zant
stephens
argued
february
decided
june
bifurcated
trial
georgia
state
jury
found
respondent
guilty
murder
imposed
death
penalty
sentencing
phase
trial
judge
instructed
jury
authorized
consider
evidence
received
guilt
phase
trial
well
facts
circumstances
presented
mitigation
aggravation
sentencing
proceeding
must
find
designate
writing
existence
one
specified
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
order
impose
death
penalty
jury
stated
writing
found
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
respondent
prior
conviction
capital
felony
substantial
history
serious
assaultive
criminal
convictions
murder
committed
escapee
respondent
appeal
pending
georgia
held
another
case
one
aggravating
circumstances
substantial
history
serious
assaultive
criminal
convictions
unconstitutionally
vague
respondent
case
georgia
held
two
aggravating
circumstances
adequately
supported
sentence
federal
district
denied
respondent
petition
habeas
corpus
appeals
held
respondent
death
penalty
invalid
response
certified
question
zant
stephens
georgia
explained
premises
view
failure
one
aggravating
circumstance
invalidate
death
sentence
otherwise
adequately
supported
aggravating
circumstances
georgia
law
finding
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
serves
limited
purpose
identifies
members
class
persons
convicted
murder
eligible
death
penalty
without
furnishing
guidance
jury
exercise
discretion
determining
whether
death
penalty
imposed
held
limited
function
served
jury
finding
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
render
georgia
statutory
scheme
invalid
holding
furman
georgia
georgia
scheme
jury
required
find
identify
writing
least
one
valid
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
individualized
determination
must
made
basis
defendant
character
circumstances
crime
state
reviews
record
every
death
penalty
proceeding
determine
whether
sentence
arbitrary
disproportionate
narrowing
function
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
properly
achieved
case
two
valid
aggravating
circumstances
upheld
georgia
two
findings
adequately
differentiate
case
objective
evenhanded
substantively
rational
way
many
georgia
murder
cases
death
penalty
may
imposed
moreover
georgia
reviewed
respondent
death
sentence
determine
whether
arbitrary
excessive
disproportionate
thus
georgia
capital
sentencing
statute
invalid
applied
pp
stromberg
california
require
respondent
death
sentence
vacated
stromberg
requires
general
guilty
verdict
set
aside
jury
instructed
rely
two
independent
grounds
one
grounds
insufficient
verdict
may
rested
exclusively
insufficient
ground
case
however
jury
merely
return
general
verdict
stating
found
least
one
aggravating
circumstance
instead
expressly
found
two
aggravating
circumstances
valid
legally
sufficient
support
death
penalty
second
rule
derived
stromberg
requiring
general
guilty
verdict
indictment
information
set
aside
rests
constitutional
unconstitutional
ground
applicable
suggestion
aggravating
circumstances
involved
conduct
protected
constitution
pp
respondent
death
sentence
impaired
asserted
ground
jury
instruction
regard
invalid
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
may
unduly
affected
jury
deliberations
although
aggravating
circumstance
struck
georgia
failed
provide
adequate
basis
distinguishing
murder
case
death
penalty
may
imposed
cases
penalty
may
imposed
underlying
evidence
respondent
history
serious
assaultive
criminal
convictions
fully
admissible
georgia
law
sentencing
phase
trial
pp
stevens
delivered
opinion
burger
blackmun
powell
joined
white
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
post
rehnquist
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
post
marshall
filed
dissenting
opinion
brennan
joined
post
georgia
response
certified
question
supplemental
briefs
filed
michael
bowers
attorney
general
georgia
william
hill
senior
assistant
attorney
general
robert
stubbs
ii
executive
assistant
attorney
general
marion
gordon
first
assistant
attorney
general
petitioner
james
bonner
jack
greenberg
james
nabrit
iii
joel
berger
john
charles
boger
deborah
fins
anthony
amsterdam
respondent
justice
stevens
delivered
opinion
question
presented
whether
respondent
death
penalty
must
vacated
one
three
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
found
jury
subsequently
held
invalid
georgia
although
two
aggravating
circumstances
specifically
upheld
answer
depends
function
jury
finding
aggravating
circumstance
georgia
capital
sentencing
statute
reasons
aggravating
circumstance
issue
particular
case
found
invalid
january
jury
bleckley
county
georgia
convicted
respondent
murder
roy
asbell
sentenced
death
evidence
received
guilt
phase
trial
included
confessions
testimony
number
witnesses
described
events
august
respondent
serving
sentences
several
burglary
convictions
also
awaiting
trial
escape
escaped
houston
county
jail
next
two
days
committed
two
auto
thefts
armed
robbery
several
burglaries
august
roy
asbell
interrupted
respondent
accomplice
course
burglarizing
home
asbell
son
twiggs
county
respondent
beat
asbell
robbed
aid
accomplice
drove
vehicle
short
distance
bleckley
county
killed
asbell
shooting
twice
ear
point
blank
range
sentencing
phase
trial
state
relied
evidence
adduced
guilt
phase
also
established
respondent
prior
criminal
record
included
convictions
two
counts
armed
robbery
five
counts
burglary
one
count
murder
respondent
testified
sorry
knew
deserved
punished
accomplice
actually
shot
asbell
pretty
high
drugs
state
requested
jury
impose
death
penalty
argued
evidence
established
aggravating
circumstances
identified
subparagraphs
georgia
capital
sentencing
statute
trial
judge
instructed
jury
law
georgia
every
person
found
guilty
murder
shall
punished
death
imprisonment
life
sentence
fixed
jury
trying
case
app
explained
jury
authorized
consider
evidence
received
trial
well
facts
circumstances
presented
extenuation
mitigation
aggravation
sentencing
proceeding
stated
may
consider
following
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
find
supported
evidence
one
offense
murder
committed
person
prior
record
conviction
capital
felony
offense
murder
committed
person
substantial
history
serious
assaultive
criminal
convictions
two
offense
murder
outrageously
wantonly
vile
horrible
inhuman
involved
torture
depravity
mind
aggravated
battery
victim
three
offense
murder
committed
person
escaped
lawful
custody
peace
officer
place
lawful
confinement
possible
statutory
circumstances
stated
writing
deliberations
sentencing
phase
case
writing
shall
send
jury
verdict
sentencing
fixes
punishment
death
electrocution
shall
designate
writing
signed
foreman
aggravating
circumstances
circumstance
found
proven
beyond
reasonable
doubt
unless
one
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
proven
beyond
reasonable
doubt
authorized
fix
punishment
death
direct
appeal
georgia
respondent
challenge
sufficiency
evidence
supporting
aggravating
circumstances
found
jury
argue
infirmity
statutory
definition
circumstances
appeal
pending
however
georgia
held
arnold
state
aggravating
circumstance
described
second
clause
substantial
history
serious
assaultive
criminal
convictions
unconstitutionally
vague
finding
made
jury
case
georgia
motion
considered
whether
impaired
respondent
death
sentence
concluded
two
aggravating
circumstances
adequately
supported
sentence
stephens
state
cert
denied
state
reaffirmed
conclusion
subsequent
appeal
denial
state
habeas
corpus
relief
stephens
hopper
cert
denied
federal
district
denied
petition
habeas
corpus
appeals
fifth
circuit
considered
two
constitutional
challenges
respondent
death
sentence
first
rejected
contention
jury
adequately
instructed
permitted
impose
life
imprisonment
rather
death
penalty
even
found
aggravating
circumstance
held
however
death
penalty
invalid
one
aggravating
circumstances
found
jury
later
held
unconstitutional
appeals
gave
two
reasons
conclusion
first
read
stromberg
california
requiring
jury
verdict
based
multiple
grounds
set
aside
reviewing
ascertain
whether
jury
relied
unconstitutional
ground
concluded
impossible
reviewing
determine
satisfactorily
verdict
case
decisively
affected
unconstitutional
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
jury
authority
return
life
sentence
even
found
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
possible
even
jurors
believed
aggravating
circumstances
established
recommended
death
penalty
decision
offense
committed
one
substantial
history
serious
assaultive
criminal
convictions
invalid
ground
petition
rehearing
state
pointed
evidence
respondent
prior
convictions
admissible
sentencing
hearing
even
relied
invalid
circumstance
appeals
modified
opinion
deleting
reference
possibility
jury
relied
inadmissible
evidence
maintained
however
reference
instructions
invalid
circumstance
may
unduly
directed
jury
attention
prior
convictions
ibid
concluded
determined
degree
certainty
required
capital
cases
instruction
make
critical
difference
jury
decision
impose
death
penalty
ibid
granted
warden
zant
petition
certiorari
briefs
merits
revealed
different
state
appellate
courts
reached
varying
conclusions
concerning
significance
invalidation
one
multiple
aggravating
circumstances
considered
jury
capital
case
although
georgia
consistently
stated
failure
one
aggravating
circumstance
invalidate
death
