faretta
california
argued
november
decided
june
sixth
amendment
made
applicable
fourteenth
guarantees
defendant
state
criminal
trial
independent
constitutional
right
may
proceed
defend
without
counsel
voluntarily
intelligently
elects
case
state
courts
erred
forcing
petitioner
accept
public
defender
denying
request
conduct
defense
pp
vacated
remanded
stewart
delivered
opinion
douglas
brennan
white
marshall
powell
joined
burger
filed
dissenting
opinion
blackmun
rehnquist
joined
post
blackmun
filed
dissenting
opinion
burger
rehnquist
joined
post
jerome
falk
appointment
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
roger
hanson
howard
schwab
deputy
attorney
general
california
argued
cause
respondent
brief
evelle
younger
attorney
general
jack
winkler
chief
assistant
attorney
general
clark
moore
assistant
attorney
general
russell
iungerich
donald
oeser
deputy
attorneys
general
john
thorne
pro
se
filed
brief
amicus
curiae
justice
stewart
delivered
opinion
sixth
fourteenth
amendments
constitution
guarantee
person
brought
trial
state
federal
must
afforded
right
assistance
counsel
validly
convicted
punished
imprisonment
clear
constitutional
rule
emerged
series
cases
decided
last
years
question
us
whether
defendant
state
criminal
trial
constitutional
right
proceed
without
counsel
voluntarily
intelligently
elects
stated
another
way
question
whether
state
may
constitutionally
hale
person
criminal
courts
force
lawyer
upon
even
insists
wants
conduct
defense
easy
question
concluded
state
may
constitutionally
anthony
faretta
charged
grand
theft
information
filed
superior
los
angeles
county
cal
arraignment
superior
judge
assigned
preside
trial
appointed
public
defender
represent
faretta
well
date
trial
however
faretta
requested
permitted
represent
questioning
judge
revealed
faretta
represented
criminal
prosecution
high
school
education
want
represented
public
defender
believed
office
loaded
heavy
case
load
judge
responded
believed
faretta
making
mistake
emphasized
proceedings
faretta
receive
special
favors
nevertheless
establishing
faretta
wanted
represent
want
lawyer
judge
preliminary
ruling
accepted
faretta
waiver
assistance
counsel
judge
indicated
however
might
reverse
ruling
later
appeared
faretta
unable
adequately
represent
several
weeks
thereafter
still
prior
trial
judge
sua
sponte
held
hearing
inquire
faretta
ability
conduct
defense
questioned
specifically
hearsay
rule
state
law
governing
challenge
potential
jurors
consideration
faretta
answers
observation
demeanor
judge
ruled
faretta
made
intelligent
knowing
waiver
right
assistance
counsel
also
ruled
faretta
constitutional
right
conduct
defense
judge
accordingly
reversed
earlier
ruling
permitting
appointed
public
defender
represent
faretta
faretta
subsequent
request
leave
act
cocounsel
rejected
efforts
make
certain
motions
behalf
throughout
subsequent
trial
judge
required
faretta
defense
conducted
appointed
lawyer
public
defender
office
conclusion
trial
jury
found
faretta
guilty
charged
judge
sentenced
prison
california
appeal
relying
upon
california
decision
expressly
decided
issue
affirmed
trial
judge
ruling
faretta
federal
state
constitutional
right
represent
accordingly
appellate
affirmed
faretta
conviction
petition
rehearing
denied
without
opinion
california
denied
review
granted
certiorari
ii
federal
courts
right
protected
statute
since
beginnings
nation
section
judiciary
act
stat
enacted
first
congress
signed
president
washington
one
day
sixth
amendment
proposed
provided
courts
parties
may
plead
manage
causes
personally
assistance
counsel
right
currently
codified
exceptions
several
also
accords
defendant
right
represent
criminal
case
constitutions
explicitly
confer
right
moreover
many
state
courts
expressed
view
right
also
supported
constitution
indicated
view
adams
ex
rel
mccann
recognized
sixth
amendment
right
assistance
counsel
implicitly
embodies
correlative
right
dispense
lawyer
help
defendant
case
indicted
federal
mail
fraud
violations
insisted
conducting
defense
without
benefit
counsel
also
requested
bench
trial
signed
waiver
right
trial
jury
prosecution
consented
waiver
jury
waiver
accepted
defendant
convicted
appeals
reversed
conviction
ground
person
accused
felony
competently
waive
right
trial
jury
except
upon
advice
lawyer
reversed
reinstated
conviction
holding
accused
exercise
free
intelligent
choice
considered
approval
may
waive
trial
jury
likewise
may
competently
intelligently
waive
constitutional
right
assistance
counsel
adams
case
course
necessarily
resolve
issue
us
held
constitution
force
lawyer
upon
defendant
whether
constitution
forbids
state
forcing
lawyer
upon
defendant
different
question
adams
recognize
albeit
dictum
affirmative
right
right
assistance
counsel
correlative
right
dispense
lawyer
help
legal
formalisms
rest
considerations
go
substance
accused
position
law
contrived
protections
accused
turned
fetters
deny
accused
choice
procedure
circumstances
though
layman
capable
lawyer
making
intelligent
choice
impair
worth
great
constitutional
safeguards
treating
empty
verbalisms
administration
criminal
law
hedged
constitutional
safeguards
protection
accused
deny
exercise
free
choice
right
dispense
safeguards
imprison
man
privileges
call
constitution
emphasis
added
courts
appeals
repeatedly
held
right
protected
bill
rights
plattner
appeals
second
circuit
emphasized
sixth
amendment
grants
accused
rights
confrontation
compulsory
process
witnesses
favor
assistance
counsel
minimum
procedural
requirements
federal
criminal
prosecutions
right
assistance
counsel
concluded
intended
supplement
rights
defendant
impair
absolute
primary
right
conduct
one
defense
propria
persona
found
support
decision
language
federal
statute
statutes
rules
governing
criminal
procedure
see
fed
rule
crim
proc
many
state
constitutions
expressly
guarantee
recognition
right
adams
price
grounds
appeals
held
implicit
fifth
amendment
guarantee
due
process
law
implicit
also
sixth
amendment
guarantee
right
assistance
counsel
right
accused
personally
manage
conduct
defense
criminal
case
see
also
ex
rel
maldonado
denno
mackenna
ellis
sternman
lowe
warner
haslam
compare
dougherty
app
intimating
right
constitutional
finding
unnecessary
reach
issue
brown
app
plurality
opinion
stating
right
statutory
nature
past
recognition
right
authority
holding
right
constitutional
dimension
state
constitutions
pointing
right
fundamental
nature
form
consensus
easily
ignored
mere
fact
path
beaten
one
justice
