anderson
bessemer
city
argued
december
decided
march
respondent
city
set
hire
new
recreation
director
manage
city
recreational
facilities
develop
recreational
programs
committee
consisting
four
men
one
woman
responsible
choosing
director
eight
persons
applied
position
including
petitioner
woman
applicant
time
petitioner
schoolteacher
college
degrees
social
studies
education
committee
offered
position
male
applicant
recently
graduated
college
degree
physical
education
four
men
committee
voted
offer
job
woman
voted
petitioner
petitioner
filed
discrimination
charges
equal
employment
opportunity
commission
eeoc
upon
finding
reasonable
cause
believe
petitioner
charges
true
invited
parties
engage
conciliation
proceedings
efforts
proved
unsuccessful
eeoc
issued
petitioner
letter
filed
action
federal
district
title
vii
civil
rights
act
trial
testimony
petitioner
applicant
hired
members
selection
committee
heard
issued
memorandum
announcing
finding
petitioner
entitled
judgment
denied
position
account
sex
memorandum
requested
petitioner
submit
proposed
findings
fact
conclusions
law
expanding
upon
set
forth
memorandum
petitioner
complied
request
requested
received
response
setting
forth
respondent
objections
proposed
findings
issued
findings
fact
conclusions
law
finding
petitioner
denied
employment
sex
based
findings
fact
qualified
candidate
asked
questions
interview
regarding
spouse
feelings
application
position
applicants
asked
male
committee
members
biased
hiring
woman
appeals
reversed
holding
district
findings
clearly
erroneous
therefore
erred
finding
petitioner
discriminated
account
sex
held
appeals
misapprehended
misapplied
standard
accordingly
erred
denying
petitioner
relief
title
vii
pp
district
simply
adopt
petitioner
proposed
findings
provided
respondent
opportunity
respond
findings
findings
ultimately
issued
varied
considerably
proposed
petitioner
reason
doubt
ultimate
findings
represented
considered
conclusions
subject
findings
stringent
appellate
review
called
applicable
rules
pp
federal
rule
civil
procedure
provides
indings
fact
shall
set
aside
unless
clearly
erroneous
due
regard
shall
given
opportunity
trial
judge
credibility
witness
finding
clearly
erroneous
although
evidence
support
reviewing
entire
evidence
left
definite
firm
conviction
mistake
committed
gypsum
district
account
evidence
plausible
light
record
viewed
entirety
appeals
may
reverse
even
though
convinced
sitting
trier
fact
weighed
evidence
differently
even
district
findings
rest
credibility
determinations
based
physical
documentary
evidence
inferences
facts
findings
based
determinations
regarding
credibility
witnesses
rule
demands
even
greater
deference
trial
finding
pp
application
principles
facts
case
discloses
appeals
erred
employment
standard
district
finding
petitioner
better
qualified
entitled
deference
notwithstanding
based
credibility
determinations
record
contains
nothing
mandates
holding
finding
clearly
erroneous
district
finding
petitioner
applicant
asked
questions
regarding
spouse
feelings
application
position
appeals
erred
failing
give
due
regard
district
ability
interpret
discern
credibility
oral
testimony
especially
woman
member
selection
committee
whose
testimony
district
felt
supported
finding
given
finding
clearly
erroneous
district
finding
bias
termed
erroneous
supported
treatment
petitioner
interview
also
testimony
one
committee
member
believed
difficult
woman
perform
job
evidence
another
member
solicited
applications
men
findings
district
based
finding
sex
discrimination
clearly
erroneous
finding
discrimination
also
clearly
erroneous
pp
white
delivered
opinion
burger
brennan
marshall
powell
rehnquist
stevens
joined
powell
filed
concurring
opinion
post
blackmun
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
post
jonathan
wallas
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
john
nockelby
levonne
chambers
peter
sherwood
eric
schnapper
carolyn
corwin
argued
cause
et
al
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
brief
solicitor
general
lee
deputy
