clark
community
creative
argued
march
decided
june
national
park
service
issued
permit
respondent
community
creative
ccnv
conduct
demonstration
lafayette
park
mall
national
parks
heart
washington
purpose
demonstration
call
attention
plight
homeless
permit
authorized
erection
two
symbolic
tent
cities
however
park
service
relying
regulations
particularly
one
permits
camping
defined
including
sleeping
activities
designated
campgrounds
campgrounds
ever
designated
lafayette
park
mall
denied
ccnv
request
demonstrators
permitted
sleep
symbolic
tents
ccnv
individual
respondents
filed
action
federal
district
alleging
inter
alia
application
regulations
prevent
sleeping
tents
violated
first
amendment
district
granted
summary
judgment
park
service
appeals
reversed
held
challenged
application
park
service
regulations
violate
first
amendment
pp
assuming
overnight
sleeping
connection
demonstration
expressive
conduct
protected
extent
first
amendment
regulation
forbidding
sleeping
meets
requirements
reasonable
time
place
manner
restriction
expression
whether
oral
written
symbolized
conduct
regulation
neutral
regard
message
presented
leaves
open
ample
alternative
methods
communicating
intended
message
concerning
plight
homeless
moreover
regulation
narrowly
focuses
government
substantial
interest
maintaining
parks
heart
capital
attractive
intact
condition
readily
available
millions
people
wish
see
enjoy
presence
permit
camping
totally
inimical
purposes
validity
regulation
need
judged
solely
reference
demonstration
hand
none
provisions
unrelated
ends
designed
serve
pp
similarly
challenged
regulation
also
sustainable
meeting
standards
valid
regulation
expressive
conduct
aside
impact
speech
rule
camping
overnight
sleeping
public
parks
beyond
constitutional
power
government
enforce
noted
substantial
government
interest
unrelated
suppression
expression
conserving
park
property
served
proscription
sleeping
pp
white
delivered
opinion
burger
blackmun
powell
rehnquist
stevens
joined
burger
filed
concurring
opinion
post
marshall
filed
dissenting
opinion
brennan
joined
post
deputy
solicitor
general
bator
argued
cause
petitioners
briefs
solicitor
general
lee
assistant
attorney
general
mcgrath
alan
horowitz
leonard
schaitman
katherine
gruenheck
burt
neuborne
argued
cause
respondents
brief
charles
sims
laura
macklin
arthur
spitzer
elizabeth
symonds
ogden
northrop
lewis
filed
brief
national
coalition
homeless
amicus
curiae
urging
affirmance
justice
white
delivered
opinion
issue
case
whether
national
park
service
regulation
prohibiting
camping
certain
parks
violates
first
amendment
applied
prohibit
demonstrators
sleeping
lafayette
park
mall
connection
demonstration
intended
call
attention
plight
homeless
hold
reverse
contrary
judgment
appeals
interior
department
national
park
service
charged
responsibility
management
maintenance
national
parks
authorized
promulgate
rules
regulations
use
parks
accordance
purposes
established
network
national
parks
includes
national
parks
lafayette
park
mall
set
heart
washington
unique
resources
federal
government
holds
trust
american
people
lafayette
park
roughly
square
located
across
pennsylvania
avenue
white
house
although
originally
part
white
house
grounds
president
jefferson
set
aside
park
use
residents
visitors
garden
park
formal
landscaping
flowers
trees
fountains
walks
benches
national
park
service
department
interior
white
house
president
park
resource
management
plan
mall
stretch
land
running
westward
capitol
lincoln
memorial
two
miles
away
includes
washington
monument
series
reflecting
pools
trees
lawns
greenery
bordered
inter
alia
smithsonian
institution
national
gallery
art
park
mall
included
major
pierre
original
plan
capital
visited
vast
numbers
visitors
around
country
well
large
numbers
residents
washington
metropolitan
area
regulations
involved
case
camping
national
parks
permitted
campgrounds
designated
purpose
cfr
campgrounds
ever
designated
lafayette
park
mall
camping
defined
use
park
land
living
accommodation
purposes
sleeping
activities
making
preparations
sleep
including
laying
bedding
purpose
sleeping
storing
personal
belongings
making
fire
using
tents
structure
sleeping
digging
earth
breaking
carrying
cooking
activities
ibid
constitute
camping
reasonably
appears
light
circumstances
participants
conducting
activities
fact
using
area
living
accommodation
regardless
intent
participants
nature
activities
may
also
engaging
ibid
park
service
issued
renewable
permit
respondent
community
creative
ccnv
conduct
wintertime
demonstration
lafayette
park
mall
purpose
demonstrating
plight
homeless
permit
authorized
erection
two
symbolic
tent
cities
tents
lafayette
park
accommodate
people
tents
mall
capacity
park
service
however
relying
regulations
specifically
denied
ccnv
request
demonstrators
permitted
sleep
symbolic
tents
ccnv
