irwin
department
veterans
affairs
argued
october
decided
december
petitioner
irwin
filed
complaint
equal
employment
opportunity
commission
eeoc
claiming
unlawfully
fired
respondent
veterans
administration
basis
race
disability
eeoc
dismissed
complaint
march
mailing
copies
letter
irwin
attorney
irwin
received
letter
april
attorney
received
actual
notice
letter
april
country
delivered
office
march
days
attorney
office
received
letter
days
irwin
received
copy
filed
action
district
alleging
inter
alia
violation
title
vii
civil
rights
act
dismissed
case
lack
jurisdiction
ground
complaint
filed
within
time
specified
provides
complaint
federal
government
must
filed
within
days
receipt
notice
final
action
taken
eeoc
appeals
affirmed
holding
notice
final
action
received
eeoc
delivers
notice
claimant
attorney
offices
whichever
comes
first
span
operates
absolute
jurisdictional
limit
held
irwin
complaint
untimely
section
requires
eeoc
letter
received
specify
receipt
must
claimant
rather
representative
congress
may
depart
common
established
practice
providing
notification
counsel
expressly
irwin
argument
material
difference
receipt
attorney
receipt
office
purposes
rejected
lower
courts
consistently
held
notice
attorney
office
acknowledged
representative
office
qualifies
notice
client
practical
effect
contrary
rule
create
uncertainty
encouraging
factual
disputes
actual
notice
received
pp
statutes
limitations
actions
government
subject
rebuttable
presumption
equitable
tolling
applicable
suits
private
defendants
applying
rule
amounts
little
broadening
congressional
waiver
sovereign
immunity
pp
irwin
failure
file
may
excused
equitable
tolling
principles
federal
courts
typically
extended
equitable
relief
sparingly
suits
private
litigants
allowing
tolling
claimant
actively
pursued
judicial
remedies
filing
defective
pleading
induced
tricked
adversary
misconduct
allowing
filing
deadline
pass
equitable
tolling
principles
extend
irwin
claim
untimely
filing
excused
attorney
office
notice
received
filed
within
days
date
personally
received
notice
best
garden
variety
claim
excusable
neglect
affirmed
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
blackmun
scalia
kennedy
joined
white
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
marshall
joined
post
stevens
filed
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
post
souter
took
part
consideration
decision
case
jon
ker
appointment
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
brian
serr
deputy
solicitor
general
roberts
argued
cause
respondents
brief
solicitor
general
starr
assistant
attorney
general
gerson
harriet
shapiro
gregory
elaine
kaplan
kerry
adams
filed
brief
national
treasury
employees
union
amicus
curiae
urging
reversal
chief
justice
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
april
petitioner
shirley
irwin
fired
job
respondent
veteran
administration
va
irwin
contacted
equal
employment
opportunity
counselor
filed
complaint
eeoc
alleging
va
unlawfully
discharged
basis
race
physical
disability
eeoc
dismissed
irwin
complaint
letter
dated
march
letter
sent
irwin
attorney
expressly
informed
irwin
right
file
civil
action
title
vii
stat
amended
et
within
days
receipt
eeoc
notice
according
irwin
receive
eeoc
letter
april
letter
attorney
arrived
attorney
office
march
attorney
country
attorney
learn
eeoc
action
return
april
irwin
filed
complaint
district
western
district
texas
may
days
eeoc
notice
received
attorney
office
days
date
claimed
received
letter
complaint
alleged
va
discriminated
race
age
handicap
violation
et
stat
amended
et
stat
amended
et
first
fifth
amendments
respondent
va
moved
dismiss
asserting
inter
alia
district
lacked
jurisdiction
complaint
filed
within
days
eeoc
decision
specified
district
granted
motion
appeals
fifth
circuit
affirmed
held
period
begins
run
date
eeoc
letter
delivered
offices
formally
designated
counsel
claimant
even
counsel
actually
receive
notice
later
appeals
determined
span
allotted
operates
absolute
jurisdictional
limit
accordingly
reasoned
district
excuse
irwin
late
filing
federal
courts
lacked
jurisdiction
untimely