solicitor
general
wallace
johnny
butler
philip
sklover
philip
van
hoy
argued
cause
respondent
brief
eugene
gressman
arthur
blue
iii
joan
bertin
richard
larson
burt
neuborne
isabelle
katz
pinzler
filed
brief
american
civil
liberties
union
et
al
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
justice
white
delivered
opinion
swint
held
district
finding
discriminatory
intent
action
brought
title
vii
civil
rights
act
stat
amended
et
factual
finding
may
overturned
appeal
clearly
erroneous
case
appeals
fourth
circuit
concluded
clear
error
district
finding
discrimination
reversed
reading
record
convinces
us
appeals
misapprehended
misapplied
standard
reverse
early
officials
respondent
bessemer
city
north
carolina
set
hire
new
recreation
director
city
although
duties
went
position
precisely
delineated
new
recreation
director
responsible
managing
city
recreational
facilities
developing
recreational
programs
athletic
otherwise
serve
needs
city
residents
committee
selected
mayor
responsible
choosing
recreation
director
five
members
four
men
one
woman
committee
auddie
boone
served
chairperson
eight
persons
applied
position
recreation
director
petitioner
time
schoolteacher
college
degrees
social
studies
education
woman
among
eight
selection
committee
reviewed
resumes
submitted
applicants
briefly
interviewed
jobseekers
following
interviews
committee
offered
position
donald
kincaid
recently
graduated
college
degree
physical
education
four
men
committee
voted
offer
job
kincaid
boone
voted
petitioner
believing
committee
passed
favor
less
qualified
candidate
solely
woman
petitioner
filed
discrimination
charges
charlotte
district
office
equal
employment
opportunity
commission
july
five
years
petitioner
filed
charges
eeoc
district
director
found
reasonable
cause
believe
petitioner
charges
true
invited
parties
attempt
resolution
petitioner
grievance
conciliation
proceedings
eeoc
efforts
proved
unsuccessful
due
course
petitioner
received
letter
petitioner
filed
title
vii
action
district
western
district
north
carolina
trial
heard
testimony
petitioner
kincaid
five
members
selection
committee
issued
brief
memorandum
decision
setting
forth
finding
petitioner
entitled
judgment
denied
position
recreation
director
account
sex
addition
laying
rationale
finding
memorandum
requested
petitioner
counsel
submit
proposed
findings
fact
conclusions
law
expanding
upon
set
forth
memorandum
petitioner
counsel
complied
request
submitting
lengthy
set
proposed
findings
app
requested
received
response
setting
forth
detail
respondent
objections
proposed
findings
objections
turn
answered
petitioner
counsel
somewhat
less
lengthy
reply
receiving
submissions
issued
findings
fact
conclusions
law
supp
set
forth
formal
findings
fact
conclusions
law
finding
petitioner
denied
employment
respondent
sex
rested
number
subsidiary
findings
first
found
time
selection
committee
made
choice
petitioner
better
qualified
kincaid
perform
range
duties
demanded
position
based
finding
petitioner
experience
classroom
teacher
responsible
supervising
schoolchildren
recreational
athletic
activities
employment
hospital
recreation
director
late
extensive
involvement
variety
civic
organizations
knowledge
sports
acquired
high
school
athlete
mother
children
involved
organized
athletics
skills
public
speaker
experience
handling
money
gained
course
community
activities
work
group
physicians
knowledge
music
dance
crafts
found
kincaid
principal
qualifications
experience
student
teacher
coach
local
youth
basketball
league
extensive
knowledge
team
individual
sports
acquired
result
lifelong
involvement
athletics
formal
training
physical
education
major
college
noting
position
recreation
director
involved
management
athletic
programs
concluded
petitioner
greater
breadth
experience
made
better
qualified
position
second
found
male
committee
members
fact
biased
petitioner
woman
based
finding
part
testimony
one
committee
members
believed
real
hard
woman
handle
job
want
wife
perform
duties
recreation
director
finding
bias
found
additional
support
