marks
argued
decided
march
petitioners
convicted
transporting
obscene
materials
violation
federal
statute
conduct
gave
rise
charge
occurred
miller
california
decided
announcing
new
standards
isolat
ing
hard
core
pornography
expression
protected
first
amendment
held
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
precludes
retroactive
application
petitioners
miller
standards
extent
standards
may
impose
criminal
liability
conduct
punishable
standards
announced
memoirs
massachusetts
bouie
city
columbia
specifically
petitioners
entitled
jury
instructions
requiring
jury
acquit
unless
finds
materials
involved
utterly
without
redeeming
social
value
time
constitutional
principle
announced
miller
serve
benefit
petitioners
must
applied
case
hamling
pp
reversed
remanded
powell
delivered
opinion
burger
white
blackmun
rehnquist
joined
brennan
filed
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
stewart
marshall
joined
post
stevens
filed
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
post
robert
eugene
smith
argued
cause
petitioners
brief
gilbert
deitch
andrew
dennison
solicitor
general
bork
argued
cause
brief
assistant
attorney
general
thornburgh
jerome
feit
justice
powell
delivered
opinion
case
presents
question
fully
answered
hamling
whether
standards
announced
miller
california
applied
retroactively
potential
detriment
defendant
criminal
case
granted
certiorari
resolve
conflict
circuits
petitioners
charged
several
counts
transporting
obscene
materials
interstate
commerce
violation
conspiracy
transport
materials
conduct
gave
rise
charges
covered
period
february
trial
begin
following
october
interim
june
decided
miller
california
supra
companion
cases
miller
announced
new
standards
isolat
ing
hard
core
pornography
expression
protected
first
amendment
new
standards
also
guide
future
interpretation
federal
obscenity
laws
clear
reels
film
decided
day
miller
see
hamling
supra
petitioners
argued
district
entitled
jury
instructions
miller
favorable
formulation
memoirs
massachusetts
plurality
opinion
memoirs
view
authoritatively
stated
law
effect
prior
miller
petitioners
charted
course
conduct
focused
particular
third
part
memoirs
test
expressive
material
constitutionally
protected
unless
utterly
without
redeeming
social
value
miller
comparable
test
whether
work
taken
whole
lacks
serious
literary
artistic
political
scientific
value
miller
petitioners
argue
casts
significantly
wider
net
memoirs
apply
miller
retroactively
thereby
punish
conduct
innocent
memoirs
violates
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
much
retroactive
application
new
statute
penalize
conduct
innocent
performed
violate
constitution
ban
ex
post
facto
laws
art
cl
cl
district
overruled
objections
instructed
jury
miller
standards
petitioners
convicted
divided
appeals
sixth
circuit
affirmed
reverse
ii
ex
post
facto
clause
limitation
upon
powers
legislature
see
calder
bull
dall
force
apply
judicial
branch
government
frank
mangum
principle
clause
based
notion
persons
right
fair
warning
conduct
give
rise
criminal
penalties
fundamental
concept
constitutional
liberty
see
harriss
lanzetta
new
jersey
right
protected
judicial
action
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
bouie
city
columbia
case
involving
cognate
provision
fourteenth
amendment
reversed
trespass
convictions
finding
rested
unexpected
construction
state
trespass
statute
state
unforeseeable
judicial
enlargement
criminal
statute
applied
retroactively
operates
precisely
like
ex
post
facto
law
art
constitution
forbids
state
legislature
barred
ex
post
facto
clause
passing
law
must
follow
state
barred
due
process
clause
achieving
precisely
result
judicial
construction
relying
bouie
petitioners
assert
miller
companion
cases
unforeseeably
expanded
reach
federal
obscenity
statutes
beyond
punishable
memoirs
appeals
rejected
argument
noted
correctly
memoirs
standards
never
commanded
assent
three
justices
one
time
apparently
concluded
fact
memoirs
never
became
law
line
reasoning
one
must
judge
whether
miller
expanded
criminal
liability
looking
memoirs
roth
last
comparable
plenary
decision
prior
miller
majority
single
opinion
announcing
rationale
behind
holding
although
certain
language
roth
formed
basis
plurality
formulation
memoirs
roth
test
distinguishing
obscenity
protected
speech
fairly
simple
one
articulate
whether
average
person
applying
contemporary
community
standards
dominant
theme
material
taken
whole
appeals
prurient
interest