jackson
observed
persuasive
reason
following
confront
nearly
universal
conviction
part
people
well
courts
forcing
lawyer
upon
unwilling
defendant
contrary
basic
right
defend
truly
wants
iii
consensus
soundly
premised
right
finds
support
structure
sixth
amendment
well
english
colonial
jurisprudence
amendment
emerged
sixth
amendment
includes
compact
statement
rights
necessary
full
defense
criminal
prosecutions
accused
shall
enjoy
right
informed
nature
cause
accusation
confronted
witnesses
compulsory
process
obtaining
witnesses
favor
assistance
counsel
defence
sixth
amendment
provide
merely
defense
shall
made
accused
grants
accused
personally
right
make
defense
accused
counsel
must
informed
nature
cause
accusation
must
confronted
witnesses
must
accorded
compulsory
process
obtaining
witnesses
favor
although
stated
amendment
many
words
right
make
one
defense
personally
thus
necessarily
implied
structure
amendment
right
defend
given
directly
accused
suffers
consequences
defense
fails
counsel
provision
supplements
design
speaks
assistance
counsel
assistant
however
expert
still
assistant
language
spirit
sixth
amendment
contemplate
counsel
like
defense
tools
guaranteed
amendment
shall
aid
willing
defendant
organ
state
interposed
unwilling
defendant
right
defend
personally
thrust
counsel
upon
accused
considered
wish
thus
violates
logic
amendment
case
counsel
assistant
master
right
make
defense
stripped
personal
character
upon
amendment
insists
true
defendant
chooses
lawyer
manage
present
case
law
tradition
may
allocate
counsel
power
make
binding
decisions
trial
strategy
many
areas
cf
henry
mississippi
brookhart
janis
fay
noia
allocation
justified
however
defendant
consent
outset
accept
counsel
representative
unwanted
counsel
represents
defendant
tenuous
unacceptable
legal
fiction
unless
accused
acquiesced
representation
defense
presented
defense
guaranteed
constitution
real
sense
defense
sixth
amendment
naturally
read
thus
implies
right
reading
reinforced
amendment
roots
english
legal
history
long
history
british
criminal
jurisprudence
one
tribunal
ever
adopted
practice
forcing
counsel
upon
unwilling
defendant
criminal
proceeding
tribunal
star
chamber
curious
institution
flourished
late
early
centuries
mixed
executive
judicial
character
characteristically
departed
traditions
reasons
specialized
trying
political
offenses
star
chamber
centuries
symbolized
disregard
basic
individual
rights
star
chamber
merely
allowed
required
defendants
counsel
defendant
answer
indictment
accepted
unless
signed
counsel
counsel
refused
sign
answer
whatever
reason
defendant
considered
confessed
stephen
commented
procedure
something
specially
repugnant
justice
using
rules
practice
manner
debar
prisoner
defending
especially
professed
object
rules
used
provide
defense
stephen
history
criminal
law
england
star
chamber
swept
away
revolutionary
fervor
long
parliament
notion
obligatory
counsel
disappeared
common
law
time
representation
counsel
practice
prosecutions
serious
crime
one
time
every
litigant
required
appear
person
conduct
cause
words
right
counsel
developed
early
civil
cases
cases
misdemeanor
prohibition
assistance
counsel
continued
centuries
prosecutions
felony
treason
thus
centuries
accused
felon
traitor
stood
alone
neither
counsel
benefit
rights
notice
confrontation
compulsory
process
associate
genuinely
fair
adversary
proceeding
trial
merely
long
argument
prisoner
counsel
crown
harsh
seems
least
prisoner
allowed
make
statements
liked
obviously
public
oral
trial
presented
many
opportunities
prisoner
secret
enquiry
based
written
depositions
continent
taken
place
trial
treason
act
began
long
important
era
reform
english
criminal
procedure
statute
granted
accused
traitor
rights
copy
indictment
witnesses
testify
oath
make
full
defense
counsel
learned
law
also
provided
appointment
counsel
accused
desired
thus
new
rights
developed
accused
retained
established
right
make
statements
liked
right
counsel
viewed
guaranteeing
choice
representation
counsel
traditional
practice
ban
counsel
felony
cases
substantially
eroded
courts
finally
eliminated
statute
recent
years
parliament
provided
appointment
counsel
serious
criminal
cases
accused
request
point
process
reform
england
counsel
ever
forced
upon
defendant
rule
succinctly
stated
woodward
evidently
always
person
charged
criminal
offence
counsel
forced
upon
see
halsbury
laws
england
pp
ed
maybury
american
colonies
insistence
upon
right
anything
fervent
england
colonists
brought
appreciation
virtues
traditional
distrust
lawyers
colonies
first
settled
lawyer
synonymous
cringing
crown
arbitrary
justices
king
bent
conviction
opposed
king
prerogatives
twisting
law
secure
convictions
prejudice
gained
strength
colonies
distrust
lawyers
became
institution
several
colonies
prohibited
pleading
hire
century
prejudice
persisted
century
lower
classes
came
identify
lawyers
upper
class
years
revolution
confederation
saw
upsurge
antilawyer
sentiment
sudden
revival
war
revolution
old
dislike
distrust
lawyers
class
heat
sentiments
constitution
forged
say
colonies
slow
recognize
value
counsel
criminal
cases
colonial
judges
soon
departed
ancient
english
practice
allowed
accused
felons
aid
counsel
defense
time
however
basic
right
never
questioned
found
instance
colonial
required
defendant
criminal
case
accept
representative
unwanted
lawyer
indeed
even
counsel
permitted
general
practice
continued
right
guaranteed
many
colonial
charters
declarations
rights
early
documents
establish
right
counsel
meant
colonists
right
choose
pleading
lawyer
representing
oneself
declaration
independence
right
along
rights
basic
making
defense
entered
new
state
constitutions
wholesale
fashion
right
counsel
clearly
thought
supplement
primary
right
accused
defend
utilizing
personal
rights
notice
confrontation
compulsory
process
colonies
newly
independent
provided
statute
rather
constitution
appointment
counsel
criminal
cases
also
meticulously
preserved
right
accused
defend
personally
recognition
right
limited
state
lawmakers
noted
judiciary
act
signed
one
day
sixth
amendment
proposed
guaranteed
federal
courts
right
parties
plead
manage
causes
personally
assistance
counsel
stat
see
time
james
madison
drafted
sixth
amendment
state
constitutions
guaranteed
accused
right
heard
counsel
others
provided
accused
allowed
counsel
various
state
proposals
bill
rights
similar
variations
terminology
case
however
counsel
provision
embedded
package
defense
rights
granted
