ins
argued
october
decided
march
section
immigration
nationality
act
act
requires
attorney
general
withhold
deportation
alien
demonstrates
life
freedom
threatened
thereby
account
specified
factors
phrase
requires
showing
likely
alien
subject
persecution
country
returned
contrast
act
authorizes
attorney
general
discretion
grant
asylum
refugee
act
unable
unwilling
return
home
country
persecution
well
founded
fear
thereof
account
particular
factors
respondent
illegal
alien
deportation
hearing
immigration
judge
applied
likely
proof
standard
asylum
claim
holding
established
clear
probability
persecution
therefore
entitled
relief
board
immigration
appeals
bia
affirmed
appeals
reversed
holding
fear
standard
generous
standard
requires
asylum
applicants
show
either
past
persecution
good
reason
fear
future
persecution
accordingly
asylum
claim
remanded
bia
evaluate
proper
legal
standard
held
clear
probability
standard
proof
govern
asylum
applications
pp
plain
meaning
statutory
language
indicates
congressional
intent
proof
standards
differ
section
threatened
standard
subjective
component
fact
requires
objective
evidence
likely
alien
subject
persecution
upon
deportation
contrast
reference
fear
makes
asylum
eligibility
determination
turn
extent
alien
subjective
mental
state
fact
fear
must
well
founded
transform
standard
likely
one
moreover
different
emphasis
two
standards
highlighted
fact
although
congress
simultaneously
drafted
new
standard
amended
left
old
standard
intact
pp
legislative
history
demonstrates
congressional
intent
different
standards
apply
pp
argument
immigration
naturalization
service
ins
anomalous
less
stringent
eligibility
standard
since
affords
greater
benefits
fails
account
fact
alien
satisfies
standard
must
still
face
discretionary
asylum
decision
attorney
general
alien
satisfying
stricter
standard
automatically
entitled
withholding
deportation
pp
ins
argument
substantial
deference
accorded
bia
position
fear
clear
probability
standards
equivalent
unpersuasive
since
narrow
legal
question
identicality
pure
question
statutory
construction
within
traditional
purview
courts
question
interpretation
type
traditionally
left
administrative
agencies
pp
stevens
delivered
opinion
brennan
marshall
blackmun
joined
blackmun
filed
concurring
opinion
post
scalia
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
post
powell
filed
dissenting
opinion
rehnquist
white
joined
post
deputy
solicitor
general
wallace
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
solicitor
general
fried
assistant
attorney
general
willard
deputy
solicitor
general
kuhl
bruce
kuhlik
david
bernal
dana
marks
keener
argued
cause
respondent
brief
bill
ong
hing
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
filed
nations
high
commissioner
refugees
ralph
steinhardt
american
civil
liberties
union
et
al
carol
leslie
wolchok
burt
neuborne
lucas
guttentag
jack
novik
robert
weiner
american
immigration
lawyers
association
ira
kurzban
international
human
rights
law
group
et
al
edward
bruce
lawyers
committee
human
rights
et
al
richard
ziegler
arthur
helton
samuel
rabinove
richard
foltin
ruti
teitel
steven
freeman
richard
rubin
justice
stevens
delivered
opinion
since
immigration
nationality
act
provided
two
methods
otherwise
deportable
alien
claims
persecuted
deported
seek
relief
section
act
requires
attorney
general
withhold
deportation
alien
demonstrates
life
freedom
threatened
account
one
listed
factors
deported
ins
stevic
held
qualify
entitlement
withholding
deportation
alien
must
demonstrate
likely
alien
subject
persecution
country
returned
refugee
act
stat
also
established
second
type
broader
relief
section
act
authorizes
attorney
general
discretion
grant
asylum
alien
unable
unwilling
return
home
country
persecution
fear
persecution
account
race
religion
nationality
membership
particular
social
group
political
opinion
stevic
rejected
alien
contention
fear
standard
governs
applications
withholding
deportation
similarly
today
reject
government
contention
standard
requires
alien
show
likely
subject
persecution
governs
applications
asylum
congress
used
different
broader
language
define
term
refugee
used
used
describe
class
aliens
right
withholding
deportation
act
establishment
broad
class
refugees
eligible
discretionary
grant
asylum
narrower
class
aliens
given
statutory
right
deported
country
danger
mirrors
provisions
nations
protocol
relating
status
refugees
provided
motivation
enactment
refugee
act
addition
legislative
history
act
makes
perfectly
clear
congress
intend
class
aliens
qualify
refugees
coextensive
class
qualify
relief
respondent
nicaraguan
citizen
entered
visitor
remained
longer
permitted
failed
take
advantage
immigration
naturalization
service
ins
offer
voluntary
departure
ins
commenced
deportation
proceedings
respondent
conceded
country
illegally
requested
withholding
deportation
pursuant
asylum
refugee
pursuant
support
request
respondent
attempted
show
returned
nicaragua
life
freedom
threatened
account
political
views
support
request
attempted
show
fear
persecution
upon
return
evidence
supporting
claims
related
primarily
activities
respondent
brother
tortured
imprisoned
political
activities
nicaragua
respondent
brother
testified
believed
sandinistas
knew
two
fled
nicaragua
together
even
though
active
politically
interrogated
brother
whereabouts
activities
respondent
also
testified
brother
status
political
opposition
sandinistas
brought
government
attention
based
facts
respondent
claimed
tortured
forced
return
immigration
judge
applied
standard
evaluating
respondent
claim
withholding
deportation
evaluating
application
asylum
found
established
clear
probability
persecution
therefore
entitled
either
form
relief
app
pet
cert
appeal
board
immigration
appeals
bia
agreed
respondent
failed
establish
suffer
persecution
within
meaning
section
immigration
nationality
act
appeals
ninth
circuit
respondent
challenge
bia
decision
entitled
withholding
deportation
argued
eligible
consideration
asylum
contended
immigration
judge
bia
erred
applying
likely
standard
proof
asylum
claim
instead
asserted
applied
fear
standard
considered
generous
agreed
relying
text
structure
act
held
fear
standard
governs
asylum
proceedings
different
fact
generous
clear
probability
standard
governs
withholding
deportation
proceedings
agreeing
appeals
seventh
circuit
interpreted
standard
require
asylum
applicants
present
specific
facts
objective
evidence
prove
either
past
persecution
good
reason
fear
future
persecution
citing
ins
remanded
respondent
asylum
claim
bia
evaluate
proper
legal
standard
granted
certiorari
resolve
circuit
conflict
important
question
ii
refugee
act
established
new
statutory
procedure
granting
asylum
refugees
act
added
new
immigration
nationality
act
reading
follows
attorney
general
shall
establish
procedure
alien
physically
present
land
border
port
entry
irrespective
alien
status
apply
asylum
alien
may
granted
asylum
discretion
attorney
general
attorney
general
determines
alien
refugee
within
meaning
section
title
stat
term
refugee
means
person
outside
country
person
nationality
case
person
nationality
outside
country
person
last
habitually
resided
unable
unwilling
return
unable
unwilling
avail
protection
country
persecution
fear
persecution
account
race
religion
nationality
membership
particular
social
group
political
opinion
stat
addition
establishing
statutory
asylum
process
act
