stovall
denno
argued
february
decided
june
petitioner
convicted
sentenced
death
murdering
one
behrendt
arrested
day
murder
without
afforded
time
retain
counsel
taken
police
officers
one
handcuffed
viewed
hospital
behrendt
seriously
wounded
husband
assailant
observing
hearing
speak
directed
officer
behrendt
identified
petitioner
murderer
behrendt
officers
testified
petitioner
trial
hospital
identification
also
made
identification
petitioner
following
affirmance
conviction
highest
state
petitioner
sought
habeas
corpus
district
claiming
behrendt
identification
testimony
violated
fifth
sixth
fourteenth
amendment
rights
district
hearing
argument
unrelated
claim
dismissed
petition
appeals
en
banc
vacated
panel
decision
reversing
dismissal
petition
constitutional
grounds
affirmed
district
held
constitutional
rule
established
today
decisions
wade
gilbert
california
ante
pp
application
cases
involving
confrontations
identification
purposes
conducted
absence
counsel
date
cf
linkletter
walker
tehan
shott
johnson
new
jersey
pp
though
practice
showing
suspects
singly
purposes
identification
widely
condemned
violation
due
process
law
conduct
confrontation
depends
totality
surrounding
circumstances
due
process
denial
confrontation
since
behrendt
person
exonerate
suspect
go
police
station
usual
lineup
way
knowing
long
live
pp
leon
polsky
argued
cause
filed
briefs
petitioner
william
cahn
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondent
richard
uviller
argued
cause
filed
brief
new
york
state
district
attorneys
association
amicus
curiae
urging
affirmance
louis
lefkowitz
attorney
general
pro
se
samuel
hirshowitz
first
assistant
attorney
general
barry
mahoney
assistant
attorney
general
filed
brief
attorney
general
new
york
amicus
curiae
urging
affirmance
justice
brennan
delivered
opinion
federal
habeas
corpus
proceeding
attacks
collaterally
state
criminal
conviction
alleged
constitutional
errors
admission
allegedly
tainted
identification
evidence
us
direct
review
convictions
involved
wade
ante
gilbert
california
ante
case
therefore
provides
vehicle
deciding
extent
rules
announced
wade
gilbert
requiring
exclusion
identification
evidence
tainted
exhibiting
accused
identifying
witnesses
trial
absence
counsel
applied
retroactively
see
linkletter
walker
tehan
shott
johnson
new
jersey
question
whether
event
facts
particular
confrontation
involved
case
petitioner
denied
due
process
law
violation
fourteenth
amendment
cf
davis
north
carolina
paul
behrendt
stabbed
death
kitchen
home
garden
city
long
island
midnight
august
behrendt
wife
also
physician
followed
husband
kitchen
jumped
assailant
knocked
floor
stabbed
times
police
found
shirt
kitchen
floor
keys
pocket
traced
petitioner
arrested
afternoon
august
arraignment
promptly
held
postponed
petitioner
retain
counsel
behrendt
hospitalized
major
surgery
save
life
police
without
affording
petitioner
time
retain
counsel
arranged
surgeon
permit
bring
petitioner
hospital
room
noon
august
day
surgery
petitioner
handcuffed
one
five
police
officers
two
members
staff
district
attorney
brought
hospital
room
petitioner
negro
room
behrendt
identified
hospital
bed
asked
officer
whether
man
petitioner
repeated
direction
officer
words
voice
identification
none
witnesses
recall
words
used
behrendt
officers
testified
trial
identification
petitioner
hospital
room
also
made
identification
petitioner
courtroom
petitioner
convicted
sentenced
death
new
york
appeals
affirmed
without
opinion
petitioner
pro
se
sought
federal
habeas
corpus
district
southern
district
new
york
claimed
among
constitutional
rights
allegedly
denied
trial
admission
behrendt
identification
testimony
violated
rights
fifth
sixth
fourteenth
amendments
compelled
submit
hospital
room
confrontation
without
help
counsel
circumstances
unfairly
focused
witness
attention
man
believed
police
guilty
person
district
dismissed
petition
hearing
argument
unrelated
claim
alleged
invalid
search
seizure
appeal
appeals
second
circuit
panel
initially
reversed
dismissal
reaching
issue
admissibility
behrendt
identification
evidence
holding
inadmissible
ground
hospital
room
identification
violated
petitioner
constitutional
right
assistance
counsel
appeals
thereafter
heard
case
en
banc
vacated
panel
decision
affirmed
district
granted
certiorari
set
case
argument
wade
gilbert
hold
wade
gilbert
affect
cases
future
cases
involve
confrontations
identification
purposes
conducted
absence
counsel
date
rulings
wade
gilbert
therefore
inapplicable
present
case
think
also
facts
case
petitioner
deprived
due
process
law
violation
fourteenth
amendment
judgment
appeals
therefore
affirmed
wade
gilbert
fashion
exclusionary
rules
deter
law
enforcement
authorities
exhibiting
accused
witnesses
trial
identification
purposes
without
notice
absence
counsel
conviction
rests
mistaken
identification
gross
miscarriage
justice
wade
gilbert
rules
aimed
minimizing
possibility
preventing
unfairness
pretrial
confrontation
experience
proved
occur
assuring
meaningful
examination
