cleburne
cleburne
living
center
argued
march
decided
july
respondent
cleburne
living
center
clc
anticipated
leasing
certain
building
operation
group
home
mentally
retarded
informed
petitioner
city
special
use
permit
required
city
concluded
proposed
group
home
classified
hospital
feebleminded
zoning
ordinance
covering
area
proposed
home
located
accordingly
clc
applied
special
use
permit
city
council
public
hearing
denied
permit
clc
others
also
respondents
filed
suit
city
number
officials
alleging
zoning
ordinance
face
applied
violated
equal
protection
rights
clc
potential
residents
district
held
ordinance
application
constitutional
appeals
reversed
holding
mental
retardation
classification
applicable
equal
protection
test
ordinance
facially
invalid
substantially
important
governmental
purpose
ordinance
also
invalid
applied
held
appeals
erred
holding
mental
retardation
classification
calling
exacting
standard
judicial
review
normally
accorded
economic
social
legislation
pp
individuals
group
affected
statute
distinguishing
characteristics
relevant
interests
state
authority
implement
equal
protection
clause
requires
classification
drawn
statute
rationally
related
legitimate
state
interest
social
economic
legislation
issue
equal
protection
clause
allows
wide
latitude
pp
mentally
retarded
persons
reduced
ability
cope
function
everyday
world
thus
different
persons
interest
dealing
providing
plainly
legitimate
one
distinctive
legislative
response
national
state
plight
mentally
retarded
demonstrates
unique
problems
also
lawmakers
addressing
difficulties
manner
belies
continuing
antipathy
prejudice
corresponding
need
intrusive
oversight
judiciary
afforded
normal
equal
protection
standard
moreover
legislative
response
hardly
occurred
survived
without
public
support
negates
claim
mentally
retarded
politically
powerless
sense
ability
attract
attention
lawmakers
equal
protection
standard
requiring
legislation
rationally
related
legitimate
governmental
purpose
affords
government
latitude
necessary
pursue
policies
designed
assist
retarded
realizing
full
potential
freely
efficiently
engage
activities
burden
retarded
essentially
incidental
manner
pp
requiring
special
use
permit
proposed
group
home
deprives
respondents
equal
protection
laws
thus
unnecessary
decide
whether
ordinance
permit
requirement
facially
invalid
mentally
retarded
involved
although
mentally
retarded
group
different
occupy
facilities
boarding
houses
hospitals
permitted
zoning
area
question
without
special
permit
difference
irrelevant
unless
proposed
group
home
threaten
city
legitimate
interests
way
permitted
uses
record
reveal
rational
basis
believing
proposed
group
home
pose
special
threat
city
legitimate
interests
requiring
permit
case
appears
rest
irrational
prejudice
mentally
retarded
including
occupy
proposed
group
home
live
closely
supervised
highly
regulated
conditions
expressly
provided
state
federal
law
pp
white
delivered
opinion
burger
powell
rehnquist
stevens
joined
stevens
filed
concurring
opinion
burger
joined
post
marshall
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
brennan
blackmun
joined
post
earl
luna
reargued
cause
petitioners
briefs
robert
miller
mary
milford
renea
hicks
reargued
cause
respondents
brief
diane
shisk
caryl
oberman
solicitor
general
lee
assistant
attorney
general
reynolds
deputy
solicitor
general
fried
deputy
assistant
attorney
general
cooper
walter
barnett
filed
brief
amicus
curiae
urging
reversal
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
filed
state
connecticut
et
al
joseph
lieberman
attorney
general
connecticut
elliot
gerson
deputy
attorney
general
henry
cohn
assistant
attorney
general
john
steven
clark
attorney
general
arkansas
john
van
de
kamp
attorney
general
california
duane
woodard
attorney
general
colorado
neil
hartigan
attorney
general
illinois
jill
solicitor
general
robert
connor
special
assistant
attorney
general
william
guste
attorney
general
louisiana
robert
barnett
assistant
attorney
general
nicholas
spaeth
attorney
general
north
dakota
arlene
violet
attorney
general
rhode
island
michael
cody
attorney
general
tennessee
charles
brown
attorney
general
west
virginia
state
maryland
stephen
sachs
attorney
general
dennis
sweeney
deputy
attorney
general
judith
sykes
assistant
attorney
general
state
pennsylvania
et
al
leroy
zimmerman
attorney
general
pennsylvania
allen
warshaw
chief
deputy
attorney
general
andrew
gordon
senior
deputy
attorney
general
attorneys
general
respective
follows
thomas
miller
iowa
frank
kelley
michigan
hubert
humphrey
iii
minnesota
stephen
merrill
new
hampshire
irwin
kimmelman
new
jersey
anthony
celebrezze
ohio
bronson
la
follette
wisconsin
state
texas
et
al
jim
mattox
attorney
general
texas
david
richards
patrick
wiseman
james
todd
philip
durst
assistant
attorneys
general
american
association
mental
deficiency
et
al
james
ellis
ruth
luckasson
stanley
herr
donald
bersoff
american
civil
liberties
union
foundation
et
al
burt
neuborne
charles
sims
robert
levy
paul
hoffman
stanley
fleishman
joseph
lawrence
james
preis
james
harrington
association
retarded
et
al
thomas
gilhool
frank
laski
michael
churchill
timothy
cook
disability
rights
education
defense
fund
arlene
brynne
mayerson
disabled
peoples
international
human
rights
advocates
karen
parker
national
conference
catholic
charities
et
al
lewis
golinker
herbert
semmel
kathleen
surgalla
elliott
atkinson
filed
brief
federation
greater
baton
rouge
civic
associations
amicus
curiae
justice
white
delivered
opinion
texas
city
denied
special
use
permit
operation
group
home
mentally
retarded
acting
pursuant
municipal
zoning
ordinance
requiring
permits
homes
appeals
fifth
circuit
held
mental
retardation
classification
ordinance
violated
equal
protection
clause
substantially
important
governmental
purpose
hold
lesser
standard
scrutiny
appropriate
conclude
standard
ordinance
invalid
applied
case
july
respondent
jan
hannah
purchased
building
featherston
street
city
cleburne
texas
intention
leasing
cleburne
living
center
clc
operation
group
home
mentally
retarded
anticipated
home
house
retarded
men
women
constant
supervision
clc
staff
members
house
four
bedrooms
two
baths
half
bath
added
clc
planned
comply
applicable
state
federal
regulations
city
informed
clc
special
use
permit
required
operation
group
home
site
clc
accordingly
submitted
permit
application
response
subsequent
inquiry
clc
city
explained
zoning
regulations
applicable
site
special
use
permit
renewable
annually
required
construction
ospitals
insane
alcoholic
sic
drug
addicts
penal
correctional
institutions
city
determined
proposed
group
home
classified
hospital
holding
public
hearing
clc
application
city
council
voted
deny
special
use
permit
clc
filed
suit
federal
district
city
number
officials
alleging
inter
alia
zoning
ordinance
invalid
face
applied
discriminated
mentally
retarded
violation
equal
protection
rights
clc
potential
residents
district
found
potential
residents
featherston
street
home
mentally
retarded
home
respects
use
permitted
city
zoning
ordinance
city
council
decision
motivated
primarily
fact
residents
home
persons
mentally
retarded
app
even
district
held
ordinance
application
constitutional
concluding
fundamental
right
implicated
mental
retardation
neither
suspect
classification
employed
minimum
level
judicial
scrutiny
applicable
equal
protection
claims
deemed
ordinance
written
applied
rationally
related
city
legitimate
interests
legal
responsibility
clc
residents
safety
fears
residents
adjoining
neighborhood
number
people
housed
home
appeals
fifth
circuit
reversed
determining
mental
retardation
classification
assess
validity
ordinance
scrutiny
mental
retardation
fact
relevant
many
legislative
actions
strict
scrutiny
appropriate
light
history
unfair
often
grotesque
mistreatment
retarded
discrimination
likely
reflect
prejudice
addition
mentally
retarded
lacked
political
power
condition
immutable
considered
heightened
scrutiny
particularly
appropriate
case
city
ordinance
withheld
benefit
although
fundamental
important
mentally
retarded
without
group
homes
stated
retarded
never
hope
integrate
community
applying
test
considered
appropriate
held