amended
withholding
deportation
provision
see
stevic
prior
attorney
general
discretion
whether
grant
withholding
deportation
aliens
however
agreed
comply
substantive
provisions
articles
nations
convention
relating
status
refugees
see
see
generally
stevic
supra
article
convention
reprinted
counterpart
statute
imposed
mandatory
duty
contracting
return
alien
country
life
freedom
threatened
account
one
enumerated
reasons
see
infra
thus
although
constrain
attorney
general
discretion
presumably
honored
dictates
nations
convention
event
act
removed
attorney
general
discretion
proceedings
stevic
considered
significant
enacting
act
congress
amend
standard
eligibility
relief
terms
refugee
hence
fear
made
integral
part
procedure
continued
play
part
thus
held
prior
consistent
construction
required
applicant
withholding
deportation
demonstrate
clear
probability
persecution
upon
deportation
remained
force
course
reasoning
based
large
part
plain
language
avail
since
expressly
provides
fear
standard
governs
eligibility
asylum
government
argues
however
even
though
fear
standard
applicable
difference
threatened
test
asks
us
hold
way
applicant
demonstrate
fear
persecution
prove
clear
probability
persecution
statutory
language
lend
reading
begin
language
congress
used
describe
two
standards
conveys
different
meanings
threatened
language
subjective
component
instead
requires
alien
establish
objective
evidence
likely
subject
persecution
upon
deportation
see
stevic
supra
contrast
reference
fear
standard
obviously
makes
eligibility
determination
turn
extent
subjective
mental
state
lien
linguistic
difference
words
fear
clear
probability
may
striking
subjective
objective
frame
reference
simply
conclude
standards
identical
ins
cert
pending
see
also
ins
case
fear
must
alter
obvious
focus
individual
subjective
beliefs
transform
standard
likely
one
one
certainly
fear
event
happening
less
chance
occurrence
taking
place
one
leading
authority
pointed
let
us
presume
known
applicant
country
origin
every
tenth
adult
male
person
either
put
death
sent
remote
labor
camp
case
apparent
anyone
managed
escape
country
question
fear
persecuted
upon
eventual
return
status
refugees
international
law
different
emphasis
two
standards
clear
face
statute
significantly
highlighted
fact
congress
simultaneously
drafted
amended
congress
chose
maintain
old
standard
incorporate
different
standard
congress
includes
particular
language
one
section
statute
omits
another
section
act
generally
presumed
congress
acts
intentionally
purposely
disparate
inclusion
exclusion
russello
supra
quoting
wong
kim
bo
contrast
language
used
two
standards
fact
congress
used
new
standard
define
term
refugee
certainly
indicate
congress
intended
two
standards
differ
iii
message
conveyed
plain
language
act
confirmed
examination
history
three
aspects
history
particularly
compelling
experience
prior
statute
dealing
asylum
abundant
evidence
intent
conform
definition
refugee
asylum
law
nations
protocol
bound
since
fact
congress
declined
enact
senate
version
bill
made
refugee
ineligible
asylum
unless
deportation
return
prohibited
practice
statutory
definition
term
refugee
contained
applies
two
asylum
provisions
within
immigration
nationality
act
section
governs
admission
refugees
seek
admission
foreign
countries
section
sets
process
refugees
currently
may
granted
asylum
prior
amendments
statutory
basis
granting
asylum
aliens
applied
within
asylum
aliens
applying
admission
foreign
countries
however
subject
previous
statutory
provision
congress
intent
respect
changes
sought
create
statute
instructive
discerning
meaning
term
fear
section
statute
authorized
attorney
general
permit
conditional
entry
certain
number
refugees
fleeing
areas
middle
east
persecution
fear
persecution
account
race
religion
political
opinion
stat
standard
applied
aliens
seeking
admission
pursuant
unquestionably
lenient
clear
probability
standard
applied
proceedings
matter
tan
example
bia
found
support
argument
alien
deportee
required
meet
standards
applied
section
act
seeking
relief
section
similarly
matter
adamska
board
held
alien
inability
satisfy
determinative
eligibility
substantially
broader
standards
one
differences
board
highlighted
statutes
requires
showing
applicant
subject
persecution
required
showing
applicant
unwilling
return
persecution
fear
persecution
emphasis
original
sum
repeatedly
recognized
standards
significantly
different
first
glance
one
might
conclude
wide
practice
old
spoke
fear
persecution
probative
meaning
term
fear
persecution
congress
adopted
analysis
legislative
history
however
demonstrates
congress
added
language
language
incorporated
nations
protocol
congress
sought
conform
see
infra
congress
told
extant
asylum
procedure
refugees
outside
acceptable
protocol
except
fact
made
various
unacceptable
geographic
political
distinctions
legislative
history
indicates
congress
way
wished
modify
standard
used
adoption
ins
argument
term
fear
requires
showing
clear
probability
persecution
clearly
violence
congress
intent
standard
admission
different
one
previously
applied
nations
protocol
one
thing
clear
legislative
history
new
definition
refugee
indeed
entire
act
one
congress
primary
purposes
bring
refugee
law
conformance
nations
protocol
relating
status
refugees
acceded
indeed
definition
refugee
congress
adopted
see
supra
virtually
identical
one
prescribed
article
convention
defines
refugee
individual
owing
fear
persecuted
reasons
race
religion
nationality
membership
particular
social
group
political
opinion
outside
country
nationality
unable
owing
fear
unwilling
avail
protection
country
nationality
outside
country
former
habitual
residence
unable
owing
fear
unwilling
return
origin
protocol
definition
refugee
found
constitution
international
refugee
organization
iro
see
stat
iro
defined
refugee
person
valid
objection
returning
country
nationality
specified
fear
based
reasonable
grounds
persecution
race
religion
nationality
political
opinions
constituted
valid
objection
see
iro
constitution
annex
pt
term
incorporated
nations
convention
relating
status
refugees
july
committee
drafted
provision
explained
expression
fear
victim
persecution
means
person
either
actually
victim
persecution
show
good
reason
fears
persecution
protocol
incorporated
fear
test
without
modification
standard
consistently
understood
drafted
well
drafting
documents
adopted
certainly
require
alien
show
likely
persecuted
order
classified
refugee
interpreting
protocol
definition
refugee
guided
analysis
set
forth
office
nations
high
commissioner
refugees
handbook
procedures
criteria
determining
refugee
status
geneva
handbook
explains
general
applicant
fear
considered
well
founded
establish
reasonable
degree
continued
stay
country
origin
become
intolerable
reasons
stated
definition
reasons
intolerable
returned
ch
ii
see
also
high
commissioner
analysis
nations
standard
consistent
examination
origins
protocol
definition
well
conclusions
many
scholars
studied
matter
simply
room
nations
definition
concluding
applicant
chance
shot
tortured
otherwise
persecuted
fear
event
happening
see
supra
pointed
stevic
moderate
interpretation
fear
standard
indicate
long
objective
situation
established
evidence
need
shown
situation
probably
result
persecution
enough
persecution
reasonable
possibility
stevic
dealt
issue
withholding
deportation
nonrefoulement
provision
corresponds
article
convention