evidence
another
male
committee
member
told
kincaid
successful
applicant
vacancy
also
solicited
applications
three
men
attempted
recruit
women
job
also
critical
inference
bias
finding
petitioner
alone
among
applicants
job
asked
whether
realized
job
involve
night
work
travel
whether
husband
approved
applying
job
finding
committee
pursued
line
inquiry
petitioner
based
testimony
petitioner
questions
asked
testimony
boone
similar
questions
asked
applicants
although
boone
also
testified
kincaid
interview
made
comment
regarding
reaction
new
bride
taking
position
recreation
director
concluded
comment
serious
inquiry
merely
facetious
remark
prompted
boone
annoyance
petitioner
questioned
spouse
reaction
also
declined
credit
testimony
one
male
committee
members
kincaid
asked
wife
feelings
way
testimony
another
committeeman
applicants
questioned
regarding
willingness
work
night
families
reaction
night
work
concluded
finding
petitioner
seriously
questioned
family
reaction
suggested
male
committee
members
believed
women
special
family
responsibilities
made
certain
forms
employment
inappropriate
finally
found
reasons
offered
male
committee
members
choice
kincaid
pretextual
rejected
proposition
kincaid
degree
physical
education
justified
choice
evidence
suggested
male
candidates
concerned
committee
valued
experience
highly
formal
training
physical
education
also
rejected
claim
one
committeemen
kincaid
hired
superiority
recreational
programs
planned
implement
selected
job
credited
testimony
one
committeemen
voted
kincaid
programs
outlined
petitioner
kincaid
substantially
identical
basis
findings
petitioner
qualified
candidate
committee
biased
hiring
woman
committee
explanations
choice
kincaid
pretextual
concluded
petitioner
met
burden
establishing
denied
position
recreation
director
sex
petitioner
conceded
ordering
city
hire
inappropriate
remedy
circumstances
awarded
petitioner
backpay
amount
attorney
fees
fourth
circuit
reversed
district
finding
discrimination
view
appeals
three
district
crucial
findings
clearly
erroneous
finding
petitioner
qualified
candidate
finding
petitioner
asked
questions
applicants
spared
finding
male
committee
members
biased
hiring
woman
rejected
findings
appeals
concluded
district
erred
finding
petitioner
discriminated
account
sex
ii
must
deal
outset
fourth
circuit
suggestion
close
scrutiny
record
case
justified
manner
opinion
prepared
district
adoption
petitioner
proposed
findings
fact
conclusions
law
recalled
fourth
circuit
many
occasions
condemned
practice
announcing
decision
leaving
prevailing
party
write
findings
fact
conclusions
law
see
cuthbertson
biggers
eeoc
federal
reserve
bank
richmond
chicopee
mfg
kendall
rejected
petitioner
contention
procedure
followed
trial
judge
case
proper
judge
given
respondent
opportunity
object
proposed
findings
adopted
petitioner
findings
verbatim
according
vice
procedure
lay
trial
solicitation
findings
already
announced
decision
adoption
substance
petitioner
proposed
findings
criticized
courts
verbatim
adoption
findings
fact
prepared
prevailing
parties
particularly
findings
taken
form
conclusory
statements
unsupported
citation
record
see
el
paso
natural
gas
marine
bancorporation
also
aware
potential
overreaching
exaggeration
part
attorneys
preparing
findings
fact
already
informed
judge
decided
favor
see
wright
nonjury
trial
preparing
findings
fact
conclusions
law
opinions
seminars
newly
appointed
district
judges
nonetheless
previous
discussions
subject
suggest
even
trial
judge
adopts
proposed
findings
verbatim
findings
may
reversed
clearly
erroneous
marine
bancorporation
supra
el
paso
natural
gas
supra
event
district
case
appear
uncritically
accepted
findings
prepared
without
judicial
guidance
prevailing
party
provided
framework
proposed
findings
issued
preliminary
memorandum
set
forth
essential
findings
directed
petitioner
counsel
submit
detailed
set
findings
consistent
respondent
provided
availed
opportunity
respond
length
proposed
findings
district
simply
adopt
petitioner
proposed
findings
findings