several
individuals
filed
action
prevent
application
regulations
proposed
demonstration
claimed
covered
regulation
also
submitted
regulations
unconstitutionally
vague
discriminatorily
applied
applied
prevent
sleeping
tents
without
violating
first
amendment
district
granted
summary
judgment
favor
park
service
appeals
sitting
en
banc
reversed
community
creative
watt
app
judges
produced
opinions
six
judges
believed
application
regulations
prevent
sleeping
tents
infringe
demonstrators
first
amendment
right
free
expression
five
judges
disagreed
sustained
regulations
applied
ccnv
proposed
demonstration
granted
government
petition
certiorari
reverse
ii
need
differ
view
appeals
overnight
sleeping
connection
demonstration
expressive
conduct
protected
extent
first
amendment
assume
present
purposes
decide
case
cf
assumption
begins
inquiry
expression
whether
oral
written
symbolized
conduct
subject
reasonable
time
place
manner
restrictions
often
noted
restrictions
kind
valid
provided
justified
without
reference
content
regulated
speech
narrowly
tailored
serve
significant
governmental
interest
leave
open
ample
alternative
channels
communication
information
city
council
los
angeles
taxpayers
vincent
grace
perry
education
assn
perry
local
educators
heffron
international
society
krishna
consciousness
virginia
pharmacy
board
virginia
citizens
consumer
council
consolidated
edison
public
service
also
true
message
may
delivered
conduct
intended
communicative
context
reasonably
understood
viewer
communicative
spence
washington
tinker
des
moines
school
district
symbolic
expression
kind
may
forbidden
regulated
conduct
may
constitutionally
regulated
regulation
narrowly
drawn
substantial
governmental
interest
interest
unrelated
suppression
free
speech
supra
petitioners
submit
appeals
regulation
forbidding
sleeping
defensible
either
time
place
manner
restriction
regulation
symbolic
conduct
agree
assessment
permit
issued
authorized
demonstration
required
compliance
cfr
prohibits
camping
park
lands
use
park
lands
living
accommodations
sleeping
storing
personal
belongings
making
fires
digging
cooking
provisions
including
ban
sleeping
clearly
limitations
manner
demonstration
carried
sleeping
like
symbolic
tents
may
expressive
part
message
delivered
demonstration
make
ban
less
limitation
manner
demonstrating
reasonable
time
place
manner
regulations
normally
purpose
direct
effect
limiting
expression
nevertheless
valid
city
council
los
angeles
taxpayers
vincent
supra
heffron
international
society
krishna
consciousness
supra
kovacs
cooper
neither
fact
sleeping
arguendo
may
expressive
conduct
rather
oral
written
expression
render
sleeping
prohibition
less
time
place
manner
regulation
contrary
park
service
neither
attempts
ban
sleeping
generally
ban
everywhere
parks
established
areas
camping
forbids
elsewhere
including
lafayette
park
mall
considered
little
trouble
concluding
park
service
may
prohibit
overnight
sleeping
parks
involved
requirement
regulation
clearly
satisfied
courts
accepted
view
disputed
prohibition
camping
sleeping
specifically
applied
disagreement
message
presented
neither
regulation
faulted
ground
without
overnight
sleeping
plight
homeless
communicated
ways
regulation
otherwise
left
demonstration
intact
symbolic
city
signs
presence
willing
take
turns
vigil
respondents
suggest
barrier
delivering
media
public
means
intended
message
concerning
plight
homeless
also
apparent
us
regulation
narrowly
focuses
government
substantial
interest
maintaining
parks
heart
capital
attractive
intact
condition
readily
available
millions
people
wish
see
enjoy
presence
permit
camping
using
areas
living
accommodations
totally
inimical
purposes
readily
understood
frequented
national
parks
across
country
observed
unfortunate
consequences
activities
refuse
confine
camping
designated
areas
urged
respondents
appeals
view
symbolic
city
tents
permitted
demonstrators
intend
cook
dig
engage
aspects
camping
sleeping
incremental
benefit
parks
justify
ban
sleeping
expressive
activity
said
enhance
message
concerning
plight
poor
homeless
agree
first
place
seriously
doubt
first
amendment
requires
park
service
permit
demonstration
lafayette
park
mall
involving
vigil
erection
tents
accommodate
people
furthermore
although
assumed
present
purposes
sleeping
banned
case
expressive
element
evident
major
value
demonstration
facilitative
without
permit
sleep
difficult
get
poor
homeless
participate
present
much
apparent
permit
application
filed
respondents
without
incentive
sleeping
space
hot
meal
homeless
come
site
app
sleeping
ban
enforced
thus
effectively
limit
nature
extent
duration
demonstration
extent
ease
pressure
parks
beyond
however
evident
cases
validity
regulation
need
judged
solely
reference
demonstration
hand
heffron
international
society
krishna
consciousness
absent
prohibition
sleeping
groups