significantly
though
article
extend
right
everyone
meets
definition
refugee
rather
provides
contracting
state
shall
expel
return
refouler
refugee
manner
whatsoever
frontiers
territories
life
freedom
threatened
account
race
religion
nationality
membership
particular
social
group
political
opinion
emphasis
added
thus
article
requires
applicant
satisfy
two
burdens
first
refugee
prove
least
fear
persecution
second
refugee
show
life
freedom
threatened
deported
section
imposition
threatened
requirement
entirely
consistent
obligations
protocol
section
contrast
discretionary
mechanism
gives
attorney
general
authority
grant
broader
relief
asylum
refugees
correspond
article
convention
instead
corresponds
article
see
article
provides
contracting
shall
far
possible
facilitate
assimilation
naturalization
refugees
like
provision
precatory
require
implementing
authority
actually
grant
asylum
eligible
also
like
alien
must
show
refugee
establish
eligibility
relief
showing
persecuted
required
thus
made
binding
protocol
article
provides
precatory
discretionary
benefit
entire
class
persons
qualify
refugees
whereas
article
provides
entitlement
subcategory
threatened
persecution
upon
return
precise
distinction
broad
class
refugees
subcategory
entitled
relief
plainly
revealed
act
see
stevic
congress
rejection
house
bill
sess
senate
bill
sess
provided
alien
must
refugee
within
meaning
act
order
eligible
asylum
two
bills
differed
however
house
bill
authorized
attorney
general
discretion
grant
asylum
refugee
whereas
senate
bill
imposed
additional
requirement
refugee
obtain
asylum
unless
deportation
return
prohibited
section
although
restriction
adopted
curtailed
attorney
general
discretion
grant
asylum
refugees
pursuant
affected
standard
used
determine
whether
alien
refugee
thus
inclusion
prohibition
senate
bill
indicates
senate
recognized
difference
fear
standard
standard
enactment
house
bill
rather
senate
bill
turn
demonstrates
congress
eventually
refused
restrict
eligibility
asylum
aliens
meeting
stricter
standard
principles
statutory
construction
compelling
proposition
congress
intend
sub
silentio
enact
statutory
language
earlier
discarded
favor
language
nachman
pension
benefit
guaranty
corporation
stewart
dissenting
cf
gulf
oil
copp
paving
russello
iv
ins
makes
two
major
arguments
support
contention
reverse
appeals
hold
applicant
show
fear
persecution
proving
likely
persecuted
reject
arguments
first
ignores
structure
act
second
misconstrues
federal
courts
role
reviewing
agency
statutory
construction
first
ins
repeatedly
argues
structure
act
dictates
decision
favor
since
anomalous
affords
greater
benefits
see
supra
less
stringent
standard
eligibility
argument
sorely
fails
take
account
fact
alien
satisfies
applicable
standard
right
remain
simply
eligible
asylum
attorney
general
discretion
chooses
grant
alien
satisfying
stricter
standard
contrast
automatically
entitled
withholding
deportation
matter
salim
example
board
held
alien
eligible
asylum
withholding
deportation
granted
limited
remedy
exercising
discretion
deny
asylum
see
also
walai
ins
supp
sdny
matter
shirdel
interim
decision
bia
consider
anomalous
entire
class
refugees
show
clear
probability
persecution
entitled
mandatory
suspension
deportation
eligible
discretionary
asylum
show
fear
persecution
entitled
anything
eligible
discretionary
relief
asylum
basis
ins
assertion
distinction
practical
significance
decisions
matter
salim
supra
matter
shirdel
supra
clearly
demonstrate
practical
import
distinction
moreover
act
amended
purpose
changing
discretionary
mandatory
provision
see
supra
congress
surely
considered
distinction
important
respect
definition
refugee
involved
house
report
provides
committee
carefully
considered
arguments
new
definition
might
expand
numbers
refugees
eligible
come
force
substantially
greater
refugee
admissions
country
absorb
however
merely
individual
group
comes
within
definition
guarantee
resettlement
ins
second
principal
argument
support
proposition
fear
clear
probability
standard
equivalent
bia
construes
two
standards
ins
argues
bia
construction
refugee
act
entitled
substantial
deference
even
conclude
appeals
reading
statutes
keeping
congress
intent
argument
unpersuasive
question
whether
congress
intended
two
standards
identical
pure
question
statutory
construction
courts
decide
employing
traditional
tools
statutory
construction
concluded
congress
intend
two
standards
identical
chevron
natural
resources
defense
council
explained
judiciary
final
authority
issues
statutory
construction
must
reject
administrative
constructions
contrary
clear
congressional
intent
citing
cases
employing
traditional
tools
statutory
construction
ascertains
congress
intention
precise
question
issue
intention
law
must
given
effect
citations
omitted
analysis
plain
language
act
symmetry
nations
protocol
legislative
history
lead
inexorably
conclusion
show
fear
persecution
alien
need
prove
likely
persecuted
home
country
find
ordinary
canons
statutory
construction
compelling
even
without
regard
longstanding
principle
construing
lingering
ambiguities
deportation
statutes
favor
alien
see
ins
errico
costello
ins
fong
haw
tan
phelan
deportation
always
harsh
measure
replete
danger
alien
makes
claim
subject
death
persecution
forced
return
home
country
enacting
refugee
act
congress
sought
give
sufficient
flexibility
respond
situations
involving
political
religious
dissidents
detainees
throughout
world
holding
today
increases
flexibility
rejecting
government
contention
attorney
general
may
even
consider
granting
asylum
one
fails
satisfy
strict
standard
whether
refugee
eventually
granted
asylum
matter
congress
left
attorney
general
decide
clear
congress
intend
restrict
eligibility
relief
prove
likely
persecuted
deported
judgment
appeals
affirmed
footnotes
compare
ins
ins
cert
pending
ins
case
ins
youkhanna
ins
sankar
ins
third
circuit
circuit
decide
since
decision
ins
stevic
standards
remain
identical
reached
conclusion
however
analysis
compelled
considered
bound
decision
rejaie
ins
see
sankar
supra
considered
whether
case
rendered
moot
recent
enactment
immigration
reform
control
act
pub
stat
nothing
act
affects
statutory
provisions
related
asylum
withholding
deportation
title
ii
act
creates
mechanism
certain
aliens
may
obtain
legalization
status
section
act
establishes
certain
exceptions
alien
resided
continuously
unlawful
status
since
january
entitled
status
adjusted
alien
lawfully
admitted
temporary
residence
alien
obtains
adjustment
status
new
act
eligible
second
adjustment
status
permanent
resident
waiting
period
months
see
alien
obtains
permanent
residence
status
route
however
eligible
benefits
usually
available
permanent
residents
example
aliens
obtain
permanent
residence
program
eligible
certain
public
welfare
benefits
five
years
grant
new
status
see
record
indicates
respondent
may
well
eligible
eventual
adjustment
status
makes
timely
application
attorney
general
establishes
procedures
administering
title
ii
therefore
appear
respondent
might
become
permanent
resident
invoking
new
procedures
even
unsuccessful
pending
request
asylum
nonetheless
possibility
relief
render
request
asylum
moot
first
legalization
provisions
act
procedures
administering
new
act
yet
place
even
benefits
identical
therefore
way
knowing
time
whether
respondent
able
satisfy
whatever
burden
placed
upon
demonstrate
eligibility
cf
ins
chadha
second
respondent
