argued
october
decided
march
held
subsection
penalty
provision
simply
authorizes
enhanced
sentence
since
create
separate
crime
government
required
charge
fact
earlier
conviction
indictment
pp
indictment
must
set
forth
element
crime
charges
hamling
need
set
forth
factors
relevant
sentencing
offender
found
guilty
charged
crime
within
limits
see
mcmillan
pennsylvania
question
factors
normally
matter
congress
see
staples
pp
congress
intended
subsection
set
forth
sentencing
factor
reasonably
clear
number
considerations
subject
matter
typical
sentencing
factor
lower
courts
almost
uniformly
interpreted
statutes
authorize
higher
sentences
recidivists
setting
forth
sentencing
factors
creating
separate
crimes
addition
words
subject
subsection
beginning
subsection
otwithstanding
subsection
beginning
subsection
meaning
neither
obscure
pointless
subsection
interpreted
provide
additional
penalties
intended
set
forth
substantive
crimes
moreover
circumstances
subsection
adoption
support
reading
statutory
text
title
criminal
penalties
reentry
certain
deported
aliens
stat
emphasis
added
signals
provision
deals
penalties
substantive
crime
reinforced
legislative
history
speaks
creation
new
penalties
finally
interpreting
subsection
create
separate
offense
risks
unfairness
introduction
trial
evidence
defendant
prior
crimes
risks
significant
prejudice
see
spencer
texas
pp
additional
arguments
supporting
contrary
interpretationthat
magnitude
increase
maximum
authorized
sentence
shows
congressional
intent
create
separate
crime
statutory
language
added
petitioner
conviction
offers
courts
guidance
interpret
subsection
doctrine
constitutional
doubt
requires
interpret
subsection
setting
forth
separate
rejected
pp
sufficient
support
precedents
elsewhere
petitioner
claim
constitution
requires
congress
treat
recidivism
element
offense
irrespective
congress
contrary
intent
winship
mullaney
wilbur
patterson
new
york
specht
patterson
taken
together
yield
broad
proposition
sometimes
constitution
require
though
sometimes
require
state
treat
sentencing
factor
element
crime
offer
support
petitioner
position
legislature
decision
treat
recidivism
particular
sentencing
factor
rather
element
crime
exceed
constitutional
limits
legislature
power
define
elements
offense
mcmillan
pennsylvania
supra
distinguished
petitioner
additional
courts
tradition
treating
recidivism
element
related
crime
simply
adopt
rule
significant
increase
statutory
maximum
sentence
trigger
constitutional
elements
rejected
pp
expresses
view
whether
heightened
standard
proof
might
apply
sentencing
determinations
bearing
significantly
severity
sentence
cf
watts
per
curiam
affirmed
breyer
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
kennedy
thomas
joined
scalia
filed
dissenting
opinion
stevens
souter
ginsburg
joined
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
washington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
march
justice
breyer
delivered
opinion
subsection
defines
crime
forbids
alien
deported
return
without
special
permission
authorizes
prison
term
two
years
subsection
section
authorizes
prison
term
years
alien
described
subsection
initial
deportation
subsequent
conviction
commission
aggravated
felony
question
us
whether
latter
provision
defines
separate
crime
simply
authorizes
enhanced
penalty
former
constitutes
separate
crime
government
must
write
indictment
mentions
additional
element
namely
prior
aggravated
felony
conviction
latter
provision
simply
authorizes
enhanced
sentence
offender
also
earlier
conviction
indictment
need
mention
fact
fact
earlier
conviction
element
present
crime
conclude
subsection
penalty
provision
simply
authorizes
increase
sentence
recidivist
define
separate
crime
consequently
neither
statute
constitution
require
government
charge
factor
mentions
earlier
conviction
indictment
september
federal
grand
jury
returned
indictment
charging
petitioner
hugo
found
deported
without
permission
consent
attorney
general
violation
section
app
december
entered
plea
guilty
hearing
district
accepted
plea
admitted
deported
later
unlawfully
returned
earlier
deportation
taken
place
pursuant
three
earlier
convictions
aggravated
felonies
id
march
district
held
sentencing
hearing
pointed
indictment
must
set
forth
elements
crime
see
hamling
added
indictment
mentioned
earlier
aggravated
felony
convictions
argued
consequently
sentence
two
years
imprisonment
maximum
authorized
offender
without
earlier
conviction
district
rejected
argument
found
applicable
sentencing
guideline
range
months
see
sentencing
commission
guidelines
manual
ch
pt
sentencing
table
ussg
imposed
sentence
months
imprisonment
app
appeal
fifth
circuit
also
rejected
petitioner
argument
like
seven
cir
cuits
held
subsection
penalty
provision
simply
permits
sentencing
judge
impose
higher
sentence
unlawfully
returning
alien
also
record
prior
convictions
see
forbes
crawford
munozcerna
haggerty
valdez
cf
cole
reaching
result
respect
ninth
circuit
however
reached
opposite
conclusion
subsection
constitutes
separate
crime
granted
certiorari
resolve
difference
among
circuits
ii
indictment
must
set
forth
element
crime
charges
hamling
supra
need
set
forth
factors
relevant
sentencing
offender
found
guilty
charged
crime
within
limits
see
mcmillan
pennsylvania
question
factors
normally
matter
congress
see
staples
definition
criminal
offense
entrusted
legislature
case
federal
crimes
solely
creatures
statute
quoting
liparota
therefore
look
statute
us
ask
congress
intended
intend
factor
statute
mentions
prior
aggravated
felony
convic
tion
help
define
separate
crime
intend
presence
earlier
conviction
sentencing
factor
factor
sentencing
might
use
increase
punishment
answering
question
look
statute
language
structure
subject
matter
context
typically
help
courts
determine
statute
objectives
thereby
illuminate
text
see
wells
slip
garrett
directly
relevant
portions
statute
existed
time
petitioner
conviction
included
subsection
congress
enacted
subsection
congress
added
see
ed
enacted
june
stat
ed
reflecting
amendments
made
stat
print
portions
text
deported
alien
criminal
penalties
reentry
certain
deported
aliens
subject
subsection
section
alien
deported
thereafter
enters
time
found
without
attorney
general
consent
legal
equivalent
shall
fined
title
imprisoned
years
notwithstanding
subsection
section
case
alien
described
subsection
whose
deportation
subsequent
conviction
commission
certain
misdemeanors
felony
aggravated
felony
alien
shall
fined
title
imprisoned
years
whose
deportation
subsequent
conviction
commission
aggravated
felony
alien
shall
fined
title
imprisoned
years
although
statute
language
forces
close
reading
text
well
consideration
interpretive
circumstances
see
wells
supra
believe
answer
question
congress
intended
subsection
set
forth
sentencing
factor
separate
reasonably
clear
outset
note
relevant
statutory
subject
matter
recidivism
subject
commission
serious
typical
sentencing
factor
one
might
imagine
see
ussg
requiring
sentencing
judge
consider
offender
prior
record
every
case
instructing
commission
write
guidelines
increase
sentences
dramatically
serious
recidivists
armed
career
criminal
act
imposing
significantly
higher
sentence
violation
serious
recidivists
drug
distribution
sentencing
commission
sourcebook
federal
sentencing
statistics
year
ending
federal
cases
involved
offenders
substantial
criminal
records
criminal
history
categories
drug
cases
involved
offenders
prior
convictions
perhaps
reflecting