demand
permission
deliver
asserted
message
camping
lafayette
park
surely
credible
claim
regard
ccnv
denial
permits
still
others
present
difficult
problems
park
service
prohibition
however
evident
case
us
least
demonstrations
lasting
days
end
materialize
others
limited
size
duration
purposes
regulation
thus
materially
served
perhaps
purposes
effectively
clumsily
achieved
preventing
tents
vigils
entirely
core
areas
park
service
decision
permit
nonsleeping
demonstrations
view
impugn
camping
prohibition
valuable
perhaps
imperfect
protection
parks
government
legitimate
interest
ensuring
national
parks
adequately
protected
think
parks
exposed
harm
without
sleeping
prohibition
ban
safe
invalidation
first
amendment
reasonable
regulation
manner
demonstration
may
carried
city
council
los
angeles
taxpayers
vincent
regulation
responds
precisely
substantive
problems
legitimately
concern
government
difficulty
therefore
understanding
prohibition
camping
ban
sleeping
overnight
reasonable
time
place
manner
regulation
withstands
constitutional
scrutiny
surely
regulation
unconstitutional
face
none
provisions
appears
unrelated
ends
designed
serve
less
valid
applied
prevent
camping
parks
wish
demonstrate
deliver
message
public
central
government
damage
parks
well
partial
inaccessibility
members
public
easily
result
camping
demonstrators
nondemonstrators
neither
case
must
government
tolerate
resort
parks
must
abide
otherwise
valid
rules
use
must
observe
traffic
laws
sanitation
regulations
laws
preserve
public
peace
reaffirmation
reasonable
time
place
manner
restrictions
expression
constitutionally
acceptable
contrary
conclusion
appeals
foregoing
analysis
demonstrates
park
service
regulation
sustainable
standard
validating
regulation
expressive
conduct
last
analysis
little
different
standard
applied
time
place
manner
restrictions
one
contends
aside
impact
speech
rule
camping
overnight
sleeping
public
parks
beyond
constitutional
power
government
enforce
reasons
discussed
substantial
government
interest
conserving
park
property
interest
plainly
served
requires
implementation
measures
proscription
sleeping
designed
limit
wear
tear
park
properties
interest
unrelated
suppression
expression
unmoved
appeals
view
challenged
regulation
unnecessary
hence
invalid
less
alternatives
satisfied
government
interest
preserving
park
lands
gainsaying
preventing
overnight
sleeping
avoid
measure
actual
threatened
damage
lafayette
park
mall
appeals
suggestions
park
service
minimize
possible
injury
reducing
size
duration
frequency
demonstrations
still
curtail
total
allowable
expression
demonstrators
engage
whether
sleeping
otherwise
suggestions
represent
disagreement
park
service
much
protection
core
parks
require
acceptable
level
preservation
attained
believe
however
either
time
place
manner
decisions
assign
judiciary
authority
replace
park
service
manager
nation
parks
endow
judiciary
competence
judge
much
protection
park
lands
wise
level
conservation
attained
accordingly
judgment
appeals
reversed
footnotes
section
amended
prohibits
use
certain
temporary
structures
connection
permitted
demonstrations
special
events
temporary
structures
may
erected
purpose
symbolizing
message
meeting
logistical
needs
first
aid
facilities
lost
children
areas
provision
shelter
electrical
sensitive
equipment
displays
temporary
structures
may
used
outside
designated
camping
areas
living
accommodation
activities
sleeping
making
preparations
sleep
including
laying
bedding
purpose
sleeping
storing
personal
belongings
making
fire
digging
earth
breaking
carrying
cooking
activities
activities
constitute
camping
reasonably
appears
light
circumstances
participants
conducting
activities
fact
using
area
living
accommodation
regardless
intent
participants
nature
activities
may
also
engaging
per
curiam
opinion
preceding
individual
opinions
described
lineup
judges
follows
circuit
judge
mikva
files
opinion
circuit
judge
wald
concurs
support
judgment
reversing
chief
judge
robinson
circuit
judge
wright
file
statement
joining
judgment
concurring
circuit
judge
mikva
opinion
caveat
circuit
judge
edwards
files
opinion
joining
judgment
concurring
partially
circuit
judge
mikva
opinion
circuit
judge
ginsburg
files
opinion
joining
judgment
circuit
judge
wilkey
files
dissenting
opinion
circuit
judges
tamm
mackinnon
bork
scalia
concur
circuit
judge
scalia
files
dissenting
opinion
circuit
judges
mackinnon
bork
concur
app
threshold
matter
must
address
respondents
contention
proposed
activities
fall
within
definition
camping
found
regulations
none
opinions
accepted
contention
least
nine
judges
expressly
rejected
opinion
mikva
opinion
wilkey
likewise
find
contention
without
merit
seriously
doubted
sleeping
tents
purpose
expressing
plight
homeless
falls
within
regulation
definition
camping
reject
suggestion
plurality
however
burden