ordinance
invalid
face
substantially
important
governmental
interests
appeals
went
hold
ordinance
also
invalid
applied
rehearing
en
banc
denied
six
judges
dissenting
opinion
urging
en
banc
consideration
panel
adoption
heightened
standard
review
granted
certiorari
ii
equal
protection
clause
fourteenth
amendment
commands
state
shall
deny
person
within
jurisdiction
equal
protection
laws
essentially
direction
persons
similarly
situated
treated
alike
plyler
doe
section
amendment
empowers
congress
enforce
mandate
absent
controlling
congressional
direction
courts
devised
standards
determining
validity
state
legislation
official
action
challenged
denying
equal
protection
general
rule
legislation
presumed
valid
sustained
classification
drawn
statute
rationally
related
legitimate
state
interest
schweiker
wilson
railroad
retirement
board
fritz
vance
bradley
new
orleans
dukes
social
economic
legislation
issue
equal
protection
clause
allows
wide
latitude
railroad
retirement
board
fritz
supra
new
orleans
dukes
supra
constitution
presumes
even
improvident
decisions
eventually
rectified
democratic
processes
general
rule
gives
way
however
statute
classifies
race
alienage
national
origin
factors
seldom
relevant
achievement
legitimate
state
interest
laws
grounded
considerations
deemed
reflect
prejudice
antipathy
view
burdened
class
worthy
deserving
others
reasons
discrimination
unlikely
soon
rectified
legislative
means
laws
subjected
strict
scrutiny
sustained
suitably
tailored
serve
compelling
state
interest
mclaughlin
florida
graham
richardson
similar
oversight
courts
due
state
laws
impinge
personal
rights
protected
constitution
kramer
union
free
school
district
shapiro
thompson
skinner
oklahoma
ex
rel
williamson
legislative
classifications
based
gender
also
call
heightened
standard
review
factor
generally
provides
sensible
ground
differential
treatment
hat
differentiates
sex
nonsuspect
statutes
intelligence
physical
disability
sex
characteristic
frequently
bears
relation
ability
perform
contribute
society
frontiero
richardson
plurality
opinion
rather
resting
meaningful
considerations
statutes
distributing
benefits
burdens
sexes
different
ways
likely
reflect
outmoded
notions
relative
capabilities
men
women
gender
classification
fails
unless
substantially
related
sufficiently
important
governmental
interest
mississippi
university
women
hogan
craig
boren
illegitimacy
beyond
individual
control
bears
relation
individual
ability
participate
contribute
society
mathews
lucas
official
discriminations
resting
characteristic
also
subject
somewhat
heightened
review
restrictions
survive
equal
protection
scrutiny
extent
substantially
related
legitimate
state
interest
mills
habluetzel
declined
however
extend
heightened
review
differential
treatment
based
age
treatment
aged
nation
wholly
free
discrimination
persons
unlike
say
discriminated
basis
race
national
origin
experienced
history
purposeful
unequal
treatment
subjected
unique
disabilities
basis
characteristics
truly
indicative
abilities
massachusetts
board
retirement
murgia
iii
background
conclude
several
reasons
appeals
erred
holding
mental
retardation
classification
calling
exacting
standard
judicial
review
normally
accorded
economic
social
legislation
first
undeniable
argued
otherwise
mentally
retarded
reduced
ability
cope
function
everyday
world
cut
pattern
testimony
record
indicates
range
whose
disability
immediately
evident
must
constantly
cared
thus
different
immutably
relevant
respects
interest
dealing
providing
plainly
legitimate
one
large
diversified
group
treated
law
difficult
often
technical
matter
much
task
legislators
guided
qualified
professionals
perhaps
opinions
judiciary
heightened
scrutiny
inevitably
involves
substantive
judgments
legislative
decisions
doubt
predicate
judicial
oversight
present
classification
deals
mental
retardation
second
distinctive
legislative
response
national
state
plight
mentally
retarded
demonstrates
unique
problems
also
lawmakers
addressing
difficulties
manner
belies
continuing
antipathy
prejudice
corresponding
need
intrusive
oversight
judiciary
thus
federal
government
outlawed
discrimination
mentally
retarded
federally
funded
programs
see
rehabilitation
act
also
provided
retarded
right
receive
appropriate
treatment
services
habilitation
setting
least
restrictive
personal
liberty
developmental
disabilities
assistance
bill
rights
act
addition
government
conditioned
federal
education
funds
state
assurance
retarded
children
enjoy
education
maximum
extent
appropriate
integrated
nonmentally
retarded
children
education
handicapped
act
government
also
facilitated
hiring
mentally
retarded
federal
civil
service
exempting
requirement
competitive
examination
see
cfr
state
texas
similarly
enacted
legislation
acknowledges
special
status
mentally
retarded
conferring
certain
rights
upon
right
live
least
restrictive
setting
appropriate
individual
needs
abilities
including
right
live
group
home
mentally
retarded
persons
act
tex
rev
civ
stat
art
vernon
supp
legislation
thus
singling
retarded
special
treatment
reflects
real
undeniable
differences
retarded
others
civilized
decent
society
expects
approves
legislation
indicates
governmental
consideration
differences
vast
majority
situations
legitimate
also
desirable
may
clc
contends
legislation
designed
benefit
rather
disadvantage
retarded
generally
withstand
examination
test
heightened
scrutiny
see
brief
respondents
relevant
inquiry
however
whether
heightened
scrutiny
constitutionally
mandated
first
instance
even
assuming
many
laws
shown
substantially
related
important
governmental
purpose
merely
requiring
legislature
justify
efforts
terms
may
lead
refrain
acting
much
recent
legislation
intended
benefit
retarded
also
assumes
need
measures
might
perceived
disadvantage
education
handicapped
act
example
requires
appropriate
education
one
equal
respects
education
nonretarded
children
clearly
admission
class
exceeded
abilities
retarded
child
appropriate
similarly
developmental
disabilities
assistance
act
texas
act
give
retarded
right
live
least
restrictive
setting
appropriate
abilities
implicitly
assuming
need
least
restrictions
imposed
others
especially
given
wide
variation
abilities
needs
retarded
governmental
bodies
must
certain
amount
flexibility
freedom
judicial
oversight
shaping
limiting
remedial
efforts
third
legislative
response
hardly
occurred
survived
without
public
support
negates
claim
mentally
retarded
politically
powerless
sense
ability
attract
attention
lawmakers
minority
said
powerless
assert
direct
control
legislature
criterion
higher
level
scrutiny
courts
much
economic
social
legislation
suspect
fourth
large
amorphous
class
mentally
retarded
deemed
reasons
given
appeals
difficult
find
principled
way
distinguish
variety
groups
perhaps
immutable
disabilities
setting
others
mandate
desired
legislative
responses
claim
degree
prejudice
least
part
public
large
one
need
mention
respect
aging
disabled
mentally
ill
infirm
reluctant
set
course
decline
doubtless
continue
instances
discrimination
retarded
fact
invidious
properly
subject
judicial
correction
constitutional
norms
appropriate
method
reaching
instances
create
new
classification
subject
governmental
action
based
classification
searching
evaluation
rather
look
likelihood
governmental
action
premised
particular
classification
valid
general
matter
merely
specifics
case
us
mental
retardation
characteristic
government
may
legitimately
take
account
wide
range
decisions
state
federal
governments
recently
committed
assisting
retarded
presume
given
legislative
action
even
one
disadvantages
retarded
individuals
rooted
considerations
constitution
tolerate
refusal
recognize
retarded
class
leave
entirely
unprotected
invidious
discrimination
withstand
equal
protection
review
legislation
distinguishes
mentally
retarded
others
must
rationally
related
legitimate
governmental
purpose
standard
believe
affords
government
latitude
necessary
pursue
policies
designed
assist
retarded
realizing
full
potential
freely
efficiently
engage
activities
burden
retarded
essentially
incidental
manner
state
may
rely
classification
whose
relationship
asserted
goal
attenuated