personally
accused
indication
differences
phrasing
counsel
reflected
differences
principle
state
colony
ever
forced
counsel
upon
accused
spokesman
ever
suggested
practice
tolerable
much
less
advisable
anyone
thought
sixth
amendment
drafted
failed
protect
right
undoubtedly
debate
comment
issue
none
sum
evidence
colonists
framers
ever
doubted
right
imagined
right
might
considered
inferior
right
assistance
counsel
contrary
colonists
framers
well
english
ancestors
always
conceived
right
counsel
assistance
accused
used
option
defending
framers
selected
sixth
amendment
form
words
necessarily
implies
right
conclusion
supported
centuries
consistent
history
iv
blinking
fact
right
accused
conduct
defense
seems
cut
grain
decisions
holding
constitution
requires
accused
convicted
imprisoned
unless
accorded
right
assistance
counsel
see
powell
alabama
johnson
zerbst
gideon
wainwright
argersinger
hamlin
surely
true
basic
thesis
decisions
help
lawyer
essential
assure
defendant
fair
trial
strong
argument
surely
made
whole
thrust
decisions
must
inevitably
lead
conclusion
state
may
constitutionally
impose
lawyer
upon
even
unwilling
defendant
one
thing
hold
every
defendant
rich
poor
right
assistance
counsel
quite
another
say
state
may
compel
defendant
accept
lawyer
want
value
counsel
unappreciated
founders
yet
notion
compulsory
counsel
utterly
foreign
whatever
else
may
said
wrote
bill
rights
surely
doubt
understood
inestimable
worth
free
choice
undeniable
criminal
prosecutions
defendants
better
defend
counsel
guidance
unskilled
efforts
defendant
voluntarily
accept
representation
counsel
potential
advantage
lawyer
training
experience
realized
imperfectly
force
lawyer
defendant
lead
believe
law
contrives
moreover
inconceivable
rare
instances
defendant
might
fact
present
case
effectively
conducting
defense
personal
liberties
rooted
law
averages
right
defend
personal
defendant
lawyer
state
bear
personal
consequences
conviction
defendant
therefore
must
free
personally
decide
whether
particular
case
counsel
advantage
although
may
conduct
defense
ultimately
detriment
choice
must
honored
respect
individual
lifeblood
law
illinois
allen
brennan
concurring
accused
manages
defense
relinquishes
purely
factual
matter
many
traditional
benefits
associated
right
counsel
reason
order
represent
accused
must
knowingly
intelligently
forgo
relinquished
benefits
johnson
zerbst
cf
von
moltke
gillies
plurality
opinion
black
although
defendant
need
skill
experience
lawyer
order
competently
intelligently
choose
made
aware
dangers
disadvantages
record
establish
knows
choice
made
eyes
open
adams
ex
rel
mccann
weeks
trial
faretta
clearly
unequivocally
declared
trial
judge
wanted
represent
want
counsel
record
affirmatively
shows
faretta
literate
competent
understanding
voluntarily
exercising
informed
free
trial
judge
warned
faretta
thought
mistake
accept
assistance
counsel
faretta
required
follow
ground
rules
trial
procedure
need
make
assessment
well
poorly
faretta
mastered
intricacies
hearsay
rule
california
code
provisions
govern
challenges
potential
jurors
voir
dire
technical
legal
knowledge
relevant
assessment
knowing
exercise
right
defend
forcing
faretta
circumstances
accept
public
defender
california
courts
deprived
constitutional
right
conduct
defense
accordingly
judgment
us
vacated
case
remanded
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
judge
informed
faretta
going
follow
procedure
going
ask
questions
right
objection
form
question
properly
taken
going
sustained
going
treat
like
gentleman
going
respect
going
give
every
chance
going
play
ground
rules
anybody
plays
know
ground
rules
know
ground
rules
lawyer
know
ground
rules
gets
tries
lot
cases
done
colloquy
follows
faretta
matter
brought
back
reconsideration
whether
continue
represent
getting
along
research
defendant
bad
honor
last
night
put
mail
motion
clerk
within
next
day
two
preparing
intricacies
trial
matter
defendant
well
honor
hoping
case
possibly
disposed
ayers
informed
yesterday
policy
hear
pretrial
motions
time
trial
possible
honor
like
date
set
soon
deems
adequate
receive
motion
sometime
trial
let
see
research
many
exceptions
hearsay
rule
defendant
well
hearsay
rule
guess
called
best
evidence
rule
honor
several
exceptions
case
law
actual
statutory
law
feel
none
challenges
jury
cause
defendant
well
twelve
peremptory
challenges
many
cause
defendant
well
many
deems
valid
grounds
challenging
juror
cause
defendant
well
numerous
grounds
challenge
witness
mean
juror
honor
one
juror
perhaps
suffered
victim
type
offense
might
prejudiced
toward
defendant
substantial
ground
might
make
juror
prejudice
toward
defendant
anything
else
defendant
well
relative
perhaps
victim
taken
look
code
section
see
defendant
challenge
juror
yes
defendant
yes
honor
done
code
section
defendant
voir
diring
jury
honor
yes
defendant
aware
section
right
offhand
code
defendant
well
research
done
challenging
witkins
jurisprudence
looked
codes
see
various
things
taken
defendant
honor
looked
california
codes
reference
trial
procedure
defendant
yes
honor
codes
defendant
done
extensive
research
penal
code
honor
civil
code
done
extensive
research
tell
defendant
empaneling
jury
honor
yes
defendant
well
district
attorney
defendant
defense
counsel
right
peremptory
challenges
jury
challenges
undisputable
reason
defense
prosecution
feel
juror
inadequate
try
case
rule
case
may
discharge
juror
valid
challenge
due
grounds
prejudice
grounds
considered
peremptory
challenges
numerous
defendant
defense
prosecution
right
make
inquiry
jury
feelings
toward
case
judge
concluded
aking
consideration
recent
case
people
versus
sharp
defendant
apparently
constitutional
right
represent
finds
ends
justice
requirements
due
process
require
prior
order
permitting
defendant
represent
pro
per
hereby
revoked
privilege
terminated
faretta
also
urged
without
success
entitled
counsel
choice
three
times
moved
appointment
lawyer
public
defender
motions
denied
people
sharp
cal
sharp
tried
california
constitution
expressly
provided
accused
criminal
prosecution
right
appear
defend
person
counsel
cal
art
earlier
decision
california
held
language
meant
accused
right
appear
counsel
people
mattson
cal
view
rejected
sharp
california
holding
defendant
criminal
prosecution
right
state
federal
constitution
represent
trial
see
generally
kamisar
lafave
israel
modern
criminal
procedure
ed
note
western
rev
note
hastings
comment
crim
although
immaterial
decision
shortly
sharp
decided
appeal