identification
witness
testimony
trial
follow
rules
applied
retroactively
think
true
right
assistance
counsel
applied
retroactively
stages
prosecution
denial
right
must
almost
invariably
deny
fair
trial
example
trial
gideon
wainwright
forms
arraignment
hamilton
alabama
appeal
douglas
california
basic
purpose
trial
determination
truth
deny
lawyer
help
technical
intricacies
criminal
trial
deny
full
opportunity
appeal
conviction
accused
poor
impede
purpose
infect
criminal
proceeding
clear
danger
convicting
innocent
tehan
shott
supra
also
retroactively
applied
rules
criminal
procedure
fashioned
correct
serious
flaws
process
trial
see
example
jackson
denno
although
wade
gilbert
rules
also
aimed
avoiding
unfairness
trial
enhancing
reliability
process
area
identification
evidence
question
whether
constitutional
rule
criminal
procedure
enhance
reliability
process
trial
necessarily
matter
degree
johnson
new
jersey
supra
extent
condemned
practice
infects
integrity
process
trial
question
probabilities
probabilities
must
turn
weighed
prior
justified
reliance
upon
old
standard
impact
retroactivity
upon
administration
justice
outlined
wade
dangers
unfairness
inherent
confrontations
identification
possibility
unfairness
point
great
manner
confrontations
frequently
conducted
likelihood
accused
often
precluded
reconstructing
occurred
thereby
obtaining
full
hearing
identification
issue
trial
presence
counsel
significantly
promote
fairness
confrontation
full
hearing
trial
issue
identification
therefore
concluded
confrontation
critical
stage
counsel
required
confrontations
must
recognized
however
unlike
cases
counsel
absent
trial
appeal
may
confidently
assumed
confrontations
identification
often
conducted
absence
counsel
scrupulous
fairness
without
prejudice
accused
trial
therefore
feel
exclusionary
rules
set
forth
wade
gilbert
justified
need
assure
integrity
reliability
system
justice
undoubtedly
affect
cases
unfairness
present
course
also
assume
injustices
past
averted
counsel
present
confrontation
identification
injustices
counsel
absent
trial
certainty
frequency
say
confrontation
cases
injustice
occurred
differs
greatly
enough
cases
involving
absence
counsel
trial
appeal
justify
treating
situations
different
kind
purpose
retroactive
application
especially
light
strong
countervailing
interests
outlined
remains
open
persons
allege
prove
stovall
attempts
case
confrontation
resulted
unfairness
infringed
right
due
process
law
see
palmer
peyton
cir
unusual
force
countervailing
considerations
strengthens
conclusion
favor
prospective
application
law
enforcement
officials
federal
government
heretofore
proceeded
premise
constitution
require
presence
counsel
pretrial
confrontations
identification
today
rulings
foreshadowed
cases
announced
requirement
wade
decided
appeals
fifth
circuit
overwhelming
majority
american
courts
always
treated
evidence
question
one
admissibility
one
credibility
jury
wall
identification
criminal
cases
law
enforcement
authorities
fairly
relied
virtually
unanimous
weight
authority
longer
valid
conducting
pretrial
confrontations
absence
counsel
therefore
clear
retroactive
application
wade
gilbert
seriously
disrupt
administration
criminal
laws
johnson
new
jersey
supra
tehan
shott
supra
thought
persuasive
retroactive
application
rule
griffin
california
application
serious
impact
six
allowed
comment
accused
failure
take
stand
said
require
void
conviction
every
person
testify
trial
impact
upon
administration
criminal
law
devastating
need
elaboration
impact
insignificant
compared
impact
expected
retroactivity
wade
gilbert
rules
least
processing
current
criminal
calendars
disrupted
hearings
conducted
determine
taint
identification
evidence
whether
event
admission
evidence
harmless
error
doubtless
inquiry
handicapped
unavailability
witnesses
dim
memories
conclude
therefore
wade
gilbert
rules
made
retroactive
also
conclude
purposes
distinction
justified
convictions
final
instant
case
convictions
various
stages
trial
direct
review
regard
factors
reliance
burden
administration
justice
entitled
overriding
significance
make
distinction
unsupportable
recognize
wade
gilbert
therefore
victims
pretrial
confrontations
absence
counsel
benefit
rules
established
cases
must
given
benefit
however
unavoidable
consequence
necessity
constitutional
adjudications
stand
mere
dictum
sound
policies
rooted
command
article
iii
constitution
resolve
issues
solely
concrete
cases
controversies
possible
effect
upon
incentive
counsel
advance
contentions
requiring
change
law
militate
denying
wade
gilbert
benefit
today
decisions
inequity
arguably
results
according
benefit
new
rule
parties
case
announced
litigants
similarly
situated
trial
appellate
process
raised
issue
regard
fact
parties
involved
chance
beneficiaries
insignificant
cost
adherence
sound
principles
ii
person
world
possibly
exonerate
stovall
words
words
man
resulted
freedom
stovall
hospital
far
distant
courthouse
jail
one
knew
long
behrendt
might
live
faced
responsibility
identifying