might
able
obtain
permanent
residence
asylum
procedure
sooner
legalization
program
satisfies
certain
conditions
may
become
eligible
adjustment
status
permanent
resident
months
grant
asylum
see
cfr
title
ii
new
act
contrast
waiting
period
light
factors
persuaded
controversy
moot
believe
new
act
makes
appropriate
exercise
discretion
dismiss
writ
certiorari
improvidently
granted
question
presented
case
arise
arisen
hosts
asylum
proceedings
brought
aliens
arrived
january
seeking
entry
refugees
countries
importance
legal
issue
makes
appropriate
us
address
merits
prior
amendments
asylum
aliens
within
governed
regulations
promulgated
ins
pursuant
attorney
general
broad
parole
authority
see
infra
asylum
applicants
within
generally
governed
act
see
infra
important
note
attorney
general
required
grant
asylum
everyone
meets
definition
refugee
instead
finding
alien
refugee
establish
alien
may
granted
asylum
discretion
attorney
general
emphasis
added
see
stevic
see
also
infra
asylum
withholding
deportation
two
distinct
forms
relief
first
mentioned
entitlement
asylum
granted
eligible
refugees
pursuant
attorney
general
discretion
granted
however
asylum
affords
broader
benefits
bia
explained
context
applicant
afghanistan
granted
relief
denied
asylum
section
relief
country
specific
accordingly
applicant
presently
protected
deportation
afghanistan
pursuant
section
section
prevent
exclusion
deportation
pakistan
hospitable
country
section
country
accept
contrast
asylum
greater
form
relief
granted
asylum
alien
may
eligible
adjustment
status
lawful
permanent
resident
pursuant
section
act
residing
one
year
subject
numerical
limitations
applicable
regulations
matter
salim
article
convention
provides
contracting
state
shall
expel
return
refouler
refugee
manner
whatsoever
frontiers
territories
life
freedom
threatened
account
race
religion
nationality
membership
particular
social
group
political
opinion
protocol
constrained
attorney
general
respect
protocol
require
granting
asylum
anyone
hence
subject
attorney
general
similar
constraint
respect
discretion
see
infra
amended
new
provides
attorney
general
shall
deport
return
alien
country
attorney
general
determines
alien
life
freedom
threatened
country
account
race
religion
nationality
membership
particular
social
group
political
opinion
emphasis
added
section
literally
provides
withholding
deportation
alien
life
freedom
threatened
country
deported
require
withholding
alien
might
subject
persecution
stevic
bia
agrees
term
fear
used
statute
refers
subjective
condition
emotion
characterized
anticipation
awareness
danger
matter
acosta
interim
decision
mar
citing
webster
third
new
international
dictionary
ed
explained
plain
language
statute
appears
settle
question
us
therefore
look
legislative
history
determine
whether
clearly
expressed
legislative
intention
contrary
language
require
us
question
strong
presumption
congress
expresses
intent
language
chooses
see
james
consumer
product
safety
gte
sylvania
case
far
causing
us
question
conclusion
flows
statutory
language
legislative
history
adds
compelling
support
holding
congress
never
intended
restrict
eligibility
asylum
aliens
satisfy
strict
objective
standard
definition
also
applies
governs
adjustment
status
refugees
granted
asylum
procedure
authorized
regulation
since
see
cfr
pt
administered
ins
district
directors
rather
bia
noted
stevic
regulations
explicitly
adopt
standard
exercise
discretion
application
provide
denial
asylum
application
shall
preclude
alien
subsequent
expulsion
hearing
applying
benefits
section
act
articles
convention
relating
status
refugees
cfr
regulations
amended
confer
jurisdiction
asylum
requests
bia
first
time
ibid
see
also
matter
janus
janek
bia
district
director
level
claims
generally
processed
see
supra
distinction
also
recognized
matter
ugricic
district
director
articulated
test
whether
applicant
prove
persecuted
good
reason
fear
persecution
see
hereafter
substantive
standard
asylum
changed
hereafter
discussing
geographic
limitations
hearings
house
subcommittee
international
operations
committee
foreign
affairs
remarks
david
martin
ins
argues
congress
intended
perpetuate
standard
used
informal
parole
proceedings
regulations
see
supra
asylum
procedure
regulations
provided
standard
amended
provide
applicant
burden
satisfying
immigration
judge
subject
persecution
cfr
standard
identical
one
set
forth
regulations
treatment
applications
withholding
deportation
see
cfr
argument
congress
intended
adhere
standard
used
informal
parole
proceedings
squared
congress
use
entirely
different
formulation
standard
defining
refugee
one
much
closer
statute
focus
standard
developed
regulations
moreover
extent
congress
ambiguous
practice
sought
incorporate
far
reasonable
conclude
sought
continue
practice
statutory
provision
adhere
informal
parole
practices
attorney
general
matter
congress
involvement
government
relies
following
passage
senate
report
support
contention
congress
sought
incorporate
standard
parole
proceedings
bill
establishes
asylum
provision
immigration
nationality
act
first
time
improving
clarifying
procedures
determining
asylum
claims
filed
aliens
physically
present
substantive
standard
changed
justice
powell
claim
house
report
also
sought
incorporate
informal
asylum
standard
unfounded
post
passage
quotes
context
plainly
indicate
house
report
referred
means
entry
issue
dealt
asylum
regulations
see
committee
reference
attorney
general
asylum
procedures
seven
pages
later
text
discussion
labeled
asylum
even
dealing
definition
fear
see
certainly
nothing
support
justice
powell
conclusion
although
evidence
concerns
application
term
refugee
term
defined
obviously
one
meaning
justice
powell
suggests
definition
fear
interpreted
incorporating
standard
asylum
regulations
rather
standard
natural
speak
preserving
interpretation
governed
form
relief
one
applied
different
form
relief
post
emphasis
added
since
definition
applies
asylum
relief
corresponding
old
well
corresponding
old
attorney
general
regulations
difficult
understand
justice
powell
reasons
likely
congress
preserved
form
relief
emphasis
added
question
answer
based
congress
choice
language
legislative
history
congress
sought
incorporate
standard
used
see
conf
displaced
persons
act
stat
congress
adopted
iro
definition
term
refugee
thus
used
fear
persecution
standard
standard
retained
refugee
relief
act
stat
well
refugee
escapee
act
stat
congress
enacted
act
used
fear
persecution
standard
interpretation
afforded
iro
definition
important
understanding
nations
definition
since
committee
drafting
nations
definition
made
clear
sought
assure
new
consolidated
convention
afford
least
much
protection
refugees
provided
previous
agreements
nations
economic
social
council
report
ad
hoc
committee
statelessness
related
problems
doc
hereafter
manual
eligibility
officers
iro
stated
fear
persecution
regarded
valid
objection
whenever
applicant
make
plausible
owing
religious
political
convictions
race
afraid
discrimination
persecution
returning
home
reasonable
grounds
understood
meaning
applicant
give
plausible
coherent
account
fears
persecution
international
refugee
organization
manual
eligibility
officers
ch
iv
annex
pt
undated
circulated
although
never
party
convention
party
protocol
incorporates
convention
definition
relevant
part
see
suggest
course
explanation
handbook
force
law
way
binds
ins
reference
asylum
provisions