render
distinction
arbitrary
irrational
see
zobel
williams
dept
agriculture
moreno
furthermore
objectives
bare
desire
harm
politically
unpopular
group
legitimate
state
interests
see
also
zobel
supra
beyond
mentally
retarded
like
others
retain
substantive
constitutional
rights
addition
right
treated
equally
law
iv
turn
issue
validity
zoning
ordinance
insofar
requires
special
use
permit
homes
mentally
retarded
inquire
first
whether
requiring
special
use
permit
featherston
home
circumstances
deprives
respondents
equal
protection
laws
occasion
decide
whether
special
use
permit
provision
facially
invalid
mentally
retarded
involved
put
another
way
whether
city
may
never
insist
special
use
permit
home
mentally
retarded
zone
preferred
course
adjudication
since
enables
courts
avoid
making
unnecessarily
broad
constitutional
judgments
brockett
spokane
arcades
grace
naacp
button
constitutional
issue
clearly
posed
city
require
special
use
permit
zone
apartment
houses
multiple
dwellings
boarding
lodging
houses
fraternity
sorority
houses
dormitories
apartment
hotels
hospitals
sanitariums
nursing
homes
convalescents
aged
insane
feebleminded
alcoholics
drug
addicts
private
clubs
fraternal
orders
specified
uses
however
insist
special
permit
featherston
home
district
found
facility
mentally
retarded
may
city
require
permit
facility
care
facilities
freely
permitted
true
already
pointed
mentally
retarded
group
indeed
different
others
sharing
misfortune
respect
may
different
occupy
facilities
permitted
zone
without
special
permit
difference
largely
irrelevant
unless
featherston
home
occupy
threaten
legitimate
interests
city
way
permitted
uses
boarding
houses
hospitals
view
record
reveal
rational
basis
believing
featherston
home
pose
special
threat
city
legitimate
interests
affirm
judgment
insofar
holds
ordinance
invalid
applied
case
district
found
city
council
insistence
permit
rested
several
factors
first
council
concerned
negative
attitude
majority
property
owners
located
within
feet
featherston
facility
well
fears
elderly
residents
neighborhood
mere
negative
attitudes
fear
unsubstantiated
factors
properly
cognizable
zoning
proceeding
permissible
bases
treating
home
mentally
retarded
differently
apartment
houses
multiple
dwellings
like
plain
electorate
whole
whether
referendum
otherwise
order
city
action
violative
equal
protection
clause
lucas
general
assembly
colorado
city
may
avoid
strictures
clause
deferring
wishes
objections
fraction
body
politic
private
biases
may
outside
reach
law
law
directly
indirectly
give
effect
palmore
sidoti
second
council
two
objections
location
facility
concerned
facility
across
street
junior
high
school
feared
students
might
harass
occupants
featherston
home
school
attended
mentally
retarded
students
denying
permit
based
vague
undifferentiated
fears
permitting
portion
community
validate
otherwise
equal
protection
violation
objection
home
location
located
five
hundred
year
flood
plain
concern
possibility
flood
however
hardly
based
distinction
featherston
home
example
nursing
homes
homes
convalescents
aged
sanitariums
hospitals
located
featherston
site
without
obtaining
special
use
permit
may
said
another
concern
council
doubts
legal
responsibility
actions
mentally
retarded
might
take
concern
legal
responsibility
respect
uses
permitted
area
boarding
fraternity
houses
difficult
believe
groups
mildly
moderately
mentally
retarded
individuals
live
featherston
present
different
special
hazard
fourth
council
concerned
size
home
number
people
occupy
district
found
appeals
repeated
potential
residents
featherston
street
home
mentally
retarded
home
respects
use
permitted
city
zoning
ordinance
app
given
finding
restrictions
number
people
occupy
home
boarding
house
nursing
home
family
dwelling
fraternity
house
dormitory
question
whether
rational
treat
mentally
retarded
differently
true
suffer
disability
shared
others
difference
warrants
density
regulation
others
need
observe
apparent
least
record
clarify
connection
characteristics
intended
occupants
featherston
home
rationally
justify
denying
occupants
permitted
groups
occupying
site
different
purposes
live
featherston
home
type
individuals
supporting
staff
satisfy
federal
state
standards
group
housing
community
dispute
home
meet
federal
requirement
facilities
type
see
cfr
words
appeals
city
never
justifies
apparent
view
people
live
crowded
conditions
mentally
retarded
persons
courts
city
also
urged
ordinance
aimed
avoiding
concentration
population
lessening
congestion
streets
concerns
obviously
fail
explain
apartment
houses
fraternity
sorority
houses
hospitals
like
may
freely
locate
area
without
permit
expressed
worry
fire
hazards
serenity
neighborhood
avoidance
danger
residents
fail
rationally
justify
singling
home
featherston
special
use
permit
yet
imposing
restrictions
many
uses
freely
permitted
neighborhood
short
requiring
permit
case
appears
us
rest
irrational
prejudice
mentally
retarded
including
occupy
featherston
facility
live
closely
supervised
highly
regulated
conditions
expressly
provided
state
federal
law
judgment
appeals
affirmed
insofar
invalidates
zoning
ordinance
applied
featherston
home
judgment
otherwise
vacated
case
remanded
ordered
footnotes
anticipated
home
operated
private
level
intermediate
care
facility
mentally
retarded
program
providing
joint
reimbursement
residential
services
mentally
retarded
clients
see
tex
human
resources
code
ann
et
seq
supp
covered
extensive
regulations
guidelines
established
department
health
human
services
texas
departments
human
resources
mental
health
mental
retardation
health
see
app
see
also
cfr
et
seq
tex
code
et
seq
site
home
area
zoned
apartment
house
district
app
section
cleburne
zoning
ordinance
pertinent
part
allows
following
uses
district
use
permitted
district
apartment
houses
multiple
dwellings
boarding
lodging
houses
fraternity
sorority
houses
dormitories
apartment
hotels
hospitals
sanitariums
nursing
homes
homes
convalescents
aged
insane
alcoholics
drug
addicts
private
clubs
fraternal
orders
except
whose
chief
activity
carried
business
philanthropic
eleemosynary
institutions
penal
institutions
accessory
uses
customarily
incident
uses
emphasis
added
section
ordinance
specifies
uses
special
use
permit
required
include
ospitals
insane
alcoholic
sic
drug
addicts
penal
correctional
institutions
section
provides
permit
use
may
issued
governing
body
public
hearing
recommendation
planning
commission
special
use
permits
limited
one
year
applicant
required
obtain
signatures
property
owners
within
two
hundred
feet
property
used
ibid
city
planning
zoning
commission
earlier
held
hearing
voted
deny
permit
district
also
rejected
clc
claims
including
argument
city
violated
due
process
improperly
delegating
zoning
powers
owners
adjoining
property
app
cf
washington
ex
rel
seattle
title
trust
roberge
appeals
address
argument
raised
parties
district
found
group
homes
currently
principal
community
living
alternatives
persons
mentally
retarded
availability
home
communities
essential
ingredient
normal
living
patterns
persons
mentally
retarded
factor
makes
group
homes
harder
establish
operates
exclude
persons
mentally
retarded
community
app
city
relied
recently
passed
state
regulation
limiting
group
homes
residents
support
argument
clc
home
overcrowded
appeals
observed
city
failed
justify
apparent
view
group
people
live
allegedly
crowded
conditions
explained
acceptable
clc
concedes
qualify
certification
new
texas
regulation
tr
oral
rearg
appeals
stated
new
regulation
applied
applications
made
may
therefore
apply
clc
home
regulation
contains
grandfather
clause
see
app
district
made
specific
finding
point
see
however
state
asserted
amici
brief
filed
six
bed
rule
pose
obstacle
proposed
featherston
street
group
home
issue
case
brief
state
texas
et
al
amici
curiae
requirement
apply
home
serious
possibility
clc
longer
interested
injunctive
relief
david
southern
officer
clc
testified
break
even
facility
type
least
ten
eleven
residents
app
however
clc
requested
damages
well
injunction
see
case
moot
oral
argument
city
brought
attention
recent
enactment
texas
statute
effective
september
providing
family
homes
permitted