california
constitution
amended
delete
right
art
empower
legislature
expressly
require
defendant
felony
case
assistance
counsel
new
statutes
face
require
counsel
capital
cases
see
cal
penal
code
supp
capital
cases
accused
retains
statutory
terms
right
appear
defend
person
counsel
however
language
tracks
old
language
art
california
constitution
construing
constitutional
language
sharp
exclude
right
former
art
state
constitution
california
also
stated
provide
right
appeal
also
held
trial
abused
discretion
concluding
faretta
made
knowing
intelligent
waiver
right
represented
counsel
since
faretta
appear
aware
possible
consequences
waiving
opportunity
skilled
experienced
representation
trial
california
courts
conclusion
faretta
constitutional
right
represent
made
context
following
unusual
rules
california
criminal
procedure
indigent
criminal
defendant
right
appointed
counsel
choice
see
drumgo
superior
cal
people
miller
cal
people
massie
cal
people
taylor
cal
app
cal
rptr
appointed
counsel
manages
lawsuit
final
say
matters
trial
strategy
see
people
williams
cal
people
foster
cal
people
monk
cal
see
generally
rhay
browder
california
conviction
reversed
grounds
ineffective
assistance
counsel
except
extreme
case
quality
representation
poor
render
trial
farce
sham
people
ibarra
cal
see
people
miller
supra
people
floyd
cal
people
hill
cal
people
reeves
cal
see
mackreth
wilson
app
cappetta
state
dist
ct
app
lockard
state
idaho
people
nelson
blanton
state
ind
westberry
state
allen
commonwealth
mass
people
haddad
state
mcghee
neb
zasada
state
super
people
mclaughlin
state
pritchard
state
hollman
state
thomlinson
state
penderville
utah
state
woodall
app
see
generally
anderson
wharton
criminal
law
procedure
grant
accused
right
heard
defend
person
counsel
ariz
art
ark
art
colo
art
conn
art
del
art
idaho
art
ill
art
ind
art
const
bill
rights
mo
art
mont
art
nev
art
pt
art
art
art
art
ohio
art
okla
art
ore
art
pa
art
art
tenn
art
utah
art
vt
art
wis
art
see
la
art
others
grant
right
defend
person
counsel
const
bill
rights
mass
pt
art
neb
art
wash
art
still
others
provide
accused
right
defend
either
counsel
ala
art
fla
art
art
miss
art
art
tex
art
see
lockard
state
supra
people
nelson
supra
blanton
state
supra
zasada
state
supra
people
mclaughlin
supra
state
mems
state
verna
app
holding
adams
reaffirmed
different
context
carter
illinois
adverted
right
neither
historic
conception
due
process
vitality
derives
progressive
standards
justice
denies
person
right
defend
confess
guilt
appropriate
circumstances
constitution
requires
counsel
tendered
require
circumstances
counsel
forced
upon
defendant
emphasis
added
see
also
moore
michigan
jackson
full
faith
credit
lawyer
clause
constitution
rev
gideon
wainwright
argersinger
hamlin
right
counsel
pointer
texas
right
confrontation
washington
texas
right
compulsory
process
see
also
oliver
often
recognized
constitutional
stature
rights
though
literally
expressed
document
essential
due
process
law
fair
adversary
process
accepted
example
accused
right
present
stages
trial
absence
might
frustrate
fairness
proceedings
snyder
massachusetts
testify
behalf
see
harris
new
york
brooks
tennessee
cf
ferguson
georgia
convicted
guilt
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
winship
mullaney
wilbur
inference
rights
course
mechanical
exercise
singer
held
accused
right
bench
trial
despite
capacity
waive
right
jury
trial
holding
stated
ability
waive
constitutional
right
ordinarily
carry
right
insist
upon
opposite
right
statement
made
concluded
constitution
affirmatively
protect
right
tried
judge
recognizing
implied
right
must
arise
independently
design
history
constitutional
text
searched
find
indication
colonists
considered
ability
waive
jury
trial
equal
importance
right
demand
one
instead
locate
isolated
instances
right
trial
judge
concluded
clear
departures
common
law
ibid
follow
approach
singer
concern
independent
right
suggest
right
arises
mechanically
defendant
power
waive
right
assistance
counsel
see
supra
contrary
right
must
independently
found
structure
history
constitutional
text
result
sever
concept
counsel
historic
roots
first
lawyers
personal
friends
litigant
brought
might
take
counsel
pleading
pollock
maitland
history
english
law
ed
similarly
first
attorneys
personal
agents
often
lacking
professional
training
appointed
litigants
secured
royal
permission
carry
affairs
representative
rather
personally
star
chamber
efficient
somewhat
arbitrary
arm
royal
power
height
career
days
tudor
stuart
kings
star
chamber
stood
swiftness
power
competitor
common
law
much
limitation
reminder
high
state
policy
safely
entrusted
system
chancy
english
law
friedman
history
american
law
see
generally
holdsworth
history
english
law
proceedings
star
chamber
began
bill
engrossed
parchment
filed
clerk
must
like
pleadings
signed
counsel
however
counsel
obliged
careful
signed
put
hands
merely
frivolous
pleas
otherwise
misbehaved
conduct
cases
liable
rebuke
suspension
fine
imprisonment
holdsworth
supra
counsel
therefore
cautious
pleadings
signed
unduly
offend
crown
see
stephen
history
criminal
law
england
presented
merely
hypothetical
risk
accused
stephen
gives
following
account
criminal
libel
trial
star
chamber
william
prynne
informed
book
called
histrio
mastix
prynne
answer
amongst
things
book
licensed
one
counsel
holbourn
apologised
without
good
cause
style
trial
like
star
chamber
proceedings
perfectly
decent
quiet
sentence
described
monstrous
sentenced
disbarred
deprived
university
degrees
stand
twice
pillory
one
ear
cut
time
fined
perpetually
imprisoned
without
books
pen
ink
paper
five
years
prynne
bastwick
burton
tried
libel
sentenced
punishment
prynne
received
prynne
branded
cheeks
instead
losing
ears
procedure
case
appears
harsh
sentence
severe
though
think
much
noticed
star
chamber
defendants
allowed
counsel
required
get
answers
signed
counsel
effect
rule
probably
object
defence
put
counsel
take
responsibility
signing
responsibility
time
extremely
serious
counsel
sign
defendant
answer
taken
confessed
information
prynne
answer
character
one
counsel
assigned
refused
sign
sign
till
proper
time
bastwick
get
one
sign
answer
burton
answer
signed
counsel
set
aside
impertinent
upon
whole
case
taken
admitted
three
judgment
passed
accordingly
stephen
supra
pollock
maitland
supra
ibid
see
also
stephen
supra
trial
begin
accusations
counsel
crown
prisoner
usually
asked
granted
privilege
answering
separately
matter
alleged
trial
became