indeed
handbook
disclaims
force
explaining
determination
refugee
status
convention
protocol
incumbent
upon
contracting
state
whose
territory
refugee
finds
office
nations
high
commissioner
refugees
handbook
procedures
criteria
determining
refugee
status
ii
geneva
nonetheless
handbook
provides
significant
guidance
construing
protocol
congress
sought
conform
widely
considered
useful
giving
content
obligations
protocol
establishes
see
mcmullen
ins
matter
frentescu
bia
matter
bia
board
decision
matter
dunar
particularly
probative
protocol
means
interacts
provisions
act
dunar
board
faced
question
whether
accession
protocol
modified
standard
proof
applied
board
elaborating
principle
treaties
lightly
read
superseding
prior
acts
congress
found
evidence
congress
sought
modify
standard
therefore
construed
provisions
inherently
inconsistent
even
board
recognized
tension
standards
satisfied
reconciled
consideration
arise
whether
board
correct
dunar
holding
based
presumption
two
provisions
consistent
says
little
protocol
interpreted
absent
presumption
given
congress
amendment
statute
make
conform
protocol
see
distinguishing
prediction
relation
standards
analysis
congress
actual
intent
see
status
refugees
international
law
real
chance
suffer
persecution
reason
good
enough
fear
refugee
international
law
balance
probability
test
inappropriate
appropriate
test
reasonable
chance
substantial
grounds
thinking
serious
possibility
see
generally
cox
fear
persecuted
sources
application
criterion
refugee
status
brooklyn
law
act
made
withholding
deportation
mandatory
order
comply
article
see
supra
section
senate
bill
provided
attorney
general
shall
establish
uniform
procedure
alien
physically
present
irrespective
status
apply
asylum
alien
shall
granted
asylum
refugee
within
meaning
section
deportation
return
prohibited
section
act
see
act
culmination
decade
legislative
proposals
reform
refugee
laws
see
generally
anker
posner
forty
year
crisis
legislative
history
refugee
act
san
diego
rev
number
occasions
period
government
objected
fear
standard
arguing
limited
providing
fear
opinion
attorney
general
failure
add
opinion
attorney
general
make
extremely
difficult
administer
section
since
entirely
subjective
western
hemisphere
immigration
hearings
subcommittee
committee
judiciary
statement
hon
francis
kellogg
special
assistant
secretary
state
see
also
anker
posner
supra
helton
political
asylum
refugee
act
unfulfilled
promise
ref
light
kind
testimony
attention
issue
unrealistic
suggest
congress
realize
fear
standard
significantly
different
standard
continuously
part
certain
exceptions
relevant
see
alien
participated
persecution
person
alien
convicted
serious
crime
constitutes
danger
community
view
ins
heavy
reliance
principle
deference
described
chevron
natural
resources
defense
council
set
forth
relevant
text
entirety
reviews
agency
construction
statute
administers
confronted
two
questions
first
always
question
whether
congress
directly
spoken
precise
question
issue
intent
congress
clear
end
matter
well
agency
must
give
effect
unambiguously
expressed
intent
congress
however
determines
congress
directly
addressed
precise
question
issue
simply
impose
construction
statute
necessary
absence
administrative
interpretation
rather
statute
silent
ambiguous
respect
specific
issue
question
whether
agency
answer
based
permissible
construction
statute
power
administrative
agency
administer
congressionally
created
program
necessarily
requires
formulation
policy
making
rules
fill
gap
left
implicitly
explicitly
congress
morton
ruiz
congress
explicitly
left
gap
agency
fill
express
delegation
authority
agency
elucidate
specific
provision
statute
regulation
legislative
regulations
given
controlling
weight
unless
arbitrary
capricious
manifestly
contrary
statute
sometimes
legislative
delegation
agency
particular
question
implicit
rather
explicit
case
may
substitute
construction
statutory
provision
reasonable
interpretation
made
administrator
agency
long
recognized
considerable
weight
accorded
executive
department
construction
statutory
scheme
entrusted
administer
principle
deference
administrative
interpretations
consistently
followed
whenever
decision
meaning
reach
statute
involved
reconciling
conflicting
policies
full
understanding
force
statutory
policy
given
situation
depended
upon
ordinary
knowledge
respecting
matters
subjected
agency
regulations
choice
represents
reasonable
accommodation
conflicting
policies
committed
agency
care
statute
disturb
unless
appears
statute
legislative
history
accommodation
one
congress
sanctioned
shimer
accord
capital
cities
cable
crisp
light
principles
clear
appeals
misconceived
nature
role
reviewing
regulations
issue
determined
examination
legislation
congress
actually
intent
regarding
applicability
bubble
concept
permit
program
question
whether
view
concept
inappropriate
general
context
program
designed
improve
air
quality
whether
administrator
view
appropriate
context
particular
program
reasonable
one
based
examination
legislation
history
follows
agree
appeals
congress
specific
intention
applicability
bubble
concept
cases
conclude
epa
use
concept
reasonable
policy
choice
agency
make
citations
footnotes
omitted
additional
reason
rejecting
ins
request
heightened
deference
position
inconsistency
positions
bia
taken
years
agency
interpretation
relevant
provision
conflicts
agency
earlier
interpretation
entitled
considerably
less
deference
consistently
held
agency
view
watt
alaska
see
also
general
electric
gilbert
bia
answered
question
relationship
objective
standard
standard
nations
protocol
least
three
different
ways
period
enacted
bia
expressly
recognized
prescribed
different
standards
see
supra
moreover
although
bia
decided
two
standards
irreconcilably
different
see
matter
dunar
ins
still
instructing
officials
apply
good
reason
test
requests
asylum
aliens
within
see
dept
justice
ins
operating
instructions
regulations
tm
explaining
fear
satisfied
applicant
show
good
reason
fears
persecution
case
decided
bia
adhered
view
ins
espouses
complete
identity
standards
however
bia
decided
reevaluate
position
issued
comprehensive
opinion
explain
latest
understanding
fear
standard
matter
acosta
interim
decision
mar
acosta
bia
noted
number
similarities
two
standards
concluded
practical
application
comparable
essentially
comparable
differences
meaningful
agency
never
stated
identical
equivalent
interchangeable
contrary
acosta
opinion
establishes
two
standards
differ
describing
objective
component
asylum
standard
bia
concluded
alien
required
establish
likelihood
persecution
particular
degree
certainty
must
real
chance
alien
become
victim
persecution
necessary
show
persecution
likely
occur
acosta
opinion
written
decided
stevic
standard
requires
application
supported
evidence
establishing
likely
alien
subject
persecution
decision
acosta
long
pattern
erratic
treatment
issue
make
apparent
bia
consistently
agreed
even
today
completely
agree
ins
litigation
position
two
standards
equivalent
meaningful
differences
two
standards
may
question
fully
decided
abstract
fact
congress
prescribed
two
different
standards
act
certainly
implies
intended
significantly
different
meanings
accept
ins
argument
impossible
think
fear
except
likely
terms
board
able
long
time
see
matter
tan
matter
adamska
apparently
little
trouble
applying
two
separate
standards
compliance
recent
courts
appeals
decisions
see