uses
residential
zones
districts
state
statute
defines
family
home
residence
housing
six
disabled
persons
including
mentally
retarded
along
two
supervisory
personnel
statute
appear
affect
city
actions
regard
group
homes
plan
house
six
residents
enactment
legislation
therefore
affect
disposition
case
macon
assn
retarded
citizens
county
planning
zoning
dism
want
substantial
federal
question
controlling
effect
case
macon
assn
retarded
citizens
involved
ordinance
effect
excluding
group
home
retarded
restricted
dwelling
units
occupied
single
family
defined
four
unrelated
persons
village
belle
terre
boraas
upheld
constitutionality
similar
ordinance
georgia
macon
assn
specifically
held
ordinance
discriminate
retarded
mentally
retarded
individuals
fall
four
distinct
categories
vast
majority
approximately
classified
mildly
retarded
meaning
iq
approximately
moderately
retarded
iqs
remaining
two
categories
severe
iqs
profound
iqs
last
two
categories
together
account
mentally
retarded
population
app
testimony
philip
roos
mental
retardation
defined
reference
intelligence
iq
alone
however
american
association
mental
deficiency
aamd
defined
mental
retardation
significantly
subaverage
general
intellectual
functioning
existing
concurrently
deficits
adaptive
behavior
manifested
developmental
period
brief
aamd
et
al
amici
curiae
quoting
aamd
classification
mental
retardation
grossman
ed
deficits
adaptive
behavior
limitations
general
ability
meet
standards
maturation
learning
personal
independence
social
responsibility
expected
individual
age
level
cultural
group
brief
aamd
et
al
amici
curiae
mental
retardation
caused
variety
factors
genetic
environmental
unknown
dean
ely
observed
surely
one
feel
sorry
person
disabled
something
ca
anything
aware
reason
suppose
elected
officials
unusually
unlikely
share
feeling
moreover
classifications
based
physical
disability
intelligence
typically
accepted
legitimate
even
judges
commentators
assert
immutability
relevant
explanation
one
given
characteristics
unlike
one
commentator
trying
render
suspect
often
relevant
legitimate
purposes
point
much
left
immutability
theory
ely
democracy
distrust
omitted
see
also
clc
originally
sought
relief
act
voluntarily
dismissed
pendent
state
claim
district
indicated
presence
might
make
abstention
appropriate
act
never
construed
texas
courts
app
number
passed
legislation
prohibiting
zoning
excludes
retarded
see
cal
health
safety
code
ann
et
seq
west
supp
stat
supp
cent
code
supp
laws
see
also
md
health
code
ann
supp
act
specifically
included
mentally
retarded
definition
handicapped
see
also
recognizes
great
variations
within
classification
retarded
children
act
requires
school
authorities
devise
individualized
educational
program
tailored
unique
needs
handicapped
child
hendrick
hudson
district
board
education
rowley
developmental
disabilities
assistance
act
also
withholds
public
funds
program
prohibit
use
physical
restraint
unless
absolutely
necessary
goes
without
saying
nothing
us
respect
validity
requiring
special
use
permit
uses
listed
ordinance
see
supra
justice
stevens
chief
justice
joins
concurring
appeals
disposed
case
critical
question
decided
three
clearly
defined
standards
equal
protection
review
applied
legislative
classification
discriminating
mentally
retarded
fact
cases
delineated
three
even
one
two
standards
rather
cases
reflect
continuum
judgmental
responses
differing
classifications
explained
opinions
terms
ranging
strict
scrutiny
one
extreme
rational
basis
never
persuaded
standards
adequately
explain
decisional
process
cases
involving
classifications
based
alienage
illegal
residency
illegitimacy
gender
age
case
mental
retardation
fit
well
sharply
defined
classifications
inclined
believe
become
known
tiered
analysis
equal
protection
claims
describe
completely
logical
method
deciding
cases
rather
method
employed
explain
decisions
actually
apply
single
standard
reasonably
consistent
fashion
craig
boren
stevens
concurring
approach
cases
always
asked
whether
find
rational
basis
classification
issue
term
rational
course
includes
requirement
impartial
lawmaker
logically
believe
classification
serve
legitimate
public
purpose
transcends
harm
members
disadvantaged
class
thus
word
rational
least
includes
elements
legitimacy
neutrality
must
always
characterize
performance
sovereign
duty
govern
impartially
every
equal
protection
case
ask
certain
basic
questions
class
harmed
legislation
subjected
tradition
disfavor
laws
public
purpose
served
law
characteristic
disadvantaged
class
justifies
disparate
treatment
cases
answer
questions
tell
us
whether
statute
rational
basis
answers
result
virtually
automatic
invalidation
racial
classifications
validation
economic
classifications
provide
differing
results
cases
involving
classifications
based
alienage
gender
illegitimacy
apply
intermediate
standard
review
cases
rather
characteristics
groups
sometimes
relevant
sometimes
irrelevant
valid
public
purpose
specifically
purpose
challenged
laws
purportedly
intended
serve
every
law
places
mentally
retarded
special
class
presumptively
irrational
differences
mentally
retarded
persons
greater
mental
capacity
obviously
relevant
certain
legislative
decisions
impartial
lawmaker
indeed
even
member
class
persons
defined
mentally
retarded
rationally
vote
favor
law
providing
funds
special
education
special
treatment
mentally
retarded
mentally
retarded
person
also
recognize
member
class
might
need
special
supervision
situations
protect
protect
others
restrictions
right
drive
cars
operate
hazardous
equipment
might
well
seem
rational
even
though
deprived
employment
opportunities
kind
freedom
travel
enjoyed
citizens
civilized
decent
society
expects
approves
legislation
indicates
governmental
consideration
differences
vast
majority
situations
legitimate
also
desirable
ante
even
appeals
correctly
observed
ignorance
prejudice
mentally
retarded
subjected
history
unfair
often
grotesque
mistreatment
discrimination
mentally
retarded
issue
case
city
decision
require
annual
special
use
permit
property
apartment
house
district
may
used
group
home
persons
mildly
retarded
record
convinces
permit
required
irrational
fears
neighboring
property
owners
rather
protection
mentally
retarded
persons
reside
respondent
home
although
city
argued
appeals
legitimate
interests
neighbors
justified
restriction
unambiguously
rejected
argument
city
argued
discrimination
really
motivated
desire
protect
mentally
retarded
hazards
presented
neighborhood
zoning
ordinances
usually
justified
basis
case
reasons
explained
ante
find
justification
wholly
unconvincing
believe
rational
member
disadvantaged
class
ever
approve
discriminatory
application
city
ordinance
case
accordingly
join
opinion
three
standards
rationally
related
legitimate
state
interest
somewhat
heightened
review
strict
scrutiny
briefly
described
ante
railroad
retirement
board
fritz
citing
cases
applying
standard
stated
arrogant
legal
scholar
claim
cases
applied
uniform
consistent
test
equal
protection
principles
commenting
intermediate
standard
review
dissent
craig
boren
justice
rehnquist
wrote
think
enough
difficulty
two
standards
review
cases
recognized
norm
rational
basis
compelling
state
interest
required
suspect
classification
involved
counsel
weightily
insertion
still
another
standard
two
divine
objectives
important
determine
whether
particular
law
substantially
related
achievement
objective
rather
related
way
achievement
phrases
used
diaphanous
elastic
invite
subjective
judicial
preferences
prejudices
relating
particular
types
legislation
masquerading
judgments
whether
legislation
directed
important
objectives
whether
relationship
objectives
substantial
enough
cf
san
antonio
independent
school
district
rodriguez
marshall
dissenting
joined
douglas
criticizing
rigidified
approach
equal
protection
analysis
therefore
believe
must
discover
correlation
classification
either
actual
purpose
statute
legitimate
purpose
may
reasonably
presume
motivated
impartial
legislature
adverse
impact
disfavored
class
apparent
aim
legislature
impartiality
suspect
however
adverse
impact
may
reasonably
viewed
acceptable
cost
achieving
larger
goal
impartial