fact
lower
courts
almost
uniformly
interpreted
statutes
authorize
higher
sentences
recidivists
setting
forth
sentencing
factors
creating
new
crimes
least
conduct
absence
recidivism
independently
unlawful
mcgatha
arango
montoya
jackson
cadc
found
statute
clearly
makes
recidivism
offense
element
circumstances
cf
prior
felony
conviction
element
conduct
otherwise
unlawful
recidivism
subject
matter
mind
turn
statute
language
essence
subsection
says
alien
deported
reappears
without
appropriate
permission
shall
fined
imprisoned
years
subsection
says
alien
described
subsection
whose
deportation
subsequent
conviction
minor
major
crime
may
subject
much
longer
prison
term
statute
includes
words
subject
subsection
beginning
subsection
words
otwithstanding
subsection
beginning
subsection
congress
intended
set
forth
substantive
crimes
respect
define
lesser
included
offense
see
blockburger
words
dissent
believes
words
mean
substantive
crime
defined
subsection
inapplicable
alien
covered
subsection
post
hence
words
represent
effort
say
defendant
punished
substantive
crimes
words
say
congress
ever
knowledge
used
similar
words
anywhere
else
federal
criminal
code
purpose
see
aggravated
simple
assault
murder
manslaughter
bank
robbery
incidental
crimes
aggravated
simple
sexual
abuse
come
surprise
since
least
years
federal
courts
presumed
congress
intend
defendant
cumulatively
punished
two
crimes
one
crime
lesser
included
offense
see
whalen
blockburger
supra
however
congress
intended
subsection
provide
additional
penalties
mystery
disappears
words
subject
subsection
otwithstanding
subsection
neither
obscure
pointless
say
without
obscurity
crime
set
forth
defines
crime
sets
forth
penalty
subject
different
penalties
alien
also
felon
aggravated
felon
higher
maximum
penalties
may
apply
offender
violates
notwithstanding
fact
sets
forth
lesser
penalty
one
committed
substantive
crime
pointless
specify
punishments
punishment
apply
whenever
offender
commits
offense
manner
set
forth
moreover
circumstances
subsection
adoption
support
reading
statutory
text
examined
language
statute
congress
added
provision
issue
original
language
help
petitioner
statute
read
follows
amendment
underscored
deported
alien
criminal
penalties
reentry
certain
deported
aliens
subject
subsection
section
alien
deported
thereafter
enters
time
found
without
attorney
general
consent
legal
equivalent
shall
guilty
felony
upon
conviction
thereof
punished
imprisonment
two
years
fine
notwithstanding
subsection
section
case
alien
described
subsection
whose
deportation
subsequent
conviction
commission
felony
aggravated
felony
alien
shall
fined
title
imprisoned
years
whose
deportation
subsequent
conviction
commission
aggravated
felony
alien
shall
fined
title
imprisoned
years
thus
time
amendment
operative
language
subsection
ordinary
provision
said
alien
shall
guilty
felony
upon
conviction
thereof
punished
imprisonment
two
years
fine
amendment
subsection
way
contrast
referred
increased
punishment
felon
aggravated
felon
described
although
one
read
language
alien
described
subsection
standing
alone
importing
elements
new
offenses
defined
reading
seems
unusual
awkward
taken
context
reasons
given
linguistically
speaking
seems
likely
congress
simply
meant
describe
alien
words
statute
guilty
felony
defined
subsection
convict
ed
thereof
dissent
points
post
congress
later
struck
subsection
words
quoted
added
place
words
shall
fined
title
imprisoned
two
years
see
immigration
act
act
stat
amendment
one
series
act
uniformly
updated
simplified
phrasing
various
disparate
civil
criminal
penalty
provisions
immigration
naturalization
act
see
act
amending
amending
amending
amending
section
act
contained
amendment
titled
increase
fine
levels
authority
ins
collect
fines
relevant
subsection
simply
criminal
fine
levels
act
stat
although
amendment
effect
making
penalty
provision
subsection
remained
unchanged
since
parallel
counterparts
subsection
neither
amendment
language
legislative
history
act
suggests
housekeeping
measure
congress
intended
change
clarify
fundamental
relationship
two
subsections
also
note
title
statute
heading
section
tools
available
resolution
doubt
meaning
statute
trainmen
baltimore
ohio
see
also
ins
national
center
immigrants
rights
title
amendment
criminal
penalties
reentry
certain
deported
aliens
stat
emphasis
added
title
contains
word
penalties
often
certainly
always
see
post
signals
provision
deals
penalties
substantive
crime
instance
amendment
title
reflect
careless
mistaken
drafting
title
reinforced
legislative
history
speaks
creation
new
penalties
see
sess
cong
rec
original
bill
titled
bill
provide
additional
criminal
penalties
deported
aliens
reenter
purposes
cong
rec
analysis
referring
senate
bill
increasing
penalties
unlawful
reentry
id
remarks
law
increas
current
penalties
illegal
reentry
deportation
id
remarks
chiles
law
impose
stiff
penalties
deported
aliens
previously
convicted
drug
offenses
cong
rec
remarks
smith
corresponding
house
bill
creates
penalty
structure
history
knowledge
contains
language
indicates
congress
intended
create
new
substantive
crime
finally
contrary
substantive
criminal
unfairness
subsection
sets
forth
separate
crime
government
required
prove
jury
defendant
previously
deported
subsequent
conviction
commission
aggravated
felony
long
recognized
introduction
evidence
defendant
prior
crimes
risks
significant
prejudice
see
spencer
texas
evidence
prior
crimes
generally
recognized
potentiality
prejudice
even
defendant
stipulation
keep
name
details
previous
offense
jury
see
old
chief
slip
jurors
still
learn
indictment
judge
prosecutor
defendant
committed
aggravated
felony
said
last
term
question
evidence
nature
prior
offense
aggravated
serious
carries
risk
unfair
prejudice
defendant
id
slip
emphasis
added
like
several
lower
courts
believe
things
equal
congress
wanted
create
kind
unfairness
respect
facts
almost
never
contested
see
forbes
rumney
brewer
en
banc
jackson
government
virgin
islands
castillo
sum
believe
congress
intended
set
forth
sentencing
factor
subsection
separate
criminal
offense
must
also
consider
several
additional
arguments
might
made
contrary
interpretation
statute
first
one
might
try
derive
congressional
intent
establish
separate
crime
magnitude
increase
maximum
authorized
sentence
magnitude
change
congress
made
however
proves
little
maximum
well
within
range
set
forth
statutes
lower
courts
generally
interpreted
providing
sentencing
enhancements
compare
ed
distributing
less
kilograms
marijuana
maximum
years
distributing
kilograms
marijuana
years
distributing
less
grams
heroin
maximum
years
distributing
kilogram
heroin
maximum
life
imprisonment
distributing
grams
cocaine
years
prior
drug
felony
conviction
years
life
doubling
maximum
term
second
subsequent
violations
drug
importation
laws
using
carrying
explosive
device
commission
felony
maximum
years
subsequent
offense
maximum
years
sexual
abuse
children
maximum
life
second
offense
mandatory
life
trafficking
counterfeit
goods
maximum
years
subsequent
offense
maximum
years
congress
later
amended
statute
increasing
maximums
years
respectively
violent
crime
control
law
enforcement
act
stat
nothing
suggests
congress
intended
transform
statute
basic
nature
later
limits
close
range
suggested
statutes
regardless
second
petitioner
dissent
point
part
statutory
language
exist
petitioner
convicted
petitioner
example
points
congress
added
two
new
subsections
subsections
petitioner
says
created
new