ultimately
issued
particularly
crucial
findings
regarding
petitioner
qualifications
questioning
petitioner
subjected
bias
part
committeemen
vary
considerably
organization
content
submitted
petitioner
counsel
circumstances
see
reason
doubt
findings
issued
district
represent
judge
considered
conclusions
reason
subject
findings
stringent
appellate
review
called
applicable
rules
iii
finding
intentional
discrimination
finding
fact
standard
governing
appellate
review
district
finding
discrimination
set
forth
federal
rule
civil
procedure
findings
fact
shall
set
aside
unless
clearly
erroneous
due
regard
shall
given
opportunity
trial
judge
credibility
witnesses
question
us
whether
appeals
erred
holding
district
finding
discrimination
clearly
erroneous
although
meaning
phrase
clearly
erroneous
immediately
apparent
certain
general
principles
governing
exercise
appellate
power
overturn
findings
district
may
derived
cases
foremost
principles
fourth
circuit
recognized
finding
clearly
erroneous
although
evidence
support
reviewing
entire
evidence
left
definite
firm
conviction
mistake
committed
gypsum
standard
plainly
entitle
reviewing
reverse
finding
trier
fact
simply
convinced
decided
case
differently
reviewing
oversteps
bounds
duty
rule
undertakes
duplicate
role
lower
applying
clearly
erroneous
standard
findings
district
sitting
without
jury
appellate
courts
must
constantly
mind
function
decide
factual
issues
de
novo
zenith
radio
hazeltine
research
district
account
evidence
plausible
light
record
viewed
entirety
appeals
may
reverse
even
though
convinced
sitting
trier
fact
weighed
evidence
differently
two
permissible
views
evidence
factfinder
choice
clearly
erroneous
yellow
cab
see
also
inwood
laboratories
ives
laboratories
even
district
findings
rest
credibility
determinations
based
instead
physical
documentary
evidence
inferences
facts
sure
various
courts
appeals
occasion
asserted
theory
appellate
may
exercise
de
novo
review
findings
based
credibility
determinations
see
orvis
higgins
lydle
swanson
baker
industries
theory
impressive
genealogy
first
articulated
opinion
written
judge
frank
subscribed
judge
augustus
hand
see
orvis
higgins
supra
impossible
trace
theory
lineage
back
text
rule
straightforwardly
findings
fact
shall
set
aside
unless
clearly
erroneous
rule
goes
emphasize
special
deference
paid
credibility
determinations
alter
clear
command
rule
make
exceptions
purport
exclude
certain
categories
factual
findings
obligation
appeals
accept
district
findings
unless
clearly
erroneous
swint
rationale
deference
original
finder
fact
limited
superiority
trial
judge
position
make
determinations
credibility
trial
judge
major
role
determination
fact
experience
fulfilling
role
comes
expertise
duplication
trial
judge
efforts
appeals
likely
contribute
negligibly
accuracy
fact
determination
huge
cost
diversion
judicial
resources
addition
parties
case
appeal
already
forced
concentrate
energies
resources
persuading
trial
judge
account
facts
correct
one
requiring
persuade
three
judges
appellate
level
requiring
much
stated
different
context
trial
merits
main
event
rather
tryout
road
wainwright
sykes
reasons
review
factual
findings
standard
deference
trier
fact
rule
exception
findings
based
determinations
regarding
credibility
witnesses
rule
demands
even
greater
deference
trial
findings
trial
judge
aware
variations
demeanor
tone
voice
bear
heavily
listener
understanding
belief
said
see
wainwright
witt
suggest
trial
judge
may
insulate
findings
review
denominating
credibility
determinations
factors
demeanor
inflection
go
decision
whether
believe
witness
documents
objective
evidence
may
contradict
witness
story
story
may
internally
inconsistent
implausible
face
reasonable
factfinder
credit
factors
present
appeals
may
well
find
clear
error
even
finding
purportedly
based
credibility
determination
see
gypsum
supra
trial
judge
finding
based
decision
credit
testimony
one
two
witnesses
told
coherent
facially
plausible
story
contradicted
extrinsic
evidence
finding
internally
inconsistent
virtually