lawmaker
rationally
decide
cost
incurred
railroad
retirement
board
fritz
stevens
concurring
judgment
see
lehr
robertson
hampton
mow
sun
wong
must
especially
vigilant
evaluating
rationality
classification
involving
group
subjected
tradition
disfavor
traditional
classification
likely
used
without
pausing
consider
justification
newly
created
classification
habit
rather
analysis
makes
seem
acceptable
natural
distinguish
male
female
alien
citizen
legitimate
illegitimate
much
history
inertia
distinguishing
black
white
sort
stereotyped
reaction
may
rational
relationship
pure
prejudicial
discrimination
stated
purpose
classification
made
mathews
lucas
stevens
dissenting
see
also
new
york
transit
authority
beazer
see
foley
connelie
stevens
dissenting
see
mathews
diaz
compare
sugarman
dougall
griffiths
ambach
norwick
foley
connelie
compare
reed
reed
califano
goldfarb
personnel
administrator
mass
feeney
heckler
mathews
compare
lalli
lalli
trimble
gordon
see
michael
superior
sonoma
county
stevens
dissenting
see
also
caban
mohammed
stevens
dissenting
matter
equal
protection
analysis
perfectly
obvious
time
immediately
child
born
wedlock
differences
men
women
justify
differential
treatment
mother
father
adoption
process
fact
ordinance
provides
applicant
special
use
permit
shall
required
obtain
signatures
property
owners
within
two
hundred
feet
property
used
app
justice
marshall
justice
brennan
justice
blackmun
join
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
holds
retarded
individuals
grouped
together
feebleminded
deemed
presumptively
unfit
live
community
underlying
holding
principle
mental
retardation
per
se
proxy
depriving
retarded
people
rights
interests
without
regard
variations
individual
ability
holding
principle
agree
equal
protection
clause
requires
attention
capacities
needs
retarded
people
individuals
outset
two
curious
paradoxical
aspects
opinion
must
noted
first
invalidates
cleburne
zoning
ordinance
grounds
discussion
heightened
scrutiny
wholly
superfluous
decision
case
two
price
one
approach
constitutional
decisionmaking
rendering
two
constitutional
rulings
one
enough
decide
case
stands
head
traditional
deeply
embedded
principles
governing
exercise
article
iii
power
weeks
ago
call
ed
mind
two
cardinal
rules
governing
federal
courts
one
never
anticipate
question
constitutional
law
advance
necessity
deciding
never
formulate
rule
constitutional
law
broader
required
precise
facts
applied
brockett
spokane
arcades
white
quoting
liverpool
new
york
philadelphia
commissioners
emigration
lower
correctly
decides
case
albeit
concludes
unnecessary
constitutional
grounds
usual
custom
compound
problem
following
suit
rather
affirm
narrower
dispositive
ground
available
alexander
louisiana
offers
principled
justification
departing
principles
given
equal
protection
precedents
see
mississippi
university
women
hogan
declining
address
strict
scrutiny
heightened
scrutiny
sufficient
invalidate
action
challenged
stanton
stanton
hooper
bernalillo
county
assessor
declining
reach
heightened
scrutiny
review
classifications
fail
test
zobel
williams
cf
mitchell
forsyth
concurring
part
second
discussion
even
puzzling
given
cleburne
ordinance
invalidated
subjected
precisely
sort
probing
inquiry
associated
heightened
scrutiny
sure
label
handiwork
heightened
scrutiny
perhaps
method
employed
must
hereafter
called
second
order
review
rather
heightened
scrutiny
however
labeled
test
invoked
today
assuredly
test
williamson
lee
optical
oklahoma
allied
stores
ohio
bowers
progeny
example
concludes
legitimate
concerns
fire
hazards
serenity
neighborhood
justify
singling
respondents
bear
burdens
concerns
analogous
permitted
uses
appear
pose
similar
threats
yet
traditional
minimal
version
test
reform
may
take
one
step
time
addressing
phase
problem
seems
acute
legislative
mind
williamson
lee
optical
oklahoma
supra
see
american
federation
labor
american
sash
semler
dental
examiners
record
said
support
ordinance
classifications
ante
traditional
standard
sift
record
determine
whether
policy
decisions
squarely
supported
firm
factual
foundation
exxon
eagerton
minnesota
clover
leaf
creamery
firemen
chicago
finally
finds
difficult
believe
retarded
present
different
special
hazards
inapplicable
groups
normal
circumstances
burden
legislature
convince
lines
drawn
sensible
legislation
presumptively
constitutional
state
required
resort
close
distinctions
maintain
precise
scientific
uniformity
reference
goals
allied
stores
ohio
bowers
supra
see
new
orleans
dukes
metropolis
theatre
city
chicago
share
criticisms
overly
broad
lines
cleburne
zoning
ordinance
drawn
ordinance
invalidated
imprecise
classifications
must
pursuant
powerful
scrutiny
minimal
test
used
review
classifications
affecting
economic
commercial
matters
imprecision
similar
ordinance
required
opticians
optometrists
licensed
practice
see
williamson
lee
optical
oklahoma
supra
excluded
new
old
businesses
parts
community
see
new
orleans
dukes
supra
hardly
fatal
statutory
scheme
refusal
acknowledge
something
minimum
rationality
review
work
view
unfortunate
least
two
respects
suggestion
traditional
test
allows
sort
searching
inquiry
creates
precedent
lower
courts
subject
economic
commercial
classifications
similar
searching
ordinary
review
small
regrettable
step
back
toward
days
lochner
new
york
moreover
failing
articulate
factors
justify
today
second
order
review
provides
principled
foundation
determining
searching
inquiry
invoked
lower
courts
thus
left
dark
important
question
remains
unaccountable
decisions
employing
refusing
employ
particularly
searching
scrutiny
candor
requires
acknowledge
particular
factors
justify
invalidating
cleburne
zoning
ordinance
careful
scrutiny
today
receives
ii
long
believed
level
scrutiny
employed
equal
protection
case
vary
constitutional
societal
importance
interest
adversely
affected
recognized
invidiousness
basis
upon
particular
classification
drawn
san
antonio
independent
school
district
rodriguez
marshall
dissenting
see
also
plyler
doe
marshall
concurring
dandridge
williams
marshall
dissenting
zoning
ordinance
works
exclude
retarded
residential
districts
community
two
considerations
require
ordinance
convincingly
justified
substantially
furthering
legitimate
important
purposes
plyler
supra
mississippi
university
women
hogan
frontiero
richardson
mills
habluetzel
see
also
buchanan
warley
first
interest
retarded
establishing
group
homes
substantial
right
establish
home
long
cherished
one
fundamental
liberties
embraced
due
process
clause
see
meyer
nebraska
retarded
adults
right
means
living
together
group
homes
deinstitutionalization
progressed
group
homes
become
primary
means
retarded
adults
enter
life
community
district
found
matter
fact
availability
home
communities
essential
ingredient
normal
living
patterns
persons
mentally
retarded
factor
makes
group
homes
harder
establish
operates
exclude
persons
mentally
retarded
community
app
pet
cert
second
mentally
retarded
subject
lengthy
tragic
history
university
california
regents
bakke
opinion
powell
segregation
discrimination
called
grotesque
much
century
mental
retardation
viewed
neither
curable
dangerous
retarded
largely
left
devices
latter
part
century
first
decades
new
one
however
social
views
retarded
underwent
radical
transformation
fueled
rising
tide
social
darwinism
science
eugenics
extreme
xenophobia
years
leading
medical
authorities
others
began
portray
feebleminded
menace
society
civilization
responsible
large
degree
many
social
problems
regime
segregation
degradation
soon
emerged
virulence
bigotry
rivaled
indeed
paralleled
worst
excesses
jim
crow
massive
custodial
institutions
built
warehouse
retarded
life
aim
halt
reproduction
retarded
nearly
extinguish
race
retarded
children
categorically
excluded
public
schools
based
false
stereotype
ineducable
purported
need
protect
nonretarded
children
state
laws
deemed
retarded
unfit
citizenship
segregation
accompanied
eugenic
marriage
sterilization
laws
extinguished
retarded
one
basic
civil
rights
man
right
marry
procreate
skinner
oklahoma
ex
rel
williamson
marriages
retarded
made
continue
voidable
also
often
criminal
offense
purpose
limitations
frequently
applied