substantive
crimes
see
antiterrorism
effective
death
penalty
act
stat
adding
subsection
illegal
immigration
reform
immigrant
responsibility
act
iirira
stat
adding
subsection
petitioner
dissent
also
refer
another
statutory
provision
congress
used
word
offense
refer
subsection
us
see
iirira
stat
laws
however
beside
point
declare
meaning
earlier
law
cf
federal
housing
administration
darlington
seek
clarify
earlier
enacted
general
term
cf
red
lion
broadcasting
depend
effectiveness
upon
clarification
change
meaning
earlier
statute
cf
seatrain
shipbuilding
shell
oil
reflect
direct
focus
congress
upon
meaning
earlier
enacted
provisions
cf
ibid
darlington
supra
consequently
find
forward
looking
legislative
mandate
guidance
direct
suggestion
courts
interpret
earlier
provisions
regardless
obvious
two
new
subsections
petitioner
points
create
new
crimes
mat
ter
express
view
adding
congress
leave
legal
question
issue
found
fact
congress
used
technical
offense
years
later
different
minor
statutory
provision
proves
least
offset
different
words
later
statute
suggest
greater
force
exact
opposite
namely
precise
interpretation
relation
subsection
subsection
adopt
see
iirira
stat
stating
new
definition
aggravated
felony
applies
subsection
violations
subsection
finally
petitioner
dissent
argue
doctrine
constitutional
doubt
requires
us
interpret
subsection
setting
forth
separate
crime
justice
holmes
said
long
ago
statute
must
construed
fairly
possible
avoid
conclusion
unconstitutional
also
grave
doubts
upon
score
state
jin
fuey
moy
citing
ex
rel
attorney
general
delaware
hudson
see
also
ashwander
tva
brandeis
concurring
canon
followed
respect
congress
assume
legislates
light
constitutional
limitations
rust
sullivan
see
also
ftc
american
tobacco
doctrine
seeks
part
minimize
disagreement
branches
preserving
congressional
enactments
might
otherwise
founder
constitutional
objections
designed
aggravate
friction
creating
power
precedent
statutes
foreign
congress
intended
simply
fear
constitutional
difficulty
upon
analysis
evaporate
thus
invoke
doctrine
must
believe
alternative
serious
likeli
hood
statute
held
unconstitutional
doctrine
serve
basic
democratic
function
maintaining
set
statutes
reflect
rather
distort
policy
choices
elected
representatives
made
similar
reasons
statute
must
genuinely
susceptible
two
constructions
complexities
unraveled
statutory
construction
avoids
constitutional
question
fair
one
unlike
dissent
believe
conditions
met
present
case
statutory
language
somewhat
complex
considering
matter
context
believe
interpretative
circumstances
point
significantly
one
direction
important
even
assume
petitioner
construction
statute
fairly
possible
jin
fuey
moy
supra
constitutional
questions
raises
requiring
discussion
simply
lead
us
doubt
gravely
congress
may
authorize
courts
impose
longer
sentences
upon
recidivists
commit
particular
crime
fact
unlike
dissent
gravely
doubt
statute
constitutionality
respect
crucial
point
constitutional
doubt
doctrine
apply
mechanically
whenever
arises
significant
constitutional
question
answer
obvious
precedent
makes
clear
need
apply
always
applied
doctrine
circumstances
similar
constitutional
question
lacking
obvious
answer
lead
majority
gravely
doubt
statute
constitutional
see
rust
declining
apply
doctrine
although
petitioner
constitutional
claims
without
force
id
blackmun
dissenting
monsanto
id
blackmun
dissenting
locke
id
stevens
dissenting
iii
invoking
several
precedents
petitioner
claims
constitution
requires
congress
treat
recidivism
element
congress
contrary
intent
moreover
petitioner
says
requirement
carries
three
subsidiary
requirements
constitution
mandates
respect
ordinary
legislatively
intended
elements
crimes
indictment
must
state
element
see
hamling
government
must
prove
element
jury
see
duncan
louisiana
government
must
prove
element
beyond
reasonable
doubt
see
patterson
new
york
find
sufficient
support
however
precedents
elsewhere
petitioner
claim
explicitly
held
constitution
due
process
clause
protects
accused
conviction
except
upon
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
every
fact
necessary
constitute
crime
charged
winship
winship
case
set
forth
proposition
constitutional
law
decide
case
said
constitution
entitles
juveniles
like
adults
benefit
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
respect
elements
crime
consider
whether
constitution
requires
government
treat
particular
fact
element
fact
necessary
constitute
crime
even
crimedefining
statute
mullaney
wilbur
provides
petitioner
stronger
support
struck
state
homicide
statute
state
presumed
homicides
committed
malice
punishable
life
imprisonment
unless
defendant
proved
acted
heat
passion
id
wrote
winship
limited
facts
constitute
crime
defined
state
law
state
undermine
many
interests
decision
sought
protect
redefining
elements
constitut
ed
different
crimes
characterizing
factors
bear
solely
extent
punishment
id
simultaneously
held
prosecution
must
establish
beyond
reasonable
doubt
nonexistence
heat
passion
fact
state
statutory
scheme
distinguished
homicide
punishable
life
sentence
homicide
punishable
maximum
years
id
read
literally
language
concede
suggests
congress
permit
judges
increase
sentence
light
recidivism
factor
set
forth
indictment
proved
jury
beyond
reasonable
doubt
later
case
patterson
new
york
supra
however
makes
absolutely
clear
reading
mullaney
wrong
patterson
pointed
state
mullaney
made
critical
absence
heat
passion
simply
potential
sentencing
factor
also
critical
part
definition
malice
aforethought
turn
part
statute
definition
homicide
crime
question
patterson
maine
defining
crime
said
malice
presumed
unless
rebutted
defendant
showing
heat
passion
id
found
circumstance
extremely
important
said
mullaney
considered
held
impermissible
shifting
burden
proof
respect
fact
state
deems
important
must
either
proved
presumed
emphasis
added
held
similar
permis
sible
respect
new
york
sentencing
factor
extreme
emotional
disturbance
id
factor
factor
state
statute
deemed
important
relation
crime
must
either
proved
presumed
id
upshot
mullaney
language
read
literally
suggests
constitution
requires
sentencing
factors
treated
elements
patterson
suggests
exact
opposite
namely
constitution
requires
scarcely
sentencing
factors
treated
way
cases
taken
together
significantly
help
petitioner
statute
involves
sentencing
prior
commission
aggravated
neither
presumed
present
need
proved
present
order
prove
commission
relevant
crime
see
defining
offense
elements
indeed
said
involves
one
frequently
found
factors
effects
specht
patterson
petitioner
cites
provide
significant
additional
help
specht
decided
patterson
indeed
winship
consider
kind
matter
issue
later
noted
colorado
defendant
specht
confronted
radically
different
situation
usual
sentencing
proceeding
mcmillan
pennsylvania
petitioner
might
read
cases
taken
together
broad
proposition
sometimes
constitution
require
though
sometimes
require
state
treat
sentencing
factor
element
see
help
petitioner
turn
case
upon
petitioner
must
primarily
rely
mcmillan
pennsylvania
supra
considered
pennsylvania
statute
set
forth
sentencing
visibly
possessing
firearm
presence
required
judge
impose
minimum
prison
term
five
years
held
constitution
require
state
treat
factor
element
crime
holding
said
state
link
ing
punishment
presence
absence
identified
fact
automatically
make
fact
element
quoting
patterson
new
york
supra
said
citing
patterson
state
legislature
definition
elements
offense
