlier
police
upon
arrests
seized
cash
without
warrant
see
complaint
waldo
seizure
yunker
seizure
williams
seizure
july
plaintiffs
motion
class
certification
plaintiffs
added
police
department
still
custody
property
see
complaint
claimed
failure
state
provide
speedy
postseizure
hearing
violated
federal
due
process
clause
see
amdt
asked
certify
case
class
action
declare
due
process
right
prompt
postseizure
hearing
declare
hearing
must
take
place
within
days
seizure
enjoin
defendants
current
practice
keeping
property
custody
longer
time
without
judicial
determination
probable
cause
see
complaint
app
defendants
moved
dismiss
complaint
ground
seventh
circuit
precedent
made
clear
constitution
require
procedure
prior
actual
forfeiture
proceeding
jones
takaki
citing
von
neumann
supra
february
district
granted
motion
dismiss
also
denied
plaintiffs
motion
class
certification
plaintiffs
appealed
may
seventh
circuit
decided
appeal
plaintiffs
favor
smith
chicago
reconsidered
departed
earlier
precedent
held
procedures
set
illinois
statute
show
insufficient
concern
due
process
right
plaintiffs
added
given
length
time
result
seizure
property
opportunity
owner
contest
seizure
illinois
law
sort
mechanism
test
validity
retention
property
required
ibid
appeals
reversed
judgment
district
remanded
case
proceedings
mandate
issued
seven
weeks
thereafter
february
granted
certiorari
review
seventh
circuit
due
process
determination
appeals
recalled
mandate
parties
filed
briefs
recognized
case
might
moot
asked
parties
address
question
mootness
forthcoming
oral
argument
oral
argument
counsel
sides
confirmed
longer
dispute
ownership
possession
relevant
property
see
tr
oral
arg
state
attorney
plaintiffs
state
returned
cars
plaintiffs
smith
perez
brunston
see
two
plaintiffs
defaulted
apparently
conceding
state
keep
cash
ibid
final
plaintiff
state
attorney
agreed
plaintiff
keep
cash
issue
counsel
state
attorney
told
us
hose
cases
ii
constitution
permits
decide
legal
questions
context
actual
cases
controversies
art
iii
controversy
must
extant
stages
review
merely
time
complaint
filed
preiser
newkirk
quoting
steffel
thompson
case
longer
actual
controversy
parties
ownership
possession
underlying
property
state
attorney
argues
continuing
controversy
damages
concede
plaintiffs
filed
motion
district
seeking
damages
plaintiffs
filed
motion
seventh
circuit
issued
opinion
granted
certiorari
appeals
recalled
mandate
taking
case
away
district
district
respond
motion
thus
us
complaint
seeks
declaratory
injunctive
relief
damages
plaintiffs
point
sought
certification
class
class
might
well
contain
members
continue
dispute
ownership
seized
property
fact
beside
point
district
denied
plaintiffs
class
certification
motion
plaintiffs
appeal
denial
hence
disputes
relevant
six
plaintiffs
state
attorney
disputes
concerned
cars
cash
disputes
parole
geraghty
named
plaintiff
whose
claim
expires
may
continue
press
appeal
merits
class
properly
certified
parties
course
continue
dispute
lawfulness
state
hearing
procedures
dispute
longer
embedded
actual
controversy
plaintiffs
particular
legal
rights
rather
abstract
dispute
law
unlikely
affect
plaintiffs
affects
illinois
citizens
dispute
solely
meaning
law
abstracted
concrete
actual
threatened
harm
falls
outside
scope
constitutional
words
cases
controversies
see
lewis
continental
bank
north
carolina
rice
per
curiam
aetna
life
ins
haworth
mills
green
find
special
circumstance
might
warrant
continuing
hear
case
sometimes
heard
attacks
practices
longer
directly
affect
attacking
party
capable
repetition
evading
review
see
federal
election
wisconsin
right
life
southern
pacific
terminal
icc
yet
unlike
cases
nothing
suggests
individual
plaintiffs
likely
prove
subject
state
seizure
procedures
see
los
angeles
lyons
doctrine
applies