women
age
unabashedly
eugenic
prevent
retarded
propagating
assure
end
enacted
compulsory
eugenic
sterilization
laws
landman
human
sterilization
see
buck
bell
holmes
cf
plessy
ferguson
bradwell
illinois
wall
bradley
concurring
judgment
prejudice
let
loose
easily
cabined
see
university
california
regents
bakke
opinion
marshall
still
categorically
disqualified
idiots
voting
without
regard
individual
capacity
discretion
exclude
left
hands
election
officials
congress
enacted
education
handicapped
act
stat
amended
et
door
public
education
opened
wide
handicapped
children
hendrick
hudson
district
board
education
rowley
important
lengthy
continuing
isolation
retarded
perpetuated
ignorance
irrational
fears
stereotyping
long
plagued
light
importance
interest
stake
history
discrimination
retarded
suffered
equal
protection
clause
requires
us
review
distinctions
drawn
cleburne
zoning
ordinance
appeared
taxing
statute
economic
commercial
legislation
searching
scrutiny
give
restrictions
ability
retarded
establish
community
group
homes
leads
conclude
cleburne
vague
generalizations
classifying
drug
addicts
alcoholics
insane
excluding
elderly
ill
boarder
transient
allowed
substantial
important
enough
overcome
suspicion
ordinance
rests
impermissible
assumptions
outmoded
perhaps
invidious
stereotypes
see
plyler
doe
roberts
jaycees
mississippi
university
women
hogan
mills
habluetzel
iii
effort
show
cleburne
ordinance
struck
exacting
standard
normally
accorded
economic
social
legislation
ante
offers
several
justifications
retarded
warrant
heightened
judicial
solicitude
justifications
however
find
support
precedents
withstand
logical
analysis
downplays
lengthy
history
purposeful
unequal
treatment
retarded
see
san
antonio
independent
school
district
rodriguez
pointing
recent
legislative
action
said
beli
continuing
antipathy
prejudice
ante
building
point
similarly
concludes
retarded
politically
powerless
deserve
greater
judicial
protection
ny
minority
wins
political
battles
loses
others
ante
import
conclusions
seems
discrimination
courts
may
remedy
discrimination
alone
perspicacious
enough
see
society
begins
recognize
certain
practices
discriminatory
part
previously
stigmatized
groups
mobilized
politically
lift
stigma
refrain
approaching
practices
added
skepticism
heightened
scrutiny
courts
however
sit
act
social
vacuum
moral
philosophers
may
debate
whether
certain
inequalities
absolute
wrongs
history
makes
clear
constitutional
principles
equality
like
constitutional
principles
liberty
property
due
process
evolve
time
natural
ordering
later
comes
seen
artificial
invidious
constraint
human
potential
freedom
compare
plessy
ferguson
bradwell
illinois
supra
bradley
concurring
judgment
brown
board
education
reed
reed
shifting
cultural
political
social
patterns
times
come
make
past
practices
appear
inconsistent
fundamental
principles
upon
american
society
rests
inconsistency
legally
cognizable
equal
protection
clause
natural
evolving
standards
equality
come
embodied
legislation
occurs
courts
look
fact
change
source
guidance
evolving
principles
equality
analysis
today
ignores
reached
conclusion
extended
heightened
scrutiny
gender
classifications
drew
parallel
legislative
developments
support
extension
ver
past
decade
congress
manifested
increasing
sensitivity
classifications
citing
examples
thus
congress
concluded
classifications
based
upon
sex
inherently
invidious
conclusion
coequal
branch
government
without
significance
question
presently
consideration
frontiero
richardson
retarded
negroes
women
much
changed
recent
years
much
remains
outdated
statutes
still
books
irrational
fears
ignorance
traceable
prolonged
social
cultural
isolation
retarded
continue
stymie
recognition
dignity
individuality
retarded
people
heightened
judicial
scrutiny
action
appearing
impose
unnecessary
barriers
retarded
required
light
increasing
recognition
barriers
inconsistent
evolving
principles
equality
embedded
fourteenth
amendment
also
offers
general
view
heightened
scrutiny
view
focused
primarily
heightened
scrutiny
apply
opposed
apply
two
principles
appear
central
theory
first
heightened
scrutiny
said
inapplicable
individuals
group
distinguishing
characteristics
legislatures
properly
may
take
account
circumstances
ante
heightened
scrutiny
also
purportedly
inappropriate
many
legislative
classifications
affecting
group
likely
valid
must
says
look
likelihood
governmental
action
premised
particular
classification
valid
general
matter
merely
specifics
case
us
deciding
whether
apply
heightened
scrutiny
ante
first
principle
sound
heightened
scrutiny
await
day
people
cut
cookie
mold
women
hardly
alike
characteristics
heightened
scrutiny
applies
legislatures
rarely
use
gender
proxy
characteristics
permissible
distinctions
persons
must
bear
reasonable
relationship
relevant
characteristics
zobel
williams
brennan
concurring
gender
per
se
almost
never
relevant
similarly
retarded
people
reduced
capacities
areas
justify
using
retardation
proxy
reduced
capacity
areas
relevant
individual
variations
capacity
exist
second
assertion
standard
review
must
fixed
reference
number
classifications
characteristic
validly
relevant
similarly
flawed
certainly
assertion
logical
one
characteristic
may
relevant
even
many
circumstances
suggest
reason
presume
relevant
circumstances
reason
suspect
sign
says
men
looks
different
bathroom
door
courthouse
door
see
bradwell
illinois
wall
precedents
belie
claim
characteristic
must
virtually
always
irrelevant
warrant
heightened
scrutiny
plyler
example
held
status
undocumented
alien
constitutional
irrelevancy
therefore
declined
review
strict
scrutiny
classifications
affecting
undocumented
aliens
frontiero
stated
gender
frequently
often
bears
relation
legitimate
legislative
aims
deem
gender
impermissible
basis
state
action
circumstances
indeed
upheld
classifications
rostker
goldberg
michael
superior
sonoma
county
heightened
strict
scrutiny
considered
appropriate
areas
gender
illegitimacy
alienage
views
trait
relevant
circumstances
others
view
indeed
concept
heightened
opposed
strict
scrutiny
flatly
inconsistent
notion
heightened
scrutiny
apply
retarded
mental
retardation
characteristic
government
may
legitimately
take
account
wide
range
decisions
ante
government
also
may
take
characteristic
account
many
circumstances
presented
careful
review
required
separate
permissible
invalid
classifications
relying
retardation
fact
retardation
may
deemed
constitutional
irrelevancy
circumstances
enough
given
history
discrimination
retarded
suffered
require
careful
judicial
review
classifications
singling
retarded
special
burdens
although
acknowledges
many
instances
invidious
discrimination
retarded
still
exist
boldly
asserts
vast
majority
situations
special
treatment
retarded
legitimate
also
desirable
ante
assertion
suggests
somehow
us
calculate
percentage
situations
characteristic
validly
invalidly
invoked
determining
whether
heightened
scrutiny
appropriate
heightened
scrutiny
triggered
past
cases
undefined
numerical
threshold
invalid
situations
crossed
inquiry
constitutional
principle
mathematics
determines
whether
heightened
scrutiny
appropriate
whenever
evolving
principles
equality
rooted
equal
protection
clause
require
certain
classifications
viewed
potentially
discriminatory
history
reveals
systemic
unequal
treatment
searching
judicial
inquiry
minimum
rationality
becomes
relevant
potentially
discriminatory
classifications
exist
constitutional
basis
found
presuming
equal
rights
required
discrimination
fourteenth
amendment
sense
connotes
substantive
constitutional
judgment
two
individuals
groups
entitled
treated
equally
respect
something
regard
economic
commercial
matters
basis
conclusion
exists
justice
holmes
urged
lochner
fourteenth
amendment
intended
embody
particular
economic
theory
lochner
new
york
dissenting
matter
substantive
policy
therefore
government
free
move
direction
change
directions
economic
commercial
sphere
structure
economic
commercial
life
matter
political
compromise
constitutional
principle
norm
equality
requires
many
opticians
optometrists
see
williamson
lee
optical
oklahoma
new
businesses
old
see
new
orleans
dukes
fourteenth