sentence
otherwise
adequately
supported
concluded
exposition
premises
view
assist
framing
precise
federal
constitutional
issues
presented
appeals
holding
therefore
sought
guidance
georgia
pursuant
georgia
statutory
certification
procedure
code
supp
zant
stephens
response
certified
question
georgia
first
distinguished
stromberg
case
jury
might
relied
exclusively
single
invalid
ground
noting
jury
case
expressly
relied
valid
sufficient
grounds
verdict
explained
premises
treatment
aggravating
circumstances
analogizing
entire
body
georgia
law
governing
homicides
pyramid
explained
cases
homicide
every
category
contained
within
pyramid
consequences
flowing
perpetrator
increase
severity
cases
proceed
base
apex
death
penalty
applying
cases
contained
space
beneath
apex
reach
category
case
must
pass
three
planes
division
base
apex
first
plane
division
base
separates
homicide
cases
fall
category
murder
plane
established
legislature
statutes
defining
terms
murder
voluntary
manslaughter
involuntary
manslaughter
justifiable
homicide
deciding
whether
given
case
falls
plane
function
trier
facts
limited
finding
facts
plane
remains
fixed
unless
moved
legislative
act
second
plane
separates
murder
cases
penalty
death
possible
punishment
plane
established
statutory
definitions
aggravating
circumstances
function
factfinder
limited
making
determination
whether
certain
facts
established
except
treason
aircraft
hijacking
given
case
may
move
second
plane
unless
least
one
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
exists
code
ann
third
plane
separates
cases
penalty
death
may
imposed
cases
shall
imposed
absolute
discretion
factfinder
place
given
case
plane
impose
death
plane
established
factfinder
establishing
plane
factfinder
considers
evidence
extenuation
mitigation
aggravation
punishment
code
ann
final
limitation
imposition
death
penalty
resting
automatic
appeal
procedure
determines
whether
penalty
death
imposed
influence
passion
prejudice
arbitrary
factor
whether
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
supported
evidence
whether
sentence
death
excessive
disproportionate
penalty
imposed
similar
cases
code
ann
performance
function
may
cause
remove
case
death
penalty
category
never
opposite
result
purpose
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
limit
large
degree
completely
factfinder
discretion
unless
least
one
ten
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
exists
death
penalty
may
imposed
event
exists
least
one
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
death
penalty
may
imposed
factfinder
discretion
decline
without
giving
reason
waters
state
hawes
state
fleming
state
making
decision
penalty
factfinder
takes
consideration
circumstances
sentence
phases
trial
circumstances
relate
offense
defendant
case
may
pass
second
plane
area
death
penalty
authorized
unless
least
one
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
found
however
plane
passed
regardless
number
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
found
long
least
one
beyond
plane
case
enters
area
factfinder
discretion
facts
circumstances
case
determine
terms
metaphor
whether
case
passes
third
plane
area
death
penalty
imposed
indebted
georgia
helpful
response
certified
question
response
makes
clear
must
confront
three
separate
issues
order
decide
case
first
limited
purpose
served
finding
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
georgia
allow
jury
measure
discretion
forbidden
furman
georgia
subsequent
cases
second
rule
stromberg
california
violated
third
case
even
though
respondent
prior
criminal
record
properly
admitted
possibility
reference
invalid
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
judge
instruction
affected
jury
deliberations
require
death
sentence
set
aside
discuss
issues
turn
georgia
unlike
jury
instructed
give
special
weight
aggravating
circumstance
consider
multiple
aggravating
circumstances
significant
single
circumstance
balance
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
pursuant
special
standard
thus
georgia
finding
aggravating
circumstance
play
role
guiding
sentencing
body
exercise
discretion
apart
function
narrowing
class
persons
convicted
murder
eligible
death
penalty
reason
respondent
argues
georgia
statutory
scheme
invalid
holding
furman
georgia
fair
statement
consensus
expressed
furman
discretion
afforded
sentencing
body
matter
grave
determination
whether
human
life
taken
spared
discretion
must
suitably
directed
limited
minimize
risk
wholly
arbitrary
capricious
action
gregg
georgia
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
thus
summarizing
central
mandate
furman
joint
opinion
gregg
set
forth
general
exposition
sentencing
procedures
satisfy
concerns
furman
expressly
stated
intend
suggest
procedures
permissible
furman
sentencing
system
constructed
along
general
lines
inevitably
satisfy
concerns
furman
distinct
system
must
examined
individual
basis
opinion
turned
specific
consideration
constitutionality
georgia
capital
sentencing
procedures
georgia
scheme
includes
two
important
features
joint
opinion
described
general
discussion
sentencing
procedures
guide
channel
exercise
discretion
georgia
bifurcated
procedure
see
statute
also
mandates
meaningful
appellate
review
every
death
sentence
see
statute
however
follow
model
penal
code
recommendation
jury
discretion
weighing
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
governed
specific
standards
see
instead
georgia
unambiguously
advised
us
aggravating
circumstance
merely
performs
function
narrowing
category
persons
convicted
murder
eligible
death
penalty
respondent
argues
mandate
furman
violated
scheme
permits
jury
exercise
unbridled
discretion
determining
whether
death
penalty
imposed
found
defendant
member
class
made
eligible
penalty
statute
argument
accepted
without
overruling
specific
holding
gregg
approved
georgia
capital
sentencing
statute
even
though
clearly
channel
jury
discretion
enunciating
specific
standards
guide
jury
consideration
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
approval
georgia
capital
sentencing
procedure
rested
primarily
two
features
scheme
jury
required
find
least
one
valid
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
identify
writing
state
reviewed
record
every
death
penalty
proceeding
determine
whether
sentence
arbitrary
disproportionate
elements
opinion
concluded
adequately
protected
wanton
freakish
imposition
death
penalty
conclusion
rested
course
fundamental
requirement
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
must
satisfy
constitutional
standard
derived
principles
furman
system
standards
vague
fail
adequately
channel
sentencing
decision
patterns
juries
result
pattern
arbitrary
capricious
sentencing
like
found
unconstitutional
furman
occur
avoid
constitutional
flaw
aggravating
circumstance
must
genuinely
narrow
class
persons
eligible
death
penalty
must
reasonably
justify
imposition
severe
sentence
defendant
compared
others
found
guilty
murder
thus
godfrey
georgia
struck
aggravating
circumstance
failed
narrow
class
persons
eligible
death
penalty
justice
stewart
opinion
plurality
concluded
aggravating
circumstance
described
subsection
georgia
statute
construed
georgia
failed
create
inherent
restraint
arbitrary
capricious
infliction
death
sentence
person
ordinary
sensibility
find
almost
every
murder
fit
stated
criteria
moreover
facts
case
distinguish
murder
murder
plurality
concluded
principled
way
distinguish
case
death
penalty
imposed
many
cases
indicate
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
play
constitutionally
necessary
function
stage
legislative
definition
circumscribe
class
persons
eligible
death
penalty
constitution
require
jury
ignore
possible
aggravating
factors
process
selecting
among
class
defendants
actually
sentenced
death
important
selection
stage
individualized
determination
basis
character
individual
circumstances
crime
see
eddings
oklahoma
lockett
ohio
plurality
opinion
roberts
harry
louisiana
gregg
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
jj
proffitt
florida
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
jj
woodson
north
carolina
plurality
opinion
georgia
scheme
provides
categorical
narrowing
definition
stage
individualized
determination
appellate
review
selection
stage
therefore
remain
convinced
structure
statute
constitutional
moreover
narrowing
function
properly
achieved
case
two
valid
aggravating
circumstances
upheld
georgia
respondent
escaped
lawful
confinement
prior
record
conviction
capital
felony
two
findings
adequately
differentiate
case
objective
evenhanded
substantively
rational
way
many
georgia
murder
cases
death
penalty
may
imposed
moreover
georgia
case
reviewed
death
sentence
determine
whether
arbitrary
excessive
disproportionate
thus
absence
legislative
standards
govern
jury
weighing
significance
either
aggravating
circumstances
render
georgia
capital
sentencing
statute
invalid
applied
case
ii
respondent
contends
rule
stromberg
california
subsequent
cases
invalidity
one
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
underlying
jury
sentencing
verdict
requires
entire
death
sentence
set
aside
order
evaluate
contention
necessary
identify
two
related
different
rules
source
stromberg
case
stromberg
member
communist
party
convicted
displaying
red
flag
violation
california
penal
code
california
statute
prohibited
display
sign
symbol