demonstrators
limited
advancement
plausible
contention
conduct
expressive
although
common
place
burden
upon
government
justify
impingements
first
amendment
interests
obligation
person
desiring
engage
assertedly
expressive
conduct
demonstrate
first
amendment
even
applies
hold
otherwise
create
rule
conduct
presumptively
expressive
absence
showing
rule
necessary
protect
vital
first
amendment
interests
decline
deviate
general
rule
one
seeking
relief
bears
burden
demonstrating
entitled
respondents
request
remand
appeals
resolution
claim
district
improperly
granted
summary
judgment
equal
protection
claim
brief
respondents
contend
disputed
questions
fact
concerning
uniformity
enforcement
regulation
claiming
groups
slept
parks
district
specifically
found
regulations
consistently
applied
enforced
fair
nondiscriminatory
manner
app
pet
cert
judges
appeals
addressed
equal
protection
claim
app
opinion
wilkey
joined
tamm
mackinnon
bork
scalia
review
record
leads
us
agree
conclusion
genuine
issue
material
fact
respondents
shown
isolated
instances
undiscovered
violations
regulations
government
seeks
regulate
conduct
ordinarily
nonexpressive
may
regardless
situs
application
regulation
thus
even
people
choose
violate
park
service
regulations
expressive
purposes
park
service
may
enforce
regulations
relating
grazing
animals
cfr
flying
model
planes
gambling
hunting
fishing
setting
fireworks
urination
reasonable
time
place
manner
restrictions
valid
even
though
directly
limit
oral
written
expression
odd
insist
higher
standard
limitations
aimed
regulable
conduct
incidental
impact
speech
thus
time
place
manner
restriction
expressive
sleeping
involved
case
sufficiently
narrowly
serves
substantial
enough
governmental
interest
escape
first
amendment
condemnation
untenable
invalidate
ground
governmental
interest
insufficient
warrant
intrusion
first
amendment
concerns
inadequate
nexus
regulation
interest
sought
served
note
recently
case
dealing
regulation
signs
framed
issue
based
crucial
part
analysis
time
place
manner
cases
city
council
los
angeles
taxpayers
vincent
also
agree
judge
edwards
observation
insist
upon
judicial
resolution
case
given
facts
record
hand
arguably
suggests
lack
common
sense
app
clearer
us
achieved
rather
exhausting
expenditure
judicial
resources
chief
justice
burger
concurring
concur
fully
opinion
find
difficult
conceive
camping
means
include
pitching
tent
building
fire
whether
sleeping
cooking
follows
irrelevant
frailties
english
language
used
country
several
centuries
used
park
service
regulations
hardly
plainer
informing
public
camping
lafayette
park
prohibited
actions
claimed
speech
entitled
protections
first
amendment
simply
speech
rather
constitute
conduct
justice
black
never
tolerant
limits
speech
emphatically
pointed
separate
opinion
cox
louisiana
first
fourteenth
amendments
think
take
away
government
state
federal
power
restrict
freedom
speech
press
assembly
people
right
purposes
picketing
though
may
utilized
communicate
ideas
speech
therefore
protected
first
amendment
emphasis
original
citations
omitted
trivializes
first
amendment
seek
use
shield
manner
asserted
tells
us
something
many
people
must
wait
day
time
courts
frivolous
proceedings
delay
causes
litigants
legitimate
nonfrivolous
claims
case
alone
engaged
time
district
judge
en
banc
appeals
judges
justices
justice
marshall
justice
brennan
joins
dissenting
disposition
case
marked
two
related
failings
first
majority
either
unwilling
unable
take
seriously
first
amendment
claims
advanced
respondents
contrary
impression
given
majority
respondents
supplicants
seeking
wheedle
undeserved
favor
government
citizens
raising
issues
profound
public
importance
properly
turned
courts
vindication
constitutional
rights
second
majority
misapplies
test
ascertaining
whether
restraint
speech
qualifies
reasonable
time
place
manner
regulation
determining
constitutes
sustainable
regulation
majority
fails
subject
alleged
interests
government
degree
scrutiny
required
ensure
expressive
activity
protected
first
amendment
remains
free
unnecessary
limitations
proper
starting
point
analysis
case
recognition
activity
respondents
seek
engage
sleeping
highly
public
place
outside
winter
purpose
protesting
homelessness
symbolic
speech
protected
first
amendment
majority
assumes
without
deciding
respondents
conduct
entitled
constitutional
protection
ante
problem
assumption
thereby
avoids
examining
closely
reality
respondents
planned
expression
majority
approach
denatures
respondents
asserted
right
thus
makes
easy
identification
government
interest
sufficient
warrant
abridgment
realistic
appraisal
competing
interests
stake
case
requires
closer
look
nature
expressive
conduct
issue
context
conduct
displayed
late
autumn
respondents
sought
permission
conduct
demonstration
lafayette
park
mall
part
demonstration
include