attacker
need
immediate
action
knowledge
behrendt
visit
jail
police
followed
feasible
procedure
took
stovall
hospital
room
circumstances
usual
police
station
stovall
argues
question
ordered
justice
fortas
reverse
remand
new
trial
ground
state
reference
trial
improper
hospital
identification
violated
petitioner
fourteenth
amendment
rights
prejudicial
reach
question
retroactivity
wade
gilbert
footnotes
schaefer
control
sunbursts
techniques
prospective
overruling
record
note
prospective
overruling
retroactive
application
federal
courts
yale
see
mishkin
foreword
term
harv
rev
see
mishkin
supra
bender
retroactive
effect
overruling
constitutional
decision
mapp
ohio
rev
schwartz
retroactivity
reliability
due
process
reply
professor
mishkin
chi
rev
see
wall
identification
criminal
cases
paul
identification
accused
persons
austl
williams
hammelmann
identification
parades
part
crim
rev
frankfurter
case
sacco
vanzetti
justice
white
justice
harlan
justice
stewart
join
reasons
stated
separate
opinion
wade
ante
perceive
constitutional
error
identification
procedure
petitioner
subjected
concur
result
portion
opinion
limits
application
new
sixth
amendment
rule
justice
black
dissenting
wade
ante
gilbert
california
ante
holds
lineup
identification
testimony
excluded
obtained
exhibiting
accused
identifying
witnesses
trial
absence
counsel
concurred
part
holdings
lineup
identification
ground
right
counsel
guaranteed
federal
courts
sixth
amendment
state
courts
sixth
fourteenth
amendments
first
question
case
whether
defendants
already
prison
unconstitutional
evidence
shall
accorded
benefit
rule
case
holds
petitioner
convicted
unconstitutional
evidence
must
remain
prison
besides
wade
gilbert
chance
beneficiaries
one
invoke
rule
except
defendants
exhibited
lineups
future
dissent
holding
keeps
people
serving
sentences
convicted
use
unconstitutional
evidence
sought
justified
ground
retroactive
application
holding
gilbert
wade
somehow
work
burden
administration
justice
serve
purpose
deter
law
enforcement
authorities
seems
deny
petitioner
others
like
benefit
new
rule
deprives
constitutional
trial
perpetrates
rank
discrimination
determines
constitution
says
believe
power
weighing
countervailing
interests
legislate
timetable
constitution
provisions
shall
become
effective
reasons
stated
dissent
linkletter
walker
hold
petitioner
every
person
jail
convictions
based
unconstitutional
evidence
given
advantage
today
newly
announced
constitutional
rules
goes
however
hold
even
though
new
constitutional
rule
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
help
petitioner
nevertheless
entitled
consideration
claim
independent
right
counsel
claim
identification
one
victims
robbery
made
circumstances
unfair
denied
due
process
law
guaranteed
fourteenth
amendment
although
finds
petitioner
claim
without
merit
dissent
holding
general
claim
unfairness
lineup
open
persons
allege
prove
term
due
process
law
direct
descendant
magna
charta
promise
trial
according
law
land
established
lawmaking
agency
constitutional
legislative
one
ever
able
point
word
constitutional
history
shows
framers
ever
intended
due
process
clause
fifth
fourteenth
amendment
designed
mean
defendants
charged
crimes
entitled
trial
governed
laws
constitutional
statutory
existence
time
commission
crime
time
trial
concept
due
process
purports
decide
question
however
looks
totality
circumstances
particular
case
determine
judgment
whether
comport
notions
decency
fairness
fundamental
justice
declares
comport
constitution
declares
forbidden
constitution
see
rochin
california
constitutional
formula
substitutes
judgment
right
constitution
declares
shall
law
land
due
process
notion
proceeds
though
written
constitution
designed
grant
limited
powers
government
neutralized
limitations
using
due
process
clause
authorize
override
written
limiting
language
substituting
view
powers
framers
granted
government
dissent
view
constitution
accepted
result
make
even
due
process
clause
possibly
construed
giving
latitudinarian
powers
still
think
goes
far
holding
courts
look
particular
circumstances
identification
lineup
determine
large
whether
suggestive
conducive
irreparable
mistaken
identification
constitutional
result
freeze
constitutional
unconstitutional
circumstances
case
giving
federal
government
permanent
constitutional
standards
also
transfers
power
determine
constitution
say
instead
performance
undoubted
constitutional
power
determine
constitution
say
result
particular
case
put
constitutional
mould
rule
evidence
think
plainly
within
constitutional
powers
creating
enforcing
criminal
laws
must
say
deference
hold
due
process
clause
gives
power
bar
state
introduction
lineup
testimony
notion
fairness
violates
specific
constitutional
prohibition
arbitrary
wholly
capricious
action
affirm
case
reverse
remand
consideration
whether
lineup
identification
petitioner
chapman
california
harmless
error
petitioner
entitled
new
trial
denial
right
counsel
guaranteed
sixth
amendment
fourteenth
amendment
makes
obligatory