emblem
opposition
organized
government
invitation
stimulus
anarchistic
action
aid
seditious
propaganda
held
first
clause
statute
repugnant
federal
constitution
found
unnecessary
pass
validity
two
clauses
jury
guilty
verdict
might
rested
exclusively
conclusion
stromberg
violated
first
explained
verdict
appellant
general
one
specify
ground
upon
rested
three
purposes
set
forth
statute
jury
instructed
verdict
might
given
respect
one
independently
considered
impossible
say
clause
statute
conviction
obtained
one
clauses
state
held
separable
invalid
determined
upon
record
appellant
convicted
clause
first
clause
statute
invalid
upon
face
conviction
appellant
far
record
discloses
may
rested
upon
clause
exclusively
must
set
aside
second
rule
derived
stromberg
case
illustrated
thomas
collins
street
new
york
cases
made
clear
reasoning
stromberg
encompasses
situation
general
verdict
indictment
information
rested
constitutional
unconstitutional
ground
thomas
collins
labor
organizer
contempt
citation
predicated
upon
speech
expressing
general
invitation
group
nonunion
workers
held
constitutionally
protected
speech
upon
solicitation
single
individual
declined
consider
state
contention
judgment
sustained
basis
individual
solicitation
alone
record
showed
penalty
imposed
account
solicitations
judgment
therefore
must
affirmed
neither
similarly
street
record
indicated
petitioner
conviction
indictment
based
protected
words
well
arguably
unprotected
conduct
flag
burning
stated
unless
record
negates
possibility
conviction
based
alleged
violations
judgment
affirmed
unless
valid
opinion
street
explained
take
rationale
thomas
indictment
information
charges
commission
crime
virtue
defendant
done
constitutionally
protected
act
one
may
unprotected
guilty
verdict
ensues
without
elucidation
unacceptable
danger
trier
fact
regarded
two
acts
rested
conviction
together
see
comparable
hazard
indictment
information
several
counts
conviction
explicitly
declared
rest
findings
guilt
certain
counts
instances
positive
evidence
trier
fact
considered
count
merits
separately
others
ibid
omitted
stromberg
thomas
street
trial
courts
judgments
rested
part
fact
defendant
found
guilty
expressive
activity
protected
first
amendment
contrast
case
suggestion
aggravating
circumstances
involved
conduct
protected
first
amendment
provision
constitution
accordingly
even
stromberg
rules
may
sometimes
apply
sentencing
context
death
sentence
supported
least
one
valid
aggravating
circumstance
need
set
aside
second
stromberg
rule
simply
another
aggravating
circumstance
invalid
sense
insufficient
support
death
penalty
case
jury
finding
respondent
person
substantial
history
serious
assaultive
criminal
convictions
provide
sufficient
basis
imposing
death
sentence
raised
none
concerns
underlying
holdings
stromberg
thomas
street
treat
constitutionally
protected
conduct
aggravating
circumstance
iii
two
themes
reiterated
opinions
discussing
procedures
required
constitution
capital
sentencing
determinations
one
hand
general
comments
gregg
joint
opinion
indicated
chief
justice
explicitly
noted
lockett
ohio
plurality
opinion
perfect
procedure
deciding
cases
governmental
authority
used
impose
death
see
also
beck
alabama
hand
qualitative
difference
death
permissible
form
punishment
corresponding
difference
need
reliability
determination
death
appropriate
punishment
specific
case
woodson
north
carolina
vital
importance
defendant
community
decision
impose
death
sentence
appear
based
reason
rather
caprice
emotion
gardner
florida
thus
although
every
imperfection
deliberative
process
sufficient
even
capital
case
set
aside
judgment
severity
sentence
mandates
careful
scrutiny
review
colorable
claim
error
respondent
contends
death
sentence
impaired
judge
instructed
jury
regard
invalid
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
substantial
history
serious
assaultive
criminal
convictions
instructions
may
affected
jury
deliberations
analyzing
contention
essential
keep
mind
sense
aggravating
circumstance
invalid
invalid
authorizes
jury
draw
adverse
inferences
conduct
constitutionally
protected
georgia
example
sought
characterize
display
red
flag
cf
stromberg
california
expression
unpopular
political
views
cf
terminiello
chicago
request
trial
jury
cf
jackson
aggravating
circumstance
georgia
attached
aggravating
label
factors
constitutionally
impermissible
totally
irrelevant
sentencing
process
example
race
religion
political
affiliation
defendant
cf
herndon
lowry
conduct
actually
militate
favor
lesser
penalty
perhaps
defendant
mental
illness
cf
miller
florida
aggravating
circumstance
issue
case
invalid
reasons
due
process
law
require
jury
decision
impose
death
set
aside
invalid
aggravating
circumstance
found
jury
case
struck
arnold
georgia
concluded
fails
provide
adequate
basis
distinguishing
murder
case
death
penalty
may
imposed
cases
penalty
may
imposed
see
nn
supra
underlying
evidence
nevertheless
fully
admissible
sentencing
phase
noted
gregg
georgia
statute
provides
sentencing
hearing
judge
jury
shall
hear
additional
evidence
extenuation
mitigation
aggravation
punishment
including
record
prior
criminal
convictions
pleas
guilty
pleas
nolo
contendere
defendant
absence
prior
conviction
pleas
provided
however
evidence
aggravation
state
made
known
defendant
prior
trial
shall
admissible
code
emphasis
supplied
think
georgia
wisely
chosen
impose
unnecessary
restrictions
evidence
offered
hearing
approve
open
argument
long
evidence
introduced
arguments
made
presentence
hearing
prejudice
defendant
preferable
impose
restrictions
think
desirable
jury
much
information
possible
makes
sentencing
decision
thus
evidence
jury
might
relied
case
find
respondent
previously
convicted
substantial
number
serious
assaultive
offenses
concedes
properly
adduced
sentencing
hearing
fully
subject
explanation
defendant
cf
gardner
florida
supra
requiring
defendant
opportunity
rebut
evidence
state
theory
sentencing
proceeding
presnell
georgia
case
involves
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
invalidated
state
grounds
vagueness
whose
terms
plausibly
described
aspects
defendant
background
properly
jury
whose
accuracy
unchallenged
hence
erroneous
instruction
implicate
repeated
recognition
qualitative
difference
death
penalties
calls
greater
degree
reliability
death
sentence
imposed
lockett
ohio
opinion
burger
although
appeals
acknowledged
rehearing
evidence
admissible
expressed
concern
trial
instructions
may
unduly
directed
jury
attention
prior
conviction
assuming
instruction
induce
jury
place
greater
emphasis
upon
respondent
prior
criminal
record
otherwise
done
question
remains
whether
emphasis
violated
constitutional
right
answering
question
appropriate
compare
instruction
actually
given
see
supra
instruction
subject
unobjectionable
cf
henderson
kibbe
nothing
constitution
prohibits
trial
judge
instructing
jury
appropriate
take
account
defendant
prior
criminal
record
making
sentencing
determination
see
supra
even
though
defendant
prior
history
noncapital
convictions
provide
sufficient
justification
imposing
death
sentence
constitutional
infirmity
instruction
stating
substance
find
beyond
reasonable
doubt
defendant
person
previously
convicted
capital
felony
escaped
lawful
confinement
authorized
impose
death
sentence
deciding
whether
sentence
appropriate
may
consider
remainder
prior
criminal
record
effect
erroneous
instruction
may
jury
therefore
merely
consequence
statutory
label
aggravating
circumstance
label
arguably
might
caused
jury
give
somewhat
greater
weight
respondent
prior
criminal
record
otherwise
given
think
georgia
erred
conclusion
mere
fact
aggravating
circumstances
presented
improperly
designated
statutory
inconsequential
impact
jury
decision
regarding
death
penalty
instructions
see
supra
place
particular
emphasis
role
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
jury
ultimate
decision
instead
trial
instructed
jury
consider
evidence
received
throughout
trial
consider
facts
circumstances
presented
extinuation
sic
mitigation
aggravation
punishment
well
arguments
presented
state
defense
app
importantly
reasons
discussed
possible
impact
fairly
regarded
constitutional
defect
sentencing
process
decision
case
depends
part
existence
important
procedural
safeguard
mandatory
appellate
review
death
sentence
georgia
avoid
arbitrariness
assure
proportionality
accept
view
subsequent
invalidation
one
several
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
automatically
require
reversal
death
penalty
assured
death
sentence
set
aside
invalidation
aggravating
circumstance
makes
penalty
arbitrary
capricious
georgia
response
certified
question
expressly
stated
different
result
might
reached
case
evidence
submitted
support
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
otherwise
admissible
thereafter
circumstance
failed
ibid
noted
gregg
also
assured
death
sentence
vacated
excessive
substantially
disproportionate
penalties
imposed
similar
circumstances
finally
note
deciding
case
express
opinion
concerning
possible
significance
holding
particular
aggravating
circumstance
invalid
statutory
scheme
judge
jury
specifically
instructed
weigh
statutory
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
exercising
discretion
whether
impose
death
penalty
see
supra
discussed
see
supra
constitution
require
state
adopt
specific
standards
instructing
jury
consideration