homeless
persons
sleeping
outside
tents
without
amenities
respondents
sought
begin
demonstration
date
full
ominous
meaning
homeless
person
first
day
winter
respondents
similarly
purposeful
choosing
demonstration
sites
portrays
sites
mall
lafayette
park
peculiar
fashion
according
lafayette
park
mall
unique
resources
federal
government
holds
trust
american
people
lafayette
park
roughly
square
located
across
pennsylvania
avenue
white
house
although
originally
part
white
house
grounds
president
jefferson
set
aside
park
use
residents
visitors
garden
park
formal
landscaping
flowers
trees
fountains
walks
benches
mall
stretch
land
running
westward
capital
lincoln
memorial
two
miles
away
includes
washington
monument
series
reflecting
pools
trees
lawns
greenery
bordered
inter
alia
smithsonian
institution
national
gallery
art
park
mall
included
major
pierre
original
plan
capital
visited
vast
numbers
visitors
around
country
well
large
numbers
residents
washington
metropolitan
area
ante
primary
purpose
making
sleep
integral
part
demonstration
central
reality
homelessness
brief
respondents
impress
upon
public
consciousness
dramatic
way
possible
homelessness
widespread
problem
often
ignored
confronts
victims
deprivations
one
homeless
men
seeking
demonstrate
explained
sleeping
lafayette
park
mall
show
people
conditions
poor
homeless
poor
city
actually
sleep
outside
winter
get
point
across
long
line
cases
afforded
first
amendment
protection
expressive
conduct
qualifies
symbolic
speech
see
tinker
des
moines
school
black
armband
worn
students
public
school
protest
policy
vietnam
war
brown
louisiana
negro
students
whites
library
protest
segregation
stromberg
california
flying
red
flag
gesture
support
communism
light
surrounding
context
respondents
proposed
activity
meets
qualifications
previously
acknowledged
importance
context
determining
whether
act
properly
denominated
speech
first
amendment
purposes
provided
guidance
concerning
way
courts
read
context
making
determination
leading
case
spence
washington
held
displaying
flag
peace
symbol
attached
conduct
protected
first
amendment
looked
first
intent
speaker
whether
intent
convey
particularized
message
second
perception
audience
whether
likelihood
great
message
understood
viewed
respondents
clearly
intended
protest
reality
homelessness
sleeping
outdoors
winter
near
vicinity
magisterial
residence
president
addition
accentuating
political
character
protest
choice
location
mode
communication
respondents
also
intended
underline
meaning
protest
giving
demonstration
satirical
names
respondents
planned
name
demonstration
mall
congressional
village
demonstration
lafayette
park
reaganville
ii
app
doubt
surrounding
circumstances
likelihood
great
political
significance
sleeping
parks
understood
viewed
certainly
news
media
understood
significance
respondents
proposed
activity
newspapers
magazines
around
nation
reported
previous
planned
display
ordinary
citizens
likely
understand
political
message
intended
respondents
likelihood
stems
remarkably
apt
fit
activity
respondents
seek
engage
social
problem
seek
highlight
using
sleep
integral
part
mode
protest
respondents
express
bodies
poignancy
plight
physically
demonstrate
neglect
suffer
articulateness
even
dickens
match
community
creative
watt
app
edwards
concurring
true
go
sleep
part
daily
regimen
part
sleep
represents
physical
necessity
vehicle
expression
characteristics
need
prevent
activity
normally
devoid
expressive
purpose
used
novel
mode
communication
sitting
standing
library
activity
necessary
facilitate
ends
usually
nothing
making
statement
moreover
sitting
standing
conduct
observer
normally
construe
expressive
conduct
however
negroes
stand
sit
whites
library
louisiana
powerfully
expressive
particular
context
acts
became
monuments
protest
segregation
brown
louisiana
supra
government
contends
forseeable
difficulty
administration
counsels
recognizing
sleep
mode
expression
protected
first
amendment
predicament
government
envisions
termed
imposter
problem
problem
distinguishing
bona
fide
protesters
imposters
whose
requests
permission
sleep
lafayette
park
mall
first
amendment
grounds
mask
ulterior
designs
simple
desire
example
avoid
expense
hotel
lodgings
government
maintains
distinctions
made
without
inquiring
sincerity
demonstrators
inquiry
pose
dangers
first
amendment
values
necessarily
find
argument
unpersuasive
first
variety
circumstances
already
require
government
agencies
engage
delicate
task
inquiring
sincerity
claimants
asserting
first
amendment
rights
see
wisconsin
yoder
exception
members
religious
group
compulsory
education
statute
justified
group
adherence
deep
religious
conviction
rather
subjective
secular
values
welsh
eligibility
exemption
military
service
conscientious
objector
status
justified
sincere
religious
beliefs
thus
incorrect
imply
scrutiny
asserted