series
excited
altercations
prisoner
different
counsel
opposed
every
statement
counsel
operated
question
prisoner
prisoner
either
admitting
denying
explaining
alleged
result
examination
prisoner
essence
trial
answers
regulated
production
evidence
argument
proceeded
counsel
crown
frequently
allege
matters
prisoner
denied
called
upon
prove
proof
usually
given
reading
depositions
confessions
accomplices
letters
like
matter
fully
inquired
presiding
judge
repeated
summed
jury
matters
alleged
prisoner
answers
given
jury
gave
verdict
holdsworth
supra
right
call
witnesses
oath
extended
felony
cases
statute
anne
stat
statute
provided
pertinent
part
accused
shall
received
admitted
make
full
defence
counsel
learned
law
make
proof
produce
lawful
witness
witnesses
shall
upon
oath
defence
behalf
case
person
persons
accused
indicted
shall
desire
counsel
person
persons
shall
tried
judge
shall
hereby
authorized
required
immediately
upon
request
assign
person
persons
many
counsel
exceeding
two
person
persons
shall
desire
counsel
shall
free
access
seasonable
hours
law
usage
contrary
notwithstanding
holdsworth
supra
mary
blandy
murder
trial
example
declared
counsel
defendant
speak
points
law
raised
defense
also
examine
defense
witnesses
crown
tr
later
century
judges
often
allowed
counsel
accused
instruct
questions
ask
even
ask
questions
respect
matters
fact
law
blackstone
commentaries
statute
provided
pertinent
part
accused
shall
admitted
close
case
prosecution
make
full
answer
defence
thereto
counsel
learned
law
attorney
courts
attornies
practise
counsel
see
poor
prisoners
defence
act
edw
poor
prisoners
defense
act
geo
legal
aid
advice
act
geo
counsel
appointed
defendant
woodward
withdrew
shortly
trial
trial
appointed
substitute
counsel
defendant
objected
rather
legal
aid
rather
conduct
case
trial
insisted
however
defendant
proceed
trial
counsel
conviction
resulted
appeal
crown
even
attempt
deny
basic
right
argued
right
waived
accused
accepted
first
counsel
appeal
rejected
argument
prisoner
right
beginning
trial
said
wished
defend
refused
think
right
make
case
jury
instead
made
counsel
held
injustice
prisoner
although
good
deal
evidence
prisoner
quashed
conviction
warren
history
american
bar
boorstin
americans
colonial
experience
example
massachusetts
body
liberties
art
provided
every
man
findeth
himselfe
unfit
plead
owne
cause
shall
libertie
imploy
man
doth
except
helpe
provided
give
noe
fee
reward
paines
warren
supra
example
zephaniah
swift
one
first
american
colonial
treatises
law
made
clear
right
counsel
recognized
connecticut
wrote
never
admitted
cruel
illiberal
principle
common
law
england
man
trial
life
shall
refused
counsel
denied
means
defence
allowed
trifling
pittance
property
question
flimsy
pretence
counsel
prisoner
heighten
indignation
practice
apparent
least
consideration
never
furnish
person
accused
crime
advice
assistance
necessary
make
defence
ancestors
first
enacted
laws
respecting
crimes
influenced
illiberal
principles
imbibed
native
country
denied
counsel
prisoners
plead
thing
points
law
manifest
much
necessity
counsel
investigate
matters
fact
points
law
truth
discovered
swift
system
laws
state
connecticut
see
see
massachusetts
body
liberties
art
supra
similarly
concessions
agreements
west
new
jersey
provided
cases
civil
criminal
person
persons
shall
compelled
fee
attorney
councillor
plead
cause
persons
free
liberty
plead
cause
please
pennsylvania
frame
government
perhaps
influential
colonial
documents
protecting
individual
rights
schwartz
bill
rights
documentary
history
hereinafter
schwartz
provided
courts
persons
persuasions
may
freely
appear
way
according
manner
personally
plead
cause
unable
friends
article
ix
pennsylvania
declaration
rights
guaranteed
hat
prosecutions
criminal
offences
man
hath
right
heard
council
vermont
declaration
rights
art
protected
right
virtually
identical
language
georgia
constitution
art
lviii
declared
provisions
barring
unauthorized
practice
law
intended
exclude
person
inherent
privilege
every
freeman
liberty
plead
cause
massachusetts
declaration
rights
art
xii
provided
accused
right
heard
counsel
election
new
hampshire
bill
rights
art
xv
affirmed
right
accused
fully
heard
defence
counsel
delaware
constitution
art
preserved
right
language
modeled
art
ix
pennsylvania
declaration
rights
similarly
georgia
included
constitution
art
iii
provision
protected
right
accused
defend
counsel
state
constitutions
express
literal
terms
right
documents
granted
defense
rights
accused
personally
phrased
right
counsel
fashion
imply
existence
antecedent
liberty
see
del
declaration
rights
right
allowed
counsel
md
declaration
rights
art
xix
right
allowed
counsel
art
xvi
criminals
privileges
counsel
prosecutors
art
xxxiv
shall
allowed
counsel
founders
believed
basic
right
free
people
underlying
belief
antilawyer
sentiment
populace
also
natural
law
thinking
characterized
revolution
spokesmen
see
kauper
higher
law
rights
man
revolutionary
society
lecture
american
enterprise
institute
public
policy
research
series
american
revolution
extracted
law
school
law
quadrangle
notes
example
thomas
paine
arguing
support
pennsylvania
declaration
rights
said
either
party
natural
right
plead
cause
right
consistent
safety
therefore
retained
parties
may
able
therefore
civil
right
pleading
proxy
council
appendage
natural
right
thomas
paine
bill
rights
reprinted
schwartz
statutes
providing
appointment
counsel
request
accused
enacted
delaware
laws
state
delaware
adams
pennsylvania
stats
large
pennsylvania
busch
south
carolina
laws
province
south
carolina
trott
appointment
also
practice
connecticut
latter
part
century
appointment
apparently
sometimes
made
even
accused
failed
request
counsel
appeared
need
lawyer
indication
appointment
ever
made
objection
accused
see
swift
supra
appointment
remained
rule
new
republic
emerged
see
statute
new
hampshire
laws
new
hampshire
melcher
statute
new
jersey
acts
nineteenth
general
assembly
state
new
jersey
see
counsel
provisions
supra
ratifying
constitution
three
urged
provision
added
way
amendment
virginia
north
carolina
proposed
virtually
identical
packages
defendant
rights
including
provision
accused
allowed
counsel
schwartz
package
proposed
new
york
provided
accused
assistance
council
defense
idea
proposing
amendments
upon
ratification
begun
pennsylvania
dissenters
ratification
whose
proposed
package
defendant
rights
provided
accused
right
heard
counsel
seen
madison
precise
formulation
right