usually
dispositive
said
define
precisely
constitutional
limits
legislature
power
define
elements
offense
id
held
whatever
limits
might
state
exceeded
ibid
petitioner
must
therefore
concede
firearm
possession
respect
mandatory
minimum
sentence
violate
limits
must
argue
nonetheless
recidivism
respect
authorized
maximum
violate
limits
assessing
petitioner
claim
examined
mcmillan
determine
various
features
case
upon
conclusion
arguably
turned
mcmillan
pointed
statute
plainly
transgress
limits
expressly
set
patterson
id
defendant
unlike
mullaney
defendant
face
differential
sentencing
ranging
nominal
fine
mandatory
life
sentence
quoting
mullaney
statute
alte
maximum
penalty
crime
operates
solely
limit
sentencing
discretion
selecting
penalty
within
range
already
available
statute
creat
separate
offense
calling
separate
penalty
id
statute
gave
impression
tailored
permit
visible
possession
finding
tail
wags
dog
substantive
offense
contrary
simply
took
one
factor
always
considered
sentencing
courts
bear
punishment
dictated
precise
weight
given
factor
id
case
resembles
mcmillan
respect
factors
different
respect
third
factor
alte
maximum
penalty
crime
also
creates
wider
range
appropriate
punishments
statute
mcmillan
nonetheless
conclude
differences
change
constitutional
outcome
several
basic
reasons
first
sentencing
factor
issue
traditional
traditional
basis
sentencing
increasing
offender
sentence
see
parke
raley
recidivism
laws
long
tradition
country
dates
back
colonial
times
currently
effect
dept
justice
office
justice
programs
statutes
requiring
use
criminal
history
record
information
june
survey
ussg
requiring
sentencing
consider
defendant
prior
record
every
case
consistent
tradition
said
long
ago
state
need
allege
defendant
prior
conviction
indictment
information
alleges
elements
underlying
crime
even
though
conviction
necessary
bring
case
within
statute
graham
west
virginia
conclusion
followed
said
distinct
nature
issue
fact
recidivism
relate
commission
offense
goes
punishment
therefore
may
subsequently
decided
id
emphasis
added
deviated
view
see
oyler
boles
due
process
require
advance
notice
trial
substantive
offense
followed
accusation
defendant
habitual
offender
parke
supra
charge
recidivism
statute
state
separate
offense
goes
punishment
said
infra
congress
reflecting
tradition
never
knowledge
made
defendant
recidivism
element
offense
conduct
proscribed
otherwise
unlawful
see
jackson
cadc
ginsburg
referring
fact
federal
statutes
make
prior
criminal
convictions
elements
another
criminal
offense
proved
jury
although
precedents
foreclose
petitioner
claim
example
state
statute
issue
graham
oyler
provided
jury
determination
disputed
prior
convictions
hold
constitution
requires
recidivism
deemed
element
petitioner
offense
mark
abrupt
departure
longstanding
tradition
treating
recidivism
go
ing
punishment
graham
supra
second
major
difference
case
mcmillan
consists
circumstance
sentencing
factor
issue
prior
conviction
triggers
increase
maximum
permissive
sentence
sentencing
factor
issue
mcmillan
triggered
mandatory
minimum
sentence
yet
permissive
maximum
mandatory
systematically
normally
work
disadvantage
criminal
defendant
contrary
statutory
minimum
binds
sentencing
judge
statutory
maximum
mandatory
minimum
justice
stevens
dissenting
mcmillan
pointed
mandate
minimum
sentence
imprisonment
twice
severe
maximum
trial
judge
otherwise
imposed
mcmillan
supra
eliminate
sentencing
judge
discretion
entirety
see
authorizing
maximum
term
life
imprisonment
sexual
abuse
children
mandating
life
imprisonment
second
offense
produce
unfairly
disproportionate
impacts
certain
kinds
offenders
see
sentencing
commission
mandatory
minimum
penalties
federal
criminal
justice
system
discussing
tariff
cliff
effects
mandatory
minimums
sum
risk
unfairness
particular
defendant
less
may
well
greater
mandatory
minimum
sentence
rather
permissive
maximum
sentence
issue
although
mcmillan
pointed
difference
mandatory
minimums
higher
authorized
maximums
neither
rested
judgment
difference
rejected
analysis
dissent
contends
post
rather
mcmillan
said
petitioners
argument
case
superficial
appeal
sentencing
fact
exposed
greater
additional
punishment
emphasis
added
reasons
given
light
particular
sentencing
factor
issue
take
mcmillan
statement
mean
said
therefore
make
determinative
difference
third
statute
broad
permissive
sentencing
range
create
significantly
greater
unfairness
judges
parole
boards
typically
exercised
discretion
within
broad
statutory
ranges
see
supra
statutory
examples
national
institute
justice
sentencing
reform
survey
sentencing
laws
friedman
crime
punishment
american
history
history
indeterminate
sentencing
sentencing
guidelines
recently
sought
channel
discretion
using
sentencing
factors
one
claims
constitution
thereby
makes
elements
crime
finally
remaining
mcmillan
factors
support
conclusion
congress
constitutional
power
treat
feature
conviction
aggravated
sentencing
factor
particular
offense
illegal
entry
deportation
relevant
statutory
provisions
change
definition
crime
reason
mcmillan
think
congress
intended
evade
constitution
either
presuming
guilt
restructuring
elements
offense
cf
mcmillan
supra
reasons
find
mcmillan
case
holding
constitution
permits
legislature
require
longer
sentence
gun
possession
significant
support
proposition
constitution
forbids
legislature
authorize
longer
sentence
recidivism
petitioner
makes
two
basic
additional
arguments
response
points
calls
different
tradition
courts
treated
recidivism
element
related
crime
see
massey
singer
people
sickles
see
also
post
citing
authority
find
claim
convincing
however
tradition
uniform
see
spencer
texas
method
determining
prior
convictions
varies
jurisdictions
affording
jury
trial
issue
leaving
question
note
recidivist
procedures
rev
eight
recidivism
statutes
provide
determination
prior
convictions
judge
jury
appear
modern
compare
state
thorne
upholding
state
recidivism
law
federal
constitutional
challenge
state
furth
nowhere
knowledge
rested
upon
federal
constitutional
guarantee
see
massey
supra
applying
federal
law
noting
jury
determination
prior
offense
applied
unless
statute
designates
different
mode
procedure
petitioner
also
argues
essence
simply
adopt
rule
significant
increase
statutory
maximum
sentence
trigger
constitutional
elements
requirement
explained
believe
constitution
interpreted
mcmillan
earlier
cases
impose
requirement
add
rule
seem
anomalous
light
existing
case
law
permits
judge
rather
jury
determine
existence
factors
make
defendant
eligible
death
penalty
punishment
far
severe
faced
petitioner
see
walton
arizona
rejecting
capital
defendant
argument
every
finding
fact
underlying
death
sentence
must
made
jury
hildwin
florida
per
curiam
judge
may
impose
death
penalty
based
finding
aggravating
factor
factor
element
offense
determined
jury
spaziano
florida
also
find
difficult
reconcile
rule
precedent
holding
circumstances
recidivism
part
definition
offense
double
jeopardy
purposes
graham
reasons
reject
petitioner
constitutional
claim
recidivism
must
treated
element
offense
iv
mention
one
final
point
petitioner
makes
separate
subsidiary
standard
proof
claims
respect
sentencing
perhaps
admitted
recidivism
time
pleaded
guilty
therefore
find
difficult
show
standard
proof
made
difference
case
accordingly
express
view
whether
heightened
standard
proof
might
apply
sentencing
determinations
bear
significantly
severity
sentence
cf
watts
per
curiam
slip
acknowledging
resolving
divergence