purpose
persons
seeking
permit
display
sleeping
form
symbolic
speech
import
something
altogether
new
disturbing
first
amendment
jurisprudence
second
administrative
difficulty
government
envisions
nothing
vague
apprehension
permitting
sleep
used
form
protected
first
amendment
activity
actually
created
administrative
problems
government
envisions
emerge
clear
factual
basis
upon
establish
necessity
limitation
government
advocates
government
final
argument
granting
respondents
proposed
activity
degree
first
amendment
protection
contextual
analysis
upon
respondents
rely
fatally
flawed
overinclusiveness
government
contends
spence
approach
overinclusive
accords
first
amendment
status
wide
variety
acts
although
expressive
obviously
subject
prohibition
government
notes
ctions
assassination
political
figures
bombing
government
buildings
fairly
characterized
intended
convey
message
readily
perceived
public
brief
petitioners
government
argument
pose
difficult
problem
determination
whether
act
constitutes
speech
end
first
amendment
analysis
determination
end
act
defined
speech
must
still
balanced
countervailing
government
interests
balancing
first
amendment
requires
doom
argument
seeking
protect
antisocial
acts
assassination
destruction
government
property
government
interference
compelling
interests
outweigh
expressive
value
conduct
ii
although
sleep
context
case
symbolic
speech
protected
first
amendment
nonetheless
subject
reasonable
time
place
manner
restrictions
agree
standard
enunciated
majority
estrictions
kind
valid
provided
justified
without
reference
content
regulated
speech
narrowly
tailored
serve
significant
governmental
interest
leave
open
ample
alternative
channels
communication
information
ante
citations
omitted
conclude
however
regulations
issue
case
applied
respondents
fail
satisfy
standard
according
majority
significant
government
interest
advanced
denying
respondents
request
engage
interest
maintaining
parks
heart
capital
attractive
intact
condition
readily
available
millions
people
wish
see
enjoy
presence
ante
interest
indeed
significant
however
neither
government
majority
adequately
explains
prohibiting
respondents
planned
activity
substantially
interest
majority
attempted
explanation
begins
curious
statement
seriously
doubts
first
amendment
requires
park
service
permit
demonstration
lafayette
park
mall
involving
vigil
erection
tents
accommodate
people
ante
perceive
serious
doubts
regarding
matter
provides
explanation
uncertainty
furthermore
even
majority
doubts
well
founded
see
doubts
relate
problem
hand
issue
posed
case
whether
government
constitutionally
compelled
permit
erection
tents
staging
continuous
vigil
rather
issue
whether
substantial
government
interest
served
banning
sleep
part
political
demonstration
may
suggesting
tents
vigil
permitted
constitutionally
required
permitted
respondents
constitutional
right
engage
expressive
conduct
supplements
activities
put
arithmetical
terms
appears
contend
permitted
grace
rather
constitutional
compulsion
denied
without
regard
requirements
government
must
normally
satisfy
order
restrain
protected
activity
notion
however
represents
misguided
conception
first
amendment
first
amendment
requires
government
justify
every
instance
abridgment
requirement
stems
recognition
first
amendment
designed
secure
widest
possible
dissemination
information
diverse
antagonistic
sources
associated
press
assure
unfettered
interchange
ideas
bringing
political
social
changes
desired
people
roth
see
also
buckley
valeo
new
york
times
sullivan
whitney
california
brandeis
concurring
moreover
stringency
requirement
diminished
simply
activity
government
seeks
restrain
supplemental
activity
government
may
permitted
grace
constitutionally
compelled
allow
government
adequately
justify
abridgment
protected
expression
reason
citizens
prevented
exercising
first
rights
safeguarded
bill
rights
majority
second
argument
comprised
suggestion
although
sleeping
contains
element
expression
major
value
respondents
demonstration
facilitative
ante
observation
provide
hint
weight
attached
respondents
first
amendment
claims
utterly
irrelevant
whether
government
ban
sleeping
advances
substantial
government
interest
majority
third
argument
based
upon
two
claims
first
ban
sleeping
relieves
government
administrative
burden
without
flat
ban
process
issuing
denying
permits
demonstrators
asserting
first
amendment
rights
sleep
parks
present
difficult
problems
park
service
ante
second
ban
sleeping
increase
probability
demonstrations
days
end
materialize
others
limited
size
duration
purpose
regulation
thus
materially
served
ante
purpose
limit
wear
tear
park
properties
ante
flaw
two
contentions
neither
supported
factual
showing
evinces
real
opposed
merely
speculative
problem
majority
fails
offer
evidence
indicating
absence
absolute
ban