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
georgia
adopted
system
georgia
sentencing
scheme
trial
judge
instructions
case
suggestion
made
presence
one
aggravating
circumstance
given
special
weight
whether
jury
concluded
respondent
prior
record
criminal
convictions
merited
label
substantial
label
assaultive
jury
plainly
entitled
consider
record
together
evidence
making
sentencing
determination
judgment
appeals
reversed
footnotes
cases
offenses
death
penalty
may
authorized
judge
shall
consider
shall
include
instructions
jury
consider
mitigating
circumstances
aggravating
circumstances
otherwise
authorized
law
following
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
may
supported
evidence
offense
murder
rape
armed
robbery
kidnapping
committed
person
prior
record
conviction
capital
felony
offense
murder
committed
person
substantial
history
serious
assaultive
criminal
convictions
offense
murder
rape
armed
robbery
kidnapping
outrageously
wantonly
vile
horrible
inhuman
involved
torture
depravity
mind
aggravated
battery
victim
offense
murder
committed
person
escaped
lawful
custody
peace
officer
place
lawful
confinement
instruction
sentencing
jury
app
quoted
full
opinion
zant
stephens
jury
made
following
special
findings
offense
murder
committed
person
prior
record
conviction
capital
felony
offense
murder
committed
person
substantial
history
serious
assaultive
criminal
convictions
offense
murder
committed
person
escaped
lawful
custody
peace
officer
place
lawful
confinement
app
thus
case
implicate
holding
godfrey
georgia
aggravating
circumstance
construed
georgia
unconstitutionally
broad
vague
defendant
arnold
sentenced
death
jury
found
aggravating
circumstance
appeal
contended
language
clause
provide
sufficiently
clear
objective
standards
necessary
control
jury
discretion
imposing
death
penalty
coley
state
furman
georgia
georgia
agreed
statutory
language
vague
nonspecific
applied
evenhandedly
jury
state
habeas
petition
respondent
unsuccessfully
challenged
aggravating
circumstance
prior
conviction
capital
felony
admittedly
conviction
time
trial
case
time
murder
georgia
interpreted
statute
code
referring
defendant
record
time
sentencing
accordingly
respondent
contention
rejected
respondent
renewed
challenge
aggravating
circumstance
federal
habeas
petition
appeals
correctly
recognized
authority
question
georgia
interpretation
state
law
contention
renewed
aspect
appeals
decision
us
code
see
infra
brief
respondent
brief
state
alabama
et
al
amici
curiae
cf
gregg
georgia
noting
cases
georgia
explicitly
relied
one
several
aggravating
circumstances
upheld
death
sentence
certified
following
question
premises
state
law
support
conclusion
death
sentence
case
impaired
invalidity
one
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
found
jury
see
williams
state
ark
state
irwin
state
moore
hopkinson
state
wyo
cases
state
set
aside
death
sentence
based
valid
invalid
aggravating
circumstances
respondent
advances
cases
support
contention
similar
result
required
however
examination
relevant
state
statutes
shows
must
jury
find
least
one
aggravating
circumstance
order
power
impose
death
sentence
addition
law
requires
jury
weigh
aggravating
circumstances
mitigating
circumstances
decides
whether
death
penalty
imposed
see
ark
stat
ann
stat
code
ann
wyo
stat
joint
opinion
specifically
described
georgia
scheme
terms
georgia
act
however
narrow
class
murderers
subject
capital
punishment
specifying
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
one
must
found
jury
exist
beyond
reasonable
doubt
death
sentence
ever
imposed
addition
jury
authorized
consider
appropriate
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
supp
jury
required
find
mitigating
circumstance
order
make
recommendation
mercy
binding
trial
see
supp
must
find
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
recommending
sentence
death
see
also
cf
opinion
white
concurring
judgment
jury
permitted
consider
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
must
find
identify
least
one
statutory
aggravating
factor
may
impose
penalty
death
way
jury
discretion
channeled
longer
jury
wantonly
freakishly
impose
death
sentence
always
circumscribed
legislative
guidelines
addition
review
function
georgia
affords
additional
assurance
concerns
prompted
decision
furman
present
significant
degree
georgia
procedure
applied
standards
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
address
concerns
voiced
several
opinions
furman
georgia
see
douglas
concurring
brennan
concurring
highly
implausible
worst
criminals
criminals
commit
worst
crimes
selected
punishment
stewart
concurring
people
convicted
rapes
murders
many
reprehensible
petitioners
among
capriciously
selected
random
handful
upon
sentence
death
fact
imposed
white
concurring
meaningful
basis
distinguishing
cases
imposed
many
cases
gregg
joint
opinion
recognized
need
legislative
criteria
limit
death
penalty
certain
crimes
decision
capital
punishment
may
appropriate
sanction
extreme
cases
expression
community
belief
certain
crimes
grievous
affront
humanity
adequate
response
may
penalty
death
opinion
also
noted
approval
efforts
legislatures
define
crimes
criminals
capital
punishment
probably
effective
deterrent
opinion
justice
white
concurring
judgment
gregg
asserted
time
aggravating
circumstance
requirement
applied
types
murders
death
penalty
may
imposed
become
narrowly
defined
limited
particularly
serious
death
penalty
peculiarly
appropriate
cf
roberts
harry
louisiana
state
may
consider
aggravating
circumstance
fact
murder
victim
peace
officer
performing
regular
duties
special
interest
affording
protection
public
servants
regularly
must
risk
lives
order
guard
safety
persons
property
conclusion
godfrey
analogous
georgia
holding
arnold
state
second
clause
aggravating
circumstance
issue
case
vague
nonspecific
applied
evenhandedly
jury
defendant
case
two
prior
convictions
sentenced
death
jury
solely
finding
substantial
history
serious
assaultive
criminal
convictions
concluded
words
substantial
history
highly
subjective
unconstitutional
see
supra
aggravating
circumstance
view
georgia
provide
principled
basis
distinguishing
arnold
case
many
murder
cases
death
penalty
imposed
statute
see
gregg
proffitt
florida
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
similarly
model
penal
code
draft
discussed
gregg
supra
sets
forth
lists
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
also
provides
sentencer
shall
take
account
facts
deems
relevant
ali
model
penal
code
prop
draft
state
course
free
decide
matter
state
law
limit
evidence
aggravating
factors
prosecution
may
offer
sentencing
hearing
number
permit
sentencer
consider
aggravating
circumstances
enumerated
statute
see
gillers
deciding
dies
rev
see
ark
stat
ann
cons
stat
see
gillers
supra
georgia
conducts
independent
review
propriety
sentence
even
defendant
specifically
raised
objections
trial
see
stephens
state
cert
denied
case
georgia
explained
performing
sentence
comparison
required
code
ann
uses
comparison
purposes
similar
cases
death
imposed
similar
cases
death
imposed
state
neither
conceded
unequivocally
denied
sentence
imposed
account
acts
nevertheless
state
maintains
invitation
sufficient
sustain
judgment
sentence
nothing
need
considered
support
situation
held
single
sentence
may
stand
even
one
counts
invalid
long
one
counts
valid
sentence
within
range
authorized
law
see
claassen
pinkerton
barenblatt
see
fair
state
lawful
evidence
tends
show
motive
defendant
lack
remorse
general
moral
character
predisposition
commit
crimes
admissible
aggravation
subject
notice
provisions
statute
purpose
code
ann
allow
defendant
examine
record
determine
convictions
fact
represented
counsel
defect
render
documents
inadmissible
phase
trial
herring
state
see
franklin
state
held
tucker
even
noncapital
sentencing
proceeding
sentence
must
set
aside
trial
relied
least
part
misinformation
constitutional
magnitude
prior
uncounseled
convictions
unconstitutionally
imposed
see
townsend
burke
reversing
sentence
imposed
uncounseled
defendant
based
extensively
materially
false
assumptions
concerning
defendant
prior
criminal
record
petitioner
acknowledges
invalid
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
supported
material
evidence
properly
jury
different
case
presented
brief
petitioner
supplemental
memorandum
petitioner
tr
oral
arg
need
decide
case
whether
death
sentence
impaired
circumstances
example
jury
finding
aggravating
circumstance
relied
materially
inaccurate
misleading
information
georgia
affirmance
case
direct
appeal
implicitly
approves
jury
instructions
accurate
reflection
state
law
moreover
instructions
entirely
consistent
explanation
georgia
statutory
scheme
given
georgia
response
certified
question
according
response
see
supra
nless
least
one
ten
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
exists
death
penalty
may
imposed
event
exists
least
one
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
death
penalty
may
imposed
factfinder
discretion
decline
without
giving
reason
making
decision
penalty
factfinder
takes
consideration
circumstances
sentence
phases
trial
precisely
trial
told
jury
arriving
determinations
regard
authorized
consider
evidence
received
throughout
trial
authorized
consider
facts
circumstances
presented
extinuation
sic
mitigation
aggravation
punishment
well
arguments
presented
state
defense