exceptional
situations
generally
named
plaintiff
make
reasonable
showing
subjected
alleged
illegality
defunis
odegaard
per
curiam
event
since
directly
affected
forfeiture
practices
might
bring
damages
actions
practices
evade
review
see
memphis
light
gas
water
div
craft
damages
claim
saves
case
mootness
consequently
case
moot
see
preiser
supra
mills
supra
iii
less
easy
say
whether
order
judgment
vacated
statute
enables
us
vacate
lower
judgment
case
becomes
moot
flexible
allowing
direct
entry
appropriate
judgment
decree
order
require
proceedings
may
circumstances
see
also
bancorp
mortgage
bonner
mall
partnership
applying
statute
normally
vacate
lower
judgment
moot
case
clears
path
future
relitigation
issues
parties
preserving
rights
parties
prejudicing
none
decision
preliminary
munsingwear
bancorp
however
described
circumstances
said
mootness
results
settlement
rather
losing
party
voluntarily
forfeited
legal
remedy
thereby
surrender
ed
claim
equitable
remedy
vacatur
plaintiffs
pointing
state
attorney
agreed
return
three
cars
cash
claim
respect
least
four
plaintiffs
case
falls
within
bancorp
settlement
exception
view
however
case
closely
resembles
mootness
happenstance
settlement
least
kind
settlement
considered
bancorp
bancorp
focused
upon
dispute
involved
legal
question
whether
bankruptcy
lawfully
confirm
debtor
chapter
reorganization
plan
plan
relied
upon
debtor
said
special
exception
called
new
value
exception
ordinary
creditor
priority
rules
parties
contested
legal
issue
bankruptcy
contested
appeal
bankruptcy
order
federal
district
contested
appeal
appeals
eventually
contested
case
pending
parties
settled
differences
bankruptcy
case
originated
including
differences
particular
contested
legal
point
ibid
agreed
upon
reorganization
plan
said
constitute
settlement
mooted
federal
case
ibid
recognizing
reorganization
plan
bankruptcy
judge
confirmed
case
amounted
settlement
mooted
case
vacate
lower
judgment
reason
leaving
lower
judgment
place
mootness
result
vagaries
circumstance
rather
party
seeking
review
caused
mootness
voluntary
action
emphasis
added
virtue
settlement
party
voluntarily
forfeited
legal
remedy
ordinary
processes
appeal
certiorari
hence
compared
mootness
caused
happenstance
considerations
equity
fairness
tilted
vacatur
applying
principles
case
us
conclude
terminations
fall
happenstance
side
line
six
individual
cases
proceeded
different
system
without
procedural
link
federal
case
us
knowledge
examined
docket
sheets
one
cases
raised
procedural
question
issue
rather
issues
six
cases
issues
solely
state
substantive
law
cars
cash
forfeitable
docket
sheets
suggest
six
state
cases
terminated
substantive
grounds
ordinary
course
state
proceedings
three
automobile
cases
state
voluntarily
dismissed
proceedings
returned
cars
months
seizures
long
enough
time
state
investigated
matters
determined
termination
related
criminal
proceedings
evidentiary
reasons
wish
claim
cars
see
dockets
people
chevrolet
impala
cook
county
il
brunston
car
returned
july
people
smith
cook
county
il
smith
car
returned
may
people
chevrolet
malibu
cook
county
il
perez
car
returned
remaining
contested
case
involving
cash
state
voluntarily
dismissed
proceedings
months
long
enough
time
state
weighed
evidence
found
compromise
settlement
appropriate
merits
see
docket
people
currency
cook
county
il
waldo
cash
returned
mar
disparate
dates
plaintiffs
forfeiture
proceedings
terminated
months
seizures
indicate
state
attorney
coordinate
resolution
plaintiffs
cases
either
plaintiffs
federal
civil
rights
case
cf
munsingwear
stating
lower
judgment
vacated
even
though
action
party
seeking
review
brought
mootness
action
commodity
decontrolled
executive
order
basically
unrelated
see
also
fleming
munsingwear
reasons
believe
presence
federal
case
played