never
clear
error
cf
aluminum
america
orvis
higgins
supra
iv
application
foregoing
principles
facts
case
lays
bare
errors
committed
fourth
circuit
employment
standard
detecting
clear
error
district
finding
petitioner
better
qualified
kincaid
fourth
circuit
improperly
conducted
amounted
de
novo
weighing
evidence
record
district
finding
based
essentially
undisputed
evidence
regarding
respective
backgrounds
petitioner
kincaid
duties
went
position
recreation
director
district
considering
evidence
concluded
position
recreation
director
bessemer
city
carried
broad
responsibilities
creating
managing
recreation
program
involving
athletics
also
activities
citizens
ages
interests
determined
petitioner
varied
educational
employment
background
extensive
involvement
variety
civic
activities
left
better
qualified
implement
rounded
program
kincaid
whose
background
narrowly
focused
athletics
fourth
circuit
reading
record
concluded
basic
duty
recreation
director
implement
athletic
program
essential
qualification
successful
applicant
either
education
experience
specifically
related
athletics
accordingly
seemed
evident
appeals
kincaid
fact
better
qualified
petitioner
based
reading
record
say
either
interpretation
facts
illogical
implausible
support
inferences
may
drawn
facts
record
either
interpretation
drawn
district
record
us
inclined
find
clearly
erroneous
question
must
answer
however
whether
fourth
circuit
interpretation
facts
clearly
erroneous
whether
district
finding
clearly
erroneous
see
mcallister
district
determined
petitioner
better
qualified
stated
finding
entitled
deference
notwithstanding
based
credibility
determinations
record
examined
light
appropriately
deferential
standard
apparent
contains
nothing
mandates
finding
district
conclusion
clearly
erroneous
somewhat
different
concerns
raised
fourth
circuit
treatment
district
finding
petitioner
alone
among
applicants
position
recreation
director
asked
questions
regarding
spouse
feelings
application
position
error
appeals
failure
give
due
regard
ability
district
interpret
discern
credibility
oral
testimony
appeals
rested
rejection
district
finding
differential
treatment
interpretation
testimony
boone
witness
whose
testimony
view
district
supported
finding
eyes
fourth
circuit
boone
testimony
made
comment
kincaid
feelings
wife
comment
judged
facetious
district
conclusively
established
kincaid
perhaps
male
applicants
well
questioned
feelings
spouse
boone
testimony
point
set
forth
margin
certainly
free
ambiguity
boone
several
times
stated
candidates
questioned
reaction
wives
least
context
petitioner
even
recalling
calling
attention
made
comment
subject
kincaid
boone
denied
asked
kincaid
wife
reaction
boone
testimony
matters
inconsistent
theory
remark
serious
inquiry
whether
kincaid
wife
approved
applying
position
whether
judge
interpretation
actually
correct
impossible
tell
paper
record
easy
imagine
tone
voice
witness
related
comment
coupled
immediate
denial
questioned
kincaid
subject
might
conclusively
established
remark
facetious
one
therefore
agree
judge
conclusion
remark
facetious
clearly
erroneous
trial
characterization
boone
remark
accepted
apparent
finding
male
candidates
seriously
questioned
feelings
wives
deemed
clearly
erroneous
trial
judge
faced
testimony
three
witnesses
one
boone
stated
none
candidates
questioned
one
male
committee
member
testified
kincaid
asked
question
way
one
another
committeeman
testified
candidates
subjected
similar
questioning
none
accounts
implausible
face
none
contradicted
reliable
extrinsic
evidence
circumstances
trial
decision
credit
boone
clearly
erroneous
fourth
circuit
refusal
accept
district
finding
committee
members
biased
hiring
woman
based
large
extent
rejection
finding
petitioner
subjected
questioning
applicants
spared
given
finding
clearly
erroneous
finding
bias
termed
erroneous
finds
support
treatment
petitioner
interview
also
testimony
one
committee
member
believed
difficult
woman
perform
job
evidence
another
member
solicited
applications
position
men
determination
findings