unless
one
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
proven
beyond
reasonable
doubt
authorized
fix
punishment
death
fix
punishment
death
electrocution
recite
exact
words
given
one
circumstances
found
proven
beyond
reasonable
doubt
recommend
life
imprisonment
necessary
recite
mitigating
aggravating
circumstances
may
find
simply
state
verdict
fix
punishment
life
prison
app
see
zant
stephens
see
supra
justice
white
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
claassen
defendant
criminal
case
found
guilty
counts
jury
instructed
verdict
general
one
one
sentence
imposed
writ
error
affirmed
conviction
sentence
saying
first
count
verdict
guilty
returned
upon
sufficient
support
judgment
sentence
question
sufficiency
counts
need
considered
similarly
barenblatt
defendant
convicted
five
counts
general
sentence
imposed
said
since
sentence
less
maximum
punishment
authorized
statute
conviction
one
count
judgment
must
upheld
conviction
upon
counts
sustainable
omitted
pinkerton
whitfield
ohio
abrams
evans
similar
holdings
therefore
clear
cases
claassen
barenblatt
stromberg
thomas
street
problem
jury
imposing
sentence
found
three
aggravating
circumstances
based
evidence
imposed
death
sentence
one
aggravating
circumstance
found
invalid
intervening
appeal
another
case
claim
stromberg
thomas
street
death
sentence
must
set
aside
agree
problem
since
evidence
supporting
invalid
aggravating
circumstances
properly
jury
however
suggests
evidence
inadmissible
federal
constitution
might
stromberg
thomas
street
problem
says
ante
jury
imposition
death
sentence
finding
one
aggravating
circumstance
also
precisely
imposition
single
sentence
imprisonment
guilty
verdicts
several
separate
counts
indictment
qualitatively
different
sentence
death
imposed
channeled
sentencing
procedure
omitted
thus
suggests
line
cases
may
applicable
sentencing
proceedings
capital
punishment
cases
fail
grasp
distinction
however
cases
sentencing
procedures
involved
claassen
barenblatt
one
sentence
several
counts
one
surer
sentence
rest
one
counts
cases
however
sustain
sentence
authorized
valid
counts
stromberg
thomas
street
invalidate
single
sentence
case
thus
may
view
problem
invalid
count
rested
constitutionally
inadmissible
evidence
since
jury
instructed
take
account
evidence
remain
question
whether
inadmissible
evidence
invalidates
sentence
perhaps
least
room
application
rule
case
seems
per
se
rule
stromberg
street
thomas
except
foregoing
join
opinion
judgment
well
justice
rehnquist
concurring
judgment
agreeing
judgment
write
separately
make
clear
understanding
application
eighth
fourteenth
amendments
capital
sentencing
procedures
used
case
agree
treatment
factual
procedural
background
case
characterization
question
presented
review
brief
must
decide
whether
procedure
georgia
imposed
death
sentence
comports
eight
fourteenth
amendments
whether
case
imposition
death
sentence
violates
rule
stromberg
california
whether
erroneous
presentation
jury
invalid
aggravating
circumstance
requires
vacating
death
sentence
imposed
jury
georgia
death
sentencing
procedure
comprehensively
detailed
statutes
state
decisions
georgia
courts
opinion
issued
georgia
response
questioned
certified
zant
stephens
jury
instructions
case
materials
reveal
two
separate
proceedings
necessary
imposition
death
sentence
georgia
first
stage
simply
traditional
criminal
trial
question
guilt
innocence
defendant
found
guilty
capital
offense
separate
sentencing
proceedings
conducted
second
proceeding
state
defendant
permitted
introduce
wide
range
evidence
extenuation
mitigation
aggravation
punishment
code
sentencing
body
directed
make
two
separate
decisions
first
decides
whether
number
specific
statutorily
defined
aggravating
circumstances
proved
beyond
reasonably
doubt
code
addition
jury
instructed
finds
one
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
make
judgment
whether
defendant
deserves
death
sentence
making
second
decision
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
found
sentence
considered
together
evidence
mitigation
aggravation
sentencer
however
instructed
formally
weigh
aggravating
circumstances
mitigating
circumstances
death
sentence
imposed
case
receives
conventional
appellate
consideration
expedited
direct
review
georgia
respondent
challenges
georgia
death
sentencing
system
violative
eight
amendment
grounds
fails
adequately
channel
discretion
sentencing
body
particular
respondent
urges
absence
instruction
sentence
must
balance
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
mitigating
circumstances
imposing
death
sentence
render
scheme
unconstitutional
reasoning
furman
georgia
respondent
claim
opinion
completely
foreclosed
precedents
except
minor
detail
georgia
current
system
identical
sentencing
procedure
held
constitutional
gregg
georgia
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
jj
white
concurring
judgment
joint
opinion
gregg
fully
recognized
georgia
scheme
direct
sentencing
body
statutory
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
weighed
formal
sense
evident
careful
description
georgia
scheme
treatment
model
penal
code
proposed
system
fact
sentencing
body
formally
instructed
weigh
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
specifically
noted
notwithstanding
lack
explicit
balancing
directive
joint
opinion
upheld
statutory
scheme
since
taken
whole
provided
sentencing
authority
sufficient
guidance
prevent
freakish
imposition
death
barred
furman
likewise
justice
white
concurrence
role
aggravating
circumstances
squarely
discussed
approved
accept
respondent
contention
sentencing
body
must
specifically
instructed
balance
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
mitigating
circumstances
require
rejecting
judgment
gregg
georgia
statute
provided
sentencing
body
adequate
guidance
permit
impose
death
ii
respondent
next
contends
stromberg
california
requires
death
sentence
set
aside
respondent
argument
rests
fact
one
three
aggravating
circumstances
specified
jury
case
later
found
invalid
decision
holding
statutory
definition
circumstance
impermissibly
vague
constitution
arnold
state
respondent
reasons
stromberg
establishes
rule
requiring
general
verdict
returned
factfinder
set
aside
based
even
part
upon
invalid
factor
supplemental
brief
respondent
according
respondent
one
aggravating
circumstances
found
jury
invalid
general
verdict
death
returned
jury
fails
stromberg
test
careful
examination
stromberg
cases
following
decision
role
aggravating
circumstances
jury
imposition
death
penalty
compels
rejection
respondent
claim
stromberg
presented
straightforward
case
defendant
convicted
violating
california
statute
prohibiting
display
red
flag
three
separate
purposes
trial
jury
instructed
defendant
convicted
acted
one
proscribed
purposes
returned
general
verdict
guilty
without
indicating
purpose
believed
motivated
defendant
concluded
first
clauses
statute
detailing
impermissible
purposes
unconstitutional
held
unnecessary
decide
validity
remaining
two
clauses
observed
prosecutor
emphatically
urged
upon
jury
convict
appellant
first
clause
alone
without
regard
clauses
concludes
impossible
say
clause
statute
conviction
obtained
given
complete
uncertainty
conviction
stand
see
also
williams
north
carolina
cramer
terminiello
chicago
yates
untied
course
jury
indicate
statutory
elements
supported
verdict
valid
stromberg
inapplicable
points
stromberg
doctrine
subsequently
extended
albeit
without
lengthy
analysis
street
new
york
vacated
conviction
based
indictment
casting
contempt
flag
statute
petitioner
convicted
criminalized
casting
contempt
upon
flag
words
act
information
filed
petitioner
alleged
violated
statute
burned
flag
shouted
derogatory
statement
likewise
state
introduced
evidence
bench
trial
petitioners
act
speech
concluded
petitioners
constitutional
rights
violated
punished
speech
thought
moreover
trial
judge
might
rested
finding
solely
petitioners
speech
presented
situation
similar
stromberg
addition
however
believed
record
case
unacceptable
danger
trier
fact
regarded
two
acts
intertwined
rested
conviction
together
short
element
crime
defined
included
constitutionally
projected
actions
alleges
argues
offer
proof
defendant
protected
conduct
satisfied
element
general
verdict
guilty
must
set
aside
even
state
also
alleged
proved
another
course
conduct
satisfied
element
stromberg
however
also
noted
record
indicates
jury
verdict
rest
intertwined
combination
protected
unprotected
conduct
instead
rested
sufficiently
unprotected
conduct
verdict
stand
neither
stromberg
line
case
street
provides
respondent
appreciable
support
agree
stromberg
rule
plainly
distinguished
since
jury
explicated
returned
two
concededly
valid
aggravation
circumstances
thereby
conclusively
negating
inference
rested
solely
invalid
circumstances
likewise
conclude
analysis
street
inapposite
helpful
explaining
case
discuss
separately
two
decision
made
sentencing
body
georgia
death
penalty
proceedings
initially
consider
applicability
street
jury
first
decision
finding
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
indicated
street
explicitly
stated
rule
regarding
treatment
aggravating
circumstance
inapplicable
indictment
information
several
counts
conviction
explicitly
declared
rest
finding
guilt
certain
counts
instances
positive
evidence
trier
fact
considered
count
merits
separately
others
omitted
exception
street
rule