assistance
counsel
defence
varied
phrasing
proposals
available
debates
various
proposals
throw
light
significance
interpretation
congress
attributed
right
counsel
beaney
right
counsel
american
courts
stated
justice
sutherland
powell
alabama
even
intelligent
educated
layman
small
sometimes
skill
science
law
charged
crime
incapable
generally
determining
whether
indictment
good
bad
unfamiliar
rules
evidence
left
without
aid
counsel
may
put
trial
without
proper
charge
convicted
upon
incompetent
evidence
evidence
irrelevant
issue
otherwise
inadmissible
lacks
skill
knowledge
adequately
prepare
defense
even
though
perfect
one
requires
guiding
hand
counsel
every
step
proceedings
without
though
guilty
faces
danger
conviction
know
establish
innocence
true
men
intelligence
much
true
ignorant
illiterate
feeble
intellect
case
civil
criminal
state
federal
arbitrarily
refuse
hear
party
counsel
employed
appearing
reasonably
may
doubted
refusal
denial
hearing
therefore
due
process
constitutional
sense
see
supra
colonial
appointment
statutes
predate
sixth
amendment
federal
law
provided
appointment
counsel
capital
cases
request
accused
early
stat
see
amdt
freedom
choice
stranger
constitutional
design
procedural
protections
defendant
criminal
proceeding
example
criminal
defendant
privileged
testify
defense
refuse
harris
new
york
see
brooks
tennessee
ferguson
georgia
cf
brown
told
many
criminal
defendants
representing
may
use
courtroom
deliberate
disruption
trials
right
recognized
beginnings
federal
law
result
thereby
occurred
moreover
trial
judge
may
terminate
defendant
deliberately
engages
serious
obstructionist
misconduct
see
illinois
allen
course
state
may
even
objection
accused
appoint
standby
counsel
aid
accused
accused
requests
help
available
represent
accused
event
termination
defendant
necessary
see
dougherty
app
right
license
abuse
dignity
courtroom
neither
license
comply
relevant
rules
procedural
substantive
law
thus
whatever
else
may
may
open
appeal
defendant
elects
represent
thereafter
complain
quality
defense
amounted
denial
effective
assistance
counsel
see
supra
see
supra
chief
justice
burger
justice
blackmun
justice
rehnquist
join
dissenting
case
like
herring
new
york
post
announced
today
another
example
judicial
tendency
constitutionalize
thought
good
effort
fails
terms
nothing
desirable
useful
permitting
every
accused
person
even
uneducated
inexperienced
insist
upon
conducting
defense
criminal
charges
moreover
constitutional
basis
holding
add
problems
already
malfunctioning
criminal
justice
system
therefore
dissent
striking
feature
opinion
devotes
little
discussion
matter
concedes
core
decision
discerning
independent
basis
constitution
supposed
right
represent
oneself
criminal
trial
see
ante
ultimate
assertion
right
tucked
lines
sixth
amendment
contradicted
amendment
language
consistent
judicial
interpretation
seems
recognize
ante
conclusion
rights
guaranteed
sixth
amendment
personal
accused
reflects
nothing
obvious
fact
trial
therefore
need
defense
neither
nearly
trivial
proposition
language
amendment
speaks
uniformly
mandatory
terms
leads
conclusion
right
counsel
merely
supplementary
may
dispensed
whim
accused
rather
decisions
consistently
included
right
counsel
integral
part
bundle
making
larger
right
defense
know
example
oliver
reversed
summary
contempt
conviction
hands
grand
jury
say
hold
failure
afford
petitioner
reasonable
opportunity
defend
charge
false
evasive
swearing
denial
due
process
law
person
right
reasonable
notice
charge
opportunity
heard
defense
right
day
basic
system
jurisprudence
rights
include
minimum
right
examine
witnesses
offer
testimony
represented
counsel
reason
hardly
requires
explanation
fact
matter
extraordinarily
small
number
cases
accused
lose
whatever
defense
may
undertakes
conduct
trial
opinion
powell
alabama
puts
point
eloquently
even
intelligent
educated
layman
small
sometimes
skill
science
law
charged
crime
incapable
generally
determining
whether
indictment
good
bad
unfamiliar
rules
evidence
left
without
aid
counsel
may
put
trial
without
proper
charge
convicted
upon
incompetent
evidence
evidence
irrelevant
issue
otherwise
inadmissible
lacks
skill
knowledge
adequately
prepare
defense
even
though
perfect
one
requires
guiding
hand
counsel
every
step
proceedings
without
though
guilty
faces
danger
conviction
know
establish
innocence
true
men
intelligence
much
true
ignorant
illiterate
feeble
intellect
short
spirit
logic
sixth
amendment
every
person
accused
crime
shall
receive
fullest
possible
defense
vast
majority
cases
command
honored
means
expressly
guaranteed
right
counsel
trial
judge
best
position
determine
whether
accused
capable
conducting
defense
true
freedom
choice
society
interest
seeing
justice
achieved
vindicated
trial
retains
discretion
reject
attempted
waiver
counsel
insist
accused
tried
according
constitution
discretion
critical
element
basic
fairness
trial
judge
discretion
decline
accept
plea
guilty
see
santobello
new
york
ii
attempt
support
result
collecting
dicta
prior
decisions
persuasive
analysis
sixth
amendment
considered
context
cases
upon
relies
beat
path
either
lead
nowhere
point
precisely
opposite
direction
adams
ex
rel
mccann
carter
illinois
defendants
competently
waived
counsel
later
sought
renounce
actions
taken
proceeding
pro
se
cases
upheld
convictions
holding
neither
uncounseled
waiver
jury
trial
uncounseled
guilty
plea
inherently
defective
constitution
language
carefully
excises
opinions
relates
affirmative
right
consequences
waiver
adams
example
justice
frankfurter
careful
point
reference
defendant
correlative
right
dispense
lawyer
help
meant
may
waive
constitutional
right
assistance
counsel
see
warner
recognizes
power
waive
constitutional
right
carry
right
insist
upon
opposite
singer
similarly
carter
opinion
observed
constitution
require
circumstances
counsel
forced
upon
defendant
citing
adams
emphasis
added
one
find
statement
impossible
square
present
holding
accused
absolutely
entitled
dispense
lawyer
help
conditions
thus
although
adams
carter
support
conclusion
defendant
represents
may
thereafter
disaffirm
deliberate
trial
decisions
see
ante
provide
comfort
regarding
primary
issue
case
far
nearly
point
price
johnston
held
although
courts
appeals
possess
power
command
prisoner
produced
argue
appeal
exercise
power
matter
sound
judicial
discretion
examination
whole
reasoning
point
instructive
discretionary
nature
power
question
grows
fact
prisoner
absolute
right
argue