matter
sanchez
escobar
interim
decision
justice
powell
argues
appeals
reversed
different
reason
misinterpreted
bia
decision
see
post
issue
raised
parties
briefs
neither
set
forth
fairly
included
within
question
presented
petition
certiorari
see
rule
question
presented
asked
whether
alien
burden
proving
eligibility
asylum
pursuant
section
immigration
nationality
act
equivalent
burden
proving
eligibility
withholding
deportation
pursuant
section
act
pet
cert
justice
blackmun
concurring
join
opinion
judgment
thus
accept
narrow
conclusion
immigration
judge
bia
incorrect
holding
standards
withholding
deportation
granting
asylum
identical
ante
accordance
holding
eschews
attempt
give
substance
term
fear
leaves
task
process
adjudication
ins
agency
charge
administering
immigration
laws
ibid
write
separately
briefly
emphasize
understanding
opinion
directed
ins
appropriate
sources
agency
derive
meaning
fear
standard
meaning
refined
later
adjudication
emphasis
believe
particularly
needed
agency
previous
interpretation
statutory
term
strikingly
contrary
plain
language
legislative
history
thus
observes
ante
language
term
fear
demands
particular
type
analysis
examination
subjective
feelings
applicant
asylum
coupled
inquiry
objective
nature
articulated
reasons
fear
moreover
describing
act
congress
attempting
bring
country
refugee
laws
conformity
nations
protocol
notes
act
definition
refugee
wherein
fear
term
appears
ante
tracks
language
protocol
see
ante
language
rich
history
interpretation
international
law
scholarly
commentaries
see
ante
nn
ins
need
ignore
sources
guidance
directions
significant
agency
formulation
fear
standard
finally
view
opinions
courts
appeals
almost
uniformly
rejected
ins
misreading
statutory
language
legislative
history
provide
admirable
example
adjudication
needed
development
standard
although
refers
conflict
among
courts
see
ante
one
exception
see
courts
appeals
addressed
question
concluded
standards
withholding
deportation
granting
asylum
rather
differences
opinion
arisen
precise
formulation
fear
standard
differences
arise
courts
agencies
seriously
grapple
problems
developing
standard
whose
form
first
given
statutory
language
intimations
legislative
history
whose
final
contours
shaped
application
standard
facts
specific
cases
efforts
courts
stand
stark
contrast
sad
say
alone
make
years
seemingly
purposeful
blindness
ins
begins
task
developing
standard
entrusted
care
see
ins
relevant
fear
reasonable
person
keeping
mind
context
reasonable
person
facing
possibility
persecution
perhaps
including
loss
freedom
even
cases
loss
life
ins
cert
pending
alien
possesses
fear
persecution
reasonable
person
circumstances
fear
persecution
returned
native
country
ins
case
contrast
term
fear
requires
alien
subjective
fear
fear
enough
basis
considered
ins
applicant
must
present
specific
facts
establishing
actually
victim
persecution
good
reason
fear
singled
persecution
account
race
religion
nationality
membership
particular
social
group
political
opinion
emphasis
original
justice
scalia
concurring
judgment
agree
plain
meaning
fear
structure
immigration
nationality
act
act
clearly
demonstrate
fear
standard
clear
probability
standard
equivalent
concur
judgment
rather
join
opinion
however
two
reasons
first
despite
reached
conclusion
undertakes
exhaustive
investigation
legislative
history
act
ante
attempts
justify
inquiry
relying
upon
doctrine
legislative
history
enactment
reveals
clearly
expressed
legislative
intention
contrary
enactment
language
required
question
strong
presumption
congress
expresses
intent
language
chooses
ante
although
true
recent
times
expressed
approval
doctrine
mind
deviation
venerable
principle
language
statute
clear
language
must
given
effect
least
absence
patent
absurdity
see
wiltberger
wheat
opinion
marshall
hartwell
wall
bate
refrigerating
sulzberger
opinion
harlan
caminetti
packard
motor
car
nlrb
opinion
jackson
sullivan
opinion
black
unexcelled
chemical
opinion
douglas
judges
interpret
laws
rather
reconstruct
legislators
intentions
language
laws
clear
free
replace
unenacted
legislative
intent
even
lights
however
explication
legislative
history
act
excessive
ins
makes
number
specific
arguments
based
upon
legislative
history
act
sufficed
seems
determine
whether
specific
arguments
establish
clearly
expressed
legislative
intent
two
standards
equivalent
think
obvious
apparently
simply
need
lengthy
effort
ascertain
import
entire
legislative
history
effort
objectionable
gratuitous
concerned
interpreted
suggest
similarly
exhaustive
analyses
generally
appropriate
worse
yet
required
cases
language
enactment
issue
clear
also
fear
case
conduct
inquiry
interpreted
betrayal
assurance
attempt
set
forth
detailed
description
fear
test
applied
ante
see
ante
appearing
endorse
particular
interpretation
fear
far
troubled
however
discussion
question
whether
ins
interpretation
fear
entitled
deference
since
quite
rightly
concludes
ins
interpretation
clearly
inconsistent
plain
meaning
phrase
structure
act
see
ante
simply
need
thus
justification
discussion
whether
interpretation
entitled
deference
see
chevron
natural
resources
defense
council
intent
congress
clear
end
matter
well
agency
must
give
effect
unambiguously
expressed
intent
congress
omitted
even
unjustifiable
however
use
superfluous
discussion
occasion
express
controversial
believe
erroneous
views
meaning
decision
chevron
chevron
stated
unambiguously
expressed
intent
congress
may
substitute
construction
statutory
provision
reasonable
interpretation
made
administrator
agency
consistently
interpreted
chevron
extremely
important
frequently
cited
opinion
courts
appeals
holding
courts
must
give
effect
reasonable
agency
interpretation
statute
unless
interpretation
inconsistent
clearly
expressed
congressional
intent
see
japan
whaling
assn
american
cetacean
fulton
hillsborough
county
florida
automated
medical
laboratories
chemical
manufacturers
assn
natural
resources
defense
council
discussion
flatly
inconsistent
interpretation
first
implies
courts
may
substitute
interpretation
statute
agency
whenever
mploying
traditional
tools
statutory
construction
able
reach
conclusion
proper
interpretation
statute
ante
approach
make
deference
doctrine
desperation
authorizing
courts
defer
otherwise
unable
construe
enactment
issue
interpretation
evisceration
chevron
also
implies
courts
may
substitute
interpretation
statute
agency
whenever
face
pure
question
statutory
construction
courts
decide
ante
rather
question
interpretation
agency
required
apply
legal
standard
particular
set
facts
ante
support
adduced
proposition
contradicted
case
purports
interpreting
since
chevron
deferred
environmental
protection
agency
abstract
interpretation
phrase
stationary
source
view
badly
misinterprets
chevron
fundamentally
however
neither
share
understand
eagerness
refashion
important
principles
administrative
law
case
questions
completely
unnecessary
decision
fully
briefed
parties
concur
judgment
justice
powell
chief
justice
justice
white
join
dissenting
many
people
come
country
fear
persecution
homeland
congress
provided
two
forms
relief
people
asylum
see
immigration
nationality
act
added
stat
withholding
deportation
see
stat
amended
stat
board
immigration
appeals
bia
concluded
practical
distinction
objective
proofs
alien
must
submit
eligible
two
forms
relief
rejects
conclusion
believe
bia
interpretation
statute
reasonable
dissent
opinion