extends
jury
determination
case
certain
specified
aggravating
circumstances
existed
jury
received
separate
instructions
several
aggravating
circumstances
returned
verdict
separately
listing
three
circumstances
fact
one
subsequently
proved
invalid
affect
validity
remaining
two
jury
findings
reversal
appeal
one
several
convictions
returned
separate
counts
affect
remaining
convictions
positive
evidence
stephens
jury
considered
aggravating
circumstance
merits
separately
others
ibid
street
provides
basis
questioning
jury
first
decision
supported
permitted
go
consider
whether
stephens
deserved
death
sentence
street
logic
even
less
applicable
georgia
death
jury
second
decision
namely
defendant
deserved
death
sentence
respondent
theory
jury
verdict
death
based
part
aggravating
circumstances
later
proved
invalid
according
respondent
must
thus
fall
rule
street
whatever
proper
application
elsewhere
street
rule
fairly
extended
sentencing
context
discussed
significant
difference
role
aggravating
circumstances
jury
decision
imposed
death
sentence
role
played
instructions
allegations
jury
determination
guilt
preclude
applying
street
sentencing
context
rule
relied
upon
respondent
developed
situation
factfinder
returns
verdict
guilty
specific
criminal
charge
returning
verdict
jury
decides
whether
defendant
committed
specific
set
defined
acts
particular
mental
state
elements
necessary
verdict
guilty
specifically
carefully
enumerated
defined
indictment
information
instructions
jury
evidence
relevant
particular
elements
alleged
state
admissible
even
subject
exclusion
prejudicial
evidence
might
distract
jury
specific
factfinding
task
performs
based
evidence
jury
decides
whether
elements
constituting
offense
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
observation
williams
new
york
accurately
captures
character
procedure
leading
criminal
conviction
trial
verdict
issue
whether
defendant
guilty
engaged
certain
criminal
conduct
specifically
accused
rules
evidence
fashioned
criminal
trials
narrowly
confin
ing
trial
contest
decision
georgia
death
jury
final
stage
deliberations
impose
death
significantly
different
decision
model
described
wide
range
evidence
admissible
literally
countless
subjects
long
recognized
determination
sentence
justice
generally
requires
taken
account
circumstances
offense
together
character
propensities
offender
gregg
emphasis
added
considering
evidence
jury
attempt
decide
whether
particular
elements
proved
instead
makes
unique
individualized
judgment
regarding
punishment
particular
person
deserves
see
lockett
ohio
role
aggravating
circumstances
making
judgment
substantially
limited
role
played
jury
instructions
allegations
indictment
ordinary
trial
georgia
aggravating
circumstances
serve
principally
restrict
class
defendants
subject
death
sentence
single
aggravating
circumstances
specified
jury
considers
evidence
deciding
whether
impose
death
penalty
see
part
supra
aggravating
circumstance
latter
stage
simply
one
countless
considerations
weighed
jury
seeking
judge
punishment
appropriate
individual
defendant
aggravating
circumstance
revealed
invalid
probable
effect
fact
alone
jury
second
decision
whether
death
sentence
appropriate
minimal
one
theories
guilt
presented
jury
trial
judge
instructions
indictment
proves
invalid
substantial
risk
jury
may
based
verdict
improper
theory
follows
necessarily
limited
number
theories
presented
jury
fact
jury
decisionmaking
carefully
routed
along
paths
specifically
set
instructions
aggravating
circumstance
proves
invalid
however
effect
ordinarily
diminish
probative
value
one
literally
countless
factors
jury
considered
inference
diminution
alter
result
reached
jury
nonexistent
given
rule
developed
street
simply
applied
sensibly
sentencing
decisions
resulting
proceedings
involving
aggravating
circumstances
instead
developed
following
part
difference
analysis
applied
question
whether
set
aside
sentencing
decisions
based
part
upon
invalid
factors
iii
respondent
contends
next
even
street
inapplicable
erroneous
submission
jury
instruction
bound
regard
unconstitutionally
vague
see
supra
must
sufficient
effect
jury
deliberations
require
vacating
verdict
although
prior
decisions
completely
consistent
regarding
effect
constitutional
error
sentencing
proceedings
sentence
imposed
defendant
general
sentencing
decisions
accorded
far
greater
finality
convictions
ordinarily
sentence
within
statutory
limits
beyond
appellate
review
gore
street
cited
approval
several
long
line
sentencing
decisions
claassen
pinkerton
barenblatt
defendants
convicted
several
separate
counts
received
general
sentence
linked
one
combination
counts
defendants
challenged
conviction
writ
error
appeal
following
rule
stated
barenblatt
since
sentence
less
maximum
punishment
authorized
statute
conviction
one
count
judgment
must
upheld
conviction
upon
counts
sustainable
omitted
claassen
said
settled
law
country
generally
criminal
case
general
verdict
judgment
indictment
information
containing
several
counts
reversed
error
one
counts
good
warrants
judgment
absence
anything
record
show
contrary
presumption
law
awarded
sentence
good
count
practical
basis
rules
articulated
gore
claassen
line
cases
clear
indicated
sentencing
decisions
rest
inquiry
countless
facts
circumstances
type
proof
particular
elements
returning
conviction
fact
one
countless
considerations
sentencer
taken
account
erroneous
misleading
otherwise
improperly
ordinarily
assumed
necessary
basis
decision
nonetheless
limited
cases
non
capital
sentencing
decisions
vacated
resentencing
tucker
two
uncounseled
therefore
unconstitutionally
obtained
convictions
introduced
defendant
sentencing
proceeding
observed
sentencing
judge
gave
explicit
specific
attention
convictions
moreover
noted
defendant
appeared
dramatically
different
light
true
character
unconstitutional
convictions
known
judge
dealing
man
unconstitutionally
imprisoned
beginning
age
years
including
years
chain
gang
finally
reemphasized
unconstitutional
character
respondent
prior
convictions
opined
permit
sentence
stand
erode
rule
gideon
wainwright
given
respondent
sentence
held
improper
case
remanded
resentencing
similarly
townsend
burke
uncounseled
defendant
sentenced
following
proceeding
trial
judge
explicitly
repeatedly
relied
upon
incorrect
assumption
defendant
convicted
several
crimes
observed
duration
severity
sentence
renders
constitutionally
invalid
careless
designed
pronouncement
sentence
foundation
extensively
materially
false
prisoner
opportunity
correct
services
counsel
provide
renders
proceedings
lacking
due
process
approach
taken
tucker
townsend
claassen
line
cases
begins
presumption
since
sentencer
judgment
rested
countless
variables
error
made
one
portion
sentencing
proceeding
ordinarily
affect
sentence
presumption
plainly
revealed
claassen
line
cases
sentence
stand
even
turns
crimes
defendant
sentenced
committed
nonetheless
defendant
may
adduce
evidence
sentencing
body
likely
acted
differently
error
occurred
order
prevail
claim
however
required
convincing
showing
introduction
specific
constitutionally
infirm
evidence
ascertainable
dramatic
impact
sentencing
authority
see
tucker
supra
townsend
burke
supra
course
careful
application
standard
appropriate
capital
cases
present
case
however
erroneous
submission
jury
invalid
aggravating
circumstance
simply
satisfy
whatever
standard
may
plausibly
based
cases
discussed
points
real
impact
resulting
error
evidence
properly
jury
capable
fit
within
category
judge
instructions
labeled
aggravating
evidence
question
respondent
prior
convictions
plainly
aggravating
factor
held
gregg
jury
free
consider
fact
instruction
gave
added
weight
doubt
played
role
deliberations
jurors
yet
georgia
plainly
right
saying
mere
fact
aggravating
circumstances
presented
improperly
designated
statutory
inconsequential
impact
jury
decision
regarding
death
penalty
plurality
recognized
lockett
ohio
perfect
procedure
deciding
cases
governmental
authority
used
impose
death
whatever
defendant
must
show
set
aside
death
sentence
present
case
involved
remote
possibility
error
effect
jury
judgment
eighth
amendment
therefore
require
defendant
sentence
vacated
jurek
texas
approved
death
penalty
statute
providing
even
less
explicitly
type
weighing
respondent
claims
necessary
texas
persons
convicted
five
types
homicide
faced
second
proceeding
jury
required
answer
three
question
whether
defendant
acts
committed
deliberately
reasonable
expectation
result
death
whether
probability
defendant
commit
violent
acts
constituting
continuing
threat
society
whether
defendant
acts
response
sort
provocation
joint
opinion
recognized
sole
function
aggravating
circumstances
texas
system
narro
categories
murders
death
sentence
may
ever
imposed
since
aggravating
circumstance
considered
guilt
determination
phase
trial
sentencing
system
contain
requirement
jury
balance
circumstances
mitigating
circumstances
respondent
contends
constitutionally
required
case
assume
purpose
decision
arnold
correctly
decided
properly
applied
respondent
case
express
view
correctness
decision
application
points
street
properly
confirmed
situations
substantial
risk
jury
imposed
criminal
punishment
activity
protected
constitution
respondent
history
violent
conduct
invalid
aggravating
circumstance
based
plainly
falls
outside
category
street
therefore
inapplicable
case
justice
marshall
justice
brennan