opinion
among
circuits
proper
standard
determining
existence
relevant
conduct
lead
increase
sentence
judgment
appeals
affirmed
writ
certiorari
appeals
fifth
circuit
march
justice
scalia
justice
stevens
justice
souter
justice
ginsburg
join
dissenting
hugo
roman
illegally
reentered
convicted
aggravated
felony
subject
maximum
possible
sentence
years
imprisonment
see
convicted
felony
subject
maximum
two
years
see
today
holds
set
forth
separate
offense
conviction
prior
felony
merely
sentencing
enhancement
offense
set
forth
causes
confront
difficult
question
whether
constitution
requires
fact
substantially
increases
maximum
permissible
punishment
crime
treated
element
charged
indictment
found
beyond
reasonable
doubt
jury
said
far
obvious
answer
question
basis
prior
law
fact
answer
considerably
doubtful
prior
cases
bearing
upon
issue
however
confronted
criminal
statute
criminal
ruling
unambiguously
relieved
prosecution
burden
proving
critical
fact
jury
beyond
rea
sonable
doubt
mcmillan
pennsylvania
statute
provided
possess
ion
firearm
element
crime
shall
determined
sentencing
preponderance
evidence
id
quoting
cons
stat
winship
provided
determinations
criminal
action
juvenile
cases
based
preponderance
evidence
id
quoting
family
act
patterson
new
york
statute
provided
extreme
emotional
disturbance
affirmative
defense
id
quoting
penal
law
mckinney
mullaney
wilbur
maine
highest
held
murder
cases
malice
aforethought
presumed
negated
defendant
id
citing
state
lafferty
contrast
provisions
involved
cases
face
place
constitutional
issue
us
say
subsection
merely
sentencing
enhancement
text
statute
supports
indeed
demand
conclusion
subsection
separate
offense
includes
violation
described
subsection
adds
additional
element
prior
felony
conviction
therefore
reach
difficult
constitutional
issue
case
adopt
think
cases
require
reasonable
interpretation
avoids
problem
illegal
reentry
simpliciter
illegal
reentry
conviction
aggravated
felony
separate
criminal
offenses
prior
conviction
aggravated
felony
element
latter
offense
must
charged
indictment
since
petitioner
sentence
must
set
aside
statute
susceptible
two
constructions
one
grave
doubtful
constitutional
questions
arise
questions
avoided
duty
adopt
latter
ex
rel
attorney
general
delaware
hudson
supra
cardinal
principle
long
applied
beyond
debate
edward
debartolo
florida
gulf
coast
building
constr
trades
council
requires
merely
determination
serious
constitutional
doubt
determination
unconstitutionality
must
course
otherwise
rule
mea
duty
first
decide
statute
unconstitutional
proceed
hold
ruling
unnecessary
statute
susceptible
meaning
causes
repugnant
constitution
ex
rel
attorney
general
delaware
hudson
supra
contends
neither
two
conditions
application
rule
present
constitutional
question
doubtful
statute
susceptible
construction
avoid
shall
address
former
point
first
genuinely
doubtful
whether
constitution
permits
judge
rather
jury
determine
mere
preponderance
evidence
rather
beyond
reasonable
doubt
fact
increases
maximum
penalty
criminal
defendant
subject
clear
enough
prior
cases
resolving
questions
margins
one
winship
supra
invalidated
new
york
statute
burden
proof
juvenile
delinquency
proceeding
reduced
proof
preponderance
evidence
held
due
process
clause
protects
accused
conviction
except
upon
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
every
fact
necessary
constitute
crime
charged
protection
extends
juvenile
charged
act
constitute
crime
committed
adult
five
years
later
mullaney
wilbur
supra
unanimously
extended
winship
protections
determinations
went
defendant
guilt
innocence
simply
length
sentence
invalidated
maine
homicide
law
intentional
murders
presumed
committed
malice
aforethought
punishable
life
imprisonment
unless
defendant
rebut
presumption
proof
acted
heat
passion
case
conviction
reduced
manslaughter
maximum
sentence
years
acknowledged
maine
law
facts
intent
general
elements
crime
felonious
homicide
nstead
bore
appropriate
punishment
category
nonetheless
rejected
distinction
guilt
punishment
winship
said
limited
facts
constitute
crime
defined
state
law
state
undermine
many
interests
decision
sought
protect
without
effecting
substantive
change
law
necessary
redefine
elements
constitute
different
crimes
characterizing
factors
bear
solely
extent
punishment
id
patterson
new
york
cut
back
broader
implications
mullaney
although
case
contained
acknowledged
language
ha
understood
perhaps
construing
due
process
clause
require
prosecution
prove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
fact
affecting
degree
criminal
culpability
denied
intend
ed
farreaching
effect
accordingly
upheld
patterson
new
york
law
casting
upon
defendant
burden
proving
affirmative
defense
murder
influence
extreme
emotional
disturbance
reasonable
explanation
excuse
defense
reduce
crime
manslaughter
explained
roof
nonexistence
affirmative
defenses
never
constitutionally
required
state
need
prove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
every
fact
existence
nonexistence
willing
recognize
exculpatory
mitigating
circumstance
affecting
degree
culpability
severity
punishment
cautioned
however
decision
might
seem
permit
state
legislatures
reallocate
burdens
proof
labeling
affirmative
defenses
least
elements
crimes
defined
statutes
obviously
constitutional
limits
beyond
may
go
regard
finally
recently
mcmillan
pennsylvania
upheld
pennsylvania
mandatory
minimum
sentencing
act
prescribed
mandatory
minimum
sentence
five
years
upon
judge
finding
preponderance
evidence
defendant
visi
bly
possessed
firearm
commission
certain
enumerated
offenses
carried
maximum
sentences
five
years
observed
never
attempted
define
precisely
constitutional
limits
noted
patterson
extent
due
process
forbids
reallocation
reduction
burdens
proof
criminal
cases
explained
whatever
limits
pennsylvania
law
transgress
primarily
neither
alter
ed
maximum
penalty
crime
committed
create
separate
offense
calling
separate
penalty
operate
solely
limit
sentencing
discretion
selecting
penalty
within
range
already
available
without
special
finding
visible
possession
firearm
feebleness
contention
serious
constitutional
doubt
evidenced
degree
must
ignore
distort
analysis
mcmillan
described
opinion
emphasizedand
emphasized
increase
maximum
penalty
issue
beyond
specifically
acknowledged
outcome
might
different
statute
might
unconstitutional
maximum
sentence
affected
petitioners
claim
visible
possession
pennsylvania
statute
element
offenses
pennsylvania
effect
defined
new
set
upgraded
least
superficial
appeal
finding
visible
possession
exposed
greater
additional
punishment
cf
providing
separate
greater
punishment
bank
robberies
accomplished
dangerous
weapon
device
despite
us
believe
present
statute
alteration
maximum
permissible
acknowledges
major
difference
case
mcmillan
ante
favor
rather
statute
constitutionality
increase
minimum
sentence
rather
permissible
maximum
disadvantageous
defendant
ibid
certainly
arguable
position
argued
temerity
note
dissent
mcmillan
position
mcmillan
rejected
upon
converse
mcmillan
rested
judgment
addition
inverting
consequence
distinction
statutes
prescribe
minimum
sentence
increase
permissible
maximum
sentence
seeks
minimize
importance
distinction
characterizing
merely
one
five
factors
relied
mcmillan
asserting
four
factors
ante
fact
however
mcmillan
set
forth
test
selectively
recruits
factors
various
parts
discussion
first
factor
example
statute
plainly
transgress
limits
expressly
set
patterson
ante
quoting