indeed
roth
memoirs
stated
applicable
law
prior
miller
much
commend
apparent
view
appeals
miller
significantly
change
law
think
basic
premise
line
reasoning
faulty
fragmented
decides
case
single
rationale
explaining
result
enjoys
assent
five
justices
holding
may
viewed
position
taken
members
concurred
judgments
narrowest
grounds
gregg
georgia
opinion
stewart
powell
stevens
three
justices
joined
controlling
opinion
memoirs
two
others
justice
black
justice
douglas
concurred
broader
grounds
reversing
judgment
reiterated
position
first
amendment
provides
absolute
shield
governmental
action
aimed
suppressing
obscenity
justice
stewart
also
concurred
judgment
based
view
hardcore
pornography
may
suppressed
see
ginzburg
stewart
dissenting
view
memoirs
plurality
therefore
constituted
holding
provided
governing
standards
indeed
every
appeals
considered
question
memoirs
miller
read
decisions
materials
deemed
constitutionally
protected
unless
prosecution
carried
burden
proving
utterly
without
redeeming
social
value
otherwise
satisfied
stringent
memoirs
requirements
memoirs
therefore
law
miller
simply
clarify
roth
marked
significant
departure
memoirs
little
doubt
third
test
announced
miller
whether
work
lacks
serious
literary
artistic
political
scientific
value
expanded
criminal
liability
miller
expressly
observed
utterly
without
redeeming
social
value
test
places
prosecutor
burden
virtually
impossible
discharge
criminal
standards
proof
clearly
thought
conduct
gone
unpunished
memoirs
result
conviction
miller
case
strictly
analogous
bouie
statutory
language
narrow
precise
fact
important
holding
expansive
construction
adopted
state
deprived
accused
fair
warning
contrast
statute
involved
always
used
sweeping
language
describe
forbidden
precisely
statute
sweeping
reach
necessarily
confined
within
constitutional
limits
announced
memoirs
severely
restricted
application
miller
also
restricts
application
beyond
language
might
indicate
miller
undeniably
relaxes
memoirs
restrictions
effect
new
construction
bouie
petitioners
engaged
dicey
business
marketing
films
subject
possible
challenge
fair
warning
products
might
subjected
new
standards
taken
special
care
insist
fair
warning
statute
regulates
expression
implicates
first
amendment
values
see
buckley
valeo
smith
goguen
section
statute
therefore
hold
accordance
bouie
due
process
clause
precludes
application
petitioners
standards
announced
miller
california
extent
standards
may
impose
criminal
liability
conduct
punishable
memoirs
specifically
since
petitioners
indicted
conduct
occurring
prior
decision
miller
entitled
jury
instructions
requiring
jury
acquit
unless
finds
materials
involved
utterly
without
redeeming
social
value
time
reaffirm
holding
hamling
constitutional
principle
enunciated
miller
serve
benefit
petitioners
must
applied
case
accordingly
judgment
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
paris
adult
theatre
slaton
kaplan
california
reels
film
orito
miller
held
basic
guidelines
trier
fact
must
whether
average
person
applying
contemporary
community
standards
find
work
taken
whole
appeals
prurient
interest
whether
work
depicts
describes
patently
offensive
way
sexual
conduct
specifically
defined
applicable
state
law
whether
work
taken
whole
lacks
serious
literary
artistic
political
scientific
value
part
test
adequate
statute
written
judicially
construed
specifically
defines
sexual
conduct
depiction
forbidden
miller
offered
examples
state
might
constitutionally
choose
regulate
patently
offensive
representations
descriptions
ultimate
sexual
acts
normal
perverted
actual
simulated
patently
offensive
representations
descriptions
masturbation
excretory
functions
lewd
exhibition
genitals
plurality
memoirs
held
three
elements
must
coalesce
material
found
obscene
therefore
outside
protection
first
amendment
must
established
dominant
theme
material
taken
whole
appeals
prurient
interest
sex
material
patently
offensive
affronts
contemporary
community
standards
relating
description
representation
sexual
matters
material
utterly
without
redeeming
social
value
petitioner
american
news
convicted
conspiracy
charge
four
petitioners
convicted
conspiracy
also
seven
eight
substantive
counts
brief
oral
argument
contended
petitioners
convictions
miller
standards
improper
consequently
government
defend
judgment
appeals
issue
agrees
petitioners
convictions
stand
shortly
memoirs
response
divergence
opinion
among
members
began
practice
disposing