seems
assume
bia
adopted
rigorous
mathematical
approach
asylum
cases
requiring
aliens
demonstrate
objectively
quantifiable
risk
persecution
homeland
argues
position
inconsistent
language
history
act
never
bia
position
thus
useful
examine
bia
approach
detail
evaluating
rejection
bia
approach
bia
tribunal
primary
responsibility
applying
act
greatest
experience
bia
interpretation
statutory
term
fear
appears
matter
acosta
interim
decision
mar
bia
analysis
immigration
judge
evaluating
asylum
application
begin
determining
underlying
historical
facts
burden
persuasion
rests
applicant
must
establish
truth
facts
preponderance
evidence
see
citing
inter
alia
gordon
rosenfield
immigration
law
procedure
rev
ed
immigration
judge
decided
historical
facts
applicant
demonstrated
decides
whether
facts
meet
definition
refugee
set
forth
act
major
point
contention
case
concerns
section
requirement
fear
acosta
bia
adhered
interpretation
language
developed
matter
dunar
requirement
fear
rules
apprehension
purely
subjective
sort
showing
must
made
ordinarily
done
objective
evidence
claimant
testimony
facts
sometimes
available
crucial
question
whether
testimony
accepted
true
makes
realistic
likelihood
persecuted
acosta
supra
quoting
dunar
supra
emphasis
added
acosta
board
use
words
realistic
likelihood
mean
fear
persecution
requires
alien
establish
particular
degree
certainty
probability
opposed
possibility
become
victim
persecution
rather
practical
matter
mean
best
described
follows
evidence
must
demonstrate
alien
possesses
belief
characteristic
persecutor
seeks
overcome
others
means
punishment
sort
persecutor
already
aware
easily
become
aware
alien
possesses
belief
characteristic
persecutor
capability
punishing
alien
persecutor
inclination
punish
alien
acosta
supra
one
might
conclude
fear
persecution
requires
showing
persecution
likely
occur
refers
standard
different
clear
probability
persecution
requires
showing
persecution
likely
occur
practical
matter
however
facts
asylum
withholding
cases
produce
instances
fine
distinctions
meaningfully
made
inquiry
cases
quantitative
examine
variety
statistics
discern
theoretical
degree
likelihood
persecution
rather
inquiry
qualitative
examine
alien
experiences
external
events
determine
kind
enable
us
conclude
alien
likely
become
victim
persecution
context
find
meaningful
distinction
standard
requiring
showing
persecution
likely
occur
standard
requiring
showing
persecution
likely
occur
accordingly
conclude
standards
asylum
withholding
deportation
meaningfully
different
practical
application
converge
ii
part
ii
opinion
examines
language
act
section
provides
attorney
general
shall
grant
withholding
deportation
country
alien
life
freedom
threatened
section
provides
attorney
general
discretion
grant
asylum
attorney
general
determines
alien
refugee
crucial
language
act
added
stat
defines
refugee
person
fear
persecution
view
language
disposes
case
ante
respect
issue
presented
case
find
language
far
ambiguous
respondent
contends
bia
fallen
error
equating
objective
showings
required
notes
language
differs
language
contemplates
partially
subjective
inquiry
premise
moves
little
explanation
conclusion
objective
inquiries
two
sections
necessarily
different
reaching
conclusion
gives
short
shrift
words
clearly
require
objective
basis
alien
fear
critical
question
presented
case
whether
objective
basis
required
fear
persecution
differs
practice
objective
basis
required
clear
probability
persecution
standards
necessarily
contemplate
objective
basis
agree
implicit
conclusion
statute
resolves
question
face
view
character
evidence
sufficient
meet
two
standards
question
best
answered
entity
familiar
types
evidence
issues
arise
cases
congress
limited
eligibility
asylum
persons
attorney
general
determines
refugees
see
attorney
general
delegated
responsibility
making
determinations
bia
board
examined
cases
ever
ever
made
considered
judgment
difference
clear
probability
standards
practical
import
evidence
presented
asylum
withholding
deportation
cases
rarely
ever
meet
one
standards
without
meeting
type
expert
judgment
formed
entity
congress
committed
question
defer
ignores
practical
realities
recognized
expert
agency
instead
concentrates
semantic
niceties
posits
hypothetical
situation
government
sought
execute
every
adult
male
view
fear
executions
even
persecution
particular
individual
likely
occur
see
ante
hypothetical
irrelevant
addresses
mathematically
demanding
interpretation
relation
bia
actual
treatment
asylum
applications
address
validity
bia
judgment
evidence
presenting
distinction
encountered
infrequently
ever
common
sense
human
experience
support
bia
conclusion
governments
rarely
persecute
people
numbers
highly
unlikely
evidence
presented
asylum
withholding
deportation
hearing
demonstrate
mathematically
specific
risk
persecution
posited
hypothetical
taking
account
types
evidence
normally
available
asylum
cases
bia
chosen
make
qualitative
evaluation
realistic
likelihoods
read
acosta
opinion
individual
fled
country
avoid
mass
executions
might
eligible
withholding
deportation
asylum
whether
presented
evidence
numerical
reach
persecution
see
acosta
interim
decision
nowhere
consider
whether
bia
interpretation
unreasonable
consider
bia
view
types
evidentiary
presentations
aliens
generally
make
asylum
cases
sum
words
congress
chosen
fear
ambiguous
contemplate
objective
basis
without
specifying
particular
evidentiary
threshold
reason
suppose
formulation
inconsistent
analysis
set
forth
acosta
bia
concluded
fear
unless
fear
objective
basis
indicating
realistic
likelihood
persecution
occur
based
text
act
alone
conclude
conclusion
unreasonable
iii
bolsters
interpretation
language
act
reference
three
parts
legislative
history
closer
examination
materials
demonstrates
ambiguous
nothing
relies
provides
positive
basis
arguing
material
difference
two
standards
first
cites
legislative
history
indicating
congress
wished
preserve
existing
standard
placed
words
fear
act
concludes
standard
congress
intended
preserve
bia
practice
old
stat
section
authorized
attorney
general
grant
conditional
entry
aliens
fleeing
communist
countries
middle
east
long
established
fear
persecution
argues
congress
chose
words
fear
preserve
asylum
standard
prior
interpretation
word
fear
standard
conditional
entry
contrast
argues
congress
chose
words
fear
preserve
attorney
general
regulations
governing
applications
asylum
aliens
regulations
substantially
accord
bia
view
namely
significant
difference
fear
clear
probability
standards
compare
cfr
asylum
cfr
withholding
deportation
common
sense
suggests
better
argument
natural
speak
preserving
interpretation
governed
form
relief
one
applied
different
form
relief
moreover
legislative
history
makes
clear
congress
referring
regulations
rather
senate
report
bill
improv
es
clarif
ies
procedures
determining
asylum
claims
filed
aliens
physically
present
substantive
standard
changed
recognizes
ante
statement
unquestionably
refers
informal
procedures
aliens
statutory
procedures
similarly
house
report
new
definition
create
new
expanded
means
entry
instead
regularizes
formalizes
policies
practices
followed
recent
years
emphasis
added
congress
hardly
felt
need
formalize
statutory
procedures
indeed
house
report
cites
attorney
general
regulations
extant
procedures
referring
view
legislative
history
indicates
congress
choice
words
fear
standard
eligibility
asylum