joins
dissenting
even
accepted
prevailing
view
death
penalty
may
constitutionally
imposed
certain
circumstances
scarcely
join
upholding
death
sentence
based
part
upon
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
vague
application
turns
solely
whim
jury
arnold
state
submission
unconstitutional
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
jury
deemed
harmless
error
theory
georgia
finding
aggravating
circumstance
play
role
guiding
sentencing
body
exercise
discretion
apart
function
narrowing
class
persons
convicted
murder
eligible
death
penalty
ante
emphasis
added
trial
judge
instructions
apprised
jury
theory
might
proper
assume
unconstitutional
statutory
factor
affect
jury
verdict
instructions
suffered
even
fundamental
constitutional
defect
failure
provide
standards
whatsoever
guide
jury
actual
sentencing
decision
decisions
concerning
death
penalty
establish
anything
capital
sentencing
scheme
based
standardless
jury
discretion
violates
eighth
fourteenth
amendments
gregg
georgia
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
citing
furman
georgia
event
jury
sentenced
respondent
death
never
informed
threshold
theory
invented
first
time
georgia
seven
years
later
instruction
actually
given
juror
might
reasonably
concluded
construing
essentially
identical
instructions
aggravating
circumstances
including
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
balanced
mitigating
circumstances
determination
defendant
sentence
way
knowing
whether
jury
sentenced
respondent
death
attention
drawn
unconstitutional
statutory
factor
continue
adhere
view
death
penalty
circumstances
cruel
unusual
punishment
forbidden
eighth
fourteenth
amendments
see
gregg
georgia
supra
marshall
dissenting
furman
georgia
supra
marshall
concurring
ii
today
upholds
death
sentence
based
part
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
state
concedes
amorphous
invited
subjective
without
minimal
objective
guidelines
application
arnold
state
supra
order
reach
surprising
result
embraces
theory
infers
georgia
response
certified
question
function
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
georgia
screen
threshold
defendants
none
circumstances
applies
according
theory
statutory
factors
found
drop
picture
entirely
play
part
jury
decision
whether
sentence
defendant
death
relying
threshold
theory
concludes
submission
unconstitutional
statutory
factor
prejudice
respondent
jury
instructions
given
eight
years
ago
consistent
new
theory
assume
jury
focus
vague
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
making
actual
sentencing
decision
jury
instructed
instructions
constitutionally
defective
basic
reason
since
left
jury
totally
without
guidance
found
single
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
decision
furman
georgia
capital
sentencing
procedures
delegated
judges
juries
plenary
authority
decide
death
sentence
imposed
sentencer
given
practically
untrammeled
discretion
let
accused
live
insist
die
furman
georgia
supra
douglas
concurring
omitted
furman
held
system
capital
punishment
existence
country
incompatible
eighth
fourteenth
amendments
later
recognized
gregg
georgia
furman
established
one
basic
proposition
established
nothing
else
ultimate
punishment
death
issue
system
standardless
jury
discretion
violates
eighth
fourteenth
amendments
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
basic
teaching
furman
state
may
leave
decision
whether
defendant
lives
dies
unfettered
discretion
jury
since
scheme
pregnant
discrimination
douglas
concurring
inevitably
results
death
sentences
wantonly
freakishly
imposed
stewart
concurring
meaningful
basis
distinguishing
cases
death
penalty
imposed
many
cases
white
concurring
see
gregg
georgia
noting
furman
ruled
death
sentences
imposed
statutes
left
juries
untrammeled
discretion
impose
withhold
death
penalty
violated
eighth
fourteenth
amendments
four
years
furman
decided
upheld
capital
sentencing
statutes
georgia
florida
texas
constitutional
attack
concluding
statutes
contained
safeguards
promised
eliminate
constitutional
deficiencies
found
furman
see
gregg
georgia
proffitt
florida
jurek
texas
conclusion
based
premise
statutes
ensured
sentencers
given
guidance
regarding
factors
crime
defendant
state
representing
organized
society
deems
particularly
relevant
sentencing
decision
gregg
georgia
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
assumed
identification
specific
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
put
end
standardless
sentencing
discretion
procedures
require
jury
consider
circumstances
crime
criminal
recommends
sentence
longer
georgia
jury
furman
jury
reach
finding
defendant
guilt
without
guidance
direction
decide
whether
live
die
instead
jury
attention
directed
specific
circumstances
crime
committed
course
another
capital
felony
committed
money
committed
upon
peace
officer
judicial
officer
committed
particularly
heinous
way
manner
endangered
lives
many
persons
addition
jury
attention
focused
characteristics
person
committed
crime
record
prior
convictions
capital
offenses
special
facts
defendant
mitigate
imposing
capital
punishment
result
jury
discretion
still
exists
discretion
exercised
controlled
clear
objective
standards
produce
application
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
jj
emphasis
added
citation
omitted
today
learn
first
time
mean
said
gregg
georgia
learn
actual
decision
whether
defendant
lives
dies
may
still
left
unfettered
discretion
jury
although
assured
gregg
sentencing
discretion
exercised
clear
objective
standards
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
jj
told
state
need
nothing
whatsoever
guide
jury
ultimate
decision
whether
sentence
defendant
death
spare
life
today
decision
state
require
jury
make
threshold
finding
finding
made
jurors
left
completely
large
nothing
guide
whims
prejudices
need
even
consider
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
found
applicable
sentencing
decision
product
discretion
nothing
else
scheme
based
standardless
jury
discretion
gregg
georgia
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
jj
know
today
decision
makes
absolute
mockery
precedents
concerning
capital
sentencing
procedures
point
requiring
state
legislatures
identify
specific
aggravating
circumstances
sentencers
left
free
ignore
deciding
defendants
die
gregg
georgia
stands
may
well
permitted
reenact
statutes
books
furman
system
discretionary
sentencing
approves
today
differs
form
capital
sentencing
procedures
held
unconstitutional
decade
ago
difference
georgia
capital
sentencing
scheme
threshold
theory
embraces
today
unchecked
discretion
previously
conferred
cases
murder
conferred
cases
murder
one
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
merely
circumscribing
category
cases
eligible
death
penalty
remove
constitutional
scrutiny
procedure
actually
sentenced
death
selected
decade
ago
struck
ohio
statute
permitted
death
sentence
jury
found
victim
murder
police
officer
gave
jury
unbridled
discretion
aggravating
factor
found
duling
ohio
summarily
ohio
see
ohio
rev
code
ann
difference
consequence
ohio
scheme
held
impermissible
duling
threshold
scheme
endorses
today
duling
establishes
constitution
prohibits
state
defining
crime
murder
police
officer
leaving
decision
whether
impose
death
sentence
unchecked
discretion
jury
must
also
prohibit
state
defining
lesser
crime
murder
permitting
jury
make
standardless
sentencing
decision
found
single
aggravating
factor
victim
police
officer
cases
ultimate
decision
whether
defendant
killed
left
discretion
sentencer
unguided
legislative
standards
whether
particular
preliminary
finding
made
guilt
phase
trial
sentencing
phase
irrelevant
requirement
finding
made
sentencing
phase
way
channels
sentencer
discretion
finding
made
constitution
forbids
one
form
standardless
discretion
must
forbid
well
iii
event
jury
sentenced
respondent
death
never
apprised
threshold
theory
relied
upon
basis
assumption
ante
jury
attribute
special
significance
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
weigh
along
evidence
aggravation
evidence
offered
respondent
mitigation
first
place
everything
judge
charge
highlighted
importance
aggravating
circumstances
circumstances
submitted
jury
writing
also
jury
turn
required
write
every
aggravating
circumstance
found
established
beyond
reasonable
doubt
jury
instructions
provide
absolutely
indication
carefully
considering
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
submitted
trial
judge
jury
even
discard
list
officially
sanctioned
grounds
imposing
death
penalty
deciding
whether
actually
sentence
respondent
death
zant
stephens
marshall
dissenting
second
assertion
georgia
finding
aggravating
circumstance
play
role
guiding
sentencing
body
exercise
discretion
ante
flatly
inconsistent
previous
characterizations
function
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
georgia
scheme
gregg
georgia
jury
instructions
essentially
identical
given
joint
opinion
justices
stewart
powell
stevens
took
great
pains
point
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
served
apprise
sentencer
information
relevant
imposition
sentence
provid
standards
guide
use
information
slightest
hint
statutory
factors
relevant
threshold
determination
whether
defendant
eligible
receive
death
penalty
contrary
joint
opinion
emphasized
informed
sentencer
factors
state
deems
particularly