sleeping
present
administrative
problems
park
service
substantially
difficult
ordinarily
confronts
mere
apprehension
difficulties
enough
overcome
right
free
expression
see
grace
tinker
des
moines
school
moreover
government
interest
avoiding
administrative
difficulties
truly
substantial
one
expect
agency
involved
administering
parks
least
allude
interest
however
perceived
difficulty
administering
requests
demonstrators
seeking
convey
messages
sleeping
among
reasons
underlying
park
service
regulations
mentioned
park
service
rejection
respondents
particular
request
erroneous
application
standard
ascertaining
reasonable
time
place
manner
restriction
also
revealed
majority
conclusion
substantial
governmental
interest
served
sleeping
ban
discourage
demonstrations
days
thus
regulation
purpose
limit
wear
tear
part
properties
ante
majority
cites
evidence
indicating
sleeping
engaged
symbolic
speech
cause
substantial
wear
tear
park
property
furthermore
government
application
sleeping
ban
circumstances
case
strikingly
underinclusive
majority
acknowledges
proper
time
place
manner
restriction
must
narrowly
tailored
however
tailoring
requirement
virtually
forsaken
inasmuch
government
offers
justification
applying
absolute
ban
sleeping
yet
willing
allow
respondents
engage
activities
feigned
sleeping
less
burdensome
short
substantial
government
interests
advanced
government
regulations
applied
respondents
decision
advances
prerogatives
bureaucracy
years
shown
implacable
hostility
toward
citizens
exercise
first
amendment
rights
iii
disposition
case
impels
make
two
additional
observations
first
case
others
involving
time
place
manner
restrictions
dramatically
lowered
scrutiny
governmental
regulations
determined
regulations
result
creation
approach
first
amendment
cases
regulations
turn
content
expression
subjected
strict
form
judicial
review
regulations
aimed
matters
expression
receive
minimal
level
scrutiny
minimal
scrutiny
prong
approach
led
unfortunate
diminution
first
amendment
protection
narrowly
limiting
concern
whether
given
regulation
creates
distinction
seemingly
overlooked
fact
restrictions
also
capable
unnecessarily
restricting
protected
expressive
activity
sure
general
prohibition
regulations
essential
tool
first
amendment
analysis
helps
put
operation
principle
government
may
grant
use
forum
people
whose
views
finds
acceptable
deny
use
wishing
express
less
favored
controversial
views
police
department
chicago
mosley
however
transformed
ban
content
distinctions
floor
offers
persons
least
equal
liberty
first
amendment
ceiling
restricts
persons
protection
first
amendment
equality
nothing
consistent
imposition
silence
upon
may
fulfill
dictates
evenhanded
offends
profound
national
commitment
principle
debate
public
issues
uninhibited
robust
new
york
times
sullivan
second
disposition
case
reveals
mistaken
assumption
regarding
motives
behavior
government
officials
create
administer
regulations
salutary
skepticism
governmental
decisionmaking
first
amendment
matters
suddenly
dissipates
determines
restriction
evidently
assumes
balance
struck
officials
deserving
deference
long
appear
tainted
content
discrimination
fails
recognize
public
officials
strong
incentives
overregulate
even
absence
intent
censor
particular
views
incentive
stems
fact
two
groups
whose
interests
officials
must
accommodate
one
hand
interests
general
public
interests
seek
use
particular
forum
first
amendment
activity
political
power
former
likely
far
greater
latter
political
dynamics
likely
lead
officials
disproportionate
sensitivity
regulatory
opposed
first
amendment
interests
discerned
background
case
although
park
service
appears
applied
revised
regulations
consistently
facts
record
case
raise
substantial
possibility
impetus
behind
revision
may
derived
less
concerns
administrative
difficulties
wear
tear
park
facilities
political
concerns
alleged
need
restrictive
regulations
stemmed
decision
favoring
first
amendment
claimants
parties
case
see
supra
moreover
response
park
service
announcement
considering
changing
rules
respondents
expressive
activities
least
one
powerful
group
urged
service
tighten
regulations
point
observations
impugn
integrity
national
park
service
rather
intention
illustrate
concretely
government
agencies
nature
driven
overregulate
public
forums
detriment
first
amendment
rights
facial
shield
unnecessary
restrictions
unpopular
ideas
modes
expression
case
particular
evidence
readily
available
impelled
subject
government
restrictive
policy
something
minimal
scrutiny
foregoing
reasons
respectfully
dissent
previous
winter
respondents
held
similar
demonstration
courts
ruled
park
service
regulations
effect
extend
respondents
proposed
activities
community
creative
watt
app
ccnv
activities
consisted
setting
sleeping
nine
tents
lafayette
park
regulations
issue
case
promulgated