significant
role
termination
separate
proceedings
conclusion
reinforced
fact
neither
party
although
aware
bancorp
suggested
contrary
oral
argument
indeed
parties
argued
mootness
oral
argument
fact
suggests
desire
avoid
review
case
played
role
producing
state
case
terminations
tr
oral
arg
presence
federal
case
played
role
causing
termination
state
cases
present
kind
voluntary
forfeit
ure
legal
remedy
led
bancorp
find
considerations
fairness
equity
tilted
vacatur
consequently
conclude
follow
ordinary
practice
thereby
clear
ing
path
future
relitigation
issues
munsingwear
thus
nothing
opinion
prevents
plaintiffs
bringing
claim
damages
based
conduct
alleged
complaint
therefore
vacate
judgment
appeals
remand
case
instructions
dismiss
ordered
anita
alvarez
cook
county
state
attorney
petitioner
chermane
smith
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
seventh
circuit
december
justice
stevens
concurring
part
dissenting
part
agree
case
moot
join
parts
ii
opinion
vacate
judgment
appeals
following
teaching
decision
bancorp
mortgage
bonner
mall
partnership
apply
general
rule
vacating
appellate
judgments
become
moot
parties
settled
bancorp
set
forth
basic
principles
determining
whether
vacate
case
become
moot
overriding
concern
equitable
beginning
disposed
moot
cases
manner
consonant
justice
view
nature
character
conditions
caused
case
become
moot
quoting
gesellschaft
turn
quoting
south
spring
hill
gold
mining
amador
medean
gold
mining
alteration
original
public
interest
must
considered
part
equitable
inquiry
bancorp
interest
generally
better
served
leaving
appellate
judgments
precedents
presumptively
correct
valuable
legal
community
whole
merely
property
private
litigants
quoting
izumi
seimitsu
kogyo
kabushiki
kaisha
philips
stevens
dissenting
hence
typically
vacate
judgment
party
seeking
review
frustrated
vagaries
circumstance
mootness
results
unilateral
action
party
prevailed
bancorp
typically
decline
vacate
party
seeking
relief
judgment
caused
mootness
voluntary
action
including
action
taken
good
faith
conjunction
opposing
party
even
respondent
agreed
settlement
caused
mootness
remains
petitioner
burden
party
seeking
relief
status
quo
appellate
judgment
demonstrate
merely
equivalent
responsibility
mootness
equitable
entitlement
extraordinary
remedy
vacatur
ootness
reason
settlement
justify
vacatur
judgment
review
view
misapplied
principles
sure
settlement
parties
case
might
distinguished
conventional
settlement
reached
parties
bancorp
evidence
suggest
petitioner
returned
respondents
property
prior
conclusion
review
purpose
expectation
manufacturing
mootness
nevertheless
petitioner
decision
return
automobiles
appears
legally
discretionary
compromise
settlement
reached
respondent
waldo
regarding
cash
ante
light
petitioner
purposive
voluntary
action
caused
mootness
along
failure
alert
us
relevant
facts
explain
vacatur
serve
public
interest
believe
failed
carry
burden
demonstrate
equitable
entitlement
extraordinary
remedy
vacatur
bancorp
third
option
disposing
case
dismissed
writ
certiorari
improvidently
granted
like
denying
petition
first
place
disposition
preserved
judgment
time
granted
certiorari
february
petitioner
already
resolved
underlying
property
disputes
five
six
named
respondents
see
ante
entirely
predictable
final
settlement
soon
follow
moreover
briefing
case
revealed
disagreement
basic
descriptive
questions
illinois
law
questions
passed
upon
compare
brief
petitioner
brief
respondents
course
way
knowing
district
applied
appeals
remand
order
left
great
discretion
fashion
appropriate
procedural
relief
help
parties
smith
city
chicago
become
clear
overhasty
deciding
review
case
improvidence
grant
provides
additional
reason
vacate
work
product
colleagues
appeals
respectfully
dissent
part
iii
opinion
judgment