relevant
sentencing
decision
emphasis
added
thought
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
play
threshold
role
sentencing
process
made
sense
say
jury
verdict
identifying
one
circumstances
served
apprise
appellate
courts
factors
relied
upon
reaching
decision
emphasis
added
premise
threshold
theory
adopted
today
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
relied
upon
jury
reaching
ultimate
sentencing
decision
considered
deciding
whether
defendant
eligible
receive
death
penalty
assumption
respondent
jury
balance
aggravating
circumstances
mitigating
circumstances
also
inconsistent
characterization
almost
identical
instructions
given
coker
georgia
plurality
opinion
see
app
coker
georgia
pp
coker
case
jury
expressly
instructed
weigh
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
plurality
opinion
sensibly
recognized
weighing
inherent
determination
whether
mitigating
circumstances
warrant
life
sentence
notwithstanding
existence
aggravating
circumstances
jury
instructed
consider
aggravating
circumstances
whether
rape
committed
person
prior
record
conviction
capital
felony
whether
rape
committed
course
committing
another
capital
felony
namely
armed
robbery
allen
carver
also
instructed
pursuant
statute
even
aggravating
circumstances
present
death
penalty
need
imposed
jury
found
mitigating
circumstances
emphasis
added
recognized
respondent
jury
may
well
assumed
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
deserve
special
weight
injustice
today
decision
becomes
apparent
georgia
capital
sentencing
procedure
sentencer
always
discretion
impose
death
sentence
regardless
whether
proof
one
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
regardless
whether
mitigating
circumstances
simply
way
know
whether
jury
sentenced
respondent
death
unconstitutional
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
included
judge
charge
important
state
authorize
prosecution
request
submission
particular
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
jury
must
assume
cases
circumstance
decisive
jury
choice
life
sentence
death
sentence
gardner
florida
opinion
stevens
justice
stewart
pointed
similar
case
georgia
capital
punishment
scheme
trial
judge
jury
know
determine
upon
appellate
review
concluded
particular
aggravating
circumstance
considered
sentencing
defendant
death
drake
zant
dissenting
denial
certiorari
emphasis
added
although
labors
mightily
effort
demonstrate
submission
unconstitutional
statutory
aggravating
circumstance
affect
jury
verdict
escape
conclusion
reached
justice
powell
last
term
respondent
sentenced
death
instructions
misled
jury
zant
stephens
powell
dissenting
man
life
stake
inconvenient
fact
simply
swept
rug
read
opinion
deny
respondent
might
received
life
sentence
unconstitutional
aggravating
circumstance
submitted
jury
rather
assumes
instruction
induce
jury
place
greater
emphasis
upon
respondent
prior
criminal
record
otherwise
done
ante
concludes
however
submission
unconstitutional
statutory
factor
amount
constitutional
defect
sentencing
process
ante
jury
properly
instructed
decide
whether
either
two
statutory
factors
applied
told
addition
deciding
whether
death
sentence
appropriate
may
consider
remainder
defendant
prior
criminal
record
ante
finds
constitutional
difference
charge
charge
actually
given
even
assuming
proper
sustain
death
sentence
reference
hypothetical
instruction
might
given
errs
assuming
hypothetical
instruction
satisfy
constitution
elaborated
part
ii
decisions
establish
actual
determination
whether
defendant
shall
live
die
merely
threshold
decision
whether
eligible
death
sentence
must
guided
clear
objective
standards
focus
sentencer
attention
must
directed
specific
factors
whose
existence
nonexistence
determined
reasonable
certainty
since
hypothetical
instruction
fail
channel
sentencer
discretion
fashion
assumption
constitutional
unwarranted
iv
foregoing
reasons
vacate
respondent
death
sentence
although
asserts
georgia
unambiguously
advised
us
finding
one
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
merely
performs
function
narrowing
category
persons
convicted
murder
eligible
death
penalty
serves
function
ante
georgia
answer
certified
question
fact
far
clear
answer
threshold
passed
regardless
number
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
found
long
least
one
thereafter
sentencer
may
consider
facts
circumstances
case
say
aggravating
circumstances
statutory
nonstatutory
may
considered
one
statutory
circumstance
found
say
finding
aggravating
circumstance
play
role
guiding
sentencing
body
exercise
discretion
apart
function
narrowing
class
persons
convicted
murder
eligible
death
penalty
ante
emphasis
added
nothing
georgia
opinion
suggest
jurors
give
special
attention
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
throughout
deliberations
rather
simply
making
threshold
determination
whether
circumstances
apply
nonetheless
purposes
opinion
assume
majority
correctly
characterized
georgia
explanation
georgia
capital
sentencing
procedure
justice
brennan
two
members
furman
majority
concluded
death
penalty
circumstances
cruel
unusual
punishment
brennan
concurring
marshall
concurring
see
gregg
georgia
white
joined
burger
rehnquist
concurring
judgment
georgia
legislature
made
effort
identify
aggravating
factors
considers
necessary
relevant
question
whether
defendant
convicted
capital
murder
sentenced
death
emphasis
added
omitted
proffitt
florida
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
jj
sentencing
authority
florida
trial
judge
directed
weigh
eight
aggravating
factors
seven
mitigating
factors
determine
whether
death
penalty
shall
imposed
white
joined
burger
rehnquist
concurring
judgment
although
statutory
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
susceptible
mechanical
application
means
vague
overbroad
leave
discretion
sentencing
authority
unfettered
jurek
texas
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
jj
appears
texas
procedure
guides
focuses
jury
objective
consideration
particularized
circumstances
individual
offense
individual
offender
impose
sentence
death
white
joined
burger
rehnquist
concurring
judgment
texas
capital
punishment
statute
limits
imposition
death
penalty
narrowly
defined
group
brutal
crimes
aims
limiting
imposition
similar
offenses
occurring
similar
circumstances
remains
true
whether
aggravating
factor
satisfies
requirement
genuinely
narrow
class
persons
eligible
death
penalty
reasonably
justify
imposition
severe
sentence
defendant
compared
others
found
guilty
murder
ante
repeatedly
recognized
capital
sentencing
statute
satisfy
constitution
simply
requires
bifurcated
trial
permits
presentation
penalty
phase
evidence
concerning
circumstances
crime
defendant
background
history
factors
aggravation
mitigation
punishment
delgado
connecticut
summarily
see
gen
moore
illinois
see
rev
ch
scoleri
pennsylvania
summarily
see
stat
tit
although
creation
separate
sentencing
proceeding
permits
exclusion
guilt
phase
information
relevant
sentencing
might
prejudice
determination
guilt
merely
bifurcating
trial
obviously
nothing
guide
discretion
sentencer
see
gregg
georgia
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
mandatory
appellate
review
substitute
legislatively
defined
criteria
guide
jury
imposing
sentence
ante
although
appellate
review
may
serve
reduce
arbitrariness
caprice
sentencing
authority
required
specify
factors
relied
upon
reaching
decision
gregg
georgia
supra
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
jj
appellate
review
serve
function
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
play
threshold
role
appellate
therefore
means
ascertaining
factors
underlying
jury
ultimate
sentencing
decision
instructions
given
case
set
forth
opinion
last
term
certifying
question
georgia
see
zant
stephens
instructions
given
gregg
quoted
justice
white
opinion
concurring
judgment
case
see
although
justice
powell
stated
dissent
leave
georgia
decide
whether
authority
find
instruction
harmless
error
beyond
reasonable
doubt
per
curiam
opinion
rejected
approach
asked
georgia
clarify
premises
underlying
decision
sustain
respondent
death
sentence
georgia
asked
conduct
conduct
review
evidence
determine
whether
instruction
harmless
error
beyond
reasonable
doubt
even
hypothetical
instruction
permissible
follow
constitutional
defect
instructions
given
case
nothing
particularly
vague
phrase
prior
criminal
record
reasonably
clear
juror
ordinary
intelligence
defendant
prior
criminal
record
consists
past
convictions
contrast
common
ground
case
statutory
aggravating
circumstances
substantial
history
serious
assaultive
criminal
convictions
vague
two
juries
expected
agree
whether
particular
defendant
history
one
thing
bring
jury
attention
readily
identifiable
factor
defendant
prior
criminal
record
leave
jury
decide
weight
factor
receive
quite
another
thing
ask
jury
determine
applicability
statutory
factor
group
individuals
ordinary
intelligence
expected
apply
objective
way
issue
resolved
defendant
take
factor
account
imposing
sentence
instructions
invite
exercise
discretion
weight
given
statutory
factor
instruction
given
vice
requiring
arbitrary
determination
made
haphazard
way
jurors
asked
flip
coin
weigh
result
sentencing
decision
even
hypothetical
charge
cited
proper
charge
given
case
still
impermissible
injected
arbitrary
determination
sentencing
process