claim
ibid
holding
direct
conflict
decisions
four
courts
appeals
granted
certiorari
determine
period
begins
run
resolve
circuit
conflict
whether
claims
jurisdictionally
barred
section
provides
employment
discrimination
complaint
federal
government
title
vii
must
filed
ithin
thirty
days
receipt
notice
final
action
taken
eeoc
appeals
determined
notice
final
action
received
eeoc
delivers
notice
claimant
claimant
attorney
whichever
comes
first
petitioner
argues
clock
begin
claimant
notice
right
sue
conclude
irwin
complaint
filed
district
untimely
appeals
observed
requires
eeoc
notification
letter
received
specify
receipt
claimant
rather
claimant
designated
representative
question
petitioner
appeared
attorney
eeoc
proceeding
system
representative
litigation
party
deemed
bound
acts
considered
notice
facts
notice
charged
upon
attorney
link
wabash
quoting
smith
ayer
congress
endorsed
sensible
practice
analogous
provisions
federal
rules
civil
procedure
provide
henever
rules
service
required
permitted
made
upon
party
represented
attorney
service
shall
made
upon
attorney
unless
service
upon
party
ordered
fed
rule
civ
proc
read
term
receipt
mean
actual
receipt
claimant
render
practice
notification
counsel
meaningless
exercise
congress
intends
depart
common
established
practice
providing
notification
counsel
must
expressly
see
decker
also
reject
irwin
contention
material
difference
receipt
attorney
receipt
attorney
office
purposes
lower
federal
courts
consistently
held
notice
attorney
office
acknowledged
representative
office
qualifies
notice
client
see
ringgold
national
maintenance
communications
satellite
app
federal
rule
civil
procedure
also
permits
notice
litigant
made
delivery
papers
litigant
attorney
office
practical
effect
contrary
rule
encourage
factual
disputes
actual
notice
received
thereby
create
uncertainty
area
law
certainty
much
desired
fact
petitioner
strictly
comply
filing
deadline
however
end
inquiry
petitioner
contends
even
failed
timely
file
error
may
excused
equitable
tolling
principles
appeals
rejected
argument
ground
filing
period
contained
jurisdictional
therefore
district
lacked
authority
consider
equitable
claims
reasoned
applies
suits
federal
government
thus
condition
congress
waiver
sovereign
immunity
since
waivers
sovereign
immunity
traditionally
construed
narrowly
determined
strict
compliance
necessary
predicate
title
vii
suit
respondent
correctly
observes
condition
waiver
sovereign
immunity
thus
must
strictly
construed
see
library
congress
shaw
previous
cases
dealing
effect
time
limits
suits
government
entirely
consistent
even
though
cases
may
distinguished
facts
locke
stated
leaving
open
general
question
whether
principles
equitable
tolling
waiver
estoppel
apply
government
involves
statutory
filing
deadline
justice
white
points
concurrence
post
nearly
thirty
years
earlier
soriano
held
petitioner
claim
jurisdictionally
barred
saying
congress
entitled
assume
limitation
period
prescribed
meant
recently
bowen
city
new
york
explained
must
careful
assume
authority
narrow
waiver
congress
intended
construe
waiver
unduly
restrictively
citation
omitted
title
provides
relevant
part
within
thirty
days
receipt
notice
final
action
taken
equal
employment
opportunity
commission
employee
applicant
employment
aggrieved
final
disposition
complaint
failure
take
final
action
complaint
may
file
civil
action
provided
section
title
time
requirements
lawsuits
private
litigants
customarily
subject
equitable
tolling
hallstrom
tillamook
county
indeed
held
statutory
time
limits
applicable
lawsuits
private
employers
title
vii
subject
equitable
tolling
waiver
sovereign
immunity
implied
must
unequivocally
expressed
mitchell
quoting
king
congress
made
waiver
think
making
rule
equitable
tolling
applicable
suits
government
way
applicable
private
suits
amounts
little
broadening
congressional
waiver
principle
likely
realistic
assessment
legislative
intent
well
practically
useful
principle
interpretation
therefore
hold
rebuttable
presumption
equitable
tolling
applicable
suits
private
defendants
also
apply
suits
congress
course
may
provide