appeal
even
present
proceedings
appellate
absence
right
sharp
contrast
constitutional
prerogative
present
person
significant
stage
felony
prosecution
recognized
privilege
conducting
defense
trial
lawful
incarceration
brings
necessary
withdrawal
limitation
many
privileges
rights
retraction
justified
considerations
underlying
penal
system
among
limited
otherwise
unqualified
right
given
judicial
code
parties
courts
plead
manage
causes
personally
citations
omitted
appeals
cases
relied
upon
likewise
dubious
authority
views
one
cases
plattner
even
attempted
reasoned
analysis
issue
decision
case
largely
based
upon
misreading
adams
price
perpetuates
opinion
today
see
every
case
cited
ante
courts
appeals
assumed
right
constitutionally
based
found
right
violated
affirmed
conviction
review
highly
questionable
whether
holdings
even
establish
law
circuits
came
short
represents
road
reality
constitutional
trail
blazing
first
time
today
one
even
hinted
previous
decisions
far
interpretation
sixth
amendment
perversion
provision
gave
full
meaning
gideon
wainwright
argersinger
hamlin
iii
like
justice
blackmun
hesitate
participate
attempt
use
history
take
legal
analysis
piecing
together
shreds
english
legal
history
early
state
constitutional
statutory
provisions
without
full
elaboration
context
occurred
evidence
relied
upon
drafters
federal
constitution
creates
questions
answers
hardly
provides
firm
foundation
upon
creation
new
constitutional
rights
rest
well
reminded
employed
exhaustive
analysis
english
colonial
practices
regarding
right
counsel
justify
conclusion
fundamental
fair
trial
less
years
later
used
essentially
material
conclude
compare
powell
alabama
betts
brady
illustrate
point
single
historical
fact
cited
appear
truly
relevant
ascertaining
meaning
sixth
amendment
proves
much
points
ante
judiciary
act
provided
statutory
right
federal
criminal
trials
text
sixth
amendment
expressly
provides
right
counsel
proposed
day
judiciary
act
signed
hardly
suggested
members
congress
number
unfamiliar
amendment
carefully
structured
language
discussion
since
constitutional
convention
remarkable
suggest
right
conduct
one
defense
considered
critical
require
constitutional
protection
left
implication
rather
traditional
canons
construction
inclusion
right
judiciary
act
omission
constitutional
amendment
drafted
time
many
men
supports
conclusion
omission
intentional
way
reconcile
idea
sixth
amendment
impliedly
guaranteed
right
accused
conduct
defense
contemporaneous
action
congress
passing
statute
explicitly
giving
right
sixth
amendment
created
right
unnecessary
congress
enact
statute
subject
case
therefore
history
lead
judges
conclude
constitution
leaves
judgment
legislatures
flexible
process
statutory
amendment
question
whether
criminal
defendants
permitted
conduct
trials
pro
se
see
betts
brady
supra
fact
hinted
contrary
view
years
surely
entitled
weight
scales
cf
jackman
rosenbaum
iv
society
right
expect
courts
find
new
rights
implied
constitution
potential
effect
upon
resources
criminal
justice
system
considered
however
considerations
conspicuously
absent
opinion
case
hardly
needs
repeating
courts
levels
already
handicapped
unsupplied
demand
competent
advocates
result
often
takes
far
longer
complete
given
case
experienced
counsel
require
assume
widespread
exercise
newly
discovered
constitutional
right
almost
certainly
follow
added
congestion
courts
quality
justice
suffer
moreover
blandly
assumes
accused
elected
defend
bound
choice
heard
complain
later
ante
assumption
ignores
role
appellate
review
reported
cases
replete
instances
convicted
defendant
relieved
deliberate
decision
even
made
advice
counsel
see
silber
totally
unrealistic
therefore
suggest
accused
always
held
consequences
decision
conduct
defense
unless
may
case
persons
accused
crime
wit
insist
upon
dubious
benefit
confers
today
expect
many
expensive
prosecutions
nullified
appeal
reasons
trial
courts
deprived
power
prevent
absent
statute
giving
right
believe
trial
courts
discretion
constitution
insist
upon
representation
counsel
interests
justice
require
however
note
record
support
characterization
case
one
occurred
although
requested
initially
granted
permission
proceed
pro
se
petitioner
expressed
dissatisfaction
lawyer
represented
alleged
defense
impaired
lawyer
refused
honor
suggestions
regarding
trial
conducted
words
use
phrase
petitioner
never
contended
defense
fully
presented
instances
overbearing
ineffective
counsel
dealt
without
contriving
broad
constitutional
rules
dubious
validity
deliberately
view
properly
declines
characterize
case
one
defendant
denied
fair
trial
see
herring
new
york
post
rehnquist
dissenting
attempt
derive
support
position
fact
sixth
amendment
speaks
terms
assistance
counsel
requires
little
comment
curious
suggest
accused
exercises
right
assistance
thereby
impliedly
consented
subject
master
ante
counsel
responsibility
client
role
litigation
vary
depending
upon
whether
accused
preferred
represent
indeed
portion
quotation
warns
turning
constitutional
protections
fetters
refers
right
trial
jury
right
counsel
see
adams
ex
rel
mccann
course
squarely
held
constitutional
right
dispense
jury
singer
relevant
snyder
massachusetts
reference
case
accused
power
supersede
lawyers
simply
helped
explain
defense
might
made
easier
permitted
present
examination
jurors
summing
counsel
justice
cardozo
opinion
made
plain
right
rooted
considerations
fundamental
fairness
distinguished
conferred
confrontation
clause
see
present
reliance
snyder
dicta
therefore
misplaced
see
supra
fact
congress
retained
statutory
right
suggests
also
assumed
sixth
amendment
guarantee
right
see
damage
anticipate
defendant
ill
advised
insistence
conducting
defense
may
mitigated
appointing
qualified
lawyer
sit
case
traditional
friend
foreclose
option
see
ante
justice
blackmun
chief
justice
justice
rehnquist
join
dissenting
today
holds
sixth
amendment
guarantees
every
defendant
state
criminal
trial
right
proceed
without
counsel
whenever
elects
find
textual
support
conclusion
language
sixth
amendment
find
historical
evidence
relied
upon
unpersuasive
especially
light
recent
history
criminal
procedure
finally
fear
right
constitutionalized
today
frequently
cause
procedural
confusion
without
advancing
significant
strategic
interest
defendant
therefore
dissent
starting
point
course
language
sixth
amendment
criminal
prosecutions
accused
shall
enjoy
right
speedy
public
trial
impartial
jury
state
district
wherein
crime