mcmillan
viz
discar
presumption
innocence
relieve
prosecution
burden
proving
guilt
narrows
issue
one
rather
giving
clue
resolution
issue
factor
solving
constitutional
problem
us
observation
ex
post
facto
law
effect
unreasonable
search
seizure
second
fourth
part
fifth
factors
fact
subparts
crucial
third
factor
one
absent
since
culled
general
discussion
mcmillan
pennsylvania
statute
simply
limited
sentencing
judge
discretion
said
whereas
mullaney
state
imposed
differential
sentencing
ranging
nominal
fine
mandatory
life
sentence
second
factor
pennsylvania
law
neither
alter
ed
maximum
penalty
crime
committed
third
factor
create
separate
offense
calling
separate
penalty
fourth
factor
operate
solely
limit
sentencing
discretion
selecting
penalty
within
range
already
available
without
special
finding
visible
possession
firearm
third
factor
statute
gives
impression
tailored
permit
visible
possession
finding
tail
wags
dog
substantive
offense
part
fifth
factor
recruitment
factors
said
selective
omitted
example
mcmillan
statement
petitioners
contend
particular
factor
made
relevant
statute
historically
treated
legal
tradition
requiring
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
id
quoting
patterson
petitioner
make
assertion
present
shall
discuss
even
selective
harvesting
incorrect
assertion
factors
recites
ante
implication
except
third
exist
present
case
well
second
contrasted
consequence
fact
assumed
mullaney
extension
permissible
sentence
little
nominal
fine
much
mandatory
life
sentence
consequence
fact
issue
mcmillan
extension
permissible
sentence
merely
limit
ation
sentencing
discre
tion
selecting
penalty
within
range
already
available
present
case
resembles
mullaney
rather
mcmillan
regard
since
fact
issue
increases
permissible
sentence
tenfold
significant
part
fifth
factor
statute
mcmillan
precise
weight
given
statutory
factor
ante
quoting
mcmillan
likewise
point
difference
similarity
parsing
various
factors
really
beside
point
one
read
mcmillan
cases
especially
mullaney
whose
limits
adverted
patterson
never
precisely
described
without
entertaining
serious
doubt
whether
statute
interpreted
present
case
constitutional
one
read
mcmillan
latest
opinion
point
without
perceiving
determinative
element
validation
pennsylvania
statute
fact
merely
limited
sentencing
judge
discretion
within
range
penalty
already
available
rather
substantially
increasing
available
sentence
even
one
read
mcmillan
without
learning
open
argument
constitution
requires
fact
increase
available
sentence
treated
element
crime
argument
said
least
superficial
appeal
enough
must
added
fact
many
state
courts
concluded
prior
conviction
increases
maximum
punishment
must
treated
element
offense
either
state
constitutions
see
state
mcclay
tuttle
commonwealth
mass
prior
conviction
increasing
maximum
sentence
must
set
forth
indictment
state
furth
state
ex
rel
lockmiller
mayo
roberson
state
crim
app
matter
common
law
see
people
ex
rel
cosgriff
craig
people
mcdonald
state
smith
iowa
uniform
current
authority
fact
prior
convictions
taken
part
offense
instantly
charged
least
extent
aggravating
authorizing
increased
punishment
state
pennye
state
waterhouse
robbins
state
ark
state
eichler
iowa
end
credibly
argue
question
whether
fact
increases
maximum
permissible
punishment
must
found
jury
beyond
reasonable
doubt
easy
one
perhaps
stresses
stresses
repeatedly
limited
subject
matter
even
tries
utter
lack
logic
limit
rejection
fair
reading
mcmillan
recidivism
cases
reasons
given
says
light
particular
sentencing
factor
issue
take
mcmillan
statement
regarding
superficial
appeal
defendant
argument
factor
issue
increased
maximum
sentence
mean
said
therefore
make
determinative
difference
ante
emphasis
added
impossible
understand
mcmillan
mean
one
thing
later
case
recidivism
issue
something
else
later
case
sentencing
factor
issue
one
might
say
course
recidivism
exception
general
rule
set
forth
mcmillan
forthright
characterization
display
doubtful
constitutional
question
light
prior
case
law
event
rational
basis
making
recidivism
exception
view
recidivism
need
proved
jury
beyond
reasonable
doubt
view
shall
discuss
precisely
contrary
tradition
punishment
relies
conclusion
upon
opinion
graham
west
virginia
see
ante
quoting
graham
supra
see
also
ante
holding
graham
provides
support
position
upheld
due
process
double
jeopardy
objections
state
recidivism
law
defendant
prior
convictions
charged
tried
separate
proceeding
convicted
underlying
offense
notes
ante
prior
convictions
charged
indictment
underlying
offense
charged
information
defendant
tried
prior
convictions
impor
tantly
law
explicitly
preserved
right
jury
determination
recidivism
question
see
graham
supra
see
also
oyler
boles
true
however
basis
graham
holding
accepted
one
conclude
recidivism
need
tried
jury
found
beyond
reasonable
doubt
essence
graham
reasoning
recidivism
proceeding
defendant
held
answer
offense
since
recidivism
charge
punishment
ibid
quoting
mcdonald
massachusetts
basis
dispensing
protections
jury
trial
findings
beyond
reasonable
doubt
explicitly
rejected
mullaney
accorded
protections
facts
general
elements
crime
felonious
homicide
bore
appropriate
punishment
category
whatever
else
mullaney
stands
certainly
stands
proposition
graham
used
line
demarcation
double
jeopardy
due
process
purposes
matter
goes
punishment
line
demarcation
purposes
right
jury
trial
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
also
mcmillan
even
narrowing
mullaney
made
clear
mere
fact
certain
finding
goes
penalty
end
inquiry
certainly
correct
distinctive
treatment
recidivism
determinations
double
jeopardy
purposes
takes
explaining
takes
explaining
less
explanation
assuredly
apparently
suggests
recidivism
never
element
crime
much
less
violence
jurisprudence
traditional
practice
requiring
jury
finding
recidivism
beyond
reasonable
doubt
explain
graham
recidivism
exception
normal
double
jeopardy
rule
conviction
lesser
included
offense
bars
later
trial
greater
crime
double
jeopardy
law
based
upon
traditional
american
english
practice
see
dixon
wilson
practice
allowed
recidivism
charged
tried
separately
see
spencer
texas
graham
supra
mcdonald
supra
allowed
recidivism
determined
judge
likely
given
many
arguments
supporting
position
constitution
requires
recidivism
finding
case
made
jury
beyond
reasonable
doubt
endorse
position
necessarily
correct
indeed
defeat
whole
purpose
honor
practice
deciding
doubtful
constitutional
questions
unnecessarily
tried
need
basis
jurisprudence
date
answer
constitutional
question
clear
burden
hand
establish
constitutional
answer
shines
forth
clearly
cases
burden
simply
sustained
think
beyond
question
today
unnecessary
resolution
point
serious
doubt
whether
constitution
permits
defendant
sentencing
exposure
increased
tenfold
basis
fact
charged
tried
jury
found
beyond
reasonable
doubt
wishes
abandon
doctrine
constitutional
doubt
forthrightly
rather
declaring
certainty
point
clouded
doubt
ii
contends
doctrine
constitutional
doubt
also
inapplicable
fairly
sus
ceptible
construction
avoids
constitutional
construction
whereby
subsection
sets
forth
separate
criminal
offense
ante
begins
statutory
analysis
examining
text
demonstrating
subject
matter
statute
commission
serious
crimeis
typical
sentencing
factor
one
might
imagine
ante
eminently
demonstrable
sounds
powerfully
good
fact
proves
nothing
certainly
true
judge
whether
bound
federal
sentencing
guidelines
likely
sentence
nearer
maximum
permitted
offense