otherwise
wishes
examination
cases
applied
equitable
tolling
doctrine
private
litigants
affords
petitioner
little
help
federal
courts
typically
extended
equitable
relief
sparingly
allowed
equitable
tolling
situations
claimant
actively
pursued
judicial
remedies
filing
defective
pleading
statutory
period
complainant
induced
tricked
adversary
misconduct
allowing
filing
deadline
pass
generally
much
less
forgiving
receiving
late
filings
claimant
failed
exercise
due
diligence
preserving
legal
rights
baldwin
county
welcome
center
brown
time
limits
imposed
congress
suit
government
involve
waiver
sovereign
immunity
evident
favorable
tolling
doctrine
may
employed
government
employed
suits
private
litigants
petitioner
urges
failure
file
timely
manner
excused
lawyer
absent
office
time
eeoc
notice
received
thereafter
filed
within
days
day
personally
received
notice
principles
equitable
tolling
described
extend
best
garden
variety
claim
excusable
neglect
judgment
appeals
accordingly
affirmed
justice
souter
took
part
consideration
decision
case
footnotes
see
zipes
trans
world
airlines
crown
cork
seal
parker
see
burnett
new
york
central
plaintiff
timely
filed
complaint
wrong
herb
pitcairn
american
pipe
construction
utah
plaintiff
timely
filing
defective
class
action
tolled
limitations
period
individual
claims
purported
class
members
see
glus
brooklyn
eastern
dist
terminal
adversary
misrepresentation
caused
plaintiff
let
filing
period
lapse
holmberg
armbrecht
justice
white
justice
marshall
joins
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
although
agree
period
begins
run
notice
equal
employment
opportunity
commission
delivered
either
claimant
claimant
attorney
join
portion
opinion
holding
time
period
subject
equitable
tolling
see
ante
recognizes
see
ante
statutory
deadlines
suits
government
one
case
conditions
government
waiver
sovereign
immunity
see
mottaz
kubrick
must
strictly
observed
exceptions
thereto
implied
lehman
nakshian
quoting
soriano
see
also
block
north
dakota
ex
rel
bd
univ
school
lands
view
failed
strictly
observe
terms
statute
issue
case
congress
expressly
provide
equitable
tolling
filing
deadline
however
holds
like
statutes
limitations
suits
private
litigants
limitations
periods
suits
government
presumptively
subject
equitable
tolling
ante
holding
needlessly
reverses
least
one
prior
decisions
tension
several
others
existence
sovereign
immunity
traditionally
held
government
consent
sued
implied
must
unequivocally
expressed
mitchell
quoting
king
rule
applies
even
contrary
presumption
suits
private
defendants
decision
library
congress
shaw
instructive
point
held
government
liable
federal
provisions
title
vii
interest
reaching
conclusion
reaffirmed
longstanding
rule
despite
consent
sued
government
liable
interest
unless
separate
explicit
waiver
effect
although
statute
case
provided
government
liable
private
person
costs
including
reasonable
attorney
fee
stated
must
construe
waivers
strictly
favor
sovereign
enlarge
waiver
beyond
language
requires
citations
omitted
seems
case
holding
time
limit
subject
equitable
tolling
done
exactly
shaw
proscribes
enlarged
waiver
beyond
language
section
requires
holding
inconsistent
traditional
approach
cases
involving
sovereign
immunity
directly
overrules
prior
decision
soriano
question
soriano
whether
war
tolled
statute
limitations
claims
government
filed
claims
arguing
equitable
tolling
plaintiff
relied
case
held
war
tolled
limitations
statute
purposes
private
causes
action
persuaded
stating
hat
case
involved
private
citizens
government
applicability
claims
sovereign
ibid
explained
permit
application
doctrine
urged
petitioner
impose
tolling
statute
every
time
limit
consent
act
passed
congress
strangely
enough
congress
required
provide
expressly
statute
period
limitation
extended
war
congress
entitled
assume
limitation
period
prescribed
meant
period
intent
mind
congress
passed
specific
legislation
time
seen
fit
toll
statutes
limitations
war
long
decided
limitations
conditions
upon
government
consents
sued
must
strictly
observed
exceptions
thereto
implied
omitted
deviates
cases