shall
committed
district
shall
previously
ascertained
law
informed
nature
cause
accusation
confronted
witnesses
compulsory
process
obtaining
witnesses
favor
assistance
counsel
defence
argued
right
assistance
counsel
necessarily
carries
right
waive
assistance
counsel
recognizes
however
ante
squarely
rejected
mechanical
interpretation
bill
rights
chief
justice
warren
speaking
unanimous
singer
stated
ability
waive
constitutional
right
ordinarily
carry
right
insist
upon
opposite
right
sixth
amendment
one
find
right
according
necessarily
implied
structure
amendment
ante
chain
inferences
delicate
deserves
scrutiny
starts
proposition
sixth
amendment
compact
statement
rights
necessary
full
defense
ante
proposition
concludes
sixth
amendment
constitutionalizes
right
adversary
criminal
trial
make
defense
know
ibid
point
least
general
proposition
reasoning
unexceptionable
however
concludes
specific
rights
sixth
amendment
personal
accused
accused
must
right
exercise
rights
personally
stated
somewhat
succinctly
reasons
accused
personal
right
defense
know
necessarily
right
make
defense
personally
disagree
although
believe
specific
guarantees
sixth
amendment
personal
accused
agree
sixth
amendment
guarantees
particular
procedural
method
asserting
rights
accused
enjoyed
speedy
trial
impartial
jury
informed
nature
accusation
confronted
witnesses
afforded
power
compulsory
process
represented
effectively
competent
counsel
see
sixth
amendment
requires
suggests
thrusting
counsel
upon
accused
considered
wish
violates
logic
sixth
amendment
counsel
assistant
master
seeks
support
conclusion
historical
analogy
notorious
procedures
star
chamber
potential
exaggerated
analogy
however
markedly
diminished
one
recalls
petitioner
seeking
absolute
right
case
defense
counsel
wishes
defendant
inadequate
consultation
adopted
trial
strategy
significantly
affects
one
accused
constitutional
rights
overbearing
conduct
counsel
remedy
brookhart
janis
fay
noia
case
distrust
animosity
personal
differences
accused
counsel
rendered
effective
representation
unlikely
impossible
see
brown
craven
see
also
anders
california
even
case
defendant
forced
wishes
expend
personal
resources
pay
counsel
defense
see
generally
fuller
oregon
james
strange
instead
holds
defendant
criminal
proceeding
may
insist
representing
regardless
complex
trial
likely
regardless
frivolous
defendant
motivations
may
agree
anything
due
process
clause
sixth
amendment
requires
subordinate
solemn
business
conducting
criminal
prosecution
whimsical
albeit
voluntary
caprice
every
accused
wishes
use
trial
vehicle
personal
political
seems
suggest
long
accused
willing
pay
consequences
folly
reason
allowing
defendant
right
ante
see
also
ex
rel
maldonado
denno
ven
cases
accused
harming
insisting
conducting
defense
respect
individual
autonomy
requires
allowed
go
jail
banner
desires
view
ignores
established
principle
interest
state
criminal
prosecution
shall
win
case
justice
shall
done
berger
see
also
singer
part
believe
amount
pro
se
pleading
cure
injury
society
unjust
result
believe
result
prove
effective
balm
almost
frustrated
pro
se
defendant
ii
argues
conclusion
supported
historical
evidence
true
common
required
century
english
american
prosecutions
points
special
emphasis
guarantees
colonial
charters
early
state
constitutions
first
judiciary
act
evidence
contemporaneous
bill
rights
widespread
recognition
right
participate
reliance
historical
evidence
begin
historical
evidence
seems
inconclusive
revealing
original
understanding
language
sixth
amendment
time
amendment
first
proposed
right
right
assistance
counsel
federal
prosecutions
guaranteed
statute
sixth
amendment
expressly
constitutionalized
right
assistance
counsel
remained
conspicuously
silent
right
believes
silence
sixth
amendment
latter
right
evidence
framers
belief
right
obvious
fundamental
need
included
many
words
order
protected
amendment
believe
least
equally
plausible
conclude
amendment
silence
right
indicates
framers
simply
subject
mind
drafted
language
paucity
historical
support
position
becomes
far
profound
one
examines
background
two
developments
recent
history
criminal
procedure
first
middle
century
defendant
criminal
proceeding
country
almost
always
disqualified
testifying
witness
interest
outcome
see
generally
ferguson
georgia
thus
ability
defend
person
frequently
defendant
chance
present
side
case
judge
jury
see
wilson
state
draconian
rules
evidence
course
relic
past
virtually
every
state
passed
statute
abrogating
rule
disqualification
see
ferguson
georgia
abolition
disqualification
right
appear
person
well
counsel
lost
original
importance
see
grano
right
counsel
collateral
issues
affecting
due
process
rev
second
historical
development
elaboration
right
counsel
road
traveled
powell
alabama
argersinger
hamlin
need
recounted
purposes
sufficient
recall
start
finish
development
right
counsel
based
premise
representation
counsel
essential
ensure
fair
trial
concedes
acknowledges
strong
argument
surely
made
whole
thrust
decisions
must
inevitably
lead
conclusion
state
may
constitutionally
impose
lawyer
upon
even
unwilling
defendant
ante
nevertheless
concludes
must
allowed
despite
obvious
dangers
unjust
convictions
order
protect
individual
defendant
right
free
choice
already
indicated
agree
drastic
curtailment
interest
state
seeing
justice
done
real
objective
sense
iii
conclusion
note
briefly
procedural
problems
suspect
today
decision
visit
upon
trial
courts
future
although
indicates
pro
se
defendant
necessarily
waives
claim
might
otherwise
make
ineffective
assistance
counsel
ante
opinion
leaves
open
host
procedural
questions
must
every
defendant
advised
right
proceed
pro
se
must
notice
given
since
right
assistance
counsel
right
mutually
exclusive
waiver
right
measured
defendant
elected
exercise
right
proceed
pro
se
still
constitutional
right
assistance
standby
counsel
soon
criminal
proceeding
must
defendant
decide
proceeding
counsel
pro
se
must
allowed
switch
midtrial
may
violation
right
ever
harmless
error
must
trial
treat
pro
se
defendant
differently
professional
counsel
assume
many
questions
answered
finality
due
course
many
however
standards
waiver
treatment
pro
se
defendant
haunt
trial
every
defendant
elects
exercise
right
procedural
problems
spawned
absolute
right
far
outweigh
whatever
tactical
advantage
defendant
may
feel
gained
electing
represent
truth
old
proverb
one
lawyer
fool
client
opinion
today
bestows
constitutional
right
one
make
fool