defendant
repeat
offender
said
many
perhaps
factors
used
define
aggravated
offenses
example
judges
typically
sentence
nearer
maximum
statute
allows
crime
conviction
committed
firearm
course
another
felony
way
suggests
armed
robbery
felony
murder
sentencing
enhancements
rather
separate
crimes
relevant
question
present
purposes
whether
prior
felony
conviction
typically
used
sentencing
factor
rather
whether
statutes
provide
higher
maximum
sentences
crimes
committed
convicted
felons
prior
conviction
typically
treated
mere
sentence
enhancement
rather
element
separate
offense
answer
question
latter
rule
common
law
practice
among
time
recent
study
aware
see
note
recidivist
procedures
rev
note
pleading
proof
prior
convictions
habitual
criminal
prosecutions
rev
common
law
fact
prior
convictions
charged
indictment
charging
underlying
crime
submitted
jury
determination
along
crime
see
spencer
texas
massey
singer
people
sickles
several
later
altered
procedure
providing
separate
proceeding
determination
prior
convictions
least
late
eight
retained
defendant
right
jury
determination
issue
see
note
recidivist
procedures
rev
supra
loss
explain
assertion
found
statute
clearly
makes
recidivism
offense
element
added
another
crime
ante
many
interesting
drags
red
herring
recidivism
parts
constitutional
doubt
part
statutory
interpretation
part
alike
discussed
logic
demonstrates
nature
charge
fact
typical
sentencing
factor
nothing
statute
means
discussed
earlier
text
reasoning
mcmillan
cases
mcmillan
distinguishes
provide
basis
saying
recidivism
exempt
clear
acknowledgment
taking
away
jury
facts
increase
maximum
sentence
constitutionally
questionable
one
wonders
state
courts
lower
federal
courts
supposed
today
terious
utterances
pursue
logic
conclude
ambiguous
statutes
adding
punishment
factors
accompanying
principal
offense
mere
enhancements
illogically
give
special
treatment
recidivism
deem
reasoning
mcmillan
superseded
cases
remain
open
doubtful
question
cases
except
involving
recidivism
whether
statutory
maximums
increased
without
benefit
jury
trial
whatever
else
one
may
say
today
opinion
doubt
brought
area
law
confusion
clarification
passing
red
herring
let
turn
statute
stood
petitioner
convicted
author
today
opinion
agreed
language
structure
enactment
subject
two
plausible
readings
one
recidivism
constitutes
separate
offense
forbes
opinion
coffin
joined
breyer
surely
enough
satisfy
requirement
expressed
justice
holmes
see
jin
fuey
moy
approved
ante
construction
fairly
possible
today
however
relegates
statutory
language
structure
merely
two
five
factors
help
courts
determine
statute
objectives
thereby
illuminate
text
ante
statutory
text
reads
relevant
part
follows
reentry
deported
alien
criminal
penalties
reentry
certain
deported
aliens
subject
subsection
section
alien
shall
fined
title
prisoned
years
notwithstanding
subsection
section
whose
deportation
subsequent
conviction
commission
three
misdemeanors
involving
drugs
crimes
person
felony
aggravated
felony
alien
shall
fined
title
imprisoned
years
whose
deportation
subsequent
conviction
commission
aggravated
felony
alien
shall
fined
title
imprisoned
years
one
struck
parallel
structure
subsections
neither
subsection
says
individual
describes
shall
guilty
felony
subsections
say
individuals
describe
shall
fined
title
imprisoned
years
suffices
define
substantive
offense
subsection
agree
hard
see
define
substantive
offense
paragraph
subsection
well
compare
example
subsection
entitled
unlawful
acts
subsection
entitled
penalties
opening
phrase
subsection
certainly
indicate
follows
merely
supplements
enhances
penalty
provision
subsection
follows
apply
notwithstanding
subsection
spite
without
prevention
obstruction
subsection
see
webster
new
international
dictionary
ed
next
phrase
case
alien
described
subsection
imports
reference
substantive
acts
attributed
hypo
thetical
alien
deportation
unauthorized
reentry
subsection
significantly
phrase
apply
subsection
alien
convicted
subsection
one
expect
provision
merely
increasing
penalty
certain
subsection
convictions
see
davis
noting
predicat
ing
punishment
upon
conviction
another
offense
one
common
indicia
provisions
instead
subsection
applies
alien
described
subsection
deported
reentered
illegally
finally
subsection
provision
applies
ubject
subsection
means
subsection
inapplicable
alien
covered
subsection
subsection
applies
notwithstanding
alien
otherwise
covered
subsection
relies
earlier
version
support
interpretation
statute
current
form
ante
agree
statutory
history
legitimate
tool
construction
statutory
history
support
rather
undermines
interpretation
earlier
version
contained
subsection
addition
setting
forth
penalties
subparts
subsection
contained
phrase
subparts
subsection
shall
guilty
felony
upon
conviction
thereof
formulation
course
easier
conclude
subsection
defines
crime
sets
forth
basic
penalty
subsection
sets
forth
merely
penalty
enhancements
additional
language
subsection
statute
connoted
elimination
additional
language
version
statute
issue
meant
achieve
see
stat
strongly
shall
guilty
felony
language
suggests
subsection
statute
contained
enhancements
strongly
otherwise
inexplicable
elimination
language
suggests
subsection
statute
meant
parallel
subsection
subsections
meant
set
forth
merely
penalties
also
offenses
considering
subject
matter
statutory
language
third
factor
considers
arriving
determination
statute
read
sentencing
enhancement
title
ment
added
subsection
criminal
penalties
reentry
certain
deported
aliens
see
stat
cited
ante
course
title
pertains
subsection
unlike
petitioner
convicted
parallel
preceding
subsection
even
disregarding
title
amendment
proves
nothing
criminal
penalties
reentry
might
normally
suggestive
enhancement
separate
offense
good
reason
believe
imports
suggestion
next
provision
enactment
adjusts
substantive
requirements
crime
aiding
abetting
unlawful
entry
alien
entitled
criminal
penalties
aiding
assisting
certain
aliens
enter
see
stat
evidently
new
substantive
offenses
penalized
simply
entitled
criminal
penalties
relevant
offense
moreover
amendment
kept
original
title
reentry
deported
alien
intact
leaving
apply
subsection
subsection
see
supra
stat
fourth
factor
leading
conclude
statute
reasonably
construed
establishing
substantive
offenses
legislative
history
see
ante
legislative
history
provision
existed
subsection
stripped
language
shall
guilty
felony
thereby
making
subsections
parallel
even
help
case
stray
statements
culls
congressional
record
prove
new
subsection
thought
increase
penalties
unlawful
reentry
dispute
critical
question
whether
adding
penalties
subsection
offense
creating
additional
severely
punished
offenses
technical
point
alluded
remarks
recites
fifth
last
argument
support
interpretation
statute
contention
contrary
interpretation
risks
unfairness
ante
require
bringing
existence
prior
felony
conviction
attention
jury
also
unfair
course
deprive
defendant
jury
determination
burden
proof
critical
question
prior
conviction
assessment
disadvantages
greater
relevance
insofar
presume
perception
shared
enacting
congress
usually
presume
however
earlier
congress
agreed
current
policy
judgments
rather
agreed
disposition
provided
traditional
practice
common
law
see
texas
astoria
fed
sav
loan
assn
solimino
norfolk
redevelopment
housing
authority
chesapeake
potomac
telephone
morissette
noted
earlier
hostility
jury
determination
prior
convictions
quite
simply
odds
manner
recidivism
laws
historically