direct
response
ccnv
fed
reg
oral
argument
government
informed
given
day
average
three
demonstrations
going
park
area
tr
oral
arg
respondents
accurately
describe
lafayette
park
american
analogue
speaker
corner
hyde
park
brief
respondents
another
purpose
making
sleep
part
demonstration
enable
participants
weather
rigors
vigil
encourage
homeless
persons
participate
demonstration
respondents
stated
application
demonstration
permit
ever
question
whether
sleeping
necessary
element
demonstration
answered
light
previous
year
demonstration
matter
hard
tried
get
homeless
persons
come
reaganville
name
given
demonstration
respondents
simply
come
sleeping
permitted
app
estimates
number
homeless
persons
range
two
three
million
see
brief
national
coalition
homeless
amicus
curiae
though
numerically
significant
homeless
politically
powerless
inasmuch
lack
financial
resources
necessary
obtain
access
many
effective
means
persuasion
moreover
homeless
persons
likely
denied
access
vote
since
lack
mailing
address
proof
residence
within
state
disqualifies
otherwise
eligible
citizen
registering
vote
detrimental
effects
homelessness
manifold
include
psychic
trauma
circulatory
difficulties
infections
refuse
heal
lice
infestations
hypothermia
extreme
exposure
elements
lead
death
christmas
weekend
new
york
city
homeless
persons
perished
cold
see
times
see
articles
appended
declaration
mary
ellen
hombs
record
vol
also
agree
majority
substantial
difference
distinguishes
test
applicable
time
place
manner
restrictions
test
articulated
see
ante
facilitative
purpose
takes
away
nothing
independent
status
symbolic
speech
moreover
facilitative
conduct
closely
related
expressive
activity
protected
first
amendment
considerations
therefore
find
agreement
judge
ginsburg
noted
personal
aspect
sleeping
symbolic
tents
demonstration
site
bears
close
functional
relationship
activity
commonly
comprehended
free
speech
community
creative
watt
app
leeping
tents
rather
simply
standing
sitting
allows
demonstrator
sustain
protest
without
stopping
short
permission
ibid
judge
ginsburg
linkage
suffices
require
genuine
effort
balance
demonstrators
interests
concerns
government
bears
responsibility
ibid
see
fed
reg
app
oral
argument
government
suggested
ban
sleeping
invalidated
applied
respondents
simply
government
willing
allow
respondents
engage
nonverbal
acts
expression
may
also
trench
upon
government
interests
served
ban
tr
oral
arg
government
maintains
result
makes
government
victim
generosity
however
government
characterization
unstinting
provider
opportunities
protected
expression
thoroughly
discredited
long
line
decisions
compelling
national
park
service
allow
expressive
conduct
claims
permit
matter
grace
see
women
strike
peace
morton
app
quaker
action
group
morton
app
abney
app
see
city
council
los
angeles
taxpayers
vincent
heffron
international
society
krishna
consciousness
see
grace
tinker
des
moines
school
brown
louisiana
see
landmark
communications
virginia
noted
however
context
regulations
facially
nonetheless
subjected
strict
scrutiny
situation
arises
regulation
vests
standardless
discretion
officials
empowered
dispense
permits
use
public
forums
see
lovell
city
griffin
hague
cio
shuttlesworth
city
birmingham
see
redish
content
distinction
first
amendment
analysis
stan
rev
furthermore
regulation
necessarily
fall
random
equal
force
upon
different
groups
different
points
view
regulation
restricts
inexpensive
mode
communication
fall
heavily
upon
relatively
poor
speakers
points
view
speakers
typically
espouse
see
city
council
los
angeles
taxpayers
vincent
supra
sort
latent
inequality
much
evidence
case
respondents
lack
financial
means
necessary
buy
access
conventional
modes
persuasion
disquieting
feature
disposition
case
lends
credence
charge
judicial
administration
first
amendment
conjunction
social
order
marked
large
disparities
wealth
sources
power
tends
systematically
discriminate
efforts
relatively
disadvantaged
convey
political
ideas
past
taken
considerations
account
adjudicating
first
amendment
rights
among
us
financially
deprived
see
martin
struthers
striking
ban
distribution
circulars
part
mode
distribution
essential
poorly
financed
causes
little
people
marsh
alabama
state
impose
criminal
sanction
person
distributing
literature
sidewalk
town
owned
private
corporation
solicitude
noticeably
absent
majority
opinion
continuing
trend
escaped
attention
commentators
see
dorsen
gora
free
speech
property
burger
old
values
new
balances
rev
van
alstyne
recrudescence
property
rights
foremost
principle
civil
liberties
first
decade
burger
law
contemp
prob
summer
critique
limits
equality
principle
first
amendment
analysis
see
redish
supra
see
goldberger
judicial
scrutiny
public
forum
cases
misplaced
trust
judgment
public
officials
buffalo
rev
see
declaration
mary
ellen
hombs
exhibit
record
vol