intended
carry
forward
practice
attorney
general
adjudicating
asylum
applications
attorney
general
concluded
standard
asylum
substantially
identical
standard
withholding
deportation
decision
interpret
language
way
entirely
reasonable
second
relies
materials
interpreting
nations
protocol
ante
several
reasons
find
materials
marginally
relevant
president
senate
thought
protocol
perfectly
consistent
country
immigration
laws
see
ins
stevic
citing
legislative
history
reluctant
assume
country
violating
protocol
years
since
adoption
moreover
recognizes
statements
nations
high
commissioner
refugees
binding
force
determination
refugee
status
protocol
incumbent
upon
contracting
state
ante
quoting
office
nations
high
commissioner
refugees
handbook
procedures
criteria
determining
refugee
status
ii
geneva
event
materials
discussed
shed
little
light
question
presented
case
none
burden
proof
nonrefoulement
article
nations
protocol
remedy
essentially
identical
withholding
deportation
act
higher
burden
proof
asylum
article
thing
materials
tend
establish
mathematical
approach
likelihood
persecution
asylum
cases
arguably
inconsistent
sense
drafters
protocol
bia
declined
adopt
approach
see
supra
simply
irrelevant
approach
might
inconsistent
views
commentators
protocol
finally
places
great
weight
changes
act
made
conference
committee
notes
senate
bill
authorized
attorney
general
grant
asylum
applicant
refugee
within
meaning
section
deportation
return
prohibited
section
act
conjectures
language
indicates
senate
recognized
difference
fear
standard
standard
enactment
house
bill
rather
senate
bill
turn
demonstrates
congress
eventually
refused
restrict
eligibility
asylum
aliens
meeting
stricter
standard
ante
omitted
neither
premise
conclusion
justified
language
senate
bill
demonstrate
senate
recognized
difference
two
standards
senate
easily
included
language
ensure
attorney
general
held
position
difference
standards
moreover
reason
believe
changes
made
conference
committee
reflected
considered
rejection
portion
senate
definition
refugee
rather
conference
committee
report
demonstrates
conference
thought
bills
adopted
general
definition
refugee
definition
see
conf
differences
conference
saw
bills
related
treatment
refugees
still
homeland
refugees
firmly
resettled
another
country
see
ibid
short
see
reason
believe
minor
differences
wording
senate
bill
act
passed
reflect
rejection
position
significant
difference
two
standards
thus
place
weight
conference
committee
choice
language
house
bill
iv
even
agreed
conclusion
significant
difference
standards
asylum
withholding
deportation
reverse
decision
appeals
uphold
decision
bia
case
careful
reading
decisions
bia
immigration
judge
demonstrates
bia
applied
lower
asylum
standard
case
respondent
claim
asylum
rested
solely
testimony
brother
experienced
difficulties
authorities
nicaragua
immigration
judge
rejected
respondent
claim
found
evidence
substance
record
brother
claim
asylum
app
pet
cert
found
none
evidence
indicates
respondent
persecuted
political
beliefs
whatever
may
belongs
particular
social
group
proven
members
family
brother
sic
detained
interrogated
arrested
imprisoned
tortured
convicted
sentenced
regime
presently
power
nicaragua
ibid
appeal
bia
affirmed
decided
case
passage
act
opinion
acosta
time
bia
confronted
number
conflicting
decisions
courts
appeals
correct
standard
evaluating
asylum
applications
bia
noted
three
different
formulations
fear
standard
clear
probability
test
see
rejaie
ins
good
reason
test
see
stevic
sava
rev
grounds
ins
stevic
realistic
likelihood
test
bia
adopted
matter
dunar
app
pet
cert
see
supra
discussing
acosta
reviewing
evidence
respondent
submitted
immigration
judge
bia
concluded
respondent
obtain
relief
standards
bia
focused
especially
fact
respondent
openly
admitted
taken
actions
nicaraguan
government
admits
never
politically
active
testified
never
assisted
brother
political
activities
moreover
admits
never
singled
persecution
present
government
app
pet
cert
board
appears
feel
exempt
holding
marbury
madison
constrained
circuit
opinions
board
applied
construction
applicant
burden
proof
asylum
case
claims
copetitioner
held
required
demonstrate
clear
probability
persecution
order
declared
eligible
asylum
citation
omitted
view
misconstrues
act
misreads
legislative
history
moreover
neither
appeals
identified
error
decision
bia
case
neither
examined
factual
findings
decision
rested
legal
standard
bia
applied
facts
reverse
decision
appeals
suggests
bia
interpretation
fear
standard
erratic
ante
examination
relevant
bia
decisions
leads
contrary
conclusion
bia
first
addressed
standard
matter
dunar
case
bia
considered
meaning
term
fear
nations
protocol
relating
status
refugees
congress
inserted
language
asylum
provisions
act
bia
interpreted
language
mean
exactly
thing
language
protocol
matter
acosta
interim
decision
mar
thus
bia
position
never
changed
bases
characterization
bia
record
decisions
applying
lenient
fear
standard
anything
statutes
clear
fear
something
fear
unfair
characterize
bia
decisions
erratic
agency
fact
interpreting
two
different
standards
bia
interpreted
statutory
definition
require
proof
four
elements
alien
must
fear
persecution
ii
fear
must
iii
persecution
must
account
race
religion
nationality
membership
particular
social
group
political
opinion
iv
alien
must
unable
unwilling
return
homeland
persecution
fear
persecution
see
course
applicant
meet
four
elements
fear
standards
see
supra
quoting
acosta
interim
decision
although
requirements
restrict
grants
relief
cases
none
rests
mathematical
considerations
suggests
govern
current
bia
practice
moreover
exegesis
plain
meaning
phrase
way
suggests
bia
test
misinterpretation
statute
regulations
constituted
country
informal
attempt
comply
exhortation
convention
relating
status
refugees
facilitate
assimilation
naturalization
art
persons
fear
persecuted
art
parties
agree
convention
language
ultimate
source
language
congress
placed
act
concludes
senate
report
probative
force
conference
committee
adopted
house
language
rather
senate
language
changes
language
made
conference
committee
help
position
explain
infra
page
house
report
indicates
house
bill
also
intended
adopt
standards
set
forth
regulations
moreover
suggestion
conference
report
change
language
affected
substantive
standard
see
infra
interpretation
supported
evidence
house
bill
like
senate
bill
intended
preserve
attorney
general
regulations
treating
two
standards
substantially
identical
see
supra
contends
question
us
ante
find
suggestion
quite
strange
immigration
naturalization
service
asked
determine
hether
alien
burden
proving
eligibility
asylum
equivalent
burden
proving
eligibility
withholding
deportation
pet
cert
question
whether
two
standards
equivalent
fairly
includes
rule
problem
defining
appropriate
standard
asylum
question
answered
facts
case
sit
answer
hypothetical
questions
statutory
construction
normally
resolve
questions
examining
facts
case
us
case
affirms
appeals
decision
bia
required
intolerably
high
burden
proof
case
yet
like
appeals
examines
neither
facts
case
us
legal
standard
bia
applied
view
rule
contemplate
result
terms
acosta
test
fear
respondent
claim
failed
first
second
elements
respondent
failed
show
either
possesses
belief
characteristic
persecutor
seeks
overcome
persecutor
already
aware
easily
become
aware
possesses
belief
characteristic
acosta
interim
decision