obscenity
cases
brief
per
curiam
decisions
redrup
new
york
first
least
cases
decided
fashion
collected
paris
adult
theatre
slaton
brennan
dissenting
see
books
rev
per
curiam
mm
motion
picture
film
cert
dismissed
sub
nom
unicorn
enterprises
ten
erotic
paintings
groner
en
banc
seven
dissenting
judges
one
judge
concurring
result
constituting
majority
issue
found
memoirs
stated
governing
standard
vacated
remanded
consideration
light
miller
pellegrino
promotions
oklahoma
city
huffman
app
conviction
reversed
grounds
upon
rehearing
miller
app
cf
grove
press
city
philadelphia
cinecom
theaters
midwest
city
fort
wayne
luros
statute
provides
pertinent
part
whoever
knowingly
transports
interstate
foreign
commerce
purpose
sale
distribution
obscene
lewd
lascivious
filthy
book
pamphlet
picture
film
paper
letter
writing
print
silhouette
drawing
figure
image
cast
phonograph
recording
electrical
transcription
article
capable
producing
sound
matter
indecent
immoral
character
shall
fined
imprisoned
five
years
reason
instant
case
different
rose
locke
broad
reading
statute
issue
upset
previously
established
narrower
construction
hamling
rejected
challenge
based
bouie
city
columbia
ostensibly
similar
challenge
sustained
similarity
superficial
petitioners
focused
part
miller
test
see
supra
argued
convictions
stand
miller
requires
categories
material
punishable
statute
must
specifically
enumerated
statute
authoritative
judicial
construction
limiting
construction
announced
time
engaged
conduct
led
convictions
held
made
claim
bouie
part
expand
reach
statute
enumeration
specific
categories
material
miller
might
found
obscene
purport
make
criminal
purpose
conduct
previously
thought
criminal
reasons
noted
text
said
part
miller
test
shifting
utterly
without
redeeming
social
value
lacks
serious
literary
artistic
political
scientific
value
implicitly
recognized
hamling
trial
took
place
miller
jury
instructed
accordance
memoirs
verdict
necessarily
meant
found
materials
utterly
without
redeeming
social
value
examined
record
determined
jury
verdict
supported
evidence
consistent
memoirs
formulation
obscenity
avoid
inquiry
ground
memoirs
relevance
might
done
miller
applied
retroactively
respects
appeals
stated
apparently
without
viewing
materials
mccree
dissenting
opinion
materials
obscene
either
memoirs
miller
conclusion
absent
dependable
means
knowing
character
materials
dubious
value
even
accept
conclusion
circumstances
adequate
substitute
decision
first
instance
properly
instructed
jury
important
element
offense
appeals
apparently
thought
remand
miller
companion
cases
necessarily
meant
miller
standards
fully
retroactive
passage
hamling
quoted
text
simply
reaffirms
principle
implicit
miller
makes
clear
remands
carried
implication
cases
remanded
courts
apply
benefits
miller
see
supra
view
disposition
case
occasion
reach
questions
presented
petition
justice
brennan
justice
stewart
justice
marshall
join
concurring
part
dissenting
part
join
opinion
insofar
holds
retroactive
application
definition
obscenity
announced
miller
california
potential
detriment
criminal
defendant
violates
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
see
bouie
city
columbia
join
however
judgment
remanding
case
new
trial
petitioners
convicted
transporting
obscene
materials
interstate
commerce
violation
adhere
view
statute
clearly
overbroad
unconstitutional
face
see
cangiano
brennan
dissenting
quoting
orito
brennan
dissenting
therefore
simply
reverse
justice
stevens
concurring
part
dissenting
part
three
reasons
combination
persuade
criminal
prosecution
constitutionally
impermissible
first
opinion
recognizes
statute
regulates
expression
implicates
first
amendment
values
ante
however
distasteful
materials
us
nevertheless
form
communication
entertainment
acceptable
substantial
segment
society
otherwise
value
marketplace
second
statute
predicated
somewhat
illogical
premise
person
may
prosecuted
criminally
providing
another
material
constitutional
right
possess
see
stanley
georgia
third
present
constitutional
standards
substantive
procedural
apply
prosecutions
intolerably
vague
evenhanded
enforcement
law
virtual
impossibility
indeed
brief
experience
persuaded
grossly
disparate
treatment
similar
offenders
characteristic
criminal
enforcement
obscenity
law
accordingly
agree
everything
said
opinion
unable
join
judgment
remanding
case
new
trial
example
appellate
intelligently
determine
whether
jury
properly
identified
relevant
community
standards