district
regarding
petitioner
qualifications
conduct
interview
bias
male
committee
members
clearly
erroneous
leads
us
conclude
finding
petitioner
discriminated
account
sex
also
clearly
erroneous
district
findings
regarding
petitioner
superior
qualifications
bias
selection
committee
sufficient
support
inference
petitioner
denied
position
recreation
director
account
sex
accordingly
hold
fourth
circuit
erred
denying
petitioner
relief
title
vii
holding
assert
knowledge
happened
years
ago
bessemer
city
superior
appeals
claim
greater
insight
appeals
state
mind
men
selection
committee
rejected
petitioner
position
recreation
director
even
trial
judge
heard
witnesses
directly
closely
touch
appeals
milieu
controversy
arises
always
confident
knows
happened
often
determine
whether
plaintiff
succeeded
presenting
account
facts
likely
true
task
task
appellate
tribunals
generally
limited
still
must
determine
whether
trial
judge
conclusions
clearly
erroneous
record
us
say
accordingly
judgment
appeals
reversed
footnotes
fourth
circuit
thus
saw
inconsistency
statement
male
committee
members
preferred
bert
broadway
experience
claim
selected
kincaid
petitioner
formal
training
see
supra
view
appeals
demonstrated
broadway
relevant
experience
kincaid
relevant
education
petitioner
neither
committee
members
ask
kind
question
applicants
recall
deny
applicants
aside
plaintiff
asked
prospect
working
night
position
knowledge
saying
asked
asked
context
asked
phyllis
know
whether
worried
jim
going
get
supper
know
goes
ways
tell
phyllis
anderson
donnie
kincaid
asked
night
work
asked
night
work
answers
one
question
let
answer
one
tell
phyllis
anderson
donnie
kincaid
asked
night
work
yes
interviews
think
next
day
sometime
know
may
answer
something
question
asked
otherwise
judge
say
asked
question
asked
think
donnie
married
think
made
comment
personally
new
bride
wo
mind
asked
wife
reaction
said
gibson
objection
honor
sustained
rephrase
answer
fourth
circuit
suggestion
inference
bias
dispelled
fact
male
committee
members
married
woman
worked
point
marriage
insufficient
establish
finding
bias
clearly
erroneous
although
decline
hold
man
attitude
toward
wife
employment
irrelevant
question
whether
may
found
bias
working
women
relevance
factor
may
particular
case
matter
district
weigh
consideration
bias
appeals
justice
powell
concurring
dissent
judgment
appeals
misapplied
rule
case
write
separately
however
concerned
one
may
read
opinion
implying
criticism
appeals
fact
engaged
comprehensive
review
entire
record
case
reading
may
encourage
overburdened
courts
appeals
simply
apply
rule
conclusory
fashion
rather
undertake
type
burdensome
review
may
appropriate
cases
case
appeals
made
arbitrary
judgment
action
district
clearly
erroneous
contrary
meticulously
reviewed
entire
record
reached
conclusion
district
error
one
easily
agree
appeals
district
committed
mistake
finding
sex
discrimination
based
fragmentary
statements
made
years
informal
exchanges
members
selection
committee
applicants
position
filled
record
us
however
factual
issue
fairly
decided
either
party
therefore
holds
district
decision
clearly
erroneous
within
meaning
rule
charlotte
branch
eeoc
petitioner
filed
complaint
took
action
five
years
testimony
trial
therefore
based
stale
recollections
justice
blackmun
concurring
judgment
like
join
opinion
think
judgment
correct
agree
says
however
join
broad
dictum
ante
effect
result
reached
district
findings
based
wholly
documentary
evidence
rest
credibility
determinations
past
joined
least
one
opinion
generally
opposite
effect
see
mississippi
valley
barge
line
see
also
ralston
purina
general
foods
good
potato
chip
swanson
baker
industries
may
correct
dictum
today
certainly
case
require
us
decide
question
record
contains
far
documentary
evidence
opinion
adequately
discloses
case
requires
resolution
question
might
eventually
persuaded
approach
wise
prefer
however
wait
case
issue
must
resolved
briefed
argued
parties
rather
address
issue
edict
without
customary
safeguards
therefore
join
judgment
opinion