believes
decisions
concerning
time
requirements
entirely
consistent
ante
even
belief
doctrine
stare
decisis
demands
attempt
reconcile
prior
decisions
rather
hastily
overrule
attempt
reveal
bowen
city
new
york
cited
alleged
inconsistency
see
ante
irreconcilable
cases
discussed
bowen
allowed
equitable
tolling
government
among
things
statutory
time
period
set
forth
expressly
allowed
tolling
section
requires
civil
action
filed
within
sixty
days
within
time
secretary
may
allow
see
emphasis
added
noted
provision
section
allowing
secretary
extend
filing
deadline
expressed
congress
clear
intention
allow
tolling
cases
moreover
observed
regulations
promulgated
secretary
governing
extensions
time
provision
based
equitable
concerns
fairness
claimants
support
ing
application
equitable
tolling
statute
case
unlike
one
bowen
manifest
clear
intention
congress
allow
tolling
thus
subject
rule
articulated
soriano
supra
accordingly
concur
judgment
believe
equitable
tolling
available
defense
filing
requirement
reach
factual
issue
whether
equitable
tolling
supported
circumstances
case
failure
recognize
importance
sovereign
immunity
statutory
construction
also
ignores
brown
gsa
case
held
title
vii
provisions
federal
employees
preempt
remedies
discrimination
federal
employment
reached
conclusion
despite
earlier
holding
johnson
railway
express
agency
title
vii
provisions
private
employees
preempt
discrimination
remedies
found
johnson
inapposite
among
things
problems
sovereign
immunity
context
johnson
case
also
asserts
allowing
equitable
tolling
government
likely
realistic
assessment
legislative
intent
ante
unclear
however
likelihood
rather
opposite
true
statute
example
enacted
presumption
set
forth
soriano
statutes
limitations
suits
government
subject
equitable
tolling
unlikely
congress
mind
present
departure
longstanding
rule
stare
decisis
fundamental
importance
rule
law
welch
texas
dept
highways
public
among
things
promotes
stability
protects
expectations
vasquez
hillery
although
always
important
guiding
principle
special
force
cases
one
involve
statutory
interpretation
congress
position
overrule
decision
chooses
patterson
mclean
credit
union
justice
stevens
concurring
part
dissenting
part
agree
conclusion
filing
deadline
subject
equitable
tolling
petitioner
failed
establish
basis
tolling
case
agree
limitations
period
began
run
petitioner
lawyer
rather
petitioner
received
notice
eeoc
petitioner
right
file
civil
action
entirely
correct
notice
litigant
attorney
generally
considered
notice
litigant
litigation
commenced
see
ante
overlooks
fact
litigation
usually
commenced
service
process
adverse
party
indeed
federal
rules
civil
procedure
expressly
require
service
opposing
litigant
see
fed
rule
civ
proc
case
involves
notice
condition
precedent
commencement
formal
litigation
therefore
believe
congress
intended
notice
like
summons
complaint
served
adverse
party
representative
contends
reading
term
receipt
mean
actual
receipt
claimant
render
practice
notification
counsel
meaningless
exercise
ante
logic
however
reading
receipt
mean
receipt
claimant
representative
renders
meaningless
exercise
eeoc
practice
notifying
claimant
personally
practice
codified
eeoc
regulations
see
cfr
actually
notifying
claimant
representative
makes
sense
regardless
notice
begins
ticking
limitations
clock
dual
notification
ensures
persons
concerned
progress
action
apprised
important
developments
cf
ibid
also
requiring
notification
employing
agency
however
claimant
representative
eeoc
necessarily
also
represent
claimant
ensuing
civil
suit
indeed
representative
administrative
proceedings
need
even
attorney
see
notice
claimant
therefore
logical
trigger
limitations
countdown
construction
sensible
light
notice
requirement
function
statutory
scheme
also
consistent
previous
admonitions
title
vii
remedial
statute
construed
favor
legislation
designed
protect
see
zipes
trans
world
airlines
love
pullman
accordingly
respectfully
dissent
judgment
instead
reverse
judgment
appeals
remand
case
resolution
disputed
factual
issue
petitioner
actually
received
notice
eeoc
right
file
civil
action