treated
country
moreover
even
free
resolve
matter
according
current
views
fair
judgment
avoiding
jury
infection
important
affording
jury
verdict
beyond
reasonable
doubt
seem
sound
correct
begin
fact
prior
conviction
almost
never
contested
ante
particularly
unlawfulentry
cases
clear
legislative
history
present
statute
senator
chiles
explained
identifying
prosecuting
illegal
alien
felons
long
complex
process
uncommon
alien
committed
certain
felony
pay
bond
walk
apprehended
similar
crime
next
county
new
name
identification
cong
rec
went
describe
two
specific
aliens
one
police
seized
passports
issued
different
names
drivers
licenses
immigration
cards
numerous
firearms
stolen
property
immigration
officials
alien
files
aliases
different
birth
dates
different
social
security
cards
id
said
aliens
exceptions
rather
common
amongst
illegal
alien
felons
ibid
representative
smith
stated
aliens
arrested
felonies
often
able
pay
expensive
bonds
disappear
new
identity
often
reappear
different
name
new
offense
cases
may
return
native
lands
reenter
new
names
papers
committing
crimes
side
ledger
doubt
whether
infection
jury
knowledge
prior
crime
serious
problem
see
spencer
supra
defendants
interests
keeping
prejudicial
prior
convictions
jury
protected
limiting
instructions
discretion
residing
trial
judge
limit
forbid
admission
particularly
prejudicial
evidence
even
though
admissible
accepted
rule
evidence
citation
omitted
old
chief
slip
abuse
discretion
federal
rule
evidence
disallow
defendant
stipulation
prior
felony
convictions
convictions
element
offense
cf
brief
national
association
criminal
defense
lawyers
amicus
curiae
section
defendants
pleaded
guilty
problem
however
legislative
even
judicial
means
dealing
short
today
decision
taking
matter
away
jury
cases
see
rev
describing
commonly
used
procedures
defendant
right
jury
invoked
denies
existence
prior
convictions
stands
mute
spencer
supra
describing
english
rule
indictment
alleges
substantive
offense
prior
conviction
jury
charged
prior
conviction
convicts
defendant
substantive
offense
sum
find
none
four
nontextual
factors
relied
upon
support
interpretation
typicality
recidivism
sentencing
factor
titles
legislative
history
risk
unfairness
persuasive
seem
significant
however
related
statutory
provision
introduced
amendment
explicitly
refers
subsection
setting
forth
offenses
see
stat
instructing
sentencing
commission
amend
sentencing
guidelines
offenses
later
amendment
course
cause
subsection
meant
time
petitioner
conviction
something
different
said
congress
expressed
understanding
subsection
creates
separate
offenses
surely
evidence
fairly
possible
read
provision
way
emphasize
conclude
part
discussion
fairly
possible
needs
established
doctrine
constitutional
doubt
require
construction
preferable
one
adopt
event
standard
deprive
doctrine
function
adopt
interpretation
avoids
constitutional
doubt
right
one
produces
precisely
result
adopt
right
interpretation
rather
doctrine
constitutional
doubt
comes
play
statute
susceptible
interpretation
delaware
hudson
interpretation
reasonable
though
necessarily
best
think
quite
impossible
maintain
standard
met
interpretation
subsection
regards
creating
separate
offenses
foregoing
reasons
think
must
interpret
statute
us
establishing
separate
offense
rather
sentence
enhancement
argued
constitutional
doubts
require
course
resolved
statutes
less
ambiguous
one
us
interpretable
sentence
enhancements
much
achieved
begs
question
course
constitutional
doubt
resolved
moreover
doctrine
constitutional
doubt
apply
result
may
dictated
rule
lenity
preserve
rather
destroy
criminal
defendant
right
jury
findings
beyond
reasonable
doubt
see
people
ex
rel
cosgriff
craig
unnecessary
case
decide
great
punishment
legislature
may
constitutionally
authorize
courts
special
sessions
impose
conviction
without
jury
sufficient
say
cases
doubtful
construction
conflicting
statutory
provisions
interpretation
given
best
protects
rights
person
charged
offense
trial
according
common
law
whichever
doctrine
applied
purpose
seems
sound
principle
whenever
congress
wishes
fact
increase
maximum
sentence
without
altering
substantive
offense
must
make
intention
unambiguously
clear
accordingly
find
establishes
separate
offense
reverse
judgment
notes
asserts
declined
apply
doctrine
circumstances
similar
constitutional
question
lacking
obvious
answer
lead
majority
gravely
doubt
statute
constitutional
ante
cases
cites
however
support
contention
rust
sullivan
believed
question
statutory
prohibition
constitutional
id
emphasis
added
locke
found
doctrine
inapplicable
lack
constitutional
doubt
statutory
language
permit
interpretation
avoid
constitutional
question
id
similarly
monsanto
language
statute
plain
unambiguous
id
claims
anomalous
require
jury
trial
factor
increasing
maximum
sentence
light
existing
case
law
permits
judge
rather
jury
determine
existence
factors
make
defendant
eligible
death
penalty
ante
citing
walton
arizona
hildwin
florida
per
curiam
spaziano
florida
neither
cases
cited
case
permits
judge
determine
existence
factor
makes
crime
capital
offense
cited
cases
hold
jury
found
defendant
guilty
elements
offense
carries
maximum
penalty
sentence
death
may
left
judge
decide
whether
maximum
penalty
rather
lesser
one
decision
constrained
statutory
requirement
certain
aggravating
factors
must
exist
person
charged
actions
expose
death
penalty
absolute
entitlement
jury
trial
elements
charge
federal
statutes
sort
see
provisions
recidivism
recited
list
aggravators
include
example
intent
defraud
mislead
use
firearm
machine
gun
destructive
device
equipped
silencer
wounding
threatening
life
dangerous
weapon
violence
text
treat
recidivism
mere
enhancement
treating
parallel
provisions
aggravated
offenses
obviously
statutory
text
issue
forbes
relevant
respects
identical
statute
us
except
years
imprisonment
offenses
less
increased
amendment
see
stat
contends
treating
subsection
establishing
substantive
offenses
renders
notwithstanding
subject
provisions
redundant
even
without
lesser
includedoffense
jurisprudence
prevent
defendant
convicted
subsections
ante
redundancy
however
consists
annoying
practice
saying
thing
twice
sensible
practice
saying
clarity
conciseness
law
provides
author
today
opinion
agreed
fact
subsection
makes
reference
simply
logical
way
indicating
relationship
arguably
two
separate
crimes
forbes
redundancy
redundancy
alternative
reading
one
believes
without
notwithstanding
subject
language
interpretive
jurisprudence
permit
subsection
penalty
added
subsection
penalties
immediately
stressing
significance
version
dismisses
amendment
eliminated
language
upon
relies
housekeeping
measure
congress
inten
change
clarify
fundamental
relationship
subsections
ante
offers
support
confident
characterization
unless
mistaken
assumption
statutory
changes
clarifications
unconfirmed
legislative
history
inoperative
suffice
say
legislative
history
need
confirm
details
changes
law
effected
statutory
language
interpret
language
according
natural
meaning
morales
trans
world
airlines
incorrect
contention
provision
amendments
reflects
opposite
congressional
understanding
see
ante
provision
amendments
apply
subsection
violations
subsection
occurring
date
enactment
stat
dispute
course
subsection
creates
separate
offenses
one
elements
separate
offenses
lesser
offense
set
forth
subsection
quoted
language
clearest
simplest
way
saying
element
subsection
offenses
must
occurred
date
enactment
order
amendments
applicable