amendment
prohibit
results
virtually
circumstances
castes
created
law
along
racial
ethnic
lines
see
palmore
sidoti
loving
virginia
mclaughlin
florida
shelley
kraemer
hernandez
texas
significantly
constrains
range
permissible
government
choices
gender
illegitimacy
example
concerned
constraints
derived
fourteenth
amendment
present
history
teaches
systemically
ignored
searching
judicial
inquiry
required
carolene
products
searching
inquiry
called
heightened
scrutiny
second
order
review
method
approaching
certain
classifications
skeptically
judgment
suspended
facts
evidence
considered
government
must
establish
classification
substantially
related
important
legitimate
objectives
see
craig
boren
valid
sufficiently
weighty
policies
actually
justify
departure
equality
heightened
scrutiny
allow
courts
reasoned
legislative
professional
judgments
tailored
unique
needs
group
like
retarded
seek
assure
hostility
thoughtlessness
reason
concerned
carried
day
invoking
heightened
scrutiny
recognizes
compels
lower
courts
recognize
group
may
well
target
sort
prejudiced
thoughtless
stereotyped
action
offends
principles
equality
found
fourteenth
amendment
classifications
based
particular
characteristic
done
past
threat
may
remains
heightened
scrutiny
appropriate
history
discrimination
retarded
continuing
legacy
amply
attest
mentally
retarded
areas
may
still
targets
action
equal
protection
clause
condemns
respect
liberty
valued
right
establish
home
community
likely
denied
basis
irrational
fears
outright
hostility
heightened
scrutiny
surely
appropriate
iv
light
scrutiny
applied
cleburne
ordinance
sweeps
broadly
dispel
suspicion
rests
bare
desire
treat
retarded
outsiders
pariahs
belong
community
disclaiming
special
scrutiny
necessary
warranted
reaches
conclusion
rather
striking
ordinance
however
invalidates
merely
applied
respondents
must
dissent
novel
proposition
preferred
course
adjudication
leave
standing
legislative
act
resting
irrational
prejudice
ante
thereby
forcing
individuals
group
discriminated
continue
run
act
gauntlet
appears
act
belief
ordinance
might
rational
applied
subgroup
retarded
circumstances
utterly
without
capacity
live
community
ordinance
invalidated
toto
capable
ever
validly
applied
issue
whether
city
may
never
insist
special
use
permit
mentally
retarded
zone
ante
issue
whether
city
may
require
permit
pursuant
blunderbuss
ordinance
drafted
many
years
ago
exclude
whether
city
must
enact
new
ordinance
carefully
tailored
exclusion
subgroup
retarded
people
circumstances
exclusion
might
reasonably
legitimate
city
purposes
leaving
sweeping
exclusion
feebleminded
applied
groups
retarded
created
peculiar
problems
future
define
relevant
characteristics
respondents
proposed
home
make
unlawful
require
seek
special
permit
delineate
principle
defines
set
retarded
people
ordinance
might
validly
applied
cleburne
city
council
retarded
applicants
left
without
guidance
potentially
valid
invalid
applications
ordinance
consequence
remedy
relegates
future
retarded
applicants
standardless
discretion
officials
already
shown
willing
readiness
captured
vague
undifferentiated
fears
ante
ignorant
frightened
residents
invalidating
face
ordinance
special
treatment
contrast
place
responsibility
tailoring
updating
cleburne
unconstitutional
ordinance
belongs
legislative
arm
city
cleburne
cleburne
perceives
legitimate
need
requiring
certain
subgroup
retarded
obtain
special
permits
establishing
group
homes
cleburne
studying
problem
making
appropriate
policy
decisions
enact
new
narrowly
tailored
ordinance
ordinance
might
well
look
different
current
one
might
separate
group
homes
presently
treated
nowhere
ordinance
hospitals
might
define
narrow
subclass
retarded
even
group
homes
legitimately
excluded
special
treatment
retarded
might
ended
altogether
whatever
contours
ordinance
might
take
city
allowed
keep
ordinance
books
intact
thereby
shift
courts
responsibility
confront
complex
empirical
policy
questions
involved
updating
statutes
affecting
mentally
retarded
legislative
solution
yield
standards
provide
sort
certainty
retarded
applicants
administrative
officials
judicial
rulings
provide
retarded
applicants
continue
attempt
surmount
cleburne
vastly
overbroad
ordinance
approach
might
defensible
circumstances
different
presented
ordinance
capable
cleanly
severed
one
judicial
cut
permissible
impermissible
applications
problems
pointed
greatly
reduced
cf
grace
statute
restricting
speech
conduct
building
grounds
invalid
applied
sidewalks
cf
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
readily
apparent
construction
appears
offered
one
define
group
retarded
people
city
might
validly
require
permit
might
zone
holding
particularly
inappropriate
group
covered
statute
appears
similarly
situated
respondents
see
ante
figure
makes
statutory
presumption
enormously
overbroad
cf
stanley
illinois
invalidating
statutory
presumption
despite
state
insistence
validly
applied
covered
knowledge
never
treated
equal
protection
challenge
statute
basis
statutes
rest
impermissibly
overbroad
generalizations
cases
invalidated
presumption
face
instead
leave
courts
task
redrafting
statute
ongoing
cumbersome
process
applied
constitutional
rulings
cleveland
board
education
lafleur
example
invalidated
inter
alia
maternity
leave
policy
required
pregnant
schoolteachers
take
unpaid
leave
beginning
five
months
expected
due
date
school
board
argued
teachers
became
physically
incapable
performing
adequately
latter
stages
pregnancy
accepted
justification
purposes
decision
assuming
policy
might
validly
applied
teachers
particularly
last
weeks
pregnancy
nonetheless
invalidated
toto
rather
simply
applied
particular
plaintiff
required
school
boards
employ
alternative
administrative
means
achieve
legitimate
health
safety
goal
legislature
enact
carefully
tailored
statute
similarly
caban
mohammed
invalidated
law
required
parental
consent
adoption
unwed
mothers
unwed
fathers
distinction
defended
ground
inter
alia
unwed
fathers
often
difficult
locate
particularly
child
infancy
suggested
legislature
might
make
proof
abandonment
easier
proof
paternity
harder
required
legislature
draft
new
statute
tailored
precisely
problem
locating
unwed
fathers
statute
left
books
invalidating
applied
unwed
fathers
actually
proved
located
presumption
unconstitutionally
overbroad
preferred
course
adjudication
strike
see
also
dept
agriculture
moreno
stanley
illinois
supra
vlandis
kline
carrington
rash
sugarman
dougall
weber
aetna
casualty
surety
levy
louisiana
view
remedial
approach
unprecedented
equal
protection
area
unwise
doctrinal
change
course
sought
parties
suggested
various
amici
discussed
oral
argument
moreover
persuasively
reason
way
novel
remedial
holding
reconsider
prior
cases
directly
point
instead
simply
asserts
preferred
course
adjudication
given
assertion
emerges
today
decision
one
hope
become
entrenched
law
without
fuller
consideration
opinion
approaches
task
principled
equal
protection
adjudication
view
precisely
wrong
way
formal
label
equal
protection
claim
reviewed
less
important
careful
identification
interest
stake
extent
society
recognizes
classification
invidious
one
yet
focusing
obsessively
appropriate
label
give
standard
review
fails
identify
interests
stake
articulate
principle
classifications
based
mental
retardation
must
carefully
examined
assure
rest
impermissible
assumptions
false
stereotypes
regarding
individual
ability
need
guidance
thereby
given
freewheeling
potentially
dangerous
standard
employed
attention
directed
invidiousness
grouping
retarded
individuals
together
moreover
narrow
remedy
fails
deal
adequately
overbroad
presumption
lies
heart
case
rather
leaving
future
retarded
individuals
run
gauntlet
overbroad
presumption
affirm
judgment
appeals
entirety
strike
face
provision
issue
therefore
concur
judgment
part
dissent
part
see
also
spector
motor
service
mclaughlin
one
doctrine
deeply
rooted
process
constitutional
adjudication
pass
questions
constitutionality
unless
adjudication
unavoidable
burton
habit
decide
questions
constitutional
nature
unless
absolutely
necessary
decision
case
see
generally
ashwander
tva
brandeis
concurring
even
today
calls
mind
principles
ante
given
lengthy
dicta
heightened
scrutiny
call
principle
must
read
irony
suggest
lower
erred
relying
heightened
scrutiny
believe
searching
inquiry
traditional
test
required
invalidate
cleburne
ordinance
see
infra
see
also
three
affiliated
tribes
wold
engineering
leroy
great
western
two
cases
cites
discussion
zobel
williams
dept
agriculture
moreno
expose
special
nature
test
employed
today
two
handful
modern
equal
protection
cases
striking
legislation
purports
standard
cases
must
generally
viewed
intermediate
review
decisions
masquerading
language
see
tribe
american
constitutional
law
discussing
moreno
see
also
moreno
supra
douglas
concurring
zobel
supra
brennan
concurring
indeed
group
home
case
specifically
located
near
park
school
shopping
center
residents
full
access
community
large
herr
rights
advocacy
retarded
people
role
ideologies
era
see
stampp
era
reconstruction
pp
goddard
possibilities
research
applied
prevention
feeblemindedness
proceedings
national
conference
charities
correction
cited
deutsch
mentally
ill
america
ed
see
also
fernald
burden
feeblemindedness
retarded
cause
unutterable
sorrow
home
menace
danger
community
terman
children
public
schools
california
schools
society
nly
recently
begun
recognize
serious
menace
feeblemindedness
social
economic
moral
welfare
state
responsible
majority
cases
chronic
pauperism
much
alcoholism
prostitution
venereal
diseases
books
titles
menace
feeble
minded
connecticut
issued
connecticut
school
imbeciles
became
commonplace
see
frazier
chairman
executive
committee
public
charities
assn
pennsylvania
menace
pennsylvania
fernald
burden
mass
juvenile
protection
association
cincinnati
hub
wheel
vice
ohio
resemblance
works
shufeldt
negro
menace
american
civilization
striking
coincidental
moore
new
york
book
sponsored
state
charities
aid
association
see
also
tyor
bell
caring
retarded
america
segregationist
purpose
laws
clear
see
act
mar
ch
tex
laws
repealed
act
designed
relieve
society
heavy
economic
moral
losses
arising
existence
large
unfortunate
persons
see
pennsylvania
assn
retarded
children
pennsylvania
supp
ed
see
generally
sarason
doris
educational
handicap
public
policy
social
history
act
apr
ch
miss
laws
see
act
mar
ch
acts
remains
effect
rev
stat
act
may
pub
acts
remains
effect
comp
laws
act
apr
ch
miss
laws
remains
effect
minor
changes
miss
code
ann
see
chamberlain
current
legislation
eugenics
limitations
marriage
lau
lau
state
wyman
see
generally
linn
bowers
historical
fallacies
behind
legal
prohibitions
marriages
involving
mentally
retarded
persons
eternal
child
grows
gonz
rev
shaman
persons
mentally
retarded
right
marry
children
family
note
right
mentally
disabled
marry
statutory
evaluation
family
see
note
mental
disability
right
vote
yale
congress
expressly
found
handicapped
children
including
retarded
simply
shut
public
school
system
see
see
generally
allport
nature
prejudice
separateness
among
groups
exaggerates
differences
history
discrimination
may
well
directly
relevant
issue
cleburne
current
exclusion
zoning
ordinance
appeared
similar
exclusion
city
ordinance
see
act
latter
tracked
word
word
similar
exclusion
comprehensive
zoning
ordinance
nearby
city
dallas
see
dallas
ordinance
passed
although
presented
legislative
history
cleburne
zoning
ordinances
genealogy
strongly
suggests
cleburne
current
exclusion
written
darkest
days
segregation
stigmatization
retarded
simply
carried
current
ordinance
recently
held
extant
laws
originally
motivated
discriminatory
purpose
continue
violate
equal
protection
clause
even
permissible
reenacted
without
discriminatory
motive
see
hunter
underwood
event
roots
law
terms
excludes
community
feebleminded
clear
examples
attest
see
supra
feebleminded
defining
term
retarded
people
era
overt
pervasive
discrimination
although
frontiero
plurality
opinion
well
established
gender
classifications
receive
heightened
scrutiny
see
mississippi
university
women
hogan
general
theories
heightened
scrutiny
relies
heavily
indeed
virtually
exclusively
lesson
massachusetts
board
retirement
murgia
brief
per
curiam
murgia
however
handed
days
explicitly
acknowledged
existence
heightened
scrutiny
see
craig
boren
powell
concurring
murgia
explains
distinctions
trigger
strict
scrutiny
says
nothing
whether
distinctions
warrant
heightened
scrutiny
subsequent
cases
addressed
issue
see
vance
bradley
alienage
classifications
present
related
variant
strict
scrutiny
applied
classifications
economic
social
area
heightened
scrutiny
applied
classification
relates
political
functions
cabell
see
also
bernal
fainter
thus
characterization
area
alienage
classification
applies
necessary
determine
strongly
must
justified
express
view
whether
strict
scrutiny
extended
classifications
constitutional
provisions
equal
protection
clause
contracts
clause
compensation
clause
due
process
clause
may
constrain
extent
government
upset
settled
expectations
changing
course
process
must
implement
changes
said
congress
misapprehended
railroad
retirement
bd
fritz
brennan
dissenting
classification
fail
minimal
standard
even
classification
fails
limits
directions
substantive
policy
take
economic
commercial
area
classification
reflects
underlying
substantive
policy
simply
arbitrary
single
talisman
define
groups
likely
target
classifications
offensive
fourteenth
amendment
therefore
warranting
heightened
strict
scrutiny
experience
abstract
logic
must
primary
guide
political
powerlessness
group
may
relevant
san
antonio
independent
school
district
rodriguez
factor
neither
necessary
gender
cases
demonstrate
sufficient
example
minors
illustrates
minors
vote
thus
might
considered
politically
powerless
extreme
degree
nonetheless
see
statutes
reflecting
prejudice
indifference
minors
aware
suggestion
legislation
affecting
viewed
suspicion
heightened
scrutiny
similarly
immutability
trait
issue
may
relevant
many
immutable
characteristics
height
blindness
valid
bases
governmental
action
classifications
variety
circumstances
see
ante
political
powerlessness
group
immutability
defining
trait
relevant
insofar
point
social
cultural
isolation
gives
majority
little
reason
respect
concerned
group
interests
needs
statutes
discriminating
young
common
need
feared
vote
legislate
young
typically
children
certainly
interact
regularly
minors
social
integration
means
minors
unlike
discrete
insular
minorities
tend
treated
legislative
arenas
full
concern
respect
despite
formal
complete
exclusion
electoral
process
discreteness
insularity
warranting
searching
judicial
inquiry
carolene
products
must
therefore
viewed
social
cultural
perspective
well
political
one
task
judges
well
suited
lessons
history
experience
surely
best
guide
respect
interests
society
likely
stigmatize
individuals
members
inferior
caste
view
belonging
community
prejudice
spawns
prejudice
stereotypes
produce
limitations
confirm
stereotype
based
history
unequal
treatment
requires
sensitivity
prospect
vestiges
endure
separating
groups
discrete
insular
many
important
legal
distinctions
page
history
worth
volume
logic
new
york
trust
eisner
holmes
strongly
suggests
loose
fit
ordinance
purported
objectives
signifies
ordinance
rests
irrational
prejudice
ante
unconstitutional
legislative
purpose
see
mississippi
university
women
hogan
event
recent
precedent
make
clear
ordinance
must
entirety
invalidated
see
hunter
underwood
hunter
involved
constitutional
provision
disenfranchising
various
felons
provision
motivated
least
part
desire
disenfranchise
negroes
invalidated
face
suggest
felons
deprived
vote
statute
motivated
purpose
racial
discrimination
see
richardson
ramirez
yet
possibility
possibility
provision
might
partly
motivated
desire
disenfranchise
negroes
suggest
provision
invalidated
applied
particular
plaintiffs
hunter
even
applied
negroes
generally
instead
concluded
without
deciding
whether
valid
enacted
today
without
impermissible
motivation
simply
observe
original
enactment
motivated
desire
discriminate
blacks
account
race
section
continues
day
effect
violates
equal
protection
arlington
heights
metropolitan
housing
development
discriminatory
purpose
infects
legislative
act
act
inconsistent
equal
protection
clause
validly
applied
anyone